WEBVTT - Rugby Direct - Episode 201

0:00:09.093 --> 0:00:11.973
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from News Talks at B.

0:00:12.373 --> 0:00:16.173
<v Speaker 1>Follow this and our Wide Ranger podcasts now on iHeartRadio,

0:00:20.413 --> 0:00:22.173
<v Speaker 1>Straight down the Middle.

0:00:21.853 --> 0:00:29.853
<v Speaker 2>Of Trump Sky, try to.

0:00:29.853 --> 0:00:33.973
<v Speaker 1>Get inside the game from every end goal. It's Rugby

0:00:33.973 --> 0:00:37.653
<v Speaker 1>Direct with Elliott Smith and Liam Navier powered by News

0:00:37.693 --> 0:00:38.213
<v Speaker 1>Talks EDB.

0:00:39.013 --> 0:00:41.533
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in to Rugby Direct powered by Habit Held Physio

0:00:41.573 --> 0:00:45.533
<v Speaker 2>book Today and Stay in the Game Rugby Direct Back.

0:00:45.613 --> 0:00:48.973
<v Speaker 2>We had Super Rugby Around one and the books. Elliott

0:00:48.973 --> 0:00:54.053
<v Speaker 2>Smith with me is Liam Napier, rugby writer, correspondent, co host,

0:00:54.093 --> 0:00:56.893
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, et cetera, Liam, Super Rugby Round ones in

0:00:56.933 --> 0:01:01.013
<v Speaker 2>the Books. Overall, how did you feel about the quality

0:01:01.013 --> 0:01:02.333
<v Speaker 2>of rugby we saw over the weekend.

0:01:03.133 --> 0:01:06.053
<v Speaker 3>I think it was a typical first round, Elliott. Great

0:01:06.093 --> 0:01:11.733
<v Speaker 3>to have it back on our earways. Suffered somewhat from

0:01:11.733 --> 0:01:13.853
<v Speaker 3>not having the best team in the competition start the round.

0:01:14.013 --> 0:01:16.573
<v Speaker 3>The Hurricanes, you know, almost came out in protest with

0:01:16.653 --> 0:01:21.173
<v Speaker 3>them not there right okay, but there was some quality.

0:01:21.373 --> 0:01:24.653
<v Speaker 3>There was some great passages, and I think there was

0:01:25.573 --> 0:01:29.813
<v Speaker 3>some clunkiness as well and some underwhelming long.

0:01:29.693 --> 0:01:30.613
<v Speaker 4>Patches as well.

0:01:30.653 --> 0:01:33.693
<v Speaker 3>So I expect the season to get better, but great

0:01:33.693 --> 0:01:37.173
<v Speaker 3>to see some upsets. I think that's crucial for this competition.

0:01:37.573 --> 0:01:40.773
<v Speaker 3>We don't want it to be highly predictable, don't want

0:01:40.813 --> 0:01:41.213
<v Speaker 3>it to be.

0:01:43.173 --> 0:01:44.173
<v Speaker 4>Scripted, do we.

0:01:44.373 --> 0:01:50.013
<v Speaker 3>So props to the Highlanders in particular, everyone's second favorite

0:01:50.013 --> 0:01:50.773
<v Speaker 3>team for the week.

0:01:52.693 --> 0:01:55.973
<v Speaker 2>Not my second favorite team, but that's all right. You

0:01:56.013 --> 0:01:58.493
<v Speaker 2>know everyone else could have their second favorite teams the Highlanders.

0:01:58.693 --> 0:02:03.213
<v Speaker 2>Let's start the Highlanders twenty five Crusaders twenty three under

0:02:03.253 --> 0:02:06.493
<v Speaker 2>the roof in Dunedin, and this was a very good

0:02:06.493 --> 0:02:10.373
<v Speaker 2>performance from the Highlanders. I thought it first half took

0:02:10.373 --> 0:02:13.373
<v Speaker 2>advantage of the Crusaders eras Crusaders couldn't hold onto any

0:02:13.453 --> 0:02:16.853
<v Speaker 2>ball for that first period and just took their opportunities

0:02:16.893 --> 0:02:20.173
<v Speaker 2>when they came. I think you've got to look at

0:02:20.333 --> 0:02:24.653
<v Speaker 2>the Crusaders and go, you know, maybe you know Cody,

0:02:24.693 --> 0:02:26.453
<v Speaker 2>Taylor and Wild and I know they had all blacks rice,

0:02:26.493 --> 0:02:27.893
<v Speaker 2>but they looked a lot better when they were on

0:02:27.933 --> 0:02:30.373
<v Speaker 2>the park, but they just Crusaders looked clunky for that

0:02:30.453 --> 0:02:33.333
<v Speaker 2>first forty but the Highlanders looked like a team and

0:02:33.413 --> 0:02:35.493
<v Speaker 2>maybe because they hadn't had as many all blacks through

0:02:35.533 --> 0:02:37.493
<v Speaker 2>pre season, but they looked like a team ready to

0:02:37.493 --> 0:02:39.493
<v Speaker 2>go for Round one. The Crusaders looked like they've been

0:02:39.493 --> 0:02:42.693
<v Speaker 2>caught by surprise that super rugby had got underway.

0:02:42.773 --> 0:02:46.293
<v Speaker 3>It will start with the Highlanders. I think almost need

0:02:46.333 --> 0:02:50.173
<v Speaker 3>to offer an apology. Round one didn't give them a chance,

0:02:50.613 --> 0:02:53.093
<v Speaker 3>and this picture thought the Crusaders would do it comfortably.

0:02:53.653 --> 0:02:57.333
<v Speaker 3>And I heard this morning actually that the tab made

0:02:57.333 --> 0:03:00.573
<v Speaker 3>a killing on that game. One punter put ten grand

0:03:01.333 --> 0:03:03.613
<v Speaker 3>on the Crusaders. I certainly had them in a few multis,

0:03:03.693 --> 0:03:05.413
<v Speaker 3>so not to that extent.

0:03:05.733 --> 0:03:07.733
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think counts ten grand lighter this morning.

0:03:09.493 --> 0:03:13.133
<v Speaker 3>But the context around the Highlanders, isn't it having lost

0:03:13.173 --> 0:03:18.173
<v Speaker 3>the LM. Pledger, Fabian Hollands, they just seem like they're

0:03:18.173 --> 0:03:21.373
<v Speaker 3>on the Rackabit and Jamie Joseph the distraction around that.

0:03:23.133 --> 0:03:23.893
<v Speaker 4>Look at their roster.

0:03:24.213 --> 0:03:27.173
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't have the star stuttered names of the other

0:03:27.213 --> 0:03:30.373
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand franchises, but they turned up and I was

0:03:30.413 --> 0:03:35.053
<v Speaker 3>really impressed with some of their non headline players. Jack Taylor,

0:03:35.053 --> 0:03:36.773
<v Speaker 3>I know the line out really struggled, but he was

0:03:36.813 --> 0:03:41.093
<v Speaker 3>good around the field. Lucas Casey was good, good on debut.

0:03:41.453 --> 0:03:44.293
<v Speaker 3>And then when they do get that front foot platform,

0:03:44.533 --> 0:03:50.893
<v Speaker 3>the outside backs in particular lethal Jacob Ratamavuki Nipkins, Caleb Tungytowe.

0:03:50.973 --> 0:03:53.213
<v Speaker 3>The try that he scored just blistering pace. He is

0:03:53.253 --> 0:03:55.693
<v Speaker 3>an out and out finisher. It was a real statement

0:03:57.013 --> 0:03:59.453
<v Speaker 3>finished from him to beat fi Haki and one another

0:03:59.573 --> 0:04:01.933
<v Speaker 3>in the corner. You know, he didn't have a lot

0:04:01.933 --> 0:04:05.653
<v Speaker 3>of room to move, but pure pace and they just

0:04:05.733 --> 0:04:06.133
<v Speaker 3>kept coming.

0:04:06.173 --> 0:04:06.693
<v Speaker 4>The Hoighlanders.

0:04:06.773 --> 0:04:09.573
<v Speaker 3>It was quite a smart tactical decision to switch the

0:04:09.573 --> 0:04:12.213
<v Speaker 3>front rows to match what the Crusaders.

0:04:11.693 --> 0:04:12.653
<v Speaker 4>Were doing with their bench.

0:04:13.893 --> 0:04:18.293
<v Speaker 3>And it did feel like watching that game that the

0:04:18.333 --> 0:04:21.293
<v Speaker 3>Crusaders would come over the top. When they was at

0:04:21.333 --> 0:04:23.973
<v Speaker 3>the fifty minute mark, they introduced their bomb, scored six

0:04:24.013 --> 0:04:27.493
<v Speaker 3>players as you mentioned, Will Jordan, Cody Taylor, Fletcher Newell,

0:04:28.973 --> 0:04:32.933
<v Speaker 3>there was a host of others and the Crusaders just

0:04:32.973 --> 0:04:37.213
<v Speaker 3>went about their methodical grinds that felt like they were

0:04:37.253 --> 0:04:38.213
<v Speaker 3>going to come over the top.

0:04:39.973 --> 0:04:43.533
<v Speaker 2>Was that a mistake, Well, yeah, I guess they're balancing that.

0:04:43.573 --> 0:04:46.693
<v Speaker 2>All blacks restands. This is the juggling act that super

0:04:46.773 --> 0:04:50.813
<v Speaker 2>rugby coaches have got to deal with, and the Crusaders

0:04:51.133 --> 0:04:53.013
<v Speaker 2>you know, have probably you know the same amount of

0:04:53.013 --> 0:04:54.653
<v Speaker 2>all blots or around about the same as the Chiefs.

0:04:54.733 --> 0:04:57.133
<v Speaker 2>So the Chiefs went to Eden park in one, which

0:04:57.133 --> 0:04:59.253
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to a minute, but you've got a delicate

0:04:59.333 --> 0:05:02.173
<v Speaker 2>balancing act. But it felt like once the Crusaders had

0:05:02.173 --> 0:05:03.773
<v Speaker 2>those all blacks on the park, they looked a lot

0:05:03.813 --> 0:05:06.573
<v Speaker 2>better for that last half hour of the game. And

0:05:07.333 --> 0:05:09.173
<v Speaker 2>as you say, rolling over the top, well, they got

0:05:09.213 --> 0:05:12.253
<v Speaker 2>to the point that they were, you know, out in

0:05:12.333 --> 0:05:15.733
<v Speaker 2>front and had a one point leads and we're looking

0:05:15.773 --> 0:05:17.893
<v Speaker 2>perhaps the better team by that point. The Hinders had

0:05:17.893 --> 0:05:20.893
<v Speaker 2>sort of fallen away a little bit in the game,

0:05:20.933 --> 0:05:23.173
<v Speaker 2>but they gave away the penalty and the Highlanders cam

0:05:23.253 --> 0:05:25.893
<v Speaker 2>Miller clutch enough to win it. So look, I thought

0:05:25.933 --> 0:05:28.493
<v Speaker 2>the Crusaders played their best rugby between the fifty minute

0:05:28.493 --> 0:05:32.093
<v Speaker 2>mark and the seventy eighth minute mark. That Penry I

0:05:32.093 --> 0:05:35.293
<v Speaker 2>felt was correct, but not much that those two players

0:05:35.333 --> 0:05:37.133
<v Speaker 2>could have done in terms of, you know, collecting the

0:05:37.173 --> 0:05:40.893
<v Speaker 2>player coming through. But ultimately they left themselves too much

0:05:40.893 --> 0:05:42.493
<v Speaker 2>work to do because at the first half they were

0:05:42.613 --> 0:05:45.853
<v Speaker 2>just really really out of sorts, and as I say before,

0:05:45.853 --> 0:05:48.293
<v Speaker 2>it felt like they were a team caught by surprise

0:05:48.333 --> 0:05:50.093
<v Speaker 2>that Super Rugby had started on February fourteen.

0:05:50.693 --> 0:05:51.653
<v Speaker 4>They had some good performers.

0:05:51.693 --> 0:05:55.893
<v Speaker 3>Ethan Blackeader was everywhere from open side, but then others

0:05:56.253 --> 0:05:57.973
<v Speaker 3>guys at least defying a nook who I thought was

0:05:58.093 --> 0:05:58.933
<v Speaker 3>really underwhelming.

0:05:59.013 --> 0:06:01.013
<v Speaker 2>We touched on it. I thought it was very underwhelming, just.

0:06:00.973 --> 0:06:07.413
<v Speaker 3>His basic skills, his positional play really just a totally

0:06:07.493 --> 0:06:09.573
<v Speaker 3>off performance. I don't know whether going back to the

0:06:09.613 --> 0:06:11.813
<v Speaker 3>wing or switching into the midfield. We touched on it

0:06:11.893 --> 0:06:13.973
<v Speaker 3>last week about being a hybrid player. He was in

0:06:14.013 --> 0:06:16.213
<v Speaker 3>the ruck at times. Maybe he's got too much on

0:06:16.253 --> 0:06:16.613
<v Speaker 3>his plate.

0:06:16.693 --> 0:06:18.573
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this could all be the place. He doesn't look

0:06:18.613 --> 0:06:20.693
<v Speaker 2>like a wing anymore for me, And I know the

0:06:20.733 --> 0:06:22.773
<v Speaker 2>Crusaders have a few injuries around the wings that were

0:06:22.813 --> 0:06:25.373
<v Speaker 2>kind of forced to put him there. But he's barely

0:06:25.373 --> 0:06:27.213
<v Speaker 2>played wing for and we played there a couple of

0:06:27.213 --> 0:06:29.253
<v Speaker 2>times the All Blacks last year, but barely played there

0:06:29.293 --> 0:06:32.773
<v Speaker 2>for the best part of three years. And he got

0:06:32.773 --> 0:06:36.253
<v Speaker 2>out done for that first tribe. Poor defensive read and

0:06:36.293 --> 0:06:38.093
<v Speaker 2>then a lot of drop ball as well, which was

0:06:38.213 --> 0:06:39.933
<v Speaker 2>something we saw from him in the All Blacks last

0:06:40.013 --> 0:06:43.653
<v Speaker 2>year as well. One handed carry. He's just not able

0:06:43.693 --> 0:06:46.933
<v Speaker 2>to secure the ball. It feels like there's a really

0:06:47.013 --> 0:06:49.453
<v Speaker 2>quality player there, but he's just got to sharpen up

0:06:49.453 --> 0:06:51.653
<v Speaker 2>on some of those basic sets and I'm not sure

0:06:51.973 --> 0:06:54.013
<v Speaker 2>that he's a great defensive reader of the game. So

0:06:55.093 --> 0:06:57.133
<v Speaker 2>on the left wing he got found out for that tribe.

0:06:57.173 --> 0:06:59.453
<v Speaker 2>But again, at center, you've got to be strong on defense.

0:06:59.533 --> 0:07:01.493
<v Speaker 2>So I think there's a few question marks over him

0:07:01.533 --> 0:07:01.933
<v Speaker 2>this season.

0:07:02.173 --> 0:07:06.613
<v Speaker 3>There's no doubting his physical capabilities ball in hands at pace,

0:07:06.973 --> 0:07:10.293
<v Speaker 3>incredibly difficult to stop. But you those soft skills, catch pass,

0:07:11.293 --> 0:07:13.893
<v Speaker 3>defensive reads like you say, so there's some pretty big

0:07:13.933 --> 0:07:16.013
<v Speaker 3>flaws to for him to.

0:07:15.973 --> 0:07:20.213
<v Speaker 4>Work through there. Interesting around the turnout.

0:07:20.253 --> 0:07:22.573
<v Speaker 3>I think that they got fifteen thousand then it looked

0:07:22.613 --> 0:07:24.853
<v Speaker 3>like a great atmosphere. But I did read something from

0:07:25.373 --> 0:07:28.053
<v Speaker 3>Dylan Cleaver's piece that he made a late decision. He's

0:07:28.093 --> 0:07:32.173
<v Speaker 3>into needing to go to the game, and real backlog

0:07:32.173 --> 0:07:35.533
<v Speaker 3>of people trying to get in, So maybe something for

0:07:36.173 --> 0:07:37.333
<v Speaker 3>the stadium to address there.

0:07:37.453 --> 0:07:40.053
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's classic New Zealand, doesn't it. Though. You arrive

0:07:40.213 --> 0:07:42.813
<v Speaker 2>and hope, Yeah, you've got enough time without wanting to

0:07:42.853 --> 0:07:44.693
<v Speaker 2>sit in the stands for too long, and then ultimately

0:07:44.853 --> 0:07:45.733
<v Speaker 2>you get in the stands late.

0:07:45.773 --> 0:07:46.893
<v Speaker 4>But look, good turnout.

0:07:46.933 --> 0:07:49.213
<v Speaker 2>Good turnout for round one. I know the few people

0:07:49.253 --> 0:07:51.213
<v Speaker 2>saying they should have done it on Saturday because it

0:07:51.213 --> 0:07:53.093
<v Speaker 2>was obviously I think its O week last week, but

0:07:53.693 --> 0:07:55.853
<v Speaker 2>you know, there are various other considerations. I thought fifteen

0:07:55.893 --> 0:07:58.933
<v Speaker 2>thousand was pretty good and you've got another home game

0:07:58.933 --> 0:08:00.613
<v Speaker 2>this week against the Chiefs, so hopefully a good turn

0:08:00.653 --> 0:08:01.133
<v Speaker 2>out then too.

0:08:01.293 --> 0:08:05.333
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I think it also speaks to the rivalry. You know,

0:08:05.373 --> 0:08:07.653
<v Speaker 3>the Southern Derby is still a massive fixture on the

0:08:07.733 --> 0:08:09.813
<v Speaker 3>rugby calendar, and you saw what it meant to the

0:08:09.893 --> 0:08:12.973
<v Speaker 3>Harner's coaching box and the players to get.

0:08:12.893 --> 0:08:14.013
<v Speaker 4>Up over the Crusaders.

0:08:14.333 --> 0:08:16.773
<v Speaker 3>That's certainly a match that will always be circled long

0:08:16.813 --> 0:08:20.373
<v Speaker 3>on the calendar, and there was genuine passion and pride

0:08:20.613 --> 0:08:21.333
<v Speaker 3>in that performance.

0:08:21.373 --> 0:08:23.573
<v Speaker 2>The work I didn't have on this opening weekend is why.

0:08:23.773 --> 0:08:25.813
<v Speaker 2>You know they've made a lot about the thirtieth anniversary.

0:08:25.973 --> 0:08:29.053
<v Speaker 2>Why wouldn't you kick it off again with Blues and Hurricanes.

0:08:29.133 --> 0:08:31.213
<v Speaker 2>Now there's probably other reasons that are not privy too,

0:08:31.333 --> 0:08:34.453
<v Speaker 2>but that kicked off Super Rugby in ninety six. Why

0:08:34.493 --> 0:08:36.213
<v Speaker 2>not kick it off in twenty twenty six with Blues

0:08:36.293 --> 0:08:37.213
<v Speaker 2>Hurricanes again? Yeah?

0:08:37.213 --> 0:08:38.173
<v Speaker 4>It would have been an easy one.

0:08:38.293 --> 0:08:41.533
<v Speaker 3>Interesting to note that thirty years ago the Haunters beat

0:08:41.533 --> 0:08:44.933
<v Speaker 3>the Crusaders by two points and thirty years on they

0:08:44.973 --> 0:08:45.813
<v Speaker 3>beat them by two points.

0:08:45.933 --> 0:08:48.413
<v Speaker 2>Uniforms as well. I think that's how in the Crusaders

0:08:48.453 --> 0:08:50.493
<v Speaker 2>campaign and known only six was not one to remember.

0:08:50.653 --> 0:08:53.933
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, another one for the good guys, So up the Landers.

0:08:54.013 --> 0:08:57.533
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's enough for that. Let's move on to Saturday afternoon.

0:08:57.653 --> 0:09:02.013
<v Speaker 2>More on a pacifica Fiji and Drewer. Good win for

0:09:02.093 --> 0:09:05.573
<v Speaker 2>Winer pacificat on the road the Drewer your latok has

0:09:05.573 --> 0:09:08.813
<v Speaker 2>been a bit of a graveyard for visiting teams. We

0:09:08.853 --> 0:09:11.093
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of question marks over them last week

0:09:11.133 --> 0:09:14.613
<v Speaker 2>around how they were going to roll out this year.

0:09:15.373 --> 0:09:19.053
<v Speaker 2>But to go over Miracle Fire lungy bags a hat

0:09:19.093 --> 0:09:22.733
<v Speaker 2>trick and then they take a win over the Feeder

0:09:22.813 --> 0:09:24.213
<v Speaker 2>and draw a great Round one performance.

0:09:24.613 --> 0:09:28.573
<v Speaker 3>Oh, huge results, particularly given everything that surrounded Moana on

0:09:28.653 --> 0:09:30.853
<v Speaker 3>and off the field, question marks about how they're going

0:09:30.893 --> 0:09:34.093
<v Speaker 3>to cover Adi. I'm not going to say Miracle stepped

0:09:34.093 --> 0:09:37.413
<v Speaker 3>into his shoes. That's way too early, but to really

0:09:37.533 --> 0:09:41.533
<v Speaker 3>come out and deliver a follow me performance that's exactly

0:09:41.533 --> 0:09:44.733
<v Speaker 3>what Wina needed. And you're right about the dur Playing

0:09:45.133 --> 0:09:47.933
<v Speaker 3>in Fiji is the hardest road trip in superb we

0:09:47.973 --> 0:09:50.173
<v Speaker 3>particularly at this time of year with a sweltering heap.

0:09:50.493 --> 0:09:52.813
<v Speaker 3>I think prior to that game, the Duror had won

0:09:53.053 --> 0:09:56.853
<v Speaker 3>fifteen of their twenty two home matches, so incredibly difficult

0:09:56.893 --> 0:10:01.133
<v Speaker 3>place to go. And I don't think you'd say a

0:10:01.173 --> 0:10:04.493
<v Speaker 3>statement performance from Juana. But to come off last year

0:10:05.013 --> 0:10:08.133
<v Speaker 3>where you beat the Blues, you beat the Crusaders, you

0:10:08.453 --> 0:10:11.053
<v Speaker 3>the cusp of the top six, and now everyone's writing

0:10:11.053 --> 0:10:14.173
<v Speaker 3>them off, well, I think people were starting to rethink

0:10:14.253 --> 0:10:15.253
<v Speaker 3>those predictions.

0:10:15.333 --> 0:10:17.013
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if they can do it over there, then you

0:10:17.053 --> 0:10:19.893
<v Speaker 2>know they can certainly Colleck some other wins drew a

0:10:19.893 --> 0:10:24.413
<v Speaker 2>big question marks over them now. I think they came

0:10:24.453 --> 0:10:26.293
<v Speaker 2>back into the game after they've been blown away by

0:10:26.373 --> 0:10:28.653
<v Speaker 2>Mowana early. But I think it's going to be a

0:10:28.693 --> 0:10:31.253
<v Speaker 2>long season to draw based on about forty eighty minutes.

0:10:31.853 --> 0:10:34.733
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it seems like the recurring themes that the

0:10:35.373 --> 0:10:37.333
<v Speaker 3>what I did see that game. It's the same issues

0:10:37.373 --> 0:10:42.413
<v Speaker 3>around basic skills, the line outs being able to convert

0:10:42.453 --> 0:10:44.453
<v Speaker 3>pressure into points when they get down there. You know,

0:10:44.453 --> 0:10:48.533
<v Speaker 3>they just rely on individual brilliant So big question marks

0:10:48.573 --> 0:10:49.293
<v Speaker 3>over their campaign.

0:10:49.373 --> 0:10:53.133
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's continue to Saturday Evening. Blues beaten by the

0:10:53.213 --> 0:10:59.013
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs nineteen fifteen. Cortez Ratam scores the winner for the

0:10:59.093 --> 0:11:02.373
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs late in the game. What did you make of

0:11:02.373 --> 0:11:02.773
<v Speaker 2>that game?

0:11:03.053 --> 0:11:08.853
<v Speaker 3>When not a great spectacle? I think two teams that

0:11:08.893 --> 0:11:11.653
<v Speaker 3>were fairly clunky. I think the first half was was

0:11:11.693 --> 0:11:16.213
<v Speaker 3>a reasonable watch, but the second half, certainly for a

0:11:16.213 --> 0:11:21.093
<v Speaker 3>good twenty minutes, was was pretty tough viewing. Lots of mistakes,

0:11:21.133 --> 0:11:25.413
<v Speaker 3>nothing really getting going for either team. I think for

0:11:25.453 --> 0:11:28.013
<v Speaker 3>the Blues, the one big question mark I still have

0:11:28.373 --> 0:11:30.293
<v Speaker 3>is are they doing enough?

0:11:30.573 --> 0:11:32.013
<v Speaker 4>Are they playing enough rugby?

0:11:32.173 --> 0:11:37.933
<v Speaker 3>Are they like I understand Verncotta's style as direct, confrontational,

0:11:39.133 --> 0:11:42.973
<v Speaker 3>you know, squeeze tactics, go to the mall, and that

0:11:43.413 --> 0:11:45.133
<v Speaker 3>doesn't seem like it's going to change. I talked to

0:11:45.173 --> 0:11:47.973
<v Speaker 3>Stephen Peterfetter last week and he was adamant that there

0:11:48.053 --> 0:11:51.413
<v Speaker 3>is room in that structure for Flair, for him to

0:11:52.613 --> 0:11:55.013
<v Speaker 3>put his imprint on the game and have a crack.

0:11:55.093 --> 0:11:59.453
<v Speaker 3>But we barely saw Caleb Clark. I think Mark Tale

0:11:59.533 --> 0:12:02.533
<v Speaker 3>is a big loss. On the other edge the right wing,

0:12:03.293 --> 0:12:06.373
<v Speaker 3>Sullivan was pretty good at fullback, but I just think

0:12:06.413 --> 0:12:07.933
<v Speaker 3>the Blues need to need to be a bit more

0:12:08.053 --> 0:12:12.213
<v Speaker 3>venture because they had ample opportunity at the back end

0:12:12.253 --> 0:12:15.213
<v Speaker 3>of that game to win it, but they just they're

0:12:15.293 --> 0:12:17.773
<v Speaker 3>rolling more got shut down, they gave away a couple

0:12:17.813 --> 0:12:21.533
<v Speaker 3>of penalties, and then boom, one moment the Chiefs steal it.

0:12:21.613 --> 0:12:23.813
<v Speaker 2>They did, and you know, they gave him a couple

0:12:23.813 --> 0:12:26.413
<v Speaker 2>of penalties to open up that door. I just felt

0:12:26.813 --> 0:12:28.893
<v Speaker 2>it was an awful game. Let's be honest, it was

0:12:28.893 --> 0:12:32.373
<v Speaker 2>an awful game of rugby. Didn't rise to any great heights,

0:12:33.013 --> 0:12:34.693
<v Speaker 2>but it did feel like one of those games where

0:12:34.693 --> 0:12:37.773
<v Speaker 2>the Blues were about to basically break the game open.

0:12:38.253 --> 0:12:41.333
<v Speaker 2>You know, they had the advantage, you know, by fifteen twelve,

0:12:41.373 --> 0:12:43.613
<v Speaker 2>and it felt like, you know, one score away and

0:12:43.653 --> 0:12:46.373
<v Speaker 2>the game's probably done. You know, some games do feel

0:12:46.413 --> 0:12:48.933
<v Speaker 2>like that. They left the door open for the Chiefs,

0:12:48.933 --> 0:12:51.693
<v Speaker 2>who I thought were clunky as well, but the Chiefs

0:12:51.733 --> 0:12:53.653
<v Speaker 2>were just you know, good enough to take that final moment.

0:12:54.413 --> 0:12:56.253
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think either team did a great job of

0:12:56.253 --> 0:12:58.453
<v Speaker 2>building pressure throughout that game. It felt like it was

0:12:58.493 --> 0:13:00.973
<v Speaker 2>a game of moments. You know, it was no score

0:13:00.973 --> 0:13:03.973
<v Speaker 2>in the opening thirty minutes, but it felt like, you know,

0:13:04.093 --> 0:13:06.413
<v Speaker 2>the was it five all at half time? It just

0:13:06.413 --> 0:13:08.893
<v Speaker 2>felt like it was one moment stacked on another moment.

0:13:08.893 --> 0:13:12.013
<v Speaker 2>But it wasn't building pressure. I think that was the

0:13:12.053 --> 0:13:14.493
<v Speaker 2>thing for the Blues is that they you mentioned the

0:13:14.573 --> 0:13:16.693
<v Speaker 2>rolling wall and everything like that, that didn't spend enough time

0:13:17.013 --> 0:13:20.173
<v Speaker 2>in the Chiefs red zone to really come home with that,

0:13:21.173 --> 0:13:23.453
<v Speaker 2>you know, that kind of performance to win that game.

0:13:23.533 --> 0:13:26.133
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know that we learned a lot about

0:13:26.133 --> 0:13:28.573
<v Speaker 2>either team in all honesty from that performance.

0:13:29.093 --> 0:13:31.133
<v Speaker 3>No, And both teams have a lot of players to

0:13:31.213 --> 0:13:35.013
<v Speaker 3>come back, particularly the Chiefs a whole host of all

0:13:35.013 --> 0:13:38.093
<v Speaker 3>blacks who didn't feature. I think the bench probably won

0:13:38.133 --> 0:13:40.773
<v Speaker 3>it for them in the end. Summer Penny Female had

0:13:40.813 --> 0:13:44.333
<v Speaker 3>a great line off a really nice delayed to proviaball

0:13:45.013 --> 0:13:47.693
<v Speaker 3>to go through and set up courties Ratama who also

0:13:47.773 --> 0:13:51.413
<v Speaker 3>came off the bench. So I think the Chiefs will

0:13:51.453 --> 0:13:55.413
<v Speaker 3>be happy obviously to come up and sneak that and

0:13:55.533 --> 0:13:58.133
<v Speaker 3>to set themselves up with that firepower they have to

0:13:58.173 --> 0:14:03.453
<v Speaker 3>come back. Damien McKenzie and a host of others tt.

0:14:03.493 --> 0:14:07.493
<v Speaker 2>Leroy Carter and played for the development team. This another

0:14:07.493 --> 0:14:09.213
<v Speaker 2>player that I'm missing as well. It was about five

0:14:09.213 --> 0:14:11.013
<v Speaker 2>of them that they didn't play on Saturday nights.

0:14:11.013 --> 0:14:13.413
<v Speaker 4>Some real fire power, that's most your back line.

0:14:13.453 --> 0:14:17.213
<v Speaker 3>I thought Quinta Pye was really good both over the

0:14:17.253 --> 0:14:22.693
<v Speaker 3>ball and bringing that physicality with his carrying to provide

0:14:22.773 --> 0:14:23.413
<v Speaker 3>was excellence.

0:14:25.213 --> 0:14:26.373
<v Speaker 2>I thought had a good game as well.

0:14:26.453 --> 0:14:30.093
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Chiefs line out didn't function very well. Bradley

0:14:30.093 --> 0:14:35.253
<v Speaker 3>Slater was really good your man on debut for the Blues,

0:14:36.653 --> 0:14:40.253
<v Speaker 3>and Yea Zarn Sullivan and a couple of others. But

0:14:40.933 --> 0:14:42.733
<v Speaker 3>the back line didn't see a great deal of ball.

0:14:42.813 --> 0:14:44.253
<v Speaker 2>The back line didn't see a great deal of ball.

0:14:44.333 --> 0:14:48.133
<v Speaker 2>I felt, like, you know, Peter Key, I thought on

0:14:48.173 --> 0:14:51.653
<v Speaker 2>debut was solid. Trying to think back to the commentary A. J. Lamb,

0:14:51.653 --> 0:14:54.373
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think we had a lot of time on ball.

0:14:54.453 --> 0:14:55.773
<v Speaker 2>Clark certainly didn't.

0:14:56.253 --> 0:14:57.213
<v Speaker 4>What about the two teens?

0:14:57.213 --> 0:15:00.853
<v Speaker 3>That was an interesting matchup Stephne de Fetter coming back

0:15:00.853 --> 0:15:04.213
<v Speaker 3>from his last real competitive game since May, and Josh

0:15:04.293 --> 0:15:07.973
<v Speaker 3>Jacob a big chance to start the season with Damien

0:15:08.013 --> 0:15:13.053
<v Speaker 3>mckinn is he welcoming his first child. What did you

0:15:13.093 --> 0:15:14.533
<v Speaker 3>make of both their performances.

0:15:14.613 --> 0:15:17.013
<v Speaker 2>I thought Jacob was pretty good by and large for

0:15:18.093 --> 0:15:20.453
<v Speaker 2>controlling the team, driving them around the park, and I

0:15:20.493 --> 0:15:22.613
<v Speaker 2>suspect that we might see more of Jacob at ten

0:15:22.693 --> 0:15:26.093
<v Speaker 2>this season than McKenzie. Might move mackenzie back at fullback,

0:15:26.133 --> 0:15:28.933
<v Speaker 2>potentially coming later in the game to ten I'm interested

0:15:28.933 --> 0:15:30.813
<v Speaker 2>to see where John O Gibbs it goes with that.

0:15:30.933 --> 0:15:33.413
<v Speaker 2>But I talked in the postmatch about being a big

0:15:33.453 --> 0:15:36.693
<v Speaker 2>fan of Josh Jacob and wanting him to regret basically

0:15:37.133 --> 0:15:39.493
<v Speaker 2>every day going to the Highlanders from twenty twenty seven.

0:15:39.773 --> 0:15:42.533
<v Speaker 2>I'd give a points decision to Josh Jacob. Piafeeda you

0:15:42.613 --> 0:15:44.493
<v Speaker 2>touched on hasn't played since made He looked like a

0:15:44.533 --> 0:15:46.573
<v Speaker 2>player that hadn't played since May. He wull be better

0:15:46.613 --> 0:15:51.253
<v Speaker 2>for that outing. I still think he didn't unlock the

0:15:51.733 --> 0:15:53.693
<v Speaker 2>Blues back line as much as you would have liked.

0:15:53.973 --> 0:15:55.813
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure he's the long term answer for them

0:15:55.853 --> 0:15:58.373
<v Speaker 2>at ten. I think when Boden Barrett's back, they'll go

0:15:58.453 --> 0:16:01.173
<v Speaker 2>back to Boden and the next few rounds. Once he's

0:16:01.213 --> 0:16:03.493
<v Speaker 2>back for that Crusaders game on the seventh, which is

0:16:03.493 --> 0:16:05.773
<v Speaker 2>around the date or the date that he's he marked.

0:16:06.973 --> 0:16:08.693
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, points decision to Jake for me.

0:16:09.653 --> 0:16:12.293
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I thought Peterfetter had some nice touches long balls

0:16:12.293 --> 0:16:16.853
<v Speaker 3>early and he kicked one fifty twenty two, but both

0:16:17.613 --> 0:16:20.573
<v Speaker 3>tens struggled off the tea early some really easy misses,

0:16:20.573 --> 0:16:23.813
<v Speaker 3>so I don't think it was an authoritative performance from

0:16:23.853 --> 0:16:26.693
<v Speaker 3>either of them. Maybe a sign of start in the season.

0:16:27.853 --> 0:16:29.853
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, interesting to see how Boden comes back as well.

0:16:29.893 --> 0:16:34.333
<v Speaker 3>Traditionally the All Blacks come back off the bench, and jeez,

0:16:34.573 --> 0:16:36.253
<v Speaker 3>will Jordan set the standard there, didn't they?

0:16:36.333 --> 0:16:38.973
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he very much did say he was excellent coming

0:16:39.013 --> 0:16:41.733
<v Speaker 2>off the bench of the Crusaders. I've seen some social

0:16:41.773 --> 0:16:43.933
<v Speaker 2>media that they did around Jordan. We're in twenty three

0:16:44.093 --> 0:16:47.253
<v Speaker 2>Michael Jordan, et cetera, So I don't think it twenty

0:16:47.293 --> 0:16:48.693
<v Speaker 2>three for two much longer.

0:16:49.853 --> 0:16:53.213
<v Speaker 4>Michael had a few more hops.

0:16:52.813 --> 0:16:57.933
<v Speaker 2>Maybe both both quality players. Ossie Games Wartas up the

0:16:57.973 --> 0:17:00.613
<v Speaker 2>Reids thirty six twelve. This is a very good performance

0:17:00.653 --> 0:17:03.173
<v Speaker 2>in the war Tars. Game was in the balance up

0:17:03.253 --> 0:17:05.493
<v Speaker 2>until what about twenty to go, and the Wartars just

0:17:05.493 --> 0:17:07.973
<v Speaker 2>broke home and ran in some late tries. Very impressed

0:17:08.013 --> 0:17:09.933
<v Speaker 2>by what they are able to do. I think they'll

0:17:10.013 --> 0:17:12.493
<v Speaker 2>rise up the table a little bit this year. The

0:17:12.533 --> 0:17:17.213
<v Speaker 2>Wartars some really good outside backs Max Jorgncern quality players,

0:17:17.253 --> 0:17:19.853
<v Speaker 2>so I was impressed by that. And the Rumby is

0:17:19.893 --> 0:17:21.853
<v Speaker 2>just too good for the Force. Fifty six to twenty four.

0:17:22.333 --> 0:17:24.373
<v Speaker 2>Signs of life in the Force that we talked a

0:17:24.373 --> 0:17:26.053
<v Speaker 2>bit a little bit about last week that they might

0:17:26.093 --> 0:17:28.213
<v Speaker 2>be back. Well, didn't start particularly well.

0:17:28.853 --> 0:17:31.973
<v Speaker 3>No, that's a drubbing at home, isn't it because traditionally

0:17:32.013 --> 0:17:34.013
<v Speaker 3>they are a lot better in Perth.

0:17:34.613 --> 0:17:36.013
<v Speaker 4>But big result for the Waratars.

0:17:36.013 --> 0:17:39.613
<v Speaker 3>I think that is a statement performance in a derby match.

0:17:40.053 --> 0:17:44.053
<v Speaker 3>They were outsiders to start that week, heavily backed. I

0:17:44.093 --> 0:17:46.173
<v Speaker 3>think their neck and neck going into the game. The

0:17:46.253 --> 0:17:49.853
<v Speaker 3>Red's missing a few but that is a real stake

0:17:49.893 --> 0:17:52.373
<v Speaker 3>in the ground from the Watars and I think they

0:17:52.413 --> 0:17:56.453
<v Speaker 3>can kick on and be genuine contenders this year. I

0:17:56.453 --> 0:18:00.213
<v Speaker 3>think Sydney's not an easy place to go, so yeah,

0:18:00.253 --> 0:18:01.493
<v Speaker 3>interesting to see if they can kick on.

0:18:01.613 --> 0:18:03.173
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, all right, we'll take a quick break here on

0:18:03.253 --> 0:18:06.453
<v Speaker 2>Rugby Direct, come back with Final four and more after this.

0:18:08.533 --> 0:18:12.253
<v Speaker 2>You're back with Rugby Direct. Time now for the Final four, Liam,

0:18:12.413 --> 0:18:16.413
<v Speaker 2>question for you number one. Did the Highlanders win over

0:18:16.453 --> 0:18:19.733
<v Speaker 2>the Crusaders on Friday night? Locke and Jamie Joseph as

0:18:19.813 --> 0:18:21.013
<v Speaker 2>the All Blacks coach.

0:18:22.133 --> 0:18:26.533
<v Speaker 3>Well, the rumor was an overdriven that it's gonna it's

0:18:26.573 --> 0:18:27.693
<v Speaker 3>gonna be announced this week.

0:18:28.133 --> 0:18:29.933
<v Speaker 2>I was hearing it was gonna it's five o'clock Friday

0:18:29.973 --> 0:18:32.493
<v Speaker 2>before the game. There was one rumor going around.

0:18:32.413 --> 0:18:34.413
<v Speaker 4>It's all rubber stamp. It's good to go here.

0:18:35.053 --> 0:18:38.853
<v Speaker 2>Late March early June did a pump first week before

0:18:38.853 --> 0:18:39.413
<v Speaker 2>the All Black time.

0:18:39.533 --> 0:18:40.293
<v Speaker 4>The breaks awave it.

0:18:40.333 --> 0:18:46.053
<v Speaker 3>Look, no it didn't, but it can only help his cause.

0:18:46.653 --> 0:18:50.893
<v Speaker 3>It was a big upset result. But it has one result.

0:18:52.453 --> 0:18:54.893
<v Speaker 2>We're very good in this country of not viewing things

0:18:54.933 --> 0:18:59.573
<v Speaker 2>in context and viewing them in pure isolation. And one

0:18:59.613 --> 0:19:01.173
<v Speaker 2>win is not going to get him the All Blacks

0:19:01.213 --> 0:19:04.053
<v Speaker 2>coaching job. It's the same as if they've been beaten

0:19:04.053 --> 0:19:06.093
<v Speaker 2>by twenty five points was not going to rule him

0:19:06.093 --> 0:19:08.093
<v Speaker 2>out of the All Blacks coaching job. That helps.

0:19:08.493 --> 0:19:13.973
<v Speaker 3>It's certainly it's it's front front viewing as it's front

0:19:14.013 --> 0:19:16.653
<v Speaker 3>of mind. It's there, it's ever present. They've rey had

0:19:16.693 --> 0:19:19.613
<v Speaker 3>a good win in Japan in the weekends. I think

0:19:19.613 --> 0:19:24.413
<v Speaker 3>they beat t Shibam.

0:19:22.973 --> 0:19:24.613
<v Speaker 2>Longer and to black at his team.

0:19:24.653 --> 0:19:27.733
<v Speaker 3>Yeah that's all right, so but that's out of sight,

0:19:27.773 --> 0:19:32.053
<v Speaker 3>out of mind to a degree. Look, yeah it doesn't.

0:19:32.173 --> 0:19:34.413
<v Speaker 3>It won't hurt his chance as well, No, won't.

0:19:35.013 --> 0:19:37.613
<v Speaker 2>And look this will be taking into consideration. But again

0:19:37.853 --> 0:19:39.413
<v Speaker 2>you just don't know that a round one result in

0:19:39.453 --> 0:19:41.533
<v Speaker 2>Super Rugby is going to be the tipping point for

0:19:41.613 --> 0:19:45.133
<v Speaker 2>the the famous five as they come to that conclusion.

0:19:45.493 --> 0:19:48.573
<v Speaker 4>That's a good I like that use that the panel.

0:19:48.373 --> 0:19:52.933
<v Speaker 2>The Panel six Nations. Scotland rumors of their death have

0:19:52.973 --> 0:19:57.093
<v Speaker 2>been greatly exaggerated. Gregor Townsend resigning for another ten years.

0:19:57.373 --> 0:19:59.253
<v Speaker 4>Better again, Gregor is back baby.

0:19:59.373 --> 0:20:02.893
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was a really good performance and England were

0:20:02.973 --> 0:20:06.893
<v Speaker 2>quite poor. I thought watched the scame yesterday morning and

0:20:07.893 --> 0:20:10.293
<v Speaker 2>didn't spect Scotland to win. Certainly didn't expect them to

0:20:10.293 --> 0:20:14.093
<v Speaker 2>win thirty one twenty. They were claudy, I thought, and

0:20:14.853 --> 0:20:18.373
<v Speaker 2>just everything that they didn't get right against Italy. They

0:20:18.493 --> 0:20:20.893
<v Speaker 2>looked polished. I thought their fords are really really good.

0:20:20.933 --> 0:20:22.613
<v Speaker 2>Their back line you know, to weep a lot too

0:20:23.333 --> 0:20:27.213
<v Speaker 2>excellent again and Finn Russell won that Battle of the

0:20:27.293 --> 0:20:29.653
<v Speaker 2>tens quite easily over George Ford.

0:20:30.973 --> 0:20:36.933
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what does do Scotland invest too much in the

0:20:37.013 --> 0:20:40.173
<v Speaker 3>England performance? This is Scotland's fifth win in six games

0:20:40.213 --> 0:20:46.973
<v Speaker 3>over England. England haven't won in Edinburgh since since twenty twenty.

0:20:48.013 --> 0:20:50.653
<v Speaker 3>Great result for Scotland, particularly the bounce back from Italy.

0:20:53.253 --> 0:20:55.853
<v Speaker 3>But it is a one off result and it is important.

0:20:56.333 --> 0:20:58.773
<v Speaker 3>It means a lot to them. The Kelcutter Cup they

0:20:58.853 --> 0:21:03.173
<v Speaker 3>always get up for ENGLM. But does is there too

0:21:03.293 --> 0:21:06.133
<v Speaker 3>much focus for Scotland on one fiction? Does that change

0:21:06.213 --> 0:21:10.213
<v Speaker 3>the complexion of Gregor Town's ends tenure as a whole.

0:21:11.133 --> 0:21:13.413
<v Speaker 2>Quite possibly. You look at the record they've had against England,

0:21:13.453 --> 0:21:17.693
<v Speaker 2>it's very very impressive, but you've got to win consistently

0:21:17.813 --> 0:21:20.013
<v Speaker 2>elsewhere and Scotland haven't been able to do that. And

0:21:20.093 --> 0:21:21.613
<v Speaker 2>you look back to what they did last year in

0:21:21.693 --> 0:21:24.253
<v Speaker 2>the Autumn Nation Series, you know that they should have

0:21:24.293 --> 0:21:26.253
<v Speaker 2>been in the All Blacks at Murrayfield. They should have

0:21:26.293 --> 0:21:30.773
<v Speaker 2>been an Argentina the following weekend at inn at Murrayfield

0:21:30.853 --> 0:21:33.013
<v Speaker 2>and blue what are twenty one? The lead or whatever?

0:21:33.053 --> 0:21:36.493
<v Speaker 2>It was? So, yep, great, they've got the curl cutter cup,

0:21:37.133 --> 0:21:39.333
<v Speaker 2>very very good performance. So I thought, as I say,

0:21:39.453 --> 0:21:42.493
<v Speaker 2>Scotland were excellent, but it's no use if they are

0:21:42.533 --> 0:21:44.533
<v Speaker 2>going to go lose to Italy and Rome in a

0:21:44.573 --> 0:21:47.013
<v Speaker 2>poor game the week before. They've obviously got another game

0:21:47.053 --> 0:21:50.973
<v Speaker 2>coming up this weekend, but they need to back these

0:21:51.053 --> 0:21:54.373
<v Speaker 2>results up. And that's the story I think of Gregor

0:21:54.413 --> 0:21:57.333
<v Speaker 2>Town's ends tenures that they have been high and then

0:21:57.333 --> 0:21:59.893
<v Speaker 2>they've been low and haven't been able to get any consistency.

0:22:00.013 --> 0:22:03.133
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, you're exactly right. The curl Cutter Cup is great,

0:22:03.333 --> 0:22:06.533
<v Speaker 2>but it's consistency that Scottish rugby fans won't.

0:22:06.653 --> 0:22:08.373
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's see what happens for the remainder of the

0:22:08.453 --> 0:22:11.013
<v Speaker 3>six nations. Great win because England had won what ten

0:22:11.293 --> 0:22:13.453
<v Speaker 3>twelve games in a row, so to halt that put

0:22:13.533 --> 0:22:16.333
<v Speaker 3>some real context around maybe where England are at as well.

0:22:17.053 --> 0:22:19.573
<v Speaker 3>Great one for Scottish rugby, but you've got to kick on.

0:22:19.813 --> 0:22:21.973
<v Speaker 3>And I also just want to make the point that

0:22:22.173 --> 0:22:25.973
<v Speaker 3>it's time now to genuinely put some respect on Italian

0:22:26.053 --> 0:22:31.413
<v Speaker 3>rugby's name because they could have easily could have. They didn't, No,

0:22:31.693 --> 0:22:36.613
<v Speaker 3>they didn't, but seven points they came within an island

0:22:36.693 --> 0:22:38.093
<v Speaker 3>and they had a try just allowed.

0:22:38.253 --> 0:22:40.693
<v Speaker 2>I thought they tried was being dislow, was pretty dubious,

0:22:41.893 --> 0:22:46.733
<v Speaker 2>maybe out of the hands, potentially slightly forward. But you

0:22:46.853 --> 0:22:48.933
<v Speaker 2>look at it and I go, is there enough for

0:22:49.013 --> 0:22:52.053
<v Speaker 2>a TMO to INTERVENA be so adamant? Is how Holly

0:22:52.133 --> 0:22:54.373
<v Speaker 2>Davidson's change your decision. I didn't think there was enough

0:22:54.413 --> 0:22:56.573
<v Speaker 2>there to go. It has to be overturned. I thought

0:22:56.573 --> 0:22:59.133
<v Speaker 2>it was a fifty to fifty call, and personally I

0:22:59.253 --> 0:23:03.373
<v Speaker 2>hate the TMO. But I think those decisions shouldn't be overruled.

0:23:03.413 --> 0:23:06.333
<v Speaker 2>I think there wasn't enough. You know, it wasn't absolutely

0:23:06.413 --> 0:23:07.693
<v Speaker 2>fluid that it was a forward pass.

0:23:08.493 --> 0:23:11.053
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it was probably the right call, but

0:23:11.773 --> 0:23:13.813
<v Speaker 4>it was it was in real time.

0:23:16.453 --> 0:23:18.213
<v Speaker 2>This is my New Year's resolution. I wasn't going to

0:23:18.293 --> 0:23:21.253
<v Speaker 2>buck on at the TMO this year, but I didn't

0:23:21.253 --> 0:23:22.733
<v Speaker 2>think there was enough that to overturn it. Put it

0:23:22.813 --> 0:23:23.053
<v Speaker 2>that way.

0:23:23.213 --> 0:23:26.453
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, good, another good performance from Badly and I think

0:23:26.493 --> 0:23:29.413
<v Speaker 3>the context around with which they are viewed now needs

0:23:29.453 --> 0:23:32.613
<v Speaker 3>to change. So like that, what they're win against Scotland

0:23:33.053 --> 0:23:35.373
<v Speaker 3>last week was not a major surprise. It was an

0:23:35.453 --> 0:23:38.773
<v Speaker 3>upset sure, But to go to Dublin and push Ireland

0:23:38.813 --> 0:23:40.893
<v Speaker 3>to the brink I think shows where they're at. And

0:23:41.773 --> 0:23:46.133
<v Speaker 3>I think they're coming to New Zealand in July, and

0:23:46.253 --> 0:23:48.333
<v Speaker 3>that's in Wellington of all places.

0:23:48.453 --> 0:23:51.573
<v Speaker 2>I saw el Ferguson puts us on Instagram as well.

0:23:51.613 --> 0:23:54.053
<v Speaker 2>You know it is the graveyard for the All Blacks

0:23:55.093 --> 0:23:57.413
<v Speaker 2>Mariki weekend, you know, I think.

0:23:57.653 --> 0:23:58.573
<v Speaker 4>Look it's in there.

0:23:59.533 --> 0:24:01.853
<v Speaker 2>What would you do if a beat the All Blacks?

0:24:03.133 --> 0:24:05.533
<v Speaker 4>I'd probably have to sing the national anthem live on

0:24:05.693 --> 0:24:06.293
<v Speaker 4>Rugby Direct.

0:24:06.773 --> 0:24:08.893
<v Speaker 2>Well, we'll make that happen a lot better than that

0:24:09.013 --> 0:24:12.373
<v Speaker 2>can happen if God for Italy beat the All Blacks

0:24:13.493 --> 0:24:17.253
<v Speaker 2>later in the year and Wales crumbling its France this

0:24:17.373 --> 0:24:20.733
<v Speaker 2>morning in a result that most of us still coming.

0:24:21.533 --> 0:24:23.973
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Griham times for Welsh rugby. But I also think

0:24:24.173 --> 0:24:25.093
<v Speaker 4>that does show.

0:24:26.413 --> 0:24:29.773
<v Speaker 3>How lethal France are and that back climb with DuPont,

0:24:30.853 --> 0:24:34.453
<v Speaker 3>Jelly Beer ramos Man, they are so good to watch.

0:24:34.533 --> 0:24:37.653
<v Speaker 2>Stack absolutely stacks. You had a piece last week top

0:24:37.733 --> 0:24:40.693
<v Speaker 2>three in the final four around getting fans back into rugby.

0:24:40.773 --> 0:24:43.293
<v Speaker 2>You spoke to Carl Budge who was made this. You

0:24:43.333 --> 0:24:45.453
<v Speaker 2>know one of his aims is the Blues CEO around

0:24:45.493 --> 0:24:49.373
<v Speaker 2>getting fans through the gates. Look that it was a

0:24:49.453 --> 0:24:52.253
<v Speaker 2>very good opening round of Super Rugby. What fifteen ish

0:24:52.373 --> 0:24:54.013
<v Speaker 2>thousand and Dunedin.

0:24:54.213 --> 0:24:56.213
<v Speaker 4>Seventeen Eden Park.

0:24:56.453 --> 0:24:59.013
<v Speaker 2>I know they had aim for maybe twenty didn't quite

0:24:59.093 --> 0:25:00.733
<v Speaker 2>get there, but there was the sale gp on, there

0:25:00.813 --> 0:25:02.973
<v Speaker 2>was other things on over the course of the weekend.

0:25:04.813 --> 0:25:07.333
<v Speaker 2>I guess a good start for getting those fans through

0:25:07.373 --> 0:25:08.613
<v Speaker 2>the gates. But there's to do.

0:25:09.613 --> 0:25:14.093
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think the challenge is outside of the kiwidobies, right.

0:25:14.173 --> 0:25:20.573
<v Speaker 3>So Chiefs Blues is a headline fixture Heihna's Crusaders probably

0:25:20.573 --> 0:25:23.613
<v Speaker 3>the biggest match of the year in Dnedain and Super Rugby,

0:25:23.933 --> 0:25:26.133
<v Speaker 3>so punters are going to come for those games. It's

0:25:26.173 --> 0:25:31.253
<v Speaker 3>when the foresaw of the drawer. Even the Brumbies who

0:25:31.293 --> 0:25:35.013
<v Speaker 3>are a headline Australian team, that appeal isn't there. So

0:25:37.493 --> 0:25:40.653
<v Speaker 3>I think one thing the Blues are doing well, there's

0:25:40.773 --> 0:25:43.013
<v Speaker 3>one day that with they're packaged up with the racing.

0:25:44.093 --> 0:25:45.773
<v Speaker 3>You can go to the racing and go to the Blues,

0:25:45.973 --> 0:25:49.573
<v Speaker 3>or you know, maybe you partner up with the Warriors

0:25:49.773 --> 0:25:55.613
<v Speaker 3>or another event in the city earlier kickoffs help family

0:25:55.653 --> 0:25:59.453
<v Speaker 3>friendly ticketing prices, or opening up the outer oval and

0:26:00.253 --> 0:26:02.853
<v Speaker 3>following things that have Aukland f C have done with

0:26:03.013 --> 0:26:07.933
<v Speaker 3>They had a big Inlands Beach in a massive slide

0:26:08.013 --> 0:26:10.333
<v Speaker 3>and all these things can sound a wee bit nef

0:26:10.453 --> 0:26:12.733
<v Speaker 3>but I think you just have to try something.

0:26:12.573 --> 0:26:14.973
<v Speaker 2>You do and you're right though those Australian games are

0:26:14.973 --> 0:26:16.733
<v Speaker 2>a hard sell, but then you also look at it

0:26:16.813 --> 0:26:20.213
<v Speaker 2>and go well, Auckland FC players Central Coast, they play

0:26:20.333 --> 0:26:22.973
<v Speaker 2>newcast Lot home, they play and no one knows who's

0:26:22.973 --> 0:26:24.813
<v Speaker 2>in their team unless you're an A league die hard

0:26:25.693 --> 0:26:30.133
<v Speaker 2>with the greatest respect. So those shouldn't be as harder

0:26:30.173 --> 0:26:32.333
<v Speaker 2>to sell those tickets as they are. You look at

0:26:32.333 --> 0:26:35.013
<v Speaker 2>the Warriors, you know, you know, you know those players

0:26:35.133 --> 0:26:37.813
<v Speaker 2>more so perhaps in the NRL, but they don't find

0:26:37.853 --> 0:26:40.253
<v Speaker 2>it hard to sell. So I think we've got a

0:26:40.293 --> 0:26:42.733
<v Speaker 2>view of Australian rugby because we got such a rugby country.

0:26:42.813 --> 0:26:44.693
<v Speaker 2>There's like, oh, this is not worth going to, whereas

0:26:44.733 --> 0:26:48.293
<v Speaker 2>in football and rugby league it's a different conversation. So

0:26:48.853 --> 0:26:51.653
<v Speaker 2>I think the Blues have a harder sell to try

0:26:51.693 --> 0:26:54.293
<v Speaker 2>and get people through the gates of those games. And

0:26:54.373 --> 0:26:55.933
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting to see what car Budge is going to

0:26:56.013 --> 0:26:57.853
<v Speaker 2>try over the next couple of years to try and

0:26:58.213 --> 0:27:02.373
<v Speaker 2>make that happen. Afternoon kickoffs might help for you, force Drewer,

0:27:02.573 --> 0:27:05.453
<v Speaker 2>Rumby's wartors, whatever game, but they can't do that every week.

0:27:05.533 --> 0:27:08.173
<v Speaker 2>So I'm intrigued. Look, innovation is a good thing in drag.

0:27:08.493 --> 0:27:12.693
<v Speaker 2>We need more of it. I think that's super Aquisin

0:27:12.773 --> 0:27:15.053
<v Speaker 2>crying out for some of those sort of blue sky

0:27:15.133 --> 0:27:15.893
<v Speaker 2>sort of thinking.

0:27:16.253 --> 0:27:17.133
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I do.

0:27:17.933 --> 0:27:20.053
<v Speaker 3>I think it's it's called by just biggest challenge in

0:27:20.133 --> 0:27:23.973
<v Speaker 3>his career. He's done exceptional things for the ASP Classic.

0:27:24.173 --> 0:27:26.693
<v Speaker 3>He's worked with sale GP and a number of other things,

0:27:26.773 --> 0:27:31.893
<v Speaker 3>but coming to a traditionally conservative sport like rugby, going

0:27:31.933 --> 0:27:34.213
<v Speaker 3>to a ground like eden Park that can be very

0:27:34.293 --> 0:27:37.733
<v Speaker 3>restrictive on what they allow you to do starting the

0:27:37.813 --> 0:27:40.333
<v Speaker 3>season with a loss, and also the style of rugby

0:27:40.373 --> 0:27:45.333
<v Speaker 3>the Blues are playing and not necessarily a great attractive proposition.

0:27:45.533 --> 0:27:47.853
<v Speaker 3>So there's a number of challenges there. But I think

0:27:47.933 --> 0:27:52.333
<v Speaker 3>he is a very innovative person, so interested to see

0:27:52.893 --> 0:27:54.253
<v Speaker 3>what he can bring to that environment.

0:27:54.293 --> 0:27:56.653
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Me, the Blues Crusaders, Blues next time games against

0:27:56.653 --> 0:27:58.693
<v Speaker 2>the Crusaders much seven. The shouldn't have too many issues

0:27:58.733 --> 0:28:01.093
<v Speaker 2>getting a decent crowd for that. It's getting going to

0:28:01.093 --> 0:28:03.173
<v Speaker 2>be a little bit cooler by that point in time.

0:28:03.653 --> 0:28:06.293
<v Speaker 2>Fans have been more tuned to rugby by round four.

0:28:06.413 --> 0:28:07.973
<v Speaker 2>But it might be but you know, there's all sorts

0:28:07.973 --> 0:28:09.173
<v Speaker 2>of Yeah.

0:28:09.253 --> 0:28:13.333
<v Speaker 3>The other challenge is Eden Park half capacity twenty thousand,

0:28:13.493 --> 0:28:19.013
<v Speaker 3>is a full mount smart stadium, so it doesn't look

0:28:19.053 --> 0:28:21.693
<v Speaker 3>the same, it doesn't feel the same from an atmosphere perspective,

0:28:22.373 --> 0:28:26.053
<v Speaker 3>and I would also probably question whether rugby has the

0:28:26.093 --> 0:28:29.693
<v Speaker 3>same die hard fans as say the Warriors do as well.

0:28:29.813 --> 0:28:31.613
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't think they do. I mean there's not

0:28:31.693 --> 0:28:36.053
<v Speaker 2>as I don't think it's a diehard Blues fandom that

0:28:36.173 --> 0:28:38.613
<v Speaker 2>there is for the Warriors, and that's out of borne

0:28:38.653 --> 0:28:42.173
<v Speaker 2>out of different things, different socioeconomic thing. There's so many

0:28:42.253 --> 0:28:46.253
<v Speaker 2>reasons for that. But the Warriors have never wanted thing

0:28:46.333 --> 0:28:48.613
<v Speaker 2>in their entire history. The Blues have won certain things,

0:28:48.653 --> 0:28:51.813
<v Speaker 2>but they're you know, the Warriors fans still turn up

0:28:51.853 --> 0:28:55.253
<v Speaker 2>Rainhaale shine at Mounts Amount Stadium. Blues fans can be fickle.

0:28:56.013 --> 0:28:58.813
<v Speaker 2>There's a certain base there, but I just question, you know,

0:28:58.853 --> 0:29:01.973
<v Speaker 2>there's not the diehards, is there? Yeah? Interesting to see

0:29:02.013 --> 0:29:03.213
<v Speaker 2>where they go to. A good piece on the US

0:29:03.453 --> 0:29:07.253
<v Speaker 2>held worth reading from Liam and number four. We'll get

0:29:07.293 --> 0:29:10.413
<v Speaker 2>some Hurricanes chat in here. Even though play Ruben Love injured,

0:29:10.493 --> 0:29:12.813
<v Speaker 2>we don't know the full details as yet. I heard

0:29:12.893 --> 0:29:16.293
<v Speaker 2>last week he was in a moon boot around Palmston North.

0:29:16.933 --> 0:29:20.093
<v Speaker 2>The Hurricanes acknowledge that with the media release. Was still

0:29:20.093 --> 0:29:23.933
<v Speaker 2>waiting to hear how he goes, but hopefully not out

0:29:23.973 --> 0:29:26.013
<v Speaker 2>for too long because I was really keen to see

0:29:26.013 --> 0:29:27.293
<v Speaker 2>how he's going to go at ten this season.

0:29:27.893 --> 0:29:31.053
<v Speaker 3>I'm hearing it's not serious, which is good news because

0:29:31.973 --> 0:29:34.613
<v Speaker 3>I think everyone would love to see Rygard Love and

0:29:34.933 --> 0:29:38.253
<v Speaker 3>Barrett kick off the season together. Whether that happens this

0:29:38.373 --> 0:29:40.733
<v Speaker 3>week against Moan, I'm not too sure, but I think

0:29:40.853 --> 0:29:43.573
<v Speaker 3>Ruben will be back soon. They've got Brett Cameron there,

0:29:43.653 --> 0:29:46.413
<v Speaker 3>so different type of player, but I think it would

0:29:46.493 --> 0:29:49.333
<v Speaker 3>be good to see Ruben Love getting extended run at ten,

0:29:50.373 --> 0:29:55.853
<v Speaker 3>both for his own stability and career progression and for

0:29:56.013 --> 0:29:56.533
<v Speaker 3>our interest.

0:29:56.773 --> 0:30:02.293
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely right MVP voting. Who'd you come up with? You

0:30:02.413 --> 0:30:02.973
<v Speaker 2>through two ones?

0:30:03.093 --> 0:30:06.133
<v Speaker 3>Lamb, Well one person we didn't mention with the Blues before.

0:30:06.213 --> 0:30:10.053
<v Speaker 3>Just a quick shout out to Torrian Barnes debut. Most

0:30:10.093 --> 0:30:14.133
<v Speaker 3>people probably never heard of him unless you're a die hard.

0:30:15.853 --> 0:30:17.693
<v Speaker 2>Drivers. Shout out to the bus drivers.

0:30:17.493 --> 0:30:19.933
<v Speaker 4>Canonbury and Follower.

0:30:21.373 --> 0:30:23.973
<v Speaker 3>But he hasn't cracked the top three. I'm going miracle

0:30:24.013 --> 0:30:27.373
<v Speaker 3>Fi Lungey. Pretty hard to go past three tries, so

0:30:27.453 --> 0:30:30.413
<v Speaker 3>he gets my three. Toper Vy excellent for the Blues.

0:30:31.373 --> 0:30:33.893
<v Speaker 3>A bit of controversy around his try, but that was legit.

0:30:34.013 --> 0:30:36.773
<v Speaker 3>You can dive for the trial line, just not over

0:30:36.853 --> 0:30:38.973
<v Speaker 3>a ruck and he was excellent at the line out.

0:30:39.493 --> 0:30:41.853
<v Speaker 3>Great soft skills around the field as well, and I'm

0:30:41.893 --> 0:30:46.813
<v Speaker 3>going one to Tavanawa. I thought typically strong over the

0:30:46.853 --> 0:30:50.733
<v Speaker 3>breakdown and with ball in hands, so a good start

0:30:50.773 --> 0:30:53.053
<v Speaker 3>to the season in his comeback.

0:30:52.853 --> 0:30:55.333
<v Speaker 2>Indeed three tries not good enough to get into my

0:30:55.413 --> 0:30:58.733
<v Speaker 2>three two ones. Tuper I gets my three points. I

0:30:58.773 --> 0:31:01.813
<v Speaker 2>thought he's excellent. That is exactly the blueprint of how

0:31:01.933 --> 0:31:04.213
<v Speaker 2>you want and all back to play in Super Rugby.

0:31:04.933 --> 0:31:06.973
<v Speaker 2>He just says to be getting better and better. He got.

0:31:07.013 --> 0:31:08.813
<v Speaker 2>He was excellent last year for the Blacks. Then he

0:31:08.813 --> 0:31:13.853
<v Speaker 2>had an injury layoff. Yeah, quality play to Lucas Casey.

0:31:14.093 --> 0:31:16.213
<v Speaker 2>Very impressed by him on debut, had a good Super

0:31:16.293 --> 0:31:18.973
<v Speaker 2>Rugby season, backed it up, sorry, good NB season backed

0:31:19.093 --> 0:31:21.613
<v Speaker 2>up on debut and Super Rugby similar to Barnes, has

0:31:21.653 --> 0:31:23.733
<v Speaker 2>come out of the wider training group and been thrusting.

0:31:24.373 --> 0:31:26.693
<v Speaker 2>I think those two have big futures in front of them.

0:31:27.253 --> 0:31:29.133
<v Speaker 2>On what we saw over the weekend, and one to

0:31:29.213 --> 0:31:36.093
<v Speaker 2>No Hotham with the Cisco the Thong song. Yeah, yeah, no,

0:31:36.413 --> 0:31:41.653
<v Speaker 2>but dount dunk du r. I don't need you're quite

0:31:41.693 --> 0:31:45.013
<v Speaker 2>evidenus thing on this podcast. I'm not one point for

0:31:45.133 --> 0:31:49.453
<v Speaker 2>not Hotham. Excellent was you know, probably the half back

0:31:49.493 --> 0:31:52.133
<v Speaker 2>of the weekend for mine from a New Zealand perspective

0:31:52.573 --> 0:31:53.773
<v Speaker 2>and a losing effort.

0:31:54.413 --> 0:31:57.973
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, probably shaded from La Christie yep, yep.

0:31:58.333 --> 0:32:00.813
<v Speaker 2>Risen was good off the bench for the Chiefs as well.

0:32:01.373 --> 0:32:04.013
<v Speaker 2>They seem to like using him in that last thirty

0:32:04.053 --> 0:32:05.573
<v Speaker 2>minute role. I mean he's done it for the All

0:32:05.613 --> 0:32:07.493
<v Speaker 2>Blacks number of times, but you know he had a

0:32:07.813 --> 0:32:10.373
<v Speaker 2>bit of a line why element to that last half hour.

0:32:11.053 --> 0:32:13.733
<v Speaker 2>Scored the winning try as well, So interested to see

0:32:14.213 --> 0:32:16.493
<v Speaker 2>how much he starts the season versus zavy Row. But

0:32:17.453 --> 0:32:19.853
<v Speaker 2>watch the space. Those are our three two ones. Also

0:32:20.373 --> 0:32:23.893
<v Speaker 2>get involved with us on fantasy as well. Rugby Direct podcast.

0:32:24.413 --> 0:32:26.293
<v Speaker 2>I heard just before kick off I'd ethan degree to

0:32:26.333 --> 0:32:28.253
<v Speaker 2>my team the hood. He was switched to the bench,

0:32:28.293 --> 0:32:29.653
<v Speaker 2>so I made a late change. I can't remember who

0:32:29.653 --> 0:32:31.053
<v Speaker 2>actually brought it in the end, but I did make

0:32:31.053 --> 0:32:33.453
<v Speaker 2>the late change, so had I think I had a

0:32:33.533 --> 0:32:36.373
<v Speaker 2>decent all weekend. But keep joining us on their Rugby

0:32:36.453 --> 0:32:38.013
<v Speaker 2>Direct podcast as where you find us.

0:32:38.333 --> 0:32:40.133
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, great turn out, thanks for getting on board. There's

0:32:40.173 --> 0:32:42.733
<v Speaker 3>ninety teams in there. Yeah, and the winner will get

0:32:43.173 --> 0:32:44.013
<v Speaker 3>super Rugby jersey.

0:32:44.093 --> 0:32:48.173
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, get am I what's your username? What's your

0:32:48.173 --> 0:32:48.533
<v Speaker 2>team name?

0:32:48.533 --> 0:32:48.573
<v Speaker 1>On?

0:32:48.653 --> 0:32:51.453
<v Speaker 2>I'm forty minute red card es, which isn't in joke

0:32:51.453 --> 0:32:52.533
<v Speaker 2>about twenty minute red cards.

0:32:52.773 --> 0:32:55.133
<v Speaker 4>I'm really hard to decipher Fox and Fazz.

0:32:54.973 --> 0:32:57.133
<v Speaker 2>Fox and this year. So yeah, it would be good

0:32:57.133 --> 0:32:59.093
<v Speaker 2>if he had everyone's actual names alongside them. You can

0:32:59.093 --> 0:33:01.293
<v Speaker 2>sort of figure that out, but those are us too. Anyway,

0:33:01.613 --> 0:33:04.933
<v Speaker 2>get involved Rugby Direct podcast to search for us as well.

0:33:05.413 --> 0:33:08.213
<v Speaker 2>Tipping Wires will run through that on our Thursday podcast.

0:33:08.973 --> 0:33:11.653
<v Speaker 2>Later in the week we'll go through who tips well

0:33:11.693 --> 0:33:13.453
<v Speaker 2>and who didn't. But once we got the team's locked in,

0:33:13.693 --> 0:33:16.413
<v Speaker 2>we will tip for round two. And also we want

0:33:16.453 --> 0:33:19.453
<v Speaker 2>your feedback and your letters and your emails and any

0:33:19.533 --> 0:33:22.893
<v Speaker 2>questions you've got in the Rugby Direct mailbag Rugby Direct

0:33:23.013 --> 0:33:27.133
<v Speaker 2>at inside dot co dot NZI to get in touch

0:33:27.173 --> 0:33:28.893
<v Speaker 2>with us. We'll read out it a couple every week.

0:33:29.133 --> 0:33:31.653
<v Speaker 2>We might even do some sort of special mailbag episodes.

0:33:31.693 --> 0:33:33.573
<v Speaker 2>We run through a lot of feedback, but certainly on

0:33:33.733 --> 0:33:36.053
<v Speaker 2>Thursdays we'll have to answer a couple of questions. So

0:33:36.253 --> 0:33:37.973
<v Speaker 2>keen on any questions you might have for.

0:33:38.413 --> 0:33:40.653
<v Speaker 4>Us two Yeah, questions, hot takes, rumors.

0:33:40.893 --> 0:33:43.533
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're open for it all. Rugby Directs the email

0:33:43.573 --> 0:33:46.933
<v Speaker 2>there at NZ dot co dot in z. Thanks to

0:33:46.973 --> 0:33:49.573
<v Speaker 2>Mark Kelly. We'll be back on Thursday with another edition

0:33:49.653 --> 0:33:52.013
<v Speaker 2>of Rugby Directs. Say safe out there, Powered by having

0:33:52.093 --> 0:33:54.493
<v Speaker 2>health physic. Book today and stay at the game.

0:33:56.693 --> 0:33:59.613
<v Speaker 1>For more from news talks, b listen live on air

0:33:59.853 --> 0:34:02.493
<v Speaker 1>or online, and keep our shows with you wherever you

0:34:02.613 --> 0:34:04.973
<v Speaker 1>go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio