1 00:00:00,400 --> 00:00:02,920 Speaker 1: Heather do for Sea Ellen all right? 2 00:00:03,040 --> 00:00:05,920 Speaker 2: So Destiny Church leaders Brian and Hannah Tamaki have been 3 00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:08,760 Speaker 2: in court today for allegedly breaking the big Auckland lockdown 4 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:10,560 Speaker 2: of twenty twenty one. Now, if you cast your mind back, 5 00:00:10,560 --> 00:00:13,160 Speaker 2: you'll remember the Tamaki's held those protests in the Auckland 6 00:00:13,200 --> 00:00:16,840 Speaker 2: domain in October and November of twenty twenty one, when 7 00:00:16,880 --> 00:00:18,279 Speaker 2: the biggest city in the country is supposed to be 8 00:00:18,360 --> 00:00:20,479 Speaker 2: under lockdown. There are a couple of other defendants also 9 00:00:20,480 --> 00:00:26,000 Speaker 2: facing charges. Steve Cullen is a criminal lawyer with us. Now, hey, Steve, Oh, hi, Heather, Steve, 10 00:00:26,120 --> 00:00:28,160 Speaker 2: isn't worth our time and our money to be pursuing 11 00:00:28,200 --> 00:00:31,000 Speaker 2: something three years later when there aren't lockdowns anymore. 12 00:00:31,640 --> 00:00:33,160 Speaker 1: Well, I hate you, and that we're a bit between 13 00:00:33,159 --> 00:00:36,000 Speaker 1: a rock and a hard place. Because if delay meant 14 00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:38,920 Speaker 1: that charges weren't pursued, then of course everybody would delay. 15 00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:42,240 Speaker 1: And we do have cases of historical fraud and historical seats. 16 00:00:42,280 --> 00:00:46,040 Speaker 1: But this listit of generous guidelines would be applied to this. 17 00:00:46,120 --> 00:00:48,000 Speaker 1: One would think that you have to have a good 18 00:00:48,080 --> 00:00:50,760 Speaker 1: close look at it and as says, whether it's viable 19 00:00:50,800 --> 00:00:52,879 Speaker 1: to carry on or not. I don't really want to 20 00:00:52,880 --> 00:00:53,840 Speaker 1: comment any more than that. 21 00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:55,600 Speaker 2: No, I take your point at the point I'm trying 22 00:00:55,600 --> 00:00:58,200 Speaker 2: to make, because the difference between this and any standard 23 00:00:58,200 --> 00:01:01,280 Speaker 2: delay is that if you rape somebody and then try 24 00:01:01,280 --> 00:01:03,000 Speaker 2: to delay it, a rape is still a rape is 25 00:01:03,440 --> 00:01:05,720 Speaker 2: a crime many many years later. But at the moment 26 00:01:05,760 --> 00:01:07,399 Speaker 2: it's a bit different with this, isn't it, Because we're 27 00:01:07,400 --> 00:01:08,880 Speaker 2: not doing the lockdowns anymore, are we. 28 00:01:09,680 --> 00:01:11,520 Speaker 1: That's right, And one would think they'd take a look 29 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:14,800 Speaker 1: out the gravity of the situation now with hindsight, but 30 00:01:14,880 --> 00:01:16,560 Speaker 1: I suppose they can't. They have to deal with it 31 00:01:16,680 --> 00:01:19,039 Speaker 1: on the basis of the out was viewed at the time, 32 00:01:19,160 --> 00:01:22,560 Speaker 1: and to take a really strict approach. If you take 33 00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:25,240 Speaker 1: somebody flouting public orders when it's in the interests of 34 00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:27,479 Speaker 1: the nation and then the interests of delf, that's got 35 00:01:27,520 --> 00:01:28,560 Speaker 1: to be viewed seriously. 36 00:01:29,200 --> 00:01:31,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, I can know what's the argument, because there's no 37 00:01:31,120 --> 00:01:33,280 Speaker 2: disputing that they were there. We saw them with our 38 00:01:33,360 --> 00:01:34,720 Speaker 2: own eyes. So why are they fighting this? 39 00:01:35,520 --> 00:01:38,920 Speaker 1: Well, one would think they're very commident and experience counsel there. 40 00:01:38,920 --> 00:01:41,319 Speaker 1: With mister mantil Casey, one would think he's either got 41 00:01:41,319 --> 00:01:43,400 Speaker 1: a very good legal or technical point. He could be 42 00:01:43,480 --> 00:01:45,120 Speaker 1: arguing under the Bill of Right Seck that they had 43 00:01:45,200 --> 00:01:48,160 Speaker 1: freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, or he made and 44 00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 1: be trying to say that there's some challenge to the 45 00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:54,920 Speaker 1: legislation that excluded people from forming public gathering. So we'll 46 00:01:54,920 --> 00:01:56,680 Speaker 1: all be watching them the brief to see what the 47 00:01:56,800 --> 00:01:58,760 Speaker 1: argument is and see how well it progresses. 48 00:01:59,600 --> 00:02:01,800 Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree with you. It's gonna fascinating. Hey, thank you, Steve. 49 00:02:01,840 --> 00:02:03,120 Speaker 2: Steve Cullen, criminal lawyer. 50 00:02:03,960 --> 00:02:07,160 Speaker 1: For more from Hither Duplessy Allen Drive, listen live to 51 00:02:07,240 --> 00:02:07,760 Speaker 1: news talks. 52 00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:11,000 Speaker 2: It'd be from four pm weekdays, or follow the podcast 53 00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:12,040 Speaker 2: on iHeartRadio