WEBVTT - Labour's David Parker on the state of foreign affairs 

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to on the Tiles. I'm your host

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.079
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Coglin. This week, We've got an interesting episode a

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>little while ago. Last week in fact, Diplosphere, who run

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of foreign policy events in Wellington. You can

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>sign up on their website and and get notifications for

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>their events, they invited me to host David Parker speech late.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>David Parkers obviously the foreign feer spokesperson for the Labor Party.

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>In the Foreign and Feast portfolio, you techinically do a

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>few big speeches every year which set out your views

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>on foreign policy where you position yourself. It's a much

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>more speech heavy portfolio than other portfolios. You invite members

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Diplomatic Corps and and and they kind of

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>analyze your speech for for for hints at where you're

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>positioning yourself in the foreign policy world. So this was

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>was one of David Parker's big foreign policy speeches. It

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>sets out a lot of his David Parker thought on

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>tax on inequality, on social media, interestingly, and it packages

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that into a sort of foreign policy framework, which I

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>think is very interesting because obviously inequality and social media

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily fit within the Foreign appears portfolio. But David

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Park clearly thinks that they do. So after the speech

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you will hear me giving an interviewing David doing a

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>quick Q and A, and then we take some questions

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:35.919
<v Speaker 1>from the audience. Thanks to Diplosphere for hosting the event,

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and thanks to David for a really interesting speech and

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a great Q and A. I thought next week we'll

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>be back with a more conventional episode, but we thought

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>we'd put this on the feed this week for your enjoyment.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to members of the Diplomatic Corps, fellow members of Parliament,

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 2>the for the State, foreign Affairs experts, experts, trade tragics,

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 2>ladies and gentlemen. Special thanks to diplas Fair for helping

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 2>organize this event. Jenegoto gatoa Mexican poet Omeilo Aichis, wrote,

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>there are centuries in which nothing happens, and years in

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 2>which centuries pass. Feels like that now, large swaths of

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>the eighty year old world Sorry, large swaths of the

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 2>eighty year old rules based world order developed after World

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 2>War II are in tatus. The dramatic withdrawal of the

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 2>United States of America from the Paris Agreement, the World

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Health Organization the wholting of the most usaid programs are

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 2>to say the least significant, the ineffective installed OECD work

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 2>on the minimum taxation of multinational companies. The whirlwind of

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 2>tariffs and counter tariffs which change almost daily. The war

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of words between neighbors in North America is unprecedented. Speed

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 2>of the recent withdrawal of US support for institutions the

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>US was pivotal in creating has shocked many. Europe already

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 2>reeling from war in Ukraine and wider instability, is now

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 2>deeply unsettled by recent statements and positions from the new

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>US administration. The withdrawal of the US security Guarantee changed

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 2>not just Europe, but geopolitics everywhere, including Asia and the Pacific.

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Tectonic shifts are rocking the world, which is markedly different

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 2>from a decade ago. Multi letteral institutions have diminished an

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 2>authority and effect. The slide of the United Nations and

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 2>other important institutions like the World Trade Organization is obvious.

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 2>The overuse of the UN's Security Council VETO and inconsistent

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 2>application of international law has undermined the United Nations. Ineffectiveness

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 2>feeds a cynicism and embolds disregard for international laws, treaties

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>and institutions. The UN Secretary General was declared persona non

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 2>grata in Israel. Many countries we identify with, like Canadian

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and European democracies, which relied on security alliances with one

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 2>great power, are obviously rethinking their strategy. In stark contrast,

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 2>the New Zealand government has spent the last eighteen months

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 2>seeking closer alignment to the US, increasingly positioning New Zealand

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.799
<v Speaker 2>as being an opposition to China. We did not consider

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 2>this a wise approach, but in any case, the shifting

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 2>global landscape has rendered it unsound. The world is in

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>a transition to a multi polar world, with heightened rivalry

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 2>between the great powers. We could be in for a

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 2>rough ride. What would a labor government do if we

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>held the reins? How should New Zealand navigate the new

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 2>world order? When should we speak out? What should when

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 2>should we stay side so as not to provoke a response.

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll set out my thoughts on New Zealand's foreign affairs

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 2>and defense and trade responses. How New Zealand would steer.

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand's independent foreign policy both transationally and I think

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 2>importantly holistically. You will have seen that we share common

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 2>views with the government on the likes of the Cook Islands,

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 2>the militarization of the Pacific, and on Ukraine, but we

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 2>differ strongly on Orcas and Gaza. This should not surprise

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 2>given Labour's record, which we're proud to stand by. The

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 2>Labour led government stayed out of the illegal invasion of

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Iraq after Ewan inspector hahns Blix found no evidence of

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 2>weapons of mass destruction. National said New Zealand should have

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 2>joined that war, which made the Middle East less secure

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>and undermine the rules based order. An earlier Labor government

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>established New Zealand's nuclear free status, which National opposed. Labour

0:05:55.640 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 2>sent peacekeeping reconstruction forces to Teamo Leste in Afghanistan. We

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 2>provided money for arms to Ukraine via the NATO Fund,

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>humanitarian aid, air transport in Europe, and New Zealand personnel

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 2>to help train Ukrainian soldiers in the UK. These are

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 2>all examples of the New Zealand Labor Party and Government

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 2>applying our independent foreign policy making decisions according to our

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 2>assessment of New Zealand's long term national interests. New Zealand

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 2>is not non aligned and works closely with local minded

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 2>countries which share our values. Australia is by far our

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 2>most important relationship. We are internationalists, not isolationists, and a

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 2>reliable supporter of international institutions. We understand communication between nations

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 2>on sensitive issues benefits from diplomacy, whether via the United

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 2>Nations or other multilateral for or bilaterally. We must be

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 2>able to talk our differences. Sorry, we must be able

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 2>to talk about it, differences between our country and others.

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Hegemony is taken too far if we cannot not. All

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 2>statements can be in public, but some should be Sometimes,

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 2>as now, there is a desire not to offend for

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 2>fear of retaliation at times of sensitivity. The wisdom of

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 2>former prime ministers on both sides of the Tasman can

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 2>be helpful. They can say what needs to be said.

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Paul Keating is well known for his pithy comments. He

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 2>recently described the fairer attributes of Australian society compare with

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 2>US societal settings. He listed cradle to the grave healthcare

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>for everyone, a sustainable retirement savings and superannuation system, an

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Australian economy which delivers substantial income increases for working people,

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 2>high rates of Australian participation in education and effective gun control.

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Keating's purpose was to emphasize that we shouldn't be subservient

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 2>nor sed moral authority to others, including the US, when

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 2>choosing our approach to the world. Malcolm Turnbull has spoken

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 2>out against US tariffs, noting their random use against Australia

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 2>is not justified by a trade and balance. John Key

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 2>has quietly but importantly emphasized that we should be careful

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 2>not to ruin our relationship with China. Helen Clark described

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 2>the pitfalls of aucust Pillar two and has been critical

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 2>of loose language, resurrecting the defunct Ansis Pact, or using

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>the Five Eyes Intelligent Network as a foreign affairs construct.

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 2>She put it succinctly and well. New Zealand needs a

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 2>clear eyed vision for courteous relationships with the US and China,

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 2>close dialogue with the Pacific Rim, Pacific Island and European friends.

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 2>Just because great power politics has shifted does not mean

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 2>aye Tero should drop our long standing commitment to human rights,

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 2>open trade, multi letteral institutions and the rights of small states. Obviously,

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 2>we understand diplomacy is required, but that should not silence

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 2>our ability to speak up and advocate what we believe in.

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 2>We raise concerns about freedom and expression and the treatment

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 2>of minorities in China, and about foreign interference. Some of

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 2>this is behind closed doors, but some are very public.

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 2>When the Chinese government, via its New Zealand embassy, criticized

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand media for reports alleging foreign interference in labour,

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 2>we quickly and publicly stood up for the rights of

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the New Zealand media and criticized the Chinese intervention. The

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand Labour parties view is that if we don't

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 2>stand up for what we believe in, we undermine our

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 2>ability to do so in future. We also undermine our

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 2>reputation for fairness and foreign affairs, built up over decades,

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 2>which in turn undermines our influence. The same principles apply

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 2>to our relationship with the US. We have acknowledged that

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 2>the current govern it's desire not to unnecessarily provoke a

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 2>response from the US when things are so volatile, but

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 2>the government's seeming unwillingness to criticize anything pertaining to the

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 2>US concerns US. Even when the US went so far

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 2>as to sanction others for participation in international institutions we support.

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 2>For example, New Zealand is a member of the International

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Criminal Court the US is not. That is their right,

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 2>but for the US to sanction those assisting the ICC

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 2>is wrong. Yet the current government chose not to stand

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 2>with sixty nine other countries, including Switzerland, France, Canada, UK, Germany, Sweden,

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 2>countries we share values with. This was an unfortunate break

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 2>with New Zealand's proud tradition and independently standing for what

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>we believe in. If we want countries to support the

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 2>international rule of law, we should apply it consistently. Many

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 2>countries think the West is inconsistent in its application of

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 2>international law. In the Middle East, the sympathy most New

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Zealand has felt for Israel and those who settled there

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 2>following the Holocaust has severely eroded. We condemned the killings

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 2>and hostage taking by Hamas on seventeen October twenty twenty three,

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 2>but seventy years after the nineteen sixty seven war, the

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 2>blatant lack of rights of Palestinian people, the endless death

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 2>and carnage in Gaza, and the lack of progress towards

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 2>a two state solution or a single state alternative is intolerable.

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 2>That's why we have said New Zealand should be assisting

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the International Court of Justice when considering whether the State

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 2>of Israel is acting illegally, as we did in respect

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 2>of Rwanda and Ukraine, and be clear that individuals and

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 2>breach of international law should face consequences in the International

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Criminal Court and via in New Zealand sanctions regime. We

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 2>have limited power and we can't always get our way.

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 2>We try to use our values and reap mutation to

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 2>influence better outcomes. We get the real politic of superpower.

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>We are long term observers of superpower behavior. We are

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 2>not surprised China has become more assertive as it has

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 2>become a superpower. The UK used to be so with

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 2>France and Spain and Esli back in the day. The

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 2>USA has long used its power in Central America and

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>beyond to influence outcomes, and is currently pressuring Panama to

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 2>limit Chinese influence. Russia's mister Putin has a history of

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 2>invading and destabilizing other countries. He's unlikely to stop, in

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 2>part because his internal political position, including his life and

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>retention of his billions may rely on continued international aggression.

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 2>This is why we support consideration by the New Zealand

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 2>government of support for multinational peacekeeping efforts in Ukraine AUCUST

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Pillar two. The New Zealand Labor Party does not support

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 2>joining AUCUST Pillar two, which the prior US administration described

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>as a China containment strategy. There was a change of

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 2>language from the New Zealand government after the twenty twenty

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 2>three election. New Zealand was described as a force multiplier

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 2>for the US. Long redundant US language was resurrected. The

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 2>government said there were strong reasons in favor of Pillar two.

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 2>It appeared to us in Labour that the public were

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 2>being softened up to join. We engage the public in

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 2>a debate. This include well attended public events. Voices four

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 2>and AUCUST Pillar two were active. The media delved into

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 2>the issue. Neither interoperability nor access to technology rely upon ORCUS,

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 2>two of the main arguments put in its favor. Cooperation

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 2>with other countries in Asia like Japan, Indonesia, Singapore or

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 2>South Korea does not rely upon ORCUS and could be

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 2>hindered if these countries do not like the anti China

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 2>ORCUST positioning. We concluded that Aucust Pilar two is not

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 2>in New Zealand's interests. Our decision was not influenced by

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 2>the election outcome or the new administration in the US,

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 2>although for some this will be relevant. It's pleasing that senior,

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 2>former National and act politicians have voiced their opposition to Interestingly,

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 2>the rhetoric from the government has toned down on orcus

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 2>that said language in India last week, instead of emphasizing

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 2>the need to navigate a multi polar world, clumsily positioned

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 2>in New Zealand is making binary choices between India and China.

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Being unsurprised that arising China is more assertive in its

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 2>nearby region does not mean we are comfortable with all

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 2>steps in the Pacific. Being situated at the bottom of

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 2>the Pacific Ocean, distant from neighbours has trade in other disadvantages,

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 2>but that physical isolation and low levels of militarization in

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the vast Pacific are our greatest defensive attributes. Changes to

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 2>that status quo concern us. We are perturbed by the

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 2>recent agreements between the Cook Islands and China, labeled as

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 2>a comprehensive strategic partnership. The agreement commits the Cook Islands

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 2>to supporting China in multilateral forums, to support candidates during

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 2>elections of various boards and committees. We agree with the

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 2>current New Zealand government the process which preceded these commitments

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 2>and their substance breach arrangements with the Cook Islands operate,

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 2>which referred to in the Joint Centennial Declaration of two

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 2>thousand and one. The Cook Islands are part of the

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 2>realm of New Zealand. Cook Islanders carry New Zealand passports.

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 2>The advantages this carries are the primary reason Cook Island's

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 2>per capita GDP is a remarkable four times that of

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Fiji and fine times that of Togga and Samoa. Advantages

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 2>include the ability to work in New Zealand and through

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand Australia, access to New Zealand health care and education,

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 2>and superannuation portability Consultation. Obligations are not some perfunctory commitment

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 2>of little importance. They are to ensure the Cook Island's

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 2>government neither deliberately nor unwittingly takes foreign affairs steps deleterious

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>to the Cook Islands or to New Zealand and to

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 2>our relationship. It is of course open to Cook Islanders

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 2>to change their relationship with New Zealand and give up

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 2>their New Zealand passports. I doubt this will occur, as

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Cook Islanders know their standard of living would slump. Security

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 2>issues for the Cook Islands could deteriorate over time too,

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 2>in terms of seabed mining. It is within the sovereign

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 2>power of the Cook Islands to pursue this if their

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 2>government desires. New Zealand's experience with hundreds of millions of

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 2>dollars of clean up costs left behind by overseas oil

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 2>companies makes us very weary. Nevertheless, if the Cook Islands

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 2>so well, New Zealand should assist them to manage the

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 2>opportunities and risks, including with international participants. The prosperity and

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 2>peacefulness of the Pacific Islands is of fundamental importance to

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand. The withdrawal of USA does not help New

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Zealand with partners like Australia must step up. We need

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 2>to do more to help Pacific countries with affordable banking services,

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 2>digital telecommunications, renewable electricity, sustainable resource utilization, especially them helping

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 2>them maximize value from their eased fisheries and climate adaptation,

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 2>better educational health and civil society outcomes are good for us.

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 2>All labor mobility can also help, although care is needed

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 2>given sensitivities for some about depopulation. New Zealand can help

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Pacific populations displaced by sea level rise. Reciprocity is the

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 2>key to prosperity and the shared desire to avoid militarizer

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 2>of the Pacific. What should we do next? Labour would

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 2>like to discuss a Pacific peace zone with other Pacific

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 2>island countries and surrounding superpowers. Phil Tweford will detail how

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 2>this measures with our historic commitments to denuclearization and peace

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 2>on another day. We are continuing to work on our

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 2>labor on our Pacific priorities within LABOUR, but one thing

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 2>is already clear. The decline in New Zealand government spending

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 2>on soft and hard power must be reversed. The split

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 2>between hard power expenditure on military personnel and hardware and

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 2>soft power spending and development assistance and diplomacy will need

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 2>to be worked through, but in our view increases to

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 2>both are needed. A good principle to start with would

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 2>be that every extra dollar spent on the military will

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 2>be matched with an equivalent lift in our development aid

0:18:55.960 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 2>to the Pacific. Today's not the day to defense procurement plan,

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 2>but some high level statements are appropriate. I make three points. One,

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I should say one to wake people up, it's been

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 2>a bit long one and coalition with others. Labour recently

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 2>replaced the rions with pights and replace the Hercules and

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 2>earlier Labor Government bought the current frigates which are now

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 2>ending our near ending of near end of life. While

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 2>will never be a substantial military power, we need naval

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 2>vessels to respond to disasters in the Pacific and it

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 2>is reasonable for our partners to expect they will have

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 2>military capabilities. Right Honorable Chris Hipkins has acknowledged this requires

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 2>cooperation across governments and election cycles. Two. Our most effective

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 2>fighting force is our sas they should be well paid

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 2>and well equipped. They like to deploy their and to

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 2>polish their renowned skills. Consideration should be given to their

0:19:55.560 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 2>deployment in Ukraine and supportive peace. Three. The war in

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine has proven quantities of small drones are important. Ukrainian

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:10.679
<v Speaker 2>drones have effectively controlled the Black Sea against an invading

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 2>nuclear power. They are affordable. We are home to rocket

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:20.959
<v Speaker 2>Lab Hamilton Jet and very sophisticated drone companies delivering leading

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 2>edge services to our world leading agricultural sector. Australia has

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 2>drone capabilities and is ahead of US in some areas

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 2>to use Sam Rogobin's analogy, and has booked the Echidneys strategy.

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.719
<v Speaker 2>In defense, we should be a prickly adversary. New Zealand

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 2>should prioritize working with Australia on defensive marine and air

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 2>drones and commit significant resources to the task. Our defense

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>spokesperson Penn Hennada is engaged in these issues. On our

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 2>turn to trade, A lack of cooperation and compromises block

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 2>progress at the WOD over many years. This is not

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 2>a dig at the US. Many US complaints about trade

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 2>and balance has caused by existing tariff's, non trade barriers, states,

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 2>subsidized over capacity, and dumping are valid. That said, other

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 2>distortions and unfairness caused by tax arbitrage substantially benefit the US,

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 2>especially in services like e commerce. So does the US

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 2>dollar reserve currency status, which in effect outsources much of

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the cost of US government deficits and debts. Clearly, these

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 2>are complex issues. As Trade minister during the last Trump administration.

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 2>I had frequent dealings with then U S Trade representative

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Robert Letheiser.

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I liked them.

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 2>He criticized private equity purchases of US manufacturing, outsourcing manufacturing

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 2>to labour cost countries to shave off the last few

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 2>percent of labor costs the owner's banked increases in capital

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 2>values at the cost of US workers. He wrote about

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 2>this in his book. He understood that the standards of

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 2>living of working New Zealand working middle class citizens were

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 2>essential to depending both the long term health of the

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 2>US economy and democracy. Without a strong middle class, working, producing, saving,

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 2>and consuming, the economy and society weakens. There are ironies

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the current system has worked for the US in terms

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 2>of its GDP per capita, which is amongst the highest

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 2>in the world. The fact is referred to by Paul Keating,

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 2>together with the parallel concentration of wealth at the very top,

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 2>are not primarily caused by other countries, but rather by

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 2>the USA's internal settings. Unfairness in trade settings is not

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 2>new for New Zealand. New Zealand and Australia both play

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 2>much fairer in global trade than most other countries, but

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 2>are still caught up in the Maelstrom. Sitting as we

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 2>do at the bottom of the Pacific. New Zealand responded

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 2>to protectionist measures in Europe and the Americas by building

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 2>trade and foreign affairs relationships in Asia. Some of those

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 2>strategies have been phenomenally successful for a little country the

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 2>China FTA Ansfitter CPTPP, which includes Japan, Canada, Mexico and Chillery.

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 2>Then we circled back to the UK and Europe. The

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 2>current government has closed the golf deal in pursuing India.

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Labour's record in trade is second to none, So how

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 2>do we protect our trade interests? Now? We're as well

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 2>placed as any distant small country can be. Our diversity

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 2>of sales channels will help us to minimize the first

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 2>round effects of the trade war. Risks to compliance with

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 2>trade agreements, and the second round effects in terms of

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the risks of an international economic slowdown are impossible to

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 2>model accurately. I certainly do not recommend tit for tat tariffs.

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Where might a new order emerge? I'll mention one idea.

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Damon O'Connor and I have discussed it's at least possible

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 2>that some of the barriers to trade between Europe and

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 2>the US will soon be reduced for both security and

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 2>economic reasons. I hope they are. What happens, then maybe

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 2>CPTPP could then be a sensible choice for Europe. The

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 2>UK is already in it. If this happens, CPTPP, which

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 2>has already overtaken the stagnant WTO, could become the de

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 2>facto international standard for trade. This possibility should be pursued

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 2>by our excellent trade officials. I want to end by

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 2>lifting our thoughts to the underlying drivers of polarization afflicting

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 2>the world. Polarization has increased between and within countries. There

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 2>are many causes. Some are geopolitical, some economic, and some technological,

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Like the role social media plays and carrying lies misinformation,

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 2>violence and death threats without consequence for those lying or

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 2>those profiting from them. People feel less secure. Whatever the cause,

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 2>this has political, economic, social, and security implications. Many foreign

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 2>affairs responses are transactional, but the big shifts post World

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 2>War II were holistic. There was a broad acceptance that

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:20.439
<v Speaker 2>the extremes of fascism, revolution and wars had been caused

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 2>by depressions and inequality, in turn partly caused by unaffordable reparations.

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 2>The New World Order after World War II was intended

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 2>to enable all countries to succeed by encouraging international trade,

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 2>access to resources, better health, and international cooperation. The decades

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 2>that followed saw enormous progress in most parts of the world,

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 2>with complementary progressive measures within countries assisting to lift outcomes

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 2>for billions of people. Now the underlying consensus has frayed

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 2>to the point of dysfunction. I believe the current turmoil

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 2>will need a holistic response, and for that to be

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 2>agreed a substantial subset of the international community. We'll need

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 2>to find common ground about the main underlying causes of

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 2>current worrisome trends. I've reached the stage of career that

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I know what I believe to be important, and for me,

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 2>there are two main themes. First I've already touched on

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 2>is gross wealth inequality, especially when this becomes intergenerational and

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 2>sections of the population stagnate. This drives instability. I won't

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 2>say more about that in this speech, but history shows

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 2>time and again that gross inequality ends in tears. The

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 2>second is the breakdown of trust, which happens when lies

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 2>and misinformation prevail over facts. A cornerstone of the emergence

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 2>of the nation state and the spread of liberal democracy

0:26:56.040 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 2>was the Enlightenment. There are rational facts, there are truths

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 2>and untruths. The scourge of irresponsible social media, megular maniacal

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 2>tax avoiding tech barons and irresponsible Internet service providers is

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>on my list of the importance. I have a view

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 2>that we in the West have made a fundamental error

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 2>in providing what is in effect and exclusion of liability

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 2>for third party content. We have wrongly taken upon the

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 2>shoulders of government the burden of regulating against what is harmful.

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I doubt this will ever work in practice. It also

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 2>puts the burden on the harm citizen or government agencies

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 2>to respond after harm is cause. The exclusion of liability

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 2>was conferred when providers were more akin to a postal service,

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 2>which has no liability for the content of a letter.

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 2>Those providers morphed into publishers, yet are protected from the

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 2>legal remedies which apply to the traditional media they undermine.

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 2>This mistake is at the core of the problem. I'm

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 2>convinced it is better to remove the exclusion of liability

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 2>excluding those selling a harmful prople product to liability for

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:14.199
<v Speaker 2>the ordinary people that their products harm and it is

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 2>a harmful product, be it damage to young people, foreign interference, defamation,

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 2>theft of other people's content, the enabling of small but

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 2>extreme groups of evildoers who find each other online, online

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 2>sexual abuse, online streaming of derorism, or the regular unpunished

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 2>threats of death and injury. Lies and information abound. A

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 2>recent senior banker recently complained to me that the Internet

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 2>investment scams are more common the legitimate products, and that

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 2>the Internet companies refuse to control them. Worse, they take

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 2>advertising revenue from the services they provide to the fraudsters.

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Much of this harm is from anonymous sources, were some

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 2>deliberately aimed at demining our democratic way of life and freedoms,

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 2>enabling private remedies for our citizens against those profiting from

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 2>selling those harmful products, incruding through low cost for such

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 2>as disputes tribournal a small claims court seems to me

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 2>to be proper. Leave it to the courts to work

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 2>out the balance between freedom of expression and the duty

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 2>not to sell a harmful product. There are ways to

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 2>introduce safeguards, such as the liability limits or safe arbors

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 2>for media content or for platforms that take up for

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 2>active steps to prevent scams, but allowing the current situation

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 2>to continue, where the burden falls almost entirely on individuals

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 2>while social media giants profit is untenable. The seth Jest

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 2>approach does not make the government a sensor, and better

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 2>avoids the risks of state suppression of freedom expression. Left unchecked,

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 2>the current ills will be made worse by those malevolently

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 2>using AI to make the harms they are already causing worse.

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Left unchecked, the oligarch owners of these platforms will increasingly

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 2>use them for their own political ends, as we already

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 2>see from some platforms. Fixing this would not ruin the Internet.

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Point to point communications would still be protected, email commerce

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 2>would endure, massive quantities of information will remain. I feel

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 2>fair that if this is not addressed, polarization and dema

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 2>magoggery will prevail, but I'm by nature an optimist. Opportunities

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 2>arise from adversity. Digital services taxes sprouted at the end

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 2>of the last Trump presidency, and I predict pressure for

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 2>change will continue to mount because so many people in

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the world are fed up with these selfish tech giants.

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 2>We should work with other countries to fix this. The

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 2>holistic changes after World War II had the betterment of

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 2>people at their heart. Labour under then Prime Minister Peter

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Savage helped ensure the United Nations apply to human rights

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 2>approach for the benefit of people in countries large and small.

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand now needs a clear eyed vision for courteous

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 2>relations with the US and China, close dialogue with the Pacific,

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Pacific Island and European friends. Everyone in this room has

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 2>a role to play. It has never been more important

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 2>to stand up for New Zealand's independent foreign policy and

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 2>we all should thank you.

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for that, David. I think you're quite right. We

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>do seem to be living in an era of accelerated time.

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I was reminded somehow that John Key once led to

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Helen Clark by saying that she led a workman government

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in an iPod age in two thousand and seven. It

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 1>was that was deemed to be very funny. It hasn't.

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't been a decade since john Key actually last

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>stepped onto this very stage. And yet we learned this

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>week that military strikes are being coordinated via group chat

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>on iPhone apps and celebrated by a string of emojis.

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 2>The Keystone Cops.

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And then celebrated by a by a string of emojis

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:28.239
<v Speaker 1>and that. So thank you for thank you for your

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>comments around around change and around around tech. One of

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the innovations I thought, and what you said was how

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>interconnected foreign affairs and domestic policy is. Now we we

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>see you your remarks about Paul Keating's criticism of US

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>domestic policy and the fact that US domestic policy settings

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>having have an impact on US foreign policy, and and

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and your remarks around tech regulation and the fact that

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the regulational lack of regulation of large US tech companies

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is having an impact both in foreign affairs and in

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>other countries domestic policies. So I think your your your

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>problem diagnosis is really is really astute there. But but

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the challenges clearly is that while these are

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>domestic US problems that are having an impact in foreign

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>affairs and in our domestic policy, our tools for dealing

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>with them are very much anchored in the twentieth century.

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>My question, I guess is what ability does a New

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Zealand foreign policy and in New Zealand's foreign policy settings,

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>what ability do we have to have some control over

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>our own over our own affairs, lead alone foreign affairs

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>when the settings that dictate them, as you quite rightly say,

0:33:56.000 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are American foreign policy settings, but also American domestic policy,

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the settings we haven't ventured in the past.

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Look, I think the individual nation state still has a

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:15.320
<v Speaker 2>huge amount of power actually to change the future. Let's

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 2>take let's take immigration. I think there's now increasing agreement,

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 2>even in parts of Europe where these issues have been difficult,

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 2>that the nation state has the right to control its

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 2>own borders in respective population flows. And we can have

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 2>different views as to how many exceptions should be allowed

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 2>by a government for humanitarian immigration or economic migration. But

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 2>there's I think now an understanding, at least in this

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 2>part of the world, that the nation state has the

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 2>right to control its borders. The nation state also has

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 2>sovereignty and respect of some of these other issues. Now

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 2>to cure them, like to cure the international flows of

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 2>people that are coming out of some disrupted parts of

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 2>the world, international cooperation is needed beyond border. But the

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 2>power of countries to make good decisions internally, including with

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 2>affect things that affect external influences, remains real. In respect

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 2>of the social media issue, I'm actually not calling for regulation.

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually calling for removal of the exclusion of liability.

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 2>It's just about the only thing you need to do,

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 2>and we can do that. Now. Could we do that alone?

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 2>We could do that with other countries. You know. I

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 2>met with Baroness Bidron, Baroness Bebn Kidron in the UK recently.

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 2>She gave up successful career as a film director to

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 2>go to the cross benches in the House of Lords

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 2>and her gig is protecting young people from harm on

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 2>social media and she's had some success in agreeing codes.

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 2>And I went to see her because I said to her,

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to work. She essentially agreed, and then

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.720
<v Speaker 2>she said, you know, David, I've given up my career

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 2>to do what is good for people, and I get

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 2>death threats.

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to pull together a few other strengths of

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>your speech. You offered a critique of the Coalition's foreign policy,

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the brutal real politique when it comes to Israel in

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States and sticking up for New Zealand stance

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on the I double C when it comes to China.

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>The Coalition. I think one of the interesting things about

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the Coalition is that It's often criticized as a fourth

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>term key English government. But one area where where that

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is clearly not true is the way it waits the

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>benefit the trade benefits of the China relationship with the

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>security benefits of the U. S relationship. It seems to

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 1>be rebalancing or readjusting those seatings and those two relationships

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:52.919
<v Speaker 1>quite significantly. I was wondering whether whether you could sort

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of whether you could outline what you think their foreign

0:36:56.760 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 1>policy is and and the waves in which it's different

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:02.879
<v Speaker 1>from the governments it's come after.

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it is a question of weight, as you say,

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think you are correct to observe that there

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 2>has been a change of weight. It's not the status

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 2>quo being caring forward. There has been a deliberate change

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 2>of weight, and history, even though it's only a year

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 2>and a half into their term, already shows they're on

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the wrong side of that decision making Framely.

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Could you describe Lave that the specific peace zone that

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you alluded to said Fil five produce here will will

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>be putting some announcement or some meat on the bones

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of that in the future.

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think in order to make progress in an

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 2>honor sues you sometimes just have to have a new

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:42.919
<v Speaker 2>construct to work around. The phrase specific peace zone didn't

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:46.479
<v Speaker 2>come from me, It was appropriated by me from someone else.

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:49.959
<v Speaker 2>It was actually Arna that mentioned that she probably stole

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 2>it from someone else too. But you know, it's a

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 2>nice fresh language, and I think it really catches something

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 2>that most specific countries would want. We've already got treaties

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:05.479
<v Speaker 2>relating to non nuclearization of the Pacific. You can see

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 2>that that I think that development of the Pacific is

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 2>an important part of achieving that peaceful outcome and the

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 2>continuation of relative demilitarization of the area. So I thought

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 2>in my colleagues and the Labor Party thought it's a

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 2>good thing to give it, give it a name, and

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 2>use it as a as a project to organize around.

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So it takes forward the existing specific demilitarization and I

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>guess reemphasizes it, restrengthens that give it gives it a

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>unified kind of.

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 2>It does, but it should also be seen in concert

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 2>with what I said about assistance into the Pacific to

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 2>allow them to achieve their development objectives. I thought what

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I've said in respect of Cook Islands is strong language.

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 2>But you'll see also there that in respect of the

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 2>deep sea mining issues which seem to be important to

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 2>the Cook Islands, that we're actually acknowledging their development aspirations.

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 2>You know. To be honest, I don't think there's many

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 2>people in New Zealand want to see deep sea mining

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 2>happen off the Cook Islands, and I'm certainly not a

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 2>proponent of it, But if that is their choice, we

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 2>should be helping them do it, and we should be

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 2>helping them minimize the risks so as to achieve development outcomes.

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 2>And that goes for every other part of the Pacific,

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 2>and those areas of development that I listed the essentials

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 2>to the development of every part of the Pacific Islands,

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 2>and that is essentially the key to New Zealand, Australian

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:45.799
<v Speaker 2>and Japanese and other influence in the Pacific, which is

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.919
<v Speaker 2>the best way to avoid its militarization.

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the I'm glad you brought up the Cooks

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this year. The coalition aims to, I guess, reset relations

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Cooks after what hapen earlier this year. I

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>think that King to use these as the sixtieth anniversary

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of Cock Island self government as an opportunity to reset

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:09.479
<v Speaker 1>those relations and perhaps assure new declaration along the lines

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I think of the two thousand and one declaration from

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the Clerk government, with a view to probably better codifying

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:23.280
<v Speaker 1>these these consultation aspects of the relationship that teens have

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>failed this year. Would you support that? Well? How would you?

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>How would you? How would you be keen I suppose

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 1>yourself to reset those relations.

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 2>If you were to do that, you know, we're very

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 2>supportive of that, and we also reject suggestions that are

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 2>made that this is some personality difficulty between the right

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Honorable Winston Peters and leaders of the Cook Islands and

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 2>now I and many of my other colleagues, and we

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 2>have just about all of the Pacific are MP's in

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 2>Parliament and the Labor Party. We travel periodically with the

0:40:56.920 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 2>with right on with Winston Peters to the Pacific. We

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 2>see how he operates. He is polite, he is professional,

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 2>so are trade officials. They're not paternalistic. They endeavor to

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 2>do the right thing. Now, I'm sure we make mistakes

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:12.439
<v Speaker 2>at time, but the idea that there is some sort

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 2>of personality or process mistake by the Minister of Foreign

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Affairs is something that we reject. We back him in

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 2>this and so we wish him success in finding a

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 2>route through.

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna look at my timekeepers time to open

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 1>to awesome. I keep an eye on the time. So look,

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'd like to open to the floor for questions.

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I have to remind everyone questions please, not statements. Statements

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 1>will get you ejected from the group. Chat up the

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:52.320
<v Speaker 1>back and you were first. We've got some roving microhones

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:59.720
<v Speaker 1>or okay, just as.

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, mister Parker.

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm wondering if you would like to review your position

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 4>of Ukraine and blaming Russia's President Putent, because there is

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 4>a remarkable lot of evidence coming from sources that you

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 4>can't really disagree with. They know a lot about it

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 4>from it in America that the war in Ukraine was

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 4>thoroughly provoked by the United States.

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:27.320
<v Speaker 5>And several EU countries.

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 4>First bar with the coup in Ukraine, which US diplomats organized.

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 4>There's a famous comment coming from the foremost so called

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:39.800
<v Speaker 4>US diplomat, Victorian new Land, say fuck the EU.

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 6>This was because.

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 4>They had a disagreement with some EU country in France

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 4>about who should take over the government that they were

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 4>displacing through a violent Now, this is all very well documented,

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 4>yet it is not within the purview of the government.

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm very so worry about that because it is something

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 4>that the Labor government should be aware now, Jeffrey.

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 7>Sachs is one of.

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Very long question answer that, just.

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Would I care to review the position that the Labor

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 2>government and the current government takes with just about the

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 2>whole of the world to find that it was a

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 2>cross border aggression by Russia that invaded Ukraine. No, we're

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 2>going to have to just agree to disagree on that one.

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 2>We we don't agree with that.

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:36.320
<v Speaker 1>How are you feeling just on that? About New Zealand's

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 1>involvement with the i P four That's been a long

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>standing thing, but it you know, it's it's it seems

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to be that that grouping and the way that New

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Zealand relates to NATO, it seems to have been of

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:49.800
<v Speaker 1>elevated importance since the invasion of Ukraine.

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Look, I was talking to someone from a number of

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:56.399
<v Speaker 2>people from Europe recently about the idea that NATO would

0:43:56.400 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 2>have some presence in the in the Indo Pacific. They

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 2>because I was a little taken a bag that given

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 2>that NATO doesn't seem to be able to I quite

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 2>get what it needs in Europe, that it might spread

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 2>its wings to save us in the South Pacific. To

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:16.880
<v Speaker 2>be honest, they said it was laughable and that it

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 2>was a a thing that was being done to plicate others.

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Interesting another, I'm going on the front.

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:36.800
<v Speaker 8>There was a yes, yes, I need a microphone, jolly good, okay.

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 8>In the introductory marks from Paris, the abandonment of the

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:45.799
<v Speaker 8>climate crisis was raised. I was somewhat dismayed that you, sir,

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:49.760
<v Speaker 8>did not mention the climate crisis at all in your address,

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 8>which maybe says says it all.

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 3>You described yourself as an optimist.

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 2>How how now are you optimistic about the future of.

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:02.880
<v Speaker 8>Man Hi, given that, whereas all of the problems you

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 8>raise are very serious, if we don't fix the climate crisis,

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 8>then we can't fix any of those.

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 2>That's probably a fair criticism of my speech. I did

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:18.200
<v Speaker 2>mention sea level rise and they need to repopulate people

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 2>in the Pacific, which is a terrible thing, given that

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 2>if that future and folds as it is, civilizations in

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 2>the Pacific will be lost. So I absolutely agree with you.

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 2>You're quite right to despair at the poor international negotiations

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 2>and respect of climate. I would say it's not just

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:53.800
<v Speaker 2>this year. I've been a bit surprised that the unf

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Triple C has chosen to base some of the recent

0:45:56.120 --> 0:46:03.120
<v Speaker 2>conference conferences and areas that are to be promoting fossil

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:05.759
<v Speaker 2>fuels in a way that the world cannot sustain if

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 2>we're to overcome the climate crisis.

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 1>On that. I was at Winston Peter's State of the

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Nation speech in christ Church over the weekend. Obviously he

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>was wearing his New Zealand first hat at the time,

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 1>but he is Even after David Seymour has rolled back

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 1>some of his criticism of the Paris Agreement in New

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Zealand's involvement in it, he is still very critical of

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the Paris Agreement and what it's doing to New Zealand's economy.

0:46:33.800 --> 0:46:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Not saying I don't think that he will he would

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like to see New Zealand withdraw and he's not saying that,

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:40.359
<v Speaker 1>but he's still incredibly critical of it. Do you think

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>his party position and is undermining his standing as foreim

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and is still with that criticism.

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Look a year and a half and it feels like

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:56.799
<v Speaker 2>people are already electioneering. We've got their missions trading scheme

0:46:56.840 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 2>because Whinston Peter's voted for it, so that imperfect, though

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 2>an instrument, has become.

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:08.320
<v Speaker 1>So campaigning and campaigning and purchasing in governing and pros

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:11.160
<v Speaker 1>even when campaigns are lasting the whole three year election

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 1>cycle and any other questions, will.

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:21.400
<v Speaker 4>Labor commit to developing a unilateral sanctions regime in government

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:22.840
<v Speaker 4>and sanctioning.

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 2>The Israeli governments we have in respect of the Israeli situation,

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:33.239
<v Speaker 2>whether we will have a broader autonomous sanction regimes not

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:35.319
<v Speaker 2>a decision that we've finally taken.

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:39.800
<v Speaker 1>On on that. So the the sanction reference in your speech,

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:45.799
<v Speaker 1>that is because the now I'm really venturing beyond my

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of international law, which is very limited year. But

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the the the the the New Zealand's being a party

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to the I Double c allows us to implement sanctions

0:47:57.000 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in relation to people in breach of their What.

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:06.080
<v Speaker 2>What we've said in respective of the Gaza and West

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Bank situation of the occupied territories is that we agree

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 2>with the bill that Greens are brought forward, which is

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:17.399
<v Speaker 2>essentially repetition of the sanctions regime that we've already got

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 2>on the books for Russia.

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, would it make sense to use that as a

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:24.400
<v Speaker 1>basis for an autonomous sanctions regime.

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 2>More broaden well, I think that legislation probably was based

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 2>on the autonomous sanctions legislation that had already been drafted

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:34.280
<v Speaker 2>I think originally under Jerry Brownlee under the last National government.

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 6>Thank you, honorable David Bucker.

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:44.399
<v Speaker 7>It was a fairly sumon Algeri rulla from Fiji think

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:48.919
<v Speaker 7>tank and arch of Malalynesians scholars and gratuates. Just a question,

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:54.759
<v Speaker 7>two questions short, one on New Zealand's position on Israel's

0:48:55.120 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 7>being taken to sec and the other is the checkbook

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 7>diplomacy that's happening within the Pacific Islands in Aungineer.

0:49:08.320 --> 0:49:15.040
<v Speaker 5>Firstly, on a lot of our irelands are Christian.

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Based and so they're voted in favor of Israel.

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:24.160
<v Speaker 5>So it shifted from New Zealand's position. How would New

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:32.320
<v Speaker 5>Zealand scateadize there to continue with the with other matters

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:38.280
<v Speaker 5>when they divergence in that position? And the second question

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:44.080
<v Speaker 5>is that checkbook and cultural diplomacy is quite what the

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 5>people in the Alids are going before.

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, what's your comment in respect of the ICJ issue?

0:49:54.800 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 2>There is a proceeding before the ICJ concerning the War Gaza,

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 2>where the allegation is being made that the State of

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Israel is in breach of the Convention against Genocide. The

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Convention against Genocide also condition or tries to stop not

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:25.719
<v Speaker 2>just the absolute decimation of the people, but also language

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 2>and actions that are on that spectrum. And we have

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:33.000
<v Speaker 2>said that New Zealand, as a member of the ICJ,

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:37.040
<v Speaker 2>should intervene in that litigation. That's the legal phrase that's

0:50:37.160 --> 0:50:40.120
<v Speaker 2>used in order to assist the court, not to gather facts.

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 2>We haven't got a fact raise, effect, proving or investigative role,

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:49.320
<v Speaker 2>but we do well understand the Convention because New Zealand

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:53.399
<v Speaker 2>on a number of occasions has intervened in prior ICJ

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 2>considerations of the Convention, and so we think New Zealand

0:50:56.120 --> 0:50:59.800
<v Speaker 2>should be there to assist the Court in respect of

0:51:00.800 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 2>the debt, diplomacy and other issues in the Pacific. I

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:09.719
<v Speaker 2>think we have to be a bit careful not to

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:16.439
<v Speaker 2>demonize others. I do think that some of the debt

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:19.800
<v Speaker 2>left behind for some infrastructure in the likes of Tonga

0:51:21.600 --> 0:51:23.800
<v Speaker 2>is proving to be a long term problem for Tonga,

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:28.320
<v Speaker 2>but I haven't seen recent evidence of that problem getting

0:51:28.360 --> 0:51:32.759
<v Speaker 2>worse and it could be that some other countries have

0:51:32.880 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 2>heard those messages and are not pursuing that debt diplomacy

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 2>in the same way. It is of course true that

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 2>there is strategic competition influence influence within the Pacific, and

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:47.719
<v Speaker 2>I've already outlined how we would address that.

0:51:48.440 --> 0:51:51.520
<v Speaker 1>We've got time for one more question than really lived

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:52.319
<v Speaker 1>at the side of the room.

0:51:52.960 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, in your speech, you've made reference to Israel and

0:51:57.640 --> 0:52:01.440
<v Speaker 6>the occupied territories and the need to pursue international or

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 6>either through a two steps solution or a one state

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 6>alternative you touched on. I found that interesting that my

0:52:10.800 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 6>question to you is would there be a basis under

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 6>international law for something like No.

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:20.880
<v Speaker 2>What I was really saying, we in the Labor Party

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:25.839
<v Speaker 2>still consider that the two state solution is desirable. It's

0:52:25.880 --> 0:52:28.960
<v Speaker 2>hard to see a one state solution working. But on

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:30.840
<v Speaker 2>the other hand, I was really saying that if you

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:33.400
<v Speaker 2>don't have a two state solution, you can't deprive people

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:36.839
<v Speaker 2>who live in effectively one country, if it's effectively been

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:40.480
<v Speaker 2>taken over by Israel, you can't deprive them of all

0:52:40.520 --> 0:52:43.320
<v Speaker 2>of the rights that other citizens have. I wasn't advocating

0:52:43.400 --> 0:52:46.400
<v Speaker 2>for an outcome. I was observing that no progress has

0:52:46.440 --> 0:52:49.239
<v Speaker 2>been made in a two state solution and in the

0:52:49.360 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 2>meantime people have got no rights under the current status quo.

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Run out well, thank you very much for your questions.

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:01.439
<v Speaker 1>We've run out of times. Thank you very much David

0:53:01.480 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 1>for answering them, and I'm heading over to Mahan now

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in Paris.

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much to all of you for joining

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:16.960
<v Speaker 3>us this morning. An important takeaway is that all foreign

0:53:17.040 --> 0:53:21.080
<v Speaker 3>policy starts at home. That resonates strongly with develop fair.

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:25.400
<v Speaker 3>A special thank you again to Honorable David Parker for

0:53:25.520 --> 0:53:30.960
<v Speaker 3>his insights and balance the speech, to Thomas for leading

0:53:31.040 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 3>a thought well an engaging conversation. Also to David Parker's office,

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:39.560
<v Speaker 3>a B team, deplosas youth leaders and the helpers from

0:53:39.680 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 3>Victoria International Leadership Program. If you would like to keep

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:47.920
<v Speaker 3>thinking with us, follow Deplo sware on our subseat platform Stack,

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:53.319
<v Speaker 3>where we continue our independent conversations on foreign affairs, duo politics,

0:53:53.440 --> 0:53:56.440
<v Speaker 3>and global change. Enjoys the rest of the day and

0:53:56.600 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 3>take off.

0:53:57.800 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. That was on the tiles for another week.

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Diblosphere for hosting that event and forgiving us

0:54:07.440 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the audio so that we could share it on our

0:54:09.239 --> 0:54:13.239
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform. Ethan Stills as always as the producer, and

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you can listen to us on our Heart radio or

0:54:15.200 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. We'll be back next week

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with more on the tiles. Thank you very much for listening.