WEBVTT - Leighton Smith Podcast #249 - July 31st 2024 - Patrick Basham & Ramesh Thakur

0:00:09.133 --> 0:00:12.733
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from News talkst B. Follow

0:00:12.813 --> 0:00:16.173
<v Speaker 1>this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.

0:00:16.813 --> 0:00:19.813
<v Speaker 1>It's time for all the attitude, all the opinion, all

0:00:19.853 --> 0:00:24.933
<v Speaker 1>the information, all the debates of us, now the Leighton

0:00:25.053 --> 0:00:27.733
<v Speaker 1>Smith Podcast powered by News Talks B.

0:00:28.133 --> 0:00:30.613
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to podcast two hundred and forty nine for July

0:00:30.733 --> 0:00:35.253
<v Speaker 2>thirty one, twenty twenty four. Patrick Masham returns after an

0:00:35.253 --> 0:00:40.493
<v Speaker 2>extended but unintended absence I think about ten months. Patrick

0:00:40.533 --> 0:00:44.213
<v Speaker 2>founded the Democracy Institute in Washington, d C. And London

0:00:44.693 --> 0:00:47.773
<v Speaker 2>and his organization does regular polling for the London Daily

0:00:47.813 --> 0:00:51.773
<v Speaker 2>Express and more, and his polling method has proven pretty

0:00:51.773 --> 0:00:56.653
<v Speaker 2>accurate to date. And part two of the eighty minute

0:00:56.733 --> 0:01:01.293
<v Speaker 2>interview that we did with Ramesh thecur on important matters

0:01:01.333 --> 0:01:05.133
<v Speaker 2>such as the dangers of a cash free society, and

0:01:05.173 --> 0:01:09.373
<v Speaker 2>there are plenty diversity in equity and inclusion, etc. And

0:01:09.453 --> 0:01:13.653
<v Speaker 2>we also cover Julian Massage the rights and wrongs as

0:01:13.693 --> 0:01:15.973
<v Speaker 2>we see it, and we have a bit of variation,

0:01:16.813 --> 0:01:20.813
<v Speaker 2>and there are other matters as well. Now, something that

0:01:20.853 --> 0:01:24.533
<v Speaker 2>I'm adverse to doing is predicting the next week's content

0:01:25.093 --> 0:01:29.533
<v Speaker 2>of a podcast, because things tend to happen but the

0:01:29.653 --> 0:01:33.293
<v Speaker 2>announcement today by in New Zealand regarding the company's green

0:01:33.373 --> 0:01:36.733
<v Speaker 2>agenda has well, I've got to say it's amused me.

0:01:37.533 --> 0:01:42.053
<v Speaker 2>Reading comments this morning also frustrated me. So there are

0:01:42.173 --> 0:01:46.333
<v Speaker 2>issues to address, but they will have to wait in

0:01:46.373 --> 0:02:05.013
<v Speaker 2>a moment. Patrick Basham Patrick Bajem is well known to

0:02:05.093 --> 0:02:08.933
<v Speaker 2>the majority of listeners to this podcast because he has

0:02:08.973 --> 0:02:12.493
<v Speaker 2>appeared on numerous occasions over a number of years. In fact,

0:02:12.533 --> 0:02:16.013
<v Speaker 2>we first met I think it was twenty thirteen when

0:02:16.053 --> 0:02:19.613
<v Speaker 2>he was actually in New Zealand. He is the founding

0:02:19.653 --> 0:02:22.973
<v Speaker 2>director of the Democracy Institute, which is based in Washington

0:02:23.493 --> 0:02:27.373
<v Speaker 2>and London. It's a research organization and Patrick does a

0:02:27.413 --> 0:02:30.453
<v Speaker 2>lot of research. In fact, you are doing a great

0:02:30.493 --> 0:02:32.813
<v Speaker 2>deal of research at the moment. Patrick, It's great to

0:02:32.853 --> 0:02:36.253
<v Speaker 2>have you back on the podcast. The Laily Express is

0:02:36.333 --> 0:02:37.453
<v Speaker 2>exploiting your work.

0:02:40.333 --> 0:02:44.173
<v Speaker 3>Yes, indeed, high lighton. Wonderful to be back with you

0:02:44.333 --> 0:02:47.053
<v Speaker 3>and with your final audience. Alwas appreciating the invitation, the

0:02:47.093 --> 0:02:50.893
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to have a conversation with you about important things. Yes,

0:02:51.173 --> 0:02:54.733
<v Speaker 3>we do a lot of public and private polling, and

0:02:55.133 --> 0:02:58.533
<v Speaker 3>most of our public polling in terms of American politics

0:02:59.133 --> 0:03:02.533
<v Speaker 3>is for The Daily Express Family of newspapers out of

0:03:02.573 --> 0:03:05.973
<v Speaker 3>the UK, and so we always do at least a

0:03:05.973 --> 0:03:10.133
<v Speaker 3>monthly poll for them, but we also do more real

0:03:10.213 --> 0:03:15.413
<v Speaker 3>time timely polls when news merits, and there's been a

0:03:15.413 --> 0:03:18.573
<v Speaker 3>lot of that lately. So we continue to pump out

0:03:18.573 --> 0:03:23.013
<v Speaker 3>the numbers. They continue to please some and irritate others,

0:03:23.013 --> 0:03:26.573
<v Speaker 3>but that probably means that we're maybe getting it close

0:03:26.613 --> 0:03:27.093
<v Speaker 3>to the mark.

0:03:27.653 --> 0:03:30.213
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, is it difficult to keep up at the moment.

0:03:31.173 --> 0:03:31.613
<v Speaker 4>It is.

0:03:32.413 --> 0:03:36.373
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that's always difficult with polling is

0:03:36.373 --> 0:03:39.693
<v Speaker 3>is to figure out just what it is that people

0:03:39.733 --> 0:03:41.733
<v Speaker 3>are focused on. You know, you're always asking what most

0:03:41.773 --> 0:03:45.733
<v Speaker 3>important issue is that type of question that your audience

0:03:45.773 --> 0:03:49.293
<v Speaker 3>will be very familiar with, and where in the normal

0:03:49.373 --> 0:03:54.373
<v Speaker 3>course of events that ebbs and flows. But there are

0:03:54.413 --> 0:04:00.413
<v Speaker 3>only occasional events that and it sort of interventions that

0:04:00.613 --> 0:04:03.893
<v Speaker 3>really can in the short, medium or long term really

0:04:03.893 --> 0:04:06.493
<v Speaker 3>sort of upset those particular apple carts or really sort

0:04:06.493 --> 0:04:09.813
<v Speaker 3>of change the nature of the public debate. But in

0:04:09.853 --> 0:04:12.813
<v Speaker 3>the US context, of course, over the last several weeks,

0:04:12.973 --> 0:04:15.533
<v Speaker 3>you know, we had the first we don't have with

0:04:15.573 --> 0:04:18.773
<v Speaker 3>the last to the last Biden Trump debate, Then we

0:04:18.813 --> 0:04:21.093
<v Speaker 3>had the assassination attempt on Trump. Then we had the

0:04:21.133 --> 0:04:24.773
<v Speaker 3>Republican Convention, Then we had Biden quitting the race. Now

0:04:24.813 --> 0:04:28.093
<v Speaker 3>we have you know, Harris against Trump. Apparently, So all

0:04:28.133 --> 0:04:30.773
<v Speaker 3>of this happened within a number of weeks, and most

0:04:30.813 --> 0:04:34.093
<v Speaker 3>of it within there's a couple of weeks at the outside,

0:04:34.533 --> 0:04:37.453
<v Speaker 3>and you're pulling all the time during that and trying

0:04:37.493 --> 0:04:41.973
<v Speaker 3>to catch trying to catch people's while they're paying attention

0:04:42.093 --> 0:04:43.453
<v Speaker 3>to this.

0:04:42.853 --> 0:04:43.853
<v Speaker 4>This new issue.

0:04:44.373 --> 0:04:47.653
<v Speaker 3>Figure out how much change that is creating in voters'

0:04:47.653 --> 0:04:51.613
<v Speaker 3>minds and consequently perhaps their decision making itself and their

0:04:51.613 --> 0:04:54.973
<v Speaker 3>actual voting. But then something else comes along, either while

0:04:55.013 --> 0:04:58.453
<v Speaker 3>you're pulling, right after you've pulled, that doesn't blow it up,

0:04:58.773 --> 0:05:01.173
<v Speaker 3>but just throws up potentially throws a lot of sparing

0:05:01.173 --> 0:05:03.133
<v Speaker 3>of the works in the sense of how do you

0:05:03.213 --> 0:05:06.933
<v Speaker 3>disentangle it all and figure out, Okay, what's happened. The

0:05:07.013 --> 0:05:09.613
<v Speaker 3>change we're seeing is mostly because the assassination attemptor it's

0:05:09.613 --> 0:05:12.573
<v Speaker 3>mostly because Trump's convention speech, where it's mostly because Biden

0:05:12.613 --> 0:05:14.573
<v Speaker 3>got out of the race, it's mostly because of Harris, right,

0:05:14.973 --> 0:05:18.013
<v Speaker 3>and so all of us on the polling side, if

0:05:18.053 --> 0:05:19.893
<v Speaker 3>you know, if we're honest with ourselves and with others,

0:05:20.813 --> 0:05:22.533
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's it's an art. It's art more than

0:05:22.573 --> 0:05:25.973
<v Speaker 3>science when it comes to this stuff, and often people

0:05:25.973 --> 0:05:27.373
<v Speaker 3>say the same. The things to do is just sort

0:05:27.373 --> 0:05:30.013
<v Speaker 3>of let let it all out and just let time

0:05:30.173 --> 0:05:34.373
<v Speaker 3>pass and things will become more obvious with the passage

0:05:34.373 --> 0:05:34.733
<v Speaker 3>of time.

0:05:34.893 --> 0:05:35.773
<v Speaker 4>That's a huge of.

0:05:35.733 --> 0:05:39.613
<v Speaker 3>Course, that we don't have any more of these unexpected

0:05:39.733 --> 0:05:43.493
<v Speaker 3>events happening over the next few weeks and months.

0:05:43.653 --> 0:05:45.853
<v Speaker 2>I've got to I've got to mention my favorite question

0:05:46.213 --> 0:05:47.933
<v Speaker 2>in one of the two polls you've done in the

0:05:47.973 --> 0:05:50.013
<v Speaker 2>last couple of weeks. See if you can guess what

0:05:50.093 --> 0:05:53.733
<v Speaker 2>it is? Yeah, the the so we've got a yes, no,

0:05:54.013 --> 0:05:57.133
<v Speaker 2>and don't know what answers. Thirteen is my lucky number,

0:05:57.813 --> 0:05:59.933
<v Speaker 2>and yes is thirteen.

0:06:03.093 --> 0:06:05.133
<v Speaker 4>Oh it's the Is it the hunt of Biden?

0:06:05.733 --> 0:06:11.893
<v Speaker 2>You got it? Sure, good hunter Biden seek Democratic presidential nomination.

0:06:12.413 --> 0:06:14.613
<v Speaker 2>And it just stunned me that there were actually thirteen

0:06:14.653 --> 0:06:17.493
<v Speaker 2>percent of respondents who said yes. Do you think they

0:06:17.493 --> 0:06:19.613
<v Speaker 2>had any idea what they were talking about? What the

0:06:19.693 --> 0:06:20.133
<v Speaker 2>question was?

0:06:20.973 --> 0:06:22.093
<v Speaker 4>I think so? Would you see?

0:06:22.133 --> 0:06:27.653
<v Speaker 3>That means that about a third a third of Democratic

0:06:27.733 --> 0:06:32.373
<v Speaker 3>voters are saying yes to that, and they are the

0:06:32.453 --> 0:06:36.893
<v Speaker 3>folks who think that Joe Biden is just a wonderful father.

0:06:37.613 --> 0:06:41.573
<v Speaker 3>His son has just had some bad luck and has

0:06:41.613 --> 0:06:45.573
<v Speaker 3>been maligned by the media and the Republicans. And what

0:06:45.893 --> 0:06:48.813
<v Speaker 3>Hunter has been doing, it was doing, you know, well,

0:06:49.013 --> 0:06:50.933
<v Speaker 3>arguably it's still doing, but certainly was doing up to

0:06:51.173 --> 0:06:55.893
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden's departure from the presidential race, was counseling his father,

0:06:56.173 --> 0:06:58.893
<v Speaker 3>being a good son, trying to run the country as

0:06:58.893 --> 0:07:06.533
<v Speaker 3>best he could in his father's literal absence. And they just,

0:07:06.973 --> 0:07:10.213
<v Speaker 3>you know, they think that thing critical is a lie,

0:07:11.373 --> 0:07:14.133
<v Speaker 3>and they will say they will support anything that Biden

0:07:14.533 --> 0:07:17.253
<v Speaker 3>did or does. They will support anything that anything the

0:07:17.333 --> 0:07:18.613
<v Speaker 3>Hunter does or says.

0:07:19.533 --> 0:07:21.773
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's it's a reflexive default position.

0:07:22.813 --> 0:07:26.693
<v Speaker 3>And but apart from those folks, those find people, everybody

0:07:26.693 --> 0:07:30.533
<v Speaker 3>else pretty much understands that you wouldn't you know, you

0:07:30.573 --> 0:07:34.573
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't want to hunt Biden though within within striking distance

0:07:34.573 --> 0:07:35.213
<v Speaker 3>of running.

0:07:34.933 --> 0:07:38.293
<v Speaker 4>A fish and chip shop, let alone the presidency.

0:07:39.293 --> 0:07:44.493
<v Speaker 2>Well at least you'd have access to his supply.

0:07:43.053 --> 0:07:48.733
<v Speaker 3>The the no figure was absolutely you, yes, there was

0:07:48.773 --> 0:07:51.493
<v Speaker 3>a madness to there was a method to his madness.

0:07:51.093 --> 0:07:55.293
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps, yes, So the no vote was eighty four percent

0:07:55.333 --> 0:07:57.773
<v Speaker 2>and don't know, three percent you can forgive that. Don't

0:07:57.813 --> 0:08:01.253
<v Speaker 2>know it's because there's always a bunch of them. But

0:08:02.653 --> 0:08:09.373
<v Speaker 2>the pulling that you've done throughout some throughout numbers and attitudes,

0:08:10.213 --> 0:08:14.253
<v Speaker 2>and for instance, let me go back to the very basics,

0:08:14.933 --> 0:08:18.253
<v Speaker 2>should Biden resign the presidency. So this is out of date,

0:08:18.893 --> 0:08:22.373
<v Speaker 2>but the yes vote was sixty three percent, twenty eight

0:08:22.413 --> 0:08:25.973
<v Speaker 2>and don't know nine, So that is now that has

0:08:26.053 --> 0:08:32.893
<v Speaker 2>now happened, and we transit to missus Harris, and she's

0:08:32.973 --> 0:08:36.573
<v Speaker 2>doing pretty well at the moment. How would how would

0:08:36.893 --> 0:08:38.933
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you've done anything on her just yet,

0:08:39.133 --> 0:08:42.693
<v Speaker 2>but how would she be performing now in your polling?

0:08:42.733 --> 0:08:43.253
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:08:44.333 --> 0:08:46.733
<v Speaker 3>Well, we actually did our most recent poll that came

0:08:46.773 --> 0:08:50.013
<v Speaker 3>out over last week, just a few days ago. It's

0:08:50.053 --> 0:08:53.173
<v Speaker 3>the first poll that we have had her up against

0:08:53.173 --> 0:08:56.773
<v Speaker 3>Trump as the presumptive nominee. We've been polling Trump against

0:08:56.813 --> 0:09:01.013
<v Speaker 3>Harris for quite some time as a possibility if if

0:09:01.013 --> 0:09:04.613
<v Speaker 3>Biden jumped or was pushed. But so we do have

0:09:04.693 --> 0:09:08.413
<v Speaker 3>one since she since Biden left the president that the

0:09:09.333 --> 0:09:14.133
<v Speaker 3>election scene, and since she jumped in and was anointed

0:09:14.133 --> 0:09:16.173
<v Speaker 3>by all the important people in the Democratic Party, we

0:09:16.253 --> 0:09:20.533
<v Speaker 3>do have one one poll on this and so I

0:09:20.573 --> 0:09:23.493
<v Speaker 3>would say in answering, in answering your question about what

0:09:23.493 --> 0:09:26.773
<v Speaker 3>do we think is also pushing back a little against

0:09:26.853 --> 0:09:30.813
<v Speaker 3>your sort of introduction to this, in that I would

0:09:30.813 --> 0:09:35.173
<v Speaker 3>say that Harris isn't doing particularly well, and that the

0:09:36.133 --> 0:09:40.133
<v Speaker 3>narrative that in the last several days everything has changed

0:09:40.813 --> 0:09:44.933
<v Speaker 3>and this is now an uber competitive race where Harris

0:09:45.413 --> 0:09:47.493
<v Speaker 3>is really sort of neck and neck with Trump is

0:09:47.773 --> 0:09:51.013
<v Speaker 3>to this point sort of without foundation, and I can

0:09:51.573 --> 0:09:53.493
<v Speaker 3>I can risk boring you in your audience.

0:09:53.133 --> 0:09:55.013
<v Speaker 4>By sort of fletting that out a little. If you'd

0:09:55.053 --> 0:09:57.573
<v Speaker 4>like it, go for it.

0:09:57.613 --> 0:10:01.573
<v Speaker 3>Well, Okay, So first of all, this the context of

0:10:02.493 --> 0:10:08.253
<v Speaker 3>the media narrative in America pre debate with Biden was

0:10:08.453 --> 0:10:12.493
<v Speaker 3>that is a very competitive close race, right, and the

0:10:12.733 --> 0:10:16.293
<v Speaker 3>criticisms of Biden from the Republicans weren't sticking because they

0:10:16.293 --> 0:10:20.173
<v Speaker 3>were so manufactured and the things in the country were

0:10:20.173 --> 0:10:22.933
<v Speaker 3>pretty good. Just that Biden wasn't getting enough credit. So

0:10:22.973 --> 0:10:25.613
<v Speaker 3>therefore it was a competitive race, otherwise he would have

0:10:25.653 --> 0:10:28.293
<v Speaker 3>won it to be winning easily. Then the debate comes

0:10:28.333 --> 0:10:31.453
<v Speaker 3>along and everybody sees what the other side has been

0:10:31.493 --> 0:10:33.853
<v Speaker 3>saying for years, which is Biden can't do the job.

0:10:34.613 --> 0:10:39.093
<v Speaker 3>Everybody pretty much agrees, and then Biden started to lose

0:10:39.133 --> 0:10:42.653
<v Speaker 3>support apparently, which was true. He lost more support. Then

0:10:42.693 --> 0:10:45.693
<v Speaker 3>the assassination attempt comes on Trump, build sympathy for Trump.

0:10:46.333 --> 0:10:51.013
<v Speaker 3>Then the Republican invention happens, good, you know, positive vibes

0:10:51.373 --> 0:10:53.333
<v Speaker 3>for Trump and the Republicans. So at the end of

0:10:53.333 --> 0:10:58.093
<v Speaker 3>that process, everyone's agreeing that Trump is a shoe in

0:10:58.453 --> 0:11:01.613
<v Speaker 3>to win. But what I would argue is that for

0:11:01.693 --> 0:11:04.973
<v Speaker 3>a year Trump was in a very strong position. Weren't

0:11:04.973 --> 0:11:08.093
<v Speaker 3>guaranteed to win, but pre debate he was a heavy favorite.

0:11:08.373 --> 0:11:10.853
<v Speaker 3>Everything that happened, the debate, the assassination attempt, the convention

0:11:11.293 --> 0:11:16.813
<v Speaker 3>made it going from quite probable to almost guarantee.

0:11:17.173 --> 0:11:20.573
<v Speaker 4>So I sail this because the media.

0:11:20.413 --> 0:11:24.133
<v Speaker 3>And the Democrats publicly at least refused to acknowledge the

0:11:24.173 --> 0:11:26.973
<v Speaker 3>fact that Trump was in such a strong position. They've

0:11:26.973 --> 0:11:30.293
<v Speaker 3>always they've argued the problem was Biden has simply become

0:11:30.373 --> 0:11:33.693
<v Speaker 3>too old and appeared not up to the job anymore

0:11:33.933 --> 0:11:38.933
<v Speaker 3>more physically than anything. So they've switched out Biden for Harris,

0:11:39.253 --> 0:11:41.693
<v Speaker 3>and they're saying, so there we are, We're right, right,

0:11:41.733 --> 0:11:44.333
<v Speaker 3>we were right. It wasn't about the policies or how

0:11:44.333 --> 0:11:47.373
<v Speaker 3>people felt about the country. About Biden's as a president,

0:11:47.413 --> 0:11:49.733
<v Speaker 3>it was simply, you know, he was too snow seen

0:11:49.733 --> 0:11:51.693
<v Speaker 3>as too old. No, we've got this young, energetic vice

0:11:51.773 --> 0:11:54.053
<v Speaker 3>president and she's going to do really well.

0:11:54.053 --> 0:11:57.093
<v Speaker 4>And look at these polls showing that she's doing really well.

0:11:57.093 --> 0:12:01.293
<v Speaker 3>What those polls The reason those polls are showing that

0:12:01.453 --> 0:12:04.533
<v Speaker 3>Trump's lead has shrunk or you know, might even be

0:12:05.133 --> 0:12:08.053
<v Speaker 3>neck and neck with Harris, is that what those polls

0:12:08.053 --> 0:12:12.453
<v Speaker 3>are doing is they are I don't know if it's intentional,

0:12:12.493 --> 0:12:16.573
<v Speaker 3>but certainly the outcome is that they are over sampling Democrats.

0:12:16.893 --> 0:12:22.173
<v Speaker 3>They're including too many Democrats disproportionate number of Democrats, then

0:12:22.213 --> 0:12:26.653
<v Speaker 3>their size of the electorate. And that means that if

0:12:26.853 --> 0:12:30.493
<v Speaker 3>you have five to ten percent too many Democrats almost

0:12:30.573 --> 0:12:32.493
<v Speaker 3>whom all of whom are going to vote for the

0:12:32.533 --> 0:12:35.893
<v Speaker 3>Democratic candidate, then you get it. Instead of trumping up

0:12:35.893 --> 0:12:37.773
<v Speaker 3>by six, he's up by two, or Istred, of being

0:12:37.813 --> 0:12:39.653
<v Speaker 3>up by four, it's now a tie, or Harris is

0:12:39.733 --> 0:12:42.613
<v Speaker 3>up by one, this kind of thing. If you are

0:12:43.973 --> 0:12:46.773
<v Speaker 3>more careful about these things, as I hope we are

0:12:46.853 --> 0:12:49.893
<v Speaker 3>and some others are, then what you see is what

0:12:49.933 --> 0:12:53.853
<v Speaker 3>we see, which is we see almost no change. So,

0:12:54.013 --> 0:12:59.613
<v Speaker 3>for example, after the convention and the assassination attempt. Our

0:12:59.653 --> 0:13:06.013
<v Speaker 3>second most recent poll, we had Trump up nine against Biden.

0:13:06.813 --> 0:13:11.173
<v Speaker 3>Our first poll, almost recent poll Trump against Harris, Trump

0:13:11.213 --> 0:13:13.293
<v Speaker 3>is up eight and.

0:13:14.693 --> 0:13:17.573
<v Speaker 4>Trump's numbers aren't down significantly.

0:13:17.973 --> 0:13:22.213
<v Speaker 3>What it is is that Democrats were so depressed and

0:13:22.973 --> 0:13:26.733
<v Speaker 3>disenchanted with Biden by the time he dropped out. The

0:13:26.773 --> 0:13:30.493
<v Speaker 3>fact they now have a living, breathing candidate, they are relieved,

0:13:30.933 --> 0:13:34.533
<v Speaker 3>They are at least temporarily energized. And some of them

0:13:34.573 --> 0:13:36.053
<v Speaker 3>who were not going to vote, and some of them

0:13:36.093 --> 0:13:39.253
<v Speaker 3>who are going to vote for Robert Kennedy Junior as

0:13:39.253 --> 0:13:43.853
<v Speaker 3>a sort of sort of protest, I've sort of come back.

0:13:44.173 --> 0:13:47.453
<v Speaker 3>So Harris is the margin between Harris and Trump is

0:13:47.573 --> 0:13:51.733
<v Speaker 3>one point in our polling, different less different than what

0:13:51.773 --> 0:13:54.973
<v Speaker 3>it was, smaller than what it was between Trump and Biden.

0:13:55.533 --> 0:13:58.413
<v Speaker 3>And if you look at, you know, all the demographic breakdown,

0:13:59.533 --> 0:14:01.733
<v Speaker 3>all of those numbers that were looking so good for

0:14:01.773 --> 0:14:05.013
<v Speaker 3>Trump and so bad for Biden among blacks and Hispanics,

0:14:05.613 --> 0:14:08.253
<v Speaker 3>even amongst women, the white working class in the PA,

0:14:08.333 --> 0:14:10.413
<v Speaker 3>and they're all those numbers haven't shifted.

0:14:11.013 --> 0:14:13.093
<v Speaker 4>Those numbers are still the same. Now this is the.

0:14:13.053 --> 0:14:14.893
<v Speaker 3>First poll, you know, we'll be doing lots of polls

0:14:14.933 --> 0:14:17.973
<v Speaker 3>between now and November five. Yep, but there's no Well,

0:14:17.973 --> 0:14:20.173
<v Speaker 3>my point is that we've been told as a search

0:14:20.573 --> 0:14:24.333
<v Speaker 3>that everything's changed now, and what I'm suggesting to your

0:14:24.373 --> 0:14:28.453
<v Speaker 3>audience is that there is no us there's no rigorous

0:14:28.533 --> 0:14:30.093
<v Speaker 3>empirical evidence to support that.

0:14:32.413 --> 0:14:34.853
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at the the figures that you mentioned. I

0:14:34.893 --> 0:14:36.973
<v Speaker 2>only had to spool down two pages and I found

0:14:36.973 --> 0:14:41.253
<v Speaker 2>it and realized that I was in era. But I

0:14:41.293 --> 0:14:45.573
<v Speaker 2>did wonder. I had wondered that poll was done. I'm

0:14:45.613 --> 0:14:49.453
<v Speaker 2>looking at the demographic subgroups just at the moment, and

0:14:49.493 --> 0:14:52.773
<v Speaker 2>then there's the main one forty eight to forty to

0:14:52.853 --> 0:14:59.253
<v Speaker 2>Harris above it. That was done after after Joe stood

0:14:59.293 --> 0:15:04.773
<v Speaker 2>down and she was declared the runner, or prior to that.

0:15:05.973 --> 0:15:08.813
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was afterwards, because he stood down on the Sunday,

0:15:09.413 --> 0:15:11.493
<v Speaker 3>and then in the next forty eight to seventy two hours,

0:15:11.533 --> 0:15:12.453
<v Speaker 3>I mean, she declared her.

0:15:12.493 --> 0:15:14.813
<v Speaker 4>It was immediately she was endorsed by Bob.

0:15:15.053 --> 0:15:16.973
<v Speaker 3>The only thing that hadn't happened by the time we

0:15:17.013 --> 0:15:19.893
<v Speaker 3>took the poll is Obama hadn't endorsed her, but everyone

0:15:19.893 --> 0:15:23.333
<v Speaker 3>had come together. They'd announced that there weren't going to

0:15:23.373 --> 0:15:25.693
<v Speaker 3>be any other candidates allowed at the convention, et cetera,

0:15:25.733 --> 0:15:29.693
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. So at that point, the only shooter drop

0:15:29.973 --> 0:15:33.253
<v Speaker 3>was and I thought this might be possible that Obama

0:15:33.333 --> 0:15:35.893
<v Speaker 3>because he didn't want Harris. But it turns out he's

0:15:35.893 --> 0:15:39.893
<v Speaker 3>been out maneuvered by her and her cabal, that he

0:15:40.373 --> 0:15:43.653
<v Speaker 3>was holding back an endorsement because he had another candidate

0:15:43.653 --> 0:15:45.533
<v Speaker 3>in mind and he was going to jump He's going

0:15:45.573 --> 0:15:47.733
<v Speaker 3>to throw in at the convention. And I thought that

0:15:47.853 --> 0:15:49.853
<v Speaker 3>might be you know that if it was a silver

0:15:49.893 --> 0:15:52.613
<v Speaker 3>bullet for the Democrats, that would be it. Obama being

0:15:52.613 --> 0:15:55.813
<v Speaker 3>a very savvy operator in these in these regards, but

0:15:56.373 --> 0:15:58.213
<v Speaker 3>he saw the writing on the wall. He wasn't able

0:15:58.213 --> 0:16:00.333
<v Speaker 3>to wouldn't be able to get Harris out. So subsequent

0:16:00.333 --> 0:16:04.173
<v Speaker 3>to that poll, he's endorsed. Obviously, he's endorsed Harris.

0:16:04.773 --> 0:16:07.533
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested also in who convinced Biden to leave in

0:16:07.573 --> 0:16:13.533
<v Speaker 2>people's opinion, and that runs from thirty six percent thinks Obama,

0:16:14.133 --> 0:16:18.613
<v Speaker 2>and surprisingly who convinced Biden to leave on four percent

0:16:18.933 --> 0:16:20.093
<v Speaker 2>was Jill Biden.

0:16:21.373 --> 0:16:25.053
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, well people recognize, I mean it's you know,

0:16:25.093 --> 0:16:29.493
<v Speaker 3>it's not exactly a secret that Joe Biden didn't want

0:16:29.533 --> 0:16:32.173
<v Speaker 3>to go. But there was a there was a window

0:16:32.213 --> 0:16:37.293
<v Speaker 3>of persuadability there. But Jill Biden everybody knew she had.

0:16:37.413 --> 0:16:40.293
<v Speaker 3>She was gripping on to the furniture in the Oval office.

0:16:40.573 --> 0:16:42.533
<v Speaker 3>She was not going to give up her presidency. I mean,

0:16:42.533 --> 0:16:45.573
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, her position is first Lady without a fight,

0:16:45.733 --> 0:16:49.133
<v Speaker 3>right literally, I mean, there are strong rooms. I don't

0:16:49.133 --> 0:16:50.933
<v Speaker 3>know if they're true, but I suspect they may be that.

0:16:51.053 --> 0:16:55.773
<v Speaker 3>For the past two years, Joe Biden was okay with

0:16:56.053 --> 0:16:58.533
<v Speaker 3>leaving as long as he left was able to leave

0:16:58.573 --> 0:17:00.813
<v Speaker 3>with his head held high, but Jill.

0:17:00.613 --> 0:17:02.933
<v Speaker 4>Biden refused to go along with it.

0:17:03.613 --> 0:17:06.573
<v Speaker 3>And more recently, of course, Joe Biden wasn't going and

0:17:06.653 --> 0:17:08.253
<v Speaker 3>didn't go with his head held high.

0:17:08.573 --> 0:17:09.773
<v Speaker 4>And that was his problem.

0:17:09.813 --> 0:17:13.653
<v Speaker 3>He just couldn't bear the thought of being ousted and

0:17:13.693 --> 0:17:15.213
<v Speaker 3>what that would mean for his legacy.

0:17:16.253 --> 0:17:18.853
<v Speaker 4>And of course, it turns out they.

0:17:18.693 --> 0:17:20.893
<v Speaker 3>Were able to get him out because Obama and Harris

0:17:20.933 --> 0:17:24.133
<v Speaker 3>were able to tell him, you know, look, you either

0:17:24.173 --> 0:17:27.533
<v Speaker 3>go now or we're going to, you know, in vote

0:17:27.533 --> 0:17:30.093
<v Speaker 3>the twenty fifth Amendment and we'll get the votes and

0:17:30.133 --> 0:17:32.453
<v Speaker 3>they'll kick you out because you're incapacitated.

0:17:32.893 --> 0:17:34.733
<v Speaker 4>And how that going to look on your legacy?

0:17:34.813 --> 0:17:36.973
<v Speaker 3>So you know, the Letter of two evils as far

0:17:36.973 --> 0:17:39.653
<v Speaker 3>as by Joe Biden was concerned, but I'm sure Jill

0:17:39.733 --> 0:17:44.053
<v Speaker 3>Biden probably had to be medicated in order to get

0:17:44.093 --> 0:17:45.373
<v Speaker 3>her literally out of the building.

0:17:45.973 --> 0:17:48.013
<v Speaker 2>Well, come time for the changeover, I think they should

0:17:48.013 --> 0:17:53.133
<v Speaker 2>have armguards on the on the White House, indeed, especially

0:17:53.213 --> 0:17:57.093
<v Speaker 2>the furniture rooms. Let me just ask you for your

0:17:57.213 --> 0:18:00.933
<v Speaker 2>personal opinion on how this will turn out. I mean,

0:18:00.973 --> 0:18:03.733
<v Speaker 2>I know it's a long call still, but how do

0:18:03.813 --> 0:18:04.693
<v Speaker 2>you think it will end up?

0:18:06.413 --> 0:18:07.733
<v Speaker 4>Strictly the election itself.

0:18:07.933 --> 0:18:16.053
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, with the obvious but necessary caveat that anything can

0:18:16.133 --> 0:18:17.933
<v Speaker 3>happen with ninety nine days out of the time I'm

0:18:17.933 --> 0:18:20.893
<v Speaker 3>speaking with you, Layton, so with less than one hundred days,

0:18:21.133 --> 0:18:23.653
<v Speaker 3>there's plenty of time for something major to happen. And

0:18:23.693 --> 0:18:27.133
<v Speaker 3>obviously the last several weeks tell us that major things

0:18:27.173 --> 0:18:29.013
<v Speaker 3>can happen, some predictable, some not.

0:18:29.973 --> 0:18:32.773
<v Speaker 4>So with that caveat out of.

0:18:32.693 --> 0:18:37.053
<v Speaker 3>The way, I would say it is highly improbable that

0:18:37.293 --> 0:18:41.533
<v Speaker 3>Harris can pull this off. And just to sort of

0:18:41.853 --> 0:18:48.813
<v Speaker 3>hopefully the audience ske sort of Pracie my rationale. If

0:18:48.853 --> 0:18:51.973
<v Speaker 3>you're looking at this, you take the names away, take

0:18:52.053 --> 0:18:55.933
<v Speaker 3>Harris away, and all the pros and the connotations that

0:18:55.973 --> 0:18:58.893
<v Speaker 3>go with that name, and Trump away and the connotations

0:18:58.893 --> 0:19:01.333
<v Speaker 3>that go with his name. You look at the state

0:19:01.373 --> 0:19:04.933
<v Speaker 3>of the country economically, socially, in terms of foreign policy,

0:19:05.133 --> 0:19:08.573
<v Speaker 3>place in the world, all of that, and you look

0:19:08.693 --> 0:19:10.613
<v Speaker 3>not just at the raw numbers, but you look at

0:19:10.853 --> 0:19:14.653
<v Speaker 3>what people what most people, what their quality of life is,

0:19:14.693 --> 0:19:18.813
<v Speaker 3>what their what their fears, frustrations are, their anger, how

0:19:18.853 --> 0:19:20.813
<v Speaker 3>they see the direction of the country, how see their

0:19:20.813 --> 0:19:22.533
<v Speaker 3>own they see their own futures.

0:19:22.733 --> 0:19:23.133
<v Speaker 4>You see.

0:19:23.213 --> 0:19:26.533
<v Speaker 3>You look at how young people are viewing things quite

0:19:26.533 --> 0:19:27.373
<v Speaker 3>differently than they.

0:19:27.213 --> 0:19:29.413
<v Speaker 4>Were when Obama was president.

0:19:30.053 --> 0:19:34.333
<v Speaker 3>You look at how Hispanics are looking at uh looking

0:19:34.373 --> 0:19:37.013
<v Speaker 3>heavily towards the Republicans in a way they happened since

0:19:37.013 --> 0:19:37.533
<v Speaker 3>George W.

0:19:37.653 --> 0:19:41.093
<v Speaker 4>Bush. You look at how arguably a fifth to a quarter.

0:19:40.933 --> 0:19:44.693
<v Speaker 3>Of black voters seriously thinking of voting in a way

0:19:44.693 --> 0:19:48.173
<v Speaker 3>that they ever voted before. And then you say, you

0:19:48.293 --> 0:19:52.733
<v Speaker 3>have a president, if a former president running whose presidency,

0:19:53.293 --> 0:19:56.133
<v Speaker 3>whilst almost would argue it was demonstrably far superior to

0:19:56.173 --> 0:19:59.853
<v Speaker 3>the one that followed it, the current one. The important

0:19:59.853 --> 0:20:04.333
<v Speaker 3>point is that if you ask, if you ask Americans

0:20:04.373 --> 0:20:06.893
<v Speaker 3>what they think of Trump's presidency, was it a success

0:20:06.973 --> 0:20:09.493
<v Speaker 3>or a failure. Was it better or worse than what's come?

0:20:09.613 --> 0:20:15.773
<v Speaker 3>Since they have always been surprisingly positive about Trump's presidency,

0:20:15.853 --> 0:20:19.533
<v Speaker 3>will they be passing month of the Biden presidency, they

0:20:19.613 --> 0:20:22.253
<v Speaker 3>become more favorable. So now the retrospective for you on

0:20:22.413 --> 0:20:26.133
<v Speaker 3>Trump the fore and president is more positive than negative,

0:20:26.213 --> 0:20:30.893
<v Speaker 3>much more. And then you have a vice president attempted

0:20:30.933 --> 0:20:34.293
<v Speaker 3>to succeed the president who.

0:20:34.813 --> 0:20:37.013
<v Speaker 4>Has never run for national office.

0:20:37.053 --> 0:20:40.853
<v Speaker 3>Well, she's run for her party's nomination once, but did

0:20:40.933 --> 0:20:43.493
<v Speaker 3>so poorly. She had to get out before any votes

0:20:43.533 --> 0:20:45.253
<v Speaker 3>were cast because it was going to be a disaster.

0:20:46.133 --> 0:20:51.533
<v Speaker 3>Who who throughout her Korea has never won a competitive race,

0:20:52.533 --> 0:20:54.813
<v Speaker 3>you know, just hasn't it hasn't had that opportunity or.

0:20:54.973 --> 0:20:57.133
<v Speaker 4>Or has failed when she's when she's attempted it.

0:20:57.373 --> 0:21:03.293
<v Speaker 3>And who has historically low favorability ratings, and is ranked

0:21:03.373 --> 0:21:06.333
<v Speaker 3>ranked by the public, not by historians, but it's ranked

0:21:06.373 --> 0:21:09.373
<v Speaker 3>by the public as of the worst vice president anyone

0:21:09.373 --> 0:21:14.253
<v Speaker 3>can remember. You pull that together, and it's hard to

0:21:14.333 --> 0:21:17.813
<v Speaker 3>see how it adds up literally or figuratively in favor

0:21:18.293 --> 0:21:23.773
<v Speaker 3>of Harris. It just, you know, it's just the trends

0:21:23.773 --> 0:21:27.373
<v Speaker 3>aren't there, The signs aren't there. It doesn't you know,

0:21:27.413 --> 0:21:31.213
<v Speaker 3>It just doesn't seem plausible that a race that was

0:21:31.893 --> 0:21:36.693
<v Speaker 3>Trump's almost guarantee to win ten days ago is going

0:21:36.733 --> 0:21:40.133
<v Speaker 3>to be a close run thing because they swapped out

0:21:40.373 --> 0:21:43.853
<v Speaker 3>a very unpopular president for an even more unpopular candidate.

0:21:44.773 --> 0:21:48.133
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm going to count to you because she has

0:21:48.573 --> 0:21:51.533
<v Speaker 2>won something where she was voted in.

0:21:51.973 --> 0:21:54.853
<v Speaker 4>Did you know that which will voted into to which position?

0:21:55.013 --> 0:21:59.653
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me quote you and declare from the current

0:21:59.893 --> 0:22:04.693
<v Speaker 2>Spectator Australia. James Allen, Who's Jim Allen, who is a

0:22:04.693 --> 0:22:09.013
<v Speaker 2>Canadian law professor who works in Well, he was in

0:22:09.053 --> 0:22:11.893
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand for a number of years and now in Queensland.

0:22:12.653 --> 0:22:14.853
<v Speaker 2>I will to quote you a diversity pick in the

0:22:14.893 --> 0:22:19.253
<v Speaker 2>oval office. Carl Harris does have one political victory. It's

0:22:19.293 --> 0:22:23.213
<v Speaker 2>the only democratically chosen office that saw her run required

0:22:23.253 --> 0:22:27.333
<v Speaker 2>actual voters to pick the winner, and she won. That

0:22:27.453 --> 0:22:29.733
<v Speaker 2>was back in twenty ten when Miss Arras ran for

0:22:29.813 --> 0:22:33.133
<v Speaker 2>the office of Attorney General of California. In that election,

0:22:33.293 --> 0:22:37.413
<v Speaker 2>Jerry Brown won the governorship against the Republican by thirteen points.

0:22:38.213 --> 0:22:42.173
<v Speaker 2>Barbara Boxer defeated her Republican opponent for the California Senate

0:22:42.253 --> 0:22:46.533
<v Speaker 2>seat race that year by ten points, and Kamala Harris

0:22:46.533 --> 0:22:52.053
<v Speaker 2>defeated the Republican candidate in twenty ten by wait for it,

0:22:52.453 --> 0:22:58.013
<v Speaker 2>zero point eight percent. Yes, yes, and that's in California.

0:22:58.133 --> 0:23:01.293
<v Speaker 2>Let me remind you exactly.

0:23:02.413 --> 0:23:06.773
<v Speaker 3>She has the unique status of being the only Democrat

0:23:06.813 --> 0:23:10.813
<v Speaker 3>in California to turn and an uncompetitive state wide race

0:23:10.813 --> 0:23:11.893
<v Speaker 3>into a competitive one.

0:23:12.173 --> 0:23:14.093
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and that you.

0:23:14.013 --> 0:23:17.053
<v Speaker 3>Know, this is this is who they're hanging their hopes upon,

0:23:17.213 --> 0:23:20.533
<v Speaker 3>right and we see, I mean, just we know all

0:23:20.573 --> 0:23:21.853
<v Speaker 3>how wonderful it's going for her.

0:23:21.893 --> 0:23:23.893
<v Speaker 4>We've been told the last few days. But if you

0:23:23.973 --> 0:23:25.853
<v Speaker 4>see what.

0:23:25.053 --> 0:23:28.253
<v Speaker 3>What they're doing, how they're campaigning, it tells us a lot.

0:23:28.333 --> 0:23:32.133
<v Speaker 3>Because the Kamal Harris campaign, they started advertising and they

0:23:32.213 --> 0:23:36.933
<v Speaker 3>started their messaging, and she is to this point clearly

0:23:37.013 --> 0:23:42.253
<v Speaker 3>running as the woke candidate. It's all it's all pride stuff,

0:23:42.533 --> 0:23:45.773
<v Speaker 3>it's all transgender. There's not a white man in sightly,

0:23:45.813 --> 0:23:48.173
<v Speaker 3>it's not a white, straight white man. I mean, it's

0:23:48.213 --> 0:23:52.813
<v Speaker 3>the identity politics to the max. They are obviously believing

0:23:53.493 --> 0:23:56.053
<v Speaker 3>that the California electurer is the national electurer, or that

0:23:56.053 --> 0:24:00.213
<v Speaker 3>there are all these hidden woke voters who no one

0:24:00.213 --> 0:24:02.373
<v Speaker 3>else has discovered yet, who are going to come out

0:24:02.493 --> 0:24:04.573
<v Speaker 3>none of the hills, but you know, come out of

0:24:04.653 --> 0:24:08.733
<v Speaker 3>their their wine bars and their suburban mansions and vote

0:24:08.773 --> 0:24:12.133
<v Speaker 3>for her. Whereas at the same time, the Trump campaign

0:24:12.813 --> 0:24:17.293
<v Speaker 3>in the Swing States are running attack ads against Harris

0:24:17.493 --> 0:24:21.053
<v Speaker 3>on crime and immigration and running their own ads pro

0:24:21.133 --> 0:24:23.693
<v Speaker 3>Trump ads on immigration in the economy. I mean, just

0:24:24.013 --> 0:24:27.533
<v Speaker 3>what they're focusing on and how they're focusing on it

0:24:27.533 --> 0:24:31.653
<v Speaker 3>gives a strong signal as to which side, regardless of

0:24:32.133 --> 0:24:35.413
<v Speaker 3>whose right or wrong policy wise, but which side gets

0:24:35.453 --> 0:24:38.253
<v Speaker 3>it in terms of where the electorate is, you know.

0:24:38.333 --> 0:24:40.973
<v Speaker 4>So it's I just don't see the magic yet.

0:24:41.053 --> 0:24:42.973
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's all going to pop up soon at the

0:24:42.973 --> 0:24:46.093
<v Speaker 3>convention or afterwards or during a debate, But that seems

0:24:46.173 --> 0:24:47.733
<v Speaker 3>highly unlikely, doesn't it.

0:24:47.733 --> 0:24:51.333
<v Speaker 2>It does seem highly unlikely. I based my prediction in

0:24:51.373 --> 0:24:53.653
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen that Trump would win on the fact that

0:24:53.693 --> 0:24:57.893
<v Speaker 2>I could not believe and would not believe that the majority,

0:24:58.173 --> 0:25:03.973
<v Speaker 2>well the collective IQ of Americans, was so stupid as

0:25:04.053 --> 0:25:08.813
<v Speaker 2>to elect the other party who deserves and I mentioned, uh,

0:25:08.933 --> 0:25:11.133
<v Speaker 2>and I'm and I'm basing my prediction for this one

0:25:11.133 --> 0:25:14.613
<v Speaker 2>on exactly the same reasoning. Now, I want to I

0:25:14.653 --> 0:25:17.933
<v Speaker 2>want to transfer a little bit because the title of

0:25:17.933 --> 0:25:22.053
<v Speaker 2>that James Allen article a diversity pick in the Oval Office.

0:25:23.093 --> 0:25:28.013
<v Speaker 2>Alex Berenson, the journalist and author. Have you ever read

0:25:28.013 --> 0:25:31.613
<v Speaker 2>any of his his spy type books.

0:25:32.573 --> 0:25:33.013
<v Speaker 4>I haven't.

0:25:33.053 --> 0:25:36.773
<v Speaker 3>I'm more familiar with him during the COVID and post

0:25:36.813 --> 0:25:39.093
<v Speaker 3>COVID period with his critiques.

0:25:38.573 --> 0:25:42.133
<v Speaker 2>Of yeah in that regard, Yeah, yeah, he wrote some.

0:25:42.253 --> 0:25:45.093
<v Speaker 2>He wrote a series. You know, there were a number

0:25:45.093 --> 0:25:49.573
<v Speaker 2>of series of books starring in each series from different

0:25:49.573 --> 0:25:54.853
<v Speaker 2>authors of you know, one particular hero, and he had one,

0:25:55.053 --> 0:25:57.693
<v Speaker 2>and I've got a collection of them. I just thought

0:25:57.693 --> 0:26:03.613
<v Speaker 2>i'd tell you he's written a piece that's about another piece.

0:26:04.533 --> 0:26:07.613
<v Speaker 2>If I'm making sense, and his is headed read this

0:26:07.813 --> 0:26:11.973
<v Speaker 2>and weak and then it brackets and be outraged. Heather

0:26:12.053 --> 0:26:14.453
<v Speaker 2>McDonald's been writing about the war on men for a while.

0:26:14.493 --> 0:26:18.213
<v Speaker 2>Today in City Journal she turned her attention to the

0:26:18.213 --> 0:26:21.613
<v Speaker 2>Boy Scouts, who are no longer the boy Scouts at all,

0:26:21.773 --> 0:26:27.093
<v Speaker 2>but Scouting America. Now. This is all about DEI and

0:26:27.213 --> 0:26:33.733
<v Speaker 2>associated woke matters. And when you read, and you can,

0:26:33.893 --> 0:26:38.853
<v Speaker 2>if you go to a Cityjournal dot org Cityjournal dot org,

0:26:38.973 --> 0:26:43.453
<v Speaker 2>you'll find the full piece written by Heather McDonald, and

0:26:43.533 --> 0:26:45.973
<v Speaker 2>it's worthy of attention. The Boy Scouts of America has

0:26:46.013 --> 0:26:50.413
<v Speaker 2>a Chief Diversity Officer and Vice President of Diversity and Inclusion.

0:26:51.253 --> 0:26:55.053
<v Speaker 2>The organization requires all Eagle Scouts to earn a badge

0:26:55.093 --> 0:26:59.453
<v Speaker 2>in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. And I can't go on

0:26:59.573 --> 0:27:03.653
<v Speaker 2>because I'll throw up. I wonder if well you tell me,

0:27:03.853 --> 0:27:09.173
<v Speaker 2>you tell us is wokeness and DEI on the way?

0:27:09.493 --> 0:27:12.253
<v Speaker 2>Is it under threat or is it still raging?

0:27:14.653 --> 0:27:19.533
<v Speaker 3>It is all of the Abovely, it is still raging

0:27:19.653 --> 0:27:23.853
<v Speaker 3>because those who advocate for it, and more specifically, those

0:27:24.493 --> 0:27:30.333
<v Speaker 3>in positions either positions created to advocate for it, usually

0:27:30.333 --> 0:27:33.893
<v Speaker 3>paid for by the taxpayer or paid for courtesy of

0:27:34.693 --> 0:27:41.613
<v Speaker 3>big business. Those folks are true believers, and of course

0:27:42.253 --> 0:27:45.613
<v Speaker 3>they want the cottage industry to continue to continue to grow.

0:27:46.573 --> 0:27:49.373
<v Speaker 3>So that is not going to stop until they are stopped, until,

0:27:49.413 --> 0:27:53.453
<v Speaker 3>for example, you know, Coca Cola and McDonald's and you

0:27:53.573 --> 0:27:57.013
<v Speaker 3>name the big multinational, until they eliminate these positions, until

0:27:57.013 --> 0:28:01.093
<v Speaker 3>the government eliminates these positions, until the academy ellict eliminates

0:28:01.093 --> 0:28:04.733
<v Speaker 3>these positions, these folks will continue making their often high

0:28:04.813 --> 0:28:10.653
<v Speaker 3>six figure salaries and pouring out more of this nonsense. However,

0:28:11.893 --> 0:28:16.253
<v Speaker 3>as more and more regular folk come to understand what

0:28:16.453 --> 0:28:18.773
<v Speaker 3>is going on, what has been going on, and what

0:28:18.813 --> 0:28:23.533
<v Speaker 3>the plans are for the future. The normal, the regular folk.

0:28:23.573 --> 0:28:27.213
<v Speaker 3>The regular person's response is that they too are horrified.

0:28:27.373 --> 0:28:31.253
<v Speaker 3>They're baffled. At first, people don't believe it's true because

0:28:31.533 --> 0:28:36.053
<v Speaker 3>it is so bizarre, so surreal, so ridiculous, so farcical.

0:28:36.213 --> 0:28:37.653
<v Speaker 4>And then they discover.

0:28:37.453 --> 0:28:40.573
<v Speaker 3>Because they started looking at their kids' textbooks, or they

0:28:40.613 --> 0:28:43.373
<v Speaker 3>talk to people they work with and their experience in

0:28:43.413 --> 0:28:46.853
<v Speaker 3>the service, that they watch Disney films and programs. But

0:28:46.933 --> 0:28:51.933
<v Speaker 3>this is actually true, and most people think the world's

0:28:51.973 --> 0:28:53.453
<v Speaker 3>gone mad. There's not much they can do about it.

0:28:53.493 --> 0:28:56.173
<v Speaker 3>But some people, particularly when it comes to education. Parents,

0:28:56.173 --> 0:28:59.173
<v Speaker 3>a lot of parents are trying to take back control,

0:28:59.213 --> 0:29:02.973
<v Speaker 3>which is something that not just the woosters what the

0:29:03.053 --> 0:29:08.813
<v Speaker 3>liberal elites who govern education in most Western countries are

0:29:08.893 --> 0:29:13.333
<v Speaker 3>very resistant to allow to give that control back, not

0:29:13.493 --> 0:29:15.973
<v Speaker 3>just in a power sense, but ideologically.

0:29:16.013 --> 0:29:17.973
<v Speaker 4>They actually think the parents shouldn't have control.

0:29:18.053 --> 0:29:21.173
<v Speaker 3>The government should have control of your kid's education, obviously,

0:29:22.173 --> 0:29:27.493
<v Speaker 3>and so public opinion, which didn't really consider these things

0:29:27.613 --> 0:29:34.213
<v Speaker 3>until fairly recently, is massively overwhelmingly against all of this madness.

0:29:35.253 --> 0:29:39.893
<v Speaker 3>And those politicians who are brave enough to step out

0:29:39.893 --> 0:29:42.933
<v Speaker 3>in front of that public opinion and sort of tend

0:29:42.973 --> 0:29:45.693
<v Speaker 3>to walk walk in front of it, lead it as

0:29:45.733 --> 0:29:49.293
<v Speaker 3>best they can, you know, tend to do well. But

0:29:49.373 --> 0:29:53.013
<v Speaker 3>most politicians are still scared because they don't want to

0:29:53.053 --> 0:29:55.853
<v Speaker 3>be labeled racist and homophobic and all the rest of it.

0:29:56.093 --> 0:30:00.813
<v Speaker 4>And just in terms of public opinion itself, just as this.

0:30:01.013 --> 0:30:02.333
<v Speaker 3>Either be real, I mean, may or may not be

0:30:02.333 --> 0:30:06.893
<v Speaker 3>reassuring to your audience, but just as overwhelmingly voters are

0:30:06.973 --> 0:30:11.253
<v Speaker 3>against these transgender policies or you you know, the critical

0:30:11.333 --> 0:30:14.893
<v Speaker 3>race theory or d I and all of that, these

0:30:14.893 --> 0:30:18.653
<v Speaker 3>are not racist, homophobic, misogynistic people.

0:30:19.693 --> 0:30:21.893
<v Speaker 4>They recognize there's a great deal. Look, there's all the

0:30:21.893 --> 0:30:22.373
<v Speaker 4>limbs in the.

0:30:22.293 --> 0:30:25.613
<v Speaker 3>World between treating everyone equally regardless of gender, race, sexual

0:30:25.613 --> 0:30:30.653
<v Speaker 3>orientation and treating some groups discriminating in favor of certain

0:30:30.653 --> 0:30:33.893
<v Speaker 3>groups because they are the minority.

0:30:34.493 --> 0:30:35.133
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:30:35.173 --> 0:30:39.293
<v Speaker 3>And so the people get it now, more and more

0:30:39.333 --> 0:30:42.733
<v Speaker 3>politicians get it. But we're still a long way from

0:30:42.773 --> 0:30:47.693
<v Speaker 3>getting rid of it. Because as obviously, the the woosters,

0:30:47.773 --> 0:30:51.373
<v Speaker 3>the woke industry has you know, established pretty strong roots

0:30:51.373 --> 0:30:55.533
<v Speaker 3>in some places, and every you know, every Olympics opening

0:30:55.573 --> 0:31:00.813
<v Speaker 3>ceremony to bacle helps you know, helps thots.

0:31:01.373 --> 0:31:06.493
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's just got a great big boost. Yes Watching

0:31:06.533 --> 0:31:10.213
<v Speaker 2>television yesterday, there was a sequence of commentaries by Kamala

0:31:10.253 --> 0:31:16.533
<v Speaker 2>Harris of her talking about equity, equity, equity, equity, equity everywhere,

0:31:16.933 --> 0:31:18.653
<v Speaker 2>and he just went on and on and on different

0:31:18.653 --> 0:31:24.133
<v Speaker 2>speeches and in equity, repeating herself. And if the if

0:31:24.173 --> 0:31:27.973
<v Speaker 2>the American public realizing that voted for her and she

0:31:28.053 --> 0:31:31.813
<v Speaker 2>became the president, I think of Mary, I think you'd

0:31:31.813 --> 0:31:32.293
<v Speaker 2>move out.

0:31:34.573 --> 0:31:38.093
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's yeah, it's it's pretty unimaginable because, you know,

0:31:38.133 --> 0:31:42.773
<v Speaker 3>when people were voting for Biden, here's somebody who's demonstrably.

0:31:42.253 --> 0:31:47.773
<v Speaker 4>Corrupt on Earth the call and challenged in various ways.

0:31:48.133 --> 0:31:51.813
<v Speaker 3>But he's someone who always, at least within his own party,

0:31:51.933 --> 0:31:52.693
<v Speaker 3>just went with the flow.

0:31:52.813 --> 0:31:52.933
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:31:53.053 --> 0:31:54.773
<v Speaker 4>He was pro segregation at the beginning.

0:31:54.813 --> 0:31:57.173
<v Speaker 3>He ended up being on the woke side because that's

0:31:57.253 --> 0:32:00.453
<v Speaker 3>just way the way the music was playing, and he

0:32:00.573 --> 0:32:02.973
<v Speaker 3>just you know, tried to go with that and very

0:32:03.013 --> 0:32:06.373
<v Speaker 3>successfully throughout you know, forty to fifty year career. Well,

0:32:06.413 --> 0:32:10.693
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Harris, she has to leaves this stuff, right. I mean,

0:32:11.173 --> 0:32:14.213
<v Speaker 3>she she is someone who is I mean, she's not

0:32:14.293 --> 0:32:18.773
<v Speaker 3>very bright. That's one problem, and she's rather unethical, that's

0:32:18.773 --> 0:32:21.893
<v Speaker 3>another problem. But she actually is a true believer. I mean,

0:32:21.933 --> 0:32:24.733
<v Speaker 3>she can't do anything more than spout talking points. She

0:32:24.813 --> 0:32:30.253
<v Speaker 3>can't debate it, she can't defend it, but she actually

0:32:30.653 --> 0:32:33.733
<v Speaker 3>likes it. You know, she wants more of it. And

0:32:34.013 --> 0:32:36.653
<v Speaker 3>you know, her problem is not that Trump's wall wasn't finished,

0:32:36.693 --> 0:32:38.173
<v Speaker 3>that it was started in the first place.

0:32:38.453 --> 0:32:41.173
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's why you know JD. Vass is debating her.

0:32:41.213 --> 0:32:45.013
<v Speaker 3>I'd like him, for example, to ask her, which of

0:32:45.053 --> 0:32:51.613
<v Speaker 3>your Marxist economist father's beliefs did you do you agree with?

0:32:51.813 --> 0:32:53.893
<v Speaker 3>And which do you disagree with? You know, I mean

0:32:53.933 --> 0:32:56.693
<v Speaker 3>it's you know, it's in the DNA. I mean, I

0:32:56.693 --> 0:32:58.853
<v Speaker 3>think he was a thousand times smarter than her. It's

0:32:58.853 --> 0:33:01.853
<v Speaker 3>wrong on everything. She's wrong on everything and not very smart.

0:33:01.973 --> 0:33:07.093
<v Speaker 3>So it's it's even more alarming and probably even more

0:33:07.173 --> 0:33:10.373
<v Speaker 3>dangerous than if she if she was actually a smart

0:33:10.453 --> 0:33:14.573
<v Speaker 3>Marxist or a dim opportunist like Biden.

0:33:15.453 --> 0:33:17.853
<v Speaker 2>Well, if he answered that sort of question, she'd probably

0:33:17.893 --> 0:33:20.653
<v Speaker 2>answer along the lines of what's gone before?

0:33:22.693 --> 0:33:25.093
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly exactly.

0:33:25.373 --> 0:33:27.733
<v Speaker 3>And I mean the next spicacle of the press question,

0:33:27.813 --> 0:33:32.293
<v Speaker 3>of course, is to ask her what the reparations she's cutting,

0:33:32.413 --> 0:33:36.173
<v Speaker 3>giving her family slaveholding history in the Caribbean. But she's

0:33:37.013 --> 0:33:39.853
<v Speaker 3>she's she's there's so much low hanging fruit with a

0:33:39.893 --> 0:33:44.933
<v Speaker 3>candidate like her right in California. It's more difficult because

0:33:44.973 --> 0:33:50.133
<v Speaker 3>California is California. But in terms of what she has

0:33:50.213 --> 0:33:52.253
<v Speaker 3>to do to win, you know, she doesn't have to

0:33:52.293 --> 0:33:55.853
<v Speaker 3>convert people in Manhattan or even people in Florida. She

0:33:55.933 --> 0:34:02.533
<v Speaker 3>has to convert white blue collar men in the rust belt, right.

0:34:03.453 --> 0:34:06.453
<v Speaker 4>She has to. She doesn't mean she doesn't like white men.

0:34:07.293 --> 0:34:09.773
<v Speaker 4>She doesn't like white people bring much at all, and

0:34:09.853 --> 0:34:10.933
<v Speaker 4>she has to convert them.

0:34:10.973 --> 0:34:16.213
<v Speaker 3>And they're worried about illegal immigration and inflation and the

0:34:16.293 --> 0:34:18.573
<v Speaker 3>lack of manufacturing jobs and crime.

0:34:18.933 --> 0:34:21.853
<v Speaker 4>It's a heavy lift for a candidate like her.

0:34:22.533 --> 0:34:27.853
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, just finally want to quote you somebody named Matthew Garrett.

0:34:28.133 --> 0:34:31.973
<v Speaker 2>To my colleagues at Bakersfield College and nationwide, I say,

0:34:32.293 --> 0:34:36.213
<v Speaker 2>keep the faith. We are winning the battle one case

0:34:36.733 --> 0:34:41.013
<v Speaker 2>at a time. Is a conservative professor who got disciplined

0:34:41.093 --> 0:34:45.373
<v Speaker 2>for criticizing DEI and has won two point four million

0:34:45.453 --> 0:34:48.733
<v Speaker 2>dollars to settle the lawsuit against the college. Isn't that

0:34:48.773 --> 0:34:49.893
<v Speaker 2>great news? Headlines?

0:34:50.933 --> 0:34:53.653
<v Speaker 3>It is great, and there are things happening in the

0:34:53.733 --> 0:34:58.293
<v Speaker 3>last let's say, twelve months that weren't happening twenty four,

0:34:58.413 --> 0:35:02.853
<v Speaker 3>thirty six, forty eight months ago, and this is very encouraging.

0:35:02.933 --> 0:35:06.773
<v Speaker 3>There were occasional victories, now the victories are starting to

0:35:06.813 --> 0:35:10.813
<v Speaker 3>pile up. Right, Are we at a currical mass? We

0:35:10.853 --> 0:35:12.333
<v Speaker 3>are in terms of we are in a critical mass in

0:35:12.413 --> 0:35:14.573
<v Speaker 3>terms of public opinion. But are we at a critical

0:35:14.573 --> 0:35:20.053
<v Speaker 3>mass in terms of policy, legislation, the law, in terms

0:35:20.053 --> 0:35:22.453
<v Speaker 3>of those who are those who are making decisions in

0:35:22.533 --> 0:35:26.893
<v Speaker 3>politics or in the corporate world, in academia. No, we're not,

0:35:27.173 --> 0:35:30.333
<v Speaker 3>but we appear to be closer, much closer than we were.

0:35:30.693 --> 0:35:34.533
<v Speaker 3>And how this election goes in November, not just presidentially,

0:35:34.573 --> 0:35:37.533
<v Speaker 3>but at the congressional level as well, is going to

0:35:37.573 --> 0:35:41.453
<v Speaker 3>tell us a lot about whether that momentum, positive momentum,

0:35:41.613 --> 0:35:45.493
<v Speaker 3>continues and we can kind of see the promised land somewhere,

0:35:45.653 --> 0:35:47.573
<v Speaker 3>maybe far in the distance, but at least it's there,

0:35:48.013 --> 0:35:50.733
<v Speaker 3>or whether we sort of look at each other and say,

0:35:50.813 --> 0:35:53.253
<v Speaker 3>my god, you know it's time to run for the.

0:35:53.293 --> 0:35:58.053
<v Speaker 2>Hills lot as there's caves in the hills. I will

0:35:58.093 --> 0:36:02.453
<v Speaker 2>take this opportunity to say, well, actually, to ask you

0:36:02.693 --> 0:36:04.933
<v Speaker 2>how often, how frequently are you going to be running

0:36:05.013 --> 0:36:05.973
<v Speaker 2>the pulling?

0:36:07.813 --> 0:36:10.773
<v Speaker 3>At least at least monthly, but it's probably going to

0:36:10.773 --> 0:36:13.293
<v Speaker 3>be twice a month the way things are looking now.

0:36:13.293 --> 0:36:18.573
<v Speaker 2>All right, So I will utilize your figures and whenever

0:36:18.613 --> 0:36:22.613
<v Speaker 2>it is appropriate we shall talk. If you accept my invitation.

0:36:23.333 --> 0:36:27.533
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, whenever you think I can be helpful, I will

0:36:27.933 --> 0:36:29.733
<v Speaker 3>endeavor to do so.

0:36:29.813 --> 0:36:31.733
<v Speaker 2>It is great talking to you again, Thank.

0:36:31.573 --> 0:36:52.453
<v Speaker 3>You, Thank you late, and pleasure in honors Mine.

0:36:45.973 --> 0:36:46.733
<v Speaker 4>Layton Smith.

0:36:47.853 --> 0:36:50.573
<v Speaker 2>There are essential fat nutrients that we need in our

0:36:50.653 --> 0:36:54.013
<v Speaker 2>diets as the body can't manufacture them. These are Omega

0:36:54.053 --> 0:36:58.173
<v Speaker 2>three and Amiga six fatty acids. Equisine is a combination

0:36:58.293 --> 0:37:01.853
<v Speaker 2>of fish oil and virgin evening primrose oil, a formula

0:37:01.933 --> 0:37:04.973
<v Speaker 2>that provides an excellent source of Amiga three and Amiga

0:37:05.013 --> 0:37:08.813
<v Speaker 2>six fatty acids in their naturally existing ratios. The Omega

0:37:08.893 --> 0:37:12.613
<v Speaker 2>six from evening primrose oil assists the Omega three fish

0:37:12.653 --> 0:37:15.693
<v Speaker 2>oil to be more effective. Equisine is a high quality

0:37:15.693 --> 0:37:18.853
<v Speaker 2>fish oil supplement enriched with evening primrose oil that works

0:37:18.893 --> 0:37:24.173
<v Speaker 2>synergistically for comprehensive health support. Sourced from the deep sea sardines,

0:37:24.253 --> 0:37:28.413
<v Speaker 2>Anchovisa magril provide essential Omega three fatty acids in their

0:37:28.413 --> 0:37:32.613
<v Speaker 2>purest form without any internal organs or toxins. Every batch

0:37:32.693 --> 0:37:35.373
<v Speaker 2>is tested for its purity before it's allowed to be sold.

0:37:35.653 --> 0:37:39.413
<v Speaker 2>Equisine supports cells to be flexible, so important to support

0:37:39.533 --> 0:37:44.933
<v Speaker 2>healthy blood flow and overall cardiovascular health. Equisine can support mood,

0:37:44.973 --> 0:37:48.533
<v Speaker 2>balance and mental clarity and focus in children, all the

0:37:48.533 --> 0:37:51.693
<v Speaker 2>way to supporting stiff joints, mental focus, brain health and

0:37:51.813 --> 0:37:55.053
<v Speaker 2>healthy eyes as we get older. Equisine is a premium

0:37:55.133 --> 0:37:58.613
<v Speaker 2>high grade fish and evening primrose oil to be taken

0:37:58.733 --> 0:38:02.093
<v Speaker 2>in addition to a healthy diet and is only available

0:38:02.093 --> 0:38:05.173
<v Speaker 2>from pharmacies and health stores. Always read the label and

0:38:05.333 --> 0:38:09.493
<v Speaker 2>users directed and if symptoms persist, seeing your healthcare professional.

0:38:09.653 --> 0:38:18.853
<v Speaker 2>Farmer Broker Auckland. Part two of the eighty minute interview

0:38:18.893 --> 0:38:21.573
<v Speaker 2>that we did with Ramesh the khur So, bringing it

0:38:21.613 --> 0:38:25.893
<v Speaker 2>back to the to the to the present and another matter.

0:38:27.853 --> 0:38:30.733
<v Speaker 2>We all agreed that speech, free speech is very important.

0:38:30.933 --> 0:38:35.733
<v Speaker 2>You can't have democracy without free speech, It's not possible.

0:38:36.493 --> 0:38:41.973
<v Speaker 2>So there was somebody who was in a crossover consistency.

0:38:41.973 --> 0:38:44.413
<v Speaker 2>I suppose there was somebody who spent a long time

0:38:46.013 --> 0:38:51.573
<v Speaker 2>either either penned up or in jail, who has very

0:38:51.613 --> 0:38:54.613
<v Speaker 2>recently been released, of course, and that is Julian Assange.

0:38:55.813 --> 0:39:02.853
<v Speaker 2>And you wrote on you called the column defending Assange.

0:39:04.933 --> 0:39:07.653
<v Speaker 2>I started out, if I may. I started out years

0:39:07.653 --> 0:39:11.013
<v Speaker 2>ago thinking he was guilty and deserved what he got.

0:39:11.773 --> 0:39:13.973
<v Speaker 2>But as time went by and I found out more,

0:39:14.693 --> 0:39:17.613
<v Speaker 2>in the end came to a to a different conclusion.

0:39:18.133 --> 0:39:22.773
<v Speaker 2>Now I have I have family members who have been

0:39:22.973 --> 0:39:27.493
<v Speaker 2>US military people in the States, and so if I

0:39:27.493 --> 0:39:30.453
<v Speaker 2>said this even today, I'd get my head torn off

0:39:31.293 --> 0:39:37.173
<v Speaker 2>because because they haven't changed their minds. But my final

0:39:37.213 --> 0:39:39.813
<v Speaker 2>word to people who say, well, why do you think so,

0:39:40.133 --> 0:39:43.253
<v Speaker 2>is because he has been He has spent his time

0:39:44.093 --> 0:39:51.653
<v Speaker 2>being behind bars and inhibited from from doing anything outside

0:39:51.693 --> 0:39:55.013
<v Speaker 2>of four walls for a long long time, so he's

0:39:55.013 --> 0:39:57.493
<v Speaker 2>paid the price. Anyway.

0:39:58.853 --> 0:40:05.733
<v Speaker 5>You say, well again, I'm in via at the same

0:40:07.413 --> 0:40:11.853
<v Speaker 5>page in story now you and I. But we obviously

0:40:11.933 --> 0:40:15.893
<v Speaker 5>began differently because from the start I didn't think he

0:40:15.973 --> 0:40:21.093
<v Speaker 5>should have been interested if for another reasons. Firstly, he's

0:40:21.133 --> 0:40:28.173
<v Speaker 5>an Australian citizen. If you and I break an American law,

0:40:29.333 --> 0:40:31.453
<v Speaker 5>they can arrest us if you're in the United States.

0:40:31.573 --> 0:40:34.893
<v Speaker 5>I don't see why their law should apply extraterritorially twelves here.

0:40:36.453 --> 0:40:40.253
<v Speaker 5>So that's the first thing to remember, and of course

0:40:40.253 --> 0:40:42.613
<v Speaker 5>that makes it worse when they start talking about treason, Well,

0:40:42.653 --> 0:40:47.413
<v Speaker 5>your country. You can't be guilty of treason against another country.

0:40:47.453 --> 0:40:51.493
<v Speaker 5>It has to be your country. So I think second,

0:40:52.093 --> 0:41:00.453
<v Speaker 5>this convention of releasing information that you have that may

0:41:00.573 --> 0:41:07.093
<v Speaker 5>cause embarrassment discomfort to governments, if you do it.

0:41:08.893 --> 0:41:11.133
<v Speaker 2>Responsibly as media.

0:41:12.253 --> 0:41:16.613
<v Speaker 5>And withhold information rather than publish it that, in your judgment,

0:41:17.293 --> 0:41:21.893
<v Speaker 5>is going to endanger lives, then that has a long

0:41:21.973 --> 0:41:26.253
<v Speaker 5>and distinguished history, which as far as press freedom is concerned,

0:41:27.053 --> 0:41:29.893
<v Speaker 5>I don't have any problem with the media cooperating with

0:41:29.933 --> 0:41:34.693
<v Speaker 5>authorities not to put lives at risk. And so in

0:41:34.733 --> 0:41:37.853
<v Speaker 5>that article I did say, if in fact the disclosures

0:41:38.653 --> 0:41:46.293
<v Speaker 5>did lead to jeopardizing the lives of soldiers, then identify

0:41:46.333 --> 0:41:49.573
<v Speaker 5>that and prosecute those individually rather than a blanket back.

0:41:50.613 --> 0:41:54.733
<v Speaker 5>And what he was doing was he was publishing information

0:41:54.853 --> 0:42:01.333
<v Speaker 5>that showed illegal and possibly criminal activities by our own governments,

0:42:02.493 --> 0:42:07.493
<v Speaker 5>and that should never be punishable under our us if

0:42:07.493 --> 0:42:10.053
<v Speaker 5>you've got it to the rule of law and the.

0:42:09.933 --> 0:42:10.853
<v Speaker 2>Freedom of the press.

0:42:12.333 --> 0:42:16.093
<v Speaker 5>I think that is exactly what visual protection laws are

0:42:16.093 --> 0:42:20.133
<v Speaker 5>needed for and have evolved over time because we recognize that.

0:42:20.813 --> 0:42:23.573
<v Speaker 5>So the comparison to the Pentagon papers, I think is

0:42:23.653 --> 0:42:29.333
<v Speaker 5>very direct. And that example I gave of Australia's agencies

0:42:29.493 --> 0:42:33.493
<v Speaker 5>snooping on the East timor ease is after well, we

0:42:33.613 --> 0:42:36.893
<v Speaker 5>condemned these actions and when the Chinese and the Russians

0:42:36.893 --> 0:42:39.933
<v Speaker 5>and the Iranians do it, and I think we should

0:42:40.013 --> 0:42:43.973
<v Speaker 5>condemn the persecution of people on those lines as well.

0:42:44.013 --> 0:42:47.733
<v Speaker 5>So yes, if Asciance disclosed anything that led to identifiable

0:42:47.733 --> 0:42:51.613
<v Speaker 5>threats against people, far by all means prosecute them.

0:42:51.653 --> 0:42:53.493
<v Speaker 2>For that is.

0:42:54.973 --> 0:42:57.093
<v Speaker 5>No, I am not aware of a single case where

0:42:57.133 --> 0:43:02.333
<v Speaker 5>it has actually put someone's laugh at risk. Now and

0:43:03.133 --> 0:43:05.573
<v Speaker 5>for my point of is the single best example of

0:43:05.613 --> 0:43:07.573
<v Speaker 5>why I think I have been supporting me is that

0:43:08.413 --> 0:43:10.173
<v Speaker 5>video that I refert. Have you seen that video from

0:43:10.253 --> 0:43:15.453
<v Speaker 5>Baghdad in around two thousand and four where a helicopter gunship.

0:43:15.533 --> 0:43:19.733
<v Speaker 2>Kills some people? Yes, yes I did.

0:43:19.733 --> 0:43:21.613
<v Speaker 5>Because I gave the link to that that's still up

0:43:21.653 --> 0:43:24.773
<v Speaker 5>on the leg because I used to show that in

0:43:24.813 --> 0:43:29.973
<v Speaker 5>my lecture on human rights. In my classes, I would

0:43:29.973 --> 0:43:32.653
<v Speaker 5>show that slip and says, you know, this is why

0:43:32.693 --> 0:43:36.893
<v Speaker 5>the rest of the world reacts so cynically to the

0:43:36.973 --> 0:43:41.373
<v Speaker 5>rhetoric of Western countries. They have no credibility in saying

0:43:41.373 --> 0:43:44.813
<v Speaker 5>they're committed to human rights. You're talking to the US

0:43:44.853 --> 0:43:48.213
<v Speaker 5>military as I was living next to a serving US

0:43:48.253 --> 0:43:51.333
<v Speaker 5>Air Force kernel when I was in Tokyo, and after

0:43:51.373 --> 0:43:53.933
<v Speaker 5>the pictures of our grave and things like that came out,

0:43:54.173 --> 0:43:56.293
<v Speaker 5>he just came home and there and says, for the

0:43:56.293 --> 0:43:58.293
<v Speaker 5>first time in his life he feels the shame wearing

0:43:58.293 --> 0:44:03.613
<v Speaker 5>the uniform for the American military. So I think you

0:44:03.653 --> 0:44:06.013
<v Speaker 5>know the same argument we use about the police. If

0:44:06.093 --> 0:44:11.893
<v Speaker 5>you close ranks and you the one bad apple, you

0:44:12.013 --> 0:44:17.013
<v Speaker 5>condemn the whole barrel of apples. If you're going to

0:44:17.053 --> 0:44:20.813
<v Speaker 5>protect the honor and reputation of the military as you should,

0:44:21.493 --> 0:44:23.093
<v Speaker 5>then I think you have to call out the UK

0:44:23.413 --> 0:44:30.693
<v Speaker 5>bad person and punish them. Bring in mind that they

0:44:30.773 --> 0:44:33.173
<v Speaker 5>make difficult choices in the fog before, that's one thing.

0:44:34.693 --> 0:44:38.533
<v Speaker 5>But if they make deliberate choices to engage in activities

0:44:38.533 --> 0:44:41.373
<v Speaker 5>that under own laws are prohibited and a criminal may

0:44:41.413 --> 0:44:41.973
<v Speaker 5>be criminal.

0:44:43.093 --> 0:44:43.893
<v Speaker 2>It goes back to.

0:44:45.373 --> 0:44:48.253
<v Speaker 5>How do you accept gain of function research being funded

0:44:48.493 --> 0:44:51.293
<v Speaker 5>and then overseas jurisdiction because it's banned in your own country.

0:44:52.773 --> 0:44:53.973
<v Speaker 5>I think it's just as bad.

0:44:54.253 --> 0:44:59.773
<v Speaker 2>So should doctor Faci be in in he should be

0:44:59.773 --> 0:45:03.133
<v Speaker 2>in the dock. I was thinking beyond the dock. He

0:45:03.733 --> 0:45:06.733
<v Speaker 2>he No, he isn't titled to the dew process. Oh sure,

0:45:07.133 --> 0:45:12.533
<v Speaker 2>I'm but sure, But I didn't mean I didn't. Yeah,

0:45:12.693 --> 0:45:15.973
<v Speaker 2>that would escape procedure. But I want procedure to take Well,

0:45:16.013 --> 0:45:16.493
<v Speaker 2>that's what I mean.

0:45:16.533 --> 0:45:18.453
<v Speaker 5>He should be in the dog. He should be charged,

0:45:18.453 --> 0:45:20.653
<v Speaker 5>and he should be made to answer for that. And

0:45:20.693 --> 0:45:21.813
<v Speaker 5>he's and he's all alone.

0:45:21.973 --> 0:45:25.013
<v Speaker 2>Either. Look, if I may, If I may, there's a

0:45:25.293 --> 0:45:27.453
<v Speaker 2>couple of other a couple of other areas that I

0:45:27.493 --> 0:45:28.493
<v Speaker 2>would like to touch with you.

0:45:28.653 --> 0:45:31.653
<v Speaker 5>Last last let me just let me just turn the

0:45:31.693 --> 0:45:36.373
<v Speaker 5>back on you. So if if, if Fauci is approving that,

0:45:36.733 --> 0:45:40.813
<v Speaker 5>but the money comes from Defense Department because they're engaged

0:45:41.613 --> 0:45:45.853
<v Speaker 5>in the effort to develop defensive defenses against use of

0:45:45.853 --> 0:45:49.653
<v Speaker 5>biological weapons, do we say someone who releases that then

0:45:49.773 --> 0:45:51.053
<v Speaker 5>is a criminal and should be charged.

0:45:51.813 --> 0:45:54.613
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's the same arguments. Some stage.

0:45:54.853 --> 0:45:57.773
<v Speaker 5>If activities are being done that are illegal, and they're

0:45:57.813 --> 0:46:01.693
<v Speaker 5>burning done by our side, then we do need mechanisms

0:46:01.933 --> 0:46:03.413
<v Speaker 5>to find out about that. And I don't think we

0:46:03.453 --> 0:46:07.493
<v Speaker 5>should persecute in this case, people release that information.

0:46:07.853 --> 0:46:13.773
<v Speaker 2>Well, i'd agree with that. Whistleblowers generally serve, serve well,

0:46:14.133 --> 0:46:16.213
<v Speaker 2>doing public service generally.

0:46:16.293 --> 0:46:18.893
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but I do I do maintain that other thing.

0:46:19.493 --> 0:46:22.453
<v Speaker 5>If in fact some of that information did cause identifiable

0:46:22.453 --> 0:46:24.413
<v Speaker 5>harm to individuals, then go after him.

0:46:24.453 --> 0:46:28.413
<v Speaker 2>That's fine, I have no problem that good. The events

0:46:28.453 --> 0:46:30.693
<v Speaker 2>that took place place last Friday, in the middle of

0:46:30.693 --> 0:46:37.373
<v Speaker 2>all the other stuff with this global outage, the crowd

0:46:37.453 --> 0:46:41.693
<v Speaker 2>strike global outage, Yeah, I think the anti virus software

0:46:41.693 --> 0:46:47.453
<v Speaker 2>company say that again, the anti virus software company, Ah,

0:46:47.693 --> 0:46:52.853
<v Speaker 2>it shows the dangers of centralized reliance on technology. Well,

0:46:52.853 --> 0:46:54.733
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly my point. It was the first thing that

0:46:54.773 --> 0:46:59.133
<v Speaker 2>I said to to this producer, to my wife that

0:46:59.453 --> 0:47:02.133
<v Speaker 2>there's an there's there's a prime example. It's the best

0:47:02.173 --> 0:47:04.373
<v Speaker 2>one I've seen for a long time, prime example of

0:47:04.413 --> 0:47:09.973
<v Speaker 2>why cash should be maintained forever. H well, certainly for

0:47:10.013 --> 0:47:13.653
<v Speaker 2>the foreseeable future. And the replacement of cash, the withdrawal

0:47:13.733 --> 0:47:16.253
<v Speaker 2>of cash. And my understanding tell me if I'm wrong,

0:47:16.293 --> 0:47:18.373
<v Speaker 2>because if somebody only told me this a couple of

0:47:18.413 --> 0:47:22.333
<v Speaker 2>days ago from from Sydney, is that they've announced the

0:47:22.333 --> 0:47:24.773
<v Speaker 2>government's announced that cash will be gone in two years

0:47:26.053 --> 0:47:29.573
<v Speaker 2>in Australia, I haven't seen that. Yeah, well I've got

0:47:29.773 --> 0:47:33.133
<v Speaker 2>I've got I've got a feeling this particular person's got

0:47:33.173 --> 0:47:36.813
<v Speaker 2>it mixed up just slightly, but they're certainly heading everywhere.

0:47:36.853 --> 0:47:38.413
<v Speaker 2>Not necessarily if you're heading that fare.

0:47:38.653 --> 0:47:42.693
<v Speaker 5>And I'm in the past couple of years, I've constantly

0:47:42.773 --> 0:47:46.653
<v Speaker 5>begun to use cash more and more. Well, I think

0:47:46.733 --> 0:47:50.413
<v Speaker 5>you're just putting ourselves at risk of complete social credit

0:47:50.493 --> 0:47:52.253
<v Speaker 5>system and government control.

0:47:53.493 --> 0:47:56.813
<v Speaker 2>That's the collusion with a big tech that's that's the

0:47:56.973 --> 0:47:58.973
<v Speaker 2>that's the name of the game exactly.

0:47:59.733 --> 0:48:03.973
<v Speaker 5>So so I am actually using cash a lot more now, right,

0:48:04.053 --> 0:48:07.253
<v Speaker 5>drawing cash and using it so obviously for a lot

0:48:07.253 --> 0:48:10.173
<v Speaker 5>of things you can't but central bank and on that Frida,

0:48:10.253 --> 0:48:12.173
<v Speaker 5>by the way, that's when I came back.

0:48:12.213 --> 0:48:16.773
<v Speaker 2>I was lucky to escape that. I have traveled, I

0:48:16.813 --> 0:48:18.573
<v Speaker 2>have I have a friend who will be listening to

0:48:18.613 --> 0:48:22.493
<v Speaker 2>this at some stage who was caught caught in Los

0:48:22.533 --> 0:48:28.533
<v Speaker 2>Angeles with his son, young son, and I'm yet to

0:48:28.533 --> 0:48:31.213
<v Speaker 2>get the picture, but I believe he's got a good

0:48:31.253 --> 0:48:37.093
<v Speaker 2>story to tell. So the danger of centralized digital wealth,

0:48:37.533 --> 0:48:42.813
<v Speaker 2>central bank digital currencies is there, is there the possibility

0:48:42.853 --> 0:48:47.213
<v Speaker 2>in your mind that they could exist in conjunction with

0:48:47.573 --> 0:48:50.933
<v Speaker 2>the current system, or do you think that the introduction

0:48:51.053 --> 0:48:57.973
<v Speaker 2>of cbdc's will just provide leverage for for removing cash.

0:48:58.133 --> 0:49:04.773
<v Speaker 5>We've seen two things. One is governments of different political

0:49:04.813 --> 0:49:10.813
<v Speaker 5>persuasions have discovered that the share of common interest in

0:49:10.933 --> 0:49:15.013
<v Speaker 5>gaining hold over technology that allows them to exit more

0:49:15.053 --> 0:49:17.013
<v Speaker 5>and more control over their own citizens.

0:49:17.653 --> 0:49:18.493
<v Speaker 2>And so.

0:49:20.213 --> 0:49:24.333
<v Speaker 5>Justin Todau in Canada had no compunction in the banking

0:49:24.693 --> 0:49:30.333
<v Speaker 5>and the financializing people associated with the Freedom Convoy of truckers,

0:49:30.533 --> 0:49:32.733
<v Speaker 5>and that included people who were giving ten dollars twenty

0:49:32.773 --> 0:49:34.613
<v Speaker 5>dollars more donations as well and.

0:49:34.613 --> 0:49:35.853
<v Speaker 2>Freezing their assets.

0:49:37.133 --> 0:49:40.333
<v Speaker 5>Now mister Mody looks at that and he says, what

0:49:40.413 --> 0:49:44.333
<v Speaker 5>a good idea. And weeks before the Indian election, the

0:49:44.333 --> 0:49:49.453
<v Speaker 5>opposition Congress party has its assets frozen under some alleged

0:49:49.533 --> 0:49:54.973
<v Speaker 5>violation of some laws or the He sees the weaponization

0:49:55.093 --> 0:49:57.613
<v Speaker 5>of the justice system and jailing of opponents in the

0:49:57.733 --> 0:49:59.453
<v Speaker 5>United States and he says, well, if the world's most

0:49:59.453 --> 0:50:02.493
<v Speaker 5>powerful democracy can do that, so it can be. And

0:50:02.533 --> 0:50:05.373
<v Speaker 5>I think there were three incumbent chief ministers at state

0:50:05.453 --> 0:50:07.973
<v Speaker 5>level who were put in jail. The head of the

0:50:08.013 --> 0:50:13.533
<v Speaker 5>General election and their ability to campaign was impeded. So

0:50:13.613 --> 0:50:18.933
<v Speaker 5>that's one side that governments have a shared interest in

0:50:19.053 --> 0:50:23.093
<v Speaker 5>expanding their power to control their citizens' activities and monitor

0:50:23.133 --> 0:50:27.773
<v Speaker 5>the citizens' citizens financial transactions, and they're moving in that direction.

0:50:28.333 --> 0:50:33.733
<v Speaker 5>So there's that site. The second thing is the elements

0:50:33.733 --> 0:50:36.853
<v Speaker 5>of the private sector discovering they have a shared interest

0:50:36.853 --> 0:50:42.013
<v Speaker 5>with governments and being able to monitor and surveil what

0:50:42.093 --> 0:50:43.253
<v Speaker 5>we are doing in terms.

0:50:43.093 --> 0:50:46.333
<v Speaker 2>Of what by very by, and being able.

0:50:46.093 --> 0:50:53.093
<v Speaker 5>To nudge our preferences towards particular products or to towards

0:50:53.573 --> 0:51:00.493
<v Speaker 5>particular ideologies and political parties. So that double centralization is

0:51:00.533 --> 0:51:04.093
<v Speaker 5>all at the expense of our liberties and freedom of

0:51:04.133 --> 0:51:09.693
<v Speaker 5>action and freedom from being monitored and put on the surveillance,

0:51:10.133 --> 0:51:14.613
<v Speaker 5>whether it's for our commercial activities purchasing history, or whether

0:51:14.653 --> 0:51:19.253
<v Speaker 5>it's for our political leanings and tendencies. So yes, it

0:51:19.293 --> 0:51:22.093
<v Speaker 5>goes back into that broader theme that varies me more

0:51:22.133 --> 0:51:26.693
<v Speaker 5>and more that we are moving into a world of

0:51:28.453 --> 0:51:34.173
<v Speaker 5>big Brother, in which big Brother is a combined national

0:51:34.373 --> 0:51:38.093
<v Speaker 5>and global behemoth. And you see that with the legacy

0:51:38.133 --> 0:51:41.133
<v Speaker 5>media in terms of news God and this and that

0:51:41.213 --> 0:51:44.613
<v Speaker 5>and then garm whatever the thing calls for, Where where

0:51:44.653 --> 0:51:49.573
<v Speaker 5>they're trying to remove from the plug is public sphere,

0:51:50.533 --> 0:51:55.933
<v Speaker 5>essentially people whose values or opinions they disagree with m

0:51:56.973 --> 0:51:59.013
<v Speaker 5>and that's happening more and more so it does worry me.

0:51:59.733 --> 0:52:01.413
<v Speaker 2>Well it is happening in Australia.

0:52:02.453 --> 0:52:07.573
<v Speaker 5>Yes, we have the Safety Commissioner who's goes after the

0:52:08.333 --> 0:52:11.733
<v Speaker 5>opinions of people. And do you remember this. She's an

0:52:11.733 --> 0:52:13.533
<v Speaker 5>American important and she took on a fight with your

0:52:13.573 --> 0:52:17.213
<v Speaker 5>own mosque on some things, so there you know.

0:52:17.253 --> 0:52:17.853
<v Speaker 4>This was this.

0:52:19.013 --> 0:52:22.253
<v Speaker 5>She asked for a couple of things. One was the

0:52:22.253 --> 0:52:28.133
<v Speaker 5>famous one where she wanted footage of the stabbing of

0:52:28.173 --> 0:52:34.133
<v Speaker 5>the archbishop. Yes, taken off not just in Australia but globally.

0:52:35.333 --> 0:52:38.493
<v Speaker 5>So the e Safety Commissioner, one individual with her staff,

0:52:39.373 --> 0:52:44.293
<v Speaker 5>asserted the right to decide what other people from in

0:52:44.333 --> 0:52:48.413
<v Speaker 5>other countries can and cannot watch. And it wasn't the

0:52:48.413 --> 0:52:50.853
<v Speaker 5>case of misinformation because this was an actual event that

0:52:50.893 --> 0:52:54.933
<v Speaker 5>had happened and she was saying, well, this may not

0:52:54.973 --> 0:52:57.413
<v Speaker 5>be wasted. At the same time, other things that were

0:52:57.773 --> 0:53:00.853
<v Speaker 5>worse from a physical violence point of view was still available.

0:53:00.853 --> 0:53:01.333
<v Speaker 2>So there's that.

0:53:01.773 --> 0:53:04.693
<v Speaker 5>But there's something else in respect of gender ideology that

0:53:04.733 --> 0:53:07.813
<v Speaker 5>she was trying the same thing in Australia. But this

0:53:08.053 --> 0:53:12.413
<v Speaker 5>is a phenomenon that that bureaucrats and technocrats decide what

0:53:12.493 --> 0:53:14.653
<v Speaker 5>we should think, what we should say, what we should

0:53:14.653 --> 0:53:17.613
<v Speaker 5>believe in, what we should buy, who should produce what

0:53:18.493 --> 0:53:22.733
<v Speaker 5>under what ours. So it's that assertion of government control

0:53:22.773 --> 0:53:26.653
<v Speaker 5>over all aspects of our daily activities that we witnessed

0:53:26.693 --> 0:53:31.213
<v Speaker 5>under COVID now being now the effort is being yet

0:53:31.253 --> 0:53:35.333
<v Speaker 5>to institutionalize and embed that as a permanent feature, which

0:53:35.373 --> 0:53:37.653
<v Speaker 5>is exactly what we were saying at the time that if

0:53:37.653 --> 0:53:41.813
<v Speaker 5>you comply. Now, don't be surprised you start to expand

0:53:41.853 --> 0:53:43.373
<v Speaker 5>and repeat this in other sectors.

0:53:43.453 --> 0:53:46.893
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and there's still still much to be said about

0:53:47.453 --> 0:53:50.853
<v Speaker 2>about the COVID era. Yeah, but it's the same.

0:53:50.893 --> 0:53:53.693
<v Speaker 5>You know, why why should the government decide that we

0:53:53.773 --> 0:53:55.333
<v Speaker 5>have to switch to electric vehicles.

0:53:56.653 --> 0:54:00.573
<v Speaker 2>I'll just save the planet. Yeah sure, but surely you

0:54:00.693 --> 0:54:01.093
<v Speaker 2>know that.

0:54:03.573 --> 0:54:06.133
<v Speaker 5>But you know, when when different forms of transport come

0:54:06.173 --> 0:54:09.293
<v Speaker 5>along and they have obvious benefits and cons and advantages,

0:54:09.373 --> 0:54:12.893
<v Speaker 5>people switch. Well, I think it's starting for government's picking

0:54:12.893 --> 0:54:15.373
<v Speaker 5>winners with regard to you know, you you have to

0:54:15.453 --> 0:54:19.813
<v Speaker 5>use renewables, you have to do electric vehicles, and again

0:54:19.853 --> 0:54:23.813
<v Speaker 5>the calculations that they don't They don't add up when

0:54:23.853 --> 0:54:26.413
<v Speaker 5>you actually go through it as well. So governments are

0:54:26.453 --> 0:54:29.613
<v Speaker 5>no better at picking winners today. In fact, they might

0:54:29.653 --> 0:54:31.373
<v Speaker 5>be worse than they have historically been.

0:54:31.573 --> 0:54:34.853
<v Speaker 2>Well you've got you've got media companies still refusing to

0:54:36.013 --> 0:54:41.093
<v Speaker 2>entertain any alternative viewpoint when it comes to matters climate

0:54:41.133 --> 0:54:44.773
<v Speaker 2>and serving the planet, et cetera. And we've got them.

0:54:44.813 --> 0:54:48.733
<v Speaker 2>We've got them here, and they are disgrace because of it.

0:54:49.733 --> 0:54:53.053
<v Speaker 2>But I'm hoping that sooner or later something will happen.

0:54:55.413 --> 0:54:57.613
<v Speaker 2>There's one other thing I wanted to mention with regard

0:54:57.693 --> 0:55:01.933
<v Speaker 2>with regard to privacy, and that it is directly linked

0:55:01.933 --> 0:55:08.413
<v Speaker 2>to CBDCs et cetera. Privacy. We have people in positions

0:55:08.453 --> 0:55:14.213
<v Speaker 2>of influence, including one retired Prime minister in this country,

0:55:15.853 --> 0:55:20.893
<v Speaker 2>who have said, anytime that something comes up about privacy

0:55:20.933 --> 0:55:24.613
<v Speaker 2>and people not knowing what you're doing, etc. Has said, well,

0:55:24.613 --> 0:55:26.373
<v Speaker 2>have you got nothing to hide? You've got nothing to fear.

0:55:26.413 --> 0:55:26.533
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:55:26.573 --> 0:55:29.013
<v Speaker 2>I know how old that that's saying is, and I

0:55:29.053 --> 0:55:32.773
<v Speaker 2>have the excital contempt for it. But the question is

0:55:33.093 --> 0:55:36.413
<v Speaker 2>why are they I've had nobody can explain this to

0:55:36.453 --> 0:55:41.093
<v Speaker 2>me yet, Why are there intelligent people that simply can't

0:55:41.133 --> 0:55:41.693
<v Speaker 2>see the light.

0:55:42.893 --> 0:55:49.693
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's a deep philosophical question. I think the short answer.

0:55:50.853 --> 0:55:55.573
<v Speaker 5>My short answer would be that the share of the population,

0:55:55.733 --> 0:55:57.973
<v Speaker 5>so you're not talking to absolute numbers, but the proportion

0:55:58.133 --> 0:56:05.413
<v Speaker 5>of the population that habitually engages in independent critical thinking

0:56:06.253 --> 0:56:11.813
<v Speaker 5>has declined quite dramatically and reflects the switch from education

0:56:12.053 --> 0:56:16.853
<v Speaker 5>to indoctrination from early childhood all the way through school

0:56:16.853 --> 0:56:22.733
<v Speaker 5>and university and spread into all sectors of society. Who

0:56:22.733 --> 0:56:28.093
<v Speaker 5>would have thought thirty forty years ago the big corporates

0:56:28.293 --> 0:56:32.253
<v Speaker 5>would think they have any business telling us what we

0:56:32.293 --> 0:56:36.453
<v Speaker 5>should think, or what values we should adopt, or what

0:56:36.693 --> 0:56:41.933
<v Speaker 5>positions on controversial social and or contested not controversial, necessarily

0:56:41.933 --> 0:56:48.093
<v Speaker 5>contested social, political, economic, and even scientific issues, that they

0:56:48.093 --> 0:56:51.933
<v Speaker 5>have some comparative advantage in knowing what the quote unquote

0:56:51.933 --> 0:56:54.693
<v Speaker 5>truth is, the truth is, and telling us their views

0:56:54.813 --> 0:56:57.613
<v Speaker 5>and we should do what they tell us.

0:56:58.133 --> 0:57:00.173
<v Speaker 2>And again on.

0:57:00.173 --> 0:57:02.533
<v Speaker 5>That there're certainly in Australia there has been a pushback

0:57:02.533 --> 0:57:06.293
<v Speaker 5>and a recognition about the media boardrooms that maybe they

0:57:06.333 --> 0:57:11.453
<v Speaker 5>should pull back from this because they've discovered that a

0:57:11.613 --> 0:57:18.253
<v Speaker 5>majority of even their employees, shareholders, and certainly their consumers

0:57:20.013 --> 0:57:24.373
<v Speaker 5>do not align with their views, and it actually affects

0:57:24.373 --> 0:57:27.933
<v Speaker 5>the bottom line. And when I go into a supermarket,

0:57:28.013 --> 0:57:33.533
<v Speaker 5>I want fresh produce and quality products at most affordable prices.

0:57:33.573 --> 0:57:37.613
<v Speaker 5>I have absolutely no interest in learning about what the

0:57:37.693 --> 0:57:40.853
<v Speaker 5>view of their CEO might be in relation to any

0:57:40.853 --> 0:57:45.893
<v Speaker 5>social or political issue. Same with celebrities. And yet they

0:57:45.933 --> 0:57:51.373
<v Speaker 5>think that the echo chamber of the elites in the

0:57:51.373 --> 0:57:57.653
<v Speaker 5>different sectors of life has an position of virtuous enlightenment

0:57:57.733 --> 0:58:00.053
<v Speaker 5>that everyone else should be made to follow.

0:58:00.613 --> 0:58:03.133
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know you want to do that, Go ahead

0:58:03.173 --> 0:58:06.213
<v Speaker 2>and do it. So the World Economic Forum is at

0:58:06.253 --> 0:58:08.533
<v Speaker 2>what point of its existence and influence? Now? Uh?

0:58:09.813 --> 0:58:16.973
<v Speaker 5>Hopefully terminal? I might become a believer in God.

0:58:17.053 --> 0:58:19.893
<v Speaker 2>Yet ah, I read, I read what you had to

0:58:19.933 --> 0:58:23.613
<v Speaker 2>say about religion. I was I was intrigued. But that

0:58:23.693 --> 0:58:24.213
<v Speaker 2>could be true.

0:58:24.253 --> 0:58:27.693
<v Speaker 5>Well, I respect other people's religion, but yes you do, Yeah,

0:58:28.453 --> 0:58:32.973
<v Speaker 5>and that's of all fits. But I have problems myself

0:58:33.013 --> 0:58:35.893
<v Speaker 5>and that left religion a long time ago and no

0:58:36.373 --> 0:58:37.413
<v Speaker 5>desire to go back.

0:58:37.973 --> 0:58:43.053
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a free world, yeah, free will, fee will,

0:58:43.733 --> 0:58:46.653
<v Speaker 2>So I think we can continue with the free society.

0:58:47.693 --> 0:58:50.213
<v Speaker 2>Just one one other thing that I would like to include.

0:58:50.773 --> 0:58:55.053
<v Speaker 2>Why I leave it out? It's your white guilt, not

0:58:55.293 --> 0:58:59.533
<v Speaker 2>my white privilege. It's a headline from another of yours.

0:58:59.573 --> 0:59:01.933
<v Speaker 5>That's a problem. That's the that's a problem, that's right. Yeah,

0:59:01.973 --> 0:59:04.573
<v Speaker 5>the problem is your white guilt, not my white privilege.

0:59:04.773 --> 0:59:08.133
<v Speaker 2>But white guilt and colonization two things that go hand

0:59:08.133 --> 0:59:10.493
<v Speaker 2>and end at the moment and seem to be motoring

0:59:10.493 --> 0:59:14.213
<v Speaker 2>along fairly powerfully, are they both in Australia and New

0:59:14.333 --> 0:59:21.493
<v Speaker 2>Zealand and the USA and Canada. So what's the answer? Well,

0:59:21.533 --> 0:59:23.013
<v Speaker 2>it's puzzled me obviously.

0:59:23.173 --> 0:59:29.933
<v Speaker 5>I mean, look, which major country, or which even middland

0:59:29.933 --> 0:59:34.613
<v Speaker 5>country can you point out to me today whose borders

0:59:34.653 --> 0:59:36.493
<v Speaker 5>do not reflect the use of force?

0:59:37.893 --> 0:59:39.773
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps repeatedly in his history.

0:59:41.213 --> 0:59:44.813
<v Speaker 5>It's been a part of history, and it's been a

0:59:44.853 --> 0:59:47.093
<v Speaker 5>part of the natural world as well, and I suspect

0:59:47.093 --> 0:59:49.373
<v Speaker 5>it will stay the case for a long time yet.

0:59:50.293 --> 0:59:53.013
<v Speaker 5>So if you're going to go back to the equivalent

0:59:53.053 --> 0:59:57.573
<v Speaker 5>of trying to trace the original sin, we're going to

0:59:57.973 --> 1:00:01.693
<v Speaker 5>lead to the most massive upheaval we've ever known, and

1:00:01.813 --> 1:00:06.213
<v Speaker 5>volatility and fighting all over again. So how do we

1:00:06.293 --> 1:00:11.733
<v Speaker 5>reconcile existing borders with present day values? Well, we don't

1:00:11.733 --> 1:00:16.973
<v Speaker 5>do that by reversing history. One second. I think the

1:00:17.013 --> 1:00:23.973
<v Speaker 5>net contribution of Western civilizations to global human welfare on

1:00:24.133 --> 1:00:31.653
<v Speaker 5>prosperity and education and longevity has been greater than that

1:00:32.373 --> 1:00:37.933
<v Speaker 5>of any other civilization and culture. And that's not such

1:00:37.933 --> 1:00:42.333
<v Speaker 5>a hard thing to document. In terms of the aspirations

1:00:42.373 --> 1:00:44.813
<v Speaker 5>that pretty much people's all over the world now have

1:00:45.773 --> 1:00:49.853
<v Speaker 5>two emulating the lifestyles and the benefits, the material benefits

1:00:50.413 --> 1:00:55.853
<v Speaker 5>and the intellectual benefits of that. And even with respect

1:00:55.933 --> 1:01:00.213
<v Speaker 5>to slavery, for example, the slave trade, again I think

1:01:00.253 --> 1:01:05.013
<v Speaker 5>it's not that difficult to document that probably the biggest

1:01:05.053 --> 1:01:08.253
<v Speaker 5>contribution to ending the slave trade, and some of the

1:01:08.413 --> 1:01:11.813
<v Speaker 5>highest costs that were made that were paid in that effort,

1:01:12.573 --> 1:01:20.453
<v Speaker 5>that came from Britain, and the biggest guilty parties in

1:01:20.533 --> 1:01:24.453
<v Speaker 5>the origins and volume of the slave trade would include

1:01:24.693 --> 1:01:32.333
<v Speaker 5>the Arabs and the Africans. So why this focus on

1:01:32.973 --> 1:01:36.333
<v Speaker 5>the sense of guilt And if that sense of guilt

1:01:36.413 --> 1:01:38.213
<v Speaker 5>was real and I'm sure I've said this, if not

1:01:38.253 --> 1:01:40.613
<v Speaker 5>to you, then to some other interview in New Zealand,

1:01:42.013 --> 1:01:44.973
<v Speaker 5>if that centers of guilt was real, and if that

1:01:45.093 --> 1:01:51.133
<v Speaker 5>sense of moral censure was real and genuine, authentic, then

1:01:51.613 --> 1:01:56.733
<v Speaker 5>huge numbers of people from the non Western countries would

1:01:56.733 --> 1:02:00.813
<v Speaker 5>not still be fighting to get into the West, and

1:02:00.893 --> 1:02:05.573
<v Speaker 5>it seems to be a confected outrage at the historical

1:02:05.653 --> 1:02:07.933
<v Speaker 5>role that some Western countries have had to play.

1:02:07.973 --> 1:02:08.573
<v Speaker 2>Other other thing.

1:02:08.573 --> 1:02:11.733
<v Speaker 5>Anyone denies that, and all in favor of having an

1:02:11.733 --> 1:02:15.093
<v Speaker 5>honest accounting in our history books. But the honest accounting

1:02:15.133 --> 1:02:18.133
<v Speaker 5>goes both ways as well. I think there were benefits

1:02:18.213 --> 1:02:20.573
<v Speaker 5>that were brought to millions of people around the world

1:02:20.613 --> 1:02:24.173
<v Speaker 5>by Western civilization, and there were costs steps were brought

1:02:24.813 --> 1:02:29.613
<v Speaker 5>and in some cases resulting in genocide or neo genocide

1:02:29.613 --> 1:02:33.213
<v Speaker 5>of indigenous populations. But that is part of history, and

1:02:33.253 --> 1:02:35.653
<v Speaker 5>I think we should study history and learn from that,

1:02:36.573 --> 1:02:41.653
<v Speaker 5>but not engaged in an endless self vagulation which is

1:02:41.733 --> 1:02:45.653
<v Speaker 5>unmerited and self destructive. I think in one of the

1:02:45.733 --> 1:02:49.773
<v Speaker 5>articles that they'd say it's like Western societies are bent

1:02:50.773 --> 1:02:54.973
<v Speaker 5>on feeding their fuel into the fire that is consuming them,

1:02:55.933 --> 1:03:00.253
<v Speaker 5>which I find very puzzling. So the net contribution of

1:03:00.293 --> 1:03:02.933
<v Speaker 5>Western civilization I think has been positive rather than negative.

1:03:03.613 --> 1:03:09.173
<v Speaker 5>Other countries have also had stayed pasts, and we acknowledge

1:03:09.173 --> 1:03:11.933
<v Speaker 5>that we don't necessarily condone that. We certainly don't want

1:03:11.933 --> 1:03:15.813
<v Speaker 5>to have that nece society today, but I think we

1:03:15.813 --> 1:03:21.933
<v Speaker 5>should just insist on treating everyone who's lawfully in our

1:03:21.973 --> 1:03:25.293
<v Speaker 5>country and is a citizen the same, without distinction on

1:03:25.373 --> 1:03:29.613
<v Speaker 5>grounds of race or religion or whatever else inherited treat

1:03:30.253 --> 1:03:34.253
<v Speaker 5>So I don't understand the white guilt part, and if

1:03:34.253 --> 1:03:36.373
<v Speaker 5>it does exist, I don't see why I, who have

1:03:36.533 --> 1:03:38.733
<v Speaker 5>not been part of that, should be made to suffer

1:03:38.933 --> 1:03:41.333
<v Speaker 5>for that either. So it goes back to where we

1:03:41.413 --> 1:03:46.653
<v Speaker 5>started off and the general attitude almost the overseas Indians

1:03:46.693 --> 1:03:49.813
<v Speaker 5>as well, that what we want is to be left

1:03:49.813 --> 1:03:53.733
<v Speaker 5>alone and given the same opportunities. Well maybe if we

1:03:53.733 --> 1:03:57.813
<v Speaker 5>should an't that it's equality of opportunity, not equality of outcomes.

1:03:57.853 --> 1:04:01.533
<v Speaker 5>So I still prefer the phrase equality of opportunity rather

1:04:01.613 --> 1:04:04.933
<v Speaker 5>than equity because that tries to look at it in

1:04:05.013 --> 1:04:09.053
<v Speaker 5>terms of outcomes. And you've seen that, you know the

1:04:09.813 --> 1:04:12.853
<v Speaker 5>decision from the US Supreme Court late last year whenever

1:04:12.893 --> 1:04:20.493
<v Speaker 5>it was on the Harvard admissions case. Japanese, none of

1:04:20.493 --> 1:04:25.213
<v Speaker 5>the Asian Americans who would have taken the case too

1:04:26.413 --> 1:04:27.533
<v Speaker 5>in the court system.

1:04:27.253 --> 1:04:30.413
<v Speaker 2>But weren't there weren't there a lot of Japanese students

1:04:30.453 --> 1:04:33.493
<v Speaker 2>who were involved in it. No, it was Chinese and

1:04:33.573 --> 1:04:35.133
<v Speaker 2>Indians more than Japanese.

1:04:36.253 --> 1:04:42.613
<v Speaker 5>It's but the Asian Americans were amongst the highest academic

1:04:42.693 --> 1:04:46.733
<v Speaker 5>scores and the lowest rates of admission. I think you

1:04:46.813 --> 1:04:50.693
<v Speaker 5>needed to be for an Asian American, it's you needed

1:04:50.693 --> 1:04:54.293
<v Speaker 5>to be in the ninetieth persentile, and your chances were

1:04:54.293 --> 1:04:59.493
<v Speaker 5>still lower than a Black in the fortieth personile, a

1:04:59.613 --> 1:05:03.493
<v Speaker 5>Hispanic in the sixtieth personyle, and a white in the

1:05:03.533 --> 1:05:07.453
<v Speaker 5>eightieth personile. So the four groups, the Asian Americans had

1:05:07.453 --> 1:05:11.813
<v Speaker 5>to be the most complet and in medical schools in

1:05:11.853 --> 1:05:15.413
<v Speaker 5>the different studies. Short this is from the American Enterprise Institute.

1:05:15.413 --> 1:05:23.053
<v Speaker 5>I think for medical schools, you on the same score,

1:05:23.493 --> 1:05:26.453
<v Speaker 5>a Black American had more than ten times a prospect

1:05:26.533 --> 1:05:29.613
<v Speaker 5>of getting admitted to medical school compared to an Asian American.

1:05:30.053 --> 1:05:33.173
<v Speaker 5>And again then it was the Hispanics the second most

1:05:33.173 --> 1:05:35.933
<v Speaker 5>advantage and the words third, and the Asians were at

1:05:35.933 --> 1:05:39.613
<v Speaker 5>the bottom. So that was what they had taken it.

1:05:40.133 --> 1:05:44.133
<v Speaker 5>It's very easy to demonstrate statistically. And finally the Supreme

1:05:44.133 --> 1:05:46.573
<v Speaker 5>Court said racial criteri you were illegal.

1:05:47.573 --> 1:05:49.213
<v Speaker 2>So it goes back to the same thing.

1:05:49.533 --> 1:05:52.973
<v Speaker 5>You believe in merit, you believe in the quality of opportunity,

1:05:54.093 --> 1:05:57.013
<v Speaker 5>and you believe in rewarding hard work. Then you get

1:05:57.013 --> 1:06:00.613
<v Speaker 5>a different student profile in universities and med schools and stuff.

1:06:01.213 --> 1:06:04.493
<v Speaker 5>Then if you start talking about equity and diversity. And

1:06:04.533 --> 1:06:07.453
<v Speaker 5>by the way, we've seen, going back to the pushback argument,

1:06:08.453 --> 1:06:11.013
<v Speaker 5>a lot of companies are now starting to dismantle the

1:06:11.093 --> 1:06:17.413
<v Speaker 5>deer elements of their bureaucracy, and so they should yep,

1:06:17.573 --> 1:06:21.093
<v Speaker 5>And well you see that, you saw the results of that. Well,

1:06:21.213 --> 1:06:24.133
<v Speaker 5>now there are allegations that that is partly to explain

1:06:24.933 --> 1:06:28.933
<v Speaker 5>the security failures with regard to the assassination attempt on Trump.

1:06:29.133 --> 1:06:30.853
<v Speaker 2>Yes, with the Secret Service.

1:06:30.533 --> 1:06:36.813
<v Speaker 5>Being interested in these efforts more than in basic competence.

1:06:37.893 --> 1:06:42.213
<v Speaker 5>And you'd think, well, it shouldn't affect universities, until suddenly

1:06:42.253 --> 1:06:46.733
<v Speaker 5>it I mean the consequence of that agenda, until suddenly

1:06:46.853 --> 1:06:50.973
<v Speaker 5>it did. When the three famous university presidents could not

1:06:51.133 --> 1:06:56.813
<v Speaker 5>answer a basic question under congressional testimony as to where

1:06:56.853 --> 1:07:02.893
<v Speaker 5>the calls to engage in ethnic expulsion of Jews or

1:07:02.933 --> 1:07:07.973
<v Speaker 5>whatever genesida Jews was to be prohibited. You remember how

1:07:08.013 --> 1:07:11.333
<v Speaker 5>they were completely unable to answer the simple moral question.

1:07:11.493 --> 1:07:13.213
<v Speaker 2>God yes comes back.

1:07:13.253 --> 1:07:16.973
<v Speaker 5>And all three happened to be women presidents, and the

1:07:17.013 --> 1:07:20.813
<v Speaker 5>Harvard one was clearly a diversity higher clearly or what

1:07:22.013 --> 1:07:27.013
<v Speaker 5>diversity higher I think for that phrase, that phrase has

1:07:27.053 --> 1:07:30.813
<v Speaker 5>become a presorative term now and they're saying that the

1:07:30.893 --> 1:07:33.253
<v Speaker 5>chief of the Secret Service is a diversity higher and

1:07:33.253 --> 1:07:34.093
<v Speaker 5>you see the results.

1:07:34.893 --> 1:07:36.213
<v Speaker 2>Well, it was, there was, there was.

1:07:36.733 --> 1:07:40.373
<v Speaker 5>She may not survive tomorrow's hearing it in Congress on sorry,

1:07:40.413 --> 1:07:40.693
<v Speaker 5>there was.

1:07:40.693 --> 1:07:44.813
<v Speaker 2>There was a similar similar lineup and they were all males,

1:07:45.773 --> 1:07:49.213
<v Speaker 2>roughly around the same time. Asked us being asked in

1:07:49.213 --> 1:07:55.453
<v Speaker 2>in the in the House inquiry how much? How much

1:07:55.533 --> 1:07:59.373
<v Speaker 2>CO two was there in the atmosphere? Few of them,

1:07:59.853 --> 1:08:05.653
<v Speaker 2>none of them knew, not one had no idea and

1:08:07.533 --> 1:08:11.813
<v Speaker 2>it was hell. We started this long but excellent conversation

1:08:12.613 --> 1:08:16.133
<v Speaker 2>with a quick mention of your book our enemy the government.

1:08:16.893 --> 1:08:18.053
<v Speaker 2>Let's conclude on it.

1:08:18.773 --> 1:08:25.253
<v Speaker 5>Why the title, Well, if you have a commitment to

1:08:25.373 --> 1:08:33.133
<v Speaker 5>human rights, you face attention. The worst breaches of human

1:08:33.213 --> 1:08:37.853
<v Speaker 5>rights and violations of human rights occur in conditions of anarchy,

1:08:39.293 --> 1:08:43.013
<v Speaker 5>and you need the machinery of government and the legislative,

1:08:43.093 --> 1:08:46.893
<v Speaker 5>executive and judicial frameworks to enforce.

1:08:48.173 --> 1:08:49.253
<v Speaker 2>Human rights.

1:08:50.493 --> 1:08:55.333
<v Speaker 5>Laws and values, to legislate and enforce them. At the

1:08:55.373 --> 1:08:59.373
<v Speaker 5>same time, if you do have stable, effective function government,

1:09:00.213 --> 1:09:04.173
<v Speaker 5>then potentially the biggest threat to your human rights comes

1:09:04.173 --> 1:09:08.453
<v Speaker 5>from governments, and these are the powerful entrance toutality in

1:09:08.533 --> 1:09:13.373
<v Speaker 5>states with their government machinery, in countries like Nazi Germany,

1:09:13.533 --> 1:09:18.653
<v Speaker 5>like communss China, like Communist Soviet Union. As it was,

1:09:19.693 --> 1:09:23.933
<v Speaker 5>so that tension is an ongoing reality and we need

1:09:23.973 --> 1:09:27.893
<v Speaker 5>to navigate that. And parts many parts of what we've

1:09:27.933 --> 1:09:30.373
<v Speaker 5>been talking about for the past hour or whatever it

1:09:30.453 --> 1:09:34.093
<v Speaker 5>has been, has been in relation to the growing threats

1:09:34.133 --> 1:09:37.413
<v Speaker 5>to our freedom and civil leuties that comes from over

1:09:37.493 --> 1:09:44.253
<v Speaker 5>centralization and over expansion of the state into spheres of

1:09:44.613 --> 1:09:50.173
<v Speaker 5>social and personal activity that hitherto were separate and considered

1:09:50.213 --> 1:09:53.973
<v Speaker 5>sacrosanct and none of the state's business, like telling us

1:09:54.013 --> 1:09:57.773
<v Speaker 5>which type of car we should buy, or which type

1:09:57.773 --> 1:10:02.013
<v Speaker 5>of car manufacturers should make and produce, and punishing dealers

1:10:02.053 --> 1:10:05.373
<v Speaker 5>if they don't sell x percentage of a particular type

1:10:05.413 --> 1:10:08.773
<v Speaker 5>of vehicle. Governments should stay out of these sources of actctivities.

1:10:09.053 --> 1:10:14.093
<v Speaker 5>In that sense, our common enemy, just as governments have

1:10:14.133 --> 1:10:16.573
<v Speaker 5>a common interest in expanding the power at the expense

1:10:16.613 --> 1:10:20.693
<v Speaker 5>of citizens, see the people's share a common interest in

1:10:20.733 --> 1:10:22.293
<v Speaker 5>limiting the powers of governments.

1:10:22.573 --> 1:10:27.013
<v Speaker 2>Hence our enemy the government. And it's a very good book,

1:10:27.333 --> 1:10:30.653
<v Speaker 2>and I recommend it. One other thing that I want

1:10:30.693 --> 1:10:36.173
<v Speaker 2>to recommend, Ramesh, is the transcript of the interview that

1:10:36.213 --> 1:10:43.173
<v Speaker 2>you did with Epic TV or Epoch TV, whichever with

1:10:43.533 --> 1:10:48.653
<v Speaker 2>someone from American Thought Leaders, and it runs eighteen pages

1:10:49.573 --> 1:10:55.013
<v Speaker 2>and it's full of great information, great commentary, and I

1:10:55.133 --> 1:10:58.093
<v Speaker 2>was actually sort of a bit envious when I read

1:10:58.093 --> 1:11:04.893
<v Speaker 2>it that I hadn't done it, But nevertheless it's superb. Yes,

1:11:05.893 --> 1:11:08.973
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know how to pronounce his name, but it's

1:11:08.533 --> 1:11:13.133
<v Speaker 2>it's You'll find it under the Romesha's name on the

1:11:13.453 --> 1:11:16.013
<v Speaker 2>on the Brownstone site. You just have to. You just

1:11:16.053 --> 1:11:18.453
<v Speaker 2>have to dig it at do a search the new

1:11:18.693 --> 1:11:24.293
<v Speaker 2>biosecurity state, and you'll get even more from that than

1:11:24.893 --> 1:11:28.093
<v Speaker 2>on top of what we've discussed in the last in

1:11:28.133 --> 1:11:32.573
<v Speaker 2>the last eighteen minutes, so you see time flies when

1:11:32.613 --> 1:11:33.573
<v Speaker 2>you're enjoying yourself.

1:11:34.013 --> 1:11:36.693
<v Speaker 5>I want to thank you. Add one thing so that

1:11:36.773 --> 1:11:39.493
<v Speaker 5>don't leave a wrong impression. Going back to the secret servicing,

1:11:39.533 --> 1:11:42.813
<v Speaker 5>when the assassination on Trump, sure, I think I would

1:11:42.893 --> 1:11:47.613
<v Speaker 5>like to acknowledge that the courage of the individual members

1:11:47.653 --> 1:11:50.733
<v Speaker 5>of the immediate protective Unit, including the women, was no

1:11:50.893 --> 1:11:53.333
<v Speaker 5>less than that of the men when they all threw

1:11:53.373 --> 1:11:57.213
<v Speaker 5>themselves and formed a protective shield around Trump. So that

1:11:57.413 --> 1:12:00.613
<v Speaker 5>wasn't a comment on you know, I wasn't trying to

1:12:00.653 --> 1:12:04.493
<v Speaker 5>demonize or not technowledge contributions to individual members. But the

1:12:04.533 --> 1:12:08.293
<v Speaker 5>factory means that the women members were not the size

1:12:08.533 --> 1:12:11.413
<v Speaker 5>and height of the male members and therefore they could

1:12:11.493 --> 1:12:14.653
<v Speaker 5>not completely form that human shield when he will come

1:12:14.693 --> 1:12:15.493
<v Speaker 5>and he stood up again.

1:12:15.773 --> 1:12:18.893
<v Speaker 2>That's the point, and that's the point that has been made.

1:12:19.053 --> 1:12:22.493
<v Speaker 2>And I have been in the same position that you

1:12:22.573 --> 1:12:25.933
<v Speaker 2>have and had to had to say that it wasn't.

1:12:26.533 --> 1:12:29.493
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't the fact that they were women, and you

1:12:29.613 --> 1:12:32.013
<v Speaker 2>may you've maybe do something that I reached across and

1:12:32.013 --> 1:12:34.613
<v Speaker 2>picked up a book and I bought this book for

1:12:34.733 --> 1:12:39.733
<v Speaker 2>my one of one of the girls, and it's by

1:12:41.173 --> 1:12:51.413
<v Speaker 2>an ex Secret Service agent whose name is Ivy Pomperess. Okay,

1:12:51.533 --> 1:12:56.973
<v Speaker 2>and there's two things I would observe. When Carolyn saw

1:12:57.013 --> 1:13:03.973
<v Speaker 2>the picture of her, she said, Wow, she's beautiful. I

1:13:03.973 --> 1:13:07.293
<v Speaker 2>couldn't say anything. But if I'd said that, you know, what,

1:13:07.293 --> 1:13:09.773
<v Speaker 2>what do you think it'd be out of for she's

1:13:09.773 --> 1:13:13.493
<v Speaker 2>a woman. The point being The book is called Becoming

1:13:13.613 --> 1:13:19.813
<v Speaker 2>Bulletproof Life Lessons from a Secret Service Agent former former

1:13:19.853 --> 1:13:23.093
<v Speaker 2>Protective Detail for three presidents and recipient of the of

1:13:23.173 --> 1:13:29.693
<v Speaker 2>the Medal of Valor Award. And I can't swear to this,

1:13:29.973 --> 1:13:36.053
<v Speaker 2>but I'm pretty sure she's five foot two mm five

1:13:36.053 --> 1:13:39.693
<v Speaker 2>foot two, which was probably shorter than those those women

1:13:39.973 --> 1:13:45.293
<v Speaker 2>the other the other the other day. But she was

1:13:45.453 --> 1:13:50.333
<v Speaker 2>patently very successful as a secret service agent. M And

1:13:50.413 --> 1:13:53.293
<v Speaker 2>on that note, I want to thank you, very very

1:13:53.413 --> 1:13:58.053
<v Speaker 2>very sincerely for a marathon effort. I'll leave you alone

1:13:58.093 --> 1:14:02.813
<v Speaker 2>for a little while, but your opinions are valuable, worthwhile

1:14:03.293 --> 1:14:07.253
<v Speaker 2>and to be heard by as many as possible. Thanks

1:14:07.373 --> 1:14:26.053
<v Speaker 2>lessen into the mail room for two hundred and forty nine,

1:14:26.453 --> 1:14:27.573
<v Speaker 2>MISSUS producer.

1:14:27.253 --> 1:14:28.133
<v Speaker 6>Welcome lighton.

1:14:28.213 --> 1:14:29.333
<v Speaker 2>How are you very well?

1:14:29.573 --> 1:14:29.893
<v Speaker 6>Great?

1:14:30.253 --> 1:14:32.973
<v Speaker 2>It would be rude of me not to ask how

1:14:33.013 --> 1:14:33.293
<v Speaker 2>are you?

1:14:33.613 --> 1:14:35.693
<v Speaker 6>I'm always good. Thank you so much.

1:14:35.773 --> 1:14:38.973
<v Speaker 2>I knew then I could have written the script anyway.

1:14:39.693 --> 1:14:43.693
<v Speaker 2>Let me begin from Dawn, reinforced by your earlier interview

1:14:43.813 --> 1:14:47.773
<v Speaker 2>of an authority on US international affairs. The name alludes

1:14:47.813 --> 1:14:51.813
<v Speaker 2>me to the effect that the Moscow Beijing Iran clique

1:14:52.413 --> 1:14:56.413
<v Speaker 2>is at pains to sustain the Biden Democrat regime. I

1:14:56.533 --> 1:15:01.893
<v Speaker 2>warmed to the above. Peace Harris given to hysterical outbursts

1:15:01.893 --> 1:15:06.413
<v Speaker 2>of laughter is an airhead. She watched her Biden brief

1:15:06.453 --> 1:15:10.853
<v Speaker 2>to deal with the exponential invasion of refugees across the

1:15:10.893 --> 1:15:15.973
<v Speaker 2>Texas border, so damaging to USA society and infrastructure. To

1:15:16.053 --> 1:15:20.813
<v Speaker 2>my mind, her present popular surge reflects mere public relief

1:15:21.133 --> 1:15:25.893
<v Speaker 2>from a medically senile, long incompetent Biden, whose leadership is

1:15:26.093 --> 1:15:32.333
<v Speaker 2>redolent of the adurn brand of progressive change early days.

1:15:32.413 --> 1:15:35.413
<v Speaker 2>Yet a couple of things to comment on that, just

1:15:36.213 --> 1:15:41.573
<v Speaker 2>briefly given to hysterical outbursts of laughter is an airhead. Oh,

1:15:41.653 --> 1:15:44.173
<v Speaker 2>I think I could do better than that, to be honest,

1:15:45.333 --> 1:15:49.493
<v Speaker 2>watched her Biden brief to deal with the exponential invasion

1:15:49.533 --> 1:15:53.253
<v Speaker 2>of refugees across the Texas border. I don't know that

1:15:53.373 --> 1:15:56.053
<v Speaker 2>I can agree with that statement. And you'll understand why

1:15:56.733 --> 1:16:00.253
<v Speaker 2>she was installed, so to speak, as the czar of

1:16:00.333 --> 1:16:04.133
<v Speaker 2>the border or whatever. But that meant nothing because this

1:16:04.173 --> 1:16:07.173
<v Speaker 2>has all been intentional. It was all. It was all

1:16:07.213 --> 1:16:12.053
<v Speaker 2>just window dressing, because that was the intent as many

1:16:12.173 --> 1:16:15.933
<v Speaker 2>as possible. And by the way, there are now appearing

1:16:16.533 --> 1:16:20.213
<v Speaker 2>signs evidence in fact of the fact that they're signing

1:16:20.253 --> 1:16:22.613
<v Speaker 2>them up to vote in this election.

1:16:23.813 --> 1:16:28.533
<v Speaker 7>Leighton Colin says the podcast with Ramashakur was very interesting,

1:16:28.933 --> 1:16:30.333
<v Speaker 7>especially on Donald Trump.

1:16:30.773 --> 1:16:31.413
<v Speaker 6>One piece.

1:16:31.413 --> 1:16:34.373
<v Speaker 7>He said it is important for Trump to pick a

1:16:34.413 --> 1:16:37.733
<v Speaker 7>person for the vice presidency that would be in tune

1:16:37.773 --> 1:16:42.453
<v Speaker 7>with his ideas and understand him. That night, after I

1:16:42.493 --> 1:16:45.333
<v Speaker 7>played the podcast, I tuned into an interview by Jesse

1:16:45.413 --> 1:16:48.373
<v Speaker 7>Walters on Sky when he had Donald Trump and JD.

1:16:48.533 --> 1:16:51.973
<v Speaker 7>Vance on so keeping in mind what Tha Kerr had said,

1:16:52.293 --> 1:16:55.293
<v Speaker 7>I was really pleased with what I saw. The two

1:16:55.373 --> 1:16:58.413
<v Speaker 7>guests were adding to each other's statements and bringing each

1:16:58.413 --> 1:17:02.173
<v Speaker 7>other into the mix, even sometimes finishing each other's sentences.

1:17:02.813 --> 1:17:05.813
<v Speaker 7>It was an interview that showed a chemistry between the

1:17:05.813 --> 1:17:09.573
<v Speaker 7>two men. The Republican Party needs to push this hard,

1:17:09.733 --> 1:17:12.693
<v Speaker 7>as quite often the USA has had a presidency ticket

1:17:12.773 --> 1:17:16.253
<v Speaker 7>that hasn't jelled at all. The Democrats we the woke

1:17:16.413 --> 1:17:19.213
<v Speaker 7>diversity ticket of Biden and Harris has proven to be

1:17:19.453 --> 1:17:22.733
<v Speaker 7>very weak and bad for US and for the world.

1:17:24.053 --> 1:17:27.373
<v Speaker 2>And Colin is quite correct and by the way, I

1:17:27.413 --> 1:17:32.413
<v Speaker 2>think I might make more reference to that David Flint's

1:17:32.533 --> 1:17:39.093
<v Speaker 2>article than Donald wrote about at the end of this podcast. Now,

1:17:39.133 --> 1:17:42.653
<v Speaker 2>Claire writes this old quote from J. D. Vance has

1:17:42.653 --> 1:17:46.373
<v Speaker 2>to be one of the funniest ever. Childless cat ladies.

1:17:47.573 --> 1:17:48.533
<v Speaker 2>Do you find that amusing?

1:17:50.613 --> 1:17:55.653
<v Speaker 6>Well, not really, I do, of course you do. A

1:17:55.733 --> 1:17:57.013
<v Speaker 6>man who won't let me have a cat?

1:17:57.173 --> 1:18:00.253
<v Speaker 2>No, no, but it's an old it's an old saying,

1:18:01.213 --> 1:18:04.293
<v Speaker 2>and he's just he's just resurrected it. And to sort

1:18:04.293 --> 1:18:08.213
<v Speaker 2>of indicate that she goes on. Derek Hunter, a conservative

1:18:08.333 --> 1:18:12.693
<v Speaker 2>American with a daily podcast, says frequently quote don't spike

1:18:12.773 --> 1:18:16.373
<v Speaker 2>the football on the five yard line. In other words,

1:18:16.493 --> 1:18:19.173
<v Speaker 2>don't count on Trump winning. It ain't over till the

1:18:19.213 --> 1:18:22.653
<v Speaker 2>fat lady sings on election day. The old fat lady's

1:18:22.693 --> 1:18:25.653
<v Speaker 2>getting a workout too. That's from Claire, who, by the way,

1:18:25.653 --> 1:18:29.013
<v Speaker 2>responds to your question about does she live in America

1:18:29.093 --> 1:18:32.533
<v Speaker 2>whatever a couple of weeks back, American expat living on

1:18:32.573 --> 1:18:34.453
<v Speaker 2>the west coast of the South Island.

1:18:35.013 --> 1:18:36.653
<v Speaker 6>Lovely's beautiful.

1:18:37.053 --> 1:18:37.773
<v Speaker 2>I think I knew that.

1:18:37.893 --> 1:18:40.773
<v Speaker 6>Actually you know everything later, No, not quite.

1:18:41.773 --> 1:18:45.333
<v Speaker 7>Nick says, longtime fan who greatly appreciates what you do.

1:18:45.573 --> 1:18:48.573
<v Speaker 7>Just wondering when or if you are getting Patrick Bashion

1:18:48.613 --> 1:18:51.413
<v Speaker 7>back on the podcast. He was always fascinating to listen

1:18:51.413 --> 1:18:53.133
<v Speaker 7>to and it would be great to hear his take

1:18:53.173 --> 1:18:55.453
<v Speaker 7>on what is happening in the States.

1:18:55.493 --> 1:18:58.733
<v Speaker 2>Well, what do you reckon, Hey fix that one easily

1:18:59.093 --> 1:19:02.693
<v Speaker 2>and thanks for the tip. A reference to the article

1:19:02.733 --> 1:19:08.053
<v Speaker 2>in the New Zealand Herald on the twenty seventh of

1:19:08.093 --> 1:19:12.933
<v Speaker 2>the seven which was last Saturdays by Stephen Joyce Health

1:19:13.013 --> 1:19:17.933
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand overhaul sad yet predictable after merger missteps. This

1:19:18.013 --> 1:19:22.733
<v Speaker 2>Herald piece should be compulsory reading for all its Gainsayers

1:19:22.813 --> 1:19:27.693
<v Speaker 2>presumably can identify tangible health benefits from mister Little's reforms

1:19:27.973 --> 1:19:32.733
<v Speaker 2>other than those of an aspirational or anticipatory nature given time.

1:19:33.133 --> 1:19:36.293
<v Speaker 2>If so, such benefits are far from obvious, either for

1:19:36.493 --> 1:19:40.813
<v Speaker 2>Mary or non Mary. That more than a billion dollars

1:19:40.853 --> 1:19:45.613
<v Speaker 2>of taxpayers money was spent on this ideological exercise is

1:19:46.013 --> 1:19:50.613
<v Speaker 2>not justifiable, given that it did little more than raise

1:19:50.773 --> 1:19:54.533
<v Speaker 2>an expectation that health services for Mary would significantly improve.

1:19:55.093 --> 1:19:58.133
<v Speaker 2>No doubt those across the board languishing in pain on

1:19:58.213 --> 1:20:02.893
<v Speaker 2>waiting lists for elective surgery would express the matter more vehemently.

1:20:05.013 --> 1:20:08.853
<v Speaker 7>Layton Jin says, the choice between Donald Trump's May America

1:20:08.973 --> 1:20:12.893
<v Speaker 7>Great Again and Kamala Harris what can be unburdened by

1:20:12.893 --> 1:20:17.773
<v Speaker 7>what has been is a choice between a man no, no,

1:20:17.813 --> 1:20:20.453
<v Speaker 7>I have no idea what can be She doesn't know either,

1:20:22.013 --> 1:20:23.773
<v Speaker 7>unburdened by what has been.

1:20:23.653 --> 1:20:27.933
<v Speaker 2>I got told her? Who told you that previously?

1:20:27.973 --> 1:20:28.133
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

1:20:28.213 --> 1:20:28.453
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:20:29.373 --> 1:20:31.613
<v Speaker 7>Is a choice between a man knows what needs to

1:20:31.613 --> 1:20:33.493
<v Speaker 7>be done because he's been there before, and a woman

1:20:33.533 --> 1:20:36.853
<v Speaker 7>who merely spouts nonsensical limericks because she's never been able

1:20:36.893 --> 1:20:39.893
<v Speaker 7>to make it. Karmala Harris is having a cinder o

1:20:40.093 --> 1:20:43.893
<v Speaker 7>durn moment, thrust into leadership by accident, and totally ill

1:20:43.893 --> 1:20:47.173
<v Speaker 7>equipped to be a leader. As Jadie Vance said at

1:20:47.293 --> 1:20:52.333
<v Speaker 7>last Saturday's campaign rally in Minnesota, if there's one thing

1:20:52.333 --> 1:20:55.253
<v Speaker 7>we've learned about Kamala Harris, it's that she's had a

1:20:55.293 --> 1:20:58.493
<v Speaker 7>hard time winning votes because she's too extreme even for

1:20:58.533 --> 1:21:03.533
<v Speaker 7>the Democrats. Remember, in the twenty twenty primary, Harris dropped

1:21:03.533 --> 1:21:06.533
<v Speaker 7>out months before they even cast the first vote. She

1:21:06.693 --> 1:21:09.813
<v Speaker 7>was so unpopular she pulled in the low digit, in

1:21:09.853 --> 1:21:13.413
<v Speaker 7>the low single digits among the Democrats the entire campaign.

1:21:13.933 --> 1:21:16.013
<v Speaker 7>She wasn't even the top three in her home state

1:21:16.053 --> 1:21:20.413
<v Speaker 7>of California. And that's pretty embarrassing, ladies and gentlemen. That

1:21:20.613 --> 1:21:26.213
<v Speaker 7>was Jodie Vance's commentary. Trump made a most excellent choice

1:21:26.213 --> 1:21:29.293
<v Speaker 7>in selecting JD. Van as his vice president because, as

1:21:29.413 --> 1:21:33.773
<v Speaker 7>Ramesh the curb brilliantly equipped Vance's trump Ism without the

1:21:33.813 --> 1:21:35.373
<v Speaker 7>Trump character flaws.

1:21:35.773 --> 1:21:37.053
<v Speaker 6>And if you think about.

1:21:36.813 --> 1:21:39.813
<v Speaker 7>It, this American election is no longer a contest between

1:21:40.013 --> 1:21:42.933
<v Speaker 7>Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Rather, it is now a

1:21:42.973 --> 1:21:47.053
<v Speaker 7>contest between JD. Vance and Kamala Harris. I only hope

1:21:47.053 --> 1:21:49.453
<v Speaker 7>for the sake of the world that Americans have more

1:21:49.493 --> 1:21:51.373
<v Speaker 7>clever voters than the stupid ones.

1:21:51.493 --> 1:21:53.453
<v Speaker 6>God help us either way.

1:21:53.213 --> 1:21:57.133
<v Speaker 2>Did I that the fact that Vance was going to

1:21:57.173 --> 1:22:00.733
<v Speaker 2>debate her and now won't be, of course, because she

1:22:00.813 --> 1:22:04.053
<v Speaker 2>will be the leader debating Trump is a bit disappointing

1:22:04.893 --> 1:22:09.813
<v Speaker 2>for the simple reason that he wrote, Actually, I think

1:22:09.853 --> 1:22:12.653
<v Speaker 2>he'd pack her up and put her on the shelf. Hmm.

1:22:14.213 --> 1:22:18.333
<v Speaker 2>This is a little different, is personal. Late, after many

1:22:18.373 --> 1:22:22.013
<v Speaker 2>years of looking at this bottle of Clevedon Hills Ports

1:22:22.533 --> 1:22:26.533
<v Speaker 2>in the wine cupboard, we have finally opened it and

1:22:26.693 --> 1:22:30.333
<v Speaker 2>sit in front of the fire here in Marpor enjoying

1:22:30.373 --> 1:22:35.773
<v Speaker 2>a delicious, tasty after dinner drink. It is truly very special.

1:22:36.413 --> 1:22:39.733
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for the wonderful tipple from John and Lindall.

1:22:41.213 --> 1:22:41.653
<v Speaker 4>I just.

1:22:43.413 --> 1:22:47.253
<v Speaker 2>Have to say there was a bottle of the original,

1:22:48.013 --> 1:22:50.933
<v Speaker 2>the original bottle, because we had about four or five

1:22:50.973 --> 1:22:54.053
<v Speaker 2>different bottles with different releases. That was in the cupboard

1:22:54.893 --> 1:22:57.373
<v Speaker 2>at the back of the cupboard where you couldn't see it,

1:22:57.893 --> 1:23:00.493
<v Speaker 2>and I dug it out. This is a little while

1:23:00.493 --> 1:23:02.893
<v Speaker 2>back now dug it out. It was years old and

1:23:03.173 --> 1:23:06.173
<v Speaker 2>it only had about a a quarter of the bottle

1:23:06.213 --> 1:23:11.093
<v Speaker 2>in it, so I tried itsolutely outstanding. So I've got

1:23:11.133 --> 1:23:16.173
<v Speaker 2>about five bottles of the of the last edition of

1:23:16.213 --> 1:23:20.493
<v Speaker 2>the Layton Support from Cleveland Hills. What four bottles? I

1:23:20.533 --> 1:23:23.373
<v Speaker 2>did not know that I have. I think it's five.

1:23:24.093 --> 1:23:28.213
<v Speaker 2>And I've decided that everybody. There's so many people asking

1:23:28.253 --> 1:23:30.053
<v Speaker 2>when are you going to do it again? Look, it

1:23:30.133 --> 1:23:33.333
<v Speaker 2>was made by Enzo Bettio with some of his grapes

1:23:34.013 --> 1:23:38.413
<v Speaker 2>and most mostly mine, but some of his, and he

1:23:38.453 --> 1:23:40.773
<v Speaker 2>made it so well, and he's now off the scene.

1:23:40.813 --> 1:23:42.853
<v Speaker 2>He's not making wine anymore, and it doesn't want to

1:23:42.853 --> 1:23:45.533
<v Speaker 2>know about it, which is which is a shame. So

1:23:45.693 --> 1:23:48.693
<v Speaker 2>these five bottles, I've decided I'm prepared to sell three

1:23:48.733 --> 1:23:52.613
<v Speaker 2>of them at five thousand dollars a bottle. So anybody

1:23:52.613 --> 1:23:56.613
<v Speaker 2>who loved it so much and as a spare five,

1:23:56.933 --> 1:23:58.493
<v Speaker 2>then give me an email.

1:23:59.493 --> 1:24:02.813
<v Speaker 6>That'll be the first financial thing that you that you

1:24:02.893 --> 1:24:11.853
<v Speaker 6>ever do properly you comfort you okay later? This is

1:24:11.853 --> 1:24:12.693
<v Speaker 6>from Salvatore.

1:24:13.093 --> 1:24:15.213
<v Speaker 7>You were right to say that this week's from Esh

1:24:15.293 --> 1:24:18.093
<v Speaker 7>the Kurr interview was one of your best. His explanation

1:24:18.213 --> 1:24:21.413
<v Speaker 7>of the politics of the United Nations and the broader

1:24:21.533 --> 1:24:25.933
<v Speaker 7>un system was absolutely masterful. A fantastic education.

1:24:27.053 --> 1:24:32.013
<v Speaker 2>At an email that was decidedly insightful. So finally from Brenda,

1:24:32.493 --> 1:24:36.573
<v Speaker 2>who wasn't writing to me but copied me in and

1:24:37.453 --> 1:24:41.733
<v Speaker 2>I think you'll see why when she writes high there

1:24:42.893 --> 1:24:46.973
<v Speaker 2>to the Reserve Bank. Hi, there, I see on your

1:24:47.013 --> 1:24:50.333
<v Speaker 2>site there is a submission portal for a digital cash survey.

1:24:50.853 --> 1:24:52.613
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't have known about this if it were not

1:24:52.693 --> 1:24:54.973
<v Speaker 2>for a friend emailing it to me. Can you please

1:24:55.013 --> 1:24:58.973
<v Speaker 2>tell me when this was uploaded. I'd like to establish

1:24:58.973 --> 1:25:01.733
<v Speaker 2>how long you have given people to respond in relation

1:25:01.893 --> 1:25:06.293
<v Speaker 2>to the complexity of the situation, given that digital currency

1:25:06.333 --> 1:25:09.813
<v Speaker 2>has the potential to forever change the landscape of our

1:25:09.813 --> 1:25:13.893
<v Speaker 2>financial system and the way people live. I would like

1:25:13.973 --> 1:25:17.493
<v Speaker 2>to know what kind of advertising you have done to

1:25:17.573 --> 1:25:21.013
<v Speaker 2>let people know this survey is taking place. Most people

1:25:21.053 --> 1:25:24.053
<v Speaker 2>do not understand what digital money is, let alone what

1:25:24.173 --> 1:25:27.213
<v Speaker 2>they should or should not be in favor, whether or

1:25:27.253 --> 1:25:29.213
<v Speaker 2>not they should or should not be in favor of it.

1:25:30.333 --> 1:25:33.413
<v Speaker 2>I looked at the survey and found it too biased

1:25:33.693 --> 1:25:36.333
<v Speaker 2>to fill out. The survey works on the premise that

1:25:36.373 --> 1:25:40.333
<v Speaker 2>respondents agree with the CBDCs and then ask questions that

1:25:40.373 --> 1:25:44.053
<v Speaker 2>are confusing and in one case contradictory. Despite these issues,

1:25:44.453 --> 1:25:48.373
<v Speaker 2>I have made a submission. I urge the Central Bank

1:25:48.453 --> 1:25:51.693
<v Speaker 2>to extend the deadline of the submission date and make

1:25:51.773 --> 1:25:55.773
<v Speaker 2>greater effort to inform the public about it. It is

1:25:55.853 --> 1:25:58.693
<v Speaker 2>deeply concerning that I did not see this survey anywhere,

1:25:59.253 --> 1:26:04.853
<v Speaker 2>and it should have been in my algorithmic footprint due

1:26:04.893 --> 1:26:08.333
<v Speaker 2>to my interest in the subject. Additionally, it would be

1:26:08.453 --> 1:26:11.613
<v Speaker 2>beneficial to reword the survey to allow those who are

1:26:11.733 --> 1:26:15.373
<v Speaker 2>against cbdc's to express their views without being led by

1:26:15.453 --> 1:26:20.533
<v Speaker 2>the questions. Please respond urgently. I have posted this query

1:26:20.773 --> 1:26:24.773
<v Speaker 2>at the NZ Center for Political Research to see if

1:26:24.813 --> 1:26:30.333
<v Speaker 2>others were aware that this survey was available. Please advise Brenda.

1:26:31.133 --> 1:26:34.933
<v Speaker 2>Brilliant approach you've taken, and I will wait to see

1:26:34.933 --> 1:26:39.973
<v Speaker 2>whether you've got a reply with regard to that. This

1:26:40.093 --> 1:26:40.653
<v Speaker 2>is producer.

1:26:40.653 --> 1:26:41.933
<v Speaker 6>Thank you, Thank you so much.

1:26:42.053 --> 1:26:43.853
<v Speaker 2>Later, I've got lots of editing to do.

1:26:43.973 --> 1:26:49.693
<v Speaker 7>You do the best bits won't be heard sarcastic bits.

1:26:58.373 --> 1:27:02.333
<v Speaker 2>I indicated that I might refer to David Flint's article

1:27:02.373 --> 1:27:06.693
<v Speaker 2>that was referred to in a letter during the mail Room.

1:27:07.053 --> 1:27:09.453
<v Speaker 2>At the end of the podcast, we are there and

1:27:10.173 --> 1:27:14.133
<v Speaker 2>I shall fulfill my suggestion. David Plint has a long

1:27:14.333 --> 1:27:18.093
<v Speaker 2>history of success in life. An interesting character is one

1:27:18.093 --> 1:27:20.373
<v Speaker 2>way to describe him. But I want to concentrate on

1:27:20.373 --> 1:27:24.293
<v Speaker 2>only what really matters as far as his professional identity

1:27:24.373 --> 1:27:27.173
<v Speaker 2>is concerned. So under the heading of Korea. He was

1:27:27.213 --> 1:27:30.213
<v Speaker 2>admitted as a lawyer in New South Wales and in

1:27:30.533 --> 1:27:33.773
<v Speaker 2>England and Wales. He is Australian. He practiced for a

1:27:33.813 --> 1:27:37.773
<v Speaker 2>number of years, lecturing in several university business and law

1:27:37.773 --> 1:27:44.133
<v Speaker 2>schools that included a wide range of subjects including business, tax, antitrust, comparative,

1:27:44.253 --> 1:27:49.213
<v Speaker 2>constitutional and international law. Now the important part comes under

1:27:49.253 --> 1:27:53.613
<v Speaker 2>the heading of honors. Flint was awarded World Outstanding Legal

1:27:53.653 --> 1:27:58.853
<v Speaker 2>Scholar the World Jurists Association, Barcelona in October nineteen ninety one.

1:27:59.653 --> 1:28:02.733
<v Speaker 2>On twelve June nineteen ninety five, he was made a

1:28:02.733 --> 1:28:06.173
<v Speaker 2>Member of the Order of Australia in recognition of service

1:28:06.173 --> 1:28:09.573
<v Speaker 2>to the print media, particularly as chairman of the Australian

1:28:09.613 --> 1:28:13.453
<v Speaker 2>Press Council and to international relations. He has written widely

1:28:13.493 --> 1:28:18.453
<v Speaker 2>on matters and you can only say highly qualified to

1:28:18.493 --> 1:28:22.813
<v Speaker 2>make comment on many things, but particularly with regard to well.

1:28:22.893 --> 1:28:25.613
<v Speaker 2>I think what I'm about to quote you A number

1:28:25.613 --> 1:28:29.373
<v Speaker 2>of people don't understand my attachment to Donald Trump, and

1:28:29.413 --> 1:28:33.093
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting weary of explaining, so I thought, so I

1:28:33.133 --> 1:28:37.973
<v Speaker 2>thought i'd quote David Flint under the heading of a

1:28:38.053 --> 1:28:40.853
<v Speaker 2>Trump victory is critical. And keep in mind that this

1:28:40.933 --> 1:28:45.093
<v Speaker 2>is written by an Australian for an Australian audience. As

1:28:45.133 --> 1:28:48.413
<v Speaker 2>far as I'm concerned, New Zealand is part of that audience,

1:28:48.613 --> 1:28:52.653
<v Speaker 2>and New Zealand is not part politically of Australia. But

1:28:52.733 --> 1:28:55.173
<v Speaker 2>we don't have a closer relationship with any other country.

1:28:56.173 --> 1:28:59.053
<v Speaker 2>So what he says I think is relevant to New

1:28:59.133 --> 1:29:02.573
<v Speaker 2>Zealand as well as Australia. Donald Trump's election as the

1:29:02.573 --> 1:29:06.813
<v Speaker 2>forty seventh president is crucial, and not only to the US.

1:29:07.853 --> 1:29:11.813
<v Speaker 2>Four more years of appeasement to the Beijing Moscow Tehran axis,

1:29:11.973 --> 1:29:17.413
<v Speaker 2>uncontrolled immigration, and the prevalence of climate catastrophism and other

1:29:17.493 --> 1:29:23.013
<v Speaker 2>alien ideologies risk such damage to the US and Western

1:29:23.133 --> 1:29:28.093
<v Speaker 2>civilization of which we are part that it could be irreversible.

1:29:28.613 --> 1:29:31.053
<v Speaker 2>If anybody can return America to the power, respect, and

1:29:31.093 --> 1:29:35.533
<v Speaker 2>authority she once enjoyed, it is Donald Trump. Here's what

1:29:35.613 --> 1:29:38.413
<v Speaker 2>he suggests he will achieve. He'll close the borders to

1:29:38.493 --> 1:29:42.253
<v Speaker 2>the uncontrolled massive migration that Biden imposed in reach of

1:29:42.293 --> 1:29:44.973
<v Speaker 2>the law. As the forty seventh president, he will no

1:29:45.053 --> 1:29:48.813
<v Speaker 2>doubt relieve America from the ideologies of the Long March

1:29:48.893 --> 1:29:53.133
<v Speaker 2>through her institutions that have imposed themselves on the nation.

1:29:53.853 --> 1:29:56.973
<v Speaker 2>He will require freeloaders to become true allies. He will

1:29:57.013 --> 1:30:00.333
<v Speaker 2>return the Beijing, Moscow Tehran axis to the good behavior

1:30:00.373 --> 1:30:03.893
<v Speaker 2>that they prudently demonstrated during his first term. He will

1:30:03.933 --> 1:30:06.933
<v Speaker 2>restore peace in the Middle East, as he did with

1:30:07.053 --> 1:30:11.013
<v Speaker 2>the Abraham Accords. He has ensured his ideas will continue

1:30:11.053 --> 1:30:14.893
<v Speaker 2>with his choice of JD. Vance as candidate to vice president,

1:30:15.213 --> 1:30:18.253
<v Speaker 2>and whatever he does at home will be a lesson

1:30:18.333 --> 1:30:23.253
<v Speaker 2>for the free world. We must therefore ignore the commentariat

1:30:23.693 --> 1:30:27.893
<v Speaker 2>that scorned him, just as they scorned Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher,

1:30:27.973 --> 1:30:32.373
<v Speaker 2>John Howard, and Tony Abbotts. And he closes this three

1:30:32.413 --> 1:30:37.053
<v Speaker 2>page article with this short comment. Today, few will disagree

1:30:37.133 --> 1:30:41.773
<v Speaker 2>that this year's election is extremely important as Trump himself says,

1:30:42.413 --> 1:30:47.093
<v Speaker 2>it is the most important close quote. America is at

1:30:47.133 --> 1:30:52.173
<v Speaker 2>the crossroads. Only Trump offers salvation. His election is crucial

1:30:52.213 --> 1:30:56.853
<v Speaker 2>to America and to the free world, including Australia, and

1:30:56.973 --> 1:31:01.213
<v Speaker 2>I'm adding New Zealand. Now if you disagree with that,

1:31:01.933 --> 1:31:05.133
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to have a good reason why. Open to

1:31:05.293 --> 1:31:09.413
<v Speaker 2>your open to your prognostications. And I'll leave it there.

1:31:09.613 --> 1:31:12.053
<v Speaker 2>But if you want to read that article, you can

1:31:12.213 --> 1:31:15.453
<v Speaker 2>probably read it on the I can't guarantee it, but

1:31:15.533 --> 1:31:18.613
<v Speaker 2>you can properly read it on the Spectator Australia website

1:31:20.013 --> 1:31:24.133
<v Speaker 2>under the name of David Plint. Otherwise could pay you

1:31:24.253 --> 1:31:29.013
<v Speaker 2>dues I suppose, and join up with Spectator Australia. This

1:31:29.093 --> 1:31:30.893
<v Speaker 2>is not a paid ad. I've been saying it for

1:31:30.893 --> 1:31:33.933
<v Speaker 2>a long time. That will take us out for podcasts.

1:31:33.933 --> 1:31:38.613
<v Speaker 2>Two hundred and forty nine two fifty a quarter of

1:31:39.053 --> 1:31:41.733
<v Speaker 2>a thousand, No big deal, really, I suppose. But there

1:31:41.813 --> 1:31:43.613
<v Speaker 2>is something else attached to it that I'll make mention

1:31:43.693 --> 1:31:46.093
<v Speaker 2>of next week. So if you would like to write

1:31:46.093 --> 1:31:48.813
<v Speaker 2>to us Latent at newstalksb dot co dot Nz or

1:31:48.893 --> 1:31:52.973
<v Speaker 2>Carolyn at the same address newstalkszeb dot co dot Nz,

1:31:54.093 --> 1:31:59.453
<v Speaker 2>we shall return shortly with two fifty. In the meantime,

1:31:59.853 --> 1:32:03.333
<v Speaker 2>let me say, quite genuinely thank you for listening and

1:32:03.413 --> 1:32:04.093
<v Speaker 2>we'll talk soon.

1:32:12.093 --> 1:32:15.773
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for more from News Talks at b Listen

1:32:15.853 --> 1:32:18.813
<v Speaker 1>live on air or online, and keep our shows with

1:32:18.933 --> 1:32:22.093
<v Speaker 1>you wherever you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio