WEBVTT - Property: Recovery or relapse?

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Junokoto. Welcome to shared lunch. I'm Garth Bray. Well winter

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is here not normally a boomer of a time for

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>our property market, and the Reserve Bank is sounding a

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>little loop warm about easing rates. Further so, what lies

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>ahead for us? Time to check in with that sage

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of the savvy property investor, Tony Alexander see what he thinks.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 1>But before that, it's some important information you should always

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>consider before investing.

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Investing involves the risk you might lose the money you

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 2>start with. We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 2>We also recommend reading product disclosure documents before deciding to invest.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 2>Everything you're about to see and here is current at

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the time of recording.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Tony, A rare pleasure to have you here face to

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>face in Auckland. Love to have you with us. Yep.

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>I'll get to the Reserve Bank in a second. But

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the centric starter that we've seen out very recently, the

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>credit reporting stuff that shows business and consumer credit up.

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's not the lending is not where it

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>was in twe but is that the first sign that

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>things are getting better or is it still not looking great?

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh? We're economists don't generally look at the lending data

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 3>for a sign of what's happening in the economy. We

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 3>tend more to look at leading indicators, what's happening with

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 3>consumer sentiment, business sentiment, these sort of things, investment, intensions,

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 3>employment and tensions. So definitely interesting there. But for instance,

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the reserve banks lending numbers, the

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 3>volume of lending to the farming sector is down about

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 3>one percent or so on a year earlier. So do

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 3>we look at that and go, farming's falling away. It's

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 3>all getting really really bad, while not with commodity prices

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 3>up about seventeen percent on a year earlier.

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>So they're probably just paying off debt, aren't they. Because

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>things are so good that it's actually a healthy sign.

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 3>That's relevant because if we talk about the good returns

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 3>being made by the farmers, oh, the region's going to boom.

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Rural towns are going to absolutely boom. Right, that's where

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to do my property investment. Yeah, we'll just

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 3>remember the costs for operating a farm have gone through

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 3>the roof in recent years. And yeah, they've been getting

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 3>a voice in their ear to pay down debt for

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 3>a long time. So the actual region stimulus. It's going

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 3>to be there, but it's not really going to be

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:04.919
<v Speaker 3>what it's been in the past coming out of recessions.

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Just on that though, I looked at that Centrix data

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and there was like a heat map of how badly

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in areas, how badly behind people are. She was lush

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>green all up the South Island, all in single digits.

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>You get up into pretty much the whole of the

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>North Island was a bit of an orange, and you

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>get to Bay of Plenty, you get to the coast Titaffity,

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it was red and we're talking like seventeen eighteen percent,

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, in an areas and sign that's not a

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>healthy sign. That's a two track economy, there isn't it.

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, for the moment, I think it does look

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 3>like that, And in a way it's sort of a

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 3>payback and a broad sense from earlier on when we

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 3>saw from a housing market perspective, things were growing really

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 3>strongly in the North Island but not in the South Island.

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 3>I used to talk a lot about it that this

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 3>boom and house prices. There was some in the South Island,

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 3>but it wasn't as much as in the North Island,

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 3>and so if we extrapolate that to businesses in general,

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 3>probably you've got more businesses getting over optimistic in the

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 3>North Island than the South Island during the boom, and

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 3>so when you get the type monetary policy occur, there's

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 3>more weeding out to do in the business sector, maybe

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 3>residential property investment market in the North Island than the

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 3>South Island. So that's sort of what I would put

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 3>it down to. I wouldn't over extrapolate that towards right

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand's future for the next hundred years. It's back

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 3>to the South Island. This population imbalanced twenty five percent

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 3>in South Island or so seventy five percent North. It's

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 3>going to reverse yet, No, it's just a bit of

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 3>a cyclical thing from that earlier on boom which was

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 3>more in the North.

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>It just must be anecdotes that I keep running into

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>people that are moving to christ Church the end to

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>try and ditch the Auckland property prices.

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's definitely happening and it's going to keep happening

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean liquidations in some of that data

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>were quite high. Business liquidations. We're talking like thirty percent

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I think was it up on year on year. That's

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>not good.

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, definitely not good. But this is what I

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 3>warned about from twenty twenty two. In fact, as early

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 3>as the first half of twenty twenty one, I was

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 3>warning residential builders just watch out. There's a boom underway.

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Lots of inexperienced, undercapitalized people are entering the residential construction sector,

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 3>as widely defined, and there's going to be a weeding

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 3>out period somewhere down the track. And then I morphed

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 3>that into talking about over twenty twenty three of this

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 3>weeding out is going to be across all sectors of

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 3>the economy in twenty twenty four. And so that's what

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 3>we saw with liquidations up et cetera last year. And

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 3>then of course I was warning strongly from August last

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 3>year when we saw the interest rates were coming down.

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 3>A journalist wrote, We're going to be a rockstar economy again,

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 3>and I thought, what a load of absolute rubbish. There

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 3>are going to be businesses that are going to be

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 3>caught out and some of the weakness we see in

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 3>the economy at the moment. It's the reality check as

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 3>I think businesses are realizing, oh, who was right? This

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 3>isn't a boom. We survived to twenty five, it's not enough.

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 3>And some businesses, either from their own volition or the

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 3>ird or the bank the creditors are realizing we can't

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 3>make it.

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>If we don't have a boom.

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Then, given the cost we've got going up, the massive

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 3>margin compression, we've got to close down. And so that

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 3>weeding out process is still rolling through twenty twenty five. Actually,

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 3>as the CENTRIC data showed in the construction sector, where

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 3>there was a much sharper increase in number of liquidations

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 3>sort of trending upwards in the past three years compared

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 3>with other sectors like retail, hospitality.

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>Because broadly, I think this month that actually turned, or

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>last month it's turned, and it almost looks like the

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>worm is turning down. The liquidations might just be starting

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to trend down. You don't think it's over.

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 3>It'd be nice to think that, but I think it's

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 3>too soon to really call that. Having said that, although

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 3>my commentary since August has been a negative, quite shockingly

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 3>so to some people, I do have to keep emphasizing

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 3>there is still a recovery underway. We've got the absence

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 3>of those crunching interest rates, out there. We have the

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 3>surprisingly good returns in parts of the primary set sector,

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>more foreign students coming into the country, there is some

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 3>business investment infrastructure, so there is a recovery underway, but

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 3>it's not an especially strong one. It's the absence of

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 3>the strong upturn, which is catching out some businesses just

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 3>in the last gasp of their breath for this year.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>If we look at what the Reserve Bank came out with,

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>which was effectively a little bit of a split decision there,

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they took some convincing the full board that a full

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>cut was needed of twenty five basis points. Apparently they

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>even talk about cutting fifty What do you take out

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of that.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I wouldn't have voted for a cut. I would

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 3>have stuck there at three point five percent.

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 3>No, people don't want to hear that because I've just

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 3>said the economy this year weaker than people were thinking.

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 3>That sounds like less inflationary pressure. Not so quick, because

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 3>the other thing I've been saying since August last year,

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 3>on top of the economy's going to still be a

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 3>bit weak going forward, is there are still inflationary pressures

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 3>bubbling on underneath in the economy. Where are they coming from, well,

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 3>they're coming through the business sector. Generally, it's when you

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 3>go and buy your cheese also at the supermarket there

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 3>or you meet So the high commodity prices great news

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 3>for our farmer's, horticulturalists, et cetera. But it feeds through

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 3>into the supermarket, so we feel it there as a consumers.

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 3>But just generally, the costs are still rising out there.

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 3>And I've talked a lot about our price seat behavior

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 3>by businesses. And if we look, for instance, at the

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 3>A and Z's Monthly Business Outlook Survey, on average, since

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 3>nineteen ninety two, when inflation started settling around two two

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 3>and a half percent on average and net twenty six

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 3>percent of businesses have said I'm raising my prices within

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 3>the next year. That's still running at forty five percent.

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 3>So we've got a well above average proportion of businesses

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 3>saying I'm putting my prices up. And this is when

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 3>conditions are still weak. We've had recession or two recessions

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 3>in the economy in the past three years. You would

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 3>expect that number to be way way down, And of

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 3>course it comes from a net seventy three percent of

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 3>them are saying my cost arising, I expect them to

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>go higher in a year's time. So my concern is

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 3>that monetary policy aims at where things are going to

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 3>be in eighteen to twenty four months time. Well, I

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 3>expect the economy is going to be stronger. And when

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 3>I look at the A and Z survey and I

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 3>offset it against another survey from the New Zealand Institute

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 3>of Economic Research, you know they've done that survey since

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 3>the nineteen sixties. What it says to me is this,

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 3>once businesses see customers coming through the door and good

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 3>numbers like next year, to raise their prices to rebuild margins.

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>And that will bring the inflation back.

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 3>The inflation will come back. And so that's why I

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 3>think the Reserve Bank's mind now has shifted away from right,

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 3>we no longer need high interesstrates to crunch inflation. To

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 3>let's be careful, we don't continue the whipping around behavior

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 3>of the past, you know, one to two decades and

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 3>cut too far now and have to rapidly increase late

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty six, twenty twenty twenty seven.

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, they really are taking quite a long view there.

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Hard to get that long view though, I mean, you

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>saw Christian hawksbeare who's you know, acting governor at the moment,

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>came out kind of with a well, it's not just

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>what we see in front of us, it's what we

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>see either side of us. They have these alternative scenarios

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>which I kind of boiled down into my head to all,

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we're facing some headwinds and it's all going to get

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 1>more expensive, or all, we're facing these headwinds and we're

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>just kind of going to give up. You know, the

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>whole economy is going to go into a coma globally

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:50.719
<v Speaker 1>almost Am I way off there? Yeah?

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 3>No, the economy is wild. Economy is still going to grow.

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Like I was reading commentary this morning about the OECD

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 3>have slashed their forecast for world growth over the next

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 3>two years. Well that was the word that was used

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 3>in there. It was only a reduction of about zero

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 3>point two percent in their forecast this year and zero

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 3>point one percent next year. So people have detail as media,

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 3>what are you going to do? But we pay attention

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 3>to Oh there's a shocking headline, you know, and we

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 3>read it, but the actual change is relatively small. And

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 3>you know the Trump Terwi war that's underway, it's definite

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 3>negative for the world economy. There are two minds on

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 3>does this boost world inflation.

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Or lower it?

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Lower it? Even Treasure and Reserve Bank can't agree on

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 3>that one.

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>For New Zealand, hence those different scenarios. Different scenario. We're

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>going to land here in the next sort of six

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to twelve months.

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 3>What are we saying, still slow recovery, which will strengthen

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty six. But we shouldn't ignore the fact

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 3>that these are good prices for the farmers being received

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 3>out there. They will gain some greater confidence, do some spending.

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 3>And contrary to what I was thinking up until a

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 3>few months ago, where I said I think the recovery

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 3>is going to be broadly based in the economy, it

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 3>will now start more in the regions you see it

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 3>first and in Theicargo and Neden, christ Church gets it,

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Taranaki plenty Waykatta get it. Auckland will be seeing it

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 3>early next year, Wellington maybe twenty twenty seven. Something will

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 3>flow through. It's just the normal lag in the process.

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:13.719
<v Speaker 3>So broadly economic recovery is underway. But my message to

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 3>people when it comes to boring and interest rates, this

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 3>is almost as good as it's going to get almost

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 3>on the mortgage mortgage rates.

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>That was exactly what I want to ask you next.

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>You've seeing banks now actually jousting again. I mean they're

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, skuting about the fact that they're under sort

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of four point nine percent. Yeah, eighteen months, Like that's

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful sort of a number. Not bad, I suppose

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in recent times we've seen a lot lower. What's going

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>on there are they're just trying to scoop up some

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of those I think it was like thirty billion a

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>month that we're going to be rolling over their mortgages.

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it was. Yeah, a lot of people.

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because everyone's been fixing sort of one year for

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 3>a number of years now. Not many people locked in

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 3>for the five years at two point nine nine percent,

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 3>as I was jumping up and down saying I would

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 3>do for eleven month months starting exactly last week five

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 3>years ago. That's when we had the two point nine

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 3>to nine percent for five years first to appear in

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty, and it lasted for about eleven months. And

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 3>so you've just got to think there's actually a group

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 3>of people out there for whom their interstrates are now

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 3>jumping up from two point ninety nine to four ninety

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 3>nine or so. Poor beggars all that far. At least

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 3>they got that time. You know, at the lower rates there,

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 3>it'll be a shock. It'll be a shock of for

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 3>them out there. Don't anticipate that the interest rates go

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 3>much lower than they are at At the moment. The

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 3>financial markets are looking towards a future where global inflation

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 3>is slightly higher, US budget deficit blowout, et cetera. Places

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 3>upward pressure on medium to long term interest rates are everywhere,

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 3>and there is an economic recovery underway in New Zealand.

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to talk about interstrates still needing to be

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 3>cut when there's an economic recovery underway, Like duh.

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, there's normal medicine reques. Does that mean? I

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 1>suppose if you're in a position where you're watching these

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>rates and you're thinking, oh, maybe I should break, It's like, well,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody's situation is their own. We should say this is

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>not financial advice, your own circummit senses dictate what you

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>should do, but potentially something to consider as hey, it's

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a longer interest rate picture.

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 3>For if I had a mortgage that was maturing let's

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 3>say in three months time or six months time, I

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't feel in need of Oh hang on, I'd better

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 3>get in right now, because inflation's going to jump up,

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 3>and in three or six months time the interest rates

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 3>are going to be half a percent high.

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't think that'd all see that.

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 3>No, I think And even if people are going one

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 3>year fixed or two years or three years, it's going

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 3>to be you know, here or there six to one,

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 3>half a dozen of the other. Because I can't yet

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 3>see enough form in the interest rates outlook to say

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 3>this is when interest rates are going to start jumping up.

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 3>This is how much they're going to go by. I'd

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 3>want to get cover against that. Probably it's the other

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 3>side of the equation. It's the employment picture that's more

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 3>important at the moment, isn't it. Yeah, that's I think

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 3>one of the reasons the real estate market is still

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 3>being held back. So in my monthly survey of realistic

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 3>agents been doing it for five years now now, on average,

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 3>in five years, twenty one percent of the agents have

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 3>ticked the box saying buyers are worried about their jobs.

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 3>At the start of twenty twenty four, it was fourteen

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 3>one four percent. So we started last year with stronger

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 3>than average job security in the economy. It was one

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 3>wonderful well. Come June last year, fifty six percent of

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 3>agents saying people are worried about their jobs. And my

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 3>latest survey are just sent out. The results of that

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 3>fifty one percent of agents still say people are worried

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 3>about their jobs. And I think that's one reason the

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 3>housing market has failed to continue the recovery we saw

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 3>in the second half of last last year. And why

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 3>for the second time now since the start of twenty

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty three, a recovery has fizzled out again. And I

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 3>think the labor market is one of the factors in play.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And you you see it at all levels, I guess, because

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're not if you're not selling, you're not buying,

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not seeing people transitioning out of homes into retirement

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>villages and so on, you just everything kind of slows down.

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>And yep, you're still seeing listings and you're still seeing

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff being built, right.

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, Well, the level of construction out there still

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 3>seems are pretty strong. In fact, as have been pointing

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 3>out to people, one of the structural shifts in you ye,

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 3>relevant to why house prices won't rise as much on

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 3>average in the future is that the level of construction

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 3>versus the population is now higher than we've had in

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 3>the past, so more supply coming forward and land being

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 3>made available, densification and tensification.

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Then the consent stuff as well. I mean they're talking

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this private consenting outfit that's saying we'll get you a

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>consent of its simple in ten days. You've got the

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>government requiring councils to say how well you performing, and

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>apparently that's lifted it from like eighty percent in time

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to like ninety more than ninetyer cent in time. So

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>there's like the system's working better, isn't it. But that

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>means more supply therefore perhaps lower prices.

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 3>More supply coming forward, not so much lower prices, although

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 3>a net thirty eight percent of realistate agents at the

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 3>moment say prices are falling in there in the area.

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, that's quite a strong result or almost back

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 3>to where we were in the middle of last year.

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I was looking. There was some There was a story

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this week about how the listed property trusts out there

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>have seen their valuations basically kind of hit the bottom

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and start to build again and there's more interest there.

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you take any kind of indication from that end

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of the market.

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Don't look at that at all myself. No, I look

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 3>more at what I'm picking up from my surveys of

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 3>the agents, the mortgage brokers, the property investors, et cetera.

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Are out there, and that tells him what's happening right now.

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the market will turn around, but I'm thinking

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 3>this is more a story for twenty twenty six than

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 3>it is for twenty twenty five. With the labor market

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 3>uncertainty at the moment, the strong supply that sits out there.

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 3>Net migration only plus twenty six thousand in the past year.

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Two years ago almost it was one hundred and thirty

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 3>five thousand net. The average for ten years net migration

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 3>gained for New Zealand is fifty thousand. So let's say

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 3>we're running at about half average recent average at the moment.

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 3>So whereas a year ago or just over a year ago,

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 3>in my survey of property investors of landlords, I had

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 3>about a net twenty five percent of landlords saying it's

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 3>easy to get a good tenant, it's bonser, no worries.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Now I've got about a record net thirty three percent

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 3>or so, saying it is hard to get a good tenant.

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 3>So for the moment, the real estate market is subdued

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 3>buyers market.

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm many of the places in the country where that's

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be particularly attractive or tricky, or it's just

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a case of shopping around.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh, you shop around, you find where you want to

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 3>live the broad area because it's near your church, it's

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 3>it's near your relatives, your friends, your sports fields, et cetera.

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 3>And you've got a greater chance of being able to

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 3>get something without having to accept. Okay, it's an operating

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 3>meth house at the moment, so I've got what are

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 3>you going to do. I've got to take it. You're

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 3>not really going to have to be making such die compromises.

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 3>There will be compromises, but not so much of that

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 3>sort of stuff.

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Sure, And I mean, are you getting that sense of

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>confidence because you speak to property investors in large numbers.

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>What are they telling you?

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 3>What are they give the Well, then the investors are

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 3>interested in buying. But it's like when you see a

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 3>market relatively flat, you're thinking, am I missing something? If

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 3>they're not buying, maybe I shouldn't buy as well, because

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 3>we're social animals and we take our queue for what

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 3>to do from what other people are doing. This is

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 3>the test. There aren't many Warren Buffets, the sort of

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 3>person when everyone else is going that way, he goes no, no, no,

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 3>I go this way. This is part of that challenge

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 3>that for the moment, prices aren't rising, and so you're thinking, well,

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 3>if I buy now, what if the price goes down

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 3>three or four percent? Will I feel like an an idiot?

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 3>And we call that foop fear of overpaying. And so

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I've got a measure of that from my real estate

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 3>agent survey as well. And now and then I'll do

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 3>a graph of foop has gone up so that more recently,

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 3>over the past four months, more buyers are worried.

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Am I buying?

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 3>Then the price goes down? Whereas FOMO only five percent

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 3>of agents say buyers are feeling fomo. It's a buyers market,

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 3>is all I can say. Wow, despite the foop, despite

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 3>the foop, Yeah, that's right. Hey, no one's going to

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 3>pick the bottom. You can't pick the top. And you've

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 3>got to be thinking, if I'm buying a property, I'm

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.239
<v Speaker 3>probably going to be in it or owning it as

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 3>a rental for a great number of years. Seriously, who

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 3>gives a great worry at all that what happens in

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 3>the next twelve to twelve months.

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that twelve months won't matter twenty years from.

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 3>Now, surely or not. Trouble is we all live in

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 3>the short term.

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:56.959
<v Speaker 1>True, Just thinking in the short term and thinking back

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to the budget, there was some supposed long term, long

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>term thinking in the budget there around things like key

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>we saver and so on. Was there anything in there

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that jumped out and made you think, kriky, we're on

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the right track here, right track and terms of well,

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of the long term plan for how

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>we get people saving more in a position to be

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>able to either invest in property, invest in whatever they're doing.

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 3>We are we are we answering that question, Well, the

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 3>budget wasn't focused on that. The budget was all about

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 3>putting in place a better fiscal track to get the

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Crown accounts for New Zealand ready for when the next

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 3>shock comes along. I mean, you can virtually guarantee within

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the next ten years there's going to be another major

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 3>shock at the New Zealand economy. We've just got no

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 3>idea when it's what it's going to be, how bad

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be. But the accounts need to be

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 3>ready for that, especially given our high dependence in New

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.479
<v Speaker 3>Zealand on people saving overseas. We use there, we use

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 3>their money, and so yeah, improving savings is definitely a

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 3>positive i'd suggest for New Zealand, but the budget wasn't

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 3>aim data doing that, and unfortunately for Key we Savor

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 3>from my point of view, right early on, when businesses

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 3>were allowed to opt out of making a contribution by saying, oh,

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 3>we're going to put it into the person's salary instead

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 3>of contributing three percent ourselves, well, i'd suggest most people

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 3>who had it put into their fully costed up salary

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 3>in that year might have noticed. I didn't get much

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 3>of a salary increase in the next three or four

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 3>years after that one, and I think for me, that's

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 3>a bastardization of Key we Savor away from what it

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 3>could have been.

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So and it's too late to try and fish that. Obviously,

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the costs are quite high there. You've just got to

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>try and work on it. Yeah, right, it's nothing else

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>in there. Obviously, the tweaks that they made to things

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>like contributions. It's all sort of water under the bridge.

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's neither here nor there. I think in terms of,

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, the outlook, do I think all suddenly there's

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 3>a big pool of savings and this is going to

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 3>provide capital for growing New Zealand businesses.

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no no.

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 3>This was hardly even at the margin sort of stuff there.

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 3>It really doesn't classifies anything major. Even when we look

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 3>at something like the twenty percent first year depreciation allowance,

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 3>businesses can claim for their for their investment, and it

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 3>sounds good and I'd say, yes, it is a good thing.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 3>The issue is a lot of businesses were already saying

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to invest and ah, now I can claim

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 3>more this year, I'll whack. Oh it's going to be

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 3>of cash flow assistance and it might stimulate some more

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 3>business investment in New Zealand. But it doesn't really change

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 3>the outlook. I'm not actually aware of anyone who's actually

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 3>changed their outlook for our economy on the basis of

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 3>the budget.

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>I certainly haven't so yet. Apparently it's going to increase

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>our gdp BI. I can't remember their figure by so much,

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>but enough to sort of nudge it up by more

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>than half a percent.

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it's going to be one percent over twenty years.

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 3>So full credit to Treasury for actually writing that. You're saying, yes,

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 3>there's a positive impact, but by the way, it's the

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 3>next two decades, and they're probably right, it is probably

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 3>going to be something like that, But it doesn't change

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 3>the key dynamic. Let's say, for businesses at the moment

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 3>of their margins are severely compressed, their costs are still rising,

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 3>they're wondering, really, when do more customers come forward? That

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 3>stuff is far more important than these tweaks from the budget.

0:20:57.240 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to try and get to a bit of

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>long term stuff now, and if we can just try

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and sort of think long term, people talk about I

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>think the phrase the great wealth transfer is one that's

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>been thrown around, this idea that you've got a range

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>of people probably hitting retirement now and getting on and

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>they're getting at the point where they're going to potentially

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>hand that wealth to another generation and so on. I mean,

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>people talk about that and how people have built that

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>up and might leave it to their kids and grandkids.

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Are the implications of that for the property market.

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 3>We lack research on what is really going to happen,

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 3>And even if one looks at research coming from countries

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 3>which have already gone through aging processes like Japan, Germany

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 3>and a few others, it may not be entirely relevant

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 3>to the New Zealand situation. And maybe especially when we've

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 3>looked at one of the developments in the past eighteen months,

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 3>is that with soaring local authority rates and insurance premiums

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 3>and electricity prices, butter and meat, any spreadsheet a person

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 3>has run for this is what I can afford to

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 3>spend in my retirement, It's all out the window. Any

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 3>savings or investment calculations you made from you know, when

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 3>campaigns first were run by the government on save for

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 3>retirement late eighties, early nineties, it's all out the window.

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 3>And so I can't help but thinking that some people

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 3>who have reached the conclusion I'm actually going to have

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 3>to spend more of what this inheritance passing on is

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 3>going to be? Why should I sacrifice even more for

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 3>these ungrateful kids or whoever a situation? And so I

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 3>think for the New Zealand context, it's really hard to

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 3>figure out any implication for what's going to happen. However,

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 3>when I was running through a little list earlier on

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 3>of reasons why the housing market is subdued at the moment,

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.959
<v Speaker 3>and I did mention a lot of construction, a lot

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 3>of supply out there, the employment market worries low fomo,

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:41.959
<v Speaker 3>I did make a little bit of a reference earlier

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 3>on to investors doing selling that extra supply is on

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 3>the market. Other investors come in bring it up to

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 3>healthy home standards, or young buyers come in and watch

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 3>some videos and learn how to use a screwdriver and

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 3>a hammer and do it up themselves. There's an opportunity

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 3>to add value to one's proper by improving undertaking long

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 3>overdue maintenance on some of those properties. So I think

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 3>that's one elements in there from the retiring genet generation

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 3>or already in retirement.

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>But is that like a wee blip or is that

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>like the start of quite a strong trend if you like,

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Because there are a lot of people out there that

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>would be facing those circumstances.

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 3>It's probably a move up to a higher level of

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.719
<v Speaker 3>investors selling on average than was the case. So if

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 3>it was chugging along like this before, it's now I

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 3>think going to chug along at a higher level like

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 3>that for a number of years, so higher average listings

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 3>of property than would have been the case. So I

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's a blip, but it's going to be sustained.

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 3>But that doesn't mean it sustains its negative impact on

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 3>the market for a great number of years. It's just

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 3>a bit more supply out there for buyers to choose from.

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 3>And you have to think to yourself, you know, from

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 3>having all of us watch this housing market be so

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 3>difficult for young buyers in particular for so many years.

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank goodness, this is a really good story, quite frankly.

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, just to finish off with the passing on

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 3>to the next generation, I don't know how that spins

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 3>out in terms of how does it affect the saving

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 3>is an investment desire of the generation that think it's

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 3>that they're going to get it, And you've got to

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 3>watch your assumptions because what I'm increasingly hearing from people

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 3>who are thinking about when they pass and then passing

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 3>on the wealth, they're going to skip a generation, or

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 3>they're going to skip two generations and give it to

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 3>not even the grand kids, the great grand kids, or

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 3>something like this, people need to watch their assumption about

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 3>who gets the dosh.

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>You've got to wonder as well whether it's going to

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>change people's approaches, like is it just going to be

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a straight roll into the same kinds of investments property

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>investments as before. Are people going to take different approaches

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>as well?

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. I think there's going to be more diversification

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 3>in people's investment portfolios when they needs to save for retirement.

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.959
<v Speaker 3>At central messages were getting hammered by the government from

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 3>the early nineteen nineties. It was soon after the shear

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 3>market had crashed in nineteen eighty seven, and people, i

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 3>think naturally moved towards other assets like residential property, assisted

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 3>by interst rates falling sharply. In the early nineteen nineties,

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 3>inflation went from averaging eleven percent to about two and

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 3>a half percent. Straits are foul away, we had migration

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 3>numbers getting stronger. It all came together to bring a

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 3>lot more people into the residential property investment market from

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 3>the mid part of the nineteen nineties than we'd seen before.

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 3>I think now that extra layer of people is slowly

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 3>going to be dissipated away. We're still going to be

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 3>left with a lot of people investing in residential property.

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 3>But I think more people now are going to be

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 3>looking at other areas in which to invest their money,

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 3>be it either for retirement or for something special. In

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 3>ten or twenty years time, I think there'll be more

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 3>diversification away from property. But still one thing of the

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 3>population is still going to be renting, So the need

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 3>for the rental population, the rental stop to be out there,

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 3>is still going to be strong.

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Tony Alexander, thank you so much, and thank you for watching.

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>For listening, whether you're on iHeart or straight off the

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 1>app or Spotify or YouTube, make sure that you hit

0:25:50.119 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that like and subscribe Quimitu. That's us for this week.