WEBVTT - Local government shake-up explained: Rate caps, mayors board and services

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Yea.

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 2>daily podcast presented by the New.

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Zealand Herald.

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 2>Regional Territorial Unitary Wards and Boards. Local government in New

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 2>Zealand is made up of seventy eight different councils that

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 2>make the decisions we encounter daily the Rhodes Air, rubbish

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 2>waters environment. It's all local government. So why has central

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 2>government announced a need for change and why has the

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister himself implored councils to.

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.279
<v Speaker 3>Quote stop doing dumb stuff.

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 2>Today On the front page of Victoria. University of Wellington,

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 2>Associate Professor in Politics, Lara Grieves is with us to

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 2>take us through what this all means and what the

0:00:56.000 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>future could hold for our local councils. So Laura, let's

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>talk first about the rates cap. So that's the annual

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 2>rates increases would be limited to between two and four percent.

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Consultation has begun and they want the laws passed through

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 2>the House by the start of twenty twenty seven in

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 2>place by twenty twenty nine.

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Now, on one hand.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Yay lower rates, right, the days of double digits would

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 2>be over, whether permitting. Of course, there will be exemptions

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>for things like natural disasters and things like that. But

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 2>on the other hand, there are concerns that the cuts

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 2>will mean cuts to basic services. And I wanted to

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 2>ask you, is it a myth that councils spend a

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of money on stupid stuff.

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 3>That's a hard one, right, because on a day to

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 3>day basis, everyone's filling the pinch, everyone's going to the supermarket,

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 3>and it's so expensive and people are kind of like

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 3>living their lives, trying to have a picture al rent

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 3>and all of those bits and pieces. So if they

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 3>are a homeowner and they get that rates bill and

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 3>they hear about those rates increases, they kind of feel,

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, mixed feelings around, well, why can't the

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 3>council manage money better? I have to manage my budget better.

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 3>And that's a lot a lot of people are feeling

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 3>on a day to day basis, And of course, if

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 3>you own a house, you know there's an argument that

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 3>you would pass those rates increases onto renters as well.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 3>So it affects kind of everyone, and a lot of

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 3>people are quite concerned about. Yeah, there's double digit rates increases,

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 3>like you said, However, on a day to day basis,

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 3>the council does fund a lot of good things that

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 3>kind of make our communities communities a lot of good

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 3>things that we use a lot. I mean, as an academic,

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 3>I use the libraries a lot. But that's one thing.

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 3>But people go and give books to their kids. You know.

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 3>There's the kind of rubbish delivery kind of pretty important.

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you've ever been to a country that

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have those sorts of services, very important something we need.

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 3>There's also the things around the water infrastructure. Wellington's problems

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 3>have really highlighted that, different things around transport and roading,

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 3>and I'll just all sorts of bits and pieces there

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 3>that we don't really think about on a day to

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 3>day basis, just kind of take advannadov in living our lives.

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 3>So this then becomes a bit of an ashure around. Okay,

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 3>so if council has less money to be able to

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 3>fund these things and they have to prioritize different bits

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 3>and pieces, it may mean that we end up in

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 3>more of say like a user pay system or something

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 3>along those lines, which then that becomes a bit of

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 3>a cultural issue for New Zealanders who are used to

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 3>say free or cheap public pools or library services and

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 3>bits and pieces like that. Ultimately, the majority at polling shows,

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 3>and this was put it on the Herald, that seventy

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 3>five percent of people support these rates caps increase caps.

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 3>A lot of those questions comes down to how you

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 3>ask the question though, that's what a lot of political

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 3>science that should say. So if I say, do you

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 3>want lower taxes or lower rates? People go yes. But

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 3>then if I say, if that means that you have

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 3>to pay every time you go to the library or

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 3>have to pay for services through some other kind of

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 3>levee or tax, would you want that? People go no.

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 3>So it's it's one of those kind of hardolitical issues

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 3>that people have a gut reaction on, but when they

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 3>look into it more, their opinion might change.

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I see that both Labor and the Greens oppose

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the rate's cap and that's despite that polling. Like you said,

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 2>seventy five percent of kiwis support it. But again the

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 2>questioning around that we'd have to look at that. But

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 2>I imagine that this would be a move that will bode

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 2>well for national calm election time, because they've not only

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 2>now got your soft on crime, but they've got the

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 2>you want people to pay more rates or something, you

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean? Like, so, is this quite a

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 2>clever tactic going into twenty twenty six?

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 3>We have to think about what the big issues are

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 3>for people, right, and so the cost of living or

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 3>the economy or something around affordability day to day is

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.239
<v Speaker 3>a big issue for New Zealand. Isn't a big issue

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 3>in polling, like, that's what they consistently say, So this

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of would on the surface look like it would

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 3>help to alleviate that for people. So that might be

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 3>a big tech for voters. Kind of overall, we don't

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.559
<v Speaker 3>see in a lot of the sort of voting data

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.679
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of the political science literature that people

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 3>are local government voters like that's not a big issue

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 3>high up on their thing. But it might be that

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 3>this kind of makes it feel to people like that

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 3>costs will come under control, So it gives them that

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 3>greater sense of control and kind of hope for the

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 3>future around this. Again, whether that's an actual you know,

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 3>economic reality or fact or not, that's that's kind of

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 3>will come out in the wash, so to speak. So

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 3>that I guess part of that broader conversation of does

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 3>it look like that, you know, national will be tough

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 3>on spending like they're tough, say they're tough on crime.

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 3>It's part of that broader package or package of ideas

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 3>that they'll be going to the election on. And yeah,

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 3>I think that that will contribute to that discourse and

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 3>bits and pieces. We know that people generally, you know,

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the groups of society that people

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 3>don't tend to support on a day to day basis,

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 3>you know it's the council and other politicians and normally

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 3>not high out the kind of trust ranking. So I

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 3>think that local government and local government spending is a

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of sensible rhetorical, discursive, kind of target or group

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.799
<v Speaker 3>that you could talk about in negative ways that won't

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 3>get a lot of pushback, but will help to kind

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 3>of contribute to this overall package of policies or brand

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>that as a party national will get tough on things

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 3>like spending and waste for spending.

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you frustrated off the performance of your local council, Well,

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the good news is that changes come out and the

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>government is acting. We think local government has lost its way,

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it's lost its social license.

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 3>This is all about thripping cost out.

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Of the system, reducing duplication, making it more organizationally efficient

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately getting better value.

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 3>For money for rate payers. But here's the take home point.

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Something's got to change because the status bob is not acceptable.

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So, at the same time, IRMA reform minister Chris

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Bishop has described potential changes to local authorities. He says

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 2>it's the most significant changes potentially to local government since

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty nine. Tell me about these ideas. What ideas

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 2>does he have for local government?

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, what we've seen over the years is that you know,

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 3>local government was established and we've just kind of gone

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 3>along long all through the eighties, nineties, two thousands and

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 3>so on. So this kind of local government structure was created.

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 3>It's evolved in little bits and pieces over time, but

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 3>there haven't been that substantive structural change. I have to

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 3>say over the past sort of fifteen years. My career

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 3>in politics political science is that we often do wring

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 3>our hands over local government and kind of go, oh,

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.239
<v Speaker 3>something needs to change. There was a local government review

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty three that had a bunch of recommendations.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Every time we have local government elections. I spent a

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of time talking about turnout being love and the

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 3>issues around turnout. So we know that structurally there are

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>some issues with local government. And one of the kind

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 3>of debates in terms of local government is is it

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 3>too big? Is it too complicated? Is it too bureaucratic?

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 3>And if you're of a party on the right, you're

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 3>generally going to say yes. You know, the Taxpayers Union

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 3>have been campaigning for the reduced rates, the less spending,

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 3>a less bureaucratic structure. ACTS National tend to campaign on

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 3>this as well and tend to kind of raise these ideas.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 3>It was the ACT party that amalgamated. They take credit

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 3>for amalgamating the Auckland councils as well. I remember they're

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 3>all the different kind of North Shore Council, all of those,

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 3>but amalgamated and twenty ten as a result of some

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 3>of their work. So this has been a long kind

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 3>of running issue of can you kind of cut truck

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 3>and change something in local government. The government has proposed

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 3>removing the eleven regional councils and instead kind of creating

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 3>these committees to oversee that work. A lot of the

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 3>regional council workers around resource management like land news planning

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 3>and environmental water type matters. All of those bits and pieces,

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 3>so basically try to make changes to that system to

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 3>remove that bureaucracy. What we have seen when local government

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 3>has changed, for example around the supercity, is that you

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 3>don't end up like there's still those roles still have

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 3>to exist in some way. There's still often other people

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 3>that come in to do the job. You couldn't drop

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 3>a lot of those functions. And the other thing within

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 3>that we're still to kind of stare is what happens

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 3>around citivity and kapu and EWA and local government in

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 3>that space. So yeah, it's really overall an argument of

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 3>do you want to kind of maintain the current level

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 3>of government in the structure or do you want to

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 3>cut some of it away. And we've seen this government's

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 3>general policy agenda has been to reduce bits and pieces

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 3>in the sort of policy public sector governance structures, and

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 3>so this kind of smaller government, reducing some of the

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 3>levels of local council makes a lot of sense in

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 3>terms of their overall direction as a government.

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Because a lot of people say what would be able

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 2>to say the name of the mayor right where they live.

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 2>A smaller group probably know their local counselor maybe because

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, forty percent turnout for local ellections. A few

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 2>people out there must know their local counselors, but you'd

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 2>be hard pressed to know who your regional counselor is,

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>or who the CEO of your regional council is or something.

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 2>For example, Hey, so there does seem to be too

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 2>many cooks in the kitchen in that respect. But you're

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 2>saying if somebody is looking after I don't know, like

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 2>E can for example, Environment Canterbury. They look out for

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 2>all of the wetlands and they've got, you know, these

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 2>massive projects about natural resources and things like that that'll

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 2>just have to be amalgamated into the christ Church City

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 2>Council presumably.

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that that's kind of the broad direction of

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 3>travel there. I think that you don't really think about

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 3>local government until something goes wrong, you know, or like

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 3>you need to think about local government. And I would

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 3>say different stakeholder groups think about local government a lot more.

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Say you're in a sports clubs than you're on the

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 3>committee of that sports club. We're doing some kind of

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 3>volunteer work. I think that that's where you would think

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 3>more about your local government and the functions there. Or Yeah,

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 3>if they do something that really irks you, really annoys you.

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that that's where you think about local government,

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 3>because they sure do have low levels of voted turnout,

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 3>and generally there's a low level of awareness or knowledge about,

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, what they do on a day to day,

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 3>week to week, month to month basis. So there's that

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 3>that problem, and that that problem has been one that

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 3>has been persisting for decades. Is what exactly to do

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 3>structurally about local government to make sure it's a sufficient

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 3>as possible and that it's actually fulfilling the needs of

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 3>the community and the community cares enough to turn out

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 3>to vote. Do these reforms kind of help help to

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 3>fix some of that potentially? I mean, we will see

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 3>what happens. I mean, if if it goes into gets

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 3>gets in and gets put in place and time and

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 3>with the election and puts and pieces there. But I mean,

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 3>I think a big frustration to some of us who've

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of taught on these issues is, yeah, the layers

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 3>of publication and the lack of kind of clarity of

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 3>what it is that everyone does on a day to

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 3>day basis, and it's still opaque for students who don't

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 3>know that little alone you kind of go on the

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 3>street kind of person, the average vita. So it's a

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 3>big problem, and I'm not sure that the reforms that

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 3>have been proposed will fix that big, broad structural problem.

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 3>But it's like someone's doing something finally in local government,

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 3>which hasn't always been the case.

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like even the fact that we're starting to kind

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 2>of talk about it again, I suppose, But do you

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 2>reckon that those suggestions for reform are actually a bit light,

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Like could we see, for example, an amalgamation of councils

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 2>into one.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 3>Like the Auckland super City.

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 2>So I was looking at this map of all of

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 2>the regional councils and you know, the district councils, the

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 2>local boards, etc. Why Cato region has like ten district

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 2>councils or something like that. And I remember we were

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 2>down there speeding to the Waititomo mayor, and even he

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 2>mentioned to us that maybe, you know, there could be

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 2>some amalgamation of those smaller councils, especially as well, because

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 2>though some of those councilors are only paid and I say,

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 2>only paid twenty to fifty k a year compared to

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 2>the bigger councils like Auckland, You've got over one hundred

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 2>k year for some of those counselors.

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 3>So is it time to have.

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 2>A much bigger, harsher conversation than the one we're even

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:27.839
<v Speaker 2>having now?

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, what I would say is that there are various

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 3>reviews that I've seen haven't necessarily proposed a structure. They've

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 3>proposed principles or ideas or values, but not necessarily a

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 3>structure of let's sort it out. This is where I

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 3>would like to see something like some citizens assemblies or

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 3>some deliberative democracy where you randomly select one hundred people

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 3>from whatever town, bring them together and get them to

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 3>discuss these issues and try to figure out what actually

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 3>a good kind of system with a good mandate looks like.

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 3>And local government, I mean a lot to do. Any

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 3>of that would mean investing time, resources, reporting another review

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of experts, and it would just be another one,

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 3>and then ultimately would that report just end up filed

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 3>on some minister's desk. But I think that ultimately a

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of the local government structures were set up more

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 3>than a century ago, you know the reality, Yeah, the

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 3>way like I'm thinking back to the borough councils and

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 3>all of those bits and pieces, And it's like governments,

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I think generally and not making those big structural changes

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of areas of our lives, right like

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, the economy, but and pieces. So I don't

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 3>necessarily think that we can expectment some government to actually

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 3>do it, actually sit down and go, how is this

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 3>going to be organized? What is an efficient their way

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 3>in the way that say, you know, electorates are organized

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 3>where you have say seventy thousand people per electorate, and

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 3>that's an electorate, that's a geographic area, and it's drawn

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 3>a certain way. So I think ultimately it would be

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 3>great if someone did just like go, okay, we're going

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 3>to take a global view, We're going to sort this

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 3>out once and sort this out with some kind of

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 3>for US party mandate and get it sorted into the future.

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 3>That would be ideal, But I can't see us doing

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 3>that the way that our current politics are set out.

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it would be a great service if labor

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 3>and national will get together and sort it out for

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 3>the decades to come, but instead we will have all

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 3>of these kind of I'm sure it's kind of amusing

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 3>spending decisions and these like local government situations in the future.

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 3>And I imagine that in ten years time we'll probably

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 3>be sitting here having the same conversation.

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, stop doing dumb stuff. You know, did you

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 4>need to spend two million dollars here in Wellington on a.

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Public toilet block?

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 4>No money on Joda bars and you know, rather than

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 4>actually fixing roads. So I mean, this is going to

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 4>force you know, when you've got scarcity, you know, as

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 4>we find the central government having inherited the mess we

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 4>got from the labor government. You know, when you're actually

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 4>paying a nine billion dollar interest bill and that's four

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 4>or five teen hospitals you can't all each and every

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 4>year because of that in trust bill.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Thank you later.

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And even the rhetoric between central government and local

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 2>government as well is pretty harsh. Hey, Like you've got

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister out here saying, you know, councils need

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 2>to stop doing dumb stuff. It's like, well, that doesn't

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 2>instill too much hope and too much pride in our

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 2>local government, does it. And I mean, and you've also

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 2>got situations around the country as well where the government

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 2>has had to step in and bring in the Commissioner, etc.

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 2>But I kind of guess like if we fixed quote

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 2>unquote the situation as a whole. You would have better

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 2>people coming forward to become a local counselor, you'd have

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 2>better ideas around the table, and more transparency and the

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 2>public actually.

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:57.479
<v Speaker 3>Knowing what all of these people do. Thus, more people.

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Are going out to vote because people probably don't realize

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 2>as soon as you step outside of your door, you've

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 2>encountered probably like five things that local government has done

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 2>for you.

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, generally this is a big issue, and I'm

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 3>looking forward to seeing what changes, you know, the changes

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 3>to the NCAA and the Civics and citizenship type curriculum changes.

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully that builds in some kind of local government educational

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 3>knowledge into that. The other thing, of course, is that

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 3>for local government, a lot of the people aren't particularly

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 3>well paid. It's like a part time job for them.

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 3>And of course we've seen that broader context of like

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 3>violent freaks towards women running in local government. So if

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 3>you kind of combine all of these contexts together, you

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 3>can see why someone wouldn't want to stand for local government.

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, the first that like not knowledge about what

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 3>they do, feeling undervalued by central government, and then this

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 3>kind of context and bits and pieces that we're hearing,

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, people not even turning up to vote. So

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you if you set up a system

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 3>like that, who are you going to get that's going

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 3>to run and who are you going to get around

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 3>those decision making governance tables. So I think it's just

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 3>one of those things where we keep wringing our hands

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 3>thinking on what could it look like, what could a

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 3>good future model be. We'd also need to figure out

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 3>what to do with Malori representation because one of the

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 3>big things on the last year that's been in the

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 3>media around local government, of course, has been the Mali

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Woods referendums. So there's a few issues to sort out there.

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 3>But again it's like I feel like we spend so

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 3>much of our time kind of going, well, what's wrong

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 3>with local government? And there's actually some real positive things

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 3>and some great things that they do in the community,

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 3>and things that like, if you are someone who loves

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 3>your community and wants to get involved, the old hope

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 3>people would go forward and yeah, really see change. I

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 3>think a lot of the local government politicists I've heard

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 3>from find it rewarding, find it rewarding to see things

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 3>on the ground actually change in their communities, and yeah,

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 3>it's a really kind of positive thing where like local

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 3>people make local decisions. But yeah, set against the this

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of negativity and the turnout and the Prime minister's comments.

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 3>So it's again, it's probably one of those what we

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 3>would call wicked problems of like local government that we

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 3>have to continually move back towards trying to figure out

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 3>something to do with it. And yeah, hopefully someone will

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 3>sort it at some point. Thanks for joining us, Lara Sulda.

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 2>That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 2>can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 2>at enzadherld dot co dot nz. The Front Page is

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 2>produced by Jane Ye and Richard Martin, who is also

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 2>our editor. I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to The Front Page

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 2>on iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts, and tune

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 2>in tomorrow for another look behind the headlines.