WEBVTT - Why the RMA is being scrapped (again) and what it means for your backyard

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Kyota.

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 2>daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald. Twenty twenty

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 2>five came with a promise of the largest economic reform

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 2>in a generation. It's when the government unveiled its radical

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>overhaul of resource management laws, which aims to cut the

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 2>number of consents currently required by forty to fifty percent.

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Led by RM reform Minister Chris Bishop, the move will

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 2>see the decades old RM replaced with two laws, one

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>focused on planning and the other on environmental protection, that

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 2>due to be passed by the end of this year

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>and be operational by twenty twenty nine. But what does

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>it all mean and why has it taken so long

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>to to tangle this convoluted law if so many people

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 2>agreed it needed to be done. Today on the Front Page,

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Herald Political editor Thomas Coglan is with us to break

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 2>it all death. First off, Thomas, what is the ROMA?

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Why have there been so many calls to change it?

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 2>And why have we been talking about changing it for decades?

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 3>So, the RAMA is the Resource Management Act, and the

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.839
<v Speaker 3>Resource Management Act basically does what it says on the term.

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 3>It manages the nation's resources. Basically, all of our resources,

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 3>from the air that you breathe, to the forest to

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 3>the waterways to the land that you build your house on,

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 3>they are managed by the Resource Management Acts. Basically everything

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 3>apart from mineral resources, which are managed under different legislation,

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 3>but almost everything else is managed by this one law

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 3>that was passed in nineteen ninety one. It was a

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 3>bipart as a labor national if it laid started that

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 3>the government changed in nineteen ninety National pasted it and

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 3>since then all of our resources have been managed under

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>this one piece of legislation. Prior to that, resources were

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 3>managed under many different pieces of legislation seven one for waters, serve,

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 3>one for this and that. So it consolidated the more

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 3>than one piece of legislation. It was meant to simplify it.

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 3>It was meant to provide a clear direction on what

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 3>you could do and we are and how Now it

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 3>didn't quite work like that, and almost since the beginning,

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 3>the ROMA has failed to deliver on that promise of simplicity,

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 3>of allowing development, allowing New Zealand's economy to grow, allowing

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 3>us to build more houses, more business premises, more factories,

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 3>all of that stuff, allowing us to do that whilst

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 3>also projecting the environment that we love and also which

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 3>our lives depend on. You know, it's no use building

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 3>heaps of factories to create lots of jobs if we

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 3>pollute the air and make us all sick. The RAMA

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 3>is meant to balance those two things, and so for

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 3>basically its entire life, it has been a subject of controversy.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 3>The controversy really picked up in the two thousands when

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 3>the housing crisis started to rear its head a little bit,

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 3>and the RMA was blamed for stuff like why our

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 3>roads are so expensive when our roads are partly expensive

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 3>to build because it takes so much time and money

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 3>to consent them, and the houses are the same. It's

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 3>really hard and expensive to build a house, which means

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 3>that house prices have gone up because it's actually much

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 3>easier to buy an existing house for a lot of

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 3>money than it is to just buy a piece of

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 3>land and build one. And so for a long time

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 3>we've been talking about remedying it. Then under the Labor government,

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 3>the last Labor government, they commissioned a working group which

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 3>essentially said, we need to repeal this thing. Entirely and

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 3>replace it with two different pieces of legislation. That's probably

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 3>the start of your question where you say, why have

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 3>we been talking about it for so long? We really

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 3>started talking about it. Then Labor did repeal it. The

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Labor repealed the RMA, got rid of it, replaced it

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 3>with two new pieces of legislation. But that wasn't the end.

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 3>The government that we currently have, the National lead coalition,

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 3>they didn't like what Labor did. They thought it was

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 3>overly complex and replaced one complex regime with another complex regime.

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Labor actually just disputes that, and actually there are lots

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 3>of similarities between what National has done and what Labor's done.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 3>So when the coalition came in, they repealed the repealed RMA,

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 3>they brought back the RMA. So the resurrected this. This

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 3>this RMA has has been brought back to life. It

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 3>is a resurrected law. The RMA is currently alive, that

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>is currently the law of the land, but it will

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 3>be repealed again. It will be repealed for a second time.

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.239
<v Speaker 3>Not many pieces of legislation get to be repealed twice,

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 3>and then it will be replaced with two new laws,

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 3>which which one of which was Planning Act which sort

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 3>of defined the planning rules. The other one as more

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 3>environmentally focused.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 2>At yeah, and on Labour's plans versus national's plans. I

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 2>know the Minister responsible for the RMA, Chris Bishop, has promised,

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, a bigger and better one. Is it bigger

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 2>and better?

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 4>That's a really good question.

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 3>And I'm going to be a wee bit of vasive

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 3>because I'd quite like to hear what the Selecte committee.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 4>The laws were introduced last year.

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 3>It'll be interesting to see what people people say in

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Selecte Committee when they come. Certainly labors labors there are

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of similarities. So Labor Labor reduced the number

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 3>of plans that councils would produce. So councils produced under

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 3>the old existing regime more than one hundred plans. They

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 3>reduced that number to I think seventeen plans, which would

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 3>be roughly one for every regional council. The government is

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 3>basically doing the current government is basically doing the same

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 3>thing in a slightly different way, reducing the number of

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 3>plans and focusing on on doing more of the more

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 3>of the heavy lifting, the big controversial stuff. At the

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 3>beginning of the process, getting everything sorted out at the

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 3>planning stage so that when it actually comes to kind

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 3>of build a house the year, you look at the

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 3>plan and the plans for the season. More or less, yes,

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 3>you can within these rules. It's slightly more complicated than that,

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 3>but it's sort of the idea so that those that

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 3>those those principles are roughly the same. There was some

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 3>complexity around some of the Maori principles that were in

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 3>the in the Labor the Labor the Labor version and

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 3>and and some submitters on the Labor version were critical

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 3>of it and thought it was overly complex and sort

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 3>of unhelpful. There is a debate over whether the National

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 3>should have just repealed the complicated and helpful bits from

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Labour's version rather than go matches or on the board,

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 3>but that's not what they did.

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 4>So we are where we are.

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 3>But certainly when we when we get to the Slik Committee,

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:31.679
<v Speaker 3>it will be interesting to hear from those submitters again

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 3>to see whether they think this one is any benefit

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 3>what Labor proposed. Because Labour's one was welcomed, I think

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm balanced people people were happy that Labored did what

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 3>it did, but it was not without controversy.

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>It's too hard to get consent from major infrastructure projects,

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, for the energy, the roads, the rail the hospitals,

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the schools we need to build. I mean some of

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>these even public sector projects, you know, hospitals, schools, tied

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>up and consenting processes for months, years at a time.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it should not take six to eight years

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to consent a wind farm in New Zealand, should not

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>take ten years to get an extension to a port,

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>for example. These are the type of real life examples

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're trying to deal with with the RMA, and

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>they've unfortunately made New Zealand a far less prosperous place

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>than it otherwise can and should be, if.

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>We get into the weeds a little bit. I liked

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 2>your explanation of the regime on externalities, because that's what

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 2>it comes down to. Hey, if I want to build

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>something in my backyard, you know what is it? Can

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>you give us that? In plain English?

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Externalities is basically, if I am in a house right now,

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 3>and if I decide to build like a coffee roastree.

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure if you're ever lived next to a

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 3>coffee roasty. It smells like coffee being roasted it's actually

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 3>it's not a case smell. It's not to everyone's taste.

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't mind it, but it's smells.

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 4>It smells.

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 3>It's not great if you're it's not everyone's taste. So

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 3>if I build a coffee roaste on my house, well,

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 3>great for me. I make a lot of money selling

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 3>my coffee, especially in Wellington, but not so good for

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 3>my neighbors. They don't make any money from me selling coffee,

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 3>and their houses smell like burnt toast because I build

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 3>a coffee roast tree on my house.

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 4>So that's the externality.

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 3>The externality is is there is their houses smell like coffee,

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 3>they lose money.

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 4>I make money. Not great.

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 3>So there's an externality here which basically means that I

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 3>will not be able to build a coffee roast try

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 3>on my house. It is a residential My my house

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 3>is on a residential zoning, and and and and.

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 4>Therefore the sort of.

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 3>Old factory pollution that would that would come from my

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 3>my that that that that roastery would not be allowed.

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Now, by contrast, if.

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I built a new deck on my house, or if

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 3>I if I did other things on my land that

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 3>affected my neighbor's not a little bit, not not, not

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 3>at all. There is no externality here and there. For

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 3>I would, I would have a wider remit within certain

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 3>rules to allow that. Obviously, there is still a building code,

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 3>I would. You know, there is still that the which

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 3>is covered under under the building X. So you know,

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 3>I can't just build something unsafe on my house.

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 4>I can't.

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 3>I can't build a that would collapse. But but but

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 3>so long as my actions on my own land do

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 3>not affect other people, then then I'm more or less

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 3>allowed to do it. There was there have been some

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 3>cases where where councilors quote their nose into even the

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 3>configuration of internal configuration of apartments, not a structural configuration.

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 3>This isn't about whether the apartment building would collapse or not,

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 3>but it was sort of you know, should your couch

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 3>face this wall a wall, or how you know, stuff

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 3>like that that is that has gone under this new rating.

0:09:55.720 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 2>So changes to five national directives the RMA have now

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 2>taken effect things that will make it easier to consent

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 2>minds and quarries. For example, then you've got converting your

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 2>garage into a granny flat. Presumably this is kind of

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 2>confusing because when I read up on their RM changes,

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>aren't they meant to come in in twenty twenty nine?

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 2>So are these kind of national directives just logistical stuff

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 2>that kind of needs to happen before they start, you know,

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 2>talking about it?

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, bit of both.

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 3>So Chris Bishop has been as the minister in charge

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 3>of this, He's had a multi stage he's called it,

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 3>I think multiple tranches of ROMA reform. So while they

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 3>are changing the whole RMA that the main law at

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 3>the top of it, they're making tweets to the existing

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 3>regime which will then be ordered over into the new regime.

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 3>So these are the national environmental standards and policy standards

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 3>that are promulgating now. They are rules regulations that can

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 3>be made by cabinet and agreed by cabinet and then

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 3>gazetted and then they become the law of the land.

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 3>They exist their current law and then they can be

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 3>adopted on a new law. So as of this week,

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 3>the new Granny Flat rules. So these are detached the

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 3>official terminology and read it off the piece of paper

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 3>because I always forget it as detached minor residential units

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 3>which I think up to which I think can be

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 3>up to seventy square meters, so sadly not the garage.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Garage I don't think can be a granny flat, but

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 3>you can put uh what.

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 4>If it's detached though, it's a very good question.

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 3>You can put a granny flat of up to seventies

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 3>square meters on your on your property detached mine and

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 3>residential unit. Residential unit still has to meet certain rules.

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Can't be you know, moldy, deadly whatever. You know, there

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 3>are still there are still rules around around the houses

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 3>and what they can.

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 4>Look like. I wilsoy not look like that.

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 3>But exists as but you can now do that as

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 3>of as of January this year, which is which is

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 3>which is nice? If that's whatever what you're doing that

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 3>those those rules come under one of these one of

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 3>these policy statements which has been gazeated, which means it's

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 3>now the law, and then they get carried over into

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 3>the New York so that they are the government is

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of it's a horrible terminology that every government loves

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 3>to use. But they say a rolling mall of initiatives

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 3>so that they start here and goes.

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 2>On right, so you can kind of start getting the

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 2>benefits of the ROMA reform slowly, but surely I can

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 2>go to Bunnings this weekend and get my wood for

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 2>my new goola out the back. But the full effect

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 2>of the law is that kind of twenty twenty nine

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 2>ish date, I suppose.

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes, there's the whole the.

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the sort of the main pieces of the RAMA,

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 3>the big stuff that the new Planning Regime dat all

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 3>comes towards the end of the decade, and there are

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 3>a whole lot of other reforms. You know, we haven't

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 3>even talked about the local government reforms. The government wants

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 3>to try and as sort of tactfully pushing a maldimation

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 3>onto councils, trying to get the regional councils and the

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 3>territorial authorities to merge. Those new councils would then be

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 3>the ones who are drawing up the plans under the

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 3>new ROMA, which will then implement some of these changes

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.719
<v Speaker 3>that we're talking about. So it's like hurting sheep. We've

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 3>got all these different things that they're trying to get

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 3>through the game at the same time. But it is

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the decade where where the full

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 3>OROMA does come into force, and of course that it

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 3>does require some of these other reforms to take place

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 3>in order to actually work.

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because like you said, I mean the goalas and

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 2>the granny flats and the new decking out the back

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 2>is probably small fry as opposed to what the change

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 2>will mean for local councils. Currently, the government says that

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>there are somewhere like one thousand, one hundred and seventy

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 2>five different kinds of zones in New Zealand, which with

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 2>them carry all different rules. So what does it mean

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 2>when it talks about these zones.

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so zone it's like a you know, you're in

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:03.599
<v Speaker 3>a residential zone you can build a house, you know,

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 3>residential property or you're like a load nsity or high

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 3>dnsity residential zone. Can you build an apartment building here

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 3>or is it just a sort of detached home that

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 3>you can build here? There's and the current regime is

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 3>allows a lot of latitude for bespoke zones, which is

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 3>why you get over a thousand of them, which which

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people think is slightly ridiculous. So to councils,

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 3>councils have a lot of latitude to do what they

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 3>want in that regard. Now, what the changes, not what

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 3>these changes will do is reduce those the number of

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 3>zones down quite radically.

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 4>In Japan, I.

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Think they only have thirteen, and the current regime has

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 3>a number. With the new regime, part of me has

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 3>a number which will be in the tens. That basically

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 3>means that councils don't really have a choice to to

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 3>to use sort of bespoke zoning measures and and basically

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 3>we have to say, well, this is a residential zone

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 3>and therefore houses can be built here, and we're not

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.479
<v Speaker 3>we're not going to use zoning to dictate quite specifically

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 3>what kind of houses can go here. People can live here,

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 3>you can build a house here. You know, this isn't

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 3>the this isn't the blue house with the red draw.

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Zone, you know, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of the regime is sort of metastasized into

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 3>an overly prescriptive regime, which is why you get more

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 3>than a thousand zones, and the government wants it to

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 3>become a more kind of liberal regime where you have

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 3>fewer zones and giving people who are actually doing the

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 3>building during the planning more lagitude to to sort of

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 3>do what they want within the rules, within the rules.

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, for the builders, that's actually, when we're doing our job,

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 5>there's not a lot of change in that respect, but

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 5>it's actually getting to putting your first nail into the timber.

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 5>It takes a long time for some Sometimes you wonder

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 5>why it takes so long. It's the paperwork behind the

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 5>scenes that will speed it up for the guys and

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 5>girls doing the work on the ground.

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 2>So when you talk about the councils then having to

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and do this kind of work themselves, that's

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 2>that's what we call the spatial plans, right.

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so the spatial planning is there was a focus

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 3>of labor regime. Of the labor regime as well. The

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 3>spatial planning will ask counsels to look over a thirty

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 3>year horizon with what needs to be done in the area.

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 3>So you will think, right over the next thirty years, well,

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 3>this corridor it's going to be, is going to grow

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 3>and develop. This is sort of an industrial corridor. This

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 3>will continue to be industrial, so maybe we will need

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 3>to preserve this this this this trunk of land for

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 3>a rail line or a large highway to carry all

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 3>the trucks heavy industry. This is a residential This area

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 3>is a residential area. It is going to continue to grow,

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 3>it will possibly identify, so we'll need to plan to

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 3>over the next thirty years improve the water infrastructure and

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 3>the sewage infrastructure. So you know, ten thousand people live

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 3>there now, forty thousand people will live there in thirty

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 3>years time, so we need to plan over the next

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 3>thirty years to build bigger and better pipes, and to

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 3>build a new train station and roads and all that

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 3>sort of stuff. So by getting all that planning done

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 3>at the top end, it gives planners over the councilors

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 3>over those thirty years and developers greater confidence to.

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 4>Sort of meet the plan.

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 3>So you will be able to make these zones under

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 3>The councils will then be able to implement the zones

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 3>which will and developers and councils will have confidence that yes,

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 3>this is a residential zone. Yes we can densify this zone.

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 3>Yes there will be infra structure to deal with with

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 3>with with what is coming. New Zealand obviously gets a

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 3>bear rep for housing and housing is far too expensive here.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 3>But over the last ten years New Zealand has slowly

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 3>moved towards intensification, and particularly in Auckland, there's been a

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of quite good in intensification, but one of the

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 3>controversies in Auckland has been that the infrastructure has somewhat lacked.

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 3>So you are putting in putting intensification, we're and creating

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 3>traffic champs because all of a sudden, all these people

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 3>live all these people are living on a Victorian street

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 3>which was built for a horse and cart and is

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 3>now dealing with five hundred uts. That is a disaster

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 3>for the people who live there. And so we're sort

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 3>of trying to get better at that now to ensure

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 3>that the infrastructure and the development happened concurrently to that

0:18:58.040 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 3>that that dilemma.

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 2>And it would kind of make sense in that spatial

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 2>planning process to have a lot less cooks in the kitchen.

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I suppose do you reckon that this is all making

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 2>way for the next kind of wayth of super cities?

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps, yes, certain, certainly, I think I think Wellington there's

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 3>not much super about Wellington.

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 4>Wellington.

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Wellington seems destined to be malgamated into what into into

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 3>something approximating the super city that that Auckland has become.

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 3>So the Wellington councils will probably get together in form

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 3>one one big council.

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, at the moment.

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 3>The obviously there is a regional council that sits at

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 3>the top of all of the Wellington councils, but there

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 3>could be a bit of coordination between them.

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 4>You know that to use.

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Wellington as an example, Wellington, the Greater Wellington Regional Council

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:01.199
<v Speaker 3>runs the sort of buses and trains and they go

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 3>through multiple multiple councils. You know, you can catch a

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 3>train from the Wide up to work in Wellington and

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 3>you'd go through you'd start and a wider upper council.

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 3>You would then go into one of the hat councils,

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 3>and I think some one of the train lines goes

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 3>through two of the hop councils before ending in Wellington Council.

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 3>So on the train jour need to work, you're passing

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 3>through four or five different territorial authorities and the infrastructure

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 3>that was on either side of that train line is

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 3>is the is the is the purview of those councils,

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 3>So you can see that there is an argument to

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 3>link that up into one system. So the regional council,

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 3>obviously the technicalogy use the Wellington example, does run that

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 3>is responsible for transport, but the physical infrastructure is often

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 3>the responsibility of territorial authorities, so yes, there was an

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 3>argument for that. It's probably actually to be fear the

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 3>buses involved, sorry, the trains involved Keepy Rail as well,

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 3>so maybe buses is a better example, but anyway, you

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 3>get the picture.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 2>And lastly, Thomas, in terms of sore or this is

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 2>to go to the Select Committee obviously, as you mentioned,

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 2>is there anyone adamantly opposed? I mean, I suppose I

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 2>do see a lot of talk about, for instance, making

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 2>way for quarries and consenting minds making it easier. But

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 2>what are the actual chances of, you know, a group

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 2>of a family of endangered frogs being wiped out because

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the consent process is consented to mine or something.

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, Shane Jones has no affection for the

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand frogs is a I.

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Know frogs are always my example because of Shane's comments, I.

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Think I think it would it would certainly be accurate

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 3>to describe the government's reforms in general as being a

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 3>shifting the needle more towards development in a way from

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 3>environmental protection. So I think the it's a bit of

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 3>an evasive answer, but it would depend on those frogs

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 3>individual circumstances, but one would one would imagine that once

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 3>this legislation passes, the circumstances would err on the pessimistic side.

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us, Thomas.

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:23.360
<v Speaker 4>No Wors, Thank you for having me.

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 2>That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 2>can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 2>at enzidhrald dot co dot nz. The Front Page is

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 2>hosted and produced by me Chelsea Daniels Caine. Dicky is

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 2>our studio operator, Richard Martin, our producer and editor, and

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.959
<v Speaker 2>our executive producer is Jane Ye. Follow the Front Page

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 2>on the iHeart app or wherever you get your podcasts,

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and join us next time for another look beyond the headlines.