1 00:00:05,160 --> 00:00:05,560 Speaker 1: Hilda. 2 00:00:05,640 --> 00:00:08,800 Speaker 2: I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a 3 00:00:08,880 --> 00:00:15,680 Speaker 2: daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald. There are 4 00:00:15,720 --> 00:00:19,640 Speaker 2: a number of employment dispute avenues in New Zealand, dependent 5 00:00:19,720 --> 00:00:21,760 Speaker 2: on what industry you're in. If you're one of the 6 00:00:21,760 --> 00:00:25,880 Speaker 2: one hundred and fourteen thousand registered teachers in this country, 7 00:00:25,920 --> 00:00:30,480 Speaker 2: you have to appear before something called the teacher's Disciplinary Tribunal. 8 00:00:30,720 --> 00:00:34,000 Speaker 2: Last year, there were five hundred and twenty four complaints, 9 00:00:34,080 --> 00:00:38,159 Speaker 2: mandatory reports and self reports received by the Teaching Council, 10 00:00:38,240 --> 00:00:41,040 Speaker 2: which is about zero point five percent of the total 11 00:00:41,200 --> 00:00:44,800 Speaker 2: number of teachers who held a practicing certificate. Now, while 12 00:00:44,800 --> 00:00:47,680 Speaker 2: it's more than twenty twenty three, which saw four hundred 13 00:00:47,720 --> 00:00:51,600 Speaker 2: and sixty two complaints, that accounted for just zero point 14 00:00:51,720 --> 00:00:55,000 Speaker 2: four percent. For the latest in our series looking at 15 00:00:55,000 --> 00:00:58,800 Speaker 2: how different tribunals work today on the Front Page, we're 16 00:00:58,880 --> 00:01:07,160 Speaker 2: joined again by Open Justice reporter Jeremy Wilkinson. So tell me, Jeremy, 17 00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:10,839 Speaker 2: what actually is the teacher's disciplinary Tribunal. 18 00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:15,680 Speaker 3: Yeah, So, the Teacher's Disciplinary Tribunal is an arm of 19 00:01:15,760 --> 00:01:20,520 Speaker 3: the Teaching Council who will appoint a what's called a 20 00:01:20,560 --> 00:01:25,000 Speaker 3: professional conduct committee to charge or prosecute teachers before the 21 00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:30,560 Speaker 3: Teachers Disciplinary Tribunal, and that's for breaches of their professional obligations, 22 00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:34,560 Speaker 3: so that they're not breaches that are illegal in a 23 00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:38,720 Speaker 3: criminal context, but they are breaches of their code of ethics. 24 00:01:38,800 --> 00:01:42,960 Speaker 3: So that might be drug use or an inappropriate relationship 25 00:01:42,959 --> 00:01:46,319 Speaker 3: with a student, or in some cases they're kind of 26 00:01:46,360 --> 00:01:49,240 Speaker 3: taking a second bite out of the cherry. If, for example, 27 00:01:49,240 --> 00:01:51,720 Speaker 3: there's a teacher who's been caught drink driving and is 28 00:01:51,800 --> 00:01:54,600 Speaker 3: charged through the district court, then they might well, they 29 00:01:54,640 --> 00:01:58,320 Speaker 3: probably will end up before the Teachers Disciplinary Tribunal as 30 00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:01,040 Speaker 3: well because it's a brief of their code of efforts. 31 00:02:01,240 --> 00:02:04,200 Speaker 2: So what kind of powers does the tribunal have. 32 00:02:04,720 --> 00:02:08,240 Speaker 3: They can cancel a teachers registration so that that person 33 00:02:08,320 --> 00:02:12,360 Speaker 3: can no longer teach in New Zealand. That really only 34 00:02:12,400 --> 00:02:15,560 Speaker 3: happens for the most serious of breaches, but we do 35 00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:18,919 Speaker 3: see it happen often. We will see a suspension or 36 00:02:18,960 --> 00:02:23,160 Speaker 3: a fine or conditions imposed on their practice, and that 37 00:02:23,240 --> 00:02:26,080 Speaker 3: those conditions might be they need to complete a course 38 00:02:26,560 --> 00:02:30,640 Speaker 3: or have supervision while they teach, or inform a prospective 39 00:02:30,680 --> 00:02:34,400 Speaker 3: employer that they've had a censure or a mark against 40 00:02:34,400 --> 00:02:35,680 Speaker 3: them at the tribunal. 41 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:37,480 Speaker 2: What kind of cases have you seen. 42 00:02:37,880 --> 00:02:41,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, I've seen quite a few in my time. There's 43 00:02:41,480 --> 00:02:44,280 Speaker 3: a few. I think one that stands out is probably 44 00:02:44,520 --> 00:02:49,440 Speaker 3: Sealin Romiah. He was the Jamescott High School deputy principal 45 00:02:49,600 --> 00:02:54,720 Speaker 3: and he was caught sending explicit images and text messages 46 00:02:55,840 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 3: to several students and another staff member, and he actually 47 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:02,240 Speaker 3: ended up in prison because one of those students was 48 00:03:02,800 --> 00:03:03,919 Speaker 3: under the age of sixteen. 49 00:03:04,200 --> 00:03:06,840 Speaker 2: Are all of the cases that the tribunal rules on 50 00:03:07,000 --> 00:03:10,280 Speaker 2: made public? What's the threshold for keeping a teacher's name 51 00:03:10,360 --> 00:03:12,040 Speaker 2: out of the public records? Say? 52 00:03:12,560 --> 00:03:16,720 Speaker 3: Yeah, So my understanding was that all of the tribunal's 53 00:03:16,760 --> 00:03:22,120 Speaker 3: decisions are made public, but the teacher might get suppression. Basically, 54 00:03:22,200 --> 00:03:24,960 Speaker 3: the tribunal will maker an assessment similar to the courts, 55 00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:28,960 Speaker 3: about whether someone is entitled to suppression, and they'll take 56 00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:31,480 Speaker 3: him into account a range of things. But the decision 57 00:03:31,520 --> 00:03:34,160 Speaker 3: will be published, but whether that person's name is in 58 00:03:34,280 --> 00:03:35,720 Speaker 3: it is a different thing. 59 00:03:36,160 --> 00:03:38,680 Speaker 2: I saw a case recently that you reported on. It 60 00:03:38,720 --> 00:03:41,200 Speaker 2: was a seventeen year old girl who said she was 61 00:03:41,240 --> 00:03:44,600 Speaker 2: offered ten thousand dollars to drop a complaint against a 62 00:03:44,640 --> 00:03:47,600 Speaker 2: family friend who came into her room in the hope 63 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:50,520 Speaker 2: that she would sleep with him. Now he wasn't her teacher, 64 00:03:50,880 --> 00:03:54,080 Speaker 2: but he was a registered teacher. She took her complaint 65 00:03:54,120 --> 00:03:56,680 Speaker 2: to the police, who then referred it to the Complaint's 66 00:03:56,680 --> 00:03:59,920 Speaker 2: Assessment Committee of the teacher's Council, which then later che 67 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:03,000 Speaker 2: charge against him. So I guess this is an example 68 00:04:03,040 --> 00:04:06,000 Speaker 2: of the kind of case that maybe police wouldn't be 69 00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:08,920 Speaker 2: able to take to court and successfully convict, but the 70 00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:10,320 Speaker 2: council could. Is that right? 71 00:04:10,760 --> 00:04:14,200 Speaker 3: So the police will obviously charge someone where they can 72 00:04:14,240 --> 00:04:17,240 Speaker 3: where they have enough evidence too, but in some cases 73 00:04:17,520 --> 00:04:20,839 Speaker 3: the charge doesn't meet the threshold for a criminal charge. 74 00:04:20,920 --> 00:04:22,680 Speaker 3: So I suppose a good example of this is that 75 00:04:22,839 --> 00:04:25,400 Speaker 3: the age of consent in New Zealand is sixteen, So 76 00:04:25,480 --> 00:04:29,560 Speaker 3: it's not illegal for a teacher to engage in a 77 00:04:29,560 --> 00:04:32,800 Speaker 3: physical sexual relationship with a sixteen year old student, and 78 00:04:32,880 --> 00:04:35,080 Speaker 3: purely in the terms of it not being criminal, but 79 00:04:35,160 --> 00:04:39,440 Speaker 3: it is deeply and fundamentally ethically morally inappropriate in terms 80 00:04:39,480 --> 00:04:43,840 Speaker 3: of a professional conduct context, so not illegal. They wouldn't 81 00:04:43,839 --> 00:04:46,880 Speaker 3: be criminal criminally charged, but they would end up before 82 00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:50,839 Speaker 3: the teacher's disciplinary tribunal and probably lose their teaching registration 83 00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:51,200 Speaker 3: for it. 84 00:04:51,480 --> 00:04:54,520 Speaker 2: Also recently, there was an interesting case from christ Church 85 00:04:54,640 --> 00:04:58,840 Speaker 2: Boys High School where an ex teacher accused the headmaster 86 00:04:59,120 --> 00:05:03,520 Speaker 2: of leaving feces on her property on eight occasions in 87 00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:06,640 Speaker 2: retaliation for her raising concerns about him with the board 88 00:05:06,760 --> 00:05:09,440 Speaker 2: and police. Now, this case was going through the Employment 89 00:05:09,560 --> 00:05:13,160 Speaker 2: Relations Authority rather than the teaching council. But you then 90 00:05:13,240 --> 00:05:16,240 Speaker 2: have a teaching council case processed in the year to 91 00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:19,800 Speaker 2: June twenty twenty four where a Fielding daycare owner was 92 00:05:19,800 --> 00:05:23,440 Speaker 2: found guilty of serious misconduct for her behavior towards children 93 00:05:23,480 --> 00:05:26,599 Speaker 2: and staff members, including telling one staffer that she was 94 00:05:27,040 --> 00:05:30,600 Speaker 2: quote too fat to eat KFC. So what is the 95 00:05:30,760 --> 00:05:34,680 Speaker 2: threshold for a case to go to one tribunal over 96 00:05:34,720 --> 00:05:36,920 Speaker 2: another When it comes to teachers. 97 00:05:37,279 --> 00:05:40,599 Speaker 3: My understanding was that with the er, you needed to 98 00:05:40,760 --> 00:05:44,839 Speaker 3: lodge your complaint to yourself. It's not a quasi judicial 99 00:05:45,040 --> 00:05:49,839 Speaker 3: professional body that is prosecuting or laying charges against a 100 00:05:49,880 --> 00:05:53,200 Speaker 3: professional like a teacher, a doctor, or a lawyer. Instead, 101 00:05:53,279 --> 00:05:57,000 Speaker 3: you have a disgruntled employee who was taking their employer 102 00:05:57,760 --> 00:06:02,479 Speaker 3: proactively through the court. I suppose and effect the employee 103 00:06:02,800 --> 00:06:06,520 Speaker 3: becomes the prosecution. You know, they might hire a lawyer 104 00:06:06,720 --> 00:06:10,279 Speaker 3: or an employment advocate to take the case on their behalf, 105 00:06:10,520 --> 00:06:13,960 Speaker 3: whereas with the teacher's disciplinary tribunal, it is a professional 106 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:19,000 Speaker 3: conduct committee of the Teaching Council who will lay charges 107 00:06:19,040 --> 00:06:22,159 Speaker 3: against a teacher for breaches of their conduct, and the 108 00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:25,560 Speaker 3: same way that the Medical Council as a professional conduct 109 00:06:25,560 --> 00:06:28,919 Speaker 3: committee or the New Zealand Law Society they have standards 110 00:06:28,960 --> 00:06:32,080 Speaker 3: committees who will lay charges against lawyers on behalf of 111 00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:34,599 Speaker 3: the law Society to take them to the lawyers and 112 00:06:34,680 --> 00:06:38,120 Speaker 3: conveyances disciplinary tribunal. So I suppose that's whether the difference 113 00:06:38,200 --> 00:06:41,520 Speaker 3: is one is person or complainant led the other side 114 00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:44,040 Speaker 3: is led by the professional body. 115 00:06:48,440 --> 00:06:50,880 Speaker 4: Nothing was done to prevent it. There were no talks 116 00:06:50,920 --> 00:06:53,800 Speaker 4: to students about specific things. It was just kind of 117 00:06:53,839 --> 00:06:56,880 Speaker 4: a don't connect with teachers on social media. There were 118 00:06:56,880 --> 00:06:59,120 Speaker 4: never any hard lines about it and it was really 119 00:06:59,200 --> 00:07:01,279 Speaker 4: up to the discretion of teachers at the end of 120 00:07:01,279 --> 00:07:04,159 Speaker 4: the day. I think the issue is with these apps 121 00:07:04,200 --> 00:07:07,000 Speaker 4: where you can erase all of the previous messages, you 122 00:07:07,040 --> 00:07:11,560 Speaker 4: can delete texts, you can erase cool history, snapchats disappear, 123 00:07:11,840 --> 00:07:14,720 Speaker 4: but having a platform where the it or the school 124 00:07:14,720 --> 00:07:17,200 Speaker 4: department is able to have access to those records. 125 00:07:17,280 --> 00:07:24,360 Speaker 2: I think that's really important. I stumbled upon your reporting 126 00:07:24,400 --> 00:07:27,840 Speaker 2: of teachers and the use of social media. Can you 127 00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:29,240 Speaker 2: tell me a little bit more about that? 128 00:07:29,760 --> 00:07:34,040 Speaker 3: So I went through the numbers last year and looked 129 00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:37,960 Speaker 3: at how many inappropriate relationship cases there were before the 130 00:07:37,960 --> 00:07:41,880 Speaker 3: tribunal and of those, how many of those was social 131 00:07:41,920 --> 00:07:45,679 Speaker 3: media a factor? And so the data showed that since 132 00:07:45,760 --> 00:07:48,960 Speaker 3: twenty ten, there have been fifty three cases of teachers 133 00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:52,120 Speaker 3: using social media to groom young people in their care, 134 00:07:52,240 --> 00:07:55,440 Speaker 3: which makes up about sixty percent of the eighty nine 135 00:07:55,480 --> 00:08:03,480 Speaker 3: cases involving that type of behavior in the last fourteen years. 136 00:08:11,280 --> 00:08:13,960 Speaker 2: Have you spoken with anyone who feels that we need 137 00:08:14,120 --> 00:08:17,920 Speaker 2: some kind of law around teachers student interactions updated given 138 00:08:18,520 --> 00:08:21,560 Speaker 2: how social media controls our lives these days. 139 00:08:21,920 --> 00:08:24,360 Speaker 3: I spoke to a few people for that article. One 140 00:08:24,400 --> 00:08:28,520 Speaker 3: of them was Professor Michael McCauley. He's form a judge 141 00:08:28,560 --> 00:08:31,520 Speaker 3: from the United Kingdom, a lecture at Victoria University School 142 00:08:31,520 --> 00:08:35,720 Speaker 3: of Government, and he focuses on ethics and integrity with 143 00:08:35,760 --> 00:08:38,840 Speaker 3: his own research. He said, be really simple and not 144 00:08:38,960 --> 00:08:42,520 Speaker 3: really that controversial to ban social media contact between teachers 145 00:08:42,559 --> 00:08:45,400 Speaker 3: and students, even in a digital age where students and 146 00:08:45,440 --> 00:08:48,200 Speaker 3: teachers do actually need to be able to email or 147 00:08:48,600 --> 00:08:51,400 Speaker 3: have some kind of communication for their assignments or their 148 00:08:51,800 --> 00:08:55,360 Speaker 3: homework or whatever it is. Has point, I suppose was 149 00:08:55,400 --> 00:08:58,000 Speaker 3: that you could just have one official point of contact 150 00:08:58,160 --> 00:09:00,920 Speaker 3: basically so that there can be a site so that 151 00:09:01,080 --> 00:09:03,640 Speaker 3: the messages can't be deleted. Like we saw with Seale 152 00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:06,760 Speaker 3: and Remia from James Cook High School. He asked three 153 00:09:06,800 --> 00:09:10,520 Speaker 3: students to download Signal, which is an encrypted messaging app, 154 00:09:10,600 --> 00:09:13,280 Speaker 3: and the messages are deleted after a certain period of time. 155 00:09:13,400 --> 00:09:16,720 Speaker 3: And that's I suppose a common theme that I saw 156 00:09:16,840 --> 00:09:20,240 Speaker 3: among that data, with those sixty percent of those eighty 157 00:09:20,320 --> 00:09:23,640 Speaker 3: nine cases was that it starts with emailing in the 158 00:09:23,679 --> 00:09:26,520 Speaker 3: pre Facebook era, and now these days it is primarily 159 00:09:26,559 --> 00:09:31,040 Speaker 3: texting or Facebook or Instagram, where these teachers are starting 160 00:09:31,040 --> 00:09:34,000 Speaker 3: a point of contact that begins quite innocently and then 161 00:09:34,080 --> 00:09:37,760 Speaker 3: progresses into something that is quite deeply inappropriate. 162 00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:40,640 Speaker 2: When we spoke last, we talked about the length of 163 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:44,760 Speaker 2: time it takes to go through the human rights justice process. 164 00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:47,280 Speaker 2: What's the turnaround for these cases. 165 00:09:47,920 --> 00:09:51,280 Speaker 3: They're a good couple of years old generally by the 166 00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:55,400 Speaker 3: time I see them come through into the written decision phase. 167 00:09:55,600 --> 00:09:59,000 Speaker 3: So what happens is they held a hearing, and that 168 00:09:59,160 --> 00:10:02,280 Speaker 3: hearing is it was similar to a courtroom, except a 169 00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:06,560 Speaker 3: lot more informal, and then the tribunal panel members will 170 00:10:06,600 --> 00:10:11,760 Speaker 3: go away and write a decision and a penalty for 171 00:10:11,840 --> 00:10:13,720 Speaker 3: the teacher and it will often be given to the 172 00:10:13,760 --> 00:10:16,079 Speaker 3: parties while in advance of it being made. 173 00:10:16,160 --> 00:10:23,800 Speaker 1: Public schools could be more than twelve hundred teachers short 174 00:10:23,840 --> 00:10:26,600 Speaker 1: this year with demand outstripping supply. And it's not just here. 175 00:10:26,960 --> 00:10:29,679 Speaker 1: Data show it's a global issue, but in New Zealand 176 00:10:29,679 --> 00:10:32,480 Speaker 1: the Ministry is projecting it's twelve hundred and fifty teachers 177 00:10:32,480 --> 00:10:33,560 Speaker 1: short of what's needed. 178 00:10:34,040 --> 00:10:37,280 Speaker 5: Ali Mattia used to be adopted. Now she wants to 179 00:10:37,320 --> 00:10:40,800 Speaker 5: be here inspiring the next generation to pursue science. 180 00:10:41,040 --> 00:10:44,920 Speaker 6: Being able to teach academics or especially a subject that 181 00:10:45,000 --> 00:10:48,160 Speaker 6: I'm passionate about, but also being able to mentor students. 182 00:10:48,200 --> 00:10:51,400 Speaker 6: I feel like that just adds another layer of value 183 00:10:51,440 --> 00:10:52,679 Speaker 6: and impact to the students. 184 00:10:52,800 --> 00:10:55,320 Speaker 5: High schools are said to face a teacher's shortage through 185 00:10:55,320 --> 00:10:59,080 Speaker 5: to twenty twenty seven. According to the Education Ministries modeling. 186 00:10:59,280 --> 00:11:03,440 Speaker 5: We have very few qualified applicants who have the right 187 00:11:03,480 --> 00:11:05,520 Speaker 5: set of skills to be able to teach our school 188 00:11:05,600 --> 00:11:07,160 Speaker 5: for any position. 189 00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:15,240 Speaker 2: When you're ever reviewing these kind of cases, Jeremy, does 190 00:11:15,280 --> 00:11:18,000 Speaker 2: it ever feel like there should be more standards in 191 00:11:18,040 --> 00:11:21,040 Speaker 2: place for teachers or even just better checks and balances 192 00:11:21,080 --> 00:11:22,920 Speaker 2: around who actually becomes a teacher? 193 00:11:23,480 --> 00:11:25,679 Speaker 3: The Teachers Counsel I think they do a really good 194 00:11:25,760 --> 00:11:28,839 Speaker 3: job of vetting teachers before they enter the profession. And 195 00:11:29,440 --> 00:11:31,480 Speaker 3: the Teachers Council will be the first to say that 196 00:11:31,640 --> 00:11:33,600 Speaker 3: the people who end up before the tribunal are a 197 00:11:33,600 --> 00:11:36,160 Speaker 3: really small minority, and it is something that they stress 198 00:11:36,280 --> 00:11:39,320 Speaker 3: when we ask them questions about people who have been 199 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:41,840 Speaker 3: suspended or had their registration canceled. 200 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:43,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, of course, I mean how many cases do we 201 00:11:43,960 --> 00:11:46,440 Speaker 2: see on average a year, say just off the top 202 00:11:46,440 --> 00:11:48,680 Speaker 2: of your head, because there's more than you know, there's 203 00:11:48,720 --> 00:11:51,520 Speaker 2: over one hundred thousand registered teachers or something like that 204 00:11:51,559 --> 00:11:52,240 Speaker 2: in New Zealand. 205 00:11:52,280 --> 00:11:57,560 Speaker 3: Hey, we might see on average around thirty thirty decisions 206 00:11:57,559 --> 00:12:01,840 Speaker 3: a year. To throw an number out, to just throw 207 00:12:01,920 --> 00:12:04,520 Speaker 3: a number out that seems about right, and we would 208 00:12:04,559 --> 00:12:08,000 Speaker 3: cover actually quite a small percentage of those. So there 209 00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:11,199 Speaker 3: are several decisions that have been uploaded this year, for example, 210 00:12:11,240 --> 00:12:15,680 Speaker 3: which involve teachers who have struck a child. But it 211 00:12:15,720 --> 00:12:19,920 Speaker 3: might be in quite a minor way, so they might 212 00:12:19,960 --> 00:12:21,800 Speaker 3: have pulled on their shirt, you know, to get them 213 00:12:21,840 --> 00:12:26,640 Speaker 3: to stop misbehaving or to direct them somewhere, and you're 214 00:12:26,679 --> 00:12:28,640 Speaker 3: not allowed to You're not allowed to do that in 215 00:12:28,679 --> 00:12:31,200 Speaker 3: New Zealand anymore. You're not allowed to lay your hands 216 00:12:31,360 --> 00:12:34,600 Speaker 3: on a child in that way. But does it make 217 00:12:34,640 --> 00:12:38,320 Speaker 3: media threshold for us to cover in most cases, No, 218 00:12:38,520 --> 00:12:39,600 Speaker 3: unless it's quite severe. 219 00:12:40,160 --> 00:12:49,480 Speaker 2: Thanks for joining us, Jeremy no Worrith no Worth. That's 220 00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:52,520 Speaker 2: it for this episode of the Front Page. You can 221 00:12:52,559 --> 00:12:56,400 Speaker 2: read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage at 222 00:12:56,480 --> 00:13:00,280 Speaker 2: enzadherld dot co dot nz. The Front Page, which is 223 00:13:00,320 --> 00:13:03,960 Speaker 2: produced by Ethan Sills and Richard Martin, who is also 224 00:13:04,200 --> 00:13:08,840 Speaker 2: a sound engineer. I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to The Front 225 00:13:08,840 --> 00:13:12,440 Speaker 2: Page on iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts, and 226 00:13:12,559 --> 00:13:16,160 Speaker 2: tune in tomorrow for another look behind the headlines.