WEBVTT - Is economic recovery stalling?

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Kyonda, and welcome to Shared Lunch, brought to you by Chase's.

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Helen Madison.

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>Today we take a pulse check on the economy. I'll

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>be speaking with Infametrics principal economist Brad Olsen.

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 3>The worry now a little bit more is that households, businesses,

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 3>and professional forecasters are all now thinking that there is

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 3>a bit more inflation to come.

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 2>So what does this mean for investors?

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 3>It's only a temporary pause that we're seeing with these tariffs,

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 3>and that some of the results could still be pretty damaging.

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 2>What should you be looking out for?

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's trying to figure out what the sweet spot is

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 3>and sort of how to balance what is a lot

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 3>of uncertainty.

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 2>And what should you ignore.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 3>It's been the sort of recognition from a lot of

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 3>people that, hey, sometimes that the markets have been over

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 3>correcting or a bit overly worried about things and then

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:48.919
<v Speaker 3>seem to come back the other way.

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Before we get started, here's some important information.

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Investing involves the risk you might lose the money you

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 4>start with. We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor.

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 4>We also recommend eating product disclosure documents before deciding to invest.

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Everything you're about to see and here is current at

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 4>the time of recording.

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Welcome Brad, great to see you again. It's been a while.

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 3>It has been a while. In goodness, what a lot

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 3>has happened in the economy in that intervening period. Seems

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 3>like we've gone from the brink of World War III

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 3>to ceasefires, to tariffs to everything else. I mean, it's

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 3>been a pretty wild ride.

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 2>It has.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Let's start here at home and think about our economy

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and growth. It appears that we are sort of stepping

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit after all the kind of recession talk,

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera. However, it appears to me that

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the only real growth we're seeing is in the rural sector,

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>with milk prices, with beef for burgers to the US,

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>which is good for exports, and then that yellow gold butter.

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 3>You're definitely right, I mean, the rural sector is definitely

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 3>powering the early stages of the economic recovery. You look

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 3>at the likes of the trade numbers we've got coming through,

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 3>commodity prices all in a better place. I think it's

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 3>true as well when you look across the world. That's

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 3>also partly a supply story. From other providers. So you

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.679
<v Speaker 3>look at the likes of butter, milk, other dairy products,

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand productions actually up, which is unusual when prices

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 3>are sort of at the levels that they are. But

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 3>it's production out of the likes of Europe and the

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Americas that haven't been doing quite as well. New Zealand's

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 3>able to provide everyone else wants to pay for it.

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 3>We've been doing not too bad. You look at also

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 3>the numbers though, so the milk payout that's come through

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:30.119
<v Speaker 3>has generated over nineteen billion of money that'll be going

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 3>back into the primary sector. What's interesting is in the

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 3>season just finished, you're talking something like four point five

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 3>four point six billion dollars more than the season before.

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 3>That's more money coming through than the entirety of the

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 3>lower interest rates that households be paying this year. So

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 3>the primary sector is definitely a very critical part at

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 3>the start. The question is does it continue. Because you

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 3>do start to see a few of those numbers that

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 3>likes the latest couple of global dairy trade options, they've

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 3>fallen back a touch and I think that does just

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 3>suggest again things are all right for the minute, but

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a question going forward in terms of

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 3>how strong it will be. Fonterra has also made it

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 3>quite clear that they think there's effectively a bit of

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 3>a downside risk. They've come out that said, you know,

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 3>milk prices at ten bucks for the season ahead, but

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 3>it could range anywhere between eleven and eight. That's a

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 3>three dollar range, the biggest they've ever provided, and more

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 3>on the downside than there is the upside. I guess

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 3>that's almost the tone for the second half of this

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 3>year is Yep, there's a recovery coming through, but it's

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 3>a very cautious and slow one.

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it only the rural sector that are actually going

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>leaps and bounds or are other do you see other

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of green shoots? Which is a bit of a

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>hackneyed phrase at the moment, but I'll use it anyway.

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 3>First three months of this year looked all right. You

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 3>saw economic activity that expanded actually quite a bit apecent,

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, some of the biggest increase in quarterly growth

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 3>that we've seen amongst a lot of our international partners.

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 3>I think the challenges after that, once you start to

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 3>get into April, you have the lights of the tariff

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.839
<v Speaker 3>slow down and everything else that's come through you've seen

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 3>some of those indicators that have fallen back. At the

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 3>start of this year, there were a few parts the

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 3>likes of there was some better manufacturing numbers that were

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 3>coming forward. You also saw better professional services activity, so

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 3>you're getting you know, business services going a bit more again.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Both of those look like they've fallen back of touch

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 3>as we've moved through into the mid year period, manufacturing

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 3>and services and disease falling back into sort of contractionary territory.

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 3>So just that feeling of yes, there's a recovery, but

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 3>it's a bit more stop start. It's a bit more

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 3>slow to get going than we might have first expected.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 3>And I feel like a lot of people ask me

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 3>these days, you know, economist said survived till twenty five

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 3>and I sort of have to respond and say, look,

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 3>we've got into the thirty first of December for that

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 3>come true. But it is going to be a slow

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 3>slog I think for this year.

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it feels like one step forward to back to

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>some degree. I mean, the cost of food seems to

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>still keep rising, fuel keeps rising, and whether that's because

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>of the conflicts and the like.

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, where are we at with inflation.

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Inflation's uncomfortable at the moment, and like probably more uncomfortable

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 3>than we would have first been expecting some people in

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 3>our forecasting that headline inflation might go through three percent

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 3>towards the second half of this year. Now, that of course,

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 3>would be the first time that it had breached that

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 3>three percent high point of the highest that the Reserve

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Bank generally wants it to go. Now, yes, there's an

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 3>expectation a short term, but there does just seem to

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 3>be enough sort of remaining inflationary pressure to make us

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 3>a little bit worried. And some people often ask, you know,

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 3>how do you have this when you've got the economy

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 3>that's in such a tough zone. You know, it's not

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 3>really a conducive environment right to raise prices, but you're

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 3>still seeing them. And I do wonder if we're starting

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 3>to see almost a twenty twenties version of stagflation. Now

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 3>that's a big word to use. I'm not saying we're

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 3>going back to the nineteen seventies. It's a very different environment,

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 3>but you do just get the feeling that there's a

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 3>little bit more of that inflationary undercurrent sitting around food

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 3>price inflation's now reaccelerated to four point four percent. What's

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 3>interesting is that last time it got sort of to

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 3>this high level, and I think you know now at

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.679
<v Speaker 3>the highest food price inflation since the end of twenty

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty three. The difference is at that point it was very,

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 3>very broad based, lots of stuff increasing in price all

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 3>the time, whereas now it's a bit more concentrated to

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 3>a more limited set of items. But the big increases.

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 3>You look at the likes of butter up sort of

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 3>fifty sixty percent the last year, mints and beef prices

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 3>higher again because those international prices. You look at the

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 3>likes of coffee, chocolate, olive oil, all of those increasing

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>all the But it's also it's not everything, but it's

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 3>the stuff that you notice so so much more, and

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 3>I think that's probably the difference. You've also got the

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 3>likes of oil prices, yes, fluctuating quite a lot this year.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 3>But the real one, I think, and the kicker for

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 3>households at the minute, is energy prices. You look at

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 3>electricity and gas now rising at the fastest they've been

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 3>going in over ten years, and again it's just that

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 3>uncomfortable piece where from a household perspective. You've got food

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 3>prices going up, you've got energy costs going up. And

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 3>the worry now a little bit more, is that households, businesses,

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 3>and prefertional forecasters all now thinking that there is a

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 3>bit more inflation to come. Inflation expectations have increased, not

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 3>massively again, not to red alert danger zones, but just

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 3>to enough of a position where again the worry starts

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 3>to creep in, sort of a bit of a pit

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 3>in the bottom of your stomach around inflation sitting by,

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's why the reserve banks in this

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>really challenging position where they're going the economy doesn't look great,

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 3>and I worry again. You look back to where we've

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 3>been a couple of years back, the likes of inflation

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 3>when it started to get bad. It was at a

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 3>time when we thought the economy wouldn't allow inflation to

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 3>pass through, and we sort of almost conveniently at the time,

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 3>ignored actual inflation starting to creep up again. Not fully

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 3>back in the same position, but it seems a little

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 3>bit too similar to completely ignore it.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a good segue to the Reserve bank. By the

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>time this episode goes to air. They will have actually

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the Reserve Bank will have actually announced.

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 2>What the official cash rate is.

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's been hoping it would be another reduction, but it

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>does feel like consensus is they will hold.

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 3>What was your prediction, We're expecting a hold as well,

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 3>to keep their official cash rate where it is at

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 3>three point twenty five percent, but also expecting that there

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 3>could be a further cut at some point later in

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 3>the year. And I guess that's where again that nervousness

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 3>creeps in that it's a little bit hard to justify

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 3>moving right this moment. You know, there's still the clarification

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 3>of what happens with the tariffs around the world, still

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 3>a bit more data to come through when it comes

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 3>to inflation and similar and so I think again that

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 3>sort of question of where does the Reserve Bank go

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 3>next is probably the bigger one, and they'll have a

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 3>better opportunity in August to be able to explain not

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 3>only the most recent decision, but also what that future

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 3>pathway looks like, because that's what everyone's concentrated on. Is

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 3>there a lot left to go? Are we close to

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the end? Have we already seen the end? Quite a

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of options going forward.

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I suppose they're sending out letters at the moment.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>According to Trump's officials and to you know, lots of

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>countries that actually probably have quite high tarifs, they do

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>something quite quickly, So you're right, we probably might have

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to wait until that happens.

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 3>And I mean you look at the market reaction as well.

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, when the tariffs originally came through at the

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 3>start of April like that, that was a bit of

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 3>a mountdown on the markets. What's I think interesting is

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 3>that even in recent times you've seen this sort of

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 3>the markets actually continue to push higher on some economic news,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 3>but almost conveniently forgetting that there's it's only a temporary

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 3>pause that we're seeing with these tariffs, and that some

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 3>of the results could still be pretty damaging. I mean,

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 3>recently we've seen an agreement with between the US and Vietnam.

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 3>They came out and said, look, twenty percent tariff. Now

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 3>that's lower than the forty six I think percent they

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 3>started with. Twenty percent tariff on everything coming out of

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Vietnam is still quite a lot though, and into the

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 3>US market becomes quite important because that's where a lot

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 3>more manufacturing is based. Anything that transits through Vietnam sitting

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 3>at forty percent tariffs and the US gets completely you know,

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 3>free access into the market. Like that's still pretty bad

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 3>for economic expectations going forward. So I'm a little bit

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 3>worried again that people are sort of quite happily blase

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 3>because it's been such a tough ride knowing what's coming next.

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 3>But if that's any indication again economic growth globally will slow.

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 3>If you're seeing those levels of teriffs. They might be

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 3>better than what was announced in April, but they're not

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 3>good for global economic growth.

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's even with China and I think the UK

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of negotiating, and we'll obviously see other negotiations in

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the next month or so. But yeah, it feels still

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>somewhat bleak.

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't it.

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, very challenging, and I mean it's one of those

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 3>things for New Zealand, of course, we rely on the

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 3>global economic environment to trade. At the moment, I think

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 3>we're actually probably not too badly placed. People were still

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 3>buying our food stuff, so we're selling to consumers a

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 3>lot more if we were selling sort of semi manufactured

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 3>goods or sort of intermediate goods that went into the

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 3>production process. If we were selling cars, you'd be in

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 3>a very, very tough spot. And having been in Korea

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 3>earlier this year, when again they are a lot more

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 3>wedded to not only the US economy, but to some

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 3>of that more manufactured stuff, they were definitely sort of

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 3>feeling the pinch a whole lot quicker than we were now.

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Interest rates also always have a bearing on house prices,

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>so the rate cuts.

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 2>That we've had, we've had several I think it's two.

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Hundred and twenty five basis points over the last few months. However,

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't appear that the heat has come back into

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that housing market.

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 3>No, not at all. And despite the fact that you

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 3>know you've got some fairly attractive interest rates on offer,

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 3>you just haven't seen that same level of buyer demand

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 3>spark up to the same degree. At the same time,

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 3>you've got a huge number of houses that are still

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 3>on the market. I think there's a few elements that.

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 3>One is the fact that there is literally half a

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 3>year's worth of normal sales setting available on the market.

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Takes a while to clear that backlog. You've also got

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of new builds that have only sort of

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 3>recently been finished up, a lot of selling activity potential

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 3>in the market, not as many buyers coming through. You've

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 3>seen the likes of net migration pull back, so your

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 3>population growth has slowed. But I think particularly again, it's

0:11:58.160 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 3>interesting sort of when you look at some of the

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 3>indicat after that tariff announcement in April, there did seem

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 3>to be a real feeling amongst potential buyers that they

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 3>actually weren't quite as keen to clamber in, you know,

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 3>worries around the likes that interest rate they might be paying,

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 3>and what it might be in the future, the risk

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 3>of do I have a job or not? Will this

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 3>completely upset the apple cart, probably more importantly for some

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:23.239
<v Speaker 3>people that probably had their potential deposit in their investments,

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden they didn't have as much of

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 3>a deposit as before. That means that there's still no

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 3>real reason that prices are going to be bid up,

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 3>and I think for a while then you'll start to

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 3>we'll continue to see yes, probably some price rises, but

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 3>very very muted as you go through the next couple

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 3>of years. And that's probably not a bad place for

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand. What's interesting is it does now mean that

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 3>people are increasingly going well, okay, housing market doesn't have

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot of immediate growth in it. Where am I

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 3>making money now? And that seems to be the piece

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 3>where people are casting around a lot more for not

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 3>only money making options, but a wider variety of those options.

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>That's a nice segue into the Cheesies Quarterly Index, which

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>we have released this week. And definitely there is a

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>correlation we've seen between interest rates and investor sentiment. We've

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>got data for the last five years, which is, you know,

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a good metric, and it would appear that when

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>rates have come down there is more immediacy in terms

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 1>of investing.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:21.719
<v Speaker 2>What would you.

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Say, I think there's a few elements to it. One

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 3>is that generally, as your interest rates come lower, some

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 3>of your sort of less risky options, you know, putting

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 3>money into term deposits or similar just isn't nearly as

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 3>attractive anymore. When it becomes a little bit harder to

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 3>make those returns, you're having to sort of, you know,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 3>change around or think about adjusting your risk profile. I

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 3>think it's also though, that as those interest rates come down,

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 3>they do normally stimulate a bit more economic activity on

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 3>the whole, both here and around the world. That generally

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 3>means more economic activity, more selling for the businesses that

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 3>you might be investing in, better returns, and similar over time.

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>So it's sort of reassuring to see that. I think. Also, though,

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 3>the big challenge in recent times has been that greater

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 3>level of volatility that you've seen coming forward. There's been

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot of rebalancing, both from retail investors but also

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the big institutional guys. Everyone's trying to figure out what

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the sweet spot is and sort of how to balance

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 3>what is a lot of uncertainty, and the best way

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 3>for that seems to be less picking one deliberate strategy

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 3>and going all in and more having that quite a

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 3>bit more diversified option, which is reassuring to see because

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 3>that seems to be the best method. But people are

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 3>very much trying to sort of seek out those different opportunities.

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>We're also seeing subset of investors which is growing actually

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>looking to other emerging sectors, like we're talking AI, we're

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>talking crypto, we're talking defense tech, we're talking autonomous vehicles,

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>which it's quite exciting in some respects. Obviously, commercialization with

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>these sort of new tech aspects are coming to the fore.

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 3>I think also though, the availability of some of these

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 3>options to investors is new, right, Like, there are some

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 3>exciting opportunities there, but some of these again are a

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 3>little bit more unproven. And look, if you want to

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 3>take that big risk, you might get that big return, sure,

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 3>but equally it might not come off to the same degree.

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 3>I remember, even a couple of years ago, you started

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 3>to see a few more businesses that have basically sold

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 3>nothing at that point, and the evaluations continue to skyrock

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 3>higher and higher on this expectation of better things to come,

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 3>coupled with the fact that people are seeking those sort

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 3>of higher returns because inflation has been high, economic pressures

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 3>have come on. They are few people like say, not

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 3>all of them, but that growing subset caen to find

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 3>a different opportunity, and I guess hoping to be not

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 3>necessarily the first, but in that sort of early wave

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 3>of adopters and investors, because that's where you start to

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 3>make some of those longer gains. Over time, you get

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 3>an early you sort of ride that wave through. What

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 3>will be interesting, I think is that at some point

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 3>you will have some of these options that don't perform

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 3>as well. That's just how the market works. It'll be

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 3>interesting to see how people respond to that in terms

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 3>of do they get a little bit burned and then

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 3>immediately withdraw or do they go, look, actually, this is

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 3>how the markets work. I'm going to be sort of

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 3>happy to keep in it for that longer period of time.

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that people generally will stick around. They're often

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 3>going to be younger investors who are have a bit

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 3>more risk tolerance, willing to ride the wave for longer.

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's something that also comes up a lot

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 3>more in conversation. You know, people have been asking recently

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 3>about the likes of AI, about gold, about carbon credits,

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 3>about you know, crypto and similar. But also what's interesting

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 3>I think is even some of the subsets of certain industries.

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, defenses are often a lot hotter and of

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 3>greater interest these days. You know, questions around will actually

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 3>how do you what are you looking for when it

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 3>comes to defense assets? You know, it's not necessarily the

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 3>usual will if consumers get to spend more than things

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 3>will be better for defense as well. I think that

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 3>the geopolitics is going to be a whole lot more challenging,

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 3>so different drivers I think means that people are also

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 3>seeking out a different sort of information than what they've

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 3>had before.

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And I do see like even in the US they're

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking about being able to use your crypto assets as

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>part of your for a house. Even in Germany they're

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at banks are looking at being able to transact

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in crypto. I mean, we're not there yet, but it

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>does seem to be continuing to increase in demand.

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely not only increase in demand, but becoming more mainstream.

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, again, you go back sort of five, certainly

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 3>ten years ago, and let's be quite honest, crypto was

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 3>not mainstream. It was very much fringe. It was seen

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.439
<v Speaker 3>to be you know, different odd at some points. I

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 3>still think, you know, for a lot of people that

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 3>you've got to keep your wits about you in some

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 3>of those areas because for sort of every sensible approach

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 3>that's being taken in some areas to crypto, there's another

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 3>fart coin that comes out every second day as well.

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Like the variety there makes it hard sometimes to sort

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 3>of say crypto is this and be an all encompassing statement.

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 3>There's a bit of variety in there, but it is

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 3>becoming more mainstream. There's certainly more opportunity that starts to

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 3>come through, and I guess also slightly challenging to say this,

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 3>but I think it's real that you look around the world,

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 3>less trust and government and similar means that people are

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 3>again just wanting to hedge their bets a little bit

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 3>more in terms of where they sort of park their

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 3>money and their assets. And I think again, for a

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of people, it's not necessarily saying, look, I'm going

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 3>all in on any one sect or whatever it happens

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 3>to be, but I'm quite keen. As an investor these days,

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 3>it seems on average to be a bit more exposed

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 3>to a lot of things, and that sort of broad,

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 3>diverse exposure does mean that you can pick up some

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 3>of those gains when some of those newer asset classes

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 3>start to emerge and provide you more potential. And I

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 3>think this is where it's been interesting seeing people develop

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 3>the last couple of years when there has been this

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of implicit conversation amongst New Zealanders around their risk tolerance,

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 3>because it has been for you know, when term deposits

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:43.959
<v Speaker 3>were high, where you didn't have to think about risk tolerance.

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 3>You parked your money in something that just gave you,

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, it just continued to provide at a high

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 3>and high level. Now that you've got to be a

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 3>bit more discerning, I think that's where the level of

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 3>interest is coming back. I mean same in terms of

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 3>the number or proportion of people on shares as I

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 3>expect to are buying companies specifically, Again, a little bit

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 3>more new wants there where people are going. Look, I've

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 3>done a bit of research. I want to make sure

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.239
<v Speaker 3>that I understand my exposure a bit more. These are

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 3>the areas I'm starting to push into. So again, I

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 3>think we've got a more discerning, a sort of more

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 3>more direct investor starting to come through.

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Rat Just thinking about the US economy, there were lots

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 1>of predictions that with the tariff uncertainty and the like,

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>that that economy would start to slow.

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 2>We actually aren't.

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Seeing that, maybe because the tariff situation is on again,

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>off again, but really it does seem that still a powerhouse.

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the US economy seems a little bit unkillable on

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 3>that front, I mean a bit serious. I mean, you're right,

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 3>people were expecting economic activity to pull back, for inflation

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 3>to spike a whole lot higher, for unemployment to start

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 3>to increase. You just really haven't seen too many of

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 3>those signs. I think underneath the surface is a little

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 3>bit in the data that does suggest again more challenges.

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 3>You look at the likes of some of the over

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 3>revisions that keep coming through to employment numbers in the US,

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 3>they do generally continue to be revised lower on this

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 3>sort of second and third published. But again there's still

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 3>enough in there, there's still enough jobs growth that's keeping

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 3>the economic motor humming. I do wonder if part of

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 3>it is a timing thing. You know, you have had

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 3>in recent times, a whole lot of uncertainty. People have

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 3>generally probably just tried to keep on moving forward, haven't

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 3>known what way to sort of move in terms of

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 3>investment or otherwise. So I do wonder if it might

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 3>be sort of again you start to see those impacts

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.959
<v Speaker 3>a little bit later on. But again, even then, the

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 3>economic motor in the US still seems solid enough for

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 3>the moment with the I mean, the feed is still

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 3>talking about sort of one to two rates cuts this

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 3>year still as well, which is sort of the weird

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 3>thing is that the economy looks robust enough, underlying conditions

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 3>look a little bit weaker, which might allow you to

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 3>cut interest rates a bit more, but you're certainly not

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 3>going to get some of the larger cuts that some

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 3>people I think hope for to try and stimulate even

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 3>more activity, and that's probably the right spot for the

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 3>US in general, but it also means that increasingly look

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 3>earlier this year, when the tariffs were announced, people were saying,

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 3>We're going to completely move away from the US. I'm

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 3>just not going to park any money there. I mean,

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 3>people have come flocking back pretty quickly because there's still

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 3>good returns. They still look at other opportunities too. Europe

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 3>still seems to be a bit more in interest than before,

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 3>but certainly those US numbers look a little bit more solid.

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess the question will be as we continue through

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 3>the year, do you see a bit more of a

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 3>trend start to emerge on either direction, because I think

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 3>that's almost part of the problem is that the US

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 3>economy is a little bit direction list at the moment.

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 3>You're not sure if it's about to trend down or

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 3>trend up. It's just it's just moving forward at a

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 3>solid pace without sort of any movement up or down.

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and markets are definitely hitting record highs and NAISDAK

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and the S and P five hundred, so it's I

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>can see why investors, particularly on Cheesy's. We have about

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of our trading as in US. That said,

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>forty one percent is held here in New Zealand, so

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit of a difference there, but in terms

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of trading, that's definitely where people are still gravitating.

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's interesting as well, right with the volatility that's

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 3>come through because I mean, you look at some of

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 3>the days we've had this year, like wild wild times

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 3>and watching what would you know previously have been a

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 3>couple of weeks or months of movement happen, you know,

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 3>within seconds or minutes. Has been quite hard to stomach sometimes,

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 3>and even amongst that, actually it looks like people have

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 3>been buying in a bit more. You know. I'm not

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 3>going to say everyone buying the dip, but I think

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 3>there's been the sort of recognition from a lot of

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 3>people that, hey, sometimes that the markets have been I

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 3>think maybe over correcting or a bit overly worried about

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 3>things and then seem to come back the other way. Now,

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 3>let's be real. I also worry a little bit that

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 3>the markets sometimes undercook or don't forward cast as much

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 3>of the challenging conditions and sort of take good expected

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 3>economic news and sort of just run with it. But

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 3>what was fascinating, I think is also in recent times,

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 3>when you had conflict in the Middle East, we've been

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 3>expecting likes of oil prices some of those other commodities

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 3>to spike up sharply. There wasn't anything, in fact, in

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 3>terms of actual market action. I think most of the

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 3>US market numbers actually went higher despite some of those

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 3>commodities starting to show pressure. Now I do wonder if

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 3>everyone's become a little bit numb in a sense to

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 3>just how many of these big geopolitical things come through.

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 3>And people are now starting to look a little bit

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 3>more at the numbers and going, Okay, yep, some people

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 3>are expecting certain things, but until I actually start to

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 3>see them that expectation move to reality. I'm going to

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 3>look at what's actually right in front of me, what's

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 3>actually being reported here and now, and move with that.

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.719
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's again, that's quite a different market

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 3>than what we've seen previously. When you jumped at shadows,

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 3>you jumped to any sort of little tibit of information.

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Now people seem to be not only holding back but

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 3>going look when there is actual, real information. I'm going

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.199
<v Speaker 3>to work on that. I'm going to pile in a

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 3>bit more, and I'm not going to react nearly as

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.479
<v Speaker 3>much to sort of just some of that that broader

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.959
<v Speaker 3>stuff in the expectation piece. That's a shift.

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump back to New Zealand and how businesses here

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>are feeling. There's been a number of out in recent weeks.

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 2>They were looking at a recovery. But what would you say,

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 2>we're sentiment.

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Now Sentiments okay? And I guess I say okay, because

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 3>depending on how you look at it, in some areas,

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 3>the economy still looks weak forward expectations still don't look great,

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 3>but confidence about what's sort of coming up next is

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 3>still improving, if you will, And I think that's again

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 3>probably indicative of where the economy is moving. It's improving

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 3>slowly but surely, but it's sort of a sluggish one.

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 3>People are still worried in different sectors about how they'll go.

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 3>You know, you look at the likes of the construction

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 3>sector again pretty tough in many respects, Retail a whole

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 3>lot more, mixed, manufacturing a whole lot more, mixed, agricultural

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 3>primary sector in a good spot, but I do think

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 3>as well. Second half of this year, you do have

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 3>people that are refixing onto those lone mortgage rates. Everyone's

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 3>trying to act a little bit more limited in terms

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 3>of their investment intentions and similar There seems to be

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 3>this view of, look, yes, there might well be better

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 3>things to come, but I'm going to be very careful

0:24:58.000 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 3>with my money. As a business, I'm going to be

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 3>careful with my hiring. And from a household perspective, everyone

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 3>seems to be more careful with their cash too.

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, jobs, I would have thought they would be coming

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit by now, but the figures aren't

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>really telling us that.

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 3>Every time we get monthly job numbers, they seem to

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 3>show a little bit of a slight tick up, but

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 3>then that almost always gets revised again within the next

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 3>couple of months. And the more interesting indicator in recent

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 3>times has been the number of job ads that are

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 3>out there, you know, the number of job opportunities that

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 3>you can apply for in seasonally adjusted terms. They've basically

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 3>been flat now for just about a year now. That's

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 3>flat at sort of levels that we haven't seen since

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 3>about twenty thirteen or so. So it's been a long time.

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 3>The fact that they're flat is good relative to the

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 3>idea that they could still be falling, but it also

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 3>says that if they've been flat for nearly a year now,

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 3>there's not really any real trend of them starting to

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 3>pick up any sort of momentum. And you do just

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 3>get this feeling again from businesses that they are in

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 3>this sort of holding pattern where they would love to

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 3>employ more people. They just can't see the sort of

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 3>expectations for really strong things ahead enough for you to

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 3>start to hire a whole bunch more. You're seeing that

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 3>as well a lot more young people that are becoming unemployed.

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 3>That's the group who are often losing their jobs, some

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 3>of them heading for Australia and similar So some of

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 3>those trends I think are fairly well established at this point.

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.239
<v Speaker 3>We also haven't seen any real trend that they are

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 3>starting to improve any quicker than we might have expected.

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.360
<v Speaker 3>In fact, in most cases they're taking a whole lot longer.

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Now, Brad, is there anything positive that investors can look too?

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Where is there any silver linux in somewhere?

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 3>As there seem to be some decent enough deals on

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the prices that you can get various

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 3>stocks and options and similar for and again you know,

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 3>where you've done a bit of homework, other options seem

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 3>to be far over valued considering what they're delivering. But

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 3>again that's very case by case. I guess what's interesting

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 3>is that normally when we look at different sectors, is

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 3>quite a general environment.

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 3>You look at retail and you go, well, all of

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 3>retail's not doing that well. It's been interesting. In the

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand case, you see a few places where they

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 3>put our announcement like, look, training conditions have been worse

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 3>than we thought. We've seen, you know, poorer results than

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 3>we've been expecting. But other areas sort of a little

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 3>bit quietly but pretty confidently going like, hey, numbers are

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 3>not bad at the moment. We're going all right, even

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 3>within sometimes the same segment, which really does go to

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 3>show that is a very discerning environment again, where it's

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 3>not sort of just everything moving in one broad thrust.

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 3>I do wonder as well if that means that people

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 3>are taking more notice of businesses, strategies, who's on the board,

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 3>what sort of movements they're making, and how quick because

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 3>this does seem to be quite a dynamic environment. Now

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 3>by that. I mean, it's shifting so quickly that I

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 3>do wonder. You know, people seem to be a lot

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 3>more interested in executives. You know, what are they doing,

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 3>what's the board doing? Have they made changes quickly enough?

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Or have they sort of allowed things to just sort

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 3>of languish and then all of a sudden, Oh, some

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 3>big changes come through. They haven't reacted to I don't know,

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 3>be it you know, government cutbacks. They haven't reacted to

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 3>how the market's been shifting. So I do think that

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 3>there's an interesting variation in the reports. Like I say, genuinely,

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 3>some going look, it's pretty tough out there, and sometimes

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 3>operators that you thought would have been a lot more

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 3>solid or stable through a downturn. But equally some areas

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 3>of the market where you go, geez, that's pretty impressive

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 3>that you're still able to make some pretty good numbers happen.

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 3>It's a bit more all what has this company going

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 3>on below the surface? How are the board performing, how

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 3>long have they been there, what are they up to?

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, are they agitating for change? What's the executive

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 3>team doing? What's the strategy? And that I do wonder

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 3>as well. I mean I don't think there's a good

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 3>indicator here in New Zealand, but like how many people

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:37.719
<v Speaker 3>are showing up to the likes of agms and similar

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 3>to try and make sure they either get their point

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 3>across to management and the board, but also trying to

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 3>gain a little bit more information of what are you

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 3>taking us forward into because it is uncertain. You've got

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 3>to be nimble, and I think people are sort of

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 3>casing out boards and management a lot more than they

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 3>did before.

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Is there anything investors should ignore if we end on that?

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, some times it's very easy to doom scroll

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 3>right in this environment like be it you know us

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 3>sort of market changes and similar. I guess probably a

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 3>need to keep your wits about you in terms of

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 3>how current your information is. I remember when the likes

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 3>of you saw a conflict in the Middle East recently.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 3>I was sometimes reading analysis that had come out that

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 3>basically had missed the mark because it had come out

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 3>too late. You know, by the time someone had published

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 3>and been like, look there's a risk of the oil

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 3>goes to one hundred and ten dollars a barrel. Oil

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 3>had crashed back below seventy all of a sudden, and

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 3>it was just so there is a real need to

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 3>be very very current, or to at least be sort

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 3>of aware of when stuff has been coming out, so

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 3>that you make sure you've got the latest stuff. But also,

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 3>like I say, not doom scrolling too much, because there's

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot out there that as an investor as a person,

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 3>you just can't control, and so I think more trying

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 3>to put some of that aside, looking for where there

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 3>is actionable intelligence that you can actually base a bit

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 3>more of a decision off that you might be able

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 3>to do something with yourself. Having a bit of a

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 3>clear headed strategy, working the information and then making the decision.

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 3>That'll probably put you a lot better than sort of

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 3>just blind reacting to every sort of market movement, because

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 3>certainly the thing that I've experienced the last couple of months,

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 3>people are coming forward with a lot more questions about

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 3>that volatility. They're going, hey, this has moved massively. Should

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I be concerned? And normally the answer that question is

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 3>if you were concerned, you should have been concerned before

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 3>the big change came through. So if you've got a

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 3>good strategy, if you know where you're going, I think

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 3>that gives you a lot more confidence as an investor

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 3>as to what you're thinking about for the future.

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sometimes it pays to hold, doesn't it. But you

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>don't want to put your head in the sand at

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the same time.

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 3>That's the balance, right, You've got to have enough recent

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 3>information to be able to make good judgment calls, not

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 3>so much that you get bogged down put your head

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 3>in the sand. Not so much either that you jump

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 3>at every moving shadow. It's a very delicate balance.

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, Brad, we could talk forever as usual, but it's

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>time to go. Thanks so much for coming into the studio.

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having me. These are always great fun.

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And thanks to everyone for tuning in. You can watch

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>your lunch on YouTube tube or find us on your

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite podcast app. Leave us a rating and tell us

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>what you like to hear next. Matowa