WEBVTT - Why does billionaire Jim Grenon want to replace NZME's board? 

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>YIELDA.

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 2>daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald. A battle

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 2>is underway for the future of one of New Zealand's

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 2>biggest media companies. Auckland based Canadian billionaire Jim Grennan has

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 2>in the last fortnight emerged as one of the biggest

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 2>shareholders in enzed Me, the owner of the enzed Herald,

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>newstalk ZEDB and many music radio stations, and next month

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 2>he hopes to vote out the company's current board members

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>and install himself and three others at the company's shareholder meeting.

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 2>It's the latest bit of turmoil to hit the media

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 2>sector in this country, with nearly every major media company

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 2>seeing upheaval to some degree over.

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 3>The last twelve months.

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Today on the Front Page, we're joined by media insider

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Shane Curry to discuss what Grennan wants endzed Me and

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 2>if the sector is any closer to stability.

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 3>So, Shane, let's start with the big one. Who exactly

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 3>is Jim Grennan and how did he make his wealth

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 3>and why is he now living in New Zealand. I've

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 3>got so many questions.

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Jim Grennan a little bit of a mystery man

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 4>in some ways. And in fact I've asked several times

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 4>for an interview with mister Grennan and he has said

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 4>he will talk at some stage. But he what we

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 4>know of him, He is a Canadian billionaire, made his

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 4>money through private equity and investing in other businesses. Moved

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 4>here in twenty twelve and as a Kiwi as a

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Kiwi resident, lives in Takapuna, and has very much come

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 4>to the four obviously in recent weeks in terms of

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 4>his shareholding and ended me and his intentions to become

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 4>an endy Me board member.

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 3>So Grennan founded his own media brands since moving here,

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand News and Essentials and The Centrist. What do

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 3>we know about his motivation to start those brands?

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 4>So he has put out several statements in the last

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 4>few weeks just in terms of media inquiries, talked a

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 4>little bit about this centriest and The Centrist itself is

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 4>basically an aggregation site if you like, and he has

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 4>said that he introduced that by means of bringing more

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 4>to the everyday discussion. I guess in the news media

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 4>kind of environment, he felt that there were stories that

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 4>weren't getting or seeing the light of day. They do

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 4>employ some journalists to write stories specifically for the website,

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 4>but other stories they point to, For instance, they will

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 4>point to stories on the Herald or to other news websites,

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 4>and so it's a little bit of an aggregation site

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 4>as well as having its own unique content. But he

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 4>felt a bit like the platform, I guess in terms

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 4>of the audio sense that there was a conversation missing

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 4>on some topics and some political stances. I guess as well.

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 3>So Grennan has sent you a statement that editorial content

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 3>is a side issue, but the quality of journalism impacts

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 3>of the business, that he wants to improve the quality

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 3>of journalism, including through training to advanced staff skills, and

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.839
<v Speaker 3>that he wants a new editorial board with representation from

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 3>both sides of the spectrum. What do you make of

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 3>all that?

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think if we just take a step back

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 4>a little bit, Chelsea is obviously you know, he is

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 4>aiming to have a seat on the board of ensied

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 4>me along with three other nominees, and we have another shareholder,

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 4>Osbian Partners, who have put forward their own two nominations.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Now at the moment, what we don't know is the

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 4>details of a letter that mister Greennan has written to

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 4>ensed Me outlining some of what he sees as operational

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 4>and governance concerns. And so I've been requesting that letter

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 4>from both enzied Me and mister Grennan's group. So far

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 4>it hasn't been released. I do expect it will be

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 4>released at some stage ahead of the annual shareholders meeting,

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 4>and in that will get a sense of really the

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 4>editorial I guess, I guess endeavor that mister Grennan is

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 4>talking about here. But on the face of it, you know,

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 4>he's made some comments that should give cheer to the

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Enzbing newsroom in the sense of, you know, wanting to

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 4>uphold and uplift the quality of journalism, maintaining standards and

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 4>building standards. But I guess the devil is in the

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 4>detail in terms of just what that specifically means. And

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 4>of course, when he talks about an emphasis on factual accuracy,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 4>the newsroom will say, yes, that there's a big focus

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 4>for us at all times less selling of the writer's opinion.

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 4>He's also said that, and that's a discussion that comes

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 4>up quite a bit in terms of differentiating opinion from

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 4>actual news stories. And you know enz ME is said

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 4>in the past, you know, it's making efforts to make

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 4>that emphasis on factual stories versus opinion a lot more differentiated.

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 4>I guess, make it much more clearer to readers just

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 4>when they're reading commentary and opinion versus a straight news story.

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 4>And so I think, you know, he's totally in line

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 4>with what the company has been trying to do and

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 4>then appealing to a wider political spectrum. I guess that

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 4>again comes back to some of the points he was

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 4>making around setting up the centrist you know, that free

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 4>flow of information and ideas that there is a broad

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 4>church of content, which you know, mass media organizations will

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 4>argue that they are already in that ballpark.

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, as you can imagine, this is a significant interest

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to our members. So are many of the journalists at

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>NZDME and as the union who represents them. We're working

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>through this issue with them, and I think it's fair

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to say that the primary primary concern here is to

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>ensure that journalists are able to continue doing their job

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>with genuine editorial independence, without fear or favor. And the

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>concern here is that we clearly have an individual who

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is highly motivated to take control of a major media

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>entity in New Zealand who is doing so quite clearly

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>with the intent of promulgating a particular political perspective, and

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>there are real concerns about what that might means. The

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>editorial independence of journalists are at injymen.

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 3>So, Australian based Spheria Asset Management that owns nineteen percent

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 3>of enz ME has come out last week and said

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 3>it backs Grinnan's plans.

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So does that.

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 3>Mean that this board takeover is basically a given?

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Do you think the current ENZME board can scrap backer? When?

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 4>Ya?

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 2>So? What?

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 4>We won't know the final breakdown of the vote obviously

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 4>until April twenty nine, and when the shareholders do all

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 4>get together, and before that meeting happens, they will have

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 4>available to them the biographies of all the six new

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 4>nominees for the board, as well as you know existing

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 4>board members. They'll know how they operate and so forth.

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 4>There will be documentation that ended ME distributes and I

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 4>expect that that will include correspondence from mister Grennan to

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 4>the company in terms of outlining his proposals and ideas

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 4>for the business. So potentially that letter, potentially that letter exactly,

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 4>and so I think the idea will be that Enzimy

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 4>shareholders will have as much information as possible ahead of

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 4>the vote. So what we do know about the numbers

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 4>right now is that enz Me's bigger shareholder, Spheria Asset Management,

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 4>which has nineteen percent of the company, that is backing

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 4>mister Grennan's bid to become a board member and the

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 4>three other nominee. So that's a significant number to get

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 4>to the fifty percent majority. This is a very fast

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 4>moving story, and I expect that mister Greennin, myself and

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 4>his supporters will be expecting to be over that fifty

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 4>percent majority. If not already then certainly by the time

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 4>April twenty nine rolls around. From my discussions, you know,

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 4>talking to lots of different parties, they do seem confident.

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Having said that, I also know that enz Me will

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 4>be talking to all of its shareholders in one way

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 4>or another in terms of presenting just how the company

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 4>is fearing its progress over the last twelve months. Especially

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 4>we've just heard the financial results and what's planned. I mean,

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 4>at the annual results announcement just a couple of weeks ago,

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 4>the company put forward three significant proposals in front of shareholders,

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 4>including the appointment of a new board member, and VA

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 4>can see on the board for that. So as I say,

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 4>there's going to be a lot more to come in

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 4>the next forty odd days.

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 3>I've been at anzedmy for nearly a decade now, and

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 3>I can't say that I've had too much to personally

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 3>do with the board or our shareholders. The same way,

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't think doctors in an emergency department are rubbing

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 3>shoulders with the Health then Z board for example. But you, however, Shane,

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 3>have been on this company's executive team. What does a

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 3>media board do and how much say do they actually

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 3>traditionally have over editorial coverage.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 4>Well, I can safely say that when I was the

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 4>editor in chief and on the executive and that was

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 4>more than two years ago now, But at no stage

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 4>did the board or the executive give direction in terms

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 4>of you must cover the story kind of thing. We're

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 4>a board an executive, you know they will make sure

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 4>the settings are right in terms of resourcing and support.

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 4>I worked very closely, for instance, on our extensive code

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 4>of conduct and ethics, presented that to the board for approvals.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Really the settings and the environment that the board and

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 4>the executive are responsible for to allow that editorial independence

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 4>to be maintained. And of course, what we've heard in

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 4>the last week or so is some concerns from the

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Journalists Union. They just want reassurances that any new board members,

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 4>including mister Greennan, will uphold that editorial independence. And so

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 4>far the noises from mister Grennan have actually been very

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 4>positive about editorial output and inputs. So the union is seeking,

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 4>i think a one to one meeting with mister Greennan,

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 4>just to be reassured itself on those points.

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 5>Bezis said that he's in favor of personal liberties. Well,

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 5>of course, so am I, and that's why I'm in

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 5>favor of free expression. You know, it's right there in

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 5>the First Amendment. And news organizations have always honored free

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 5>expression by having a variety of points of view on

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 5>their opinion pages. But Beasos now is just shutting that down,

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 5>and he's saying that only his point of view is

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 5>going to be represented on those pages. And that really

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 5>is a betrayal the heritage of the Washington Post, and

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 5>I think a betrayal of the very idea of free expression.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 3>So Amazon boss Jeff Bezos purchased The Washington Post back

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 3>in twenty thirteen, but in the last decade he hasn't

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 3>caused much controversy there as he has in the last

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 3>six months. First he stopped the paper from endorsing a

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 3>presidential candidate in last year's election, and well recently he's

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 3>been dictating what he wants to see in the opinion

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 3>part of the paper. That's led to staff resignations and

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 3>a drop in digital subscriptions. So do you think that

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 3>the same reaction could happen here?

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 4>I think a totally different market in America. So if

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 4>you look at the American market, you know, obviously tens

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 4>of millions of people in The Washington Post is very

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 4>much a global brand, almost and certainly a national brand.

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 4>The New Zealand market is much smaller than news catching

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 4>the area, if you like, is much smaller, and so

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 4>all of the mainstream media organizations in New Zaan will

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 4>strive to be a broad church of ideas, of opinions

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 4>and commentary, and of course covering lots of the same

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 4>topics at times. Now, that's not to say that those

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 4>ideas can be broadened, or that news media organizations can

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 4>pick up different topics to chase individually from each other,

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 4>and of course they do do that. The American journalism

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 4>system and media systems a little bit different as well,

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the opinion pages are generally run by

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 4>executive editors who report up through a different line from

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 4>the newsroom itself, and so that kind of church and

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 4>state a little bit, the two different divisions, whereas hair

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 4>opinion and news is basically led by the editor in

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 4>chief as a whole. And so it's a bit of

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 4>a different model. And I can see what Bezos is doing,

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 4>and it has been, in my view, a change, a

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 4>pivot obviously from him. He's previously said that he didn't

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 4>want to interfere at all with any of the Washington

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 4>Post content. I think you need to look at the

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 4>political landscape obviously in America at the moment, and Bezos

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 4>was literally sitting behind Donald Trumpet on Inauguration Day along

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 4>with some of the other tech giant CEOs and owners.

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 4>And to know that, you know, there's a very careful

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 4>kind of game being played there at the moment. All

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 4>I see really happening in the New Zealand market, yep,

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 4>they'll be focused on mister Greennan if he becomes a

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 4>board member and any other new board members. But of course,

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's a mass market newspaper, the New Zealand Herald.

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 4>It's a mass market media organization ended me. It's always

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 4>had private owners, and I expect that all the shearholders,

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 4>certainly all the directors, will certainly be trying to make

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 4>in of Me as successful as possible into the future.

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 2>So let's move on to the rest of the industry.

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 2>And things have not been sunny the last year. The

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 2>entire news Hub brand was shut down in July, Iconic

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 2>TV and Z shows were canceled after decades on air,

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Shortland Street was cut down to just three episodes a week,

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 2>and now the Heir has had a major restructure of

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 2>its staff. Now do you think we are near the

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 2>end of these cuts or could there be.

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 4>More to camp I thought we were at the end

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 4>of dramatic change a while ago. I must say last

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 4>year really was one for the books. This year has

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 4>started no differently so far. I didn't expect to be

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 4>covering my own companies in so much detail as I

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 4>have been. And certainly the other big company that's hit

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 4>the headlines already this year is Sky Television. So Sky

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 4>and enz in me early on in twenty twenty five

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 4>to two big publicly listed media companies in New Zealand

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 4>are the ones that I guess have been in the spotlight.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 4>But I do expect that, you know, change is constant

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 4>now and I think we all expect that in the

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 4>media industry. And no, I think if you look at

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 4>some of the outlooks on the forecast that the CEOs

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 4>have been putting out, they are expect They are a

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 4>little more confident about the middle of the end of

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 4>the year in terms of advertising revenue and seeing I

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 4>hate the word, but seeing the green shoots, if you like,

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 4>in the economy that will hopefully shore up some of

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 4>that revenue. And so, you know, I'm more optimistic about

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 4>this year than I was about last year, that's for sure.

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 4>But certainly, you know, I think at all times we

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 4>just need to be listening to our audiences, observing just

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 4>how they're reading and taking in our content, listening to

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 4>our content in the case of the podcasts and so forth, Chelsea,

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 4>and knowing that we're still appealing to a wide readership

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 4>or wide audience. You know, there's more than two million

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 4>people a day that come into the Herald and so

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 4>you know that these are significant numbers and it's just

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 4>about getting that business model right.

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's been a lot of expectations on the government

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 3>to intervene, particularly around the Fair Digital News Bargaining Bill,

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 3>and it seems that it's been in limbo for a

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 3>while now. Is that still on the agenda.

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's three different pieces of legislation if you like,

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 4>or three pieces that the government is focusing on, and

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 4>one of the key ones is the Fair Digital News

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Bargaining Bill. Now that has actually been put on the

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 4>back burner a fair bit because we were initially going

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 4>to be observing how this new legislation in Australia would

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 4>work out. But the Aussies themselves have taken fright. There's

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 4>a federal election obviously not too far away across the Tasman,

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 4>but also taken fright at any sort of repercussions if

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 4>they do sort of pin down facebooks in the Googles

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 4>of the world in terms of repercussions from the Trump administration,

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 4>and so New Zealand and Paul Goldsmith now really have

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 4>to decide if we do try and pay their own

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 4>way again in terms of the fair Digital News Bargaining bill.

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 4>I do believe it's still alive as an issue, and

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure the media industry will be pushing for it

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 4>in some form to be enacted at least by the

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 4>end of the year. But I do think at the

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:39.239
<v Speaker 4>moment with that on hold and another two pieces of legislation,

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 4>one of them is before Select Committee at the moment,

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 4>that's the Sunday Advertising legislation, and then there's another which

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 4>sort of encompass a whole lot of other issues such

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 4>as a levy or at least a levy yes on

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 4>revenue from the streamers for New Zealand content in New Zealand,

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 4>amongst some other moves. All of this it's a little

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 4>bit messy at the moment, but they should start coming through,

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 4>as I say, hopefully midyear, end of the year.

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 3>So Shane, you know I love asking you to look

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 3>into your crystal ball for future predictions. Do you have any?

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Do you think things are going to get better? Are

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 3>there some challenges we haven't discussed yet? What's your top back?

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, I actually had twenty five predictions for twenty five

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 4>and one of my first media columns of the year,

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 4>and I think you know some of them have come

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 4>to fruition already just in terms of the first three months,

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 4>and look, it's a changing game all the time. But

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 4>what I do know is that there is you know,

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 4>while there are issues around trust and news and absolutely

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 4>media companies need to be addressing that and listening to

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 4>their audiences, there is still an insatiable appetite for knowledge

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 4>in this world for news. As I talked about the

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 4>numbers of people coming to The Herald, it's the same

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 4>for ZB, It's the same for a lot of our

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 4>other major media organizations. People are still coming to us

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 4>for information, wanting to know what's going on in the world.

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 4>So as a baseline, you know, that has to be

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 4>encouraging for us. So I'm always with a sense of

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 4>optimism looking ahead. It's about getting these business models right

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 4>and being given that runway and the resource to be

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 4>able to make sure that we are able to keep

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 4>our newsroom levels at the levels they are, if not boosted. Now,

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 4>we've been going through a fair bit of hurt ourselves

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 4>in the last few weeks, there's no doubt about that,

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 4>but I'm optimistic that that will flatten out and hopefully

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 4>rebuild very soon.

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:25.719
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for joining us. Shane.

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 4>Thanks Chelsea.

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 2>That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 2>can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 2>at enzadherld dot co dot mz. The Front Page is

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 2>produced by Ethan Sells and Richard Martin, who is also

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 2>our sound engineer.

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to the Front Page on iHeartRadio

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 3>or wherever you get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 3>for another look behind the headlines.