WEBVTT - Overshoot Conference: What breaking 1.5°C means for climate action

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Kielda.

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 2>daily podcast presented by The New Zealand Herald. We're edging

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 2>closer to exceeding one point five degrees celsius of warming

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 2>globally and scientists will gather to understand the implications of

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 2>missing our climate change targets. The world's best will descend

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>upon Austria this week for the first ever Overshoot conference.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>It's while Winston Peters delivered a truth bomb at the

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>un recently singling out four countries for being the world's

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 2>largest emitters. So what happens if we don't meet our

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 2>climate targets? Today on the front Page, Victoria University climate

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>scientist Professor James Renwick is with us to delve into

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 2>climate overshoot and why we should care about. First off, James,

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>can you tell us what climate overshoot actually means?

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>The Paris Agreement, which was drawn up in twenty fifteen,

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>said that the countries of the world would do what

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>they have to do to reduce emissions fast enough to

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>stop at a global warming of well below two degrees

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>above pre industrial or but a mouthful, and that the

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>countries of the world would pursue efforts to stop at

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.919
<v Speaker 1>one and a half degrees of warming. So the Paris

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Agreement ranges between one and a half and two degrees

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of warming, and overshoot refers to the idea that the

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>countries of the world have not done enough and that

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>warming is going to exceed one and a half degrees

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even two degrees. So the idea there as well, Yes,

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, that could happen, but provided we can call

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>things off again fairly quickly, it may not be the

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>end of the world kind of thing. So it's all

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>about what is the actual trajectory that the Earth's line

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.399
<v Speaker 1>in terms of temperature arise, and what can we do

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>about cooling things down again. US temperatures do get above

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the thresholds and the Paris Agreement. Now you'll be aware

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>probably that the bottom of the Paris Agreement one point

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>five degrees.

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 3>Has already been breached one year.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Last year was the first year more than one and

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a half degrees above free industrial But that's not quite

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of that story. You really need to say

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 1>ten years average of ten years above one and a

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>half before you could say for sure that yes, we've

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>broken through that limit, and we're not quite there yet.

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>We're at about one point three degrees in the ten

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>year average, but all our things are going we will

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>be there by the.

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 3>End of this decade.

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 2>So what more can be done?

0:02:55.600 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, everything, We're not doing anything. The thing that

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>needs to happen is we have to stop emitting greenhouse gases,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>especially carbon dioxide. And the main way we emit carbon

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>dioxide is we burn fossil fuels, So burning coal, burning oil,

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>burning natural gas all release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And we've been putting more and more and more of

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>this stuff into the air every year, with one or

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>two little blips than ever. Half of the total emissions

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of greenhouse gases humans have managed to do since you know,

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the seventeen hundreds have happened since nineteen ninety, so really,

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, putting our foot on the gas literally, and

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we're changing the climate faster and faster. In the thirty

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>years the work been talking about fixing this problem, they've

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>made it twice as bad and we're just accelerating in

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the wrong direction. So the world's doing nothing apart from talking.

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So it would be great to see a big rollout

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of renewal energy and a big reduction in the burning

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of coal and oil, especially lots of ebs and solar panels,

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff is really what the world needs.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's happening, you know in places China are leading

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the world solar panels and win tair of once, but

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>they're also leading the world and building coal fire past

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>oceans such. Yeah, a bit of a double edged sword there. So, Yeah,

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>what we need is just a reduction and emissions across

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the globe. And I guess that's been the theme of

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>or that will be one of the themes of the

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Overshirt Conference and certainly has been talked about at the

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>UN Climate a week in New York.

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 2>When do you think the world is going to get serious?

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 2>What a great question, because I mean, you've been in

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>this game for a long time, James, you're probably sick

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 2>of you know, warning, And I mean as soon as

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 2>everyone says, oh this is going to happen, that's going

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 2>to happen, it happens, but nothing's done about it.

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>No, And I really don't have an answer to that question.

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>When is the world going to get serious? It should

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>have happened thirty years ago, forty years ago even was possible.

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>It was already plenty of warning back in the nineteen eighties.

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>But the status quo has an awful lot of power

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>behind it. The fossil fuel industry is one of the

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>most profitable in history. You know, there's a lot of

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 1>power and many title and doing things the way we

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>have done them for the last two hundred years or so.

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 4>So governments are reluctant to really act, and I think,

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, government's policymakers don't quite believe or they don't

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 4>feel it.

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, they might know the facts, but they don't

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>have the you know, the emotional response that you really

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>need before you take something important on board. So when

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 1>is this going to happen. I hope it's in the

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>next five years, but it's going to take some major

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>extreme events and some I guess well resourced, rich countries

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know, maybe a whole lot of death and

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>destruction before government's really taken on board that, oh gee,

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>this actually is important. It actually is affecting our economy

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and our lifestyles and everything. So, you know, I don't

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>want to wish extremes and death and destruction on people,

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't seem as though anything else, any of

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the science really tells the story, and so a lot

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of people are trying to tell the stories in different

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>ways through the arts and so on, and maybe that's

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>making a difference. But the pace of change has been

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>so slow it's been just impossible even see in the

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>last few decades that I really wonder when we'll get

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>onto it. I suppose the good news, you could say,

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>is that humans have all the power. You know, we

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>are the one species doing this. We're releasing all the

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in housecases into the atmosphere. Whenever we stop doing that,

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we will stop climate change within a year or two.

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>This is now well known, so we'll always have all

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the power. But it's really it really comes down to

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>when do we use how bad do we let things

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>get in the meantime, And that's the trade off. I

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>suppose that policy makers around the world think about if

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>they think about it at all, you know what about

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>short term profit versus long term sustainability. That doesn't take

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>much thinking about from my perspective. But if you're trying

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to turn a buck this year, I suppose it does

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.119
<v Speaker 1>take a bit of thinking about. And this year's buck

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>just always seems to win.

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, So China recently pledged for the first time

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 2>to reduce total greenhouse gas emissions to seven to ten

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 2>percent below peak levels by twenty thirty five. This includes

0:07:55.680 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 2>expanding wind and solar capacity, increasing non fossil fuel energy share,

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 2>and ramping up electric vehicle sales, but it still falls

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 2>short of the thirty percent of cuts that some observers

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 2>say are needed for that one point five degrees. What

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 2>does China's new pledge mean for global climate negotiations.

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, it is a step forward. It's great to see

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that China is actually pledging to actually reduce emissions, not

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>just the intensity of emissions or the things they've come

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>up with before. So yes, that's a step forward. That's great,

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>But as you've just said, it's it's a bit weak,

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit slow. You know that there was a

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.319
<v Speaker 1>report from the Untergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that came

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>out nearly ten years ago now twenty eighteen, on what

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>do we need to do to stop at one and

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a half degrees of women And that document said fifty

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>percent reductions in emissions by twenty thirty and China's talking

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>about maybe ten percent by twenty thirty five. So it's

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going in the right direction, but it's way slow.

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>China is the biggest committer globally, so if they did that,

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it would still be a win. But we need every

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>other bigger money and smaller amount of for that matter,

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to do the same. And like I said before this,

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>there's not really any country that's really managing to do that.

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>The UK, yes, this one I can think of, has

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>reduced its submissions significantly. Well that's you could argue that's

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>by exporting those emissions. You know, all the manufacturing that

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>used to happen in Britain probably nowhattans in China and

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>other Asian countries. So the global effect has been well

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty murdered, to put it mildly.

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters recently made headlines at the

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>UN by stating that the world's four biggest emitters that's China, India,

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 2>Russia and the US bear the brunt of responsibility, comprising

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 2>about sixty percent of global emissions. He urged leaders to

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 2>quote face the elephant in the room and describe the

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 2>situ as a battle we can't possibly win. It's been

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 2>described as a truth bomb. How has that been received?

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 2>And first of I mean what was your first reaction

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 2>to seeing that, because it is a bit of a

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 2>different change in tax for Winston Peters.

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, indeed, and you could well or a truth bomb.

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And he's quite right in the sense that those four

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>countries are the biggest emitters in the world, and we

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>won't have solved the problem until those nations really get

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on board and reduce their emissions substantially. But you know,

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>those countries account for sixty percent of global emissions, which

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>means that if you put all the other countries together

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Supfairs in New Zealand, you get the other forty percent,

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and there's nothing to stop the other countries of the

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>world doing what they need to do. And if we

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>could produce global emissions by forty percent while all of

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>those countries get into zero, fabulous. You know, that would

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>be a great step forward, and maybe you would shame

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the bigger metis into doing the same thing totally hope. Yeah,

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sort of sympathetic to what he's saying,

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and he's quite right, but he's also kind of trying

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to sidestep any responsibility in this country and in other

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>countries that only emit one percent of global emissions or less,

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and every country has to play their part. We've got

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to get the zero global emissions of carbon dioxide and

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that means zero country is still emitting CO two. So yep, okay,

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 1>And I'd love to see the big countries respond to

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that appropriately, But it doesn't absolve us. And his comment

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's a battle we can't win us absolutely wrong.

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 3>And like I said, we have all the power.

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>We are the ones emitting these greenhouse gases. We can

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>stop whenever we like I wish it was saying that,

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>so we can absolutely win. We being the global community.

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's not anyone country, even just China got zero missions.

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>That wouldn't fix it. It will be a stick love

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>step forward. But all countries have to act and all

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>countries can contribute to winning. We will definitely win if

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we do this.

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 5>Another unofficial stated in nineteen eighty nine that within a decade,

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 5>entire nations could be wiped off the map by global

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 5>warming not happening. You know, it used to be global cooling.

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 5>If you look back years ago, in the nineteen twenties

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 5>and the nineteen thirties, they said global cooling will kill

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 5>the world. We have to do something. Then they said

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 5>global warming will kill the world. But then it started

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 5>getting cooler, so now they could just call it a

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 5>climate change because that way they can't miss climate change,

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 5>because if it goes higher or lower, whatever the hell happens,

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 5>is climate change. It's the greatest job ever perpetrated on

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 5>the world in my opinion.

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, speaking of the Big Four, it's all while Donald

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Trump told the UN that climate change was and I quote,

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 2>the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world, what

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 2>does the rest of the world and New Zealand I

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 2>suppose do when the US president doesn't play ball?

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh boy, it's a good question.

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Donald Trump's a bit of a special

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>cases and he says all sorts of crazy things, and

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>this is as crazy as anything else I've heard him

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>say recently. Of course, it's not a conjob. You know,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>there's so much of so many mountains of scientific evenents

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and understanding. You know, we've got the observations, we have

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the understanding of the physics and all the rest of it.

0:13:55.880 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>We have the models. What's happening. There's no rome for uncertainty,

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and it was not it's definitely not a con job.

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>But when the president of the US is something like that.

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>It does, of course, it kind of gives license to

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>people in other countries that are maybe uncertain about what

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>they should do, to say, oh, well, okay, the US

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is treating it.

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Like a joke, why don't we do the same. So

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 3>it's not good for the global conversation, of course.

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>But I really wonder these days how much Donald Trump,

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, how much weight he carries in terms of

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>these international conversations. He's sort of said so many strange

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>things and passed off the countries that I wonder whether

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the US is just being a bit sidelines and you know,

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the world can carry on and do what it has

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to do without the US joining in, and of course

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that will hurt the US economy, and Trump won't be

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the president forever, so the US can get on board

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>at some stage. In the meantime, a a number of

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you as states are doing what they need to do anyway,

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>reducing missions. It's not as though the federal government controls

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>what all of the states do.

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 3>So it's a bit of a mixed big It's not

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 3>good globally to.

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Have one of the world's most prominent political leaders saying

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>these things, But you know, I think most people take

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's statements with the big grown or starved.

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Actually, well, you've been a climate scientist for decades now,

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I hope you don't mind me giving away your age.

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 2>What kind of conversation has the conversation shifted from when

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 2>you began looking into climate change to now.

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, those conversations have shifted, but they started happening at

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the very least. You know, you do hear a lot

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>more conversation around action on climate change. And you know,

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in this country, the policy landscapes quite different. Here's the

0:15:56.320 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Climate Change Commission, we have the Zero carbonac the government

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and principle at least has focused on taking action on

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>climate change. So that's that is quite a change over

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the decades that I've been looking at all this. But

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, it's a strange. It's maybe not unexpected

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>really when you think about it. But back in the day,

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>back last century, the end of last century, there was

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a fair bit of hope around I guess, and the

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>idea that we have time and we can take action

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we'll get on top of this problem.

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>So I had some faith that governments countries around the

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>world would actually step up and really start to reduce

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>their emissions over the time I've been working on the problem.

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>As time's gone on, that hasn't happened. And like I said,

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>actually the missions have continued to go up. It's become

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of more and more desperate, I guess, And in

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the science community there's a lot more desperation and worry, anxiety,

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>anger even about the lack of action, because the problem

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>has become clearer and obviously more dangerous, but the action

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>still isn't there. So everything's become a bit more fractureous.

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And I suppose this is what I'm saying. Maybe it's

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>not too surprising. As the climate changes, that puts stresses

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>on natural systems, that puts stresses on food security, water security,

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>even where people can live. You know, sea level rises

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:32.959
<v Speaker 1>are already affecting that. So things are becoming gradually harder. Life's

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>becoming a bit harder. And when that happens, people generally

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>turn onwards, you know, circle wagons and look after their

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>own and nationalism and you know, countries looking after themselves

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>rather than cooperating, which is really what we need, has

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>become the prevalent story. And I think countries want to

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>protect their own economies. They don't want to be spending

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>money on what they might see is some possible problem

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in fifty year's time or something like that. Of course,

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that is absolutely not what it is. It's happening right now.

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's maybe to be expected that things have gone

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the way that Donald Trump describes. And that's not something

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I anticipated back in the nineteen nineties. I genuinely thought

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>countries would see what needed to be done and do it.

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 3>But you know, that's that's a very naive thought.

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And it reminds me of a statement that Al Gore

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>made in his movie An Inconvenient Truth that twenty years ago,

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and he said, you know, he studied the climate system

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and what was going on with greenhouse gases and all

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it, and he went to Congress in

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen eighties and he said, oh, I just need

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell Congress what's happening and they'll get onto it.

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, that was forty years ago, and he

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>did tell Congress and they listened and then went back

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to worrying about the economy. So it's yeah, human nature

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is the big problem, you know, and when how much

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it will take to break through that kind of thinking.

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I dorn't no worries, mate, how much it'll take. It'll

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it will cost a lot of money, and I suspect

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of lives before we see reelection.

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us, James, sure thing. That's it for

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 2>this episode of the Front Page. You can read more

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 2>about today's stories and extensive news coverage at enzadherld dot

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 2>co dot nz. The Front Page is produced by Jane

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Ye and Richard Martin, who is also our editor. I'm

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to the Front Page on iHeartRadio or

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow for

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 2>another look behind the headlines.