1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,240 Speaker 1: And a sign that Darling Tanner's digging and she managed 2 00:00:02,240 --> 00:00:03,880 Speaker 1: to bring the media, but not her own party, who 3 00:00:03,920 --> 00:00:06,160 Speaker 1: still can't get hold of her. Apparently she still disputes 4 00:00:06,200 --> 00:00:08,440 Speaker 1: the report, which we've yet to see, although the only 5 00:00:08,480 --> 00:00:10,720 Speaker 1: people holding up its releases I understand it now are 6 00:00:10,760 --> 00:00:13,400 Speaker 1: Tanner herself Andrew, her husband. Anyway, Peter duns with us 7 00:00:13,440 --> 00:00:15,800 Speaker 1: on this, Peter, very good morning to you, good one. 8 00:00:15,800 --> 00:00:17,600 Speaker 1: Having seen the interview last night and she said nothing 9 00:00:17,640 --> 00:00:20,400 Speaker 1: particularly coherent. She doesn't agree with the report, which is 10 00:00:20,440 --> 00:00:22,520 Speaker 1: her right. Isn't the ball now in the Green's court? 11 00:00:22,560 --> 00:00:23,680 Speaker 1: They've got to do something about this? 12 00:00:24,160 --> 00:00:27,080 Speaker 2: Yes, and I think this is I thought originally her 13 00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:29,640 Speaker 2: response had two bits foot, but I'm not so sure now. 14 00:00:29,640 --> 00:00:31,440 Speaker 2: I thought she was on the one hand, she could 15 00:00:31,440 --> 00:00:33,519 Speaker 2: be undecided about the future. On the other, which I 16 00:00:33,520 --> 00:00:35,960 Speaker 2: think is far more likely, she's now throwing down the 17 00:00:35,960 --> 00:00:38,920 Speaker 2: gold book to the Greens. You move, not me, and 18 00:00:39,000 --> 00:00:40,559 Speaker 2: I think that's going to put them in a very 19 00:00:40,560 --> 00:00:41,360 Speaker 2: difficult position. 20 00:00:41,479 --> 00:00:44,600 Speaker 1: Indeed, what does it say about Chloe's leadership that this 21 00:00:44,680 --> 00:00:47,279 Speaker 1: has been allowed to drag on for so long? And 22 00:00:47,320 --> 00:00:49,240 Speaker 1: I'm assuming in an embarrassing way. 23 00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:52,400 Speaker 2: Well seventeen weeks class and it's certainly not going to 24 00:00:52,400 --> 00:00:55,080 Speaker 2: be resolved in anytime soon. Does show I think a 25 00:00:55,200 --> 00:01:00,400 Speaker 2: lack of both decisiveness and also empathy within the Green Party. 26 00:01:00,440 --> 00:01:03,040 Speaker 2: They haven't really tried to work out a cheerway through this, 27 00:01:03,680 --> 00:01:06,000 Speaker 2: if Darlian Tanner's account is correct. But they said we 28 00:01:06,040 --> 00:01:08,000 Speaker 2: came to the meeting and said right, you've got to resign, 29 00:01:08,720 --> 00:01:11,240 Speaker 2: then that doesn't show much in the way of personnel 30 00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:12,040 Speaker 2: management skills. 31 00:01:12,200 --> 00:01:14,640 Speaker 1: No, indeed not the walker jumping. I get that they're 32 00:01:14,680 --> 00:01:17,160 Speaker 1: against it, but what better example is there because you 33 00:01:17,160 --> 00:01:20,039 Speaker 1: can't possibly want this woman wandering off one is an 34 00:01:20,040 --> 00:01:21,840 Speaker 1: independent or worst of the Marray Party, can you? 35 00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:24,480 Speaker 2: Well, that's right, and the differently of the Greens have 36 00:01:24,520 --> 00:01:26,840 Speaker 2: not though is of course we saw wed go right 37 00:01:26,880 --> 00:01:30,760 Speaker 2: back to the Donnerty other case in the early two thousands. 38 00:01:30,920 --> 00:01:33,640 Speaker 2: It's not an open and shut case. Case dragged on 39 00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:37,320 Speaker 2: and went to the High Court in the end over 40 00:01:37,440 --> 00:01:39,840 Speaker 2: many many months, and that's the last thing the Greens 41 00:01:39,840 --> 00:01:41,840 Speaker 2: would want. So if Tana's not going to cooperate and 42 00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:44,600 Speaker 2: go quietly and they decided to invoke the walk up 43 00:01:44,760 --> 00:01:48,000 Speaker 2: dumping legislation, then the seventeen weeks we've had so far 44 00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:50,240 Speaker 2: could probably treble. What the matters results? 45 00:01:50,240 --> 00:01:53,040 Speaker 1: Should they release the report despite the fact Tanna and 46 00:01:53,040 --> 00:01:54,920 Speaker 1: her husband don't want it released, given we paid for 47 00:01:55,000 --> 00:01:55,440 Speaker 1: most of it. 48 00:01:56,080 --> 00:01:57,520 Speaker 2: Well, I think I think it does need to be 49 00:01:57,560 --> 00:02:00,160 Speaker 2: released because there's obviously a public debate about who said what, 50 00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:03,680 Speaker 2: who did what, when and how And it's not good 51 00:02:03,760 --> 00:02:06,200 Speaker 2: enough really for Tanna and her husband to say, you know, 52 00:02:06,400 --> 00:02:08,399 Speaker 2: we don't think the report's correct, but we don't want 53 00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:09,840 Speaker 2: it released. That just doesn't stack up. 54 00:02:09,919 --> 00:02:11,519 Speaker 1: Now it does. Nice to say you, Petter, appreciate it 55 00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:13,160 Speaker 1: as always, Peter done. Are they just weird or is 56 00:02:13,200 --> 00:02:15,720 Speaker 1: it me? I mean, are increasingly looking like a bunch 57 00:02:15,760 --> 00:02:18,800 Speaker 1: of weirdos. The more you look into the party, the 58 00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:21,120 Speaker 1: more odd they are. And I said yesterday on the program, 59 00:02:21,120 --> 00:02:24,239 Speaker 1: this does go back to candidate selection. Clearly, nobody asks 60 00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:26,639 Speaker 1: any questions at all about your background, where you've been, 61 00:02:26,720 --> 00:02:28,440 Speaker 1: what you think, how you behave all of these sort 62 00:02:28,440 --> 00:02:32,360 Speaker 1: of questions. Do not forget this was about migrant exploitation. 63 00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:35,160 Speaker 1: This was not There was nothing lighthearted about this. This 64 00:02:35,240 --> 00:02:38,760 Speaker 1: is about migrant exploitation. One of the worst things you 65 00:02:38,760 --> 00:02:40,480 Speaker 1: could possibly do one as a human being, but be 66 00:02:40,520 --> 00:02:43,359 Speaker 1: as a politician, I would have thought. For more from 67 00:02:43,360 --> 00:02:46,480 Speaker 1: the mic Asking Breakfast, listen live to news talks it'd 68 00:02:46,480 --> 00:02:49,600 Speaker 1: be from six am weekdays, or follow the podcast on 69 00:02:49,639 --> 00:02:50,399 Speaker 1: iHeartRadio