1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,279 Speaker 1: As if she didn't have enough to do. The Education 2 00:00:02,320 --> 00:00:04,080 Speaker 1: Minister has been asked to go and sort out the 3 00:00:04,120 --> 00:00:06,360 Speaker 1: government's ideas around social media. This is a plan on 4 00:00:06,400 --> 00:00:08,720 Speaker 1: how to restrict the under sixteens. It's a member's bill 5 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:10,960 Speaker 1: but now officially part of the government's program, despite the 6 00:00:10,960 --> 00:00:13,640 Speaker 1: fact that Act not on board. The Education Minister. Erica 7 00:00:13,680 --> 00:00:16,880 Speaker 1: Stanford's with us. Good morning Monding, mate. You got any 8 00:00:16,920 --> 00:00:19,840 Speaker 1: sense whether technically you can actually achieve this or is 9 00:00:19,880 --> 00:00:21,079 Speaker 1: this all about good fields? 10 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:24,279 Speaker 2: No, I do think we can achieve this, and I 11 00:00:24,280 --> 00:00:26,760 Speaker 2: wouldn't have asked to have taken this on if I didn't. 12 00:00:27,240 --> 00:00:30,520 Speaker 2: I already had conversations with world leading experts who have 13 00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:34,240 Speaker 2: been involved in some of the legislative changes in other countries, 14 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:36,559 Speaker 2: including the EU, and there is an opportunity for us 15 00:00:36,600 --> 00:00:39,080 Speaker 2: to be fast followers and learn from the best in 16 00:00:39,120 --> 00:00:41,879 Speaker 2: the world at what's worked and create something that can 17 00:00:41,920 --> 00:00:45,040 Speaker 2: work for New Zealand. But it's the issue is too 18 00:00:45,040 --> 00:00:46,840 Speaker 2: important for us to say this is too hard, Mike, 19 00:00:46,920 --> 00:00:49,960 Speaker 2: This is personal to me. You know, these guys do 20 00:00:50,040 --> 00:00:54,240 Speaker 2: not care about our kids. They're causing immense harm, and 21 00:00:54,320 --> 00:00:56,720 Speaker 2: you know we owe it to them to do something. 22 00:00:57,080 --> 00:00:59,440 Speaker 1: I all of this we agree with, but as I 23 00:00:59,520 --> 00:01:03,120 Speaker 1: talk with web the other day, technically I don't believe 24 00:01:03,160 --> 00:01:04,840 Speaker 1: it can be done. Am I wrong? 25 00:01:06,480 --> 00:01:09,840 Speaker 2: Well, look, I've also got some concerns about the Australian 26 00:01:09,840 --> 00:01:11,920 Speaker 2: model and whether or not, you know, they'll be able 27 00:01:11,959 --> 00:01:14,360 Speaker 2: to implement it, which is why I want to take 28 00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:18,000 Speaker 2: a more nuanced and sophisticated approach. There are many other 29 00:01:18,080 --> 00:01:23,640 Speaker 2: countries who have done similar things and had much better implementation, 30 00:01:23,840 --> 00:01:25,240 Speaker 2: and I want to go and look at what they've done. 31 00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:28,520 Speaker 2: I think we can. But look, I'm no expert. I mean, 32 00:01:28,720 --> 00:01:31,720 Speaker 2: I know your concerns, but you know you may not 33 00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:35,080 Speaker 2: be an expert either. But there that are All. 34 00:01:34,959 --> 00:01:37,360 Speaker 1: I know is what I've read, and I cannot name 35 00:01:37,400 --> 00:01:40,320 Speaker 1: you a single country who's part legislation that has managed 36 00:01:40,360 --> 00:01:42,680 Speaker 1: two banded sixteen year olds on social media. It's just 37 00:01:42,720 --> 00:01:44,400 Speaker 1: not technically possible. 38 00:01:45,680 --> 00:01:47,880 Speaker 2: It is possible, And I've got friends in very high 39 00:01:47,960 --> 00:01:50,040 Speaker 2: will used to be in very high places at Facebook 40 00:01:50,120 --> 00:01:53,840 Speaker 2: and other companies who know that they know. I mean, 41 00:01:53,880 --> 00:01:56,280 Speaker 2: if you look, you read that book Careless People by 42 00:01:56,320 --> 00:01:58,440 Speaker 2: Sarah and Williams. You read that book. It has a 43 00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:01,120 Speaker 2: whole chapter on the fact that they would liberately marketing 44 00:02:01,120 --> 00:02:03,920 Speaker 2: to thirteen to sixteen year olds. They know who they are. 45 00:02:04,280 --> 00:02:06,600 Speaker 2: They were selling beauty ads to young girls who are 46 00:02:06,640 --> 00:02:10,120 Speaker 2: taking pictures of themselves down off the internet, targeting them deliberately. 47 00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:12,960 Speaker 1: No I get that. No, I get that they might 48 00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:14,760 Speaker 1: be able to do it if they were willing to. 49 00:02:14,800 --> 00:02:16,080 Speaker 1: But what you're going to do is to have to 50 00:02:16,160 --> 00:02:18,960 Speaker 1: drag pig tech into something they don't want to, and 51 00:02:18,960 --> 00:02:20,440 Speaker 1: no one else has been able to do it yet. 52 00:02:20,440 --> 00:02:21,520 Speaker 1: That's what That's my point. 53 00:02:22,280 --> 00:02:24,280 Speaker 2: There have been other there are other countries around the 54 00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:29,320 Speaker 2: world who have got far better regimes where they have 55 00:02:29,400 --> 00:02:32,800 Speaker 2: said to them, look, we're going to find you this way, 56 00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:35,800 Speaker 2: which actually has made those companies sit up and realize 57 00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:37,960 Speaker 2: it's not worth their while to exploit our kids when 58 00:02:38,000 --> 00:02:39,840 Speaker 2: they do it that way. And I'm very carefully watching 59 00:02:39,880 --> 00:02:41,880 Speaker 2: what other countries have done. There are good examples, mate. 60 00:02:42,000 --> 00:02:44,600 Speaker 1: Okay, a couple of other quick things in your various 61 00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:46,480 Speaker 1: other First word, do you really have time for all 62 00:02:46,520 --> 00:02:47,239 Speaker 1: of us? 63 00:02:49,960 --> 00:02:51,960 Speaker 2: Well? I do. I do, And like I say, this 64 00:02:52,000 --> 00:02:54,120 Speaker 2: is too important. We have to shift societal norms on 65 00:02:54,200 --> 00:02:56,560 Speaker 2: this digital stuff to make sure that we're protecting our kids. 66 00:02:57,000 --> 00:02:57,520 Speaker 2: It's worth it. 67 00:02:57,720 --> 00:03:00,480 Speaker 1: Back to Friday's announcement. You're on a no win here 68 00:03:00,480 --> 00:03:02,360 Speaker 1: with the abuse thing, aren't you. It doesn't matter what 69 00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:04,480 Speaker 1: you do. There will always be people who simply are 70 00:03:04,520 --> 00:03:07,160 Speaker 1: not happy and will not be satisfied. And that's just life, 71 00:03:07,240 --> 00:03:07,600 Speaker 1: isn't it. 72 00:03:08,600 --> 00:03:10,280 Speaker 2: Well I said that from the very start. I said, 73 00:03:10,800 --> 00:03:13,040 Speaker 2: you know, there will be people who we will be disappointed, 74 00:03:13,080 --> 00:03:15,400 Speaker 2: but there will be many other people. And we know 75 00:03:15,480 --> 00:03:17,600 Speaker 2: this already because people have already gone and put in 76 00:03:17,639 --> 00:03:20,000 Speaker 2: for their top ups. And you know who. I know 77 00:03:20,040 --> 00:03:22,760 Speaker 2: because I've spoken to many survivors, you know who will 78 00:03:23,600 --> 00:03:25,640 Speaker 2: recognize that this isn't going to make up for the 79 00:03:25,680 --> 00:03:28,280 Speaker 2: pain that they suffered, but it is something that they 80 00:03:28,280 --> 00:03:32,399 Speaker 2: accept is a workable solution. But of course there will 81 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:35,080 Speaker 2: always be others who are not happy and will talk 82 00:03:35,120 --> 00:03:37,560 Speaker 2: to the media, and that was always going to be 83 00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:39,400 Speaker 2: the way. But I think the fact that this is 84 00:03:39,440 --> 00:03:43,080 Speaker 2: the single biggest investment into the redress scheme in the 85 00:03:43,120 --> 00:03:45,680 Speaker 2: history of this country, more than three quarters of a 86 00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:49,240 Speaker 2: billion dollars to make sure that we have got what 87 00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:52,160 Speaker 2: looks like and acts like a single system that's topping 88 00:03:52,240 --> 00:03:55,600 Speaker 2: up people who've already had redress. You know, we've done 89 00:03:56,720 --> 00:03:59,040 Speaker 2: a lot of what the Royal Commission asked for. But 90 00:03:59,440 --> 00:04:00,840 Speaker 2: what I'm trying to say in the meter is this 91 00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:03,520 Speaker 2: is just the first step. There's nothing to say that 92 00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:07,240 Speaker 2: we won't make further changes and move more close to 93 00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:11,480 Speaker 2: an independent redress system after twenty twenty seven, when we 94 00:04:11,520 --> 00:04:12,360 Speaker 2: have a review. 95 00:04:12,280 --> 00:04:16,280 Speaker 1: O Golden Visa's immigration. That was my headache last NA 96 00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:18,880 Speaker 1: last week and dealing with the department who repaying the bump. 97 00:04:19,520 --> 00:04:23,040 Speaker 1: Does the new Golden Visa exclude the use of qualified 98 00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:27,120 Speaker 1: domestic Institutional investor and the qualified Domestic limited partnership In 99 00:04:27,200 --> 00:04:29,240 Speaker 1: other words, is it anti Chinese? 100 00:04:30,400 --> 00:04:32,720 Speaker 2: It's not anti Chinese at all. It's what it is. 101 00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:37,159 Speaker 2: The previous labor government put these in place as well. 102 00:04:37,480 --> 00:04:41,599 Speaker 2: It's saying that if you have to repatriate your money mandatorily, 103 00:04:42,080 --> 00:04:44,640 Speaker 2: like through the QDII or the QDLP that you're talking about, 104 00:04:45,279 --> 00:04:47,400 Speaker 2: but any other scheme by any other country, if it 105 00:04:47,440 --> 00:04:50,560 Speaker 2: has to be repatriated, you are not the investor that 106 00:04:50,600 --> 00:04:52,760 Speaker 2: we are looking for. We want people who are here 107 00:04:52,839 --> 00:04:55,520 Speaker 2: with their money long term, and it doesn't matter what 108 00:04:55,520 --> 00:04:58,440 Speaker 2: scheme it is. It's not anti any country. We want 109 00:04:58,440 --> 00:04:59,880 Speaker 2: people who are here for the long term. 110 00:05:00,360 --> 00:05:03,680 Speaker 1: Right appreciate your time is always there can Stanford Education, Immigration, 111 00:05:04,200 --> 00:05:07,800 Speaker 1: Social Media Minister. For more from the My Asking Breakfast 112 00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:11,360 Speaker 1: listen live to news Talks at B from six am weekdays, 113 00:05:11,560 --> 00:05:13,600 Speaker 1: or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio