WEBVTT - "The ACC SportsBook - July 19th"

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Live for the Export Beer Garden Studio. This is the

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>ACC Sportsbook thanks to the TAB.

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 2>The ACC Sports Book thanks to the TB.

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in Carl Tyley from the TB Mate Live from Home.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>It's been a good week for the sports Book podcast,

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't it?

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 3>Mate? We are absolutely flying, like I don't know where

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 3>to go from here, and either's you know, normally it's

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 3>only one way. Up is the only way to go.

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 3>But we're already at the top, so yeah, I don't know.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I've got to say the view from up here is

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>absolutely tremendous. Sadly Glane couldn't join us Today's in witness

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Protection this week, but I know that he is very,

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>very excited as well.

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>The group chat that we had going was was firing.

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Up over the weekend if you missed it, our three

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>way hunch came in for the first time ever. It's

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>probably not something that we should be breaking about, you know,

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>as hard as we are, but you've got to celebrate

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>your wins, you know. If you don't mark these occasions,

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, they can just sort of fly by. I'm

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>just trying to bring up what our three legs were.

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>So you had a horse, you went on molt time

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>yep was your horse. I went Greg Marju anytime try scorer,

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and then Lane had.

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 3>On No, I went you had the English.

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, many fe were Boso and then Lane had Mark

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Talia and they were both in in the first half.

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>It was just by halftime. At the All Blacks game,

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we were on it's just outrageous.

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 3>And we can't forget on top of the three way

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 3>we talked about the top four racing multi and that

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 3>cash too.

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 2>I mean it was I'll be honest, I put that on.

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I had like three dollars jingling around in the bottom

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of my account, so I chucked that full leg the

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>top four MAULTI on just to keep track of it.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 2>It actually wasn't paying that much.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>It was only around two three four dollars maybe if

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you put them all in, but I just wanted to

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>keep track of it to see if it did come in.

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 2>And boy did it every single one of them. Now

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 2>granted one of them did come in fourth.

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 3>But I think two of them came fourth.

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Our theory was if you're multi them all laptop four

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 2>like your home and host, and you.

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Were exactly and the last one beer on the loose

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 3>was Rand mcgrace nine, and I think he came fourth

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 3>by about a nose. So, like the Great Dominic Toretto said,

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:22.679
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't matter if you win by an inch or

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 3>a mile.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Winning is winning, Winning is winning.

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>It's about family and the acc Sportsbook family is up

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>big this week. Congratulations to everyone who irresponsibly followed us

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in on those bits across the weekend. And we've got

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>more to cook up later on at the end of

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>this podcast as well. But before we do, I reckon

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we rip straight into NRL. I I'm in a Rugby

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>league mood this week off the back of Origin hell

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.679
<v Speaker 1>of an Origin game as well. I think the punters.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 1>I was saying on the Agenda podcast this morning, Carl

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>that I walked into the office and a couple of

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>people asked me what my tips were this weekend around

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors. I was like, I kind of honest, I'd

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>probably steer clear of this game. I can't pick it

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>either way. What about you?

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm disappointed to hear that. Man. I'm I'm all

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 3>over the Wars here. I think it is obviously going

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 3>to be a very tight game. The Raiders. We've got

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 3>a handful of superstars back Jamal Foggery. Yeah, they're playing

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 3>a dollars seventy Warriors aro out to two dollars fifteen.

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 3>I put this, this could be the Warriors season. I

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 3>think they get this when they could go on a run.

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 3>If we don't win this, it's going to be a

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 3>lot tougher.

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 2>We then need to win like six in a row.

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 2>I think after that, don't we?

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Yeah yeah. In terms of the punting though, split

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 3>fifty to fifteen the head to head, So I guess

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 3>punters are with you then, and I don't really know

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 3>where to go.

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but.

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 3>We've got twice as much money on the Warriors at

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 3>the point start, So that two and a half point underdogs. Okay,

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 3>can you remember what that means?

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it means that they will either win or by two.

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Points three points. Three points yes, yeah, no, sorry, you

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 3>are right? Two points Yeah the tables of ten. Yeah,

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 3>DWZ and AFB are best backed in the first try

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 3>score market, which is probably no surprise to anyone. Yeah,

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 3>and then Chanelle Harris Tavita backed anytime.

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I think if you were going to go a vibe

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>punt this weekend, rts out to the wing. He's two

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.119
<v Speaker 1>dollars and two cents to score anytime. That's probably where

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I would be leaning if I had to go one

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>way or another.

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 2>That point start minus two and a half.

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>At that point you're basically saying we win because it's

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>either that or it's like a golden point.

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Thriller and we lose.

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>We can't do that again and that Yeah, I don't

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>think any amount of money that I won off that would,

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, stem the flow of pain after losing to

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a drop goal. But you know that the hard part

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>about this game is, you know everyone's saying, yes, our

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>backs are up against the wall. We have to win

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>this game to keep our season alive. So do Camber.

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>So the desperation is not higher on one side or

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the other. I guess what's gonna change it is if

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Barnett and Kirk Capewar back up from Origin.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 2>It was a.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Fucking brutal game of rugby league on Wednesday night. But

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they do seem like two dudes who would back up, don't.

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 3>They, especially Barnett now that he will be given the

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 3>captain's armband with the too out the rest of the season. Yes,

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be surprised to see him back up. I

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 3>guess it'll be a matter of how many minutes they

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 3>end up playing. I've actually got a good Mitch Barnett

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 3>stat for later on the pod.

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Good. I'm looking forward to it.

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 3>We mentioned RTS on the wing? Was it two any time?

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Have a look at well this is I'm heavy a

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 3>look at two more tries for four doors. Think that

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 3>the halves peering. You know, early in the season, all

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 3>we could do was go right. Yeah, we're a bit

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 3>more balanced now, but I feel like they favor the left. Yeah,

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 3>and that is where RTS will be. So I can

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 3>see a little double in the future for Roger.

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't mind that they do with to mighty

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>luck to go to that left edge because he likes,

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, right kicker likes to put it out on

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that on that left edge, and that's exactly where Roger

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>will be. They'll be looking to test out there shining

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>new toy on the wing as well.

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 2>I just two on Roger seems I would hate for

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 2>Roger to have us as chick to score one.

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Try and me to be disappointed at the end of

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the game because he didn't score two. You know, it's

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>probably how why I wouldn't go for that one.

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 3>But the beauty of that is you can bet on

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 3>both options.

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>No, that is a great point. That is a great

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>point an otherwise origin affected week end of rugby league.

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>If the punter is getting around any other games, there's

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>not too much sort of value to be seenund there

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is a.

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 3>All over South's in the head to head market dollar

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 3>thirty six. They are pretty even split Knights and Broncos.

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 3>The Knights are dollar ninety eight underdogs at home, the

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 3>interesting one Storm two dollar ten outsiders at home. There's

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 3>excuse me, twice as much money on the Storm against

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 3>the Trucks there.

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't mind that, because you've got the Mountain

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Storm at the top of the NRL table at the moment,

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 2>and you've got them at two dollars ten. Now the Roosters,

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 2>you would probably say the form team at the moment,

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.119
<v Speaker 2>But anytime you've got the leading team and the combat

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 2>two dollars ten, I can see why the punters are

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 2>going for it.

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I've got a little just trying to dig up a

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 3>stat from our podcast earlier in the week. This fixture

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the Storm Roosters home crowd basically means nothing. The visiting

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 3>team has won seven of the last thirteen between these

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 3>two a and a single single digit margin. Sorry, Yeah,

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 3>nine of the last seventeen have been by six or less.

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So this one's going to be tight, that's what you're saying. Yep, yep,

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>And the line seems to suggest that as well. Plus

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>two and a half anytime it's under like four, I

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>don't really want to get mess with Yeah, it is,

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it is. I don't want to mess with it. I mean,

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>if it comes off, you're you're a gifted gambler. But

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't, so what we're thinking. But yeah, that

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>is definitely the match of the round as well. When

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 1>you look at the schedule, Penrith versus the Dolphins could

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>be all right, I don't think Penrith should be a

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar twenty favorites against the Dolphins, even with Nathan clearyback.

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I guess the Friends have had their troubles away

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 3>from home. They don't. They haven't been backing up wins

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 3>that of late. I did say state when I was

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 3>hunting for some stats earlier that they have covered the

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 3>line in a number of their games following a win.

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 3>So I think that twelve and a half points is

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 3>the line at the moment, which is quite a lot

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 3>considering the Dolphins have spent majority of the season in

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the top four.

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're right about them not traveling very well. I

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like earlier, only about a month ago, we were

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about how they just won their first game in

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Sydney and yes in the club's history.

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that plus Cleary, Yeah yes, yeah.

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people are going to lose a lot

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of money bidding on Nathan Cleary this weekend, I think,

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and I can't help myself but have a look at

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>what Dave Hafeed is paying for the Gold Coast Titans,

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>who are two dollars eighty five outsiders against Manly for

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>good reason as well, he's three dollars twenty five, which

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I think is good money.

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's an interesting one that I guess that merely

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 3>put an number on the Nights last week. But the

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Titans have been going okay, the one three on the

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 3>trot now the you know the big underdogs, they tend

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 3>to go well as well. They're seven and a half

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 3>point underdogs. This has the returns to Brookvale like the

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 3>plus seven and a half looks pretty good for me.

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Titans was this the matchup earlier on in the

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>year where the Titans really pushed the Seagulls.

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 2>It was like a thirty six thirty four or something

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 2>like that.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the I've always been saying this year

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>about the Titans. They're like a They're a glass cannon team.

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>They can put up forty points on you and still

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>lose a game like that. They've got strike weapons, yeah,

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty four to thirty Yeah exactly, They've got strike weapons

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 1>all over the field. They can score from anywhere, but

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>they also leak like a sieve. So it's I think

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 1>tri scorers are the way to play that game. Your sabs,

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>your turbos, yeah, your forfeeders, o Kennys.

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 3>There's plenty of them.

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>There is probably spent far too long talking about a

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Gold Coast Titans game. Anything else that the punters are

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>liking to look of in the NRL, No.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Not really, nothing that stands out.

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>No, No, onto the rugby Union, which continues this weekend.

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we're playing Fiji tomorrow. Almost unbeckable today in

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand at a dollar and five, although Matt and

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Jerry this morning we're talking about mortgaging their house and

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>putting it on New Zealand, for because if you put

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars on, which we're trying to do the

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 1>math on their gender podcast this morning, if you put

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars on New Zealand at a dollar and

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it was a dollar and six, that spits back about

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty thousand dollars. Of course, if you lose your house

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>betting on the all backs because FIGI beat them, that'd

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>be tough, a tough one to explain to the bank.

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 3>It would. I would sort of step in here and say,

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 3>please gain more responsibly punters. Yes, of course, of course,

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 3>you say, unbeckable. Someone has put five thousand dollars on

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 3>the AB's at a dollar on.

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Six, So what does that pay them? It's like sixty bucks?

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't yeah, oh yeah, sorry question Without wording.

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 3>The math live on a calculator right now, I get

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 3>sixty dollars.

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Yep, work it that.

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 3>That seems like a lot of energy spent for sixty bucks.

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 2>It does, doesn't it?

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And I also kind of think like if it does miss,

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you're just going to be so gutted that you risked

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:35.839
<v Speaker 1>so much for so little and then lost it. What

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are the punters liking around this game. Are they getting

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>on the line as their try scorers? How do you like?

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Again?

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>The same person asked me this morning and I said

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't sort of go near the Warriors game. I

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of feel the same about the All Backs game.

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know where the value is.

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, punters, you bang on with your your thoughts. There,

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 3>punters are all over the line. He's in on twenty

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 3>five and a half point favorite. It's there's fifteen times

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.119
<v Speaker 3>as much money on the All Blacks at the line. Yeah,

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 3>dollar eighty seven there, Caleb Clark's getting smash your first

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 3>try scorer, and the debutante Billy Proctor best backed in

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 3>the anytime market.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh so the Procter family getting heavily invested into into

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>their son cousin nephew's debut.

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 3>Fun fact, I just had breakfast at a cafe down

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 3>the road that Billy Proctor's anti owns.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, there you go.

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking through the try the anytime try scorers,

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and a name has really popped out to me here

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>at two dollars and thirty five cents at one point,

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the greatest rugby.

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Union player on the planet.

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>At one point, I think arguably one of the best

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>rugby league players in the world as well. Semi rad

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Radra is playing on the wing for FIGI this weekend.

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>He's at two dollars thirty five. I don't mind that.

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Anytime you could get he's playing n RAL. Anytime he

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 3>gets Semi with a two in front of his name, yeah,

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 3>was very very probably profitable for punters he's did he

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 3>say he's on the wing because he's been normally has

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 3>been playing in the centers. Right, If he's on the wing,

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 3>that two thirty five is very nice.

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I will check out the teamless, but yeah, I was

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty five for him. Is his pretty pretty juicy? I'm

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>just trying to dig up there.

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, he's on the wing, yep, yeah.

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Eleven Simi Rodric geez. I don't know they can score

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>from anywhere. He I think he's still one of the

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>highest paid players rugby players.

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 2>In the world. Yeah, I don't mind that.

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Is this is this a the bookie's sort of undervaluing

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 3>undervaluing Fiji here. I know they're obviously not a top

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 3>ten nation, but they've proven, especially in sort of World

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Cups and tournaments, that they can bang it with some

0:14:55.840 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 3>of the best they can. Yeah. Sorry, I guess travel

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 3>comes into it.

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Travels a big part of it.

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I also think the history, because we did like a

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>throwback Thursday segment yesterday where we had a look at

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>when we played Fiji in nineteen ninety seven. We beat

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>them by seventy points on that occasion, and that's basically

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>been the score line every time we've played them, except

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>for in twenty twenty one, which might have been the

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>last time we did play them, which was the closest

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>game we had, and we scored fifty eied and they

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>scored twenty something. So I don't mind New Zealand minus

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty five and a half. Obviously that's where everyone's going.

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think the way to play this is

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit of triscore of bingo. Just pick your favorite

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>all blacks players, Maybe throw semi Ra Dradra in there

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and see if you can see what you can dig out.

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Yep, I like it.

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>The Open Championship teed off overnight as well. We put

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>one of our agenda punts on Dan Hillier top forty finish.

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not looking real likely, point, is it.

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 3>It seems like the guys that went out early had

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 3>the better the better go of it. Yeah, Dan was

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 3>in that. Having said that, Dan was in that bunch

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 3>and he's finished plus five. Yeah he's he's definitely not

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 3>out of it. Obviously needs to make the cut, have

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 3>a decent have a decent go tomorrow. There's a guy

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Brown, never heard of him. He is minus six

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 3>leading it. So I can't win. Shane Lowry though form

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 3>my open winner minus five e second fox. He's t

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 3>forty two at plus two, and I haven't seen where

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 3>the other kewies are, but they.

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Were Hendrew's around plus three and Cabori was plus two

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, so pretty good start. Before before it all

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 3>teed off twelve percent of the money, which sort of

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 3>best back was Rory McElroy. He had an absolute shocker. Yeah.

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I was just talking about the slice off the tee

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>where the railroad was down the right hand side of

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the fairway.

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's as as someone who has sliced the ball

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>across you know, a road, a train tracks into the ocean,

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, into paddocks.

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 2>That's that'll wreck you round. Whenever you do something like that.

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>If you know it doesn't matter if you slice it,

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>if it leans on the field on the next fairway over.

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>But when you hit it to somewhere that's not part

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 1>of the golf course, that's a real demoralizer. And so

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to be tough for poor Rory

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to come back from that.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, very very familiar with that situation myself as well.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 3>Min I.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>Were there any big winners from across the week at

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the tab.

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 3>There was. There were a couple of really sick ones too.

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 3>We had a ninety nine dollars five leg racing multi

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 3>that sounds like an account emptier. Yeah, that's it won

0:17:57.600 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 3>nine and a half thousand dollars.

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, revolting.

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 3>How many five legs? Yeah, basically what we did last

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.239
<v Speaker 3>last week. They obviously put a little bit more on

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 3>than we did. There's one thousand dollars sixteen leg table

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 3>tennis multi that won sixteen thousand dollars.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's good. Shit, that is good.

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 3>The short shortest leg in that one was a dollar

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 3>eleven and the longest leg a dollar forty two.

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 2>It's all the favorites.

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I kind of feel like that bet to me screams

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of either someone who's just gone bugger at all the

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 1>favorites or someone who is a massive sicko for table

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>tennis and reckons that it's a blind spot for the

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>TB because those niche sports sometimes if you're really into them,

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you can find a bit of value. It's one or

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the other.

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Though, table tennis betting boomed during COVID. It was one

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 3>of the only sports that you could you could still

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 3>bet on, and there's certainly been a I guess a

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 3>cult following of table tennis punters since that time, So

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be surprised if it was the latter of

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 3>your two situations them.

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 2>And I okay, I don't mind that.

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 3>A couple others a three dollars four leg twenty six

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 3>plus winning margin multi on under twenty basketball. Oh, such

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 3>four legs, and they were all twenty six plus in

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 3>the winning margin market, and they all came in three

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 3>dollars into one point three thousand.

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, when you said one point three, I

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>thought we could say a million for a second.

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 3>And then a twenty dollars three leg football maltie that

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 3>cash just under five thousand dollars. There was two two

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 3>correct scores on that at nine dollars and eight dollars

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 3>and a match result draw at three dollars forty.

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So that when I hear these things, I always want

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>to see what the rest of their like betslips look like.

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Did they just you know, like that week when you

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>pluck something like that out of obscurity. Did you just

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>nail that one? Or how much other shit did you

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>throw out the wall across the weekend as well? That's

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>what I would like to see. Unfortunately, we'll never get

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 1>to see it anymore. Should we take a quick break, No,

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>let's say a wee rest, let's take a breather.

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right back. Pause the podcast now and grab

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 2>a pen for the hottest tips from around the tab office.

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I just want to remind people listening to this that

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this is what we're talking about at the top of

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, where every single one of these tips we

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>put on top four and they all came in. I'm

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>not saying that past performance guarantees you know, the performance

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of these tips this week. All I'm saying is the

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>track record is good. That's all I'm saying. You know

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that the table is hot.

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 3>We talked about this last week where we said, you know,

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 3>we thought our you know, top four hit rate was

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 3>sitting at about eighty or ninety. We can confidently say

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 3>after a week of data, we're at one hundred percent.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>So man, look, let that inform your bits as you will.

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 1>But all we're saying is we're going all right. So

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what have you heard around the TB office this week?

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 2>Huh?

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 3>We'll do a real, real quick recap the five tips

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 3>we had last week. This week, so it was monk

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 3>Tim had a win, Blue Sky at Night came fourth,

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 3>one A Ruer one I Ruher came first, in flight

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 3>came first, and Bear on the Loose was the one

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 3>that got us in my nose.

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Top four here on the list is one of my

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 2>favorite names for a horse.

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Great great mental image, up there with Craigg, second only

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>to Craig.

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, I've got him at one, two, three, four, five.

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 3>I might be getting little bit out over my skis

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 3>here with six, but let's let's do it. Eddington Race

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 3>nine tonight, which is harness number five. Rustenberg out a

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 3>dollar eighty has won two or four starts starts looks

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 3>very promising. First Crack tonight at the standing start as

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 3>opposed to the mobile I like to think of it

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 3>as the flying lap so if if he gets away

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 3>and starts good, he should be very hard to beat.

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 3>So that's number five Rustenberg at a dollar eighty.

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Don't mind that.

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 3>One tomorrow, Race one number three impressive Bell four dollars

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 3>forty with odds boost. This this comes from the guy

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 3>that gave us mult time last week and said just wins.

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 2>So okay, well, what's the book on this one this week?

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Then see the little liner you mean proven on a

0:22:58.800 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 3>heavy track.

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's all I've got is the is the track heavy?

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 2>We'll have to take the word for it.

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 3>The track is heavy.

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 2>It's good enough for me.

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So that was a race one number three Roger Rod.

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 3>Race three number I haven't written the number down. The

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 3>name is Martel. Martel, give me a second. It is

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 3>number four. Okay, should position them south up front from

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 3>the jump and be hard to track down. You can

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 3>get Martel at five dollars with odds boost.

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 2>So I boosts on all day tomorrow it is.

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 3>There's only five runners in that race.

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh see, that's that's peak top four sort of territory there.

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 2>That's the anchor of our Malti.

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 3>And there's only seven in the in the first race

0:23:58.840 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Brilliant.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:06.199
<v Speaker 3>Rose four up, sorry, Raised four at Rosehill. I love

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 3>this pure alpha yeah at two dollars.

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Eighty yep, perfect, that's so much for pure alpha.

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 3>And it gets more alpha ish. You've got the two

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 3>alphas in the mix here. J Mack Chris Waller. That's

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 3>probably what you need to know.

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Did they rename the horse when J Max said he'd

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 2>ride it?

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 3>I guess so that's the only the only reason that

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 3>you'd name a horse like this.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 2>You kind of have to.

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 3>But never been out of the cornilla in five starts?

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 3>So is actually a pure alpha?

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:44.719
<v Speaker 3>So it's Rosehill RaSE four, Rosehill Race six. Going back

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 3>to the well from last week, in flight is backing up.

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 3>You can get two dollars forty in flight.

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 2>It didn't let us down last week?

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Did it did not? And the last one Eagle Farm

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Raise seven number one zappud at two dollars forty three starts,

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 3>two wins and a third.

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, brilliant.

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, hopefully you managed to job all of

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>those ones down, and if you didn't, we'll blast them

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>up on the old Instagram page.

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Here's a tip for pund is.

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>What I do is because it's up on the story,

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you bring the story up and then you you know,

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you can like swap tabs across on you if you're

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>on the old iPhone, so you swipe up. Then you

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>go to your tab account and it'll hold the picture

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>there for you. And the other thing that it's done,

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it's rarely bringing families together, is my missus will sit

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>there and hold the Instagram story on her phone so

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that I can place the.

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Beds on my phone. And if that's not love, then

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what it is.

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 3>You've I send these to you in an email. Why

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 3>are you holding the story?

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Because it's about bringing families together, Carl, you know her

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and I wouldn't have that beautiful moment if we did that.

0:25:58.000 --> 0:25:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Very good.

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of romance, let's just rip straight into stats to

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>impress the ladies.

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, nice, easy one to start. Warriors Raiders. Warriors

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 3>have won three in a row. First the Raiders.

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, they smashed them twice last year. That was

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the turnaround of this season.

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Could happen.

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Sticking with that, sticking with that game, you should be

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 3>able to find a market somewhere for the Warriors to

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 3>win either half. Yes, Canberra have lost either half and

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 3>each of its last eleven matches.

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Wait, Cambra have lost either half.

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 3>So they won't they won't won't win.

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 2>They don't win both.

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Cool breaking news. Yeah, Camber now dollars sixty eight, Warriors

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 3>out to two dollars twenty What do they know? What's

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 3>what's I'm going to keep going and try and look

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 3>at Instagram for detail. You keep going, I'll have a look,

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 3>all right, I said, I've got Mitch Barnett stat Mitch

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Barnett has scored a try in each of the warriors

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 3>last two night matches.

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, he likes it at night.

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 3>He likes it at night. And you can get Mitch

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 3>oneette anytime at eight dollars seventy five.

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god.

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, go back to baseball. I know you love

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 3>these ones. Diamondbacks versus the Cubs. The Dbacks have led

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 3>after the third innings in each of their last nine games.

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 3>Versus in our Central opponents that hold a losing record.

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I loved I've got a d Backs had Actually

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know what team it was for the first

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>six months.

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I owned it up.

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 3>The d Backs super fair last one to the tennis

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Nadal versus Navonne and the ATP Bustard quarterfinal. Nadal has

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 3>failed to cover the game handicap, which is three and

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 3>a half, in each of his last ATPI ATP quarter

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 3>finals against opponents from Argentina.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you managed to dig these ones up,

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's powerful stuff when you do that one.

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 2>How one really gets me. I love the baseball ones.

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 3>So very good.

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like third innings on a Wednesday against left handed

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>opponents from single parent households. I don't know how they

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.880
<v Speaker 1>keep track of them. I've had a quick look through

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 1>sosh Meda. I can't find anything that would have affected

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the line. I don't know if maybe they've heard that

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>one of mitchure Kurt aren't going to back up.

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Don't know. Maybe it was a massive bit, smashed it

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 2>in a bit.

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe anyway, time for our last segment of the week,

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and I've had a couple of messages on social media

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>from people asking to get involved in the three way,

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think maybe from next week if you're open

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to it, And obviously we have to run it past

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Lane when he's back from witness protection, but do we

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>expand the three way into a four way and bring

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the listener.

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 3>In that's Larry.

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Are you open? Are you open to another person in

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 2>the room.

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Hey, I'm open to anything. Man, I'm down for a

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 3>good time.

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Nothing's a problem, all right, Okay, I think we'll have

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to do that next week. I was going to ask

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Lane for his leg and I didn't, so again this

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>week we're just going to have to give him another

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>leag So if you were tossing up between two for

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>our three way, feel free to check both them in.

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>But I'd like to start with my bet and we

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to the Rugby Union World where this weekend

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I would like to take And this is a bit

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of a a sort of a learning thing for me.

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've been struggling with the plus and minus

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>points start really twisting my head into a pretzel. But

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>since we've been doing this podcast, I think I've wrapped

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>my head around it, and so i'd like to take

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>one for a spin this weekend if I could. I'm

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>going to go South Africa minus thirty six and a

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>half against Portugal. That's obviously dollar eighty seven. I don't

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>think Portugal are getting within thirty six points of South

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Africa surely.

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 3>I'll just seeing a look at that game. The total

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 3>points is sixty three and a half, like a South

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Africa running out a children's team, because surely the line

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 3>should be sixty three and a half. Well that's exactly

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe Portugal good at rugby.

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that's exactly what I thought. Nah, I

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine Portugal are good at rugby.

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 2>You can't. You cannot bet on South Africa to win

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 2>this game.

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>That's market suspended, even if they've I mean, if I

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>look at the triscorers, I'm sure I won't recognize.

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the names.

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>My Pimpie's playing Curly, Orensey's playing Lacano Am who was

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the World Player of the Year just a few years ago.

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think they can get taled out Portugal

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>by more than thirty six and a half.

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 2>So I'd like to check that one. And that's my league.

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>South Africa minus thirty six points against port deal very nice.

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 3>I just just I text my WA's man and I

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 3>said any news. He said, both still playing so far,

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 3>so not sure, but anyway, my leg I'm going to

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 3>stick with one of our tips in the racing again

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 3>this week. It's done as well, Rosehille number six. I'm

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 3>going with in Flight at two forty to get fourth

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 3>win in a row and second win for us.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I like that in Flight's starting to become a regular

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>feature if you're okay with it. I'd actually like to

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>suggest a third leg that we could put on for

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>James Michael Lane. There's a couple of different options that

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll get you to pick from. I think that

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>if he were here, he would either want to double

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>down on last week's win, which was Mark Talaire, who's

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>been replaced by Caleb Clark. It'd either go Caleb Clark,

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.479
<v Speaker 1>or since we were talking about him so much just before,

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>do we chuck semi Radrodra into our three way.

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's get another one another belt a. Yeah, okay, let's

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 3>we're in winning form. Let's hold hold form until we

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 3>get this fourth man in. Okay, so do we go

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 3>with Caleb Clark. Let's go Caleb Clark. Auy we molted

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 3>them together six dollars thirty seven.

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's about where we want to be playing. It's

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>nice and safe. I don't think Caleb Clark's done our

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>odds any wonders, but he will help us bring it home.

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So that is our three way that'll be up on

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>sosh Met as well, and with any luck, next week

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll be putting together another video congratulating ourselves for heading

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>two consecutive three ways, and with any luck, we'll be

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>bringing in a fourth person into the room as well.

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for joining us this Friday morning, Carl.

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy watching the Warriors stupid o'clock tonight, Enjoy watching the

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>All Blacks tomorrow at two thirty, and enjoy you're responsible

0:32:57.840 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>punting across the weekend as well, mate.

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah you too, man I, thank you for having me.

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Er.

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 3>We'll spend here at the ACC Sports Book, but our

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 3>friends at the tab are good to go.