1 00:00:19,059 --> 00:00:19,419 Speaker 1: Kyota. 2 00:00:19,579 --> 00:00:22,819 Speaker 2: Chelsea Daniels here, host of the Front Page. We're taking 3 00:00:22,819 --> 00:00:25,779 Speaker 2: away breakover summer, but to help build the gap, we're 4 00:00:25,819 --> 00:00:29,099 Speaker 2: re issuing some of our most significant episodes of twenty 5 00:00:29,179 --> 00:00:32,379 Speaker 2: twenty five on behalf of the Front Page team. Thanks 6 00:00:32,459 --> 00:00:34,778 Speaker 2: for listening and we look forward to being back with 7 00:00:34,859 --> 00:00:44,418 Speaker 2: you On January twelfth, twenty twenty six. Kyota owned Chelsea 8 00:00:44,539 --> 00:00:48,419 Speaker 2: Daniels and This is the Front Page, a daily podcast 9 00:00:48,539 --> 00:00:50,699 Speaker 2: presented by the New Zealand Herald. 10 00:00:53,979 --> 00:00:57,939 Speaker 1: Should the ultra wealthy pay more tax? 11 00:00:58,499 --> 00:01:02,579 Speaker 2: It's a debate that's continued for decades, even centuries, from 12 00:01:02,659 --> 00:01:06,419 Speaker 2: ancient Athens to present day. The idea has been a 13 00:01:06,579 --> 00:01:11,179 Speaker 2: constant when it comes to addressing inequality, yet no government 14 00:01:11,339 --> 00:01:14,059 Speaker 2: in the last few decades has been brave. 15 00:01:13,899 --> 00:01:15,618 Speaker 1: Enough to impose one. 16 00:01:16,259 --> 00:01:20,098 Speaker 2: It's a staple of the Green parties prepared posed budget 17 00:01:20,139 --> 00:01:23,898 Speaker 2: which promises bold moves to make sure everyone has a 18 00:01:23,979 --> 00:01:27,018 Speaker 2: warm home, decent ki and the care and. 19 00:01:27,019 --> 00:01:29,059 Speaker 1: Support for a good life. 20 00:01:29,699 --> 00:01:33,499 Speaker 2: But who pays and is leaning even more left than 21 00:01:33,658 --> 00:01:37,539 Speaker 2: center doing wonders for the party's polling. Today on the 22 00:01:37,538 --> 00:01:41,379 Speaker 2: Front Page, Green Party co leader Chloe's Swarbrick is with 23 00:01:41,459 --> 00:01:44,898 Speaker 2: us to discuss whether it's time for the wealthy to 24 00:01:45,299 --> 00:01:51,418 Speaker 2: fund the rest of us. First off, Chloe, your Green's 25 00:01:51,419 --> 00:01:54,619 Speaker 2: on Tour road show is taking the party's Green budget 26 00:01:54,699 --> 00:01:58,699 Speaker 2: directly to communities. What are the most common concerns or 27 00:01:58,779 --> 00:02:00,819 Speaker 2: questions or stuff raised with you? 28 00:02:01,459 --> 00:02:03,338 Speaker 3: People know that the wheels are falling off. You know, 29 00:02:03,499 --> 00:02:05,698 Speaker 3: if you diagnose the problem of the world that we're 30 00:02:05,699 --> 00:02:07,939 Speaker 3: living in today or the country that we're living in today, 31 00:02:08,019 --> 00:02:10,059 Speaker 3: you know, half a million New Zealanders are using food 32 00:02:10,059 --> 00:02:11,899 Speaker 3: banks every single month, one hundred and ninety one New 33 00:02:11,939 --> 00:02:15,219 Speaker 3: Zealanders or leaving the country every single day, and a 34 00:02:15,299 --> 00:02:17,579 Speaker 3: pharraicle correctly two thirds of them are between the ages 35 00:02:17,619 --> 00:02:20,459 Speaker 3: of eighteen to forty five. If Nicola Willis has concerns 36 00:02:20,459 --> 00:02:22,819 Speaker 3: about the aging population and the challenges that that may 37 00:02:22,859 --> 00:02:27,139 Speaker 3: face in terms of fiscal propositions for us, then we 38 00:02:27,258 --> 00:02:29,939 Speaker 3: need to actually be having sensible, rational conversations. And that 39 00:02:30,059 --> 00:02:33,419 Speaker 3: was just only underscored by the iid's Long Term Insights 40 00:02:33,459 --> 00:02:35,419 Speaker 3: briefing from a few weeks ago, which told us that 41 00:02:35,578 --> 00:02:38,539 Speaker 3: the rational conversation in politics isn't if we change the 42 00:02:38,538 --> 00:02:41,019 Speaker 3: tax system, it's how we change the tax system to 43 00:02:41,059 --> 00:02:42,659 Speaker 3: make things fairer. But look, you don't need to be 44 00:02:42,659 --> 00:02:45,138 Speaker 3: an economist to know that things are pretty dire and 45 00:02:45,179 --> 00:02:47,659 Speaker 3: pretty diabolical out there at the moment, and New Zealanders 46 00:02:47,659 --> 00:02:50,738 Speaker 3: are feeling it every single day. So I'm also really 47 00:02:50,739 --> 00:02:52,299 Speaker 3: proud of the fact that we've been going out there 48 00:02:52,299 --> 00:02:55,218 Speaker 3: and saying we're not as here to complain in solidarity 49 00:02:55,258 --> 00:02:57,779 Speaker 3: with those complaints, but also to put some solutions on 50 00:02:57,819 --> 00:03:00,139 Speaker 3: the table. So for us, that's looked like obviously free 51 00:03:00,138 --> 00:03:04,179 Speaker 3: early childhood education, free dentistry, free GPS in the primary 52 00:03:04,179 --> 00:03:08,659 Speaker 3: healthcare space, and also helping the transition into a climate 53 00:03:08,698 --> 00:03:11,298 Speaker 3: resilient economy, because you can't just be talking about climate 54 00:03:11,339 --> 00:03:14,538 Speaker 3: adaptation without also talking about how we curb our climate 55 00:03:14,619 --> 00:03:18,819 Speaker 3: changing emissions. And this government's making some deeply irresponsible and 56 00:03:18,978 --> 00:03:22,179 Speaker 3: frankly stupid decisions with, for example, the two hundred million 57 00:03:22,219 --> 00:03:24,978 Speaker 3: dollars that it's decided to invest in new fossil fuel subsidies. 58 00:03:25,179 --> 00:03:26,138 Speaker 3: It's taxpayer money. 59 00:03:26,659 --> 00:03:27,418 Speaker 1: Yeah, so the. 60 00:03:27,339 --> 00:03:31,538 Speaker 2: Party's promising you mentioned, free early childhood education, free dental care, 61 00:03:31,578 --> 00:03:33,379 Speaker 2: free GP visits. I mean, what do you say to 62 00:03:33,418 --> 00:03:36,739 Speaker 2: critics who find all of this to be fiscally unrealistic. 63 00:03:37,739 --> 00:03:40,859 Speaker 3: I'd say that if we were advocating for or fighting 64 00:03:40,939 --> 00:03:45,178 Speaker 3: for free compulsory education or free hospitals these days would 65 00:03:45,179 --> 00:03:47,819 Speaker 3: be called the exact same thing. It'd be called wasteful spending, 66 00:03:47,819 --> 00:03:51,099 Speaker 3: would be called Marxists, and all the rest come at us. 67 00:03:51,419 --> 00:03:54,179 Speaker 3: The reality is that we've done really big things in 68 00:03:54,219 --> 00:03:56,819 Speaker 3: the past, and the nineteen thirties and forties, after World 69 00:03:56,819 --> 00:03:59,139 Speaker 3: Wars and the Great Depression, we came together as a 70 00:03:59,139 --> 00:04:02,099 Speaker 3: country and decided to build a nation which looked like 71 00:04:02,139 --> 00:04:05,899 Speaker 3: the foundations of public healthcare, public education, and public housing. 72 00:04:06,299 --> 00:04:09,419 Speaker 3: And we paid for that responsibly by higher taxes on 73 00:04:09,459 --> 00:04:11,939 Speaker 3: those who had profited handsomely during a time of hardship 74 00:04:11,939 --> 00:04:14,659 Speaker 3: for many. Right now, we're in a situation where the 75 00:04:14,699 --> 00:04:18,099 Speaker 3: top one percent in this country hold twenty three percent 76 00:04:18,179 --> 00:04:21,259 Speaker 3: of all of the country's wealth, and IRD research from 77 00:04:21,299 --> 00:04:23,219 Speaker 3: twenty twenty three told us that the top three hundred 78 00:04:23,219 --> 00:04:25,859 Speaker 3: eleven households pay an effective tax rate less than half 79 00:04:25,859 --> 00:04:27,379 Speaker 3: of that of the average New Zealander. 80 00:04:27,779 --> 00:04:28,979 Speaker 1: It's not fair. 81 00:04:29,499 --> 00:04:31,099 Speaker 3: And when are we going to be able to have 82 00:04:31,139 --> 00:04:34,219 Speaker 3: a rational political debate about how we fix and change 83 00:04:34,259 --> 00:04:37,259 Speaker 3: these things? I mean, there's a reason that the conservatives 84 00:04:37,339 --> 00:04:39,339 Speaker 3: on the other side of the political debate are not 85 00:04:39,419 --> 00:04:41,899 Speaker 3: even willing to engage in the terms of this debate. 86 00:04:41,939 --> 00:04:43,939 Speaker 3: They simply want to shut it down and that should 87 00:04:43,939 --> 00:04:46,299 Speaker 3: tell New Zealanders everything that they need to know. I'd 88 00:04:46,299 --> 00:04:48,979 Speaker 3: also add that in the government's first hundred days, one 89 00:04:48,979 --> 00:04:51,259 Speaker 3: of the first things that it did, as quietly as 90 00:04:51,299 --> 00:04:55,019 Speaker 3: it possibly could, was revoke or appeal the enabling legislation 91 00:04:55,299 --> 00:04:59,019 Speaker 3: to require ird to report on the fairness or on 92 00:04:59,139 --> 00:05:00,419 Speaker 3: fairness of our tax system. 93 00:05:00,579 --> 00:05:02,819 Speaker 1: One the way there is I think Nobel Peace. 94 00:05:02,659 --> 00:05:07,179 Speaker 2: Prize winning economists have recently called for a global tax 95 00:05:07,339 --> 00:05:10,779 Speaker 2: on the ultra wretch, arguing that even a modest two 96 00:05:10,859 --> 00:05:16,179 Speaker 2: percent wealth tax on billionaires stay not even just millionaires billionaires. 97 00:05:16,099 --> 00:05:18,899 Speaker 1: Could raise substantial revenue international. 98 00:05:19,539 --> 00:05:22,659 Speaker 2: Now, how does the Green parties proposed wealth tax compare 99 00:05:22,899 --> 00:05:25,299 Speaker 2: And do you see New Zeraltters having a kind of 100 00:05:25,419 --> 00:05:29,059 Speaker 2: a leadership role in this global argument at the moment? 101 00:05:29,259 --> 00:05:31,899 Speaker 3: I mean, we absolutely could be taking leadership position if 102 00:05:31,899 --> 00:05:34,178 Speaker 3: we want to do. Unfortunately, I think with this current 103 00:05:34,219 --> 00:05:36,259 Speaker 3: government we're saying far more of a shredder than we 104 00:05:36,299 --> 00:05:38,259 Speaker 3: are any kind of vision for the nation that we'd 105 00:05:38,259 --> 00:05:39,779 Speaker 3: want to build. And this is the point that I 106 00:05:39,819 --> 00:05:43,019 Speaker 3: made in the budget debate. You know, this kind of cut, cut, 107 00:05:43,099 --> 00:05:46,579 Speaker 3: cut after callous cut, whether it's in conservation or frontline 108 00:05:46,579 --> 00:05:49,499 Speaker 3: of what's necessary for communities or climate resilience or adaptation 109 00:05:49,659 --> 00:05:53,739 Speaker 3: or whatever. It's not only cruel and unusual, but it's 110 00:05:53,859 --> 00:05:56,379 Speaker 3: not how you build a country, it's how you break one. 111 00:05:56,819 --> 00:05:58,219 Speaker 3: And that's where I kind of come back to those 112 00:05:58,259 --> 00:06:02,299 Speaker 3: basic economic principles. You know, it's really deeply ironic and 113 00:06:02,379 --> 00:06:06,219 Speaker 3: profoundly nonsensical for the government to be talking out one 114 00:06:06,219 --> 00:06:09,459 Speaker 3: side of its mouth about productivity and growth while actively 115 00:06:09,539 --> 00:06:13,099 Speaker 3: kneecapping precisely those things with its fiscal strategy, where it 116 00:06:13,139 --> 00:06:15,179 Speaker 3: is pulling back on government investment and the things that 117 00:06:15,299 --> 00:06:18,899 Speaker 3: drive that productivity and that growth, let alone fear distribute 118 00:06:19,299 --> 00:06:21,619 Speaker 3: of those things. But to your question on how our 119 00:06:21,699 --> 00:06:24,499 Speaker 3: tax proposals would work, so we put on the table 120 00:06:24,659 --> 00:06:27,058 Speaker 3: a proposal for a wealth tax, which would only apply 121 00:06:27,099 --> 00:06:29,499 Speaker 3: to the top approximate three percent in this country. So 122 00:06:29,579 --> 00:06:32,779 Speaker 3: for anyone with an individual net wealth over two million dollars, 123 00:06:32,859 --> 00:06:34,539 Speaker 3: so for a couple it's over four million, and that's 124 00:06:34,659 --> 00:06:38,619 Speaker 3: net wealth, so it's minus obviously your mortgages. Ratherwise, you'd 125 00:06:38,619 --> 00:06:41,739 Speaker 3: pay a two point five percent tax above that two 126 00:06:41,739 --> 00:06:45,299 Speaker 3: million dollars net wealth individually, and doing that along the 127 00:06:45,299 --> 00:06:48,259 Speaker 3: suite of other reforms, and using debt sensibly to actually 128 00:06:48,299 --> 00:06:51,619 Speaker 3: pay for productive investment in our infrastructure, as opposed to 129 00:06:51,659 --> 00:06:54,019 Speaker 3: the tax cuts of Nicola Willis, which have generated zero 130 00:06:54,179 --> 00:06:57,019 Speaker 3: jobs and in fact only continued to minimize the opportunity 131 00:06:57,059 --> 00:07:00,299 Speaker 3: for young New Zealanders. We can build an economy that 132 00:07:00,379 --> 00:07:01,419 Speaker 3: works for people and planet. 133 00:07:03,859 --> 00:07:07,819 Speaker 4: They are further entrenching a system, mister Speaker, which sees 134 00:07:07,859 --> 00:07:11,979 Speaker 4: our nurses, our firefighters, our teachers pay an effective tax 135 00:07:12,059 --> 00:07:15,939 Speaker 4: rate almost double that of the wealthiest in this country. 136 00:07:16,219 --> 00:07:19,499 Speaker 4: And not only is that so deeply un fear and 137 00:07:19,659 --> 00:07:22,539 Speaker 4: so deeply inequitable, that it robs us of the very 138 00:07:22,579 --> 00:07:25,259 Speaker 4: productivity that they tell us that they care about, it 139 00:07:25,379 --> 00:07:27,699 Speaker 4: robs us of the investment that we could be making 140 00:07:27,739 --> 00:07:29,779 Speaker 4: and that infrastructure that all. 141 00:07:29,579 --> 00:07:30,459 Speaker 1: Of us need. 142 00:07:31,179 --> 00:07:34,899 Speaker 4: The fundamental problem with the economy and the tax system 143 00:07:35,059 --> 00:07:38,579 Speaker 4: in altero in New Zealand is that we overtax work 144 00:07:38,859 --> 00:07:42,819 Speaker 4: and we undertaxt indeed oftentimes do not tax at all wealth. 145 00:07:45,459 --> 00:07:49,739 Speaker 2: We're hearing these terms rich ultra riches as a term 146 00:07:49,779 --> 00:07:53,659 Speaker 2: that I've heard pop up recently as well. How does 147 00:07:53,659 --> 00:07:58,779 Speaker 2: the Green Party define rich in this context of tax policy, 148 00:07:58,979 --> 00:08:01,579 Speaker 2: where do we draw the line for who should pay more? 149 00:08:02,099 --> 00:08:04,779 Speaker 1: I mean we we've drawn the line and our proposals 150 00:08:04,819 --> 00:08:07,939 Speaker 1: as that termillion dollar figgre termillion dollars individual net wealth 151 00:08:08,099 --> 00:08:09,979 Speaker 1: puts in the top three percent in this country. 152 00:08:10,059 --> 00:08:12,699 Speaker 3: So I think you're doing pretty all right. And this 153 00:08:12,859 --> 00:08:14,299 Speaker 3: is where I think we just kind of need to 154 00:08:14,339 --> 00:08:17,059 Speaker 3: come back to these really fundamental points. Right there are 155 00:08:17,179 --> 00:08:20,819 Speaker 3: very few people in this country individually afford to pay 156 00:08:20,819 --> 00:08:23,179 Speaker 3: for the cost of building a school or a hospital, 157 00:08:23,419 --> 00:08:25,699 Speaker 3: or even closer to home for a loved one's cancer 158 00:08:25,739 --> 00:08:29,499 Speaker 3: treatment when tragedy befalls us. That is why we pull 159 00:08:29,579 --> 00:08:33,019 Speaker 3: our resources together and we create this thing called a country, 160 00:08:33,139 --> 00:08:35,699 Speaker 3: because we're not five million random individual people or running 161 00:08:35,699 --> 00:08:38,019 Speaker 3: around this country doing our own thing. We actually need 162 00:08:38,059 --> 00:08:41,179 Speaker 3: each other and we can build this infrastructure by working together. 163 00:08:41,699 --> 00:08:43,779 Speaker 3: So yeah, I mean, maybe it's a bit of a 164 00:08:43,819 --> 00:08:46,179 Speaker 3: red hearing to try and define what we perceive rich 165 00:08:46,259 --> 00:08:48,019 Speaker 3: to be, but we've decided to draw the line in 166 00:08:48,139 --> 00:08:50,139 Speaker 3: terms of our wealth taxes currently at that two million 167 00:08:50,179 --> 00:08:51,578 Speaker 3: dollar net individual wealth. 168 00:08:51,618 --> 00:08:54,899 Speaker 1: What about Nan and Pop who bought say, a villa 169 00:08:55,098 --> 00:08:57,618 Speaker 1: in Mount Eden for ten of tomatoes in the. 170 00:08:57,539 --> 00:09:00,658 Speaker 2: Seventeenes or something, and they're obviously going to be above that. 171 00:09:01,098 --> 00:09:01,899 Speaker 1: What happens there. 172 00:09:02,019 --> 00:09:04,899 Speaker 3: Yeah, so in terms of people who are, you know, 173 00:09:05,139 --> 00:09:08,179 Speaker 3: asset wealthy but don't necessarily have the cash flow, they 174 00:09:08,179 --> 00:09:11,179 Speaker 3: would be able to have this eventually paid off in 175 00:09:11,218 --> 00:09:14,059 Speaker 3: the same way that rates can accumulate against the kind 176 00:09:14,098 --> 00:09:15,578 Speaker 3: of property to the point that it's sold or the 177 00:09:15,618 --> 00:09:18,019 Speaker 3: point at which somebody passes on. So we'd have those 178 00:09:18,019 --> 00:09:19,939 Speaker 3: sameatures and our wealth tacks. 179 00:09:20,259 --> 00:09:24,459 Speaker 1: Critics often claim that higher taxes on wealth will drive 180 00:09:25,139 --> 00:09:27,219 Speaker 1: high net worth individuals to leave the country, and this 181 00:09:27,338 --> 00:09:31,179 Speaker 1: is probably a few gimes and that's why we simply 182 00:09:31,179 --> 00:09:32,379 Speaker 1: can't do anything about it. 183 00:09:33,338 --> 00:09:36,059 Speaker 2: No, No, what evidence do we have that something similar 184 00:09:36,059 --> 00:09:38,219 Speaker 2: wouldn't happen here? Like would there be some kind of 185 00:09:38,299 --> 00:09:39,978 Speaker 2: brain drain? 186 00:09:40,179 --> 00:09:42,059 Speaker 1: I mean we're seeing one at the moment anyway. 187 00:09:41,738 --> 00:09:42,618 Speaker 3: That's kind of the point. 188 00:09:43,539 --> 00:09:47,259 Speaker 1: But would we be seeing different individuals leave and we 189 00:09:47,259 --> 00:09:49,139 Speaker 1: don't mind them leaving, but we want the young people 190 00:09:49,218 --> 00:09:50,978 Speaker 1: to day It's frankly ludicrous. 191 00:09:51,019 --> 00:09:53,939 Speaker 3: Look, I'm not going to pretend that it is easy 192 00:09:54,379 --> 00:09:57,259 Speaker 3: to change the tax system. Of course it's not. But 193 00:09:57,858 --> 00:10:00,218 Speaker 3: ease should not be the reason that we do something. 194 00:10:00,458 --> 00:10:03,779 Speaker 3: Fairness and equity and the fundamental principles and values that 195 00:10:03,819 --> 00:10:05,779 Speaker 3: we have as New Zealanders, that is that we care 196 00:10:05,779 --> 00:10:07,539 Speaker 3: about each other and the planet that we live on 197 00:10:07,618 --> 00:10:10,139 Speaker 3: should be the driving force behind why we do things, 198 00:10:10,259 --> 00:10:13,738 Speaker 3: and we've done people should and we've done hard things 199 00:10:13,738 --> 00:10:17,179 Speaker 3: in the past. So I mean, yeah, just a lot 200 00:10:17,218 --> 00:10:22,458 Speaker 3: of the the arguments that are often floated around. For example, Norway. 201 00:10:22,618 --> 00:10:24,539 Speaker 3: At the top of my head, I think there's approximately 202 00:10:24,539 --> 00:10:28,738 Speaker 3: two hundred and thirty six thousand millionaires and billionaires in Norway, 203 00:10:29,059 --> 00:10:31,819 Speaker 3: and there are approximately thirty high profile individuals who made 204 00:10:31,819 --> 00:10:33,539 Speaker 3: a big song and dance about leaving the country as 205 00:10:33,578 --> 00:10:35,858 Speaker 3: a result of their wealth tax changes, and that resulted 206 00:10:35,899 --> 00:10:38,858 Speaker 3: in a huge amount of hysteria, but again a drop 207 00:10:38,858 --> 00:10:40,778 Speaker 3: in the bucket in terms of the reality of it. 208 00:10:41,218 --> 00:10:43,138 Speaker 3: So I think we just need to come back down 209 00:10:43,179 --> 00:10:45,739 Speaker 3: to earth as far as this debate goes, and ask 210 00:10:45,779 --> 00:10:48,659 Speaker 3: ourselves why do people want to live here? It shouldn't 211 00:10:48,659 --> 00:10:50,499 Speaker 3: be a race to the bottom to shred the social 212 00:10:50,498 --> 00:10:52,139 Speaker 3: safety in there and the infrastructure that all of us 213 00:10:52,218 --> 00:10:54,539 Speaker 3: ultimately rely on. All the country falls apart and people 214 00:10:54,618 --> 00:10:58,378 Speaker 3: end up with less social cohesion and we have more 215 00:10:58,419 --> 00:11:00,499 Speaker 3: people sleeping rough down the bottom of Queen Street outside 216 00:11:00,498 --> 00:11:03,299 Speaker 3: of luxury stores. The reason that people should want to 217 00:11:03,338 --> 00:11:05,619 Speaker 3: live here is because of our great quality of life, 218 00:11:05,899 --> 00:11:08,458 Speaker 3: and we are losing that because we are not investing 219 00:11:08,458 --> 00:11:08,699 Speaker 3: in it. 220 00:11:16,458 --> 00:11:18,419 Speaker 1: What about people? And you've probably heard this one before 221 00:11:18,458 --> 00:11:20,059 Speaker 1: as well, because I've heard it a few times. 222 00:11:20,539 --> 00:11:25,899 Speaker 3: I've worked hard to get here. I ask anyone, Well, firstly, 223 00:11:25,939 --> 00:11:30,299 Speaker 3: I would say the hard working news. Some of the 224 00:11:30,379 --> 00:11:33,379 Speaker 3: hardest working New Zealanders that I have met are single 225 00:11:33,379 --> 00:11:35,779 Speaker 3: mothers working multiple jobs, paying double the effective tax rate 226 00:11:35,779 --> 00:11:38,258 Speaker 3: if the multi multi millionaires and billionaires in this country. 227 00:11:38,738 --> 00:11:41,499 Speaker 3: So yeah, I mean, any politician who wants to claim 228 00:11:41,618 --> 00:11:45,018 Speaker 3: to be fighting for the hard working New Zealanders should 229 00:11:45,059 --> 00:11:48,059 Speaker 3: be fighting for those who make their income from work, 230 00:11:48,379 --> 00:11:49,779 Speaker 3: not from near wealth accumulation. 231 00:11:50,059 --> 00:11:52,179 Speaker 1: By the way, I read some critique about the Ears. 232 00:11:52,379 --> 00:11:55,578 Speaker 2: So you've got this thing five thousand dollars per passenger 233 00:11:55,699 --> 00:11:59,259 Speaker 2: private jet tax proposing, and I've read something that's somewhere 234 00:11:59,259 --> 00:12:03,138 Speaker 2: that said, look, it'll it'll force people to fly commercialism 235 00:12:03,458 --> 00:12:06,498 Speaker 2: And I actually laughed out loud at that because these 236 00:12:06,539 --> 00:12:08,378 Speaker 2: people are not like five thousand. 237 00:12:08,139 --> 00:12:10,979 Speaker 1: Dollars to me, for instance, I don't know. 238 00:12:10,978 --> 00:12:13,218 Speaker 2: About you, but that's I don't have that just totally 239 00:12:13,218 --> 00:12:15,018 Speaker 2: will really do you know what I mean? But these 240 00:12:15,019 --> 00:12:18,618 Speaker 2: people who have private jets, I'm going to say, they 241 00:12:18,618 --> 00:12:21,138 Speaker 2: will drop that on a lunch kind of same things. 242 00:12:20,899 --> 00:12:24,059 Speaker 3: So little in the multiples of that that it costs 243 00:12:24,098 --> 00:12:25,618 Speaker 3: they actually use the private jet to get here in 244 00:12:25,659 --> 00:12:26,019 Speaker 3: the position. 245 00:12:26,098 --> 00:12:28,579 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, do you have any data or any 246 00:12:28,618 --> 00:12:31,939 Speaker 2: idea how many of those private jet passengers are actually 247 00:12:32,019 --> 00:12:34,498 Speaker 2: coming here every month? Yeah? 248 00:12:34,539 --> 00:12:36,619 Speaker 3: Every year. I believe it's between two hundred and fifty 249 00:12:36,659 --> 00:12:39,378 Speaker 3: to three hundred, so it's not that many. But again, 250 00:12:39,458 --> 00:12:41,258 Speaker 3: this is about kind of drawing a line in the 251 00:12:41,299 --> 00:12:43,619 Speaker 3: sand or making a point of principle, because we've seen 252 00:12:43,618 --> 00:12:46,979 Speaker 3: similar policies applied in other jurisdictions. I just think that 253 00:12:47,259 --> 00:12:49,819 Speaker 3: it is insane that we are at a point in 254 00:12:49,858 --> 00:12:54,139 Speaker 3: time where regular people, low income, metal income regular people 255 00:12:54,218 --> 00:12:57,299 Speaker 3: are trying their best to use reusable straws and reusable cups, 256 00:12:57,539 --> 00:12:59,699 Speaker 3: and billionaires are allowed to set the planet on fire. 257 00:12:59,899 --> 00:13:01,419 Speaker 3: That's kind of the end of it for me. 258 00:13:01,738 --> 00:13:04,618 Speaker 2: Oh yeah, well, Jeff Bezos's wedding the other Oh yeah, 259 00:13:04,659 --> 00:13:07,299 Speaker 2: I was keeping a close eye on that guest list, 260 00:13:07,379 --> 00:13:11,019 Speaker 2: thinking like, oh right, you have to see Oprah this. Yeah, 261 00:13:11,098 --> 00:13:14,898 Speaker 2: I mean, in New York City recently, attacks the rich 262 00:13:15,179 --> 00:13:18,739 Speaker 2: message helped Zoran Mumdani to win the. 263 00:13:18,939 --> 00:13:20,659 Speaker 1: Democratic mayoral primary. 264 00:13:20,738 --> 00:13:23,138 Speaker 2: Do you say this as a sign that public sentiment 265 00:13:23,259 --> 00:13:26,299 Speaker 2: is shifting globally in favor. 266 00:13:25,659 --> 00:13:26,819 Speaker 1: Of wealth taxes. 267 00:13:27,259 --> 00:13:27,499 Speaker 2: Yeah. 268 00:13:27,578 --> 00:13:29,378 Speaker 3: I think there's a few things that we can take 269 00:13:29,419 --> 00:13:33,578 Speaker 3: from Zoran's win. The first, you know, I really applaud 270 00:13:33,659 --> 00:13:36,659 Speaker 3: the approach that he took post Trump's win. He went 271 00:13:36,699 --> 00:13:39,978 Speaker 3: into communities within New York and the equivalents of kind 272 00:13:39,978 --> 00:13:42,259 Speaker 3: of electorates or borrows or whatever they call them over there, 273 00:13:42,578 --> 00:13:45,258 Speaker 3: and he asked people why they had flipped from the 274 00:13:45,299 --> 00:13:47,379 Speaker 3: Democrats to voting for Trump, because that seems to be 275 00:13:47,379 --> 00:13:50,539 Speaker 3: a question that many of us in commentary land are asking. 276 00:13:50,978 --> 00:13:54,339 Speaker 3: And what he found, strangely enough, was people citing the 277 00:13:54,338 --> 00:13:57,779 Speaker 3: cost of living and basic economic issues, and they felt 278 00:13:57,819 --> 00:14:00,458 Speaker 3: as though they had voted for decades and decades, their 279 00:14:00,578 --> 00:14:03,218 Speaker 3: entire lives for the Democrats to do something about it, 280 00:14:03,618 --> 00:14:06,458 Speaker 3: and they hadn't. So it was kind of a hail Mary, 281 00:14:06,738 --> 00:14:08,778 Speaker 3: something needs to change. So we're just going to grasp 282 00:14:08,819 --> 00:14:11,098 Speaker 3: for the closest thing that looks like a meaningful transformation 283 00:14:11,218 --> 00:14:14,179 Speaker 3: or a meaningful change there, and that is why he 284 00:14:14,379 --> 00:14:18,098 Speaker 3: ended up coming out with such strong fundamental economic policies 285 00:14:18,098 --> 00:14:21,538 Speaker 3: of how you basically rebuild society, of how you rebuild communities, 286 00:14:21,539 --> 00:14:25,139 Speaker 3: of how you provide people with actual economic freedom, which 287 00:14:25,179 --> 00:14:28,579 Speaker 3: then results in those social freedoms. So you know, will 288 00:14:28,619 --> 00:14:30,579 Speaker 3: be completely transparent about the fact that backwhen I was 289 00:14:30,579 --> 00:14:34,379 Speaker 3: at university, I was enamored by the idea of libertarianism, 290 00:14:34,419 --> 00:14:37,859 Speaker 3: which is actually the ideology encapsulated best by the activity 291 00:14:37,939 --> 00:14:39,219 Speaker 3: right now, because. 292 00:14:38,979 --> 00:14:40,379 Speaker 1: I was like, oh, yeah, course it makes sense. 293 00:14:40,419 --> 00:14:42,219 Speaker 3: We'll just get to run around, live our own lives, 294 00:14:42,219 --> 00:14:44,619 Speaker 3: don't interrupt other people doing their own thing. But the 295 00:14:44,699 --> 00:14:46,499 Speaker 3: more that I thought about it and I read a 296 00:14:46,499 --> 00:14:50,258 Speaker 3: second book, you then start to realize that that social 297 00:14:50,299 --> 00:14:53,219 Speaker 3: freedom is a losory. It's not real if you don't 298 00:14:53,259 --> 00:14:56,099 Speaker 3: have access to the material basics to be able to 299 00:14:56,139 --> 00:14:59,258 Speaker 3: participate in society to survive, let alone to thrive. So 300 00:14:59,459 --> 00:15:01,379 Speaker 3: that's where he came out, obviously with the kind of 301 00:15:01,419 --> 00:15:04,179 Speaker 3: tax the rich stuff, but also those basic propositions for 302 00:15:04,219 --> 00:15:07,379 Speaker 3: free public transport services, for free early childhood. Yeah, I 303 00:15:07,419 --> 00:15:10,739 Speaker 3: think that what that tells us is in a nutshell 304 00:15:11,779 --> 00:15:16,539 Speaker 3: tempered centrism which has failed people for decades, for forty decades, 305 00:15:16,579 --> 00:15:19,459 Speaker 3: as they've been subjected to trackle down economics is a 306 00:15:19,499 --> 00:15:24,138 Speaker 3: breeding ground for effectively right wing radicalism, and the antidote 307 00:15:24,139 --> 00:15:26,739 Speaker 3: to that is to ensure that everybody has their basic 308 00:15:26,779 --> 00:15:28,299 Speaker 3: needs met. It's not rocket science. 309 00:15:30,219 --> 00:15:34,259 Speaker 5: On our numbers, the opposition parties Labor, the Greens, Antiparty 310 00:15:34,339 --> 00:15:36,699 Speaker 5: Malori would be in a position to govern if an 311 00:15:36,699 --> 00:15:40,139 Speaker 5: election was held today. Let's break the numbers down. National 312 00:15:40,219 --> 00:15:43,219 Speaker 5: is on thirty point seven points. That's down two point 313 00:15:43,299 --> 00:15:46,059 Speaker 5: two on our last poll in March. Labor is a 314 00:15:46,059 --> 00:15:49,179 Speaker 5: head of National sitting on thirty three point two. That's 315 00:15:49,219 --> 00:15:52,379 Speaker 5: a slight increase of zero point nine. The Greens into 316 00:15:52,379 --> 00:15:55,459 Speaker 5: Party Maiti are both up. The Greens one point six 317 00:15:55,459 --> 00:15:58,739 Speaker 5: points to eleven point six while to party Maliti has 318 00:15:58,819 --> 00:16:03,138 Speaker 5: nudged up zero point five to five point five percentage points. 319 00:16:05,939 --> 00:16:09,619 Speaker 1: Well, the Green Party is currently pobbling really well, we 320 00:16:09,699 --> 00:16:13,499 Speaker 1: can go high the double digits. 321 00:16:13,219 --> 00:16:15,779 Speaker 2: Now, which is I mean, this far out from election 322 00:16:15,899 --> 00:16:19,539 Speaker 2: isn't too bad, all right, and that's ahead of ACT 323 00:16:19,579 --> 00:16:22,779 Speaker 2: in New Zealand. First, in the recent post fresh Water 324 00:16:22,899 --> 00:16:25,299 Speaker 2: and urn z read research poles. 325 00:16:25,379 --> 00:16:28,299 Speaker 1: Rather, what do you attribute this surge and support to? 326 00:16:30,379 --> 00:16:33,819 Speaker 3: First thing, I say, I'm always so reticent to provide 327 00:16:33,859 --> 00:16:34,778 Speaker 3: commentary on poles. 328 00:16:34,819 --> 00:16:37,138 Speaker 1: Oh, I mean, it feels. 329 00:16:36,819 --> 00:16:38,939 Speaker 3: Like reading the tea leaves and it's kind of like, 330 00:16:39,019 --> 00:16:41,099 Speaker 3: you know, everyone's always like when it's good, Oh yeah, 331 00:16:41,139 --> 00:16:42,619 Speaker 3: it means that we're doing great, and when it's bad, 332 00:16:42,619 --> 00:16:45,379 Speaker 3: we don't actually pay that much attention. That's what internal pole, 333 00:16:46,379 --> 00:16:50,499 Speaker 3: but our and another thing is just my basic experience. 334 00:16:50,499 --> 00:16:52,538 Speaker 3: You know, in Auckland Central in twenty twenty, I was 335 00:16:52,539 --> 00:16:53,939 Speaker 3: put behind on all the poles, and then of course 336 00:16:53,979 --> 00:16:56,139 Speaker 3: we ended up making history. Because the real pole is 337 00:16:56,379 --> 00:16:58,419 Speaker 3: people realizing not to watch the poles, but we are 338 00:16:58,419 --> 00:17:00,539 Speaker 3: the poles. We have agency and we can actually change 339 00:17:00,579 --> 00:17:02,619 Speaker 3: things here. But I guess to try and read the 340 00:17:02,659 --> 00:17:05,219 Speaker 3: tea leaves and the vibes that are out there. The 341 00:17:05,299 --> 00:17:07,859 Speaker 3: sense that I'm getting from folks across the country is 342 00:17:08,739 --> 00:17:12,139 Speaker 3: people are much like as we're discussing around Zoruns, when 343 00:17:12,259 --> 00:17:18,019 Speaker 3: people are looking for what the next iteration of our 344 00:17:18,379 --> 00:17:21,499 Speaker 3: economic framework looks like. People know that the wheels are 345 00:17:21,499 --> 00:17:24,019 Speaker 3: falling off of the way that things are currently operating. 346 00:17:24,539 --> 00:17:27,059 Speaker 3: So there's obviously a heck of a lot of frustration. 347 00:17:27,779 --> 00:17:30,219 Speaker 3: And I'm really proud to be co leading a party 348 00:17:30,379 --> 00:17:33,179 Speaker 3: that is putting genuine solutions on the table. And this 349 00:17:33,259 --> 00:17:36,339 Speaker 3: is about also understanding the kind of fundamental principles of 350 00:17:36,379 --> 00:17:39,859 Speaker 3: the Green Party. Two, because it's a moral panic that 351 00:17:40,019 --> 00:17:42,099 Speaker 3: I get asked about every few months or so where 352 00:17:42,099 --> 00:17:44,339 Speaker 3: people are like, oh, you're talking about social policies. That's 353 00:17:44,339 --> 00:17:46,379 Speaker 3: not Green Party stuff. Your name is green, your color 354 00:17:46,499 --> 00:17:48,979 Speaker 3: is green. So just to give you some insight, the 355 00:17:49,059 --> 00:17:51,138 Speaker 3: Green Party or Green parties all around the world have 356 00:17:51,219 --> 00:17:53,739 Speaker 3: the same four core charter principles. What differentiates the Green 357 00:17:53,779 --> 00:17:55,739 Speaker 3: Party in Altered or in New Zealand is a recognition 358 00:17:55,739 --> 00:17:58,739 Speaker 3: of ten tooth your waiting is our foundational constitutional text. 359 00:17:59,099 --> 00:18:02,899 Speaker 3: From that flows firstly the notion of ecological responsibility. Resources 360 00:18:02,939 --> 00:18:05,899 Speaker 3: are finite, even those resources that do regenerate need time 361 00:18:05,979 --> 00:18:08,459 Speaker 3: and space and God forbids and planning Chane Jones in 362 00:18:08,539 --> 00:18:11,659 Speaker 3: order to regenerate. If you accept that as the first principle, 363 00:18:11,739 --> 00:18:13,859 Speaker 3: that makes you know in terms of the flow on 364 00:18:13,899 --> 00:18:16,899 Speaker 3: effects for society, it makes sense to go, well, we 365 00:18:16,939 --> 00:18:18,979 Speaker 3: need to share those resources and a somewhat fair, a 366 00:18:19,619 --> 00:18:22,419 Speaker 3: just and reasonable and rational way. That's not a social 367 00:18:22,459 --> 00:18:25,299 Speaker 3: responsibility or social justice on the internet. The third is 368 00:18:25,339 --> 00:18:28,379 Speaker 3: appropriate decision making we like devolving decision making powers down 369 00:18:28,379 --> 00:18:30,219 Speaker 3: to the level where it actually affects people. It's why 370 00:18:30,219 --> 00:18:32,899 Speaker 3: I'm such a massive nerd for local government. And the 371 00:18:32,979 --> 00:18:35,379 Speaker 3: fourth is non violence. Of course we're happies and we 372 00:18:35,419 --> 00:18:37,299 Speaker 3: don't like going to war, but if you dig into 373 00:18:37,299 --> 00:18:40,579 Speaker 3: that a little bit deeper, it's basically about how do 374 00:18:40,619 --> 00:18:44,179 Speaker 3: you create these systems and settings and blueprints and ways 375 00:18:44,179 --> 00:18:47,619 Speaker 3: of operating as a country and governance and making decisions 376 00:18:48,099 --> 00:18:52,419 Speaker 3: that don't neglect people or their perspectives so that further 377 00:18:52,459 --> 00:18:54,499 Speaker 3: down the track they go, this thing doesn't work for me, 378 00:18:54,579 --> 00:18:56,059 Speaker 3: and I want to uproot the entire thing. 379 00:18:56,259 --> 00:18:58,179 Speaker 1: Do you reckon? The Greens have bounced back. 380 00:18:59,579 --> 00:19:02,539 Speaker 3: I mean, yeah, we're back, baby, But I think I 381 00:19:02,579 --> 00:19:07,059 Speaker 3: think that you know, my aspirations, our aspirations as a party, 382 00:19:08,099 --> 00:19:10,499 Speaker 3: will not be met until we live in a country 383 00:19:10,619 --> 00:19:14,019 Speaker 3: where every child is able to live a good life, 384 00:19:14,219 --> 00:19:18,139 Speaker 3: until our rivers are clean, and you know, our native 385 00:19:18,179 --> 00:19:21,219 Speaker 3: wildlife is flow perishing. It was utterly mind lying to 386 00:19:21,259 --> 00:19:23,899 Speaker 3: know to be in a discussion or a debate or 387 00:19:23,899 --> 00:19:26,259 Speaker 3: whatever you want to call it the other day with 388 00:19:26,379 --> 00:19:28,779 Speaker 3: an act Party MP where you know, the proposition of 389 00:19:28,819 --> 00:19:32,419 Speaker 3: bringing back the more was on the table through genetic engineering, 390 00:19:32,419 --> 00:19:35,419 Speaker 3: and it's like, yeah, cool, like novel whatever, get it. Yep, 391 00:19:35,499 --> 00:19:38,739 Speaker 3: science is awesome, but like we're putting our eggs in 392 00:19:38,739 --> 00:19:43,299 Speaker 3: the basket of something that literally sounds like Jurassic Park. Meanwhile, 393 00:19:43,539 --> 00:19:47,539 Speaker 3: seventy five percent of our current native wildlife is at 394 00:19:47,619 --> 00:19:51,779 Speaker 3: risk of extinction. The government is approving in fast tracking 395 00:19:51,899 --> 00:19:55,299 Speaker 3: coal mines and kiwi habitats and cutting predator free twenty 396 00:19:55,339 --> 00:19:58,819 Speaker 3: fifty and Department of Conservation funding make it make sense. 397 00:19:58,819 --> 00:20:00,219 Speaker 1: I was like, mama's got a lot of meat on. 398 00:20:01,539 --> 00:20:06,099 Speaker 2: Look. Finally, if Chris Luckson called you tomorrow, he said, look, 399 00:20:06,099 --> 00:20:09,539 Speaker 2: I've had a good look at your green badga not bad, 400 00:20:09,819 --> 00:20:12,259 Speaker 2: but I'll let you pick one thing to implement tomorrow. 401 00:20:12,299 --> 00:20:14,539 Speaker 2: And he's got a genie out of the back, so 402 00:20:14,899 --> 00:20:16,499 Speaker 2: don't worry about logistics. 403 00:20:16,779 --> 00:20:17,699 Speaker 1: What would you choose? 404 00:20:18,019 --> 00:20:20,819 Speaker 3: Oh, I think espe the wealth tax as a starting point. 405 00:20:20,859 --> 00:20:24,019 Speaker 3: You know, if we're talking about economic transformation and fairness, 406 00:20:24,059 --> 00:20:27,459 Speaker 3: which is deeply into related to climate justice, then we 407 00:20:27,499 --> 00:20:30,138 Speaker 3: need tax reform. And regardless of whatever side of the 408 00:20:30,139 --> 00:20:32,299 Speaker 3: political spectrum that you're on at the moment, as the 409 00:20:32,339 --> 00:20:36,179 Speaker 3: IID themselves said, and you know they're not politically beholden. 410 00:20:37,499 --> 00:20:42,179 Speaker 3: The sensible, rational, mature political debate at the moment is 411 00:20:42,219 --> 00:20:44,299 Speaker 3: not if we have tax reform, it's how we do 412 00:20:44,339 --> 00:20:45,019 Speaker 3: tax reform. 413 00:20:45,579 --> 00:20:46,859 Speaker 1: Thanks for joining us, Chloe. 414 00:20:46,899 --> 00:20:47,219 Speaker 5: Thank you. 415 00:20:50,579 --> 00:20:53,819 Speaker 2: That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You 416 00:20:53,819 --> 00:20:57,699 Speaker 2: can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage 417 00:20:57,699 --> 00:20:58,939 Speaker 2: at enzid Herald. 418 00:20:58,819 --> 00:21:00,059 Speaker 1: Dot co dot MZ. 419 00:21:00,779 --> 00:21:04,459 Speaker 2: The Front Page is produced by Ethan Sells and Richard Martin, 420 00:21:04,499 --> 00:21:06,099 Speaker 2: who is also our sound engineer. 421 00:21:06,539 --> 00:21:08,059 Speaker 1: I'm Chelsea Daniels. 422 00:21:08,539 --> 00:21:11,979 Speaker 2: Subscribe to the Front Page on iHeartRadio or wherever you 423 00:21:11,979 --> 00:21:15,899 Speaker 2: get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow for another look 424 00:21:15,979 --> 00:21:17,339 Speaker 2: behind the headlines. 425 00:21:19,139 --> 00:21:19,179 Speaker 3: The