WEBVTT - Leighton Smith Podcast #263 - November 6th 2024 - Professor Nigel Biggar and Patrick Basham

0:00:09.133 --> 0:00:12.693
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from news talks ITB. Follow

0:00:12.773 --> 0:00:16.213
<v Speaker 1>this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.

0:00:17.053 --> 0:00:18.333
<v Speaker 2>It's time for all the.

0:00:18.373 --> 0:00:22.133
<v Speaker 1>Attitude, all the opinion, all the information, all the debates

0:00:22.253 --> 0:00:27.093
<v Speaker 1>of us now the lighton Smith podcast cow it by

0:00:27.173 --> 0:00:27.973
<v Speaker 1>news talks ITB.

0:00:28.573 --> 0:00:31.813
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to podcasts two hundred and sixty three for November six,

0:00:32.053 --> 0:00:36.173
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four. And it is November five in the

0:00:36.333 --> 0:00:39.973
<v Speaker 3>United States of America, and today is election day. That

0:00:40.093 --> 0:00:43.173
<v Speaker 3>has promised some insight and coverage from early in the

0:00:43.253 --> 0:00:48.813
<v Speaker 3>count and Patrick Basham from Democracy Institute releases exit poll

0:00:48.933 --> 0:00:52.813
<v Speaker 3>numbers that of course will be replaced with some real

0:00:52.973 --> 0:00:56.453
<v Speaker 3>life numbers in the very near future, if not already.

0:00:56.773 --> 0:01:00.573
<v Speaker 3>But watching Upholster at work and seeing how accurate he

0:01:00.733 --> 0:01:04.093
<v Speaker 3>and his team are is just part of the interesting

0:01:04.133 --> 0:01:08.213
<v Speaker 3>game now. Whatever the outcome of Patrick delivers his usual

0:01:08.373 --> 0:01:13.693
<v Speaker 3>quality commentary. Over the last few weeks, even last few days,

0:01:14.213 --> 0:01:18.173
<v Speaker 3>I've realized something of importance. The FSU, the Free Speech Union,

0:01:18.333 --> 0:01:22.933
<v Speaker 3>has not been overstating its case, not been for a period.

0:01:22.973 --> 0:01:25.773
<v Speaker 3>I was wondering if they were in a state of overkill.

0:01:26.253 --> 0:01:28.933
<v Speaker 3>It seemed that there were any number of international commentators

0:01:28.973 --> 0:01:32.733
<v Speaker 3>visiting New Zealand with some more coming. But after interviewing

0:01:32.773 --> 0:01:37.413
<v Speaker 3>the latest and present guest, I've realized that the FSU

0:01:37.693 --> 0:01:40.693
<v Speaker 3>is on track. The discussion with Nigel big Ar and

0:01:40.773 --> 0:01:42.853
<v Speaker 3>reading a lot of his work nailed it for me.

0:01:43.413 --> 0:01:47.053
<v Speaker 3>Professor Bigger wrote the Higher Education Freedom of Speech Bill

0:01:47.133 --> 0:01:52.173
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty one for Britain. But his work doesn't stop there. Well,

0:01:52.213 --> 0:01:55.813
<v Speaker 3>actually did, but there's a story behind. It's interesting and

0:01:56.053 --> 0:02:00.013
<v Speaker 3>I believe that you will greatly appreciate his analysis. But

0:02:00.093 --> 0:02:12.133
<v Speaker 3>in just a moment, Patrick Basham now from the Democracy Institute,

0:02:12.173 --> 0:02:15.293
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Basham. Patrick actually has been very busy, how can

0:02:15.333 --> 0:02:17.493
<v Speaker 3>I say it. He's been working his butt off. After

0:02:17.493 --> 0:02:21.373
<v Speaker 3>spending a few days in Doha at an investment conference,

0:02:21.853 --> 0:02:23.653
<v Speaker 3>he raced back to Washington. I spoke to him from

0:02:23.693 --> 0:02:26.533
<v Speaker 3>the airport. Actually he raced back to Washington to cover

0:02:26.613 --> 0:02:32.853
<v Speaker 3>the election. And we had the Institute's final polling numbers

0:02:33.693 --> 0:02:36.573
<v Speaker 3>twenty four hours ago, will say, and now as a

0:02:36.613 --> 0:02:40.253
<v Speaker 3>result of Patrick's association with the Daily Express in the US,

0:02:40.933 --> 0:02:44.253
<v Speaker 3>we have some exit poll figures. It is great to

0:02:44.253 --> 0:02:46.173
<v Speaker 3>have you back on the podcast, and this is something

0:02:46.173 --> 0:02:49.573
<v Speaker 3>that we've never done before and it's made difficult Patrick,

0:02:49.613 --> 0:02:52.213
<v Speaker 3>as you well know by the fact that the timing

0:02:52.373 --> 0:02:56.173
<v Speaker 3>of this election as opposed to this podcast, and it's

0:02:56.253 --> 0:03:01.293
<v Speaker 3>their fault, not mine, that we are up against the clock,

0:03:01.413 --> 0:03:04.613
<v Speaker 3>so to speak. But that doesn't mean that a lot

0:03:04.653 --> 0:03:06.973
<v Speaker 3>of people are very interested in what you have to say.

0:03:07.453 --> 0:03:09.133
<v Speaker 2>I was very kind of you, kind of to have

0:03:09.253 --> 0:03:12.333
<v Speaker 2>me back on the program again. Or it's good to

0:03:12.333 --> 0:03:14.213
<v Speaker 2>talk to you. It's such an exciting time. I mean

0:03:15.053 --> 0:03:17.533
<v Speaker 2>when you say about timings, I can really appreciate it

0:03:17.573 --> 0:03:20.493
<v Speaker 2>because I've been had such a whirlwind trip to Middle

0:03:20.533 --> 0:03:25.973
<v Speaker 2>East and came back so sleep deprived that all of

0:03:25.973 --> 0:03:28.613
<v Speaker 2>the time zones across America are challenging me with the

0:03:28.973 --> 0:03:33.453
<v Speaker 2>with the polling, let alone the top there the more

0:03:33.573 --> 0:03:36.293
<v Speaker 2>transcontinental one you're dealing with, But there's already lots to

0:03:36.373 --> 0:03:38.453
<v Speaker 2>chew on, I think, so I think it should be

0:03:38.893 --> 0:03:39.933
<v Speaker 2>an interesting conversation.

0:03:39.973 --> 0:03:42.413
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's let's have a look at the exit

0:03:42.493 --> 0:03:46.413
<v Speaker 3>figures that you came up with, because they are interesting.

0:03:47.133 --> 0:03:50.533
<v Speaker 3>You didn't do any state by state, Am I right

0:03:50.653 --> 0:03:50.973
<v Speaker 3>or wrong?

0:03:51.453 --> 0:03:55.093
<v Speaker 2>Correct? The reason for that is, I mean, partly, you know,

0:03:55.453 --> 0:04:00.853
<v Speaker 2>cost timing logistics, but also we just done a whole

0:04:00.933 --> 0:04:05.413
<v Speaker 2>series of swing state polls and we thought that now

0:04:05.493 --> 0:04:07.853
<v Speaker 2>we and the newspaper thought the national polls should be

0:04:09.253 --> 0:04:11.613
<v Speaker 2>truly that and that we could pick and you know,

0:04:11.653 --> 0:04:13.693
<v Speaker 2>we could instead of doing a national poll, we could

0:04:13.733 --> 0:04:16.573
<v Speaker 2>pick one or two exit swing states do exit poles,

0:04:16.773 --> 0:04:18.693
<v Speaker 2>and they might prove to be the pivotal ones. But

0:04:19.653 --> 0:04:21.973
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's a guess. It's a guestimate, and we

0:04:22.013 --> 0:04:23.933
<v Speaker 2>thought that we would be able to hoped we would

0:04:23.933 --> 0:04:25.733
<v Speaker 2>be able to pick up in a national exit pole

0:04:26.653 --> 0:04:29.213
<v Speaker 2>whatever what was that was changing or whatever it was

0:04:29.293 --> 0:04:32.733
<v Speaker 2>most meaningful. So that's that's the sort of risk we took.

0:04:33.053 --> 0:04:35.853
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think you've done the greatest number of people

0:04:36.013 --> 0:04:37.973
<v Speaker 3>that you've done so far, am I right?

0:04:38.893 --> 0:04:41.533
<v Speaker 2>That is right, Yes, we've done well. It was twenty

0:04:41.653 --> 0:04:44.693
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and fifty I think it was the was

0:04:44.733 --> 0:04:48.933
<v Speaker 2>the final tally. So that's quite a bit more than

0:04:48.933 --> 0:04:51.493
<v Speaker 2>we normally do and more than we would have done

0:04:51.533 --> 0:04:54.453
<v Speaker 2>if we'd done individual states. So it's you know, we're

0:04:55.173 --> 0:04:59.933
<v Speaker 2>pretty confident that we got our arms around those who

0:04:59.933 --> 0:05:02.973
<v Speaker 2>had already voted, I mean the vote. The voting is

0:05:02.973 --> 0:05:05.733
<v Speaker 2>still going on in most places, so you know, because

0:05:06.253 --> 0:05:09.093
<v Speaker 2>you have to get these things done and in a

0:05:09.093 --> 0:05:12.213
<v Speaker 2>little early we hope it's not premature in terms of results,

0:05:12.253 --> 0:05:14.933
<v Speaker 2>but you know, you just try to you just try

0:05:14.973 --> 0:05:18.493
<v Speaker 2>to nail down what you can and and cover your

0:05:18.653 --> 0:05:20.773
<v Speaker 2>basis and would say your butt as well as you can.

0:05:20.853 --> 0:05:23.213
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I mean, as a long standing critic

0:05:23.253 --> 0:05:25.933
<v Speaker 2>of exit polls, I'd be the first one to say

0:05:25.973 --> 0:05:28.133
<v Speaker 2>that these are as much art as science.

0:05:28.613 --> 0:05:30.173
<v Speaker 3>Are you started with the voting method?

0:05:30.533 --> 0:05:33.173
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that's the interesting thing about this year's exit

0:05:33.213 --> 0:05:37.533
<v Speaker 2>pole because traditionally is I'm sure your audience is aware,

0:05:38.173 --> 0:05:40.573
<v Speaker 2>exit polls are usually what we used to call man

0:05:40.613 --> 0:05:42.773
<v Speaker 2>on the street or person in the street, person coming

0:05:42.773 --> 0:05:46.773
<v Speaker 2>out of the polling station, interviews and lots of young

0:05:46.773 --> 0:05:50.013
<v Speaker 2>people would be hired at certain locations around the country,

0:05:50.053 --> 0:05:53.453
<v Speaker 2>whether it was you know, UK, Canada, US, you name it,

0:05:53.773 --> 0:05:55.733
<v Speaker 2>and then there asked a series of questions and those

0:05:55.733 --> 0:05:58.213
<v Speaker 2>are fed back. One of the problems with that, of course,

0:05:58.293 --> 0:06:00.493
<v Speaker 2>is it's it's you have to you know, it's you

0:06:00.573 --> 0:06:03.773
<v Speaker 2>have to which locations do you choose? But the biggest problem,

0:06:03.893 --> 0:06:07.213
<v Speaker 2>what we thought the challenge was was the fact that

0:06:07.853 --> 0:06:10.933
<v Speaker 2>at the time time when we arranged this with the newspaper,

0:06:11.013 --> 0:06:13.173
<v Speaker 2>we were looking at about thirty five forty percent of

0:06:13.253 --> 0:06:16.333
<v Speaker 2>people had already voted for exit poles. Correct, it's now

0:06:16.533 --> 0:06:19.973
<v Speaker 2>more than half before election day, So that means even

0:06:20.013 --> 0:06:23.253
<v Speaker 2>if you do a fantastic job of an exit poll

0:06:23.293 --> 0:06:26.293
<v Speaker 2>on election day, you're going to miss half the voters.

0:06:26.853 --> 0:06:28.973
<v Speaker 2>So we thought it made you know, that's really the

0:06:29.013 --> 0:06:34.013
<v Speaker 2>main reason we did what we did. And so when

0:06:34.053 --> 0:06:38.333
<v Speaker 2>we started it, especially early today with the calling, it

0:06:38.453 --> 0:06:43.253
<v Speaker 2>was we were pleasantly surprised that the comparative willingness of

0:06:43.293 --> 0:06:45.973
<v Speaker 2>people to want the ability of people to speak because

0:06:46.133 --> 0:06:50.213
<v Speaker 2>disproportionate number of people had already voted, and so we

0:06:50.253 --> 0:06:54.053
<v Speaker 2>could start getting some serious data and numbers in results

0:06:54.053 --> 0:06:57.333
<v Speaker 2>in you know, well before you would have traditionally expected.

0:06:57.653 --> 0:06:59.373
<v Speaker 3>Are you the only one doing it this way? Do

0:06:59.413 --> 0:07:03.533
<v Speaker 3>you think? Or are some of the other big boys

0:07:04.653 --> 0:07:10.293
<v Speaker 3>following the same routine of calling than standing outside booze?

0:07:11.533 --> 0:07:15.413
<v Speaker 2>I'm I hesitate to say, I know this definitively. I

0:07:15.493 --> 0:07:18.333
<v Speaker 2>think we are. I think we are the only one

0:07:18.373 --> 0:07:24.373
<v Speaker 2>exclusively using our regular polling method. Could be proven wrong,

0:07:24.413 --> 0:07:26.533
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think so. I think they are mostly

0:07:26.573 --> 0:07:30.093
<v Speaker 2>traditional or some sort of hybrid's that's that's my sense.

0:07:30.453 --> 0:07:34.253
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So you divided that up into voting by mail,

0:07:34.453 --> 0:07:37.213
<v Speaker 3>early in person and election day and the figures of

0:07:37.253 --> 0:07:44.213
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight, thirty one and forty one. So let's get

0:07:44.053 --> 0:07:48.933
<v Speaker 3>into the really nitty gritty the president The presidential vote

0:07:49.093 --> 0:07:52.053
<v Speaker 3>is the simplest of all. I think you take it.

0:07:53.213 --> 0:07:58.093
<v Speaker 2>Sure. Our exit poll finds Trump ahead by four points,

0:07:58.133 --> 0:08:01.573
<v Speaker 2>fifty one to forty seven. And the point of reference

0:08:01.653 --> 0:08:03.573
<v Speaker 2>here when you do an exit pole, you know don't

0:08:03.573 --> 0:08:05.693
<v Speaker 2>know I mean we as you know, we finished up

0:08:06.013 --> 0:08:09.333
<v Speaker 2>our final poll national poll late last week, and you

0:08:09.373 --> 0:08:11.213
<v Speaker 2>don't know whether the exit pole is going to be

0:08:11.213 --> 0:08:14.653
<v Speaker 2>way different in one direction or going to be most identical.

0:08:14.893 --> 0:08:16.533
<v Speaker 2>This one turns out, at least in terms of the

0:08:17.133 --> 0:08:19.293
<v Speaker 2>popular vote, to be very close, because our last poll

0:08:19.373 --> 0:08:21.293
<v Speaker 2>is fifty to forty seven in Trump's favor. This is

0:08:21.333 --> 0:08:23.813
<v Speaker 2>fifty one to forty seven. So that part of it

0:08:23.853 --> 0:08:27.973
<v Speaker 2>tells us, well, I guess you might say, tells us

0:08:28.013 --> 0:08:30.413
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be doubly right or doubly wrong. But

0:08:30.773 --> 0:08:35.613
<v Speaker 2>it gives us some sense of security that we weren't

0:08:36.733 --> 0:08:40.693
<v Speaker 2>way off. At least our methods are consistent. And of course,

0:08:41.133 --> 0:08:43.373
<v Speaker 2>as exit polls. One of the problems with the exit

0:08:43.373 --> 0:08:47.253
<v Speaker 2>polls the outcome of the outcomes in North America anyways,

0:08:47.293 --> 0:08:52.093
<v Speaker 2>they tend nearly always to be biased towards the liberal

0:08:52.173 --> 0:08:57.213
<v Speaker 2>or left wing party or candidate, and whether the results

0:08:57.253 --> 0:08:59.093
<v Speaker 2>turn out to be accurate or not, and often they're not.

0:08:59.693 --> 0:09:03.893
<v Speaker 2>And so we didn't know whether that might be more

0:09:05.493 --> 0:09:09.533
<v Speaker 2>an outcome of the sort of method or whether it's

0:09:09.653 --> 0:09:15.533
<v Speaker 2>just another the bias found elsewhere. But finding that Trump

0:09:15.653 --> 0:09:18.093
<v Speaker 2>is in as good a position with those who've already

0:09:18.133 --> 0:09:23.813
<v Speaker 2>voted as those were prospective voters is obviously tells a lot.

0:09:23.853 --> 0:09:27.133
<v Speaker 2>And what I think it does at this early juncture

0:09:27.173 --> 0:09:29.733
<v Speaker 2>when we don't means we're as we're speaking, there's just

0:09:29.773 --> 0:09:35.173
<v Speaker 2>the very first little results trickling in. It tells us

0:09:35.253 --> 0:09:38.453
<v Speaker 2>that what has been apparently happening on the ground, what

0:09:38.493 --> 0:09:41.973
<v Speaker 2>has been measured on the ground today in America, across America,

0:09:42.413 --> 0:09:44.853
<v Speaker 2>with those you know, those who are the forty one

0:09:44.853 --> 0:09:49.013
<v Speaker 2>percent who were voting in person, that the comparatively strong

0:09:49.053 --> 0:09:53.693
<v Speaker 2>Republican turn out, the comparatively lower Democratic turnout might actually

0:09:54.453 --> 0:09:56.973
<v Speaker 2>be the case, you know, might be the case through

0:09:56.973 --> 0:09:57.453
<v Speaker 2>that through the.

0:09:57.493 --> 0:09:58.253
<v Speaker 4>Day, in the evening.

0:09:59.173 --> 0:10:04.093
<v Speaker 2>So this is good news for the Trump side, But

0:10:04.533 --> 0:10:05.933
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure, I mean, I don't know yet what

0:10:06.013 --> 0:10:07.773
<v Speaker 2>the other exit polls may or may not be showing

0:10:07.813 --> 0:10:10.853
<v Speaker 2>because to release they head to head until the polls

0:10:10.853 --> 0:10:11.293
<v Speaker 2>are closed.

0:10:11.533 --> 0:10:15.093
<v Speaker 3>Right now, you've for demographics, you've done the list of

0:10:15.173 --> 0:10:20.533
<v Speaker 3>for nineteen and it's a very interesting result. I think,

0:10:20.813 --> 0:10:28.613
<v Speaker 3>let me run through it. Men, women, white, Black, Hispanic, Asian, GOP, Democrats, Independent, Catholic,

0:10:29.733 --> 0:10:31.893
<v Speaker 3>and then age groups eighteen to twenty nine, thirty to

0:10:31.933 --> 0:10:35.813
<v Speaker 3>thirty four, forty five to sixty four, sixty five plus urban, suburban,

0:10:35.893 --> 0:10:41.013
<v Speaker 3>small town, rural, middle class and blue collar. That must

0:10:41.013 --> 0:10:44.173
<v Speaker 3>have been the most difficult part of part of doing it,

0:10:44.213 --> 0:10:48.213
<v Speaker 3>I would think. But what stood out to you?

0:10:48.653 --> 0:10:52.293
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a couple of things stand out, and then most

0:10:52.333 --> 0:10:54.333
<v Speaker 2>of the things that have actually stood out all year

0:10:54.333 --> 0:10:56.813
<v Speaker 2>because you're aware of no late and then some of

0:10:56.813 --> 0:11:00.573
<v Speaker 2>your audience. Maybe our numbers haven't changed that much over

0:11:00.613 --> 0:11:02.453
<v Speaker 2>the course of the year. So the things that stand out,

0:11:02.533 --> 0:11:06.573
<v Speaker 2>especially if you're looking at this a new are the

0:11:06.693 --> 0:11:11.373
<v Speaker 2>minority votes. That's arguably the most telling, the fact that

0:11:11.813 --> 0:11:15.013
<v Speaker 2>according to our exit Paul, you know, Trump's getting more

0:11:15.053 --> 0:11:20.573
<v Speaker 2>than one in five black vote and he's getting almost

0:11:20.573 --> 0:11:25.733
<v Speaker 2>one in two Hispanic votes. And that you know, when

0:11:25.733 --> 0:11:27.853
<v Speaker 2>you when you drill down a bit, what that means

0:11:27.853 --> 0:11:32.413
<v Speaker 2>you've got more Hispanic men than women choosing Trump rather

0:11:32.413 --> 0:11:36.093
<v Speaker 2>than the traditional Democrat vote. However, it's not there's not

0:11:36.173 --> 0:11:38.973
<v Speaker 2>a lot in it. You know, Trump is quite popular

0:11:38.973 --> 0:11:43.493
<v Speaker 2>with Hispanic women, whereas on the black side, you're looking

0:11:43.493 --> 0:11:46.253
<v Speaker 2>at over thirty percent thirty thirty five percent of Black

0:11:46.293 --> 0:11:50.933
<v Speaker 2>men voting for Trump. But the last holdout for the Democrats,

0:11:50.973 --> 0:11:57.293
<v Speaker 2>particularly with Kamala Harris as the candidate, are black women's. Basically,

0:11:57.293 --> 0:11:59.773
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about middle aged and old, older black women.

0:12:00.493 --> 0:12:02.933
<v Speaker 2>And so you you put that high that high compared

0:12:02.973 --> 0:12:04.773
<v Speaker 2>to be high figure among men that can party of

0:12:04.853 --> 0:12:07.053
<v Speaker 2>low figure among black women together, and you end up

0:12:07.053 --> 0:12:08.813
<v Speaker 2>with sort of a little over one in five. So

0:12:08.853 --> 0:12:13.413
<v Speaker 2>those two numbers alone, you know, if you ask me, okay,

0:12:13.453 --> 0:12:16.413
<v Speaker 2>you know, pick pick one or two of these demographic subgroups,

0:12:16.893 --> 0:12:20.933
<v Speaker 2>and you know, and make your your wager on who wins,

0:12:21.533 --> 0:12:24.933
<v Speaker 2>those are the ones I'd pick because it's just historically

0:12:24.973 --> 0:12:29.733
<v Speaker 2>and arithmetically, it's just really hard borrowing on impossible for

0:12:29.813 --> 0:12:34.973
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats to win a contemporary American national election with

0:12:35.453 --> 0:12:38.933
<v Speaker 2>only in inverted commerce, seventy eight percent of the Black

0:12:39.013 --> 0:12:42.013
<v Speaker 2>vote or half of the Hispanic vote. They just can't

0:12:42.053 --> 0:12:45.333
<v Speaker 2>make it up with white voters. There are only so

0:12:45.453 --> 0:12:50.093
<v Speaker 2>many white liberal women to go around. You know, whether

0:12:50.093 --> 0:12:52.453
<v Speaker 2>some people might view that editorially is a good thing,

0:12:52.493 --> 0:12:56.413
<v Speaker 2>but in terms of the arithmetic, lectural arithmetic, for the Democrats,

0:12:56.773 --> 0:13:00.493
<v Speaker 2>it's unfortunate. And that's why they count on, you know,

0:13:00.613 --> 0:13:08.093
<v Speaker 2>such your uniform almost you know, universal within those electorates

0:13:08.413 --> 0:13:10.053
<v Speaker 2>court and so we don't when you don't get that.

0:13:10.213 --> 0:13:13.813
<v Speaker 2>The other two that jump out at me, they often

0:13:13.853 --> 0:13:16.653
<v Speaker 2>mirror each other, although they aren't. They aren't the same

0:13:16.693 --> 0:13:21.133
<v Speaker 2>people's This overlap is the independence who are we The

0:13:21.173 --> 0:13:25.253
<v Speaker 2>exit poll has Trump up eight points. Independents don't always

0:13:26.973 --> 0:13:30.893
<v Speaker 2>reflect the winner, but they usually do. And the other

0:13:30.933 --> 0:13:33.453
<v Speaker 2>one is the Catholic vote. And the reason we've highlighted

0:13:33.533 --> 0:13:36.933
<v Speaker 2>that is the evangelical vote is very important. It's overwhelmingly

0:13:36.973 --> 0:13:40.373
<v Speaker 2>for Trump. You have atheists is much smaller, overwhelmingly for Harris.

0:13:40.733 --> 0:13:46.453
<v Speaker 2>And then your sort of traditional Protestant, various Protestant denominations

0:13:46.933 --> 0:13:51.293
<v Speaker 2>that tend to skew Republican. But Catholics are a swing

0:13:51.653 --> 0:13:54.973
<v Speaker 2>are these swing maybe the only swing religious group block

0:13:55.013 --> 0:13:58.373
<v Speaker 2>in America? They tend to go with the winner. Doesn't

0:13:58.413 --> 0:14:00.773
<v Speaker 2>tend to be a big difference between the two sides,

0:14:00.813 --> 0:14:03.213
<v Speaker 2>and it's very much like the independent vote. We've got

0:14:03.253 --> 0:14:07.893
<v Speaker 2>an eight point lead for Trump, and that also again,

0:14:07.933 --> 0:14:09.853
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you're looking at this in terms of

0:14:09.853 --> 0:14:11.853
<v Speaker 2>what a history tells us, it tells us that the

0:14:12.013 --> 0:14:16.533
<v Speaker 2>Independents and Catholics are going for going for one candidate,

0:14:16.893 --> 0:14:20.533
<v Speaker 2>and the other candidates lost a good chunk of their

0:14:20.573 --> 0:14:23.053
<v Speaker 2>minority vote which they had count on. You know, that

0:14:23.173 --> 0:14:25.373
<v Speaker 2>suggests the wind is blowing in this particular direction.

0:14:27.173 --> 0:14:30.973
<v Speaker 3>There are two columns that I'm interested in at this point.

0:14:31.693 --> 0:14:35.773
<v Speaker 3>One is for the Democrats. The other is for the Republicans,

0:14:35.973 --> 0:14:39.973
<v Speaker 3>the GOP. And the reason that I that I'm interested

0:14:40.173 --> 0:14:44.813
<v Speaker 3>is because I missed it in the Republican column because

0:14:44.813 --> 0:14:49.213
<v Speaker 3>it's right at the bottom. But overall, let me just

0:14:49.253 --> 0:14:53.373
<v Speaker 3>explain something. This is this is a this is a

0:14:53.493 --> 0:14:55.493
<v Speaker 3>row of shop what do you what would you call

0:14:55.533 --> 0:15:00.733
<v Speaker 3>them polls or what? A row of vertical.

0:15:01.333 --> 0:15:06.053
<v Speaker 2>Yes, they're they're stacked columns.

0:15:05.533 --> 0:15:11.013
<v Speaker 3>Right, That's what I wanted. Ah, And then you've got

0:15:11.533 --> 0:15:14.933
<v Speaker 3>you've got Harris at the bottom and Trump at the top.

0:15:15.013 --> 0:15:19.573
<v Speaker 3>So it's blue and red and the in the GOP column,

0:15:19.813 --> 0:15:24.573
<v Speaker 3>the Democrat sorry, the Republican column you've got ninety six

0:15:24.613 --> 0:15:29.173
<v Speaker 3>percent for Trump voted for Trump, four percent of Republicans

0:15:29.253 --> 0:15:34.013
<v Speaker 3>voted for Harris. And then on the other side, you've

0:15:34.053 --> 0:15:38.853
<v Speaker 3>got ninety four percent voting for Harris and six percent

0:15:39.933 --> 0:15:43.653
<v Speaker 3>voting for Trump. Now that means it's very close, but

0:15:43.933 --> 0:15:45.053
<v Speaker 3>Trump came out top in that.

0:15:46.333 --> 0:15:49.093
<v Speaker 2>That's right, And let's you know, be consistent whether it

0:15:49.133 --> 0:15:52.733
<v Speaker 2>was Biden or Harris's Democratic candidate. For a year or two,

0:15:52.853 --> 0:15:57.213
<v Speaker 2>Trump has been holding on to almost everyone who considers

0:15:57.253 --> 0:16:00.733
<v Speaker 2>himself a Republican and almost everyone who voted for him

0:16:01.013 --> 0:16:05.133
<v Speaker 2>last time. On the Democratic side, it hasn't been disastrous,

0:16:05.573 --> 0:16:08.933
<v Speaker 2>but there's been a little bit of blea kitch compared

0:16:08.973 --> 0:16:12.693
<v Speaker 2>to Trump's voters a few, you know, it's been sort

0:16:12.693 --> 0:16:14.813
<v Speaker 2>of high single digits who voted for him last time

0:16:14.933 --> 0:16:17.773
<v Speaker 2>was saying they wouldn't versus low single digits on the

0:16:17.773 --> 0:16:21.493
<v Speaker 2>Trump side. And you know, in a close race, that

0:16:21.573 --> 0:16:23.373
<v Speaker 2>makes a difference. And of course it depends how the

0:16:23.453 --> 0:16:27.053
<v Speaker 2>volume of votes are for these these these two groups,

0:16:27.213 --> 0:16:31.573
<v Speaker 2>and it tells you how solid Trump's vote has been

0:16:31.653 --> 0:16:34.853
<v Speaker 2>all along, you know, and therefore that it was always

0:16:34.893 --> 0:16:36.933
<v Speaker 2>going to be there's also are going to be a

0:16:36.933 --> 0:16:39.173
<v Speaker 2>close race. I mean, he was never going to do poorly.

0:16:39.213 --> 0:16:41.813
<v Speaker 2>It's a question of did he almost get over the

0:16:41.813 --> 0:16:45.533
<v Speaker 2>line like he officially did last time, or didn't do

0:16:45.653 --> 0:16:51.493
<v Speaker 2>last time, or with new voters and enough switchers from

0:16:51.573 --> 0:16:56.853
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats, either past voters or people who maybe didn't

0:16:56.893 --> 0:16:59.693
<v Speaker 2>vote last time, would he would he make it? And

0:16:59.773 --> 0:17:02.173
<v Speaker 2>what's been interesting is that what they call the sort

0:17:02.173 --> 0:17:06.053
<v Speaker 2>of the flippers, those who voted one way last time

0:17:06.053 --> 0:17:08.853
<v Speaker 2>and then voted nipway this up. He's been winning those

0:17:09.213 --> 0:17:14.093
<v Speaker 2>two to one pretty consistently. And it's not doesn't change

0:17:14.133 --> 0:17:16.893
<v Speaker 2>everything those kinds of numbers because we're they're at the margin,

0:17:16.933 --> 0:17:19.853
<v Speaker 2>But in a in a close race nationally or in

0:17:19.893 --> 0:17:22.373
<v Speaker 2>swing states, you know, that can be everything.

0:17:23.653 --> 0:17:27.973
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, I'm just skipping a hit here at the at

0:17:27.973 --> 0:17:32.493
<v Speaker 3>the moment, I don't think that the details of early

0:17:32.533 --> 0:17:36.693
<v Speaker 3>in person voters matter too much to us, unless you

0:17:37.013 --> 0:17:42.333
<v Speaker 3>think otherwise. Well, actually, actually I'm wrong, because you're you know,

0:17:42.373 --> 0:17:45.453
<v Speaker 3>you look at the the votes for Trump early in

0:17:45.493 --> 0:17:49.653
<v Speaker 3>person voters, fifty seven percent for Harris and that's that's

0:17:49.693 --> 0:17:52.213
<v Speaker 3>a flip? Is that not on the on on previous ears?

0:17:53.493 --> 0:17:56.173
<v Speaker 2>Yes, this is the Yeah, this is the thing. Is

0:17:56.213 --> 0:18:01.453
<v Speaker 2>that Harris I mean the Democrats, you know, they've been

0:18:01.853 --> 0:18:05.053
<v Speaker 2>crushing previous to this election the mail vote, not just

0:18:05.093 --> 0:18:08.573
<v Speaker 2>simply in terms of volume, but in terms of the

0:18:08.733 --> 0:18:11.533
<v Speaker 2>spread between them and the republic The Republicans were actually

0:18:11.533 --> 0:18:14.413
<v Speaker 2>sort of consciously not going through the mail, and they've

0:18:14.413 --> 0:18:16.493
<v Speaker 2>turned it around this time and they vote through the mail,

0:18:16.573 --> 0:18:20.333
<v Speaker 2>vote through the mail, and the Republican numbers haven't actually

0:18:20.413 --> 0:18:22.773
<v Speaker 2>shifted if you should have averaged it all out across

0:18:22.773 --> 0:18:25.253
<v Speaker 2>the country, they haven't shifted that much. You say, Okay,

0:18:25.293 --> 0:18:27.813
<v Speaker 2>well that doesn't that isn't much of a help. Well,

0:18:27.853 --> 0:18:30.133
<v Speaker 2>actually it is, because you know, we had all this

0:18:30.173 --> 0:18:33.293
<v Speaker 2>male in voting because of COVID and so many people

0:18:33.333 --> 0:18:35.933
<v Speaker 2>foind it convenient to do it that way. So for

0:18:36.013 --> 0:18:39.493
<v Speaker 2>the Republicans to sort of maintain roughly that level is

0:18:39.533 --> 0:18:43.133
<v Speaker 2>quite good, particularly when you consider that in most states,

0:18:43.173 --> 0:18:46.853
<v Speaker 2>basically the swing states, the Democrat mail in vote has

0:18:46.933 --> 0:18:51.413
<v Speaker 2>dropped off considerably, and so there's both the difference between

0:18:51.493 --> 0:18:56.293
<v Speaker 2>the who they're voting for is condensed, and also just

0:18:56.373 --> 0:18:58.613
<v Speaker 2>the volume. You know, that lead like Harris has this

0:18:58.653 --> 0:19:02.053
<v Speaker 2>eight point lead upon among those who voted by mail,

0:19:02.533 --> 0:19:04.733
<v Speaker 2>but there are much fewer of them, so that eight

0:19:04.773 --> 0:19:07.213
<v Speaker 2>points doesn't count as much as it did for Biden

0:19:07.253 --> 0:19:09.253
<v Speaker 2>when the lead was far more eight points as well.

0:19:09.773 --> 0:19:12.933
<v Speaker 2>And you look at the early in person that Trump

0:19:13.533 --> 0:19:17.733
<v Speaker 2>has edged them out fifty one for those they have

0:19:17.813 --> 0:19:21.053
<v Speaker 2>chosen Trump fifty one over forty seven for Harris. And

0:19:21.133 --> 0:19:24.733
<v Speaker 2>again that's that's a big improvement in all these different

0:19:24.773 --> 0:19:27.853
<v Speaker 2>ways for the Republicans visa v. The Democrats. And so

0:19:28.173 --> 0:19:31.133
<v Speaker 2>when you when you put those two together, those who

0:19:31.173 --> 0:19:33.693
<v Speaker 2>mailed in their ballots and those who voted in person

0:19:33.733 --> 0:19:37.413
<v Speaker 2>but early, you put it in the in the synthesize it,

0:19:37.453 --> 0:19:41.093
<v Speaker 2>you know, number data wise, and you end up with

0:19:41.213 --> 0:19:45.213
<v Speaker 2>going into election day Harris with a small advantage sort

0:19:45.213 --> 0:19:48.413
<v Speaker 2>of two three points. And then it becomes election day

0:19:49.533 --> 0:19:53.813
<v Speaker 2>becomes about who gets their people, those that are remaining

0:19:53.933 --> 0:19:56.933
<v Speaker 2>roughly half to actually physically go and vote. And it's

0:19:56.933 --> 0:20:01.173
<v Speaker 2>traditionally been the day when Republicans either caught up and

0:20:01.213 --> 0:20:04.573
<v Speaker 2>overtook the Democrats or you know, failed to do so.

0:20:04.573 --> 0:20:09.613
<v Speaker 2>So both sides had everything riding, have everything riding on

0:20:09.893 --> 0:20:12.693
<v Speaker 2>the in person election day vote.

0:20:12.933 --> 0:20:14.813
<v Speaker 3>Tell me something, what are recalled vote?

0:20:16.213 --> 0:20:21.133
<v Speaker 2>Recalled votes are asking people who they voted for last time.

0:20:21.453 --> 0:20:23.133
<v Speaker 2>If you know I did a vote last time, and

0:20:23.173 --> 0:20:26.293
<v Speaker 2>if they did, who they voted for. The reason for asking, well,

0:20:27.293 --> 0:20:28.893
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of reasons for ask any question, but the

0:20:29.333 --> 0:20:34.013
<v Speaker 2>real true reason for asking that is to it's a

0:20:34.093 --> 0:20:36.333
<v Speaker 2>kind of an insurance policy or a safety net to

0:20:36.413 --> 0:20:38.813
<v Speaker 2>make sure that you're not talking to a skewed group.

0:20:39.213 --> 0:20:41.733
<v Speaker 2>That is, you know, like if I if we've done

0:20:41.733 --> 0:20:46.533
<v Speaker 2>this poll and our recalled vote was, you know, ten

0:20:46.573 --> 0:20:50.893
<v Speaker 2>points Trump ahead ten points from twenty twenty, we had

0:20:50.933 --> 0:20:55.853
<v Speaker 2>ten percent more Trump voters than were in the actual electorate,

0:20:56.253 --> 0:20:57.813
<v Speaker 2>then what we would have to do, if we didn't

0:20:57.813 --> 0:20:59.453
<v Speaker 2>want to chuck the whole thing out, is we would

0:20:59.533 --> 0:21:02.453
<v Speaker 2>have to then weight everything for that basis to take

0:21:02.453 --> 0:21:08.813
<v Speaker 2>away Trump votes and Republican volume throughout the poll. So

0:21:09.013 --> 0:21:13.013
<v Speaker 2>just give you one quick example. On the weekend, your

0:21:13.013 --> 0:21:15.893
<v Speaker 2>listeners might have heard about it. One or two state

0:21:15.973 --> 0:21:19.893
<v Speaker 2>poles that came out that surprised everybody with how well

0:21:19.973 --> 0:21:23.253
<v Speaker 2>Harris was doing. And of course it turns out in

0:21:23.293 --> 0:21:28.853
<v Speaker 2>both cases the recalled vote was massively pro Biden from

0:21:28.893 --> 0:21:33.413
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty, way beyond just you know, double digits difference

0:21:33.453 --> 0:21:38.573
<v Speaker 2>from how that state actually voted, And so you adjust

0:21:38.693 --> 0:21:41.693
<v Speaker 2>that and suddenly Harris doesn't have this surprising lead. She's

0:21:41.733 --> 0:21:45.733
<v Speaker 2>actually still behind. And so when we saw our recall

0:21:45.813 --> 0:21:51.053
<v Speaker 2>vote is actually the charts, the slides don't allow for

0:21:52.253 --> 0:21:56.453
<v Speaker 2>you know, decimal points. So our recall vote was actually

0:21:56.573 --> 0:22:01.853
<v Speaker 2>forty nine point five for Biden to forty six, which

0:22:01.893 --> 0:22:04.813
<v Speaker 2>is a little less than the official popular vote margin

0:22:05.173 --> 0:22:09.573
<v Speaker 2>he won by, but not much. So that told hold

0:22:09.653 --> 0:22:13.173
<v Speaker 2>us whatever else might not be, you know, kosher with

0:22:13.213 --> 0:22:16.413
<v Speaker 2>this poll. Perhaps we'll find out. Then over the next

0:22:16.453 --> 0:22:19.613
<v Speaker 2>couple of days, we do have a group that does

0:22:20.213 --> 0:22:25.053
<v Speaker 2>those who voted last time are an accurate reflection of

0:22:25.093 --> 0:22:28.053
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty. And then of course, you know you've talked

0:22:28.053 --> 0:22:30.453
<v Speaker 2>to all the new voters and see what they're thinking

0:22:30.653 --> 0:22:31.733
<v Speaker 2>and put that all together.

0:22:32.853 --> 0:22:37.253
<v Speaker 3>Okay, One that intrigues me that I hadn't seen anywhere else,

0:22:37.853 --> 0:22:41.453
<v Speaker 3>and that is new voter's choice. And the margin is considerable.

0:22:41.733 --> 0:22:47.093
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's sixteen points, which is you know, new voters

0:22:47.133 --> 0:22:50.693
<v Speaker 2>are about seven percent. There's about six or seven percent

0:22:50.733 --> 0:22:54.013
<v Speaker 2>who have voted before, but not that often, not that regular.

0:22:54.053 --> 0:22:57.133
<v Speaker 2>And then you've got seven percent who have never voted before.

0:22:57.133 --> 0:22:59.773
<v Speaker 2>And they're not all young people, most of them are,

0:22:59.893 --> 0:23:01.853
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of them have folks who just just

0:23:01.893 --> 0:23:04.933
<v Speaker 2>weren't interested in many and they're even registered to vote.

0:23:06.573 --> 0:23:10.293
<v Speaker 2>So that is what that's obviously it's a very positive

0:23:10.293 --> 0:23:16.773
<v Speaker 2>sign for Trump. But what it tells us, or reminds us,

0:23:17.533 --> 0:23:22.573
<v Speaker 2>is of Trump's appeal beyond the traditional Republican conservative voter,

0:23:23.573 --> 0:23:27.693
<v Speaker 2>of whom there are simply no longer a sufficient number

0:23:27.733 --> 0:23:34.533
<v Speaker 2>to win a national election. And Trump has for the

0:23:34.533 --> 0:23:39.333
<v Speaker 2>third time running, perhaps most expertly this time, will see

0:23:40.013 --> 0:23:43.653
<v Speaker 2>he has been able to his campaigns have been able

0:23:43.693 --> 0:23:52.853
<v Speaker 2>to identify, reach, persuade, motivate Americans who stopped voting ten

0:23:52.893 --> 0:23:58.213
<v Speaker 2>twenty years ago, who never voted, or, counterintuitively to many

0:23:58.333 --> 0:24:02.773
<v Speaker 2>this time in twenty four are only just approaching their

0:24:03.053 --> 0:24:07.213
<v Speaker 2>first opportunity to vote. And he is doing. You know,

0:24:07.253 --> 0:24:12.213
<v Speaker 2>his support among eighteen to twenty nine year olds, sort

0:24:12.253 --> 0:24:18.253
<v Speaker 2>of your zoomers, is in the forties now, whereas last

0:24:18.253 --> 0:24:22.853
<v Speaker 2>time that age group he was in the high teens. Right,

0:24:23.293 --> 0:24:26.933
<v Speaker 2>So that's all going very well. And of course that

0:24:27.413 --> 0:24:29.733
<v Speaker 2>a lot of those folks, some of them have voted before,

0:24:29.773 --> 0:24:34.293
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of them haven't. And so these those

0:24:34.493 --> 0:24:37.213
<v Speaker 2>the new voters and the occasional voters are what in

0:24:37.253 --> 0:24:42.333
<v Speaker 2>the polling business you call low propensity voters, and when

0:24:42.453 --> 0:24:45.453
<v Speaker 2>so many elections pliculing in America are about turnout rather

0:24:45.493 --> 0:24:49.293
<v Speaker 2>than persuasion, certainly in the latter stages, and with the

0:24:49.973 --> 0:24:54.693
<v Speaker 2>partisan divide so strong and so set so sort of

0:24:54.693 --> 0:25:00.293
<v Speaker 2>in the cement, whichever side can identify and reach and

0:25:00.413 --> 0:25:05.133
<v Speaker 2>motivate low propensity voters is almost certainly going to win.

0:25:05.853 --> 0:25:08.373
<v Speaker 2>And it was part of the secret source of a

0:25:08.373 --> 0:25:11.333
<v Speaker 2>lot of a secret source of all those unexpected mail

0:25:11.373 --> 0:25:13.893
<v Speaker 2>in ballots the Democrats of twenty twenty. Many of the

0:25:13.933 --> 0:25:16.293
<v Speaker 2>people whose names at least were on those ballots had

0:25:16.333 --> 0:25:18.453
<v Speaker 2>never voted before, or hadn't voted for a long time,

0:25:18.693 --> 0:25:20.293
<v Speaker 2>and even some of them, many of them didn't even

0:25:20.293 --> 0:25:24.693
<v Speaker 2>know they voted in twenty twenty. But this time the

0:25:24.933 --> 0:25:30.133
<v Speaker 2>Trump campaign recognized from the get go that this was

0:25:30.173 --> 0:25:33.453
<v Speaker 2>how they could potentially turn an absolute squeaker They might win,

0:25:33.493 --> 0:25:36.613
<v Speaker 2>they might not to have a coin toss election into

0:25:36.653 --> 0:25:40.253
<v Speaker 2>one that gave them a greater chance of victory likelihood

0:25:40.293 --> 0:25:44.773
<v Speaker 2>of victory. And so most of their outreach they're knocking

0:25:44.813 --> 0:25:47.853
<v Speaker 2>on doors and text messages and all that kind of thing,

0:25:48.573 --> 0:25:53.093
<v Speaker 2>has been to identify people who they think, for one

0:25:53.133 --> 0:25:57.133
<v Speaker 2>reason or another, would be inclined to support them, many

0:25:57.133 --> 0:26:02.333
<v Speaker 2>of them former Democrats, many of them independents, and get

0:26:02.413 --> 0:26:05.053
<v Speaker 2>enough of them out to make a difference. And whether

0:26:05.093 --> 0:26:07.453
<v Speaker 2>he wins the election or not, they've certainly made a

0:26:07.533 --> 0:26:09.653
<v Speaker 2>substantial out of progress in that direction.

0:26:10.133 --> 0:26:15.213
<v Speaker 3>So the expected winner, yes, is based on anything else

0:26:15.413 --> 0:26:17.733
<v Speaker 3>other than the results you got in this.

0:26:18.613 --> 0:26:21.533
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, it's I can. I mean, if you

0:26:22.013 --> 0:26:24.093
<v Speaker 2>have the time, I can explain to you why we

0:26:24.533 --> 0:26:26.093
<v Speaker 2>asked these sort of crazy questions.

0:26:27.053 --> 0:26:28.613
<v Speaker 3>I'll leave that to you whether you want to do it.

0:26:30.693 --> 0:26:34.253
<v Speaker 2>Give me enough rope to hang myself if I forget,

0:26:34.293 --> 0:26:38.453
<v Speaker 2>to thank you later. So that is one of the

0:26:38.493 --> 0:26:43.613
<v Speaker 2>ways that we attempt to tease out how people are

0:26:43.653 --> 0:26:46.493
<v Speaker 2>really thinking and how strong their support is for one

0:26:46.533 --> 0:26:50.373
<v Speaker 2>candidate or another. Because one of the tricks we learned,

0:26:50.813 --> 0:26:53.213
<v Speaker 2>you know, our first so let's say our only, but

0:26:53.453 --> 0:26:56.133
<v Speaker 2>our only claims to fame in the polling world, was

0:26:56.173 --> 0:26:58.973
<v Speaker 2>that we nailed the Brexit vote in the UK at

0:26:58.973 --> 0:27:01.573
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen, right. And one of the ways we were

0:27:01.613 --> 0:27:05.733
<v Speaker 2>able to do that and then identify mostly successfully the

0:27:05.773 --> 0:27:09.773
<v Speaker 2>Trump vote in America ever since is getting our arms

0:27:09.813 --> 0:27:14.373
<v Speaker 2>around the shy Brexit voter, the shy Trump voter h

0:27:14.973 --> 0:27:17.733
<v Speaker 2>and one of the ways we figured out you could

0:27:17.733 --> 0:27:21.253
<v Speaker 2>do that was when you had these sort of disproportionate

0:27:21.333 --> 0:27:24.813
<v Speaker 2>number of undecided voters who clearly, based on their answers

0:27:24.813 --> 0:27:28.653
<v Speaker 2>to other questions, were sympathetic to Brexit or tremble whoever,

0:27:28.653 --> 0:27:31.653
<v Speaker 2>whatever the cause or person may be, but wouldn't but

0:27:31.693 --> 0:27:35.053
<v Speaker 2>put said and maintain they were undecided if you ask,

0:27:35.133 --> 0:27:37.453
<v Speaker 2>It turns out if you ask them questions not about

0:27:37.493 --> 0:27:43.053
<v Speaker 2>themselves but about others, they are far more likely to

0:27:43.053 --> 0:27:47.373
<v Speaker 2>to indirectly indicate to you what they plan on doing. So, yeah,

0:27:47.413 --> 0:27:50.093
<v Speaker 2>so you ask them about their neighbor, you ask them

0:27:50.133 --> 0:27:53.333
<v Speaker 2>about their friends, their relatives, their wife, the people they

0:27:53.333 --> 0:27:56.533
<v Speaker 2>work with, or you asked them and or you ask

0:27:56.653 --> 0:28:00.373
<v Speaker 2>them so you know you're undecided. No one knows what's

0:28:00.373 --> 0:28:01.613
<v Speaker 2>gonna happen. Who do you think is going to win?

0:28:01.933 --> 0:28:03.653
<v Speaker 2>And it's amazing how many of these people have a

0:28:03.653 --> 0:28:06.813
<v Speaker 2>really strong opinion about it's going to win. And so

0:28:07.733 --> 0:28:09.773
<v Speaker 2>it's another part that have signed for Trump fifty three

0:28:09.893 --> 0:28:13.813
<v Speaker 2>forty six. It's a greater margin then you find in

0:28:13.853 --> 0:28:16.373
<v Speaker 2>this exit poll, or we always find there's a greater

0:28:16.493 --> 0:28:18.693
<v Speaker 2>margin a few points. You know, if we find a

0:28:18.933 --> 0:28:20.573
<v Speaker 2>we do a poll with most of our polls have

0:28:20.653 --> 0:28:24.093
<v Speaker 2>been recently nationally Trump up by two or three. You

0:28:24.213 --> 0:28:25.933
<v Speaker 2>ask the question about who you think's going to win,

0:28:26.653 --> 0:28:29.133
<v Speaker 2>or who your neighbors voting for, and you get Trump

0:28:29.213 --> 0:28:32.973
<v Speaker 2>up by four or six or eight. Uh, it always

0:28:33.053 --> 0:28:37.333
<v Speaker 2>goes in that direction. And what I think when we

0:28:37.373 --> 0:28:41.693
<v Speaker 2>think from our polls, we've been able to demonstrate that,

0:28:42.413 --> 0:28:45.213
<v Speaker 2>you know, that does tell you something. But if you

0:28:45.293 --> 0:28:49.013
<v Speaker 2>simply think about Trump's performance, this will be his third election,

0:28:49.533 --> 0:28:53.613
<v Speaker 2>whether it's primaries, caucuses, or general elections, whether he wins, loses,

0:28:53.653 --> 0:28:57.893
<v Speaker 2>whatever he does, he nearly always out votes his polling,

0:28:57.973 --> 0:29:00.653
<v Speaker 2>whether it's a point five points, you know, he just

0:29:01.893 --> 0:29:05.933
<v Speaker 2>the poll Most posters underestimate Trump. I mean, it's just

0:29:05.973 --> 0:29:08.853
<v Speaker 2>a fact. And obviously one of the key ess this

0:29:08.973 --> 0:29:12.453
<v Speaker 2>time is is that going to happen again? And I

0:29:12.493 --> 0:29:14.413
<v Speaker 2>have suspected it would. I didn't know, you know, you

0:29:14.413 --> 0:29:18.453
<v Speaker 2>don't know to how to what degree, But it's, uh,

0:29:18.533 --> 0:29:20.453
<v Speaker 2>that's what I've always said. And again, over the next

0:29:20.533 --> 0:29:23.093
<v Speaker 2>number of hours and days, I maybe be proven completely wrong.

0:29:23.373 --> 0:29:25.733
<v Speaker 2>But I've been saying all year to people that the

0:29:25.893 --> 0:29:30.293
<v Speaker 2>narrow lead that we've been finding consistently for Trump, we

0:29:30.573 --> 0:29:33.373
<v Speaker 2>obviously we could be wrong. But if we are wrong

0:29:33.733 --> 0:29:35.253
<v Speaker 2>and you ask you put a gun to my head,

0:29:35.253 --> 0:29:39.573
<v Speaker 2>I'd say we are underestimating his vote rather than overestimating

0:29:39.613 --> 0:29:42.253
<v Speaker 2>his vote, you know, to be you know, I don't

0:29:42.253 --> 0:29:44.413
<v Speaker 2>know whether I'll be proven right or not, but this

0:29:44.653 --> 0:29:47.653
<v Speaker 2>kind of a result on the exit poll suggests there

0:29:47.733 --> 0:29:52.133
<v Speaker 2>might be something to my guess.

0:29:53.413 --> 0:29:57.253
<v Speaker 3>Is there anything anything else apart from the any anything

0:29:57.293 --> 0:30:01.813
<v Speaker 3>personal that you would like to throw into this conversation

0:30:02.013 --> 0:30:08.053
<v Speaker 3>briefly checking the time? Ah, about how you think it's

0:30:08.093 --> 0:30:12.093
<v Speaker 3>kind of now, or anything that's out of order, or

0:30:12.133 --> 0:30:14.893
<v Speaker 3>any any election day surprise.

0:30:16.293 --> 0:30:22.893
<v Speaker 2>Right, Well, intellectually, my own judgments of what will happen

0:30:22.933 --> 0:30:25.493
<v Speaker 2>are based I mean, obviously I'm a greg proponent of polling,

0:30:25.573 --> 0:30:28.973
<v Speaker 2>but polling can be wrong, and polling isn't everything, And

0:30:29.493 --> 0:30:31.853
<v Speaker 2>there are all kinds of other dozens of other metrics,

0:30:31.853 --> 0:30:35.973
<v Speaker 2>some empirical, some anecdotal, which historically have are is that

0:30:36.053 --> 0:30:39.053
<v Speaker 2>proven as accurate or even more accurate than polling? So

0:30:39.173 --> 0:30:42.613
<v Speaker 2>my brain, you know, I try to get my intellectual

0:30:42.693 --> 0:30:46.373
<v Speaker 2>arms around all of that. And as a consequence of that,

0:30:46.613 --> 0:30:50.093
<v Speaker 2>all year my brain has told me this is Trump's

0:30:50.813 --> 0:30:54.373
<v Speaker 2>election to lose. Could he lose it? Yes? Will you

0:30:54.573 --> 0:30:58.293
<v Speaker 2>lose it. I don't think so. I think probably not. Okay,

0:30:58.453 --> 0:31:02.333
<v Speaker 2>that's where my brain has been. But for since the summer,

0:31:03.453 --> 0:31:08.573
<v Speaker 2>my intuition, my gut has been on a sort of

0:31:08.573 --> 0:31:11.613
<v Speaker 2>of its own. Now, therefore, I sort of when they're

0:31:11.613 --> 0:31:13.493
<v Speaker 2>the same, you know how other people are and how

0:31:13.533 --> 0:31:16.293
<v Speaker 2>you are latent, When you're braking your intuition are in sync,

0:31:16.493 --> 0:31:18.573
<v Speaker 2>you sort of feel confident whatever that is. Even if

0:31:18.573 --> 0:31:19.893
<v Speaker 2>it's bad views do you think at least you can

0:31:19.893 --> 0:31:22.573
<v Speaker 2>face it. But when when they're not quite in sync,

0:31:22.613 --> 0:31:26.933
<v Speaker 2>you start questioning both. But what my intuition has been

0:31:26.973 --> 0:31:28.733
<v Speaker 2>telling me for a couple of months, and I've mentioned

0:31:28.733 --> 0:31:32.253
<v Speaker 2>this to anyone you know unwise enough to ask, is

0:31:32.293 --> 0:31:38.333
<v Speaker 2>that although you can't expect it these days, I've just

0:31:38.413 --> 0:31:41.573
<v Speaker 2>had this nagging feeling that this thing could get blown

0:31:41.613 --> 0:31:44.173
<v Speaker 2>wide open and it could end up being trumped quite

0:31:44.213 --> 0:31:45.413
<v Speaker 2>by quite a big margin.

0:31:46.533 --> 0:31:47.453
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to the club.

0:31:47.573 --> 0:31:50.573
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, and now, of course you know you have

0:31:50.613 --> 0:31:53.413
<v Speaker 2>to check yourself one because I have to sort of

0:31:53.813 --> 0:31:56.453
<v Speaker 2>people ask me to speak to the numbers. But also

0:31:56.733 --> 0:31:59.893
<v Speaker 2>you know, you want's own personal bias and all of that.

0:32:00.213 --> 0:32:03.173
<v Speaker 2>But it's not a not a sense I had a

0:32:03.253 --> 0:32:05.693
<v Speaker 2>year ago or two years ago, before the last election,

0:32:05.813 --> 0:32:09.013
<v Speaker 2>or before the one before that. This just and I'm

0:32:09.013 --> 0:32:10.693
<v Speaker 2>certainly not the first person to think or to say

0:32:10.733 --> 0:32:14.173
<v Speaker 2>this out loud, but the election itself has a lot

0:32:14.213 --> 0:32:16.573
<v Speaker 2>of echoes. For those of us old enough to remember,

0:32:16.653 --> 0:32:19.613
<v Speaker 2>you might be late. And I'm not sure the nineteen

0:32:19.653 --> 0:32:25.533
<v Speaker 2>eighty Carter Reagan race, where all of the kind of

0:32:25.893 --> 0:32:32.213
<v Speaker 2>basic metrics were favored Reagan, but in terms of the

0:32:32.533 --> 0:32:36.493
<v Speaker 2>conventional wisdom and the much faded polls of where they

0:32:36.493 --> 0:32:39.853
<v Speaker 2>were much far fewer then, they never really had him

0:32:39.853 --> 0:32:43.653
<v Speaker 2>in a great position. It was competitive, but Carter was

0:32:43.733 --> 0:32:45.373
<v Speaker 2>up a lot, and then he be up and this

0:32:45.453 --> 0:32:48.893
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing, and then it all broke for Reagan

0:32:48.933 --> 0:32:52.133
<v Speaker 2>at the end. And I think it's less that there

0:32:52.173 --> 0:32:54.213
<v Speaker 2>were specific I mean, Bragan had a great debate and

0:32:54.253 --> 0:32:56.053
<v Speaker 2>things like that, but I think it was less that

0:32:56.133 --> 0:32:58.493
<v Speaker 2>and more that it was always going that way, but

0:32:58.573 --> 0:33:01.533
<v Speaker 2>it was hidden, you know, it was sort of under

0:33:01.573 --> 0:33:05.773
<v Speaker 2>the radar stuff. And Reagan wins up winning by nine

0:33:05.773 --> 0:33:07.893
<v Speaker 2>points in a race that the experts said would be

0:33:07.933 --> 0:33:10.453
<v Speaker 2>one or two points either way, right, And it just

0:33:11.053 --> 0:33:14.413
<v Speaker 2>it feels like that, it has felt like that. But

0:33:14.653 --> 0:33:17.293
<v Speaker 2>you know, every other every day there's another media pole

0:33:17.373 --> 0:33:20.493
<v Speaker 2>saying Kamala is up by two, or this swing state

0:33:20.693 --> 0:33:23.373
<v Speaker 2>is you know, within a decimal point, and all the

0:33:23.373 --> 0:33:27.733
<v Speaker 2>rest of it, and the crazy posters like me, we

0:33:27.813 --> 0:33:31.693
<v Speaker 2>have our results that suggest, you know, it's advantage Trump,

0:33:32.653 --> 0:33:35.653
<v Speaker 2>which i've you know, maintained it is up to this,

0:33:35.773 --> 0:33:38.133
<v Speaker 2>up to this brain minute, and the exit pole, I think,

0:33:38.573 --> 0:33:40.853
<v Speaker 2>you know, gives me more more reason to do that.

0:33:40.893 --> 0:33:44.733
<v Speaker 2>But I'm looking at this exit pole and there's nothing

0:33:44.813 --> 0:33:50.093
<v Speaker 2>in it that screams landslide except for the question. We've

0:33:50.133 --> 0:33:53.013
<v Speaker 2>just been discussing the expected winner, which I found, you know,

0:33:53.093 --> 0:33:56.693
<v Speaker 2>one of the more useful over the years in different contexts.

0:33:56.733 --> 0:34:01.573
<v Speaker 2>So again, you know, if she wins big, I'll have

0:34:01.813 --> 0:34:04.973
<v Speaker 2>missed both both my brain and my intuition will have missed.

0:34:05.653 --> 0:34:09.493
<v Speaker 2>But that's my quasi personal take on the evening. And

0:34:09.533 --> 0:34:12.413
<v Speaker 2>what that means, of course, is that I wouldn't be

0:34:12.413 --> 0:34:15.453
<v Speaker 2>at all surprise surprised, will be shocked, I should say,

0:34:15.693 --> 0:34:19.373
<v Speaker 2>be pleasantly surprised, you know, if he wins these blue

0:34:19.413 --> 0:34:23.733
<v Speaker 2>states like Virginia and New Mexico and Minnesota and New Hampshire.

0:34:25.133 --> 0:34:28.533
<v Speaker 2>And that's why, well it is in the American context,

0:34:28.933 --> 0:34:32.333
<v Speaker 2>if it's an absolute blowout. If my intuition is right,

0:34:32.933 --> 0:34:36.773
<v Speaker 2>then we'll know quite early because the Virginia's New Hampshire's

0:34:37.213 --> 0:34:41.413
<v Speaker 2>are on these coast and Virginia's one of the for

0:34:41.493 --> 0:34:44.213
<v Speaker 2>actually Virginia's closing just around now. They'll start doing the

0:34:45.813 --> 0:34:49.813
<v Speaker 2>start doing the early vote counts. But you know, but

0:34:49.893 --> 0:34:51.853
<v Speaker 2>if they go as they tould, as they have gone

0:34:51.853 --> 0:34:56.373
<v Speaker 2>in recent elections, then we'll be waiting for others. But yeah,

0:34:56.373 --> 0:35:00.573
<v Speaker 2>there's just it just feels it feels that way. I mean,

0:35:00.613 --> 0:35:04.933
<v Speaker 2>there's a number of people commenting today, some famous, some

0:35:05.093 --> 0:35:07.493
<v Speaker 2>not famous, who've all been i mean, on the on

0:35:07.533 --> 0:35:10.533
<v Speaker 2>the not the Trump campaign, but they're on the Trump side,

0:35:10.813 --> 0:35:13.133
<v Speaker 2>Trump's side pretty much wishing to win. And they've all

0:35:13.173 --> 0:35:15.813
<v Speaker 2>made the same point, which is, whether they're thirty years

0:35:15.853 --> 0:35:18.093
<v Speaker 2>old or sixty years old, they can't quite remember the

0:35:18.173 --> 0:35:21.853
<v Speaker 2>last time that everything seemed to be lined up for

0:35:21.893 --> 0:35:24.773
<v Speaker 2>the Republican to win, except for the fact half the

0:35:24.853 --> 0:35:28.413
<v Speaker 2>pole say you might lose, you know, So it's I

0:35:28.453 --> 0:35:31.093
<v Speaker 2>think it's on one side of the aisle at least.

0:35:31.453 --> 0:35:36.733
<v Speaker 2>It's a fairly common theme that what one's seeing and

0:35:36.813 --> 0:35:39.813
<v Speaker 2>reading and hearing is from you know, you might say

0:35:41.133 --> 0:35:46.253
<v Speaker 2>official sources doesn't quite gel with the how how it

0:35:46.293 --> 0:35:47.053
<v Speaker 2>all smells? You know?

0:35:47.413 --> 0:35:53.093
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just got a message in the top right corner,

0:35:54.613 --> 0:35:57.533
<v Speaker 3>as you do. And all I got all I got

0:35:57.533 --> 0:36:00.813
<v Speaker 3>off it before it disappeared was Trump projected to win

0:36:00.973 --> 0:36:04.973
<v Speaker 3>in Kentucky and great. A couple of others followed. I

0:36:05.013 --> 0:36:09.333
<v Speaker 3>think anyway, I can't exist it. Look, I'm going to

0:36:09.413 --> 0:36:11.573
<v Speaker 3>let you go because I know you have other obligations.

0:36:11.613 --> 0:36:14.213
<v Speaker 3>I have a challenge for you, if there is, if

0:36:14.253 --> 0:36:18.573
<v Speaker 3>there is a good reason, shall we reconvene tomorrow for

0:36:18.653 --> 0:36:21.453
<v Speaker 3>something that's never been done before on this podcast, and

0:36:21.493 --> 0:36:23.973
<v Speaker 3>that is to do a follow up?

0:36:24.333 --> 0:36:26.693
<v Speaker 2>No, absolutely, if there if there is good reason, and

0:36:26.773 --> 0:36:27.893
<v Speaker 2>then we should do that.

0:36:28.013 --> 0:36:31.293
<v Speaker 3>I will be enthusiastic if you if you don't answer

0:36:31.373 --> 0:36:33.213
<v Speaker 3>your phone, I'll know that you didn't agree with me

0:36:33.373 --> 0:36:34.173
<v Speaker 3>on the good reason.

0:36:35.453 --> 0:36:38.733
<v Speaker 2>No, it probably means that I finally I've just involuntarily

0:36:38.773 --> 0:36:42.413
<v Speaker 2>fallen asleep. But I don't know there's much chance of

0:36:42.493 --> 0:36:44.213
<v Speaker 2>that anyway.

0:36:44.653 --> 0:36:48.413
<v Speaker 3>As always, you're most generous. Let you go, and just

0:36:48.493 --> 0:36:51.133
<v Speaker 3>be aware that you are much valued.

0:36:51.293 --> 0:36:53.533
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you're most kindly. Always a pleasure.

0:37:04.853 --> 0:37:09.293
<v Speaker 3>Levericks is an antihistamine made in Switzerland to the highest quality.

0:37:09.493 --> 0:37:13.373
<v Speaker 3>Leverix relieves hay fever and skin allergies or itchy skin.

0:37:13.853 --> 0:37:18.133
<v Speaker 3>It's a dual action antihistamine and has a unique nasal

0:37:18.373 --> 0:37:23.013
<v Speaker 3>decongestant action. It's fast acting for fast relief and it

0:37:23.053 --> 0:37:26.173
<v Speaker 3>works in under an hour and lasts for over twenty

0:37:26.213 --> 0:37:30.013
<v Speaker 3>four hours. Leverrix is a tiny tablet that unblocks the nose,

0:37:30.333 --> 0:37:34.213
<v Speaker 3>deals with itchy eyes, and stops sneezing. Leverix is an

0:37:34.253 --> 0:37:38.613
<v Speaker 3>antihistamine made in Switzerland to the highest quality. So next

0:37:38.613 --> 0:37:42.133
<v Speaker 3>time you're in need of an effective antihistamine, call into

0:37:42.213 --> 0:37:46.813
<v Speaker 3>the pharmacy and ask for Leverx l e v Rix

0:37:47.293 --> 0:37:50.693
<v Speaker 3>Leverrix and always read the label. Take as directed and

0:37:50.813 --> 0:37:54.973
<v Speaker 3>if symptoms persist, see your health professional. Farmer Broker Auckland.

0:38:00.653 --> 0:38:06.173
<v Speaker 3>Nigel Bigar CBE is Regius Professor Emeritus of Moral Theology

0:38:06.373 --> 0:38:09.173
<v Speaker 3>the University of Oxford, is Chairman of the Board of

0:38:09.173 --> 0:38:12.773
<v Speaker 3>the Free Speech Union, one of Prospects magazines twenty five

0:38:12.973 --> 0:38:16.853
<v Speaker 3>Top Thinkers of twenty twenty four, and author of the

0:38:16.893 --> 0:38:23.293
<v Speaker 3>best selling Colonialism, A Moral Reckoning. Out of those four lines,

0:38:23.493 --> 0:38:29.693
<v Speaker 3>I could drive this interview with multiple feed off questions. Nigel,

0:38:29.853 --> 0:38:31.733
<v Speaker 3>great to have you in New Zealand. I've been looking

0:38:31.733 --> 0:38:35.453
<v Speaker 3>forward to your arrival. You are an impressive man, a

0:38:35.573 --> 0:38:39.373
<v Speaker 3>very impressive thinker, and even if one doesn't agree with you,

0:38:39.373 --> 0:38:43.333
<v Speaker 3>you have very persuasive powers. Welcome to the lesiond Welcome

0:38:43.333 --> 0:38:43.973
<v Speaker 3>to the country.

0:38:45.173 --> 0:38:47.773
<v Speaker 4>Glad to be here. I've been in New Zealand for

0:38:47.813 --> 0:38:49.173
<v Speaker 4>about twelve hours and I'm joining it.

0:38:49.253 --> 0:38:52.293
<v Speaker 3>So far terrific. I want to quote you a few

0:38:52.333 --> 0:38:56.213
<v Speaker 3>things and then ask you a question. Following the academic

0:38:56.213 --> 0:38:59.493
<v Speaker 3>freedom report by doctor James Kiersted from the New Zealand

0:38:59.533 --> 0:39:04.813
<v Speaker 3>Initiative shows many experiences of academics self censoring. He was

0:39:04.853 --> 0:39:08.293
<v Speaker 3>even closer than the initiative because he was a prefarre

0:39:08.733 --> 0:39:12.533
<v Speaker 3>lecturer at the university for a number of years. University

0:39:12.533 --> 0:39:16.893
<v Speaker 3>of Auckland's flawed policy on academic freedom took four years

0:39:16.933 --> 0:39:21.293
<v Speaker 3>to draft, only for academics to rightly reject it. Damning

0:39:21.373 --> 0:39:25.773
<v Speaker 3>results at the aut Law Society staff survey and a

0:39:25.853 --> 0:39:31.493
<v Speaker 3>professor's equally damning response Massi University's staff survey results more

0:39:31.533 --> 0:39:35.573
<v Speaker 3>evidence of self censorship at university and finally, for the

0:39:35.613 --> 0:39:39.493
<v Speaker 3>moment at least, back in May, Victoria University three speech

0:39:39.533 --> 0:39:45.693
<v Speaker 3>panel discussion was postponed due to backlash. So there's just one, two, three, four,

0:39:45.813 --> 0:39:50.773
<v Speaker 3>five things that have happened at universities in the very

0:39:50.853 --> 0:39:55.653
<v Speaker 3>recent well in the immediate past. Nigel, simple question. I

0:39:55.693 --> 0:39:58.853
<v Speaker 3>think you grew up in a democracy. I was born

0:39:58.853 --> 0:40:01.813
<v Speaker 3>in a democracy. We've both grown up and we know

0:40:01.813 --> 0:40:05.413
<v Speaker 3>what democracy is all about. What has happened that what

0:40:05.453 --> 0:40:08.613
<v Speaker 3>I've just quoted you is in play at the moment

0:40:08.813 --> 0:40:13.973
<v Speaker 3>in this country, Australia, Britain, America, Canada, all the Anglo

0:40:14.053 --> 0:40:16.893
<v Speaker 3>speaking world. What's happened? How did it get here?

0:40:18.013 --> 0:40:21.653
<v Speaker 4>That's a great and important question, Lathon. Then you're quite right.

0:40:22.173 --> 0:40:27.293
<v Speaker 4>When I first fell into trouble over my views on

0:40:27.493 --> 0:40:31.293
<v Speaker 4>Colonel History in twenty seventeen, I had no idea there

0:40:31.293 --> 0:40:34.693
<v Speaker 4>was a problem. I was accustomed to speaking my mind

0:40:35.413 --> 0:40:38.493
<v Speaker 4>and I try and do so reasonably, but I wasn't

0:40:38.533 --> 0:40:42.253
<v Speaker 4>aware that anyone would try and shut me down. So

0:40:42.973 --> 0:40:48.013
<v Speaker 4>what's happened a number of different things. You certainly have

0:40:49.173 --> 0:40:55.133
<v Speaker 4>the emergence of, I think a minority of very zealous

0:40:55.493 --> 0:41:00.613
<v Speaker 4>progressive folk who have dogmatic views on gender, dogmatic views

0:41:00.653 --> 0:41:03.973
<v Speaker 4>on the extent to which we're racist, and dogmatic views

0:41:04.013 --> 0:41:12.373
<v Speaker 4>on how bad, how relentlessly colonial government was, so you

0:41:12.453 --> 0:41:14.893
<v Speaker 4>have the zealous. Then, as I've discovered, you have a

0:41:14.933 --> 0:41:20.213
<v Speaker 4>majority of people in universities, both students and professors, who

0:41:20.613 --> 0:41:23.733
<v Speaker 4>don't know much about the issues, just want to get

0:41:23.773 --> 0:41:28.653
<v Speaker 4>on with their careers and their lives conflict averse and

0:41:28.813 --> 0:41:32.373
<v Speaker 4>have failed, I think, have failed to understand how much

0:41:32.453 --> 0:41:36.453
<v Speaker 4>is at stake here. And then, most presently of all,

0:41:36.493 --> 0:41:41.973
<v Speaker 4>you've got university administrations run by apparently grown ups who

0:41:42.573 --> 0:41:47.293
<v Speaker 4>twenty years ago would have been quite firm in telling

0:41:47.373 --> 0:41:50.813
<v Speaker 4>let's say, agree to students, we feel your pain, but

0:41:50.893 --> 0:41:55.693
<v Speaker 4>I'm afraid you don't get to evade points of view

0:41:55.733 --> 0:41:58.613
<v Speaker 4>you don't like. And that's changed. And I think it's

0:41:58.613 --> 0:42:02.333
<v Speaker 4>the behavior of institutions and authorities at the top that

0:42:02.533 --> 0:42:06.373
<v Speaker 4>is most decisive and most troubling. Why have they changed

0:42:06.373 --> 0:42:10.373
<v Speaker 4>their behavior, Well, some of them have absorbed and critically

0:42:11.133 --> 0:42:14.693
<v Speaker 4>notions like the only virtue is compassion, the only virtue

0:42:14.773 --> 0:42:17.213
<v Speaker 4>is kindness, and we must do all we can to

0:42:17.293 --> 0:42:24.653
<v Speaker 4>avoid upsetting young people, especially members of supposedly marginalized or

0:42:25.853 --> 0:42:30.293
<v Speaker 4>victimized groups. Historically, so that's that's certain ideas have got

0:42:30.293 --> 0:42:34.093
<v Speaker 4>into the bloodstream of culture, and those who lead us

0:42:35.013 --> 0:42:38.253
<v Speaker 4>have absorbed those ideas. But there's also the fact that

0:42:38.373 --> 0:42:44.093
<v Speaker 4>universities are businesses and highly competitive businesses, and they are

0:42:44.573 --> 0:42:48.253
<v Speaker 4>desperate to retain market share and attract students and to

0:42:48.373 --> 0:42:53.413
<v Speaker 4>keep donors on side. And if they perceive that certain

0:42:53.533 --> 0:43:00.373
<v Speaker 4>views are going to disturb potential customers or disturb potential donors,

0:43:00.533 --> 0:43:04.013
<v Speaker 4>they will quickly clamp down on those ideas. So I

0:43:04.053 --> 0:43:06.693
<v Speaker 4>think it's a number of different factors that have brought

0:43:06.773 --> 0:43:10.013
<v Speaker 4>us here. So there's there are They questioned later was

0:43:10.013 --> 0:43:11.973
<v Speaker 4>a simple one, but the answer is a bit more complicated.

0:43:12.533 --> 0:43:15.333
<v Speaker 3>Well, it needs to be complicated because it seems simple,

0:43:15.573 --> 0:43:17.813
<v Speaker 3>and to get a decent answer, it has to come

0:43:17.853 --> 0:43:21.253
<v Speaker 3>out as you've described it. Now you talk, you talk

0:43:21.253 --> 0:43:25.973
<v Speaker 3>about universities and competition. Does that where does that place

0:43:26.173 --> 0:43:29.053
<v Speaker 3>universities on the free market ticket?

0:43:29.533 --> 0:43:31.933
<v Speaker 4>You know, I'm sixty nine years old later, and so

0:43:32.013 --> 0:43:34.573
<v Speaker 4>when I was to university in the nineteen seventies in Britain,

0:43:35.333 --> 0:43:38.453
<v Speaker 4>I think about twelve percent of every generation at university.

0:43:38.453 --> 0:43:41.773
<v Speaker 4>Then it was very late, but with twelve percent of

0:43:41.773 --> 0:43:45.493
<v Speaker 4>the university of the each co op going to university,

0:43:45.933 --> 0:43:50.613
<v Speaker 4>the States could afford to fund my education. So I

0:43:50.613 --> 0:43:52.653
<v Speaker 4>don't think. I don't think my parents paid much at all.

0:43:53.533 --> 0:43:58.733
<v Speaker 4>But then around before the end of the twentieth century, governments,

0:43:59.653 --> 0:44:05.973
<v Speaker 4>certainly in Britain and elsewhere, decided to expand university sector enormously,

0:44:06.013 --> 0:44:09.493
<v Speaker 4>so that now in Britain it's some between forty and

0:44:09.493 --> 0:44:13.813
<v Speaker 4>fifty percent of every generation goes to university. Well, the

0:44:13.853 --> 0:44:17.653
<v Speaker 4>state couldn't afford to fundel that directly, so they developed

0:44:17.653 --> 0:44:23.253
<v Speaker 4>a business model which partly involves partly involved students paying fees.

0:44:24.333 --> 0:44:28.053
<v Speaker 4>It also involves New Zealand and Australia numbers very well.

0:44:28.573 --> 0:44:34.413
<v Speaker 4>It involves attracting overseas students, not least from China, to

0:44:34.453 --> 0:44:37.613
<v Speaker 4>come to our universities. But the unity depends on overseas

0:44:37.613 --> 0:44:41.093
<v Speaker 4>students heavily, and they certainly depend on student fees. So

0:44:41.373 --> 0:44:45.773
<v Speaker 4>in international rankings of universities, one of the categories is

0:44:45.773 --> 0:44:50.613
<v Speaker 4>now student experience. Now that didn't appear twenty thirty years ago.

0:44:51.013 --> 0:44:54.333
<v Speaker 4>And you know, I'm all for students being aware of

0:44:55.133 --> 0:44:59.853
<v Speaker 4>excuse me, of universities being aware of how students are

0:45:00.333 --> 0:45:06.093
<v Speaker 4>experiencing their university because frankly, during my undergraduate career fifty

0:45:06.173 --> 0:45:11.293
<v Speaker 4>years ago, I wasn't taught very well. Frankly, So universities

0:45:11.373 --> 0:45:13.213
<v Speaker 4>have good reasons as it were, You want to know

0:45:13.933 --> 0:45:17.413
<v Speaker 4>how students are fairing, what the experience is. However, the

0:45:17.533 --> 0:45:19.813
<v Speaker 4>danger is, and I think it's the danger that is

0:45:20.533 --> 0:45:26.413
<v Speaker 4>really has been realized. The danger is you treat students

0:45:26.413 --> 0:45:28.293
<v Speaker 4>like customers and if they're not unhappy, it doesn't matter

0:45:28.293 --> 0:45:31.573
<v Speaker 4>why they're unhappy. They're not happy. That should determine policy.

0:45:32.173 --> 0:45:35.213
<v Speaker 4>That I think is a major distortion, because students, of course,

0:45:35.213 --> 0:45:38.453
<v Speaker 4>can be happy for all sorts of bad reasons. Maybe

0:45:38.453 --> 0:45:42.053
<v Speaker 4>they're lazy, they don't like working. So universites can't take

0:45:42.053 --> 0:45:43.733
<v Speaker 4>that serious, but they do. They do.

0:45:44.733 --> 0:45:47.973
<v Speaker 3>So this is a clip on question. Students think that

0:45:47.973 --> 0:45:51.093
<v Speaker 3>they run the university, so it seems why and how

0:45:51.133 --> 0:45:54.213
<v Speaker 3>did they get that idea. I mean, you've partly sorry,

0:45:54.213 --> 0:45:58.093
<v Speaker 3>you've partly you've partly answered that, but we're taking a

0:45:58.133 --> 0:46:01.253
<v Speaker 3>step further. In my mind, that they come to university

0:46:01.373 --> 0:46:03.893
<v Speaker 3>learn very quickly or be told very quickly by fellow

0:46:03.933 --> 0:46:08.173
<v Speaker 3>students or however else that they they control it or

0:46:08.653 --> 0:46:11.613
<v Speaker 3>control it, and so it goes to their head why

0:46:11.613 --> 0:46:12.653
<v Speaker 3>were they allowed to do that?

0:46:13.533 --> 0:46:17.773
<v Speaker 4>So, yes, universities are businesses. I mean they have to

0:46:17.813 --> 0:46:20.893
<v Speaker 4>make ends meet. We get that, nothing wrong with that,

0:46:22.453 --> 0:46:26.853
<v Speaker 4>but those at the top of the universities. Nevertheless, should

0:46:26.933 --> 0:46:30.653
<v Speaker 4>remember that universities are not primarily there to make a profit.

0:46:30.733 --> 0:46:34.973
<v Speaker 4>They there to survive, but they're there to educate, and

0:46:35.893 --> 0:46:41.573
<v Speaker 4>university leaders should also remember that although not all wisdom

0:46:41.613 --> 0:46:44.133
<v Speaker 4>lies with adults, the fact of the matter is that

0:46:44.813 --> 0:46:47.933
<v Speaker 4>professors and older people usually know a lot more than

0:46:47.973 --> 0:46:53.413
<v Speaker 4>younger people, and therefore they should have the as it were,

0:46:53.493 --> 0:46:58.093
<v Speaker 4>the kind of self confidence, and they should have a

0:46:58.173 --> 0:47:02.253
<v Speaker 4>right conception of what their businesses, which is education, to

0:47:02.253 --> 0:47:05.133
<v Speaker 4>be able to say to students again, we feel your pain,

0:47:05.213 --> 0:47:10.053
<v Speaker 4>we understand you're aggrieved, but actually no, we think you

0:47:10.173 --> 0:47:13.933
<v Speaker 4>require this for your education. You don't get to determine things.

0:47:14.093 --> 0:47:16.013
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's a combination of what I was

0:47:16.013 --> 0:47:21.573
<v Speaker 4>saying before in terms of universities being excessively business like

0:47:21.653 --> 0:47:23.773
<v Speaker 4>and how they can see what they're up to, so

0:47:23.813 --> 0:47:26.773
<v Speaker 4>they are very sensitive, as it were, to market indicators

0:47:26.773 --> 0:47:31.173
<v Speaker 4>of student student dissatisfaction. But there's also I think I

0:47:31.253 --> 0:47:34.173
<v Speaker 4>wonder if there isn't also a kind of cultural change

0:47:34.213 --> 0:47:36.973
<v Speaker 4>here that we're now ruled by those who grew up

0:47:37.013 --> 0:47:41.533
<v Speaker 4>in the nineties sixties, and these are people who are

0:47:41.533 --> 0:47:47.013
<v Speaker 4>afraid of exercising authority. I do remember I held a

0:47:47.053 --> 0:47:52.053
<v Speaker 4>conference in twenty nineteen under the title Academic Freedom under

0:47:52.093 --> 0:47:54.733
<v Speaker 4>Threat what is to be done in Oxford, And the

0:47:54.773 --> 0:47:59.293
<v Speaker 4>observation was made that the people of my generation, who

0:47:59.293 --> 0:48:03.773
<v Speaker 4>grew up or slightly younger than me, we were told

0:48:03.773 --> 0:48:06.773
<v Speaker 4>that authority is a bad thing. So I would not

0:48:06.853 --> 0:48:09.253
<v Speaker 4>be surprised if a lot of those olimans you shoulds

0:48:09.413 --> 0:48:12.253
<v Speaker 4>actually are very uncomfortable about saying no.

0:48:13.693 --> 0:48:20.933
<v Speaker 3>That actually stuns me. You'd think if you grew up

0:48:20.933 --> 0:48:23.053
<v Speaker 3>in the sixties and you had a lifetime of experience

0:48:23.093 --> 0:48:25.773
<v Speaker 3>behind you, buy now you do, you'd have grasped some reality.

0:48:27.453 --> 0:48:30.333
<v Speaker 4>Well, you would have thought so. But that's not the

0:48:30.333 --> 0:48:33.573
<v Speaker 4>way they tend to behave. I mean, I'm just aware

0:48:33.693 --> 0:48:36.693
<v Speaker 4>how in my own universe, even in my own university,

0:48:36.773 --> 0:48:39.773
<v Speaker 4>and Oxford is relatively clear of some of the worst.

0:48:40.493 --> 0:48:45.613
<v Speaker 4>As vice Chancellor send out some circular recently exhorting everyone

0:48:45.653 --> 0:48:50.053
<v Speaker 4>to be kind. I'm all, I'm all favorite of kindness,

0:48:51.493 --> 0:48:55.733
<v Speaker 4>but it ain't the only virtue. And sometimes you don't

0:48:55.733 --> 0:48:58.733
<v Speaker 4>do other people. You don't do them justice, and you

0:48:58.773 --> 0:49:03.053
<v Speaker 4>don't you don't help them always by being kind. Sometimes

0:49:03.053 --> 0:49:05.813
<v Speaker 4>you have to be firm, and they won't experience that,

0:49:05.893 --> 0:49:09.253
<v Speaker 4>they will not experience that as kindness. But but you

0:49:09.333 --> 0:49:12.733
<v Speaker 4>need to serve their welfare, not just their feelings. Because sometimes,

0:49:12.773 --> 0:49:15.933
<v Speaker 4>as I have long said, and as I'm sure lots

0:49:15.973 --> 0:49:19.933
<v Speaker 4>of younger folks here would find incomprehensible, I often say,

0:49:20.373 --> 0:49:24.373
<v Speaker 4>sometimes feelings lie. You can't take them for you can't

0:49:24.373 --> 0:49:28.293
<v Speaker 4>take them as indicators of the truth. And so they

0:49:28.373 --> 0:49:29.933
<v Speaker 4>were grown up, grown ups for the sake of the

0:49:29.933 --> 0:49:32.853
<v Speaker 4>welfare of younger, younger people. Sometimes they say, I know,

0:49:32.973 --> 0:49:36.133
<v Speaker 4>I know how you feel strongly about this, but I'm

0:49:36.133 --> 0:49:37.773
<v Speaker 4>totally sorry. I'm not going to yield.

0:49:38.373 --> 0:49:40.853
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry. Who did you say? There was the chancellor?

0:49:41.293 --> 0:49:42.853
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it was that. I don't I don't

0:49:42.853 --> 0:49:44.693
<v Speaker 4>want to get Yeah, it was it was a vice

0:49:44.773 --> 0:49:48.293
<v Speaker 4>chancellor at Oxford. I think who sent out a circular.

0:49:50.093 --> 0:49:52.093
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to I'm going to leap leap to

0:49:52.133 --> 0:49:57.373
<v Speaker 3>the present. Oxford needs a firebrand chancellor to destroy wokery.

0:49:57.773 --> 0:50:00.973
<v Speaker 3>James Price and James Price in the in the Telegraph,

0:50:01.413 --> 0:50:05.973
<v Speaker 3>and I'll go further where he says. My vote would

0:50:05.973 --> 0:50:10.973
<v Speaker 3>go to Professor Reverend Nigel Biggas, an academic and writer who,

0:50:11.053 --> 0:50:14.373
<v Speaker 3>when dragged into the culture Wars did not apologize meekly,

0:50:14.853 --> 0:50:18.573
<v Speaker 3>but took his place bravely on the intellectual barricades. He

0:50:18.653 --> 0:50:21.053
<v Speaker 3>will be well known to readers of the Telegraph for

0:50:21.093 --> 0:50:24.573
<v Speaker 3>his accounts of the erosion of academic freedom and failures

0:50:24.613 --> 0:50:28.053
<v Speaker 3>to grasp it. Charged with thought crimes, he did not

0:50:28.253 --> 0:50:32.373
<v Speaker 3>commit bigger stood up to the mob, and has provided

0:50:32.413 --> 0:50:35.133
<v Speaker 3>an inspiration for many of us who wished to do

0:50:35.293 --> 0:50:37.813
<v Speaker 3>the same. Like I say, I'm bringing this forward, we'll

0:50:37.813 --> 0:50:41.213
<v Speaker 3>have to take a step back in a moment. You you

0:50:41.293 --> 0:50:44.453
<v Speaker 3>got into this position because of colonialism, the book.

0:50:45.533 --> 0:50:47.413
<v Speaker 4>A nature before that.

0:50:48.013 --> 0:50:52.013
<v Speaker 3>Well, all right, so that the book magnified it. Yeah, certainly,

0:50:52.053 --> 0:50:56.973
<v Speaker 3>okay either way. You you got yourself into into trouble.

0:50:57.053 --> 0:51:00.653
<v Speaker 3>You got yourself for a few problems. What gave what

0:51:00.733 --> 0:51:03.573
<v Speaker 3>gave you the courage to take the stands you did

0:51:03.973 --> 0:51:04.653
<v Speaker 3>and survived.

0:51:06.093 --> 0:51:10.373
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's a that's a great question. I've thought about

0:51:10.373 --> 0:51:13.453
<v Speaker 4>it a lot, because people do say I've been courageous

0:51:13.453 --> 0:51:17.493
<v Speaker 4>and brave, and my heart is warmed by that, and

0:51:17.853 --> 0:51:21.053
<v Speaker 4>I'm encouraged by it, and I hope it's true. But

0:51:21.413 --> 0:51:26.813
<v Speaker 4>I've often thought I feel like decorated soldiers who've been

0:51:27.013 --> 0:51:31.173
<v Speaker 4>courageous on the battlefield who risk their lives to save

0:51:31.253 --> 0:51:34.573
<v Speaker 4>their mates, and I suspect they also feel kind of

0:51:35.853 --> 0:51:40.853
<v Speaker 4>something perplexed because they were just doing their duty. That's

0:51:40.853 --> 0:51:43.013
<v Speaker 4>what they did. They didn't they didn't do it to

0:51:43.013 --> 0:51:46.253
<v Speaker 4>be courageous. And so when I think about, you know,

0:51:46.973 --> 0:51:50.893
<v Speaker 4>what makes me or what makes other people courageous or

0:51:50.973 --> 0:51:56.653
<v Speaker 4>to take risks in doing or saying things, I think

0:51:56.773 --> 0:52:01.213
<v Speaker 4>really late is simply if you care about something enough,

0:52:01.693 --> 0:52:03.733
<v Speaker 4>if you care about enough, if you love it enough,

0:52:04.533 --> 0:52:06.533
<v Speaker 4>then there comes a point where you just can't stand

0:52:06.573 --> 0:52:11.493
<v Speaker 4>by anymore and see it crushed or damaged or defamed,

0:52:12.093 --> 0:52:14.533
<v Speaker 4>and you have to speak up. But I think it's

0:52:14.573 --> 0:52:18.893
<v Speaker 4>a compulsion out of love for something that makes you say,

0:52:19.293 --> 0:52:22.533
<v Speaker 4>bugger it, I don't care what people think. I'm going

0:52:22.573 --> 0:52:25.253
<v Speaker 4>to take this risk. So it's not that you aim

0:52:25.333 --> 0:52:27.693
<v Speaker 4>to be courageous. It knows you aim to be courageous.

0:52:27.693 --> 0:52:30.573
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a matter of saying to yourself, well

0:52:30.613 --> 0:52:34.453
<v Speaker 4>do I care enough to stand by and see this

0:52:34.933 --> 0:52:41.173
<v Speaker 4>precious thing crushed? And some people need to get up

0:52:41.213 --> 0:52:45.333
<v Speaker 4>and stand up. I think also, Frankly Lateten, it's also

0:52:45.373 --> 0:52:51.853
<v Speaker 4>partly personality. I'm Scot's I'm more inclined to be directed

0:52:51.853 --> 0:52:56.693
<v Speaker 4>and blunt than most of my nice, gentle, polite English

0:52:57.133 --> 0:53:01.613
<v Speaker 4>friends and colleagues. I'm more impatient. And also I'm older,

0:53:01.653 --> 0:53:04.453
<v Speaker 4>so I'm sixty nine. At the end of my career,

0:53:04.653 --> 0:53:07.413
<v Speaker 4>I was relatively safe. Other colleagues have suffered much more

0:53:07.453 --> 0:53:10.573
<v Speaker 4>grievous than I. And you know, one thing about older

0:53:10.613 --> 0:53:15.933
<v Speaker 4>age is that it's produced as two things which are

0:53:15.933 --> 0:53:18.013
<v Speaker 4>a dangerous combination. First of all, you finally think that

0:53:18.093 --> 0:53:22.053
<v Speaker 4>what you think, and secondly, you cease to carry what

0:53:22.053 --> 0:53:24.093
<v Speaker 4>other people think so much so you inclined to say

0:53:24.093 --> 0:53:29.413
<v Speaker 4>what you think. And I, although you know I've attracted aggression,

0:53:30.813 --> 0:53:32.933
<v Speaker 4>it wouldn't be anywhere else. So I'm very glad to

0:53:32.933 --> 0:53:36.533
<v Speaker 4>be saying, well, I think, because I think what There's

0:53:36.533 --> 0:53:38.173
<v Speaker 4>some things that are important, and there's some truth that

0:53:38.173 --> 0:53:39.973
<v Speaker 4>are important that I'm glad to say them.

0:53:40.213 --> 0:53:42.973
<v Speaker 3>I can only say, excellent. Want to read you a

0:53:43.253 --> 0:53:47.213
<v Speaker 3>letter to the editor. This is This is purely coincidental.

0:53:47.613 --> 0:53:51.493
<v Speaker 3>It arrived this morning from a friend of mine. You

0:53:51.653 --> 0:53:53.493
<v Speaker 3>took a photo of it and said it to me,

0:53:54.173 --> 0:53:58.333
<v Speaker 3>not knowing that I was talking to you. It's just

0:53:58.453 --> 0:54:05.173
<v Speaker 3>so coincidental. Fears of censure, the concern by doctor Jared Gilbert,

0:54:05.533 --> 0:54:08.653
<v Speaker 3>sociologist at the University of Canterbury, that students don't turn

0:54:08.733 --> 0:54:12.893
<v Speaker 3>up to class but would rather choose to engage remotely

0:54:13.013 --> 0:54:16.373
<v Speaker 3>for courses that are not designed that way. This was

0:54:16.413 --> 0:54:19.893
<v Speaker 3>for an article that appeared on October twenty eighth. Don't

0:54:19.933 --> 0:54:24.053
<v Speaker 3>speak up in class and have become disengaged, claiming that

0:54:24.093 --> 0:54:28.373
<v Speaker 3>they have anxiety issues. They might have missed the boat. Sorry,

0:54:28.373 --> 0:54:30.693
<v Speaker 3>the letter might have missed the boat. Could it be

0:54:30.773 --> 0:54:32.933
<v Speaker 3>that the Could it be that the fault of all

0:54:33.013 --> 0:54:36.293
<v Speaker 3>this lies with the universities themselves and not entirely were

0:54:36.333 --> 0:54:39.213
<v Speaker 3>the students. Many years ago, universities were the bastions of

0:54:39.253 --> 0:54:43.293
<v Speaker 3>free thought, opened discourse and debate from professors to first

0:54:43.333 --> 0:54:48.933
<v Speaker 3>grade to first year undergraduates. However, could the reasons for

0:54:48.973 --> 0:54:54.013
<v Speaker 3>student disengagement outlined by Gilbert be emblematic of the decline

0:54:54.013 --> 0:54:57.213
<v Speaker 3>in our university's commitment to a willingness to protect the

0:54:57.293 --> 0:55:00.853
<v Speaker 3>viewpoints of all engaged in debate even though there is disagreement.

0:55:01.253 --> 0:55:03.453
<v Speaker 3>One example of this was the backlash over the letter

0:55:03.493 --> 0:55:07.173
<v Speaker 3>published by several University of Auckland academics in the Listener

0:55:07.253 --> 0:55:09.973
<v Speaker 3>back in twenty twenty one. You may have heard of this,

0:55:10.053 --> 0:55:14.453
<v Speaker 3>by the way, arguing that Matt oranger Mary is not

0:55:14.653 --> 0:55:18.093
<v Speaker 3>science in the traditional sense. There was a call for

0:55:18.133 --> 0:55:21.853
<v Speaker 3>these academics to be censured. Surely, if academics are going

0:55:21.893 --> 0:55:24.893
<v Speaker 3>to run the risk of being censured at their own university,

0:55:25.493 --> 0:55:28.413
<v Speaker 3>then what hope will ordinary students have in delivering their

0:55:28.453 --> 0:55:31.773
<v Speaker 3>own views on whatever topic they might feel passionate about,

0:55:32.293 --> 0:55:37.253
<v Speaker 3>not because of anxiety, but for the fear of being censured.

0:55:38.373 --> 0:55:45.453
<v Speaker 4>Yep, those are unfortunately not rare phenomena. Later so, I

0:55:45.493 --> 0:55:53.733
<v Speaker 4>think universities have a very very serious civic duty to

0:55:53.773 --> 0:55:59.253
<v Speaker 4>create a forum where all ideas that are lawful are

0:55:59.293 --> 0:56:02.933
<v Speaker 4>allowed to come into play, and where students are trained

0:56:04.453 --> 0:56:08.493
<v Speaker 4>to react to ideas that challenge them more threatns no

0:56:08.613 --> 0:56:12.773
<v Speaker 4>or upset them with strict justice, not to distort them

0:56:13.253 --> 0:56:16.093
<v Speaker 4>in reporting, not to much represent them, not to lie

0:56:16.093 --> 0:56:20.293
<v Speaker 4>about them, and trained to have the courage to think

0:56:20.333 --> 0:56:24.173
<v Speaker 4>about them, to wonder whether actually this strange idea, the

0:56:24.213 --> 0:56:26.613
<v Speaker 4>threatening idea, might be right, or how far it's right.

0:56:27.333 --> 0:56:32.653
<v Speaker 4>But they have a universes have a duty to support

0:56:32.693 --> 0:56:35.533
<v Speaker 4>an environment where all sorts of ideas, some of them

0:56:36.093 --> 0:56:39.453
<v Speaker 4>are no doubt challenging, come into play, and with students

0:56:39.533 --> 0:56:44.493
<v Speaker 4>are trained in the virtues necessary for us to have

0:56:44.533 --> 0:56:46.973
<v Speaker 4>a liberal society, because if universities failed to do that,

0:56:48.093 --> 0:56:50.733
<v Speaker 4>our public life and a political life is going to

0:56:50.773 --> 0:56:53.533
<v Speaker 4>suffer in the way it now is, where people tend

0:56:53.573 --> 0:56:57.573
<v Speaker 4>to shout and scream and and appeal to emotion, and

0:56:57.613 --> 0:57:00.853
<v Speaker 4>they don't know how to deal with perfectly reasonable ideas.

0:57:00.893 --> 0:57:04.853
<v Speaker 4>And what you've just described these New Zealand academics as

0:57:04.933 --> 0:57:11.973
<v Speaker 4>saying about the difference between certain traditional Maori stories and

0:57:12.213 --> 0:57:15.733
<v Speaker 4>natural science, for example, that's a perfectly sensible point to make.

0:57:16.453 --> 0:57:18.333
<v Speaker 4>They should be allowed to say that, and students should

0:57:18.373 --> 0:57:22.413
<v Speaker 4>be required, frankly required to deal with these things in

0:57:22.453 --> 0:57:24.813
<v Speaker 4>a rational manner, and that does require the self for

0:57:24.853 --> 0:57:28.333
<v Speaker 4>strange of emotion. And too many universities, not all of them,

0:57:28.333 --> 0:57:32.413
<v Speaker 4>too many universities are completely oblivious to that duty. That

0:57:32.453 --> 0:57:34.893
<v Speaker 4>they're behaving, as it were, simply as businesses. They've forgotten

0:57:34.893 --> 0:57:39.773
<v Speaker 4>what their main purpose is. But so I agree, I

0:57:39.773 --> 0:57:43.133
<v Speaker 4>think universities have a lot to do it. Also, I mean,

0:57:43.173 --> 0:57:47.533
<v Speaker 4>I think it is said that mental health issues are

0:57:47.573 --> 0:57:52.933
<v Speaker 4>a growing problem among students, and of course what I

0:57:52.973 --> 0:57:55.493
<v Speaker 4>would what I would have called what I still call

0:57:55.973 --> 0:58:00.893
<v Speaker 4>distress or even mild depression is now now trauma. I

0:58:00.933 --> 0:58:03.733
<v Speaker 4>regard distress and depression as a normal, normal feature of life,

0:58:03.773 --> 0:58:06.093
<v Speaker 4>and I think it's not helping kids if they are

0:58:06.213 --> 0:58:10.013
<v Speaker 4>told that. But I'm also told that living life on

0:58:10.533 --> 0:58:14.773
<v Speaker 4>social media does create lots of anxiety in Eurosis, and

0:58:14.773 --> 0:58:18.093
<v Speaker 4>that may be a new phenomenon, in which case, when

0:58:18.093 --> 0:58:22.093
<v Speaker 4>presented with kids who are really distressed at ideas that

0:58:22.133 --> 0:58:26.093
<v Speaker 4>they find disturbing, universities need to treat this as a

0:58:26.133 --> 0:58:32.613
<v Speaker 4>partial therapeutic problem, not allowing students to proceed without having

0:58:32.653 --> 0:58:35.533
<v Speaker 4>different fund ideas they don't like, but helping students to

0:58:35.573 --> 0:58:40.133
<v Speaker 4>acquire resilience in coping with ideas they don't like. Whereas

0:58:40.173 --> 0:58:42.333
<v Speaker 4>I think the tendency is to take the easy option

0:58:42.733 --> 0:58:48.773
<v Speaker 4>of simply allowing students to shield themselves from find things

0:58:48.773 --> 0:58:49.813
<v Speaker 4>they find distressing.

0:58:50.533 --> 0:58:55.213
<v Speaker 3>All right, So resilience is one of the most important

0:58:55.253 --> 0:58:58.573
<v Speaker 3>aspects of life, particularly when you're growing up.

0:58:59.373 --> 0:58:59.613
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:59:00.253 --> 0:59:04.653
<v Speaker 3>So let's just verbally draw up a short list of

0:59:04.693 --> 0:59:09.093
<v Speaker 3>things that might have might have gone wrong one way

0:59:09.173 --> 0:59:12.213
<v Speaker 3>or another that have allowed kids to grow up and

0:59:12.653 --> 0:59:17.333
<v Speaker 3>find themselves in this position, not understanding why it's happened

0:59:17.373 --> 0:59:20.173
<v Speaker 3>and what they can do about it. The collapse of

0:59:20.173 --> 0:59:23.173
<v Speaker 3>marriage is my first option, is my first offer. The

0:59:23.213 --> 0:59:28.453
<v Speaker 3>collapse of marriage, the lack of father's same category, pulling

0:59:28.453 --> 0:59:31.653
<v Speaker 3>the rug on kids at achievement. One of one of

0:59:31.653 --> 0:59:34.773
<v Speaker 3>my sons, for instance, was at a school where he

0:59:34.853 --> 0:59:41.253
<v Speaker 3>had he had three chances to submit answers to an exam. Yes,

0:59:41.413 --> 0:59:44.813
<v Speaker 3>after it was over, he did. They all did. So

0:59:44.893 --> 0:59:47.293
<v Speaker 3>there's no there was no pressure, there's no drive as

0:59:47.333 --> 0:59:49.893
<v Speaker 3>far as that's concerned. What would you what would you

0:59:49.893 --> 0:59:51.373
<v Speaker 3>add to that shortlist so far?

0:59:52.573 --> 0:59:56.813
<v Speaker 4>Is it? Comment on that last point? Late? And yes,

0:59:56.933 --> 1:00:00.853
<v Speaker 4>I in my own university one hears of all sorts

1:00:00.933 --> 1:00:04.413
<v Speaker 4>of special measures being taken to allow students of suffering

1:00:04.453 --> 1:00:09.493
<v Speaker 4>anxiety to to take exams, to retake exam because of

1:00:09.533 --> 1:00:13.813
<v Speaker 4>course failing is distressing. I fail. I fail quite badly.

1:00:14.293 --> 1:00:15.013
<v Speaker 4>At university.

1:00:15.093 --> 1:00:19.133
<v Speaker 3>We have something in common, Well, we both.

1:00:19.053 --> 1:00:22.693
<v Speaker 4>Learned there's there's life after failure. But that's but that's

1:00:22.933 --> 1:00:26.653
<v Speaker 4>the point, isn't it That it's not doing students a service.

1:00:26.973 --> 1:00:29.533
<v Speaker 4>It's not being kind to them to pretend that the

1:00:29.573 --> 1:00:32.373
<v Speaker 4>outside world is going to forgive them all the time,

1:00:32.613 --> 1:00:37.133
<v Speaker 4>or as it will ignore their failure. The outside world

1:00:37.173 --> 1:00:41.253
<v Speaker 4>is going to be very harsh so so universities and

1:00:41.453 --> 1:00:47.773
<v Speaker 4>parents need to get kinder to their kids in explaining

1:00:47.813 --> 1:00:51.213
<v Speaker 4>to them that actually failure is a pretty normal part

1:00:51.213 --> 1:00:54.533
<v Speaker 4>of human life. One needs to learn to fail and

1:00:54.573 --> 1:00:56.533
<v Speaker 4>then to get them off the ground and try again.

1:00:56.653 --> 1:00:59.813
<v Speaker 4>That's that's called resilience. But but I fear that's not

1:00:59.893 --> 1:01:03.853
<v Speaker 4>what's happening, and students are being indulged in a way

1:01:03.853 --> 1:01:06.293
<v Speaker 4>that is actually doing them harm and the adults are

1:01:06.293 --> 1:01:07.053
<v Speaker 4>responsible for that.

1:01:07.893 --> 1:01:10.253
<v Speaker 3>Let's say the attack on masculinity.

1:01:11.333 --> 1:01:15.373
<v Speaker 4>Yes, help help me there, well, the attack.

1:01:15.093 --> 1:01:19.453
<v Speaker 3>On masculinity that the boys, for instance, are not allowed

1:01:19.493 --> 1:01:22.653
<v Speaker 3>to show masculine tendencies when they're at school, when they're

1:01:23.533 --> 1:01:27.253
<v Speaker 3>when they're when they're growing up. Attitudes are part of

1:01:27.413 --> 1:01:31.693
<v Speaker 3>the physical part of life is another part, yes, and

1:01:31.733 --> 1:01:34.573
<v Speaker 3>not having a not having a shall we say, a

1:01:34.613 --> 1:01:36.853
<v Speaker 3>guide through life in the form of a man in

1:01:37.293 --> 1:01:39.973
<v Speaker 3>the family contributes even more.

1:01:40.933 --> 1:01:41.093
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:01:41.213 --> 1:01:46.293
<v Speaker 4>Of course, masculinity and feminity are kind of ideal types

1:01:46.333 --> 1:01:49.973
<v Speaker 4>of behavior. So so to be masculin is to be strong.

1:01:50.293 --> 1:01:55.253
<v Speaker 4>It's to be willing to to to fight, to be

1:01:55.293 --> 1:02:02.373
<v Speaker 4>in conflict, to have resilience and courage. Strength, femininity the

1:02:02.453 --> 1:02:05.813
<v Speaker 4>ideal is no, it's it's not about fightings, about reconciliations,

1:02:05.813 --> 1:02:09.853
<v Speaker 4>about relationships, it's about being kind of it. My view

1:02:09.933 --> 1:02:14.173
<v Speaker 4>is that all human beings should, in different situations, be

1:02:14.373 --> 1:02:17.853
<v Speaker 4>masculine and feminine. I have heard and this is plausible,

1:02:17.893 --> 1:02:22.093
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what the empirical substantiation of it is.

1:02:22.573 --> 1:02:25.493
<v Speaker 4>Part of the problem in universities and elsewhere is the

1:02:25.533 --> 1:02:29.893
<v Speaker 4>feminization institutions often run by women. I've not plain against that,

1:02:30.533 --> 1:02:34.133
<v Speaker 4>but if it's true that women tend to focus on

1:02:34.933 --> 1:02:40.733
<v Speaker 4>reconciliation and conflict with avoidance and kindness and compassion, if

1:02:40.893 --> 1:02:45.213
<v Speaker 4>women are too feminine, not not masculine enough, then that

1:02:45.373 --> 1:02:49.733
<v Speaker 4>is certainly contributed to our problem. Because what we need,

1:02:49.813 --> 1:02:54.053
<v Speaker 4>is particularly in university, is also in schools. We need

1:02:54.093 --> 1:03:00.013
<v Speaker 4>our young people taught how to manage conflict responsibly because

1:03:00.453 --> 1:03:02.173
<v Speaker 4>when they go into life, they're not going to be

1:03:02.213 --> 1:03:04.733
<v Speaker 4>able to avoid conflict. So the question is how do

1:03:04.773 --> 1:03:07.493
<v Speaker 4>you manage it responsibly? And if you avoid it, If

1:03:07.493 --> 1:03:10.693
<v Speaker 4>you will kids to avoid it all the time and

1:03:10.853 --> 1:03:16.613
<v Speaker 4>not to grow the virtues of patients and resilience and

1:03:16.693 --> 1:03:20.693
<v Speaker 4>self restraint, then they're going to mismanaged conflict. And when

1:03:20.693 --> 1:03:23.413
<v Speaker 4>they grew up to run institutions, we're all going to.

1:03:23.333 --> 1:03:27.453
<v Speaker 3>Suffer the Higher Education Freedom of Speech Build twenty twenty one,

1:03:27.533 --> 1:03:31.253
<v Speaker 3>but that you had a big hand in. You made

1:03:31.413 --> 1:03:35.493
<v Speaker 3>a you made a submission to the Public Bills Committee. Yes,

1:03:35.733 --> 1:03:38.973
<v Speaker 3>and I've read it and I've read it and its outstanding,

1:03:40.133 --> 1:03:43.733
<v Speaker 3>and it got if I'm not mistaken, it got passed.

1:03:44.653 --> 1:03:46.893
<v Speaker 4>The bill was passed. Yeah, it was in active last year.

1:03:47.093 --> 1:03:50.613
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and then it didn't. One day it was coming

1:03:50.613 --> 1:03:53.053
<v Speaker 3>into fourth and the next day it wasn't.

1:03:53.053 --> 1:03:58.133
<v Speaker 4>What happened change your government, the new Labor government of

1:03:58.213 --> 1:04:06.533
<v Speaker 4>kas Darma I and my allies in shaping and promoting

1:04:06.573 --> 1:04:10.813
<v Speaker 4>the hid K Should Be Speech Bill, which was an

1:04:10.813 --> 1:04:14.093
<v Speaker 4>active in May last year. We wondered before the election

1:04:14.213 --> 1:04:18.373
<v Speaker 4>whether a new Labor government would try and pull it

1:04:18.573 --> 1:04:22.013
<v Speaker 4>or qualified or damage it or whatever. And there's no

1:04:22.013 --> 1:04:25.333
<v Speaker 4>sign at all, none at all, that they were interested

1:04:25.373 --> 1:04:28.733
<v Speaker 4>in changing what we put in position. But no sooner

1:04:28.733 --> 1:04:31.333
<v Speaker 4>had the government been elected at the Secretary of State

1:04:31.373 --> 1:04:34.253
<v Speaker 4>for Education Bridge At Phillipson, announced that she was going

1:04:34.293 --> 1:04:41.493
<v Speaker 4>to suspend the operation of the Act and perhaps repeal it. Now,

1:04:41.853 --> 1:04:46.613
<v Speaker 4>why did you do that? Well, someone from within government,

1:04:47.453 --> 1:04:52.533
<v Speaker 4>a reliable source, i'm told, reported that vice chancellors had

1:04:52.613 --> 1:05:00.293
<v Speaker 4>lent on the then Shadow Secretary of State because the

1:05:00.893 --> 1:05:07.213
<v Speaker 4>Act would have required universities to make transparent their dependents,

1:05:07.773 --> 1:05:12.853
<v Speaker 4>their dependent on foreign that is Chinese funding, and the

1:05:13.173 --> 1:05:15.453
<v Speaker 4>advice chancellors did not want to have to be transparent

1:05:15.493 --> 1:05:17.893
<v Speaker 4>about that, which is why they lent on the Secretary

1:05:17.893 --> 1:05:20.773
<v Speaker 4>of State. That's not why the Secretary of State stay

1:05:20.893 --> 1:05:25.413
<v Speaker 4>she wants to pause it or to repeal it. But

1:05:25.493 --> 1:05:27.733
<v Speaker 4>we're told actually that is why the buds vice chances

1:05:27.733 --> 1:05:30.053
<v Speaker 4>that have lent on her. So, yes, the Act is

1:05:30.093 --> 1:05:35.333
<v Speaker 4>currently paused because we have a Free Speech Union in

1:05:35.373 --> 1:05:39.333
<v Speaker 4>Britain now founded four years ago, now extremely healthy, twenty

1:05:39.373 --> 1:05:44.133
<v Speaker 4>thousand members, an annual income from subscriptions alone of about

1:05:44.133 --> 1:05:48.613
<v Speaker 4>a million pounds plus donations. Because we have an FSQ

1:05:48.773 --> 1:05:54.933
<v Speaker 4>with a staff and a full time legal mind working

1:05:54.973 --> 1:06:00.493
<v Speaker 4>on cases, the FSU has applied to take the government

1:06:00.573 --> 1:06:03.893
<v Speaker 4>to court by means of judicial review. So there's bad

1:06:03.933 --> 1:06:08.213
<v Speaker 4>news that Laton. Yes, the government appears to want to

1:06:08.333 --> 1:06:12.093
<v Speaker 4>who perhaps repeal the Act. The good news is we

1:06:12.133 --> 1:06:15.573
<v Speaker 4>now have an institution in Britain sufficiently powerful and well

1:06:15.613 --> 1:06:19.933
<v Speaker 4>resourced to challenge that and to embarrass the government. In

1:06:19.973 --> 1:06:21.253
<v Speaker 4>the pages of the press.

1:06:21.853 --> 1:06:25.573
<v Speaker 3>Concern about threats to free speech and research in universities

1:06:25.613 --> 1:06:32.333
<v Speaker 3>is sometimes dismissed as a manufactured distraction. Can I suggest

1:06:32.413 --> 1:06:37.613
<v Speaker 3>that that is a very purposed claim to allow them

1:06:37.733 --> 1:06:40.613
<v Speaker 3>to continue with what they want to achieve.

1:06:42.253 --> 1:06:45.733
<v Speaker 4>Oh yes, later, every time I hear that, my blood

1:06:45.733 --> 1:06:50.373
<v Speaker 4>pressure starts to rise. Because it's the leaders of most

1:06:50.413 --> 1:06:57.293
<v Speaker 4>of our universities in Britain, throughout four years of press

1:06:57.333 --> 1:07:03.013
<v Speaker 4>coverage or free speech in universities, have consistently said, there

1:07:03.053 --> 1:07:06.253
<v Speaker 4>is no problem. The problem is limited to a small

1:07:06.333 --> 1:07:09.733
<v Speaker 4>handful of cancelation of events and we're all committed to

1:07:09.733 --> 1:07:14.533
<v Speaker 4>free speech. That's what they say. I will point out

1:07:14.613 --> 1:07:21.853
<v Speaker 4>that although I probably was the first the first person

1:07:23.853 --> 1:07:27.853
<v Speaker 4>to hit the pages of the press in twenty seventeen

1:07:28.893 --> 1:07:35.453
<v Speaker 4>because an attempted to be maze to constrain my academic freedom,

1:07:35.773 --> 1:07:39.573
<v Speaker 4>and it was in the pressook for weeks and so

1:07:39.613 --> 1:07:42.813
<v Speaker 4>all of my most people in Oxford and in the

1:07:43.013 --> 1:07:48.173
<v Speaker 4>university university administration who are conscious will know who I

1:07:48.213 --> 1:07:51.573
<v Speaker 4>am and what happened to me. Nobody in the administration

1:07:51.693 --> 1:07:54.013
<v Speaker 4>oxyd University has ever asked me to come in and

1:07:54.013 --> 1:07:57.333
<v Speaker 4>talk to them of what's going on. Apart from that,

1:07:57.453 --> 1:08:02.413
<v Speaker 4>you've got people like Kathleen Starkey, lesbian, a gender critical

1:08:02.973 --> 1:08:08.173
<v Speaker 4>feminist philosopher. If you ever hear her speech, she's on YouTube.

1:08:08.373 --> 1:08:10.973
<v Speaker 4>She is a model of reason, the model of reason.

1:08:11.773 --> 1:08:13.853
<v Speaker 4>She was driven out of her job in her career

1:08:13.893 --> 1:08:17.333
<v Speaker 4>at the University of Sussex a few years ago by

1:08:17.533 --> 1:08:24.133
<v Speaker 4>campaign carried out by students are betted by fellow academics,

1:08:24.693 --> 1:08:27.173
<v Speaker 4>and the university authorities allowed it to happen. She was

1:08:27.253 --> 1:08:30.293
<v Speaker 4>driven out of a job. So I get really quite

1:08:30.293 --> 1:08:32.973
<v Speaker 4>angry when I had universities an others say this is

1:08:33.013 --> 1:08:36.253
<v Speaker 4>not a problem, because it is to say that you

1:08:36.333 --> 1:08:40.733
<v Speaker 4>simply have to willfully ignore ample evidence of their being

1:08:40.853 --> 1:08:44.573
<v Speaker 4>a problem. And if anyone's in any doubt, go and

1:08:44.573 --> 1:08:46.893
<v Speaker 4>look at the website of the Free Speech Union in

1:08:46.933 --> 1:08:49.693
<v Speaker 4>the UK. There are plenty of cases of people, not

1:08:49.773 --> 1:08:52.733
<v Speaker 4>just universities but in other walks of life whose free

1:08:52.733 --> 1:08:57.813
<v Speaker 4>speech and academic and freedom of thought is being constrained,

1:08:57.813 --> 1:08:59.413
<v Speaker 4>and lawfully in many.

1:08:59.173 --> 1:09:02.773
<v Speaker 3>Cases, I quite for the very beginning again. And in

1:09:02.853 --> 1:09:06.533
<v Speaker 3>their June submission to the Times Education Commission, Tony Blair

1:09:06.573 --> 1:09:11.853
<v Speaker 3>and Andrew o'donnis wrote that the Higher Education Freedom of

1:09:11.893 --> 1:09:15.693
<v Speaker 3>Speech Bill is now making its way through Parliament is

1:09:15.733 --> 1:09:19.293
<v Speaker 3>a reform in search of a problem. Since free speech

1:09:19.373 --> 1:09:23.333
<v Speaker 3>is hardly a key issue on university campuses, Tony Blair

1:09:23.933 --> 1:09:26.533
<v Speaker 3>lives up to his reputation or down to it? Should

1:09:26.533 --> 1:09:28.413
<v Speaker 3>I say?

1:09:28.893 --> 1:09:32.013
<v Speaker 4>Well? Actually, like and I used to hold a candle

1:09:32.013 --> 1:09:35.853
<v Speaker 4>for Tony Blair and didn't hold a candle for Andrew

1:09:35.893 --> 1:09:39.493
<v Speaker 4>Dunnas And the best I can say is that there

1:09:39.613 --> 1:09:43.493
<v Speaker 4>is an ignorant statement, and given the available evidence, it

1:09:43.573 --> 1:09:47.013
<v Speaker 4>is a willfully ignorant statement. And they should know better.

1:09:47.413 --> 1:09:48.573
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm sure they do.

1:09:51.253 --> 1:09:55.173
<v Speaker 4>Well that case through more vulnerable, right, because there's a

1:09:55.213 --> 1:10:01.533
<v Speaker 4>serious problem because, as I interimitted before, we need we

1:10:01.573 --> 1:10:04.213
<v Speaker 4>need a liberal society which we all thought we heard

1:10:04.333 --> 1:10:08.853
<v Speaker 4>until ten years ago, where all lawful ide years get

1:10:08.893 --> 1:10:12.733
<v Speaker 4>to be expressed. And that means where we're raining orthodoxies

1:10:13.693 --> 1:10:18.653
<v Speaker 4>whenever they are but orthodoxies with regard to gender self recognition.

1:10:18.973 --> 1:10:24.053
<v Speaker 4>Orthodoxy is about about our societies being systemically racist. Orthodox

1:10:24.173 --> 1:10:27.013
<v Speaker 4>is about that all ourcalgal history is nothing but a

1:10:27.093 --> 1:10:32.093
<v Speaker 4>literary of racism and oppression. Those orthodoxies need testing, they

1:10:32.133 --> 1:10:34.853
<v Speaker 4>need challenging. I think every one of them is actually false,

1:10:35.733 --> 1:10:39.293
<v Speaker 4>but they are. They are determining a government policy. They're

1:10:39.293 --> 1:10:43.733
<v Speaker 4>determine determining curriculating schools. And they're false, and we need

1:10:43.733 --> 1:10:46.853
<v Speaker 4>a society which is able to test them and to

1:10:46.973 --> 1:10:49.813
<v Speaker 4>expose how far they're false and how far they're true.

1:10:50.693 --> 1:10:55.293
<v Speaker 4>And universities have an enormously important civic duty to perform

1:10:55.893 --> 1:11:00.573
<v Speaker 4>in helping to shape as I said before, so they're

1:11:00.613 --> 1:11:05.213
<v Speaker 4>capable of having liberal discussions. And governments have an enormously

1:11:06.493 --> 1:11:10.173
<v Speaker 4>an enormous civic duty to make sure we have spaces

1:11:10.213 --> 1:11:14.573
<v Speaker 4>where which are probably liberal. And all sorts of institutions

1:11:14.773 --> 1:11:17.733
<v Speaker 4>and sometimes governments are failing, and the future of liberal

1:11:17.733 --> 1:11:22.213
<v Speaker 4>society among us is therefore jeopardized. And it's really really important.

1:11:22.253 --> 1:11:24.453
<v Speaker 4>So all those people who were trying to get on

1:11:24.533 --> 1:11:26.573
<v Speaker 4>with their lives and hoping there's no problem that they

1:11:26.573 --> 1:11:29.253
<v Speaker 4>had to deal with here and they can just keep

1:11:29.253 --> 1:11:32.373
<v Speaker 4>their heads under the parapet. If you want a liberal society,

1:11:32.573 --> 1:11:34.613
<v Speaker 4>you need to stand up, because otherwise we're going to

1:11:34.653 --> 1:11:34.933
<v Speaker 4>lose it.

1:11:35.853 --> 1:11:39.133
<v Speaker 3>So we've got universities. Now we've talked about them right

1:11:39.133 --> 1:11:43.413
<v Speaker 3>from the beginning, but you've got students arriving at universities

1:11:43.453 --> 1:11:47.693
<v Speaker 3>where I constantly hear it's a regular thing that they

1:11:47.773 --> 1:11:50.293
<v Speaker 3>arrive at university and they can't even construct a sentence.

1:11:51.093 --> 1:11:53.493
<v Speaker 3>They can't analyze anything, they don't know what they're doing.

1:11:54.493 --> 1:11:59.373
<v Speaker 3>So who's is that the result of the backwash from

1:11:59.493 --> 1:12:04.133
<v Speaker 3>universities or is it providing the problem for universities.

1:12:06.093 --> 1:12:08.813
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's probably listening again to do with this massive

1:12:08.813 --> 1:12:13.533
<v Speaker 4>expansion of higher education in the nineties and early noughties.

1:12:14.533 --> 1:12:17.733
<v Speaker 4>So so in Britain we you know, universities used to

1:12:17.813 --> 1:12:21.893
<v Speaker 4>be research universities then we we we I think Margaret

1:12:21.933 --> 1:12:25.853
<v Speaker 4>Thatcher actually her government decided to upgrade the status of

1:12:25.933 --> 1:12:32.293
<v Speaker 4>what were polytechnics into universities. Polytechnics traditionally were about vocational education,

1:12:32.453 --> 1:12:36.533
<v Speaker 4>which is very important, very important indeed, But that that

1:12:36.573 --> 1:12:40.733
<v Speaker 4>meant that some some polytechnics decided to stop doing vocational

1:12:40.853 --> 1:12:45.893
<v Speaker 4>education and to try and rival universities in academic research

1:12:45.933 --> 1:12:50.653
<v Speaker 4>and teaching. And it also means that there are some

1:12:50.773 --> 1:12:57.133
<v Speaker 4>of the weaker polytechnics who you know, as businesses, they

1:12:57.173 --> 1:13:01.093
<v Speaker 4>want to attract students, but their admissions criteria pretty low.

1:13:03.293 --> 1:13:06.693
<v Speaker 4>And it does mean therefore that kids are being sent

1:13:06.733 --> 1:13:11.653
<v Speaker 4>to university who twenty years ago would not have gone

1:13:11.653 --> 1:13:15.333
<v Speaker 4>to university simply because they're not prepared for it. Actually

1:13:15.533 --> 1:13:18.493
<v Speaker 4>they have no attitude for it. They're much better off

1:13:19.293 --> 1:13:23.013
<v Speaker 4>going to learn a vocational skills, so they become plumbers

1:13:23.013 --> 1:13:27.133
<v Speaker 4>and whatever, because we need you know, we will never

1:13:27.173 --> 1:13:30.413
<v Speaker 4>cease to need people with manual skills or artisanal skills,

1:13:30.853 --> 1:13:34.413
<v Speaker 4>vacational skills. And I mean I've heard talks certainly in

1:13:34.413 --> 1:13:39.053
<v Speaker 4>Britain in recent years that maybe was a mistake, particularly

1:13:39.093 --> 1:13:42.133
<v Speaker 4>under the Blair government, to take an arbitrary figure of

1:13:42.133 --> 1:13:44.893
<v Speaker 4>forty or fifty percent of the population to serve the

1:13:44.973 --> 1:13:49.973
<v Speaker 4>knowledge economy, because actually that has led to a decline

1:13:50.093 --> 1:13:55.253
<v Speaker 4>in the standards of some universities, because otherwise some kids

1:13:55.253 --> 1:13:57.373
<v Speaker 4>simply couldn't cope if they were subjected to a more

1:13:57.373 --> 1:14:00.133
<v Speaker 4>reduced standards. So there has been a decline in standards.

1:14:01.453 --> 1:14:03.733
<v Speaker 4>And then going back to an earlier point we made

1:14:03.773 --> 1:14:08.453
<v Speaker 4>about concessions made to students stuff from various kinds of

1:14:08.533 --> 1:14:12.773
<v Speaker 4>mental and health. It makes it easier for them. And

1:14:12.813 --> 1:14:16.293
<v Speaker 4>then also there is the issue of grade inflation in

1:14:17.133 --> 1:14:21.533
<v Speaker 4>earlier years. For four decades ago, the number of students

1:14:21.573 --> 1:14:26.293
<v Speaker 4>getting first class degrees was small ten percent. Maybe it's

1:14:26.333 --> 1:14:29.493
<v Speaker 4>now thirty percent, and that I think is partly because

1:14:29.533 --> 1:14:34.013
<v Speaker 4>of as a market competition, because you know, you want

1:14:34.013 --> 1:14:38.333
<v Speaker 4>to attract good students to university. Well, if you're a

1:14:38.493 --> 1:14:41.493
<v Speaker 4>university that gives first class de reason out generously, then

1:14:41.493 --> 1:14:43.653
<v Speaker 4>that's one reason why student might choose to go with you.

1:14:43.933 --> 1:14:45.933
<v Speaker 4>But of course it means that standards are being lowered

1:14:47.013 --> 1:14:50.613
<v Speaker 4>for market reasons, and so you know, if there's are

1:14:50.693 --> 1:14:53.853
<v Speaker 4>undermining their own credibility in this.

1:14:53.853 --> 1:14:58.773
<v Speaker 3>Way, how much do you indulge in politics? Oh, publicly

1:14:58.933 --> 1:14:59.493
<v Speaker 3>or privately.

1:15:01.373 --> 1:15:04.853
<v Speaker 4>I'm now out of myself as a conservative, so I

1:15:04.893 --> 1:15:06.973
<v Speaker 4>do politics at.

1:15:06.853 --> 1:15:10.813
<v Speaker 3>This point of time. And by the time we are

1:15:10.893 --> 1:15:16.973
<v Speaker 3>released with this podcast, they'll be counting votes. What's your

1:15:17.013 --> 1:15:22.613
<v Speaker 3>thought on the American elect presidential election. I'm not even

1:15:22.693 --> 1:15:24.493
<v Speaker 3>really asking you who do you think is going to win,

1:15:24.693 --> 1:15:28.853
<v Speaker 3>because that's a question most people are trying to avoid.

1:15:29.453 --> 1:15:34.533
<v Speaker 3>I'm just I'm wondering, if you accept the complaint of

1:15:34.773 --> 1:15:39.013
<v Speaker 3>how could a country, a nation as big as three

1:15:39.093 --> 1:15:45.093
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty million people, produce two candidates of such inferiority.

1:15:46.413 --> 1:15:51.053
<v Speaker 3>That was before Biden resigned, and it's now applicable to

1:15:51.093 --> 1:15:54.053
<v Speaker 3>his replacement. Now I'm not saying that's what I believe,

1:15:54.133 --> 1:15:56.933
<v Speaker 3>but that's what that's the quote, and I'm wondering what

1:15:57.013 --> 1:15:57.693
<v Speaker 3>your response is.

1:16:00.813 --> 1:16:05.773
<v Speaker 4>Well, if the complained is about the quality of front

1:16:05.853 --> 1:16:09.453
<v Speaker 4>rank politicians. Then there's not just an American problem. I

1:16:09.453 --> 1:16:13.653
<v Speaker 4>think we have a general problem in the democratic world

1:16:13.893 --> 1:16:16.253
<v Speaker 4>that the best people are not going to politics, and

1:16:16.933 --> 1:16:21.453
<v Speaker 4>the quality of politicians that appears quite mediocre generally. As

1:16:21.493 --> 1:16:24.653
<v Speaker 4>for the American situation, well, of course, although you and

1:16:24.693 --> 1:16:27.933
<v Speaker 4>I look get to vote, we and the rest of

1:16:27.973 --> 1:16:30.733
<v Speaker 4>the world, and not least the free world will have

1:16:30.773 --> 1:16:34.453
<v Speaker 4>to suffer the result in one way or another. Yeah,

1:16:34.733 --> 1:16:37.573
<v Speaker 4>I mean yes, of course. Donald Trump, in so many

1:16:37.653 --> 1:16:45.253
<v Speaker 4>ways is this mainly crude and appears quite stupid. Sometimes.

1:16:45.293 --> 1:16:47.853
<v Speaker 4>On the other hand, those who watch the effect of

1:16:47.893 --> 1:16:52.053
<v Speaker 4>his policies when he was present say that with regard

1:16:52.173 --> 1:16:56.253
<v Speaker 4>to deterring Russia and China, he was actually more robust

1:16:56.893 --> 1:17:01.653
<v Speaker 4>than Obama and Biden. There is also the feature that

1:17:02.653 --> 1:17:05.693
<v Speaker 4>whatever you think of Donald Trump himself, the fact there

1:17:05.773 --> 1:17:08.053
<v Speaker 4>is a lot of Americans want to vote for him,

1:17:08.573 --> 1:17:11.973
<v Speaker 4>and they are often Americans who feel left behind or

1:17:12.013 --> 1:17:16.853
<v Speaker 4>ignored by the progressive elite. And I've certainly seen in

1:17:16.853 --> 1:17:20.293
<v Speaker 4>my own country. I see it all the time. The

1:17:20.373 --> 1:17:24.373
<v Speaker 4>progressive elites do not want to hear certain things, certainly

1:17:24.413 --> 1:17:28.893
<v Speaker 4>not about immigration, and they just refuse to listen, and

1:17:28.933 --> 1:17:31.933
<v Speaker 4>as a consequence of which people who are concerned about

1:17:31.973 --> 1:17:36.453
<v Speaker 4>let's say illegal immigration or the rate of immigration, or

1:17:36.573 --> 1:17:42.213
<v Speaker 4>that the impact of immigration on housing or parts of

1:17:42.213 --> 1:17:46.293
<v Speaker 4>the country that are still languishing in post industrial ruin,

1:17:47.013 --> 1:17:49.293
<v Speaker 4>the refusal of the left to pay attention to other

1:17:49.373 --> 1:17:52.413
<v Speaker 4>things just means that other people who are concerned about

1:17:52.453 --> 1:17:56.733
<v Speaker 4>them become increasingly illustrated and move to the right, so

1:17:56.813 --> 1:18:00.893
<v Speaker 4>that the deafness of the left causes an absurge in

1:18:00.973 --> 1:18:03.093
<v Speaker 4>support for the right. And I think that's to some

1:18:03.213 --> 1:18:07.293
<v Speaker 4>extent to it. In so far as you find Trump

1:18:07.893 --> 1:18:11.853
<v Speaker 4>apport the fault, I think lies to a large extent

1:18:12.573 --> 1:18:13.853
<v Speaker 4>on the side of the Democrats.

1:18:14.613 --> 1:18:19.453
<v Speaker 3>You just used a word that was in my mental

1:18:19.653 --> 1:18:23.893
<v Speaker 3>waiting list. You said it, You said it lies with

1:18:23.973 --> 1:18:27.253
<v Speaker 3>the with the Democrats. My belief is that there are

1:18:27.293 --> 1:18:32.333
<v Speaker 3>so many lies being told now that objecting, objecting that

1:18:32.373 --> 1:18:37.853
<v Speaker 3>they're wrong is a waste of time. The lies, the

1:18:37.893 --> 1:18:42.533
<v Speaker 3>lies are breeding like flies, and and even even when

1:18:42.573 --> 1:18:46.333
<v Speaker 3>they are discredited. And I'm thinking of three or so

1:18:46.693 --> 1:18:51.733
<v Speaker 3>quotes from Trump that got twisted and thrown thrown at

1:18:51.773 --> 1:18:54.813
<v Speaker 3>him from a from a different perspective. Obama was using

1:18:54.853 --> 1:18:59.093
<v Speaker 3>one of them yesterday in the speech, and I can't

1:18:59.253 --> 1:19:02.573
<v Speaker 3>understand why they get away with it. The only reason

1:19:02.613 --> 1:19:05.733
<v Speaker 3>that I can provide is that things have standards have

1:19:05.773 --> 1:19:09.013
<v Speaker 3>collapsed so much that nobody cares well.

1:19:09.253 --> 1:19:12.333
<v Speaker 4>It's a dangerous supposed to be, isn't And I agree.

1:19:12.573 --> 1:19:18.013
<v Speaker 4>And social media, which is so uninhibited, allows lies to

1:19:18.133 --> 1:19:21.573
<v Speaker 4>spread in a way that they couldn't do informer generations.

1:19:22.173 --> 1:19:25.453
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm an academic. I try to be reasonable,

1:19:25.773 --> 1:19:28.853
<v Speaker 4>and I'm sometimes perplexed as to how on earth one

1:19:29.613 --> 1:19:36.013
<v Speaker 4>persuades people who are zealous and dogmatic. And I think

1:19:36.013 --> 1:19:38.573
<v Speaker 4>I've come an inclusion. If people want to lie, you

1:19:38.573 --> 1:19:40.693
<v Speaker 4>can't stop them. You just can't stop them. If they

1:19:40.693 --> 1:19:43.533
<v Speaker 4>want to lie, they'll carry on doing it unless they

1:19:44.093 --> 1:19:47.813
<v Speaker 4>suffer some kind of penalty. All one can do. And

1:19:47.893 --> 1:19:52.173
<v Speaker 4>I just assisted doing this. I tell the truth as

1:19:52.213 --> 1:19:56.373
<v Speaker 4>best I know it. I try and expose lies I

1:19:56.413 --> 1:20:01.533
<v Speaker 4>find around me as best I can. My experience has

1:20:01.573 --> 1:20:04.173
<v Speaker 4>been certainly through the success of my book. And I

1:20:04.253 --> 1:20:08.413
<v Speaker 4>mentioned the editor of plum Scree, who commissioned it for

1:20:08.533 --> 1:20:12.573
<v Speaker 4>blooms Free canceled it. He predicted sales up up to

1:20:12.693 --> 1:20:16.333
<v Speaker 4>twenty thousand copies. It's now soul over sixty thousand copies.

1:20:16.933 --> 1:20:22.573
<v Speaker 4>My experience in Oxford was putting on lectures to platform

1:20:22.653 --> 1:20:25.813
<v Speaker 4>more or less conservative thinking. There's a big appetite for it,

1:20:26.293 --> 1:20:28.373
<v Speaker 4>and since I've been in Australia, a lot of people

1:20:28.413 --> 1:20:30.373
<v Speaker 4>want to hear what I have to say. So I'm

1:20:30.533 --> 1:20:34.173
<v Speaker 4>encouraged that. You know, the lopul out there who don't

1:20:34.733 --> 1:20:40.733
<v Speaker 4>buy the lies, don't buy the orthodoxies about race and

1:20:40.813 --> 1:20:43.773
<v Speaker 4>gender and colonial history. They don't know very much, but

1:20:43.813 --> 1:20:46.613
<v Speaker 4>they know enough to know that doesn't make sense. But

1:20:46.893 --> 1:20:50.133
<v Speaker 4>who are eager to be told the whole truth? So

1:20:50.213 --> 1:20:53.493
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to unestimate the problem later. And you know,

1:20:53.493 --> 1:20:57.173
<v Speaker 4>most people like be talking to or not youngsters. But

1:20:58.533 --> 1:21:01.693
<v Speaker 4>there's an appetet out there for the truth and whatever

1:21:01.733 --> 1:21:07.173
<v Speaker 4>the difficult is, and however formidable task looks those of

1:21:07.293 --> 1:21:09.733
<v Speaker 4>us well, we all have a responsibility to speak the

1:21:09.733 --> 1:21:12.733
<v Speaker 4>truth as we know it, and I'm confident more people

1:21:12.813 --> 1:21:15.933
<v Speaker 4>will listen than we might we might fear.

1:21:16.413 --> 1:21:20.253
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I just got to quite you a headline and

1:21:21.333 --> 1:21:24.773
<v Speaker 3>my question is very simple. Do you believe the following?

1:21:25.773 --> 1:21:30.933
<v Speaker 3>And if so, can you explain it? But I will

1:21:30.933 --> 1:21:39.253
<v Speaker 3>allow a brief explanation why the ruling class fears democracy.

1:21:40.653 --> 1:21:41.453
<v Speaker 3>Do you agree with that?

1:21:43.093 --> 1:21:48.893
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I do. I do because the ruling class has

1:21:48.933 --> 1:21:55.493
<v Speaker 4>discovered that democratic politics will produce results they don't like.

1:21:56.133 --> 1:21:59.293
<v Speaker 4>So it produced Brexit, and it may well produce the

1:21:59.333 --> 1:22:05.453
<v Speaker 4>second Trump presidency. And so yes, Presa elites begin to

1:22:05.493 --> 1:22:10.213
<v Speaker 4>wonder about democracy because people are getting wrong. Well, you know,

1:22:11.053 --> 1:22:15.613
<v Speaker 4>I'm a democrat written and I know that democracy isn't perfect.

1:22:15.653 --> 1:22:18.933
<v Speaker 4>I mean Hitler. Hitler came to pound that I said before,

1:22:19.893 --> 1:22:25.213
<v Speaker 4>by normal democratic constitutional means. So you know, the people

1:22:25.213 --> 1:22:28.933
<v Speaker 4>can get badly wrong, that's for sure. But the alternatives

1:22:28.973 --> 1:22:31.533
<v Speaker 4>democracy are even worse. And what we have to do is,

1:22:32.493 --> 1:22:36.293
<v Speaker 4>first of all, when the people give an answer we

1:22:36.293 --> 1:22:39.373
<v Speaker 4>don't want to hear, we need to listen very carefully.

1:22:39.933 --> 1:22:41.853
<v Speaker 4>Just in the case that people are saying something we

1:22:41.533 --> 1:22:44.653
<v Speaker 4>needed to hear. What we shouldn't do, and this is

1:22:44.653 --> 1:22:47.693
<v Speaker 4>what the eleite to do is to dismiss the people

1:22:47.733 --> 1:22:54.253
<v Speaker 4>as ignorant, uncivilized, wicked. So those are voted for Brexit,

1:22:54.293 --> 1:22:59.893
<v Speaker 4>we're all stupid white xenophobes with a salader for empire

1:22:59.933 --> 1:23:06.453
<v Speaker 4>wanted to take Britain back to nineteen hundred, just as

1:23:06.493 --> 1:23:09.773
<v Speaker 4>the left too often does. Instead of engaging and engaging

1:23:09.813 --> 1:23:14.213
<v Speaker 4>with the reasons, the real reasons. The left too often

1:23:14.733 --> 1:23:17.853
<v Speaker 4>reaches for dismissal, just just wipe it off the table

1:23:18.613 --> 1:23:22.693
<v Speaker 4>and to dismiss the people. So although the people sometimes

1:23:22.773 --> 1:23:27.333
<v Speaker 4>do get it wrong, elites need to listen because if

1:23:27.333 --> 1:23:30.453
<v Speaker 4>they don't listen, they are going to be responsible for

1:23:30.813 --> 1:23:35.373
<v Speaker 4>a violent reaction. But I'm afraid too many elites just

1:23:35.413 --> 1:23:39.853
<v Speaker 4>talk to themselves and they're not honest, and they stay

1:23:39.853 --> 1:23:41.333
<v Speaker 4>in their comfort zone, and they need to come out

1:23:41.333 --> 1:23:45.453
<v Speaker 4>and and listen carefully and look carefully, and not just

1:23:46.173 --> 1:23:50.013
<v Speaker 4>dismiss some popular view views they don't like as racist

1:23:50.093 --> 1:23:51.373
<v Speaker 4>or as anaphobic or whatever.

1:23:52.853 --> 1:23:55.413
<v Speaker 3>Just looking at the line of this is quite by accident,

1:23:55.533 --> 1:24:01.413
<v Speaker 3>because I was about the rapid a line from your

1:24:01.853 --> 1:24:05.333
<v Speaker 3>article that I'll get to in a second. That is

1:24:05.373 --> 1:24:10.653
<v Speaker 3>not how the progressive lift react. What's the progressive just quickly.

1:24:12.373 --> 1:24:17.573
<v Speaker 4>Well, I define a progressive as someone who believes in

1:24:18.253 --> 1:24:22.373
<v Speaker 4>trans generous self identification, who believes that our societies are

1:24:22.413 --> 1:24:26.373
<v Speaker 4>systemic the racism, believes that clone history was nothing but wickedness.

1:24:27.253 --> 1:24:33.853
<v Speaker 4>What's more, a progressive is authoritarian, will not heed dissent,

1:24:33.973 --> 1:24:36.253
<v Speaker 4>will not listen to descent, and does their best to

1:24:37.093 --> 1:24:42.213
<v Speaker 4>repress it, repress it. So I'll talk about the repressive left,

1:24:42.333 --> 1:24:46.013
<v Speaker 4>because they all left was more liberal. You know that

1:24:46.133 --> 1:24:48.773
<v Speaker 4>they all left would have an argument with you and

1:24:48.813 --> 1:24:52.733
<v Speaker 4>give reasons this plot the repressive left, they don't want

1:24:52.773 --> 1:24:55.453
<v Speaker 4>an argument. They want to use power. They want to

1:24:55.533 --> 1:24:58.653
<v Speaker 4>use a timidation to shut things down. So it's a

1:24:58.653 --> 1:25:03.773
<v Speaker 4>combination of a certain dogmatic point of view plus authoritarian politics.

1:25:04.933 --> 1:25:09.733
<v Speaker 3>You might have wondered that the of my life.

1:25:11.213 --> 1:25:11.853
<v Speaker 4>What are you thinking?

1:25:13.013 --> 1:25:16.453
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I can I can describe a progressive in in

1:25:16.613 --> 1:25:19.973
<v Speaker 3>two words? All right, go ahead, and you send her

1:25:20.013 --> 1:25:28.533
<v Speaker 3>adern by her own by her own exclamation. But but

1:25:29.493 --> 1:25:32.653
<v Speaker 3>people listening to this know my thoughts on that. Soon

1:25:32.653 --> 1:25:34.453
<v Speaker 3>as soon as as soon as I as soon as

1:25:34.493 --> 1:25:37.653
<v Speaker 3>I heard her say that she was a progressive, I knew,

1:25:38.053 --> 1:25:40.773
<v Speaker 3>I knew we were in trouble. So so now I

1:25:40.813 --> 1:25:43.813
<v Speaker 3>have to get very quickly with you because I'm wearing

1:25:43.813 --> 1:25:51.253
<v Speaker 3>your sin. I want to encourage the reading of how

1:25:51.373 --> 1:25:55.013
<v Speaker 3>conservatives can win the culture Wars that you wrote and

1:25:55.053 --> 1:26:00.853
<v Speaker 3>published only what less than a week ago in in

1:26:00.973 --> 1:26:04.613
<v Speaker 3>Quadrant magazine and the current Quadrant magazine. It's the lead story.

1:26:04.653 --> 1:26:08.333
<v Speaker 3>I think from memory, how conservatives can win the culture

1:26:08.493 --> 1:26:10.533
<v Speaker 3>wardshould why should we read it?

1:26:12.893 --> 1:26:17.453
<v Speaker 4>You should read it first of all, because you're right. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

1:26:18.773 --> 1:26:23.493
<v Speaker 4>uh read it because some conservatives, sort of centrist conservatives,

1:26:24.333 --> 1:26:28.613
<v Speaker 4>pretend that the culture wars are not important, that they're manufactured,

1:26:29.133 --> 1:26:32.733
<v Speaker 4>and they're the kind of things that that nasty people

1:26:32.773 --> 1:26:34.853
<v Speaker 4>on the extreme right and extreme left fight and we

1:26:34.893 --> 1:26:37.093
<v Speaker 4>should rise above it. And I say no, the culture

1:26:37.213 --> 1:26:43.093
<v Speaker 4>was enormously important for the safety of women, for hormongious

1:26:43.173 --> 1:26:46.933
<v Speaker 4>race relations, and for the self confidence of the liberal

1:26:46.933 --> 1:26:50.573
<v Speaker 4>Western the face of threats from China and Russia. So

1:26:50.653 --> 1:26:52.933
<v Speaker 4>conservatives need to get in there and win the argument

1:26:52.973 --> 1:26:57.573
<v Speaker 4>because important truths are at stake here, and we can

1:26:57.613 --> 1:27:00.493
<v Speaker 4>win it, I think, because, as I've said, most people

1:27:00.573 --> 1:27:05.813
<v Speaker 4>in our societies don't know enough about race and gender

1:27:05.893 --> 1:27:11.693
<v Speaker 4>and colonial history. They're not entirely convinced by the progressive

1:27:12.333 --> 1:27:16.093
<v Speaker 4>story being hoisted upon them. So if we can simply

1:27:16.173 --> 1:27:23.213
<v Speaker 4>mobilize the unsure, slightly intimidated majority, I think the landscape,

1:27:23.213 --> 1:27:27.053
<v Speaker 4>the political landscape, would change quickly. But some of us

1:27:27.093 --> 1:27:29.573
<v Speaker 4>need to have the courage or the recklessness to stand

1:27:29.653 --> 1:27:33.573
<v Speaker 4>up and say things that other people object to in

1:27:33.613 --> 1:27:36.533
<v Speaker 4>the hope that we can really the troops and just

1:27:36.693 --> 1:27:39.573
<v Speaker 4>encourage more people to voice their doubts because their doubts

1:27:39.613 --> 1:27:43.333
<v Speaker 4>actually are reasonable and they ensure some of the stuff

1:27:43.333 --> 1:27:46.733
<v Speaker 4>they're being told is false, and it is false. So

1:27:46.773 --> 1:27:50.653
<v Speaker 4>we need together the troops to start exposing the falsehoods.

1:27:51.253 --> 1:27:53.813
<v Speaker 3>It's a mastery as far as I'm concerned, how conservatives

1:27:53.853 --> 1:27:57.213
<v Speaker 3>can win. The culture was and it's the I think

1:27:57.253 --> 1:28:04.093
<v Speaker 3>the lead story in the November Quadrant magazine from Australia

1:28:04.213 --> 1:28:07.013
<v Speaker 3>that I encourage everyone to read.

1:28:07.613 --> 1:28:10.013
<v Speaker 4>Yes I should. I should add later that it was

1:28:10.013 --> 1:28:11.973
<v Speaker 4>a Quadrant that brought me for the first time to

1:28:11.973 --> 1:28:17.773
<v Speaker 4>Australia three weeks ago, and now FSU New Zealand have

1:28:17.853 --> 1:28:19.693
<v Speaker 4>brought me here to Wellington.

1:28:19.493 --> 1:28:23.293
<v Speaker 3>The Free Speech Union, of course. And you're talking, you're

1:28:23.333 --> 1:28:24.293
<v Speaker 3>talking tonight.

1:28:25.813 --> 1:28:29.533
<v Speaker 4>Talking to night in summer in Parliament, I believe I'm

1:28:29.573 --> 1:28:35.333
<v Speaker 4>also talking in christ Church on Wednesday and in Auckland

1:28:35.573 --> 1:28:36.893
<v Speaker 4>on on Saturdays.

1:28:38.333 --> 1:28:43.253
<v Speaker 3>Excellent, Nigel Bigger. It's been a huge pleasure, at a

1:28:43.333 --> 1:28:49.533
<v Speaker 3>privilege to meet you sort of. And and one day

1:28:50.253 --> 1:28:51.813
<v Speaker 3>if I get to shake your hand, you can buy

1:28:51.893 --> 1:28:53.253
<v Speaker 3>me a drink. I'm sorry, I'll buy.

1:28:53.133 --> 1:28:57.093
<v Speaker 4>You a drink. I will, Linton, And thanks so much

1:28:57.093 --> 1:28:58.893
<v Speaker 4>for having me on because these issues are so important

1:28:58.893 --> 1:29:00.773
<v Speaker 4>to all of us, and it's great that you give

1:29:00.813 --> 1:29:02.413
<v Speaker 4>me the maritime it's my pleasure.

1:29:02.693 --> 1:29:09.373
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for now Light and swith okay mail room

1:29:09.453 --> 1:29:12.853
<v Speaker 3>for two hundred and sixty three, missus producer. We are

1:29:13.013 --> 1:29:16.453
<v Speaker 3>very close to the first the first announcements with regard

1:29:16.573 --> 1:29:20.453
<v Speaker 3>to the election, and I think we'll just play this

1:29:20.493 --> 1:29:21.053
<v Speaker 3>straight down the.

1:29:21.013 --> 1:29:25.173
<v Speaker 5>Middle, absolutely latent, so let's get let's get going with it.

1:29:25.773 --> 1:29:30.813
<v Speaker 5>Aileen says, it wouldn't surprise me if Queen Kamala the

1:29:30.853 --> 1:29:34.053
<v Speaker 5>Kookabaro wins the election on November the fifth, Bring on

1:29:34.133 --> 1:29:37.613
<v Speaker 5>the skyrockets and Roman candles. She'll be laughing all the

1:29:37.653 --> 1:29:39.773
<v Speaker 5>way to the top, and so will her handlers in

1:29:39.853 --> 1:29:44.013
<v Speaker 5>the background. Political dynasties are powerful in the Democrat Party,

1:29:44.173 --> 1:29:48.053
<v Speaker 5>especially when they're lawyers, the Clinton's and the Obamas as

1:29:48.133 --> 1:29:54.853
<v Speaker 5>recent examples. But lawyers, no disrespect, aren't economists, and as wordsmiths,

1:29:54.933 --> 1:29:57.333
<v Speaker 5>they can often pull on emotions to win their case.

1:29:57.933 --> 1:30:01.213
<v Speaker 5>And Eileen says, God bless America and God defend New.

1:30:01.173 --> 1:30:05.973
<v Speaker 3>Zealand indeed on both counts. Now, Jenny, Jenny was watching

1:30:06.093 --> 1:30:08.933
<v Speaker 3>a television interview and she was for us by what

1:30:09.093 --> 1:30:12.733
<v Speaker 3>the interviewee was saying, I don't know who it was.

1:30:13.693 --> 1:30:15.613
<v Speaker 3>Until I can find out, I'll just leave that apart.

1:30:16.453 --> 1:30:19.453
<v Speaker 3>I'm totally perplexed. She goes on, who you can believe

1:30:19.533 --> 1:30:22.173
<v Speaker 3>in this troubled world in which we live. This gets

1:30:22.253 --> 1:30:24.933
<v Speaker 3>worse and worse the more it goes on. I'm beginning

1:30:25.013 --> 1:30:27.493
<v Speaker 3>to think that whoever wins the election, there's going to

1:30:27.533 --> 1:30:32.013
<v Speaker 3>be big trouble either way. We watched January sixth, carry

1:30:32.053 --> 1:30:35.773
<v Speaker 3>on when Trump requested police protection as there was talk

1:30:35.853 --> 1:30:40.213
<v Speaker 3>of trouble. Nanci Pelosi did not grant his request the

1:30:40.413 --> 1:30:44.253
<v Speaker 3>extra for the extra protection, and the officers did not arrive.

1:30:44.693 --> 1:30:47.613
<v Speaker 3>But there was a Democrat man who was identified by

1:30:47.693 --> 1:30:50.053
<v Speaker 3>the media as being a Democrat. He was wearing a

1:30:50.093 --> 1:30:52.493
<v Speaker 3>Trump hat. He was stirring up the crowd big time.

1:30:52.613 --> 1:30:57.333
<v Speaker 3>No mention of that occurring. I can't think of his name,

1:30:57.733 --> 1:31:00.373
<v Speaker 3>but he did get he got nailed in the end.

1:31:00.573 --> 1:31:02.693
<v Speaker 3>I think he had a connection with the FBI, But

1:31:02.773 --> 1:31:05.693
<v Speaker 3>I'm not totally sure. Are you able to mention any

1:31:05.733 --> 1:31:06.853
<v Speaker 3>of this on your podcast?

1:31:08.053 --> 1:31:08.093
<v Speaker 2>No?

1:31:08.733 --> 1:31:11.613
<v Speaker 3>I can't, or is the subject much too sensitive to

1:31:11.733 --> 1:31:16.453
<v Speaker 3>even try? Never roll on the fifth, Well, here we are, Leyton.

1:31:16.173 --> 1:31:18.293
<v Speaker 5>Michael says, love your show, but I won't say a

1:31:18.373 --> 1:31:22.213
<v Speaker 5>second Trump presidency is inevitable just yet. Too many gaffes

1:31:22.253 --> 1:31:25.373
<v Speaker 5>the left wing media have pounced on at the moment,

1:31:25.453 --> 1:31:28.653
<v Speaker 5>such as the Puerto Rico joke, and they don't care

1:31:28.693 --> 1:31:32.013
<v Speaker 5>if women like it or not comment and Professor Lickman,

1:31:32.093 --> 1:31:35.493
<v Speaker 5>who's been write nine out of ten past elections, is

1:31:35.613 --> 1:31:39.213
<v Speaker 5>still predicting a Harris victory. Hopefully this will be his

1:31:39.413 --> 1:31:41.053
<v Speaker 5>second incorrect prediction.

1:31:41.373 --> 1:31:44.373
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you need a coin, that's all toss up. Some

1:31:44.573 --> 1:31:48.733
<v Speaker 3>comments from Claire some comments regarding a letter about how

1:31:49.173 --> 1:31:52.693
<v Speaker 3>easy it is for overseas people to fraudulently vote in

1:31:52.733 --> 1:31:56.093
<v Speaker 3>the US election. As an expat who voted, I know

1:31:56.213 --> 1:32:00.653
<v Speaker 3>it's not easy. But first, Bezos doesn't need to endorse Kamara.

1:32:01.413 --> 1:32:04.173
<v Speaker 3>With almost every article favorable to her in his newspaper,

1:32:04.293 --> 1:32:08.653
<v Speaker 3>it's extremely clear he supports her. I wouldn't actually count

1:32:08.773 --> 1:32:12.013
<v Speaker 3>on that the moment. You might be right, you might

1:32:12.093 --> 1:32:16.093
<v Speaker 3>be wrong. For an expat to vote. We need an

1:32:16.253 --> 1:32:20.013
<v Speaker 3>address at our last domicide in the US. We need

1:32:20.213 --> 1:32:22.893
<v Speaker 3>a social Security number, we need to fill in a

1:32:23.013 --> 1:32:27.573
<v Speaker 3>voter registration and absentee ballot request, sign it and email

1:32:27.613 --> 1:32:31.613
<v Speaker 3>it back. Due to time zone differences, weekends, etc. This

1:32:31.773 --> 1:32:35.973
<v Speaker 3>took me about four days. Only then will they send

1:32:36.053 --> 1:32:39.213
<v Speaker 3>you your ballot with strict instructions on mailing it back.

1:32:39.333 --> 1:32:42.853
<v Speaker 3>That's right, mailing it back. Four years ago I voted online,

1:32:42.893 --> 1:32:46.013
<v Speaker 3>but maybe because of fraud, that option was not available

1:32:46.133 --> 1:32:49.373
<v Speaker 3>this year. The ballot must be placed into a plain

1:32:49.533 --> 1:32:54.293
<v Speaker 3>envelope with voted ballot written on it. This envelope is

1:32:54.333 --> 1:32:58.053
<v Speaker 3>then placed into another plane envelope, also with instructions on

1:32:58.133 --> 1:33:01.213
<v Speaker 3>that envelope as to the mailing address and where your

1:33:01.293 --> 1:33:05.093
<v Speaker 3>return address and signature goes. I wanted to track my ballot,

1:33:05.173 --> 1:33:08.413
<v Speaker 3>but New Zealand post only allows those blue places to

1:33:08.613 --> 1:33:12.053
<v Speaker 3>envelopes for tracking. My ballot would have been disallowed for

1:33:12.173 --> 1:33:17.053
<v Speaker 3>not being mailed in a plain envelope. Crazy, my state

1:33:17.333 --> 1:33:21.413
<v Speaker 3>is read my ballot wouldn't be necessarily so, but I

1:33:21.533 --> 1:33:24.093
<v Speaker 3>wanted to vote for Trump so he can take out

1:33:24.213 --> 1:33:29.333
<v Speaker 3>the garbage. Is to that, Thank you clear Layton.

1:33:29.413 --> 1:33:31.773
<v Speaker 5>Vanessa says, just wanted to say how much I enjoyed

1:33:31.813 --> 1:33:34.773
<v Speaker 5>listening to the latest podcast with your son Christian talking

1:33:34.853 --> 1:33:37.813
<v Speaker 5>with you from the UK. He says he'll talk again anytime.

1:33:37.973 --> 1:33:39.173
<v Speaker 5>You'll have to hold him to that.

1:33:39.693 --> 1:33:44.093
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, I will I am and as a promise. Now,

1:33:44.133 --> 1:33:48.013
<v Speaker 3>Allison writes once I was a listener to Candace Owen's

1:33:49.253 --> 1:33:51.493
<v Speaker 3>But have you heard her in the past year or so?

1:33:52.253 --> 1:33:55.893
<v Speaker 3>Her vitriol, her lies against Israel, her false and evil

1:33:55.933 --> 1:33:59.413
<v Speaker 3>accusations against the IDF. The way she words thinks her

1:33:59.533 --> 1:34:05.133
<v Speaker 3>serious slanders against all manner of persons such as Madame

1:34:05.653 --> 1:34:09.853
<v Speaker 3>Macron and others, is oppress and difficult to listen to,

1:34:10.253 --> 1:34:13.773
<v Speaker 3>so I don't online. One may look up the long

1:34:13.893 --> 1:34:17.653
<v Speaker 3>letter that Dennis Prager wrote to Candace, a one time

1:34:17.773 --> 1:34:20.653
<v Speaker 3>friend of his, trying to point out her errors in

1:34:20.813 --> 1:34:24.533
<v Speaker 3>his gracious way. But would it be too much to

1:34:24.573 --> 1:34:28.053
<v Speaker 3>say that there is no correcting Candace. When an arrogant

1:34:28.053 --> 1:34:31.053
<v Speaker 3>person knows everything, what is one to do but boycott her?

1:34:31.693 --> 1:34:35.613
<v Speaker 3>Her speech is so filled with deep rooted bitterness, anti Semitism,

1:34:35.813 --> 1:34:40.413
<v Speaker 3>false presuppositions, and lack of knowledge of the subject that

1:34:40.573 --> 1:34:44.733
<v Speaker 3>we actually have been praying that she not be accepted

1:34:44.893 --> 1:34:47.533
<v Speaker 3>in Australia. Our first prayer has been answered, and also

1:34:47.613 --> 1:34:51.173
<v Speaker 3>that New Zealand reject her application, waiting for our second

1:34:51.213 --> 1:34:54.413
<v Speaker 3>prayer to be heard. Bless you and Carolyn Layton, and

1:34:54.533 --> 1:34:57.493
<v Speaker 3>again thank you for all the hard work that you

1:34:57.613 --> 1:35:01.173
<v Speaker 3>do in bringing us a superb podcast every week. And

1:35:01.253 --> 1:35:04.013
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate that letter comment Allison.

1:35:03.733 --> 1:35:07.013
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, Paul says, thanks for all that you do.

1:35:07.173 --> 1:35:09.453
<v Speaker 5>I don't know how you do it up against ignorance

1:35:09.533 --> 1:35:13.253
<v Speaker 5>so called media actors and announcers who are either too

1:35:13.373 --> 1:35:15.733
<v Speaker 5>complacent to go and find the truth or more likely

1:35:15.893 --> 1:35:18.813
<v Speaker 5>too lazy, pathetic and scared to speak the truth.

1:35:18.893 --> 1:35:22.133
<v Speaker 3>I'll go for the second, do what is right.

1:35:22.853 --> 1:35:24.933
<v Speaker 5>I'm not a religious man, but I am praying for

1:35:25.013 --> 1:35:28.093
<v Speaker 5>the right outcome on Tuesday, Wednesday, New Zealand Time.

1:35:28.413 --> 1:35:31.813
<v Speaker 3>And that's from Paul, Paul, and that's it. Thanks. Now

1:35:32.013 --> 1:35:35.493
<v Speaker 3>we wait to see in the well. By the time

1:35:35.573 --> 1:35:37.373
<v Speaker 3>you hear this, of course we all know numbers, but

1:35:37.493 --> 1:35:40.573
<v Speaker 3>at the moment we speak with bated breath. Well, I

1:35:40.653 --> 1:35:42.093
<v Speaker 3>was going to say ignorance that I thought, no, that's

1:35:42.133 --> 1:35:47.293
<v Speaker 3>the wrong word. It could be misinterpreted without information. That's right,

1:35:47.413 --> 1:35:57.893
<v Speaker 3>see you soon, see you. Now that will take us

1:35:57.893 --> 1:36:00.413
<v Speaker 3>out to a number two sixty three. I have to

1:36:00.453 --> 1:36:02.293
<v Speaker 3>say that it was put together under a little bit

1:36:02.333 --> 1:36:06.013
<v Speaker 3>of pressure, but nevertheless we got there. I think. So

1:36:06.333 --> 1:36:08.053
<v Speaker 3>if you would like to write to us Layton and

1:36:08.173 --> 1:36:10.493
<v Speaker 3>New U Talks av dot co dot nz or Carolyn

1:36:10.533 --> 1:36:13.973
<v Speaker 3>at newstalksb dot co dot nz. I would expect and

1:36:14.093 --> 1:36:16.493
<v Speaker 3>hope there'll be plenty of commentary on the on the

1:36:16.573 --> 1:36:20.573
<v Speaker 3>election outcome, part of which we have covered. I wish

1:36:20.613 --> 1:36:23.813
<v Speaker 3>there was more. So it remains to be said that

1:36:23.933 --> 1:36:25.933
<v Speaker 3>we shall be back for two seventy four in a

1:36:26.013 --> 1:36:29.853
<v Speaker 3>few days. Until then, thank you for listening and we'll

1:36:29.973 --> 1:36:30.413
<v Speaker 3>talk soon.

1:36:38.453 --> 1:36:41.653
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for more from News Talks B.

1:36:41.933 --> 1:36:45.173
<v Speaker 1>Listen live on air or online, and keep our shows

1:36:45.213 --> 1:36:48.493
<v Speaker 1>with you wherever you go with our podcast on iHeartRadio