1 00:00:00,680 --> 00:00:04,120 Speaker 1: The huddle with New Zealand Southeby's International Realty find you 2 00:00:04,120 --> 00:00:06,880 Speaker 1: are one of a kind on the huddle this evening' 3 00:00:06,880 --> 00:00:10,000 Speaker 1: got Morris Williamson Auckland Council obviously former National Party minister 4 00:00:10,039 --> 00:00:12,760 Speaker 1: and Ali Jones read pr and christ Church Local board member. 5 00:00:12,760 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 1: Holl are you too good? 6 00:00:14,440 --> 00:00:18,560 Speaker 2: Ay, Good evening, Heather, and good evening Ali Hirius. 7 00:00:18,079 --> 00:00:20,200 Speaker 1: Morris, what did you make of the pay equity announcement. 8 00:00:21,880 --> 00:00:24,520 Speaker 2: I think it's a sensible move because they're not getting 9 00:00:24,600 --> 00:00:26,840 Speaker 2: rid of pay equity. Pay equity will be here to stay. 10 00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:29,480 Speaker 2: But it's how you do the comparators. And I've had 11 00:00:29,520 --> 00:00:32,080 Speaker 2: a number of companies and employers raise it with me 12 00:00:32,120 --> 00:00:36,159 Speaker 2: along the way, saying that the ludicrous comparator of some 13 00:00:36,360 --> 00:00:40,279 Speaker 2: staff they've got with another occupation I think I I mean, 14 00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:42,159 Speaker 2: I've heard the Minister in the House today saying that 15 00:00:42,400 --> 00:00:44,720 Speaker 2: Health New Zealand and the clerical staff were being compared 16 00:00:44,760 --> 00:00:49,400 Speaker 2: to mechanical engineers Health New Zealand librarians to transport engineers. 17 00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:52,720 Speaker 2: And the one I loved was Oranger Tamariki social workers 18 00:00:52,720 --> 00:00:57,080 Speaker 2: to air traffic controllers. There's just lunatic lunacy. It's dear lunacy. 19 00:00:57,320 --> 00:00:59,639 Speaker 2: So the idea of pay equity is good, but make 20 00:00:59,680 --> 00:01:01,200 Speaker 2: sure you get the comparators sorted. 21 00:01:01,320 --> 00:01:01,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, I agree. 22 00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:04,160 Speaker 3: What do you think about it, Ali, Well, there's no 23 00:01:04,600 --> 00:01:06,760 Speaker 3: doubt in my mind that the coalition's using this to 24 00:01:06,760 --> 00:01:10,520 Speaker 3: fund the budget. Absolutely nothing they have said today Luxeon 25 00:01:10,800 --> 00:01:13,800 Speaker 3: or van Walden has made sense. So I heard chryst 26 00:01:13,840 --> 00:01:16,360 Speaker 3: Re Luxen say we're making sure we have a process 27 00:01:16,400 --> 00:01:20,760 Speaker 3: that is more robust, workable and sustainable than what I mean. 28 00:01:20,880 --> 00:01:23,080 Speaker 3: I have been involved with the College of Midwives pay 29 00:01:23,120 --> 00:01:26,880 Speaker 3: equity case. I'm not any longer. The hopes they had 30 00:01:26,920 --> 00:01:31,319 Speaker 3: to jump through the independent very expensive reports that they 31 00:01:31,319 --> 00:01:35,920 Speaker 3: had to pay for to get robust and accepted comparators. 32 00:01:36,200 --> 00:01:37,440 Speaker 1: And this is also for Meris. 33 00:01:37,440 --> 00:01:40,920 Speaker 3: The midwives union was huge. Morris, I think you're being 34 00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:44,600 Speaker 3: incredibly disingenuous when you start talking about, you know, comparing 35 00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:48,080 Speaker 3: librarians with engineers and so forth. Once it gets to 36 00:01:48,160 --> 00:01:50,920 Speaker 3: a negotiation into a court case, as it has with 37 00:01:50,960 --> 00:01:54,960 Speaker 3: the midwives, you just don't get that stuff accepted without 38 00:01:55,160 --> 00:01:59,280 Speaker 3: robust independent reports. So I think they're actually changing something 39 00:01:59,360 --> 00:02:00,880 Speaker 3: that doesn't need changeing. 40 00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:05,080 Speaker 1: Who were the midwives comparing themselves to. By the way, Alie, that's. 41 00:02:04,920 --> 00:02:07,120 Speaker 3: A good question, and that's one but I haven't managed 42 00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:10,400 Speaker 3: to look at and pull up today. But the PwC report, 43 00:02:10,400 --> 00:02:13,840 Speaker 3: I think it was PwC that did it. They looked 44 00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:16,720 Speaker 3: at the number of years that someone studies for what 45 00:02:16,880 --> 00:02:22,440 Speaker 3: their experiences and what their life protection responsibilities are in 46 00:02:22,480 --> 00:02:24,560 Speaker 3: the work that they do. So there are a whole 47 00:02:24,639 --> 00:02:28,160 Speaker 3: lot of different things that it might have been, for example, 48 00:02:28,240 --> 00:02:30,960 Speaker 3: a police detective. I'm not sure, don't quote me on that, 49 00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:35,360 Speaker 3: but it is done in a very scientific, very very 50 00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:39,440 Speaker 3: independent and robust waste. So I was curious to hear 51 00:02:39,440 --> 00:02:41,200 Speaker 3: Brook van Velden say that rubbish to. 52 00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:43,720 Speaker 2: So Alie, Well, those comparators I gave you here that 53 00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:46,680 Speaker 2: are actually in claims, because I've seen the copies of them, 54 00:02:46,840 --> 00:02:48,480 Speaker 2: and I thought the best one i've seen, I haven't 55 00:02:48,520 --> 00:02:51,680 Speaker 2: even yes that one use this one. Corrections officers have 56 00:02:51,760 --> 00:02:55,359 Speaker 2: been used as a compartor for nurses claims, for admin's 57 00:02:55,360 --> 00:02:58,239 Speaker 2: support staff claims, and for teacher aides. Now, I don't 58 00:02:58,240 --> 00:03:00,440 Speaker 2: think they've got anything to do with each other, whether 59 00:03:00,480 --> 00:03:03,080 Speaker 2: one's better or not, or bigger or less, but I 60 00:03:03,160 --> 00:03:05,360 Speaker 2: just think to use them as a comparator for the 61 00:03:05,400 --> 00:03:07,040 Speaker 2: work you do is just wrong. 62 00:03:07,240 --> 00:03:09,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, but we don't know that, Morris. That's what the 63 00:03:09,200 --> 00:03:12,639 Speaker 3: Price Waterhouse Cooper's report does. It looks at how long 64 00:03:12,720 --> 00:03:15,640 Speaker 3: people study. It looks at their degree of responsibility. It 65 00:03:15,639 --> 00:03:18,280 Speaker 3: looks at the life protection and the work that they do. 66 00:03:18,360 --> 00:03:21,200 Speaker 3: It looks at their earnings. We can't sit here as 67 00:03:21,280 --> 00:03:25,040 Speaker 3: lay people and say, oh, an engineer is nothing like xyz. 68 00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:27,480 Speaker 3: It's got to be done properly. So those claims that 69 00:03:27,520 --> 00:03:30,480 Speaker 3: you're talking about are likely, if they don't stack up, 70 00:03:30,639 --> 00:03:33,400 Speaker 3: to be kicked out. So the process in the system 71 00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:36,400 Speaker 3: is already there. This is purely to get money that 72 00:03:36,440 --> 00:03:38,400 Speaker 3: they can put towards the budget, no doubt. 73 00:03:38,440 --> 00:03:41,680 Speaker 1: Ali In which case, then if the claims will the 74 00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:44,440 Speaker 1: thirty three claims that have been sopped, they will simply 75 00:03:44,560 --> 00:03:47,880 Speaker 1: be reapplying, presumably under the new rules. It is just 76 00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:49,600 Speaker 1: deferring the spend, then, isn't it. 77 00:03:50,600 --> 00:03:52,480 Speaker 3: Well, yes, it is deferring the spend. But we all 78 00:03:52,480 --> 00:03:54,280 Speaker 3: know and Morris will know this too, that when you're 79 00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:56,680 Speaker 3: working either with long term plans at a city council 80 00:03:56,760 --> 00:03:58,800 Speaker 3: level or you're doing it through a budget at a 81 00:03:58,880 --> 00:04:02,200 Speaker 3: national government level, being able to first spend and move 82 00:04:02,280 --> 00:04:05,800 Speaker 3: money around is absolutely key. And presenting of the budget, 83 00:04:06,120 --> 00:04:08,320 Speaker 3: and the point that she made about just starting again. 84 00:04:08,520 --> 00:04:11,920 Speaker 3: It was kind of just dropped into conversation. This case 85 00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:14,920 Speaker 3: that the Midwives has been have been running, has been 86 00:04:14,960 --> 00:04:17,880 Speaker 3: going for nearly a decade. The decision has been reserved 87 00:04:17,880 --> 00:04:20,920 Speaker 3: for nearly a year, and it has cost them thousands 88 00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:23,120 Speaker 3: and thousands of dollars. Is that just going to be 89 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:23,880 Speaker 3: chucked out the window? 90 00:04:23,920 --> 00:04:25,800 Speaker 1: When she doesn't? It will be, won't it? Because it 91 00:04:25,880 --> 00:04:29,200 Speaker 1: is retrospective. This law is retrospective, So it stops everything 92 00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:30,120 Speaker 1: in its tracks, doesn't it. 93 00:04:30,760 --> 00:04:32,240 Speaker 3: Yeah, that I don't know, And I've just been in 94 00:04:32,279 --> 00:04:35,440 Speaker 3: touch with the college head now and she she does, well. 95 00:04:35,240 --> 00:04:38,359 Speaker 2: It's out retrospect. But how about if you get a 96 00:04:38,480 --> 00:04:41,479 Speaker 2: much better sort of clarity about the comparators and the 97 00:04:41,520 --> 00:04:45,320 Speaker 2: definitions into the legislation and then you don't have these 98 00:04:45,520 --> 00:04:49,039 Speaker 2: wild and swings of there is no way that some 99 00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:50,840 Speaker 2: of these occupations are comparisons. 100 00:04:50,880 --> 00:04:53,040 Speaker 3: Why does it need to be in the legislation, Morris, 101 00:04:53,279 --> 00:04:57,120 Speaker 3: it's in the negotiations, and they vary so much, particularly 102 00:04:57,200 --> 00:04:59,680 Speaker 3: with women. Where you've got and who one of your 103 00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:03,279 Speaker 3: texters say earlier, Heather, Oh you can't compare? You know 104 00:05:03,320 --> 00:05:05,520 Speaker 3: what was it a librarian with an engineer. They've got 105 00:05:05,520 --> 00:05:07,320 Speaker 3: to be men and women in the same job. The 106 00:05:07,400 --> 00:05:11,120 Speaker 3: point is most of these professions have got only women 107 00:05:11,279 --> 00:05:13,960 Speaker 3: in them. That's what a comparator is for. So I 108 00:05:13,960 --> 00:05:17,920 Speaker 3: don't think people actually understand that the Huddle. 109 00:05:17,680 --> 00:05:21,839 Speaker 2: With New Zealand Southeby's International Realty achieve extraordinary results with 110 00:05:22,000 --> 00:05:23,280 Speaker 2: unparallel reach. 111 00:05:23,240 --> 00:05:25,360 Speaker 1: Back of the Huddle. Morris Williams and Ali Jones. Ali, 112 00:05:25,480 --> 00:05:27,240 Speaker 1: what did you make of the NATS pretending they're going 113 00:05:27,279 --> 00:05:31,240 Speaker 1: to do something about banning kids from social media? Oh? 114 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:34,159 Speaker 3: Look, when you get into the detail of it, I 115 00:05:34,160 --> 00:05:37,120 Speaker 3: think some of the comments that some of the politicians 116 00:05:37,120 --> 00:05:41,200 Speaker 3: have made are fair enough. They're talking about putting some restrictions, 117 00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:44,560 Speaker 3: putting some parameters, putting some controls around it that you know, 118 00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:46,880 Speaker 3: we try and help our kids in many ways in 119 00:05:46,920 --> 00:05:49,760 Speaker 3: their lives in New Zealand, and this is causing a 120 00:05:49,839 --> 00:05:54,279 Speaker 3: huge problem just almost unfettered access to the Internet. So look, 121 00:05:54,320 --> 00:05:57,039 Speaker 3: I think banning is probably not what they're going to do. 122 00:05:57,040 --> 00:05:58,760 Speaker 3: It all depends what the terms of reference are and 123 00:05:58,800 --> 00:05:59,880 Speaker 3: what the outcomes expected. 124 00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:03,320 Speaker 1: I mean, if you really were going to do something, Morris, 125 00:06:03,360 --> 00:06:05,240 Speaker 1: you wouldn't do it as a member's bill. Would you 126 00:06:05,000 --> 00:06:07,240 Speaker 1: you do it as much it does as a government bill, 127 00:06:07,320 --> 00:06:07,960 Speaker 1: or get some cross pack. 128 00:06:08,080 --> 00:06:09,480 Speaker 2: It goes into the bis get ten and never gets 129 00:06:09,480 --> 00:06:11,600 Speaker 2: seen again, so it's got your headlined today and you'll 130 00:06:11,640 --> 00:06:14,799 Speaker 2: never remember it again. I actually think it's a great idea. 131 00:06:15,200 --> 00:06:18,599 Speaker 2: I've got very serious concerns about how you make it work, 132 00:06:18,960 --> 00:06:21,039 Speaker 2: and how are you implemented, and how easy it is 133 00:06:21,080 --> 00:06:23,400 Speaker 2: to get around it, because these tech companies will set 134 00:06:23,480 --> 00:06:27,480 Speaker 2: up new products which won't be called social media products. 135 00:06:27,480 --> 00:06:30,200 Speaker 2: They'll be streaming service or something else, and you'll still 136 00:06:30,200 --> 00:06:32,320 Speaker 2: be able to put your material in. I just think 137 00:06:32,360 --> 00:06:35,680 Speaker 2: the kids' minds are being warped so badly by social media. 138 00:06:35,720 --> 00:06:38,800 Speaker 2: I think it's really changing the world in a really 139 00:06:38,839 --> 00:06:41,320 Speaker 2: bad way. And if there is a way when my 140 00:06:41,440 --> 00:06:43,039 Speaker 2: kids grow up. We had to try and find a 141 00:06:43,080 --> 00:06:45,880 Speaker 2: way to blocking the Wi fi so they couldn't be 142 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:48,560 Speaker 2: playing on the social media as it was back and 143 00:06:48,600 --> 00:06:50,400 Speaker 2: it was only getting started. In the end, we got 144 00:06:50,440 --> 00:06:51,680 Speaker 2: to the point we didn't know how to do it 145 00:06:51,720 --> 00:06:53,840 Speaker 2: because the technology didn't allow on those days, So we 146 00:06:54,000 --> 00:06:55,839 Speaker 2: turned the Wi Fi off at about six o'clock at 147 00:06:55,920 --> 00:06:57,800 Speaker 2: night and Raymond would complain to me, I want to 148 00:06:57,800 --> 00:06:59,039 Speaker 2: go on to the Internet and look, as I said, 149 00:06:59,040 --> 00:07:00,760 Speaker 2: well you can't because it's all blocked off so that 150 00:07:00,839 --> 00:07:02,880 Speaker 2: kids can't get on the w I think it's the 151 00:07:02,880 --> 00:07:04,680 Speaker 2: best thing to do is to stop your kids from 152 00:07:04,680 --> 00:07:07,400 Speaker 2: seeing this stuff because they are exposed to garbage on 153 00:07:07,440 --> 00:07:07,960 Speaker 2: that stuff. 154 00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:10,120 Speaker 1: I would have thought, Morris, that there's a reasonable number 155 00:07:10,200 --> 00:07:13,040 Speaker 1: of votes out there from parents, you know, parents like 156 00:07:13,080 --> 00:07:16,480 Speaker 1: yourself who've been through, parents like myself who face the 157 00:07:16,480 --> 00:07:18,200 Speaker 1: prospect of going through it like there must be a 158 00:07:18,320 --> 00:07:21,240 Speaker 1: huge number and grandparents, So there must be a huge 159 00:07:21,320 --> 00:07:23,320 Speaker 1: number of votes, and actually doing this properly and getting 160 00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:23,880 Speaker 1: it right. 161 00:07:24,520 --> 00:07:26,120 Speaker 2: Correct, And the only way you'll get it right is 162 00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:27,600 Speaker 2: if you do it as a government bill with all 163 00:07:27,680 --> 00:07:31,960 Speaker 2: the necessary advisors in there and the contestable advice about 164 00:07:32,120 --> 00:07:34,800 Speaker 2: how you make it work, how you get around the 165 00:07:34,840 --> 00:07:37,680 Speaker 2: tech companies trying to skirt around it. Put some penalties 166 00:07:37,720 --> 00:07:40,200 Speaker 2: in place that they can get pinged and stung quite 167 00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:44,120 Speaker 2: badly if they're proven to misbehave. Because it's a great idea. 168 00:07:44,240 --> 00:07:46,920 Speaker 2: I just it's really hard to do, That's all I'm saying. 169 00:07:46,960 --> 00:07:49,080 Speaker 1: Too, right, Hey, Ali, I'm still not even though three 170 00:07:49,080 --> 00:07:50,760 Speaker 1: of them have done it now with the gmails. I'm 171 00:07:50,760 --> 00:07:54,080 Speaker 1: still not that exercise by it, are you? No? Not really? 172 00:07:54,160 --> 00:07:56,480 Speaker 3: I look, this was actually really close to home for 173 00:07:56,600 --> 00:07:59,280 Speaker 3: me because I can't do everything that I need to 174 00:07:59,280 --> 00:08:01,360 Speaker 3: do with my elector roll, with my counselor email. I 175 00:08:01,400 --> 00:08:04,280 Speaker 3: can't screenshot, I can't copy and paste, and apparently this 176 00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:07,040 Speaker 3: is all downe to security and obviously it's a trust 177 00:08:07,040 --> 00:08:08,600 Speaker 3: issue as well. I know it's bloody. 178 00:08:08,920 --> 00:08:10,000 Speaker 1: It's very frustrated. 179 00:08:10,480 --> 00:08:12,520 Speaker 3: So I have to while I have to forward it 180 00:08:12,560 --> 00:08:14,800 Speaker 3: to my red PR email and do things from there, 181 00:08:14,840 --> 00:08:17,280 Speaker 3: which the Council's happy about because then if there's a leak, 182 00:08:17,360 --> 00:08:20,000 Speaker 3: thing though, it's me sending it to my work email. 183 00:08:20,280 --> 00:08:23,040 Speaker 3: But I know what the frustrations are. What I'm more 184 00:08:23,080 --> 00:08:26,160 Speaker 3: concerned about is how these ministers aren't able to do 185 00:08:26,240 --> 00:08:28,480 Speaker 3: the jobs that they are supposed to be doing. Quite 186 00:08:28,480 --> 00:08:30,880 Speaker 3: how hard is it to make sure you can print too, right? 187 00:08:30,920 --> 00:08:32,680 Speaker 1: I mean the printing issue is something I'll tell you 188 00:08:32,679 --> 00:08:36,479 Speaker 1: what though, Morris, I was thinking, actually I'm quite impressed 189 00:08:36,840 --> 00:08:39,079 Speaker 1: with I always worry about ministers doing this because I 190 00:08:39,080 --> 00:08:41,360 Speaker 1: think are they trying to get around the Official Information Act? 191 00:08:41,400 --> 00:08:44,319 Speaker 1: But I was quite impressed that actually TVs had managed 192 00:08:44,360 --> 00:08:47,520 Speaker 1: to get like a couple of folders that Erica actually 193 00:08:47,559 --> 00:08:49,400 Speaker 1: gave to them out of her own Gmail account. That's 194 00:08:49,440 --> 00:08:52,280 Speaker 1: not bad, is it? She's facing up Heather. 195 00:08:52,400 --> 00:08:55,520 Speaker 2: I learned about twelve thirteen years ago how to not 196 00:08:55,640 --> 00:08:58,520 Speaker 2: do this stuff. A strappy young reporter working for I 197 00:08:58,559 --> 00:09:02,160 Speaker 2: think the story TV three stopped me on the bridge 198 00:09:02,160 --> 00:09:04,760 Speaker 2: walk over and shoved a microphone in my face and said, 199 00:09:04,800 --> 00:09:06,880 Speaker 2: do you use private email? And what the hell is 200 00:09:06,920 --> 00:09:08,120 Speaker 2: this course? 201 00:09:08,120 --> 00:09:08,560 Speaker 1: Does that mean? 202 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:10,560 Speaker 2: Oh? Yes, that's right, it was you. 203 00:09:11,720 --> 00:09:14,760 Speaker 1: Was because I think I was how embarrassing? Stop each 204 00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:17,400 Speaker 1: is the right way, but was it's why were you 205 00:09:17,480 --> 00:09:18,679 Speaker 1: in trouble? What were you doing? 206 00:09:19,200 --> 00:09:21,800 Speaker 2: What you were asking? Every one of them? All ministers 207 00:09:21,840 --> 00:09:24,120 Speaker 2: were being asked as we walked over, did we use 208 00:09:24,160 --> 00:09:26,240 Speaker 2: private email? And I thought, well, yeah, of course I 209 00:09:26,320 --> 00:09:28,960 Speaker 2: do ye private email? I mean, if I'm arranging to 210 00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:31,600 Speaker 2: have dinner with Ray when I don't use my parliamentary 211 00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:32,679 Speaker 2: ministerial emails. 212 00:09:32,440 --> 00:09:34,160 Speaker 1: What are you doing and doing it on email? Anyway? 213 00:09:34,160 --> 00:09:35,360 Speaker 1: Why aren't you just calling your. 214 00:09:35,240 --> 00:09:38,520 Speaker 2: Wife many times? If you're stuck in a boring meeting 215 00:09:38,559 --> 00:09:40,160 Speaker 2: and you can't get out to make a phone call, 216 00:09:40,200 --> 00:09:43,000 Speaker 2: I'll flick an email to somebody. You really so. 217 00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:45,520 Speaker 1: Would you email? This is interesting, you'd email your wife 218 00:09:45,840 --> 00:09:47,640 Speaker 1: for a dinner date over texting your wife. 219 00:09:47,720 --> 00:09:49,720 Speaker 2: No, no, no, no no, not a dinner date, but 220 00:09:49,800 --> 00:09:51,640 Speaker 2: just to say I'll be back home tonight for dinner. 221 00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:53,040 Speaker 1: Okay, all right, you're. 222 00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:55,120 Speaker 3: Still doing it hither, aren't you? Why don't you shove 223 00:09:55,160 --> 00:09:56,000 Speaker 3: the microphone right up? 224 00:09:56,040 --> 00:09:59,800 Speaker 1: As I am so fascinated by Morris's private communications, as 225 00:09:59,840 --> 00:10:01,160 Speaker 1: you you years later. 226 00:10:01,160 --> 00:10:03,360 Speaker 2: You scared. You scared the bejeez on me that day 227 00:10:03,360 --> 00:10:04,920 Speaker 2: because I thought I had done something wrong, and then 228 00:10:04,920 --> 00:10:07,640 Speaker 2: it turned out every minister you were stopping and asking them. 229 00:10:07,720 --> 00:10:10,960 Speaker 1: It was just the confidence with which I was approaching it. Obviously, guys, 230 00:10:11,040 --> 00:10:14,040 Speaker 1: thank you. It's lovely to chat to you. Morris Williamson 231 00:10:14,040 --> 00:10:15,480 Speaker 1: and Ellie Jones are huddle this evening. 232 00:10:16,160 --> 00:10:19,319 Speaker 2: For more from Hither Duplessy, Allen Drive listen live to 233 00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:22,480 Speaker 2: news talks it'd be from four pm weekdays, or follow 234 00:10:22,520 --> 00:10:24,280 Speaker 2: the podcast on iHeartRadio