WEBVTT - Janet Xuccoa: Trusts aren't just for the wealthy

0:00:05.721 --> 0:00:09.401
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Weekend Collective podcast from News Talks.

0:00:09.441 --> 0:00:09.681
<v Speaker 2>It be.

0:00:11.361 --> 0:00:15.161
<v Speaker 3>Find me to the moon, Let me play up there

0:00:15.321 --> 0:00:20.161
<v Speaker 3>with those stars, let me see what spring is like.

0:00:20.361 --> 0:00:22.601
<v Speaker 4>Ad you bitter and.

0:00:22.801 --> 0:00:28.081
<v Speaker 5>Mark in other words, hold my hand.

0:00:30.721 --> 0:00:39.281
<v Speaker 3>In other words, maybe kiss me, kill my heartless song

0:00:39.681 --> 0:00:45.681
<v Speaker 3>and let me sing forevermore. You are all out along

0:00:45.921 --> 0:00:52.321
<v Speaker 3>for all our worship and the doll another words, another words,

0:00:52.801 --> 0:00:59.841
<v Speaker 3>please be true? Any other words, I've been in love

0:00:59.961 --> 0:01:00.561
<v Speaker 3>with you.

0:01:04.281 --> 0:01:06.521
<v Speaker 5>Ah. I just had to wait for the band break there.

0:01:06.681 --> 0:01:08.761
<v Speaker 5>So there's a little bit of Frank Sinasha. I think

0:01:08.801 --> 0:01:10.761
<v Speaker 5>that's his Duets album. I know I have no idea

0:01:10.801 --> 0:01:14.201
<v Speaker 5>who he's singing with there, but great arrangements and everything. Anyway,

0:01:14.561 --> 0:01:16.201
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to the Shay. I'm Tim Beverage. This is

0:01:16.201 --> 0:01:18.921
<v Speaker 5>the Weekend Collective. If you missed the chat we have

0:01:18.961 --> 0:01:22.601
<v Speaker 5>with Alex flint Or from the Health Hub but also

0:01:22.761 --> 0:01:25.601
<v Speaker 5>Politics Central, where we discussed, among other things, the crackdown

0:01:25.601 --> 0:01:27.201
<v Speaker 5>on the boy of racist has been announced by Chris

0:01:27.241 --> 0:01:29.241
<v Speaker 5>Bishop and Mark Mitchell, then you can go and check

0:01:29.241 --> 0:01:31.521
<v Speaker 5>out our podcast. Just go to News Talk seed b

0:01:32.121 --> 0:01:34.881
<v Speaker 5>and look for the Weekend Collective and every hour, once

0:01:34.881 --> 0:01:36.881
<v Speaker 5>we've done it, we get it loaded online pretty quickly,

0:01:36.921 --> 0:01:39.561
<v Speaker 5>so you should be safe to search for that anytime.

0:01:39.961 --> 0:01:42.521
<v Speaker 5>But right now we're going this is smart money. We

0:01:42.561 --> 0:01:44.521
<v Speaker 5>are going to have a chat about trusts. In fact,

0:01:44.561 --> 0:01:46.481
<v Speaker 5>a couple of weeks over the last week or two,

0:01:46.481 --> 0:01:49.881
<v Speaker 5>we've had some people calling asking questions about trust and

0:01:49.881 --> 0:01:52.681
<v Speaker 5>we're you're a week too early or your two weeks

0:01:52.681 --> 0:01:56.761
<v Speaker 5>too early, because we have a trusts expert in the

0:01:56.841 --> 0:02:00.961
<v Speaker 5>studio and she is, well, she's why she'd let her

0:02:00.961 --> 0:02:03.401
<v Speaker 5>introduce herself. Actually she's been on the show before. But

0:02:03.481 --> 0:02:06.081
<v Speaker 5>we want your care before I introduce you, sir. We

0:02:06.081 --> 0:02:09.521
<v Speaker 5>want your calls if you've got any questions about trust

0:02:09.561 --> 0:02:12.241
<v Speaker 5>because a lot of people think that trusts are only

0:02:12.401 --> 0:02:16.241
<v Speaker 5>for the very wealthy. Of course, the expression that comes

0:02:16.281 --> 0:02:19.281
<v Speaker 5>to mind is a trust fund baby? Why does that

0:02:19.321 --> 0:02:21.081
<v Speaker 5>baby have a trust fund? But what was it set

0:02:21.161 --> 0:02:24.281
<v Speaker 5>up for? And the assumption is that it's useless for

0:02:24.361 --> 0:02:26.881
<v Speaker 5>the everyday person, And maybe it does seem that way

0:02:26.921 --> 0:02:29.601
<v Speaker 5>to you. But when might you want to trust, whether

0:02:29.641 --> 0:02:32.081
<v Speaker 5>you've been in a former relationship, do you need to

0:02:32.081 --> 0:02:34.401
<v Speaker 5>set up a trust for your kids? But there are

0:02:34.401 --> 0:02:36.481
<v Speaker 5>many reasons that people may want to start a trust,

0:02:37.121 --> 0:02:39.361
<v Speaker 5>which is why our guest is here to explain that

0:02:39.401 --> 0:02:41.641
<v Speaker 5>for us, and she's a trust expert. And as I said,

0:02:41.801 --> 0:02:45.081
<v Speaker 5>in her name is Janet Zukoa. Janet, how are you going.

0:02:45.401 --> 0:02:47.081
<v Speaker 6>I'm well, thank you, thank you for having me on

0:02:47.121 --> 0:02:47.401
<v Speaker 6>the show.

0:02:47.721 --> 0:02:52.041
<v Speaker 5>You're welcome, thanks for coming in. Now, actually tell us

0:02:52.081 --> 0:02:53.561
<v Speaker 5>a little bit about I mean, you've been on the

0:02:53.561 --> 0:02:56.721
<v Speaker 5>show just just once before. How did you get into

0:02:57.201 --> 0:03:00.681
<v Speaker 5>trusts and what's your background in terms of and you've

0:03:00.681 --> 0:03:02.481
<v Speaker 5>written a couple of books actually, which I've got a

0:03:02.481 --> 0:03:04.361
<v Speaker 5>copy of here. But anyway, how did you get into it?

0:03:04.521 --> 0:03:08.241
<v Speaker 6>Well, I've got a commerce degree majoring in accounting, and

0:03:08.281 --> 0:03:12.041
<v Speaker 6>I've got a law degree, and I have a very

0:03:12.641 --> 0:03:16.961
<v Speaker 6>high interest in tax and trusts and economics.

0:03:17.241 --> 0:03:19.081
<v Speaker 5>Yep. When did that develop? Was that something? You were

0:03:19.081 --> 0:03:22.321
<v Speaker 5>always interested in the financial side of things and legal

0:03:22.361 --> 0:03:24.001
<v Speaker 5>structures and accounting.

0:03:23.961 --> 0:03:28.601
<v Speaker 6>Early early I can remember raiding my father's factory of

0:03:28.521 --> 0:03:32.001
<v Speaker 6>a puzzle pieces that were rejected for an export order

0:03:32.201 --> 0:03:34.321
<v Speaker 6>and getting out there in the markets and standing on

0:03:34.721 --> 0:03:36.721
<v Speaker 6>literally an apple box and trying to sell them when

0:03:36.761 --> 0:03:38.721
<v Speaker 6>I was really little. So I was always interested in

0:03:39.761 --> 0:03:40.721
<v Speaker 6>always interested.

0:03:42.681 --> 0:03:45.121
<v Speaker 5>So when did and when did you get into the

0:03:45.161 --> 0:03:46.161
<v Speaker 5>trust side of things?

0:03:46.281 --> 0:03:49.641
<v Speaker 6>I think really My interest developed in trust when I

0:03:49.681 --> 0:03:54.801
<v Speaker 6>started to become keen on tax because in a tax

0:03:54.841 --> 0:03:57.081
<v Speaker 6>structure you will often find a trust or two.

0:03:57.561 --> 0:04:03.241
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I noticed your company is New Zealand Family Trust

0:04:03.281 --> 0:04:08.761
<v Speaker 5>Services Limited, So I guessing family trusts are You're guessing.

0:04:08.921 --> 0:04:12.041
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, So when New Zealand's trust are your choice because

0:04:12.161 --> 0:04:15.561
<v Speaker 6>that is all we do, is trusts, and as a

0:04:15.561 --> 0:04:19.041
<v Speaker 6>result of that, our fees are not outlandish, and our

0:04:19.081 --> 0:04:21.401
<v Speaker 6>processes are good, and we're available.

0:04:21.761 --> 0:04:23.881
<v Speaker 5>How easy is it to set up a trust? Because

0:04:25.081 --> 0:04:28.161
<v Speaker 5>obviously there's the simple sort of crew way. I mean,

0:04:28.281 --> 0:04:30.201
<v Speaker 5>there's always the DIY, but that would be fraught, I

0:04:30.201 --> 0:04:33.001
<v Speaker 5>would guess. But are there some basics to setting up

0:04:33.001 --> 0:04:36.321
<v Speaker 5>a trust that mean it shouldn't be as scary for

0:04:36.361 --> 0:04:38.641
<v Speaker 5>people as they might imagine, like, oh, that sounds like

0:04:38.681 --> 0:04:39.441
<v Speaker 5>a big deal.

0:04:39.961 --> 0:04:42.521
<v Speaker 6>It shouldn't be scary, but people should be aware of

0:04:42.561 --> 0:04:45.401
<v Speaker 6>what they're doing when they when they're setting up a trust,

0:04:45.521 --> 0:04:48.601
<v Speaker 6>entering into a trust relationship. So if you're settling a

0:04:48.641 --> 0:04:51.601
<v Speaker 6>trust and you're putting assets into it, you are divesting

0:04:51.681 --> 0:04:55.481
<v Speaker 6>yourself of those assets of direct control as an individual,

0:04:55.521 --> 0:04:59.321
<v Speaker 6>as an owner, and you're putting that control into the

0:04:59.361 --> 0:05:03.601
<v Speaker 6>trustees hands, who of course, should be acting for the

0:05:03.601 --> 0:05:05.921
<v Speaker 6>best benefit of the the beneficiaries.

0:05:06.761 --> 0:05:09.361
<v Speaker 5>What are the limits of when it comes to trusts,

0:05:09.401 --> 0:05:13.401
<v Speaker 5>Like somebody says, I've got that. I mean here, just

0:05:13.441 --> 0:05:16.281
<v Speaker 5>a very crude example would be someone who's got a

0:05:16.321 --> 0:05:19.521
<v Speaker 5>lot of money, they don't want any future relationships, sort

0:05:19.521 --> 0:05:21.081
<v Speaker 5>of get in their hands on it and they want

0:05:21.081 --> 0:05:22.441
<v Speaker 5>to set up a trust and they go, I've got

0:05:22.481 --> 0:05:25.721
<v Speaker 5>all my money and a trust. Well, it's technically not

0:05:25.801 --> 0:05:26.841
<v Speaker 5>your money any longer.

0:05:27.121 --> 0:05:29.681
<v Speaker 6>It's certainly not so. Once you set up the trust

0:05:29.721 --> 0:05:32.001
<v Speaker 6>and move the assets into the trust, then, as I said,

0:05:32.001 --> 0:05:34.521
<v Speaker 6>you divested your personal ownership and you put it in

0:05:34.561 --> 0:05:37.561
<v Speaker 6>the hands of the trustees. But that's not necessarily going

0:05:37.601 --> 0:05:41.721
<v Speaker 6>to be bulletproof against personal relationships. Yeah, And we did

0:05:41.801 --> 0:05:44.601
<v Speaker 6>have a question the last time I was here from

0:05:44.601 --> 0:05:47.841
<v Speaker 6>a gentleman who was thinking about setting up a trust

0:05:47.881 --> 0:05:50.361
<v Speaker 6>but was in a relationship. And I said at the

0:05:50.441 --> 0:05:54.521
<v Speaker 6>time you certainly needed to take legal advice and that

0:05:55.041 --> 0:05:58.761
<v Speaker 6>with regards to trust. If you're going to enter into

0:05:58.881 --> 0:06:01.641
<v Speaker 6>personal relationship and you want to keep your assets separate,

0:06:02.001 --> 0:06:04.401
<v Speaker 6>then it's important to come plain at the very beginning.

0:06:04.841 --> 0:06:07.081
<v Speaker 6>And yes, certainly have trust, but you also need a

0:06:07.081 --> 0:06:10.361
<v Speaker 6>property relationship agreement. Yeah, both of them. I like my

0:06:10.441 --> 0:06:13.121
<v Speaker 6>clients to have them in conjunction with each.

0:06:12.921 --> 0:06:16.281
<v Speaker 5>Other actually, because I mean, the best time to have

0:06:16.281 --> 0:06:18.521
<v Speaker 5>a trust is before you think you need it. And

0:06:18.561 --> 0:06:21.201
<v Speaker 5>that's the problem is that you don't think you need

0:06:21.201 --> 0:06:23.561
<v Speaker 5>it until you need it, and by then sometimes it's

0:06:23.601 --> 0:06:26.761
<v Speaker 5>too late. Is that that one of the sort of problems.

0:06:27.081 --> 0:06:30.041
<v Speaker 6>So the problem there was recently a case about that.

0:06:30.081 --> 0:06:34.041
<v Speaker 6>The problem is the proximity of establishing a trust and

0:06:34.121 --> 0:06:36.721
<v Speaker 6>moving assets into the trust and then entering into a

0:06:36.761 --> 0:06:40.681
<v Speaker 6>personal relationship. So the claim can always be that you're

0:06:40.721 --> 0:06:44.441
<v Speaker 6>trying to I supposed to get out of sharing with

0:06:44.481 --> 0:06:48.601
<v Speaker 6>your with your nearest and dearest or off have assets

0:06:48.641 --> 0:06:50.361
<v Speaker 6>off so you don't have to share them. Should the

0:06:50.441 --> 0:06:51.321
<v Speaker 6>unthinkable happen?

0:06:51.721 --> 0:06:55.961
<v Speaker 5>Because one of the for many people, one of the

0:06:56.001 --> 0:06:58.081
<v Speaker 5>concerns they would be if you've been in a relationship

0:06:58.161 --> 0:07:01.081
<v Speaker 5>and you've had kids and you want to protect your

0:07:01.481 --> 0:07:05.361
<v Speaker 5>income or your assets or your wealth for those chill children.

0:07:06.401 --> 0:07:09.281
<v Speaker 5>Is that quite a common scenario where people would go,

0:07:09.361 --> 0:07:12.681
<v Speaker 5>you know what, I've come through a divorce. I really

0:07:12.681 --> 0:07:14.441
<v Speaker 5>want to look after the kids, and I just don't

0:07:14.481 --> 0:07:17.641
<v Speaker 5>want to have the I don't want to threaten their

0:07:17.681 --> 0:07:20.481
<v Speaker 5>futures by you know, losing half of it in the

0:07:20.521 --> 0:07:22.161
<v Speaker 5>next relationship that falls apart.

0:07:22.201 --> 0:07:25.081
<v Speaker 6>The GST clients, So they lose fifty percent first round,

0:07:25.161 --> 0:07:27.281
<v Speaker 6>and then everyone's in title a couple of tryouts, aren't

0:07:27.321 --> 0:07:31.321
<v Speaker 6>they managed, so then they have then there lose another

0:07:31.361 --> 0:07:34.001
<v Speaker 6>half of the half that they've got and they kind

0:07:34.001 --> 0:07:36.441
<v Speaker 6>of end up with, you know, fifteen percent or less.

0:07:36.441 --> 0:07:39.761
<v Speaker 6>So the gstc lights we call them. So we do

0:07:39.921 --> 0:07:43.401
<v Speaker 6>find that individuals that are that are on their own

0:07:44.281 --> 0:07:46.961
<v Speaker 6>and thinking that they may enter into a second, third,

0:07:47.001 --> 0:07:50.561
<v Speaker 6>or fourth relationship do put their assets into trust to

0:07:50.641 --> 0:07:55.361
<v Speaker 6>try and protect their children's inheritances. But recently, last couple

0:07:55.401 --> 0:07:58.161
<v Speaker 6>of weeks, I've had a couple come in and they

0:07:58.201 --> 0:08:02.201
<v Speaker 6>are on their second relationship. Yeah, they've done their they've

0:08:02.201 --> 0:08:05.841
<v Speaker 6>done their financial settlements with their with their first spouses,

0:08:06.281 --> 0:08:09.441
<v Speaker 6>they both got children, and what they want to do

0:08:09.521 --> 0:08:12.161
<v Speaker 6>is they wanted to have a trust each which they did,

0:08:12.481 --> 0:08:16.201
<v Speaker 6>and each of their trusts had its own assets in

0:08:17.481 --> 0:08:21.601
<v Speaker 6>from the payout that they got from their first relationship basically,

0:08:22.201 --> 0:08:26.121
<v Speaker 6>and then each trust went and contracted to buy half

0:08:26.361 --> 0:08:29.361
<v Speaker 6>a house, a new house that that couple could live in.

0:08:29.841 --> 0:08:32.281
<v Speaker 5>So what that they each had a trust and they

0:08:32.321 --> 0:08:34.721
<v Speaker 5>want to buy a house, and so each trust buys

0:08:34.761 --> 0:08:36.121
<v Speaker 5>half the house half the house.

0:08:35.961 --> 0:08:38.601
<v Speaker 6>Right, And so what that's going to do is that's

0:08:38.641 --> 0:08:42.201
<v Speaker 6>going to if one of them died, that with along

0:08:42.241 --> 0:08:44.121
<v Speaker 6>with a property relationship agreement. I might add that they

0:08:44.241 --> 0:08:47.081
<v Speaker 6>entered into. What that's going to do is that if

0:08:47.121 --> 0:08:50.121
<v Speaker 6>one of them does die, the half of that house

0:08:50.201 --> 0:08:54.281
<v Speaker 6>under their estate planning documents will go to their children

0:08:54.681 --> 0:08:58.761
<v Speaker 6>and not the other partner's children. That's how they planned that.

0:08:59.241 --> 0:09:03.801
<v Speaker 5>So that doesn't that sounds inconvenient because you'd like to

0:09:03.841 --> 0:09:06.041
<v Speaker 5>think that if you have in to the relationship and

0:09:06.081 --> 0:09:09.881
<v Speaker 5>your loved one dies, that you can still live there until.

0:09:09.841 --> 0:09:13.721
<v Speaker 6>They can still do that. But that's that's all been

0:09:13.841 --> 0:09:16.801
<v Speaker 6>that's all been sorted out under a memoranimal wishes. But

0:09:17.201 --> 0:09:20.881
<v Speaker 6>what will happen is that that person's half is really

0:09:20.961 --> 0:09:24.721
<v Speaker 6>held for their children, not for the for the alive

0:09:25.001 --> 0:09:28.641
<v Speaker 6>spouse's children. That's what I'm saying, they're not natural born children.

0:09:28.881 --> 0:09:30.841
<v Speaker 5>What happens actually just in that, I mean, we could

0:09:30.841 --> 0:09:32.561
<v Speaker 5>get bogged down in the weeds on this one. But

0:09:32.601 --> 0:09:35.721
<v Speaker 5>if so, for instance, that does happen, somebody passes away,

0:09:36.121 --> 0:09:39.041
<v Speaker 5>but you want to move. Does that can you still

0:09:39.081 --> 0:09:43.001
<v Speaker 5>protect your ability to use the value of the house

0:09:43.081 --> 0:09:45.401
<v Speaker 5>to move somewhere else, but still protect the other half

0:09:45.441 --> 0:09:47.081
<v Speaker 5>for the.

0:09:46.361 --> 0:09:49.961
<v Speaker 6>Issue, if you've had a proper trust expert on this

0:09:50.121 --> 0:09:52.801
<v Speaker 6>case from the very beginning. And I say that because

0:09:52.801 --> 0:09:55.001
<v Speaker 6>there are a lot of people out there that set

0:09:55.041 --> 0:09:58.721
<v Speaker 6>up trusts and that they're really it's a it's another

0:09:58.801 --> 0:10:02.521
<v Speaker 6>service that they offer and they don't necessarily specialized in trusts.

0:10:02.681 --> 0:10:04.921
<v Speaker 6>But if you've had a trust expert on that job,

0:10:05.361 --> 0:10:07.721
<v Speaker 6>then they are likely to be working with lawyers and

0:10:07.761 --> 0:10:10.361
<v Speaker 6>accountants and all of that is sorted out at the

0:10:10.481 --> 0:10:15.201
<v Speaker 6>very beginning. So you need to plan for those eventualities

0:10:15.241 --> 0:10:17.161
<v Speaker 6>at the beginning of setting up the trust.

0:10:17.561 --> 0:10:19.881
<v Speaker 5>What's your response when people think that trusts are just

0:10:19.921 --> 0:10:20.801
<v Speaker 5>for wealthy people?

0:10:21.481 --> 0:10:25.001
<v Speaker 6>So, well, no longer. Not in New Zealand. I mean

0:10:25.041 --> 0:10:28.361
<v Speaker 6>New Zealand is a land of entrepreneurship. I don't know

0:10:28.361 --> 0:10:30.081
<v Speaker 6>how many trusts we have because we don't have a

0:10:30.121 --> 0:10:32.241
<v Speaker 6>register like we have a register of companies. We don't

0:10:32.241 --> 0:10:35.121
<v Speaker 6>actually have a register of trust. But there's been estimated

0:10:35.161 --> 0:10:38.441
<v Speaker 6>somewhere between four and six hundred thousand trusts in New Zealand.

0:10:38.481 --> 0:10:40.801
<v Speaker 6>So that's a lot of trust per capita what we

0:10:40.881 --> 0:10:41.281
<v Speaker 6>got here.

0:10:41.441 --> 0:10:43.521
<v Speaker 5>I thought it might actually behind that funnily enough, but yeah,

0:10:43.561 --> 0:10:44.121
<v Speaker 5>that's still.

0:10:44.001 --> 0:10:47.561
<v Speaker 6>Well, well that's what they're saying, and people think that

0:10:47.881 --> 0:10:50.601
<v Speaker 6>they are for the uber wealth wealthy, and they also

0:10:50.641 --> 0:10:53.001
<v Speaker 6>think that there might be something shunky about them, But

0:10:53.681 --> 0:10:57.441
<v Speaker 6>that's very far from the truth. In New Zealand. Genuine

0:10:57.441 --> 0:11:01.481
<v Speaker 6>New Zealanders who are seeking asset protection from creditors and

0:11:01.521 --> 0:11:07.001
<v Speaker 6>their businesses from new relationship partners. People that want to

0:11:07.041 --> 0:11:11.841
<v Speaker 6>set up trust for estate planning purposes or for inheritence purposes.

0:11:12.041 --> 0:11:14.001
<v Speaker 6>Those are the people that are setting up the keys

0:11:14.001 --> 0:11:15.481
<v Speaker 6>that are setting up trusts in New Zealand.

0:11:16.121 --> 0:11:19.801
<v Speaker 5>So before we came on, you were talking about there

0:11:19.801 --> 0:11:22.401
<v Speaker 5>were just recently you've had people three different people have

0:11:22.401 --> 0:11:25.001
<v Speaker 5>set up trust for as an example, because this will

0:11:25.001 --> 0:11:27.041
<v Speaker 5>also be food for thought for people who are listening,

0:11:27.361 --> 0:11:30.281
<v Speaker 5>what are some of the examples of maybe those three

0:11:30.761 --> 0:11:32.041
<v Speaker 5>motivations for a trust.

0:11:33.001 --> 0:11:36.441
<v Speaker 6>So I would have to used different names here, of course.

0:11:40.281 --> 0:11:43.081
<v Speaker 5>Yes, let's just go cut person A, B and C.

0:11:44.081 --> 0:11:49.041
<v Speaker 6>So mister and missus A have just decided that they're

0:11:49.081 --> 0:11:53.561
<v Speaker 6>going to start a furniture production company, and so they've

0:11:53.601 --> 0:11:55.481
<v Speaker 6>come to me and they've got a home and they've

0:11:55.481 --> 0:11:57.761
<v Speaker 6>got a little bit of money, and they want their

0:11:57.881 --> 0:12:00.121
<v Speaker 6>house to be owned and the money to be owned

0:12:00.121 --> 0:12:02.641
<v Speaker 6>by a trust so that it hives that off and

0:12:02.641 --> 0:12:04.441
<v Speaker 6>protects that from company creditors.

0:12:04.521 --> 0:12:07.321
<v Speaker 5>So they're going into business and if the business goes

0:12:08.041 --> 0:12:10.641
<v Speaker 5>then they don't want to see everything gone because of that.

0:12:10.841 --> 0:12:12.961
<v Speaker 6>Correct, And nobody goes into business.

0:12:12.681 --> 0:12:15.201
<v Speaker 5>To foil No, but planning.

0:12:15.321 --> 0:12:18.401
<v Speaker 6>Planning, that's sensible, that's sensible for our well. So that

0:12:18.481 --> 0:12:21.761
<v Speaker 6>was that was one example. The second example that I

0:12:21.801 --> 0:12:24.161
<v Speaker 6>had was what I've just told you. A couple had

0:12:24.161 --> 0:12:28.121
<v Speaker 6>come in and wanted to ensure that if anything happened

0:12:28.121 --> 0:12:30.201
<v Speaker 6>to them, if they if one of them died, the

0:12:31.361 --> 0:12:35.521
<v Speaker 6>estate would be in trust for their for their children,

0:12:35.561 --> 0:12:39.001
<v Speaker 6>their maternal born children, not the other partner's children. And

0:12:39.041 --> 0:12:42.401
<v Speaker 6>the third I thought was quite admirable. There was there

0:12:42.481 --> 0:12:47.041
<v Speaker 6>was a mother that came in and she she wanted

0:12:47.201 --> 0:12:51.761
<v Speaker 6>to set up a trust for her child, a child's

0:12:51.761 --> 0:12:54.721
<v Speaker 6>a young child, and she'd got some money from her

0:12:54.761 --> 0:12:57.521
<v Speaker 6>parents and wanted to make sure that that was almost safe.

0:12:57.601 --> 0:12:59.081
<v Speaker 6>And I think that's very sensible.

0:12:59.761 --> 0:13:05.001
<v Speaker 5>So how often in the my crude memory of equal

0:13:05.241 --> 0:13:09.081
<v Speaker 5>and trusts is that the law has evolved to the

0:13:09.161 --> 0:13:12.881
<v Speaker 5>extent that trusts are not as rock solid as they

0:13:13.001 --> 0:13:14.601
<v Speaker 5>used to be used to. I think under the old

0:13:14.601 --> 0:13:16.601
<v Speaker 5>English common law, you set up a trust and goodbye,

0:13:16.681 --> 0:13:19.921
<v Speaker 5>that money's gone, Whereas now the courts will look through

0:13:20.041 --> 0:13:23.201
<v Speaker 5>transactions and go, well, okay, we understand you better trust

0:13:23.281 --> 0:13:25.201
<v Speaker 5>set up, but it was set up with this motivation

0:13:25.321 --> 0:13:28.681
<v Speaker 5>in hand, and we're not buying it. Basically, Well, they

0:13:28.761 --> 0:13:33.521
<v Speaker 5>look through it because it might be to defeat some another.

0:13:33.281 --> 0:13:35.321
<v Speaker 6>Way to defeat a creditors, right, oh yes.

0:13:35.361 --> 0:13:37.681
<v Speaker 5>In other words, well, the example would be that furniture

0:13:37.681 --> 0:13:41.681
<v Speaker 5>production company. If they have set that up and six

0:13:41.721 --> 0:13:44.761
<v Speaker 5>months later they go bun, how solid is the trust

0:13:44.801 --> 0:13:47.441
<v Speaker 5>they set up to protect their family home? Because the

0:13:47.441 --> 0:13:49.561
<v Speaker 5>courts might go, well, hang on a minute, this is

0:13:49.681 --> 0:13:53.041
<v Speaker 5>simply set up to defeat a response. It's something you

0:13:53.081 --> 0:13:56.561
<v Speaker 5>should have provided for for your creditors. Where does that

0:13:56.601 --> 0:13:57.881
<v Speaker 5>get murky?

0:13:57.681 --> 0:14:00.681
<v Speaker 6>So there's got to be the right intention of setting

0:14:00.761 --> 0:14:03.481
<v Speaker 6>up a trust, and assets can be clawed back out

0:14:03.481 --> 0:14:06.641
<v Speaker 6>of a trust if the intention has been proven that

0:14:06.841 --> 0:14:09.721
<v Speaker 6>they've been trying to defeat the purposes of creditors or

0:14:09.881 --> 0:14:10.921
<v Speaker 6>relationship partners.

0:14:11.041 --> 0:14:13.321
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, does that mean that when you're sending out of trust,

0:14:13.361 --> 0:14:15.321
<v Speaker 5>you record the intention or you put.

0:14:15.201 --> 0:14:17.921
<v Speaker 6>Something I do with my clients, I do I'm very

0:14:17.921 --> 0:14:20.521
<v Speaker 6>clear or not. I take copious amounts of notes of

0:14:20.561 --> 0:14:24.481
<v Speaker 6>why we're doing things and what the what the reasoning is.

0:14:24.521 --> 0:14:27.121
<v Speaker 5>Oh so you do that as a record of the

0:14:27.281 --> 0:14:30.361
<v Speaker 5>basis for the transaction, in addition to saying in the

0:14:30.401 --> 0:14:33.721
<v Speaker 5>trust deed like a preamble whereas the party wants to

0:14:33.761 --> 0:14:36.721
<v Speaker 5>do X, onye and z for this reason, which anyone

0:14:36.721 --> 0:14:38.841
<v Speaker 5>can make up an excuse. But you use your notes

0:14:38.881 --> 0:14:40.401
<v Speaker 5>as well as a backup.

0:14:41.001 --> 0:14:43.481
<v Speaker 6>And that's the beauty of New Zealand Family Trust Services.

0:14:43.521 --> 0:14:46.321
<v Speaker 6>That is all we do, is I've said, just trust work.

0:14:46.441 --> 0:14:49.241
<v Speaker 6>So right from the very beginning, when we have a

0:14:49.281 --> 0:14:53.801
<v Speaker 6>meeting with a client, we take down detailed notes as

0:14:53.881 --> 0:14:56.121
<v Speaker 6>to what we're doing and why we're doing it. We

0:14:56.241 --> 0:14:58.721
<v Speaker 6>make sure that the trust deeders fit for purpose for

0:14:58.801 --> 0:15:02.681
<v Speaker 6>the circumstances that we're addressing. It's not a quokie cutter

0:15:02.801 --> 0:15:04.961
<v Speaker 6>exercise where you just bash everything out and it's like

0:15:05.361 --> 0:15:06.721
<v Speaker 6>you can have one and you can have one and

0:15:06.801 --> 0:15:09.881
<v Speaker 6>put another one over here. So and we make sure

0:15:09.921 --> 0:15:12.241
<v Speaker 6>that the lawyers and the accountants of the client are

0:15:12.241 --> 0:15:15.161
<v Speaker 6>well and truly involved so that we're doing the right thing.

0:15:15.241 --> 0:15:18.041
<v Speaker 6>That's a fact finding exercise. We want to know what

0:15:18.161 --> 0:15:20.961
<v Speaker 6>else is going on in their lives, and that's important

0:15:21.001 --> 0:15:23.201
<v Speaker 6>if we're going to be an independent trustee. A lot

0:15:23.521 --> 0:15:27.361
<v Speaker 6>of people that were independent trustees, such as accountants and

0:15:27.441 --> 0:15:30.721
<v Speaker 6>lawyers have now hang up there hanging up the hat

0:15:30.761 --> 0:15:33.401
<v Speaker 6>and that reguard because it is high risk. And since

0:15:33.481 --> 0:15:36.521
<v Speaker 6>the Trust Act twenty nineteen have come in, I think

0:15:36.641 --> 0:15:39.881
<v Speaker 6>a lot of professionals have decided that they will stick

0:15:39.921 --> 0:15:42.681
<v Speaker 6>to their netting rather than just adding another service, and

0:15:42.761 --> 0:15:45.401
<v Speaker 6>that they're not really onto all the time.

0:15:45.601 --> 0:15:48.001
<v Speaker 5>So being an independent trustee is is it a bit

0:15:48.041 --> 0:15:51.241
<v Speaker 5>like the the evolution of that role? Is it a

0:15:51.321 --> 0:15:56.201
<v Speaker 5>little bit like say, company directors are now having to

0:15:56.241 --> 0:16:01.681
<v Speaker 5>be very vigilant. Vigilant that's the word, and well trained

0:16:01.681 --> 0:16:03.921
<v Speaker 5>and versed in what's going on with the law and

0:16:04.001 --> 0:16:08.681
<v Speaker 5>companies because increasingly they're finding themselves in the firing line,

0:16:08.681 --> 0:16:11.921
<v Speaker 5>whereas maybe fifty years ago you just took the honorarium

0:16:11.921 --> 0:16:12.401
<v Speaker 5>and moved on.

0:16:13.881 --> 0:16:16.841
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so it used to be before the trust At

0:16:16.881 --> 0:16:19.401
<v Speaker 6>twenty nineteen came in, we always had the common law

0:16:19.441 --> 0:16:23.161
<v Speaker 6>and you always had to hit certain milestones. And in fact,

0:16:23.681 --> 0:16:25.641
<v Speaker 6>I would go as far as to say that the

0:16:25.721 --> 0:16:28.201
<v Speaker 6>trust at twenty nineteen has wound a lot of our

0:16:28.241 --> 0:16:32.121
<v Speaker 6>common law into into piece of legislation now. But prior

0:16:32.161 --> 0:16:36.041
<v Speaker 6>to that, lots lots of accountants and lawyers and friends

0:16:36.441 --> 0:16:38.801
<v Speaker 6>would step forward and they would say, we'll be the

0:16:38.841 --> 0:16:41.561
<v Speaker 6>independent trustee. And what that meant is that they weren't

0:16:41.561 --> 0:16:44.321
<v Speaker 6>going to be a beneficiary of the trust. And that

0:16:44.481 --> 0:16:47.201
<v Speaker 6>was as far as it went. They didn't actually do anything.

0:16:47.361 --> 0:16:50.241
<v Speaker 6>They just said that they would be the independent trustee,

0:16:50.281 --> 0:16:51.601
<v Speaker 6>the third trustee.

0:16:51.161 --> 0:16:54.161
<v Speaker 5>All care but not realizing the responsibility possibly.

0:16:54.601 --> 0:16:58.161
<v Speaker 6>And so as a result of the legislation coming through,

0:16:58.241 --> 0:17:01.721
<v Speaker 6>which really does tighten things up, it enshrines the duties

0:17:01.761 --> 0:17:06.761
<v Speaker 6>of trustees, it gives beneficiaries rights for clear rights. And

0:17:06.841 --> 0:17:09.681
<v Speaker 6>as a consequence of that, a lot of advisors have

0:17:09.721 --> 0:17:11.721
<v Speaker 6>got out of the business of being trustees because trust

0:17:11.841 --> 0:17:15.441
<v Speaker 6>is a person liable. And then the other question that

0:17:15.481 --> 0:17:17.561
<v Speaker 6>I was posed recently was, oh, well, you could just

0:17:17.601 --> 0:17:20.161
<v Speaker 6>be a trustee in a company and therefore you limit

0:17:20.201 --> 0:17:23.721
<v Speaker 6>your liability just like an ordinary director or shareholder and

0:17:23.761 --> 0:17:25.921
<v Speaker 6>a company would. But that's not true if you're a

0:17:25.921 --> 0:17:29.441
<v Speaker 6>trustee as a company like New Zealand Family Trust Service

0:17:29.521 --> 0:17:33.961
<v Speaker 6>is limited. As a trustee, I now have to where

0:17:34.001 --> 0:17:36.921
<v Speaker 6>the responsibilities of not only being a trustee but also

0:17:37.001 --> 0:17:39.681
<v Speaker 6>being a director. So it's a double whammy. You've got

0:17:39.721 --> 0:17:40.281
<v Speaker 6>to get it right.

0:17:40.641 --> 0:17:43.361
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, actually, for the look, tell you what we will

0:17:43.361 --> 0:17:45.361
<v Speaker 5>take quick break now if you've got any questions for

0:17:45.441 --> 0:17:49.041
<v Speaker 5>Janet Janetzcoa. She is managing director of New Zealand Family

0:17:49.041 --> 0:17:52.561
<v Speaker 5>Trust Services. If you think do I need a trust?

0:17:53.201 --> 0:17:54.961
<v Speaker 5>You might even think it's a dumb question. And I

0:17:55.001 --> 0:17:58.121
<v Speaker 5>think that when we're dealing with sort of specialized topics

0:17:58.161 --> 0:18:00.961
<v Speaker 5>like this, there is no such thing as a dumb question,

0:18:01.601 --> 0:18:03.481
<v Speaker 5>because a lot of the time people think, oh gosh,

0:18:03.481 --> 0:18:06.001
<v Speaker 5>if only i'd ask that question and taken a simple step,

0:18:06.001 --> 0:18:08.161
<v Speaker 5>maybe I wouldn't have had the misery a few years

0:18:08.161 --> 0:18:10.081
<v Speaker 5>on of not having made the move on a trust.

0:18:10.601 --> 0:18:15.441
<v Speaker 5>Oh sorry, I've just seen a text. Somebody's just us,

0:18:15.441 --> 0:18:19.121
<v Speaker 5>should Prince Harry get a trust? I don't even know

0:18:19.161 --> 0:18:21.001
<v Speaker 5>what that is, but for some reason it's funny.

0:18:21.721 --> 0:18:24.881
<v Speaker 6>Look what a connosation behind us?

0:18:26.041 --> 0:18:29.041
<v Speaker 5>Anyway, Look, hey, look, we love your cause. Eight hundred

0:18:29.041 --> 0:18:31.201
<v Speaker 5>and eighty ten eighty We are getting a few texts

0:18:31.241 --> 0:18:32.801
<v Speaker 5>or so. I know some people like to keep things

0:18:32.841 --> 0:18:34.601
<v Speaker 5>private on this sort of thing, but you can give

0:18:34.641 --> 0:18:36.961
<v Speaker 5>us a call and jump the queue. Janet Zuccoa here,

0:18:37.041 --> 0:18:38.721
<v Speaker 5>she's ready to take your cause. If you've got any

0:18:38.801 --> 0:18:40.881
<v Speaker 5>questions around trust. We'll be back in just a moment.

0:18:40.881 --> 0:18:43.001
<v Speaker 5>It's come out to twenty five past five. News Talk

0:18:43.041 --> 0:18:45.601
<v Speaker 5>said B. News Talk said B. Yes, my expert is

0:18:45.961 --> 0:18:49.041
<v Speaker 5>Janet Zucca. She's a trust expert. She's the managing director

0:18:49.081 --> 0:18:52.521
<v Speaker 5>of New Zealand Family Trust Services Limited, and we're taking

0:18:52.561 --> 0:18:55.801
<v Speaker 5>your cause any questions you've got. No question is to

0:18:57.481 --> 0:18:59.681
<v Speaker 5>is to be feared, because I think that's a very

0:18:59.681 --> 0:19:03.881
<v Speaker 5>complex subject sometimes, so just ask away. Phil good A,

0:19:04.081 --> 0:19:05.401
<v Speaker 5>Oh sorry, Sandy good Day.

0:19:07.041 --> 0:19:07.201
<v Speaker 1>Hi.

0:19:08.281 --> 0:19:11.561
<v Speaker 2>So I'm keen to set up a trust, but I

0:19:11.601 --> 0:19:13.681
<v Speaker 2>haven't because I kind of keep thinking, you know, like

0:19:14.241 --> 0:19:17.001
<v Speaker 2>that they are a bit more see through these days

0:19:17.161 --> 0:19:20.041
<v Speaker 2>and all around the intentions and things. So what I

0:19:20.041 --> 0:19:22.721
<v Speaker 2>don't understand is, as you said in the furniture example,

0:19:22.801 --> 0:19:24.801
<v Speaker 2>they've gone to set up a furniture business, so they

0:19:24.841 --> 0:19:27.601
<v Speaker 2>want to put their house in the trust. Clearly their

0:19:27.601 --> 0:19:32.121
<v Speaker 2>intention is to protect their house. That's what I don't get, Like,

0:19:32.161 --> 0:19:34.561
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what am I meant to tell the lawyer

0:19:34.561 --> 0:19:36.681
<v Speaker 2>when they're setting up the trust, like that is totally

0:19:36.681 --> 0:19:41.001
<v Speaker 2>my intention is to protect my house. And so therefore

0:19:41.001 --> 0:19:43.281
<v Speaker 2>you're saying that you're writing down the intentions and all

0:19:43.281 --> 0:19:45.921
<v Speaker 2>that sort of stuff. But like so then if anything

0:19:46.161 --> 0:19:48.161
<v Speaker 2>was to happen and you go back and you look

0:19:48.201 --> 0:19:50.961
<v Speaker 2>at the intention, I'm like, well that was the intention?

0:19:51.801 --> 0:19:55.001
<v Speaker 2>Oh a little bit of a time in the market.

0:19:55.321 --> 0:19:57.601
<v Speaker 5>Or so are you asking in a way that do

0:19:57.641 --> 0:19:59.521
<v Speaker 5>you have to be guarded with the instructions you give

0:19:59.561 --> 0:20:01.641
<v Speaker 5>to your trustee because of that might form part of

0:20:01.681 --> 0:20:04.881
<v Speaker 5>the record. Janet, what's your response to standing, well.

0:20:05.081 --> 0:20:07.681
<v Speaker 2>Are legitimate saying turn it up your trust to particut

0:20:07.721 --> 0:20:08.121
<v Speaker 2>your house?

0:20:09.161 --> 0:20:11.241
<v Speaker 7>I'm confused, now, good questions.

0:20:12.121 --> 0:20:14.601
<v Speaker 6>It is indeed legitimate. What we do is we take

0:20:14.681 --> 0:20:17.401
<v Speaker 6>lots of notes around what clients tell us, so that

0:20:17.481 --> 0:20:20.441
<v Speaker 6>if we ever end up in a situation where the

0:20:20.441 --> 0:20:24.241
<v Speaker 6>trust is being challenged, we can point to our meetings

0:20:24.241 --> 0:20:26.041
<v Speaker 6>with our clients and what they've actually said.

0:20:27.401 --> 0:20:30.841
<v Speaker 5>Does it mean? But what if the person's coming and said, look,

0:20:30.841 --> 0:20:33.281
<v Speaker 5>you know, I've got I've got a business I'm starting up.

0:20:35.281 --> 0:20:37.801
<v Speaker 5>Might not fly. I don't want the credit as getting

0:20:37.801 --> 0:20:39.641
<v Speaker 5>a whole if you know, I've got some money to

0:20:39.921 --> 0:20:41.561
<v Speaker 5>seed money to get the business going, but if it

0:20:41.601 --> 0:20:43.881
<v Speaker 5>all goes belly up, I don't want my house to

0:20:43.921 --> 0:20:47.161
<v Speaker 5>form part of it. That does sound problematic, isn't it.

0:20:47.761 --> 0:20:49.961
<v Speaker 6>I probably wouldn't be writing all that down, But I

0:20:49.961 --> 0:20:52.201
<v Speaker 6>don't think anybody would tell me that. I think they

0:20:52.241 --> 0:20:55.521
<v Speaker 6>would say that they're setting up a business with great

0:20:55.561 --> 0:20:58.681
<v Speaker 6>intentions of it being very successful. Nobody goes into business

0:20:58.681 --> 0:21:02.641
<v Speaker 6>with it being unsuccessful. What you do find occasionally, as

0:21:02.681 --> 0:21:06.041
<v Speaker 6>you find overseas, people coming down and they want to

0:21:06.121 --> 0:21:09.881
<v Speaker 6>use trusts here for purposes which might not be legitimate.

0:21:09.961 --> 0:21:12.161
<v Speaker 6>And as a trust advisor, you've definitely got to have

0:21:12.641 --> 0:21:14.201
<v Speaker 6>your eyes and ears open to that.

0:21:14.321 --> 0:21:16.401
<v Speaker 5>What are your obligations on that? If you if somebody

0:21:16.441 --> 0:21:17.961
<v Speaker 5>is coming down and they are doing something which you

0:21:18.001 --> 0:21:21.201
<v Speaker 5>think this is for purposes which are not are not legitimate,

0:21:21.241 --> 0:21:23.161
<v Speaker 5>where how does that go with the ethics of the

0:21:23.161 --> 0:21:25.641
<v Speaker 5>whole being a trust an independent trustee.

0:21:25.841 --> 0:21:29.081
<v Speaker 6>I simply close the meeting. I just say I'm not

0:21:29.161 --> 0:21:31.161
<v Speaker 6>your not your girl. I don't think that you're in

0:21:31.161 --> 0:21:33.561
<v Speaker 6>the right place, and we couldn't take that business.

0:21:33.881 --> 0:21:35.281
<v Speaker 5>Are you thinking of sending up a trust?

0:21:35.281 --> 0:21:38.881
<v Speaker 2>Sandy, Yes, yeah, I know, I'd love to, but I

0:21:38.881 --> 0:21:42.121
<v Speaker 2>guess I always keep thinking about, well, you know, I

0:21:42.161 --> 0:21:44.521
<v Speaker 2>feel like they've become weaker and therefore that they wouldn't

0:21:44.521 --> 0:21:47.401
<v Speaker 2>actually give me the protection that I'm looking for. But

0:21:47.521 --> 0:21:48.881
<v Speaker 2>maybe it is just an extra.

0:21:48.761 --> 0:21:51.761
<v Speaker 8>Layer of you know, like I don't know, but.

0:21:51.921 --> 0:21:55.041
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to. But I get confused around that exact point.

0:21:55.161 --> 0:21:56.881
<v Speaker 2>You know, am I meant to say, yes, it is

0:21:56.961 --> 0:22:00.241
<v Speaker 2>to put my house, you know, to protect my house,

0:22:00.321 --> 0:22:02.001
<v Speaker 2>or am I not meant to I get confused.

0:22:02.641 --> 0:22:06.081
<v Speaker 5>I guess Sandy's worried about how how quick, how readily

0:22:06.321 --> 0:22:08.761
<v Speaker 5>trusts get looked through by the courts if there's a dispute.

0:22:09.201 --> 0:22:12.681
<v Speaker 6>So trust to trust can get looked through via the courts,

0:22:12.721 --> 0:22:15.561
<v Speaker 6>and they certainly can if they've got a family home

0:22:15.641 --> 0:22:17.881
<v Speaker 6>and you've moved into that with your nearest and dearest.

0:22:17.921 --> 0:22:22.001
<v Speaker 6>The family home takes a very precious position in regards

0:22:22.041 --> 0:22:26.121
<v Speaker 6>to the regards to law and family. Courts can look

0:22:26.161 --> 0:22:29.161
<v Speaker 6>through trust. So it's important to ensure that not only

0:22:29.281 --> 0:22:33.201
<v Speaker 6>is they trusted up correctly, but it's administered appropriately as well.

0:22:33.801 --> 0:22:35.481
<v Speaker 5>Right. Hey, thanks for you, Corl, thanks for being the

0:22:35.481 --> 0:22:37.881
<v Speaker 5>ball roll in their Sandy, Phil, Hello, how on a second.

0:22:38.601 --> 0:22:39.561
<v Speaker 5>There we go. Hi.

0:22:40.641 --> 0:22:43.201
<v Speaker 7>Hi, My question is, well, i'd need to believe that

0:22:43.441 --> 0:22:46.801
<v Speaker 7>you could only gift so much of the family home

0:22:48.761 --> 0:22:50.601
<v Speaker 7>perannum or is that not right?

0:22:51.401 --> 0:22:54.001
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so I think I think you're going back to

0:22:54.041 --> 0:22:56.081
<v Speaker 6>the old gifting regime. So it used to be that

0:22:56.201 --> 0:22:59.241
<v Speaker 6>we would move a house, for example, and too a

0:22:59.281 --> 0:23:00.361
<v Speaker 6>trust and we would.

0:23:00.161 --> 0:23:02.961
<v Speaker 5>Get twenty seven thousand a year or something given.

0:23:02.721 --> 0:23:04.801
<v Speaker 6>I owe you off the trustees because they've bought the

0:23:04.841 --> 0:23:07.321
<v Speaker 6>house off of us in the form of an acknowledgment

0:23:07.321 --> 0:23:10.681
<v Speaker 6>of debt, and then we would forgive twenty seven thousand

0:23:10.761 --> 0:23:13.681
<v Speaker 6>dollars of that per year. We could actually forgive all

0:23:13.681 --> 0:23:15.921
<v Speaker 6>of it all in one go, but anything over twenty

0:23:15.921 --> 0:23:18.721
<v Speaker 6>seven thousand one cent over it and you pay duty.

0:23:19.081 --> 0:23:21.561
<v Speaker 6>And that's been abolished for many years now, so you

0:23:21.641 --> 0:23:25.041
<v Speaker 6>can forgive the debt immediately, and in fact so lots

0:23:25.081 --> 0:23:27.201
<v Speaker 6>and lots of people do. And the reason why they

0:23:27.241 --> 0:23:31.201
<v Speaker 6>do that is because under the Minister of Social Welfare rules,

0:23:31.241 --> 0:23:36.921
<v Speaker 6>which I might say can be incredibly complex. Under those rules,

0:23:38.001 --> 0:23:41.761
<v Speaker 6>if you gift more than a certain amount within a

0:23:41.761 --> 0:23:46.041
<v Speaker 6>certain period, that gift can be disregarded and then you

0:23:46.081 --> 0:23:49.081
<v Speaker 6>can end out notionally with too much wealth and therefore

0:23:49.121 --> 0:23:51.961
<v Speaker 6>not get a rest home subsidy. And some people are

0:23:52.121 --> 0:23:54.481
<v Speaker 6>never going to get a rest home subsidy and they're

0:23:54.561 --> 0:23:57.961
<v Speaker 6>never going to go through get through a gifting program.

0:23:58.201 --> 0:24:00.961
<v Speaker 5>Oh, actually the whole rest home subsidy, because that's been

0:24:00.961 --> 0:24:04.921
<v Speaker 5>an issue in our family. It's funny that the user pays.

0:24:05.121 --> 0:24:06.361
<v Speaker 5>But I'll tell you what, if you've got one. A

0:24:06.441 --> 0:24:08.601
<v Speaker 5>quick way to whittle down your assets is if one

0:24:08.601 --> 0:24:10.841
<v Speaker 5>of you has to go into care and you haven't

0:24:10.881 --> 0:24:12.841
<v Speaker 5>set that, you even got a trust set up years

0:24:12.841 --> 0:24:15.841
<v Speaker 5>and years ago, it's a great way to whittle down wealth.

0:24:15.841 --> 0:24:17.561
<v Speaker 5>At the rate of about two or three thousand bucks

0:24:17.601 --> 0:24:17.921
<v Speaker 5>a week.

0:24:18.641 --> 0:24:22.601
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that was my question that I was wondered. I

0:24:22.641 --> 0:24:25.801
<v Speaker 7>wondered if I'm in my early sixties and if I

0:24:25.841 --> 0:24:29.681
<v Speaker 7>seen it up now, that would stop the home eating.

0:24:30.441 --> 0:24:31.521
<v Speaker 6>That does it?

0:24:31.841 --> 0:24:32.041
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:24:32.081 --> 0:24:35.681
<v Speaker 6>Not necessarily what you would want to do with an

0:24:35.681 --> 0:24:39.761
<v Speaker 6>advisor to sit down and really do some predictions around

0:24:39.761 --> 0:24:44.001
<v Speaker 6>some numbers, what your wealth is now, what it would be,

0:24:44.161 --> 0:24:46.881
<v Speaker 6>for example, at the age of seventy five or eighty,

0:24:47.841 --> 0:24:52.441
<v Speaker 6>take a notional age and how much gifting you could

0:24:52.481 --> 0:24:55.441
<v Speaker 6>get through, and then on today's rules, whether you would

0:24:55.481 --> 0:24:57.841
<v Speaker 6>get arrested themselves stiff. You've got all of that gifting

0:24:57.961 --> 0:25:00.921
<v Speaker 6>and followed all of those rules. Remember we are talking

0:25:01.321 --> 0:25:05.281
<v Speaker 6>years in advance. I'm sure you won't be going into well,

0:25:05.321 --> 0:25:06.921
<v Speaker 6>that's if you go into a rest time, not all

0:25:06.961 --> 0:25:08.561
<v Speaker 6>New Zealand just going to a rest time and your

0:25:08.561 --> 0:25:11.921
<v Speaker 6>small potent. But if they went into a rest time,

0:25:12.801 --> 0:25:14.881
<v Speaker 6>that could be years and years away and those rules

0:25:14.881 --> 0:25:15.921
<v Speaker 6>could all change again.

0:25:17.081 --> 0:25:19.361
<v Speaker 7>Here's a simple question. If you put your one of

0:25:19.401 --> 0:25:23.521
<v Speaker 7>your ass It's like I've some flats. Do you put

0:25:23.521 --> 0:25:28.081
<v Speaker 7>them under the trust? Do I retain the return off them?

0:25:28.361 --> 0:25:31.121
<v Speaker 4>Or well any makes the money out of it.

0:25:31.281 --> 0:25:36.201
<v Speaker 6>Any assets that are held in trust that produce income

0:25:36.761 --> 0:25:40.481
<v Speaker 6>will be will be the property of the trustees. Then

0:25:40.521 --> 0:25:45.761
<v Speaker 6>be up to the trustees to exercise their discretion and

0:25:45.801 --> 0:25:48.441
<v Speaker 6>make a distribution to you, possibly alone to you.

0:25:50.161 --> 0:25:53.681
<v Speaker 7>Right, Here's another question, as you being the lawyer for

0:25:53.761 --> 0:25:58.401
<v Speaker 7>the trust, do I pay trust yearly? Do I pay

0:25:58.441 --> 0:26:01.721
<v Speaker 7>the lawyer annually or the trust pays the.

0:26:03.881 --> 0:26:05.041
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that was going to be one of my quick

0:26:05.281 --> 0:26:07.521
<v Speaker 5>Whether the Trustee Actors made it more expensive to have

0:26:07.561 --> 0:26:08.841
<v Speaker 5>independent trustees and all.

0:26:08.681 --> 0:26:13.961
<v Speaker 6>That, so, I think probably the Trustee Act has set

0:26:14.121 --> 0:26:17.721
<v Speaker 6>the bar as to what is expected of trustees. And

0:26:17.961 --> 0:26:21.121
<v Speaker 6>as you can imagine, if an independent trustee who specializes

0:26:21.161 --> 0:26:23.401
<v Speaker 6>in the business of being a trustee gets it wrong,

0:26:23.801 --> 0:26:26.521
<v Speaker 6>they will have the book thrown at them. So in

0:26:26.721 --> 0:26:30.561
<v Speaker 6>some in some ways you've got the players that don't

0:26:30.561 --> 0:26:34.161
<v Speaker 6>really don't really know what they're doing or aren't doing

0:26:34.201 --> 0:26:36.481
<v Speaker 6>the right job, getting out of business, which makes it

0:26:36.521 --> 0:26:39.841
<v Speaker 6>harder to find an independent trustee. But the independent trustees

0:26:39.841 --> 0:26:43.161
<v Speaker 6>that are standing, they have to have processes around them,

0:26:43.201 --> 0:26:45.401
<v Speaker 6>and they have to insurance policies around them as well.

0:26:45.441 --> 0:26:47.721
<v Speaker 6>And I can tell you, having just gone through our

0:26:47.761 --> 0:26:51.761
<v Speaker 6>insurance regime, that it becomes more complicated and more expensive

0:26:51.841 --> 0:26:54.761
<v Speaker 6>year on year. So that's a long way of saying, yes,

0:26:54.801 --> 0:26:57.601
<v Speaker 6>we do charge. We charge six hundred and ninety five

0:26:57.641 --> 0:27:00.401
<v Speaker 6>dollars a year for being a professional trustee. And that

0:27:00.961 --> 0:27:05.641
<v Speaker 6>does give a client an annual trustee meeting each year

0:27:05.681 --> 0:27:08.921
<v Speaker 6>which must be completed. Okay, so that's included in that.

0:27:09.601 --> 0:27:13.281
<v Speaker 6>But also if there's other work to be done, for example,

0:27:13.361 --> 0:27:18.441
<v Speaker 6>signing documents, taking loans, going to auctions, helping clients with investments,

0:27:18.801 --> 0:27:21.801
<v Speaker 6>that is all charged out at an hourly rate. And

0:27:21.841 --> 0:27:23.761
<v Speaker 6>so I guess in that way it could get it

0:27:23.801 --> 0:27:26.481
<v Speaker 6>could get pricey. But the majority of trusts that we

0:27:26.641 --> 0:27:30.801
<v Speaker 6>work for put assets in and leave those assets for

0:27:30.881 --> 0:27:33.321
<v Speaker 6>some time. They're not taking money in and out of

0:27:33.321 --> 0:27:35.401
<v Speaker 6>a trust all the time, or moving assets in and

0:27:35.401 --> 0:27:36.161
<v Speaker 6>out of a trust.

0:27:36.921 --> 0:27:40.241
<v Speaker 5>Gosh, that actually surprised me that that's a lot less

0:27:40.241 --> 0:27:43.201
<v Speaker 5>than I thought it would be. So it's good information.

0:27:43.161 --> 0:27:45.521
<v Speaker 6>For us because, as I say, we are New Zealand

0:27:45.561 --> 0:27:48.641
<v Speaker 6>as trustee of choice and we do a lot of it.

0:27:48.761 --> 0:27:52.081
<v Speaker 5>So well, that's good news, because yeah, I'm sure that

0:27:52.121 --> 0:27:56.441
<v Speaker 5>to many people are quite quite well good news. It's

0:27:56.601 --> 0:27:58.801
<v Speaker 5>a good piece of information. Hey, thanks Bell on that

0:27:58.881 --> 0:28:02.081
<v Speaker 5>independent trustee thing. Just quickly before got a next call Janet.

0:28:02.881 --> 0:28:05.481
<v Speaker 5>This this text here says, hi, guys, I'm an independent trustee,

0:28:05.481 --> 0:28:08.561
<v Speaker 5>but I need to resigned you to unforeseen circumstances. How

0:28:08.601 --> 0:28:11.401
<v Speaker 5>complex and expensive is it for me to be removed

0:28:11.401 --> 0:28:12.681
<v Speaker 5>and replace? That's from Dave.

0:28:13.561 --> 0:28:16.081
<v Speaker 6>Well, it will depend first on the terms of the

0:28:16.121 --> 0:28:20.081
<v Speaker 6>trusteed and also on the assets and indeed on what

0:28:20.241 --> 0:28:23.361
<v Speaker 6>situation they're facing. So in the order courses of events,

0:28:23.361 --> 0:28:28.921
<v Speaker 6>most trusteeds have the ability to resign. As an independent trustee.

0:28:29.801 --> 0:28:33.521
<v Speaker 6>You would just simply ask us the trustees, or or

0:28:33.521 --> 0:28:35.881
<v Speaker 6>it might be the settler or whoever's holding the power

0:28:35.881 --> 0:28:38.401
<v Speaker 6>a point or ship that you want to step down

0:28:38.441 --> 0:28:41.761
<v Speaker 6>and point somebody else. So that would be really easy,

0:28:42.081 --> 0:28:45.721
<v Speaker 6>and they'd be the easiest way. And any assets that

0:28:45.761 --> 0:28:47.961
<v Speaker 6>are held in the trust, their titles have to be

0:28:48.361 --> 0:28:51.881
<v Speaker 6>updated to reflect the new trustees' names. If one has

0:28:51.921 --> 0:28:55.401
<v Speaker 6>indeed been appointed, most certainly reflect that you've resigned as

0:28:55.401 --> 0:28:59.561
<v Speaker 6>an independent trustee. But if you're facing a particular situation,

0:29:00.321 --> 0:29:03.161
<v Speaker 6>then you'd want to get advice before you resigned, because

0:29:03.241 --> 0:29:07.881
<v Speaker 6>you may well want you're in gemnification crafted in a

0:29:07.921 --> 0:29:10.921
<v Speaker 6>certain manner. It might not even be sensible for you

0:29:10.961 --> 0:29:15.961
<v Speaker 6>to resign, for instance, don't think that's something unforcenreness has

0:29:15.961 --> 0:29:19.361
<v Speaker 6>gone wrong on your watch as an independent trustee. Resigning

0:29:19.521 --> 0:29:21.161
<v Speaker 6>is going to get you out of the hot order,

0:29:21.161 --> 0:29:22.361
<v Speaker 6>because it probably won't.

0:29:23.281 --> 0:29:26.321
<v Speaker 5>Okay, gosh, we've got the questions rolling and we've got

0:29:26.321 --> 0:29:27.641
<v Speaker 5>the calls as well, so I'm going to try and

0:29:27.641 --> 0:29:29.161
<v Speaker 5>split the difference so a little bit, but we're going

0:29:29.201 --> 0:29:30.561
<v Speaker 5>to take a break. We'll be back in just a moment.

0:29:30.601 --> 0:29:32.601
<v Speaker 5>It's twenty one and a half minutes to Sex News Talks.

0:29:32.601 --> 0:29:34.561
<v Speaker 5>They'd be yes, welcome back to boy, I tell what

0:29:34.561 --> 0:29:35.801
<v Speaker 5>there had a lot of calls, So we're going to

0:29:35.801 --> 0:29:37.521
<v Speaker 5>try and get through as much information as we can

0:29:37.721 --> 0:29:41.481
<v Speaker 5>with Janet Zukashi's managing director of New Zealand Family Trust Services.

0:29:42.201 --> 0:29:43.921
<v Speaker 5>So let's go to Sally. Hello.

0:29:45.041 --> 0:29:49.481
<v Speaker 9>Hello, my husband and I set up for family trust

0:29:49.521 --> 0:29:52.961
<v Speaker 9>and I'm wondering why redid it now? So if it's

0:29:53.001 --> 0:29:55.761
<v Speaker 9>any advantage to me, I'm a widow and I've got

0:29:55.761 --> 0:30:02.361
<v Speaker 9>two children and eight grandchildren, and I just what advantage

0:30:02.401 --> 0:30:06.481
<v Speaker 9>is it me having a trust? The houses and the trust.

0:30:07.561 --> 0:30:09.641
<v Speaker 5>So should you? Should it stand the trust to you've

0:30:09.641 --> 0:30:12.241
<v Speaker 5>got to trust? Do you keep it? Janet?

0:30:12.641 --> 0:30:15.601
<v Speaker 9>I guess that is what advantage is it to me

0:30:15.761 --> 0:30:17.361
<v Speaker 9>to be having the trust?

0:30:18.641 --> 0:30:21.081
<v Speaker 6>Probably when you set out the trust, maybe you were,

0:30:21.201 --> 0:30:23.961
<v Speaker 6>maybe you were in business, or maybe it might have

0:30:24.001 --> 0:30:27.721
<v Speaker 6>been for some other reason. But the needs, needs and

0:30:27.881 --> 0:30:32.721
<v Speaker 6>desires change over time, and so that's a very good question.

0:30:33.321 --> 0:30:35.721
<v Speaker 6>If a client's coming in with a trust already and

0:30:35.761 --> 0:30:37.721
<v Speaker 6>wants us to be a trustee, I always ask do

0:30:37.761 --> 0:30:40.081
<v Speaker 6>we still need do we still need to continue this trust?

0:30:40.521 --> 0:30:44.561
<v Speaker 6>In your answer? In your case, possibly there's no benefit

0:30:44.601 --> 0:30:46.721
<v Speaker 6>to you anymore, but it may be a benefit to

0:30:46.761 --> 0:30:50.761
<v Speaker 6>your children or your grandchildren. For example, if you pass

0:30:50.841 --> 0:30:56.361
<v Speaker 6>those assets to them directly rather than from trust to trust,

0:30:57.001 --> 0:30:58.841
<v Speaker 6>then and they've got a problem, they've got a credited

0:30:58.881 --> 0:31:01.721
<v Speaker 6>problem for example, or a relationship problem, then there there

0:31:01.761 --> 0:31:05.921
<v Speaker 6>could go there inheritance. Meanwhile, if the trust is running

0:31:06.001 --> 0:31:08.761
<v Speaker 6>and you want to make distributions from it to maybe

0:31:08.881 --> 0:31:12.321
<v Speaker 6>the grandchildren to help them with education, for example, and

0:31:12.481 --> 0:31:14.321
<v Speaker 6>possibly you could do that out of the trust.

0:31:15.961 --> 0:31:24.561
<v Speaker 9>Okay, haven't done any of that as yet, but even

0:31:24.601 --> 0:31:28.361
<v Speaker 9>the person that does my book said, you know it's

0:31:28.401 --> 0:31:31.721
<v Speaker 9>a really well, it's there a disadvantage of for me

0:31:31.881 --> 0:31:33.201
<v Speaker 9>having that trust.

0:31:33.601 --> 0:31:37.601
<v Speaker 6>Well, I don't know your circumstances, but if the trust

0:31:37.681 --> 0:31:42.161
<v Speaker 6>is being run well, hm, and if you've got an

0:31:42.721 --> 0:31:44.881
<v Speaker 6>if you've got an independent trustee, I suppose maybe that

0:31:44.921 --> 0:31:46.001
<v Speaker 6>would cost you more money.

0:31:46.681 --> 0:31:48.161
<v Speaker 5>Have you got family selling.

0:31:49.841 --> 0:31:52.001
<v Speaker 9>Two children, eight grandchildren?

0:31:52.561 --> 0:31:56.361
<v Speaker 6>So those children could no doubt get a benefit from it.

0:31:56.841 --> 0:32:00.961
<v Speaker 6>I and you, if indeed you are giving them benefits

0:32:01.081 --> 0:32:04.481
<v Speaker 6>or they are going to inherit, then I frequently bring

0:32:04.521 --> 0:32:07.801
<v Speaker 6>the children and say, look, mom and dad, they're not

0:32:07.841 --> 0:32:11.041
<v Speaker 6>earning income now, and you are going to inherit from

0:32:11.081 --> 0:32:13.281
<v Speaker 6>this trust, and it would be nice if you could

0:32:13.281 --> 0:32:16.281
<v Speaker 6>contribute to some of these fees and the children are

0:32:16.321 --> 0:32:17.361
<v Speaker 6>often amenable to that.

0:32:17.921 --> 0:32:20.561
<v Speaker 5>Okay, hopefully that's a bit helpful, Sally. We're going to

0:32:20.601 --> 0:32:22.481
<v Speaker 5>keep moving because we've got a lot to get through

0:32:22.481 --> 0:32:23.721
<v Speaker 5>and we won't get through it all, to be honest,

0:32:23.761 --> 0:32:26.121
<v Speaker 5>so we'll have to beg Janet to come back and

0:32:26.161 --> 0:32:28.841
<v Speaker 5>have another chat with us sometime. But thanks for your call, Sally.

0:32:29.601 --> 0:32:32.321
<v Speaker 5>Bill Hello, got to look.

0:32:32.201 --> 0:32:36.481
<v Speaker 8>Up to Janet. Up to the mid nineties, everyone got

0:32:36.601 --> 0:32:44.321
<v Speaker 8>free care in retirement homes, etc. An act was passed

0:32:45.641 --> 0:32:49.241
<v Speaker 8>stopping that, and eminent lawyers have told me over the

0:32:49.361 --> 0:32:55.601
<v Speaker 8>last twenty years that it's a monopoly because the rich

0:32:55.721 --> 0:33:00.841
<v Speaker 8>people who have done trusts get free free care and

0:33:00.881 --> 0:33:04.041
<v Speaker 8>the poor people who don't own houses get free care.

0:33:04.121 --> 0:33:07.161
<v Speaker 8>The people in the are the ones that pay for it,

0:33:07.241 --> 0:33:11.721
<v Speaker 8>et cetera, the ones who haven't done trusts. And I

0:33:12.121 --> 0:33:15.841
<v Speaker 8>in fact worked for the Minister of Health and Research

0:33:15.921 --> 0:33:20.241
<v Speaker 8>in old people's homes some fifteen years ago and in

0:33:20.321 --> 0:33:24.001
<v Speaker 8>one large home in Wellington, the manager told me that

0:33:24.081 --> 0:33:31.041
<v Speaker 8>only one person paid for their care. Everyone else had

0:33:31.041 --> 0:33:35.561
<v Speaker 8>it paid for them etc. By government because they didn't

0:33:35.641 --> 0:33:37.281
<v Speaker 8>have they had trusts, or they.

0:33:37.161 --> 0:33:39.121
<v Speaker 5>Didn't have You have you got a question in their bill.

0:33:39.921 --> 0:33:44.361
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, the question is if everyone knows about this, more

0:33:44.401 --> 0:33:47.681
<v Speaker 8>people I understand have created trusts in the last twenty

0:33:47.721 --> 0:33:53.441
<v Speaker 8>five years because of this particular reason of care homes.

0:33:53.761 --> 0:33:56.401
<v Speaker 8>What do you think, Jennet, And do you think that

0:33:56.441 --> 0:33:59.841
<v Speaker 8>the government, who shies off because I've spoken to politicians,

0:34:00.881 --> 0:34:03.321
<v Speaker 8>should do something about it.

0:34:03.721 --> 0:34:06.121
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, they're not going to start paying for it,

0:34:06.161 --> 0:34:08.441
<v Speaker 5>would be my guest given the economy. But yeah, any

0:34:08.441 --> 0:34:08.961
<v Speaker 5>comment on that.

0:34:09.001 --> 0:34:12.841
<v Speaker 6>Jenneral, New Zealand is in a bit of a flux.

0:34:12.921 --> 0:34:16.881
<v Speaker 6>We have to play with what we've got and New

0:34:16.921 --> 0:34:20.201
<v Speaker 6>Zealand the government is only taking so much in regards

0:34:20.201 --> 0:34:25.121
<v Speaker 6>to the tax take, so I suppose that they cut

0:34:25.161 --> 0:34:28.041
<v Speaker 6>their cloth where they can. I don't know whether it's

0:34:28.121 --> 0:34:31.521
<v Speaker 6>whether that's an actual fact to say that wealthy people

0:34:31.601 --> 0:34:34.001
<v Speaker 6>never pay for any rest home care. I can tell

0:34:34.041 --> 0:34:37.201
<v Speaker 6>you that I've got several clients who do actually pay

0:34:38.121 --> 0:34:41.081
<v Speaker 6>up to five thousand dollars a week. But I do

0:34:41.121 --> 0:34:43.481
<v Speaker 6>take your point, and you certainly wouldn't be setting up

0:34:43.481 --> 0:34:45.081
<v Speaker 6>a trust today just to try and get a rest

0:34:45.121 --> 0:34:46.401
<v Speaker 6>home subsidy, that's for sure.

0:34:47.241 --> 0:34:50.321
<v Speaker 5>Hey, but thanks for your call. Bill. Let's actually, by

0:34:50.361 --> 0:34:52.881
<v Speaker 5>the way, somebody's just quick we'll try and alternate with

0:34:53.041 --> 0:34:55.201
<v Speaker 5>texts and calls. Is it better to have a trust

0:34:55.281 --> 0:34:58.441
<v Speaker 5>or a company if you have rental property? So that

0:34:58.681 --> 0:34:59.761
<v Speaker 5>difficult question to answer.

0:35:00.001 --> 0:35:04.001
<v Speaker 6>So that is really about your personal circumstances. And most

0:35:04.001 --> 0:35:06.001
<v Speaker 6>certainly tax would play a bit of a part there

0:35:06.081 --> 0:35:09.921
<v Speaker 6>because companies tax rate there is twenty eight percent, and

0:35:09.961 --> 0:35:13.161
<v Speaker 6>of course the trustee tax rate come first of first

0:35:13.161 --> 0:35:17.801
<v Speaker 6>of April last year, moved to move to thirty nine percent. That's,

0:35:17.841 --> 0:35:21.001
<v Speaker 6>of course if the trustees do indeed retain the income.

0:35:21.481 --> 0:35:25.721
<v Speaker 6>Because for instance, the trustees may not retain it, they

0:35:25.721 --> 0:35:28.201
<v Speaker 6>may distribute it to beneficiaries and then it would be

0:35:28.361 --> 0:35:33.521
<v Speaker 6>taxed at the recipient beneficiaries personal tax rates. So so

0:35:33.641 --> 0:35:35.561
<v Speaker 6>let me let me give it all. Let me give

0:35:35.601 --> 0:35:38.401
<v Speaker 6>you an example. Let's say the trust earns forty thousand,

0:35:38.641 --> 0:35:42.401
<v Speaker 6>and we've got maybe Mary, Well, we'll take come, we'll

0:35:42.401 --> 0:35:45.481
<v Speaker 6>take James and Mary. James Earns seventy thousand, Mary Earns

0:35:45.521 --> 0:35:48.641
<v Speaker 6>one hundred and eighty thousand, they're married. The trust earns

0:35:48.681 --> 0:35:51.241
<v Speaker 6>forty thousand, and so what's it going to do. Is

0:35:51.241 --> 0:35:53.321
<v Speaker 6>the trust is going to retain that income and pay

0:35:53.401 --> 0:35:56.281
<v Speaker 6>thirty nine percent on it, or is it going to allocate,

0:35:56.321 --> 0:35:58.281
<v Speaker 6>and if it was going to allocate, it will probably

0:35:58.281 --> 0:36:01.361
<v Speaker 6>allocate it to James because he will be on less

0:36:01.401 --> 0:36:06.001
<v Speaker 6>tax rate than Mary at thirty nine percent. Or maybe

0:36:06.041 --> 0:36:09.481
<v Speaker 6>they allocate it to Barry. Now, let's assume that Barrier

0:36:09.561 --> 0:36:11.801
<v Speaker 6>is over the age of sixteen but doesn't earn a

0:36:11.841 --> 0:36:15.001
<v Speaker 6>lot of income or maybe no income, and his tax

0:36:15.081 --> 0:36:17.161
<v Speaker 6>rates could be as low as ten and a half percent,

0:36:18.441 --> 0:36:20.401
<v Speaker 6>So ten and a half percent on the first fifteen

0:36:20.841 --> 0:36:25.561
<v Speaker 6>six hundred and then after seventeen and a half cents,

0:36:25.561 --> 0:36:28.081
<v Speaker 6>So that could be a really good tax savings. Or

0:36:28.121 --> 0:36:32.041
<v Speaker 6>even better still, he's an idea, an idea, even better still,

0:36:32.441 --> 0:36:36.161
<v Speaker 6>let let the trustees invest in a pie and only

0:36:36.241 --> 0:36:39.041
<v Speaker 6>pay tax at twenty a percent. How's that?

0:36:39.361 --> 0:36:42.841
<v Speaker 5>There you go, there's some so I don't know what

0:36:42.921 --> 0:36:44.721
<v Speaker 5>else to add to that. I'm going to take a

0:36:44.761 --> 0:36:46.761
<v Speaker 5>quick moment. We'll come back with some more calls. It

0:36:47.001 --> 0:36:49.281
<v Speaker 5>is eleven minutes to six news talks. He'd be yes,

0:36:49.281 --> 0:36:51.121
<v Speaker 5>eight minutes to six, and we're going to see if

0:36:51.121 --> 0:36:52.761
<v Speaker 5>we can squeeze another call or two. So we're trying

0:36:52.761 --> 0:36:54.521
<v Speaker 5>to be as concise as possible. The Janet's a co

0:36:54.601 --> 0:36:56.841
<v Speaker 5>who's the managing director of New Zealand family trust service

0:36:56.921 --> 0:37:00.521
<v Speaker 5>is limited. Matt, Hello, good.

0:37:00.401 --> 0:37:03.761
<v Speaker 10>Any guys, Hey, I won't want to tie in with

0:37:03.841 --> 0:37:06.081
<v Speaker 10>a will When I died to leave my last DoD

0:37:06.081 --> 0:37:12.001
<v Speaker 10>block to children slash, nephews and nieces that I was

0:37:12.041 --> 0:37:14.041
<v Speaker 10>wondering if is there a way to make a roll

0:37:14.081 --> 0:37:16.681
<v Speaker 10>in and roll out clause with if they want to

0:37:16.721 --> 0:37:19.801
<v Speaker 10>live here they all contribute evenly. If not, they can

0:37:19.921 --> 0:37:22.441
<v Speaker 10>roll out and miss out. Is there a way to

0:37:22.561 --> 0:37:23.361
<v Speaker 10>sort of work there?

0:37:24.801 --> 0:37:27.561
<v Speaker 6>Well, you could possibly set up a trust via your will,

0:37:27.681 --> 0:37:30.601
<v Speaker 6>So the trust comes into existence once you die and

0:37:30.641 --> 0:37:33.681
<v Speaker 6>the estate or the asset passes to the trust then

0:37:34.241 --> 0:37:37.481
<v Speaker 6>and you could leave instructions under a memorand with wishes

0:37:37.521 --> 0:37:42.601
<v Speaker 6>of how you would want that want that asset handled

0:37:42.801 --> 0:37:45.681
<v Speaker 6>during during during you know, during during the period that

0:37:45.721 --> 0:37:49.361
<v Speaker 6>the trust is going to exist for. So the trustees

0:37:49.401 --> 0:37:52.241
<v Speaker 6>at that point could then go to the beneficiaries and say, well,

0:37:52.281 --> 0:37:53.881
<v Speaker 6>we're going to do this, or we're going to do that,

0:37:54.081 --> 0:37:56.321
<v Speaker 6>or we require a contribution from you for this or

0:37:56.601 --> 0:37:56.961
<v Speaker 6>so if.

0:37:56.921 --> 0:37:59.161
<v Speaker 5>You don't contribute, you're out. And can you actually set

0:37:59.241 --> 0:38:00.641
<v Speaker 5>up something along that line?

0:38:00.881 --> 0:38:03.041
<v Speaker 6>Well, you can't roll from the from the grave, and

0:38:03.081 --> 0:38:07.401
<v Speaker 6>you can't make beneficiaries. Beneficiary sort of pay you, but

0:38:08.001 --> 0:38:10.681
<v Speaker 6>you could, of course use your powers of persuasion.

0:38:11.201 --> 0:38:14.121
<v Speaker 5>Can you actually set it up that that in terms

0:38:14.161 --> 0:38:17.081
<v Speaker 5>of paying its way? I think is that what you're asking, Matt,

0:38:17.081 --> 0:38:19.721
<v Speaker 5>that somehow everyone makes sure that the trust is maintainable

0:38:19.721 --> 0:38:21.561
<v Speaker 5>and they're not just sitting there waiting to get their share.

0:38:21.761 --> 0:38:22.761
<v Speaker 5>Is that what you're talking about.

0:38:23.441 --> 0:38:25.521
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, I've got a last dole block and there's

0:38:25.521 --> 0:38:27.841
<v Speaker 10>a lot of room for even tiny houses and stuff.

0:38:27.881 --> 0:38:31.241
<v Speaker 10>I'm just thinking, I want my family and the future

0:38:31.721 --> 0:38:35.521
<v Speaker 10>whichever place they can come. When times get tough. In

0:38:35.561 --> 0:38:38.161
<v Speaker 10>this only one person loveacy, they pay the full cost

0:38:38.641 --> 0:38:41.641
<v Speaker 10>someone else wants, then they split it. Then well.

0:38:42.961 --> 0:38:45.881
<v Speaker 6>Okay, yeah, if the if the lifestyle block belongs to

0:38:45.961 --> 0:38:48.721
<v Speaker 6>the belongs to the trust, and the trustees need to

0:38:48.721 --> 0:38:51.601
<v Speaker 6>make sure that the income is there to meet or

0:38:51.721 --> 0:38:54.361
<v Speaker 6>meet all costs, and so in good years when it's

0:38:54.401 --> 0:38:57.761
<v Speaker 6>making money, they should be squirreling that money away to

0:38:57.801 --> 0:39:00.201
<v Speaker 6>make sure that it's there and the lean years.

0:39:00.401 --> 0:39:02.081
<v Speaker 5>Okay, right, let's see if we've got time we had

0:39:02.281 --> 0:39:03.561
<v Speaker 5>I only got about a minute and a half there,

0:39:03.801 --> 0:39:04.641
<v Speaker 5>so you have to be quick.

0:39:05.601 --> 0:39:09.361
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Just a couple of questions Jennet, I've got to

0:39:09.801 --> 0:39:12.321
<v Speaker 4>my late wife and I set up a family trust,

0:39:13.241 --> 0:39:18.281
<v Speaker 4>and we have mended and blended families, and she has

0:39:18.361 --> 0:39:22.481
<v Speaker 4>passed the administration of the trust has passed to me,

0:39:23.641 --> 0:39:28.241
<v Speaker 4>and on my side of the family, circumstances of changed

0:39:28.281 --> 0:39:32.761
<v Speaker 4>and I've got to buy or make a contribution to

0:39:32.801 --> 0:39:38.361
<v Speaker 4>buy one party out. This is going to then mean

0:39:38.481 --> 0:39:42.161
<v Speaker 4>that some of the bequests on my late wife's side

0:39:42.721 --> 0:39:47.121
<v Speaker 4>may be short on funds. Where do bequests stand in trusts?

0:39:49.281 --> 0:39:53.841
<v Speaker 6>Short the quest really falls into a person's estate, not

0:39:53.961 --> 0:39:58.441
<v Speaker 6>in regards to trustees affairs. Trustees are there to manage

0:39:58.441 --> 0:40:01.641
<v Speaker 6>the trust that probably would follow a Memoran wishes. Memoran

0:40:01.681 --> 0:40:05.521
<v Speaker 6>wishes are highly persuasive, but they're not legally binding. So

0:40:05.721 --> 0:40:07.641
<v Speaker 6>while I would say in the first instance, has get

0:40:07.641 --> 0:40:08.481
<v Speaker 6>some really good.

0:40:08.361 --> 0:40:12.401
<v Speaker 5>Advice, and I think what we're saying is that if

0:40:12.561 --> 0:40:15.521
<v Speaker 5>there's money and a trust, a bequest cannot give away

0:40:15.601 --> 0:40:18.401
<v Speaker 5>money that's not it's to get so that if there's

0:40:18.441 --> 0:40:21.641
<v Speaker 5>a bequest that you can't give away something that belongs

0:40:21.681 --> 0:40:23.361
<v Speaker 5>to the trust bequest.

0:40:23.961 --> 0:40:26.481
<v Speaker 6>It's up to the trustees to bestow their discretion for

0:40:26.561 --> 0:40:30.401
<v Speaker 6>discretionary trusts and work their way through it, and of

0:40:30.401 --> 0:40:33.881
<v Speaker 6>course trustees are going to be careful and that and

0:40:33.921 --> 0:40:36.481
<v Speaker 6>that they could range a range of factors are considered

0:40:36.521 --> 0:40:38.641
<v Speaker 6>before they start exercising their discretion.

0:40:38.881 --> 0:40:40.961
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's what I'm guessing. I'm sorry, we can't haven't

0:40:40.961 --> 0:40:42.961
<v Speaker 5>got time to dig into it, people, And I'm guessing

0:40:43.001 --> 0:40:45.281
<v Speaker 5>that maybe someone's put something in the trust and then

0:40:45.321 --> 0:40:47.521
<v Speaker 5>in the will they've said I'm giving this to such

0:40:47.521 --> 0:40:49.601
<v Speaker 5>and such as like, sorry, it's in the trust.

0:40:49.361 --> 0:40:51.721
<v Speaker 6>And there's yeah, there's there's a bit of conflict there.

0:40:52.681 --> 0:40:56.241
<v Speaker 5>Which I would imagine the trust would prevail anyway. But

0:40:56.281 --> 0:40:57.641
<v Speaker 5>you know what, we haven't really got time to dig

0:40:57.641 --> 0:41:00.001
<v Speaker 5>into that. All we've got time for is to say, Janet,

0:41:00.001 --> 0:41:02.721
<v Speaker 5>thank you so much for coming in. Time has flown

0:41:02.761 --> 0:41:05.481
<v Speaker 5>and we've been a lot of people texting answer, so

0:41:05.561 --> 0:41:09.281
<v Speaker 5>we'll get Janet back again and we can pick up

0:41:09.281 --> 0:41:12.761
<v Speaker 5>the conversation. But if you want to check out information

0:41:12.841 --> 0:41:16.801
<v Speaker 5>around Janet's company, well not the New Zealand Fan it's

0:41:17.201 --> 0:41:20.521
<v Speaker 5>n Zfamily Trusts dot cod or ENZ, so go and

0:41:20.561 --> 0:41:23.361
<v Speaker 5>check out the website. And thanks so much for coming.

0:41:23.201 --> 0:41:25.441
<v Speaker 6>In, Janet, thank you for having me, and well.

0:41:25.321 --> 0:41:27.561
<v Speaker 5>Forward to next time. And thanks my producer Tyre Roberts,

0:41:27.601 --> 0:41:29.601
<v Speaker 5>have a great Sunday, and we'll catch you soon.

0:41:33.561 --> 0:41:36.361
<v Speaker 1>For more from the Weekend Collective, listen live to News

0:41:36.401 --> 0:41:39.481
<v Speaker 1>Talk zed be weekends from three pm, or follow the

0:41:39.521 --> 0:41:41.001
<v Speaker 1>podcast on iHeartRadio.