WEBVTT - A flip flop on interest rates—Brad’s view

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Cureda and welcome to this episode of Shared Lunch, where

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>we briefly touch upon everyone's favorite subject, interest rates. As

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you may have heard, the Reserve Bank has decided to

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>again hold the official cash rate at five and a

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:20.479
<v Speaker 1>half percent. But why does this matter? Well, this is

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>what sets the rates we all pay on our mortgages,

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>loans and what we receive when our deposits. My name's

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Laton Robertson, the co founder and co COO at Chazy's.

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And to understand the impact of this, we're joined by

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>Inframetrics principal economist Brad Olsen.

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Investing involves risk you might lose the money you start with.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 2>We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor. We also

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 2>recommend reading product disclosure documents before deciding to invest. Everything

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 2>you're about to see and hear is current at the

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 2>time of recording.

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey Brad, thanks so much for joining us. You're in Geneva,

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>but obviously news travels very fast. How you going on?

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, thanks, you know, it's pretty hot over here, but

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 3>thank you everyone backing. New Zealand is pretty hot under

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 3>the cholera. As to what's happening with interest rates, so

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of interest a lot of intrigue still going

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 3>on about what the Reserve Bank thinks and importantly what

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 3>they'll do and when.

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, completely, So you've had a bit of a chance

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>to read the statement and what time is it.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Over there by the way, at about six am?

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh, good on you. Hey, Well, look, the consensus from

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>what we're reading so far seems well that was that

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be no change and that's what's happens.

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>But specifically there was a lot of talk about with

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>regards to inflation in this one and when rates are

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 1>going to be about to be cut. So what's your

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 1>take from what they put out today?

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, look, actually quite a flip flop really from the

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Reserve Bank in their view. Remember back in May they

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 3>were talking about how they considered increasing the official cash rate.

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Now they're talking and saying that they're confident that inflation

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 3>will be back within the target band of one to

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 3>three percent by the end of this year. They're talking

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 3>about how interest rates have to remain restrictive, but that'll

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 3>be tempered over time depending on how inflation actually goes.

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 3>So really they've gone from sort of talking about a

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 3>hike three weeks six weeks ago to effectively opening the

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 3>door to an interest rate cut. Now it's not going

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 3>to come immediately, but it does start to bend your

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 3>air a little bit towards maybe November this year is

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 3>actually likely for the Reserve Bank. A little bit hard

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 3>to understand how they got there, but I think this

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 3>is probably the right flip flop. Because all of the

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 3>data we have been seeing recently is showing the economy

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 3>slow down, showing less inflationary pressure. It should open that door,

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 3>and I think the Reserve Bank has just put a

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 3>little bit of a crack in that door and opened

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 3>up the opportunity.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it really is a flip. I think the assessment

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>last time was more hawkish than expected, this time more dubvish.

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>So for listeners, the hawks normally asking for a more

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>aggressive stance and wanting its straits to increase normally, and

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>then data's being the opposite. So looking for Laurence Trase,

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>which it's very much the read of how this one's

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 1>coming out. So you mentioned November, would you say that's

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>your pack at the moment as well?

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Well? The question here really is that do we think

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 3>the Reserve Bank is going to stick to its message?

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Because again it's completely one eighty in the last six weeks.

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Who knows what they'll come out with in six weeks

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 3>time again. Gosh, they could be back up to a

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 3>fifty basis point i'd given how they sort of go

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 3>between one or the other. Now, I don't think that's

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 3>actually seriously what's going to happen. But I guess I'm

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 3>a little bit worried that we seem to sort of

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 3>be jumping at every single shadow of every data point

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 3>that comes out. You look at the bank last time,

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>they were looking at inflation that had come in at

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 3>a headline level, better, at a non tradable level, worse

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 3>than i'd expected. You look though, at sort of a

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 3>week or so ago, you've got the latest quarterly survey

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 3>of business opinion from NZII looked a lot better in

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 3>terms of inflationary pressures pulling back and similar. I guess

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 3>I'd hate for inflation to come out next week in

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 3>the bank to go well, all of a sudden, it's worse,

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 3>and therefore we're back to our hawkish stant So I

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>just don't think they have enough confidence in the Reserve

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Bank's ability to get out of the same bed every

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 3>morning at the moment to say what it is. Here's

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 3>I think the frustration infametrics we were at November twenty

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty four being the first cut. If you go back

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 3>a couple of months after the last statement from the

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Reserve Bank where they're like, oh, geez, we need to

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 3>hike it up, we actually pushed it out till February. Now,

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 3>I'd hate for us to also flip flop and go

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 3>straight back to November, but I guess what we're sort

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 3>of seeing is that we were pretty convinced that there's

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 3>enough information that will come through by November to cut.

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 3>We just didn't think the Reserve Bank would have that

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 3>much gumption because of how strong their talk was so

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 3>between November and February. I think is a very live possibility.

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if i'd put money either way on it,

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 3>because I don't know if the Reserve Bank is particularly

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 3>consistent on their view. But given everything we've seen so far,

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 3>given that weaker data coming through, it does seem to

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 3>be consistent that if you can get inflation below three

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 3>percent by the end of this year, that should open

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 3>the doors for the Reserve Bank to go Yep, we're

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 3>definitely on the right pathway now. Is the right time

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 3>to ease, because it's going to take at a time

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 3>for any of their decisions to actually fully hit the economy.

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Interesting, and there's a few changes still to flow

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>from here.

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that the statement today will do,

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure is well, swap breaks will adjust over the

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>next few days, and swapbrates are where the mortgages are priced,

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and I do expect we might see a bit of

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>home loan rate easy and off the back of this

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>that will have an impact. And then of course we'll

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>have the new changes from the government with tax relief

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>coming in over the next month. So I very much

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>agree there's a lot of movements still to happen. But

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>if we just bring it back to sentiment in New

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Zealand at the moment, it feels like there's a bit

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of pain now, you know, really in the households and

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>businesses alike. And I think that's not so flip floppy.

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I would say that's feeling reasonably embedded. So you know,

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you think if we had enough pain?

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that you're right. I mean that pain is

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 3>quite clearly hitting now. You see that in all of

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 3>the indicators. What is interesting is andcdotally going around the country,

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 3>I've been hearing from a lot of people that sort

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 3>of said, look, the first three months of twenty four

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 3>were hard, but not sort of you know that they

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 3>were manageably hard. From April on, it feels like things

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 3>have gotten a lot darker, and I think again, you're

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 3>starting to see that through in a number of different indicators,

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 3>which are effectively saying, look, I'm finding it tough as

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 3>a business to just get sales. Households are fighting it

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 3>tough to find the money to go out and spend,

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 3>and so all of that does imply and you see

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 3>that in the business surveys people saying look, it's tougher

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 3>at the moment to get that sort of economic activity.

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not wanting to put up prices quite as much,

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 3>people who are saying, look, I don't think that my

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 3>job security is all that good anymore. Therefore I'm probably

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 3>not asking for the pay rises like I might have

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 3>been before. All of that, I think you're right, is

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 3>consistent with that view that the hits come through, that

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 3>inflation should fall back, that the Reserve Bank's got enough evidence,

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 3>and I think probably the two things we're looking out

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 3>for in the short term, You've got inflation data out

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 3>next week. You've got labor market data out in a

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 3>couple of weeks time after that. If both of those

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 3>continue to show that softening, and we expect they will,

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 3>then I think that really does add that weight of

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 3>evidence behind the Reserve Bank being confident and then did confidently.

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Interesting, The labor market has sort of been the savior,

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>hasn't it with regards to the economic or the positive

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>story out a lot of these lately. But that data

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>will be interesting because it feels like that is most

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>likely turning. One of the interesting things, just as a

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:22.559
<v Speaker 1>point is, we've just done the investor survey that Cheesy

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>does as well out index and investor sentment has turned.

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Sentiment has turned back to a balanced view, which you know,

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that may be is people expecting

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.559
<v Speaker 1>to see interest rates start to cut, and as interest

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>rates change or go down, and then people do look

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>down the asset classes like equity. Sort of interesting to

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>see how that plays out. Anyway. What's your key takeaway

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>from the from the MPUs to the monetary policy statement?

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Was it an EP sectually? I don't think it was

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:49.679
<v Speaker 1>today was it?

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 3>But it's just just a monetary policy review. Yes, look, yeah,

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 3>the main message here, I think is that, look, rates

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 3>cats are sort of more live, more on the table

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 3>than before. It's going to be interesting to see how

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 3>the Reserve Bank squares this up in a couple of

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 3>weeks when they release their next actual monetary policy statement

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 3>in their forecast. You remember, you know again, six weeks

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 3>ago they were picking an increase and no real cut

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 3>until August September next year. If they're going to be

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 3>realistic on the talk that we've just had today, they'd

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 3>have to bring their pick forward like ten months. That

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 3>would be pretty substantial and would require some pretty serious explaining.

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 3>But I think you're right that sort of this is

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a sentiment shift as well, and that

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 3>people are feeling quite challenged at the moment, but also

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 3>a feeling of some of those greenish shoots maybe emerging

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 3>next year. You know, people have been taking out shorter

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 3>and shorter home loans because they're expecting those interest rate cuts.

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 3>You noted that sort of shift and sentiment from the

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Shears's index. You're seeing, you know, consumer confidence not good

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 3>at the moment, but expectations for next year look better.

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 3>It does seem to be that sort of still survived

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 3>till twenty five story, but maybe a slightly earlier pitch

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 3>for their interest rate relief. It's not going to be huge,

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 3>but it will make a difference when it comes, and

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 3>the Reserve Bank seems more open to it now than

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 3>certainly what they were six weeks ago.

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, nice, great brand. I've heard a bit of that

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>survived twenty five, Like I saw someone else right about

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>thrive to twenty five the other day, which I thought

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>was a great mantra for us to carry forward forward.

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And certainly what I got out of my experience in

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the US a few weeks ago was people taking more

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of that view. But certainly a lot of complexity out

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>there in the market still in interest rates, adding to

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 1>that with regards to challenge. So I'm personally of the

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>view that i'd like to see them drop sooner rather later,

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>but completely understand the pressures and I wouldn't want to

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>be sitting in that room making the decision myself. So

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>one last question for you, what do you think the

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>risks are of them having gone too far and it's

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>been harder to pull back into a growth cycle because

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of holding it straights too long.

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that sort of the longer we leave it,

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 3>and certainly almost every passing day it feels like they're

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.599
<v Speaker 3>at that risk grows greater and greater. They almost have

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 3>certainly overcooked it a touch. It's just do they bring

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 3>it back by moving by the end of this year

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 3>or do they sort of leave that just that extra

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 3>three months over summer, you know, sort of starts the

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 3>year off with a slower start. I think that might

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 3>well be a mistake. I'm just not sure if they're

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of going to stick with that view that they hold,

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 3>if they were going to move sooner, I think they've

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.719
<v Speaker 3>opened the door and so that that might signore a

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 3>bit of a shift. But like I say, we've been

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 3>here before, we've seen these changes come through, and I'm

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 3>never quite sure if I back it. I want to

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 3>see a little bit more data and certainly a few

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 3>more resounding words from the bank to really lock in

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:26.239
<v Speaker 3>that expectation.

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, do you think we'll be first to go? Like

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>us haven't gone yet, Australia still talk of higher inst rate. Still,

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think we'll be the first to start cutting?

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if we'll be the first. I'd still

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 3>expect probably the THEED will go in the next month

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 3>or two, maybe three months. I do think though, that

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 3>OZ is a real life possibility of having to type further.

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, their inflation has actually been reaccelerating at least

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 3>we don't have that. Sure ours isn't going down as

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 3>fast as we might like, but at least it's not

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 3>going up. So I think, you know, definitely a different

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 3>risk profile depending on where you are in the world.

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, hey, great, thanks for joining us Brad and Geneva

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the morning with a hot day of your head of

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you really appreciate it. Thank you, and thanks also to

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone for tuning in for this short episode of Shared Lunch.

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You can watch Shared Lunch on YouTube or wherever you

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts.