1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:02,120 Speaker 1: On the huddle of this this evening, Tris Shurson Shurson, 2 00:00:02,160 --> 00:00:04,520 Speaker 1: Willis pr and Mark Sainsbury broadcast to hire you. 3 00:00:04,519 --> 00:00:06,320 Speaker 2: Two good Hello. 4 00:00:06,640 --> 00:00:08,200 Speaker 1: Now I don't know about yu, Trish. Would you be 5 00:00:08,240 --> 00:00:09,879 Speaker 1: a bogan who's into you're going to go to the 6 00:00:09,960 --> 00:00:10,440 Speaker 1: rugby ley? 7 00:00:12,400 --> 00:00:14,880 Speaker 3: Well, I don't think you'll find me at the State 8 00:00:14,920 --> 00:00:17,639 Speaker 3: of Origin match, but that doesn't mean I am not 9 00:00:17,880 --> 00:00:21,319 Speaker 3: fizzing about it coming to Auckland. I was driving around 10 00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:24,080 Speaker 3: last week as often do I haven't with the radio 11 00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:26,880 Speaker 3: on and I heard someone on talking about how this 12 00:00:27,040 --> 00:00:31,160 Speaker 3: last weekend we've had in Auckland that our hotel bookings 13 00:00:31,280 --> 00:00:34,640 Speaker 3: had been the biggest they had been since pre COVID, 14 00:00:35,400 --> 00:00:37,840 Speaker 3: and I just think, you know, the Queen City over 15 00:00:37,880 --> 00:00:41,879 Speaker 3: the last six years had really lost her shine, and 16 00:00:41,920 --> 00:00:44,240 Speaker 3: I feel like she's getting it back. You can living 17 00:00:44,280 --> 00:00:46,800 Speaker 3: in Auckland. You can just feel it as you drive around. 18 00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:49,760 Speaker 3: We've got amazing things at the sale GP and having 19 00:00:49,920 --> 00:00:54,080 Speaker 3: a big forward pipeline of these great events like State 20 00:00:54,080 --> 00:00:58,040 Speaker 3: of Origin means that hopefully Auckland can get back into 21 00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:01,000 Speaker 3: playing in the big leagues when it comes to these 22 00:01:01,120 --> 00:01:04,200 Speaker 3: kinds of events. But we do need those big league 23 00:01:04,280 --> 00:01:07,640 Speaker 3: settings that makes it great for events to come here. 24 00:01:07,760 --> 00:01:11,280 Speaker 1: You're too right. I mean, actually, in all honesty saying so, 25 00:01:11,360 --> 00:01:13,920 Speaker 1: the announcement of state of origin is actually much less 26 00:01:13,959 --> 00:01:16,440 Speaker 1: important than the change of rules for Eden Park, isn't it. 27 00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:19,040 Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean that's that's going to be a sort 28 00:01:19,040 --> 00:01:21,199 Speaker 2: of a game. I mean it's I think everyone seems 29 00:01:21,200 --> 00:01:23,319 Speaker 2: he pleased about that, unless you can happen to be 30 00:01:23,600 --> 00:01:25,400 Speaker 2: you know, some of the bigley live there who don't 31 00:01:25,520 --> 00:01:27,400 Speaker 2: like it going on. I mean I found it. Your 32 00:01:27,440 --> 00:01:29,520 Speaker 2: interesting thing about the state of Oha courses is they 33 00:01:29,520 --> 00:01:31,520 Speaker 2: could have it at any stadium in Australia and sell 34 00:01:31,560 --> 00:01:33,440 Speaker 2: it out. You know, they don't need to bring it 35 00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:35,880 Speaker 2: here as a money spinner, but they want to grow 36 00:01:35,959 --> 00:01:36,560 Speaker 2: the game. 37 00:01:37,480 --> 00:01:39,000 Speaker 1: And we sweetened it with five mil. 38 00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:43,280 Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, but look, you know, as I said that 39 00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:45,920 Speaker 2: one of those stated of games wherever you had them, 40 00:01:45,920 --> 00:01:48,120 Speaker 2: we ever had them, is going to be a money spinner. 41 00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:51,080 Speaker 2: Yeah too. Right, So, and look I think it's fantastic 42 00:01:51,520 --> 00:01:54,080 Speaker 2: and there's I think that Trisha's right, you know, having 43 00:01:54,160 --> 00:01:56,560 Speaker 2: things that look forward to you sort of get that 44 00:01:56,680 --> 00:01:59,240 Speaker 2: lift without that before you even speak the day Yeah too. 45 00:01:59,360 --> 00:02:02,120 Speaker 1: Right now, this FDA business, Trish, what do you think 46 00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:04,680 Speaker 1: about this. So we is this thirty three billion dollars 47 00:02:04,720 --> 00:02:06,000 Speaker 1: over fifteen years serious? 48 00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:12,680 Speaker 3: Well, I mean, I don't know about whether it's The 49 00:02:12,760 --> 00:02:15,560 Speaker 3: question is whether it's serious. I think the question is 50 00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:20,600 Speaker 3: what does the wording actually mean? Because when it comes 51 00:02:20,639 --> 00:02:23,480 Speaker 3: to trade deals, they open doors, but of course they 52 00:02:23,520 --> 00:02:27,959 Speaker 3: don't make companies walk through them. So this thirty four 53 00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:32,000 Speaker 3: billion line sounds good that that's essentially saying, you know, 54 00:02:32,320 --> 00:02:38,160 Speaker 3: our companies will go off and make these investments in India. 55 00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:42,200 Speaker 3: But the real question is can we here in New 56 00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:47,600 Speaker 3: Zealand create the conditions where businesses want to actually make 57 00:02:47,639 --> 00:02:49,959 Speaker 3: that kind of investment at scale? And I think that's 58 00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:53,320 Speaker 3: the bigger question. And often we get confused between what 59 00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:58,400 Speaker 3: government can do and actually all of the real business 60 00:02:58,440 --> 00:03:01,200 Speaker 3: stuff that businesses have to to make this stuff work. 61 00:03:02,040 --> 00:03:06,280 Speaker 1: Yep, fair point saying so, And on this constant carping 62 00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:08,440 Speaker 1: from the Labor Party, they're only doing this for politics, 63 00:03:08,520 --> 00:03:10,079 Speaker 1: right because we all know that at the end of 64 00:03:10,120 --> 00:03:11,680 Speaker 1: the day they're going to support this, aren't they. 65 00:03:12,680 --> 00:03:15,840 Speaker 2: Well yes, But I mean the other issue, I mean, 66 00:03:15,880 --> 00:03:18,359 Speaker 2: I think this serious questions be asked about this thirty 67 00:03:18,400 --> 00:03:22,840 Speaker 2: five billion investment, and they're from ordver Young that a 68 00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:26,200 Speaker 2: very good piece of the Herald sort of going into 69 00:03:26,240 --> 00:03:29,800 Speaker 2: the details of this, and a lot of it was 70 00:03:31,600 --> 00:03:34,560 Speaker 2: that that sort of money who was going to mean 71 00:03:34,680 --> 00:03:36,720 Speaker 2: a who was going to have that money to invest 72 00:03:36,800 --> 00:03:41,360 Speaker 2: plus built into the agreement is something that we're in 73 00:03:41,400 --> 00:03:43,680 Speaker 2: there can say hey, you haven't fulfilled this, We're going 74 00:03:43,720 --> 00:03:46,440 Speaker 2: to cancel this or do this or claim that, and 75 00:03:46,480 --> 00:03:49,000 Speaker 2: no one's one hundred percent sure of how that's going 76 00:03:49,040 --> 00:03:49,560 Speaker 2: to work. 77 00:03:50,720 --> 00:03:52,840 Speaker 1: Trash. 78 00:03:52,960 --> 00:03:53,200 Speaker 2: Yeah. 79 00:03:53,320 --> 00:03:57,240 Speaker 3: I caught the Q and A interview yesterday with Todd 80 00:03:57,320 --> 00:04:03,480 Speaker 3: McClay and it was canvassing this issue and the migration 81 00:04:03,720 --> 00:04:07,560 Speaker 3: issue in relation to the trade agreement, and I think 82 00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:10,080 Speaker 3: there's two things that struck out for me, Like for most, 83 00:04:10,280 --> 00:04:14,400 Speaker 3: for most Kiwi's this is really hard to understand and get. 84 00:04:14,280 --> 00:04:14,680 Speaker 2: A grip on. 85 00:04:15,240 --> 00:04:18,400 Speaker 3: So I think the call is to our senior politicians 86 00:04:18,600 --> 00:04:23,120 Speaker 3: to be upfront about it and try not to skew 87 00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:29,200 Speaker 3: off into populism, because you know, migration is such a 88 00:04:29,240 --> 00:04:32,120 Speaker 3: hot button issue around the world and Winston is trying 89 00:04:32,120 --> 00:04:34,719 Speaker 3: to go off on that tangent with this, but also 90 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:38,600 Speaker 3: on these kinds of numbers and what they mean in 91 00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:42,000 Speaker 3: the agreement. It may be that the government needs to 92 00:04:42,040 --> 00:04:45,040 Speaker 3: get much clearer on the messaging around that and what 93 00:04:45,200 --> 00:04:49,320 Speaker 3: these words actually mean in not only in practice, but 94 00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:51,839 Speaker 3: who will have to deliver on these promises? 95 00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:54,080 Speaker 1: Yeah too write and whether they can actually be forced 96 00:04:54,080 --> 00:04:55,599 Speaker 1: to deliver on them. Guys, we'll take a break and 97 00:04:55,640 --> 00:04:57,640 Speaker 1: come back and just to talk about David Seymour and 98 00:04:57,640 --> 00:05:00,599 Speaker 1: his cutting the size of government policy the huddle Mark 99 00:05:00,640 --> 00:05:03,679 Speaker 1: Sainsbury Trisherson now Saints what did you make of David 100 00:05:03,680 --> 00:05:06,039 Speaker 1: Seymour's policy to cut the size of government? 101 00:05:07,920 --> 00:05:11,520 Speaker 2: How many times have we heard this? But I do 102 00:05:11,600 --> 00:05:14,560 Speaker 2: have a certain amount of sympathy for cutting the size. 103 00:05:14,560 --> 00:05:16,960 Speaker 2: I think cabinet is too bigger. I've always preferred the 104 00:05:16,960 --> 00:05:19,120 Speaker 2: American system. You get proper people who know what they're 105 00:05:19,120 --> 00:05:23,159 Speaker 2: doing in cabinet rather than time service. But regardless of that, 106 00:05:23,200 --> 00:05:26,040 Speaker 2: you actually nailed it before. If it's not a bottom line, 107 00:05:26,040 --> 00:05:27,000 Speaker 2: what does it actually mean? 108 00:05:28,560 --> 00:05:30,640 Speaker 1: Yes, Tresh, what do you thank you? Sainso for agreeing 109 00:05:30,680 --> 00:05:32,520 Speaker 1: with me? Tresh? 110 00:05:33,279 --> 00:05:38,159 Speaker 3: Would add two words actually to your bottom line in 111 00:05:38,240 --> 00:05:42,280 Speaker 3: terms of every policy put up this election, and that 112 00:05:42,320 --> 00:05:46,560 Speaker 3: would be cost benefit. And you know this is a 113 00:05:46,600 --> 00:05:51,320 Speaker 3: great example of where we are lacking real cost benefit 114 00:05:51,400 --> 00:05:56,799 Speaker 3: analysis across government. Starting with what does this whole picture 115 00:05:56,800 --> 00:06:00,839 Speaker 3: look like. So don't forget when you're looking at the 116 00:06:00,880 --> 00:06:03,840 Speaker 3: sort of structure of government, you've got ministers sitting at 117 00:06:03,839 --> 00:06:07,960 Speaker 3: the top, who then are in charge of portfolios, and 118 00:06:08,000 --> 00:06:10,560 Speaker 3: then as a result of those portfolios, you have the 119 00:06:10,640 --> 00:06:14,719 Speaker 3: departments sitting underneath them. So in my view, this isn't 120 00:06:14,760 --> 00:06:18,719 Speaker 3: an all chart hobby to relook at how we can 121 00:06:18,760 --> 00:06:24,520 Speaker 3: streamline government. It's actually about accountability. Because you the three 122 00:06:24,520 --> 00:06:27,200 Speaker 3: of us, I don't know how many times we've looked 123 00:06:27,240 --> 00:06:30,320 Speaker 3: at things going wrong, we've talked about a lack of accountability. 124 00:06:30,560 --> 00:06:37,640 Speaker 3: That's because the system is an absolute muddle. So that's 125 00:06:37,680 --> 00:06:41,359 Speaker 3: problem one that it needs to solve is better accountability. 126 00:06:42,040 --> 00:06:45,719 Speaker 3: The second point is, you know, if you want to 127 00:06:45,800 --> 00:06:49,880 Speaker 3: reform departments, you have to reform what sits above them. 128 00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:54,800 Speaker 3: So that is actually to Mark's point about streamlining our cabinet. 129 00:06:54,880 --> 00:06:59,040 Speaker 3: At the moment, way too many cabinet ministers portfolios are 130 00:06:59,080 --> 00:07:01,800 Speaker 3: a mess across them. There's a lot of duplication, which 131 00:07:01,839 --> 00:07:05,880 Speaker 3: means for ministries it's confusing as well. And then I 132 00:07:05,880 --> 00:07:08,760 Speaker 3: think the other point, and this is really the risk area. 133 00:07:08,800 --> 00:07:13,400 Speaker 3: Though this would have to be done incredibly thoughtfully and surgically, 134 00:07:13,720 --> 00:07:18,280 Speaker 3: because what we've seen time and time again is reorganizing 135 00:07:18,280 --> 00:07:21,080 Speaker 3: the deck chairs on the Titanic. Health in New Zealand 136 00:07:21,120 --> 00:07:24,960 Speaker 3: is a great example, and you get stasis, you get 137 00:07:25,080 --> 00:07:29,000 Speaker 3: huge cost and people again they lose sight of the 138 00:07:29,040 --> 00:07:32,000 Speaker 3: cost benefit analysis and the problem that we're trying to solve. 139 00:07:31,880 --> 00:07:34,120 Speaker 1: You too, right, is it not possible actually saying so 140 00:07:34,200 --> 00:07:36,680 Speaker 1: that the government is by government? I do mean you know, 141 00:07:36,800 --> 00:07:40,480 Speaker 1: the state, the public service, the cabinet, that the executive, 142 00:07:40,480 --> 00:07:43,360 Speaker 1: the whole lot of it is so big and there 143 00:07:43,400 --> 00:07:46,400 Speaker 1: are so many vested interests and so much fear of 144 00:07:46,560 --> 00:07:49,120 Speaker 1: taking a risk that actually the chances of being able 145 00:07:49,520 --> 00:07:51,520 Speaker 1: to reduce it are pretty low. 146 00:07:54,360 --> 00:07:56,800 Speaker 2: So a combination of the deep state and. 147 00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:04,280 Speaker 1: Not like conspiracy theory, no more tiding on. Look look 148 00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:05,280 Speaker 1: at look at health. 149 00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:07,960 Speaker 2: Look there's always an issue, and I think there's always 150 00:08:07,960 --> 00:08:10,120 Speaker 2: been an issue spent even with the public service. It's 151 00:08:10,120 --> 00:08:14,640 Speaker 2: just like this monolith and it's just very hard to change, 152 00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:16,800 Speaker 2: you know. So whether you're going to have to look 153 00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:21,120 Speaker 2: at something you're radical and or do you look at 154 00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:23,400 Speaker 2: sort of incremental change, it's just gonna. 155 00:08:23,240 --> 00:08:25,200 Speaker 1: Not know you need to go radical. But if you 156 00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:26,960 Speaker 1: do go radical, do you reckon it would work, Like 157 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:30,600 Speaker 1: do you reckon? You could actually convince somebody Okay, here's 158 00:08:30,720 --> 00:08:32,800 Speaker 1: this is how you do it, wouldn't it be you'd 159 00:08:32,840 --> 00:08:34,480 Speaker 1: cut a bunch of ministries like you go through and 160 00:08:34,520 --> 00:08:38,679 Speaker 1: you go bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, Women's Ministry, mari Affairs, ministry, 161 00:08:38,720 --> 00:08:40,760 Speaker 1: Ethnic af fairs, like just get rid of them, wouldn't you. 162 00:08:43,559 --> 00:08:45,120 Speaker 2: Then we've also got no no, no. 163 00:08:46,960 --> 00:08:47,400 Speaker 3: Industries. 164 00:08:47,760 --> 00:08:50,839 Speaker 2: But are you going to end up as well? There's 165 00:08:50,880 --> 00:08:52,640 Speaker 2: all got a factor in the human cost. I mean, 166 00:08:52,640 --> 00:08:54,800 Speaker 2: look at even just what the cuts, the cuts, which 167 00:08:54,840 --> 00:08:57,400 Speaker 2: is the next transpiring the cuts the sort of Wellington 168 00:08:57,960 --> 00:08:59,480 Speaker 2: that's the other thing you're going to you're talking of 169 00:08:59,559 --> 00:09:00,800 Speaker 2: also people's lives. 170 00:09:01,679 --> 00:09:05,280 Speaker 1: Ye would, But I think again, go go Trish. 171 00:09:05,280 --> 00:09:08,000 Speaker 3: You're starting you're starting in the middle of the sad word. 172 00:09:08,040 --> 00:09:09,880 Speaker 3: You've got to start with the slice on top. You 173 00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:13,400 Speaker 3: have to start with cabinet and how that's leans example, 174 00:09:13,760 --> 00:09:17,040 Speaker 3: and then and then that is what determines then what 175 00:09:17,240 --> 00:09:21,240 Speaker 3: portfolios and ministry sit under that. If you just come 176 00:09:21,320 --> 00:09:23,600 Speaker 3: back to which is where we've got in the last 177 00:09:23,640 --> 00:09:26,720 Speaker 3: few years with quote, you know, cuts to the public service, 178 00:09:27,440 --> 00:09:30,400 Speaker 3: again we lose sight of the problem that we're trying 179 00:09:30,400 --> 00:09:35,480 Speaker 3: to solve and we also don't get to the benefit 180 00:09:35,520 --> 00:09:37,080 Speaker 3: that we need out of it. So you've got to 181 00:09:37,080 --> 00:09:39,359 Speaker 3: start at the top and work through it systematically. 182 00:09:39,440 --> 00:09:40,480 Speaker 1: Okay, now, before you. 183 00:09:40,480 --> 00:09:42,760 Speaker 2: See, there also should be a cross party issue. I mean, 184 00:09:42,800 --> 00:09:46,280 Speaker 2: how government runs and the efficiency is you know, no, 185 00:09:46,400 --> 00:09:48,560 Speaker 2: it's in power for ever, so it switches over. So 186 00:09:48,800 --> 00:09:51,240 Speaker 2: it should be something that all the parties should be 187 00:09:51,280 --> 00:09:53,760 Speaker 2: involved in saying how can we make this better? Yeah? 188 00:09:53,800 --> 00:09:55,600 Speaker 1: Well true, but yeah, and we'll have a debate about 189 00:09:55,600 --> 00:09:57,760 Speaker 1: bipartisanship or whether that's a good idea later or not. 190 00:09:58,000 --> 00:10:00,319 Speaker 1: Listen really quickly from each of you, say so, if 191 00:10:00,360 --> 00:10:02,880 Speaker 1: I had to ask you to define what New Zealand 192 00:10:03,000 --> 00:10:05,800 Speaker 1: cuisine is, how would you describe it? 193 00:10:05,920 --> 00:10:06,439 Speaker 2: Chips? 194 00:10:07,480 --> 00:10:08,319 Speaker 1: What like fries? 195 00:10:09,240 --> 00:10:15,000 Speaker 2: Yeah? Seven million servings a week? This is seven million 196 00:10:15,400 --> 00:10:16,520 Speaker 2: servings a week. 197 00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:21,080 Speaker 1: Here, what does this say about us? Okaysh please do 198 00:10:21,200 --> 00:10:21,680 Speaker 1: better than that. 199 00:10:23,240 --> 00:10:28,080 Speaker 3: I would describe New Zealand cuisine as fantastic. It's almost 200 00:10:28,280 --> 00:10:32,559 Speaker 3: like the foundations of the best Italian cuisine. It's based 201 00:10:32,600 --> 00:10:38,440 Speaker 3: on incredibly beautiful fresh produce and ingredients with amazing, amazing 202 00:10:38,559 --> 00:10:41,800 Speaker 3: chefs who know just how to bring those ingredients to 203 00:10:41,880 --> 00:10:45,760 Speaker 3: the foe without you know, without overegging the pudding as 204 00:10:45,760 --> 00:10:46,000 Speaker 3: it were. 205 00:10:46,080 --> 00:10:48,800 Speaker 1: I like that, you see. That's better than chips. 206 00:10:52,960 --> 00:10:56,679 Speaker 2: Shift using Lord above. 207 00:10:56,760 --> 00:10:58,600 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, thank you so much. Lovely to talk to 208 00:10:58,600 --> 00:11:00,000 Speaker 1: the pair of Trishes and Mark Says. 209 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:03,240 Speaker 3: Read for more from Hither Duplessy Allen Drive. 210 00:11:03,400 --> 00:11:06,839 Speaker 2: Listen live to news Talks it B from four pm weekdays, 211 00:11:06,920 --> 00:11:09,120 Speaker 2: or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio.