1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:02,480 Speaker 1: Very soopaut Senior political correspondence. 2 00:00:01,920 --> 00:00:03,520 Speaker 2: Your high Barring, Good afternoon, Heather. 3 00:00:03,760 --> 00:00:06,600 Speaker 1: Do you care about the Stanford email scale of go on? 4 00:00:08,240 --> 00:00:10,800 Speaker 2: I would say about it two? If that, I mean 5 00:00:10,960 --> 00:00:15,640 Speaker 2: who key is? I mean she's not doing what she inadvertently, 6 00:00:16,600 --> 00:00:21,840 Speaker 2: she says, pointed people to the National Party website about 7 00:00:21,840 --> 00:00:26,320 Speaker 2: the tools that are now available to schools to get 8 00:00:26,360 --> 00:00:31,080 Speaker 2: better literacy and numeracy out of the students. Now you know, 9 00:00:31,160 --> 00:00:36,680 Speaker 2: she stood up and did a video herself explaining the 10 00:00:36,680 --> 00:00:39,760 Speaker 2: the how the hew it was meant to go and 11 00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:42,199 Speaker 2: I think, you know that's her doing her job. But 12 00:00:42,360 --> 00:00:46,519 Speaker 2: unfortunately it was channeled through the National Party website and 13 00:00:46,560 --> 00:00:51,120 Speaker 2: that was the big problem. But Jenny Anderson, who of Courses, 14 00:00:51,240 --> 00:00:56,840 Speaker 2: the new education spokes spokesperson for the Labor Party, taking 15 00:00:56,880 --> 00:00:59,400 Speaker 2: over from Willow jeen Prime, who had a number of 16 00:00:59,440 --> 00:01:04,480 Speaker 2: difficulties in that role. Ginny Anderson had a few difficulties 17 00:01:04,520 --> 00:01:07,880 Speaker 2: today as well. She wanted to get into the weeds 18 00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:15,720 Speaker 2: about why the email, which basically was taken down, why 19 00:01:15,800 --> 00:01:21,400 Speaker 2: it was so suddenly withdrawn. Winston Peters though, seeing the 20 00:01:21,440 --> 00:01:25,200 Speaker 2: irony and all of it, dragged the debate into the absurd. 21 00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:28,240 Speaker 3: Have a listener How does this temporary brief oversight for 22 00:01:28,280 --> 00:01:31,720 Speaker 3: a few minutes compare with the a fifty two million 23 00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:34,839 Speaker 3: bribe to the Public Interest Journalism Fund. 24 00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:39,800 Speaker 4: Ah, mister speaker, a member of the House cannot accuse 25 00:01:39,880 --> 00:01:41,560 Speaker 4: anyone of bribery. 26 00:01:41,080 --> 00:01:43,480 Speaker 3: And I did not hear that word bribery if it 27 00:01:43,600 --> 00:01:46,319 Speaker 3: was used. Can the remember indicate if that word was used? 28 00:01:46,400 --> 00:01:48,640 Speaker 3: It was used, and I stand behind it? Okay, good, 29 00:01:48,800 --> 00:01:51,760 Speaker 3: you do have to withdraw that coming withdraw What I 30 00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:54,480 Speaker 3: would in the meantime suggest the remember something, withdraws it 31 00:01:55,400 --> 00:01:59,080 Speaker 3: or withdraws from the house. Who removed the video from 32 00:01:59,120 --> 00:02:02,840 Speaker 3: the National Party YouTube channel at around ten pm last night? 33 00:02:03,320 --> 00:02:05,840 Speaker 5: Mister speaker, I don't know the identity of the exact 34 00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:06,440 Speaker 5: person that. 35 00:02:06,400 --> 00:02:08,359 Speaker 3: Did it, the Honorable David Seymour. 36 00:02:09,000 --> 00:02:14,200 Speaker 4: Has the Minister considered engaging a private detective to get 37 00:02:14,360 --> 00:02:17,320 Speaker 4: to the bottom of this weighty matter. Who did it, 38 00:02:17,400 --> 00:02:19,160 Speaker 4: who took it off the you to your tube channel? 39 00:02:19,280 --> 00:02:21,240 Speaker 4: And how do we make sure it never happens again. 40 00:02:23,560 --> 00:02:25,920 Speaker 5: Mister speaker, I know that the member is very excited 41 00:02:25,919 --> 00:02:28,720 Speaker 5: about her very first question as Education spokesperson and would have. 42 00:02:28,639 --> 00:02:29,600 Speaker 2: A great conspiracy. 43 00:02:29,960 --> 00:02:32,799 Speaker 5: But unfortunately, mister Speaker, there is not one here. 44 00:02:35,240 --> 00:02:39,519 Speaker 2: I just love the absurdity of the debate, Such a 45 00:02:39,560 --> 00:02:42,120 Speaker 2: minor thing to take up the time of the House. 46 00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:45,320 Speaker 2: Why on earth you'd asked a question about it? Maybe 47 00:02:45,639 --> 00:02:48,920 Speaker 2: Ginny Anderson is now reflecting on being the education. 48 00:02:49,040 --> 00:02:50,000 Speaker 1: Did Winston withdraw? 49 00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:50,280 Speaker 6: Not? 50 00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:53,040 Speaker 2: Oh, I'm sorry I should have said it? He did 51 00:02:53,080 --> 00:02:54,760 Speaker 2: withdraw reluctantly. 52 00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:56,799 Speaker 1: Hey have you got a cold watch for us? 53 00:02:57,080 --> 00:02:59,800 Speaker 2: Have I got a call? It would be great. But 54 00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:04,680 Speaker 2: it was the electricity generation in New Zealand that got 55 00:03:04,760 --> 00:03:08,440 Speaker 2: an airing during question time in the House today. Theoretically 56 00:03:08,520 --> 00:03:11,000 Speaker 2: the lights should never go out in this country. I 57 00:03:11,040 --> 00:03:14,600 Speaker 2: did a bit of digging about how much renewable electricity 58 00:03:14,639 --> 00:03:19,320 Speaker 2: we have. Eighty to ninety percent of our energy is renewable, 59 00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:23,880 Speaker 2: mainly coming from hydro and geothermal. Hydro accounts for about 60 00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:28,400 Speaker 2: fifty five percent, geothermal twenty one percent, wind up to 61 00:03:28,520 --> 00:03:32,120 Speaker 2: nine percent, very little and sold her up to just 62 00:03:32,560 --> 00:03:36,840 Speaker 2: two percent. But like electric cars at the moment, that's 63 00:03:36,920 --> 00:03:41,440 Speaker 2: rapidly winding up. Now you'd think the Greens Chloe Swarbrick 64 00:03:42,240 --> 00:03:45,880 Speaker 2: would know about all of this. She had a political 65 00:03:45,920 --> 00:03:49,120 Speaker 2: point to make, though, Despite what Chris Luxon was telling 66 00:03:49,400 --> 00:03:52,240 Speaker 2: his deputy David Seymour here they all are. 67 00:03:52,360 --> 00:03:54,200 Speaker 1: J Zian is the only country I know of that's 68 00:03:54,240 --> 00:03:58,040 Speaker 1: making the rather unique transition from domestic guest international cold 69 00:03:58,080 --> 00:04:01,000 Speaker 1: and the process worstling emissions. But that is a function 70 00:04:01,120 --> 00:04:03,600 Speaker 1: of a failed Labour Greens energy policy. 71 00:04:03,960 --> 00:04:10,080 Speaker 4: Does burning coal to generate electricity increase or decrease New 72 00:04:10,160 --> 00:04:11,560 Speaker 4: Zealand's emissions? 73 00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:15,960 Speaker 1: I think actually burning international Indonesian coal is about twice 74 00:04:15,960 --> 00:04:18,280 Speaker 1: as bad as using domestic gas. 75 00:04:19,360 --> 00:04:22,919 Speaker 6: What will it take for him to cancel this billion 76 00:04:22,960 --> 00:04:29,279 Speaker 6: dollar fossil fuel dependence, fostering LNG infrastructure and instead invest 77 00:04:29,480 --> 00:04:31,800 Speaker 6: that money in renewables. 78 00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:36,000 Speaker 1: This is a country experiencing a renewables boom. 79 00:04:36,640 --> 00:04:38,760 Speaker 2: Yeah, and I think maybe the Green should have thought 80 00:04:38,760 --> 00:04:41,720 Speaker 2: about that when they were part of a government, not 81 00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:45,400 Speaker 2: an influential part of the Labor government in the past 82 00:04:45,440 --> 00:04:48,839 Speaker 2: three years, but they should have thought about pushing that cause. 83 00:04:48,600 --> 00:04:51,400 Speaker 1: There, listen really quickly. I'm not too stressed out about 84 00:04:51,400 --> 00:04:54,040 Speaker 1: this dinner, this ten thousand dollars dinner with luxener You. 85 00:04:54,320 --> 00:04:57,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, well, it's not ten thousand dollars ahead, it's a table. 86 00:04:57,440 --> 00:05:00,960 Speaker 2: It's a table. So and I heard your very unkind 87 00:05:01,040 --> 00:05:04,799 Speaker 2: remarks about my somebody I will. 88 00:05:04,640 --> 00:05:07,440 Speaker 1: Point out nobody's cash and have they They paid for 89 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:08,039 Speaker 1: it a year ago. 90 00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:11,520 Speaker 2: We've got a date, have you. We're going in a 91 00:05:11,560 --> 00:05:15,320 Speaker 2: couple of week after next very senior businessman paid several 92 00:05:15,360 --> 00:05:18,520 Speaker 2: thousand dollars to have dinner with me. But it's a 93 00:05:18,560 --> 00:05:21,719 Speaker 2: good cause because it's for the Pontston b Rugby Club. 94 00:05:22,279 --> 00:05:25,240 Speaker 5: And sorry, I didn't realize that your your date plans 95 00:05:25,240 --> 00:05:26,840 Speaker 5: with each other were that well advanced. 96 00:05:26,839 --> 00:05:30,599 Speaker 2: Well, I think I inquired over your availability here. Maybe 97 00:05:30,640 --> 00:05:32,560 Speaker 2: you're forgetting No, I have nothing in my diary. 98 00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:33,760 Speaker 1: There is nothing in my diary. 99 00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:36,560 Speaker 2: Oh really you must that's the end of that. 100 00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:37,679 Speaker 1: It's completely running. 101 00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:40,599 Speaker 2: I've been taken up. And I think that person who 102 00:05:40,600 --> 00:05:42,000 Speaker 2: said that I'd love to have dinner with me? 103 00:05:42,240 --> 00:05:44,479 Speaker 1: Lord, how did this become about Barry instead of lux 104 00:05:44,520 --> 00:05:48,040 Speaker 1: and senior political correspondent. 105 00:05:48,720 --> 00:05:51,880 Speaker 4: For more from Hither Duplessy Allen Drive, listen live to 106 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:55,039 Speaker 4: news talks it'd be from four pm weekdays, or follow 107 00:05:55,080 --> 00:05:56,840 Speaker 4: the podcast on iHeartRadio.