1 00:00:09,093 --> 00:00:12,693 Speaker 1: You're listening to a podcast from News Talks B Follow 2 00:00:12,773 --> 00:00:16,173 Speaker 1: this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio. 3 00:00:16,613 --> 00:00:19,332 Speaker 2: Treasury is nudging the government to look at potentially selling 4 00:00:19,372 --> 00:00:22,573 Speaker 2: off some state assets that are underperforming or are no 5 00:00:22,692 --> 00:00:25,532 Speaker 2: longer fit for purpose. To discuss this further, we are 6 00:00:25,653 --> 00:00:29,493 Speaker 2: joined by Brad Olson, the CEO of in for Metrics. Brad, 7 00:00:29,493 --> 00:00:30,773 Speaker 2: could they have you back on the show? 8 00:00:31,093 --> 00:00:32,333 Speaker 3: Good afternoon, team Brad. 9 00:00:32,373 --> 00:00:35,813 Speaker 4: Are we currently borrowing more money from overseas to run 10 00:00:35,853 --> 00:00:39,413 Speaker 4: the basics of this country? So are we basically going 11 00:00:39,493 --> 00:00:43,533 Speaker 4: in debt just to stay to tread water? 12 00:00:43,973 --> 00:00:46,532 Speaker 5: Yeah, Unfortunately, we are having to borrow for sort of 13 00:00:46,573 --> 00:00:49,412 Speaker 5: just the daily costs, which of course means that future 14 00:00:49,452 --> 00:00:51,533 Speaker 5: generations have got to pay that back, but they don't 15 00:00:51,533 --> 00:00:53,853 Speaker 5: get any of the benefit because it's paying for payments 16 00:00:53,893 --> 00:00:56,333 Speaker 5: that are going out one time only sort of right 17 00:00:56,413 --> 00:00:59,653 Speaker 5: the second So that doesn't make a huge amount of sense. 18 00:00:59,893 --> 00:01:02,853 Speaker 5: It's a tough one economically, but on the current forecast, 19 00:01:02,893 --> 00:01:05,133 Speaker 5: that's going to continue out until the end of the decade, 20 00:01:05,173 --> 00:01:07,333 Speaker 5: So it is challenging. When you're in deficit, you have 21 00:01:07,373 --> 00:01:10,973 Speaker 5: to pay for all of that sort of gap in debt, 22 00:01:11,213 --> 00:01:12,812 Speaker 5: and I think the point that the Treasury has come 23 00:01:12,813 --> 00:01:15,133 Speaker 5: out with with their investment statement is saying, look, let's 24 00:01:15,133 --> 00:01:17,853 Speaker 5: actually have a bit more of a conversation around like 25 00:01:18,093 --> 00:01:21,333 Speaker 5: why does the government own certain stuff at various points 26 00:01:21,373 --> 00:01:24,853 Speaker 5: over time. It's bought things, it's acquired things, it's held 27 00:01:24,893 --> 00:01:28,613 Speaker 5: on to things. But why should we own a TV station? 28 00:01:28,693 --> 00:01:32,092 Speaker 5: Should we own farms? Should we own electricity companies? Maybe 29 00:01:32,133 --> 00:01:35,732 Speaker 5: the default answer that should be maybe not instead of 30 00:01:35,773 --> 00:01:36,493 Speaker 5: definitely yes. 31 00:01:37,212 --> 00:01:39,613 Speaker 4: So if you look at those assets though, say TV 32 00:01:39,693 --> 00:01:43,693 Speaker 4: and Z New Zealand posts, key we bank Land Corps 33 00:01:43,693 --> 00:01:46,253 Speaker 4: seems like quite a good one, but they are they 34 00:01:46,253 --> 00:01:48,533 Speaker 4: difference makers if we sold there. I mean, how much 35 00:01:48,613 --> 00:01:49,573 Speaker 4: is TV and Z worth? 36 00:01:50,693 --> 00:01:51,453 Speaker 3: Well? All up? 37 00:01:51,493 --> 00:01:54,133 Speaker 5: The government or Treasury reckons that the government owns about 38 00:01:54,213 --> 00:01:58,333 Speaker 5: ninety nine billion dollars worth of assets that are sort 39 00:01:58,333 --> 00:02:01,493 Speaker 5: of more commercial in nature, so they're not your vital 40 00:02:01,533 --> 00:02:04,013 Speaker 5: infrastructure like roads and similar I think that's about three 41 00:02:04,093 --> 00:02:07,133 Speaker 5: hundred and forty odd billion that you get with hospital skills, 42 00:02:07,253 --> 00:02:10,413 Speaker 5: roads all that. Talking about doing anything with them, there's 43 00:02:10,613 --> 00:02:13,373 Speaker 5: a couple I think there's nearly two hundred billion worth 44 00:02:13,453 --> 00:02:16,613 Speaker 5: of commercial investments, so you know, the like acc Fund, 45 00:02:16,653 --> 00:02:19,933 Speaker 5: the super Fund. Again, no one's discussing getting rid of them. 46 00:02:20,293 --> 00:02:22,493 Speaker 5: You might always change exactly what they want to do 47 00:02:22,613 --> 00:02:25,293 Speaker 5: with their money and what the government requires of those 48 00:02:25,333 --> 00:02:29,572 Speaker 5: managers to fund or to look to increase those investments. 49 00:02:29,573 --> 00:02:32,333 Speaker 5: But it's the ninety nine billion dollars worth of assets 50 00:02:32,373 --> 00:02:36,853 Speaker 5: that the effectively their companies of different descriptions, that you go, well, 51 00:02:37,133 --> 00:02:40,452 Speaker 5: why is the government going to be better at deciding 52 00:02:40,493 --> 00:02:43,253 Speaker 5: on how these assets play out than the private sector, 53 00:02:43,373 --> 00:02:46,333 Speaker 5: especially when some of them are you know, they're not 54 00:02:46,373 --> 00:02:49,172 Speaker 5: fully owned by the government either, and so there's other influences, 55 00:02:49,293 --> 00:02:51,933 Speaker 5: other investors that sort of want a certain return. And 56 00:02:51,972 --> 00:02:54,893 Speaker 5: I think, look, the point here is more not necessarily 57 00:02:54,933 --> 00:02:56,733 Speaker 5: just to sort of, as some people put it, you know, 58 00:02:56,773 --> 00:02:59,133 Speaker 5: you sell the family looms and then you know, you 59 00:02:59,252 --> 00:03:00,213 Speaker 5: just sort of spend. 60 00:02:59,933 --> 00:03:00,732 Speaker 3: It on the day to day. 61 00:03:01,053 --> 00:03:04,773 Speaker 5: It's more, if we want more investments into certain areas, 62 00:03:04,813 --> 00:03:06,733 Speaker 5: which apparently is a country we do. We know we've 63 00:03:06,733 --> 00:03:10,292 Speaker 5: got an infrastructure deficit, the government better to recycle out 64 00:03:10,333 --> 00:03:12,293 Speaker 5: some of the assets that they're not currently getting the 65 00:03:12,293 --> 00:03:14,613 Speaker 5: best performance from or don't think are the best things 66 00:03:14,653 --> 00:03:17,253 Speaker 5: to hold, and instead use that money to invest in 67 00:03:17,293 --> 00:03:19,293 Speaker 5: other things that they do think are more important, like 68 00:03:19,373 --> 00:03:21,893 Speaker 5: over time, you do it just you're spending an investment 69 00:03:22,213 --> 00:03:24,413 Speaker 5: as a household. I think that's healthy for the government 70 00:03:24,493 --> 00:03:25,173 Speaker 5: to consider too. 71 00:03:25,853 --> 00:03:28,852 Speaker 4: Now I think most people agree that, you know, private 72 00:03:28,893 --> 00:03:31,813 Speaker 4: ownership is more efficient than government ownership. But then that 73 00:03:31,853 --> 00:03:34,253 Speaker 4: brings in the profit over public good part of it. 74 00:03:34,293 --> 00:03:36,453 Speaker 4: So what are the risks around that of selling these 75 00:03:36,493 --> 00:03:38,053 Speaker 4: assets or parts of these assets. 76 00:03:39,053 --> 00:03:41,853 Speaker 5: Yeah, there's difficult elements, and I think you know, people 77 00:03:41,893 --> 00:03:44,133 Speaker 5: are always concerned when they start to see some of 78 00:03:44,173 --> 00:03:47,373 Speaker 5: those big profit numbers. But again that's the risk that 79 00:03:47,493 --> 00:03:49,973 Speaker 5: investors are taking around, you know, putting their money in 80 00:03:50,333 --> 00:03:53,053 Speaker 5: at some times they might not be making as bigger returns. 81 00:03:53,333 --> 00:03:55,853 Speaker 5: But importantly, remember that there's still a profit you know, 82 00:03:55,973 --> 00:03:58,813 Speaker 5: expectation from a number of New Zealand companies that are 83 00:03:58,853 --> 00:04:01,813 Speaker 5: still owned by the government, like in New Zealand TV 84 00:04:01,933 --> 00:04:03,733 Speaker 5: and Z all of those they are expected to turn 85 00:04:03,773 --> 00:04:06,613 Speaker 5: a profit. They're expected to make money. So the sort 86 00:04:06,653 --> 00:04:09,173 Speaker 5: of idea that you know, government owns shouldn't be making 87 00:04:09,213 --> 00:04:12,653 Speaker 5: money is actually completely wrong. It's deliberately set up to 88 00:04:12,733 --> 00:04:16,253 Speaker 5: do that. And instead you then go, well, how do 89 00:04:16,293 --> 00:04:19,813 Speaker 5: you sort of potentially make sure that there are some 90 00:04:20,013 --> 00:04:23,613 Speaker 5: elements of maybe not control, but regulation around what comes through. 91 00:04:23,853 --> 00:04:28,133 Speaker 5: There's still regulation, for example, around different elements of how 92 00:04:28,173 --> 00:04:30,453 Speaker 5: the media works and what things can or can't be 93 00:04:30,773 --> 00:04:33,373 Speaker 5: published and everything else, so you don't lose control of 94 00:04:33,413 --> 00:04:35,333 Speaker 5: that as a government, but you just don't sort of 95 00:04:35,573 --> 00:04:37,773 Speaker 5: have to then be playing in the ad revenue space 96 00:04:37,893 --> 00:04:38,613 Speaker 5: or anything else. 97 00:04:38,693 --> 00:04:41,213 Speaker 3: So look, there's a whole raft of these. 98 00:04:41,293 --> 00:04:43,053 Speaker 5: I guess the sort of challenge in the question is 99 00:04:43,173 --> 00:04:44,933 Speaker 5: if you sort of were to get a bunch of 100 00:04:44,933 --> 00:04:47,613 Speaker 5: New Zealanders to write out a bunch of assets that 101 00:04:47,653 --> 00:04:50,253 Speaker 5: they think the government should hold and what the government 102 00:04:50,293 --> 00:04:52,773 Speaker 5: does hold, how many people are writing down what we've 103 00:04:52,773 --> 00:04:55,293 Speaker 5: currently got, and how many people have got other stuff 104 00:04:55,293 --> 00:04:57,413 Speaker 5: that they think is more important that would be better 105 00:04:57,413 --> 00:04:59,213 Speaker 5: to swap in an outfull You might well have the 106 00:04:59,253 --> 00:05:01,893 Speaker 5: same value of investments at the end, but it might 107 00:05:01,893 --> 00:05:04,213 Speaker 5: be in different areas, sort of more social areas where 108 00:05:04,253 --> 00:05:07,333 Speaker 5: normally the private market might not provide that sort of stuff, 109 00:05:07,653 --> 00:05:10,413 Speaker 5: be it you know, health care, BAEd, infrastructure or otherwise. 110 00:05:10,853 --> 00:05:14,693 Speaker 4: We're talking to Infometric CEO Brad Olsen. Now, energy sector 111 00:05:14,733 --> 00:05:17,293 Speaker 4: is the one that everyone brings up. So the current 112 00:05:17,453 --> 00:05:21,613 Speaker 4: price of electricity in New Zealand, how much is partial 113 00:05:21,853 --> 00:05:26,053 Speaker 4: asset sales responsible for that price increased. 114 00:05:26,053 --> 00:05:26,693 Speaker 3: Well, I don't think. 115 00:05:27,013 --> 00:05:29,493 Speaker 5: I don't think a huge huge amount, because again, government 116 00:05:29,533 --> 00:05:32,813 Speaker 5: retains you know, a fear whack of those those companies. 117 00:05:32,813 --> 00:05:36,053 Speaker 5: They can you know, exert control. And I guess the point, right, 118 00:05:36,093 --> 00:05:38,933 Speaker 5: if you're the government and you own an electricity company, 119 00:05:39,013 --> 00:05:41,853 Speaker 5: but you're at the same time saying, well, the electricity 120 00:05:41,893 --> 00:05:44,173 Speaker 5: companies are not doing good for the people of New Zealand. 121 00:05:44,173 --> 00:05:46,373 Speaker 5: And that's sometimes the comments that come out from various 122 00:05:46,413 --> 00:05:49,413 Speaker 5: politicians like, bro, you own them, do something with it, 123 00:05:49,493 --> 00:05:51,853 Speaker 5: like either use your power or like get rid of them, 124 00:05:51,893 --> 00:05:54,933 Speaker 5: because there's sort of no point in holding something, collecting 125 00:05:54,933 --> 00:05:56,653 Speaker 5: the money that comes in from the profits and then 126 00:05:56,693 --> 00:05:58,533 Speaker 5: going oh, well, the thing that I own is not 127 00:05:58,573 --> 00:06:00,493 Speaker 5: doing the thing that I want it to make it. 128 00:06:00,573 --> 00:06:01,773 Speaker 3: That's what ownership's for. 129 00:06:02,213 --> 00:06:04,413 Speaker 5: And I guess that's probably the big challenge right of 130 00:06:04,453 --> 00:06:06,253 Speaker 5: the last couple of years, is that people have gone, 131 00:06:06,293 --> 00:06:09,413 Speaker 5: will hang on, we're owning these things, we're not clearly 132 00:06:09,453 --> 00:06:12,573 Speaker 5: exerting the control that we think we want to. What's 133 00:06:12,613 --> 00:06:14,493 Speaker 5: the point of that ownership again, which is why this 134 00:06:14,613 --> 00:06:17,373 Speaker 5: conversation is going up. And I guess, look, the point 135 00:06:17,413 --> 00:06:19,853 Speaker 5: really when you look at the likes of energy companies 136 00:06:19,853 --> 00:06:23,453 Speaker 5: and similar is if government hasn't made bigger calls or 137 00:06:23,493 --> 00:06:26,893 Speaker 5: sort of had more direction on what they want from 138 00:06:26,933 --> 00:06:30,213 Speaker 5: those energy companies, then it sort of can't say that 139 00:06:30,253 --> 00:06:33,453 Speaker 5: there's you know, that they've done anything particular to energy prices, 140 00:06:33,493 --> 00:06:35,893 Speaker 5: because clearly the lever's been there and nothing's been pulled. 141 00:06:35,933 --> 00:06:38,533 Speaker 5: So it does be the question, what's the point in 142 00:06:38,693 --> 00:06:40,613 Speaker 5: having something if you're not going to use the ownership 143 00:06:40,693 --> 00:06:41,373 Speaker 5: rights over it. 144 00:06:41,373 --> 00:06:43,333 Speaker 2: It's very nice, you said, Brad. But the tricky part, 145 00:06:43,373 --> 00:06:45,213 Speaker 2: correct me if I'm wrong with the when it comes 146 00:06:45,213 --> 00:06:47,773 Speaker 2: to the gentailors and the electricity company is the untold 147 00:06:47,853 --> 00:06:50,933 Speaker 2: hundreds and hundreds of millions various government has pumped into 148 00:06:50,973 --> 00:06:53,293 Speaker 2: the infrastructure. Then you look at the idea of selling 149 00:06:53,333 --> 00:06:56,653 Speaker 2: them off and all that costs sunk into that, and 150 00:06:56,693 --> 00:06:59,173 Speaker 2: then to bring in an overseas owner to say, yep, 151 00:06:59,173 --> 00:07:01,893 Speaker 2: we'll buy those those infrastructure assets off you thank you 152 00:07:01,973 --> 00:07:05,093 Speaker 2: very much for your years of pumping millions into that. 153 00:07:05,413 --> 00:07:07,853 Speaker 2: Isn't that kind of where people get a bit concerned 154 00:07:07,933 --> 00:07:10,253 Speaker 2: is as a country, we've looked after that for a 155 00:07:10,293 --> 00:07:12,453 Speaker 2: long time, and now they're going to put it up 156 00:07:12,453 --> 00:07:12,853 Speaker 2: for sale. 157 00:07:13,933 --> 00:07:14,493 Speaker 3: Yeah, to a. 158 00:07:14,453 --> 00:07:16,933 Speaker 5: Degree it can be, although your sales price should include 159 00:07:16,973 --> 00:07:17,453 Speaker 5: all of that. 160 00:07:17,373 --> 00:07:19,213 Speaker 3: Sort of sunk effort to be put into it. 161 00:07:19,493 --> 00:07:22,053 Speaker 5: But I think, I mean again, I don't think anyone's 162 00:07:22,053 --> 00:07:24,213 Speaker 5: made the cast that it has to exclusively go to 163 00:07:24,253 --> 00:07:26,693 Speaker 5: an overseas investor. You know, if you ask people, if 164 00:07:26,893 --> 00:07:28,653 Speaker 5: you're starting to see this coming up from a few 165 00:07:28,933 --> 00:07:31,773 Speaker 5: different companies in New Zealand around using key we say 166 00:07:31,773 --> 00:07:34,213 Speaker 5: for assets to go into infrastructure. I mean, you know, 167 00:07:34,253 --> 00:07:37,373 Speaker 5: the likes of Simplicity has talked about that recently too. 168 00:07:37,533 --> 00:07:40,213 Speaker 5: So there's clearly options to try and sort of provide 169 00:07:40,253 --> 00:07:43,493 Speaker 5: more of a commercial directive but also sort of you know, 170 00:07:43,693 --> 00:07:46,333 Speaker 5: maybe not keep it fully and let's call it government ownership, 171 00:07:46,333 --> 00:07:49,093 Speaker 5: but at least provide the option or the opportunity for 172 00:07:49,333 --> 00:07:51,893 Speaker 5: New Zealanders to still do it. And again I guess 173 00:07:51,933 --> 00:07:54,533 Speaker 5: the challenges right, I mean, you heard from the Finance 174 00:07:54,573 --> 00:07:57,213 Speaker 5: Minister recently who said, look, we didn't think we were 175 00:07:57,213 --> 00:07:59,533 Speaker 5: being a constraint on the energy companies, but the more 176 00:07:59,533 --> 00:08:01,413 Speaker 5: and more we talk to them, the more and more 177 00:08:01,453 --> 00:08:03,573 Speaker 5: they say, well, look, if the government's not willing to 178 00:08:03,573 --> 00:08:06,773 Speaker 5: put money in themselves to maintain their current holdings, then 179 00:08:06,813 --> 00:08:09,733 Speaker 5: maybe as an energy company, we won't invest quite as much. 180 00:08:09,973 --> 00:08:11,893 Speaker 5: That was the point that was always made, and so 181 00:08:11,973 --> 00:08:14,733 Speaker 5: government sort of said, look, we've never held back on you. 182 00:08:14,773 --> 00:08:17,533 Speaker 5: It's just that no one's really asked the question as directly. 183 00:08:17,613 --> 00:08:20,533 Speaker 5: So the next couple of years idea expect that you 184 00:08:20,613 --> 00:08:23,213 Speaker 5: might well see the government either need to pony up 185 00:08:23,253 --> 00:08:26,133 Speaker 5: more investment to put more into the energy sector to 186 00:08:26,133 --> 00:08:28,933 Speaker 5: help things out. That's sort of the challenge. If we've 187 00:08:28,933 --> 00:08:32,253 Speaker 5: got pretty limited amounts of money anyway, is there a 188 00:08:32,293 --> 00:08:34,653 Speaker 5: decision that New Zealanders are okay with putting that level 189 00:08:34,653 --> 00:08:35,612 Speaker 5: of investment. 190 00:08:35,173 --> 00:08:41,293 Speaker 3: In, Because if it is, that's. 191 00:08:38,852 --> 00:08:41,053 Speaker 5: The compromise that you've got, and it's a very very 192 00:08:41,053 --> 00:08:41,852 Speaker 5: delicate balance. 193 00:08:42,492 --> 00:08:45,492 Speaker 4: Now going to Keywi Bank speaking of delicate balances, and 194 00:08:45,533 --> 00:08:47,653 Speaker 4: I would say sort of a catch twenty two situation. 195 00:08:47,892 --> 00:08:49,693 Speaker 4: So the idea of key Wei Bank is compete with 196 00:08:49,732 --> 00:08:51,652 Speaker 4: the Aussie banks and so not so much money is 197 00:08:51,693 --> 00:08:54,813 Speaker 4: going overseas because we feel like we might have sold 198 00:08:54,813 --> 00:08:56,652 Speaker 4: off bn Z and such back in the day for 199 00:08:57,173 --> 00:09:00,173 Speaker 4: a bargain and then get got absolutely rinsed on that. 200 00:09:00,892 --> 00:09:04,132 Speaker 4: But for key We Bank to compete, then we need 201 00:09:04,173 --> 00:09:06,813 Speaker 4: to bring sort of sell off a large percentage of 202 00:09:06,813 --> 00:09:08,893 Speaker 4: it and then it becomes the same thing as the 203 00:09:09,173 --> 00:09:12,253 Speaker 4: Aussie banks. So do you think that that is a 204 00:09:12,252 --> 00:09:14,612 Speaker 4: solvable problem? And do you think there's enough money in 205 00:09:14,773 --> 00:09:18,693 Speaker 4: New Zealand for if you you know, you owning New Zealanders, 206 00:09:18,693 --> 00:09:20,333 Speaker 4: we're allowed to buy into Kiwi Bank, do you think 207 00:09:20,333 --> 00:09:22,612 Speaker 4: that is a possibility to make a competitive bank in 208 00:09:22,653 --> 00:09:23,412 Speaker 4: those in that regard? 209 00:09:24,533 --> 00:09:25,773 Speaker 3: Look, I think that one's tricky. 210 00:09:25,813 --> 00:09:28,773 Speaker 5: One of my greatest challenges just conceptually with that one 211 00:09:28,852 --> 00:09:30,933 Speaker 5: is that if you're going to own a bank as 212 00:09:30,933 --> 00:09:32,813 Speaker 5: a government, but you're not going to use that bank 213 00:09:32,852 --> 00:09:34,773 Speaker 5: to do your own banking, If you're not going to. 214 00:09:34,773 --> 00:09:37,372 Speaker 3: Back you the thing you own, why should anyone else 215 00:09:37,892 --> 00:09:40,213 Speaker 3: like that? It becomes a real challenge. 216 00:09:40,372 --> 00:09:43,413 Speaker 5: And so again, if it's not making you know, the 217 00:09:43,453 --> 00:09:45,773 Speaker 5: difference that it was intended to, if it's not providing 218 00:09:45,813 --> 00:09:48,773 Speaker 5: that sort of you know, huge difference that people expecting 219 00:09:48,773 --> 00:09:50,453 Speaker 5: when it was set up, you do I think have 220 00:09:50,533 --> 00:09:52,133 Speaker 5: to ask do we keep doing the same thing and 221 00:09:52,173 --> 00:09:54,133 Speaker 5: not getting what we want? Or do we need to 222 00:09:54,252 --> 00:09:57,892 Speaker 5: change tech either by yep, changing the investment levels or whatever, 223 00:09:57,933 --> 00:10:00,533 Speaker 5: but sometimes by saying is is this still you know 224 00:10:00,693 --> 00:10:02,733 Speaker 5: the top priority for what we're doing with our money? 225 00:10:03,012 --> 00:10:05,333 Speaker 5: Are we better to let other people own it? And 226 00:10:05,612 --> 00:10:07,373 Speaker 5: I mean, like there's a lot of talk of the 227 00:10:07,492 --> 00:10:10,612 Speaker 5: likes of the profits and there going offshore. I mean 228 00:10:10,933 --> 00:10:13,733 Speaker 5: there's a little bit of there's elements of that all 229 00:10:13,732 --> 00:10:16,132 Speaker 5: the time and different investments that we make. But at 230 00:10:16,173 --> 00:10:18,693 Speaker 5: the same time, there's also the advantage of well, the 231 00:10:18,732 --> 00:10:21,052 Speaker 5: banks still provide a pretty important service when it comes 232 00:10:21,093 --> 00:10:23,173 Speaker 5: to mortgages and otherwise there's still a lot of people 233 00:10:23,372 --> 00:10:26,933 Speaker 5: that are employed to hear domestically buy those operations. And 234 00:10:27,293 --> 00:10:29,333 Speaker 5: a lot of the time those higher profits are also 235 00:10:29,533 --> 00:10:32,573 Speaker 5: over time at least have been funding those higher capital 236 00:10:32,612 --> 00:10:35,093 Speaker 5: buffers that the banks have been required to hold by 237 00:10:35,132 --> 00:10:37,693 Speaker 5: the Reserve banking case things go wrong. So yes, some 238 00:10:37,773 --> 00:10:40,093 Speaker 5: big numbers and we saw some more I think out today, 239 00:10:40,173 --> 00:10:42,732 Speaker 5: But that also means that if things went in the 240 00:10:42,773 --> 00:10:44,733 Speaker 5: wrong direction, you hope it never does. You hope the 241 00:10:44,773 --> 00:10:47,772 Speaker 5: regulations there, but if it ever does, there's still protections 242 00:10:47,813 --> 00:10:49,852 Speaker 5: in place because of those higher numbers that have been 243 00:10:49,852 --> 00:10:53,132 Speaker 5: coming through. So Catch twenty two in multiple different ways. 244 00:10:52,852 --> 00:10:53,693 Speaker 3: On the banking front. 245 00:10:53,813 --> 00:10:57,333 Speaker 2: Yeah, Bread, always fantastic to get your thoughts and analysis. 246 00:10:57,413 --> 00:11:00,093 Speaker 2: Thanks so much for coming back on the program. Thank 247 00:11:00,093 --> 00:11:02,693 Speaker 2: you having me feisty, love it. That is, Brad Olsen's 248 00:11:02,693 --> 00:11:04,213 Speaker 2: CEO of Informetrics. 249 00:11:04,693 --> 00:11:07,372 Speaker 1: For more from news talks that'd be listen live on 250 00:11:07,413 --> 00:11:10,412 Speaker 1: air or online, and keep our shows with you wherever 251 00:11:10,453 --> 00:11:12,973 Speaker 1: you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio