WEBVTT - Leighton Smith Podcast #242 - June 5th 2024 - Oliver Hartwitch

0:00:09.133 --> 0:00:12.013
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from news Talks at B.

0:00:12.413 --> 0:00:16.213
<v Speaker 1>Follow this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.

0:00:16.813 --> 0:00:19.813
<v Speaker 1>It's time for all the attitude, all the opinion, all

0:00:19.853 --> 0:00:24.373
<v Speaker 1>the information, all the debates of the US Now the

0:00:24.533 --> 0:00:27.733
<v Speaker 1>Leyton Smith Podcast powered by News Talks it B.

0:00:28.333 --> 0:00:31.413
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Podcasts two hundred and forty two. For June five,

0:00:31.773 --> 0:00:35.813
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four. Oliver Hardrich, Executive Director of the New

0:00:35.893 --> 0:00:40.613
<v Speaker 2>Zealand Institute, on the twenty twenty four budget, the good

0:00:40.853 --> 0:00:45.573
<v Speaker 2>and the disappointing. We have some basics and expand discussion

0:00:45.613 --> 0:00:50.333
<v Speaker 2>to other realms such as Switzerland, the UK election and

0:00:50.373 --> 0:00:53.813
<v Speaker 2>the future of the Tory Party, New Zealand, economic growth

0:00:53.853 --> 0:00:57.773
<v Speaker 2>and productivity and will it really take fifteen years until

0:00:57.893 --> 0:01:01.333
<v Speaker 2>twenty forty for the economy to be righted? And then

0:01:01.373 --> 0:01:05.133
<v Speaker 2>from seemingly out of nowhere, we found ourselves talking about

0:01:05.733 --> 0:01:11.413
<v Speaker 2>what is known as the delectable lives multiculturalism, and that's

0:01:11.453 --> 0:01:14.453
<v Speaker 2>a very interesting little segment. Then at the back end

0:01:14.493 --> 0:01:17.533
<v Speaker 2>of two forty two, we look at the lost generation,

0:01:18.173 --> 0:01:23.213
<v Speaker 2>lost in the underbelly of a dysfunctional, fatherless society. A

0:01:23.253 --> 0:01:27.773
<v Speaker 2>psychologist reports from two thousand and nine, when things were

0:01:27.813 --> 0:01:31.733
<v Speaker 2>bad and with considerable foresight, predicts what will take place

0:01:31.933 --> 0:01:34.413
<v Speaker 2>if nothing's done about it, and today we live with

0:01:34.493 --> 0:01:38.973
<v Speaker 2>the consequences of inaction. Don't miss it. But first a

0:01:39.053 --> 0:01:41.453
<v Speaker 2>quick word on something that I know that you're curious about,

0:01:41.613 --> 0:01:45.933
<v Speaker 2>the next US president. The jury verdict in the Trump

0:01:45.973 --> 0:01:51.573
<v Speaker 2>case came out the day after last week's podcast. That

0:01:51.813 --> 0:01:54.333
<v Speaker 2>was frustrating, But there has been and there will be

0:01:54.413 --> 0:01:56.973
<v Speaker 2>so much written and said on the case. It requires

0:01:57.533 --> 0:02:02.293
<v Speaker 2>what you might call a record setting length podcast on

0:02:02.333 --> 0:02:05.293
<v Speaker 2>my part in order to address it. But here is

0:02:05.333 --> 0:02:09.093
<v Speaker 2>my brief take. The case will be studied in law

0:02:09.133 --> 0:02:12.413
<v Speaker 2>classes forever. It will in the end go down as

0:02:12.453 --> 0:02:16.093
<v Speaker 2>the most corrupt court room in American history, with the

0:02:16.173 --> 0:02:18.773
<v Speaker 2>judge and the prosecutor setting new lows, and I mean

0:02:18.973 --> 0:02:23.293
<v Speaker 2>really new lows in legal ethics. But I want to

0:02:23.373 --> 0:02:26.253
<v Speaker 2>quote you a little bit of a little bit of

0:02:26.293 --> 0:02:31.773
<v Speaker 2>detail there was. As we've heard since that decision was announced,

0:02:32.093 --> 0:02:35.013
<v Speaker 2>we've heard how much money the Trump campaign has raised.

0:02:35.493 --> 0:02:38.493
<v Speaker 2>But it doesn't stop there. Trump campaign says it raised

0:02:38.533 --> 0:02:41.773
<v Speaker 2>fifty three million within a day of his New York verdict.

0:02:42.333 --> 0:02:45.333
<v Speaker 2>The ultra wealthy Republican donors are rallying behind the former

0:02:45.453 --> 0:02:49.933
<v Speaker 2>US President Donald Trump following his historical trial and criminal conviction.

0:02:50.933 --> 0:02:55.613
<v Speaker 2>But there is much more. There was an announcement made

0:02:56.453 --> 0:02:59.733
<v Speaker 2>on my phone as I as I was working this morning,

0:03:00.253 --> 0:03:01.773
<v Speaker 2>and I'll get to that in a second, because it

0:03:01.813 --> 0:03:05.693
<v Speaker 2>follows on from this. Among the billionaires who have been

0:03:06.293 --> 0:03:11.853
<v Speaker 2>turning and supporting Trump are Silicon Valley investor David Sachs,

0:03:12.613 --> 0:03:16.453
<v Speaker 2>who posted on X that there is now only one

0:03:16.493 --> 0:03:19.813
<v Speaker 2>issue in this election, whether the American people will stand

0:03:19.853 --> 0:03:24.093
<v Speaker 2>for the USA becoming a banana republic. And he's right

0:03:24.133 --> 0:03:28.493
<v Speaker 2>on target, over and above what matters about Trump, That's

0:03:28.573 --> 0:03:32.693
<v Speaker 2>the most important thing. On June sixth, mister Sachs and

0:03:32.773 --> 0:03:36.533
<v Speaker 2>fellow investor Cheamus I don't know how to pronounce his

0:03:36.573 --> 0:03:40.373
<v Speaker 2>second name, are planning to host a fundraiser for Trump

0:03:40.453 --> 0:03:44.453
<v Speaker 2>in San Francisco. Attendees are reportedly being asked to contribute

0:03:44.573 --> 0:03:50.613
<v Speaker 2>as much as three hundred thousand dollars each. Now, while

0:03:50.613 --> 0:03:53.093
<v Speaker 2>I was while I was working, my phone came up

0:03:53.133 --> 0:03:59.653
<v Speaker 2>with an X release that fundraiser had sold out not

0:03:59.773 --> 0:04:02.973
<v Speaker 2>just for three hundred thousand an individual, but for five

0:04:03.053 --> 0:04:06.613
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand four a couple, and they expect during the

0:04:06.653 --> 0:04:11.013
<v Speaker 2>course of the function to raise many many more millions.

0:04:11.413 --> 0:04:14.693
<v Speaker 2>Now the list of billionaires who are racing to his

0:04:14.813 --> 0:04:19.213
<v Speaker 2>support is shocking a lot of people because, especially when

0:04:19.213 --> 0:04:23.253
<v Speaker 2>it comes to Silicon Valley, because they're turning in their

0:04:23.333 --> 0:04:28.293
<v Speaker 2>droves because they realize finally that they were backing the

0:04:28.293 --> 0:04:31.493
<v Speaker 2>wrong horse all along. Now there's another article I want

0:04:31.493 --> 0:04:33.813
<v Speaker 2>to make a quick reference to, and and it's sort

0:04:33.813 --> 0:04:37.693
<v Speaker 2>of personal, and it's a bit lighting and in its

0:04:37.693 --> 0:04:41.333
<v Speaker 2>tone for this simple reason. From a site by James

0:04:41.333 --> 0:04:45.413
<v Speaker 2>Howard Kunstler. It's almost as if the principles, the prosecutors,

0:04:45.413 --> 0:04:48.613
<v Speaker 2>and the judge were performing for their political audience with

0:04:48.733 --> 0:04:52.253
<v Speaker 2>a wink and a nod and a stage whisper. Watch

0:04:52.413 --> 0:04:56.893
<v Speaker 2>this as they ignore yet another fundamental element of American

0:04:56.973 --> 0:05:01.453
<v Speaker 2>due process. The ninnies of Biden world seem to not

0:05:01.613 --> 0:05:04.853
<v Speaker 2>understand that by subjecting mister Trump to a kangaroo court,

0:05:05.413 --> 0:05:08.213
<v Speaker 2>they've made him the kind of outdoor that Americans revere

0:05:08.413 --> 0:05:11.973
<v Speaker 2>above every other archetypal hero. I just got to say

0:05:11.973 --> 0:05:14.413
<v Speaker 2>here at this point, the first hero in my life

0:05:14.813 --> 0:05:18.293
<v Speaker 2>was Robin Hood. He is the new Robin Hood, the

0:05:18.373 --> 0:05:22.493
<v Speaker 2>people's outlaw, with Joe Biden relegated as the wicked sir guy,

0:05:22.573 --> 0:05:26.013
<v Speaker 2>of Gisbon, master of foul play, and servant of the

0:05:26.093 --> 0:05:30.973
<v Speaker 2>evil Regent Prince John in Braggan's Barack Obama. The galvanizing

0:05:31.013 --> 0:05:33.493
<v Speaker 2>moment of this melodrama was not the verdict of the

0:05:33.613 --> 0:05:38.573
<v Speaker 2>judge one Merchant's Kangaroo Corral of a Court, but the

0:05:38.573 --> 0:05:41.573
<v Speaker 2>next day in the White House, when Joe Biden was

0:05:41.613 --> 0:05:45.093
<v Speaker 2>asked to comment on it, as he shuffled away from

0:05:45.133 --> 0:05:50.773
<v Speaker 2>the podium, halted, turned and smirked silently at the cameras,

0:05:51.293 --> 0:05:55.613
<v Speaker 2>a gesture that is sure to live in infamy. If

0:05:55.653 --> 0:05:57.413
<v Speaker 2>you didn't see that, you need to if you ever

0:05:57.413 --> 0:06:00.653
<v Speaker 2>get a chance, because it's just picture has a million words.

0:06:01.213 --> 0:06:03.093
<v Speaker 2>The fund should really kick in when the judge gets

0:06:03.093 --> 0:06:06.213
<v Speaker 2>to sentenced Trump the outlaw on July eleven, a few

0:06:06.253 --> 0:06:09.573
<v Speaker 2>days before the Republican Convention, et cetera, et cetera. Now,

0:06:09.693 --> 0:06:13.613
<v Speaker 2>in a sane world, of course, the US Supreme Court

0:06:13.653 --> 0:06:18.373
<v Speaker 2>would be entreated to adjudicate this gross insult to due process,

0:06:18.733 --> 0:06:22.933
<v Speaker 2>as spelled out in Section one of the fourteenth Amendment.

0:06:23.333 --> 0:06:25.253
<v Speaker 2>And this is where I'm going to terminate it in

0:06:25.333 --> 0:06:29.613
<v Speaker 2>a second, because this is just one example, but it's

0:06:29.653 --> 0:06:32.933
<v Speaker 2>a prime example of the corruption of the court here

0:06:33.053 --> 0:06:38.613
<v Speaker 2>is Section one of the Fourteenth Amendment. No State shall

0:06:38.613 --> 0:06:42.653
<v Speaker 2>make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges

0:06:42.853 --> 0:06:46.973
<v Speaker 2>or immunities of citizens of the United States. Nor shall

0:06:47.013 --> 0:06:50.813
<v Speaker 2>any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property

0:06:51.093 --> 0:06:54.613
<v Speaker 2>with our due process of law, nor deny to any

0:06:54.693 --> 0:06:59.053
<v Speaker 2>person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

0:06:59.413 --> 0:07:01.053
<v Speaker 2>Which you might have noticed that this is not a

0:07:01.133 --> 0:07:04.333
<v Speaker 2>sane world, at least not these days. Now. The point

0:07:04.373 --> 0:07:08.693
<v Speaker 2>being is the prosecution and the judge work together to

0:07:08.893 --> 0:07:12.453
<v Speaker 2>smash Section one of the fourteenth Amendment. And that's only

0:07:12.493 --> 0:07:18.133
<v Speaker 2>one example corruption beyond belief. Now in a moment, Oliver Hartwitch,

0:07:26.333 --> 0:07:29.133
<v Speaker 2>now some words from a very happy customer of wet

0:07:29.133 --> 0:07:32.733
<v Speaker 2>and forget on window which I purchased some window Witch recently,

0:07:32.773 --> 0:07:35.133
<v Speaker 2>and I'm thrilled with the product. I cleaned the ground

0:07:35.213 --> 0:07:38.413
<v Speaker 2>level of our home, the big conservatory and the glass

0:07:38.453 --> 0:07:43.493
<v Speaker 2>balustrades in about forty five minutes, nothing short of brilliant results.

0:07:43.613 --> 0:07:47.333
<v Speaker 2>Yet's another happy customer. And why are we surprised? Window

0:07:47.373 --> 0:07:50.813
<v Speaker 2>which exterior glass cleaner is the Bears window cleaner? Ever

0:07:51.133 --> 0:07:53.693
<v Speaker 2>it is streak free, no need to squeegee ever again

0:07:53.973 --> 0:07:57.653
<v Speaker 2>because of the invisible liquid squeegee window which is your

0:07:57.693 --> 0:08:00.893
<v Speaker 2>concentrate and garden sprayer all in one window which is

0:08:00.933 --> 0:08:04.973
<v Speaker 2>a combination of smart surfucants that dissolve crime and window

0:08:05.013 --> 0:08:08.213
<v Speaker 2>which has a unique formula that contains citrate water so

0:08:08.373 --> 0:08:12.333
<v Speaker 2>ofteners and high performance additives to sheet water from the window,

0:08:12.613 --> 0:08:16.813
<v Speaker 2>eliminating water spotting. So help yourself. Window Witch from wet

0:08:16.853 --> 0:08:22.573
<v Speaker 2>and Forget over twenty company standalone stores nationwide Wetinforget dot

0:08:22.613 --> 0:08:24.533
<v Speaker 2>co dot NZ or you can call them on a

0:08:24.533 --> 0:08:28.213
<v Speaker 2>weight hundred and three zero three thousand window Witch from

0:08:28.373 --> 0:08:29.133
<v Speaker 2>wet and Forget.

0:08:29.893 --> 0:08:31.053
<v Speaker 1>Laighton Smith.

0:08:36.893 --> 0:08:40.933
<v Speaker 2>Oliver Hartwich is the executive director of the New Zealand Initiative.

0:08:40.973 --> 0:08:43.693
<v Speaker 2>He's been on the podcast on a number of occasions

0:08:43.693 --> 0:08:46.773
<v Speaker 2>over the years and it's always a pleasure to say

0:08:47.573 --> 0:08:50.453
<v Speaker 2>thank you if you're agreeing to discuss the budget with

0:08:50.573 --> 0:08:55.053
<v Speaker 2>us and other matters, because this conversation won't be restricted

0:08:55.253 --> 0:08:59.933
<v Speaker 2>just to the budget, but Oliver from your own perspective

0:09:00.213 --> 0:09:04.373
<v Speaker 2>and or from the Initiative's perspective collectively, if you want,

0:09:05.213 --> 0:09:08.093
<v Speaker 2>what is your overall take on this budget?

0:09:08.573 --> 0:09:10.933
<v Speaker 3>But first of all, lighton. Great to be with you again.

0:09:11.293 --> 0:09:13.613
<v Speaker 3>Always a pleasure to talk to you. And as for

0:09:13.693 --> 0:09:17.813
<v Speaker 3>the budget, well, I wasn't disappointed, but that was only

0:09:17.813 --> 0:09:23.213
<v Speaker 3>because I didn't have high expectations. The budget was disappointing,

0:09:23.253 --> 0:09:26.253
<v Speaker 3>perhaps in one way, until we get back to twenty

0:09:26.413 --> 0:09:30.573
<v Speaker 3>nineteen spending levels. Remember that was Grant Robertson's well being budget.

0:09:31.133 --> 0:09:33.973
<v Speaker 3>This budget now reveals we'll have to wait until twenty

0:09:34.213 --> 0:09:37.773
<v Speaker 3>thirty eight, and I think that sums up this budget

0:09:37.853 --> 0:09:40.893
<v Speaker 3>in a nutshell. It is I would say, not very ambitious,

0:09:41.733 --> 0:09:45.533
<v Speaker 3>which is also perhaps a bit disappointing if you consider

0:09:45.533 --> 0:09:48.173
<v Speaker 3>that this is, of course the new government's first budget,

0:09:48.213 --> 0:09:51.173
<v Speaker 3>and usually first budgets are the most ambitious of them all,

0:09:51.653 --> 0:09:54.373
<v Speaker 3>because that's when they still think they have a mandate

0:09:54.413 --> 0:09:56.293
<v Speaker 3>to be a bit more radical, to try a few

0:09:56.293 --> 0:09:59.653
<v Speaker 3>more things, and then usually governments actually lose that ambition

0:09:59.773 --> 0:10:03.333
<v Speaker 3>gradually over the years. So for a first budget, I

0:10:03.493 --> 0:10:06.493
<v Speaker 3>would have liked to see a bit more ambition to

0:10:06.533 --> 0:10:09.973
<v Speaker 3>bring spending levels back underc because right now they aren't.

0:10:10.373 --> 0:10:13.733
<v Speaker 2>You've actually introduced something that I wasn't anticipating for a while,

0:10:14.133 --> 0:10:17.213
<v Speaker 2>so now I will park it just for the minute.

0:10:17.813 --> 0:10:22.373
<v Speaker 2>But where would you suggest they could have curbed the

0:10:22.973 --> 0:10:26.173
<v Speaker 2>ambitions that they that they are exercising well.

0:10:26.213 --> 0:10:29.493
<v Speaker 3>The thing is, if you just go back five years

0:10:29.533 --> 0:10:33.813
<v Speaker 3>to that twenty nineteen Well Being Budget, that was when

0:10:33.893 --> 0:10:37.133
<v Speaker 3>Jasinda Adern and Grant Robertson introduced their new vision for

0:10:37.173 --> 0:10:41.093
<v Speaker 3>fiscal policy, and spending in that Well Being Budget was

0:10:41.253 --> 0:10:45.453
<v Speaker 3>about twenty nine percent of GDP and it was celebrated

0:10:45.573 --> 0:10:49.693
<v Speaker 3>as something progressive and ambitious from a kind of progressive

0:10:49.733 --> 0:10:54.413
<v Speaker 3>side of politics perspective, and nobody would have accused Adirn

0:10:54.493 --> 0:10:57.933
<v Speaker 3>and Robertson of being driven by austerity or by the

0:10:57.933 --> 0:11:01.773
<v Speaker 3>wish to slash government spending. We now have a government

0:11:01.813 --> 0:11:06.053
<v Speaker 3>budget delivered by a National led government that promises to

0:11:06.053 --> 0:11:09.093
<v Speaker 3>spend thirty three percent of GDP, and yet people are

0:11:09.093 --> 0:11:12.813
<v Speaker 3>going crazy over how austerity driven this budget is, when

0:11:12.853 --> 0:11:15.773
<v Speaker 3>in fact they're spending four percent of GDP more than

0:11:15.813 --> 0:11:18.813
<v Speaker 3>the Adern government did in their first Well Being budget.

0:11:19.373 --> 0:11:23.173
<v Speaker 3>And that's what I find astonishing. Actually, So when Adurn

0:11:23.253 --> 0:11:26.013
<v Speaker 3>spends twenty nine percent, people think this is really generous,

0:11:26.493 --> 0:11:29.213
<v Speaker 3>and when Nicola Willis spends thirty three percent, people say

0:11:29.213 --> 0:11:32.973
<v Speaker 3>this is actually quite austere. And what I would have

0:11:33.053 --> 0:11:35.853
<v Speaker 3>liked to see in this budget now is actually a

0:11:35.893 --> 0:11:40.333
<v Speaker 3>pathway back to where we were before overd and ideally

0:11:40.453 --> 0:11:43.133
<v Speaker 3>where we were in twenty seventeen before Adurn took over.

0:11:43.253 --> 0:11:49.213
<v Speaker 3>But the pathway to that physical normality is exceedingly long.

0:11:49.373 --> 0:11:51.933
<v Speaker 3>So if you have to wait fourteen years just to

0:11:51.973 --> 0:11:54.253
<v Speaker 3>go back to where we were in twenty nineteen, I

0:11:54.293 --> 0:11:56.933
<v Speaker 3>don't think that is very ambitious. The other thing I

0:11:56.973 --> 0:12:00.733
<v Speaker 3>would just mention is actually we have seen enormous spending

0:12:00.773 --> 0:12:03.733
<v Speaker 3>increases over the last few years. We just looked into

0:12:03.773 --> 0:12:07.333
<v Speaker 3>them the other day and found that in twenty nineteen

0:12:08.333 --> 0:12:11.173
<v Speaker 3>we of course projected where we would be today, and

0:12:11.213 --> 0:12:14.333
<v Speaker 3>so we could actually compare these figures now and realize that,

0:12:14.733 --> 0:12:17.813
<v Speaker 3>for example, in health, we are currently spending eight billion

0:12:17.853 --> 0:12:22.093
<v Speaker 3>dollars more then we would have anticipated just five years ago.

0:12:22.773 --> 0:12:26.293
<v Speaker 3>And then you ask yourself, okay, so we're spending eight

0:12:26.333 --> 0:12:29.493
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars more in health even compared to what we

0:12:29.573 --> 0:12:32.213
<v Speaker 3>thought we would, And yet where is all of that

0:12:32.373 --> 0:12:35.213
<v Speaker 3>money and what has it achieved? Because I haven't actually

0:12:35.213 --> 0:12:39.133
<v Speaker 3>seen any great improvements in health delivery. What we have

0:12:39.253 --> 0:12:42.493
<v Speaker 3>seen is of course a massive reorganization of the health sector,

0:12:42.813 --> 0:12:45.093
<v Speaker 3>where we got ready for DHBs, where we created a

0:12:45.133 --> 0:12:48.893
<v Speaker 3>new our Health authority, where we instituted a lot new

0:12:49.293 --> 0:12:52.733
<v Speaker 3>kind of organizational structures without actually seeing any results. So

0:12:52.773 --> 0:12:54.653
<v Speaker 3>if you're asking where I would have liked to see

0:12:55.093 --> 0:12:57.893
<v Speaker 3>an emphasis in this budget is actually trying to curb

0:12:58.053 --> 0:13:01.413
<v Speaker 3>all of these structures, all of this spending that doesn't

0:13:01.453 --> 0:13:04.933
<v Speaker 3>yield any results, and in doing so then point a

0:13:05.013 --> 0:13:07.453
<v Speaker 3>clearer pathway back to physical normality.

0:13:07.613 --> 0:13:12.333
<v Speaker 2>So the obviously question is why didn't they do it.

0:13:14.013 --> 0:13:16.973
<v Speaker 3>Well? And the obvious answer is because it's totally hard,

0:13:17.133 --> 0:13:21.653
<v Speaker 3>because you're coming from a perspective where the budget is broken,

0:13:21.733 --> 0:13:24.733
<v Speaker 3>and not because of their own faults, but because of

0:13:24.813 --> 0:13:27.733
<v Speaker 3>everything that happened in the six years prior so. The

0:13:27.733 --> 0:13:30.853
<v Speaker 3>previous government really tested the limits of spending to destruction.

0:13:31.413 --> 0:13:34.933
<v Speaker 3>They created an almighty mess in fiscal policy. The left

0:13:34.973 --> 0:13:38.773
<v Speaker 3>a lot of pistol cliffs in the budget, meaning they

0:13:39.293 --> 0:13:41.773
<v Speaker 3>basically said we're going to fund stuff, but only really

0:13:41.813 --> 0:13:44.053
<v Speaker 3>funded them for the next year or two, and so

0:13:44.093 --> 0:13:48.413
<v Speaker 3>they left fiscal holes everywhere across government policy for the

0:13:48.453 --> 0:13:51.333
<v Speaker 3>new government to clean up. So, coming into that situation

0:13:51.413 --> 0:13:55.133
<v Speaker 3>now and with just a year actually in government, it

0:13:55.213 --> 0:13:57.373
<v Speaker 3>is difficult for any government to turn this around. And

0:13:57.533 --> 0:14:00.533
<v Speaker 3>I understand that a lot of the changes required will

0:14:00.573 --> 0:14:03.693
<v Speaker 3>also take years to think welfare spending. The previous government

0:14:04.253 --> 0:14:08.493
<v Speaker 3>did not actually enforce welfare rules, eligibility rules, and we

0:14:08.613 --> 0:14:11.493
<v Speaker 3>filled the welfare roles with people who shouldn't have been there.

0:14:12.213 --> 0:14:15.293
<v Speaker 3>That is enormously costly, and to turn that around will

0:14:15.293 --> 0:14:17.653
<v Speaker 3>take a long time. You probably can't do that overnight.

0:14:18.413 --> 0:14:20.933
<v Speaker 3>I mean, for all the things done over six years,

0:14:20.933 --> 0:14:22.733
<v Speaker 3>you can't expect them to fix it in a couple

0:14:22.733 --> 0:14:25.093
<v Speaker 3>of months. But I would have still liked to see

0:14:25.093 --> 0:14:28.653
<v Speaker 3>a clearer pathway out of this mess and a clearer

0:14:28.693 --> 0:14:31.133
<v Speaker 3>ambition to saying, look, we really want to go back

0:14:31.173 --> 0:14:32.813
<v Speaker 3>to where we once were as a country.

0:14:33.653 --> 0:14:39.333
<v Speaker 2>Okay, then let me ask you a reverse question. What

0:14:39.893 --> 0:14:42.333
<v Speaker 2>would you would like to have seen done? What could

0:14:42.413 --> 0:14:46.253
<v Speaker 2>they have done to head back in that direction that

0:14:46.333 --> 0:14:48.413
<v Speaker 2>would have won them plowed it well?

0:14:48.453 --> 0:14:51.613
<v Speaker 3>There are small line items in the budget where you

0:14:51.653 --> 0:14:55.173
<v Speaker 3>can see that they probably didn't really go through the

0:14:55.173 --> 0:14:59.133
<v Speaker 3>budget with a fine tooth code. For example, subsidies for

0:14:59.173 --> 0:15:02.493
<v Speaker 3>the film industry. They are still running over forty million dollars.

0:15:02.533 --> 0:15:04.813
<v Speaker 3>Now you ask yourself, is that really something that you

0:15:04.933 --> 0:15:05.453
<v Speaker 3>want to do?

0:15:05.973 --> 0:15:06.333
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:15:06.413 --> 0:15:09.373
<v Speaker 3>The rest of the budget is deep in the I

0:15:09.413 --> 0:15:11.693
<v Speaker 3>would have actually thought no, you can probably go a

0:15:11.733 --> 0:15:15.373
<v Speaker 3>bit harder on that. Next thing is they have issued

0:15:15.573 --> 0:15:18.813
<v Speaker 3>a blank target to government departments to cut between six

0:15:18.813 --> 0:15:21.413
<v Speaker 3>and a half and seven and a half percent spending,

0:15:21.413 --> 0:15:25.453
<v Speaker 3>and we have seen initial cuts of course to public

0:15:25.453 --> 0:15:29.293
<v Speaker 3>sector employment public service employment to be more specific. Well,

0:15:29.493 --> 0:15:31.453
<v Speaker 3>I think this could go a lot further, because we

0:15:31.573 --> 0:15:35.053
<v Speaker 3>know we started from forty seven thousand public servants in

0:15:35.133 --> 0:15:37.453
<v Speaker 3>twenty seventeen. We are now at a level of about

0:15:37.493 --> 0:15:41.253
<v Speaker 3>sixty five thousand. They cut about two or maybe three thousand,

0:15:41.733 --> 0:15:43.533
<v Speaker 3>but there's a long way to go on until we

0:15:43.613 --> 0:15:45.333
<v Speaker 3>go back to the levels we previously had.

0:15:46.733 --> 0:15:51.773
<v Speaker 2>Was it wise? I wonder to not take the big leap,

0:15:51.933 --> 0:15:58.013
<v Speaker 2>but the small step at this particular point, because well,

0:15:58.013 --> 0:16:00.293
<v Speaker 2>the best reason I can suggest for it is that

0:16:00.333 --> 0:16:05.053
<v Speaker 2>by making all of those people unemployed, it would create

0:16:05.093 --> 0:16:09.573
<v Speaker 2>an extra cost in welfare and put far too many

0:16:09.573 --> 0:16:17.013
<v Speaker 2>people on the unemployment list in a country that is

0:16:18.133 --> 0:16:19.853
<v Speaker 2>not really creating jobs.

0:16:21.413 --> 0:16:24.373
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't think so for a moment. And I mean,

0:16:24.413 --> 0:16:27.453
<v Speaker 3>you wouldn't seriously suggest that all those people now employed

0:16:27.453 --> 0:16:30.653
<v Speaker 3>by the public service in Wellington are so poorly qualified

0:16:30.653 --> 0:16:32.453
<v Speaker 3>that they wouldn't find jobs elsewhere, would you.

0:16:32.613 --> 0:16:35.053
<v Speaker 2>Well, if I was going to be honest, I'd say

0:16:35.093 --> 0:16:38.413
<v Speaker 2>that I'd question how employable they were, otherwise they might

0:16:38.453 --> 0:16:40.253
<v Speaker 2>not be in the public service.

0:16:40.933 --> 0:16:45.333
<v Speaker 3>There was a bit tongue in cheek anyway, but seriously,

0:16:46.173 --> 0:16:49.013
<v Speaker 3>there is no justification for employing that many people here

0:16:49.013 --> 0:16:51.413
<v Speaker 3>in Wellington. I mean, you look at individual departments and

0:16:51.453 --> 0:16:53.613
<v Speaker 3>you can see how much they have ballooned. My favorite

0:16:53.613 --> 0:16:57.733
<v Speaker 3>example is still the Ministry of Education that started its

0:16:57.813 --> 0:17:01.093
<v Speaker 3>life after the Department of Education in the early two

0:17:01.093 --> 0:17:04.453
<v Speaker 3>thousands on about four hundred people, and it's gone up

0:17:04.493 --> 0:17:06.893
<v Speaker 3>to about four and a half thousand. So we have

0:17:07.013 --> 0:17:10.173
<v Speaker 3>more bureaucrats in that ministry that we have schools in

0:17:10.213 --> 0:17:12.653
<v Speaker 3>the country. And I think you would probably find it

0:17:12.693 --> 0:17:14.813
<v Speaker 3>easy to cut back a little bit there.

0:17:15.093 --> 0:17:18.173
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I mentioned you took took us somewhere that I

0:17:18.213 --> 0:17:20.213
<v Speaker 2>wasn't going to go for a bit. The date of

0:17:20.733 --> 0:17:24.933
<v Speaker 2>thirty eight, twenty thirty eight, The date that I saw

0:17:24.973 --> 0:17:30.213
<v Speaker 2>that caught my attention and the really frustrated me was

0:17:30.773 --> 0:17:33.493
<v Speaker 2>twenty forty. That figgure has been mentioned in a couple

0:17:33.493 --> 0:17:38.533
<v Speaker 2>of opinion pieces. Twenty forty is when we are basically

0:17:38.573 --> 0:17:44.773
<v Speaker 2>looking for the country to reappear on the international scene

0:17:44.813 --> 0:17:50.693
<v Speaker 2>at any at any strength or level. Of strength twenty forty. Well,

0:17:50.773 --> 0:17:54.093
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned fourteen years, So fourteen or fifteen years from now,

0:17:54.413 --> 0:17:57.573
<v Speaker 2>that's what we're aiming at. And I couldn't agree with

0:17:57.613 --> 0:18:00.813
<v Speaker 2>you more that if we're looking that far ahead before

0:18:00.813 --> 0:18:05.133
<v Speaker 2>we can expect any real improvements. Then I repeat something

0:18:05.133 --> 0:18:09.293
<v Speaker 2>that somebody said to me just recently in answer to

0:18:09.293 --> 0:18:12.013
<v Speaker 2>a question. I said, how bad is it? And the

0:18:12.133 --> 0:18:17.693
<v Speaker 2>answer was very very, very bad or words that meant

0:18:17.733 --> 0:18:22.533
<v Speaker 2>the same. I don't remember exactly the quote, but extremely

0:18:22.733 --> 0:18:24.333
<v Speaker 2>bad was the state of the.

0:18:24.293 --> 0:18:28.173
<v Speaker 3>Country, Yes, and I would agree with that. I also

0:18:28.253 --> 0:18:31.693
<v Speaker 3>think actually twenty forty or thirty eight, as shocking as

0:18:31.693 --> 0:18:34.853
<v Speaker 3>it seems, is a realistic prospect for getting things back

0:18:34.933 --> 0:18:38.893
<v Speaker 3>under control, because in some of our areas of government

0:18:38.933 --> 0:18:43.053
<v Speaker 3>policy or problems are so enormous that it will take

0:18:43.093 --> 0:18:46.613
<v Speaker 3>a long long time to fix them. Again, talk about education.

0:18:47.253 --> 0:18:50.493
<v Speaker 3>So we have an education system that is currently plagued

0:18:50.533 --> 0:18:53.973
<v Speaker 3>by low attendance rates. So only forty six percent of

0:18:54.013 --> 0:18:58.253
<v Speaker 3>our school students are now attending school regularly, meaning at

0:18:58.333 --> 0:19:01.253
<v Speaker 3>least ninety percent of the time. We have seen our

0:19:01.293 --> 0:19:06.573
<v Speaker 3>results in international studies go back over decades. So think

0:19:06.613 --> 0:19:12.533
<v Speaker 3>of PISA and Timson Pearls that's going backwards. And we

0:19:12.693 --> 0:19:16.733
<v Speaker 3>now also have a new generation of teachers recently revealed

0:19:16.733 --> 0:19:18.533
<v Speaker 3>in a study by the ends at IR in New

0:19:18.613 --> 0:19:23.613
<v Speaker 3>Zealand Institute of Economic Research, where a huge proportion of

0:19:23.653 --> 0:19:26.973
<v Speaker 3>our young teachers have actually failed maths in English in

0:19:27.053 --> 0:19:31.133
<v Speaker 3>their own school time. So if you want to rebuild

0:19:31.173 --> 0:19:35.333
<v Speaker 3>a system with that kind of personnel, it's going to

0:19:35.373 --> 0:19:38.733
<v Speaker 3>be hard because we have plenty of teachers now in

0:19:38.773 --> 0:19:40.733
<v Speaker 3>our schools who have probably never seen what a good

0:19:40.733 --> 0:19:44.013
<v Speaker 3>school looks like, not even in their own experience. So

0:19:44.813 --> 0:19:47.493
<v Speaker 3>all of these reforms that we're doing now that my

0:19:47.613 --> 0:19:50.133
<v Speaker 3>colleague Michael Johnson is working on now as chair of

0:19:50.373 --> 0:19:53.973
<v Speaker 3>Erica Stanford's Ministerial Advisory Group, they are the right things

0:19:54.053 --> 0:19:57.893
<v Speaker 3>to do, except you can't expect results overnight. They will

0:19:57.933 --> 0:20:01.613
<v Speaker 3>take years to work their way through the system. I'm

0:20:01.653 --> 0:20:03.773
<v Speaker 3>not saying it will take until twenty forty, but you

0:20:03.813 --> 0:20:06.813
<v Speaker 3>can't expect an overnight improvement in our education results. That

0:20:06.933 --> 0:20:10.293
<v Speaker 3>will take a long time because the system is fundamentally broken.

0:20:12.693 --> 0:20:15.173
<v Speaker 2>Which part of it is fundamentally broken the teaching?

0:20:15.893 --> 0:20:18.413
<v Speaker 3>Do you say which part is fundamentally broken? I would

0:20:18.493 --> 0:20:23.053
<v Speaker 3>say which part isn't Because practically everything in our education

0:20:23.213 --> 0:20:26.733
<v Speaker 3>system is not fit for purpose. You look at some

0:20:27.253 --> 0:20:31.333
<v Speaker 3>teacher training, well, we know actually from our own research

0:20:31.373 --> 0:20:34.333
<v Speaker 3>here the Initiative, that our young teachers do not get

0:20:34.333 --> 0:20:37.173
<v Speaker 3>the training that would actually prepare them for standing in

0:20:37.173 --> 0:20:40.133
<v Speaker 3>front of a classroom. You look at the way we're

0:20:40.173 --> 0:20:43.613
<v Speaker 3>teaching literacy and numeracy, and we know again from our

0:20:43.653 --> 0:20:46.293
<v Speaker 3>own research that for decades we've been going in the

0:20:46.333 --> 0:20:51.253
<v Speaker 3>wrong direction on both and we now have about forty

0:20:51.333 --> 0:20:55.013
<v Speaker 3>to fifty percent of school leavers leaving school functionally illiterate

0:20:55.013 --> 0:20:58.093
<v Speaker 3>and enumerate. What else of the system is not working? Well,

0:20:57.973 --> 0:21:01.093
<v Speaker 3>we could talk about what students do after leaving school.

0:21:01.893 --> 0:21:05.813
<v Speaker 3>Our vocational education system is broken after the forced amalgamation

0:21:05.893 --> 0:21:08.013
<v Speaker 3>of the politics into poking on and what it is

0:21:08.013 --> 0:21:10.493
<v Speaker 3>ours that has been We could then talk about a

0:21:10.613 --> 0:21:14.013
<v Speaker 3>university system, and again we hosted a symposium just a

0:21:14.013 --> 0:21:16.613
<v Speaker 3>few weeks ago at the Initiative we talked about the

0:21:16.653 --> 0:21:19.773
<v Speaker 3>state of university education New Zealand, and it is broken

0:21:19.813 --> 0:21:23.013
<v Speaker 3>on practically every level. You talk about free speech, academic freedom,

0:21:23.053 --> 0:21:27.173
<v Speaker 3>and universities. You talk about the financial financial situation of universities.

0:21:28.373 --> 0:21:31.293
<v Speaker 3>It is not a pretty picture. So no matter what

0:21:31.493 --> 0:21:34.333
<v Speaker 3>aspect of the education system you're looking at. It is

0:21:34.453 --> 0:21:36.733
<v Speaker 3>under enormous pressure and it will take a long time

0:21:36.773 --> 0:21:37.333
<v Speaker 3>to fix it.

0:21:37.453 --> 0:21:40.253
<v Speaker 2>You didn't actually use the word curriculum.

0:21:40.013 --> 0:21:42.093
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's probably because I forgot to mention it, because

0:21:42.093 --> 0:21:43.733
<v Speaker 3>there's so many other things that are wrong. I mean,

0:21:43.773 --> 0:21:48.133
<v Speaker 3>the curriculum is another field which is fundamentally broken because actually,

0:21:48.213 --> 0:21:50.413
<v Speaker 3>let's face it, we don't really have a proper curriculum

0:21:50.533 --> 0:21:54.213
<v Speaker 3>right now. It is a flimsy document that doesn't actually

0:21:54.213 --> 0:21:57.293
<v Speaker 3>give you any proper guidance on what students are supposed

0:21:57.293 --> 0:22:00.293
<v Speaker 3>to learn our school. And the flip side of the curriculum,

0:22:00.293 --> 0:22:02.733
<v Speaker 3>of course, is the assessment system that also needs to

0:22:02.733 --> 0:22:05.253
<v Speaker 3>be reformed, because at the moment, the assessment system is

0:22:05.293 --> 0:22:09.493
<v Speaker 3>geared towards ensuring that every students enough points to get

0:22:09.493 --> 0:22:12.413
<v Speaker 3>a certificate at the end, whether they learned anything before

0:22:12.533 --> 0:22:15.533
<v Speaker 3>or not. I mean, all of these areas are areas

0:22:15.653 --> 0:22:19.293
<v Speaker 3>of reform right now. So Erica Stanford is doing exactly

0:22:19.333 --> 0:22:23.573
<v Speaker 3>the right things across the whole board of education problems.

0:22:24.373 --> 0:22:27.453
<v Speaker 3>But even with the best efforts, we shouldn't expect miracles

0:22:27.453 --> 0:22:30.373
<v Speaker 3>from America Stanford. I'm a huge fan of Erica Stanford's work.

0:22:30.493 --> 0:22:32.813
<v Speaker 3>Don't get me wrong, and I think she's doing exactly

0:22:32.853 --> 0:22:34.613
<v Speaker 3>the right things. But I think it would be unfair

0:22:34.653 --> 0:22:37.333
<v Speaker 3>to measure her by successes that she would have had

0:22:37.333 --> 0:22:39.773
<v Speaker 3>in a year or two, because from where we are

0:22:39.813 --> 0:22:42.213
<v Speaker 3>coming from, this is going to be a very, very

0:22:42.373 --> 0:22:43.293
<v Speaker 3>long process.

0:22:43.613 --> 0:22:49.173
<v Speaker 2>I interviewed somebody last week in the podcast Militia Grisola

0:22:50.213 --> 0:22:53.933
<v Speaker 2>from a primary school in West Sydney. I was talking

0:22:53.933 --> 0:22:57.573
<v Speaker 2>with some people yesterday about it, and the comment I

0:22:57.613 --> 0:23:01.333
<v Speaker 2>got was how good she was, and they were very

0:23:01.453 --> 0:23:05.773
<v Speaker 2>enthusiastic about what she had to say. And then one

0:23:05.813 --> 0:23:08.813
<v Speaker 2>of them said, yeah, but it's all just come and sense,

0:23:08.893 --> 0:23:14.173
<v Speaker 2>isn't it. And that created another discussion about the lack

0:23:14.253 --> 0:23:17.733
<v Speaker 2>of common sense. Common sense is not common anymore, and

0:23:17.853 --> 0:23:22.653
<v Speaker 2>for so many of those students who become teachers, they

0:23:22.693 --> 0:23:26.213
<v Speaker 2>have no idea about basics and common sense lit alone

0:23:26.213 --> 0:23:28.453
<v Speaker 2>getting a decent enough of education be able to teach

0:23:28.493 --> 0:23:30.613
<v Speaker 2>the curriculum whatever it might.

0:23:30.693 --> 0:23:33.773
<v Speaker 3>That's right, that's right. And I listened to your interview

0:23:33.973 --> 0:23:36.973
<v Speaker 3>last week and I also came back with the same

0:23:37.013 --> 0:23:40.093
<v Speaker 3>impression that this is just common sense. She reminded me

0:23:40.213 --> 0:23:44.613
<v Speaker 3>very much of Katherine Berbertsing, another fantastic mistress. The head

0:23:44.653 --> 0:23:48.733
<v Speaker 3>of mikhaela School in London in Wembley, and for years,

0:23:48.733 --> 0:23:51.693
<v Speaker 3>of course Katherine Berbertsing has been on that mission to

0:23:51.813 --> 0:23:54.973
<v Speaker 3>introduce common sense back into the British education system with

0:23:55.253 --> 0:23:59.533
<v Speaker 3>enormously positive results. So it's probably now the best school

0:23:59.813 --> 0:24:02.853
<v Speaker 3>anywhere you can find in England, and it's based on

0:24:02.973 --> 0:24:06.373
<v Speaker 3>common sense, on actually teaching the basics and teaching them well,

0:24:07.333 --> 0:24:10.373
<v Speaker 3>i'll give you another exam. But we visited Ireland last

0:24:10.453 --> 0:24:12.613
<v Speaker 3>year with a delegation of the New Zealand Initiative and

0:24:12.693 --> 0:24:15.133
<v Speaker 3>we had a session with the Irish Education Ministry in

0:24:15.213 --> 0:24:19.533
<v Speaker 3>Dublin and they talked us through their basic strategies and

0:24:19.653 --> 0:24:22.253
<v Speaker 3>what they're trying to achieve. They taught us how they

0:24:22.293 --> 0:24:26.013
<v Speaker 3>measure success and how they're tracking their interventions, and you know,

0:24:26.493 --> 0:24:28.293
<v Speaker 3>we all sat there and thought, well, wouldn't it be

0:24:28.373 --> 0:24:30.693
<v Speaker 3>nice to hear something like that from our own education

0:24:30.813 --> 0:24:34.853
<v Speaker 3>ministry because there was none of this kind of modernist

0:24:34.933 --> 0:24:38.533
<v Speaker 3>nonsense that you often get, and none of the languages

0:24:38.573 --> 0:24:41.573
<v Speaker 3>that you wouldn't even understand because they sounds so sociological.

0:24:41.613 --> 0:24:43.893
<v Speaker 3>It was just good old common sense and trying to

0:24:43.933 --> 0:24:47.453
<v Speaker 3>make sure that their students get a decent education that

0:24:47.453 --> 0:24:49.853
<v Speaker 3>they learn how to read and write and do maths

0:24:49.893 --> 0:24:52.373
<v Speaker 3>and get a basic science education, and then tracking the

0:24:52.373 --> 0:24:55.533
<v Speaker 3>progress of their schools. It was just so refreshing to

0:24:55.613 --> 0:24:58.333
<v Speaker 3>hear that from a ministry because we haven't had that

0:24:58.493 --> 0:25:00.333
<v Speaker 3>kind of conversation with a ministry for years.

0:25:00.693 --> 0:25:04.493
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I want to stay with Militia Grizzuola just for

0:25:04.533 --> 0:25:07.733
<v Speaker 2>a moment longer. There are teachers who have no idea

0:25:08.373 --> 0:25:11.453
<v Speaker 2>about the way that she approaches things as a principal

0:25:11.493 --> 0:25:15.093
<v Speaker 2>of a school, but she outlines the way that she

0:25:15.293 --> 0:25:18.373
<v Speaker 2>trained some of those teachers that came to her school,

0:25:18.573 --> 0:25:20.933
<v Speaker 2>And the best part of it all, as far as

0:25:20.973 --> 0:25:22.853
<v Speaker 2>I was concerned, was right at the very end of

0:25:22.893 --> 0:25:26.053
<v Speaker 2>the discussion where she said the first thing she says

0:25:26.093 --> 0:25:28.773
<v Speaker 2>to a new teacher that arrives, sits them down and

0:25:28.853 --> 0:25:31.853
<v Speaker 2>talks to them and says, everything you learned at university,

0:25:31.973 --> 0:25:37.893
<v Speaker 2>forget it, and then retrains them. Famili, Do we not

0:25:38.133 --> 0:25:43.893
<v Speaker 2>just need a handful even of principles who are capable

0:25:43.893 --> 0:25:44.893
<v Speaker 2>of taking that approach.

0:25:45.653 --> 0:25:49.213
<v Speaker 3>Yes, we need these principles, and principles play a massive

0:25:49.333 --> 0:25:52.853
<v Speaker 3>role in our education system, but it shouldn't be up

0:25:52.893 --> 0:25:55.853
<v Speaker 3>to the principles to undo the damage done by university

0:25:55.933 --> 0:25:59.813
<v Speaker 3>education departments. I mean, ideally, you wouldn't want to have

0:25:59.813 --> 0:26:02.373
<v Speaker 3>any damage to correct in the first place, So we

0:26:02.493 --> 0:26:05.973
<v Speaker 3>should probably go back to proper teacher education as we

0:26:06.053 --> 0:26:08.573
<v Speaker 3>once had it. I mean today, when you look at

0:26:09.013 --> 0:26:13.693
<v Speaker 3>teacher education that happens predominantly at our universities, these teachers

0:26:13.733 --> 0:26:17.613
<v Speaker 3>are getting sociology lessons basically, but they're never really taught

0:26:17.653 --> 0:26:20.053
<v Speaker 3>practically what it means to stand in front of a classroom.

0:26:20.533 --> 0:26:23.293
<v Speaker 3>So we produced a report at the initiative last year

0:26:23.933 --> 0:26:26.853
<v Speaker 3>that was by my colleague Michael Johnston with his or

0:26:26.933 --> 0:26:29.973
<v Speaker 3>researcher Stephanie Martin. And Stephanie is a teacher herself, and

0:26:30.013 --> 0:26:33.133
<v Speaker 3>she writes up in that introductory chapter of the report,

0:26:33.453 --> 0:26:37.253
<v Speaker 3>which you can find on our website, her experience of

0:26:37.333 --> 0:26:40.093
<v Speaker 3>studying to become a teacher at the University of Auckland

0:26:40.373 --> 0:26:43.733
<v Speaker 3>and then realizing how useless that all education was once

0:26:43.773 --> 0:26:46.253
<v Speaker 3>she actually stood in front of first students for the

0:26:46.253 --> 0:26:49.053
<v Speaker 3>first time. So we've got a problem. It shouldn't be

0:26:49.093 --> 0:26:52.533
<v Speaker 3>actually left to the principles to undo the damage. Ideally

0:26:52.573 --> 0:26:55.293
<v Speaker 3>we would actually provide our teachers a decent education in

0:26:55.293 --> 0:26:55.973
<v Speaker 3>the first place.

0:26:56.133 --> 0:26:59.133
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but you've got to start somewhere and working in

0:26:59.173 --> 0:27:03.493
<v Speaker 2>reverse is probably going to get you the fastest result. Yeah.

0:27:03.533 --> 0:27:05.253
<v Speaker 3>Well, but what you can also do is, of course

0:27:05.293 --> 0:27:09.253
<v Speaker 3>you can establish an alternative teacher education system training system,

0:27:09.253 --> 0:27:12.413
<v Speaker 3>and we have some parts of that already operating in

0:27:12.453 --> 0:27:17.133
<v Speaker 3>the country. There is one training college in christ Church

0:27:17.173 --> 0:27:19.373
<v Speaker 3>that does it that way in cooperation with the schools

0:27:19.373 --> 0:27:23.213
<v Speaker 3>where the teacher's actually in practical experience. And from what

0:27:23.253 --> 0:27:26.373
<v Speaker 3>I've heard, a number of Auckland schools are now thinking

0:27:26.413 --> 0:27:30.173
<v Speaker 3>about pulling out of university teacher education by organizing their

0:27:30.213 --> 0:27:31.613
<v Speaker 3>own training courses.

0:27:32.893 --> 0:27:36.333
<v Speaker 2>That's the best news I've heard today. Education is something

0:27:36.413 --> 0:27:39.173
<v Speaker 2>we spend so much time on and yet and yet

0:27:39.613 --> 0:27:44.373
<v Speaker 2>the results of the old discussion and the nitpicking seems

0:27:44.373 --> 0:27:48.333
<v Speaker 2>to have got us nowhere to date. But your confidence

0:27:48.413 --> 0:27:52.453
<v Speaker 2>in the new minister, I think is probably quite valid

0:27:53.093 --> 0:27:55.733
<v Speaker 2>and I'm looking forward to those results.

0:27:56.973 --> 0:28:00.533
<v Speaker 3>Cars I'm optimistic, I would say, because I can see

0:28:00.533 --> 0:28:03.093
<v Speaker 3>it on a daily basis here in the office. My

0:28:03.173 --> 0:28:08.373
<v Speaker 3>colleague Michael Johnston chairs Erica Stanford's Minister Advisory Group, and

0:28:08.453 --> 0:28:09.773
<v Speaker 3>therefore every now and then I get a bit of

0:28:09.773 --> 0:28:13.133
<v Speaker 3>an insight into what's happening and the amount of reform

0:28:13.213 --> 0:28:15.773
<v Speaker 3>work they're doing, and I'm hugely impressed. It's the kind

0:28:15.813 --> 0:28:18.933
<v Speaker 3>of education reforms that for years we've only been talking

0:28:18.933 --> 0:28:21.653
<v Speaker 3>about and now they're happening. So for the first time,

0:28:21.693 --> 0:28:24.693
<v Speaker 3>really in twelve years of doing education, working at the initiative,

0:28:24.733 --> 0:28:25.733
<v Speaker 3>I'm really optimistic.

0:28:26.493 --> 0:28:29.853
<v Speaker 2>Let's look at some of the other aspects of the budget,

0:28:30.773 --> 0:28:34.053
<v Speaker 2>I think, just briefly, because it's had so much coverage already.

0:28:34.613 --> 0:28:37.973
<v Speaker 2>Tax changes. Is there anything worthwhile in the tax changes?

0:28:38.773 --> 0:28:42.493
<v Speaker 3>Oh, let's talk about this in parts. I mean, I

0:28:42.573 --> 0:28:46.373
<v Speaker 3>understand why the government went ahead with the tax cuts

0:28:46.413 --> 0:28:50.213
<v Speaker 3>simply for political reasons. I've had this discussion with ministers

0:28:50.213 --> 0:28:54.533
<v Speaker 3>and actually with the Prime Minister themselves, and I argued, actually,

0:28:54.573 --> 0:28:57.373
<v Speaker 3>you probably shouldn't look at text cuts while the budget

0:28:57.453 --> 0:29:00.093
<v Speaker 3>is in such a big structural deficit, because you only

0:29:00.133 --> 0:29:04.653
<v Speaker 3>make your pistal consolidation job harder for yourselves. And the

0:29:04.733 --> 0:29:08.733
<v Speaker 3>answer I always got from the government was, look, promises

0:29:08.853 --> 0:29:11.613
<v Speaker 3>when we campaigned, we now have to deliver because otherwise

0:29:11.613 --> 0:29:15.213
<v Speaker 3>we'll lose all our credibility or political credibility just half

0:29:15.213 --> 0:29:18.133
<v Speaker 3>a year into the job. And I understand that political

0:29:18.173 --> 0:29:22.573
<v Speaker 3>calculus to a degree. I would say though that I

0:29:22.573 --> 0:29:25.013
<v Speaker 3>think most people would be understanding if you told them, Look,

0:29:25.093 --> 0:29:27.693
<v Speaker 3>we just took over. We found all the physical cliffs

0:29:27.693 --> 0:29:30.853
<v Speaker 3>and physical rules, and yes we promised you tax belief,

0:29:30.933 --> 0:29:33.973
<v Speaker 3>but we found a situation that is much much worse

0:29:34.013 --> 0:29:36.893
<v Speaker 3>and even we anticipated, and therefore we can't deliver it

0:29:36.973 --> 0:29:39.493
<v Speaker 3>just yet. This will have to wait maybe until next

0:29:39.573 --> 0:29:41.933
<v Speaker 3>year or the year after. I think people would have

0:29:42.013 --> 0:29:45.933
<v Speaker 3>understood that. So that's the political side of things. On

0:29:45.973 --> 0:29:49.093
<v Speaker 3>the economic side of things, I think it's clearer. We

0:29:49.173 --> 0:29:53.533
<v Speaker 3>are running the second largest structural deficit in the developed world.

0:29:54.133 --> 0:29:57.133
<v Speaker 3>There's only one country that has a higher structural deficit

0:29:57.213 --> 0:29:59.693
<v Speaker 3>than us in that's the United States. There's a small

0:29:59.693 --> 0:30:02.013
<v Speaker 3>difference between New Zealand and the United States because the

0:30:02.093 --> 0:30:05.293
<v Speaker 3>United States can print US dollars and somehow the world

0:30:05.373 --> 0:30:08.693
<v Speaker 3>things that US dollars are still useful. Therefore they get

0:30:08.733 --> 0:30:13.853
<v Speaker 3>away with this fiscal perflicacy. When Easiland, the situation is different.

0:30:14.253 --> 0:30:16.693
<v Speaker 3>We can't get away with structural deficits. And I should

0:30:16.693 --> 0:30:20.453
<v Speaker 3>probably explain what structural deficits are. So basically, a structural

0:30:20.453 --> 0:30:22.453
<v Speaker 3>deficit is a deficit. Yet you would have in a

0:30:22.493 --> 0:30:25.493
<v Speaker 3>normal year, So when the economy is not particularly booming,

0:30:25.533 --> 0:30:28.413
<v Speaker 3>when it's not in particular in a particular recession, but

0:30:28.533 --> 0:30:32.053
<v Speaker 3>just in a normal year, whether your taxes and your

0:30:32.613 --> 0:30:35.693
<v Speaker 3>spending actually end up. And on that measure, we are

0:30:35.733 --> 0:30:40.053
<v Speaker 3>currently running a massive structural deficit, and that is just

0:30:40.093 --> 0:30:42.253
<v Speaker 3>not sustainable because it would mean that if you do

0:30:42.333 --> 0:30:45.813
<v Speaker 3>this long enough, the country will go broke. Therefore, I

0:30:45.813 --> 0:30:50.813
<v Speaker 3>would have prioritized consolidating the budget, consolidating our finances and

0:30:51.253 --> 0:30:55.973
<v Speaker 3>basically closing this fiscal deficit and the structural deficit before

0:30:56.093 --> 0:30:59.573
<v Speaker 3>even contemplating any text cuts. So that's one thing to

0:30:59.613 --> 0:31:02.853
<v Speaker 3>look out. There is another way of looking at it economically,

0:31:02.893 --> 0:31:06.413
<v Speaker 3>which again perhaps makes the government's case a bit more

0:31:06.733 --> 0:31:10.093
<v Speaker 3>and that is the text inaxation issue, because actually, let's

0:31:10.093 --> 0:31:12.813
<v Speaker 3>face it, what we got now wasn't even a real

0:31:12.893 --> 0:31:15.773
<v Speaker 3>tax cut in that sense. It was basically just restoring

0:31:16.053 --> 0:31:18.133
<v Speaker 3>the tax brackets to a state where they would have

0:31:18.133 --> 0:31:21.973
<v Speaker 3>been had they been adjusted to normal inflation. And that

0:31:22.173 --> 0:31:25.213
<v Speaker 3>I think makes good sense in principle, and I think

0:31:25.253 --> 0:31:28.373
<v Speaker 3>we should probably make this a general rule that every

0:31:28.453 --> 0:31:32.733
<v Speaker 3>year the tax brackets automatically get adjusted by say, the

0:31:32.733 --> 0:31:36.733
<v Speaker 3>consumer price index. And that would also make this less

0:31:36.733 --> 0:31:39.973
<v Speaker 3>political because everybody would know this is happening on an

0:31:40.013 --> 0:31:43.293
<v Speaker 3>annual basis, and every year we get them adjusted just

0:31:43.333 --> 0:31:45.973
<v Speaker 3>in line with inflation. So I think that would make

0:31:46.013 --> 0:31:47.973
<v Speaker 3>sense to actually move to such a system in the

0:31:47.973 --> 0:31:51.773
<v Speaker 3>long run, well in the medium term hopefully, But right

0:31:51.853 --> 0:31:56.093
<v Speaker 3>now I would have on balance come down to keeping

0:31:56.453 --> 0:31:58.813
<v Speaker 3>the tax brackets just for this year as they are

0:31:58.853 --> 0:32:01.853
<v Speaker 3>because of his Scoo. Situation is so dire and we

0:32:01.933 --> 0:32:05.453
<v Speaker 3>probably can't afford as if tax adjustments, even they are

0:32:05.453 --> 0:32:08.253
<v Speaker 3>not even amounting to much of a tax cut.

0:32:09.933 --> 0:32:13.493
<v Speaker 2>Let me approach a couple of other aspects, the forecasts

0:32:13.773 --> 0:32:16.613
<v Speaker 2>that we've already discussed, and as I read through them

0:32:16.773 --> 0:32:19.453
<v Speaker 2>again in a couple of opinion pieces as well as

0:32:19.493 --> 0:32:23.173
<v Speaker 2>I read as I read through them, I thought, this

0:32:23.213 --> 0:32:26.053
<v Speaker 2>is all guesswork. The last few years have shown us

0:32:26.293 --> 0:32:32.893
<v Speaker 2>on two major fronts. COVID secondly, but the irresponsibility of

0:32:32.893 --> 0:32:36.333
<v Speaker 2>the administration that was in for three years before before

0:32:36.373 --> 0:32:39.893
<v Speaker 2>that ever happened. We don't know what's around the corner.

0:32:40.573 --> 0:32:43.493
<v Speaker 2>How do we how do we? I mean, how can

0:32:44.973 --> 0:32:49.213
<v Speaker 2>how can you as a Prime minister, mister of finance,

0:32:49.653 --> 0:32:52.933
<v Speaker 2>as part of the government, how could you say this

0:32:52.973 --> 0:32:55.053
<v Speaker 2>is what we're going to do, This is how we're

0:32:55.053 --> 0:32:58.413
<v Speaker 2>going to achieve it, and by twenty forty we should

0:32:58.413 --> 0:33:00.613
<v Speaker 2>be back on track. When you have no idea what's

0:33:00.613 --> 0:33:03.653
<v Speaker 2>going to come between now and then, and maybe you

0:33:03.693 --> 0:33:08.733
<v Speaker 2>should be taking precautionary measures to cover for that makes.

0:33:08.573 --> 0:33:12.013
<v Speaker 3>Sense, Ye, makes perfect sense. That's exactly how I feel

0:33:12.053 --> 0:33:15.893
<v Speaker 3>as well. So there are many assumptions, of course in

0:33:15.933 --> 0:33:20.213
<v Speaker 3>the budget, and both of them strike me as relatively optimistic.

0:33:20.373 --> 0:33:24.733
<v Speaker 3>So they have inflation go down relatively quickly. They have

0:33:25.853 --> 0:33:30.173
<v Speaker 3>or financing costs for government debt staying moderately as at

0:33:30.213 --> 0:33:34.173
<v Speaker 3>around four and a half percent. They don't, of course

0:33:34.373 --> 0:33:36.893
<v Speaker 3>model what would happen after an earthquake is an army

0:33:37.333 --> 0:33:39.893
<v Speaker 3>of volcanic eruption, and yet we know that these events

0:33:40.013 --> 0:33:44.293
<v Speaker 3>occur quite regularly in New Zealand. So I think there

0:33:44.333 --> 0:33:47.493
<v Speaker 3>are lots of risks on the downside. On the upside,

0:33:47.573 --> 0:33:49.933
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what could happen that really surprised us? I mean,

0:33:50.093 --> 0:33:53.493
<v Speaker 3>I think suddenly getting a splurge of productivity, probably not.

0:33:54.213 --> 0:33:56.493
<v Speaker 3>Are we suddenly seeing all the conflicts in the global

0:33:56.493 --> 0:34:01.293
<v Speaker 3>economy disappear between the West and China, Russia and the others.

0:34:01.613 --> 0:34:05.733
<v Speaker 3>Probably not. So I think there are way more risks

0:34:05.773 --> 0:34:09.533
<v Speaker 3>actually on the downside and or modeling doesn't take that

0:34:09.573 --> 0:34:13.693
<v Speaker 3>into account properly. And by the way, I also think

0:34:13.733 --> 0:34:16.653
<v Speaker 3>we should always leave a bit more room for maneuver

0:34:16.813 --> 0:34:21.013
<v Speaker 3>for these external shocks when they occur, because they are

0:34:21.653 --> 0:34:24.213
<v Speaker 3>of course from memory. I think we spend about twenty

0:34:24.253 --> 0:34:27.853
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent of GDP on the cleanup of the Canterbury earthquakes.

0:34:27.853 --> 0:34:30.853
<v Speaker 3>So just imagine the Wellington Ford line goes off or

0:34:30.853 --> 0:34:33.573
<v Speaker 3>the Alpine fault, and then you would look at an

0:34:33.613 --> 0:34:37.173
<v Speaker 3>event of similar magnitude, if not larger. So I would

0:34:37.293 --> 0:34:41.493
<v Speaker 3>ideally like to leave some buffer for such events. And

0:34:41.493 --> 0:34:43.893
<v Speaker 3>that's another reason why we should actually try to keep

0:34:43.933 --> 0:34:46.533
<v Speaker 3>government debt as a percentage of GDP much lower than

0:34:46.573 --> 0:34:49.773
<v Speaker 3>it is in countries like the US or Europe, because

0:34:49.813 --> 0:34:52.613
<v Speaker 3>they don't have these extra risks added to their economies.

0:34:52.653 --> 0:34:54.933
<v Speaker 3>And that's why we I think, have to be even

0:34:54.933 --> 0:34:55.853
<v Speaker 3>more cautious here.

0:34:56.493 --> 0:35:00.013
<v Speaker 2>But it's rather a small spanner in the works with

0:35:00.133 --> 0:35:06.813
<v Speaker 2>regard to the makeup of this country. There is growing

0:35:06.853 --> 0:35:11.133
<v Speaker 2>division at the moment. Fact it's never gone away. It

0:35:11.213 --> 0:35:14.413
<v Speaker 2>might calm down in better times, but it shows itself

0:35:15.133 --> 0:35:18.013
<v Speaker 2>with higher profile at a time like this. This is

0:35:18.053 --> 0:35:23.413
<v Speaker 2>the disagreement between races, to put it simply, and the

0:35:23.453 --> 0:35:30.133
<v Speaker 2>spin offs from those if we continue on this particular path.

0:35:30.333 --> 0:35:32.613
<v Speaker 2>If we had continued on the path that they put

0:35:32.653 --> 0:35:34.373
<v Speaker 2>us on, or they were intending to put us on

0:35:35.253 --> 0:35:40.413
<v Speaker 2>back in the previous administration, I fear the country would

0:35:40.413 --> 0:35:44.613
<v Speaker 2>have been lost forever. But at the moment I'm questioning

0:35:44.653 --> 0:35:47.853
<v Speaker 2>whether or not there need needs to be far more

0:35:47.933 --> 0:35:53.853
<v Speaker 2>done to overcome this son, far more done on a

0:35:54.093 --> 0:35:57.813
<v Speaker 2>if necessary, confrontational level, to overcome the issues.

0:36:00.173 --> 0:36:02.373
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the problem is actually that the genie is also

0:36:02.413 --> 0:36:05.253
<v Speaker 3>a bottle. It's really difficult to get it back in

0:36:05.413 --> 0:36:09.933
<v Speaker 3>after six years of having that as government pollus. It

0:36:10.453 --> 0:36:13.853
<v Speaker 3>scares me the development were on and it has actually

0:36:13.853 --> 0:36:16.173
<v Speaker 3>turned the country into a completely different country to the

0:36:16.173 --> 0:36:19.453
<v Speaker 3>one that I migrated to in twenty twelve. So when

0:36:19.453 --> 0:36:22.933
<v Speaker 3>I arrived here coming from Australia, I thought, actually Nsiven

0:36:23.053 --> 0:36:26.373
<v Speaker 3>was fortunate to be in race relations where it was

0:36:26.413 --> 0:36:28.453
<v Speaker 3>at the time, especially VIISA of the Australia. Were there

0:36:29.253 --> 0:36:32.293
<v Speaker 3>many more unsolved problems, I would say, And it seemed

0:36:32.333 --> 0:36:34.533
<v Speaker 3>to me, at least in contrast with Australia much more

0:36:34.573 --> 0:36:38.533
<v Speaker 3>harmonious as it was in twenty twelve, where everybody got

0:36:38.613 --> 0:36:41.733
<v Speaker 3>on and where the basic issues were resolved, they were

0:36:41.773 --> 0:36:45.693
<v Speaker 3>of course some still lingering injustices, because you could actually

0:36:45.693 --> 0:36:48.853
<v Speaker 3>look at, for example, education rates and compare them across

0:36:48.893 --> 0:36:51.893
<v Speaker 3>different ethnic lines and find that Mari and Pacific Our

0:36:51.893 --> 0:36:54.853
<v Speaker 3>students were on average far less successful at school than

0:36:55.493 --> 0:36:59.573
<v Speaker 3>Parking Are students, and especially Asian students. But I think

0:36:59.773 --> 0:37:02.573
<v Speaker 3>in order to fix these discrepancies, you would have focused

0:37:02.613 --> 0:37:06.173
<v Speaker 3>on the issues at hand, namely the education system. Instead,

0:37:06.253 --> 0:37:09.253
<v Speaker 3>what the government did from twenty seven onwards was to

0:37:09.253 --> 0:37:13.853
<v Speaker 3>turn every such socioeconomic problem into a race issue, and

0:37:14.813 --> 0:37:17.653
<v Speaker 3>I think in doing so it actually divided the country enormously,

0:37:17.933 --> 0:37:22.413
<v Speaker 3>and that is really difficult to mend together again. Know

0:37:22.613 --> 0:37:25.733
<v Speaker 3>that we've had a change of government, but in principle

0:37:25.773 --> 0:37:27.853
<v Speaker 3>I agree with you, this country is divided. I'm just

0:37:27.933 --> 0:37:31.773
<v Speaker 3>not sure whether a direct confrontational approach would help us,

0:37:31.853 --> 0:37:34.493
<v Speaker 3>or whether this would actually drive the country even further apart.

0:37:35.133 --> 0:37:38.133
<v Speaker 3>I wish we could just work on issues where there

0:37:38.133 --> 0:37:41.573
<v Speaker 3>are discrepancies, like education, fix these issues, and I hope

0:37:41.613 --> 0:37:45.573
<v Speaker 3>that by doing that we would make the overlying race

0:37:45.653 --> 0:37:48.213
<v Speaker 3>issues slowly disappear.

0:37:51.093 --> 0:37:55.653
<v Speaker 2>It's a nice it's a pleasant thought. I I have

0:37:55.813 --> 0:37:57.893
<v Speaker 2>serious doubts if you've.

0:37:57.733 --> 0:38:00.893
<v Speaker 3>Got I'm not saying that I'm confident that it will work,

0:38:00.973 --> 0:38:04.933
<v Speaker 3>but I would like to see a path to resolving

0:38:04.933 --> 0:38:07.773
<v Speaker 3>these issues that seize the least amount of confrontation and

0:38:07.853 --> 0:38:10.653
<v Speaker 3>polarize session, because we've got enough of that already.

0:38:11.773 --> 0:38:15.333
<v Speaker 2>Well, certainly I agree, which leads me on to the

0:38:15.373 --> 0:38:21.013
<v Speaker 2>situation in another part of the world, Switzerland, and there

0:38:21.013 --> 0:38:26.013
<v Speaker 2>has been a small campaign over a number of years

0:38:26.053 --> 0:38:29.453
<v Speaker 2>to try and introduce the Swiss system to the hundred

0:38:29.533 --> 0:38:34.693
<v Speaker 2>Days into New Zealand. Just before I go on, would

0:38:34.773 --> 0:38:36.893
<v Speaker 2>you approve of that? Do you think that would be

0:38:36.933 --> 0:38:37.573
<v Speaker 2>a good idea?

0:38:38.213 --> 0:38:41.013
<v Speaker 3>Well, as you know, Laton, I'm a huge fan of Switzerland.

0:38:42.053 --> 0:38:45.453
<v Speaker 3>Switzerland is one of the most fascinating countries on Earth

0:38:45.533 --> 0:38:48.613
<v Speaker 3>because they are doing so many things differently, and they're

0:38:48.653 --> 0:38:52.493
<v Speaker 3>doing so many things much better than us. So anything

0:38:52.533 --> 0:38:55.333
<v Speaker 3>that Switzerland does I think is worth studying. And I've

0:38:55.413 --> 0:38:57.853
<v Speaker 3>really always admired Switzerland and a power from that. I mean,

0:38:57.893 --> 0:39:00.413
<v Speaker 3>as a German, you look at Switzerland think well, the

0:39:00.413 --> 0:39:02.533
<v Speaker 3>Swiss are just like the Germans, but nobody hates them,

0:39:02.613 --> 0:39:07.573
<v Speaker 3>so that's great. And when I look at Switzerland, what

0:39:07.733 --> 0:39:10.613
<v Speaker 3>I particular like is the way the country runs from

0:39:10.653 --> 0:39:14.733
<v Speaker 3>the bottom up. There's hardly anyone in the Swiss federal government.

0:39:15.053 --> 0:39:17.213
<v Speaker 3>Do you know how many ministers they have in burn.

0:39:17.893 --> 0:39:22.253
<v Speaker 2>Next to none? Seven. Yeah, that's it.

0:39:22.333 --> 0:39:25.613
<v Speaker 3>And the presidency of Switzerland rotates among the ministers. And

0:39:25.613 --> 0:39:29.733
<v Speaker 3>the ministers, by the way, are drawn from all political parties,

0:39:29.773 --> 0:39:31.933
<v Speaker 3>and it has been like that for decades, so they've

0:39:31.973 --> 0:39:36.293
<v Speaker 3>got a permanent all party coalition. The only reason why

0:39:36.333 --> 0:39:39.733
<v Speaker 3>that works is because everything in the end is subject

0:39:39.813 --> 0:39:42.093
<v Speaker 3>to the threat of a referendum. That's the one hundred

0:39:42.173 --> 0:39:45.733
<v Speaker 3>days you're talking about. So you collect enough signatures, you

0:39:45.813 --> 0:39:48.173
<v Speaker 3>take it to the people, and then the people will

0:39:48.173 --> 0:39:52.053
<v Speaker 3>have the final word. And I think that's a wonderful model.

0:39:52.053 --> 0:39:54.253
<v Speaker 3>But the other thing that works well about Switzerland is

0:39:54.293 --> 0:39:59.733
<v Speaker 3>the decentralization. The decentralization. We're in a country the size

0:39:59.853 --> 0:40:03.853
<v Speaker 3>of Canterbury with just over nine million people. They have

0:40:03.933 --> 0:40:08.813
<v Speaker 3>twenty six cantons and two thousand councils, and each and

0:40:08.893 --> 0:40:13.053
<v Speaker 3>each council has its own income tax system, so in effact,

0:40:13.253 --> 0:40:15.813
<v Speaker 3>you have more than two thousand different income tax systems

0:40:15.853 --> 0:40:18.893
<v Speaker 3>and Switzerland and our sounds crazy, of course when you

0:40:18.933 --> 0:40:20.933
<v Speaker 3>talk about it here in New Zealanders typically say, oh,

0:40:20.973 --> 0:40:24.933
<v Speaker 3>this must be a recipe, recipe for disaster. Actually it

0:40:25.013 --> 0:40:27.653
<v Speaker 3>is not, because it works. It has actually kept taxes

0:40:27.733 --> 0:40:30.853
<v Speaker 3>quite low in Switzerland. It has made sure that Swiss

0:40:30.893 --> 0:40:34.893
<v Speaker 3>local government is responsive to the population and that people

0:40:34.893 --> 0:40:39.533
<v Speaker 3>are actually treated like customers by their councils, which you

0:40:39.573 --> 0:40:42.693
<v Speaker 3>couldn't say of council's relationships with New Zealanders. And so

0:40:42.773 --> 0:40:46.333
<v Speaker 3>I think structurally Switzerland works so much better. So I

0:40:46.373 --> 0:40:49.333
<v Speaker 3>think we should study this system a lot more and

0:40:49.853 --> 0:40:52.973
<v Speaker 3>try to figure out what we could copy from them.

0:40:53.573 --> 0:40:56.733
<v Speaker 3>I would just say one word of caution, you cannot

0:40:56.853 --> 0:41:02.493
<v Speaker 3>copy Switzerland because Switzerland has grown like this over centuries literally,

0:41:02.973 --> 0:41:06.653
<v Speaker 3>and there are some structural elements of the Swiss experience

0:41:06.653 --> 0:41:10.613
<v Speaker 3>that you can't replicate here either. So, for example, in Switzerland,

0:41:10.933 --> 0:41:13.693
<v Speaker 3>you have a society that is maybe not polarized, but

0:41:13.773 --> 0:41:18.453
<v Speaker 3>definitely fragmented. So you have German speakers, you have French speakers,

0:41:18.533 --> 0:41:21.693
<v Speaker 3>Italian speakers, and Romance speakers, so you've got four languages

0:41:21.693 --> 0:41:25.173
<v Speaker 3>in the country. You have different religious affiliations, so you've

0:41:25.213 --> 0:41:28.573
<v Speaker 3>got strong Catholic parties still in strong Protestant parts, and

0:41:28.613 --> 0:41:31.933
<v Speaker 3>then you've got other who are not even Christian at all.

0:41:32.573 --> 0:41:35.013
<v Speaker 3>And then of course you've got the typical political divisions

0:41:35.173 --> 0:41:38.973
<v Speaker 3>left wing, right wing, centrist, green, whatever, and so you

0:41:39.053 --> 0:41:42.053
<v Speaker 3>put all of these different identities together and what you

0:41:42.133 --> 0:41:44.653
<v Speaker 3>have is a country that is fragmented in so many

0:41:44.693 --> 0:41:48.813
<v Speaker 3>different lines. Again, sounds like a recipe for disaster, but actually,

0:41:48.853 --> 0:41:51.013
<v Speaker 3>in a Swiss case, what it has done is it

0:41:51.093 --> 0:41:54.733
<v Speaker 3>is ensured that things are decided locally because you could

0:41:54.733 --> 0:41:57.093
<v Speaker 3>never find agreement among all of them at a central level.

0:41:57.853 --> 0:42:02.613
<v Speaker 3>And that has actually created a system of political governance

0:42:03.133 --> 0:42:06.053
<v Speaker 3>that has worked extremely well for Switzerland. But it's really

0:42:06.093 --> 0:42:08.733
<v Speaker 3>based on these factors. When you look at New Zealand,

0:42:08.813 --> 0:42:13.253
<v Speaker 3>yes we have different ethnic clients, but probably not quite

0:42:13.293 --> 0:42:16.173
<v Speaker 3>to the degree that the Swiss habits as a totally

0:42:16.213 --> 0:42:19.733
<v Speaker 3>fragmented society. And nevertheless, as I said, it is a

0:42:19.773 --> 0:42:21.693
<v Speaker 3>system worth learning from, and.

0:42:21.653 --> 0:42:23.613
<v Speaker 2>It's probably not the only one, but it's certainly a

0:42:23.693 --> 0:42:26.853
<v Speaker 2>very a very good one. So while we're talking about

0:42:26.853 --> 0:42:33.813
<v Speaker 2>the makeup of a country, migration, immigration is a very

0:42:33.853 --> 0:42:34.453
<v Speaker 2>important thing.

0:42:34.493 --> 0:42:34.613
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:42:34.653 --> 0:42:37.053
<v Speaker 2>I read something a little earlier this morning, before we

0:42:37.413 --> 0:42:41.093
<v Speaker 2>before we sat down to talk. I read that the

0:42:41.213 --> 0:42:45.413
<v Speaker 2>level of migration looks like it's going to be maintained

0:42:46.213 --> 0:42:49.613
<v Speaker 2>for the foreseeable future. Now, I've got a couple of

0:42:49.933 --> 0:42:53.333
<v Speaker 2>back questions off that one I've been asking for a while,

0:42:53.453 --> 0:42:56.013
<v Speaker 2>just throwing it out, rather than asking one hundred and

0:42:56.013 --> 0:42:58.453
<v Speaker 2>forty thousand people that came into this country last year,

0:42:58.933 --> 0:43:02.053
<v Speaker 2>where did they come from, what qualifications did they have?

0:43:02.173 --> 0:43:06.213
<v Speaker 2>What contribution to the country can they possibly make? Because

0:43:06.253 --> 0:43:10.013
<v Speaker 2>I'm a believer in the fact that a country is

0:43:10.533 --> 0:43:13.853
<v Speaker 2>and should have control of who comes into it, and

0:43:13.893 --> 0:43:16.733
<v Speaker 2>they should be people that are worthy of it, who

0:43:16.893 --> 0:43:20.013
<v Speaker 2>can contribute to the country and the rest of the population.

0:43:21.573 --> 0:43:23.373
<v Speaker 2>And I'm certainly aware that there are a lot of

0:43:23.413 --> 0:43:25.813
<v Speaker 2>people here who can't you say.

0:43:27.573 --> 0:43:29.893
<v Speaker 3>I say that I have asked myself exactly the same

0:43:29.933 --> 0:43:32.493
<v Speaker 3>question and passed it on to our colic Bryce Wilkinson

0:43:32.973 --> 0:43:34.973
<v Speaker 3>a few weeks ago, and I asked Bryce to actually

0:43:35.013 --> 0:43:37.653
<v Speaker 3>look into these migration statistics and tell me who's coming,

0:43:38.293 --> 0:43:40.933
<v Speaker 3>because I had the same look at the statistics that

0:43:41.013 --> 0:43:43.333
<v Speaker 3>you probably had, and I thought, well, that's extraordinary. We

0:43:43.373 --> 0:43:47.173
<v Speaker 3>had a net loss of fifty thousand New Zealand citizens

0:43:47.173 --> 0:43:50.173
<v Speaker 3>to Australia, and at the same time we had a

0:43:50.213 --> 0:43:53.293
<v Speaker 3>net migration intake of one hundred and forty thousand. So,

0:43:53.333 --> 0:43:55.093
<v Speaker 3>by the way, these are net figures. I mean, there

0:43:55.133 --> 0:43:57.453
<v Speaker 3>are way more people arriving, but there are also people leaving.

0:43:57.453 --> 0:44:00.373
<v Speaker 3>But the net intake is one hundred and forty and

0:44:00.613 --> 0:44:03.293
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to know, actually, how does this work. You

0:44:03.333 --> 0:44:07.213
<v Speaker 3>occasionally read stories in the newspapers where they say this

0:44:07.253 --> 0:44:10.853
<v Speaker 3>is a massive net brain drain. So we're losing our

0:44:10.853 --> 0:44:14.253
<v Speaker 3>best qualified people and they are taking over across the

0:44:14.333 --> 0:44:17.013
<v Speaker 3>tessment to have a new career in Australia, and at

0:44:17.013 --> 0:44:20.293
<v Speaker 3>the same time we're getting relatively poorly qualified migrants in.

0:44:20.853 --> 0:44:23.973
<v Speaker 3>And so what we actually have as a net movement

0:44:24.013 --> 0:44:26.933
<v Speaker 3>as a net brain drain. And Bryce is looking into

0:44:26.933 --> 0:44:29.053
<v Speaker 3>this right now, but I haven't got the final figures

0:44:29.053 --> 0:44:31.933
<v Speaker 3>from him yet, but from everything that he has told

0:44:31.973 --> 0:44:36.013
<v Speaker 3>me so far, it does look, indeed like the loss

0:44:36.013 --> 0:44:38.373
<v Speaker 3>of skills is there and we are not getting the

0:44:38.373 --> 0:44:42.053
<v Speaker 3>same qualifications back into the country. Bryce is also looking

0:44:42.093 --> 0:44:46.453
<v Speaker 3>into the source of our new migrants and memory I

0:44:46.493 --> 0:44:50.093
<v Speaker 3>think in the last year the number of migrants from

0:44:50.333 --> 0:44:53.493
<v Speaker 3>European countries was I think only twelve percent of the total,

0:44:54.093 --> 0:44:56.813
<v Speaker 3>and the majority, the vast majority of our migrants now

0:44:57.013 --> 0:45:00.773
<v Speaker 3>are originating from Asian countries, and I mean, that seems

0:45:00.813 --> 0:45:03.333
<v Speaker 3>to be the experience anyway when you're looking around, especially

0:45:03.373 --> 0:45:08.133
<v Speaker 3>Auckland Auguland is slowly turning into a more ethnically Asian

0:45:08.133 --> 0:45:10.573
<v Speaker 3>sy team. It's not the same, of course in other

0:45:10.613 --> 0:45:12.973
<v Speaker 3>parts of the country, and especially the South Island is

0:45:12.973 --> 0:45:15.173
<v Speaker 3>still a bit of a different story. But there seems

0:45:15.173 --> 0:45:18.733
<v Speaker 3>to be definitely a changing ethnic composition of parts of

0:45:18.733 --> 0:45:22.493
<v Speaker 3>the country and as also from our early research, a

0:45:22.653 --> 0:45:25.213
<v Speaker 3>change in the skill set of the population that is

0:45:25.613 --> 0:45:27.533
<v Speaker 3>linked to our migration patterns.

0:45:28.093 --> 0:45:32.693
<v Speaker 2>It's not the race, it's the it's the culture that

0:45:32.893 --> 0:45:37.133
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I've maintained for a long time. I'm not

0:45:37.173 --> 0:45:40.613
<v Speaker 2>a racist, but I am certainly a culturalist. If you

0:45:41.213 --> 0:45:44.293
<v Speaker 2>if you if you put people together from alien cultures

0:45:44.933 --> 0:45:48.573
<v Speaker 2>that have a history of not fitting, then taking them

0:45:48.573 --> 0:45:52.133
<v Speaker 2>in is something not to be not to be encouraged.

0:45:53.653 --> 0:45:55.693
<v Speaker 3>You can throw can I can I can I respond

0:45:55.693 --> 0:46:01.133
<v Speaker 3>to that? Yeah, I think I'm going a long way

0:46:01.413 --> 0:46:04.653
<v Speaker 3>with you on that one. In fact, I think we

0:46:04.693 --> 0:46:08.333
<v Speaker 3>should probably not talk about a multicultural society. We should

0:46:08.533 --> 0:46:11.413
<v Speaker 3>talk about a multi ethnic society, and that's a different thing.

0:46:12.253 --> 0:46:15.733
<v Speaker 3>So I did write a short paper for the Australian

0:46:15.733 --> 0:46:19.613
<v Speaker 3>Productivity Commission when I worked there arguing that actually, when

0:46:19.613 --> 0:46:23.853
<v Speaker 3>you're looking at Australia, lots of Australians are claiming that

0:46:23.853 --> 0:46:27.173
<v Speaker 3>Australia is a multicultural society, and I actually, no, it

0:46:27.253 --> 0:46:30.653
<v Speaker 3>isn't it is a multi ethnic society because there is one,

0:46:30.813 --> 0:46:33.813
<v Speaker 3>or at least at the time, there was one Australian

0:46:33.853 --> 0:46:36.213
<v Speaker 3>culture where people are told, no matter where you're from,

0:46:36.733 --> 0:46:40.933
<v Speaker 3>you leave all that baggage behind. You become Australian, you

0:46:40.973 --> 0:46:43.373
<v Speaker 3>become one of us. You live in the suburbs, your

0:46:43.453 --> 0:46:46.093
<v Speaker 3>kids will be intermarry with each other, and after two

0:46:46.213 --> 0:46:51.133
<v Speaker 3>or three generations you will be basically indistinguishable from anyone

0:46:51.133 --> 0:46:53.253
<v Speaker 3>else in this country because you have all kind of

0:46:53.293 --> 0:46:55.973
<v Speaker 3>lived together, and you've had your kids had children together,

0:46:56.493 --> 0:46:58.533
<v Speaker 3>and therefore you become Australian. And by the way, on

0:46:58.653 --> 0:47:01.213
<v Speaker 3>arrival will make you sign an Australian value statement where

0:47:01.213 --> 0:47:03.973
<v Speaker 3>you sign up to our basic roots. And so I

0:47:04.093 --> 0:47:07.293
<v Speaker 3>thought this whole idea of Australian multiculturalism was a misnomal

0:47:07.693 --> 0:47:10.853
<v Speaker 3>Becauseustralian culture, at least at the time I wrote this paper,

0:47:10.853 --> 0:47:14.213
<v Speaker 3>I think around twenty nine or ten, it was defined

0:47:14.253 --> 0:47:16.373
<v Speaker 3>that there was such a thing as an Australian culture,

0:47:16.813 --> 0:47:20.653
<v Speaker 3>and then it doesn't matter was ethnic community you belong to.

0:47:20.733 --> 0:47:23.173
<v Speaker 3>You can have your ethnic community and your ethnic identity,

0:47:23.533 --> 0:47:26.213
<v Speaker 3>but the culture was clearly defined as that of a

0:47:26.253 --> 0:47:29.613
<v Speaker 3>Western liberal democracy and I liked that concept. And by

0:47:29.613 --> 0:47:32.973
<v Speaker 3>the way, this was how Australia at least always worked.

0:47:33.573 --> 0:47:39.093
<v Speaker 3>So think back even to the times Australian settlement. I mean,

0:47:39.333 --> 0:47:43.173
<v Speaker 3>Australia got migrants mainly from the United Kingdom, but people

0:47:43.173 --> 0:47:45.893
<v Speaker 3>who in the United Kingdom wouldn't have got on. So

0:47:45.933 --> 0:47:49.893
<v Speaker 3>you got Catholics and Protestants and Irishmen and Englishmen. And

0:47:49.933 --> 0:47:52.613
<v Speaker 3>basically the only way that Australia could work at the

0:47:52.653 --> 0:47:55.173
<v Speaker 3>time was to tell all of them, look, we know

0:47:55.253 --> 0:47:57.693
<v Speaker 3>about your conflicts you had back home, but they belonged

0:47:57.733 --> 0:47:59.933
<v Speaker 3>to where you came from, and you are not allowed

0:48:00.213 --> 0:48:04.373
<v Speaker 3>to parade them around here. Your idea is to become Australian.

0:48:04.733 --> 0:48:07.813
<v Speaker 3>And it's worked again. And after the war, think of

0:48:07.853 --> 0:48:11.893
<v Speaker 3>the Greek migration wave into Australia. I saw statistics at

0:48:11.893 --> 0:48:16.813
<v Speaker 3>the time about the prevalence of Greek orthodox as a

0:48:17.013 --> 0:48:21.733
<v Speaker 3>denomination in Australia, and that basically lasted about two generations

0:48:21.733 --> 0:48:24.333
<v Speaker 3>of Greek migration into Australia and then the integration, they

0:48:24.373 --> 0:48:28.413
<v Speaker 3>became indistinguishable from the rest of society. So I think

0:48:28.853 --> 0:48:31.613
<v Speaker 3>we should really be careful how we are calling these things.

0:48:31.693 --> 0:48:34.933
<v Speaker 3>Is it multiculturalism. I think if it's really multiculturalism and

0:48:34.973 --> 0:48:37.333
<v Speaker 3>you've got different cultures living side by side, it's a

0:48:37.373 --> 0:48:42.013
<v Speaker 3>recipe for disaster. There is something that all people in

0:48:42.013 --> 0:48:45.613
<v Speaker 3>the country should agree on, and these are the foundations

0:48:45.653 --> 0:48:48.573
<v Speaker 3>of society. That we've got equal rights for men and women,

0:48:48.973 --> 0:48:51.773
<v Speaker 3>that we have no problem no matter what sexual orientation

0:48:51.893 --> 0:48:54.693
<v Speaker 3>you have. You can have any religion or none. This

0:48:54.813 --> 0:48:57.373
<v Speaker 3>is all part of living in a free Western society.

0:48:57.413 --> 0:48:59.213
<v Speaker 3>And if you can sign up to that, you're welcome.

0:48:59.573 --> 0:49:01.613
<v Speaker 3>But you are not allowed to bring any other culture

0:49:01.653 --> 0:49:04.933
<v Speaker 3>that is incompatible with these basic values, because that would

0:49:04.933 --> 0:49:08.133
<v Speaker 3>be a recipe for disaster and for driving societies apart.

0:49:08.773 --> 0:49:10.653
<v Speaker 2>So do I take it that you were agreeing with

0:49:11.133 --> 0:49:11.813
<v Speaker 2>as far as I.

0:49:11.813 --> 0:49:14.573
<v Speaker 3>Went, Yes, but I would be careful in how we

0:49:14.653 --> 0:49:18.333
<v Speaker 3>call this. I think this is actually multicultures is a

0:49:18.333 --> 0:49:21.253
<v Speaker 3>bit of misnoma. I think we should talk about multi

0:49:21.253 --> 0:49:25.573
<v Speaker 3>ethnic societies, but with a clear, clearly defined national culture

0:49:25.813 --> 0:49:31.213
<v Speaker 3>which is based on enlightenment, on Western civilization, on the

0:49:31.293 --> 0:49:34.013
<v Speaker 3>rule of law, on property rights, and there are some

0:49:34.173 --> 0:49:36.853
<v Speaker 3>things that I believe should not be subject to debate,

0:49:37.693 --> 0:49:41.573
<v Speaker 3>such as such as the ones that I mentioned. These

0:49:41.613 --> 0:49:44.493
<v Speaker 3>are the basic pillars on which our society rests. And

0:49:44.533 --> 0:49:46.653
<v Speaker 3>then it doesn't matter the color of your skin or

0:49:46.653 --> 0:49:49.213
<v Speaker 3>what you believe. And when you come into the country,

0:49:49.253 --> 0:49:51.333
<v Speaker 3>you basically sign up to that. And the Australians actually

0:49:51.373 --> 0:49:54.413
<v Speaker 3>literally make you sign up to these values by putting

0:49:54.533 --> 0:49:57.173
<v Speaker 3>this Australian value statement to every migrant. You have to

0:49:57.173 --> 0:49:59.613
<v Speaker 3>sign this to get a visa, and that I think

0:49:59.653 --> 0:50:03.133
<v Speaker 3>sends a very clear signal to newcomers that yes you

0:50:03.213 --> 0:50:05.653
<v Speaker 3>have come and yes you're welcome here, but there are

0:50:05.693 --> 0:50:08.013
<v Speaker 3>some basic rules that we would expect you to live by.

0:50:08.333 --> 0:50:11.493
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that is still the same with the

0:50:11.493 --> 0:50:14.213
<v Speaker 2>same success now as it was over the periods that

0:50:14.293 --> 0:50:14.773
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned.

0:50:15.733 --> 0:50:18.533
<v Speaker 3>No, it has changed, and that worries me. But at

0:50:18.613 --> 0:50:21.813
<v Speaker 3>least that's how it was traditionally practiced in Australia, and

0:50:21.853 --> 0:50:22.933
<v Speaker 3>I believe in New Zealand too.

0:50:23.053 --> 0:50:25.213
<v Speaker 2>So where did the practice go wrong?

0:50:26.213 --> 0:50:29.573
<v Speaker 3>The practice goes wrong when people think, oh, there is

0:50:29.573 --> 0:50:31.973
<v Speaker 3>basically an equivalence of cultures, and we can't actually say

0:50:32.013 --> 0:50:34.653
<v Speaker 3>that one culture is better than the other. And maybe

0:50:34.653 --> 0:50:36.693
<v Speaker 3>you can't say that one culture is better than the other,

0:50:36.733 --> 0:50:39.933
<v Speaker 3>but you can definitely define what culture you live under.

0:50:40.173 --> 0:50:43.453
<v Speaker 3>And I think it becomes really difficult and dangerous when

0:50:44.333 --> 0:50:46.773
<v Speaker 3>that is no longer clear, when anything goes because it

0:50:46.813 --> 0:50:50.133
<v Speaker 3>just leads to the segregation of society. And by the way,

0:50:50.293 --> 0:50:52.373
<v Speaker 3>if you want to see an example of where that's

0:50:52.413 --> 0:50:55.653
<v Speaker 3>gone wrong, just look at Europe, look at what's happening

0:50:55.693 --> 0:50:58.533
<v Speaker 3>in France, look at Germany, look at parts of Britain.

0:50:58.693 --> 0:51:01.133
<v Speaker 3>The segregation of society that we see in parts of

0:51:01.173 --> 0:51:04.813
<v Speaker 3>Europe is something that I wouldn't want to see replicated here.

0:51:05.053 --> 0:51:07.053
<v Speaker 2>And I would certainly join you on that.

0:51:07.293 --> 0:51:09.053
<v Speaker 3>By the way, can I say one more thing about that?

0:51:09.693 --> 0:51:12.853
<v Speaker 3>I think it is also in part it's not just

0:51:12.853 --> 0:51:15.853
<v Speaker 3>the fault of the migrants in these countries, looking at

0:51:15.853 --> 0:51:19.773
<v Speaker 3>the German experience that I'm quite familiar with, still, it

0:51:19.893 --> 0:51:25.053
<v Speaker 3>is also a fault of German society of never having

0:51:25.253 --> 0:51:28.293
<v Speaker 3>actually walken up to the fact that Germany is a

0:51:28.493 --> 0:51:32.533
<v Speaker 3>country that attracts migrants. What I have in mind are

0:51:32.653 --> 0:51:35.493
<v Speaker 3>the so called guest workers that started arriving in the

0:51:35.573 --> 0:51:39.933
<v Speaker 3>nineteen fifties, initially from countries like Spain and Italy, and

0:51:39.973 --> 0:51:44.453
<v Speaker 3>then over the years I extended to especially Turkey. So

0:51:44.893 --> 0:51:47.933
<v Speaker 3>these people came in. They were called guest workers, and

0:51:48.253 --> 0:51:51.373
<v Speaker 3>the idea was, as the name suggests, that there are

0:51:51.453 --> 0:51:53.733
<v Speaker 3>guests in the country and after a few years they

0:51:53.733 --> 0:51:56.653
<v Speaker 3>would leave and disappear and go back home to their

0:51:56.813 --> 0:51:59.933
<v Speaker 3>countries where they had come from. And they didn't, and

0:51:59.973 --> 0:52:03.053
<v Speaker 3>in fact they had children and their children had children.

0:52:03.093 --> 0:52:07.573
<v Speaker 3>So suddenly, by the nineteen eighties nineties there was serious

0:52:07.613 --> 0:52:10.853
<v Speaker 3>talk in German of guest workers of the third generation.

0:52:11.653 --> 0:52:14.053
<v Speaker 3>And I think it is ludicrous. If your family has

0:52:14.093 --> 0:52:16.413
<v Speaker 3>been in a country for fifty or sixty years, and

0:52:16.493 --> 0:52:20.853
<v Speaker 3>if you're now the third generation of those so called

0:52:20.893 --> 0:52:23.573
<v Speaker 3>guest workers, you're no longer a guess at that stage

0:52:23.573 --> 0:52:26.973
<v Speaker 3>you should belong to society. But mainstream society had never

0:52:27.013 --> 0:52:30.653
<v Speaker 3>signaled to them that they were supposed to be there

0:52:30.693 --> 0:52:33.853
<v Speaker 3>for the long term, and therefore they were always told, well, actually,

0:52:33.973 --> 0:52:35.773
<v Speaker 3>you're not really one of us, and we don't expect

0:52:35.773 --> 0:52:38.253
<v Speaker 3>you to become one of us, because in the end

0:52:38.773 --> 0:52:41.613
<v Speaker 3>you're guests and we expect you to leave again. And

0:52:41.653 --> 0:52:44.853
<v Speaker 3>I think that was again the wrong policy to take,

0:52:44.933 --> 0:52:48.613
<v Speaker 3>because you would have ideally practiced, for example, what the

0:52:48.613 --> 0:52:51.293
<v Speaker 3>Australians do, where they say, okay, you have arrived now,

0:52:51.333 --> 0:52:53.973
<v Speaker 3>and now we're making sure that you become Australian. In

0:52:54.013 --> 0:52:56.133
<v Speaker 3>the same way, the Germans could have said, actually, you

0:52:56.133 --> 0:52:57.893
<v Speaker 3>have arrived now and we're trying to make sure that

0:52:57.933 --> 0:53:01.213
<v Speaker 3>you actually learned German and become part of mainstream society here.

0:53:01.573 --> 0:53:04.133
<v Speaker 3>But they didn't. They always pretended and kept up this

0:53:04.213 --> 0:53:06.773
<v Speaker 3>fiction that at some stage she would just disappear. And

0:53:06.813 --> 0:53:08.853
<v Speaker 3>while they kept up the fiction, they allowed them to

0:53:08.893 --> 0:53:11.933
<v Speaker 3>form parallel societies. So you've got whole suburbs now of

0:53:11.973 --> 0:53:15.453
<v Speaker 3>German cities where they basically have their parallel infrastructure, where

0:53:15.493 --> 0:53:18.453
<v Speaker 3>everything is Turkish and where you wouldn't find it a

0:53:18.453 --> 0:53:21.453
<v Speaker 3>word of German spoken. What I find interesting, by the way,

0:53:21.493 --> 0:53:24.493
<v Speaker 3>is when you look at this experience, you can find

0:53:24.533 --> 0:53:28.533
<v Speaker 3>that the first generation was perfectly integrated, because that was

0:53:28.573 --> 0:53:32.733
<v Speaker 3>a generation that worked. They find found jobs in the factories,

0:53:32.773 --> 0:53:35.253
<v Speaker 3>they had German colleagues, They learned the language because they

0:53:35.253 --> 0:53:37.813
<v Speaker 3>wanted to interact with their colleagues. And so the first

0:53:37.853 --> 0:53:41.973
<v Speaker 3>generation of Turkish Mirgrants was by some measures better integrated

0:53:42.013 --> 0:53:46.173
<v Speaker 3>than their children and grandchildren are today because mainstream society

0:53:46.213 --> 0:53:50.573
<v Speaker 3>allowed them to segregate and form parallel social structures. And

0:53:50.613 --> 0:53:53.173
<v Speaker 3>again it just shows you what you have to do

0:53:53.333 --> 0:53:57.573
<v Speaker 3>to integrate newcomers. The best form of integration for newcomers

0:53:57.653 --> 0:54:00.853
<v Speaker 3>is through the labor market because it forces people to

0:54:00.973 --> 0:54:04.293
<v Speaker 3>learn the language of their colleagues. It forces them to

0:54:04.533 --> 0:54:09.573
<v Speaker 3>actually pay for their own households, so they're not aligned

0:54:09.573 --> 0:54:12.293
<v Speaker 3>on benefits and in that way they become part of

0:54:12.333 --> 0:54:14.853
<v Speaker 3>mainstream society. Once you give up on that, and once

0:54:14.853 --> 0:54:17.973
<v Speaker 3>you actually push them away out of mainstream society, you

0:54:17.973 --> 0:54:20.133
<v Speaker 3>are asking for trouble down the liner. That's where many

0:54:20.173 --> 0:54:21.373
<v Speaker 3>European countries are.

0:54:22.013 --> 0:54:25.733
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Switzerland, you mentioned France, and you mentioned Germany

0:54:25.773 --> 0:54:28.253
<v Speaker 2>and Turkey, but you haven't mentioned the UK.

0:54:28.773 --> 0:54:31.253
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I've lived in the UK two for four

0:54:31.293 --> 0:54:32.933
<v Speaker 3>and a half years. What do you want to talk about?

0:54:33.133 --> 0:54:35.493
<v Speaker 2>Well, the politics of the UK at the moment, the

0:54:35.853 --> 0:54:38.853
<v Speaker 2>scenario there, what's your interpretation?

0:54:39.773 --> 0:54:42.013
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the real question is actually will the Conservative

0:54:42.013 --> 0:54:44.453
<v Speaker 3>Party survive. It's not a question of whether they might

0:54:44.533 --> 0:54:47.253
<v Speaker 3>win the election. I think that will not happen, but

0:54:47.893 --> 0:54:51.253
<v Speaker 3>it's just a question of how bad that election result

0:54:51.373 --> 0:54:54.173
<v Speaker 3>will be for the Tories after fourteen years in government.

0:54:54.333 --> 0:54:57.293
<v Speaker 2>Can I reimate can I rearrange that how bad it is,

0:54:57.333 --> 0:54:59.733
<v Speaker 2>how bad it will be for the country, not just

0:54:59.773 --> 0:55:01.333
<v Speaker 2>the story party, the country.

0:55:01.893 --> 0:55:03.893
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, I mean we can take that almost as

0:55:03.893 --> 0:55:06.133
<v Speaker 3>a given that we will have a strong labor government

0:55:06.133 --> 0:55:10.093
<v Speaker 3>with a strong majority in the Commons, but they might

0:55:10.133 --> 0:55:13.533
<v Speaker 3>not even be any meaningful opposition left. So, especially after

0:55:13.613 --> 0:55:16.653
<v Speaker 3>Nigel Farage declared that he's now entering as the new

0:55:17.213 --> 0:55:21.493
<v Speaker 3>leader of Reform, he will probably take enough percentage points

0:55:21.533 --> 0:55:25.053
<v Speaker 3>off the Tories to really reduce the Tories to maybe

0:55:25.133 --> 0:55:28.093
<v Speaker 3>where the Canadian Conservatives were in the nineteen nineties stay

0:55:28.173 --> 0:55:31.253
<v Speaker 3>I think they finished with just two MPs. It might

0:55:31.293 --> 0:55:33.573
<v Speaker 3>not be that bad, but I wouldn't be surprised if

0:55:33.573 --> 0:55:35.653
<v Speaker 3>in the end we just have maybe thirty or forty

0:55:35.653 --> 0:55:38.613
<v Speaker 3>Conservative MPs left. Now he can't really run a proper

0:55:38.613 --> 0:55:41.453
<v Speaker 3>opposition all of that, and they will be crushed by

0:55:41.493 --> 0:55:44.373
<v Speaker 3>perhaps more than five minute Labor MPs. So this will

0:55:44.413 --> 0:55:46.973
<v Speaker 3>be an extraordinary situation that we haven't really hadn't Britain

0:55:47.013 --> 0:55:47.773
<v Speaker 3>for a long time.

0:55:48.933 --> 0:55:51.653
<v Speaker 2>What would be the reaction to it? Do you think?

0:55:52.613 --> 0:55:56.773
<v Speaker 3>Well? I think we will probably see the most left

0:55:56.813 --> 0:55:59.093
<v Speaker 3>wing government that Britain has had in a long time.

0:55:59.653 --> 0:56:03.773
<v Speaker 3>I mean Margaret Thatcher was once asked after leaving office

0:56:03.813 --> 0:56:06.933
<v Speaker 3>what was her biggest achievement, and her response was Tony Blair,

0:56:07.773 --> 0:56:12.493
<v Speaker 3>because she argued that she had actually forced the British

0:56:12.613 --> 0:56:15.733
<v Speaker 3>Labor Party so much to the right to accept most

0:56:15.773 --> 0:56:18.773
<v Speaker 3>of her basic settings of the British economy that it

0:56:18.773 --> 0:56:21.133
<v Speaker 3>didn't really matter that there was a change of government

0:56:21.173 --> 0:56:24.133
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen ninety seven from John Major to Tony Blair

0:56:24.253 --> 0:56:27.893
<v Speaker 3>and Ny Margaret Thatcher was right. But what has happened

0:56:28.373 --> 0:56:31.013
<v Speaker 3>since is, of course that the Labor Party has had

0:56:31.253 --> 0:56:34.333
<v Speaker 3>a massive shift to the left, especially of course previously

0:56:34.413 --> 0:56:37.693
<v Speaker 3>under Jeremy Corbyn as later, but even now with Kiir Starmer.

0:56:37.773 --> 0:56:40.093
<v Speaker 3>It is a far cry from where it used to

0:56:40.133 --> 0:56:43.973
<v Speaker 3>be under Tony Blair and even under Gordon Brown. So

0:56:44.053 --> 0:56:45.973
<v Speaker 3>I think we are now looking at the prospect of

0:56:46.013 --> 0:56:50.693
<v Speaker 3>a seriously left leaning government governing Britain over the next

0:56:50.693 --> 0:56:54.773
<v Speaker 3>five years, and that will be quite a turning point

0:56:54.773 --> 0:56:55.253
<v Speaker 3>for the country.

0:56:55.573 --> 0:56:59.293
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you a tourism question, given that that's

0:56:59.413 --> 0:57:03.173
<v Speaker 2>the result, and give it six months to a year.

0:57:04.013 --> 0:57:07.653
<v Speaker 2>Based on the experience that we've witnessed with the Mayor

0:57:07.813 --> 0:57:11.453
<v Speaker 2>of London, do you think a parliament of five hundred

0:57:11.573 --> 0:57:16.853
<v Speaker 2>labor labor rights with no opposition would change the country

0:57:17.293 --> 0:57:20.493
<v Speaker 2>enough to say to some of us, at least Britain's

0:57:20.493 --> 0:57:21.333
<v Speaker 2>off the travel list.

0:57:22.413 --> 0:57:24.493
<v Speaker 3>Lloyd might have to do the opposite. And because we

0:57:24.533 --> 0:57:26.573
<v Speaker 3>could see sterling collapse and then your holiday becomes a

0:57:26.573 --> 0:57:27.093
<v Speaker 3>lot cheaper.

0:57:29.053 --> 0:57:33.413
<v Speaker 2>Some people are so selfish, just trying to be a

0:57:33.413 --> 0:57:37.333
<v Speaker 2>little bit optimistic. Though I wasn't referring to you, I

0:57:37.373 --> 0:57:40.133
<v Speaker 2>was referring to the people that you referred to. No,

0:57:40.213 --> 0:57:43.893
<v Speaker 2>it's and I understand that, I understand that completely. But

0:57:44.053 --> 0:57:48.133
<v Speaker 2>the country itself. Look at what's happened in the United

0:57:48.213 --> 0:57:52.653
<v Speaker 2>States with the non existent southern border, the amount of

0:57:52.773 --> 0:57:57.253
<v Speaker 2>crime that exists all across America now from an extra

0:57:57.373 --> 0:58:00.093
<v Speaker 2>ten or the last figure I heard was twelve million

0:58:00.253 --> 0:58:03.413
<v Speaker 2>illegals in there just on this occasion in the last

0:58:03.413 --> 0:58:07.853
<v Speaker 2>three years. The country is very unsafe. Look. I watched

0:58:07.853 --> 0:58:11.573
<v Speaker 2>a video, short video that somebody took on their camera

0:58:12.253 --> 0:58:14.653
<v Speaker 2>of a guy in San Francisco the middle of the

0:58:14.773 --> 0:58:18.773
<v Speaker 2>day walking down what looked like a main street. There

0:58:18.773 --> 0:58:22.093
<v Speaker 2>weren't a lot of people, about plenty of traffic walking

0:58:22.133 --> 0:58:25.653
<v Speaker 2>down on main street. Who got jumped on by four

0:58:26.213 --> 0:58:28.773
<v Speaker 2>It could have even been five I couldn't quite make

0:58:28.813 --> 0:58:32.053
<v Speaker 2>it out. Gangsters who were dressed in hoodies and the

0:58:32.053 --> 0:58:36.053
<v Speaker 2>whole thing who kicked the proverbial out of him and

0:58:36.173 --> 0:58:38.613
<v Speaker 2>took everything he had, jumped in, jumped in their car

0:58:38.613 --> 0:58:42.293
<v Speaker 2>and drove off the middle of the day.

0:58:42.533 --> 0:58:44.333
<v Speaker 3>But it could have been Central Auckland.

0:58:43.973 --> 0:58:49.173
<v Speaker 2>Too, My point exactly if you want, mm hmm yep.

0:58:50.133 --> 0:58:52.253
<v Speaker 2>But what I was, what I was really relating to,

0:58:52.293 --> 0:58:54.133
<v Speaker 2>I suppose I was using that as an example to

0:58:54.133 --> 0:58:55.493
<v Speaker 2>say where London could end up.

0:58:56.493 --> 0:58:59.773
<v Speaker 3>Sure, and I mean in parts of Britain you probably

0:58:59.773 --> 0:59:04.173
<v Speaker 3>already have these problems. So yeah, that is a prospect

0:59:04.453 --> 0:59:08.013
<v Speaker 3>and it won't get much better, or it might get

0:59:08.053 --> 0:59:10.133
<v Speaker 3>a lot. Boy is actually under that Labor government. But

0:59:10.133 --> 0:59:12.213
<v Speaker 3>we should probably talk a little bit about the Tories too,

0:59:12.293 --> 0:59:17.013
<v Speaker 3>because they've been in power for fourteen years and I

0:59:17.053 --> 0:59:21.253
<v Speaker 3>have now read I like reading comments to newspaper columns

0:59:21.293 --> 0:59:23.133
<v Speaker 3>from British newspapers because you get a bit of a

0:59:23.173 --> 0:59:25.933
<v Speaker 3>sense of what their readers think, and especially in the

0:59:26.013 --> 0:59:28.453
<v Speaker 3>Daily Telegraph, which is one of my favorite papers. I

0:59:28.533 --> 0:59:31.773
<v Speaker 3>read comments now under practically every article saying things like

0:59:32.253 --> 0:59:35.053
<v Speaker 3>I'm a lifelong Tory voter and I've had it with

0:59:35.093 --> 0:59:38.693
<v Speaker 3>that party and I've been voting for the Tories for

0:59:38.693 --> 0:59:41.053
<v Speaker 3>forty or fifty years, but in this coming election they

0:59:41.053 --> 0:59:45.013
<v Speaker 3>will not have my vote. The Tory parties fourteen years

0:59:45.013 --> 0:59:48.133
<v Speaker 3>in office have been disastrous, with few exceptions. I think

0:59:48.133 --> 0:59:51.293
<v Speaker 3>the one exception being Michael Gove's education reforms is probably

0:59:51.333 --> 0:59:55.653
<v Speaker 3>the only positive legacy that they're leaving behind. But the

0:59:55.693 --> 0:59:59.453
<v Speaker 3>rest of those fourteen years, starting with David Cameron and

0:59:59.493 --> 1:00:03.613
<v Speaker 3>then continuing with Teresa May, then Boris Johnson, List Trusts

1:00:03.773 --> 1:00:07.173
<v Speaker 3>Bishi Sonak, it's been a disaster for the country. Actually

1:00:07.213 --> 1:00:10.293
<v Speaker 3>they did nothing. Actually their spending went up. They are

1:00:10.333 --> 1:00:14.973
<v Speaker 3>spending more than Tony Blair ever did. They didn't do

1:00:15.093 --> 1:00:17.773
<v Speaker 3>any of the things that they promised. They are still

1:00:17.813 --> 1:00:21.373
<v Speaker 3>going on with high speed railway links to Birmingham and

1:00:21.413 --> 1:00:28.653
<v Speaker 3>other places. What is the legacy of the Tory government? Yes,

1:00:28.853 --> 1:00:32.013
<v Speaker 3>and what was the promise when they started? So they

1:00:32.013 --> 1:00:35.533
<v Speaker 3>started with all sorts of wonderful marketing slogans under David Cameron.

1:00:35.973 --> 1:00:40.093
<v Speaker 3>And I mean I worked there until two thousand and

1:00:40.093 --> 1:00:42.693
<v Speaker 3>eight when Cameron was opposition leader and we were in

1:00:42.733 --> 1:00:45.613
<v Speaker 3>a thing than quite closely linked to him, and even

1:00:45.653 --> 1:00:48.173
<v Speaker 3>at the time I thought, well this is all a

1:00:48.173 --> 1:00:51.133
<v Speaker 3>lot of marketing talk, but not much substance because they

1:00:51.133 --> 1:00:54.373
<v Speaker 3>were not actually talking much policy anymore these days. They

1:00:54.413 --> 1:00:57.453
<v Speaker 3>were focused on just rebuilding the image of the party.

1:00:57.493 --> 1:01:00.373
<v Speaker 3>They gave it a new logo. Gone was market such

1:01:00.413 --> 1:01:02.853
<v Speaker 3>as torture Freedom, and it was replaced by a left

1:01:02.933 --> 1:01:07.973
<v Speaker 3>leaning tree that children could have painted. It was all

1:01:08.693 --> 1:01:10.933
<v Speaker 3>it was all appearance, it was all pr it was

1:01:10.973 --> 1:01:15.933
<v Speaker 3>all marketing, and I think basically that's what gutted the

1:01:16.013 --> 1:01:19.493
<v Speaker 3>Tory Party and led to them spending fourteen years in

1:01:19.533 --> 1:01:22.373
<v Speaker 3>government not really knowing who they are anymore. And I

1:01:22.453 --> 1:01:24.413
<v Speaker 3>see that as a problem not just for the Tory

1:01:24.453 --> 1:01:27.093
<v Speaker 3>Party but for many center right parties around the world,

1:01:27.573 --> 1:01:30.773
<v Speaker 3>where they have actually put the slogans ahead of decent

1:01:30.813 --> 1:01:32.533
<v Speaker 3>policy development. And that worries me.

1:01:33.253 --> 1:01:36.533
<v Speaker 2>It should worry all of us. What should worry all

1:01:36.573 --> 1:01:41.333
<v Speaker 2>of us is the decline of government in practically every

1:01:41.853 --> 1:01:47.333
<v Speaker 2>Anglo country, namely one where they're booming, namely one where

1:01:47.413 --> 1:01:48.773
<v Speaker 2>everything is going really well.

1:01:49.213 --> 1:01:51.093
<v Speaker 3>And not just Anglo countries. I can tell you that

1:01:51.133 --> 1:01:54.333
<v Speaker 3>the situation is not much better, if at all, on

1:01:54.453 --> 1:01:56.933
<v Speaker 3>the continent in Europe. So I think it's a decline

1:01:56.933 --> 1:02:01.693
<v Speaker 3>that we see in governance or government across developed countries

1:02:01.733 --> 1:02:05.733
<v Speaker 3>around the world, and it is frightening, as absolutely frightening.

1:02:06.053 --> 1:02:08.213
<v Speaker 2>I've got a couple of books. I can't see that

1:02:08.493 --> 1:02:10.213
<v Speaker 2>of them at the moment, but I've got a couple

1:02:10.213 --> 1:02:12.813
<v Speaker 2>of books that I've had for some time. One I

1:02:12.853 --> 1:02:17.773
<v Speaker 2>remember was published in nineteen ninety seven, Why the West

1:02:18.453 --> 1:02:25.093
<v Speaker 2>Leads for Now, and the other one was even more provoking.

1:02:27.493 --> 1:02:31.573
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting to keep books that make predictions to see

1:02:31.773 --> 1:02:34.933
<v Speaker 2>just how the authors have, how successful they've been, how

1:02:34.933 --> 1:02:36.853
<v Speaker 2>good they are, and whether they're worth willing and you

1:02:36.973 --> 1:02:41.013
<v Speaker 2>learn you actually learn something from the approach that authors

1:02:41.093 --> 1:02:44.413
<v Speaker 2>take when you when you see a history of correct

1:02:44.453 --> 1:02:48.613
<v Speaker 2>predictions or even one major one. We don't teach history

1:02:48.613 --> 1:02:50.733
<v Speaker 2>in schools, and here we are back on education while

1:02:50.773 --> 1:02:55.213
<v Speaker 2>I am so, let's give it a miss. RBNZ governor

1:02:55.293 --> 1:02:59.773
<v Speaker 2>says eventually monetary policy will win the day end quote,

1:03:00.013 --> 1:03:04.373
<v Speaker 2>beating ordinary kiwi's and blames overseas factors. On the very

1:03:04.373 --> 1:03:07.053
<v Speaker 2>same day, inflation fell in the UK to two point

1:03:07.173 --> 1:03:12.053
<v Speaker 2>three percent. Now that's Robert McCulloch from the University of Auckland,

1:03:12.093 --> 1:03:15.653
<v Speaker 2>but there are others making similar comments. There's been a

1:03:15.653 --> 1:03:18.573
<v Speaker 2>bit of a bit of a sour taste in the

1:03:18.613 --> 1:03:23.333
<v Speaker 2>mouth lately from the governor of the Reserve Bank, and

1:03:23.373 --> 1:03:24.733
<v Speaker 2>you are well familiar with it.

1:03:25.253 --> 1:03:28.933
<v Speaker 3>You say, well, at a time when we have our

1:03:29.693 --> 1:03:34.213
<v Speaker 3>tradeables inflation running at relatively law levels and un non

1:03:34.333 --> 1:03:38.213
<v Speaker 3>tradable inflation still running it close to six percent, I

1:03:38.253 --> 1:03:42.333
<v Speaker 3>think it would be wiser for the Reserve Bank governor

1:03:42.373 --> 1:03:45.613
<v Speaker 3>to just acknowledge his own contributions, or that are the

1:03:45.653 --> 1:03:49.173
<v Speaker 3>contributions of his bank that he leads towards some our

1:03:49.213 --> 1:03:52.213
<v Speaker 3>inflation crisis. Because a lot of our inflation problems in

1:03:52.213 --> 1:03:55.293
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand are homemade. They are still the result of

1:03:55.333 --> 1:03:58.573
<v Speaker 3>the extraordinary amount of money that the Reserve Bank created

1:03:58.653 --> 1:04:03.293
<v Speaker 3>during the OVID years fifty five billion dollars that flooded

1:04:03.293 --> 1:04:06.813
<v Speaker 3>our markets, that drove up domestic prices, and I think

1:04:06.853 --> 1:04:09.653
<v Speaker 3>that is the main story behind. On the other thing,

1:04:09.773 --> 1:04:13.853
<v Speaker 3>where the Reserve Bank should probably just acknowledge some responsibilities

1:04:13.893 --> 1:04:17.013
<v Speaker 3>and the enormous losses to the taxpayer that they have

1:04:17.333 --> 1:04:21.973
<v Speaker 3>caused in pursuing these policies. So we are currently looking

1:04:22.013 --> 1:04:25.013
<v Speaker 3>at about eleven billion dollars that the taxpayer has to

1:04:25.053 --> 1:04:28.853
<v Speaker 3>spend on recapitalizing the Reserve Bank of New Zealand because

1:04:28.933 --> 1:04:32.853
<v Speaker 3>for all the money printing activities, the Reserve Bank was

1:04:32.893 --> 1:04:36.533
<v Speaker 3>indemnified from by the Minister of Finance at the beginning,

1:04:36.573 --> 1:04:39.773
<v Speaker 3>meaning that any losses that they incurred could be passed

1:04:39.773 --> 1:04:42.213
<v Speaker 3>on to the taxpayer. And that's what's happening right now.

1:04:42.813 --> 1:04:46.253
<v Speaker 3>So the Reserve Bank's performance actually in these COVID years,

1:04:46.373 --> 1:04:51.013
<v Speaker 3>I think deserves much closer stroordiny and I think maya

1:04:51.093 --> 1:04:54.173
<v Speaker 3>kulpa from the Reserve Bank governor would be appropriate.

1:04:54.973 --> 1:04:58.413
<v Speaker 2>Can I just raise with you the fact that the

1:04:58.453 --> 1:05:01.733
<v Speaker 2>Reserve Bank seems to have turned itself into a forest,

1:05:01.933 --> 1:05:06.533
<v Speaker 2>or at least the start of a forest, that other

1:05:06.613 --> 1:05:10.413
<v Speaker 2>aspects of the banks, I should probably say the governor's

1:05:10.453 --> 1:05:15.773
<v Speaker 2>approach to life questionable for a Reserve Bank governor.

1:05:16.773 --> 1:05:20.893
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you're probably referring to the articles that we saw

1:05:21.613 --> 1:05:23.933
<v Speaker 3>the end of last week about the conflict that we've

1:05:23.933 --> 1:05:28.573
<v Speaker 3>had with the Reserve Bank here the initiative. Well, it

1:05:28.653 --> 1:05:33.333
<v Speaker 3>was all an unfortunate episode, an incident that played out

1:05:33.453 --> 1:05:36.333
<v Speaker 3>when our chair Roger part Which wrote a column for

1:05:36.373 --> 1:05:39.773
<v Speaker 3>the New Zealand Herald in which he once again dealt

1:05:39.813 --> 1:05:44.973
<v Speaker 3>with capital requirements for banks. And that's a technical disagreement

1:05:44.973 --> 1:05:46.853
<v Speaker 3>that we've had with the Reserve Bank for many years.

1:05:47.533 --> 1:05:51.533
<v Speaker 3>Roger wrote a column and once again asked whether the

1:05:51.573 --> 1:05:54.893
<v Speaker 3>Reserve Bank's policies on prudential regulations the regulations for the

1:05:54.933 --> 1:06:01.133
<v Speaker 3>banks were properly argued. And I would have thought, under

1:06:01.133 --> 1:06:03.933
<v Speaker 3>normal circumstances, it was such a mild column. There was

1:06:03.933 --> 1:06:08.333
<v Speaker 3>nothing polemical about it. Nothing should have followed from it. Instead,

1:06:08.533 --> 1:06:11.613
<v Speaker 3>what happened, and it was revealed by Jeanne Tripsheney in

1:06:11.653 --> 1:06:16.133
<v Speaker 3>the Herald. The Reserve Banks governor then brought Nima to

1:06:16.293 --> 1:06:19.213
<v Speaker 3>the CEOs and chairs of our largest banks and complained

1:06:19.413 --> 1:06:22.773
<v Speaker 3>about that column and basically told the banks you are

1:06:22.813 --> 1:06:25.573
<v Speaker 3>members of the New Zealand Initiative and why are you

1:06:25.693 --> 1:06:29.493
<v Speaker 3>supporting an organization that writes columns for the Herald like that?

1:06:30.533 --> 1:06:32.893
<v Speaker 3>And he wrote a letter to the editor which was

1:06:32.973 --> 1:06:36.853
<v Speaker 3>some then printed in the New Zealand Herald last Saturday,

1:06:37.973 --> 1:06:41.613
<v Speaker 3>and he made the same points publicly as well, referring

1:06:41.973 --> 1:06:44.293
<v Speaker 3>back to the membership of the banks of the Initiative.

1:06:44.933 --> 1:06:46.973
<v Speaker 3>And when I saw all of that and read this

1:06:47.053 --> 1:06:50.053
<v Speaker 3>in a herald, I was alarmed because I thought, first

1:06:50.093 --> 1:06:52.733
<v Speaker 3>of all, you're the Reserve Bank governor. You should be

1:06:53.093 --> 1:06:56.253
<v Speaker 3>able to live with criticism, and especially if it's not polemical.

1:06:56.293 --> 1:06:59.333
<v Speaker 3>It was not personal, it was just a disagreement on

1:06:59.453 --> 1:07:02.573
<v Speaker 3>a policy matter, So why are you not able to

1:07:02.613 --> 1:07:06.653
<v Speaker 3>live with that level of public debate? And secondly, and

1:07:06.693 --> 1:07:10.613
<v Speaker 3>perhaps was disturbing. The banks that he sent the letter

1:07:10.653 --> 1:07:12.573
<v Speaker 3>to are the same banks, of course, that are being

1:07:12.613 --> 1:07:15.853
<v Speaker 3>regulated by the Reserve Bank, So to send them a

1:07:15.933 --> 1:07:20.573
<v Speaker 3>letter and tell them, look, we've just been criticized by

1:07:20.573 --> 1:07:23.493
<v Speaker 3>the initiative. You are members of that initiative. And then

1:07:23.653 --> 1:07:25.973
<v Speaker 3>between the lines, do you think it's a wise idea

1:07:26.013 --> 1:07:27.973
<v Speaker 3>to be members of the initiative when they're writing articles

1:07:28.013 --> 1:07:31.613
<v Speaker 3>that are so critical of us? I thought that at

1:07:32.733 --> 1:07:36.533
<v Speaker 3>a sour aftertaste, a Reserve Bank governor shouldn't behave like

1:07:36.653 --> 1:07:39.453
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, you have to be careful when you're

1:07:39.693 --> 1:07:42.853
<v Speaker 3>regulating an industry, when you're then telling the industry what

1:07:42.933 --> 1:07:45.373
<v Speaker 3>they have to do things that you are actually not

1:07:45.453 --> 1:07:48.173
<v Speaker 3>responsible for. I mean, he's not regulating them for the

1:07:48.293 --> 1:07:52.333
<v Speaker 3>articles that we write. And therefore I was concerned. And

1:07:52.373 --> 1:07:56.533
<v Speaker 3>then on Friday last week, the Minister of Finance revealed

1:07:56.693 --> 1:07:59.453
<v Speaker 3>in a press conference that I had sent her and

1:07:59.533 --> 1:08:01.573
<v Speaker 3>the chair of the Reserve Bank a letter to just

1:08:01.613 --> 1:08:05.053
<v Speaker 3>make these points and now we will see what happens

1:08:05.053 --> 1:08:07.133
<v Speaker 3>and what follows after that. But I was not impressed

1:08:07.173 --> 1:08:09.533
<v Speaker 3>by the approach taken by the Reserve Bank on that matter.

1:08:09.973 --> 1:08:12.853
<v Speaker 2>There was a column headline five or six years ago

1:08:12.933 --> 1:08:16.413
<v Speaker 2>in the Herald referring to the Governor of the Reserve

1:08:16.493 --> 1:08:19.613
<v Speaker 2>Bank genius or zombie. Is it too early to say?

1:08:20.773 --> 1:08:24.813
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't characterize him with either of these terms. I

1:08:24.853 --> 1:08:27.133
<v Speaker 3>want him to do his job and I want him

1:08:27.133 --> 1:08:29.613
<v Speaker 3>to do his job in accordance with the Reserve Bank

1:08:29.653 --> 1:08:32.573
<v Speaker 3>of New Zealand Act twenty twenty one and with the

1:08:32.613 --> 1:08:36.213
<v Speaker 3>Reserve Bank's own Court of Conduct. It's a beautiful document,

1:08:36.253 --> 1:08:38.093
<v Speaker 3>by the way. When you read the Court of Conduct,

1:08:38.253 --> 1:08:40.893
<v Speaker 3>it says we treat everybody with respect, we are all

1:08:40.933 --> 1:08:47.573
<v Speaker 3>for big debates, we take on board alternative viewpoints. Basically,

1:08:47.613 --> 1:08:51.813
<v Speaker 3>we're open minded and we are not engaging in name calling. Roughly,

1:08:51.853 --> 1:08:54.253
<v Speaker 3>that's what the Court of conducts as well. Then I

1:08:54.253 --> 1:08:56.493
<v Speaker 3>would like to see the Reserve Bank behave like that,

1:08:57.533 --> 1:09:01.133
<v Speaker 3>and by actually putting pressure on members of the Initiative

1:09:01.213 --> 1:09:06.133
<v Speaker 3>to effectively withdraw their membership from an organization that criticizes

1:09:06.173 --> 1:09:08.453
<v Speaker 3>the Reserve Bank. I don't think it complies with their

1:09:08.493 --> 1:09:12.493
<v Speaker 3>own court of conduct and actually should be unacceptable in

1:09:13.053 --> 1:09:17.253
<v Speaker 3>a rule of law based democracy to have a regulator

1:09:17.293 --> 1:09:17.893
<v Speaker 3>behave like.

1:09:17.853 --> 1:09:23.693
<v Speaker 2>That well spoken. So finally, last question, growth and productivity.

1:09:23.973 --> 1:09:26.493
<v Speaker 2>If you were in a position to wave your magic

1:09:26.533 --> 1:09:30.533
<v Speaker 2>wand what would what move would you make to aid

1:09:30.533 --> 1:09:32.173
<v Speaker 2>and abid those two things?

1:09:32.773 --> 1:09:36.573
<v Speaker 3>Even with a magic wand, it wouldn't be easy because

1:09:36.693 --> 1:09:41.213
<v Speaker 3>some productivity draw are things that result from getting your

1:09:41.213 --> 1:09:44.693
<v Speaker 3>whole set of policies right. And currently I think we've

1:09:44.693 --> 1:09:47.093
<v Speaker 3>got a whole set of policies wrong. So it will

1:09:47.133 --> 1:09:50.853
<v Speaker 3>take more than just one abracadabra until we get the

1:09:50.853 --> 1:09:54.013
<v Speaker 3>economy growing again. But if I could just single out

1:09:54.013 --> 1:09:56.533
<v Speaker 3>a couple of things I would like to do immediately.

1:09:57.133 --> 1:09:59.973
<v Speaker 3>The first thing I would do, I would open New

1:10:00.053 --> 1:10:03.053
<v Speaker 3>Zealand to international capital. We are one of the most

1:10:03.053 --> 1:10:06.053
<v Speaker 3>restrictive countries when it comes to capital imports to foreign

1:10:06.173 --> 1:10:09.573
<v Speaker 3>liked investment, and we are shooting our in the foot

1:10:09.893 --> 1:10:12.853
<v Speaker 3>because we need that capital and we need that investment

1:10:12.973 --> 1:10:15.453
<v Speaker 3>not just because we need the money, but we need

1:10:15.493 --> 1:10:18.373
<v Speaker 3>to be linked into international value chains. We need to

1:10:18.413 --> 1:10:21.653
<v Speaker 3>have access to these value chains in order to lift

1:10:21.653 --> 1:10:23.853
<v Speaker 3>on productivity and by the way, once we've got the

1:10:23.853 --> 1:10:28.093
<v Speaker 3>capital here, that will create growth, opportunities, jobs, And if

1:10:28.093 --> 1:10:29.573
<v Speaker 3>you want to see an example of a country that

1:10:29.653 --> 1:10:32.773
<v Speaker 3>works along those lines, look at Ireland. They became rich

1:10:32.973 --> 1:10:36.213
<v Speaker 3>out of foreign direct investment, and I think we should

1:10:36.253 --> 1:10:39.333
<v Speaker 3>be trying to do the same. And that means basically

1:10:39.333 --> 1:10:42.693
<v Speaker 3>getting rid of Overseas Investment Office and our Overseas Investment Act.

1:10:43.253 --> 1:10:45.293
<v Speaker 3>If you want to keep any of this just limited

1:10:45.333 --> 1:10:49.853
<v Speaker 3>to national security concerns, but otherwise open the floodgates to capital,

1:10:49.853 --> 1:10:53.133
<v Speaker 3>that's what New Zealand needs. The second thing I would do,

1:10:53.173 --> 1:10:54.973
<v Speaker 3>and that links us back to the discussion we had

1:10:55.013 --> 1:11:00.533
<v Speaker 3>earlier on Switzerland. I would love to abolish or counsel

1:11:00.693 --> 1:11:03.573
<v Speaker 3>rights system and replace it with a local income tax.

1:11:04.773 --> 1:11:08.173
<v Speaker 3>The way that would work for growth and productivity is

1:11:08.373 --> 1:11:12.293
<v Speaker 3>input because currently councils will always get the same amount

1:11:12.373 --> 1:11:16.333
<v Speaker 3>of tax revenue council rates revenue, because it doesn't matter

1:11:16.373 --> 1:11:20.653
<v Speaker 3>whether the council performs, whether the council's economy performs, whether

1:11:20.693 --> 1:11:23.533
<v Speaker 3>the businesses in the council's area are successful, you will

1:11:23.573 --> 1:11:26.453
<v Speaker 3>always get the same revenue regardless. There are no incentives

1:11:26.493 --> 1:11:29.733
<v Speaker 3>for the council to be good for its local economy

1:11:29.813 --> 1:11:33.253
<v Speaker 3>under that system. Once you replace this with a local

1:11:33.293 --> 1:11:37.453
<v Speaker 3>income tax, you get a completely definit incentive structure. Then

1:11:37.613 --> 1:11:40.733
<v Speaker 3>a council would get more tax revenue if people have

1:11:40.813 --> 1:11:44.493
<v Speaker 3>higher incomes, if they generate more growth, if they generate

1:11:44.533 --> 1:11:48.933
<v Speaker 3>more wealth. And therefore, I think once you change the

1:11:49.013 --> 1:11:52.733
<v Speaker 3>system towards a Swiss tile local income tax, you will

1:11:52.733 --> 1:11:55.573
<v Speaker 3>see councils bending over backwards to make it possible for

1:11:55.693 --> 1:11:59.813
<v Speaker 3>companies to grow and invest. I have some very practical

1:11:59.853 --> 1:12:03.053
<v Speaker 3>examples in mind. I recently spoke to a CEO of

1:12:03.093 --> 1:12:05.733
<v Speaker 3>a small company that tried to build a small factory,

1:12:06.373 --> 1:12:08.613
<v Speaker 3>and they've been trying that since twenty eighteen. Cost the

1:12:08.653 --> 1:12:12.373
<v Speaker 3>Council's been an absolute nightmare. So practically every step along

1:12:12.413 --> 1:12:14.813
<v Speaker 3>the way, the council asks for twenty more clarifications than

1:12:14.853 --> 1:12:17.413
<v Speaker 3>each time they ask for twenty clarifications, you spend an

1:12:17.493 --> 1:12:20.653
<v Speaker 3>average of ten thousand dollars on each bullet point answering

1:12:20.653 --> 1:12:24.573
<v Speaker 3>it with consultants. Now, imagine the council at an incentive

1:12:24.613 --> 1:12:27.493
<v Speaker 3>an interest in getting this company this new factory off

1:12:27.493 --> 1:12:30.973
<v Speaker 3>the ground. I think the council would ask fewer questions,

1:12:30.973 --> 1:12:33.813
<v Speaker 3>they would streamline the whole process because they would have

1:12:33.813 --> 1:12:35.973
<v Speaker 3>an interest in getting the factory up and running so

1:12:36.013 --> 1:12:40.373
<v Speaker 3>that they could generate text revenue for the council. And

1:12:40.413 --> 1:12:41.973
<v Speaker 3>I think in that way we would create a lot

1:12:42.013 --> 1:12:44.573
<v Speaker 3>more growth, would probably create a lot more housing as well.

1:12:45.213 --> 1:12:48.973
<v Speaker 3>And if I had this magic wand I would do

1:12:49.053 --> 1:12:52.773
<v Speaker 3>these two things at once. So abolish any rules on

1:12:52.933 --> 1:12:56.653
<v Speaker 3>FDI or a direct investment and changing the way that

1:12:56.693 --> 1:12:59.013
<v Speaker 3>we find as councils so that they have a reason

1:12:59.093 --> 1:13:00.013
<v Speaker 3>to go for growth.

1:13:00.493 --> 1:13:04.093
<v Speaker 2>That would be the next mayor of Oakland, do you.

1:13:03.133 --> 1:13:06.373
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't think I've got the charm The office requires.

1:13:08.653 --> 1:13:11.693
<v Speaker 2>Oliver Hart, which it is always a pleasure, and this

1:13:11.733 --> 1:13:15.453
<v Speaker 2>one was supremely so thank you for your time and

1:13:16.933 --> 1:13:17.453
<v Speaker 2>keep your thinking.

1:13:17.493 --> 1:13:17.613
<v Speaker 1>Oh.

1:13:17.653 --> 1:13:20.413
<v Speaker 2>One last question, one last question.

1:13:20.973 --> 1:13:23.053
<v Speaker 3>Now called lumber, right, I have the lumber, always had

1:13:23.253 --> 1:13:23.853
<v Speaker 3>the last question.

1:13:24.253 --> 1:13:27.533
<v Speaker 2>I've asked you this before on at least one, but

1:13:27.533 --> 1:13:30.493
<v Speaker 2>I think more occasions. Would you consider leaving this country

1:13:30.533 --> 1:13:31.013
<v Speaker 2>at the moment?

1:13:31.413 --> 1:13:32.853
<v Speaker 3>No, because I've got its shop to them.

1:13:32.933 --> 1:13:36.253
<v Speaker 2>Still, it's a good answer and I'll take it. Thanks again,

1:13:36.413 --> 1:13:38.653
<v Speaker 2>thank you, and it won't be the last time.

1:13:39.013 --> 1:13:39.293
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

1:13:39.373 --> 1:13:57.933
<v Speaker 2>Lateon, there are essential fat nutrients that we need in

1:13:57.973 --> 1:14:00.933
<v Speaker 2>our diet as the body can't manufacture them. These are

1:14:01.053 --> 1:14:05.133
<v Speaker 2>Omega three and Amiga six fatty acience. Equisin is a

1:14:05.173 --> 1:14:08.893
<v Speaker 2>combination of fish oil and virgin evening primrose oil, a

1:14:08.933 --> 1:14:12.093
<v Speaker 2>formula that provides an excellent source of Omega three and

1:14:12.173 --> 1:14:15.893
<v Speaker 2>Omega six fatty acids in their naturally existing ratios. The

1:14:15.933 --> 1:14:19.853
<v Speaker 2>Omega six from evening primrose oil assists the Omega three

1:14:19.893 --> 1:14:22.773
<v Speaker 2>fish oil to be more effective. Equisine is a high

1:14:22.853 --> 1:14:26.053
<v Speaker 2>quality fish oil supplement enriched with evening primrose oil that

1:14:26.133 --> 1:14:30.613
<v Speaker 2>works synergistically for comprehensive health support. Source from the deep

1:14:30.653 --> 1:14:35.493
<v Speaker 2>sea sardines Anchovisa Magril provide essential Amiga three fatty acids

1:14:35.653 --> 1:14:39.133
<v Speaker 2>in their purest form without any internal organs or toxins.

1:14:39.573 --> 1:14:42.253
<v Speaker 2>Every batch is tested for its purity before it's allowed

1:14:42.293 --> 1:14:45.653
<v Speaker 2>to be sold. Equisine supports cells to be flexible, so

1:14:45.813 --> 1:14:50.493
<v Speaker 2>important to support healthy blood flow and overall cardiovascular health.

1:14:50.973 --> 1:14:54.853
<v Speaker 2>Equisine can support mood, balance and mental clarity and focus

1:14:54.853 --> 1:14:58.413
<v Speaker 2>in children, all the way to supporting stiff joints, mental focus,

1:14:58.453 --> 1:15:01.973
<v Speaker 2>brain health and healthy eyes as we get older. Equisine

1:15:02.053 --> 1:15:05.293
<v Speaker 2>is a premium, high grade fish and evening primrose oil

1:15:05.453 --> 1:15:08.373
<v Speaker 2>to be taken in addition to a healthy diet. It

1:15:08.573 --> 1:15:12.133
<v Speaker 2>is only available from pharmacies and health stores. Always read

1:15:12.133 --> 1:15:15.653
<v Speaker 2>the label and users directed, and if symptoms persist, see

1:15:15.733 --> 1:15:27.413
<v Speaker 2>your healthcare professional. Farmer Broker Auckland. Welcome to the mail

1:15:27.493 --> 1:15:30.293
<v Speaker 2>room for podcast two hundred and forty two, missus producer,

1:15:31.653 --> 1:15:34.373
<v Speaker 2>I would like you to lead. If you don't mind.

1:15:34.333 --> 1:15:37.933
<v Speaker 4>Lateon, I will. Kevin says, listening to your weekly podcasts

1:15:38.293 --> 1:15:41.533
<v Speaker 4>and many times re listening to them, is a pleasant

1:15:41.573 --> 1:15:45.173
<v Speaker 4>diversion and thankfully reminds me the whole world hasn't transformed

1:15:45.213 --> 1:15:49.373
<v Speaker 4>into absurdity. I rather suspect you have a deeper understanding

1:15:49.413 --> 1:15:51.733
<v Speaker 4>of the nature of the world's state of affairs, maybe

1:15:51.773 --> 1:15:55.493
<v Speaker 4>not apparent to those interviewees who miss your obvious clues

1:15:55.573 --> 1:16:00.253
<v Speaker 4>and dispersed amongst the insightful questions you ask. I'm usually

1:16:00.293 --> 1:16:03.293
<v Speaker 4>in a state of anticipation as you poke holes in

1:16:03.333 --> 1:16:06.693
<v Speaker 4>the fabric of current reality and tease out and expose

1:16:06.733 --> 1:16:10.573
<v Speaker 4>the pieces of information each guest may have to further

1:16:10.693 --> 1:16:14.733
<v Speaker 4>unpick the powers that Bee's masterful plan to continually enslave

1:16:15.373 --> 1:16:19.693
<v Speaker 4>mankind in a beehive mentality. For this and the information

1:16:19.853 --> 1:16:23.573
<v Speaker 4>imparted by your refusal to embrace a woke or meronic

1:16:23.933 --> 1:16:26.133
<v Speaker 4>dumbed down, politically correct narrative.

1:16:26.293 --> 1:16:27.013
<v Speaker 2>I thank you.

1:16:27.853 --> 1:16:31.773
<v Speaker 4>More recently John or Cock, Muriel Newman and Anthony Willie

1:16:31.813 --> 1:16:34.093
<v Speaker 4>I have shared with many friends, but the real tour

1:16:34.213 --> 1:16:37.573
<v Speaker 4>of forse without doubt was the letter from Leon Hill,

1:16:37.613 --> 1:16:41.133
<v Speaker 4>the assie from Iceland. Being on the fringes of a

1:16:41.173 --> 1:16:44.693
<v Speaker 4>loosely organized freedom movement of New Zealand, I was aware

1:16:44.733 --> 1:16:49.613
<v Speaker 4>of the conspiracy theory pertaining to a proposed population wide

1:16:49.733 --> 1:16:53.413
<v Speaker 4>digital idea which is to be implemented overseas and here.

1:16:53.453 --> 1:16:57.493
<v Speaker 4>But the shock of realizing Australia just now legislated for

1:16:57.653 --> 1:17:01.573
<v Speaker 4>its implementation galvanized me into sharing that letter with as

1:17:01.573 --> 1:17:05.813
<v Speaker 4>many people as possible for being that watchman for encroachments

1:17:05.933 --> 1:17:08.853
<v Speaker 4>on our freedom. Again, I thank you from Kevin.

1:17:08.973 --> 1:17:11.453
<v Speaker 2>Kevin, very nice of you. Thank you. And there's a

1:17:11.493 --> 1:17:15.533
<v Speaker 2>couple of things to comment on, specifically where he says,

1:17:15.773 --> 1:17:18.173
<v Speaker 2>I rather suspect you have a deeper understanding of the

1:17:18.253 --> 1:17:22.493
<v Speaker 2>nature of the world's state of affairs, maybe not apparent

1:17:22.533 --> 1:17:27.213
<v Speaker 2>to those interviewees who miss your obvious clues blah blah.

1:17:27.613 --> 1:17:30.813
<v Speaker 2>I've decided what the problem is the problem is that

1:17:30.853 --> 1:17:35.053
<v Speaker 2>there are too many people who have no idea what

1:17:35.293 --> 1:17:39.373
<v Speaker 2>really is going on because they restrict themselves to their

1:17:39.413 --> 1:17:43.453
<v Speaker 2>own particular format without and I've had this discussion with

1:17:43.533 --> 1:17:45.933
<v Speaker 2>so many people over over a long period of time.

1:17:46.333 --> 1:17:50.973
<v Speaker 2>If you're reading material that comes via media that shuts

1:17:51.133 --> 1:17:55.133
<v Speaker 2>down any objection to the narrative of the day or

1:17:55.173 --> 1:17:59.213
<v Speaker 2>the moment, or the year or the lifetime, then you're

1:17:59.373 --> 1:18:02.213
<v Speaker 2>going to be ignorant of what might really be going

1:18:02.253 --> 1:18:04.573
<v Speaker 2>on because you can't make a judgment call. All you're

1:18:04.573 --> 1:18:08.053
<v Speaker 2>doing is group thinking and being spoon fed, which is

1:18:08.053 --> 1:18:10.613
<v Speaker 2>really done. And I've had a couple of those in

1:18:10.613 --> 1:18:13.453
<v Speaker 2>interviews in the not too distant past. If I may

1:18:13.493 --> 1:18:17.533
<v Speaker 2>say from Chester Laateon just wanted to say I listened

1:18:17.573 --> 1:18:19.693
<v Speaker 2>to Uriel Newman last week and thought that she was

1:18:19.933 --> 1:18:24.053
<v Speaker 2>truly brilliant. It just saddens me that she is ignored

1:18:24.093 --> 1:18:27.253
<v Speaker 2>by mainstream media in this country as she delivers her

1:18:27.293 --> 1:18:30.853
<v Speaker 2>message intelligently and thoughtfully. She covered the issues read the

1:18:30.853 --> 1:18:35.133
<v Speaker 2>treaty and general topics around it with great clarity. When

1:18:35.133 --> 1:18:38.213
<v Speaker 2>the Herald were running their radio ads about how they

1:18:38.653 --> 1:18:43.653
<v Speaker 2>quote told both sides of the story those quote, I

1:18:43.813 --> 1:18:47.093
<v Speaker 2>put in a complaint to the Broadcasting Standards Authority suggesting

1:18:47.133 --> 1:18:51.253
<v Speaker 2>that no, they didn't it attached several of Muriel's newsletters

1:18:51.293 --> 1:18:55.133
<v Speaker 2>as proof, only to be told that my complaint did

1:18:55.173 --> 1:18:58.853
<v Speaker 2>not reach the threshold where they would or could take action.

1:18:59.613 --> 1:19:02.853
<v Speaker 2>Spare me. You're up against it, aren't.

1:19:02.573 --> 1:19:06.173
<v Speaker 4>You, Leake Jen says. Just a month ago, Channel nine

1:19:06.173 --> 1:19:11.173
<v Speaker 4>Australia reported that Minisha Grizoo had been dubbed Australia's strictest

1:19:11.373 --> 1:19:14.773
<v Speaker 4>Principle and the success of the Marsden Road Public School

1:19:14.813 --> 1:19:18.533
<v Speaker 4>was mostly due to her strict implementation of her behavior

1:19:18.613 --> 1:19:23.693
<v Speaker 4>curriculum in her school. Menisha explains, we are teaching children

1:19:23.733 --> 1:19:26.973
<v Speaker 4>how to address an adult, how to enter the classroom

1:19:27.053 --> 1:19:30.173
<v Speaker 4>and correctly look after your books when you teach. This

1:19:30.293 --> 1:19:32.893
<v Speaker 4>is a lesson from when the child is five. They

1:19:32.973 --> 1:19:35.013
<v Speaker 4>don't see it as a discipline by the time they

1:19:35.013 --> 1:19:37.293
<v Speaker 4>are twelve years old, because it is something that is

1:19:37.493 --> 1:19:40.333
<v Speaker 4>ingrained in them right from the time they enter the school.

1:19:41.133 --> 1:19:45.213
<v Speaker 4>The article detailed four pillars of the Marsden Way. The

1:19:45.253 --> 1:19:50.213
<v Speaker 4>first pillar is the standardized core syllabus which all teachers follow.

1:19:50.613 --> 1:19:54.133
<v Speaker 4>The second pillar is the systematic way in which all

1:19:54.173 --> 1:19:58.453
<v Speaker 4>teachers are to teach. The third pillar is the structured

1:19:58.573 --> 1:20:02.693
<v Speaker 4>system by which all students are assessed and the fourth

1:20:02.693 --> 1:20:07.253
<v Speaker 4>pillar is the consistent drumming of good civics and citizenship

1:20:07.413 --> 1:20:11.853
<v Speaker 4>into all students. These four pillars show that Manisha Grizzuola's

1:20:11.893 --> 1:20:15.933
<v Speaker 4>success is due to the clarity and uniformity of expectations

1:20:16.413 --> 1:20:20.893
<v Speaker 4>she has set for all teachers, students and parents. I

1:20:20.933 --> 1:20:22.733
<v Speaker 4>loved it when she said in your podcast that we

1:20:22.813 --> 1:20:25.733
<v Speaker 4>need to train and discipline kids while they are young

1:20:25.853 --> 1:20:31.813
<v Speaker 4>because quote that little defiance becomes swearing tomorrow. How true.

1:20:32.013 --> 1:20:36.333
<v Speaker 4>Just recall those disrespectful New Zealand students brazenly swearing at

1:20:36.413 --> 1:20:40.293
<v Speaker 4>David Seymour in public. We need more Miniesia Grizzolas, not

1:20:40.653 --> 1:20:43.173
<v Speaker 4>just in Australia, but in New Zealand too.

1:20:44.813 --> 1:20:50.813
<v Speaker 2>Excellent, Paul writes, thanks for discussing digital ideas. Sadly it's

1:20:50.813 --> 1:20:54.973
<v Speaker 2>something we will likely have to contend with due to

1:20:55.133 --> 1:21:00.653
<v Speaker 2>public apathy and low IQ or conniving globalist politicians combination

1:21:00.733 --> 1:21:03.573
<v Speaker 2>of all. I'd say New Zealand, a small country at

1:21:03.613 --> 1:21:06.613
<v Speaker 2>the bottom of the world, needs to diversify what it

1:21:06.693 --> 1:21:09.733
<v Speaker 2>does to pay the bills. Too often we have followed

1:21:09.733 --> 1:21:13.693
<v Speaker 2>along and copied what larger nations have done, even after

1:21:13.773 --> 1:21:17.173
<v Speaker 2>it had failed. Offshore gives an example of the firearms Register.

1:21:17.413 --> 1:21:19.453
<v Speaker 2>We don't have to do this, It's not in our

1:21:19.453 --> 1:21:23.253
<v Speaker 2>best interest. Look how we copied the deregulated power market

1:21:23.693 --> 1:21:28.573
<v Speaker 2>and now we have expensive power and limited generation. When

1:21:28.653 --> 1:21:33.093
<v Speaker 2>the Ministry of Electricity was closed, it was planning on

1:21:33.173 --> 1:21:37.973
<v Speaker 2>building a nuclear reactor. We need to work smarter, not harder.

1:21:38.813 --> 1:21:41.693
<v Speaker 2>We could be one of the countries offering the electronic

1:21:41.773 --> 1:21:46.733
<v Speaker 2>id haven for poor souls stuck in socialist hellholes around

1:21:46.733 --> 1:21:50.373
<v Speaker 2>the platter. We could be the New Switzerland of the

1:21:50.413 --> 1:21:54.533
<v Speaker 2>South Pacific and the lifeboat of personal freedom. If only

1:21:55.173 --> 1:22:02.053
<v Speaker 2>cheers from Paul Paul, very good suggestions, good comments the

1:22:02.093 --> 1:22:05.653
<v Speaker 2>New Switzerland. While we've bandied that one around for some time,

1:22:06.293 --> 1:22:09.693
<v Speaker 2>going all the way back to the eighties and the

1:22:09.813 --> 1:22:13.533
<v Speaker 2>changes wrought by Roger Douglas Attel. But the commentary we

1:22:13.693 --> 1:22:17.293
<v Speaker 2>just enjoyed with Oliver Hartwich, I think has made a

1:22:17.333 --> 1:22:20.733
<v Speaker 2>contribution to the discussion. There just isn't enough of it.

1:22:21.533 --> 1:22:25.253
<v Speaker 4>Laken Colin says the last government in New Zealand, using

1:22:25.453 --> 1:22:30.053
<v Speaker 4>identity politics and guidance from the UN has left us

1:22:30.093 --> 1:22:34.293
<v Speaker 4>with a lot of people feeling a sense of victimization. Therefore,

1:22:34.333 --> 1:22:37.173
<v Speaker 4>some are resorting to a sense of entitlement, and others

1:22:37.213 --> 1:22:39.853
<v Speaker 4>are sick of it all and are leaving the country.

1:22:40.333 --> 1:22:43.813
<v Speaker 4>We even have one political party wanting to legitimize something

1:22:43.893 --> 1:22:46.533
<v Speaker 4>like a Part eight because of their sense of entitlement.

1:22:47.253 --> 1:22:49.573
<v Speaker 4>One hopes that Mary King can use his king e

1:22:49.693 --> 1:22:53.773
<v Speaker 4>Tunga to steer a better path. Otherwise we are going backwards.

1:22:54.413 --> 1:22:58.253
<v Speaker 4>People should realize the monetary and social damage needs some

1:22:58.373 --> 1:23:02.693
<v Speaker 4>time to be corrected. In the last podcast, Minisha Grizzuola

1:23:02.893 --> 1:23:05.173
<v Speaker 4>optimized the way of thinking we need to get back

1:23:05.213 --> 1:23:08.253
<v Speaker 4>to where people have a sense of decency and want

1:23:08.533 --> 1:23:09.933
<v Speaker 4>to contribute to society.

1:23:10.013 --> 1:23:13.693
<v Speaker 2>That's from Colin, Colin, thank you. From Chris, I have

1:23:13.733 --> 1:23:15.533
<v Speaker 2>a feeling. I read this last week. I just have

1:23:15.653 --> 1:23:18.013
<v Speaker 2>a feeling, but I woult to include it anyway because

1:23:18.093 --> 1:23:22.413
<v Speaker 2>worthy of a second reading. It comes from Chris. It

1:23:22.453 --> 1:23:25.693
<v Speaker 2>comes as no surprise that primary teachers are failing maths

1:23:25.733 --> 1:23:30.773
<v Speaker 2>and science. This is because both these subjects explore reality

1:23:30.853 --> 1:23:35.613
<v Speaker 2>and facts, and changing the answer doesn't alter truth, but

1:23:35.733 --> 1:23:39.253
<v Speaker 2>only makes the answer wrong. The reason for teachers failing

1:23:39.293 --> 1:23:43.453
<v Speaker 2>subjects based on truth and reason is candidates who are

1:23:43.813 --> 1:23:48.773
<v Speaker 2>strong in these areas will self select out of teacher training.

1:23:49.573 --> 1:23:52.653
<v Speaker 2>The problem is not the teaching of math and science,

1:23:53.053 --> 1:23:56.013
<v Speaker 2>but the type of system that favors candidates with flexible

1:23:56.053 --> 1:24:00.693
<v Speaker 2>ideas on how the world works. If in a teacher

1:24:00.733 --> 1:24:04.493
<v Speaker 2>training and school system that tells you what to think

1:24:05.093 --> 1:24:08.813
<v Speaker 2>and prohibits reason discussion, the situation will not imp until

1:24:08.933 --> 1:24:11.933
<v Speaker 2>candidates who value a fact based approach to life are

1:24:12.013 --> 1:24:15.253
<v Speaker 2>welcome to bag in. For the record, I'm married to

1:24:15.293 --> 1:24:18.653
<v Speaker 2>a school teacher who understands the system and the politics

1:24:18.773 --> 1:24:21.893
<v Speaker 2>of keeping your job, and then there's a ps at

1:24:21.893 --> 1:24:24.733
<v Speaker 2>the bottom. I homeschool our kids and the biggest champion

1:24:24.773 --> 1:24:28.493
<v Speaker 2>of this continuing is my school teacher's.

1:24:28.133 --> 1:24:31.893
<v Speaker 4>Spouse, Layton George says. This week we were treated to

1:24:31.933 --> 1:24:37.213
<v Speaker 4>a wonderful example of apology, acknowledgment and gracious acceptance, where

1:24:37.253 --> 1:24:40.013
<v Speaker 4>the mutual act of goodwill to parties agreed to a

1:24:40.053 --> 1:24:43.613
<v Speaker 4>settlement which goes some way to address historical wrongs and

1:24:43.693 --> 1:24:46.653
<v Speaker 4>allow both sides to move forward and look to the future.

1:24:47.213 --> 1:24:51.053
<v Speaker 4>The mood in Parliament was profound. Unfortunately, there was a

1:24:51.093 --> 1:24:54.413
<v Speaker 4>misunderstanding around the protocols of both parties. At the end

1:24:54.453 --> 1:24:59.693
<v Speaker 4>of proceedings, Predictably, Mari members of the opposition seized upon

1:24:59.733 --> 1:25:03.653
<v Speaker 4>the opportunity to make political capital of the oversight. As

1:25:03.653 --> 1:25:08.253
<v Speaker 4>a result, the positive mood became tainted by unseemly political posture.

1:25:09.253 --> 1:25:12.693
<v Speaker 4>The budget was presented the following day. The Marie Party

1:25:12.813 --> 1:25:16.213
<v Speaker 4>was present only for the time required for their speech.

1:25:16.293 --> 1:25:20.453
<v Speaker 4>In reply, their co leader's address was full of acrimony

1:25:20.573 --> 1:25:25.693
<v Speaker 4>and vitriol, with demands for separate governance and large portions

1:25:25.733 --> 1:25:29.853
<v Speaker 4>of taxpayer funds. The contrast with the previous day could

1:25:29.853 --> 1:25:32.453
<v Speaker 4>not have been more stark. From a day of respect

1:25:32.573 --> 1:25:35.493
<v Speaker 4>and forgiveness to one of rancor and threats of revolt.

1:25:36.493 --> 1:25:39.973
<v Speaker 4>Questions arise on whether some of the Marie political leadership

1:25:40.013 --> 1:25:44.173
<v Speaker 4>is serving the best interests of their constituents or simply

1:25:44.213 --> 1:25:48.253
<v Speaker 4>preferring self serving histrionics. That's from George.

1:25:48.693 --> 1:25:53.533
<v Speaker 2>George, appreciate it now, Peter Wrights. Firstly, I send my

1:25:53.613 --> 1:25:59.093
<v Speaker 2>condolences over Carolyn's mother's death. I don't really know what

1:25:59.173 --> 1:26:01.693
<v Speaker 2>else to say other than it hurt like hell when

1:26:01.733 --> 1:26:04.493
<v Speaker 2>my mum died, so I can only presume that Caroline

1:26:04.533 --> 1:26:07.693
<v Speaker 2>is hurting too very much. I have to say I

1:26:07.733 --> 1:26:10.013
<v Speaker 2>hope that she theres plenty of support around her at

1:26:10.013 --> 1:26:14.373
<v Speaker 2>this time. She did have plenty and still does. Secondly,

1:26:14.813 --> 1:26:18.213
<v Speaker 2>how refreshing it was to hear your interview with Miniitia Gazula.

1:26:18.853 --> 1:26:22.133
<v Speaker 2>I found her approach to be forthright, clear, honest and

1:26:22.173 --> 1:26:25.613
<v Speaker 2>no nonsense, all qualities which I think any leader must possess.

1:26:26.053 --> 1:26:29.133
<v Speaker 2>While she didn't come out and use the it's my

1:26:29.213 --> 1:26:32.533
<v Speaker 2>way of the highway cliche, that is what her actions

1:26:32.573 --> 1:26:36.053
<v Speaker 2>amounted to, and I can only presume that her teachers

1:26:36.293 --> 1:26:40.173
<v Speaker 2>must at least have appreciated her direct communication, regardless of

1:26:40.173 --> 1:26:42.613
<v Speaker 2>whether they liked it or not. I only wish that

1:26:42.693 --> 1:26:45.813
<v Speaker 2>the last Labour led government had behaved more like this.

1:26:46.893 --> 1:26:50.693
<v Speaker 2>It is all very well being inclusive, but when you're

1:26:50.733 --> 1:26:54.173
<v Speaker 2>running a country, I think that clear, direct and unambiguous

1:26:54.253 --> 1:26:57.613
<v Speaker 2>language is needed, and lord knows there was precious little

1:26:57.613 --> 1:27:01.373
<v Speaker 2>of that during the adern Hipkins years. Was it only years,

1:27:01.613 --> 1:27:05.853
<v Speaker 2>not like centuries? From the actions of the current coalition,

1:27:06.013 --> 1:27:08.093
<v Speaker 2>it seems that they are at least being far more

1:27:08.333 --> 1:27:11.893
<v Speaker 2>directed an upfront with their language, and long may it continue.

1:27:12.373 --> 1:27:15.533
<v Speaker 2>I was going to suggest that we your podcast listeners,

1:27:16.173 --> 1:27:18.533
<v Speaker 2>passed the hat around and raise money to send Erica

1:27:18.613 --> 1:27:23.213
<v Speaker 2>Stanford to Minesia Gazoula's school for some lessons of her

1:27:23.253 --> 1:27:26.813
<v Speaker 2>own Stanford's that is, but then it occurred to me

1:27:26.893 --> 1:27:30.133
<v Speaker 2>that I am already a taxpayer of which Erica Stanford

1:27:30.173 --> 1:27:33.453
<v Speaker 2>is a recipient. Therefore, as I am directly paying her

1:27:33.493 --> 1:27:36.893
<v Speaker 2>wages as her employer, I direct her to I direct

1:27:36.893 --> 1:27:40.733
<v Speaker 2>her to make this trip. She could learn a lot. Well.

1:27:41.013 --> 1:27:43.253
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if you changed your mind or modified your

1:27:43.293 --> 1:27:47.053
<v Speaker 2>thoughts a little bit after the discussion with Oliver because

1:27:47.093 --> 1:27:50.493
<v Speaker 2>he was singing her praises some highly in whiting, was

1:27:50.533 --> 1:27:54.533
<v Speaker 2>he not, missus producer? Your mother was a wonderful person,

1:27:55.653 --> 1:28:00.533
<v Speaker 2>an even greater woman actually, and she was somebody that

1:28:01.253 --> 1:28:05.053
<v Speaker 2>everybody I know, she was somebody that they all loved,

1:28:05.653 --> 1:28:08.333
<v Speaker 2>or if they didn't know well enough, they thought admirably

1:28:08.613 --> 1:28:11.933
<v Speaker 2>of her. Very intelligent woman. And you've been telling me

1:28:12.013 --> 1:28:12.853
<v Speaker 2>that for years.

1:28:13.293 --> 1:28:15.693
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm so proud of my mum. She died at

1:28:15.733 --> 1:28:20.693
<v Speaker 4>the age of ninety two. And you know, you kind

1:28:20.693 --> 1:28:23.653
<v Speaker 4>of think that once somebody gets to that great old age,

1:28:23.693 --> 1:28:26.573
<v Speaker 4>it becomes easier because you know that they have had

1:28:26.613 --> 1:28:30.573
<v Speaker 4>a wonderful breadth of life. But it doesn't get easier

1:28:30.613 --> 1:28:34.453
<v Speaker 4>at all. She was highly intelligent. She was one of

1:28:34.493 --> 1:28:38.893
<v Speaker 4>those first women at university. She went to university in

1:28:38.933 --> 1:28:43.973
<v Speaker 4>London and then to the Sorbonne, Paris. Apparently she just

1:28:44.693 --> 1:28:47.893
<v Speaker 4>narrowly managed to not get into Oxford or Cambridge, and

1:28:48.733 --> 1:28:54.253
<v Speaker 4>in the would have been fifties, No forties, wouldn't it

1:28:54.373 --> 1:28:57.093
<v Speaker 4>forties and fifties, That would have been quite the achievement.

1:28:57.933 --> 1:29:00.973
<v Speaker 4>She was by far the most intelligent one in my family,

1:29:01.653 --> 1:29:04.173
<v Speaker 4>and right up until the day she died, she was

1:29:04.213 --> 1:29:06.093
<v Speaker 4>doing crosswords.

1:29:05.373 --> 1:29:08.053
<v Speaker 2>And blakes gravel.

1:29:08.413 --> 1:29:13.253
<v Speaker 4>Her breadth of the English language was ridiculous. I'm going

1:29:13.293 --> 1:29:16.813
<v Speaker 4>to miss her so terribly, but I am so thankful

1:29:17.013 --> 1:29:20.853
<v Speaker 4>to have my family around me. And it happens to

1:29:20.933 --> 1:29:23.733
<v Speaker 4>us all, does it not? And thank you Layton.

1:29:25.013 --> 1:29:29.173
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately does happen to us all. And she was a wonderful,

1:29:29.173 --> 1:29:32.413
<v Speaker 2>wonderful woman. I loved it dearly. Thank you, thank you,

1:29:33.093 --> 1:29:35.413
<v Speaker 2>and we shall see you next week, Yes you will.

1:29:51.493 --> 1:29:55.893
<v Speaker 2>I made mentioned earlier of the Lost Generation, written by

1:29:56.093 --> 1:29:59.573
<v Speaker 2>a psychologist who forwarded it to me in two thousand

1:29:59.573 --> 1:30:02.933
<v Speaker 2>and nine, written and read on news talks at me

1:30:03.173 --> 1:30:06.893
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and nine. Back then, there was some

1:30:07.253 --> 1:30:11.253
<v Speaker 2>lots of issues, lots of trouble with kids, young kids,

1:30:11.853 --> 1:30:15.253
<v Speaker 2>undisciplined kids, et cetera. It is only worse today because

1:30:15.293 --> 1:30:19.013
<v Speaker 2>it hasn't been addressed appropriately. So the proof is in

1:30:19.053 --> 1:30:22.613
<v Speaker 2>the interim period from two thousand and nine to now

1:30:23.213 --> 1:30:26.573
<v Speaker 2>as to what should have been done and what could

1:30:26.573 --> 1:30:31.173
<v Speaker 2>have been done but wasn't. And this is what she wrote,

1:30:32.013 --> 1:30:36.173
<v Speaker 2>the last generation lost in the underbelly of a dysfunctional

1:30:36.413 --> 1:30:40.893
<v Speaker 2>fatherless society. The saddest aspect of recent events, particularly amongst

1:30:41.013 --> 1:30:44.253
<v Speaker 2>young men, is that it's unlikely to stop in the

1:30:44.293 --> 1:30:48.693
<v Speaker 2>near future. Why because no one or no organization or

1:30:48.773 --> 1:30:51.933
<v Speaker 2>social agency or government department is doing anything to address

1:30:51.973 --> 1:30:56.293
<v Speaker 2>the deepening chaos. It is a multi layered problem, not

1:30:56.373 --> 1:30:59.333
<v Speaker 2>just the domain of responsibility of one group of people,

1:30:59.733 --> 1:31:03.093
<v Speaker 2>but that of a collective of people, organizations, and yes,

1:31:03.813 --> 1:31:09.853
<v Speaker 2>especially government departments. The problem pheps Almost half of the

1:31:10.013 --> 1:31:13.693
<v Speaker 2>Y generation, that is, those born after nineteen eighty were

1:31:13.773 --> 1:31:17.693
<v Speaker 2>raised in a single parent family, mainly mothers. The absent

1:31:17.813 --> 1:31:22.773
<v Speaker 2>father syndrome is now epidemic, and the result more destructive

1:31:22.853 --> 1:31:25.933
<v Speaker 2>than could ever have been imagined. Keep in mind this

1:31:25.973 --> 1:31:29.013
<v Speaker 2>is two thousand and nine. Now it's worse. A generation

1:31:29.133 --> 1:31:32.173
<v Speaker 2>full of extremely angry young men has been the result.

1:31:32.613 --> 1:31:35.893
<v Speaker 2>Then in bracket she puts, there are also many very

1:31:35.973 --> 1:31:40.333
<v Speaker 2>angry adolescent girls, with few of these adolescents having a

1:31:40.373 --> 1:31:44.293
<v Speaker 2>positive male role model. The outcome will soon border on

1:31:44.533 --> 1:31:48.493
<v Speaker 2>anarchy by this displaced group, and they don't know how

1:31:48.533 --> 1:31:53.013
<v Speaker 2>to behave or what acceptable behavior is because it's never

1:31:53.053 --> 1:31:55.973
<v Speaker 2>been role modeled or taught to them in their formative years.

1:31:56.653 --> 1:31:59.373
<v Speaker 2>Mothers can only do so much and nothing at all

1:31:59.453 --> 1:32:02.853
<v Speaker 2>if they suffer from any addictions or dependence on alcohol

1:32:02.933 --> 1:32:06.573
<v Speaker 2>or drugs. Who has any teeth to stop them doing

1:32:06.693 --> 1:32:11.893
<v Speaker 2>exactly what they like? Not parents, not the police, not teachers.

1:32:12.733 --> 1:32:18.493
<v Speaker 2>They despise and defy authority, why because they can. Years

1:32:18.533 --> 1:32:21.733
<v Speaker 2>of PC crap has brought about a breed of uncivilized

1:32:21.733 --> 1:32:24.853
<v Speaker 2>little monsters, some of whom terrorize their parents on a

1:32:24.893 --> 1:32:29.773
<v Speaker 2>regular basis. Kids from age ten and up are inflicting

1:32:29.973 --> 1:32:34.093
<v Speaker 2>untold pain and agony on their parents, from diabolical behavior

1:32:34.173 --> 1:32:38.933
<v Speaker 2>to physical assault. Some parents feel helpless and fearful. Does

1:32:39.013 --> 1:32:43.693
<v Speaker 2>this necessarily point to bad parenting? In some cases? It does,

1:32:44.093 --> 1:32:48.973
<v Speaker 2>In others, it simply points to excessive indulgence and no boundaries.

1:32:49.893 --> 1:32:53.533
<v Speaker 2>The despair that afflicts these kids and the perceived futility

1:32:53.573 --> 1:32:57.213
<v Speaker 2>of their lives, coupled with anger and low self esteem,

1:32:57.693 --> 1:33:00.933
<v Speaker 2>is what drives some of them to drugs and suicide.

1:33:00.973 --> 1:33:04.653
<v Speaker 2>Some never had a chance. Some have had plenty of

1:33:04.733 --> 1:33:08.173
<v Speaker 2>chances and not had the common sense to grab them.

1:33:08.493 --> 1:33:12.933
<v Speaker 2>So possible solutions. All primary schools must have at least

1:33:13.213 --> 1:33:17.653
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent male teachers who are paid a decent professional salary.

1:33:18.373 --> 1:33:23.333
<v Speaker 2>Scrap NCEEA and bring back sc A and O levels

1:33:23.773 --> 1:33:28.453
<v Speaker 2>as in the UK reintroduce a realistic minimum entrance level

1:33:28.493 --> 1:33:33.053
<v Speaker 2>to any tertiary institution and not a free for all.

1:33:33.293 --> 1:33:35.053
<v Speaker 2>I'm biding my tongue because I want to add to

1:33:35.093 --> 1:33:38.333
<v Speaker 2>all this, but I don't need to. Competition and genuine

1:33:38.373 --> 1:33:42.613
<v Speaker 2>achievement made a goal and not something to be modest about,

1:33:42.813 --> 1:33:46.973
<v Speaker 2>but recognized and praised. Police and teachers to be given

1:33:47.053 --> 1:33:52.533
<v Speaker 2>more power, reasonable force included in controlling defiant adolescence. This

1:33:52.693 --> 1:33:55.773
<v Speaker 2>is the only way to restore any respect for authority.

1:33:56.053 --> 1:34:00.613
<v Speaker 2>Political correctness must be dispatched immediately to the scrap heap

1:34:00.653 --> 1:34:03.213
<v Speaker 2>where it belongs with all the other garbage in the world.

1:34:04.013 --> 1:34:08.133
<v Speaker 2>A bostal system for the encouragible young men under at

1:34:08.933 --> 1:34:13.573
<v Speaker 2>where they're supported, educated and rehabilitated back into society and

1:34:13.693 --> 1:34:17.413
<v Speaker 2>not in training for a life of crime. Much tougher

1:34:17.453 --> 1:34:20.733
<v Speaker 2>penalties for the eighteen plus group, particularly for crimes of

1:34:20.933 --> 1:34:24.453
<v Speaker 2>violence and drug dealing. The minimum age for driving raised

1:34:24.493 --> 1:34:29.213
<v Speaker 2>to eighteen and only for four cylinder cars, and directing

1:34:29.293 --> 1:34:33.293
<v Speaker 2>age raise back to twenty. No doll or benefits other

1:34:33.373 --> 1:34:38.533
<v Speaker 2>than sickness or invalids for anyone under twenty. They then

1:34:38.613 --> 1:34:44.053
<v Speaker 2>become their parents' responsibility. All of these changes require cooperation

1:34:44.213 --> 1:34:48.213
<v Speaker 2>from many government departments and social agencies, more so in

1:34:48.253 --> 1:34:53.093
<v Speaker 2>the areas of education and justice. Revising legislation should clearly

1:34:53.133 --> 1:34:56.293
<v Speaker 2>be no hardship for the current government two thousand and nine.

1:34:57.253 --> 1:34:59.653
<v Speaker 2>Who is going to be first to put their hands

1:34:59.733 --> 1:35:04.293
<v Speaker 2>up badger your MP relentlessly if nothing is done to

1:35:04.333 --> 1:35:09.653
<v Speaker 2>address the worsening problem of suicide street violence, and nothing

1:35:09.693 --> 1:35:13.973
<v Speaker 2>will change, and dozens more young people will die needlessly

1:35:14.133 --> 1:35:18.053
<v Speaker 2>and tragically. No one is safe. You too, or a

1:35:18.093 --> 1:35:23.573
<v Speaker 2>family member can become a statistic or victim. So again,

1:35:23.653 --> 1:35:27.373
<v Speaker 2>I say this was written in two thousand and nine.

1:35:27.653 --> 1:35:30.973
<v Speaker 2>I read it on radio, but it didn't go any

1:35:31.013 --> 1:35:35.693
<v Speaker 2>further than that. It's a damn fine piece. It's short,

1:35:36.133 --> 1:35:40.293
<v Speaker 2>it's sharp, it's honest, and it's truthful. And here we are,

1:35:40.613 --> 1:35:43.733
<v Speaker 2>fifteen years down the track. And as the author says,

1:35:44.093 --> 1:35:47.613
<v Speaker 2>if nothing's done, it'll only get worse, much worse, and

1:35:47.693 --> 1:35:51.013
<v Speaker 2>so it has. Back in two thousand and nine, they

1:35:51.013 --> 1:35:52.973
<v Speaker 2>didn't have ram raiders, they didn't have a lot of

1:35:53.013 --> 1:35:57.173
<v Speaker 2>other things. Now they do and there's more coming. Now.

1:35:57.213 --> 1:36:02.013
<v Speaker 2>You tell me who is responsible, My suggestion is it's

1:36:02.053 --> 1:36:04.933
<v Speaker 2>the authorities, the people who should have been leading, should

1:36:04.933 --> 1:36:10.733
<v Speaker 2>have been introducing all of the above and didn't. Why

1:36:11.573 --> 1:36:15.213
<v Speaker 2>because we have been putting up with a range of

1:36:15.213 --> 1:36:20.253
<v Speaker 2>politicians who in some areas in particular, are gutless or

1:36:20.293 --> 1:36:22.893
<v Speaker 2>haven't got a clue, take your choice, and the last

1:36:22.933 --> 1:36:25.333
<v Speaker 2>six years is only promoted it much further, of course,

1:36:25.733 --> 1:36:29.653
<v Speaker 2>because when you are a sop to this age group,

1:36:30.933 --> 1:36:34.333
<v Speaker 2>you'll pay the price. And we all are still have

1:36:34.453 --> 1:36:38.693
<v Speaker 2>I overstated that the psychologist overstate in neither cases the

1:36:38.773 --> 1:36:43.533
<v Speaker 2>answer yes. So that will take us out for podcasts

1:36:43.533 --> 1:36:46.173
<v Speaker 2>two forty two. If you would like to write to us,

1:36:46.773 --> 1:36:49.653
<v Speaker 2>love getting email latent at news Talks AV dot co

1:36:49.773 --> 1:36:53.093
<v Speaker 2>dot nz or Carolyn Newstalks AV dot co dot nz.

1:36:53.693 --> 1:36:58.293
<v Speaker 2>We'll return with two forty three very shortly. Until then,

1:36:58.413 --> 1:37:01.773
<v Speaker 2>as always, thank you for listening and we'll talk soon.

1:37:09.573 --> 1:37:13.293
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for more from News Talk set b listen

1:37:13.373 --> 1:37:16.333
<v Speaker 1>live on air or online and keep our shows with

1:37:16.413 --> 1:37:19.573
<v Speaker 1>you wherever you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio,