WEBVTT - The Last Advocate: Top pathologist delves into Kiwi murders, mysteries and the macabre

0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>This episode of A Moment in Crime refers to murders,

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>including the killing of children. It also contains descriptions of

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>post mortem examinations and forensic evidence. This content is intended

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>for a mature audience.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Mark Lundy did it.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>He murdered his wife, Christine and their young daughter Amber

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and their Parmeston North home. A New Zealand's leading pathologist,

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>after working on the Lundee case for years, can tell

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you why he's sure, without a shadow of a doubt,

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Lundy is a double murderer. I know there's many people

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>out there that don't believe Lundee is responsible. They think

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that he's been stitched up, that someone else did it.

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Since the day it happened, Lundy himself has protested his innocence,

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>but he was the only one who could have done it.

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what two High Court juries have decided at separate

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>murder trials, and Kenrick temple Camp backs them based on

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the science of the case. In this episode of A

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Moment in Crime, you'll hear more about Kenrick's work on

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the Lundy case, dubbed Operation Winter by police, and you'll

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>find out what he thinks about another infamous New Zealand

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>double murder the polarizing case of Scott Watson, convicted of

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>killing Ben Smart and Olivia Hope during New Year's celebrations

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety nine. Usually, episodes of a Moment of

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Crime focus on old cases, cold cases, or recent cases

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of national and international significance involving Keiwi offenders or victims. Today,

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll take you to the other side of the cordon

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>inside Kinrick's world. Since the nineteen eighties, he's been tasked

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>with establishing the cause of death for countless men, women

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and children. He's also been called in to solve the

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>baffling health mysteries of the living, and he spends hours

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>in a lab each week examining various samples and swabs

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to diagnose everything from viruses to cancer. Kenrick has written

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>three books on the work he does and has pa

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>about His latest is called The Final Diagnosis and is

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>available now with the booker. It was the perfect opportunity

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to talk with a man who knows more about murder

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>than most people in New Zealand. I'll include information in

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the show notes about his books and a link to

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>my story about Kenrick's vast and varied career.

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 2>If there's other cases you.

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Want to hear about on a Moment in Crime. Email

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>me at Anna dot leask at enzme dot co dot Nz.

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>From the who dunnets in cold cases to the strange

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and quirky, crime is one of the most fascinating corners

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of society and the news. From the New Zealand Herald

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>newsroom comes a Moment in Crime, a podcast delving into

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>some of New Zealand's most high profile cases, offenses and offenders.

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Each month, I'll take you inside some of our most

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>infamous incidents, notorious offenders, and behind the scenes of high

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>profile trials and events to show you what's really happening

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in your backyard. Kindric temple Camp was born in Zimbabwe,

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>emigrating to New Zealand in nineteen eighty seven and settling

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in Parmesan North, where he joined the local pathology practice.

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Pathologists are specialist doctors who diagnose and study human diseases

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and conditions. The job is extremely varied and can range

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>from testing tissue and fluid samples to diagnosing diseases and

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>investigating deaths. Those deaths might be due to an illness,

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>something sudden or mysterious, or the result of a crime.

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>The latter generally requires them to stand up in court

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and explain an intense.

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Detail how and why a person died.

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Their evidence is then considered by a jury in determining

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>whether a person charged is guilty or not. Over the years,

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Kinrick has seen it all, and he's pretty much written

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>about it all. In twenty eighteen, his first book, The

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Cause of Death, was published, in which he lifted the

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>lid on the most unusual stories of death and murder

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>had encountered during his career. The Quick in the Dead

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>followed in twenty twenty, covering the unlikely, extraordinary, obscure, and

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>often tragic ways humans meet their end, and in June

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, The Final Diagnosis. He's ken rec explaining

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the new book how he chooses which cases of the

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>thousands he oversees every year to write about, and why

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>he includes living patients.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 3>It's a continuation. They're really a trilogy because they are

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 3>all my memoirs of cases that I've been involved with.

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 3>The first book was predominant. It was one hundred percent

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 3>about autopsies and the dead. The second book, The Quick

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 3>and the Dead, and this one, The Final Diagnosis. It's

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 3>a mixed bag of autopsies obviously on people who have

0:04:56.160 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 3>had unusual or suspicious deaths, and some murders as well,

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 3>and people who've had unusual diseases, unusual presentation of diseases,

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 3>or actually make a point. So there are quite a

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 3>few live people in live patients in my new book

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 3>in which I talk about their diseases, and that's a

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 3>little bit different.

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And how do you select the cases for each book?

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you must have, I imagine, countless examples to

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>draw upon, but how do you select? You know, how

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>did you do it for the final diagnosis?

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, every day that I go to work is amazing.

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 3>There are always new cases. They are always unbelievable things

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 3>to find and are happening. I guess this is cherry

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 3>picking all those that stick in my mind and are

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 3>the most unusual. And as I write them, it's amazing

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 3>how new ones come up. And all the time I'm

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 3>thinking of ones and new ones, or thinking of ones

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 3>that I've seen in the past, and I think, damn,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 3>why didn't I include that one in the book, because

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 3>that's just brilliant. But of course you can't write about everything,

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 3>and I can't remember them all, of course, but I

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 3>have to go and research each one when I decided

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 3>to write about it.

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>As you can imagine, it takes a long time to

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>complete all the training needed to do the job Kinric does.

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not for the fainthearted, looking at bodies and parts

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of bodies and slides of mysterious nasties found within bodies

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>all day, and I'm not sure too many kids wake

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>up one day and think I want to be a pathologist.

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I asked Conc how he got into this branch of medicine,

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>what inspired him to work mostly with the dead and dying,

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and why he's stayed in the job for so many years.

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a lot of people ask that. Of course, when

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 3>you go to medical school, everybody wants to be a

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 3>neurosurgeon or some sort of fancy surgeon, or deliver babies

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. Nobody ever says, oh, I'm going

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 3>to go to medical school and be a pathology And

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 3>it actually wasn't high on my horizon. But I just

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:09.239
<v Speaker 3>started in medical school and I was an Army cadet,

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 3>and I had during the vacations, I had to go

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 3>back into the army. And what happened was, as a

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 3>nineteen year old, I was sent out with a squad

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 3>to pick up three bodies from an aircraft accident, and

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 3>we had to put them into a bag and take

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 3>them off to the mortuary for an autopsy. And that's

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 3>quite a shocking thing for a nineteen year old just

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the year before I'd been a prefect at school,

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 3>so it was a little bit of a shock. But

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 3>when I got to the moltuary, there was a pathologist there,

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Lee, who was outstanding, and he turned what would

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 3>have been a terrible experience into something really amazing, you know,

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 3>getting the bodies together again, working out what had happened,

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 3>making and putting a whole context behind what we were

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 3>seeing and what had happened. And I just thought, this

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 3>is just brilliant, and you know, it's stuck in my

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 3>mind and throughout my medical career. I just wanted to

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 3>be a pathologist.

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about the training. How do you get to

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>where you are?

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, you first have to get yourself through medical school

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 3>and do your house job and a bit of clinical work,

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 3>and then when you've done that, you have to sign

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 3>up with a training a laboratory in a hospital, a

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 3>teaching hospital or another hospital, and that takes another five

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 3>years of training, and along the way there are a

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 3>couple of pretty stiff exams that you've got to get through,

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 3>and at the end of that you're ready to start.

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 3>So it takes thirteen years altogether from the time you

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 3>start medical school to the time that you're ready to

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 3>say I'm a consultant pathologist, and then all you need

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 3>is another forty years experience on top of that.

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I expect that the training is intense, you know, thirteen years,

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and then getting into what you want to do. You

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>will never put off along the way.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 3>No, you know, there there was quite a difference in

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 3>my day. I come from a generation where you left

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 3>school and you went and did your career straight away

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 3>and you got straight into it. So I was a

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 3>consultant by the time I was thirty, whereas the world

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 3>is very different today. You know, a lot of the

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 3>graduates coming out of medical school are a bit older

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 3>and they've done another degree and then they do a

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 3>bit of overseas experience, and you know, I've got registrars

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 3>that i'm training that are in their forties, and you know,

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 3>I find that very interesting. But because it's you know,

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 3>when I was forty, I can't imagine sitting down and

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 3>trying to learn all those books and focus on all

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 3>every disease of every organ. But that's what they have

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 3>to do.

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>And what were some of the earlier cases that you

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>worked on as a pathologist? How do you sort of

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>start off?

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, during your training you do, of course, you

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 3>do two types of cases that we do. They're the

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 3>cases on the living, the biopsies and the diagnosis of

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 3>cancers and exotic diseases and not so exotic diseases in

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 3>the living. And then there are of course the autopsies

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 3>and the diagnoses on the dead. And during your training

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 3>you do and you do both. The emphasis is of

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:18.599
<v Speaker 3>course on the living and on making diagnoses from biopsies

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 3>and recognizing changes in tissues and discovering just what earth

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 3>is going on with the patient and often that's a

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 3>bit of a mystery.

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And you're now considered sort of the leading pathologists to

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand. Tell me about the work that you've had

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to do over the years to sort of rise through

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the ranks, because it's not just all the crime stuff

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that we see in the documentaries and the true crime shows,

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>is it.

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 3>No, I wouldn't really call myself a leading pathologist. I'm

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 3>an old pathologist, which is perhaps if you hang around

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 3>long enough, people will think you the leading pathologists. But no, no,

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm definitely an old pathologist these days, and I guess

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 3>it's pathology has changed a lot in New Zealand over

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 3>the last thirty years. When I started doing pathology here,

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 3>we tended to do a bit of everything, so you know,

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 3>you'd be in I worked in Palmerston North Hospital and

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 3>we did our diagnostic biopsies and we also did all

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 3>the autopsies on all the homicides, the suspicious deaths, the

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 3>traffic accidents, the suicides, and these days that's all changed

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 3>now there's more and more specialization in the current training.

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 3>The pathologists don't even learn how to do autopsies anymore.

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 3>That's gone. They do that after they've finished their fellowship,

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 3>So after their five year training, after their thirteen years

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 3>from the beginning to the end, they then have to

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 3>go and learn how to do autopsies.

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And what would be some of the most high profile

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>cases you've worked on that people would know about out there?

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, quite a few that I've written about. I guess

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 3>what always comes to mind are the homicides and of course,

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 3>the one that everybody always asks about is the Mark

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Lundy case, which I didn't actually do the autopsies on,

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 3>although I've been involved in all three of Mark Lundy's trials,

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 3>including going to London and listening to the sitting in

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 3>on the Privy Council for three days, so that that

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 3>was been a pretty interesting one that spanned a good

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 3>part of my career.

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>In February two thousand and one, Mark Lundy, then aged

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 1>forty three, was arrested in charge with murdering his wife

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Christine and their seven year old daughter Amber. The pair

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>were hacked to death at Palmston North home, likely with

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:44.599
<v Speaker 1>an axe or tomahawk.

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I've covered this.

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Case more extensively in an earlier episode of A Moment

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.599
<v Speaker 1>in Crime, so I'm only giving a brief summary of

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the case here. On the night of the murders, Lundy

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>had checked into a motel in Patni, Wellington. Mobile data

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>proved that Lundon he was at the motel at five

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>point thirty and eight twenty eight pm. A sex worker

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>hired by Lundy confirmed he was also there between eleven

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty pm and one am. Police say that just after

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>five thirty pm Lundy drove at breakneck speed from his

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>motel to Palmerston North, killed his family, and arrived back

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in Potoni before eight.

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Twenty eight pm.

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>They contended he killed Christine for her life insurance money

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>because of financial pressure.

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 2>Four days earlier, the couple had reviewed their life.

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Insurance and agreed Christine's would be raised from two hundred

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars to five hundred thousand dollars. Lundy killed Amber,

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>police said because she had witnessed all or part of

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>her mother's murder.

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 2>The prosecution relied.

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Heavily on a particular piece of forensic evidence, a speck

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of body tissue found on one of Lundy's polo shirts,

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>which was located in the back seat of his car.

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>An international pathologist identified it as Christine Lundy brain tissue,

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was argued the only way it could have

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>ended up on Lundy's shirt was if he himself was

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the murderer. Lundy gave evidence at the trial, strenuously denying

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>he killed his wife or child. His lawyers were adamant

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that Lundy could not possibly have made the round trip

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>from Wellington to palmest.

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 2>North and back in just three hours.

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>They said contamination could account for the tissue found on

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Lundy's shirt. After seven hours of deliberation, the jury found

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Lundy guilty of both murders. He was sentenced to life

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in prison with a minimum non parole period of seventeen years.

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>The Court of Appeal rejected Lundy's attempt to overturn his

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>conviction and sentence. In fact, they increased his minimum non

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>parole period to twenty years in twenty thirteen, though the

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Privy Council the New Zealand's Court of Last Appeal overturned

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the convictions and ordered a retrial that went ahead in

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen, and the Crown expanded the window for the

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>time of death to fourteen hours, alleging Lundy may have

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>returned to Palmerston North early in the morning to murder

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>his family. The second jury was also convinced beyond reasonable

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>doubt by the Crown case and found Lundy guilty of

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>both murders. Again, Lundy was sent back to prison, where

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>he remains today. He still maintains his innocence and is

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>still trying to clear his name. Kinrich speaks about his

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>role in the Lundy case in The Final Diagnosis. This

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is part of his book voiced by an actor.

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 4>Juries are smart. They have seven hundred plus years of

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 4>collective life experience. We all live in a science based

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 4>society with remote controls, microwaves, computers, and aeroplanes. We understand

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 4>science and while we may not know exactly how it works,

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 4>we know it does and it can be explained simply

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 4>so we can follow it. It isn't witchcraft, after all.

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Christine's DNA was found in both flips of tissue Lundy's

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 4>shirt was reported that the odds were one billion times

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 4>to one more likely that the DNA was from Christine

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 4>Lundy than someone else unrelated to her chosen at random

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 4>from the New Zealand population. This is a massive boost

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 4>to the case against Lundy, and the analytical level of

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 4>certainty shows how reliable DNA matching can be. The DNA

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 4>belond Christine. The Oxford pathologists first brought up the idea

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 4>of sausages and hamburgers as a source of animal brain tissue,

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 4>and that story gained some traction as I still get

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 4>asked about it from time to time. But Mark Lundy

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 4>would have to be the unluckiest man in history to

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 4>have got an accidental contamination with animal brain tissue from

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 4>a hamburger, and then for that tissue also to contain

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 4>DNA indistinguishable from his wife's. All I can say is

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 4>the DNA on his shirt is human and was of

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 4>good quality. The tissue was brain, as the international experts

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 4>have established, and I can say it was uncooked through

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 4>microscopic histological examination. I say cooked meats and other foods

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 4>histologically in my daily work, So I am confident of that.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 4>So I can say with authority that the brain tissue

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:09.239
<v Speaker 4>on the Lundy shirt had emphatically never been cooked. It

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 4>was science applied to the two deposits of brain tissue

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 4>on Mark Lundy's shirt that put paid to his plans

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 4>of getting away with murder. Lundy realistically would have never

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 4>predicted and therefore planned for, this accidental, minute but unequivital

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 4>soiling of his shirt. That was his most significant mistake.

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.239
<v Speaker 1>I asked Kenrick Moore about Lundy and other stand up

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>cases from his lengthy career.

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, that certainly has been tried a lot, hasn't it.

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 3>I guess from a pathologists point of view, we try

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 3>not to have a personal opinion that's based on just

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 3>what we've heard, or we think what I look at

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 3>is what does the science say. And the science certainly

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 3>has produced evidence that he can has been unable to

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 3>overturn in court. And it really is quite compelling, and

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 3>it's very difficult to argue why you have your wife's

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 3>brains on your shirt.

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>What would be the most bizarre case you've come across

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>over the years, in someone living or dead?

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 3>Probably I wrote in my first book about a case

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 3>of spontaneous combustion, which is something that pathologists talk about

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 3>but which isn't greatly understood. And this is people who

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 3>they thought originally just caught fire spontaneously and burnt slowly

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 3>down into a puddle without actually setting fire to any

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 3>of their surroundings. And the science of this has now

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 3>been worked out. And the case that I was called

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 3>to I went out to and it was on a

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 3>provincial road out in the manner were two and it

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 3>was a man who had been drinking heavily at the

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 3>Shannon Pub and he had picked up a bottle of

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 3>vodka and headed off back. And he pulled over to

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 3>the side of the road, drank his bottle of vodka

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 3>and lit up a cigarette and obviously went to sleep.

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 3>The cigarette dropped onto his clothing and it started smoldering,

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, but like a candlewick, and he gradually, just

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 3>without gaining consciousness, he gradually just burnt himself to death

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 3>sitting inside the car. The car didn't catch fire, and

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 3>there was just smoke all over the windows, and he

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 3>was basically not quite a puddle of fat, but pretty

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 3>close to going that way. And I just never i'd

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 3>heard about the spontaneous combustion. I've never seen a case,

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 3>and I think that was the closest that I've ever

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 3>come to it. That was really weird.

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I bet how do you wind down after working

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>on something like that? Does it affect you or is

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it just part of the job and you just sort

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of carry on?

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. You know, whenever you open up a body, a

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 3>freshly dead body or perhaps a not so freshly dead one,

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 3>there's a suppression or a suspension of your norm normal

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 3>physiology and emotion. You know, by physiology, I mean, you

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 3>know your body function. What does it tell you to

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 3>do when you open and see your body being opened?

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 3>Tells you to run away? You know, you get this

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 3>adrenaline rush of fear and flight, and you want to

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 3>run away, and you've got to suppress that and then

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 3>there's the emotional aspect. You're looking at a body being opened,

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 3>and you know, I mean, this is an appalling mutilation

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 3>if you're not used to it, and you've got to

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 3>suppress that. As time goes on, of course, you get

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 3>used to it. I suppose you get inoculated, and I've

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 3>pathologists do get used to this. One of the questions

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 3>that I always ask is okay, And people always ask

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 3>pathologists exactly this question that you've asked. I ask, why

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 3>don't general surgeons get the same thing? I mean, somebody

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 3>gets brought in from a car accident and they've got

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 3>a shattered body there, and they open up their abdomen

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 3>and take out bits of bowel and stitch it up

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 3>and so on. Surely they have exactly the same fears

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 3>that that we do, which is, you know, basically this

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 3>is horrific, but you've got to do something. Hm.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>What would be I imagine some cases are harder than others,

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, even for someone that's been in the profession

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>as long as you is it is it the young people,

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the children that are hardest? Or you know, what, what

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 1>is it that you sort of not struggle with but

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>you find particularly challenging.

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think young children always poignant, aren't they. And yes,

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I've had a number of cases where my registerrars have

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 3>just been unable to carry out the autopsy. There were

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.959
<v Speaker 3>the three children who died in the man or two

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 3>in the pang and a valley when they were swimming

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 3>in a in a in the river and part of

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 3>the cliff came down and the cliff killed all three

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 3>of them. And it's written in my first book, and

0:21:55.880 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 3>that that was three children from two families. That that

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 3>was terrible. My registrars couldn't do those autopsies. I had

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 3>to go and do those. And of course that that

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 3>does affect you, because it's it's nobody deserves nobody deserves

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 3>to die to start with. But when it's a young

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 3>child like that and it's just so pointless, it's a

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 3>it's not a good feel. And those are the ones

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 3>that I remember, of course.

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess. So the flip side of it is, you know,

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to get answers and to help the families get closure,

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody has to do that job, right.

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, that's right. I mean I guess one of

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 3>the ways I deal with it is I don't see

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 3>these as cadavers. I mean a body is not an

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 3>inanimate object. It really reflects humanity. They are my patients,

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 3>and I am a doctor, and I am looking after them,

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 3>and I'm finding what happened, and I'm telling their story.

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm their last advocate, and I will tell the truth

0:22:56.480 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 3>about them and what happened, and do it respect fully,

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 3>and then they can be laid to rest, with a

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 3>story known and everything tidied away. And we understand. Understanding

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 3>is important part of loss and grief is of course understanding,

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 3>isn't it.

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Professionally can Reck and I have a few things in common.

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>We both, in our own ways, investigate and tell the

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>stories of the dead. We see and hear gruesome details

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of murders. We bear witness to the unfathomable grief of

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>people who have lost a parent, sibling, or child to

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a violent act. Are questioned almost daily about New Zealand's

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>most high profile offenders and offenses. In my case, it's

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>usually about whether I think a particular person is guilty

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of a crime, or if a jury got the right

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>verdict and a murder trial I've been reporting on. Ken

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Rick gets that a lot too, And there's another question

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>He's often asked.

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Everybody wants to talk about murder. Whenever I go to meetings,

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 3>nobody ever says, have you seen any amazing diseases recently?

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 3>Have you seen any amazing tumors? You know, what's the

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 3>most exotic disease you've come across? Nobody ever asks that.

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 3>They always ask about murder. Everybody wants to know We're

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 3>fascinated by murder. And the problem is that all the

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 3>murders that I've done, I've dealt with in my first

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 3>two books. So I thought, what on earth can I

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 3>do in the third book? And what is At a

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of the Lions and Rotary and other meeting probus

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 3>meetings that I go to, people have always asked me,

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 3>you know how to commit the perfect murder? And the

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 3>answer is yes, I do, but I'm not going to

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 3>tell you. But what I can tell you is look

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 3>at a number of famous and not so famous murders

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 3>in New Zealand and tell you what the murderers did wrong,

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 3>and then from that you can work out what you

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 3>need to do for your perfect murder.

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>The prosecution of Scott Watson is one of the cases

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Kenrick delves into in his latest book, Watson was jailed

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>for life for the minimum non parole period of seventeen

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>years for the murders of Olivia Hope seventeen and Ben

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Smart twenty one. The friends disappeared after boarding a stranger's

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>yacht early on January one, nineteen ninety nine, after marking

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the new year with friends at Ferno Lodge, a century

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>old boat access only resort in the Endeavor in Let.

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 2>Their bodies have never been found.

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Watson has always denied killing or even meeting Hope and Smart.

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>He's repeatedly been denied parole since he became eligible, and

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>continues to fight to clear his name. Watson's latest appeal

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>actually began the day that I interviewed Kinrick. At the

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>time of recording this podcast, a decision had not yet

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>been made. I'll include a link in the show notes

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>for the latest on this long running saga if you'd

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 1>like to read more. But here is Kinrick explaining why

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>he decided to cover the Sounds case in his book.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 3>The Scott Watson case was one that I selected to

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 3>talk about, not because I have any inside knowledge or

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 3>any particular views about And it's interesting to note that

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the Scott Watson case is going to the Court of

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Appeal today, Yes, which is interesting, and there were a

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 3>couple of things that I wanted to a couple of

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 3>points I wanted to make about Scott Watson's case. It's

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 3>not what was done wrong, it was just I think

0:26:55.440 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 3>how the evidence plays out, particularly eyewitness evidence, and everybody

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 3>knows eyewitnesses are not terribly reliable, and that's really what

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 3>I've written about in the book can Reck.

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Are the criminal cases that you've worked on with a

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>forensic evidence tells you clearly one thing, but the jury

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>decides the opposite when they come back with a verdict.

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, I personally haven't had one of those, which

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 3>is interesting. Every case that I've been involved with has

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 3>the evidence that we've collected at all topsy, and examination

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 3>of the scene and the police investigations, it's all made sense.

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 3>And every case I've been involved with has had a conviction.

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 3>So I've never come across a case where the evidence

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 3>has been rejected, and I'm quite proud of that because

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that means that the evidence we put forward

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 3>was bust in the first instance, and in a murder case,

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 3>the police and the prosecutor will look very carefully at

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 3>the autopsy what the pathologist says, how it all ties

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 3>together before making their decision. And I think that I'm

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 3>quite proud of the fact that so far, well I'm

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 3>not doing homicides at the moment anymore, that the conviction

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 3>rate has been pretty well one hundred percent. There are

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 3>cases I'm aware of where I think it's gone the

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 3>wrong way, but I wasn't involved with those.

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>In the final diagnosis. You talk about why circumstantial is

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>often the most compelling and steadfast form of evidence. Tell

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>me more about that.

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know circumstantial evidence. A lot of people say, oh,

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 3>you hear this all the time. He was found guilty,

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 3>but the evidence was only circumstantial. Well, circumstantial evidence is

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 3>very good. Eyewitness evidence is extremely bad, and that's well known.

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 3>The psychologists know about it. There's been many tests of it,

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 3>and of course I talk about it with the Sounds murder.

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Eyewitness evidence is not good. There is one type of

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 3>eyewitness evidence that's outstanding, of course, and that is security cameras,

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 3>and that's changed everything, and I write a bit about

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 3>that too. But circumstantial evidence involves clues that you cannot manufacture,

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 3>that are left by mistake behind, and there's nothing that

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 3>you can do. You didn't intend them to be there,

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 3>but added together, they form a very compelling argument. Like,

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 3>for instance, in Mark Lundy's case, two specs of brain

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 3>tissue on his shirt is circumstantial evidence, but it's pretty compelling.

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 3>The DNA analysis of that tissue is pretty compelling. The

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 3>fact that his wife and his daughter had chips of

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 3>paint in their injuries in their head similar to that

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 3>with which Mark Lundy's tools were painted, is circumstantial evidence.

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 3>It's not gotcha evidence. But all of these things start

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 3>adding up, and when you get a whole pile of

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 3>circumstantial facts coming together, it becomes very hard to say, well,

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 3>can there be another explanation? And the answer is usually

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 3>not really.

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because some of our most high profile cases have

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>been based on circumstantial evidence, haven't they. If you look

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>at you know, David Bain and his family, there were

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>no witnesses. We've had one in christ which recently where

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>there's still nobody, and there's been a man convicted of murder,

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>all on circumstantial evidence because there's nobody, And it's interesting

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that you are sort of explaining that that's better evidence

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>than witnesses, because humans do make errors, don't they. I

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's what people don't really understand, is that that

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>eyewitness stuff isn't always as reliable as you might think.

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 3>No, that's right. And I talk in my book about

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 3>what o' neil tyson, who's a famous astrophysicist and presenter

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 3>in the United States. He talks about how he was

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 3>called up for jury service in the United States. And

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 3>the judge said to the jurors before they were appointed

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 3>in this case, there is only one witness, and that

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 3>is an eyewitness to the robbery or the event, whatever

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 3>it was. Do any of you have a problem with that?

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 3>And he put up his hand and he said, if

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 3>you've only got one eyewitness, and I've got a problem

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 3>with that, because in the court of law, eyewitness evidence

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 3>may be important, but in the court of science it's

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 3>worth nothing. And if you've only got one eyewitness, it

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 3>doesn't prove it's not going to prove anything. And the

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 3>judge then turned around and said, oh, thank you for that.

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 3>You'll be dismissed. And he said to the other juris,

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 3>does anybody else want two eyewitnesses? And one of the

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 3>juris said, hang on, he didn't say that, and within

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 3>seconds of having explained why the judge as an ear witness,

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 3>if you like, had got it wrong. He didn't get

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 3>it either, And that's what humans do. We actually don't

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 3>get it right. We don't hear things right, we don't

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 3>see things right.

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think in court cases it's always better to

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>trust the science, isn't it.

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, the good thing about science is that it's true

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 3>whether you believe it or not, and it never changes.

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 3>So yes, that is correct. And of course, getting back

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 3>to the circumstantial evidence, the value of that is one

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 3>of the analogies is that each piece of circumstantial evidence

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 3>is like a thread in a rope, but itself it's

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 3>not hugely strong. You plat them all together you get

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 3>something that's actually quite strong and very difficult to break.

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>And just going back to this perfect murder concept, do

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you write a lot about that?

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Is that even possible at this.

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Dan and age, with all the technology out there and

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>experts like yourself, you know, working to lock up people

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that murders.

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, the perfect murder, of course it's possible, and of it,

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 3>by definition, it will be one that I've never seen

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 3>because you won't recognize it for what it is. And

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 3>you know. One of the stories I like to tell

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 3>is we actually can be quite bad at recognizing that

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 3>a murder has occurred, and they've sort of semi humorous

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 3>example that I use as Jack and the Beanstalk, which

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 3>is a story that we tell our children. I tell

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 3>my twenty twenty month old daughter that frequently. She loves

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 3>the story. But this is a story of a young

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 3>boy who gets involved in three different home invasions, steals

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 3>from the homeowner, who chases him, and then he is

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 3>murdered by the young boy. And this is not recognized

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 3>as it's a straightforward homicide with home invasion. This just

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 3>isn't recognized as a murder. It's put out as something

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 3>quite moral in fact, and if you look at it,

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 3>that's the perfect murder. And what you have to do

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 3>in society. If you interachieve a perfect murder, it must

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 3>be something that nobody will recognize. I'll look at it

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 3>and say, no, it looks all right.

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Crime is something that fascinates us all and in recent

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>years has been a real influx and true crime content documentaries,

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>television series, movies, and podcasts, and there thousands focused on

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>specific incidents or offenders and then there's the fictional crime shows,

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the Law and Orders, the CSIS, the Special Victor Unit,

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Criminal Minds, and countless others popping up week on week.

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>In almost every iteration, there's a rock star pathologist who

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 1>manages to crack the case with an hours, tying up

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>every loose end nicely and neatly.

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Before they go home for the day.

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>But how does it work in the real world? Do

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>can reckon as colleagues find that golden taketive evidence as

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>quickly is it even possible? And does it create unhelpful

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>myths about their important work?

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:31.760
<v Speaker 3>The shows do seem to be pretty well never ending.

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 3>I gather silent witnesses on its twenty seventh season now,

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 3>which is it's just unbelievable. You know, somebody's got it

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 3>must have very fertile imagination. No, it's not like that

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 3>at all. It's everything has to be done meticulously, of course,

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 3>but it's always a big puzzle until the end, and

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 3>it all comes together only very slowly. And I guess

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 3>what The shows don't show you because they can't. They

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 3>can't show you that the investigations that pathologists do have

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 3>got a very liquid component to them, and the smell

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 3>is missing as well. You know, it is quite different

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 3>from that. They very sanitized, I guess is the term

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking for. The pathologists never seem very messy to me,

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.760
<v Speaker 3>but I seem to get splashed quite a lot.

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And what are the best and worst parts of your job?

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 3>I guess the best part is the absolute unknown of

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 3>what's coming every day. That it could be a quiet

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.720
<v Speaker 3>day with nothing, but most of the time something completely

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 3>unknown comes up. Now a lot of people say, no,

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 3>the ideal job is you work from eight to five

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 3>and you know you have your lunch break, and you

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 3>know every day is the same as every other. I

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 3>can't imagine anything more boring than that. And the best

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 3>part of the job is just the amazing cases that

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 3>come up endlessly, and it really is quite fascinating. And

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 3>of course there's always a patient behind it, and that

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 3>is the physicianally part of it. But I feel like

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:12.240
<v Speaker 3>I've solved a crossword puzzle or a sodoku, a difficult

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.359
<v Speaker 3>sudoku when I reach a diagnosis and it's a sort

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 3>of Eureka moment and you feel really great.

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in that respect, it must be quite rewarding, even

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>though often very grim.

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I imagine well, yeah, I guess we get immunized to it.

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 3>In our particular group, we see thirty six thirty seven

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 3>thousand biopsies on live patients every year, and probably, I

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 3>don't know, twenty percent of them have got cancer. Every

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 3>one of them's got a difficult story behind them. They're

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 3>having the biopsy for a reason, and I guess we

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 3>get used to that, and that's probably the routine part

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 3>of our work. But still it's really gratifying when you

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 3>know that you've got these out and you've got the

0:37:58.000 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 3>answer and something can be done.

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 2>And how has pathology changed over the years.

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>You've been in this game for a very long time,

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and I imagine there's been a lot of changes and

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>advancers tell me about that.

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, of course there have been huge advances, of course,

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 3>because there's been all the change with genetics and genomics

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 3>and DNA and so on, which has changed our diagnostic

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:26.800
<v Speaker 3>work hugely. But I think you know, probably what people

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 3>would understand best is what's happened in murder cases. Thirty

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 3>years ago, when there was a murder case, the pathologist

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 3>was the first to be called to the scene was

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.839
<v Speaker 3>closed off, and the pathologist to be the first in

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 3>there to actually look at the body, look at the

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 3>way the body was lying, look at the whole scene

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 3>around there, so that the injuries and the cause of

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 3>death could be closely related to what happened at the scene.

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 3>And that was a critical part of a murder investigation.

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 3>That changed about two things thousand to two thousand and

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 3>five totally and it's quite different now. Two things changed immensely.

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 3>The first one was DNA and now the scientists to

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 3>collect DNA off the body of the first on the scene.

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.479
<v Speaker 3>They go in there and they swab the body from

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 3>top to bottom, and even small fragments of DNA from

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:25.320
<v Speaker 3>the perpetrator the murderer will be found. That changed it hugely.

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 3>The second thing that changed with security cameras. There are

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 3>security cameras everywhere, and that of course is the ultimate

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 3>eyewitness evidence that so far is reliable. I'm not saying

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 3>they can't be falsified, but so far they proved reliable.

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 3>And when there's a homicide, I think the police go

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 3>and collect security cameras from everywhere in the whole area

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and they all get analyzed. And we saw that, for

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 3>instance with the Grace Mulane and Jesse Kempson when Jesse

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 3>Kempson murdered Grace Mulane back in December twenty eighteen, he

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 3>had nowhere to go. I mean it was all on

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 3>security camera, you know, him meeting up with her and

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 3>going in the lift up to the room and so on.

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 3>It was all there, and him going to the warehouse

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 3>to buy suitcases and carrying the empty suitcases up and

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 3>wheeling the full suitcases down. It was all there there.

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, what can you say?

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>You just absolutely cannot argue with you know, the science

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and effects, even though many do no.

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 3>And of course the most amazing story wasn't here. It

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 3>was to do with Sarah Everard, the young woman who

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 3>disappeared near Clapham Common Brixton Hill in London back and

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 3>I think it was twenty twenty one, and she disappeared

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 3>walking home one night, and I think there were huge

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:54.319
<v Speaker 3>vigils held on Clapham Common. I think Princess Kate went

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:56.959
<v Speaker 3>to them as well. And what had happened is she'd

0:40:57.000 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 3>been picked up in an area where there were no

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 3>security cameras, and of course she had because she was

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 3>picked up by a Metropolitan policeman called Wayne Cousins, and

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:08.280
<v Speaker 3>he knew that there were no security cameras in the area,

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 3>but unfortunately for him, and yet he had hired a

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Vauxhall car to carry the deed out. Unfortunately for him.

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 3>The London buses are fitted with security cameras because the

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:24.800
<v Speaker 3>drivers get attacked, and two passing buses, the first bus

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 3>on their camera they caught him talking to her standing

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 3>next to the Vauxhall and the next bus that went

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 3>past got the Vauxhall's registration number and from that they

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 3>were able to find out that he had rented the

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 3>car and track the car to Hoadwood near Ashford, where

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:47.399
<v Speaker 3>the body was found. And what can you do? I mean,

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 3>there are no clues to be found. He would never

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 3>have been found until he did it again, which is

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 3>what the serial type murders often do. He would never

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 3>have been found, but there's no no where to go

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 3>it he's absolutely stitched up completely. So that those are

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 3>the two big changes.

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>What would be the biggest misconception about your job and

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>your work that people have?

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:16.720
<v Speaker 3>I think that probably again, it's around life and death.

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 3>I think most people know that pathologists do autopsies and

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 3>that's our signature dish if you like, and they know

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 3>about us dealing with bodies that are dragged out of

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:31.359
<v Speaker 3>the river and shark attacks and all this sort of thing.

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 3>But what they don't know about is the work that

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 3>we do with living patients, the diagnostic work. Like the

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 3>woman with breast cancers. We work out what hormones that

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 3>the cancers respond to, We work out what chemotherapeutic drugs

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 3>they can use, and we do this on a whole

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 3>host of cancers. So we're involved with what sort of

0:42:54.719 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 3>backroom technology around diagnosing people and getting them on the

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 3>right treatment path. All of that is, you know, it

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 3>hasn't got the glamour of investigating a murder, but I

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:12.320
<v Speaker 3>don't think many people know that pathologists do that, or

0:43:12.360 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 3>if they do, it's below the visual horizon.

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>And all that work is just so so important, isn't

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it to the community?

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 3>And you know it is when it's your biopsy?

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>And why did you decide to write about your career?

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is your third book, as you said,

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 1>part of the trilogy. You're presenting your knowledge, you know,

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:31.279
<v Speaker 1>in a really deep dive sort of way.

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:33.359
<v Speaker 2>What led you to write the books?

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:38.799
<v Speaker 3>Well? I think it says I often quote Rally who said,

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:41.880
<v Speaker 3>the time takes up all that we have and shuts

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 3>the story of our days in a dark and silent tomb.

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 3>And that struck me as true of all the many,

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 3>many hours are spent doing autopsy. So I would write

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:55.360
<v Speaker 3>out these reports send them to the coroner, and that

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 3>was pretty well lit. You know, the families didn't know,

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 3>nobody knew what their story were. And I thought, well,

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, I'm really I'm not an author, I'm a historian.

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 3>I'll write down what I saw and how it presented

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 3>to me. And I started doing this, and the families

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 3>were just so grateful. You know. I'd phone them up

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 3>and I'd say, look, I'm writing a story about your

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:21.759
<v Speaker 3>loved one. You know, I'm really sorry to come and

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 3>raise this all up again. And they were just so supportive,

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 3>and they said, no, you must tell the story, you

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:31.399
<v Speaker 3>must use their name. We want to hear it. All.

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 3>We didn't know anything about any of this. And you know,

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 3>once I started doing that, one thing led to another,

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 3>and of course I ended up then writing more and

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 3>more about the living patients too, and talking to them

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 3>and writing their stories too, And about half of them

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:52.880
<v Speaker 3>are very happy for me to use their name and

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.760
<v Speaker 3>tell their story. And about half of them I changed

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:59.919
<v Speaker 3>the name or fictionalize the setting to protect identities.

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess that raises a good point. A lot of

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the work that you would have done over the years

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in the criminal space, if there isn't a guilty plan,

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't go to trial. People don't often hear, you know,

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the pathology expert evidence, do they, And they don't know

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>what's gone on behind the scenes and the evidence that

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>was there if it had gone to trial.

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well that's right, And sometimes it works the other

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 3>way round. I had dealt with a young child who

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 3>had been murdered by his mother's boyfriend, and it was

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 3>the second time that he had done carried out the

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 3>same type of murder, and the evidence was being heard

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 3>before the Justices of the peace who had to make

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 3>a determination whether there was enough evidence for him to

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 3>go to trial. The man involved had said he was

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:54.640
<v Speaker 3>not guilty, of course, and I came and gave my evidence,

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:57.320
<v Speaker 3>which he sat there and listened to, and then afterwards

0:45:57.000 --> 0:45:59.320
<v Speaker 3>he said, no one to change my plea to guilty.

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know whether that was because of what I said,

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 3>but I was quite clear about what had happened, and

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:08.320
<v Speaker 3>he changed his plea and there never was a formal

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 3>trial in the sense of everything being heard. So sometimes

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:16.360
<v Speaker 3>it goes that way too, you know, the story is

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:17.080
<v Speaker 3>just never told.

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and what do you want people to take away

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:22.319
<v Speaker 1>from the final diagnosis.

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:27.760
<v Speaker 3>That's an interesting question. I guess death has been pretty

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 3>well sanitized in the West. I mean, we've outsourced it

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 3>to funeral directors, to the police, to the doctors and

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 3>bodies and the dead or removed from our site. They

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 3>go to a place unseen and the whole thing's dealt

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 3>with in a very sanitary way. And I think it's

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 3>probably not the best way to deal with it. I

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:58.320
<v Speaker 3>would rather that people see death as really part of

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 3>being alive. You can't outsource your grief. Understand death, know

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 3>about it. It is important to know why your loved

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 3>ones died, you know. I think is a move against

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 3>having all chopsysse days. I think it's very civilized to

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 3>know that why people died and what happened, and occasionally

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:23.240
<v Speaker 3>you get big surprises. So I guess my message would

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 3>be death is with us. It is us, it is

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 3>part of us. We're all going there one day and

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 3>we should accept it as part of our normal lives.

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Kenrick's book is available now at all of the usual retailers, libraries,

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and as an e book for those of you who

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>prefer to read on your device. The work of pathologists

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>has been crucial to many of the cases I've covered

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:50.839
<v Speaker 1>in a Moment in crime. Their analysis of evidence has

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>led to the convictions of dozens of killers and sex offenders.

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:57.479
<v Speaker 1>They've helped so of cold cases and explain the most

0:47:57.520 --> 0:48:00.839
<v Speaker 1>bizarre of crimes. They're also doing a lot of really

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:04.880
<v Speaker 1>important work for the community, helping to diagnose diseases and

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in some cases working hard on developing treatments and cures.

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Kinrick's work over the years is fascinating and compelling, and

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 1>across his three books you can get a good insight

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>into how pathologists really contribute to crime and justice.

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:22.880
<v Speaker 3>There's a saying that writing is the art of turning

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 3>blood into ink, but I think in my case this

0:48:27.320 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 3>probably literally is a case of turning blood into ink.

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:34.920
<v Speaker 3>It's been an easy journey for me to write. People

0:48:34.960 --> 0:48:37.760
<v Speaker 3>often ask why do you write? How do you write?

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 3>I just tell the story, you know, they're not it's

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 3>not what I think. I could never write fiction. I

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 3>just tell the story of what I saw and what

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 3>I thought and what became of my patients.

0:48:54.960 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 1>A Moment in Crime is an enzed Me podcast written

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and hosted by me analysk sandor crime and justice reporter

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 1>for the New Zealand Herald. This episode was produced by myself,

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:09.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast production manager Ethan Sills and Liam McDonald from enzied

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>me Sound and Vision.

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:14.879
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to my colleague Black Benny at Newstalalk z B for.

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Voicing the extract of Kinrick's book, The Final Diagnosis, and

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 1>special thanks to Kinrick for sitting down to speak with

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:25.279
<v Speaker 1>me about his book and his career. The world of

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:28.839
<v Speaker 1>pathologists has always intrigued and interested me, and I really

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:30.440
<v Speaker 1>appreciated being able to speak to.

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Kinrick about his work.

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks also to Hollyhart Jenkins at HarperCollins for her assistance

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 1>with the interview. Episodes of A Moment in Crime are

0:49:39.600 --> 0:49:43.880
<v Speaker 1>usually released monthly on insidherld dot co, dot mzed iHeartRadio

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and all your.

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Other usual podcast apps.

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:48.840
<v Speaker 1>If you've got a crimeal case you'd like me to

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:52.680
<v Speaker 1>consider covering in future, email Anna dot Least at enzdme

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:54.320
<v Speaker 1>dot co dot mzed