WEBVTT - The ETF that lets you own SpaceX

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Many people are not allowed to get into private equity

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in the US. You have to have a net worth

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:08.479
<v Speaker 1>of over one million dollars and you have to have

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>an income above two hundred thousand. I think the potential

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>for private equity is larger than crypto. You've got many

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 1>private companies that are worth currently thirteen trillion dollars. There's

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>no question Elon Musk people you know, either love him

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>or hate him. Arguably, he's one of the greatest entrepreneurs

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>we've ever had, certainly the richest on Paperjora.

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 2>And welcome to Shared Lunch, brought to you by Cheesy's.

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm Helen Madison, and today on the program, we take

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 2>a look at how retail investors might get the opportunity

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 2>to invest in private equity. Normally you have to be

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.319
<v Speaker 2>a wholesale investor to do this, in other words, an

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 2>institution or an individual who has access to millions of dollars.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 2>With fewer companies listing on share markets today, searching for

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>other potential that's not publicly listed as a hot topic

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>in a moment to the people behind the first private

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 2>public crossover exchange traded fund, Dr Joel Schulman from er

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Shares Before we jump in, here's some important information.

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Investing involves the risk you might lose the money you

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 3>start with. We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 3>We also recommend reading product disclosure documents before deciding to invest.

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Everything you're about.

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 3>To see and here is current at the time of recording.

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Welcome, Joel, thanks for joining us from Boston tonight.

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.279
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, it's great to join you. Joel.

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 2>You're all about democratizing access to private equity. I'm really

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 2>curious to see why you're so passionate about that.

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, so, for the last twenty years, we've seen etl's

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>increase from about one trillion to about thirteen trillion dollars.

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>In corresponding with that growth in ETRS, we've seen a similar,

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>almost identical increase in private equity, growing from one trillion

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to thirteen trillion. And now so we've seen this parallel

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>path of two fairly large markets increase in size, considerably

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>increase in size thirteen acts. But yet we haven't seen

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>any sort of crossover, no linkage, and so we're excited

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to provide opportunity for retail investors to finally access to

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>this private market that they've been precluded from investing in

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>all these years.

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 2>One thing we can't ignore though this week, Joel, is

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 2>the sort of sea of red that Will Street has

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 2>been experiencing. They're still pretty bruised even the second week.

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 2>And now the tech stocks particularly, I know that's one

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 2>that you favor quite a bit, have been hit. What's

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 2>your perspective a on where things are going?

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>But also is.

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 2>This constant volatility sort of making a sort of statement

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 2>whereby some companies may not really want to list anymore

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 2>and remain private.

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Well so, independent of whatever has been going on in

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks here in the US, and

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>they've peaked about mid February, and since mid February, things

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>have been on the decline. And that corresponds probably more

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>so with policy issues and maybe valuation issues to some extent,

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things going on that you probably hear

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>about New Zealand that is addressing sort of our internal

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>situation with you know, potential concerns and.

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 4>Backlash on tariffs.

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Independent of that, however, the reason why private equity has

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>not been coming to market more frequently, there's been a

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>hesitation among many of the issuers to go to the

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>IPO market. Public markets for the last few years, and

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a variety of reasons for that, perhaps nuisance lawsuits

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and other things which have caused many companies to pause.

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So when we think about, you know, twenty five thirty

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>years ago when Amazon went public at five hundred million

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>dollars and in Nvidia went to market a five hundred

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and sixty million dollars. This is back in ninety eight

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine around that time period. We're not seeing that anymore.

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing companies stay private longer and come to market

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten billion, twenty billion, thirty billion, levels that

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years ago would have been unheard of. And

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>so it's more of that, you know, compared to the

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the recent tumult in the marketplace.

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so this volatility, you thinking too, that this is

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 2>going to be the new normal.

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>For example, Well, I think the current volatility is a temporary,

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a temporary happenstance in the US markets. In fact, if anything,

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this may be a buyer's opportunity to come in.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why I say that we're the last

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>tip we had was in twenty one twenty two, we

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>actually had a recessionary environment. Recessionary conditions. We had interest

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>rates going up, we had the economy slowing down. We

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of problems stemming from the COVID nineteen.

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 4>You know crisis. And the follow from that.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Is now we're seeing a volatility associated with internal and

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>concerns regarding your terrif issues. But the economy here in

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the US one of the strongest economies in the world.

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>The economy is generally okay. I mean there's that, you know,

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>the economy is you know, is chugging along at a

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>two three percent you know, or so clip on GDP,

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and and so I don't see the same sort of

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>issues we've had in the past when we've seen markets

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 1>slow down. So I see this particular drop the last

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>month more temporary than long term. I think actually in

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, we're going to see the markets end

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in a very strong path, you know, particularly here in

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the US.

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 4>I see the markets on a strong note.

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 2>John, Just thinking about the popularity of private equity. I mean,

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 2>we've seen the likes of governments and pension funds, a

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 2>number of kind of traditional institutions if you like, want

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 2>a piece of the pie. What's behind that? Are they

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 2>feeling that it's least risky because I mean it is

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 2>classed as an a liquid a seat.

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>It is a liquid And unfortunately, retail investors are not

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>allowed to get into this. You have to be an

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>accredited investor, at least that's the case in the US

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and most markets.

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:17.799
<v Speaker 4>You have to have a net worth.

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Again, in the US, you have to have a net

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>worth of over one million dollars and you have to

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>have an income above two hundred thousand or two hundred

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand if you're a joint filer between you and your spouse.

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 4>And so many people are not allowed to get.

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Into private equity and they have to watch these opportunities

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>pass them by. So when they read about an anthropic

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>or an open AI or a scale AI, or an

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and a ROLL or an r case space X, they're

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to invest in. And so it's only the

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>accredited investors, the institutional investors, the big pension funds, endowments,

0:06:56.279 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and the rich individual investors, the ultra high networth high

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>network that can invest in private equities and sharing these rewards.

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Joel, lets have a look at XOVR, which is the

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 2>private public crossover exchange traded fund which I think you

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>launched back in August last year, so not that long ago.

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>And it's called the first of its kind, but is

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 2>that because it is actually excess for retail investors? What's

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the difference?

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's the it was the first etr to allow

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>private equity in the ETF wrapper, and so private equity

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>has been around for a while in open m mutual

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>funds or closed them mutual funds, or even something called

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>an interval fund, but this is the first time it's

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>been in an ETF wrapper. And there's some, you know,

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.119
<v Speaker 1>some nuances to that. The interval fund may not trade

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>as often or allow it may trade, it may trade more,

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it may trade, but it may not allow liquidity very often.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I should have said that a closed end fund may

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>trade in a premium or a discount to NAV and

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>so the net asset value. So if it trades the premium,

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that means that the true value of the assets are

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>one level and the price that you pay to access

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>them may be at a higher level. With an ETF,

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it's chairly price very close to net asset value, and

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>it allows trading through the day, which enables people to

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>have liquidity to go in and out, which for a

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>private equity for an et for an ETF to have

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>private equity as unusual, it's eighty five percent. In our index.

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>We have an index called the Entrepreneur thirty Index. It

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>has a track record that goes back for many years

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's a growth oriented index. And importantly, when we

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 1>built the index, we built the index on a VC platform.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>So by way of background, I'm a professor at a

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>school called Batson College, which some people in New Zealand

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>may have heard of. It's the number one school notnchpreneurship

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and I've been a ten yearful professor there for many years.

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>And I built this model to invest in publicly traded

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>companies based on how venture capitalists investing private companies, and

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>so we've been doing that for many years. So for

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>us to now go into private equities, it's consistent with

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the way we've invested right along, where we look at

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>companies as if they were a private or venture capital backfirms,

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and we look at those companies both in the public form.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 4>But now we're going back and getting them right before

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 4>they go public.

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 2>So Joe, that index is that what this ETF private

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 2>public crossover actually tricks? Is that right?

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 1>So the index is called the entrepreneur thirty index. It

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>actually has a ticker. The E is an Edward Ars

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and Robert three zero thirty. If people, investors, or anyone

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 1>chooses to look at XOVR, they'll see that it's highly correlated,

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>moves very closely with the ER thirty tier indexes. We've

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>relaunched in August twenty ninth, twenty twenty four, So prior

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to August twenty ninth, the fund was investing differently.

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so the CTF tracks that entrepreneurial index. If you

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 2>like an inseet basket of thirty entrepreneurial stocks, but you

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 2>have the private equity aspect as there included, and that

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 2>like I know, SpaceX is eleven percent I think of

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 2>the holdings you have currently and any of these other

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 2>things like open AI.

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So the index does not include private So the difference

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 1>between the index and XOVR. XOVR has the index for

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the fund, but also now has ten

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen percent private equities. The largest holding SpaceX. So

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX is around ten or eleven percent of our total

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>portfolio and it represents the majority of our private equity holdings.

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>We have another stock, another private stock called Klarna, which

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>is a buy and LP later stock. It's a Swedish company.

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>They just announced that they're going to come up with

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>their IPO and that we expect that news to be

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>forthcoming in the next.

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 4>Week or so.

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 2>So the holding of say ten to fifteen percent private equity,

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 2>is there a cap like would the regulator come down

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 2>on you if you increased that? Because I've seen, you know,

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 2>some of the other competitors are thinking about maybe up

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 2>to thirty five percent private equity in an eating right,

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 2>What sort of constrains you for keeping it there? And

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 2>is there a good reason to keep it, say fifteen percent.

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So private equity is, as you point out, an illiquid asset.

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 4>And even though space x is.

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>A three hundred and fifty billion dollar market cap as

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>of the last tender offer, it's still it's it's you know,

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it's widely held among high net worth and institutional investors.

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't trade is frequently obviously as a public equity security,

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's still considered illiquid. And even though it may

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>be more liquid than other private equities, it's still in

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the general scheme of things illiquid and as a result,

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a regulatory body here in the US called the SEC

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the Securities Exchange Commission restricts having too much of an

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>ETF or any it's they're called forty Act funds, which

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>means they're regulated by the nineteen forties Acts, which includes

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds, open end closed end funds, and ETFs. Those

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>instruments which go to the retail market could be limited

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>need to be limited to fifteen percent. And I think

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a good rule because it protects the retail investor.

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And we're being very careful to stay underneath that fifteen

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>percent threshold.

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 2>So it's a sort of a guard viol in some

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 2>ways the font PAS, so that particus the retail and

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 2>vista Right, what about in terms of excess as the

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 2>no minimum investment I think is what I read. And

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 2>also I mean sort of the cost you talk about

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 2>it being relatively low, I mean, actually how accessible is

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 2>it for someone who doesn't have lots of money?

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So access for an ETF and our ETF has no minimum,

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>so we have daily liquidity, you can come in. We

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>have investors who come in for one hundred dollars or

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, I'm sure we have probably some

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>investors that come in for fifty dollars or one hundred

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>or a thousand, So there's no limit, no minimum investment.

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Daily liquidity you can buy and sell the same day

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>through trading hours in the US which are nine thirty

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to four. We try to market pretty close to net

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>asset value which on a daily basis to get that

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>and so we think it provides and we try to

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>keep our fees relatively low for this type of instrument.

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Other instruments that have access to equity charge appreciably more

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>than our management fee were well below one percent, and

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>so we try to make it attractive to any investor

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>could do. Someone could be a retail investor with fifty

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>or one hundred dollars to put to work, and they

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 1>could be somebody.

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>We had an investor today to come in for three million,

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>so we have a wide range of investors who come

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>into our fund.

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 2>What are the risks though, because we've talked about a

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 2>liquid assets being the private equity aspect, but as you've

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 2>sort of said, it depends really on the likes of

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>that private equity with SpaceX, it could be slightly different.

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean the risks are they as great as they

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 2>would be for other investments, or how would a retail

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 2>investor kind of assess that right.

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>So, first and foremost the fundamental risk that the investor

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>has in XOVR, it's just the market movement. And so

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we are growth oriented. We have we have exposure to

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>attack and we primarily enforced actors, information technologies, healthcare, consumer

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>discretionary and communication services. We have some fintech as well,

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and we have of course exposure you know, to space exploration.

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So we tend to be in high growth industries, high

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>growth companies. And so first and foremost the risk that

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>investor would have in our funds, which is the same

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that they would have for example, if they invest in

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the qqques or other growth oriented indices that invest heavily

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in tech and healthcare, is the market movement. So if

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>interest rates rise tech in other securities which are considered

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>long duration, long duration means you get more of your

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>benefits in the future, those types of stocks are going

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to suffer when interest rates go up or when this

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>market volatility or when markets contract. So you investors tend

0:15:56.160 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to see when when investors, when investors get nervous, they

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>tend to move more to value, or they tend to

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>move to cash, or they tend to move to bonds.

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>When you come to private equities, you'll see it's probably

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>even more exacerbated in the marketplace like that. So for example,

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the stocks, and even though the private markets

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>have been you know, showing with SpaceX, you know, some

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of the secondary markets are showing SpaceX you know, doing

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>well and so forth, which you know, we would expect that,

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, to do well based on a lot of

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>idiosyncratic conditions. Some of the pure benchmarks in this market

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are moving. So sometimes you'll see privates not correspond with

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>those movements because the other public markets are moving daily

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and privates may be seeing a stationary They tend to

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>move in step function. They can move into step function

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>both up and they can move into step function down.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And as we saw in twenty one and twenty two, privates,

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're moving in a step function down. Now

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing you know, over the last couple of years

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>markets were more positive, more growth oriented. We saw privates

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>appreciating during twenty twenty three and twenty twenty four, early

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:14.360
<v Speaker 1>part of twenty twenty five, and we'll see soon. For example,

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.719
<v Speaker 1>probably our best litmus test is going to be one

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of our holdings, Klarna.

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 4>We'll see how it comes out.

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>We bought it an evaluation of market evaluation twelve billion. Well,

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 1>it's going to come out to peer benchmarks like a firm.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a company in Australia called after Pay that was

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>bought by Block. You'll we'll see very soon how the

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>market is valuing these and we expect our stock to

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>move comparable to these valuations as well. So we'll we'll

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty good insight fairly soon, probably within the

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>next few weeks, how how that particular private security is

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>holding up or not when market information comes out.

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 2>As the advantages to investing in an eighteenth flight this

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 2>into of that private equity aspects, and would you get

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>more transparency than if I would just went straight into

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 2>private equity privately you know if you know what.

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Well, if you went into a private equity

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>directly yourself, that means you're again ultra you're either a

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>high net worth ultra high networth individual investor. You can

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>spread your legal costs and infrastructure costs in buying these things,

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 1>and plus you'll have a better idea of how to negotiate.

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 4>If you're doing it frequently.

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>So for many investors or let's say putting to work

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>five hundred thousand dollars or less. Even if you're an

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>individual investor, even if you're a high net worth investor,

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you may not want to go directly in. And for

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone else it's you're not allowed. You can't get into

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it because there are restrictions in getting in. And for

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 1>even ultra high networth people, they may want the liquidity

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>because they may want to go in. Even if they

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to go directly into a private equity,

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they may want the liquidity. Maybe they have a wedding

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in the family than want to spend money or buy

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a new house, or you'll do a buy a boat.

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>So the liquidity becomes very important to people. And that's

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the advantage of an ETF.

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 2>What do you think the potential for private equity is.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 2>I've seen you've quoted before saying it could be I

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 2>think five to six times the size of crypto, and

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 2>well bigger than as you've already explained to ETFs. Why

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 2>do you think that and how soon are we talking?

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, Crypto is an interesting acid class. I don't recall

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>saying it's five to six times a larger than crypto.

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying I wouldn't say that I think the

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>potential for private equity is larger than crypto in that

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you've got many private companies that are worth currently thirteen

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars. Crypto is currently I think one to two

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars. I don't know after the most recent your

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>price point. So currently it's five to six times higher.

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I was quoted saying that that's currently it's higher.

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the trajectory, I think private equity is

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to attract more and more capital. We're

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 1>seeing it, you know, through the early part of well

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw in twenty twenty four, is attracting a lot

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>more of the capital going into companies than even public equity.

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And as I mentioned before, many companies are choosing to

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>stay private longer for a variety of reasons. And so

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>as a result, and this is a global phenomenon. The

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that we're seeing Karna, which is a Swedish company,

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.479
<v Speaker 1>coming to market here in the US, you'll suggest that

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>this is an opportunity for global investors. So they're probably

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>companies in New Zealand that may choose to go public

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>someday and maybe you know, it's going to take them

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a while. Maybe some of your best own companies down there,

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, would like to tap the public markets. The

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>best markets to go public tend to be in the US.

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>They tend to be the NASTAC and the New York

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>SoC Exchange. So for example, we've seen in Europe the

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>London Stock Exchange pale in terms of volume compared to

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the US markets. Maybe one of these types of vehicles

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>where larger, better known brands are seeing private equity as

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>of mechanism to get there in anticipation of going public

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe six months a year, within two years down the road.

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 2>It's rocket Lab one that you've looked at, or is

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 2>it a conflict given you've got SpaceX.

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Rocket Lab is is a pure company. It's an entrepreneurial company.

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>It's what we looked at. It's currently a small cap.

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>We tend to in our XOVR ETF. One of the

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>things I did mention these are entrepreneurial, publicly traded entrepreneurial companies,

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but they're large cap, which means that they tend to

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>be ten billion dollars or larger in cap size. So

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>rocket Lab is a company that we've looked at. It's

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a little small by our standards in terms of the

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the fund we have. Moreover, we already

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>have a very large position in SpaceX. We see that

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>we see SpaceX is the dominant player. And so one

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 1>of the things I did not mention beforehand. When we

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>go into private equity, one of the things we want

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to do is pick the leader. We want to pick

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the company with the biggest mote, and the case of SpaceX,

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I didn't mention before him. It's

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>not only an entrepreneurial company that obviously is involved in

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>space exploration, but as your group knows in New Zealand,

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it has Starlink, and Starlink is the crown jewel of SpaceX.

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And because they have seventy two hundred plus satellites in

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>low Earth orbit around the world, and because they're now

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>supplying telecommunications to geographically remote locations both the land, sea

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and air around the world, because it has geopolitical importance

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>for military capabilities, this is emerging. SpaceX, which holds Starlink,

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is emerging. Are one of the most critical assets that the

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:07.479
<v Speaker 1>United States has from a military perspective, and we believe

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 1>that this is one of those companies that's going to

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>continue to rise in importance globally, but certainly within the US.

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>And that's irrespective of the fact that Elon Musk is

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>part of the the Trump administration. So there's that extra

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>political benefit that we see that makes us like this

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>particular asset even more.

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Have you had any backlash? I mean, el Musk isn't

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 2>always the most popular with everybody around the world, right.

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 4>So the backlash is there.

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's no question Elon Musk people you know,

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 1>either love him or hate him. You may know, our

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>president also has has you know, people who are polarized

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>around him that you love him or hate him. I

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>saw a recent poll that says he's he's now has

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the he now has the most popular ratings he's ever had,

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>But he still has a large percent of the population

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that don't like him. So irrespective of whether people think

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>they he's great or not, we have to recognize that,

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, politicians whether and by the way, the same

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>thing held true for the politician before him. You know,

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden was very polarizing, so half the population didn't

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>really like him. So so in these particular situations, you know,

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>there tends to be a backlash among you know, various

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>political groups.

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 4>Was with Elon Musk.

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>You'll arguably, arguably he's one of the greatest entrepreneurs we've

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>ever had, certainly the richest on paper. A lot of

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>people don't like him, but a lot of people do

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>like him, and in terms of his capabilities and what

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>he built with SpaceX and Starlink, we think it's an

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary company. We know that sometimes there's again geopolitical risks.

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>So when the US and Canada we're having tiff issues,

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>there is a politician in Canada said, you know, we

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>want to we want to cut off the the Starlink.

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>We want to cut off the Starlink contract. Well, what

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 1>what they're really doing, what this politician was doing is

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>cutting off you know, starlink access for ten or fifteen

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand people you're living in geographical remote areas of Canada,

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>then weren't going to get the cell phone service and TV.

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>So he wasn't really hurting Starling so much as he

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 1>was hurting his own consumers. So the fact that some

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of these assets are becoming a geopolitical you know, hot potato,

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't believe is a long term concern. We realize

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it's an issue, but we believe the value and the

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>benefit of starlink not only in space exploration, but more

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>importantly with telecommunications and what it has in terms of

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>capabilities you know, for weather sell like monitoring and helping

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to grow telecommunications globally is really important.

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Just wondering where does sustainability come in with the index

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 2>that the fun tricks for the listed equities anyway, is

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 2>there any thought of that or is it purely on

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 2>on entrepreneurship and picking a great entrepreneur as opposed to

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 2>an average entrepreneur.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's interesting when people talk about sustainability or ESG

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the so first and foremost, most of our stocks are

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in tech and healthcare and communication services and consumer discretionary

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't have a very large carbon imprint. But importantly,

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>when we think about governance, these are the entrepreneurs globally.

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure if you think about your top entrepreneurs,

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>your top business people in New Zealand.

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 4>They're probably entrepreneurs.

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's certainly true in almost every country around the

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>world that the people creating the jobs, creating the wealth

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>for societies around the world are these entrepreneurs. And this

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>has been true forever, right, So if you go back

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in your country's history. You'll see the great entrepreneurs were

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the ones who created the wealth in your society, just

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>as it's these entrepreneurs have done it in other places.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Getting back to XOVR, there's a fair bit of competition

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 2>on your heels. I mean Black Rock are looking at

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 2>this or maybe even launched something. I say that Apollo

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 2>and State Street Global Advisors, they've put a fund up

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 2>that said it's gone into a bit of trouble with

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 2>the regulator, and it's probably slightly different when they talk

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 2>about private credit being behind it. Are you worried that

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 2>there's there's many more coming in or do you think

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 2>it's a good thing to have a competition and the

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 2>are the big differences between the funds.

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Probably well so C Street and Apollo or as you mentioned,

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 1>private credit, which is a completely different market. We're in

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>private equity and we're trying to take the leadership position

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>with EXOVR. We're working with some of the databases to

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>take leadership role and how private equity is being priced

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>on a regular basis. So we're working very closely there

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and we're continuing to try to advance the state of

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the markets. And so competition's inevitable others will come in.

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>We've been grappling with this for a while. We didn't

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>We launched the fund in August of twenty nine of

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, but we didn't buy our first private

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>equity until December third, so three months later, so only

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a small part of the overall fund can be in

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>private equity. As I mentioned before, private equity is consistent

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>with our model. Our entrepreneur model started on the private side.

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 1>It was based on venture capitalists, and then we extended

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that over to the public. And we have a track

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>record which goes back and shows how we were able

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to get into things like Nvidia back in two thousand

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>and five and our funds when we first launched, and

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we got Amazon in two thousand and five. So our strategy,

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>our approach enables to get into companies fairly early on,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>which we think is commenser with again our investment thesis.

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>We're basically again taking private companies, venture capital back companies

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and seeing as they go through and identifying them once

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>they become public if other companies try to PLoP in

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>private equity and maybe inconsistent with their thesis. And in fact,

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we recently talked to a fund manager or a CIO

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of a major company who put a company in called

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:15.239
<v Speaker 1>app Loven into a value fund and we couldn't we

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>couldn't disagree more. And app love and is one of

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the highest growth stocks in the market. We've owned it

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>for several years. It's gone up something like three thousand

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>times our three thousand percent now three thousand times three

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand percent in the last two and a half years.

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not a value stock, it's a gross stock. But

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>yet this value manager put it in. So other funds

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that try to put private equity into it into their

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>funds that they're probably not going to be consistent with

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the investment theme.

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Just to finish off, Joe, I'm just wondering what sort

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 2>of takeap have you head for the IXOVR and particularly

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 2>in Australia mwsaland so.

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>We very much appreciate you asking the question. We don't

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>see the flows as an ETF. We're not allowed to

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>see where they're coming home from, but we know that

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>they're strong demand. You're coming from your part of the

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>world just recently started. We know there are some brokers

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in your area that have recently listed US, and we

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the interest that you're express in here. It's a

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>great story space Ax and Starlink, great story around the world.

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Having access to private equity is certainly, you know, part

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of our story and with daily liquidity, so we appreciate

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you helping us get the word out. Is a pleasure

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>speaking with you, and we hope to communicate with you

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>more in the near future.

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Really appreciate you joining us, Joel, and thanks everyone for

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 2>tuning in. You can watch Shed Lunch on YouTube or

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 2>follow us on your favorite podcast app. Leave us a

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 2>rating and a comment about what you'd like to hear next.