WEBVTT - Leighton Smith Podcast #285 - May 21st 2025 - Bryan Leyland & J. R. Bruning

0:00:09.093 --> 0:00:11.973
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from news talks it B.

0:00:12.373 --> 0:00:16.173
<v Speaker 1>Follow this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.

0:00:16.693 --> 0:00:19.733
<v Speaker 1>It's time for all the attitude, all the opinion, all

0:00:19.773 --> 0:00:24.813
<v Speaker 1>the information, all the debates of theis now the Leyton

0:00:24.933 --> 0:00:27.653
<v Speaker 1>Smith Podcast powered by news talks it B.

0:00:28.053 --> 0:00:30.973
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to podcasts two eighty five for May twenty one,

0:00:31.053 --> 0:00:34.413
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four. And let's start with a warning. This

0:00:34.453 --> 0:00:37.533
<v Speaker 2>is a lengthy podcast, but it could have been longer.

0:00:37.773 --> 0:00:42.573
<v Speaker 2>Exercising discipline is sometimes difficult. It's a double interview session

0:00:42.693 --> 0:00:46.453
<v Speaker 2>starting with an update on New Zealand power supply by

0:00:46.533 --> 0:00:49.613
<v Speaker 2>power systems engineer Brian Leyland, who has been on the

0:00:49.613 --> 0:00:53.453
<v Speaker 2>podcast on well more than one occasion. Eighteen months ago,

0:00:53.653 --> 0:00:57.013
<v Speaker 2>he wrote in the New Zealand Herald, virtually every aspect

0:00:57.013 --> 0:01:00.173
<v Speaker 2>of our power system is a cause for concern. Still is,

0:01:00.533 --> 0:01:04.733
<v Speaker 2>and as before, considering the recent discovery that Chinese solar

0:01:04.773 --> 0:01:09.213
<v Speaker 2>farms have built in kill switches accessible to theies who

0:01:09.253 --> 0:01:11.533
<v Speaker 2>could switch off all the farms that they have supplied.

0:01:12.173 --> 0:01:15.573
<v Speaker 2>That's about fifty percent worldwide. Now, to suggest that we

0:01:15.613 --> 0:01:19.573
<v Speaker 2>are confronted with a serious issue is hardly debatable. What

0:01:19.733 --> 0:01:23.213
<v Speaker 2>is debatable is whether it's being handled competently and Brian

0:01:23.253 --> 0:01:25.613
<v Speaker 2>will take it from there. Then we have the suggestion

0:01:25.773 --> 0:01:29.653
<v Speaker 2>that the New Zealand public is growing increasingly skeptical about

0:01:29.653 --> 0:01:34.053
<v Speaker 2>the capacity for democratic institutions to put our best interests

0:01:34.053 --> 0:01:37.693
<v Speaker 2>at heart. Conventions and processes are in place to ensure

0:01:37.733 --> 0:01:43.053
<v Speaker 2>that these institutions are transparent and accountable. Public good policy

0:01:43.173 --> 0:01:47.613
<v Speaker 2>requires that the information underpinning decision making is of the

0:01:47.613 --> 0:01:51.973
<v Speaker 2>best possible standard. But what if those processes are bypassed.

0:01:52.493 --> 0:01:56.413
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand government agency for Economic Growth, the Ministry for Business,

0:01:56.413 --> 0:02:02.253
<v Speaker 2>Innovation and Employment otherwise known as MB is so entranced

0:02:02.253 --> 0:02:07.093
<v Speaker 2>by the promise of biotechnology that has, to all appearances

0:02:07.253 --> 0:02:12.693
<v Speaker 2>short circuited the democratic process and good regulatory practice. This

0:02:12.733 --> 0:02:15.053
<v Speaker 2>has become a case study that may not only reflect

0:02:15.133 --> 0:02:18.973
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand's woes, but mirror the global crises in policy

0:02:19.053 --> 0:02:23.493
<v Speaker 2>and science across the Western world. And of course this discussion,

0:02:23.853 --> 0:02:27.253
<v Speaker 2>and of course this discussion is related to the gene

0:02:27.293 --> 0:02:31.653
<v Speaker 2>Technology Bill, which is a subject to some heated debate

0:02:31.693 --> 0:02:35.613
<v Speaker 2>at this point of time. Now, the words that I've

0:02:35.653 --> 0:02:39.533
<v Speaker 2>been quoting are by j. R. Brunning or Jody Running,

0:02:39.933 --> 0:02:44.773
<v Speaker 2>who is a sociologist and a Trustee of Physicians and

0:02:44.853 --> 0:02:49.453
<v Speaker 2>Scientists for Global Responsibility. She has been on the podcast

0:02:49.693 --> 0:02:54.693
<v Speaker 2>on one occasion, I think from memory, and she's actually

0:02:54.773 --> 0:02:57.173
<v Speaker 2>very thorough. But the other thing to add at this

0:02:57.213 --> 0:03:01.133
<v Speaker 2>point is that the information in this report compelled us,

0:03:01.213 --> 0:03:05.173
<v Speaker 2>I quote compelled us to request that the Ombudsman undertake

0:03:05.173 --> 0:03:08.493
<v Speaker 2>a formal inquiry. So if by chance you have to

0:03:08.493 --> 0:03:11.893
<v Speaker 2>be interested in what goes on well shall we say,

0:03:12.293 --> 0:03:17.133
<v Speaker 2>behind the scenes, then this is a very very interesting discussion.

0:03:17.573 --> 0:03:30.253
<v Speaker 2>But up in a moment. Brian Layland Layton Smith. Now

0:03:30.253 --> 0:03:32.973
<v Speaker 2>the name Brian Leland is familiar to most of you,

0:03:33.053 --> 0:03:36.413
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure, but there are always some who were fresh

0:03:36.413 --> 0:03:39.253
<v Speaker 2>on the scene or who haven't heard of somebody I'm

0:03:39.293 --> 0:03:41.533
<v Speaker 2>talking with. So let me give you a little of

0:03:41.573 --> 0:03:44.293
<v Speaker 2>his background, well much of it, actually, we'll give him.

0:03:44.613 --> 0:03:47.133
<v Speaker 2>We'll give him the full course. He is a New

0:03:47.213 --> 0:03:51.613
<v Speaker 2>Zealander based consulting engineer with experience in all aspects of

0:03:51.653 --> 0:03:55.413
<v Speaker 2>the power industry. His main interest is in hydro power.

0:03:55.453 --> 0:03:59.653
<v Speaker 2>He has experience in wind, solar, tidal and wave power.

0:04:00.173 --> 0:04:04.813
<v Speaker 2>He also has worked on substations and transmission lines on diesel,

0:04:05.173 --> 0:04:09.373
<v Speaker 2>steam and gas turbine stations and he had he's had

0:04:09.413 --> 0:04:13.213
<v Speaker 2>some involvement in nuclear power. I'm particularly interested in that. Actually,

0:04:13.933 --> 0:04:19.813
<v Speaker 2>his academic qualifications include do academic qualifications count for much anymore? Well,

0:04:19.813 --> 0:04:23.173
<v Speaker 2>they do for some people anyway, include a master's degree

0:04:23.213 --> 0:04:28.653
<v Speaker 2>in Power system design and a Distinguished Fellow of Engineering

0:04:28.693 --> 0:04:32.653
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand, a Fellow at the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,

0:04:33.173 --> 0:04:37.893
<v Speaker 2>and a retired Fellow of the Institution of Engineering and Technology.

0:04:38.493 --> 0:04:41.453
<v Speaker 2>He's also acted as a consultant on many overseas projects

0:04:41.493 --> 0:04:45.293
<v Speaker 2>in developing countries. This has included work for the World Bank,

0:04:45.933 --> 0:04:49.933
<v Speaker 2>the Asian Development Bank, and as an independent advisor on

0:04:50.053 --> 0:04:57.173
<v Speaker 2>dam projects in India, Pakistan, West Africa and Afghanistan. I'd

0:04:57.213 --> 0:05:00.973
<v Speaker 2>say that that qualifies him to make as much comments,

0:05:01.013 --> 0:05:03.933
<v Speaker 2>if not more than most people in this country involved

0:05:03.933 --> 0:05:09.093
<v Speaker 2>in the electricity industry. Brian, did I missety thing up now?

0:05:09.293 --> 0:05:12.493
<v Speaker 2>That was? You will almost make me feel embarrassed? Well,

0:05:12.533 --> 0:05:16.893
<v Speaker 2>in fact you do. Well, there's no need for it.

0:05:16.573 --> 0:05:21.013
<v Speaker 2>What now? Quote you something from about a year ago,

0:05:22.933 --> 0:05:25.773
<v Speaker 2>maybe ten months and it's from the New Zealand Herald

0:05:26.613 --> 0:05:31.933
<v Speaker 2>and it's written by Samantha g of Radio New Zealand.

0:05:32.893 --> 0:05:34.813
<v Speaker 2>And there's really only one line. I want to read

0:05:36.093 --> 0:05:41.653
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand is heading toward an electricity supply crisis. Now

0:05:41.693 --> 0:05:44.933
<v Speaker 2>you were awarding of that in the middle of last year.

0:05:44.933 --> 0:05:47.653
<v Speaker 2>We spoke about it. But that's the middle of last year.

0:05:47.693 --> 0:05:50.333
<v Speaker 2>We're now a good ten months down the track. What

0:05:50.493 --> 0:05:51.373
<v Speaker 2>might have changed?

0:05:52.453 --> 0:05:56.533
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what has changed is the availability of gas. We

0:05:56.613 --> 0:05:59.053
<v Speaker 3>now know that we've got less gas, and we assumed

0:05:59.053 --> 0:06:03.653
<v Speaker 3>a year ago. We now know also that the combined

0:06:03.653 --> 0:06:06.853
<v Speaker 3>cycle station in Taranake, which is throughout articular meguans, will

0:06:06.893 --> 0:06:09.853
<v Speaker 3>be retired pretty soon. So we've got less gas and

0:06:09.933 --> 0:06:14.893
<v Speaker 3>less capability of burning it. And the latest security of

0:06:15.013 --> 0:06:19.493
<v Speaker 3>supply assessment by Transpower, the draft one says that next

0:06:19.573 --> 0:06:21.613
<v Speaker 3>year is going to be worse than this year, and

0:06:21.653 --> 0:06:24.333
<v Speaker 3>the year after it will be worse still. Now, who

0:06:24.333 --> 0:06:28.053
<v Speaker 3>says that Transpower the system operator?

0:06:28.213 --> 0:06:29.613
<v Speaker 2>And how would Transpower know?

0:06:30.973 --> 0:06:33.773
<v Speaker 3>Well, they are the ones who are in theory. The

0:06:33.773 --> 0:06:35.453
<v Speaker 3>other ones who are trying to keep the lights on.

0:06:36.453 --> 0:06:39.093
<v Speaker 3>But they have no power to build new stations or

0:06:39.293 --> 0:06:41.293
<v Speaker 3>influence to building a new stations.

0:06:41.613 --> 0:06:46.013
<v Speaker 2>But are they assuming that there will be weather that

0:06:46.573 --> 0:06:47.253
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work?

0:06:49.893 --> 0:06:52.653
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they always assume that there's a possibility of but

0:06:52.773 --> 0:06:56.213
<v Speaker 3>dry year. But it's getting to the stage now where

0:06:56.253 --> 0:06:59.453
<v Speaker 3>even in a normal year there may have to be

0:06:59.973 --> 0:07:02.773
<v Speaker 3>blackouts during peak DeMint periods because we just haven't got

0:07:02.893 --> 0:07:05.333
<v Speaker 3>enough capacity to keep the lights on, but they would

0:07:05.333 --> 0:07:09.933
<v Speaker 3>be fairly short two or three hours and intermittent. But

0:07:10.013 --> 0:07:12.413
<v Speaker 3>a dry year, which is what we've just been through

0:07:12.453 --> 0:07:14.893
<v Speaker 3>and had last year, is much different and you need

0:07:15.773 --> 0:07:18.733
<v Speaker 3>massive rotating blackouts to cope with the fact that you

0:07:18.813 --> 0:07:19.853
<v Speaker 3>haven't gotten that energy.

0:07:20.133 --> 0:07:25.333
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's something about an assumption that sits uncomfortably

0:07:25.373 --> 0:07:29.453
<v Speaker 2>with me. They assume that this will be the case,

0:07:30.133 --> 0:07:33.013
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't plan for if their assumption is wrong.

0:07:34.493 --> 0:07:38.373
<v Speaker 3>They've got a reasonable handle on contingencies and they've factored

0:07:38.373 --> 0:07:42.733
<v Speaker 3>the men, but I think they've been on the generous side.

0:07:42.853 --> 0:07:48.933
<v Speaker 3>Was the contingencies, I would be more pessimistic than they've been.

0:07:49.453 --> 0:07:51.893
<v Speaker 2>In your experience, and you do a bit of public speaking, etc.

0:07:52.933 --> 0:07:59.533
<v Speaker 2>Is the New Zealand population across the board aware of

0:07:59.853 --> 0:08:04.533
<v Speaker 2>how close we are to losing control? No, not at all.

0:08:04.973 --> 0:08:09.333
<v Speaker 3>And before two thousand and three, if we got short

0:08:09.373 --> 0:08:12.413
<v Speaker 3>of power, the first thing they did was ask the

0:08:12.453 --> 0:08:15.533
<v Speaker 3>public to save power, turn off flights, don't do so

0:08:15.613 --> 0:08:18.853
<v Speaker 3>much hot water and all that sort of thing, and

0:08:19.173 --> 0:08:21.893
<v Speaker 3>that used to ease the situation by quite a bit.

0:08:21.933 --> 0:08:25.653
<v Speaker 3>It was got a significant reponse. After two thousand and

0:08:25.733 --> 0:08:30.133
<v Speaker 3>three they decided that they would shut down industry and

0:08:30.173 --> 0:08:34.013
<v Speaker 3>commerce before they asked people to save electricity. So last

0:08:34.053 --> 0:08:36.573
<v Speaker 3>year we shut down Method X and paid a lot

0:08:36.613 --> 0:08:39.173
<v Speaker 3>for the gas, which is it turned out we virtually

0:08:39.213 --> 0:08:43.133
<v Speaker 3>did not need, and we reduced output on the smelter,

0:08:43.213 --> 0:08:46.013
<v Speaker 3>which also cost quite a lot. And this year we've

0:08:46.013 --> 0:08:50.213
<v Speaker 3>done the same. For those who don't know, and they

0:08:50.253 --> 0:08:53.213
<v Speaker 3>claim that we're we're getting through it all right, when

0:08:53.253 --> 0:08:56.573
<v Speaker 3>the real story is we've had shutdowns, just that the

0:08:56.653 --> 0:08:58.293
<v Speaker 3>public didn't see them.

0:08:58.653 --> 0:09:01.733
<v Speaker 2>For those unfamiliar, what is METHODEX or who?

0:09:02.773 --> 0:09:05.293
<v Speaker 3>Method X is the gas? What used to be the

0:09:05.333 --> 0:09:08.293
<v Speaker 3>gas the gasoline plant, but now it makes Method X

0:09:08.413 --> 0:09:14.213
<v Speaker 3>methanol instead of gasoline. And it's been a steady taker

0:09:14.373 --> 0:09:18.173
<v Speaker 3>of gas over the years and provided the steady load

0:09:18.253 --> 0:09:21.933
<v Speaker 3>for the gas fields which make most of their money

0:09:21.973 --> 0:09:24.653
<v Speaker 3>out of the liquids associated liquids, so it needs a

0:09:24.653 --> 0:09:25.453
<v Speaker 3>steady demand.

0:09:25.573 --> 0:09:26.693
<v Speaker 2>So it's done a good job.

0:09:27.453 --> 0:09:31.693
<v Speaker 3>But we shouldn't be shutting it down just because we've

0:09:31.773 --> 0:09:34.333
<v Speaker 3>run out of We haven't stored enough.

0:09:34.133 --> 0:09:37.253
<v Speaker 2>Gas, so why are we shutting it down?

0:09:38.253 --> 0:09:40.253
<v Speaker 3>We're starting it down so the gas can be burned

0:09:40.293 --> 0:09:43.133
<v Speaker 3>in the gas turbine stations to keep the lights on.

0:09:44.213 --> 0:09:48.893
<v Speaker 2>And how long would that last? I think it's several months.

0:09:49.013 --> 0:09:52.533
<v Speaker 3>We've got we've shut shutting methodics down for several months,

0:09:52.573 --> 0:09:54.973
<v Speaker 3>and we've paid for the gas. And as things are

0:09:54.973 --> 0:09:58.933
<v Speaker 3>looking at the moment, we could give it all back tomorrow.

0:10:00.173 --> 0:10:01.933
<v Speaker 3>But we've paid for it and we're stuck with it.

0:10:03.493 --> 0:10:04.573
<v Speaker 2>And that's not a good thing.

0:10:05.493 --> 0:10:08.773
<v Speaker 3>Well, it puts out the price of power. And you

0:10:08.813 --> 0:10:12.653
<v Speaker 3>can remember the way the powers market works, the most

0:10:12.693 --> 0:10:15.853
<v Speaker 3>expensive generator sets the planes for all of them. So

0:10:15.973 --> 0:10:19.253
<v Speaker 3>when gas is scarce, my little hydro scheme is making

0:10:19.293 --> 0:10:23.533
<v Speaker 3>heaps of money because it's I get the high price

0:10:23.573 --> 0:10:24.813
<v Speaker 3>of the gas thing.

0:10:25.133 --> 0:10:29.813
<v Speaker 2>It's crazy, all right. So let's let's just go back

0:10:29.853 --> 0:10:35.293
<v Speaker 2>in history a little bit, because we've discussed it before,

0:10:35.613 --> 0:10:39.893
<v Speaker 2>but it's always I think necessary to update and remind.

0:10:40.573 --> 0:10:46.693
<v Speaker 2>But when did the when did the problem you've mentioned

0:10:46.733 --> 0:10:49.613
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and three? But when did the problem really

0:10:49.813 --> 0:10:53.373
<v Speaker 2>become the issue that it is now, or at least

0:10:53.413 --> 0:10:54.293
<v Speaker 2>the lead into it.

0:10:55.573 --> 0:11:01.813
<v Speaker 3>Probably when we signed the Paris Agreement and decided that

0:11:02.293 --> 0:11:06.253
<v Speaker 3>coal and gas were bad things and that wind and

0:11:06.293 --> 0:11:09.453
<v Speaker 3>solar were good things, and forgot about the need to

0:11:09.493 --> 0:11:11.373
<v Speaker 3>keep the lights on when the wind's not blowing and

0:11:11.413 --> 0:11:12.413
<v Speaker 3>the sun's not shining.

0:11:15.053 --> 0:11:16.173
<v Speaker 2>Who was in government then?

0:11:17.093 --> 0:11:20.253
<v Speaker 3>It was Key that signed the Paris Agreement and it

0:11:20.333 --> 0:11:22.893
<v Speaker 3>was just center the shutdown gas exploration.

0:11:24.653 --> 0:11:30.253
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that John Key would sign it today?

0:11:30.453 --> 0:11:34.453
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea it had to be, but anyone

0:11:34.493 --> 0:11:37.133
<v Speaker 3>would have to be pretty stupid. I mean, the whole

0:11:37.453 --> 0:11:43.573
<v Speaker 3>agreement internationally is falling to pieces, and seventeen out of

0:11:43.613 --> 0:11:45.813
<v Speaker 3>the two hundred odd people that have signed up to

0:11:45.853 --> 0:11:48.773
<v Speaker 3>it or the countries have signed up to it, have

0:11:48.893 --> 0:11:52.693
<v Speaker 3>given returns this year. Fourteen of them are not meeting

0:11:52.693 --> 0:11:57.373
<v Speaker 3>their promises with one of them, but the other nearly

0:11:57.413 --> 0:12:02.173
<v Speaker 3>two hundred, I've forgotten about it. The whole things are

0:12:02.893 --> 0:12:07.733
<v Speaker 3>a massive nothing. Well it always was, it always was,

0:12:07.773 --> 0:12:10.333
<v Speaker 3>but it's billions of dollars a year.

0:12:10.973 --> 0:12:12.093
<v Speaker 2>Can you put a figure on that.

0:12:15.413 --> 0:12:19.933
<v Speaker 3>According to some reports I've seen, the cost of buying

0:12:20.093 --> 0:12:23.173
<v Speaker 3>carbon credits, which apparently we will soon have to do,

0:12:23.933 --> 0:12:27.173
<v Speaker 3>could be ten billion dollars between now and twenty thirty.

0:12:28.133 --> 0:12:30.813
<v Speaker 3>So that's a couple of billion dollars a year. Then

0:12:31.013 --> 0:12:33.133
<v Speaker 3>there's the fact that it's jacked up the power price,

0:12:33.373 --> 0:12:36.773
<v Speaker 3>probably by three or four cents, So everybody's paying three

0:12:36.853 --> 0:12:39.573
<v Speaker 3>or four cents more for power than they otherwise would.

0:12:40.493 --> 0:12:43.733
<v Speaker 3>Then you've got the effect that petrol and diesel and

0:12:43.773 --> 0:12:46.973
<v Speaker 3>all that are also more expensive because of carbon tax.

0:12:47.733 --> 0:12:51.293
<v Speaker 3>So there's that. It's an endless list. Almost everything you

0:12:51.293 --> 0:13:00.213
<v Speaker 3>can think about is affected by the net zero belief.

0:13:02.253 --> 0:13:06.373
<v Speaker 2>All right, So let's assume that you have been appointed

0:13:06.493 --> 0:13:11.013
<v Speaker 2>as the lord of the the realm of power supply?

0:13:12.333 --> 0:13:14.813
<v Speaker 2>What would you do? But would I do? First?

0:13:15.173 --> 0:13:21.013
<v Speaker 3>Is forget about the net zero and also about the

0:13:21.133 --> 0:13:25.333
<v Speaker 3>rumor that man made greenhouse gases caused dangerous global warming.

0:13:26.173 --> 0:13:27.893
<v Speaker 3>And if I could do both of those things, I

0:13:27.933 --> 0:13:32.533
<v Speaker 3>would be searching for gas high speed and burning coal

0:13:32.613 --> 0:13:36.053
<v Speaker 3>and gas and developing geothermal as fast as I could,

0:13:36.173 --> 0:13:40.093
<v Speaker 3>which is happening now, and maybe build some more hydro

0:13:40.173 --> 0:13:44.253
<v Speaker 3>schemes if the greenies would let me the other alternatives.

0:13:45.333 --> 0:13:49.013
<v Speaker 2>Hold it, hold it, Remember where you were going with that.

0:13:49.413 --> 0:13:53.253
<v Speaker 2>But if the greenies would let you, what would what

0:13:53.333 --> 0:13:56.893
<v Speaker 2>would what would be required to put them out of action?

0:13:56.973 --> 0:14:03.853
<v Speaker 2>As far as that's concerned. A government was determination. Can

0:14:03.853 --> 0:14:07.093
<v Speaker 2>you see any on the horizon? No, I thought I'd ask.

0:14:09.133 --> 0:14:13.533
<v Speaker 3>David Seymour, but I'm not quite sure what he believes anyway.

0:14:14.173 --> 0:14:18.533
<v Speaker 2>So where are you going before I interrupted you?

0:14:18.813 --> 0:14:21.413
<v Speaker 3>Okay, if we still wanted to believe in man made

0:14:21.453 --> 0:14:23.733
<v Speaker 3>global warming, I would go nuclear.

0:14:24.813 --> 0:14:27.773
<v Speaker 2>And that's long term worldwide.

0:14:28.173 --> 0:14:31.733
<v Speaker 3>Nuclear is the obvious way to generate all the energy

0:14:31.773 --> 0:14:37.213
<v Speaker 3>we need safely and cheaply. That's it. It'll do it,

0:14:37.613 --> 0:14:38.653
<v Speaker 3>and it'll do it safely.

0:14:39.613 --> 0:14:43.133
<v Speaker 2>Here's the interesting thing, Well, it's only one interesting thing.

0:14:43.893 --> 0:14:45.933
<v Speaker 2>The Australians have just had an election. Of course, the

0:14:45.933 --> 0:14:49.813
<v Speaker 2>Greens got dumped on but they still are in a

0:14:49.853 --> 0:14:56.613
<v Speaker 2>position of power slash influence as far as this is concerned,

0:14:57.053 --> 0:15:01.773
<v Speaker 2>and the majority of Australians it appears, certainly a large

0:15:01.893 --> 0:15:06.933
<v Speaker 2>number are still opposed to nuclear power, something I cannot

0:15:06.973 --> 0:15:10.813
<v Speaker 2>work out with that con tree, you can, I.

0:15:10.933 --> 0:15:12.813
<v Speaker 3>But then the other thing I can't work out is

0:15:12.813 --> 0:15:16.093
<v Speaker 3>why they export millions of tons of coal millions and

0:15:16.133 --> 0:15:21.373
<v Speaker 3>millions and won't burn it, and why they export vast

0:15:21.493 --> 0:15:24.653
<v Speaker 3>qualities of gas from the North Fork Shelf and won't

0:15:24.693 --> 0:15:28.653
<v Speaker 3>open up gas wells in the southeast equally stupid.

0:15:28.373 --> 0:15:32.813
<v Speaker 2>Well, has this has something to do with the structure

0:15:32.853 --> 0:15:40.293
<v Speaker 2>of the Australian political scene. Yeah, I wonder, No, I

0:15:40.333 --> 0:15:42.733
<v Speaker 2>don't wonder, you can't. I was going to say, I

0:15:42.773 --> 0:15:44.413
<v Speaker 2>wonder what it would be like in this country if

0:15:44.413 --> 0:15:49.333
<v Speaker 2>we divided ourselves up into four quarters, for instance, and

0:15:49.333 --> 0:15:55.973
<v Speaker 2>and elected our own local as in state politicians.

0:15:57.093 --> 0:15:59.893
<v Speaker 3>Well, seeing we've got into the elected power system from

0:15:59.933 --> 0:16:03.573
<v Speaker 3>the PowerPoint of view, to be chaos. If it's chaos

0:16:03.613 --> 0:16:06.653
<v Speaker 3>already even worse than it is now that.

0:16:07.373 --> 0:16:09.413
<v Speaker 2>All right, we'll past, will pass on that.

0:16:10.893 --> 0:16:11.093
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:16:13.093 --> 0:16:20.773
<v Speaker 2>James Kilty of Transpower was on radio this morning, the

0:16:20.853 --> 0:16:26.213
<v Speaker 2>day we speak, which is Tuesday. What did he have

0:16:26.333 --> 0:16:27.333
<v Speaker 2>to say?

0:16:28.133 --> 0:16:31.173
<v Speaker 3>Well, basically, he said that we are short of power

0:16:32.133 --> 0:16:35.013
<v Speaker 3>and the situation is worse than it was last year.

0:16:36.733 --> 0:16:39.053
<v Speaker 3>But he seems to believe that lots and lots of

0:16:39.093 --> 0:16:43.133
<v Speaker 3>wind and solar and batteries will save the situation. And

0:16:43.253 --> 0:16:47.013
<v Speaker 3>that's simply not true. And the reason is that batteries

0:16:47.453 --> 0:16:53.253
<v Speaker 3>are impossibly expensive when you when you need to make

0:16:53.333 --> 0:16:55.293
<v Speaker 3>up for the fact that the wind hasn't blown for

0:16:55.293 --> 0:16:58.533
<v Speaker 3>the last five days and two thousand mega wats of

0:16:58.573 --> 0:17:04.893
<v Speaker 3>wind are not there, saving extoring enough electricity to keep

0:17:04.933 --> 0:17:07.533
<v Speaker 3>us to keep the lights on during that period is

0:17:07.533 --> 0:17:08.933
<v Speaker 3>impossibly expensive.

0:17:10.853 --> 0:17:14.893
<v Speaker 2>Let's forget for the moment. Let's forget the impossible and

0:17:15.053 --> 0:17:19.973
<v Speaker 2>an expensive part. How difficult would it be impossible?

0:17:20.853 --> 0:17:23.093
<v Speaker 3>Same thing if everybody does it in the world, and

0:17:23.173 --> 0:17:25.293
<v Speaker 3>there's no point in us doing it, and that everybody else does.

0:17:26.453 --> 0:17:30.613
<v Speaker 3>There's not enough rare earth and various other critical materials

0:17:30.933 --> 0:17:35.253
<v Speaker 3>available in the time frame to do the job. And

0:17:35.333 --> 0:17:37.933
<v Speaker 3>it means opening minds at a rapid rate, which you

0:17:37.973 --> 0:17:44.053
<v Speaker 3>can't do. And it's rare which come out mostly come

0:17:44.093 --> 0:17:47.533
<v Speaker 3>out of China. The Americans have got plenty of them,

0:17:47.653 --> 0:17:51.853
<v Speaker 3>but they're Australians, so are the Australians. But their whole

0:17:51.893 --> 0:17:55.253
<v Speaker 3>approvals system means it takes about six or eight years

0:17:55.293 --> 0:17:56.253
<v Speaker 3>to open a new mind.

0:17:57.733 --> 0:17:58.693
<v Speaker 2>So you just can't do it.

0:17:58.733 --> 0:18:01.653
<v Speaker 3>Then we haven't got all the engineers needed to do

0:18:01.773 --> 0:18:05.813
<v Speaker 3>all the reinforcement and build all these new stations. It's

0:18:05.893 --> 0:18:09.773
<v Speaker 3>just simply is impossible from every point of view.

0:18:10.493 --> 0:18:17.133
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let me extract from you then that's an appropriate

0:18:17.173 --> 0:18:21.653
<v Speaker 2>word actually considering the question what these what these rare

0:18:21.693 --> 0:18:27.453
<v Speaker 2>earths actually provide, it's all very well, all very well

0:18:27.493 --> 0:18:30.013
<v Speaker 2>to throw around I don't mean you, but generally throw

0:18:30.053 --> 0:18:33.013
<v Speaker 2>around you know, rare earth, rare earths, But what are

0:18:33.053 --> 0:18:37.173
<v Speaker 2>they especial, especially in relationship to what we're talking about.

0:18:37.893 --> 0:18:42.413
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, apparently they're not actually all that rare, but

0:18:42.813 --> 0:18:47.333
<v Speaker 3>they're an odd thing. But for instance, all the new

0:18:48.453 --> 0:18:52.973
<v Speaker 3>wind turbine generators and other things rely on high strength

0:18:53.453 --> 0:18:59.533
<v Speaker 3>permanent magnets, which use a product called neodymium, which provides

0:18:59.693 --> 0:19:01.613
<v Speaker 3>very strong magnets. I've got one on my desk and

0:19:01.653 --> 0:19:07.533
<v Speaker 3>it's extremely strong, and all the wind wind turbine generators

0:19:07.693 --> 0:19:11.733
<v Speaker 3>use them. And yet thousands and thousands of tons. Then

0:19:11.773 --> 0:19:15.573
<v Speaker 3>another thing that we'd be short of is copper, because

0:19:15.573 --> 0:19:17.493
<v Speaker 3>you need lots of copper for the windings of the

0:19:17.573 --> 0:19:20.013
<v Speaker 3>generators and for the cables that connect it all together.

0:19:20.693 --> 0:19:24.053
<v Speaker 3>We can't open copper mines fast enough, and I mean

0:19:24.053 --> 0:19:27.653
<v Speaker 3>we'd double or treble the current rate of mining, and

0:19:27.693 --> 0:19:30.653
<v Speaker 3>you probably wouldn't still wouldn't be enough.

0:19:31.093 --> 0:19:32.253
<v Speaker 2>Do we have copper here?

0:19:33.453 --> 0:19:33.613
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:19:34.053 --> 0:19:37.573
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think so. No, We've probably got rares somewhere.

0:19:37.653 --> 0:19:41.413
<v Speaker 2>But we do have gold. We do have gold, yes,

0:19:41.453 --> 0:19:45.613
<v Speaker 2>so we can buy the copper. Yeah. All right. Now,

0:19:46.053 --> 0:19:49.853
<v Speaker 2>with regard to James Kilty, what else did he have

0:19:49.933 --> 0:19:57.213
<v Speaker 2>to say, particularly not only about nuclear.

0:19:58.773 --> 0:20:03.693
<v Speaker 3>He didn't mention nuclear, He didn't mention further gas exploration,

0:20:03.853 --> 0:20:07.573
<v Speaker 3>which we desperately need because it's the only short term

0:20:07.653 --> 0:20:11.053
<v Speaker 3>thing can dig us out of trouble. And yet he

0:20:11.093 --> 0:20:15.133
<v Speaker 3>didn't mention it. It's very strange. I would have thought

0:20:15.173 --> 0:20:17.613
<v Speaker 3>that he would be hammering on the government store for

0:20:17.733 --> 0:20:22.933
<v Speaker 3>more gas, and he just doesn't seem to understand the

0:20:22.973 --> 0:20:26.773
<v Speaker 3>storage problem and the fact that when the wind doesn't

0:20:26.773 --> 0:20:29.653
<v Speaker 3>blow and the sun doesn't shine, something's got to keep

0:20:29.653 --> 0:20:34.053
<v Speaker 3>the lights on. But there's also another problem because when

0:20:34.053 --> 0:20:37.173
<v Speaker 3>the wind is blowing and when the sun does shine,

0:20:37.653 --> 0:20:40.493
<v Speaker 3>we'll have it. We'll be a wash with electricity if

0:20:40.533 --> 0:20:42.493
<v Speaker 3>there're the ones that are all built, go ahead, three

0:20:42.533 --> 0:20:45.893
<v Speaker 3>thousand odd megawats and so the price will crash to

0:20:45.973 --> 0:20:49.173
<v Speaker 3>nothing on the market. So all these wind farms and

0:20:49.213 --> 0:20:54.373
<v Speaker 3>solar farms won't be earning anything when they're generating the most.

0:20:54.453 --> 0:20:58.093
<v Speaker 2>Well, your average punter might into fear here and say

0:20:58.653 --> 0:21:02.613
<v Speaker 2>what he means, it crashed to nothing. It's their product.

0:21:03.573 --> 0:21:08.213
<v Speaker 2>They can set the price, Yeah, but it's a surface

0:21:08.373 --> 0:21:09.053
<v Speaker 2>of it. They can't.

0:21:09.733 --> 0:21:14.173
<v Speaker 3>Why not, Well, all they can do is refuse to generate,

0:21:15.973 --> 0:21:17.773
<v Speaker 3>and then the price goes up, and then I'm getting

0:21:17.773 --> 0:21:23.853
<v Speaker 3>any of it either. Yeah, Otherwise they all form a

0:21:23.933 --> 0:21:26.933
<v Speaker 3>consortium and agree just how much to generate to keep

0:21:26.973 --> 0:21:29.493
<v Speaker 3>the price at the at the level they would like

0:21:29.533 --> 0:21:32.333
<v Speaker 3>it to be. A see, there is which is which

0:21:32.413 --> 0:21:34.613
<v Speaker 3>is not very good from a novely point of view.

0:21:35.453 --> 0:21:37.773
<v Speaker 2>There it's a sin in a way. That's what the

0:21:37.813 --> 0:21:42.373
<v Speaker 2>generators are doing. Now, there is something that intrigues me

0:21:42.693 --> 0:21:46.013
<v Speaker 2>at the moment across across a much bigger board than

0:21:46.013 --> 0:21:49.653
<v Speaker 2>we're discussing. But the principle, the principle is the same.

0:21:51.533 --> 0:21:56.613
<v Speaker 2>Why is it that so many countries are in trouble

0:21:57.893 --> 0:22:02.533
<v Speaker 2>because of what has not gone before and has now

0:22:02.573 --> 0:22:07.733
<v Speaker 2>caught up with us? What's where? Where? And how did

0:22:07.773 --> 0:22:13.573
<v Speaker 2>it become a major issue that countries like us ended

0:22:13.653 --> 0:22:14.373
<v Speaker 2>up here.

0:22:15.453 --> 0:22:19.493
<v Speaker 3>Okay, for some reason or other and with the connivance

0:22:19.493 --> 0:22:22.093
<v Speaker 3>of a lot of people, not necessarily all getting together

0:22:23.453 --> 0:22:26.133
<v Speaker 3>and plotting against it. But it suits a whole lot

0:22:26.133 --> 0:22:31.333
<v Speaker 3>of people to tell everybody that the wills and in

0:22:31.373 --> 0:22:35.053
<v Speaker 3>the edge of disaster from global warning, it's a terrible

0:22:35.133 --> 0:22:39.253
<v Speaker 3>situation and only I can save you, and you've got

0:22:39.253 --> 0:22:44.813
<v Speaker 3>to do lots of penance, which is the salvation circus

0:22:44.893 --> 0:22:47.773
<v Speaker 3>type argument. The world is going to come to an end.

0:22:47.973 --> 0:22:50.453
<v Speaker 3>Come to me and give me lots of money and women.

0:22:51.293 --> 0:22:54.413
<v Speaker 3>And so they've played on that. Nothing like a good

0:22:54.493 --> 0:23:00.453
<v Speaker 3>crisis to get political support, and that's where it started.

0:23:00.533 --> 0:23:04.053
<v Speaker 3>But there's a whole lot of outfits in the world,

0:23:04.693 --> 0:23:07.573
<v Speaker 3>and a whole lot of so called scientists climate scientists

0:23:08.373 --> 0:23:12.573
<v Speaker 3>who make their living depends on keeping this whole scam

0:23:12.573 --> 0:23:17.653
<v Speaker 3>going and send there's the renewable energy people, the wind

0:23:17.653 --> 0:23:22.133
<v Speaker 3>and solar overseas who get heavily subsidized, and they are

0:23:22.253 --> 0:23:25.533
<v Speaker 3>very interested in keeping this game going and increasing the subsidies.

0:23:26.813 --> 0:23:31.613
<v Speaker 3>And the subsidies for offshore wind are horrenders about forty

0:23:31.773 --> 0:23:38.013
<v Speaker 3>cents a killing with out subsidy. It's crazy. And there's

0:23:38.013 --> 0:23:40.333
<v Speaker 3>a bigger subsidy for offshore wind than there is for

0:23:40.373 --> 0:23:43.413
<v Speaker 3>onshore wind. They're both the same product. Why do you

0:23:43.453 --> 0:23:44.493
<v Speaker 3>pay more for one.

0:23:44.333 --> 0:23:44.773
<v Speaker 2>Than the other?

0:23:46.133 --> 0:23:48.293
<v Speaker 3>Why do you pay more than the market price, which

0:23:48.333 --> 0:23:50.693
<v Speaker 3>is coal fired generation or nuclear?

0:23:51.853 --> 0:23:56.813
<v Speaker 2>Are you familiar with the name David Leggetts vaguely Director

0:23:56.853 --> 0:24:00.773
<v Speaker 2>of Research and Education for the Cornwall Alliance for the

0:24:00.773 --> 0:24:05.013
<v Speaker 2>Stewardship of Creation. He's a retired professor of climatology at

0:24:05.053 --> 0:24:09.413
<v Speaker 2>the University of Delaware and he's involved with the various organizations.

0:24:09.493 --> 0:24:13.653
<v Speaker 2>I read this, I read this this morning. Over the years,

0:24:13.813 --> 0:24:17.213
<v Speaker 2>even before I joined the Cordwell Alliance, I received numerous

0:24:17.213 --> 0:24:20.693
<v Speaker 2>complaints from people sending me emails who I believe are

0:24:20.773 --> 0:24:24.973
<v Speaker 2>well meaning that take issue that take issue with my

0:24:25.053 --> 0:24:28.893
<v Speaker 2>position on carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas, as a pollutant,

0:24:29.373 --> 0:24:32.493
<v Speaker 2>and as the single most existential threat to the planet

0:24:32.493 --> 0:24:34.893
<v Speaker 2>as a whole. First, he says, let me state for

0:24:34.933 --> 0:24:39.733
<v Speaker 2>the record that I do not believe that carbon dioxide, methane,

0:24:39.773 --> 0:24:44.293
<v Speaker 2>and nitrous oxide are existential threats to the planet, nor

0:24:44.333 --> 0:24:47.733
<v Speaker 2>are they reasonable threats of any kind. Second, let me

0:24:47.813 --> 0:24:49.973
<v Speaker 2>also state for the record that I do not believe

0:24:50.013 --> 0:24:53.973
<v Speaker 2>carbon dioxide is a pollutant. In fact, if all life

0:24:54.053 --> 0:24:58.173
<v Speaker 2>on Earth ceased to exist, our atmosphere would lose all

0:24:58.253 --> 0:25:01.653
<v Speaker 2>its oxygen content, and the proportion of carbon dioxide in

0:25:01.693 --> 0:25:06.573
<v Speaker 2>our atmosphere would increase above ninety five percent. So what

0:25:06.733 --> 0:25:09.733
<v Speaker 2>he writes, and then goes on, look, I have to

0:25:09.773 --> 0:25:13.133
<v Speaker 2>say this. I've said it before, but in that debate

0:25:13.173 --> 0:25:15.493
<v Speaker 2>that was held by Sky Television and back in two

0:25:15.533 --> 0:25:22.133
<v Speaker 2>thousand and seven, the television debate after showing the first

0:25:24.013 --> 0:25:27.413
<v Speaker 2>climate scam movie, a bunch of us sat around a

0:25:27.413 --> 0:25:35.893
<v Speaker 2>couple of professors Greenie and myself and another another professor

0:25:36.253 --> 0:25:38.573
<v Speaker 2>who was sort of who was on my team if

0:25:38.613 --> 0:25:42.813
<v Speaker 2>you like. And at the end of that I was

0:25:42.893 --> 0:25:47.653
<v Speaker 2>asked for the last words and my comment was simple,

0:25:49.133 --> 0:25:54.413
<v Speaker 2>CO two is not a pollutant. End of story, and

0:25:55.133 --> 0:25:57.453
<v Speaker 2>everyone reckon we run that won the debate, but the

0:25:58.013 --> 0:26:00.813
<v Speaker 2>point being that that has been around for a long time,

0:26:01.213 --> 0:26:04.013
<v Speaker 2>but it's not a pollutant. But it doesn't get much

0:26:04.053 --> 0:26:05.693
<v Speaker 2>traction in mainstream.

0:26:09.093 --> 0:26:11.173
<v Speaker 3>If you look on the stuff website, it will not

0:26:11.373 --> 0:26:15.453
<v Speaker 3>publish anything that questions man made global warming.

0:26:16.653 --> 0:26:22.093
<v Speaker 2>Well stuff are stuffed. Yeah, no no interest in them

0:26:22.413 --> 0:26:26.773
<v Speaker 2>except for the people I know there. Now, is there

0:26:26.813 --> 0:26:28.373
<v Speaker 2>any any more you want to hit on?

0:26:29.813 --> 0:26:29.893
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:26:30.293 --> 0:26:33.613
<v Speaker 3>No, I think if everybody realizes that we are in

0:26:33.613 --> 0:26:37.213
<v Speaker 3>a more serious situation and hitting words and that they

0:26:37.213 --> 0:26:42.413
<v Speaker 3>should be okay, loving their MP for more guts, that's it.

0:26:42.373 --> 0:26:44.293
<v Speaker 2>All right. No, I've got I've got, I've got a

0:26:44.293 --> 0:26:47.653
<v Speaker 2>bit more. If I can tell me something, If you

0:26:47.773 --> 0:26:53.853
<v Speaker 2>were to debate the appropriate people, and I make it plural,

0:26:54.213 --> 0:26:59.533
<v Speaker 2>the appropriate pleep, the appropriate people in an open debate

0:27:00.333 --> 0:27:03.453
<v Speaker 2>on this subject, who who is it? And I'm talking

0:27:03.493 --> 0:27:07.173
<v Speaker 2>government people, Who is it? That you would be either

0:27:07.293 --> 0:27:12.613
<v Speaker 2>wanting or find yourself debating with I'm not sure it's

0:27:12.693 --> 0:27:16.573
<v Speaker 2>an amorphous mob. Would it would have to be the minister,

0:27:16.613 --> 0:27:17.573
<v Speaker 2>would it not? For a start?

0:27:17.773 --> 0:27:22.333
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think the minister would be the obvious one.

0:27:22.413 --> 0:27:25.213
<v Speaker 3>And he seems to believe in it, And I would

0:27:25.213 --> 0:27:28.453
<v Speaker 3>simply ask him what evidence does he have other than

0:27:29.293 --> 0:27:33.253
<v Speaker 3>climate models and the consensus of scientists, which is worthless,

0:27:34.013 --> 0:27:37.133
<v Speaker 3>that man made greenhouse gases caused dangerous global warming?

0:27:37.613 --> 0:27:41.853
<v Speaker 2>Why that's the question. And they won't answer it because

0:27:41.893 --> 0:27:44.453
<v Speaker 2>they can't. And I've been through that same experience for

0:27:44.533 --> 0:27:48.653
<v Speaker 2>years now. Why is it that they can't answer it?

0:27:48.773 --> 0:27:54.613
<v Speaker 3>Because nobody has produced convincing evidence based on real world data,

0:27:54.773 --> 0:27:59.133
<v Speaker 3>not climate models, that man made greenhouse gases caused dangerous

0:27:59.133 --> 0:28:01.653
<v Speaker 3>global warming. Nobody as far as like a Maya in

0:28:01.693 --> 0:28:04.733
<v Speaker 3>the world. We put up a ten thousand dollars prize

0:28:04.733 --> 0:28:07.213
<v Speaker 3>for someone who could provide the information.

0:28:07.333 --> 0:28:11.693
<v Speaker 2>We got no takers. No, you didn't. I recall in fact,

0:28:11.693 --> 0:28:16.333
<v Speaker 2>I've made a contribution to that. Yeah, then what are

0:28:16.373 --> 0:28:19.613
<v Speaker 2>we doing? What are we doing with ministers, be they

0:28:19.653 --> 0:28:24.133
<v Speaker 2>ministers of climate or whatever they are, who are totally

0:28:24.253 --> 0:28:27.733
<v Speaker 2>unwilling to have an open discussion about the rights and

0:28:27.773 --> 0:28:30.933
<v Speaker 2>wrongs of their ministry.

0:28:31.013 --> 0:28:34.413
<v Speaker 3>The best thing, I think, and I'm not necessary, right,

0:28:35.253 --> 0:28:38.573
<v Speaker 3>is just to hammer on about the excessive costs of

0:28:39.253 --> 0:28:42.693
<v Speaker 3>net zero. How are we squandering all this money? We

0:28:42.733 --> 0:28:45.853
<v Speaker 3>can't make a difference to climate. Everybody else is falling

0:28:45.853 --> 0:28:48.013
<v Speaker 3>by the wayside and ignoring their obligations.

0:28:48.093 --> 0:28:49.533
<v Speaker 2>Oh, but we've got to do our little bit.

0:28:50.573 --> 0:28:52.973
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well you've got to persuade them that we can't

0:28:52.973 --> 0:28:55.973
<v Speaker 3>afford to do our little bit. And one of my

0:28:56.093 --> 0:28:59.973
<v Speaker 3>projects is to try and make up a list of

0:29:00.053 --> 0:29:02.693
<v Speaker 3>all the what it does cost us. And I'm sure

0:29:02.773 --> 0:29:05.773
<v Speaker 3>it's something like two to five billion dollars a year.

0:29:06.333 --> 0:29:12.133
<v Speaker 2>Well, I absolutely nothing when you get it. When you

0:29:12.213 --> 0:29:15.173
<v Speaker 2>come to that number, let me know I will. In

0:29:15.213 --> 0:29:18.893
<v Speaker 2>the meantime, spread the word, folks, is the only thing

0:29:18.933 --> 0:29:22.813
<v Speaker 2>that I mean. Just tell people send this interview to

0:29:22.893 --> 0:29:25.533
<v Speaker 2>everyone you know, even if you think they won't listen

0:29:25.533 --> 0:29:30.213
<v Speaker 2>to it. That's my comment, Brian, good to talk to you.

0:29:30.253 --> 0:29:32.693
<v Speaker 2>Good to talk to you too, and you keep flying

0:29:32.693 --> 0:29:55.373
<v Speaker 2>the flag. Hi gave. Bucklin is a natural oral vaccine

0:29:55.453 --> 0:29:58.493
<v Speaker 2>in a tablet form called bacterial I say it it'll

0:29:58.493 --> 0:30:02.093
<v Speaker 2>boost your natural protection against bacterial infections. In your chest

0:30:02.173 --> 0:30:05.413
<v Speaker 2>and throat. A three day course of seven Bucklelan tablets

0:30:05.413 --> 0:30:07.573
<v Speaker 2>will help your body build up to three months of

0:30:07.693 --> 0:30:12.493
<v Speaker 2>immunity against bugs which cause bacterial cold symptoms. So who

0:30:12.493 --> 0:30:15.333
<v Speaker 2>can take buccolan well the whole family From two years

0:30:15.333 --> 0:30:18.533
<v Speaker 2>of age and upwards. A course of Buckolan tablets offers

0:30:18.613 --> 0:30:22.253
<v Speaker 2>cost effective and safe protection from colds and chills. Protection

0:30:22.373 --> 0:30:25.853
<v Speaker 2>becomes effective a few days after you take buccolan and

0:30:26.013 --> 0:30:28.773
<v Speaker 2>lasts for up to three months following the three day course.

0:30:29.333 --> 0:30:32.053
<v Speaker 2>Buccolan can be taken throughout the cold season, over winter,

0:30:32.373 --> 0:30:34.973
<v Speaker 2>or all the year round. And remember Buckelan is not

0:30:35.053 --> 0:30:38.933
<v Speaker 2>intended as an alternative to influenza vaccination, but may be

0:30:39.093 --> 0:30:42.813
<v Speaker 2>used along with the flu vaccination for added protection. And

0:30:42.933 --> 0:30:45.573
<v Speaker 2>keep in mind that millions of doses have been taken

0:30:45.613 --> 0:30:49.573
<v Speaker 2>by Kiwis for over fifty years. Only available from your pharmacist.

0:30:49.853 --> 0:30:53.213
<v Speaker 2>Always read the label and users directed and see your

0:30:53.213 --> 0:31:01.933
<v Speaker 2>doctor if systems persist. Farmer Broker au Clumb Jody Brunning

0:31:02.653 --> 0:31:07.133
<v Speaker 2>is a trustee of Physicians and Scientists for Global Responsibility.

0:31:08.373 --> 0:31:12.693
<v Speaker 2>Primary research focus is on the relationship between governance policy

0:31:13.293 --> 0:31:18.493
<v Speaker 2>and the production of scientific technical knowledge for public good

0:31:19.093 --> 0:31:22.773
<v Speaker 2>and she is a prolific worker in this field, and

0:31:22.853 --> 0:31:25.973
<v Speaker 2>I have great admiration for her. Now, for those who

0:31:26.093 --> 0:31:33.853
<v Speaker 2>are unfamiliar, PSGR physicians and scientists for Global Responsibility, and

0:31:34.373 --> 0:31:38.173
<v Speaker 2>they have been well. They were formulated about around about

0:31:38.733 --> 0:31:43.653
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety nine, I think or two thousand, am I right, Yes,

0:31:43.693 --> 0:31:46.573
<v Speaker 2>you are very good. One question that I want to

0:31:47.013 --> 0:31:51.653
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you how political is the organization?

0:31:52.053 --> 0:31:54.973
<v Speaker 2>What political leaning might PSGR have.

0:31:56.453 --> 0:31:56.933
<v Speaker 4>Well, to be.

0:31:56.893 --> 0:31:59.533
<v Speaker 5>Honest, when we have our agms, which is when we

0:31:59.613 --> 0:32:04.093
<v Speaker 5>come together, the trustees come together, we simply don't actually

0:32:04.373 --> 0:32:05.253
<v Speaker 5>talk about it.

0:32:05.893 --> 0:32:08.013
<v Speaker 4>I guess it's because.

0:32:08.173 --> 0:32:11.373
<v Speaker 5>We are looking at health and we're looking at policy,

0:32:11.653 --> 0:32:15.693
<v Speaker 5>and I guess both national or labor tend to move

0:32:15.773 --> 0:32:21.693
<v Speaker 5>forward in a relatively amorphous fashion, so there is no

0:32:21.813 --> 0:32:27.573
<v Speaker 5>discussion around that. I guess that's the most honest answer

0:32:28.733 --> 0:32:32.373
<v Speaker 5>we get. And we're very limited in how we actually

0:32:32.413 --> 0:32:36.013
<v Speaker 5>approach ministers. I guess I may have briefly spoken to

0:32:36.493 --> 0:32:42.373
<v Speaker 5>email Steve Abel recently, but it's to thank him for

0:32:42.493 --> 0:32:44.173
<v Speaker 5>the work on Select Committee.

0:32:44.173 --> 0:32:46.373
<v Speaker 4>But we really don't do much.

0:32:47.453 --> 0:32:49.853
<v Speaker 2>The reason I asked the question is because we have

0:32:49.893 --> 0:32:54.093
<v Speaker 2>all become well, lots of us have become more deeply

0:32:54.133 --> 0:32:58.613
<v Speaker 2>involved with foreign politics then we might have once been.

0:32:59.493 --> 0:33:02.133
<v Speaker 2>And when it comes to America, of course, there is

0:33:02.653 --> 0:33:05.533
<v Speaker 2>a very much there's a great deal of muck breaking

0:33:05.573 --> 0:33:09.733
<v Speaker 2>that goes on, a great deal of bias and shall

0:33:09.773 --> 0:33:13.933
<v Speaker 2>we say, illegalities. And we like to think that in

0:33:13.933 --> 0:33:16.733
<v Speaker 2>this country we're pretty clean. But I have a feeling

0:33:16.813 --> 0:33:20.213
<v Speaker 2>that things have muddied a little more than they should

0:33:20.213 --> 0:33:23.653
<v Speaker 2>have in some areas, this being one of them, science

0:33:23.653 --> 0:33:27.493
<v Speaker 2>and medicine. And I guess part of the reason for that,

0:33:27.733 --> 0:33:30.013
<v Speaker 2>very strong part of the reason for that way of

0:33:30.013 --> 0:33:33.253
<v Speaker 2>thinking is what we went through in the last few years,

0:33:33.533 --> 0:33:36.293
<v Speaker 2>how we were dealt with, how the crisis was dealt with,

0:33:36.573 --> 0:33:41.053
<v Speaker 2>and what we now know that we were told was

0:33:41.093 --> 0:33:43.413
<v Speaker 2>a no no back during that period.

0:33:43.533 --> 0:33:48.293
<v Speaker 5>You say, look, absolutely, as I have said on this

0:33:48.493 --> 0:33:51.773
<v Speaker 5>Daily Telegraph article, the New Zealand style of government is

0:33:51.813 --> 0:33:56.413
<v Speaker 5>already authoritarian. That's a direct quote from Sir Jeffrey Palmer

0:33:56.413 --> 0:34:01.613
<v Speaker 5>and Andrew Butler Casey. There are no formal constitutional constraints.

0:34:01.653 --> 0:34:04.573
<v Speaker 5>New Zealand has one House of Parliament, which is the

0:34:04.613 --> 0:34:09.093
<v Speaker 5>House of Representatives, of course, and the executive dominates cabinet

0:34:09.133 --> 0:34:15.133
<v Speaker 5>has almost total gemony over parliamentary process. For example, our

0:34:15.173 --> 0:34:20.333
<v Speaker 5>Attorney General General has six ministerial hats. The executive you know,

0:34:20.373 --> 0:34:24.533
<v Speaker 5>the ministries and agencies create the reports for the Select Committee.

0:34:24.573 --> 0:34:29.453
<v Speaker 5>The Select committees have basically no sort of no powers

0:34:29.533 --> 0:34:35.133
<v Speaker 5>to do their own inquisitive inquiry. New Zealand is extraordinarily,

0:34:35.173 --> 0:34:39.133
<v Speaker 5>extraordinarily vulnerable to despotism.

0:34:39.413 --> 0:34:41.533
<v Speaker 2>I would say more so than Australia.

0:34:42.733 --> 0:34:44.493
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think so because we only have one House

0:34:44.533 --> 0:34:50.453
<v Speaker 5>of Parliament and remember our Australia, the Queensland has one

0:34:50.453 --> 0:34:52.933
<v Speaker 5>House of Parliament, which is the state with one House

0:34:52.933 --> 0:34:56.773
<v Speaker 5>of Parliment, and that's in Australia. That's where a lot

0:34:56.773 --> 0:35:01.093
<v Speaker 5>of the COVID laws, the federal the state laws could

0:35:01.173 --> 0:35:03.213
<v Speaker 5>be then they could be sort of cut and pasted

0:35:03.253 --> 0:35:08.333
<v Speaker 5>from Queensland's initiative and so we were super vulnerable basically,

0:35:08.413 --> 0:35:14.133
<v Speaker 5>And because our academia are now largely politically silent, our

0:35:14.293 --> 0:35:17.333
<v Speaker 5>scientists have been silenced because the fund the threat of

0:35:17.373 --> 0:35:22.093
<v Speaker 5>no funding prevents political inquiry that dare I say, into

0:35:22.533 --> 0:35:29.293
<v Speaker 5>technologies that are unsafe and perhaps for me, when I

0:35:29.333 --> 0:35:33.773
<v Speaker 5>saw that May Act created overnight by the Attorney General

0:35:33.893 --> 0:35:38.973
<v Speaker 5>David Parker in twenty twenty and it didn't have the

0:35:39.013 --> 0:35:40.933
<v Speaker 5>protection of people it couldn't.

0:35:41.333 --> 0:35:43.213
<v Speaker 4>It couldn't discern.

0:35:42.773 --> 0:35:48.373
<v Speaker 5>Between a healthy person being safe and someone being at risk.

0:35:48.413 --> 0:35:49.333
<v Speaker 4>And it also.

0:35:49.093 --> 0:35:54.133
<v Speaker 5>Couldn't discern the difference between cases and infection rates and

0:35:54.213 --> 0:35:58.373
<v Speaker 5>actually the risk of hospitalization and death. And that legislation

0:35:58.413 --> 0:36:03.053
<v Speaker 5>could be just draw drawn up, put in overnight, and

0:36:03.293 --> 0:36:07.333
<v Speaker 5>that was okay, And it showed me that we're very

0:36:07.413 --> 0:36:10.853
<v Speaker 5>vulnerable to the next emergency or false flag event.

0:36:11.093 --> 0:36:14.893
<v Speaker 2>It shouldn't have become as any surprise, considering that the

0:36:14.933 --> 0:36:18.013
<v Speaker 2>distinction between a man and a woman was something else

0:36:18.053 --> 0:36:19.013
<v Speaker 2>they lost track of.

0:36:19.493 --> 0:36:23.133
<v Speaker 5>Well, it shows that we're sort of, I guess, a

0:36:23.173 --> 0:36:28.093
<v Speaker 5>bit ideologically vulnerable to the themes of the day that

0:36:29.173 --> 0:36:33.493
<v Speaker 5>seem to drift through the Anglo the Anglo nations in

0:36:33.573 --> 0:36:38.293
<v Speaker 5>particular at the Commonwealth nations. So where where whe're sort

0:36:38.293 --> 0:36:42.253
<v Speaker 5>of see it almost seems as if the central parties

0:36:42.253 --> 0:36:45.253
<v Speaker 5>are being spoon fed the same stuff. And of course

0:36:45.253 --> 0:36:51.333
<v Speaker 5>it always has to it could never contradict large global

0:36:51.413 --> 0:36:57.573
<v Speaker 5>corporations either, So they're sort of fulfilling these global patterns

0:36:58.013 --> 0:37:04.533
<v Speaker 5>which we can all possibly recognize similar patterns that.

0:37:03.293 --> 0:37:04.133
<v Speaker 4>That conform to it.

0:37:04.213 --> 0:37:06.253
<v Speaker 5>I used to be what I called woke, and now

0:37:06.373 --> 0:37:11.253
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking at what we call woe. And it's really

0:37:11.293 --> 0:37:13.693
<v Speaker 5>difficult because we haven't been taught to look critically.

0:37:13.773 --> 0:37:15.493
<v Speaker 4>We've been taught to assemble.

0:37:15.013 --> 0:37:19.213
<v Speaker 5>Information and put it in a place, but the veracity

0:37:19.253 --> 0:37:24.293
<v Speaker 5>of that information, whether it's good qualityduced to it, and

0:37:24.333 --> 0:37:27.133
<v Speaker 5>that's what our young people and I don't think I

0:37:27.253 --> 0:37:30.893
<v Speaker 5>myself has taught that at high school or university either

0:37:31.133 --> 0:37:34.053
<v Speaker 5>to start to really look critically at who produced the

0:37:34.093 --> 0:37:38.973
<v Speaker 5>information and were there any conflicts political or financial of interests.

0:37:39.133 --> 0:37:40.653
<v Speaker 4>I think we haven't done that correctly.

0:37:41.333 --> 0:37:43.773
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's had a long grounding, then, hasn't it The

0:37:43.853 --> 0:37:47.133
<v Speaker 2>ignorance I'm talking Let me quote this the beginning of

0:37:47.173 --> 0:37:49.853
<v Speaker 2>the article that you published a couple of days ago,

0:37:50.173 --> 0:37:53.213
<v Speaker 2>which is really what we're here to discuss. In the

0:37:53.253 --> 0:37:58.293
<v Speaker 2>main anyway, a remarkable situation has arisen in New Zealand.

0:37:58.453 --> 0:38:03.413
<v Speaker 2>The agency tasks with economic growth that controls the science

0:38:03.493 --> 0:38:07.413
<v Speaker 2>funding budget, wants to have the power of administering the

0:38:07.493 --> 0:38:12.853
<v Speaker 2>legislation that would steward the very technologies that it directly

0:38:12.893 --> 0:38:18.253
<v Speaker 2>funds scientists to produce. It is the most perfect form

0:38:18.253 --> 0:38:21.013
<v Speaker 2>of vertical integration, and it says a lot about the

0:38:21.013 --> 0:38:26.773
<v Speaker 2>biggest risk to democracy, the concentration and centralization of power.

0:38:27.853 --> 0:38:29.493
<v Speaker 2>Now there's more I'd like to read, and I might

0:38:29.533 --> 0:38:33.093
<v Speaker 2>get to it shortly, but just looking at that first paragraph,

0:38:33.213 --> 0:38:37.533
<v Speaker 2>the concentration and centralization of power, Now this is a

0:38:37.613 --> 0:38:41.693
<v Speaker 2>what we're discussing here as a scientific field. Is it

0:38:41.773 --> 0:38:46.293
<v Speaker 2>not a surprise that that's the area where this leverage

0:38:47.013 --> 0:38:52.533
<v Speaker 2>seems to be growing as opposed to other matters of politics.

0:38:55.173 --> 0:38:58.213
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure about that, because when you look at

0:38:58.253 --> 0:39:01.773
<v Speaker 5>what's happened to statsin z for example, they're seeming to

0:39:02.133 --> 0:39:09.413
<v Speaker 5>concentrate power through harmonizing ID numbers across news nilands landscape,

0:39:09.453 --> 0:39:12.693
<v Speaker 5>and we're seeing that happening in the information sharing agreements.

0:39:13.293 --> 0:39:14.693
<v Speaker 4>But it's often I.

0:39:14.653 --> 0:39:17.493
<v Speaker 5>Guess the pattern that is the similar A similar pattern

0:39:17.533 --> 0:39:23.053
<v Speaker 5>there is the technology has become scalable to such an

0:39:23.133 --> 0:39:27.253
<v Speaker 5>extent that it can be done. So I guess I

0:39:27.853 --> 0:39:31.973
<v Speaker 5>have to perhaps I now agree with you, because we

0:39:32.053 --> 0:39:37.173
<v Speaker 5>can produce, for example, gene edited technologies and organisms that

0:39:37.253 --> 0:39:41.413
<v Speaker 5>can be scaled up in a massive place. Whe're then

0:39:41.533 --> 0:39:44.653
<v Speaker 5>seeing the concentration of power to enable that further, so

0:39:44.693 --> 0:39:49.093
<v Speaker 5>we're seeing what I called their vertical integration. It's the

0:39:49.333 --> 0:39:54.573
<v Speaker 5>economic growth agency responsible for trying to increase the amount

0:39:54.613 --> 0:39:59.293
<v Speaker 5>of inventions that go into out into the ether, that

0:39:59.333 --> 0:40:02.933
<v Speaker 5>hopefully make money, and that've taken it upon it themselves.

0:40:03.093 --> 0:40:05.133
<v Speaker 5>That it's just sort of like they said to the APAA,

0:40:05.213 --> 0:40:07.933
<v Speaker 5>So we're going to take control of producing the new

0:40:08.733 --> 0:40:14.453
<v Speaker 5>legislation for GMOs because gene edited techniques and organisms are

0:40:14.893 --> 0:40:19.933
<v Speaker 5>genetically modified. These they produce genetically modified organisms. Gene edited

0:40:21.013 --> 0:40:24.773
<v Speaker 5>organisms are one subset of that, so we shouldn't be

0:40:24.813 --> 0:40:28.693
<v Speaker 5>deceived by pretending there's something else. So it's yeah, it's

0:40:29.413 --> 0:40:32.253
<v Speaker 5>pretty crazy, it's really crazy.

0:40:32.653 --> 0:40:34.253
<v Speaker 2>I want to quote you a bit more of yourself

0:40:34.333 --> 0:40:37.373
<v Speaker 2>because I was impressed with it. The New Zealand public

0:40:37.413 --> 0:40:41.853
<v Speaker 2>is growing increasingly skeptical about the capacity for democratic institutions

0:40:41.893 --> 0:40:46.013
<v Speaker 2>to put our best interest at heart. Conventions and processes

0:40:46.053 --> 0:40:49.533
<v Speaker 2>are in place to ensure that these institutions are transparent

0:40:50.493 --> 0:40:55.333
<v Speaker 2>and accountable. Public good policy requires that the information underpinning

0:40:55.373 --> 0:40:59.493
<v Speaker 2>decision making is of the best possible standard, which is

0:40:59.493 --> 0:41:01.733
<v Speaker 2>always a very vague term as far as I'm concerned.

0:41:02.253 --> 0:41:06.733
<v Speaker 2>But what if those processes are bypassed, if processes of

0:41:06.853 --> 0:41:11.253
<v Speaker 2>knowledge gathering un the what if scientists and researchers have

0:41:11.373 --> 0:41:15.333
<v Speaker 2>become so hemmed in by tightly controlled policy, that they're

0:41:15.413 --> 0:41:17.853
<v Speaker 2>more like pawn's in a chess game rather than truth

0:41:17.893 --> 0:41:22.013
<v Speaker 2>seekers driven by curiosity to expand knowledge for the betterment

0:41:22.053 --> 0:41:26.213
<v Speaker 2>of society. How does this entrapment of science come out

0:41:26.213 --> 0:41:28.013
<v Speaker 2>in the wash? Take it from there.

0:41:29.373 --> 0:41:32.453
<v Speaker 5>So the Ministry for Business and in Innovation and Employment

0:41:32.653 --> 0:41:36.413
<v Speaker 5>MV is quite interesting. They gained their powers through secondary legislation.

0:41:36.893 --> 0:41:39.013
<v Speaker 4>They did not hold it.

0:41:40.053 --> 0:41:42.373
<v Speaker 2>So what is secondary legislation.

0:41:43.693 --> 0:41:51.173
<v Speaker 5>So when traditionally when a ministry is it comes into being,

0:41:51.693 --> 0:41:54.853
<v Speaker 5>it's through a primary active legislation and that has a

0:41:54.893 --> 0:41:57.293
<v Speaker 5>purpose and purpose says you must do this, this, and this.

0:41:57.733 --> 0:41:59.293
<v Speaker 4>There's no such purpose for MV.

0:41:59.733 --> 0:42:04.453
<v Speaker 5>They came into into power through an Order in Council

0:42:05.093 --> 0:42:10.453
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twelve and the legislation that produced MB gave

0:42:10.573 --> 0:42:14.413
<v Speaker 5>them the powers over the science enterprise. So this did

0:42:14.453 --> 0:42:20.813
<v Speaker 5>not go through Parliament, so then MB could control the science.

0:42:20.853 --> 0:42:23.093
<v Speaker 5>So that was twenty twelve, and by twenty fourteen they

0:42:23.253 --> 0:42:26.893
<v Speaker 5>released the National Statement of Science Investment. That was twenty

0:42:27.213 --> 0:42:29.093
<v Speaker 5>and so that was the plan from twenty fifteen to

0:42:29.133 --> 0:42:32.813
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty five and the subject of my master's thesis

0:42:32.813 --> 0:42:39.293
<v Speaker 5>of sociology research project and I interviewed scientists, professors, associate

0:42:39.333 --> 0:42:44.213
<v Speaker 5>professors looking at health research policy, and I was able

0:42:44.253 --> 0:42:49.933
<v Speaker 5>to identify that this national Statement of Science Investment, which

0:42:50.373 --> 0:42:59.493
<v Speaker 5>prioritized innovation, basically produced the desire or the requirement that

0:42:59.533 --> 0:43:03.973
<v Speaker 5>if you're applying for funding in New Zealand, you must

0:43:04.013 --> 0:43:10.573
<v Speaker 5>be assuring the funding committees, which are peer scientists, that

0:43:10.653 --> 0:43:12.533
<v Speaker 5>you are going to produce an innovation.

0:43:13.573 --> 0:43:13.973
<v Speaker 4>And that.

0:43:15.493 --> 0:43:21.613
<v Speaker 5>Entrapped scientists because it required them to look for patents

0:43:21.733 --> 0:43:28.013
<v Speaker 5>and internet and produce intellectual property rights and IP and

0:43:28.253 --> 0:43:33.973
<v Speaker 5>it required that they would not One of the requirements

0:43:34.053 --> 0:43:37.133
<v Speaker 5>was that the science would be excellent. So every scientist

0:43:37.173 --> 0:43:40.853
<v Speaker 5>knows if you're an electrical engineer, you will understand a

0:43:40.853 --> 0:43:44.693
<v Speaker 5>certain form of excellence. If you're a cancer researcher, you'll

0:43:44.853 --> 0:43:48.253
<v Speaker 5>understand a certain form of excellence. Excellence is something that

0:43:48.333 --> 0:43:52.133
<v Speaker 5>you agree with in a tiny subset of a particular discipline.

0:43:52.453 --> 0:43:55.933
<v Speaker 5>So the requirement for excellence and innovation meant that all

0:43:55.973 --> 0:43:57.933
<v Speaker 5>of a sudden you had a lot more applied science,

0:43:58.133 --> 0:44:01.613
<v Speaker 5>a lot less basic science being undertaken. It was much

0:44:01.653 --> 0:44:05.413
<v Speaker 5>more difficult to apply for science for basic research, which

0:44:05.773 --> 0:44:09.893
<v Speaker 5>is what we know is the curiosity driven research, and

0:44:10.013 --> 0:44:13.853
<v Speaker 5>often that basic research is where we find the problems,

0:44:14.173 --> 0:44:17.213
<v Speaker 5>where we understand, for example, what that exposure to that

0:44:17.293 --> 0:44:22.813
<v Speaker 5>chemical or that emission might do to the biological cell,

0:44:22.933 --> 0:44:27.613
<v Speaker 5>the human body, the waterway, and that's how we understand, oh,

0:44:27.653 --> 0:44:30.373
<v Speaker 5>we need to regulate it in a certain way. So

0:44:30.573 --> 0:44:33.373
<v Speaker 5>right now we don't have any of that sort of science.

0:44:33.733 --> 0:44:38.653
<v Speaker 5>So it's no prize that when you identify something that

0:44:38.733 --> 0:44:41.533
<v Speaker 5>is causing harm you then look for the scientist or

0:44:41.573 --> 0:44:47.173
<v Speaker 5>the scientific group the researching that harm. That you will

0:44:47.213 --> 0:44:51.773
<v Speaker 5>not find that in New Zealand today. So then when

0:44:51.813 --> 0:44:55.493
<v Speaker 5>I say pawns in a chess game, it means that

0:44:56.133 --> 0:45:01.453
<v Speaker 5>the basic science that is decided on what our big

0:45:01.533 --> 0:45:07.333
<v Speaker 5>missions are, that is politically decided by MB by the

0:45:07.373 --> 0:45:11.693
<v Speaker 5>menace and in all by their I guess that the

0:45:11.693 --> 0:45:16.133
<v Speaker 5>political scientists such as Sir Peter Blackman that worked for

0:45:16.173 --> 0:45:21.013
<v Speaker 5>them and who who themselves will have their own you know,

0:45:21.053 --> 0:45:24.173
<v Speaker 5>their own babies, their own areas that they really want

0:45:24.213 --> 0:45:27.773
<v Speaker 5>to progress. So we have very narrow forms of basic

0:45:27.813 --> 0:45:33.173
<v Speaker 5>science that's permitted, and we do not get scientists researching

0:45:33.733 --> 0:45:38.733
<v Speaker 5>the toxics, the you know, the EMF the toxics we

0:45:39.533 --> 0:45:44.733
<v Speaker 5>had after COVID finished, you know, in twenty twenty twenty three,

0:45:44.933 --> 0:45:47.413
<v Speaker 5>they were able to set aside twenty million dollars for

0:45:47.613 --> 0:45:50.493
<v Speaker 5>MR and A research. But of course we didn't even

0:45:50.493 --> 0:45:54.533
<v Speaker 5>see two million dollars for research on the mechanisms of

0:45:54.613 --> 0:46:00.493
<v Speaker 5>harm that can occur through injection with a vaccine that

0:46:01.013 --> 0:46:04.373
<v Speaker 5>itself is an MR and a gene edited biologic drum.

0:46:04.533 --> 0:46:09.573
<v Speaker 2>All right, So the leaning that they're taking is as

0:46:09.613 --> 0:46:11.293
<v Speaker 2>opposed to scientific.

0:46:11.773 --> 0:46:17.533
<v Speaker 5>Well, and to be fair, so if you're looking at

0:46:17.613 --> 0:46:23.893
<v Speaker 5>regulatory science, that is always socio political or socio scientific,

0:46:24.413 --> 0:46:30.933
<v Speaker 5>because regulatory scientists need to make everyone happy. And this

0:46:30.973 --> 0:46:36.933
<v Speaker 5>is why we often see regulation scientific information or the

0:46:37.053 --> 0:46:41.413
<v Speaker 5>information being used by regulatory scientists becoming more and more outdated,

0:46:41.973 --> 0:46:46.453
<v Speaker 5>no matter how quickly technology speeds, and we already see

0:46:46.453 --> 0:46:49.533
<v Speaker 5>with this gene technology build no capacity, for example, for

0:46:49.573 --> 0:46:54.853
<v Speaker 5>the regulator to actually have inquisitorial powers to understand, for example,

0:46:54.893 --> 0:47:01.253
<v Speaker 5>what ARI means, for the capacity for gene technology to

0:47:01.653 --> 0:47:06.173
<v Speaker 5>be released at scales to move more quickly, for many,

0:47:06.213 --> 0:47:11.053
<v Speaker 5>many more GMO gene edited organisms to be released into

0:47:11.093 --> 0:47:13.733
<v Speaker 5>the into the environment than previously.

0:47:14.333 --> 0:47:18.013
<v Speaker 4>And ultimately we were talking.

0:47:17.773 --> 0:47:22.493
<v Speaker 5>About the DSIR, which was disabled in nineteen ninety two.

0:47:23.293 --> 0:47:26.053
<v Speaker 5>It was replaced by another ministry that was then disabled

0:47:26.093 --> 0:47:30.093
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twelve, which was replaced by mb These minstry,

0:47:30.573 --> 0:47:35.093
<v Speaker 5>these ministries were more separate from because they were just science.

0:47:35.813 --> 0:47:44.573
<v Speaker 5>Once we had the whole science funding institutions stuck inside

0:47:44.613 --> 0:47:52.093
<v Speaker 5>the Ministry for Economic Growth, it became pervasively political because

0:47:52.093 --> 0:47:55.373
<v Speaker 5>that's economic growth. It can't do anything else but be

0:47:55.533 --> 0:47:59.413
<v Speaker 5>controubled by that minister, and that is the priority of

0:47:59.453 --> 0:48:00.093
<v Speaker 5>that minister.

0:48:00.973 --> 0:48:03.213
<v Speaker 2>Mbie otherwise known as Mimbi.

0:48:05.453 --> 0:48:10.693
<v Speaker 4>Who was the minister, the Honorable Judith Colins.

0:48:11.293 --> 0:48:14.493
<v Speaker 2>See, I couldn't. I couldn't. I went looking because I

0:48:14.573 --> 0:48:17.493
<v Speaker 2>wasn't I wasn't precisely or I wasn't sure, So I

0:48:17.533 --> 0:48:21.813
<v Speaker 2>went searching. I found plenty on memory, but I couldn't

0:48:21.853 --> 0:48:22.533
<v Speaker 2>find the minister.

0:48:23.573 --> 0:48:26.973
<v Speaker 5>So it's really this is why it's really diffuse and difficult.

0:48:26.973 --> 0:48:31.813
<v Speaker 5>So Collins was the minister, so I apologize. Collins was

0:48:31.853 --> 0:48:35.573
<v Speaker 5>the Minister for Science, So of course she's inside MB

0:48:35.773 --> 0:48:39.693
<v Speaker 5>as the Minister for silence science. And at the same

0:48:39.733 --> 0:48:42.453
<v Speaker 5>time she's the Attorney General, she's a King's Counsel, she's

0:48:42.493 --> 0:48:45.773
<v Speaker 5>the Minister for Defense, she's the Minister for digitizing government.

0:48:46.053 --> 0:48:48.373
<v Speaker 5>She was the Minister for Science and then she became

0:48:48.413 --> 0:48:51.613
<v Speaker 5>the Minister for Public Service. She's the Minister for the GCS,

0:48:52.093 --> 0:48:54.693
<v Speaker 5>the n z SIS and the Minister for Space. So

0:48:54.973 --> 0:48:57.093
<v Speaker 5>of course we've never ever in the history of New

0:48:57.173 --> 0:49:00.493
<v Speaker 5>Zealand had an Attorney General with that many ministerial hats,

0:49:01.013 --> 0:49:03.973
<v Speaker 5>and if we want to talk about centralizing government, that's

0:49:03.973 --> 0:49:09.333
<v Speaker 5>a whole other interview. And so she quick clique rushed

0:49:09.373 --> 0:49:14.413
<v Speaker 5>these reforms through and there are very clear moments where

0:49:14.453 --> 0:49:20.813
<v Speaker 5>you can see that she was ordering officials not to

0:49:20.853 --> 0:49:25.053
<v Speaker 5>do certain things. So, for example, MB in twenty twenty

0:49:25.093 --> 0:49:29.653
<v Speaker 5>four deliberately wrote out engagement with the public and that's

0:49:29.693 --> 0:49:34.413
<v Speaker 5>in the regulatory impact Statement on page thirteen, and then

0:49:34.453 --> 0:49:38.893
<v Speaker 5>they handpicked the technical Advisory Group and the stakeholders. Earlier,

0:49:39.413 --> 0:49:42.653
<v Speaker 5>the Productivity Commissioner in the Frontier Firms report had said,

0:49:43.213 --> 0:49:47.133
<v Speaker 5>if we're going to update the gene editing technology legislation,

0:49:47.853 --> 0:49:51.693
<v Speaker 5>we need early consultation with the public and with Maori.

0:49:52.933 --> 0:49:58.053
<v Speaker 5>The Productivity Commissioner was very clear, but at the minister's direction,

0:49:58.333 --> 0:50:03.773
<v Speaker 5>at the Attorney General's direction, that was prohibited. And similarly,

0:50:05.213 --> 0:50:10.493
<v Speaker 5>at ministerial direction, officials did not consider options for reforming.

0:50:10.533 --> 0:50:13.493
<v Speaker 5>There has no the hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act.

0:50:13.893 --> 0:50:17.773
<v Speaker 5>So Collins has said, no one is allowed to talk

0:50:17.813 --> 0:50:20.933
<v Speaker 5>about reforming that has no act. We've got because that

0:50:21.053 --> 0:50:25.733
<v Speaker 5>is of course under the control of the Department of Conservation,

0:50:26.133 --> 0:50:31.293
<v Speaker 5>I think, And it's of course that is stewarded. It's

0:50:31.333 --> 0:50:34.533
<v Speaker 5>administered by the Department of Conservation. But of course the

0:50:34.533 --> 0:50:38.133
<v Speaker 5>EPA has responsibility for it. So what would happen now

0:50:38.253 --> 0:50:42.293
<v Speaker 5>is MB would have responsibility for of course it's it's

0:50:42.333 --> 0:50:46.133
<v Speaker 5>designed the terribly drafted Primary Act. But then MB would

0:50:46.173 --> 0:50:48.893
<v Speaker 5>be responsible for all the secondary of legislation that could

0:50:48.933 --> 0:50:51.813
<v Speaker 5>tumble out, so it wouldn't be the EPA doing that work,

0:50:51.853 --> 0:50:54.573
<v Speaker 5>it would be MB. And so it's due to Collins

0:50:54.573 --> 0:50:57.533
<v Speaker 5>that said, we're not we're not considering options for reforming

0:50:57.573 --> 0:51:01.973
<v Speaker 5>that has no act. And Professor Jack Heineman has pointed

0:51:02.013 --> 0:51:07.173
<v Speaker 5>out that what are the costs of, for example, the

0:51:07.213 --> 0:51:09.773
<v Speaker 5>administration of the cur has no act compared to the

0:51:09.773 --> 0:51:14.813
<v Speaker 5>new legislation, which in this new legislation is so nebulous

0:51:14.853 --> 0:51:17.613
<v Speaker 5>that no one ever will understand where it starts and stops.

0:51:17.613 --> 0:51:19.693
<v Speaker 5>Whereas there has no act, actually has worked, it's a

0:51:19.733 --> 0:51:20.893
<v Speaker 5>nineteen ninety six act.

0:51:21.173 --> 0:51:23.293
<v Speaker 4>It's worked actually very very well.

0:51:24.093 --> 0:51:27.653
<v Speaker 5>For example, New Zealand has avoided all the superweeds that

0:51:27.813 --> 0:51:32.213
<v Speaker 5>America has because of the herbicide tolerant crops. So we've

0:51:32.533 --> 0:51:38.893
<v Speaker 5>avoided that bullet, shall we say, by our strict outside

0:51:40.133 --> 0:51:44.573
<v Speaker 5>we don't let GMOs freely into the environment. But it

0:51:44.693 --> 0:51:48.693
<v Speaker 5>is not a strict ban, and so this is also

0:51:48.893 --> 0:51:51.373
<v Speaker 5>the public have been somewhat misled because it hasn't been

0:51:51.373 --> 0:51:53.613
<v Speaker 5>a strict ban, but it has been a very strict

0:51:53.653 --> 0:51:55.333
<v Speaker 5>case by case assessment basis.

0:51:56.213 --> 0:52:01.093
<v Speaker 2>But there is no doubt. It appears or an expectation

0:52:01.253 --> 0:52:02.853
<v Speaker 2>is a is a better way to put it. It

0:52:02.933 --> 0:52:07.853
<v Speaker 2>is an expectation that some of what is happening in

0:52:07.853 --> 0:52:11.093
<v Speaker 2>the genet field will roll out into the into the wild,

0:52:11.173 --> 0:52:13.773
<v Speaker 2>so to speak, and will be then uncontrollable.

0:52:15.253 --> 0:52:22.173
<v Speaker 5>Yes, and I do believe that MP's have been misled

0:52:22.493 --> 0:52:28.653
<v Speaker 5>and deceived because they believe, and this is quoting a minister,

0:52:29.133 --> 0:52:33.893
<v Speaker 5>that these gene edited organisms will be completely different from

0:52:34.053 --> 0:52:39.893
<v Speaker 5>genetically modified organisms. They're still genetically modified organisms. So what

0:52:39.933 --> 0:52:43.453
<v Speaker 5>we've seen is we haven't seen any any science. So

0:52:43.813 --> 0:52:49.013
<v Speaker 5>you were talking before about science being politicized. Science is trustworthy,

0:52:50.053 --> 0:52:54.693
<v Speaker 5>like law is trustworthy if it follows good process, if

0:52:54.693 --> 0:53:00.773
<v Speaker 5>it follows conventions. This is why when a scientist writes

0:53:00.853 --> 0:53:03.773
<v Speaker 5>up a scientific paper, he or she has to write

0:53:03.853 --> 0:53:04.653
<v Speaker 5>up the methods.

0:53:05.253 --> 0:53:05.693
<v Speaker 4>We have to.

0:53:05.693 --> 0:53:10.253
<v Speaker 5>Understand what other information was looked up to produce the

0:53:10.693 --> 0:53:16.253
<v Speaker 5>information base on which this scientific project was made. And

0:53:16.293 --> 0:53:21.813
<v Speaker 5>then that scientists will declare the values. Is it going

0:53:21.813 --> 0:53:24.173
<v Speaker 5>to be a ninety five percent of probability? For example,

0:53:24.493 --> 0:53:27.893
<v Speaker 5>they will declare precise value, So it's the same for

0:53:29.053 --> 0:53:33.533
<v Speaker 5>governance and law and convention a value. If you look

0:53:33.533 --> 0:53:35.693
<v Speaker 5>at a value for you and me, it might be

0:53:35.933 --> 0:53:39.293
<v Speaker 5>are we protecting children? How do we protect children? Do

0:53:39.373 --> 0:53:42.773
<v Speaker 5>we protect children based on the potential that they could

0:53:42.813 --> 0:53:48.773
<v Speaker 5>be harmed by a genetically modified organism that might be inflammatory,

0:53:48.853 --> 0:53:51.853
<v Speaker 5>so it might cause harm over the long term if

0:53:51.893 --> 0:53:54.693
<v Speaker 5>they didn't know what they were eating and it became

0:53:54.733 --> 0:53:58.013
<v Speaker 5>a big part of their diet. Or are we going

0:53:58.053 --> 0:54:00.333
<v Speaker 5>to say we want to be very protective, so we

0:54:00.453 --> 0:54:04.453
<v Speaker 5>have to declare everything transparently. So I guess I'm mushing

0:54:04.533 --> 0:54:07.413
<v Speaker 5>things up here because I'm trying to get a lot.

0:54:08.573 --> 0:54:08.693
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:54:09.333 --> 0:54:10.133
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thank you.

0:54:10.533 --> 0:54:14.373
<v Speaker 5>So what we haven't seen we haven't we haven't seen

0:54:15.693 --> 0:54:21.213
<v Speaker 5>a robust risk assessment. So what Envy have done is

0:54:21.253 --> 0:54:25.333
<v Speaker 5>they produced a little like a stupid little, i'm going

0:54:25.413 --> 0:54:29.093
<v Speaker 5>to say, stupid little press release in about August twenty

0:54:29.093 --> 0:54:32.013
<v Speaker 5>twenty four. That was their scientific basis and that was

0:54:32.053 --> 0:54:37.573
<v Speaker 5>the last thing we saw before the actual bill was released.

0:54:38.013 --> 0:54:42.053
<v Speaker 5>And in that stupid little press release they said the

0:54:42.093 --> 0:54:44.173
<v Speaker 5>public aren't going to be consulted and they will have

0:54:44.213 --> 0:54:47.573
<v Speaker 5>their time to be consulted once the legislation, the bill

0:54:47.653 --> 0:54:52.093
<v Speaker 5>is released. Now. They also by then the government had

0:54:52.413 --> 0:54:56.933
<v Speaker 5>known that they had the regulatory Impact Statement, where ministers

0:54:56.973 --> 0:55:01.893
<v Speaker 5>themselves knew that there was not an assurance that the

0:55:02.013 --> 0:55:05.613
<v Speaker 5>future bill would be safe, that it would be do

0:55:05.733 --> 0:55:07.693
<v Speaker 5>the job it was meant to do, because there was

0:55:07.773 --> 0:55:12.613
<v Speaker 5>no there was no methods based procedural risk assessment to

0:55:12.853 --> 0:55:20.573
<v Speaker 5>understand the gene editing techniques, the gene editing organisms that

0:55:20.653 --> 0:55:23.613
<v Speaker 5>are going to be what's called risk tiered. They're going

0:55:23.653 --> 0:55:26.133
<v Speaker 5>to be put outside the legislation because they're going to

0:55:26.173 --> 0:55:31.053
<v Speaker 5>pretend they're pretending they're not GMOs. So they're saying these

0:55:31.093 --> 0:55:33.573
<v Speaker 5>are not a GMO because they don't, for example, produce

0:55:33.693 --> 0:55:37.853
<v Speaker 5>a protein. They're not looking at what DNA might still

0:55:37.893 --> 0:55:41.213
<v Speaker 5>be in those organisms. They're not looking at what might

0:55:41.213 --> 0:55:44.973
<v Speaker 5>have happened if they put they spliced DNA in, then

0:55:45.013 --> 0:55:48.333
<v Speaker 5>they took the DNA out and that resulted in a

0:55:48.373 --> 0:55:54.413
<v Speaker 5>reshuffling of the genome and then, for example, that organism

0:55:54.453 --> 0:55:57.413
<v Speaker 5>becomes more vulnerable to sickness or disease. But they don't

0:55:57.413 --> 0:56:00.413
<v Speaker 5>want to talk about that because they put the different

0:56:00.493 --> 0:56:03.973
<v Speaker 5>DNA in and they pulled it back out again, and

0:56:04.053 --> 0:56:07.653
<v Speaker 5>so they don't have to declare the DNA or the

0:56:07.733 --> 0:56:10.933
<v Speaker 5>foreign change because it's been taken out again. So it

0:56:10.933 --> 0:56:13.853
<v Speaker 5>becomes a little bit misleading, a little bit you can't understand.

0:56:13.893 --> 0:56:16.773
<v Speaker 5>So they're pretending that's not a GMO and that doesn't

0:56:16.813 --> 0:56:19.053
<v Speaker 5>have to be declared. It can be risked heered outside.

0:56:19.213 --> 0:56:21.653
<v Speaker 2>Well, hang on hold it. The term GMO was one

0:56:21.653 --> 0:56:25.773
<v Speaker 2>that's applied by it, that's invented, if you like, and applied. Yes,

0:56:25.813 --> 0:56:31.093
<v Speaker 2>So what you're saying is that as they've applied it

0:56:31.453 --> 0:56:34.093
<v Speaker 2>to one thing, they've now rearranged it and they've decided

0:56:34.133 --> 0:56:39.813
<v Speaker 2>to it's not science. It's not science, it's it's engineering driven.

0:56:40.573 --> 0:56:42.973
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a it's a shell game.

0:56:43.653 --> 0:56:46.213
<v Speaker 5>So if you look at the food stands as Australia

0:56:46.253 --> 0:56:50.853
<v Speaker 5>New Zealand, they're P one zero five five. It's a

0:56:50.973 --> 0:56:54.733
<v Speaker 5>current I think bill or change in proposed change in the.

0:56:55.173 --> 0:56:57.653
<v Speaker 4>Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act.

0:56:58.013 --> 0:57:02.733
<v Speaker 5>And they're proposing that certain classes are GMOs aren't GMOs anymore.

0:57:02.893 --> 0:57:05.013
<v Speaker 5>But if you go back and look over the last

0:57:05.053 --> 0:57:08.053
<v Speaker 5>ten years through all the white papers where they've done

0:57:08.093 --> 0:57:13.093
<v Speaker 5>the assessments of what these new gene edited organisms are

0:57:13.253 --> 0:57:16.413
<v Speaker 5>that might not involve an exact change to their DNA,

0:57:17.293 --> 0:57:21.493
<v Speaker 5>Oh so sorry, they don't produce a protein, they are

0:57:21.533 --> 0:57:24.693
<v Speaker 5>not a GMO, And so they're making that. They're producing

0:57:24.693 --> 0:57:27.973
<v Speaker 5>all these little white papers that don't have a ref

0:57:28.093 --> 0:57:30.813
<v Speaker 5>that that don't have any methods. They're not showing that

0:57:30.853 --> 0:57:34.653
<v Speaker 5>we're doing a review of the scientific literature to understand

0:57:34.853 --> 0:57:38.733
<v Speaker 5>what harm or risk may may arise. So food standards

0:57:38.733 --> 0:57:41.253
<v Speaker 5>have been doing that for the last decade. Then we've

0:57:41.253 --> 0:57:45.493
<v Speaker 5>seen MB do this that play the same trick. We're

0:57:45.493 --> 0:57:48.493
<v Speaker 5>not doing any methods based risk assessment, but we're going

0:57:48.533 --> 0:57:50.813
<v Speaker 5>to tell you that it's going to be risk proportionate.

0:57:52.013 --> 0:57:57.253
<v Speaker 5>Where they get their scientific evidence from is the Royal Society.

0:57:57.653 --> 0:58:03.693
<v Speaker 4>So the Royal Society, with themselves paid by envy, have

0:58:03.893 --> 0:58:09.053
<v Speaker 4>to do there are their sort of I.

0:58:09.093 --> 0:58:13.373
<v Speaker 5>Call it the Royal Society campaign that was between largely

0:58:13.413 --> 0:58:18.293
<v Speaker 5>between twenty sixteen and twenty nineteen, and that campaign was

0:58:18.373 --> 0:58:22.773
<v Speaker 5>not a risk assessment. They were not required to do

0:58:22.813 --> 0:58:24.333
<v Speaker 5>a process of risk assessment.

0:58:24.613 --> 0:58:25.653
<v Speaker 4>The campaign was.

0:58:25.653 --> 0:58:29.653
<v Speaker 5>Desired to open up the conversation and the discussions on

0:58:30.333 --> 0:58:33.653
<v Speaker 5>gene edited techniques and organisms and to help us talk

0:58:33.693 --> 0:58:37.413
<v Speaker 5>about the benefits. And so when we were submitting to

0:58:37.453 --> 0:58:40.933
<v Speaker 5>the gene Technology Bill, it occurred to us that the

0:58:40.973 --> 0:58:45.253
<v Speaker 5>policy formulation process was so bad and that then became

0:58:45.733 --> 0:58:50.693
<v Speaker 5>a large article which we called the hijacking of democracy

0:58:50.733 --> 0:58:55.373
<v Speaker 5>the Case of Gene Technology Regulatory Reform, because what we

0:58:55.413 --> 0:58:58.813
<v Speaker 5>could see is that is the Royal Society did not

0:58:58.933 --> 0:59:01.213
<v Speaker 5>do any form of risk assessment. And then at the

0:59:01.293 --> 0:59:04.253
<v Speaker 5>end of this all their lovely look what we can

0:59:04.333 --> 0:59:09.653
<v Speaker 5>do process, they did a recommendations for law Chaine and

0:59:09.733 --> 0:59:13.173
<v Speaker 5>so that their recommendations for law change were what was

0:59:13.253 --> 0:59:17.933
<v Speaker 5>grabbed by the Harnessing Biotech Manifesto by the National Party

0:59:18.173 --> 0:59:20.773
<v Speaker 5>and then that was what was put into the regulatory

0:59:20.813 --> 0:59:26.173
<v Speaker 5>impact statement. So we have policy light policy that didn't

0:59:26.173 --> 0:59:30.893
<v Speaker 5>do the scientific robust analysis, didn't do the economic analysis,

0:59:31.013 --> 0:59:35.013
<v Speaker 5>didn't do a cost benefit analysis. We know that they

0:59:35.053 --> 0:59:41.613
<v Speaker 5>could turn around tomorrow and start gene editing Romoa Maori species,

0:59:42.053 --> 0:59:45.053
<v Speaker 5>but if they didn't it didn't result in a protein,

0:59:45.213 --> 0:59:48.213
<v Speaker 5>they wouldn't have to declare to Maori what they'd done.

0:59:48.493 --> 0:59:50.733
<v Speaker 5>But then we have that sneaky little problem of gene

0:59:50.773 --> 0:59:54.493
<v Speaker 5>flow into the environment. So Maori would not have any knowledge,

0:59:54.973 --> 0:59:58.253
<v Speaker 5>any control. But it's also the same for our food.

0:59:59.213 --> 1:00:03.293
<v Speaker 5>The food that we export from New Zealand, all those

1:00:03.373 --> 1:00:08.573
<v Speaker 5>exporters that rely on the clean green, that rely on

1:00:08.613 --> 1:00:11.973
<v Speaker 5>that trustworthy basis that we can say it's not GMO,

1:00:12.493 --> 1:00:16.533
<v Speaker 5>would now have to go through a really expensive process

1:00:16.573 --> 1:00:21.213
<v Speaker 5>of verification. And we know that the margins on on.

1:00:21.613 --> 1:00:23.493
<v Speaker 4>Food can be very tight.

1:00:23.933 --> 1:00:29.293
<v Speaker 5>So we could see a decline in export product because

1:00:29.893 --> 1:00:33.773
<v Speaker 5>the export the foreign export markets knew we had we

1:00:33.893 --> 1:00:37.653
<v Speaker 5>had run the race to the bottom, We had become

1:00:38.453 --> 1:00:43.053
<v Speaker 5>most possibly one of the weakest regulatory jurisdictions in the world.

1:00:43.373 --> 1:00:45.293
<v Speaker 4>If this bill would be passed.

1:00:45.333 --> 1:00:50.933
<v Speaker 2>And the Europeans in particular, I understand are will hold

1:00:50.933 --> 1:00:53.053
<v Speaker 2>a much higher higher barrier.

1:00:54.613 --> 1:00:55.973
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and they do.

1:00:56.293 --> 1:00:59.773
<v Speaker 5>And they they've also got the precautionary principle in their legislation.

1:01:00.333 --> 1:01:04.813
<v Speaker 5>They don't they're already doing things that we're not doing.

1:01:04.853 --> 1:01:09.453
<v Speaker 5>They say we will not have glycosytes breid on crops,

1:01:09.493 --> 1:01:14.333
<v Speaker 5>whereas New Zealand has no restrictions in that way. And

1:01:14.373 --> 1:01:20.093
<v Speaker 5>so even though they've got similar legislation, which is concerning

1:01:20.093 --> 1:01:23.813
<v Speaker 5>what they call new breeding new genomic techniques, so the

1:01:23.893 --> 1:01:26.453
<v Speaker 5>Europeans are a little bit more transparent than us. They

1:01:26.493 --> 1:01:30.773
<v Speaker 5>call them new genomic techniques, whereas we nebulously call them

1:01:30.813 --> 1:01:33.093
<v Speaker 5>new breeding techniques, so that we don't actually know what

1:01:33.093 --> 1:01:34.853
<v Speaker 5>the heck we're talking about, because anything could be a

1:01:34.893 --> 1:01:38.933
<v Speaker 5>new breeding technique. So their legislation has been held up

1:01:39.013 --> 1:01:42.933
<v Speaker 5>because they've got all these questions around transparency and traceability,

1:01:43.293 --> 1:01:45.053
<v Speaker 5>where we're not doing any of that.

1:01:45.533 --> 1:01:48.053
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's where it came to the Green Editing Bill

1:01:48.133 --> 1:01:51.853
<v Speaker 2>came to the fore from my perspective was that when

1:01:51.893 --> 1:01:54.933
<v Speaker 2>once we learned that they would not have to identify

1:01:55.613 --> 1:02:02.973
<v Speaker 2>any gene clangers in food in supermarkets, then we lost

1:02:03.013 --> 1:02:06.573
<v Speaker 2>control of what we eat. And that's and that's patently obvious.

1:02:09.173 --> 1:02:11.733
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's time to go back to a basic

1:02:11.813 --> 1:02:15.653
<v Speaker 2>or two. What is their purpose in wanting to do

1:02:15.693 --> 1:02:18.373
<v Speaker 2>this in the first place, Why is the why is

1:02:18.413 --> 1:02:20.733
<v Speaker 2>the government so involved in it?

1:02:22.053 --> 1:02:26.853
<v Speaker 5>So they've identified that the current legislation is too strict

1:02:26.973 --> 1:02:30.093
<v Speaker 5>and they want the legislation to be less strict. And

1:02:30.213 --> 1:02:33.573
<v Speaker 5>basically they admit this in the problem definition.

1:02:33.173 --> 1:02:36.213
<v Speaker 2>For what reason? So what do they wanted to be

1:02:36.293 --> 1:02:36.773
<v Speaker 2>less strict?

1:02:37.533 --> 1:02:42.213
<v Speaker 5>So what we've seen in the last decade is increasing

1:02:42.413 --> 1:02:47.933
<v Speaker 5>numbers of businesses and scientists speaking up about the fact

1:02:47.973 --> 1:02:53.733
<v Speaker 5>that the has NO Act is too restrictive. What we've

1:02:53.893 --> 1:02:57.413
<v Speaker 5>failed to understand and what has not been clear to

1:02:57.573 --> 1:03:01.853
<v Speaker 5>farmers or the public. Most of those people speaking up

1:03:02.333 --> 1:03:09.333
<v Speaker 5>have themselves by the financial investments, or they're biotech lobbyists,

1:03:09.373 --> 1:03:13.413
<v Speaker 5>such as you know William Roliston as a biotechnology lobbyist

1:03:13.453 --> 1:03:16.213
<v Speaker 5>for example, he puts I'm a farmer hat on but

1:03:16.413 --> 1:03:20.773
<v Speaker 5>his his work over the last sort of decades it's

1:03:20.813 --> 1:03:24.013
<v Speaker 5>shown that he really is very focused on biotechnology.

1:03:25.173 --> 1:03:26.693
<v Speaker 2>His name at me again, I didn't catch.

1:03:26.533 --> 1:03:27.933
<v Speaker 4>It, William Rolliston.

1:03:29.253 --> 1:03:33.413
<v Speaker 5>And then we have scientists that come from the Crown

1:03:33.533 --> 1:03:38.053
<v Speaker 5>research institutes such as Plant and Food Research or AG Research.

1:03:38.533 --> 1:03:42.733
<v Speaker 5>And so what their problem is, and it harts back

1:03:42.773 --> 1:03:47.053
<v Speaker 5>to what we were talking about earlier, is their funding

1:03:47.573 --> 1:03:52.733
<v Speaker 5>has become tightened and tightened and titans around them needing

1:03:53.453 --> 1:03:57.493
<v Speaker 5>to produce patents and ip and so they're now they're

1:03:57.573 --> 1:04:04.493
<v Speaker 5>now depending on royalties for the funding to continue as

1:04:04.533 --> 1:04:09.133
<v Speaker 5>part of their investment strategy. They're publicly paid institute, but

1:04:09.213 --> 1:04:11.693
<v Speaker 5>they are more and more depending on the royalties from

1:04:11.773 --> 1:04:15.253
<v Speaker 5>their investments as a way of keeping themselves going. As

1:04:15.293 --> 1:04:19.453
<v Speaker 5>the government titans the what they can actually apply for.

1:04:19.973 --> 1:04:25.293
<v Speaker 5>And rather shockingly part of this, Judith Collins' latest move

1:04:26.053 --> 1:04:28.973
<v Speaker 5>is we're seeing the shift to the fact that the

1:04:29.053 --> 1:04:33.093
<v Speaker 5>scientists would own their own patents. Now this has happened

1:04:33.093 --> 1:04:37.053
<v Speaker 5>in America and it hasn't happened. I thought it actually

1:04:37.133 --> 1:04:41.373
<v Speaker 5>was quite quite excellent that the institutes would own the patents.

1:04:41.413 --> 1:04:42.853
<v Speaker 4>Still, but we're so.

1:04:42.973 --> 1:04:47.853
<v Speaker 5>Financialized, so for example, AG research can't freely go out

1:04:48.693 --> 1:04:51.533
<v Speaker 5>or plant in food research. They can't freely go out

1:04:51.693 --> 1:04:55.893
<v Speaker 5>and undertake public good research. So AG research can't look

1:04:55.933 --> 1:04:59.813
<v Speaker 5>at for a long term funding. They can do short

1:04:59.893 --> 1:05:02.133
<v Speaker 5>term funding that they can fit in when they have

1:05:02.173 --> 1:05:03.813
<v Speaker 5>a little tiny bit of slack.

1:05:04.213 --> 1:05:05.413
<v Speaker 4>But the idea of.

1:05:05.333 --> 1:05:11.733
<v Speaker 5>Looking at a five year, twenty million dollar project to

1:05:11.773 --> 1:05:16.893
<v Speaker 5>prevent weeds, to look at the basic sides for lots

1:05:16.893 --> 1:05:21.293
<v Speaker 5>of different robotics technologies, or to look at integrated pest

1:05:21.373 --> 1:05:25.613
<v Speaker 5>management for weeds, because they know that there is so much,

1:05:27.253 --> 1:05:31.813
<v Speaker 5>so much herbicide resistance in glyco state, there's increasing herbicide

1:05:31.853 --> 1:05:37.333
<v Speaker 5>resistance and all the other other herbicides. But if they

1:05:37.373 --> 1:05:40.573
<v Speaker 5>were just looking at public good work, they couldn't.

1:05:40.573 --> 1:05:42.373
<v Speaker 4>They've got to have IP at the end of it.

1:05:42.493 --> 1:05:45.253
<v Speaker 5>Similarly, plant and food research, they can't go and look

1:05:45.253 --> 1:05:48.933
<v Speaker 5>at the best nutrition for babies in New Zealand because

1:05:48.933 --> 1:05:51.893
<v Speaker 5>there's no IP. If they start looking at what are

1:05:52.533 --> 1:05:57.253
<v Speaker 5>the optimum levels for B vitamins and A A vitamins

1:05:57.293 --> 1:06:00.933
<v Speaker 5>for adolescents or you know, to stop to prevent mental health,

1:06:00.933 --> 1:06:03.293
<v Speaker 5>they would be outside their funding scrope because there's no

1:06:03.653 --> 1:06:07.533
<v Speaker 5>innovation at the end of it. Because it's a generic

1:06:07.613 --> 1:06:11.093
<v Speaker 5>vitamin or minus. All can't be patented. So then they're

1:06:11.213 --> 1:06:14.093
<v Speaker 5>stuck in this cycle and that's why they end up.

1:06:14.653 --> 1:06:17.453
<v Speaker 5>This is why this is my opinion, is that they

1:06:17.533 --> 1:06:21.653
<v Speaker 5>end up talking about genetics all the time because if

1:06:21.653 --> 1:06:26.173
<v Speaker 5>you gene edit, you can then patent that that knowledge

1:06:26.533 --> 1:06:29.573
<v Speaker 5>and then continue and this is the treadmill that they're

1:06:29.613 --> 1:06:34.293
<v Speaker 5>really on. Doctor Elvira Demesis explained that when you're a

1:06:34.373 --> 1:06:38.933
<v Speaker 5>biotechnology science, it's a very very narrow discipline, so it's

1:06:38.973 --> 1:06:41.973
<v Speaker 5>you can't look out and do basic science in other areas,

1:06:42.893 --> 1:06:46.773
<v Speaker 5>and so that then the more biotech scientists you get

1:06:46.853 --> 1:06:51.333
<v Speaker 5>in for example, at research again you're you're limiting what

1:06:51.493 --> 1:06:54.653
<v Speaker 5>you're then going to apply for funding for. So you

1:06:54.733 --> 1:06:57.493
<v Speaker 5>get this sort of this treadmill of this sort of

1:06:57.653 --> 1:07:00.653
<v Speaker 5>area of science, rather than, for example, if they had

1:07:00.773 --> 1:07:04.133
<v Speaker 5>molecular biologists working there that had a broader scope.

1:07:04.173 --> 1:07:07.933
<v Speaker 2>For example, personal question, this is your specialty, this is

1:07:07.973 --> 1:07:12.013
<v Speaker 2>your dealing with this sort of thing. How difficult was it?

1:07:12.533 --> 1:07:15.533
<v Speaker 2>How different and how difficult might this have been to

1:07:15.653 --> 1:07:19.973
<v Speaker 2>put together? And I'm talking the article that you wrote

1:07:20.013 --> 1:07:24.053
<v Speaker 2>that runs nine pages because of what I conceive as

1:07:24.133 --> 1:07:28.893
<v Speaker 2>a confusion for you. How difficult was it to put

1:07:28.933 --> 1:07:31.893
<v Speaker 2>it all together, to structure it?

1:07:31.893 --> 1:07:35.373
<v Speaker 4>It's really hard. So I'm a sociologist.

1:07:35.453 --> 1:07:36.133
<v Speaker 2>I feel better.

1:07:37.893 --> 1:07:39.813
<v Speaker 4>I do not have a science degree.

1:07:41.093 --> 1:07:45.053
<v Speaker 5>Everything that is a scientific references run past someone with

1:07:45.133 --> 1:07:46.533
<v Speaker 5>a science degree.

1:07:46.933 --> 1:07:47.973
<v Speaker 4>We produced.

1:07:48.053 --> 1:07:52.053
<v Speaker 5>So this is the first paper when powerful agencies hijack

1:07:52.133 --> 1:07:56.533
<v Speaker 5>democratic systems. Part one the case of gene technology regulatory reform.

1:07:56.973 --> 1:07:59.693
<v Speaker 5>That was meant to take a month, It took two

1:07:59.693 --> 1:08:02.653
<v Speaker 5>and a half months. One chapter of that was meant

1:08:02.693 --> 1:08:05.653
<v Speaker 5>to be on science system that turned into a second

1:08:06.173 --> 1:08:10.213
<v Speaker 5>forty to fifty page paper to the case of Science

1:08:10.293 --> 1:08:17.173
<v Speaker 5>System Reform, and these took four months to produce, and

1:08:17.213 --> 1:08:21.373
<v Speaker 5>then this article in the Daily Telegraph has taken about

1:08:21.413 --> 1:08:24.573
<v Speaker 5>a week to two weeks to produce, and of course

1:08:25.013 --> 1:08:28.653
<v Speaker 5>it's come off the back of our presentation to the

1:08:28.733 --> 1:08:32.533
<v Speaker 5>Select Committee, where I only presented really to one Health

1:08:32.533 --> 1:08:36.453
<v Speaker 5>Committee member on this. And you'll be able to find

1:08:36.453 --> 1:08:40.733
<v Speaker 5>all the links on the PSCR dot org dot nz website, and.

1:08:40.733 --> 1:08:41.373
<v Speaker 4>So it is.

1:08:41.453 --> 1:08:46.373
<v Speaker 5>It is really hard because the story of when complex

1:08:46.453 --> 1:08:52.813
<v Speaker 5>systems go awry is normally a very very very difficult

1:08:53.173 --> 1:08:57.493
<v Speaker 5>thing to understand. So when we've we've made the complaint

1:08:57.573 --> 1:09:01.693
<v Speaker 5>to the Ombardsman, PSGR have made the complaint to the Ombardsman,

1:09:01.773 --> 1:09:04.373
<v Speaker 5>and we've said that because we're concerned that the actions

1:09:04.373 --> 1:09:07.933
<v Speaker 5>of MV over time may be contrary to public law,

1:09:08.453 --> 1:09:13.453
<v Speaker 5>they may be found to be unreasonable, unjust and improperly discriminatory,

1:09:13.493 --> 1:09:15.813
<v Speaker 5>and we believe mb was wrong to take on the

1:09:15.853 --> 1:09:19.093
<v Speaker 5>powers of policy and law formulation for this new gene

1:09:19.093 --> 1:09:24.493
<v Speaker 5>technology regulations, for the policy and for the bill. So

1:09:24.573 --> 1:09:29.093
<v Speaker 5>we think what's happened is that they're directly undermining public

1:09:29.173 --> 1:09:33.013
<v Speaker 5>law conventions to get this true and what we think

1:09:33.053 --> 1:09:39.253
<v Speaker 5>that the evidence suggests maladministration, so talking to the complex

1:09:39.333 --> 1:09:43.013
<v Speaker 5>muddle and the mess of all this, and so maladministration

1:09:43.173 --> 1:09:46.293
<v Speaker 5>is conduct which is capable of causing injustice and is

1:09:46.333 --> 1:09:51.533
<v Speaker 5>possibly systemic in that it might foreseeably continue if left unremedied.

1:09:52.133 --> 1:09:55.693
<v Speaker 5>And maladministration has also been referred to as usually something

1:09:55.773 --> 1:09:57.693
<v Speaker 5>short of outright corruption.

1:09:58.013 --> 1:09:59.013
<v Speaker 4>But's still wrong.

1:10:00.053 --> 1:10:04.453
<v Speaker 5>So that extends beyond mere illegality to more generally framed

1:10:04.573 --> 1:10:09.333
<v Speaker 5>allegations of injustice. And here I'm quoting Joseph as well.

1:10:09.733 --> 1:10:13.053
<v Speaker 5>So what we've seen is systemic. We've seen it from

1:10:13.733 --> 1:10:16.933
<v Speaker 5>the creation of the problem definition, we've seen it from

1:10:16.973 --> 1:10:20.573
<v Speaker 5>the absence of using the scientific evidence. We've seen it

1:10:20.613 --> 1:10:22.973
<v Speaker 5>in the minister telling the officials what to do. But

1:10:23.053 --> 1:10:26.333
<v Speaker 5>of course when we complain to the ombardsmen, the ombardsmen

1:10:26.373 --> 1:10:29.773
<v Speaker 5>are saying, well, I can't investigate the actions of officials,

1:10:29.813 --> 1:10:36.093
<v Speaker 5>but there is evidence that ministers, while concerned with policy formulation,

1:10:36.653 --> 1:10:41.973
<v Speaker 5>are not exempt from ombardsman investigations. However, the ombudsman's pretending

1:10:42.133 --> 1:10:46.213
<v Speaker 5>that it can't. You know, the fact that a decision

1:10:46.253 --> 1:10:48.013
<v Speaker 5>is taken by a minister does not mean it is

1:10:48.053 --> 1:10:53.333
<v Speaker 5>a policy decision and immune from Ombudsman investigation. So ministerial

1:10:53.773 --> 1:10:58.133
<v Speaker 5>decisions are matters of administration, So it's the ombudsman wants

1:10:58.173 --> 1:11:00.413
<v Speaker 5>to step back. They want to say there's no personal

1:11:00.573 --> 1:11:08.013
<v Speaker 5>interest in this muddle of fast tracking, this muddle of

1:11:08.373 --> 1:11:13.013
<v Speaker 5>failing to consult with the public, this muddle of not

1:11:13.253 --> 1:11:19.053
<v Speaker 5>doing any scientific risk assessment to understand anything about all

1:11:19.133 --> 1:11:23.293
<v Speaker 5>these GMOs that would be the gene edited organisms, for example,

1:11:23.373 --> 1:11:26.213
<v Speaker 5>and there's many more example. I'm being quite limited just

1:11:26.253 --> 1:11:29.933
<v Speaker 5>talking about gene edited organisms that don't produce proteins because

1:11:29.933 --> 1:11:32.133
<v Speaker 5>it's sort of easier to understand.

1:11:33.533 --> 1:11:38.613
<v Speaker 4>But there's other issues that are sort of ear tag.

1:11:38.453 --> 1:11:41.773
<v Speaker 5>To not be in it, such as SDN derived sort

1:11:41.773 --> 1:11:46.093
<v Speaker 5>of their sort of like blueprints for fast tracking gene editing,

1:11:46.133 --> 1:11:49.213
<v Speaker 5>and Jack Herneman's really good at talking about this, and

1:11:49.333 --> 1:11:53.773
<v Speaker 5>so it's sort of like MBA has said, we're going

1:11:53.853 --> 1:11:56.373
<v Speaker 5>to pretend we're doing the science when we're not because

1:11:56.373 --> 1:12:01.533
<v Speaker 5>they don't actually have the scientific expertise inside mb and

1:12:01.573 --> 1:12:04.253
<v Speaker 5>so what the bill has created is this massive pletuau

1:12:04.573 --> 1:12:08.093
<v Speaker 5>of uncertainty, and that primary Act, the bill that we're

1:12:08.093 --> 1:12:12.973
<v Speaker 5>looking it is just fluid, so it's uncontainable, and good

1:12:13.053 --> 1:12:16.413
<v Speaker 5>legislation is meant to create like a set of rails

1:12:16.453 --> 1:12:21.413
<v Speaker 5>for the officials. But this legislation, because so much is

1:12:21.453 --> 1:12:26.853
<v Speaker 5>outside the regulatory purview, the regulator can't look at that

1:12:27.293 --> 1:12:31.173
<v Speaker 5>stuff that's being structured outside of the legislation. But the

1:12:31.573 --> 1:12:36.653
<v Speaker 5>regulator also won't have inquisitorial powers. They forced the regulator

1:12:36.733 --> 1:12:39.613
<v Speaker 5>to only look at what other regulators are also looking at.

1:12:39.693 --> 1:12:44.133
<v Speaker 5>And so during covert when all the regulators had the

1:12:44.173 --> 1:12:49.333
<v Speaker 5>same lockstep procedure of only really looking at fires or

1:12:49.333 --> 1:12:51.773
<v Speaker 5>whatever fires I wanted to declare, they'd look at and

1:12:51.773 --> 1:12:53.693
<v Speaker 5>then they wouldn't even tell us what they were looking at.

1:12:54.053 --> 1:12:59.173
<v Speaker 5>So we've got this regulatory secrecy that means the regulators

1:12:59.173 --> 1:13:02.213
<v Speaker 5>aren't forced to look at the same the latest scientific

1:13:02.253 --> 1:13:05.973
<v Speaker 5>literature on risk. Whereas at the same time you have

1:13:06.093 --> 1:13:12.533
<v Speaker 5>the hypocrisy where we know that the corporations, the developers

1:13:13.453 --> 1:13:16.413
<v Speaker 5>are going to be they're going to be using artificial

1:13:16.533 --> 1:13:20.813
<v Speaker 5>intelligence to scale up, they're going to be doing everything

1:13:20.893 --> 1:13:24.013
<v Speaker 5>they can to get more and more patents released, to

1:13:24.053 --> 1:13:26.653
<v Speaker 5>get more and more money into that corporation, whereas we

1:13:26.733 --> 1:13:32.773
<v Speaker 5>don't see similar powers of the regulator from conception even

1:13:32.853 --> 1:13:38.133
<v Speaker 5>trying to keep up. And when you're a government regulator.

1:13:38.213 --> 1:13:42.053
<v Speaker 5>As I said before, it's a political space, so they

1:13:42.293 --> 1:13:45.853
<v Speaker 5>are trying to navigate keeping everyone happy. But it's also

1:13:45.893 --> 1:13:49.453
<v Speaker 5>a gray area. So when you know, we could talk

1:13:49.453 --> 1:13:54.893
<v Speaker 5>about fluoride. So when fluoride is toxic to me at

1:13:54.893 --> 1:13:58.293
<v Speaker 5>a certain dose, it's completely different from when it's toxic

1:13:58.333 --> 1:14:02.173
<v Speaker 5>to a five year old at a certain dose. So

1:14:02.213 --> 1:14:05.893
<v Speaker 5>we need to understand that we have different ages where

1:14:05.893 --> 1:14:10.053
<v Speaker 5>we're vulnerable. We're vulnerable, different genes are vulnerable to different

1:14:10.653 --> 1:14:13.093
<v Speaker 5>because they've got different pathways of vulnerability.

1:14:13.653 --> 1:14:15.693
<v Speaker 4>And so regulators need to.

1:14:15.613 --> 1:14:20.933
<v Speaker 5>Be able to be to inquire about all the different

1:14:21.013 --> 1:14:25.453
<v Speaker 5>gray areas that mean that what they're doing is never

1:14:25.493 --> 1:14:26.293
<v Speaker 5>going to be certain.

1:14:26.373 --> 1:14:28.173
<v Speaker 4>It's never going to be one hundred percent.

1:14:27.933 --> 1:14:30.693
<v Speaker 5>Certain, which is why the precaution principle is so important.

1:14:31.373 --> 1:14:35.093
<v Speaker 2>Look, is this so complicated that your average partner is

1:14:35.613 --> 1:14:37.453
<v Speaker 2>never going to come to grips with it.

1:14:38.813 --> 1:14:43.973
<v Speaker 5>The trick about anything that's complicated is to start talking,

1:14:44.893 --> 1:14:50.013
<v Speaker 5>because otherwise it's ta do. Otherwise we're no better than Germany,

1:14:50.613 --> 1:14:54.013
<v Speaker 5>you know, before World War Two, Because and that is

1:14:54.053 --> 1:14:58.613
<v Speaker 5>what censorship does to us. As a sociologist, I've always

1:14:58.733 --> 1:15:04.133
<v Speaker 5>been fascinated by undone science, and I guess the work

1:15:04.173 --> 1:15:08.653
<v Speaker 5>I do with PSA is a lot about learn to

1:15:08.653 --> 1:15:13.133
<v Speaker 5>talk about the things in our society, the man made

1:15:13.213 --> 1:15:17.613
<v Speaker 5>things that we want to use them and not get

1:15:17.653 --> 1:15:20.013
<v Speaker 5>sick from using them, but if they actually do make

1:15:20.093 --> 1:15:24.533
<v Speaker 5>us sick, we've got to have enough of a government

1:15:24.613 --> 1:15:28.253
<v Speaker 5>that has enough of a backbone and enough of the

1:15:29.093 --> 1:15:33.653
<v Speaker 5>enough ethical pathways that it will actually research those technologies

1:15:33.733 --> 1:15:37.733
<v Speaker 5>and make sure that we're safe. So we have to

1:15:37.853 --> 1:15:39.813
<v Speaker 5>because we have to do this for our babies. We

1:15:39.933 --> 1:15:42.973
<v Speaker 5>have to talk do this for our rivers, our drinking water,

1:15:43.093 --> 1:15:47.893
<v Speaker 5>our fresh water. So it's about having that courage around

1:15:47.933 --> 1:15:50.933
<v Speaker 5>the dinner table, you know, you know, at the picnic

1:15:51.013 --> 1:15:55.813
<v Speaker 5>to say, you know what I think. Maybe MR and

1:15:55.853 --> 1:16:01.173
<v Speaker 5>A vaccines aren't safe because we never saw the placebo

1:16:01.373 --> 1:16:05.373
<v Speaker 5>for them. We never saw how it impacted a really

1:16:05.453 --> 1:16:09.093
<v Speaker 5>healthy person, whereas how it impacted a sick person.

1:16:10.853 --> 1:16:12.293
<v Speaker 4>For example, we need.

1:16:12.093 --> 1:16:15.893
<v Speaker 5>Fluoride to be tested by the EPA, not by the

1:16:15.973 --> 1:16:19.173
<v Speaker 5>chief Scientists for the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet,

1:16:19.253 --> 1:16:22.173
<v Speaker 5>who doesn't ever do a methodology and show that it

1:16:22.253 --> 1:16:26.573
<v Speaker 5>was a methods based assessment of fluoride safety. We need

1:16:27.333 --> 1:16:32.573
<v Speaker 5>GMOs to be assessed for safety by an agency that's

1:16:32.613 --> 1:16:36.493
<v Speaker 5>not the agency responsible for economic growth, so we can

1:16:36.533 --> 1:16:40.933
<v Speaker 5>start normalizing that. We can say glat to say has

1:16:41.013 --> 1:16:44.373
<v Speaker 5>been found in all these offshore court cases to cause

1:16:44.613 --> 1:16:49.533
<v Speaker 5>cancer in the people that used glasses regularly. We can

1:16:49.613 --> 1:16:53.893
<v Speaker 5>talk about what evidence came out in the discovery process

1:16:54.453 --> 1:16:57.613
<v Speaker 5>in these court cases. In the rest of the world

1:16:58.533 --> 1:17:01.213
<v Speaker 5>was if we look at our own New Zealand EPA,

1:17:01.533 --> 1:17:05.653
<v Speaker 5>their own methodology document doesn't give them the powers.

1:17:05.293 --> 1:17:07.333
<v Speaker 4>To look at the discovery process.

1:17:07.813 --> 1:17:10.733
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't give them the powers to inquire into the

1:17:10.813 --> 1:17:15.133
<v Speaker 5>latest scientific evidence on whether a chemical might harm a

1:17:15.213 --> 1:17:18.853
<v Speaker 5>hormone or a baby at a certain level that is

1:17:18.893 --> 1:17:22.613
<v Speaker 5>different from what the regulatory science that is supplied by

1:17:22.613 --> 1:17:23.493
<v Speaker 5>the corporations.

1:17:23.773 --> 1:17:26.413
<v Speaker 4>So we have to have to we have to have

1:17:26.493 --> 1:17:28.133
<v Speaker 4>the courage to.

1:17:28.493 --> 1:17:33.173
<v Speaker 5>Think differently and speak differently and recognize that uncertainty or

1:17:33.293 --> 1:17:36.253
<v Speaker 5>caution is something we can all talk about. Well, we

1:17:36.293 --> 1:17:39.333
<v Speaker 5>all know that we don't let the toddler run into

1:17:39.413 --> 1:17:44.213
<v Speaker 5>the ocean because we know that's harmful, so we have.

1:17:44.453 --> 1:17:45.213
<v Speaker 4>But we stopped that.

1:17:45.533 --> 1:17:48.613
<v Speaker 5>But it could be okay, The toddler might be okay.

1:17:49.493 --> 1:17:52.173
<v Speaker 5>But it's that when do we start thinking about risk

1:17:52.253 --> 1:17:55.893
<v Speaker 5>and how we how we i hope. I'm saying this

1:17:55.973 --> 1:17:58.693
<v Speaker 5>reasonably clearly, but that the concept of risk is so

1:17:58.813 --> 1:18:01.973
<v Speaker 5>different for everybody. But we need our scientists to have

1:18:02.053 --> 1:18:05.293
<v Speaker 5>the scientific freedom to be able to understand that.

1:18:06.213 --> 1:18:09.053
<v Speaker 2>Just wrap it up. Do you have a personal opinion

1:18:09.053 --> 1:18:10.973
<v Speaker 2>on this should be prepared to express?

1:18:11.453 --> 1:18:14.933
<v Speaker 5>Well, I guess as the author of the two papers

1:18:15.013 --> 1:18:18.733
<v Speaker 5>I've co authored, the first one the Gene Technology Bill

1:18:18.853 --> 1:18:25.453
<v Speaker 5>one with Elvira Domese. But my personal opinion is that, yeah,

1:18:26.093 --> 1:18:30.333
<v Speaker 5>democracy is being short circuited right now. But my and

1:18:30.373 --> 1:18:34.813
<v Speaker 5>my personal concern is that if the Ombardsman rejects this

1:18:35.013 --> 1:18:39.653
<v Speaker 5>on the basic that there is no personal interest, even

1:18:39.693 --> 1:18:43.213
<v Speaker 5>though all the members of PC are interested in this,

1:18:43.773 --> 1:18:46.733
<v Speaker 5>even though it's very likely that it's in general it's

1:18:46.733 --> 1:18:51.213
<v Speaker 5>of interest to the general public, my opinion is that

1:18:51.253 --> 1:18:56.653
<v Speaker 5>we don't have anywhere else to go. And my opinion

1:18:56.733 --> 1:18:59.973
<v Speaker 5>is starting to be is envy above the law? Is

1:19:00.013 --> 1:19:04.213
<v Speaker 5>the attorney general above the law? That's I'm starting to

1:19:04.333 --> 1:19:08.333
<v Speaker 5>question that, which is the rule of law? Democracy only works.

1:19:08.533 --> 1:19:11.053
<v Speaker 4>The rule of law works. But if we can't actually.

1:19:11.333 --> 1:19:20.013
<v Speaker 5>Explore when ministers short circuit policy because they you know,

1:19:20.133 --> 1:19:22.053
<v Speaker 5>they they're on the direction of the minister, we do

1:19:22.133 --> 1:19:26.173
<v Speaker 5>not consider these options. But you can't investigate the actions

1:19:26.173 --> 1:19:28.813
<v Speaker 5>of those ministers. What do we what are we left with?

1:19:29.013 --> 1:19:31.813
<v Speaker 5>Are we left with the democracy or is it as

1:19:32.013 --> 1:19:34.333
<v Speaker 5>Butler and Parma say, is it just authoritarian?

1:19:34.333 --> 1:19:37.373
<v Speaker 4>Are we we open to the despots?

1:19:37.653 --> 1:19:40.573
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Well, the despots exist on both sides

1:19:40.613 --> 1:19:44.773
<v Speaker 2>or they can. So it's not it's not picking not

1:19:44.853 --> 1:19:47.853
<v Speaker 2>choosing one team over the other. It's a it's a

1:19:47.933 --> 1:19:48.853
<v Speaker 2>protection factor.

1:19:49.413 --> 1:19:51.773
<v Speaker 5>And so one of the biggest things I would ask

1:19:51.893 --> 1:19:55.333
<v Speaker 5>with this bill is that it's a conscience vote because

1:19:55.373 --> 1:19:59.453
<v Speaker 5>we we're seeing what what control does the party whip

1:19:59.573 --> 1:20:04.173
<v Speaker 5>have over what whoever is and who.

1:20:04.213 --> 1:20:05.853
<v Speaker 4>Is informing the party whip?

1:20:06.173 --> 1:20:09.333
<v Speaker 5>This is this is if this is if we're voting

1:20:09.333 --> 1:20:12.293
<v Speaker 5>in our individual and peace, but they have to vote

1:20:12.373 --> 1:20:15.653
<v Speaker 5>look step by a party with that we don't know

1:20:15.693 --> 1:20:19.533
<v Speaker 5>any that is outside Official Information Act. And then if

1:20:19.573 --> 1:20:24.213
<v Speaker 5>we have the Attorney General with six ministerial hats, who

1:20:24.253 --> 1:20:26.813
<v Speaker 5>only needs to be in cabinet with three other people

1:20:27.453 --> 1:20:31.653
<v Speaker 5>to pass legislation, I mean, the centralization of powers shows

1:20:31.693 --> 1:20:39.053
<v Speaker 5>that New Zealand is extraordinarily vulnerable to not being a democracy.

1:20:39.173 --> 1:20:43.133
<v Speaker 5>And so and we've seen, you know, people stop writing

1:20:43.173 --> 1:20:49.293
<v Speaker 5>blogs recently because they're getting huge pressure from the dominant politically.

1:20:49.333 --> 1:20:52.253
<v Speaker 2>There has to be there has to be some action

1:20:52.373 --> 1:20:52.573
<v Speaker 2>on that.

1:20:53.293 --> 1:20:56.293
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I have I have with PHR.

1:20:56.773 --> 1:21:03.213
<v Speaker 5>I've emailed our most eminent public law this is constitutional

1:21:03.213 --> 1:21:07.093
<v Speaker 5>and administrative law experts, to say, please can you provide

1:21:07.133 --> 1:21:10.293
<v Speaker 5>I'm not a lawyer, I'm associatedogists and I'm trying to

1:21:10.373 --> 1:21:13.053
<v Speaker 5>talk about law and I'm trying to say the Onwardsman

1:21:13.933 --> 1:21:15.573
<v Speaker 5>on behalf of the PSGR.

1:21:15.333 --> 1:21:18.293
<v Speaker 4>Please you need to investigate this. This is a very

1:21:18.373 --> 1:21:19.053
<v Speaker 4>big issue.

1:21:19.093 --> 1:21:22.813
<v Speaker 5>We've documented this in fifty pages, and the Ombardsman's just

1:21:22.853 --> 1:21:25.133
<v Speaker 5>wanting to say, well, it's no personal interest to PSH

1:21:25.693 --> 1:21:30.893
<v Speaker 5>failing to engage with this greatest sort of I would

1:21:30.893 --> 1:21:35.253
<v Speaker 5>say obligation to ensure that MB does not keep doing this.

1:21:36.093 --> 1:21:41.093
<v Speaker 5>And I'm trying to find anyone who has expert expertise

1:21:41.133 --> 1:21:45.213
<v Speaker 5>in constitutional or administrative law to come back and support

1:21:45.373 --> 1:21:48.933
<v Speaker 5>us in communicating and communications with the onwardsman.

1:21:49.613 --> 1:21:53.573
<v Speaker 4>It's I think we're in extraordinarily precarious times.

1:21:53.653 --> 1:21:56.293
<v Speaker 2>Later, well you won't. You won't get much of an

1:21:56.333 --> 1:22:00.253
<v Speaker 2>argument out of me for that. So got to quote

1:22:00.333 --> 1:22:05.533
<v Speaker 2>in conclusion with the paragraphs that you wrote new Zealand's

1:22:05.893 --> 1:22:09.053
<v Speaker 2>mb is silent on what best practic this might mean

1:22:09.173 --> 1:22:12.413
<v Speaker 2>in this rapidly advancing field because they haven't assessed it.

1:22:13.373 --> 1:22:16.933
<v Speaker 2>The regulator and the Enforcement and Monitoring agency lack any

1:22:17.133 --> 1:22:21.893
<v Speaker 2>obligation to keep abreast of industry developments, including the integration

1:22:21.973 --> 1:22:25.373
<v Speaker 2>of artificial intelligence, which will further speed up development and

1:22:25.413 --> 1:22:30.493
<v Speaker 2>release of gene editing technologies and organisms. In this world

1:22:30.533 --> 1:22:34.133
<v Speaker 2>where the science is swiftly advancing, we should be able

1:22:34.133 --> 1:22:37.173
<v Speaker 2>to ask why the case by case approach is currently

1:22:37.213 --> 1:22:41.213
<v Speaker 2>considered to boo An unfortunate conflict of interest in the

1:22:41.413 --> 1:22:45.813
<v Speaker 2>Select Committee process is that the Gene Technology Select Committee

1:22:45.813 --> 1:22:52.373
<v Speaker 2>Report will be overseen and produced by MBIE. Mb letters

1:22:52.373 --> 1:22:54.173
<v Speaker 2>we have written it in our sitting with the Ombudsmen

1:22:54.213 --> 1:22:57.413
<v Speaker 2>of New Zealand. We know that there is a possibility

1:22:57.413 --> 1:23:00.973
<v Speaker 2>that our complaint may be dismissed because firstly MBIE is

1:23:01.013 --> 1:23:05.733
<v Speaker 2>a powerful agency and it will not appreciate being investigated.

1:23:06.013 --> 1:23:09.613
<v Speaker 2>But also because this is a science thing. The science

1:23:09.653 --> 1:23:13.213
<v Speaker 2>thing can boondoggle well meaning MPs and officials. It doesn't

1:23:13.293 --> 1:23:18.253
<v Speaker 2>need to for people who don't have it, who haven't subscribed,

1:23:18.933 --> 1:23:22.133
<v Speaker 2>where will they find this particular article.

1:23:23.653 --> 1:23:26.453
<v Speaker 5>So this article is currently on the day in the

1:23:26.533 --> 1:23:30.893
<v Speaker 5>Daily Telegraph dot co dot MZ. I believe, and it's

1:23:30.933 --> 1:23:35.973
<v Speaker 5>called when the Economic Growth Agency captures biotech regulation.

1:23:36.493 --> 1:23:38.173
<v Speaker 4>A serious question of science.

1:23:38.933 --> 1:23:42.093
<v Speaker 5>And the reason I said a serious question of science

1:23:42.213 --> 1:23:46.733
<v Speaker 5>is because when I was listening to the Oral Select

1:23:46.773 --> 1:23:52.293
<v Speaker 5>Committee processes, all of the MB funded scientists and science

1:23:52.413 --> 1:23:58.613
<v Speaker 5>organizations and the you know, the biotech investors kept talking

1:23:58.653 --> 1:24:02.053
<v Speaker 5>and urging the Oral the Select Committee to be scientific

1:24:02.133 --> 1:24:05.093
<v Speaker 5>and to follow good scientific process. But of course they've

1:24:05.133 --> 1:24:08.573
<v Speaker 5>never declared that the science hadn't been done. So yes,

1:24:08.613 --> 1:24:12.973
<v Speaker 5>So you can find on the Daily Telegraph, but also

1:24:13.133 --> 1:24:15.893
<v Speaker 5>ps gr n Z p s g r n Z

1:24:16.333 --> 1:24:17.973
<v Speaker 5>dot substack dot com.

1:24:18.173 --> 1:24:19.453
<v Speaker 4>You'll find.

1:24:21.053 --> 1:24:26.493
<v Speaker 5>You'll find links to psgr's work. And I think actually

1:24:26.533 --> 1:24:29.933
<v Speaker 5>I may have put the first part first part of

1:24:29.973 --> 1:24:34.013
<v Speaker 5>this article on my own personal substat j R b

1:24:34.333 --> 1:24:38.573
<v Speaker 5>r u n I n g JR running dot substat

1:24:38.573 --> 1:24:41.013
<v Speaker 5>dot com. But that's also you can search for Talking

1:24:41.133 --> 1:24:43.773
<v Speaker 5>Risk on substack and find me Jody.

1:24:44.013 --> 1:24:48.253
<v Speaker 2>We've gone twice the lenks I expected, but it's I

1:24:48.253 --> 1:24:50.253
<v Speaker 2>think it's important, it's necessary, and I want to thank

1:24:50.253 --> 1:24:53.973
<v Speaker 2>you for your time and the more power to more

1:24:54.013 --> 1:24:54.813
<v Speaker 2>power to your work.

1:24:55.493 --> 1:25:00.973
<v Speaker 5>I'm very grateful Laighton and psgr welcomes members associate members,

1:25:01.413 --> 1:25:06.533
<v Speaker 5>members are scientists, members are not scientists. And I just really,

1:25:06.573 --> 1:25:09.533
<v Speaker 5>really I thank you for having a coria because the

1:25:09.653 --> 1:25:14.013
<v Speaker 5>science thing, as you said, it's a science thing that

1:25:14.093 --> 1:25:19.893
<v Speaker 5>actually it's about good process. It's about trust, being trustworthy

1:25:19.973 --> 1:25:23.853
<v Speaker 5>and accountable and fear and that's what democracy is. So

1:25:24.013 --> 1:25:26.053
<v Speaker 5>this is we need to be able to talk about this.

1:25:26.173 --> 1:25:29.733
<v Speaker 5>So I'm so grateful, thank you a pleasure.

1:25:30.053 --> 1:25:32.053
<v Speaker 2>And I might just add, by the way that I've

1:25:32.093 --> 1:25:34.813
<v Speaker 2>had to explain to well, I've tried to explain to

1:25:34.853 --> 1:25:37.693
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people over a period of time that

1:25:37.933 --> 1:25:42.053
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to be an economist to understand economics.

1:25:42.413 --> 1:25:45.413
<v Speaker 2>You don't have or procedure, you don't have to be

1:25:45.773 --> 1:25:52.093
<v Speaker 2>a doctor necessarily or almost anything to be able to

1:25:52.173 --> 1:25:55.693
<v Speaker 2>rationalize your way through to the fact through the fact

1:25:55.813 --> 1:25:57.653
<v Speaker 2>that there is something amiss.

1:25:59.573 --> 1:26:04.493
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, And as we talked about, remember the basic research,

1:26:04.533 --> 1:26:07.093
<v Speaker 5>the basic science is not being funded, so we're ending

1:26:07.173 --> 1:26:09.853
<v Speaker 5>up with lots and lots of technical experts. When you

1:26:09.933 --> 1:26:13.493
<v Speaker 5>have lots and lots of technical experts, they find it

1:26:13.733 --> 1:26:18.053
<v Speaker 5>very hard to join the dots which are political, which

1:26:18.053 --> 1:26:24.013
<v Speaker 5>are ethical, which are legal, which are moral and so

1:26:24.133 --> 1:26:27.213
<v Speaker 5>we actually have to start understanding that science is not

1:26:27.293 --> 1:26:30.413
<v Speaker 5>this ideology that we worship.

1:26:30.893 --> 1:26:31.333
<v Speaker 4>Science.

1:26:31.413 --> 1:26:34.733
<v Speaker 5>To be trustworthy, science must follow good process and it's

1:26:34.973 --> 1:26:37.773
<v Speaker 5>just like democracy. To be trustworthy, it has to be

1:26:37.893 --> 1:26:42.933
<v Speaker 5>transparent and accountable, so people can be curious and they

1:26:42.933 --> 1:26:46.693
<v Speaker 5>can be skeptical. And so you're exactly right late, and thank.

1:26:46.533 --> 1:27:09.053
<v Speaker 2>You framed beautifully, Thank you so much. A podcast five,

1:27:09.213 --> 1:27:12.053
<v Speaker 2>and the mailroom and the missus producer is here and waiting,

1:27:12.133 --> 1:27:12.973
<v Speaker 2>how are you late?

1:27:13.013 --> 1:27:14.133
<v Speaker 4>And I'm great? How are you?

1:27:14.333 --> 1:27:16.253
<v Speaker 2>Will you look great? And if you're great, I'm great.

1:27:17.013 --> 1:27:17.973
<v Speaker 4>That's the way it goes.

1:27:18.013 --> 1:27:19.013
<v Speaker 2>Why don't you go great?

1:27:19.413 --> 1:27:19.733
<v Speaker 4>Start?

1:27:20.773 --> 1:27:23.413
<v Speaker 6>Jackie says, I feel inspired to write and thank you

1:27:23.493 --> 1:27:26.573
<v Speaker 6>for your wonderful interview with doctor Pierre Corey. It fills

1:27:26.573 --> 1:27:28.613
<v Speaker 6>me with hope to know that some of this information

1:27:29.213 --> 1:27:32.373
<v Speaker 6>is starting to see the light of day. Also, latent

1:27:32.373 --> 1:27:35.613
<v Speaker 6>that you crossed over with the link of pattern recognition,

1:27:35.853 --> 1:27:39.173
<v Speaker 6>as you and pet Pierre discussed from climate scam to

1:27:39.213 --> 1:27:43.213
<v Speaker 6>what truly is the COVID scam? I am someone like

1:27:43.293 --> 1:27:46.013
<v Speaker 6>many others for whom the COVID scenario did not make

1:27:46.093 --> 1:27:49.973
<v Speaker 6>any sense. From very early on, I remember watching footage

1:27:49.973 --> 1:27:53.773
<v Speaker 6>of Dr Pierre Corey with his colleagues from the FLCCC.

1:27:54.853 --> 1:27:58.893
<v Speaker 6>That's the Frontline COVID Critical Care Alliance, he says in

1:27:58.973 --> 1:28:03.213
<v Speaker 6>brackets in the early days discussing their ideas and success

1:28:03.893 --> 1:28:09.693
<v Speaker 6>using repurposed alternative treatments using age old trusted medicines like

1:28:09.853 --> 1:28:15.493
<v Speaker 6>hydroxychloricon and ivermectin. How different the worldwide health or outcome

1:28:15.533 --> 1:28:18.653
<v Speaker 6>could have been if only these wonderful experienced doctors were

1:28:18.653 --> 1:28:21.773
<v Speaker 6>not shut down as they were. This also brings to

1:28:21.813 --> 1:28:24.053
<v Speaker 6>my mind to remind you that we in New Zealand

1:28:24.053 --> 1:28:28.253
<v Speaker 6>have our very own team of independent, thinking, courageous doctors

1:28:28.253 --> 1:28:33.373
<v Speaker 6>in the form of nzdsos and Jackie goes on to

1:28:33.613 --> 1:28:36.693
<v Speaker 6>give us a few a few names there. She says

1:28:36.733 --> 1:28:39.973
<v Speaker 6>they have worked tirelessly in a similar way to the

1:28:40.093 --> 1:28:45.613
<v Speaker 6>FLCCZ Alliance, speaking out, documenting, questioning every step of the

1:28:45.653 --> 1:28:48.613
<v Speaker 6>way on behalf of New Zealanders. I know that they

1:28:48.653 --> 1:28:52.413
<v Speaker 6>are currently working extremely hard collating information to be presented

1:28:52.453 --> 1:28:56.573
<v Speaker 6>to the Royal Commission Inquiry Part two at the request

1:28:56.653 --> 1:28:59.733
<v Speaker 6>of the Commission. Their journey must have been very similar

1:28:59.773 --> 1:29:02.613
<v Speaker 6>to that of your guest Dr Cory. I for one,

1:29:02.733 --> 1:29:06.053
<v Speaker 6>feel and debted to them for their efforts, expertise and

1:29:06.213 --> 1:29:10.493
<v Speaker 6>sacrifices on our behalf finally late, and thank you again

1:29:10.533 --> 1:29:13.893
<v Speaker 6>for your wonderful podcast and the opportunity for further discussion

1:29:14.013 --> 1:29:15.853
<v Speaker 6>and thought provoking commentary.

1:29:16.333 --> 1:29:17.293
<v Speaker 4>And that's from Jackie.

1:29:17.453 --> 1:29:22.973
<v Speaker 2>Jackie brilliantly said thank you. Practically every email this week

1:29:23.093 --> 1:29:27.813
<v Speaker 2>was about per Corey, and it's not surprising. I was

1:29:27.853 --> 1:29:31.733
<v Speaker 2>thrilled to receive your podcast interviewing Doctor per Cory this week,

1:29:32.293 --> 1:29:36.133
<v Speaker 2>having read doctor Cory's book, The War on ivermecnan and

1:29:36.213 --> 1:29:40.893
<v Speaker 2>similarly morphing, as did Dr Corey from a vaccine committed

1:29:40.973 --> 1:29:44.293
<v Speaker 2>Old Jeff into a New Jeff. The book was fascinating,

1:29:44.333 --> 1:29:48.053
<v Speaker 2>illuminating and profound. The man, in my opinion, is a

1:29:48.213 --> 1:29:52.333
<v Speaker 2>humanitarian hero, as is a previous interviewee of yours, doctor

1:29:52.373 --> 1:29:56.053
<v Speaker 2>Paul Merrick Layton. The thrust of my email is to

1:29:56.093 --> 1:29:59.933
<v Speaker 2>pose this question. At this stage of the slowly dwindling

1:30:00.053 --> 1:30:04.893
<v Speaker 2>COVID pandemic, there is so much evidence that A mrn

1:30:04.973 --> 1:30:10.093
<v Speaker 2>A vaccines are just plain dangerous and b repurposed cheap

1:30:10.133 --> 1:30:14.133
<v Speaker 2>drugs like ivermectin work. Even if these two assertions are

1:30:14.173 --> 1:30:16.893
<v Speaker 2>not one hundred percent driveable at this point in time,

1:30:17.373 --> 1:30:20.853
<v Speaker 2>then at the very least, there is certainly enough intelligent

1:30:21.013 --> 1:30:25.973
<v Speaker 2>questioning around these matters. So why then, are governments, including

1:30:26.013 --> 1:30:30.613
<v Speaker 2>the New Zealand government, so blithely and casually recommending continued

1:30:30.653 --> 1:30:34.093
<v Speaker 2>COVID jabs? Layton like me, I'll wager you will not

1:30:34.293 --> 1:30:39.333
<v Speaker 2>have another clot shot? Am I right? Best regards, Jeff, Jeff,

1:30:39.373 --> 1:30:42.373
<v Speaker 2>you are correct one hundred percent, Laydon.

1:30:42.373 --> 1:30:45.653
<v Speaker 6>Steve says, thank you for hosting Pierre Corey on the podcast.

1:30:45.813 --> 1:30:49.573
<v Speaker 6>Such a courageous and inspiring man. Though, as you pointed

1:30:49.613 --> 1:30:52.573
<v Speaker 6>out in your conversation with Professor Thomas Barodi way back

1:30:52.613 --> 1:30:56.413
<v Speaker 6>in August twenty twenty, Barodi was ahead of Cory with

1:30:56.533 --> 1:31:01.853
<v Speaker 6>his cocktail of ivermecton, doxy cyclin and zinc. His ideas, however,

1:31:01.933 --> 1:31:05.813
<v Speaker 6>were buried completely by the Australian authorities. What is not

1:31:06.293 --> 1:31:09.173
<v Speaker 6>widely known is that at the time of the first

1:31:09.373 --> 1:31:13.693
<v Speaker 6>SARS outbreak in the early two thousands, the US Defense

1:31:14.093 --> 1:31:20.933
<v Speaker 6>Advanced Research Projects Agency began researching countermeasures for coronaviruses, and

1:31:20.973 --> 1:31:26.693
<v Speaker 6>by twenty sixteen had concluded that ivermectin also, but to

1:31:26.733 --> 1:31:32.893
<v Speaker 6>a lesser extent, hydroxychloroquine, was highly effective against such infections.

1:31:33.533 --> 1:31:36.453
<v Speaker 6>That information was passed on by the way to the CDC.

1:31:37.453 --> 1:31:40.133
<v Speaker 6>Obviously this would have been known to Fauci and all

1:31:40.173 --> 1:31:44.413
<v Speaker 6>those responsible for the global COVID response, including the WHO

1:31:44.653 --> 1:31:48.813
<v Speaker 6>Gates and our own Ashley Bloomfield, but they all deliberately

1:31:48.893 --> 1:31:54.213
<v Speaker 6>suppressed that information and arranged to persecute and prosecute those

1:31:54.253 --> 1:31:57.933
<v Speaker 6>who tried to disclose it to the world. Surely this

1:31:58.013 --> 1:32:00.733
<v Speaker 6>must rank as one of the most evil acts in history.

1:32:01.173 --> 1:32:03.693
<v Speaker 6>Tens of millions of lives would have been saved, and

1:32:03.733 --> 1:32:06.253
<v Speaker 6>there would have been no need for the COVID injections,

1:32:06.373 --> 1:32:09.573
<v Speaker 6>which were, by their very natured delay, deliberately designed two

1:32:09.613 --> 1:32:14.493
<v Speaker 6>cause harm. A COVID awakening is happening slowly.

1:32:14.173 --> 1:32:15.733
<v Speaker 4>Around the world, and there.

1:32:15.573 --> 1:32:19.813
<v Speaker 6>Will be increasing calls for accountability that when the public

1:32:19.933 --> 1:32:25.013
<v Speaker 6>understands quite how deliberately and maliciously i've emecton and hydroxy

1:32:25.093 --> 1:32:29.173
<v Speaker 6>chloroquine were suppressed, it will surely call for the most

1:32:29.253 --> 1:32:31.413
<v Speaker 6>extreme penalties for those responsible.

1:32:31.533 --> 1:32:32.893
<v Speaker 4>And that is from Steve.

1:32:33.133 --> 1:32:36.533
<v Speaker 2>Steve excellent. Now I've got a question for you. How

1:32:36.653 --> 1:32:41.733
<v Speaker 2>is the everyday average well punter, as I say occasionally,

1:32:42.213 --> 1:32:43.973
<v Speaker 2>how are they going to come across that? How are

1:32:44.013 --> 1:32:47.573
<v Speaker 2>they going to find that out? Which media in this country,

1:32:47.613 --> 1:32:50.933
<v Speaker 2>and I mean mainstream media. Which media in this country

1:32:51.573 --> 1:32:55.253
<v Speaker 2>is blowing the trumpet on this? Can you point me

1:32:55.293 --> 1:32:58.373
<v Speaker 2>to one, because I'm unfamiliar with it now. I don't

1:32:58.373 --> 1:33:00.893
<v Speaker 2>spend a lot of time on mainstream media, I must admit,

1:33:01.453 --> 1:33:05.373
<v Speaker 2>so maybe I've missed something. But my guess is that

1:33:05.533 --> 1:33:08.013
<v Speaker 2>much of the mainstream media, if not most of it,

1:33:08.053 --> 1:33:11.733
<v Speaker 2>is more more intent on burying their attitude to it

1:33:11.773 --> 1:33:14.653
<v Speaker 2>at the time and their compliance with the powers that be,

1:33:15.413 --> 1:33:19.413
<v Speaker 2>and they don't particularly want to be, shall we say, exposed.

1:33:20.493 --> 1:33:25.053
<v Speaker 2>There was criminal activity. You're quite right. It is a

1:33:25.253 --> 1:33:28.293
<v Speaker 2>very very evil thing. There was criminal activity, and there

1:33:28.293 --> 1:33:30.613
<v Speaker 2>are people, even in this country, as we've said before,

1:33:31.173 --> 1:33:33.573
<v Speaker 2>and better people than me have said it, who should

1:33:33.613 --> 1:33:37.893
<v Speaker 2>be behind bars. Now. Now this letter asks for anonymity,

1:33:38.733 --> 1:33:42.933
<v Speaker 2>so I don't see why not. Greetings, what's new? Nothing?

1:33:42.973 --> 1:33:45.973
<v Speaker 2>Of course, another simply stunning discussion, this time between you

1:33:46.053 --> 1:33:49.533
<v Speaker 2>and perre Corey. Great to hear him talking with you.

1:33:49.653 --> 1:33:52.293
<v Speaker 2>His protocols have been on my fridge since they first

1:33:52.333 --> 1:33:56.573
<v Speaker 2>came out and have been shared with many, albeit some

1:33:56.653 --> 1:34:01.013
<v Speaker 2>of the medications have been challenging but not impossible to obtain.

1:34:02.053 --> 1:34:05.013
<v Speaker 2>Name withheld. Please if you read this out even now,

1:34:05.413 --> 1:34:08.733
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to drop myself in it. However, his

1:34:08.813 --> 1:34:13.333
<v Speaker 2>protocol and the comments of others Tess Laurie, Peter mccullor,

1:34:13.773 --> 1:34:17.573
<v Speaker 2>a doctor Chetty South Africa, gave me assurance I was

1:34:17.653 --> 1:34:21.493
<v Speaker 2>correct in not taking a drug that had potential heart

1:34:21.533 --> 1:34:26.093
<v Speaker 2>harm and has been proven and admitted. Having had one

1:34:26.093 --> 1:34:28.693
<v Speaker 2>heart attack, I don't want another one. And when my

1:34:29.133 --> 1:34:33.253
<v Speaker 2>longtime doctor would not give advice on boosting my immune

1:34:33.293 --> 1:34:38.293
<v Speaker 2>system instead said get vexed, I lost faith and confidence

1:34:38.373 --> 1:34:41.293
<v Speaker 2>in the industrial medical complex. Go well, keep up the

1:34:41.293 --> 1:34:44.133
<v Speaker 2>good work from anonymous.

1:34:44.613 --> 1:34:47.373
<v Speaker 6>Leyton Trish says after listening to Pierre Corey took about

1:34:47.413 --> 1:34:50.373
<v Speaker 6>the misinformation on the cures for COVID, it reminded me

1:34:50.413 --> 1:34:54.053
<v Speaker 6>of a book I've recently read. It's called Pharma Nomics,

1:34:54.413 --> 1:34:57.973
<v Speaker 6>A real eye opener to the way pharmaceutical companies work.

1:34:58.253 --> 1:35:02.253
<v Speaker 6>The ordinary citizen would be shocked. When did medicine become

1:35:02.333 --> 1:35:05.133
<v Speaker 6>something that was something to be negotiated for the highest

1:35:05.253 --> 1:35:08.533
<v Speaker 6>price and people wonder why it costs so much. It

1:35:08.613 --> 1:35:12.093
<v Speaker 6>is well worth a read. I thoroughly enjoyed Pier Corey

1:35:12.253 --> 1:35:16.613
<v Speaker 6>such enthusiasm and that's from trash.

1:35:15.933 --> 1:35:21.413
<v Speaker 2>The enthusiasm aspect of doctor Corey was mentioned by a

1:35:21.493 --> 1:35:24.533
<v Speaker 2>number of people. Actually it was you know, it was

1:35:25.533 --> 1:35:29.973
<v Speaker 2>actually uplifting. Now, thanks for introducing doctor pier Corey to us.

1:35:30.933 --> 1:35:34.493
<v Speaker 2>His description of the sinister force he faced during COVID

1:35:34.613 --> 1:35:38.133
<v Speaker 2>was chilling when he said, I quote, that was when

1:35:38.173 --> 1:35:41.053
<v Speaker 2>I finally realized I was up against something. I didn't

1:35:41.093 --> 1:35:43.613
<v Speaker 2>know what it was, but it wasn't good, and it

1:35:43.693 --> 1:35:47.413
<v Speaker 2>wasn't scientific, it wasn't humanitarian. I knew there was a

1:35:47.453 --> 1:35:50.453
<v Speaker 2>force that was working against what we were trying to do,

1:35:51.133 --> 1:35:54.653
<v Speaker 2>which has helped people and the world. So I started

1:35:54.653 --> 1:35:57.253
<v Speaker 2>to get the feeling like there was something out there

1:35:57.413 --> 1:36:00.733
<v Speaker 2>that was working against us. That was the first time

1:36:00.813 --> 1:36:05.133
<v Speaker 2>I realized this was not just a scientific argument. Close quote.

1:36:05.653 --> 1:36:08.613
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if Pierre realized it or not, but

1:36:08.733 --> 1:36:13.613
<v Speaker 2>he had just succinctly described evil and this reality of

1:36:13.693 --> 1:36:17.933
<v Speaker 2>COVID hell was made more jarring in Jasindra Dern's recent

1:36:18.053 --> 1:36:23.373
<v Speaker 2>self worshiping Yale speech about herself and her own leadership.

1:36:23.853 --> 1:36:26.973
<v Speaker 2>I have never heard so much self delusional tripe like this.

1:36:27.693 --> 1:36:31.453
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe she actually said, I'm proud that our

1:36:31.493 --> 1:36:35.453
<v Speaker 2>approach to COVID saved and estimated twenty thousand lives. Then

1:36:35.453 --> 1:36:39.453
<v Speaker 2>she spews a full Kamala Harris word salad, saying, right now,

1:36:39.493 --> 1:36:43.093
<v Speaker 2>we need the power of your impostor syndrome. I don't

1:36:43.093 --> 1:36:45.893
<v Speaker 2>get that, but I'll stay with it because I don't Ptoine.

1:36:46.133 --> 1:36:49.733
<v Speaker 2>Right now, we need the power of your impostor syndrome

1:36:50.493 --> 1:36:54.773
<v Speaker 2>because it's also your curiosity and your humility. We need

1:36:54.813 --> 1:36:58.373
<v Speaker 2>your sensitivity because it's also your kindness and your empathy.

1:36:59.013 --> 1:37:02.893
<v Speaker 2>I see what you mean about the word salad. What

1:37:02.933 --> 1:37:05.693
<v Speaker 2>the hell is that? He says. On the other hand,

1:37:05.733 --> 1:37:10.133
<v Speaker 2>Michael Jackson reported a different story in Spectator Australia is

1:37:10.213 --> 1:37:15.253
<v Speaker 2>saying to Kiwi's Addern's legacy is not one of kindness

1:37:15.693 --> 1:37:21.053
<v Speaker 2>and empathy. On top of the heartlessness of the COVID years,

1:37:21.573 --> 1:37:24.253
<v Speaker 2>it is one of a significant increase in national debt

1:37:24.693 --> 1:37:28.133
<v Speaker 2>forty seven percent of GDP according to IMF figures, up

1:37:28.173 --> 1:37:32.813
<v Speaker 2>from the low thirties in twenty eighteen. Recessions and economic malays.

1:37:33.773 --> 1:37:36.893
<v Speaker 2>One thing I do agree with adern though. The world

1:37:36.933 --> 1:37:42.453
<v Speaker 2>has indeed become a dumpster fire because delusional, narcissistic communist

1:37:42.533 --> 1:37:48.013
<v Speaker 2>leaders like herself keep committing political arson. More Doctor Pierre

1:37:48.013 --> 1:37:54.213
<v Speaker 2>Corey's fewer to Sinda Aderns, please thank you now just

1:37:54.253 --> 1:37:58.813
<v Speaker 2>one word. I don't disagree with anything that you said,

1:37:59.253 --> 1:38:01.933
<v Speaker 2>and more and more people are coming to realize the

1:38:01.973 --> 1:38:07.693
<v Speaker 2>correctness of it. As for Michael Jackson, I'm in touch

1:38:07.733 --> 1:38:09.693
<v Speaker 2>with him at the moment, and we'll have him on

1:38:09.693 --> 1:38:12.613
<v Speaker 2>the podcast in a week or two, is my anticipation,

1:38:12.773 --> 1:38:16.453
<v Speaker 2>Missus Producer. That's it, lovely, Later, we've got I think

1:38:16.453 --> 1:38:17.813
<v Speaker 2>we've got a few more for next week if we

1:38:17.853 --> 1:38:20.213
<v Speaker 2>need them. All work. Thanks, thanks, thank you to see

1:38:20.253 --> 1:38:20.493
<v Speaker 2>you then.

1:38:20.693 --> 1:38:20.973
<v Speaker 4>Bie.

1:38:33.893 --> 1:38:37.093
<v Speaker 2>Now, before we go, some comments on Joe Biden and

1:38:37.213 --> 1:38:40.533
<v Speaker 2>his prostate cancer. And I make these comments at this

1:38:40.573 --> 1:38:44.813
<v Speaker 2>point anyway, because most of you know that I got

1:38:44.853 --> 1:38:48.213
<v Speaker 2>diagnosed with prostate cancer and had my prostate out something

1:38:48.333 --> 1:38:52.773
<v Speaker 2>like twenty three years ago. Gosh, is it really that long? Anyway,

1:38:52.853 --> 1:38:56.013
<v Speaker 2>I have a vested interest in it, So let me

1:38:56.053 --> 1:38:58.613
<v Speaker 2>refer to let me refer to some commentary.

1:38:58.813 --> 1:38:58.893
<v Speaker 3>No.

1:38:59.413 --> 1:39:01.453
<v Speaker 2>First of all, my thought. The first thing that I

1:39:01.493 --> 1:39:04.493
<v Speaker 2>said to Missus Producer when the announcement was my well

1:39:04.533 --> 1:39:06.973
<v Speaker 2>she told me when the announcement was made was that

1:39:07.013 --> 1:39:10.333
<v Speaker 2>he's had this for a long time. There's nothing new,

1:39:10.693 --> 1:39:13.733
<v Speaker 2>It's just another thing that's been hidden from the public.

1:39:14.653 --> 1:39:18.213
<v Speaker 2>That was my thought immediately. It's my thought now. Apart

1:39:18.213 --> 1:39:24.093
<v Speaker 2>from that. I've garnered some commentary from some American commentators

1:39:24.293 --> 1:39:28.053
<v Speaker 2>as it happened, starting with Kurt Schlichter, who was on

1:39:28.093 --> 1:39:31.293
<v Speaker 2>the podcast a few weeks ago. And I love his

1:39:31.413 --> 1:39:34.973
<v Speaker 2>work because he's brutal, or he's prepared to be brutal

1:39:34.973 --> 1:39:38.533
<v Speaker 2>when it's appropriate, and I think this particular situation calls

1:39:38.533 --> 1:39:41.093
<v Speaker 2>for it. He covers it, so I'm not going to

1:39:41.133 --> 1:39:45.933
<v Speaker 2>try except to quote him. What a remarkable coincidence that

1:39:46.013 --> 1:39:48.973
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden's wranglers discovered that he had cancer right in

1:39:49.013 --> 1:39:52.613
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the revelations about how he was totally senile,

1:39:52.813 --> 1:39:56.213
<v Speaker 2>and everyone around him, including his very real doctor wife,

1:39:56.573 --> 1:40:02.013
<v Speaker 2>covered it up. Yeah right, his puppet masters knew even

1:40:02.213 --> 1:40:06.333
<v Speaker 2>if that human Router barger a spell it for you,

1:40:06.813 --> 1:40:10.493
<v Speaker 2>r U t ab A. In fact, let me pause

1:40:10.533 --> 1:40:15.973
<v Speaker 2>here for a moment and check it. Check its meaning. Well,

1:40:16.013 --> 1:40:19.613
<v Speaker 2>we learned something every day. Rutter Barger is a Swedish vegetable.

1:40:20.573 --> 1:40:23.573
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know to who he is referring. Is

1:40:23.613 --> 1:40:28.453
<v Speaker 2>his wife got Swedish blood? I don't know. Doesn't matter.

1:40:28.813 --> 1:40:31.653
<v Speaker 2>Stage four prostate cancer does not sneak up on you.

1:40:32.293 --> 1:40:35.573
<v Speaker 2>It's easy to detect. I know my PSA, he says,

1:40:35.973 --> 1:40:39.053
<v Speaker 2>it's zero point zero seven. I got a tested a

1:40:39.053 --> 1:40:41.453
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks ago. I get a tested every year.

1:40:41.813 --> 1:40:44.813
<v Speaker 2>Weird that I have better medical care than the president

1:40:44.853 --> 1:40:48.333
<v Speaker 2>of the United States, Right, But you don't believe that.

1:40:48.773 --> 1:40:51.093
<v Speaker 2>And I don't believe that the hacks, the frauds, and

1:40:51.213 --> 1:40:55.893
<v Speaker 2>Charlatan's demanding that you believed that, certainly don't believe it.

1:40:56.533 --> 1:40:59.013
<v Speaker 2>There are two categories of people who heard the news

1:40:59.853 --> 1:41:02.293
<v Speaker 2>and immediately told us that we need to slow our

1:41:02.413 --> 1:41:08.253
<v Speaker 2>role on demanding accountability for the rudderless presidency in solemn

1:41:08.453 --> 1:41:12.173
<v Speaker 2>deference to the ultra convenient revelation. The first kind are

1:41:12.253 --> 1:41:17.373
<v Speaker 2>nice people, too nice. Some are serial Fredricon invertebrates who

1:41:17.413 --> 1:41:22.613
<v Speaker 2>always counsel weakness, submission, and silence. Some believe Christian charity

1:41:22.733 --> 1:41:25.813
<v Speaker 2>requires not any prayers for him and his family, but

1:41:25.893 --> 1:41:30.053
<v Speaker 2>a free pass on this massive wrongdoing for everyone involved.

1:41:30.773 --> 1:41:35.213
<v Speaker 2>Others have an understandable sensitivity to the subject because they

1:41:35.253 --> 1:41:37.733
<v Speaker 2>had family members who suffered the same terrible illness that

1:41:37.813 --> 1:41:41.653
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden has been revealed to have, Even though everybody

1:41:41.653 --> 1:41:44.453
<v Speaker 2>around him must have known he had it four years

1:41:44.853 --> 1:41:48.493
<v Speaker 2>and simply lied to cover it up. Now let me

1:41:48.613 --> 1:41:51.653
<v Speaker 2>cut to the end. But but, but, but but you're

1:41:51.693 --> 1:41:55.973
<v Speaker 2>picking on a guy with a stutter who has prostate cancer. Well,

1:41:56.053 --> 1:41:59.693
<v Speaker 2>the fake fussy pearl clutching over us being meanies isn't

1:41:59.693 --> 1:42:03.533
<v Speaker 2>going to work anymore. I, for one, remember their grave disappointment.

1:42:03.693 --> 1:42:08.013
<v Speaker 2>This is some sarcasm. I for one remembered their grave

1:42:08.333 --> 1:42:12.133
<v Speaker 2>disappointment when Donald Trump was almost murdered and when an

1:42:12.133 --> 1:42:15.293
<v Speaker 2>innocent man was Just the other day, I stumbled on

1:42:15.333 --> 1:42:18.773
<v Speaker 2>a Twitter thread of leftist morons explaining how the whole

1:42:18.813 --> 1:42:22.053
<v Speaker 2>Butler shooting thing was a giant head fake, designed to

1:42:22.053 --> 1:42:26.013
<v Speaker 2>do something because of reasons and shut up your all

1:42:26.093 --> 1:42:30.933
<v Speaker 2>racists and literally Hitler. If Trump got a prostate cancer diagnosis,

1:42:31.533 --> 1:42:34.933
<v Speaker 2>every Blue state and Ivy League college campus will declare

1:42:34.933 --> 1:42:39.053
<v Speaker 2>a holiday. The difference is that we're not celebrating his disease.

1:42:39.853 --> 1:42:43.533
<v Speaker 2>We're just not granting a blanket pardon because of it.

1:42:44.093 --> 1:42:46.533
<v Speaker 2>And that's what it boils down to. Now, just quickly,

1:42:47.053 --> 1:42:51.453
<v Speaker 2>I refer to another another piece that goes thus, Several

1:42:51.493 --> 1:42:55.093
<v Speaker 2>physicians and experts took to Twitter to cast dispersion, stating

1:42:55.133 --> 1:42:57.213
<v Speaker 2>that the timing of the announcement, as well as the

1:42:57.213 --> 1:43:00.813
<v Speaker 2>seriousness of the diagnosis of the former president simply didn't

1:43:00.853 --> 1:43:03.893
<v Speaker 2>add up. They weren't swallowing the official story coming from

1:43:03.933 --> 1:43:07.213
<v Speaker 2>a politician, hook line and sinker, as they may have

1:43:07.333 --> 1:43:11.373
<v Speaker 2>done in the past. How could an easily detectable and

1:43:11.453 --> 1:43:15.413
<v Speaker 2>treatable form of cancer reach such a grave state without

1:43:15.533 --> 1:43:20.173
<v Speaker 2>anyone catching it in the most medically monitored human on

1:43:20.253 --> 1:43:23.973
<v Speaker 2>the planet. Even CNN wasn't buying it as they broke

1:43:24.013 --> 1:43:29.453
<v Speaker 2>into immediate coverage. Doc brambab speculated that Biden perhaps was

1:43:29.493 --> 1:43:32.893
<v Speaker 2>seeking treatment in secret and the hormone treatments may have

1:43:32.933 --> 1:43:37.013
<v Speaker 2>contributed to his cognitive to climb. Cancer expert doctor Stephen

1:43:37.133 --> 1:43:41.653
<v Speaker 2>Key also wrote, this is the commentary I first read. Actually,

1:43:42.333 --> 1:43:47.813
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Stephen Key quay that it's highly likely Biden's cancer

1:43:47.813 --> 1:43:51.693
<v Speaker 2>diagnosis came sometime during the duration of his term, and

1:43:51.773 --> 1:43:55.173
<v Speaker 2>even possibly at the beginning or even before. The highest

1:43:55.213 --> 1:43:58.773
<v Speaker 2>probability is that the diagnosis has been known for many years,

1:43:59.133 --> 1:44:01.773
<v Speaker 2>but a calculated decision was made to not announce it,

1:44:02.133 --> 1:44:05.333
<v Speaker 2>not treat it, and hope after the re election the

1:44:05.373 --> 1:44:08.773
<v Speaker 2>treatment could be done when it was still a local disease.

1:44:08.893 --> 1:44:13.653
<v Speaker 2>An unfortunate turn of events, he wrote, and I think finally,

1:44:14.373 --> 1:44:18.333
<v Speaker 2>Nick Mark, a medical practitioner, wrote on Twitter, as someone

1:44:18.373 --> 1:44:23.413
<v Speaker 2>who follows presidential health reporting, I noticed something odd. Unlike

1:44:23.453 --> 1:44:29.293
<v Speaker 2>his predecessors, Biden's physicians never reported PSA aha, and he

1:44:29.453 --> 1:44:34.213
<v Speaker 2>included an extensive thread showing that not taking or reporting

1:44:34.213 --> 1:44:38.413
<v Speaker 2>a PSA test for a president is rare. What's more,

1:44:38.493 --> 1:44:41.693
<v Speaker 2>journalists up to swallowing whatever story is fed to them

1:44:41.733 --> 1:44:46.293
<v Speaker 2>by the former president's aides took to promoting skeptical experts

1:44:46.333 --> 1:44:50.533
<v Speaker 2>of the former president's sudden diagnosis. Whether it's the medical

1:44:50.533 --> 1:44:53.693
<v Speaker 2>fought out from heavy handed pandemic policy, there is a

1:44:53.693 --> 1:44:57.213
<v Speaker 2>welcome dose of skepticism coming from a community that has

1:44:57.333 --> 1:45:01.093
<v Speaker 2>been in dire need of thought reform. Would things be

1:45:01.093 --> 1:45:03.293
<v Speaker 2>different if Joe Biden was still the president we were

1:45:03.333 --> 1:45:08.453
<v Speaker 2>all all taking his doctor's word at face value. Maybe,

1:45:08.573 --> 1:45:12.093
<v Speaker 2>But thanks to medical experts openly questioning, this new Biden

1:45:12.173 --> 1:45:16.773
<v Speaker 2>diagnosis after ignoring his decline for so long is a

1:45:16.813 --> 1:45:21.533
<v Speaker 2>welcome change, and we should hope that it continues. Concluding

1:45:21.573 --> 1:45:25.253
<v Speaker 2>with trust, the science is no longer good enough, and

1:45:25.333 --> 1:45:28.133
<v Speaker 2>it certainly should not be good enough for the ongoing

1:45:28.213 --> 1:45:32.093
<v Speaker 2>cover up of the former president's health one of the

1:45:32.413 --> 1:45:37.253
<v Speaker 2>most abused phrases. I think in the last well at

1:45:37.373 --> 1:45:44.733
<v Speaker 2>least decade, if not longer, trust the science skepticism is necessary.

1:45:44.933 --> 1:45:46.893
<v Speaker 2>So that will take us out for podcasts number two

1:45:46.973 --> 1:45:49.333
<v Speaker 2>hundred and eighty five and if you'd like to comment

1:45:49.933 --> 1:45:53.653
<v Speaker 2>latent at newstalksb dot co dot nz or Carolyn with

1:45:53.733 --> 1:45:58.173
<v Speaker 2>a y at newstalksb dot co dot nz. We shall

1:45:58.213 --> 1:46:01.373
<v Speaker 2>return in a few days with podcast two eight six.

1:46:01.893 --> 1:46:04.653
<v Speaker 2>Until then, as always, thank you for listening and we'll

1:46:04.653 --> 1:46:05.133
<v Speaker 2>talk soon.

1:46:13.053 --> 1:46:16.693
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for more from news Talks at B Listen

1:46:16.773 --> 1:46:19.733
<v Speaker 1>live on air or online, and keep our shows with

1:46:19.813 --> 1:46:22.973
<v Speaker 1>you wherever you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio