WEBVTT - Five years since the first lockdown: Are we doing enough to prepare for the next pandemic?

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Hielda.

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 2>daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald. At eleven

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 2>fifty nine pm on March twenty fifth, twenty twenty, New

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Zealand entered its first Level four COVID nineteen lockdown. To many,

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 2>that moment may feel like it happened just yesterday, while

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>others are glad it's firmly in the past. Whatever your

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 2>feelings are about New Zealand's response to the COVID pandemic,

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 2>that first lockdown was a life altering event for many

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>of us.

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Five years on.

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 2>Did it change us for the better? Or did it

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 2>kickstart something else?

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Entirely?

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 2>University of Otago epidemiologist Michael Baker became a household name

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:58.279
<v Speaker 2>overnight for his commentary during the pandemic. He joins us

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 2>today on the Front Page to look back at the

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>start of the pandemic and forward towards potentially the next one. So, Michael,

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 2>it's been five years since the first lockdown started.

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Can you believe it's been that long?

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 3>Some days it seems longer, some days it seems like yesterday.

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I feel like I know what your answer

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.559
<v Speaker 2>will be already. But do you think that a call

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.119
<v Speaker 2>for a nationwide lockdown was the right one?

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes. But one of the things about lockdown is that

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 3>the term is used very differently if you're trying to

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 3>stamp out the virus, if you're going for elimination, versus

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 3>how the term was used in most countries that were

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 3>not trying to get rid of the virus. They were

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 3>just suppressing it to stop it overwhelming the system. And

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 3>that's how old influenza plan, which is about flattening the

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 3>curve and trying not to overwhelm the health system, it

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 3>took I think a radical approach and said we want

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 3>to get rid of the virus entirely. And that is

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 3>a very different use of lockdown because it's for a

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 3>much shorter period. I think with lockdowns we've got a

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 3>real problem with the terminology and that in much of

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 3>the world they were used to flatten the curve, and

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 3>that's the old approach to influenza in our pandemic plan,

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 3>whereas in New Zealand we had a much more radical approach,

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 3>which was to eliminate the virus entirely. We went alone.

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean China had led the way and then countries

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 3>like Australia, Taiwan, Singapore and actually quite a few countries

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 3>in Southeast Asia adopted the same approach and in that

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 3>situation using lockdowns hopefully for a short period of time

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 3>to stamp out the virus and then you can go

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 3>back to life as usual.

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you think if we had our time again, we

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 2>would take the same approach.

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 3>I think so, and for good reason. I mean, we've

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 3>had the raw Commission of Inquiry into the COVID response

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 3>that produced a very large, comprehensive report that was released

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 3>in November last year, and they concluded that this was

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 3>the optimal approach. We've also done a lot of research

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 3>on this, comparing countries that took elimination approaches with those

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>that use suppression and mitigation, which is a reduced level

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 3>of control, and the outcomes were so much better for

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 3>countries that took elimination. I think it should be the

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 3>default choice in future. Ever pandemic has sufficient severity, and

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about with COVID nineteen a case fatality risk

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 3>of getting up towards one percent. Initially before we had vaccines,

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 3>and if you think back to nineteen well none of

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 3>us can think back to nineteen eighteen. But we can

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 3>look at that pandemic, which was the worst natural disaster

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 3>in our history, and that flu pandemic came through and

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 3>it killed about one percent of the useualm population in

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 3>just six weeks, So that was about nine thousand people died,

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 3>and so we know that that level of impact is

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 3>totally unacceptable. So if we had a pandemic that was

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 3>coming at us that we thought might be as severe

0:03:57.840 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 3>as that, I think everyone would want us to share

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 3>our borders until we knew what we were dealing with

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 3>and can work out how to manage it. So I

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 3>think that's a huge lesson we have learned, and I

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 3>think it's now going to be built into I think

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 3>our pandemic planning.

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 2>The one PM press conferences, they were such a key

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 2>part of daily life for close to two years for

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 2>the majority of the country. It was the only way

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 2>of knowing how many cases there were on any given day.

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Now most of us wouldn't have a clue how many

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 2>cases there were last week, or deaths or hospitalizations or

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 2>anything like that. So where are things at currently with COVID? Michael,

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 2>How serious is of a threat is it?

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, we've recently looked at the last five years and

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 3>we're COVID as now and it's still our most important

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 3>single infectures to these I mean, last year it put

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 3>nine thousand people in hospital, it killed around six hundred

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 3>and sixty people, and also it caused a large number

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 3>of cases long COVID. We think somewhere around six to

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 3>seven percent of the population and now living with longe COVID,

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 3>which has a huge economic cost, perhaps around two billion

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 3>dollars a year. So it's certainly a major health problem.

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 3>But of course people don't want to think about it.

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 3>They want to imagine they've moved on from COVID, and

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 3>many ways we have. We don't need an emergency response,

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 3>of course to COVID nineteen, but we still need to

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 3>prevent it and manage it.

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 4>Over the past few weeks, the world has changed, and

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 4>it has changed very quickly. In February, it would have

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 4>seemed unimaginable to close New Zealand's borders to the world,

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 4>and now it has been an obvious step as we

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 4>fight COVID nineteen. This is because we are experiencing an

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 4>unprecedented event, a global pandemic that in New Zealand we

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 4>have moved to fight by going hard and going early.

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Five years on social distancing. My q QR codes everywhere

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 2>you go, vaccine mandates, rushing to buy toilet paper, and

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 2>hunting for teddy bears all feels.

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Just like relics.

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, If people have adopted any lessons from that time

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 2>in lockdown, what would you hope those were?

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, one of the big lessons is around how viruses

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 3>get transmitted, and prior to COVID, I think the conventional

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 3>wisdom was they were transmitted in droplets which have a

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 3>range of up to about two meters, or from touching

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 3>surfaces contaminating them. That's called fomite transmission. And the thing

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 3>we learned from COVID nineteen is something we should have

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 3>known for a long time, is that actually aerosols are

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 3>really important. These these very fine droplet nuclei that we

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 3>breathe out and cough out, and they can linger in

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 3>the air for long periods, and they can also waft

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 3>over great distances. And one of the benefits of the

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 3>really good science that we had during this period was

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 3>it just identified the fact that this was really important.

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 3>So this means designing our indoor environments differently improving ventilation,

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 3>thinking more about controlling infictions and hospitals and wearing masks

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 3>and situations where the ventilation is very poor, like public transport.

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's one of the main lessons at

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 3>the medical or epidemiological level. I think another one, of course,

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 3>is just how effective vaccines can be. I mean, they

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 3>really did transform the environment once we could vaccinate, and

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 3>unfortunately we were able to vaccinate at a high level before

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 3>we got infected with this virus, and that gave us

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 3>extremely low mortality from this infection compared with most countries.

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.679
<v Speaker 2>The first part of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>COVID came out last December, and I'll read out one

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 2>quote from it to you. Contentious public health measures like

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 2>vaccine mandates wore away at what had initially been a

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 2>united wall of public support for the pandemic response.

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Would you agree with that.

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 3>I think that there was some overuse of mandates, and

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 3>I think they were well intentioned. One of the effects

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 3>of putting pressure on people we'd some people would say

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 3>nudging them to get vaccinated, but in fact it was

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 3>stronger than a nudge, was that we did achieve very

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 3>high vaccine coverage, but I think we did pay a

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 3>price in terms of cohesion and trust in what we

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 3>were doing, and I think I hope that we would

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 3>do things differently next time, if there was a next time,

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 3>which is very likely.

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 2>When did you first notice the mood starting to turn?

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Because we were so united there for probably the first

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 2>year of this and then things really started to shift.

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Hey, yes, So I think midway through year two there

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 3>were a whole lot of pressures building up. I mean,

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 3>there were pressures around obviously vaccination, but I think one

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 3>of the other pressures was just New Zealanders wanted to

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 3>return to New Zealand more easily, and we realized that

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the quarantine system was absolutely capacity. It couldn't take any

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 3>more people. So that created rationing and I think quite

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 3>a bit of ill will towards the response. So that's

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 3>the problem. And I think one of the great difficulties

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 3>with elimination is exiting for this strategy, because it is

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 3>quite binary. You know, you've got no transmission or you've

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 3>got ongoing transmission. You know, there isn't really a middle ground,

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 3>and I think that was a difficulty and you could

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 3>see by the end of year two we had reached

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 3>a really critical point and obviously it progressed to the

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 3>parliamentary occupation and very visible protests. So that was the

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:38.199
<v Speaker 3>very difficult time for the government working on this exit strategy.

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Now, just from doing this episode and speaking with you, Michael,

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 2>I know that I'm going to receive emails about this.

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 2>People are still angry about COVID. There are it's misinformation

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 2>disinformation online. Still how much do you get even five

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 2>years on now, Well it.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Has decreased a lot, But basically every time I write

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 3>something or are on COVID or talk to the media

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 3>or talk about vaccination, I will get very unpleasant emails.

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 3>And there are still people. Most of the people I meet,

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, out socially are very positive about New Zealm response,

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 3>and I think, thank me and others who contributed to that.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 3>But then you occasionally meet someone who is mainly about

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 3>vaccination who is very verbally abusive and unpleasant. You know.

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I've had a few encounters where I felt physically threatened,

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 3>but I haven't been assaulted, And I think that overall

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 3>the level of risk is actually much higher for other

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 3>groups who have to interact with the public during this period.

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 3>I think journalists I know did get assaulted, politicians got assaulted,

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 3>and I think frontline staffs, police and people were emergency departments.

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 3>So I think it has been very negative, some of

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the disinformation and attacks. But I've got quite used to

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 3>them now, and I know in many ways it's not

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 3>really personal. It's just that people are getting so bombarded

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.359
<v Speaker 3>with so much disinformation now, I think they are quite confused.

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 2>I think people in your position probably hoped that the

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 2>pandemic would have united US and prepared us for the

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 2>next one. But instead we've got the likes of the

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 2>USA and other countries pulling out of the World Health Organization.

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 2>We've got that dis and misinformation being baked into public policy.

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 2>A lot of young people seem to be quite affected

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 2>by the pandemic, interfering with their.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Childhoods as well.

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 2>If Christopher Luxen got a call next month telling them that,

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, bird flu cases is skyrocketing and we need

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 2>to go into a lockdown again, you'd have to agree

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 2>that the public sentiment and support that was present five

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 2>years ago simply isn't there anymore.

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it's decreased. The surveys that we have

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 3>done and also read about show that there's still a

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 3>high level of trust, and scientists and health professionals also

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 3>that most people supported the museum response. That's the elimination strategy.

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 3>So if we get it right, if there are future

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 3>pandemics of this scale or larger, there should be much

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 3>more reliance on rapid productive measures like closing borders and

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 3>switching to quarantine. And the good thing, or one of

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 3>the good things about those measures is they mean that

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 3>life in museum would carry on more or less as

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 3>it did during the good phases of the pandemic response.

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 3>That is that you could still have people attending mass

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 3>sporting events and going about their lives. And after all,

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 3>domestic tourism is always a larger contribution to our economy

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 3>than overseas tourism, so we can actually get by quite

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 3>well if we have to do that that response. Now,

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 3>I think lockdowns are a different measure. They do require

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 3>a lot of public support to work, and many of

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 3>us would say we need to actually use other approaches

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 3>much more. And one of the most effective ways is

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 3>it still requires public engagement, is mask use. And the

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 3>evidence and I've been involved in some very large international

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 3>reviews that show masks are highly effective. They can stop

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 3>any virus, and while you're waiting for a vaccine that

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 3>for fluid might take six months before it arrives. Masks

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 3>are very effective if we get local outbreaks, for instance,

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 3>if our border controls don't work. So I'm optimistic. We've

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 3>got a lot of good tools and really lockdowns should

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 3>be a last resort, but certainly if you had a

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 3>very severe outbreak that was spreading across the country, you'd

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 3>need to look at something like that.

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 5>A few thousand anti lockdown protesters have gathered in the

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 5>Auckland domain for the third time since the Delta outbreak began.

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 5>It's been called Freedom Day and is being led by

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 5>Destiny Church leader Brian Tomicki. The card have also marched

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 5>through a new market and farmers have also joined. They've

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 5>set up some vegetable stands in front of tractors with

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 5>some signs reading no farms, no food. Although organizers have

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 5>encouraged it, little masks are being worn, nor is social

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 5>distancing being observed, and there is a strong police presence.

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 2>What's the likelihood of us seeing another COVID level pandemic

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>in our lifetimes?

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, there have been several modeling efforts that have looked

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 3>at this level of risk understandably, and the risk is rising.

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 3>And currently the estimate is around twenty percent of seeing

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 3>another COVID magnitude pandemic within the next ten years, so

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 3>it's maybe around two to three percent a year. That's

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 3>the risk. And it's like earthquakes. You can look at

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 3>the overall level of risk, but it doesn't tell you

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 3>exactly when and where it will happen. I mean, if

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 3>it did, that would be fantastic, but modeling can't do that.

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 3>It can just look at an average level of risk,

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 3>and that risk is rising, and it's for a number

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 3>of reasons. Partly just that a massive humanity our contact

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 3>with animal reservoirs that might be the source of the

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 3>next pandemic agent. But actually my biggest worry now is

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 3>for engineered pathogens. And we have a growing list of

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 3>laboratories it's now approaching a thousand across the globe that

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 3>are called a level four lab and they have the

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 3>ability to work on very dangerous pathogens, and of course

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of them as farther know, all of them

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 3>are doing this for the right reasons, to plan better

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 3>defenses for pathogens, better anti virals, and so on. But

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 3>we have the technology to edit genomes now and alter pathogens.

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 3>And the worry is that this can happen if people

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 3>are radicalized or have personality disorders, and there are still

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 3>bad actors who may be doing things that are not

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 3>known these at a state level. So I think that

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 3>is an increasing concern for the future that I think

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 3>raises the risk level several degrees.

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 2>And I mentioned before about bird flu or the H

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 2>five and one virus. Now that's been spreading over the

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 2>last year globally, but notably in the US. So, Michael,

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 2>how can we go about making people pay attention again

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 2>and prepare or even be interested in another pandemic threat.

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 3>One of the best things we can do now is

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 3>to actually get people used to using basic measures with

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 3>the winter peak of respiratory and fictions we get every year,

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 3>particularly influenza, which is still Before COVID nineteen it was

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 3>our number one infectures disease killer and it's still a

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 3>very significant virus. So, for example, we could introduce measures

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 3>such as encouraging people to wear masks on public transport

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 3>when we're in the middle of the flu season every

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 3>year as a protective measure that would get us used

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 3>to the fact that that masks are actually quite comfortable

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 3>once you're used to using them. And these are the

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 3>N ninety five masks that actually filter out small particles.

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 3>It's not the the basic surgical masks. So that's one

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 3>thing we can do. We need to get much better

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 3>at infection control in our healthcare system. There's some evidence

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 3>that about fifteen percent of COVID deaths in Australia, for instance,

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 3>came from transmission and hospitals, and we have many reports

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 3>in New Zealand, but we're not even counting these cases here.

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 3>This is people who are very vulnerable, they earned hospital

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 3>for some reason, and then someone else gives them COVID

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 3>in that environment, and we really should be stopping this.

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 3>So these are practical ways of getting better at infection control.

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 3>The other area, of course, is vaccination. We obviously have

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 3>We're not hearing much about COVID vaccine, but it's still

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 3>very good at protecting us from serious illness. And also

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 3>one of its big benefits is reducing the risk of

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 3>long COVID and that's why I think we should lower

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 3>the age of eligibility for boosters down to eighteen, because

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 3>currently it's at thirty and that's different from other countries

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 3>like Australia, so that all these things we can be

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 3>doing now. I think we just need to have this

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 3>public communication about these respiratory infections and the fact that

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 3>we don't have to put up with them. There are

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 3>things we can do and all of that better understanding

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 3>would mean we're much better able to respond to future

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 3>pandemics that will probably be other respiratory infections. And at

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 3>the moment we're not really seeing this conversation happening. But

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 3>if you look at Asian countries which went through the

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 3>original SARS and then now COVID, they are a mass

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 3>wearing societies and public transport and so on, and of

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 3>course it's one of the things you really see is

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 3>quite striking when you go to those countries, and it

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 3>meant that places like Japan South Korea avoided largely avoided

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 3>lockdowns and they did have border management, but not the

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 3>intensity of New Zealand, so that seemed to have been

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 3>one of the big benefits for those societies. But one

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 3>of the other areas that I think is so important

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 3>is to have a strong voice for public health in

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand, just to keep reminding us that we can

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 3>make our populations healthier and safer and give people longer

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 3>lives without suffering from some of these avoidable threats. And

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm quite concerned at the moment that we're seeing this

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 3>as some effor it's to muzzle the voice of public

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 3>health in New Zealand. I think this is sending a

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 3>chilling effect through the system. So some of the voices

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 3>in New Zealand I can no longer speak out on

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 3>public health concerns, particularly the local medical officers of health,

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's a missed opportunity because the best

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 3>way to really get people prepared for these future threats

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 3>is to keep them in the public eye, and so

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a negative step to actually reduce the

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 3>public discussion about public health concerns. So I hope that's

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 3>something we can learn from our experience with the pandemic

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 3>and the period since that we need to have. We

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 3>need to encourage these voices in these conversations.

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us, Michael.

0:19:58.359 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Great to talk. Thank you.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 2>That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 2>can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 2>at enzdherld dot co dot MZ. The Front Page is

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 2>produced by Ethan Sills and Richard Martin, who is also

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 2>a sound engineer.

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Chelsea Daniels.

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe to the front page on iHeartRadio or wherever you

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow for another look

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 2>behind the headlines.