WEBVTT - Chainsaws vs scalpels: How to do DOGE properly

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>This week on the Business of Tech powered by two

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Degrees Business, we're talking DOGE, the Trump Administration's Department of

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Government Efficiency. It's tearing through government agencies, laying off tens

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:19.479
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of public servants, and dismantling entire departments such

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>as US AID. It's all in aid off a grand

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>plan to slash the US deficit, which sees America pay

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>iwatering amounts each year to service national debt. Here's how

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Elol Musk, doge's chief architect, describes the mission to Fox News.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Our goal is to reduce the deficit by a trillion dollars,

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>so from a nominal deficit of two trillion to track

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 2>cut the deficit in half to one trillion, or looked

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 2>at it in toilet federal spanning, to drop the federal

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>spanning from seven trillion to sex trillion. We want to

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 2>reduce the spending by eliminating waste and fort reduce the

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>spanning by fifteen percent, which seems really quite achievable. The

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 2>government is not efficient and there's a lot of Western frauds,

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 2>so we feel confident that fifteen percent reduction can can

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 2>be done without affecting any of the critical government services.

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Sounds great in theory, but critics argue that the efficiency

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>drive is really a thinly veiled attempt to weed out

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the so called deep state that Trump believes trying to

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>derail his first presidency. They also claim all hurt US

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>citizens by radically reducing key functions like Social Security and

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the National Institutes of Health. Even the Department of Education

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is getting a massive cut. DOAGE claims it's amassed one

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty billion US in savings already, thirty percent

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of it from contract grant and lease cancellations. Musk tells

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>us that less than fifteen percent of the spending being

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>cut is out and out fraud. The next six to

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve months will reveal the impact of DOGE on the

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>USA government and on the services that citizens enjoy, but

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>already governments around the world are considering their own cost

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>cutting drives. We got off to an early start even

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>before the Coalition government came into office, with labor trimming

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>public servant headcount. That's accelerated under the Coalition, which spending

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>cuts to programs across the board with a similar aim

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to cut national debt. We've also got David Seymour's Ministry

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of regulation tasked with identifying and cutting superfluous rules and regulations.

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's be fair, doge is something else entirely with Elon

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Musk's team of young geeks given unprecedented access to government records,

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's ripe for conflicts of interest as well, with musks

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 1>companies SpaceX and Tesla having received billions in contracts and

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>subsidies from the US government. But I think most people

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>have some sympathy for the idea of smaller government and

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>cutting red tape and using technology to gain more visibility

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>into government spending and procuring services in a smarter way.

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>So how could we do doge properly here in New Zealand. Well,

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I assembled a super smart panel of people to try

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and find out. Joining me this week are Rob Campbell,

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Ben Reid, and Paul Quickendon.

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Rob Campbell has been a board director and chair of

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>companies like SkyCity, Tourism Holdings and Somerset Group, as well

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>as sitting on the boards of government agencies like the

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Environmental Protection Agency and tefatu Ura Health New Zealand, where

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>he was sacked as board chair in February twenty twenty three.

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>For a LinkedIn post, he wrote that criticized the National

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Party's policy on the Three Waters reform. If anyone knows

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>where the inefficiencies in our largest government agencies are, it's

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>probably rob Ben Reid returns to the show the christ

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Church Futurist and tech can sultant. He's given a lot

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of thought to how technology can play a role in

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>creating a more efficient and fairer government in everything from

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>policymaking to electronic voting, and Paul quickened In rounds out

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the panel. Paul's the chief commercial officer and head of

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>the New Zealand operation of Easy Crypto, the largest locally

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>owned crypto exchange, which last month was acquired by Australian

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>owned swift FX. Paul thinks a lot about how decentralized

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>technologies like the blockchain and smart contracts can be applied

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to the big problems facing society. So, without further ado,

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>here's my chat with the Doge Panel this week on

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the Business of Tech. Rob Ben Paul, welcome to the

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Business of Tech. Thanks so much for coming on. You're

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Jordder so like me, you've probably been watching with a

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>mix of horror, fascination and sort of amusement. What's been

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 1>going on in the US with DOGE, the Department of

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Government Efficiency, the Elon Musk led efforts, and boy, it's

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>just amazing what's coming out every week some of the

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>things that he has done. Obviously big layoffs in some

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>government departments, some government departments effectively being dismantled, the likes

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of us AID. You're seeing the United States Digital Services,

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>an agency that was run out of the White House

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that's been basically absorbed into DOGE. You've got Elon Musks

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>essentially saying I need the source code of government to

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>do this properly. I need to get into every database,

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>look at every data feed to make sure that what

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm being told about what is going on in government

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is accurate. He's talking about magic money computers that exist

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in the US government. A lot of people have said, well, duh, yeah,

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what the Treasury and others do. They print and

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>manufacture money. But you've also got a vein I suspect

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>you agree as well. Of Look, this is actually a

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>useful thing to do to look at efficiency, waste, and

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>even fraud. And Musca said he thinks it's probably about

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>ten to twenty percent of its actual fraud that is

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>going on where they see they need to fix things.

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>The rest of it is inefficiency, and it's probably something

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you can all relate to. We're all frustrated about how

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>slow moving and bureaucratic government can be and that is

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>leading to real problems in society, inequality, slow access to

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>for instance, healthcare. We've just in the last couple of

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>days we heard some horrific stories about people having to

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>wait for cardiograms and potentially that leading to fatal conditions.

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.119
<v Speaker 1>So we know there is an efficiency, there are bottlenecks there,

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>but really Keen, first of all, we will stell it

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>with you, Rob, with your extensive experience both in business

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and obviously as the chair of Ta Fatuura for period

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>as well, overseeing huge government spending there and a big bureaucracy.

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of dog and is there a

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>kernel of value on what they're attempting.

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 4>There's a kernel of value in continuously reevaluating what you're

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 4>doing to ensure that you are doing it efficiently and effectively,

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 4>whether you're in private business or government, and governments are

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 4>notoriously not good at this, So there's value in that.

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Whether letting a mad axe man into the front door

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 4>and having him roam around the government is a good

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 4>way of doing that. I'm much less convinced. I don't

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 4>think there's much to be said for the way they're

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 4>going about it. But that doesn't mean that there isn't

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 4>a need to have continual reevaluation of that kind going on.

0:07:53.600 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 4>But as has happened here much lesser levels. The key

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 4>to doing any of these exercises is to understand the mechanism,

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 4>the model that you're dealing with. Understand what is happening there,

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 4>not just deal with it, which with the metrics which

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 4>are coming out the far end, but understand what the

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 4>model is you're working with. And if you don't do that,

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.559
<v Speaker 4>you can go and roam around. Accountants to it quite often,

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 4>and just as dangerously, you can go and roam around.

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 4>And so we want to cut this, we want to

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 4>cut that, we want to do this. But if you

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 4>don't understand to come back to it, don't understand the

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 4>model of what's going on here, then you're probably going

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 4>to cause as much damage as you'll do good. And

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 4>I suspect that with the way they're approaching it in

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 4>the US, that's highly likely to be the case.

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's a big criticism of DOGE so far

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is that the team members, while a lot of them

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>are skilled computer programmers, some of the very young, gifted

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>people that have come out of Tesla and other companies

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>like that, they sort of lack any understanding of government processes, contracts,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>how grants work, the actual realities of working in government.

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>So it's one thing to take a sort of a

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>tech focus on this, and they know how efficient tech

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>can be, but the actual workings of government is a

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>completely different thing. And without doing it in conjunction with

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>all those people who have that domain knowledge, I guess

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you're going to run into trouble.

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and two steps there, Peter one, I agree with

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.439
<v Speaker 4>the way you frame it that I would go even

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 4>further and say that it's not enough just to understand the

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 4>current machinery, because it's a fair bet the current machinery

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 4>is clumsy and wrong and obscuring things. You've got to

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 4>go back to that real model of what it is

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 4>we're trying to do here, How are we trying to

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 4>do it? Does that make sense? And the technology and

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 4>the accounting and everything else really follows on after that,

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 4>You know, you can send in some bright tech people.

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 4>There's not really any different descending and some bright accountants

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 4>to look at one of these things. If you really

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 4>don't understand what you're trying to achieve and have a

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 4>good model of what you try to achieve, the danger

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 4>is that you will just cause distruction, not creation.

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And what's your take on Doge? Obviously you've written a

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>book last year, Fast Forward Our Tailor, which is really

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>advocating for digital first government, things like legislating full service

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>application programming interfaces to make government a lot more efficient

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and equitable. What's your take on what you've seen sort

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of unfold in the US with Doge.

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like Rob says, sort of going in there with

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 3>a chainsaw is you know, we'll wait to see how

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 3>it all turns out. But I mean I've listened. I

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 3>think the US is a very different political environment to

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 3>hear and out there are and I think what I

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 3>had a very interesting podcast recently where the Gray Area Podcasts,

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 3>where the speaker was basically describing the underlying political access here.

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Whereas you've got status quoests who seem to think that

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 3>everything's fine, versus brokennests who think that everything is broken,

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 3>and you have the extreme brokennest wing have now taken

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 3>hold of the leaves of power, and so really they

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 3>really didn't think it was worth fixing, if you if

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 3>you like, So, I think part of the strategy here

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 3>is to go in and just utterly dismantle what is there,

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 3>and it can't be any more broken than it was before. So,

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think that, as I say, the US

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 3>context is very different to hear it in out you know,

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 3>the book. In my book, you know, it was really

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 3>thinking about how emerging technology can provide solutions to deliver

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 3>our rutcomes. And if we agree that productivity, accessibility, efficiency

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 3>are all outcomes of you know, horizon points we should

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 3>be aiming towards, then you know, employing some of these

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 3>modern technologies is arguably, you know, the way to achieve

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 3>that very quickly. Yeah, So look some of the ideas

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 3>that I you know, I like to reimagine the state

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 3>quote and I wouldn't say that Altibor's government is broken,

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 3>but I'd say it has a whole lot of inertia

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 3>inside it. You have a permanent public service constitutionally, which

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 3>leads to almost a culture of risk avoidance and and

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, reluctance to rise significant change and if you

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 3>if you think about, you know, the modern services that

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 3>we're that we're consuming from, you know, the frontier technology

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 3>firms right now, then they are all software interfaces. And

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 3>so if you could re imagine the service delivery channels

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 3>of government as being software and application programming interface, and

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 3>increasingly that you could have an AI agent that would

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 3>interact with government services, then I think you could probably

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 3>take out aultimate a lot of the roles that are happening,

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, in government right now, and and actually build

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 3>of a better service outcomes there. Finally, those better service

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 3>outcomes is the front front loading of the whole process

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 3>that they're certainly not doing in the in the US

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and we'll come back to some of the suggestions

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you have in Fast Forward al Tara around this that

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>may help. Paul. You're at easy Crypto at the moment,

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>you're really passionate and understand blockchain technologies, and you're actually

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>running a hackathon on this particular issue. Was this sort

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of inspired by Doage seeing what was going on in

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the US and thinking, actually, could we do this in

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a sensible way and get some of our most innovative

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>technologists to contribute to it.

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 5>So we wrote a series of provocations for the Hack

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 5>of Time some time ago, and at that time, the

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 5>rumors of what DOGE was going to be and what

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 5>it's turned out to be a very different and what

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean by that, as DOGE was trying to drive

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 5>some efficiency, there was talk of what chains being embedded

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 5>in some US processes to streamline stuff and where you know,

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 5>I represent a sector that believes that blockchains do have

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 5>a role to play and some of that, and so

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 5>we write a series of provocations. But it's not just

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 5>about building government departments on blockchains and eliminating and that's

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 5>not that's not what the Hack of pons about. It

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 5>was just really trying to get people to think about

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 5>some real world use cases and those solutions that would

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 5>have meaningful value. And given you know, we all touch government,

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 5>central or local government in some way, shape and form, like,

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 5>it's an easy thing for us to all from the

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 5>outside look in and go maybe we could do this

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 5>a little bit better. And you know, I think as

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 5>citizens were allowed to question our services are delivered to us,

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 5>and I think that's part of a good robust democracy.

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 5>But we are not advocating for what's you know, the

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 5>ideologically driven stuff that's coming out of DOGE. Now, that's

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 5>that's not where we started. And you know, again like

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 5>the one that I think you know, we were faring

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 5>to around, could you run in an expense system a

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 5>government expenses a blockchain. That was just one of maybe

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 5>twenty five provocations to the teams. So you know, we're

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 5>just trying to get people who's great mat of stimulated

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 5>when we wrote this sometime again.

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's great, and I'm sure that's something actually the

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>likes of Judith Collins, the Minister for Digitizing Government, is

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>actually going to welcome, you know, sort of innovation in

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>this space. But Rob, you know, you're the one who's

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>had the most experience actually on the inside of working

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>with big government departments. I think at one point you

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>said New Zealand health system you described as a blocked

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>digestive system, which is a nice metaphor for it. But

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>can you sort of elaborate on that in a big

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>department like that? And health is a sort of I

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>guess is a special case and they are working to

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>try and fix it. But where are the sorts of

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>places that you really see the inefficiency and the wastage

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that just really starts to result in a degradation of

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>service for citizens.

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think I think health was and still is

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 4>a particularly ramshackle. It doesn't really even deserve to be

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 4>called a system. It's a kind of a ramshackle assembly

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 4>of different systems. And if you take, for example, the

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 4>recent stuff about t FUTU or are trying to run

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 4>the finances on a spreadsheet, Well, actually what they were

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 4>trying to do was take a whole lot of systems

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 4>that were producing different financial information and had to assemble

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 4>it somehow had never been assembled before, and the obvious

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 4>way to assemble it was on a spreadsheet. It wasn't

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 4>that anyone had started out wanting to manage it that way,

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 4>to be fair to the people currently running that. But

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 4>the reimagining thing, it sounds a bit of a grand phrase,

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 4>but there is enormous scope to improve these systems. I'm

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 4>working with a small fintech setup at the moment that

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 4>has some ideas about payments and accountability and audits and

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 4>all those kind of things that could improve distribution of benefits,

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 4>for example, And there are any of these ideas around

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 4>and what there was what there needs to be is

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 4>an openness to consider, apply and experiment with those within

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 4>the public service, which there isn't. So what you had

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 4>in health was a whole lot of ideas that had

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 4>been thrown at what was when Tavardaora was formed, the

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 4>largest software development house in New Zealand, accumulating people who

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 4>were defending often incompatible projects that were working against one another,

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 4>and simply because no one had really stood back and

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 4>properly thought about what are we trying to achieve here,

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 4>what are the priorities, what are the available technologies. So

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 4>they were basically trying to assess various offers that were

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 4>being made to them by various other providers and then

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 4>rebuild them in some way. So it was no wonder.

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 4>It was a mess, and I think that's not uncommon.

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 4>So some of that culture has to change, but I

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 4>don't really think that's all that difficult. I mean, New

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Zealand does have a pretty active ecosystem of people coming

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 4>up with quite practical ideas which are not moonshots by

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 4>any stretch of the imagination, but are immediately applicable, which

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 4>could be picked up by government departments. And there is

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 4>a degree of sclerosis within those government departments, as there

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 4>is within within a number of larger private companies too.

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 4>I think the cause of that is a lack of

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 4>understanding both of the models of what is being done,

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 4>but also of the technologies at politician level, at board

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 4>member level, and at senior executive level. There are a

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 4>lot of people within the public service that understand, are

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 4>open to and would welcome innovation, but it is really

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 4>being stopped by a lack of understanding from the type.

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 3>In my view, I totally agree with that, and I

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 3>think what I'd also add is structurally the way that

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 3>the bureaucracy is structured into these monolithics, siloed departments where

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 3>actually a technology student will be architected with common components

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 3>across all of these and they're you know, there were

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, there is a g CDO trying to coordinate

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 3>across all of them. But actually, you know, services like identity,

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 3>like payments would be common across the whole government platform,

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 3>and yet every individual department still operates their own to

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 3>some degree. And so, you know, I think there's this

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally re architecting the bureaucracy is going to be a

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 3>consequence of attempting to digitize the whole government, and these

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 3>these departments are not in the mood for that right.

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 3>They operate with a with a large degree of inerture.

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 3>As I said, So, one of the considerations I would

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 3>say is why do we have permanent government departments, government agencies?

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:56.919
<v Speaker 3>Why do we not just the same way as we

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 3>have an election every three years, Why don't we just

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 3>put us sinessa limit that you know, a government department

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 3>will live for five years and then it will be

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 3>recycled and shut down. And so you know, why could

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 3>you not actually derive some of this permanent refreshment of

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 3>your bureaucracy into some legislation.

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know, one of the ideas in the book,

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>as I said at the start Digital First, government legislated

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>full Services API. No government service can be enabled without

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>API implementation. And for people who don't understand what that is,

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a sort of a plug and essentially that

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>allows data to be transferred between systems in a seamless

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of way. So, and that's something I hear a

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>lot across government. It is very siloed, and it's sort

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of by design, partly for the reasons that I think

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you've alluded to that they don't want to change, but

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>also citizens don't necessarily want to change. We don't even

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>want a digital driver's license in this country. There's a

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of opposition to putting data all in one place,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>even if there's a good case that it's going to

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>help people get more equitable access.

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.719
<v Speaker 5>So my take on all of this conversation is that

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 5>it's when you are in health and you're a nurse.

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 5>You're very clear what you're doing and the goals you

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 5>know is the patient right in front of you. But

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 5>as you start to get further away your loose side

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 5>of the outcomes you're trying to deliver. It happens in

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 5>big companies. I used to work for a tower communications company.

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 5>It happens there as well, and you can get fixated

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 5>on your little project and your little thing and have

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 5>no actual connection to the outcome you're trying to do

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 5>the thing. The observable thing for me is that across

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 5>all of the bureocracy that is government is there's no

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 5>single vision or platforms. And you know, you've talked you

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 5>know being and I agree with some of what you said.

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 5>I may have some challenges with some others parts of

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 5>what you said, but that's okay. You know, things about

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 5>identity and access management, how that's done, my personal information,

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 5>how that is shared or not shared. Payments because it's

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 5>still about moving money and did you money around. Those

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 5>sorts of things all should be a foundation blocks for

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.719
<v Speaker 5>every government department that builds on it. But that's not

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 5>how it's been constructed. And it's because they were organically developed,

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 5>you know, as they were digitizing. They're probably digitized at

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 5>different times. You know, I can remember before the dhvs

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 5>became an amalgamated set, like they were just hospitals, So

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 5>you know, they all kind of grew and then you

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 5>have such huge technology debt that trying to bring it

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 5>together what you're talking about being which is the Amazon

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 5>way and API first, but you had a very charismatic,

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 5>single leader at the top who was able to enforce

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 5>that stuff and doing that through a public service, that's

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 5>a real challenge, and you know, you almost get to

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 5>a point in time where you have to say, we

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 5>have to start a new we have to start with

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 5>some foundational building blocks and starting new.

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 4>I think you also have to have regard to the

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 4>way finance and spending ability is spread through the public service.

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 4>It really operates on what I've always seen is kind

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 4>of a jamjar theory where there's an appropriation of money

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 4>for a particular purpose, which is to find ahead of time,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 4>and that's what's available for that purpose, and that goes

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 4>into that jam jar. And if you're managing a public

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 4>service operation, you have a whole set of these jam

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 4>jars which have been predetermined for you, and what you're

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 4>not doing is really ever sitting back and seeing where

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 4>the money would be most effectively spent, So you are

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 4>spending it out of each jar, and that does lead

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 4>to a kind of a very inefficient decision making system

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 4>as well. So my point is it's embedded in the

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:45.959
<v Speaker 4>way they're financed, embedded in the way that they have

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 4>the ability to spend, which entrenches it so that actually

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 4>saving some money or doing something better in one part

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 4>of the operation doesn't necessarily make any progress for you.

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 5>Again, that's where we'd think blockchain a role to play,

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 5>because if a blockchain system was there and every government

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 5>department could see that someone's building a brand new payment system,

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 5>you had some sort of edict that said, why don't

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 5>you reuse what we've got rather than build something new.

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 5>Those types of things is where you know, we think

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 5>blockchains are really powerful because they're quite transparent in that regard,

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 5>and they're also really good at managing the flow of

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 5>information because it's always there, you know. That's kind of

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 5>the other key element of blockchains. And so having a

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 5>system where what someone did in twenty twenty three is

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 5>available to the people in twenty twenty four, twenty twenty five,

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 5>so they can kind of see the evolution, I think

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 5>is also a powerful thing around blockchain. So that's why, Peter,

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, we did have these publications written. So we

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 5>do think there are good uses for blockchain technology in

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 5>the public sector, but it's not a be all in

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 5>or we're not trying to take it all over.

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I would say that every government in the

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 3>West world, in the democratic world, is going to be

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 3>having the same conversation right now. The UK announced last

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 3>week kis that I think gives forty five billion pounds

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 3>of efficiencies of cost cutting from AI and digitization their initiative,

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 3>and so I think, you know, the Elon Musk led

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Doge initiative in the US is driving this conversation of worldwide,

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's an opportunity because if every government

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 3>is having the same challenges. Then let's coordinate, let's cooperate,

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 3>let's build open gov stack and I'm sure it just

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 3>exists so that you can basically just coordinate and take

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 3>the best bits from what everybody else is building all

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 3>around the world blockchain, but other open source components as well,

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 3>and that would be The other principle absolutely is that

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:48.239
<v Speaker 3>unless there is a compelling reason why the software that

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 3>is deployed inside government needs to be closed source, then

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 3>as a principle, everything that is deployed needs to be

0:25:55.320 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 3>open source. That also mitigates against the enclosure of of

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 3>government services by large technology companies who have managed to

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 3>basically build significant footprint underneath government services that exists, and

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 3>that's going to be quite hard in future if we

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 3>don't change direction towards more open source, flexible software to

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 3>actually get to wean ourselves off.

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a big bone of contention with our local

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>tech companies. The likes of Ian McCrae from Orion Healthcare.

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>It felt like he was being his head against the

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>brick wall dealing with our health system because that big,

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>big tech procurement is so entrenched, the likes of Microsoft's

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and AWS. We have a cloud first strategy and government,

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and they are the default providers to offer that.

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 3>The political climate has changed, right, so they are effectively

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 3>beholden to a very unpredictable, unstable government which will potentially

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 3>could add tariffs reverse tariffs to the cost of those

0:26:56.280 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 3>and so it would be very at idea I think

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 3>to build some resilience and diversity in voice into where

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.719
<v Speaker 3>we're procuring most of the platforms we're running our then

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 3>it systems on. Yeah.

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, I think often government under official government officials often

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 4>underestimate the extent to which those very large mega vendors

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 4>are running their own business model quite effectively too. And

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 4>it may coincide with your needs it or it may not,

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 4>but it's not The aim is not that and so

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 4>the more we can take a open attitude towards that,

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 4>the better. And I think for a non technologist like me,

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 4>which I say straight away I am, the more you

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 4>get involved in the stuff, the more you learn how

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 4>much better protection there is in terms of accountability, auditability,

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 4>and transparency in open systems. So totally agree with that.

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Rob. One of the premise of DOGE is that

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they need sort of access to the source code of government.

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Is they don't trust the government officials. You know, they

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about things like social security. There are problems with

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the so called death file, the record of deceased individuals.

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 1>They claim that people have been receiving benefits for years

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>after they've actually been deceased. So there are issues like

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that which you may get given a report put on

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>your desk as someone in governance off a government department,

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and you get one view off it, but the reality

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>is different. So that's the argument for the deep reach

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>they need to have into these government departments. What was

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>your sense when you were sharing to fatu Aura? Could

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you actually trust the information? Did you have faith in

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the information that was being presented to you that you

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>had to make major, potentially hundreds of millions of dollars

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>type decisions based on that?

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 4>It was not trustworthy. People were trustworthy, the people were honest,

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 4>but they were working within systems that couldn't be relied

0:28:56.080 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 4>upon to be accurate or compatible with one another. Absolutely

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 4>a problem, and you know, I think it's no wonder

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 4>you know that there are inefficiencies, I'm sure, and I

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 4>don't know about the US system, but Elon Musk has

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 4>probably benefited from more of the inefficiencies than anyone else

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 4>in history, so he would know. But here there are undoubtedly,

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, individually small but possibly collective inaccuracies and wrong

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 4>payments and wrong allocations going on all the time. And

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 4>it isn't everyone's interests that we improve those and improve

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 4>them quickly. And the better that's, the quicker that's done,

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 4>the better, So, you know, I think it almost Peter,

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 4>I know you sort of wanted to hang this discussion

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.719
<v Speaker 4>around Doge, but actually the discussion is much better if

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 4>you ignore Doze in my view, and look at what

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 4>we really need here and and what our problems are

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 4>and the solutions that are available.

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, just one, you know, the immediate issues in front

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of our health system. One of them is you know,

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>they're making a call at the moment about letting go

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>essentially a large part of the health IT workforce, from

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you know to fatu Aura. Interesting your views on that

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>rib at a time where it seems that digital health

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and preventative healthcare and all the digital tools that are

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>available now around the world to provide those sorts of services.

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, does this make sense to you that we

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>need to sort of sort of burn it all down

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and rebuild it, or are you really worried about the

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>loss of capability that's going to come with us.

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, a couple of things there. One is you've got

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 4>to be very careful in politicians and public service executives

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 4>talk about the job cuts they're making. Typically most of

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 4>those jobs that no one's in. They like to announce

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 4>that they're making job cuts, but often their vacant positions

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 4>that they're cutting, So you've got to watch the numbers.

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 4>There was scope for rationalization in the way the Ministry

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 4>of Health and the individual health boards had built up

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 4>their digital teams. It wasn't well structured or well organized,

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 4>so there was scope for rationalization. And that I'm just

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 4>not close enough to know whether the decisions being made

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 4>now are the right ones in that but you know,

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 4>this is not a matter of having the most people.

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 4>It's a matter of having the right systems and well

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 4>directed thinking going on about it. So yeah, I'm just

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 4>too far away to know now. But there was certainly

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 4>scope for rationalization.

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 5>And you could see in the US the law of

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 5>unindenda consequences that are about to flow through, right, and

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 5>the people who are indulge and let's be honesty and

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 5>I think may still be the richest man alife, but

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 5>Tesla's shoes are forward, aren't aren't going to be hurt, right,

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 5>But the funding cuts, the decision that they're making are

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 5>going to flow through and start affecting everyday people's lives,

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 5>whether it's their benefits, whether it's their health, whether it's

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 5>their education, those sorts of things, and you know, even

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.959
<v Speaker 5>inside of you know, the New yealing house system. If

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 5>we if we do get to a position where we

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 5>take an idealistic we need to cut x amount of

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 5>people from the its stuff, it'll be the patience that

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 5>suffer because while while those people it's very hard to

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 5>connect what they're doing, I can guarantee you because we

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 5>saw it in Locatto when there was a big hack, stuff,

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 5>bad stuff will happen. You're no one in that organization

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 5>is setting out to do a bad job. They're actually

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 5>doing things. And if we dis arbitrarily cut it, and

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 5>I've worked in an organization that used to do this,

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 5>we're going to go, hey, we're just going to take

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 5>fifteen percent of our workforce out this year, bad stuff happens.

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, one hundred percent. My attitude, my argument would be

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 4>that there was a need to rationalize duplication and confusion,

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 4>and the projects that were being worked on, not that

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 4>the certain I don't have no idea whether the numbers

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 4>were right or on. What I would absolutely guarantee is,

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 4>from what I know of the senior executives and directors

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 4>and commissioners within that organization at the moment, the chances

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 4>that they are making the right decisions about what it

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 4>projects to proceed with them which not are very low.

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 4>It's almost sitting there making the wrong decisions.

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Well and this and this again goes back to that

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 3>question of transparency, right, So there are lots of if

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 3>you could see the source code, if you could see

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 3>the architecture, if the actual applications were in GET in

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 3>a GET repository where people could download them and contribute

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 3>to them, I just I just feel that there'd be

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 3>more collective intelligence about some of the decisions being made.

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 3>But we have this sort of hierarchical, very centralized decision

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 3>making apparatus which is being shown up to basically not

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 3>really big sets for purpose in you know, in what

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 3>really in the next you know, two to three years,

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 3>we're going to see AI just deployed throughout our entire

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 3>economy and potentially drive you know, complete automation of pretty

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 3>much all cognitive work. Anything that is done in front

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 3>of a computer screen will be you know, arguably some

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 3>of the stuff that I'm seeing will be the doable

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 3>by an AI agent within one or two years. And

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 3>so how are we preparing to take advantage of that change?

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:12.240
<v Speaker 3>And then also where's the conversation nationally as a different topic,

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:17.359
<v Speaker 3>but about what happens when people are disestablished from their

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 3>roles by AI technology. So, you know, how are we

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 3>going to work towards some kind of fair transition to

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 3>a post AI labor market?

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you go into in your book, you know,

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the concept that has been discussed about a universal basic

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>income and things like that, which is happening that discussion

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and trials off it in places like Scandinavia. But on

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>that transparency issue, Paul, as you've mentioned, you think, you know,

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>blockchain is very amenable to that goal. We haven't really

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>seen any experimentation in government. We've got Treasury, Reserve Bank

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>rather looking at the concept of a central bank digital currency.

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>They've put quite a long time frame on that. Nothing

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>as much is going to happen, And is there anything

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>obvious to you where this sort of technology with things

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 1>like smart contracts, you know, that automation of the handshaking

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>between government departments that can sometimes take a long time

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and be very bureaucratic. Any obvious areas that you could

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>apply that sort of technology to.

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Look, I think for me, the standout candidate is

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 5>how we manage identities and people's identities with it across

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 5>all the government departments. I think blockchain technologies lend itself

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 5>very well to that sort of stuff, and just protecting

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 5>people's most private information. I think that is going to

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 5>be increasingly important given the future that BENC is coming

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 5>with AIS, because you know, if you think hackers are bad,

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 5>now imagine them under seeing the power Amazon to do

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 5>what they're doing. It'll be horrific, and frankly, the security

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:51.839
<v Speaker 5>companies aren't built to deal with that. So I think

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 5>identity is certainly first and foremost for me, but also

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 5>things like, you know, even just how we run our democracy,

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 5>information and voting. There are already several governments out there

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 5>not South Korea is one of them who are voting

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 5>using blockchain technology help to feed up accounts, but also

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 5>gets through the photo fraud which was a big topic.

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.879
<v Speaker 3>In America again. So there are there are really.

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 5>Simple, you know, from our point of view, simple technologies

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 5>that can be extended into that space. And you know,

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 5>with the consumer data right and all of that stuff

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 5>rolling through, like we think there's we need to have

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 5>something that's not fit for yesterday, which is kind of

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 5>possibly where we're going to end up. We need something

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 5>that's going to be fit for this world where you've

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 5>got ali agents doing what it's doing. And I think

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 5>that touches on your point, Rob, But the people making

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 5>the decisions probably looking backwards, not forwards, because it's hard

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 5>to keep up.

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 4>There is one point of view, Paul. Just to follow

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 4>on from that thought, you know, it's easy to get

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 4>depressed about that just when you think about the chances

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 4>or how you would get this sort of decision making

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 4>made properly from the center the other viewers that it

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 4>won't be Let's forget about it. Let's accept that in fact,

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 4>this is going to bubble up from what people do

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 4>at a more micro level in individual companies and businesses

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 4>and bits of operation, and eventually the people at the

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 4>top will be dragged along to understanding it. And may well,

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 4>I think that's happening in health. In health technology, it's

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 4>been much more widely applied out in community and private

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 4>enterprise health organizations. I see it happening a little bit

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 4>in fintech as well, and I think perhaps it will

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 4>bubble up from outside rather than be taken as a

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 4>kind of a digital program. The moment you get these

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 4>big government agencies sometimes seems to squash things rather than

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:40.919
<v Speaker 4>promoting them.

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:44.760
<v Speaker 3>I was really inspired by the work that ald retained

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 3>it in Taiwan when she was a government Digital Minister,

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:54.399
<v Speaker 3>and that does zero interitative that she led there, which

0:37:54.520 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 3>was really allowing all citizens to basically contribute to governments.

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 3>To government I to open, complete transparency on the source code.

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 3>And to the point about voting systems, you know, we

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 3>have a system where you put a thick on a

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 3>piece of paper once every three years to elect are

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 3>representative and so much more. They were invented. They deployed

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 3>a system based on pollus which drives towards consensus rather

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 3>than adversarial politics. And so it was really interesting almost

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 3>the gamification of political decision making through crowd sourcing and

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 3>much more wide participation. So again, all of these are

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 3>just innovations that are are available to be used and

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 3>can be deployed. We have, but because of the funding

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:46.399
<v Speaker 3>structures that none of it, none of it happens at all.

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I just want to wrap up with, ideally, hopefully an

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 1>idea from each of you about what we could do

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 1>now given that we you know, we're very fiscally constrained

0:38:56.920 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. We have a government with a growth mindset.

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>They say they're very sort of tech friendly, but the

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is everything. Ben, for instance, you have suggested

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we need some sort of agency or group within government

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that takes a view across government on technology investment. If

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't have that, we're going to continue to have

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the siloed approach to investing in the infrastructure that could

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 1>underpin a lot of the stuff that will ultimately make

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 1>government more efficient and equitable.

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And whether that's a centralized government department in the

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 3>traditional mold, I would push back on. I think working

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:45.800
<v Speaker 3>towards more decentralized collaborative initiatives just to make progress, I

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 3>think would probably be a better idea than establishing yet

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:53.839
<v Speaker 3>another department in the bureaucracy. I think to basically pull

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 3>it apart and enable and that will involve funding some

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of decentralized innovation model that gets applied and addresses

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 3>the concerns around risk and so create maybe an innovation

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 3>sandbox opportunity. But you know as soon as you create

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 3>a slope that people will walk downhill. And so to

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 3>basically create an environment where innovation that gets deployed into

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.359
<v Speaker 3>government services is there's a really clear pass for that.

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 3>I think a decentralized model is probably the better way

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 3>to do that.

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Paul, from your perspective, We've got an amazing community here

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of blockchain developers. I'm doing sort of gaming applications, fintech applications.

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>What would you like to see sort of brought to

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>bear on these problems facing government?

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 5>So I've got kind of a two face response. So

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 5>I think we should come up with a vision. So

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 5>Singapore is a country without a lot of resources, and

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 5>it's innovated into finance because that was a natural place

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:54.479
<v Speaker 5>to do it. And I think, you know our days

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 5>are relying on commodity driven economy is probably done. So

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 5>I think if we can lean into a vision as

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 5>a government that says we want to be tech vest

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:07.240
<v Speaker 5>and truly mean it, not just the talking, but truly

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:11.240
<v Speaker 5>mean it. And then you know, I think Rob's point.

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, there's a whole bunch of very clever, smart,

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:16.320
<v Speaker 5>nimble stetups in New Zealand, and I think if we

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 5>can get Central to buy into supporting those businesses adopting

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 5>their technology for the greater good as well as supporting

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 5>them to export, I think that would be a really

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 5>good outcome climper nation as well as our central government services.

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And last word for you, Rob, what would you really

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>like to see and what do you think we could achieve?

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Having been through the inferno of working at in the

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>health sector and seeing firsthand after coming from sky City

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and the likes you know that have a very much

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:48.799
<v Speaker 1>a profit incentive to be efficient and to automate as

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>much as possible and that sort of thing. What would

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you like to see and what do you think could

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>be achievable in terms of tackling you know that the

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>waste and the inefficiency in health and other government departments.

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 4>I think the key here is innovation, and I think

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:07.800
<v Speaker 4>at the moment in New Zealand we think about innovation

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 4>in the wrong way. We think about it at kind

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 4>of the institutional and in vesta level, or perhaps at

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 4>the private equity level. What change needs is to have

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 4>the government being able to think much more in a

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 4>venture capital mode about how it gets things moving, how

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 4>it encourages good ideas that are coming up and gets

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 4>them impluented at a smaller level. They don't have to

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 4>find these big macro solutions to things. The solutions probably

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 4>are very disaggregated, so you might as well approach them

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 4>in that way. So that really comes back around, I

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 4>think to what Ben and Paul have both been saying.

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:48.320
<v Speaker 4>We just need I don't want to set up another

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 4>agency either, but we just need to create the scope

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:54.880
<v Speaker 4>where our focus is on encouraging innovation, which is of

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:58.440
<v Speaker 4>its nature usually pretty small when it starts, and you

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 4>have to be prepared to take risks with that. The

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 4>idea that the big money coming in from offshore is

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:04.840
<v Speaker 4>going to do this then or the next thing, I

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:08.239
<v Speaker 4>think it's a complete cul de sac. It's going to

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 4>take us nowhere. So that's the key thing.

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, lots of great ideas there, and the Doge machine

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>will roll on in the US and we'll keep an

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>eye on that, and we'll keep an eye on what's

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>going on in government. But thanks so much, for all

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 1>those great ideas. We'll put show notes up on the

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 1>website linking to Ben's book and Paul's work with the

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.839
<v Speaker 1>hackathon and everything else. So thanks so much guys for

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>coming on the Business of Tech.

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Thank you Peter.

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Thanks starving us.

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>So there you have some really great ideas there really

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:52.240
<v Speaker 1>about the potential role of decentralized technology and collaboration. But also,

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 1>as Rob said, it's about people as well, and it's

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>about strategy, having a firm plan of what you actually

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 1>want to achieve, rather than just taking the hatchet to

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:06.879
<v Speaker 1>government spending for ideological reasons. So hopefully it's something that

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the government here will increasingly do do this in an

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>evidence based way. We've got Judith Collins as the Minister

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:19.879
<v Speaker 1>for digitizing government. She wants more efficiency, she wants better

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>customer service in government. There are ways to do that

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:27.240
<v Speaker 1>leveraging really good technology. So hopefully she's got some good

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>ideas out of this as well. But let me know

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>what you think in the comments on my LinkedIn post.

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Show notes are also in the podcast section at Business

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>deesk dot co dot nz. Lots of links related to

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this week's episode. Now you can stream the podcast on

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio or your favorite podcast app. Get in touch with

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 1>your ideas for upcoming topics and guests. Just email me.

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Peter at Peter Griffin dot co dot nz or

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm really easy to find on LinkedIn and I'd love

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. Next week, I talk to Carmen

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Visselik under a Velocity Global about growing tech trade with India.

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Kamen is doing significant business with banks in India and

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 1>was under Prime Minister's recent trade delegation to India. She

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:16.760
<v Speaker 1>has some sage advice for tech and digital companies trying

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to tap into the vast Indian market that's dropping next Thursday.

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Till then, have a great week.