1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:02,480 Speaker 1: Change coming to the three strikes raise human jails is 2 00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:04,640 Speaker 1: going to be allowing at the threshold entry point currently 3 00:00:04,680 --> 00:00:07,200 Speaker 1: based around the two year sentence that'll be have to won. 4 00:00:07,240 --> 00:00:10,080 Speaker 1: The Law Association Vice president Julian Kincaid's with us on 5 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:11,239 Speaker 1: this Juliane morning to you. 6 00:00:11,920 --> 00:00:12,600 Speaker 2: Good morning, Mike. 7 00:00:12,800 --> 00:00:15,480 Speaker 1: You're disappointed. Will that be a fairce eummation of your view? 8 00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:20,640 Speaker 2: Very disappointed. We did make submissions to the committee about 9 00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:23,320 Speaker 2: the issues that we saw with the three strikes as 10 00:00:23,320 --> 00:00:26,240 Speaker 2: it was currently drafted prior to the United slant yesterday 11 00:00:26,280 --> 00:00:31,320 Speaker 2: by Nicola McKay. And this is just exacerbating a problem 12 00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:32,560 Speaker 2: that will exist anyway. 13 00:00:33,200 --> 00:00:35,840 Speaker 1: Is it the three strikes or is it the trigger point. 14 00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:39,160 Speaker 2: It's a combination of it all. First of all, there's 15 00:00:39,200 --> 00:00:42,120 Speaker 2: no evidence that this actually works in the way that 16 00:00:42,240 --> 00:00:46,400 Speaker 2: people want to work. It's not at terence. Unfortunately, what 17 00:00:46,440 --> 00:00:48,640 Speaker 2: we want, all of us want less crime and less 18 00:00:48,640 --> 00:00:52,400 Speaker 2: serious crime. But this is actually going to capture all 19 00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:55,880 Speaker 2: sorts of people who shouldn't necessarily be there. For example, 20 00:00:56,280 --> 00:00:59,120 Speaker 2: sencing is very nuanced and difficult, and some people might 21 00:00:59,160 --> 00:01:01,120 Speaker 2: be sent to jail simply because they don't have a 22 00:01:01,120 --> 00:01:04,160 Speaker 2: house in which they can do an electronically monitored sentence. 23 00:01:04,440 --> 00:01:06,560 Speaker 2: It will lead to unfair and unjust outcomes. 24 00:01:06,959 --> 00:01:09,440 Speaker 1: Is it nuanced because they've made it nuanced, and it 25 00:01:09,440 --> 00:01:11,360 Speaker 1: doesn't have to be as nuanced as it is. 26 00:01:12,560 --> 00:01:15,720 Speaker 2: No sentencing must be nuanced. There are so many factors 27 00:01:15,720 --> 00:01:18,920 Speaker 2: in human beings that apply. We look first at the 28 00:01:18,959 --> 00:01:22,360 Speaker 2: offense always in sentencing, and the judge takes a starting 29 00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:25,240 Speaker 2: point based on the offense, and then they look at 30 00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:29,760 Speaker 2: factors that are unique to that offender. And there's a 31 00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:33,440 Speaker 2: balance that has to be performed with all sentences. And 32 00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:37,160 Speaker 2: it's complex, and that complexity might not always come across 33 00:01:37,319 --> 00:01:40,039 Speaker 2: in a newspaper article, which I think is where a 34 00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:43,640 Speaker 2: lot of the people who see problems get their information. 35 00:01:45,280 --> 00:01:47,760 Speaker 1: But those people have a vote, as to you, and 36 00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:50,000 Speaker 1: this is where we're at. We're at the intersection of 37 00:01:50,080 --> 00:01:52,559 Speaker 1: public opinion versus the legal fraternity, aren't we. 38 00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:57,680 Speaker 2: Yes, one would expect that any changes are based on evidence, 39 00:01:57,760 --> 00:02:00,640 Speaker 2: and if they seriously want there to be a difference 40 00:02:00,680 --> 00:02:03,559 Speaker 2: made to serious offending, they need to put more money 41 00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:08,880 Speaker 2: into mental health and other rehabilitation processes which help to 42 00:02:08,960 --> 00:02:11,440 Speaker 2: keep make sure take away the causes of crime, and 43 00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:15,480 Speaker 2: that will impact on the people committing crimes. 44 00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:18,040 Speaker 1: True to say, if you're in jail, you don't commit crime. 45 00:02:19,960 --> 00:02:21,359 Speaker 2: Actually not true. 46 00:02:22,960 --> 00:02:24,920 Speaker 1: You're not breaking into my house while you're in jail. 47 00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:28,280 Speaker 2: No, you're not breaking into your house. But there are 48 00:02:28,280 --> 00:02:31,239 Speaker 2: other crimes that people commit allegedly at the moment of 49 00:02:31,320 --> 00:02:33,600 Speaker 2: a few cases before the courts, whilst they're in jail. 50 00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:37,040 Speaker 2: That is not the issue. I'm also very very concerned 51 00:02:37,040 --> 00:02:40,360 Speaker 2: about the lack of parole. Parole is an incentive for 52 00:02:40,480 --> 00:02:44,040 Speaker 2: good behavior, and it encourages people, incentivises them to do 53 00:02:44,480 --> 00:02:49,320 Speaker 2: engage with psychologists and take programs, understand the trigger points. 54 00:02:49,480 --> 00:02:53,519 Speaker 2: Under this regime, the most serious offenders will be not 55 00:02:53,639 --> 00:02:56,440 Speaker 2: allowed any parole. They won't be given any rehabilitation. We 56 00:02:56,520 --> 00:02:58,720 Speaker 2: can say that now, and then they'll be chucked out 57 00:02:58,720 --> 00:03:02,480 Speaker 2: on the street without the There's strong support that the 58 00:03:02,520 --> 00:03:06,080 Speaker 2: parole system puts around people to make sure they transition 59 00:03:06,240 --> 00:03:09,400 Speaker 2: back into our society. This is actually going to achieve 60 00:03:09,440 --> 00:03:12,080 Speaker 2: exactly the opposite of what they want to achieve, and 61 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:13,399 Speaker 2: that's what concerns us. 62 00:03:13,480 --> 00:03:15,680 Speaker 1: Julien Kin Kay, appreciate your time very much. Mike. We 63 00:03:15,680 --> 00:03:17,640 Speaker 1: don't want to deterrent. We want more bad people in 64 00:03:17,639 --> 00:03:19,600 Speaker 1: prison for longer. Mike. The reason we have so many 65 00:03:19,639 --> 00:03:22,680 Speaker 1: recidibus criminals is because of that defense Lawyer're making excuses 66 00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:25,680 Speaker 1: for them and why they offend, and so neither party 67 00:03:25,720 --> 00:03:26,480 Speaker 1: shall agree. 68 00:03:26,919 --> 00:03:29,840 Speaker 2: For more from The mic Asking Breakfast Listen live to 69 00:03:29,960 --> 00:03:33,000 Speaker 2: news talks it'd be from six am weekdays, or follow 70 00:03:33,040 --> 00:03:34,560 Speaker 2: the podcast on iHeartRadio