WEBVTT - Tech skills -  upgrade now or fall behind

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Our tech sector is undoubtedly one of the fastest growing

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>areas off our economy and exporting powerhouse and yielding high

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:15.159
<v Speaker 1>salaries for those employed in it. So do we have

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the talent and skills pipeline to support its growth? Well, Nope,

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>not even close. I'm Peter Griffin and on this week's

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>episode if the Business of Tech powered by two Degrees Business,

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at one of the biggest issues facing the

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>tech sector, an urgent need to rapidly upskill the workforce

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>and technologies like artificial intelligence, just as our best and

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>brightest head for the exits seeking greener pastures overseas. My

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>guest on the pod this week is Craig Young, the

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>long serving CEO of Two Hands, the Technology Uses Association

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of New Zealand, a member's based advocacy body that has

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>done great work over the years on behalf of consumers

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on everything from breaking up telecoms monopoly to pushing for

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>greater digital inclusion. Two and recently published its annual Digital

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Priorities Report, which rounds up the views of dozens of

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>tech leaders looking at what we need to do in

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the tech and digital space to really advance our aims

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>as a nation. It's they're a pretty frustrated bunch, with

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>no digital strategy or even a clear roadmap for the

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>country's approach to AI. There's a sense in the report

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're drifting along while other countries like Australia get

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>dead serious about the opportunities and the risks that technology pose.

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But the most pressing issue is the tech skills gap.

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>The government is currently revamping its approach to apprenticeships, internships

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and the like what's known as vocational education. It has

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a plan to create a group of industry skills boards.

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>But where do tech and the creative economy fit in

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>while bundled in with manufacturing. That's not good enough, says Craig,

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>who wants to see finally a dedicated skills push for

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the knowledge economy industries. The government claims to want to

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>double exports from over the next ten years. So here's

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the interview with Two Hands CEO Craig Young. Craig Young,

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Business of Tech. How are you doing, Craig,

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing well. Thank you, Peter Kyodor and thank you

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Yeah, great to have you on. Been

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>meaning to have you on the show because you're doing

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>such great work. With Two Hands, an organization that's been

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>around in New Zealand for a long time. I remember

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>as a cadet reporter Ernie Newman was the head of

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Two Hands, a long serving chief executive, always had a

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>great turn of phrase and real advocate for consumers. But

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>just give us a little bit of background about Two

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Hands and the evolution of the organization over the years.

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>You've been CEO, nowfare what coming up on ten years?

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, Peter? Ten years and I really can't believe where

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 2>that time's gone because every year is so different. You know,

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 2>we've been through quite a lot during that time as well.

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I too remember the earning Newman days. I've been around

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 2>for a while as well. I wasn't quite a cadet,

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, and he did a good twelve years as

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 2>the CEO. And I've learned over time looking at other

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 2>organizations like this, you do tend to see the ones

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 2>that make the most impact, where the leader hangs around

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 2>for a little while. You know, we were the Taic

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Communications Users Association and in those days when the nineties

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 2>and early two thousands, there was a lot of issue

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 2>in MAHI that needed to be done for users across

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 2>the board from individuals right through to corporates, and we

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 2>saw the you know, significant changes that occurred, and we

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of got to the point of when I started

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 2>where we had probably won that battle, maybe not the

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 2>overall war, if you want to put it that way,

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 2>but when that batt also we had to sort of

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 2>reshape and refigure. And it's why in twenty twenty we

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 2>changed the tar in our name to technology because we

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 2>recognized that there wasn't a user group for the broader

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 2>tech space. But also telecommunications had morphed, had morphed in

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 2>a big way to being much more than just you know,

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 2>making phone calls and text messages.

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you did, you know, I think you were

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>integral in the early days to actually winning that war

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>around structural separation of telecom into Chorus and Spark. You know,

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 1>the work that two ADS did advocating for the consumer

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely integral to that. So I think kiwi's a

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>debt of gratitude to two Ads, As you say, it's

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>become a broader remit now and it's really encapsulated. Every

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 1>year you do this Digital Priorities Report, and it's just

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>been published Digital Priorities in twenty twenty five and I've

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>got to say, I consider get a sense of frustration.

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>This report is based on surveys and interviews with thirty

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>six CIOs, chief information officers and chief technology officers. Some

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>big names in there. If you flick through the report

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>and you're around the tech sector, you'll know some of

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>these people. They're really smart people, and I just get

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a sense reading it that they're frustrated at some of

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the issues that we face in the lack of progress

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in the digital space. There are some strengths in there,

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and maybe let's start on a positive note, you know,

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of where we're at in terms of our

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>digital infrastructure, our digital economy, the digital space in New Zealand.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>What are our strengths at the moment in your eyes.

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 2>That's a really good question, Peter, And you're right about

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 2>the feeling that comes through. But there is some positiveness,

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 2>You're absolutely right, and I think it's more frustration that

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 2>we haven't made the most of what we've got. And certainly,

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 2>you know the structural separation of course on a telecom

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 2>the interesting just in a side there. I was actually

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 2>at chorus during that time, so you know, New Zealand

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 2>is a small place, so you move from one side

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 2>to the other, but absolutely believe in that the cio CTOs.

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, there is some really amazing things happening in

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand and the technology space, and they're really keen

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 2>to utilize New Zealand technology. The growth of high speed

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>broadband is you know, obviously a key underpinning to so

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 2>many things that gets done, and we see businesses taking

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 2>up those services, you know, more and more, where as

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 2>individuals were very quick to take it up, particularly during COVID,

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, when we wanted to stream so much TV.

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 2>But you know, we're seeing different things being used. You know,

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 2>the difference between when I started and now on international cables,

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 2>the number of cables that we have coming into New Zealand,

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 2>so our connections to the world is so much better

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 2>and we see more of those occurring as well. So

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, there is some real good things about our infrastructure.

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 2>We might be the last bus stop before Antarctica, but

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 2>we really do have great connectivity to the rest of

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the world and inside our nation. Five GM mobile networks

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and we're going to see some upgrades to those later

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>in the year when they all build their what's called

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 2>a standalone core so that's the core of the network

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 2>will be upgraded to five G and they'll be able

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 2>to provide some extra services that will be amazing for us.

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 2>We've done some amazing things in rural we shouldn't we

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't you know, step back from some of the stuff

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 2>that's been done with the wireless ISPs, with the RCG.

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, the idea of sharing infrastructure is so important

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to the further out you get from urban.

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 2>So you know, it's easy sometimes to think about the

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 2>things we don't have, but we do have quite a lot,

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 2>and we have some very smart people. We just don't

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 2>have enough of them. Yeah, so there are some possibles.

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>And look, one of the interesting things was after writing

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>the report, obviously you do get sort of focused in

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 2>on what you think should happen next. And one of

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 2>our speakers at our recent event decided to ask is

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 2>AI tool you know, can you tell me what the

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 2>sense of positivity is from this report? It actually came

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 2>about at six out of ten, So it's not a

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 2>completely negative report. It's slightly positive. And when you talk

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 2>to the CEOs etc. About their perspective on where we

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 2>sit in the world, they do put us at about

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 2>a sex out of ten, so not all dream and gloom.

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and as you mentioned in there, things like, you know,

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got pretty good e commerce legislation, online banking access,

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>although you were a little bit behind on the open

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 1>banking front, and it's something your predecessor, Ernie Newman is

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 1>still sort of talking about, you know, the competitive issues

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that we have. But you know, there are some positives

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>there in terms of the challenges and the opportun unities

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that we face. You know, they're pretty clear in there.

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>You talk about escalating cybersecurity risks and a bit of

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>complacency or under resourcing in that space, the persistent tech

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:16.719
<v Speaker 1>talent gap, and we'll talk in more detail about that.

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Digital inclusion is still not where it needs to be

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of resourcing and progress we're making on that.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But there was something more fundamental, I think underpinning at all,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>which is really a lack of visible strategic government leadership

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:33.599
<v Speaker 1>in the digital space. And I've been talking to a

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people about that. We've had a change of government,

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>but we are look eighteen months into this new government.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>They've done some things in the innovation space, big shake

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 1>up underway, but let's face it, we still don't have

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a national digital strategy, do we.

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 2>So look, I think you're right, Peter, we don't have

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 2>a national digital strategy, even though the government has talked

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 2>it up and certainly when they were in opposition they

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 2>were absolutely committed to using digital technology as a key

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 2>growth platform. I think, you know, we'll give them some

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 2>some we'll let off a little bit. They did a

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of shifting and changing last year, but unfortunately that's

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 2>led to changes in their ministerial portfolios. But also I

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 2>understand that it's not quite clear on who's taking ownership

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 2>of digital transformation within government. It's just a bit too

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 2>spread out. I think the other thing is we haven't

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 2>seen a strategy for the use of AI, and we

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 2>certainly know that it's a big topic of discussion aroundst

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 2>MPs ministers and also on the security side. You know,

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>the thing that we're looking for is not necessarily some great, big,

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 2>long document, but it is something where government takes leadership.

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 2>There's such a big part of our economy, of our

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 2>population and what they do with just even everyday individuals.

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Having some sense of a direction that they want the

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 2>nation to go in I think is really important.

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that sort of leads me to my question,

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>what would an effect of strategy look like in your view?

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the sort of first practical steps

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that would need to happen. Obviously it has to be

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>government and industry and other stakeholders groups in society working together.

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>But you know, how do you start putting this together.

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>What's your sort of dream, sort of list of things

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that could be got off the ground relatively quickly or

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>should be included in a strategy.

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I think what we've got to be aware of and

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 2>quite clever around is the fact that technology moves so quickly,

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 2>and so you know, if we want to spend months

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 2>and months trying to work up a strategy developing regulation,

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be left behind. And that is different

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 2>from the way government normally works. So we're quite clear

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 2>on that. You're absolutely right, it's got to be a collaborative.

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be a collaborative approach government. You're actually

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, we've talked about that they're a big part

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 2>of the economy. They take leadership, but we recognize, and

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 2>the digital leaders did as well, that they need to

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 2>be engaged and involved. And it's not just the technology

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 2>industry that will be our export base. But if we

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 2>want to grow our economy and grow productivity, then it's

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 2>the other businesses also that need to pick up digital

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 2>and do digital transformation. So I think that's the first

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 2>place is trying to get those perspectives together and come

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 2>up with some overriding direction, whether you want to call

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 2>it a vision or just a sense of direction, and

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 2>without getting to engage. I mean, the last government did

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 2>have a digital strategy, but it was quite a thick

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 2>document and they're basically done it them I wouldn't say

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 2>they've done it themselves. That's a bit unfair, but it

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 2>wasn't as collaborative as it could have been. And I

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 2>think what we need to do is something that will

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 2>be able to be flexible and live and change as

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 2>we go. Certainly, you know, if you talk three years ago,

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 2>we wouldn't have been talking about AI as much as

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about it now. And it's just a classic

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 2>example of something that can just turn things upside down.

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 2>So you've got to be able to react and cope

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 2>to those sort of technology changes. You know, as well

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 2>as I repeted it, we see amazing technology, you know,

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 2>sort of coming and sometimes it takes a long time

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 2>to come and then suddenly it's here, and so you know,

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 2>you do have time to get ready for it, but

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 2>you probably don't you think that way, and then suddenly

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 2>you've got to do something. So it's not easy. I'm

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 2>not saying it's going to be easy to sit down

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 2>and do something like this, but it is a conversation

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 2>and a sense of direction that we really need.

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think a lot of people in the tech

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>community viewed the fact that Judith Collins was having this

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>tech portfolio elevating the position off these sorts of issues,

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>had a bunch of portfolios that seemed to complement each other,

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the digitizing government portfolio. But the reality is, and obviously

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>she's out of most of those portfolios now in favor

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of Shane Retti, who's a very competent minister. But there's

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a sense we've lost momentum. There's been a few random,

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of individual initiatives, and look, we are in a

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>constrained time in terms of government putting money into new

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>initiatives like digital inclusion and that sort of thing. But

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a sense halfway through this term that it's sort

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of lost momentum. Will that be fair.

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 2>I think you're right, Peter, and it certainly comes through,

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, a radious specific section in the report on

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the reaction of CEOs etc. Two Government and we asked

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 2>them the specific question, We said, what have you seen

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 2>from this government? And that's where things like the invisible

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 2>government term came out. Disappointment I think as well. I

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 2>think you're right. There was a real excitement that we

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 2>could build on what had been done and that this

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 2>government was going to be really focused on. And look,

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 2>no disrespect to the ministers themselves, because they are very

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, passionate and they are good people, but they

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 2>are loaded up. So Minister Collins was given you know,

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 2>a large number of portfolios and so not everything gets

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 2>the focus that it might necessarily deserve. So, you know,

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 2>on that basis, that's why I think we've said government

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 2>leadership is important, and the leaders that we've been talking

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 2>to are you know, saying there's a gap there.

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Drilling down into some of the issues that you've identified.

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>A perennial one that comes up as cybersecurity risk. The

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>risks are escalating and AI is increasingly having a role

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to play in that. Also in defense of cybersecurity, which

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is great. But yeah, look everywhere every time I talk

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to cio CTOs, they just sort of say, lookd A's

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>frustration within their own organizations around how seriously cybersecurity is taken.

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>What's sort of at the height of our reluctance to

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>as a nation and individually as businesses and consumers even

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to really take this seriously.

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a couple of things. And look, this

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 2>one is not going to go away as far as

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm concerned. It's been you know, every one of the

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>five reports we've done, this has been one of them.

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>And it just keeps going. And you know, we could

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 2>look at the stats and talk to people anecdotally about

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 2>the challenges their face every day and they attack vectors

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 2>that they're saying every day, you know, just growing all

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the time. And you talked about AI, the weaponization of AI.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, on both sides of the of the of this.

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a couple of things that play into

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand. One is, you know I talked about earlier,

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 2>we are well connected to the world. We are no

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 2>longer that large little country halfway around the world. We're

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 2>seen as an easy pick by some actors as not

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 2>necessary to get access to things in New Zealand, but

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 2>to get to go through us to other environments in

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 2>other countries. So that's disappointing obviously, But it's that she'll

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.959
<v Speaker 2>be right attitude, I think particularly from individuals. You know,

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm nobody, Why would it happen to me, Well, you

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 2>can be used to get access to somebody else, so

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 2>it may not be you, But we are just one.

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 2>We are part of the global population when it comes

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 2>to digital where microseconds from anywhere in the world. And

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 2>I think in the corporate space, you know, boards in

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 2>particular have been dealing with significant issues over the last

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 2>five ten years. Health and safety became a really big one,

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 2>and so maybe security sort of got pushed down the list.

0:17:56.480 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 2>And of course those sort of compliance issues, security issues

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 2>don't necessarily easily convert to ROI and revenue and profit

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 2>and all those sorts of things, and it's they're just

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 2>being over I don't know whether they're seeing it and going, well,

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 2>the risk isn't that great. Well, actually the risk is

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 2>pretty great, and most CTOs are the ones at the

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 2>forefront of that and trying to convince their boards. If

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 2>you don't take security seriously, you could end up being

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 2>someone like Marks and Spencers. In the UK, there's been

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 2>a couple of big occurrences over there that have I

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 2>think should be wake up.

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Calls OPTUS In Australia that was the big one in

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this part of the world, which led to legislation change

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the penalties for data breaches, which has

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>been pointed to here. We have very low penalties ten

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars fine for Privacy Act breaches, so that is

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>an issue in terms of what the government is doing.

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of consternation about, you know, the

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>CERT Organization being folded into the National Center for Cybersecurity

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of, you know, what the government is doing

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>with the malware free networks and with CERT. What's your

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>sense on how prepared we are or how well resourced

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we are as a nation to tackle some of these

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 1>big issues trying to identify and intercept these big threats,

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>whether they're cyber criminal, criminals trying to scam us, or

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>even some of the state based stuff trying to disrupt

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>us for geopolitical reasons.

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Look, it's perennial, Christian Peter and I don't think we'd

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 2>ever have enough resources in there, but we've got some

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 2>really good people. But I think, you know, certainly that

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 2>folding of CERT into n CSC was in air pluses

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 2>and minuses. I mean, I think the pros are that

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 2>it's a lot closer to the mechanisms that are watching

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 2>what's happening around the world and the learnings and those

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 2>sorts of things. But what we lost in the immediate

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 2>moment was actually the ability to communicate and collaborate with

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 2>organizations and with businesses. And certainly I've been talking to

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>them over the last couple of weeks and saying, look,

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 2>you've really got to up the game and get back

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 2>out there and talk to people, because that's what is

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 2>going to make the difference when it comes to collaboration.

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 2>So we're very keen to work with them on getting information,

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 2>but building pathways backwards and forwards because businesses, particularly large corporates,

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 2>rely on information that comes from there. And I'm also

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 2>with you, Peter, you know, talking about what happened in

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Australia and the changes. I mean, we haven't seen those

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.719
<v Speaker 2>happen here, and I really do not want a large

0:20:56.240 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 2>incident to be the cause of things changing here. You know,

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 2>we really do need to get into that and unfortunately,

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 2>as I said at the beginning, this is not one

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 2>that's going to go away. We're just going to have

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 2>to keep working at it.

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And I guess related to that, you know, cybersecurity experts

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>are really hard to recruit. The big issue I think

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that you've identified in twenty twenty five among priorities is

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>this persistent tech talent gap. We sort of had this

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>weird situation. We always have struggled to get tech people here,

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>so we've made it attractive for people to come to

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand to fill that gap. Then we had a

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of a softening off the labor market. Now of

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>course we've seen an exodus of people because of the

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>soft economy here, people looking for greener pastures. So I

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>think it's getting intense again. And we've seen the government,

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've seen digital nomad visas. We've seen the

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>golden sort of visas for people who want to invest

0:21:57.800 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe in startups in New Zealand, put some money in

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and come and get a pathway to residency. So hopefully

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>we'll get Google ex Google executives and people coming to

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand. But this is a persistent thing, isn't it.

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And we had an industry transformation plan for digital workforce

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and that sort of stuff got knocked on the head.

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Funding was pulled. What have we got now?

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, I want to talk about the IP for

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 2>a minute, because there's a lot of work that went

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 2>into that. And look, whether you liked the concept of

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 2>IP across the board, what happened where they just knocked

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 2>all the IPS on the head was really a step

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 2>backwards for technology because we had it was the first

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 2>sign of actually working together to try and figure out

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:46.360
<v Speaker 2>what the funnel looks like. And certainly, you know post COVID,

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 2>when you talk to most of the CEOs et cetera,

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 2>they were talking about immigration settings. Well, we've done quite

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.479
<v Speaker 2>a bit of work in that space, but certainly over

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 2>the last two years they've talked more about how do

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 2>we grow this home grown talent or encourage New Zealanders

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 2>to come back in these areas that we need them.

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:09.719
<v Speaker 2>And they're not always what you'd consider to be general

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 2>tech that you're right, you know, the cybersecurity experts, the

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 2>AI people, the data scientists. It's not just the code

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 2>is that we need. It's a whole range of things.

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 2>And there's been some changes since this government came in

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 2>that you know, haven't really made any real help. So

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 2>you've seen the ip GO and then the announcements around

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 2>post tertiary or sorry tertiary education, so certainly vocational education changes.

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, this government came in with a particular policy

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 2>where they wanted to unwind Tipookinger and it's driven I

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 2>think a whole lot of activity and actions that haven't

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 2>worked in the favor of the technology industry. And so

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 2>because what we've talked about is there has to be

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 2>a number of ways that people can get into this space.

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>And I want to talk particularly about one development that

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>is live at the moment. There's consultation going on about this.

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the winding down of the so called workforce

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Development Councils, which were set up in twenty twenty really

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>as a response to COVID. They are being replaced by

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>these industry standards boards, and the Tertiary Education Commission has

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>pointed out upfront there's going to be less funding for them.

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>These are going to be boards that focus on vocational

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>education things like internships, apprenticeships, cadet ships. But the list

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of boards that they're looking to set up, the very

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>traditional construction infrastructure, trades, that sort of thing. Then you've

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>got tech sort of bundled in with manufacturing. And I've

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>seen a press release from Tuhas and other tech leaders

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>basically saying this isn't good enough. We need a dedicated

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>focus on the digital and creative economies, which includes things

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>like video games.

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Absolutely, We've been talking about this for years. So

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 2>this is where, you know, if we want more people

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 2>to take up these roles within digital technology transformation, all

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 2>these different ones, we've got to think outside the box.

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 2>It can't just be you go to university and to

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 2>get a degree, because not everybody can afford to go

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 2>to university, not everybody has the capacity to do what

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.959
<v Speaker 2>you do at a university. There's got to be other pathways.

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 2>And you know, Peter, we've done some little things where

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 2>we've gone and talked to students in areas which you

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 2>typically probably wouldn't consider where people would go into tech

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 2>degrees and ask them why don't you consider tech? And

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 2>it usually comes down to, well, i've got to look

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>after the family or i've got to you know, it's

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 2>not an easy path. I can't see myself going to university.

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 2>So these ideas of internships and apprenticeships and you know,

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 2>different pathways into this US so critically important for us,

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 2>and yet this announcement and proposal is basically just going, well,

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 2>we're just going to focus in on the traditional ones.

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, great, but give us an id ISD or

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 2>do IDC or whatever you want to call it for

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 2>digital technology, because putting technology in with manufacturing isn't really

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the answer. And actually, if you look at it, any

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 2>technology qualifications or studies or tech digital, it's going to

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 2>go back to the NZQA framework at TEC. So there'll

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 2>be no if it put into encouraging these others. Now,

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 2>I do want to say, Peter, there are some organizations,

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 2>private sector organizations that are looking at these things and

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 2>implementing them themselves, but that's only going to scratch the

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 2>surface in such a small way. I mean, or credit

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 2>to them, but they're not getting a support that they're

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 2>need or being able to roll it out further. So

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm really disappointed because I think this we've

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 2>missed a trick. We're mister trick.

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Yet, Yeah, totally, Like I talked to the likes of

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Data Common that and to their credit, you know, they

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>are putting money into cadet chips and internships and that

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. You've got the vendors that are going

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>really hard on saying we're going to train one hundred

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand people. This is Microsoft, but on their technology stack.

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's understandable. A WS will do the same,

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>salesforce will do the same. We can't just rely on

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of initiatives. We need to have a strategic

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>approach to how we build this digital workforce, and.

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 2>They need a lot of other skills other than just

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 2>knowing how to use you know, the copilot stack or

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the aw stack. They need to have critical thinking because

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, as we talked about earlier, digital technology changes

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 2>so quickly that what they're learning today it's maybe on genai,

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 2>will not be what they need to work on in

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 2>ten years time. You know, quantum computing will be here,

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 2>so we'll be doing other things, and we'll be doing

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 2>so many other different things. They might be working in

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 2>the medical industry rather than in the in the straight

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 2>technology industry. They could be winging an amazing range of areas.

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.880
<v Speaker 2>It could be in the agricultural sector. But they need

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 2>that capability to think in and know how these things

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 2>work rather than just knowing how to do a prompt

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 2>and copile it. Well, that's pretty unfair, but you know,

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 2>you get in the drift of what I'm talking about.

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think some submissions close on that proposal

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>for these new industry standards boards on May the twentieth,

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.239
<v Speaker 1>So really encourage people to have their say about that

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and see if we can make some progress you and

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>put that in front of officials that basically making the

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>case for a dedicated digital technology and creative board that

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>gives a focus and hopefully some targets as well. How

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>many AI engineers are we going to need in the

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>next decade. If we don't know that, we've got nothing

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to aim for, we're not going to make it.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I said, disconnect. Have you read the government's

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 2>growth agenda? Technology is in there, and we heard the

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister over the weekend talk about technology is one

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 2>of those And yet here where we've got you know,

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 2>where we invest in our people that will make this happen,

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 2>We've got no investment and no framework to make it happen.

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 2>So I feel like there's you know, they're talking across

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 2>each other or not not lining things up. So that's

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 2>that's disappointing.

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, another one that is unfortunately disappointing is our progress

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>on digital is our progress on digital inclusion, you know,

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>paint the picture for us. At the moment. We've seen

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of initiatives that do great work at the

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>front lines sort of defunded, have lost their funding, some

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>government funding and the charitable funding is there at a

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>lower level, so some great initiatives unfortunately have gone. There's

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>less funding for those that remain. We did have, you

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of work which you alluded to in

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the broadband space, you know UFB, and the government's committed

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to push that out even further. There's the Rural Connectivity Group,

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the mobile operators are collaborating, so there's some good infrastructure

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on. Where are the remaining gaps that we

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>really need to address when it comes to digital inclusion.

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's start of the infrastructure space. I mean obviously remote rural,

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 2>and there are things you know, with copper turn off,

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 2>three G mobile going and networks being turned off. Those

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 2>can be dealt with and fixed. There are solutions, not

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 2>as many as I'd hoped and not as competitive as hope,

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 2>but you know, those are things and I don't think

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the answer is which I've heard in some places, which

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 2>is Starlink's the answer or two reasons for that. One

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 2>is it's quite expensive and secondly, do you really want

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 2>to pull on your eggs in that basket? And you know,

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 2>we haven't talked about geopolitical scenarios, but that is one

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 2>of them. I think what we need to move on

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 2>from is is this build, build something big, because it

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 2>will fix most of the problem. And now we're at

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 2>the stage where we need to be thinking outwards in

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 2>which is who's not connected, Why aren't they connected? What's

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 2>leaving them behind? And if you as a government want

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 2>to digitize and you want to, you know, have people

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 2>interacting with you through digital technology, you're going to have

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 2>to look after people as well. You can't leave them behind.

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 2>And so there is the question around affordability for a

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 2>small but significant group. You know, it is something that's

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 2>that's important to look at. And we've certainly you shared

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 2>with the government over the years on some of the

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 2>solutions and they could they could look at and we've

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 2>tried to be very practical, so we haven't gone in

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 2>and go and spend X billion dollars and connect to

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 2>everybody we've gone look at those that are missing out

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 2>because they're missing out on other things. So you know,

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 2>why don't you roll this in And we've been talking

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 2>about connectivity being the fourth utility. So you need electricity,

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 2>you need water, you need roads, and you need to

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 2>be connected because you can't live and work in this current,

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 2>this day and age if you don't have those services.

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 2>So if you could get that built into that way

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 2>of thinking, I think, you know, that would be a

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 2>great start. But then you start to think about you know,

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 2>inclusion isn't just about being connected so you can text

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 2>your or message or do something like them. It is

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 2>around how you interact with others, how you and that's

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 2>certainly across the board. You know, keeping you connected with

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 2>people is really important. But then also it gives you

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 2>opportunities to think about, well, I can create a business

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 2>out of this. I can be connected, I can build something.

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 2>And also you know, as a young person, if you're

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 2>if you've got the tools and you learn those tools

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 2>and use them, it also opens you up to a

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 2>whole new world that you can live and working as well.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Other than just those and went back to those talking

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 2>about those traditional industries. You know, if you don't know.

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 2>If you don't connect it and don't have it, then yeah,

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 2>you can't see it. So where it's hard. Look, I'm

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 2>not going to say it's easy. It is difficult. It

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 2>is costly in some ways, but we have to start somewhere.

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and there was an initiative under labor I think

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it also came out of COVID really to subsidize broadband

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for families that really needed it through the education lend.

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So your kids are all in lockdown at home, here's

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a subsidy on your broadband subscription to enable them to

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>learn from home. What's the status of that? Now? There

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>was talk about that being wound down, then it was

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>thrown a lifeline. Is it still going, No, it's gone gone.

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>It finished up last year. Yeah, So I mean disappointing

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in one regard, but on the other side of it,

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like, well, what can we use what

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>do we learn from that we can take forward? And

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>again you know, we came back to doing some work

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>around the numbers and then looking at it and going

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>why don't you simply use the mechanisms you have in

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>place with education and aministry of social development to help

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>people without trying to do something different because I mean,

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not in the place of creating bureaucracy or regulations

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of it. We really just want to

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>see outcomes to help people. Yeah, there's an infrastructure divide.

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>It goes to devices as well, the literacy being able

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>to use all of that. And now we've got artificial intelligence,

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>which risks sort of another divide. You know, I can

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>afford to have a Perplexity account and get great use

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>out of it and do all this great stuff with it.

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>But if you're using some of these free tools, you're

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 1>not going to get as quick results or as high

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>quality results. So I guess that's another layer on top

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of it. When it digital equity. You've got this powerful

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>new tool, but who's actually going to have access to it?

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and every new tool is the same, isn't it, Peter.

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 2>So every new tool, you know, it can be used

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 2>for good or for bad, or you know, could broaden

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 2>the inequity. I'm with you too on the you know,

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 2>if these free tools don't give you as much. The

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 2>other danger is, of course with the free tools, is

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 2>everything you load into it goes into the tool, doesn't it. Sorry,

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, you have to be careful around that, and

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 2>if you don't understand that, you may be giving up

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 2>stuff that you really don't want to.

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Look, we've really not seen much from the government on

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the AI front. There's guidance for the public sector, there's

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>a strategy in the works, and there will be some

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 1>guidance for business. But I think this really goes to

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>one of the key points you also make in there

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is our risk aversion when it comes to technology adoption.

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the CIOs and CTO said, you know, they

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of rate us a six out of ten also

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>on our new tech adoption, which is not that flash.

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're behind the ball on AI, so we

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:07.919
<v Speaker 1>have an issue where some people won't necessarily be able

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to access it because it's too expensive. But overall we

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>drag the chain and this has been a common theme

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in New Zealand. Even though we've had all this great infrastructure,

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we were slow to the cloud. We're slow to adopt

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 1>these advanced technologies, which is having implications for our productivity.

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, after ten years of talking to members and

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.919
<v Speaker 1>consumers and businesses, what do you see has been key

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 1>to this?

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 2>If I knew the answer to that, Peter I'll be

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 2>out there selling it. But yeah, there is, and I

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:43.720
<v Speaker 2>think it's just become exacerbated in the last couple of years.

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Actually that this over cautiousness and perhaps lack of ambition

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 2>at a national level, which then flows down to decision makers,

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 2>is a concern. And all we can do is continue

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.359
<v Speaker 2>to talk to them and say, well, how can we

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 2>help you understand what's coming down the track. I mean,

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 2>sorry to talk about turns for a minute, but we

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 2>always see what we do to two pillars. One is

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 2>our advocacy work, so that's the external stuff where we're

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 2>talking to decision makers, doing media work, all that sort

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 2>of stuff. You know, these sorts of reports. But these

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 2>reports do two things. They are for decision makers, but

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 2>we're also trying to help our members understand what's coming

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 2>down the track and how they can make use of it.

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 2>And maybe, look, maybe we haven't been as good as

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 2>we should have been in helping our members understand that stuff.

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:39.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, sometimes I get the message from some people

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 2>that oh, I just ask my vendor what's coming. Well,

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 2>that's great because that your vendor continue, but actually you

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 2>don't get the breadth of the interest and knowledge of

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 2>what's coming. So maybe we haven't done as good a

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 2>job as we could, and maybe that's a good learning

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 2>for us. But yeah, we're trying to help our members

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 2>understand you know, these things as well, and so that's

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 2>it's tricky for us as well to keep on top

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 2>of everything. But I mean I have I do have

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 2>a small sense of optimism that there are that you know,

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 2>if you get this sense from these people that is

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 2>an issue and it makes them think about it, and

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 2>the report is a discussion starter as well, so you know,

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 2>hopefully these sorts of conversations will help.

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm optimistic as well. We've got some great people doing

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>great things with AI for instance, and U seeing some

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.439
<v Speaker 1>of the startups that are not really on the radar

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 1>yet that I'm talking to are just doing incredible work.

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>So I am optimistic about that. I think literacy and

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 1>education is key things that we need to crack and

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that goes back to the workforce development and that as well.

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But if we can maybe finish on a positive note,

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>if we can craig one major shift, you know that

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>we might be able to see in twenty twenty five

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that could have a positive impact on the digital landscape.

0:38:57.440 --> 0:38:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Is the one thing that if we got Shane Retti

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:03.719
<v Speaker 1>and Judith Colins and that together and industry supported, we

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:05.359
<v Speaker 1>might be able to get over the line. That would

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>make a difference.

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I think the one thing I'd really like to see

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 2>is around the tech talent side, and it is about

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 2>developing a plan that enables multiple tracks into a career

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 2>in digital technology. And we have to think about things

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 2>like what makes it easier for underrepresented groups, because underrepresented

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 2>groups provide you know, there is a good reason for

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 2>doing you know, talking to them one is just the

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 2>right thing to do. But the other thing is that's

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 2>a whole pool of talent that we're missing out on

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 2>that could help us with our issue of not enough talent.

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 2>So you know, getting more women back into the work

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the workforce, into digital terianformation, making it

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 2>easier for them to move in and out things like

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 2>fractional employment. But then there's also you know, I think

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the vocational tracks will assist with people who are in

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 2>underrepresented groups. I mean, we're doing some little bits and

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 2>pieces around helping MALDI in PACIFICA. You know understand, you know,

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 2>what sort of career they can have, But we're only

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 2>a small organization. So I think if we could get

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 2>people talking about that and getting some of those pathways

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 2>stood up, I think they would make a huge difference.

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:39.479
<v Speaker 1>So a pretty clear call to action from Craig Young.

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>We need to get serious about tech skills. Not just

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>importing talent, yes, we'll continue to need to do that,

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:49.799
<v Speaker 1>but getting industry and the education sector on the same

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>page to partner for better access to vocational training for

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>tech related skills. So, if you're in the tech sector,

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>get in a submission on the government's consolation about these

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>new industry skills boards. Tell them what you think. Let

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 1>them know that tech, digital skills, and the creative economy,

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 1>which includes things like video games, visual effects and the

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>film industry might need a specific focus and some funding

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>support to seed something decent with industry. I'll put a

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>link in the submissions page in the show notes. Just

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>go to the podcast section at Businessdesk dot co dot

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:31.240
<v Speaker 1>nz to find it. Submissions are closing pretty soon May twenty,

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>so get one in quickly. Thanks to Craig for coming

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast. The Business of Tech is streaming on

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio or your favorite podcast app. Get in touch with

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 1>your feedback and guest suggestions email me on Peter at

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Peter Griffin dot co dot nz or via LinkedIn. I'm

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:51.959
<v Speaker 1>there most days. Next week, a Wellington based startup that's

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>just raised one million dollars, bought a competitor and is

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>using AI to change how scientific research is undertaken. To

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>next Tuesday for that, and I'll catch you then