WEBVTT - "Against All Odds India Win The T20 World Cup"

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Dinna Koto and marste Alter and welcome to the BYC Podcast,

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>coming to you from the Export Beer Garden studio in

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the midst of a week dominated by Indian winds, Indians,

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Indian flags and Indian helpable relief. This week we reflect

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>on the T twenty World Cup Dani Mom and what

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>it all really means. We gloss over to annihilations of

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the white Ferns. We dig into some correspondence from our

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>legendary listeners and wash it all down with some cricket

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>violence juice from Pakistani I'm Paul Ford, godfather of the

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Beige Brigade. I'm joined by Master of the New Zealand

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Cricket Scoop, Dylan Cleaver, our pleasy DNDE of the Substack

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>sports newsletter Unmissible writing in there the bounce absolute belter

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of the newsletter. Highly recommend and I pay for it. DC.

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Did you bust out your green, orange and white face

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>paint and body paint this week?

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I didn't.

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Actually, it was a really niggli time to watch it,

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 3>and I've got a confession. I did watch the match

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:11.839
<v Speaker 3>in full, but unfortunately I already knew the result before

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 3>I watched the end of it, but I still found

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 3>myself weirdly excited because I didn't actually I didn't realize

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 3>the permutations that got us to that Indian victory. And

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 3>really how I think we'll address this a little bit later,

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 3>but how South Africa were knocking on the door of

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 3>history and it was unlocked, yet they couldn't find a

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 3>way through.

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, for the three people in the whole cricket and

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>universe that don't know what happened. Of course, India a

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and seventy six for seven off their twenty others,

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the rat Rat Holy finding some form seventy six off

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine balls in the miracle, man akshar Ptel with

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>forty seven off thirty one, and Nortie and Kishev Maharaj

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the pick of the bowlers. And then the South African

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>chase which looks so bad, then so good and then

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>ultimately failed, one sixty nine for eight off their twenty overs.

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Massive innings from Heinrich class and the Basher Quintin de

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Kock was superb. David Millard did some good things, and

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it was Hardik Pandia with the most wickets, but it

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 1>was Jasper, yes, but Boomra that man, that miracle man again,

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>who was a real factor in that final. Dylan. I

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>thought it was an excellent final, actually played on one

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of the best pitchers in the tournament, and definitely between

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the two best teams. Of course, they both went into

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the match unbeaten, having won eight matches in a row.

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>There were some foi balls and some bullshit in the format.

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was some shenanigans I think around how

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>it all came together, but we can't really argue with

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>what the final that was produced.

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was excellent.

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 3>You had two teams that are clearly committed to the

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 3>T twenty, and you can see that by their domestic competitions,

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 3>which are throwing a lot of money, a lot of resource,

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of time at two best teams of the

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 3>tournament are traditional cricket venue in a town or a

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 3>city that breathes cricket and has just such great lineage

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 3>of world class players, possibly.

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 2>The greatest of them all.

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 3>And Gary Sobers and so everything about it felt right.

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 3>It was.

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 2>It was just a.

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Really good game of cricket. Verat Poly in his last

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 3>T twenty, I know it goes out a winner goes

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 3>out with.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Some class I didn't actually realize.

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Did you realize what a drought it had been for

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 3>India at ICC tournaments? I just kind of assume that

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 3>they win these kind of things all the time, but

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 3>it was it actually been got to a point where

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 3>there was some real anxiety on the subcontinent.

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I expected to win. I think it's probably

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's just so much overwhelming coverage about them,

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly when these tournaments roll around, right, But I think

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a thirteen year drought, isn't it. They've lost the

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>most recently the fifty over final at home, where literally

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the entire Indian state expected them to win, and of

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>course multiple World Test Championship finals. They're always I mean,

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they were a sensational team, but as you say that,

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the pressure continued to build and certainly over the last

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>thirteen years they had not managed to deliver.

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the twenty eleven World Cup I think was the

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 3>last one, and yeah, there was certainly a lot of

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 3>fretting going along. As you mentioned that South Africa started poorly,

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 3>but let's be honest here they got themselves into a

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 3>precision position one hundred and fifty one four after sixteen overs.

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 3>That is a Doddle twenty six of twenty four with

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 3>two set players, not just two set players, but Klassen

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 3>and Miller, who were t twenty.

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Gods with the bat. How did they lose from there?

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I don't know. I mean, obviously it would be

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>very easy to just say they choked, but you did.

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:02.119
<v Speaker 1>When you're watching the game, you did always feel because

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>it was real that the joker in the pack was

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>still those two overs that Boomra had up his sleeve,

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and you knew that if he could come out and

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>wreck and havoc that South Africa and Tail even sort

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of that lower order good players. But it did feel

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>like some of those guys are batting maybe a little

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.239
<v Speaker 1>bit higher than you'd ideally want them to do really

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>kind of so Evrica very reliant on their their top

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>five really, and after that, you know, with Maharaj and

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Yansen coming in, it did feel like they were you

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to see them just quite that early, to

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>be honest. And so yeah, look, I'm reluctant to call

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>it a choke, you know, I think it was a

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it was just a boomrai actually, And you know, as

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you say, they were in trouble early and they were

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>actually in trouble sort of reasonably late as well. It

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>was really that not from class in that twenty seven

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>ball fifty two, but yes you did think as well

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty six off twenty four they should be okay, a

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>very well timed injury break. I'm not reading anything into it.

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Was literally just a momentum breaker from Richard punt and

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>then when they came back Class and of course just

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 1>gave us wicked away. Just you can't criticize in those

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>blazing at everything, very unlikely that he was going to

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>come out and just knock it around ones and twos,

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of what the situation. That's all the

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:22.239
<v Speaker 1>situation needed.

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Frustratingly, Yeah, well that's exactly right. I mean, boomra bowl.

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 3>That's seventeenth over and I'm sitting there watching it, admittedly

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 3>already knowing the result, saying just get your six singles.

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>You can do all the damage at the other end. Instead,

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 3>as you mentioned, Class gave his wicked away. You're dead right,

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Marco Jensen. Yensen, batting at least one position too high

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 3>at number seven, comes out and tries to block, tries

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 3>to play a traditional cricket for defense, and gets his

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 3>Poles knocked it and from that moment on you could

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 3>feel the tremors in the South Africa and dug out

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 3>and I just had well.

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I didn't have the feeling. I knew it.

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 3>I knew they were going to fall short, but you

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 3>could almost sense that hope fading away. Each person that

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 3>came to the wicket was a little less confident than

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the last one.

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.119
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, in the end, in the end, the best

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 2>team one.

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 3>And in some ways it was hard to gauge that

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 3>earlier in this tournament because some of the conditions they

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 3>played on were it was such a lottery because the

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 3>format possibly needs to be ironed out ahead of the

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 3>next one. But in the end, I think, you know,

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 3>the best team won and we was waving goodbye to

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 3>a few t twenty legends after this World Cup, like

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 3>came Williamson, Ravi Jadasa who was just a non factor

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 3>brit India in this tournament, row At Sharma and Verat

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Kohley who had a dreadful tournament until went. It really

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 3>really made a motion.

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right, what I think seventy five He had seventy

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>five runs in the tournament. That's across eight games. I

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>can't I be bad at eight times, but let's just

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>say roughly, and then scored seventy six in the final,

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, he was superban and went through the gears.

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I did love. Of course. There was lots of talking

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we've touched on this about the joy and the palpable

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>relief and also the redemption arc of India. And I

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>saw a couple of reporters sort of pretty obvious to

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge a redemption song by Bob Marley, of course, and

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Bob Marley Country over there. But you know, I'm not

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>quite sure that we can. It's probably drawing quite a

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>long bow to say that this Cricket World Cup was

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the story about a team that had been abducted into

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>slavery fighting for their physical and mental freedom. I just

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like that might be a little bit kind of

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 1>gilding the lily.

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, look, they didn't play a Jamaica reve which is

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 3>actually Bob Marley's hometown.

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Totally totally good luck. If you were traveling from anywhere

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>trying to get to that game apparently was absolutely apocalyptic.

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>If you were a journalist who was not part of

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the TV commentary crew, if you were a person who

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>was not a player, or an umpire apparently, just the

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>absolutely ridiculous situation where you traveled for ten hours in

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>what is a direct one hour flight from a couple

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of the semi final venues. I know the English media

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>were absolutely raging, not that they were there, so they

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't need to worry too much. Yeah, you mentioned DC

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>those delivery, the delivery to to Marko Jensen, and there

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>was another sensational delivery to Resa Hendrix, who has had

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a pretty difficult tournament, felt like a bit of a

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>walking wicket, and boom used up one of his best

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>deliveries on caustling him. I saw Kracken vocal Boomra and

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I really related to this. When I was watching those

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>last the sort of last chapter of that game. They

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>said Boomra is like phone. He is like the phone

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>a friend and who wants to be a millionaire. He's

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>like your lifeline. You know he's going to do something

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and it's just a matter of when you're going to

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>play that card. I mean, that's a pretty extraordinary position

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for a for a player to be in.

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean he is that good, isn't he. I

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 3>actually might assigned one of those previous wickets to him. Incorrectly.

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Pandia was also pretty good at the end as well,

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 3>and he had been the kind of fragile link in

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 3>that Indian bowling line up up till then as well.

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 3>He was kind of the one that opposition of targeted.

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 3>But Boomra really is that good? And of course we

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 3>can't leave this final without touching on what was either

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 3>a sensational boundary catch and emblematic of where the modern

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 3>game has got to in terms of outfielding.

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Or a little bit controversial. Where do you stand on

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 2>this pool?

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Do you stand on the boundary rope or do you

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 3>stand just inside it?

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I feel like I'm arguing with the Almighty on

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>this one because I saw that Sakyadev said that it

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>was God's plan for him to take that catch, So

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I waited. I do go into this discussion with some trepidation,

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>but look his dancing feet in the deep. They've talked

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>about taking one of the most important catches in Indian

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>cricket history. Look it was that. Where did I sit

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>on it? I'm happy with it, to be honest. I

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>think I've got the rule book out. The playing conditions

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>for this tournament said that it's the cushion, not a

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>white line, which is the boundary. Literally, Section nineteen point

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>three says if a solid object used to mark the

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>boundary is disturbed for any reason, then the boundary shall

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>be considered to be in its original position. So look,

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I just think I don't think that he touched the

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>tobler owne Yes, his foot was over the sort of

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>pre marked white line. I understand that it was to

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>do with where the pitch wills, and it was there

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole game. And I don't know did a South

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>African player did Arik not? Yeah, when he thundered into

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the fence early on in the match, did he did

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he move it and it didn't get moved back into place?

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure? But either way, look, I think I'm

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I like the controversy because I think it's just part

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of the game and it's great that there's these stories

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and narratives and there's some great little AI videos that

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>make it look more dubious and so on. But from

0:11:57.840 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>my point of view, fear and Square I thought it was.

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, my heart went out to David Miller. Actually,

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I've got a lot of time for him, and yeah,

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>well where did you Where did you find it. It

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>was it God's plan.

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know if it was God's plan. I

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 3>don't know if he should bring Vishnu or receiver or

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure which one governs boundary catches. But I

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 3>always like every time I get something over that, now,

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 3>my mind immediately cast back to Law's twenty nineteen and

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Trent Bolt, And again it was just my immediate thought,

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 3>and I try to banish it. I was trying to

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 3>get out, Damn thought get out, but I couldn't. I'm

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 3>just thinking throw it into capital. But no, I think

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 3>it's I think it was fine. Yeah, it would be

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 3>really weird to try and explain it to an American

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 3>who might have just been into this, getting into cricket

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 3>and watching this tournament if that had been ruled not

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 3>out because his foot clipped the freestanding white line when

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 3>for all intents and purposes, you know, the Tobla owns

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 3>the boundary.

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think there are. I mean I think maybe

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>there's different playing conditions and sometimes it is the line

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and et cetera. But yeah, look, it just seemed fair

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and square. It was also one of those moments in

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the game where you go that is a screamer of

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a catch if the match turns on that, you know

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>fair enough? Actually yeah, and I know, of course I

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>know David Miller was not sitting in the dug out.

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>He certainly did not start returning to the dugout till

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>he'd watched it about a hundred times and then dragged

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>his bat and dragged his sorry us back to the

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>South African dugout. And as I say, I did feel

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>really sorry for him. He's one of those guys I've followed.

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I've talked about it before. He wasn't playing

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>or we ended up having a couple of drinks at

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a Barrack mount More just not just me and having

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole bunch of people. And he was a real

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>good bugger. He told some great yarns about Danie Vittori

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and Jesse Ryder and ipl times and all that kind

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of stuff.

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>He's thirty five years old, of course, famously has never

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>played Test cricket. Retired from first class cricket twenty eighteen.

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.719
<v Speaker 1>He's played two hundred and ninety eight international matches and

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>zero Test matches, despite having an average of thirty six

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and six tons in first class cricket I mean, and

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, an archetypal just if you were making a

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:18.839
<v Speaker 1>T twenty cricketer. He is the kind of guy that

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>he plays an incredible fielder. I don't know if he bowls.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he probably doesn't. You know that he does

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>famously famous quote which was from his old man. And

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>he's been playing cricket like this his whole life. If

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it's in the arc, it's out in the park, if

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it's in the v it's in the tree. And I

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>just think, you know, if our dads had given us

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that kind of advice, we would be probably much better

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>cricketers than what we were trying to do out there

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>DC noirdling it around and so on, you know. And

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I felt really sorry for Miller. He was in tears

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>at the end. I think he felt like, you know, well,

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously he was probably one foot away from pulling off

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>what would have been a sensational victory for South Africa.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned this before, or he was facing hard

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at Pandia. It was a low full toss. He smoked it.

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he you know, wasn't He wasn't one of the

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>class and ones that were sort of landing on the

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>solar panels on the roof of the grandstand. But jeez,

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>he got a lot of it. And I thought when

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Pandi was bowling that last those you know, in those

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>final overs, he's there for the taking. This guy he's

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to step up to it.

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But credit to him he did.

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 3>He did.

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The other sensational piece of cracket I just wanted

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to touch on this before we go, was that runout. Well,

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>first of all, a Chapatel, how good is a floating

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>number eight who comes up and just looks sensational forty

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>seven or thirty one resurrected the Indian innings. But the

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>runout run him being run out by Quintin da Kock

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>from the wicket keeper's end he was at the non

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>strikers in was one of the greatest pieces of cricket.

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely superb presence of mind from Quintin to Cock. Has

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>he retired? Is he retiring as well? I feel like

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the last hurrah for him as well.

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 3>I kind of felt like this if he is retiring,

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 3>it kind of feels like this is a a third

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 3>or fourth retirement. It feels like he's stepped aside from

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of things. But then I recognize it remembered

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 3>that one of them was actually just refusing to play

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 3>after refusing to kneel at the World T twenty in

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 3>the UAE. So I think I mistook that for a

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 3>retirement because I was half surprised to see him here

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 3>at the the st of the tournament next year. So

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 3>haven't you given the international game away? But yeah, it

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 3>was a sensational piece of cricket by to Cook and

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 3>a slightly lazy piece of cricket from the otherwise brilliant

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Exha Patel.

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he was just tired. DC. He doesn't normally

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>back for thirty one deliveries. He certainly doesn't normally get

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>forty seven. Jesus is a handy, very handy player. Hey,

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we should take away break and when we come back,

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:50.239
<v Speaker 1>let's have a quick yarn about what this whole messy, interesting, fascinating,

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>intriguing T twenty World Cup means for cricket. Welcome back

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to the BYC with Dylan Clever and Paul Ford, where

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>going over the entrails of the Cricket World Cup. We

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>hardly even really talking about the Black Caps, to be honest.

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>But Dylan, when you reflect on this tea twenty World Cup.

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's a pretty lofty question. But what do

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>you think it all means? What's its legacy? Did it

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>do what it was meant to do? What kind of

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>things stick in your mind?

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 3>Actually, it just felt a little bit messy. Partly that

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 3>was weather, Partly that was underprepared venues. Partly it is format.

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if the group to Super eight to

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 3>semis to Final works. It just feels like it could

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 3>be cleaner. I know that you get less content if

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 3>you go straight into the knockouts from from group play,

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 3>and I mean content is king right, But I thought

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 3>I thought it mostly did it strive?

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Really?

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 3>And you've said here we've learned how to use the

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 3>word diaspora. Well, I've actually learned how to say it

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 3>because I kept on that I would always call it diaspora,

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 3>I think. But I went and had a online tutory

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 3>and the emphasis is on the s, it's on the

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 3>second syllable, So it's diaspora is how you say it.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Did get a real workout during this tournament, didn't it?

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Because everyone was kind of like, well, Americans aren't gonna

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>watch it, and then everyone's like, well no, but diespera

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the diaspora will watch it. Yeah, that was definitely one.

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>But it did feel it felt a bit Mickey Mouse.

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was the I mentioned the travel thing before,

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and I know there were probably good reasons for some

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of this, but it did feel like things are slightly

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>tilted in favor of a risk in terms of that

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>New York ground b just things just making it a

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>bit easier for India. It did feel like it wasn't

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>quite an even playing field literally and metaphorically.

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and the Mickey Mouse reference works well in Mickey

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Mouse's second home, which of course is Florida, where they

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 3>had four matches scheduled and unfortunately they got just one

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 3>of the men and that was a real blow I

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 3>think for the organizers. I think the shocking state of

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 3>the pitch in.

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 2>New York was clearly a blow.

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 3>But they still got cricket there at least, and they

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 3>still got some actually quite exciting games, not the kind

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>of games you would expect at a Teach twenty betting extravaganza,

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 3>but they were still games of cricket that came down

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 3>to the wire in some cases.

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 2>But Trinidad was an excuseable.

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 3>You're one of the great venues of the world there

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 3>in Queen's Park Oval and yet we play on this

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 3>brand new venual. Might not be brand new, but it's

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 3>new enough. And it was just it was poor cricket.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 3>There's no other word to describe it. I didn't think

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 3>the cricket in Diana was great, but it was serviceable.

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 3>And I think one of the bonuses for the organizers

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 3>was the US playing pretty well. You know, they were

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 3>at class once they got to that Super eight stage,

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 3>but there was joy unconfined with the way they went

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 3>through the group stage. That was fantastic. An Jones belting

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 3>untold sixes and ticks and heartland.

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 2>It was great. So I would say, what would I

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 2>give it. I'd probably give it a flat B.

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Like I sort of a seven out of ten? Is

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>that where you going with that?

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Probably six point five seven out of ten. I

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 3>don't give half max, so yeah, i'd have to give

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 3>the seven out of ten.

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Myself.

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Look, I mean I think you touched on a

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of things that that when I when I reflect

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>on this tournament, it's that, you know, T twenty is

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a monster, and I know it's a cliche that twenty

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>overs just brings teams into it that would not be

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>able to survive in battle in a full blowing dual

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>over fifty overs at alone test cricket, Well, I don't

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>think they would anyway, and I think, you know, we

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>saw that with the United States of America. I think,

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably their players are a little bit distracted

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that they're having to answer their emails.

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>They went into the Super Eights because they ran out

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 1>of annual leave and so they were just having to

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of work around around the clock on both fronts,

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you know. But that rise of the second tier great,

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>always great when the host nation does well, you know.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm really on board with with what happened there,

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>although it was probably you know, not great for Pakistan

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 1>obviously or New Zealand, and you know, it's hard to

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>go past Afghanistan. We touched on this last week. There

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>was also some comments this week about how their travel

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>arrangements for the to get from the end of the

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Super Eights into their semi final. You know, they were

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>back at the hotel at three am, and then they

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>were traveling to the next venue at eight am and

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>playing the day after that. You know, it's pretty that's

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough and as I say, feels like some of

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the bigger teams. One in particular, I had a much

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>more of an armchair ride on that front. The other

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing, just as an aside, I saw just before

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we came on here, that there's been an entreaty from

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>at the Afghanistan women's team, who are unofficial, that they

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>have asked that the ICC assist them and setting up

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a refugee team based in Australia in the absence of

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a national side. Of course, woman aren't able to play

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>because of the Teliban horrific regulations, So an interesting little

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>conundrum there for icy c chair and all around good

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>bugger Greg Bark later to assess, that's a pretty tangled

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>web that's being woven there. I'd suggest for the icy

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>seed or wade into.

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, PEPs.

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 3>It's a chance for him to get back on the

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 3>front foot after this issue, because he is a terrific

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 3>bloke and he does a great job.

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 2>But the one, the one.

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps misstep in his role was when he described the

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 3>taliband's grip on the woman's game there as a blip.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I think when.

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 4>You described it, immediately regretted it, and there was clearly

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 4>not the context he meanted there, but he was hauled

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 4>over the Cole's way.

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 2>The international well, yeah, mainly Twitter, and I.

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Think he meant vice like grip not blip, but yeah,

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>close close. I mean the other thing that caught my

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>eye is really, you know, there was a mix. I

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>guess you've seen it with India. In the Indian case,

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>experienced players are kind of the their rock stars and

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>were probably the reason that they did so well. In

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>other cases, teams rolled the dice, took a bunch of

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>experienced players and came up short. England made the semi finals,

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>probably on reflection a pretty bloody good effort. Australia of

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>course not making it through. New Zealand obviously not making

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it through. It does feel like there is a real

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>changing of the guard that's happening amongst international cricket. And

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to make that point, it's pretty extraordinary. I heard getting

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in Haigues say how Sahinton Dohalka played one T twenty

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>international and Rat Cooley and Rowert Shama have played what

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>two hundred or whatever? It has had a quick lock

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>From a New Zealand perspective, it's just remarkable to think

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>about this. Chris Ken's played two T twenty internationals and

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>scored three runs. Nathan Nashtell played four, Stephen Fleming played five,

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and Craig McMillan played eight. Tim Soudy one hundred and

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty six not out, goup To one hundred and twenty two.

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Is so one hundred and seventeen not out, Mitchell Satner

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and four not out. Generational shift in how

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the game is played.

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, and I know that Chris Ken's won in particularly.

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if there was a format he was born for,

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 3>it was probably T twenty right, So.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Wearing David Miller's T shirt in the tree, I'd suggest.

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Mind if you go back, if you go back a

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 3>couple of generations before that, you can do the same

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 3>exercise with the event of one day cricket where it

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 3>came in sort of the late seventies early eighties, and

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 3>you look back at some of the New Zealand players,

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean Ken Wadsworth, who obviously passed away back to

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 3>you young, but he was one that was identified as

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 3>someone who would have been a traffic one day player

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 3>never got the chance.

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Yea, that's exactly right. And yeah, and then the other

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 1>thing we just touched on this before, but I did

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>have a quick block and the T twenty Cricket will

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Cup in Sri Lanka and India is February and March

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six, so just shy of two years away.

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>The twenty teams will be divided into four groups of five.

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>The top two teams in each group will advance to

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the Super eight, so brace yourself India and Sri Lanka,

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>who are pretty lucky. Qualifiers hosts Australia, England, South Africa,

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Western Is, USA, Bangaledesh and in Afghanistan are in because they

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>made the Super eights and then the three least worst

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in the rankings after that lot so New Zealander threw

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>as a Pakistan in Ireland and there's eight spots to

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>be decided via the regional qualifiers. Yeah, I think you

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this before. India, no Judasia, no Koali, no Shama,

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand obviously no Bolt and probably a host of others.

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.959
<v Speaker 1>And there's lots of speculation that Australia won't have the

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>likes of Warner's gone, but also Max will wag Stark,

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>those kind of guys very likely to be not on

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the scrap pep but sort of easing their way out

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of T twenty International Cricket, possibly against their will. DC.

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's packet there if you didn't have anything more to

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>throw at that throw at the wall on that particular topic.

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 1>And when we come back, will WinCE and never look

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>at the White Fans. Welcome back to the BBC Podcast.

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It's Paul Ford and Dylan Pleaver coming to you from

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the Export Beer Garden Studio DYCA. The White Ferns are

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough start to their tour of England. A couple

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of drubbings.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, look, losing to England's not surprising, but Jeep

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 3>has won a mess just awful. I'll just quickly run

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 3>through the short score cads because it won't take long.

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 3>In the first game at Chesla Street, New Zealand bettered

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 3>first posted one five six England in reply one five

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 3>seven for one and just twenty one point two overs.

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Moving down the road to Worcester for game two, New

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Zealand a game, betting first, posting one for one England

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 3>in reply one four to two for two in just

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty four point three overs. Yep, you heard that right.

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 3>The White Ferns have scored sub one sixty in both

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 3>games have taken a sum total of three England wickets.

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 2>And one of them was a runout.

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Look, there's losing to England, and I think everybody that's

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 3>listened to the BYC, anyone that follows cricket with any

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of close lens on the game, on all formats

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 3>of the game, will recognize that New Zealand has slipped

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 3>a long way behind Australia, England, probably India now. But

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 3>there's losing and then there's absolutely not showing up on

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 3>what is a pretty high profile tour for them.

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think I saw it seventeen years I think

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the Indian injury out. Seventeen years since

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand beat England in a woman's ODI series And

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:00.719
<v Speaker 1>as you say, doesn't feel like, well this series gone already,

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>but hard to think of one that would be more

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>lopsided than that. It does feel like we're playing fifty

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 1>over cricket from the eighties and England are playing IPLT

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty cricket. Yeah, really really tough going A couple of

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>quotes Sophie Devine, new Zealand captain, first game really disappointed

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and game two similar trends. We didn't battle over that's

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 1>a crime one hundred and forty. You're not going to

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>be competitive fair play. I think that's pretty much bang on.

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just don't think things are right there.

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that to miss in terms of I don't

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 3>want to go so far to say culturally, because unless

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 3>you're in the camp, you don't know what the culture

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 3>of a team is like. So I think we can

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 3>look outside and go, well, there's something not right there.

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 3>But very clearly my understanding was that Jason Wells wanted

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 3>to continue in his role as selector.

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 2>He was effectively.

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.479
<v Speaker 3>Told no, it didn't have his contract renewed, that they

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 3>were going to look in a different direction there. Now, look,

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm joining dots here. I'm adding two and two and

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe getting seven and a half. So that but Wells

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 3>is very tight with Robbie Kerr. I mean they played

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 3>together at Wellington.

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Has that a shot across the bows of the power

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 3>structure within that team? Maybe is it sending a message?

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't know. I don't have answers to these.

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm not close enough connected, but it feels like there's

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 3>something very wrong at the state of women's cricket.

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 2>This team is not getting better.

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 3>We thought that when we hosted the World Cup that

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 3>was a low point, right that Bob Carter raising physically

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 3>out badly. Getting a more dynamic Australian coach that had

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 3>great success as an assystem with the Australian women's team

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 3>was a good step in the right direction, perhaps nurture

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 3>some of this younger talent coming through. But I do

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 3>think you've got to ask it, do we have young

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 3>talent coming through? We're still heavily reliant on Saphie Divine

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 3>and Susie Bait, who are moving into their mid thirties.

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Not seeing the world on fire on this tour very obviously,

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 3>but then again, no one knows. And I watched the

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 3>way England and Australia play the game now in India

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 3>play the game now, and the game is moving more.

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't mean this in a patronizing way at all,

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 3>but it's I guess the skill sets of the game

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 3>are moving closer to perhaps the men's game a lot

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 3>of power hitting in front of the wicket that simply

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 3>wasn't there in the past, and the women's game. I'm

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 3>not seeing that translate to New Zealand performance. Some very

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 3>good players Mellicur is a very good player. Saviiet Divine

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 3>is a player who can power hit in front of

0:30:56.120 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 3>the wicket, very good player. But that's second tier of

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 3>players coming through. It just doesn't seem to be there.

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 3>And look, I don't know where they go. I don't

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 3>know if you have had any deep thoughts on it,

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 3>but these are terrible, terrible results. We can't we can't

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 3>get away from that. And I think we've said this

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 3>over the past couple of years. New Zealand Cricket have

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 3>to make some calls here are they going to invest

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.719
<v Speaker 3>heavily in the woman's game? So how are they going

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 3>to do it? You can just throw money at something

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 3>and expect it to be better. You've got to throw

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 3>money at it in terms of resource, and where do

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 3>you put that resource? Does New Zealand, because it's got

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 3>a small talent, Paul, perhaps and load up on their

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 3>T twenty and make that the game that the format

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 3>they're going to pursue. And I mean, I don't know

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 3>over to you, Paul, any thoughts.

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you do know, Dylan, And then I think

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>there's some very sevy observations there, and you know, I

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>think you know We've been a broken record about that

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>reliance on the same you know, I was going to

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>say half a dozen, but really it's three or four players,

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's the next tier and then the tier below that.

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And then as you say that, the youngsters coming through

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, lots of them have been given chances.

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Have they been given chances too early? Is this a

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>part of a five year plan? There's five years too long?

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>How's the plan going? I don't like the look of it.

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>It makes me feel nervous. Yeah, look, I'm not sure,

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, well I guess what I do know is

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>or who I do know is Jason Wells as an

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>absolute top man. And yeah, I'm just not sure that

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>will be better without someone like that involved. So that

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.239
<v Speaker 1>that's news to me an interesting one. I will keep

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>an eye out for him at the Island Blaye Island

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Bay Football Club rooms over the next few weeks and

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>see what we can glean from him.

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean some players in that team, and I don't

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 3>want to pick on individuals because you know, they don't

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 3>get the same backing as the men, they ain't get

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 3>the same money in that but there's some players in

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 3>that team that are getting lots and lots and lots

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 3>of chances and doing to nothing with them.

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 2>So do you do you cut them and move on

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 2>to the next.

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 2>It just feels like a hot mess at the moment.

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>One thing that isn't a hot mess is the correspondence

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to the byc. Thank you to everyone that's Scott in touch.

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got a couple of whipped through here DC. The

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>first one is from UK Paul and it's on the

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Test Captain. See hello fellas. Love listening to your podcast

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>from over here in the UK always makes me laugh.

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Keep up the great work. A question I would be

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>interested to hear you discuss is who do you think

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:30.719
<v Speaker 1>should be the black Caps Test captain for the upcoming

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>red ball tour. At the conclusion of the tests versus Australia,

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of question marks on whether Tim

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Souley would remain as skipper. While I have no issues

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>with Tim as captain as such, the big question really

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>would be is he a definite pick for selection in

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming red ball games away against Afghanistan, Sri Lanka

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and India given the spin friendly nature of these wickets.

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>If it's place in the team isn't guaranteed. Surely he

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>can't be captain. The easy answer might be Tom Latham,

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>though I wonder if it's an opportunity to look to

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the future a bit with Daryl or a Glen Phillips

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>or Devin Conway.

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 2>What do you reckon?

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's a good question. I would There's a couple

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 3>of things I would like to say. On the first

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 3>of all, Mitchell's thirty three Conway to thirty three on Monday,

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 3>So is that really looking to the future? If if

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 3>they you're next in line. Glenn Phillips would be a

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 3>very bold move. But I think he I mean bless him,

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 3>but I think he operates on a slightly different wavelength

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 3>and most sentient human beings, so it might be it

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:32.720
<v Speaker 3>might be a risk too far, but it's a good idea.

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 3>But what I would say is Tim Southy is going

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.879
<v Speaker 3>to be captain for those games. And you look at

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:41.439
<v Speaker 3>his record his career. He's taken three hundred and eighty

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.439
<v Speaker 3>Test wickets at an average of twenty nine point six

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 3>to one at a strike rate of fifty nine point five.

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 2>This will surprise a lot of people.

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Injury Lanka, he's taken sixty four wickets an average of

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 3>eighteen with a strike rate of forty five point three,

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 3>so miles better than.

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 2>His overall record.

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 3>In India, he's taken fifty two wickets an average of

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty four point sixty nine at a straight raid of

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 3>forty six point nine, miles better better's overall record. I

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 3>think people do tend to forget he is a very,

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 3>very canny, clever bowler in sub continent and conditions.

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 2>But we cannot.

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Overlook the fact that he was poor last summer. So

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm guessing his rope is shorter, but he's not at

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 3>the end of it yet.

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm on board with that very I had the

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>same set of stats and I was actually really surprised

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that his stats in India in particular, we're better than

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>his overall career stats. And yeah, look, I think it

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's he's an absolute lock. Tom Latham is

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>potentially a contender if Saudi decides he needs a rest

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, But I feel like it would be Saudi

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>making that call, and I just can't see it happening.

0:35:53.239 --> 0:36:00.439
<v Speaker 1>He's notoriously fit and notoriously hates not playing too. I think, yeah,

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>in particular, the STG comes to mind, he's probably far

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>too grumpy to be twelve men when he's put in

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that position. So yeah, look, love the speculation of the discussion,

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>but I'm with you on that.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he does need an up to conform. He

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 3>can continue playing like you did the last home summer. Else,

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 3>I mean, at his age, you are standing to wonder

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.839
<v Speaker 3>if he's fallen off the cliff in terms of his performance.

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 2>But we're not there yet. Hey, look is another.

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.439
<v Speaker 3>Great piece of correspondence which I will rush through as DCF.

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 3>On the future of T twenty black Caps, Hi, all,

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 3>I've enjoyed the discussions you've had in the last few

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 3>episodes about what changes you'd like to see the black

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 3>Caps T twenty approach going forward and which players will

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 3>or won't be making the trip to the continent in

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six. However, as a key, we living overseas,

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 3>specifically the USA, a country desperately trying to convince itself

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 3>that watching a one null baseball game is a good

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 3>way to spend three hours, and one that thinks silly.

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Midn is a ridiculous name for a position, but tight

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 3>end and shortstop aren't. My knowledge of the next generation

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 3>of black Cap stars could be as best be described

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 3>as bugger or I probably couldn't pick Eddie Ashot or

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Willow Walk out of a lineup if my life depended

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 3>on it. So to that end, I was wondering if

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 3>you could add a third discussion to your future Black

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Caps teach me any lineup series for the benefit of us, Skiwiz.

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 3>You don't get to see a lot of super smash

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 3>sport trophy, your plunketshield cricket. Who would you rate as

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 3>the up and comers who best fit the profiles and

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 3>cricketers you'd like to see in the black Caps T

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty squad two years in the years coming? He as

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 3>if you qualifiers the potential power heading top all a better.

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, who would we like to see in the

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 3>next up for the next few years? As the like

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 3>said Michael Bracewill, Trent Bolt, Lockie Ferguson and others are

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 3>phased out? Cheers all And if I run into any

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Kiwis at the Major League Cricket matches in North Carolina

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 3>next month, I'll shout them a pint or whip up

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 3>a homemade minsen cheese.

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Nice house good. It makes me want to travel over

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.320
<v Speaker 1>there just for that Minton Cheese. I mean yeah, I

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>mean we're going to talk about this, I imagine for literally

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>years to come. But you know, and we have talked

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>about a few few guys that are in the mix.

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 1>What I did I had a quick look at sort

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of the highest strike rates in the Super Smash, just

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to get a flavor because I feel like you sort

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of have a vibe of guys that you've seen play

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>just when it had to look at some raw numbers. Now,

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the highest strike rate from a bating point of view

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is Doug Bracewell, which is a bit waking, but you

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>know there it is a ninety three, not out of

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>do that, so fair play to him. There's a really

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:35.879
<v Speaker 1>interesting guy by the name of Bevan John Jacobs from

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>hal Ting who plays for Canterbury. He's been a revelation

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in Canterbury Club cricket and he did some really really

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>good things in the Super Smash and he's in that

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>another Sapha that's cutting his way in through the New

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Zealand scene. I think he's definitely one to watch. I mean,

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Tim Robinson's an obvious one. Fin Allen's going to be there.

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I like the Max Choo's done some good things. He's

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of young, possibly not that young. I think I

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>always talking about him because his auntie is my next

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>door neighbor. But uh, Mitchy mitch Hay is another one

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 1>that I think is worth a crack and a guy

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that I know is not young. But you know, I'm

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>not saying he's David Miller, but a touch of David

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Miller as well. O'donnald you know, I think he could

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>have done some good things. And I think Nathan Smith

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a really obvious one that's about

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to break through. So I think those are some contenders

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>from a batting point of view.

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, well I look as well.

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 3>I probably perused some of the same stats as you

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 3>and Robertson mitch Hay and Dean Foxcroft. Those three are

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 3>actually over in the over in India at the moment,

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 3>learning to sweep on spinning wickets, so that might be

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 3>appointed to where the selectors think the future lies. And

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 3>I go so far to say it's a huge pointer.

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Dean Foxcroft has planned to deceive a little in the

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 3>T twenty game and she but he's certainly got talent.

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:07.399
<v Speaker 3>I love the way he bats when he's when he's in,

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 3>but his stroke rate is pretty He didn't I didn't

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 3>think he had an amazing season last season. Mooer Bass

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 3>is another one who has got talent dripping out of

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:24.760
<v Speaker 3>his paws. Maybe maybe t twenties. Not quite his game yet,

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 3>but it will be. I always wonder why Nick Kelly

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:32.439
<v Speaker 3>hasn't ever had a crack and he's about to turn

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:37.320
<v Speaker 3>thirty one, but he always plays well for Wellington.

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 2>And then on the bowling front, you know Ben Lister

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 2>is still twenty eight.

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Riston p Jason Hoyt, who's sick this week. By the way,

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>he's actually not dead. Well that thing is.

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 3>But Ben, this is twenty eight he's got. Last season,

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:56.720
<v Speaker 3>I think his economy was just to tick over six

0:40:56.760 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 3>and a strike rate was thirteen, like he was the

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 3>pick of the seemers. Eddie es shock unfortunately I didn't

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:09.800
<v Speaker 3>realize this actually, but he had back surgery, really serious

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 3>back surgery. He's actually got to I think he might

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 3>have even had a screw inserted, which sounds very shame

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Bond type of surgery. So I guess we wait bade

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 3>a breath to see if he has to reconfigure his

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:28.240
<v Speaker 3>action or anything like that. But obviously he's got a

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 3>huge potential as a leg spinner and another guy who's

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 3>done nothing yet to justify this lofty place on the

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 3>b YC. But just keep half an eye out for

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Jock McKenzie.

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Chose.

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he was gonna He was in the Blues I

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 3>think super rugby squad and he was a two sports

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 3>star at high school. He is now throwing his lot

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 3>in with cricket. He looked last summer with the times

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 3>I watched him. I thought he's possibly not quite there

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 3>yet with either discipline, but there's clearly potential there and

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I think he might be. He might be kind of

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 3>a Blacks, but maybe with a little bit more upside

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 3>than the Clackson for the long term because he's very young.

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 2>I think he might be twenty two.

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah nice and I mean Nathan Smith again for me

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>just to chuck in a couple of guys that kind

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of haven't come through in the bowling, and I know

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>he's there, he's been in the squad, he's played already.

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>But Zach Folks I think is going to be a

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>real gun coming through and definitely a terrific player to watch.

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>He can bat too, so yeah, there's a few names

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>there that we're throwing around so that we can claim

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>them down the track. Hopefully that's helpful DCF, but definitely

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a topic the future T twenty black Caps team that

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>will be wrestling with over the next couple of years.

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Ahead of that, TEA twenty World Cup third one. Just

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 1>quickly as mother on Devlin, did you guys see Marden

0:42:56.920 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Devlin's rant on the larger number of folks employed by

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 1>New Cricket, I suspect Gary Stead is carrying the can

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 1>for poor planning. Maybe player empowerment gone astray. Jared Kimber

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>on his pod made the point that countries like New

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Zealand and Sri Lanka with our lesser numbers, are going

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to have good and bad periods. New Zealand's at the

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>end of a great period and it seems that not much.

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:16.839
<v Speaker 1>There's not too much in the way of talent coming through,

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>at least not the kind of talent that we've been

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>used to over the past ten or fifteen years. What

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts, boys.

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:26.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, look, I didn't see the rent, but I think

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 3>by most standards, New Zealand runs a fairly lean operation,

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 3>so I wouldn't have thought that New Zealand is getting

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 3>clogged up by bureaucracy, head office or in the high

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 3>performance system down in Lincoln. That's not to say I

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 3>don't think there shouldn't be changes in the high performance

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 3>system and they shouldn't be fresh blood perhaps, but I

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think too many people is the problem there. I

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 3>think Jerry Kidner's dead right. You know New Zealand's fortunes

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 3>are going to be cyclical.

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:03.399
<v Speaker 2>You try and.

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Smooth out that roller coaster as best you can with

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 3>good succession planning. Has New Zealand got that right at

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 3>the moment, will clearly not if they go into a

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:16.839
<v Speaker 3>tournament with essentially the entire team maybe Finelle and over

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:20.920
<v Speaker 3>thirty and and it's up to the BYC to discuss

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 3>who that next wave of talent coming through is because

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 3>it's not obvious to other people. So you know, perhaps

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:30.239
<v Speaker 3>they haven't got it right, and perhaps we are on

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 3>the brink of a prolonged slump. I hope not, but

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 3>we are. I mean, Jared's right, We're never going to

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:42.880
<v Speaker 3>have a factory line of talent like India can that

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 3>pulls out of the Rangi Trophy and the I P

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:47.799
<v Speaker 3>l and that sort of thing. It's just never going

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 3>to be part of the New Zealand game. So yeah,

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:52.879
<v Speaker 3>that's my thoughts on that, muzz.

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I agree with you to say, and I think,

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:58.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, as we've, as we've touched on before, it's

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 1>been and as he does himself in his email, you know,

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:05.359
<v Speaker 1>it's been an incredible run from a playing point of view.

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 1>But I also think, you know, we talk about New

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Zealand punching above its weight, and now the expectations are higher,

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:12.319
<v Speaker 1>and that's where we get pissed off when we lose

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:14.839
<v Speaker 1>to teams like Afghanistan. But also I think it's fair

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:18.839
<v Speaker 1>to say that the way that cricket has been run

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in New Zealand also punches above its weight. I know

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it's controversies from time to time, but none of these huge,

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:28.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of massive things have happened over the last few years.

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's a pretty it's a pretty neat

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and tidy shop generally, and I think lots of things

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>have obviously worked pretty damn well over the last you know,

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 1>ten years or so, for sure. So yeah, I think, yeah,

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:43.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. I'm not sure we should talking about

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 1>matter Devlin, because I think that's probably exactly what he wants.

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Hey, it was a bad campaign, it was. It was

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 3>a poor campaign in the Caapan for this World T twenty.

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 3>There are reasons that we've discussed on previous podcasts for

0:45:57.120 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 3>namely pork preparation and maybe coming to the end of cycle.

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it's deeper than that.

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And now it's time for a little bit

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of Pauwford's violence Corner Paul.

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Forward's cricket violence Corner.

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Pakistani cricketer Umar Akmal has been arrested for allegedly thrashing

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a traffic warden and he was taken to the police

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 1>station and charged under sections one eight six, two seven

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 1>nine and three five three of the Pakistan Penal Code

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:27.280
<v Speaker 1>four obstructing an official at work, tearing a police uniform

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and misbehaving and hurling threats. The traffic warden stopped Ukmar

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:34.280
<v Speaker 1>after he would stopped for violating a traffic light signal.

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>He counter alleged that the warden had abused and slapped him.

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:41.240
<v Speaker 1>The place where the incident took place has CCTV cameras

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>all around it. I would ask the authorities to look

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>at the footage and then decide whether I have done

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:49.280
<v Speaker 1>anything wrong, Umar said, sounds like quite a good defense,

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:49.879
<v Speaker 1>to be fair.

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you what the you don't want to get

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 3>on the wrong side of two seven six on the

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Pakistani penal code, that's for sure. Mar Aknel, What a

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:59.319
<v Speaker 3>curious cricketer he was. I remember he came out to

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand when he was really young, brother of Cameron

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 3>ack now the keeper with iron gloves. But he scored

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 3>a fantastic test century and I think I might have

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:14.400
<v Speaker 3>been working with Shane Bond on his biography at the

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 3>time and I remember him just saying that that kid

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 3>is a gun.

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:21.440
<v Speaker 2>He could be anything, and he really didn't amount to

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:22.439
<v Speaker 2>much at all.

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>No, it's always a bad day when you're in the

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>paper for tearing a police uniform. I would suggest, Hey,

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Cleaver, I think I think that's us. Thanks everyone

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:36.360
<v Speaker 1>for joining us on this week's boy C podcast. You

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>could fill your week watching the White Fans play in

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:41.799
<v Speaker 1>the Dead of the Night in England live stream via

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the ICC website from midnight to night, and then you

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:47.360
<v Speaker 1>can watch the t twenties from one thirty am on

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Sunday maybe and in the meantime, if you've got anything

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:53.799
<v Speaker 1>to get off your chest, send us a short diet

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 1>tribe to b YC at Beasewague dot co dot nz.

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Take care out there, kak on no