WEBVTT - Leighton Smith Podcast #286 - May 28th 2025 - Nigel Horrocks & Justin Matthews

0:00:09.093 --> 0:00:11.973
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from news talks it B.

0:00:12.373 --> 0:00:16.173
<v Speaker 1>Follow this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.

0:00:16.693 --> 0:00:19.733
<v Speaker 1>It's time for all the attitude, all the opinion, all

0:00:19.773 --> 0:00:24.813
<v Speaker 1>the information, all the debates of the now the Leighton

0:00:24.933 --> 0:00:27.653
<v Speaker 1>Smith podcast coward by news talks it B.

0:00:27.973 --> 0:00:30.773
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to podcast two hundred and eighty six for May

0:00:30.813 --> 0:00:33.693
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight, twenty twenty five. Well, this is going to

0:00:33.693 --> 0:00:37.453
<v Speaker 2>be the shortest intro I've ever done. I believe the

0:00:37.493 --> 0:00:42.013
<v Speaker 2>following discussion runs about an hour fifteen minutes and it is.

0:00:42.413 --> 0:00:44.933
<v Speaker 2>It's viteful to a lot of people to hear it.

0:00:44.933 --> 0:00:47.933
<v Speaker 2>It's also interesting for those who think it won't be interesting,

0:00:48.293 --> 0:00:52.493
<v Speaker 2>at least that's my interpretation. So we have the discussion,

0:00:52.653 --> 0:00:54.653
<v Speaker 2>then we have the mail room, and then there is

0:00:55.093 --> 0:00:58.613
<v Speaker 2>a little more on AI at the back end before

0:00:58.653 --> 0:01:02.173
<v Speaker 2>we go. But like it or not, AI is fast

0:01:02.333 --> 0:01:05.893
<v Speaker 2>changing the world in many industries. It may not have

0:01:05.893 --> 0:01:09.853
<v Speaker 2>affected or involved you, yet, just as the Internet now

0:01:09.933 --> 0:01:13.133
<v Speaker 2>encompasses everything and involves all of us, from how we

0:01:13.253 --> 0:01:18.093
<v Speaker 2>communicate via email to shop online, AI will change the

0:01:18.093 --> 0:01:20.973
<v Speaker 2>way that we do a lot of things. I was

0:01:20.973 --> 0:01:24.293
<v Speaker 2>surprised myself. Now, whereas the Internet took some years to

0:01:24.333 --> 0:01:28.213
<v Speaker 2>reach the mass population. AI is changing industries quicker than

0:01:28.253 --> 0:01:32.413
<v Speaker 2>you would imagine, and it's bringing serious ethical questions about

0:01:32.893 --> 0:01:36.053
<v Speaker 2>what we're letting ourselves in for and who is pulling

0:01:36.053 --> 0:01:38.773
<v Speaker 2>the strings to control it. The big tech companies are

0:01:38.773 --> 0:01:43.173
<v Speaker 2>pouring literally billions into research to be the market leader.

0:01:43.853 --> 0:01:47.493
<v Speaker 2>So after a very short break, I'll introduce you to

0:01:48.093 --> 0:01:53.133
<v Speaker 2>both Nigel Hurricks and Justin Matthews, who have put together

0:01:53.173 --> 0:01:56.293
<v Speaker 2>a sub stack, but just as importantly, or if not

0:01:56.413 --> 0:02:00.413
<v Speaker 2>more so, they both have careers and histories that have

0:02:00.573 --> 0:02:10.893
<v Speaker 2>led them to this very event AI with some considerable knowledge.

0:02:11.853 --> 0:02:15.493
<v Speaker 2>Buccolan is a natural oral vaccine in a tablet form

0:02:15.573 --> 0:02:19.413
<v Speaker 2>called bacterial l sate. It'll boost your natural protection against

0:02:19.413 --> 0:02:22.573
<v Speaker 2>bacterial infections in your chest and throat. A three day

0:02:22.613 --> 0:02:25.453
<v Speaker 2>course of seven Bucklan tablets will help your body build

0:02:25.533 --> 0:02:29.213
<v Speaker 2>up to three months of immunity against bugs which cause

0:02:29.373 --> 0:02:32.933
<v Speaker 2>bacterial cold symptoms. So who can take buccolan well, the

0:02:32.973 --> 0:02:35.973
<v Speaker 2>whole family. From two years of age and upwards. A

0:02:36.053 --> 0:02:39.413
<v Speaker 2>course of Buckelan tablets offers cost effective and safe protection

0:02:39.493 --> 0:02:43.493
<v Speaker 2>from colds and chills. Protection becomes effective a few days

0:02:43.533 --> 0:02:46.373
<v Speaker 2>after you take buccolan and lasts for up to three

0:02:46.373 --> 0:02:49.453
<v Speaker 2>months following the three day course. Buccolan can be taken

0:02:49.493 --> 0:02:52.653
<v Speaker 2>throughout the cold season, over winter, or all year round.

0:02:52.893 --> 0:02:55.813
<v Speaker 2>And remember Buckelan is not intended as an alternative to

0:02:55.853 --> 0:02:59.293
<v Speaker 2>influenza vaccination, but may be used along with the flu

0:02:59.373 --> 0:03:03.493
<v Speaker 2>vaccination for added protection. And keep in mind that millions

0:03:03.493 --> 0:03:06.773
<v Speaker 2>of doses have been taken by Kiwis for over fifty years.

0:03:07.133 --> 0:03:10.573
<v Speaker 2>Only available from your firemist. Always read the label and

0:03:10.773 --> 0:03:14.173
<v Speaker 2>users directed, and see your doctor if systems persist. Farmer

0:03:14.213 --> 0:03:26.533
<v Speaker 2>Broker auckland Leyton Smith AI it's become more prominent in

0:03:26.613 --> 0:03:28.973
<v Speaker 2>my life of recent times. I mean, there is Ai

0:03:29.133 --> 0:03:31.893
<v Speaker 2>Fabler who we've had on the podcast once or twice,

0:03:32.293 --> 0:03:35.213
<v Speaker 2>and he writes very good stuff, but that doesn't tell

0:03:35.293 --> 0:03:38.493
<v Speaker 2>us much about the whole AI industry. Let me read

0:03:38.573 --> 0:03:41.253
<v Speaker 2>you some headlines. Every one of these is coming in

0:03:41.293 --> 0:03:43.893
<v Speaker 2>the last week. One was just this morning. On both

0:03:43.893 --> 0:03:47.293
<v Speaker 2>sides of the Tasman we are too fearful of AI.

0:03:47.613 --> 0:03:51.533
<v Speaker 2>Doug Bergham warns, whoever wins the AI race controls the world.

0:03:51.613 --> 0:03:55.053
<v Speaker 2>Who's Doug Bergham? He is the Interior Secretary responsible for

0:03:55.093 --> 0:03:58.293
<v Speaker 2>managing the well more than five hundred and seven million

0:03:58.373 --> 0:04:01.493
<v Speaker 2>acres of federally owned land in the US, and he

0:04:01.573 --> 0:04:04.693
<v Speaker 2>is haunted by a fear that seems at first glance

0:04:04.733 --> 0:04:07.893
<v Speaker 2>outside his mandate. He worries the free world will lose

0:04:07.933 --> 0:04:11.133
<v Speaker 2>dominant in the field of artificial intelligence, and with that

0:04:11.773 --> 0:04:13.973
<v Speaker 2>the future. Then there's a cap on it. So does

0:04:14.013 --> 0:04:17.733
<v Speaker 2>the president forget AI. Students are already cheating their way

0:04:17.773 --> 0:04:21.413
<v Speaker 2>through exams and last for the moment is more, but

0:04:21.493 --> 0:04:23.693
<v Speaker 2>last for the moment is the least important one. Chris

0:04:23.773 --> 0:04:28.933
<v Speaker 2>Luxen defends National's use of AI. So it's getting more

0:04:29.133 --> 0:04:33.813
<v Speaker 2>and more publicity and it's affecting more and more lives.

0:04:34.613 --> 0:04:38.573
<v Speaker 2>Nigel Horrack was the news editor at Newstalks NB well

0:04:38.613 --> 0:04:42.293
<v Speaker 2>when it became Newstalks EDB in that period, and he is,

0:04:42.453 --> 0:04:47.013
<v Speaker 2>according to people who have informed me or reinformed me,

0:04:47.653 --> 0:04:50.893
<v Speaker 2>the best news editor that we ever had. What more

0:04:50.933 --> 0:04:53.933
<v Speaker 2>can I say? He also is a pioneer, or was

0:04:53.973 --> 0:04:57.533
<v Speaker 2>a pioneer in internet matters. But he's also done something

0:04:57.693 --> 0:05:00.613
<v Speaker 2>very recently. He did a course at Oxford University, well

0:05:00.653 --> 0:05:03.093
<v Speaker 2>not Oxford, it was online, but it was a course

0:05:03.613 --> 0:05:08.533
<v Speaker 2>on AI. And the important thing is my understanding, is

0:05:08.573 --> 0:05:12.133
<v Speaker 2>that he almost threw in the towel part way through

0:05:12.173 --> 0:05:15.613
<v Speaker 2>because it was so so hard he didn't and he

0:05:15.693 --> 0:05:19.373
<v Speaker 2>ended up getting ninety percent, which at Oxford I'd have

0:05:19.453 --> 0:05:23.133
<v Speaker 2>to say is ginormous. Nigel, Welcome to the Late and

0:05:23.173 --> 0:05:24.813
<v Speaker 2>Smith podcast. It's great to have you here.

0:05:25.653 --> 0:05:27.853
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me here, Leason, and do good

0:05:27.893 --> 0:05:28.613
<v Speaker 3>catch up again.

0:05:28.853 --> 0:05:33.773
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, now along with you is somebody you're in well,

0:05:33.893 --> 0:05:36.693
<v Speaker 2>i'll say, in business with. His name is Justin Matthews.

0:05:36.893 --> 0:05:40.093
<v Speaker 2>He is a senior lecturer in Digital Media at aut

0:05:41.093 --> 0:05:44.453
<v Speaker 2>He has worked in media and film, in TV design,

0:05:44.613 --> 0:05:49.173
<v Speaker 2>technology and the web and at one stage Justin ran

0:05:49.253 --> 0:05:52.733
<v Speaker 2>the New Zealand Herald website from the tech point of view,

0:05:53.013 --> 0:05:57.773
<v Speaker 2>and he is co substack writer along with Nigel for

0:05:57.973 --> 0:06:02.133
<v Speaker 2>a site called Creative Machinists. Justin, let me start with you.

0:06:02.573 --> 0:06:05.653
<v Speaker 2>What is creative machinists actually mean?

0:06:07.333 --> 0:06:12.053
<v Speaker 4>Oh, that's a good one. It's actually marqinez which I

0:06:12.093 --> 0:06:14.333
<v Speaker 4>had to learn as well because of Latin, but it

0:06:14.413 --> 0:06:18.293
<v Speaker 4>basically means machine and it was a fancier way of

0:06:18.373 --> 0:06:21.773
<v Speaker 4>going creative machines basically kind of giving it that little

0:06:21.813 --> 0:06:23.293
<v Speaker 4>bit of edge or difference.

0:06:24.133 --> 0:06:26.253
<v Speaker 2>Nigel, who started it? You or Heat?

0:06:26.733 --> 0:06:27.853
<v Speaker 4>We started it together?

0:06:27.933 --> 0:06:31.973
<v Speaker 3>Really, we both had an interest in AI, and we

0:06:32.013 --> 0:06:37.173
<v Speaker 3>also have both done a course on social media at aut.

0:06:38.373 --> 0:06:40.573
<v Speaker 4>SO and we both actually worked at.

0:06:40.493 --> 0:06:44.253
<v Speaker 3>The Herald Online in that period, so we've known each

0:06:44.253 --> 0:06:46.773
<v Speaker 3>other full long time and she had an interest in technology.

0:06:47.213 --> 0:06:50.773
<v Speaker 3>But there's a lot of people talking lateness, you know,

0:06:50.893 --> 0:06:53.413
<v Speaker 3>about AI, but a lot of them are just talking

0:06:53.453 --> 0:06:57.173
<v Speaker 3>about the tools and getting very excited about the next

0:06:57.253 --> 0:07:01.373
<v Speaker 3>variation of whatever tool is coming through. And I suppose

0:07:01.493 --> 0:07:06.693
<v Speaker 3>because of my journalistic background, I'm especially interested, as you are,

0:07:06.973 --> 0:07:10.813
<v Speaker 3>in the wider picture, how is this actually affecting life

0:07:10.893 --> 0:07:12.413
<v Speaker 3>or how could it affect life?

0:07:12.653 --> 0:07:14.213
<v Speaker 4>And what are the implications?

0:07:14.253 --> 0:07:19.653
<v Speaker 3>What are the ethical implications we seem to I've been

0:07:19.733 --> 0:07:25.773
<v Speaker 3>through the early days of technology startups and the Internet

0:07:25.813 --> 0:07:28.893
<v Speaker 3>from before it was even there was even a web browser,

0:07:29.333 --> 0:07:31.653
<v Speaker 3>and what I saw over that time was exactly the

0:07:31.693 --> 0:07:35.293
<v Speaker 3>same thing. For a while, Random magazine very successful Good

0:07:35.373 --> 0:07:40.253
<v Speaker 3>net Guide, which discussed all these issues as well as

0:07:40.293 --> 0:07:43.933
<v Speaker 3>helping you online. Whereas a lot of people in the

0:07:44.053 --> 0:07:47.773
<v Speaker 3>kind of tech world simply get excited about the next

0:07:47.813 --> 0:07:51.333
<v Speaker 3>big thing without actually taking a breath and saying is

0:07:51.373 --> 0:07:55.533
<v Speaker 3>this good for humanity? Is this something that we should

0:07:55.613 --> 0:07:56.533
<v Speaker 3>actually be pushing?

0:07:57.053 --> 0:07:58.813
<v Speaker 2>So there is a good and a bad side to

0:07:59.413 --> 0:08:02.773
<v Speaker 2>AI as far as I'm concerned, would you agree.

0:08:02.773 --> 0:08:05.813
<v Speaker 3>Definitely, there are certainly some good things. I think the

0:08:05.853 --> 0:08:11.093
<v Speaker 3>most exciting thing is that in terms of health development,

0:08:11.613 --> 0:08:16.293
<v Speaker 3>AI is definitely emerging as a very practical tool in

0:08:16.333 --> 0:08:20.093
<v Speaker 3>cancer intervention and treatment in a variety of ways. And

0:08:20.133 --> 0:08:23.653
<v Speaker 3>in fact, some health people are some of the health

0:08:23.653 --> 0:08:26.973
<v Speaker 3>people who are working in the UK and USA say

0:08:27.013 --> 0:08:33.733
<v Speaker 3>that AI is enabling them to do a faster approach

0:08:33.853 --> 0:08:37.093
<v Speaker 3>to working out how to cure some diseases and cancer,

0:08:37.653 --> 0:08:40.453
<v Speaker 3>and it looks as though it will have a critical

0:08:40.493 --> 0:08:45.933
<v Speaker 3>impact on medicine and the development of treatment. So AI

0:08:46.093 --> 0:08:50.413
<v Speaker 3>tools are definitely helping develop solutions for curing disease. But

0:08:50.493 --> 0:08:55.333
<v Speaker 3>there are other aspects of AI that perhaps need debate

0:08:56.333 --> 0:08:58.333
<v Speaker 3>and possibly regulation.

0:08:58.493 --> 0:09:01.933
<v Speaker 2>When you talk about health being the most important at

0:09:01.933 --> 0:09:07.813
<v Speaker 2>this point of view. From this position, then there is

0:09:07.853 --> 0:09:11.693
<v Speaker 2>the excus ample, which is only very recent, of AI

0:09:11.893 --> 0:09:13.533
<v Speaker 2>telling someone to go kill themselves.

0:09:13.893 --> 0:09:18.773
<v Speaker 4>Yes, actually that was very concerning. That was involving a

0:09:18.813 --> 0:09:23.933
<v Speaker 4>company called character dot AI. Basically there was an issue

0:09:23.933 --> 0:09:28.653
<v Speaker 4>where the person was talking to this AI and they

0:09:28.653 --> 0:09:32.453
<v Speaker 4>were getting more and more lost into their nature of

0:09:32.453 --> 0:09:39.733
<v Speaker 4>their reality, and they ended up deciding to the AI

0:09:39.973 --> 0:09:43.133
<v Speaker 4>basically ended up convincing them that their world wasn't real,

0:09:43.453 --> 0:09:47.373
<v Speaker 4>and so the person chose to follow the AI into

0:09:47.453 --> 0:09:49.973
<v Speaker 4>the next life or something and kill themselves.

0:09:50.453 --> 0:09:53.693
<v Speaker 2>Charming, and I can imagine there are people who under

0:09:53.693 --> 0:09:57.373
<v Speaker 2>those circumstances, certainly some circumstances would follow through on that.

0:09:58.853 --> 0:09:59.093
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:09:59.133 --> 0:10:03.973
<v Speaker 3>One of the big issues that I was watching is

0:10:04.013 --> 0:10:08.733
<v Speaker 3>today the Meet the Press program that runs on America

0:10:08.773 --> 0:10:11.933
<v Speaker 3>on Sundays, and the whole program is devoted to what

0:10:12.053 --> 0:10:14.053
<v Speaker 3>they consider to be one of the big issues in

0:10:14.093 --> 0:10:20.213
<v Speaker 3>America at the moment, which is loneliness and advanced robotics

0:10:20.253 --> 0:10:25.733
<v Speaker 3>and emotional AI is actually reshaping human connections so that

0:10:26.333 --> 0:10:29.973
<v Speaker 3>there are companies, especially one in China, that are producing

0:10:30.653 --> 0:10:37.333
<v Speaker 3>robotic companions. And one of the big moves towards developments

0:10:37.333 --> 0:10:41.413
<v Speaker 3>of AI is what have been called AI assistance that

0:10:41.493 --> 0:10:45.773
<v Speaker 3>will be after guide us through life. We have a

0:10:45.813 --> 0:10:47.493
<v Speaker 3>little bit of that at the moment where we can

0:10:47.533 --> 0:10:51.053
<v Speaker 3>ask sire on our Apple phones or Alexa if you

0:10:51.133 --> 0:10:54.853
<v Speaker 3>have one of those Amazon devices. But where this is

0:10:54.933 --> 0:11:02.373
<v Speaker 3>going is that people who need companionship are abandoning the

0:11:02.453 --> 0:11:06.133
<v Speaker 3>traditional dating apps, for example, and there are now very

0:11:06.133 --> 0:11:10.733
<v Speaker 3>popular dating apps in America which are AIS, so in fact,

0:11:10.773 --> 0:11:15.813
<v Speaker 3>you're not meeting real people, you are having a supposed relationship.

0:11:16.133 --> 0:11:19.813
<v Speaker 3>Now where that is going is that means that these

0:11:20.293 --> 0:11:26.133
<v Speaker 3>AI robotic robotics are actually suggesting to you what you

0:11:26.173 --> 0:11:27.493
<v Speaker 3>should be doing with your life.

0:11:28.413 --> 0:11:32.733
<v Speaker 2>There's an extension to that mention you made of robots

0:11:32.813 --> 0:11:34.613
<v Speaker 2>and things. I want to leave that for the moment,

0:11:34.653 --> 0:11:36.573
<v Speaker 2>but for heaven's sake, don't forget. To remind me. If

0:11:36.613 --> 0:11:39.453
<v Speaker 2>I forget, Let's just work our way through some of

0:11:39.493 --> 0:11:42.773
<v Speaker 2>the some of the aspects of it, because that'll be

0:11:42.853 --> 0:11:46.293
<v Speaker 2>spin off from pretty much all of them. For instance,

0:11:46.613 --> 0:11:52.093
<v Speaker 2>AI is mimicking leading music artists and unofficial songs featuring them,

0:11:52.373 --> 0:11:55.773
<v Speaker 2>and they're being released on platforms like Spotify. How are

0:11:55.773 --> 0:11:56.573
<v Speaker 2>they getting away with that?

0:11:56.973 --> 0:12:00.613
<v Speaker 4>Well, the way they're doing that latent is because there

0:12:00.733 --> 0:12:04.413
<v Speaker 4>is all this undisputed law at the moment about what's

0:12:04.493 --> 0:12:07.853
<v Speaker 4>legal and what's not, and that huge grade space I

0:12:07.893 --> 0:12:11.853
<v Speaker 4>suppose until it's defined, is going to allow the AI

0:12:11.973 --> 0:12:16.333
<v Speaker 4>companies and people building these sort of tools to create opportunities.

0:12:16.573 --> 0:12:18.533
<v Speaker 4>And then you've got people out there wanting to take

0:12:18.613 --> 0:12:22.533
<v Speaker 4>advantage of it. We don't know what's law yet for

0:12:22.613 --> 0:12:25.853
<v Speaker 4>what is considered to be true copyright around the AI stuff.

0:12:26.053 --> 0:12:29.373
<v Speaker 4>And so you have these people using these tools. Some

0:12:30.293 --> 0:12:33.493
<v Speaker 4>of these are using them to create interesting stuff. They're

0:12:33.493 --> 0:12:36.493
<v Speaker 4>being very creative. Some of them are fans and they

0:12:36.533 --> 0:12:41.093
<v Speaker 4>want to create effectively music based off there the artists

0:12:41.133 --> 0:12:43.213
<v Speaker 4>that they're fans of, and then some of them are

0:12:43.213 --> 0:12:46.733
<v Speaker 4>just doing it actually quite maliciously to create opportunities to

0:12:48.253 --> 0:12:52.013
<v Speaker 4>further their own gain. There was that recent case, for instance,

0:12:52.053 --> 0:12:57.573
<v Speaker 4>where this guy basically created this entire industry of fake

0:12:57.693 --> 0:13:00.813
<v Speaker 4>music from AI and also having AI bots listen to

0:13:00.853 --> 0:13:04.573
<v Speaker 4>it so that he could pack the streaming system of Spotify,

0:13:05.213 --> 0:13:09.053
<v Speaker 4>and it was basically able to take qus millions of

0:13:09.093 --> 0:13:12.413
<v Speaker 4>dollars of streaming fees. So, yeah, this is a really

0:13:12.453 --> 0:13:14.893
<v Speaker 4>interesting space where you've got this creative This is one

0:13:14.893 --> 0:13:16.733
<v Speaker 4>of the things we do with the creative mckinnest things.

0:13:16.733 --> 0:13:20.253
<v Speaker 4>We keep looking at all the material about where does

0:13:20.653 --> 0:13:25.293
<v Speaker 4>AI begin and human interactions start, and what are we

0:13:25.333 --> 0:13:27.893
<v Speaker 4>going to do as far as understand where those boundaries

0:13:27.933 --> 0:13:30.933
<v Speaker 4>should exist, because at the moment, no one seems to

0:13:30.933 --> 0:13:33.053
<v Speaker 4>know exactly where we should be drawing the line.

0:13:33.773 --> 0:13:36.013
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask a question that associated with that that

0:13:36.693 --> 0:13:40.253
<v Speaker 2>occurred to me while you were mentioning it. Let's take

0:13:41.973 --> 0:13:45.813
<v Speaker 2>a singer, a singer that I'm going to mention, doctor

0:13:45.893 --> 0:13:49.773
<v Speaker 2>John because for two reasons. One is he's right up

0:13:49.813 --> 0:13:52.333
<v Speaker 2>there at the top with me and well with some

0:13:52.413 --> 0:13:56.253
<v Speaker 2>of his music. And secondly, he's now departed. He's dead.

0:13:56.573 --> 0:14:00.893
<v Speaker 2>Now I get the idea that somebody could reinvent him

0:14:01.093 --> 0:14:05.093
<v Speaker 2>through AI write new songs and have him sing them,

0:14:05.893 --> 0:14:09.293
<v Speaker 2>or would somebody else? How would all how would they

0:14:09.373 --> 0:14:13.773
<v Speaker 2>do that getting the voice to sound the same. And secondly,

0:14:14.413 --> 0:14:17.253
<v Speaker 2>the most important question is would I want to listen

0:14:17.693 --> 0:14:18.933
<v Speaker 2>knowing that it's nothing.

0:14:19.733 --> 0:14:23.653
<v Speaker 3>There are some Michael Jackson songs out there which do

0:14:23.973 --> 0:14:27.213
<v Speaker 3>sound a little bit like Michael Jackson, because if you

0:14:27.613 --> 0:14:30.453
<v Speaker 3>put Michael Jackson into all the tools, you can then

0:14:31.013 --> 0:14:33.973
<v Speaker 3>end up doing stuff with Michael Jackson.

0:14:34.173 --> 0:14:35.253
<v Speaker 4>I think what's interesting.

0:14:35.253 --> 0:14:38.813
<v Speaker 3>I've talked a lot about this because in some years

0:14:38.813 --> 0:14:40.933
<v Speaker 3>ago there's been a little bit of this sort of

0:14:43.013 --> 0:14:45.373
<v Speaker 3>stuff going on. I don't know if you remember late

0:14:45.453 --> 0:14:52.333
<v Speaker 3>and there was a famous Natalie Cole album called Duets

0:14:52.053 --> 0:14:55.733
<v Speaker 3>with Natkin Cole, and the two of them sang the

0:14:55.813 --> 0:14:58.373
<v Speaker 3>songs together. But of course net Can Cole a departed

0:14:58.693 --> 0:15:01.413
<v Speaker 3>now that is not quite the same as doing it.

0:15:01.493 --> 0:15:04.453
<v Speaker 3>But I'm just saying that there over time there has

0:15:04.533 --> 0:15:07.973
<v Speaker 3>been a bit of trickery going on. Record companies use

0:15:08.013 --> 0:15:12.253
<v Speaker 3>a tool which is called auto tune, where sometimes they

0:15:12.293 --> 0:15:16.693
<v Speaker 3>can change make the voice better of the artist. This

0:15:16.893 --> 0:15:21.573
<v Speaker 3>is a whole different copyright game, though, where the tools

0:15:21.613 --> 0:15:24.293
<v Speaker 3>are out there where you can feed all the Michael

0:15:24.373 --> 0:15:28.373
<v Speaker 3>Jackson songs and then get Michael Jackson to create.

0:15:28.133 --> 0:15:31.213
<v Speaker 4>A new song. And that is.

0:15:33.293 --> 0:15:35.973
<v Speaker 3>The problem is that if you recall the early days

0:15:35.973 --> 0:15:39.453
<v Speaker 3>of the Internet, in which you were on board very early,

0:15:40.213 --> 0:15:45.413
<v Speaker 3>a regulation always takes a long time. Lawmakers take forever

0:15:45.693 --> 0:15:50.253
<v Speaker 3>to actually do something about things, so that a lot

0:15:50.293 --> 0:15:53.693
<v Speaker 3>of stuff happened on the Internet before lawmakers woke up.

0:15:53.733 --> 0:15:56.413
<v Speaker 3>And that's why we've now got quite a lot of

0:15:56.413 --> 0:16:01.893
<v Speaker 3>issues with social media because the lawmakers and regulators didn't

0:16:01.893 --> 0:16:05.173
<v Speaker 3>actually address it. And that is what's going on here.

0:16:05.733 --> 0:16:09.613
<v Speaker 3>As Justin says, the issues about copywriter in a very

0:16:09.613 --> 0:16:10.533
<v Speaker 3>gray area.

0:16:10.613 --> 0:16:13.253
<v Speaker 2>But just going back to my question at the end,

0:16:13.413 --> 0:16:15.853
<v Speaker 2>would I want to listen to it knowing that it

0:16:15.973 --> 0:16:17.253
<v Speaker 2>wasn't Doctor John.

0:16:18.293 --> 0:16:20.733
<v Speaker 3>Now, well, I'm a great fan of Doctor John too,

0:16:21.013 --> 0:16:24.733
<v Speaker 3>and I certainly don't particularly want to listen to doctor

0:16:24.853 --> 0:16:28.453
<v Speaker 3>John singing songs that he didn't do.

0:16:29.013 --> 0:16:31.133
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think that the answer to that is,

0:16:31.213 --> 0:16:34.373
<v Speaker 4>it does appear people are prepared to listen to songs

0:16:34.613 --> 0:16:38.533
<v Speaker 4>that are AI. The latest sort of statistics that are

0:16:38.533 --> 0:16:42.853
<v Speaker 4>coming out or people exploring this are saying that audiences

0:16:42.933 --> 0:16:45.853
<v Speaker 4>don't seem to necessarily have a big issue with the

0:16:45.893 --> 0:16:49.213
<v Speaker 4>idea at this stage that some of this stuff might

0:16:49.253 --> 0:16:53.253
<v Speaker 4>be AI. And this is another concern, I suppose, or

0:16:53.293 --> 0:16:57.533
<v Speaker 4>another challenge for us is a lot of artists, obviously,

0:16:58.613 --> 0:17:00.373
<v Speaker 4>and so a lot of artists are resistant to this.

0:17:00.373 --> 0:17:04.453
<v Speaker 4>There's a case of them writing open letters about wanting

0:17:04.493 --> 0:17:06.133
<v Speaker 4>to kind of stop some of this stuff, but it

0:17:06.133 --> 0:17:09.533
<v Speaker 4>doesn't appear audiences I can convinced that it isn't something

0:17:09.573 --> 0:17:11.973
<v Speaker 4>that they're prepared to be part of. And so your

0:17:12.053 --> 0:17:15.253
<v Speaker 4>questions specifically, I think the nature of it is that

0:17:15.413 --> 0:17:19.093
<v Speaker 4>audiences and certain of percentages of audiences are prepared to

0:17:19.173 --> 0:17:23.853
<v Speaker 4>listen to new music. The nature of that is that

0:17:24.333 --> 0:17:26.893
<v Speaker 4>we think that audiences are going to be into it.

0:17:27.853 --> 0:17:31.773
<v Speaker 2>Okay, there's a connection with that with something else that'll

0:17:31.813 --> 0:17:36.213
<v Speaker 2>come up eventually. Let's get back to some other aspects

0:17:36.213 --> 0:17:39.213
<v Speaker 2>of it. We know that when it comes to the

0:17:39.253 --> 0:17:42.853
<v Speaker 2>military there are going to be some very big questions

0:17:42.973 --> 0:17:46.573
<v Speaker 2>asked now I mentioned maybe I didn't mention this one.

0:17:46.653 --> 0:17:51.413
<v Speaker 2>Another headline, CIA says winning tech war with China top priority,

0:17:51.573 --> 0:17:58.133
<v Speaker 2>citing existential threat to the US is basic AI likely

0:17:58.173 --> 0:18:00.693
<v Speaker 2>to become an existential threat to humankind.

0:18:01.253 --> 0:18:03.453
<v Speaker 4>I think that there's a lot of talk about the

0:18:03.453 --> 0:18:07.053
<v Speaker 4>doom of that, and look, the reality is that there

0:18:07.133 --> 0:18:11.613
<v Speaker 4>is a percentage of truth to the idea that AI

0:18:11.733 --> 0:18:14.413
<v Speaker 4>might end up destroying us, and a lot of people

0:18:14.453 --> 0:18:17.493
<v Speaker 4>in the field of artificial intelligence development, the people that

0:18:17.533 --> 0:18:22.213
<v Speaker 4>are working at Google, Open Ai, Anthropic, these are sort

0:18:22.213 --> 0:18:26.373
<v Speaker 4>of these leading companies exploring these AI tools. They do

0:18:26.693 --> 0:18:30.813
<v Speaker 4>believe that there is a percentage of truth to the

0:18:30.853 --> 0:18:34.893
<v Speaker 4>idea that AI might destroy us. But it's again, like

0:18:34.933 --> 0:18:38.093
<v Speaker 4>anything with probabilities, it's a bit of an unknown. There

0:18:38.173 --> 0:18:40.613
<v Speaker 4>is a lot of safety that goes on around the

0:18:40.733 --> 0:18:46.653
<v Speaker 4>use of constructing these AI technologies, and there probably is

0:18:46.773 --> 0:18:49.213
<v Speaker 4>more of a case of it being beneficial to humankind

0:18:49.333 --> 0:18:50.733
<v Speaker 4>rather than destroying us.

0:18:51.333 --> 0:18:55.413
<v Speaker 3>I think the warfare though Laton, is definitely one that

0:18:55.533 --> 0:18:59.333
<v Speaker 3>does raise some serious questions. I mean, fully yearsigned from

0:18:59.333 --> 0:19:04.533
<v Speaker 3>that movie The Terminator about killer robots, we now have

0:19:04.733 --> 0:19:11.493
<v Speaker 3>autonomous weapons warfare, reshaping global military strategy and also determining

0:19:11.493 --> 0:19:15.773
<v Speaker 3>who wins and loses. We've got AI, we've got drones,

0:19:16.253 --> 0:19:19.813
<v Speaker 3>We've got autonomous weapons being deployed in the real life

0:19:20.373 --> 0:19:24.213
<v Speaker 3>conflicts at the moment of Gaza and Ukraine. The Israeli

0:19:24.253 --> 0:19:30.293
<v Speaker 3>Defense Minister Director General says that over the next decade,

0:19:30.493 --> 0:19:33.853
<v Speaker 3>AI robots in land and sea will be the ones

0:19:33.893 --> 0:19:38.613
<v Speaker 3>who are actually doing modern warfare. He says that it's

0:19:38.653 --> 0:19:42.333
<v Speaker 3>a complete game changer and the future battlefield will be

0:19:43.093 --> 0:19:46.453
<v Speaker 3>very much unmanned systems fighting together.

0:19:48.413 --> 0:19:54.173
<v Speaker 2>I read somewhere that there is likely to be a

0:19:54.213 --> 0:19:59.733
<v Speaker 2>combination for some time of shall we say, AI and

0:19:59.853 --> 0:20:03.453
<v Speaker 2>real life on the battlefield, battalions made up of a mix.

0:20:04.613 --> 0:20:07.853
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's pretty much the play that will occur for

0:20:07.893 --> 0:20:12.613
<v Speaker 4>at least next decade. The systems are not powerful enough

0:20:12.613 --> 0:20:16.133
<v Speaker 4>to be completely autonomous, like Nigel mentioned the Terminator, We

0:20:16.253 --> 0:20:20.253
<v Speaker 4>certainly haven't got that level of technology. But the integration

0:20:20.613 --> 0:20:25.613
<v Speaker 4>of artificial intelligence machines, combat machines and humans is definitely

0:20:25.933 --> 0:20:29.013
<v Speaker 4>the future. I mean, the militaries currently in the US

0:20:30.493 --> 0:20:35.213
<v Speaker 4>have been working with these autonomous fighter jets that effectively

0:20:36.413 --> 0:20:42.213
<v Speaker 4>they basically fly with a main fighter jet, like a

0:20:42.293 --> 0:20:45.533
<v Speaker 4>leading fighter jet, and they will basically just be following

0:20:45.533 --> 0:20:48.333
<v Speaker 4>it and then going ahead and sort of scouting out

0:20:48.373 --> 0:20:51.213
<v Speaker 4>locations and fighting with them. So I think these kind

0:20:51.293 --> 0:20:56.453
<v Speaker 4>of combined swarms of AI with humans is definitely the

0:20:56.653 --> 0:20:58.333
<v Speaker 4>future that is currently in play.

0:20:58.693 --> 0:21:01.493
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember those a few years ago? There were

0:21:01.573 --> 0:21:09.533
<v Speaker 2>news items with and in movies with flock of bird

0:21:09.773 --> 0:21:12.493
<v Speaker 2>like creatures, but they weren't they were would we call

0:21:12.573 --> 0:21:15.733
<v Speaker 2>them AI? But let's let's do so anyway, they were

0:21:15.813 --> 0:21:19.413
<v Speaker 2>chasing people through the through the jungle and killing them.

0:21:21.053 --> 0:21:23.453
<v Speaker 2>What's happened? What's happened to that? Do you know any

0:21:23.493 --> 0:21:26.813
<v Speaker 2>idea because there's been nothing mentioned of it in the

0:21:26.893 --> 0:21:28.853
<v Speaker 2>last well two three years.

0:21:30.453 --> 0:21:32.773
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure which one you're specifically talking to, but

0:21:33.053 --> 0:21:35.253
<v Speaker 4>it does sound like the drone stuff, I mean, the

0:21:35.853 --> 0:21:37.813
<v Speaker 4>the This is one of the this is one of

0:21:37.813 --> 0:21:42.133
<v Speaker 4>the big concerns about the automated artificial intelligence military stuff,

0:21:42.533 --> 0:21:47.533
<v Speaker 4>and that is these these swarms of AI drones that

0:21:47.813 --> 0:21:50.253
<v Speaker 4>kind of do what you were just saying. They effectively

0:21:50.373 --> 0:21:55.733
<v Speaker 4>create a swarm of machines that I that you cannot escape,

0:21:55.773 --> 0:21:58.693
<v Speaker 4>that they kind of can swarm around you, they can

0:21:58.733 --> 0:22:02.853
<v Speaker 4>track you down, and it doesn't matter how agile you are,

0:22:02.853 --> 0:22:04.853
<v Speaker 4>and as you can point out, if you're running through

0:22:04.853 --> 0:22:08.053
<v Speaker 4>a forest, you'd basically still be able to be wiped out.

0:22:08.373 --> 0:22:11.813
<v Speaker 4>And that's scary because that kind of sort of swarming

0:22:11.853 --> 0:22:16.493
<v Speaker 4>technology is a sort of new category of danger when

0:22:16.493 --> 0:22:18.213
<v Speaker 4>it comes to military conflict.

0:22:18.893 --> 0:22:22.293
<v Speaker 2>So there's another scary whichever way you look at it,

0:22:22.333 --> 0:22:28.133
<v Speaker 2>and that is a suggestion that AI could replace politicians.

0:22:28.573 --> 0:22:33.053
<v Speaker 3>Well, that is definitely there are some people who are

0:22:33.813 --> 0:22:38.613
<v Speaker 3>suggesting that there are a number of ways that AI

0:22:38.733 --> 0:22:46.813
<v Speaker 3>could certainly get involved in politics. There's a belief that politicians,

0:22:46.853 --> 0:22:53.813
<v Speaker 3>for example, could use chat bots which they could discuss

0:22:53.933 --> 0:23:00.373
<v Speaker 3>with their constituents resolve disagreements, and also AI could be

0:23:00.453 --> 0:23:06.413
<v Speaker 3>used to write legislation. The appeal of replacing flesh and

0:23:06.453 --> 0:23:12.213
<v Speaker 3>blood politicians with chatbots is definitely being seriously advocated. One

0:23:12.533 --> 0:23:16.213
<v Speaker 3>more radical idea, which some are suggesting, is actually eliminating

0:23:16.293 --> 0:23:21.093
<v Speaker 3>humans whatsoever from politics. And we know that some politicians

0:23:21.213 --> 0:23:25.133
<v Speaker 3>are not terribly bright or doing great things. If AI

0:23:25.333 --> 0:23:29.293
<v Speaker 3>advances to the point where it can reliably perhaps make

0:23:29.533 --> 0:23:33.493
<v Speaker 3>better decisions than humans, then there could be an area

0:23:33.613 --> 0:23:38.533
<v Speaker 3>that it certainly could be explored. According to some enthusiasts.

0:23:38.933 --> 0:23:43.213
<v Speaker 4>They're calling it the algrocracy. I think it's pronounced, which

0:23:43.253 --> 0:23:45.493
<v Speaker 4>is basically algorithms running government.

0:23:47.373 --> 0:23:50.933
<v Speaker 2>I've done about you, guys, but I have no time

0:23:51.013 --> 0:23:55.893
<v Speaker 2>for tolerating that at all, none whatsoever. But it's frightening

0:23:55.933 --> 0:23:59.653
<v Speaker 2>to think that it somehow it could happen, and maybe

0:23:59.693 --> 0:24:02.533
<v Speaker 2>you'd like to trace a possibility trail for it.

0:24:03.733 --> 0:24:07.773
<v Speaker 3>There was a candidate that stood in Sussex in the

0:24:08.173 --> 0:24:13.693
<v Speaker 3>UK elections and he actually actually he created an AI

0:24:13.813 --> 0:24:17.293
<v Speaker 3>chatbot and so it was called AI Steve who was

0:24:17.333 --> 0:24:22.573
<v Speaker 3>actually standing. His argument was that it meant that politicians.

0:24:23.453 --> 0:24:26.173
<v Speaker 3>He had created a politician who was always around to

0:24:26.213 --> 0:24:29.853
<v Speaker 3>talk to constituents and who could take their views into

0:24:29.933 --> 0:24:36.733
<v Speaker 3>consideration and do better research to create better policies. He

0:24:36.853 --> 0:24:39.373
<v Speaker 3>didn't do very well in the elections, so there's probably

0:24:39.373 --> 0:24:40.893
<v Speaker 3>the answer to your fears later.

0:24:41.973 --> 0:24:44.493
<v Speaker 4>I think the way to track that, though, is I

0:24:44.533 --> 0:24:48.773
<v Speaker 4>think you're correct. It is very concerning the idea of

0:24:49.333 --> 0:24:55.253
<v Speaker 4>allowing ourselves to be subject to algorithms as a way

0:24:55.253 --> 0:24:59.013
<v Speaker 4>of governance. We already have seen quite frankly, the danger,

0:24:59.213 --> 0:25:03.213
<v Speaker 4>or I just think the disrupt the destructiveness that algorithms

0:25:03.213 --> 0:25:06.813
<v Speaker 4>have created around social media experiences, and the nature of

0:25:06.853 --> 0:25:10.493
<v Speaker 4>how that is often leads into problems around the way

0:25:10.533 --> 0:25:16.133
<v Speaker 4>the algorithm presents content information, misinformation, disinformation. It isn't a

0:25:16.133 --> 0:25:20.013
<v Speaker 4>big stretch to think that. The thing that people don't

0:25:20.053 --> 0:25:24.213
<v Speaker 4>quite understand, I think is that we are already engaged

0:25:24.373 --> 0:25:28.093
<v Speaker 4>in a lot of stuff that's to do with artificial intelligence.

0:25:28.133 --> 0:25:31.053
<v Speaker 4>The social media algorithms that we sort of a lot

0:25:31.053 --> 0:25:34.733
<v Speaker 4>of people engage with every day are using artificial intelligence.

0:25:34.733 --> 0:25:37.133
<v Speaker 4>They're not They're not just sort of what you would

0:25:37.133 --> 0:25:41.013
<v Speaker 4>call these simplistic algorithms from previous times. They are using

0:25:41.093 --> 0:25:44.053
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence in the way they're operating. So we already

0:25:44.053 --> 0:25:47.573
<v Speaker 4>see that it's not necessarily very great there extending that

0:25:47.693 --> 0:25:51.773
<v Speaker 4>into arms of government. I'm with you, it's extremely concerning

0:25:51.813 --> 0:25:55.013
<v Speaker 4>and something I also would be very adamant to push against.

0:25:55.573 --> 0:25:55.813
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:25:55.853 --> 0:25:59.653
<v Speaker 2>It's like it's a little like some medical matters that

0:25:59.733 --> 0:26:05.853
<v Speaker 2>over the years have caused consternation. Artificial insemination springs to

0:26:05.893 --> 0:26:09.093
<v Speaker 2>mind in the very early days, and I had conversations

0:26:09.133 --> 0:26:13.013
<v Speaker 2>with one doctor who I was somewhat friendly with conversations

0:26:13.013 --> 0:26:17.453
<v Speaker 2>on radio, and he took the He took the attitude

0:26:17.733 --> 0:26:21.173
<v Speaker 2>which many people, if not most, might say, is the

0:26:21.213 --> 0:26:24.333
<v Speaker 2>logical one, and that is it's not up to them

0:26:24.453 --> 0:26:28.693
<v Speaker 2>to make the decision on how something is used. It's

0:26:28.733 --> 0:26:33.533
<v Speaker 2>just up to them to provide responses to some questions

0:26:33.533 --> 0:26:35.693
<v Speaker 2>and issues that are begging.

0:26:35.693 --> 0:26:39.653
<v Speaker 3>And sorry, go on, no, no, please go ahead.

0:26:40.013 --> 0:26:43.053
<v Speaker 2>Well if you take, if you follow that path, we

0:26:43.133 --> 0:26:47.253
<v Speaker 2>have now advanced, if that's the word, down a trail

0:26:47.413 --> 0:26:50.213
<v Speaker 2>where there has where there is much more going on

0:26:50.373 --> 0:26:55.413
<v Speaker 2>with reproductive matters than back in those days, and there

0:26:55.493 --> 0:26:59.493
<v Speaker 2>is no knowing where it might stop. I mean, this

0:26:59.893 --> 0:27:02.173
<v Speaker 2>has just come to me. It's not I never thought

0:27:02.213 --> 0:27:05.013
<v Speaker 2>of this before. What about the implanting of a chip

0:27:05.093 --> 0:27:07.213
<v Speaker 2>in a baby's brain while it's still in the womb

0:27:07.533 --> 0:27:08.333
<v Speaker 2>for whatever reason.

0:27:08.973 --> 0:27:11.733
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean the answer to that is that sort

0:27:11.733 --> 0:27:16.293
<v Speaker 4>of capability isn't possible yet. But we know with Elon

0:27:16.413 --> 0:27:20.973
<v Speaker 4>Musk's Neuralink and other technology companies that the idea of

0:27:20.973 --> 0:27:25.533
<v Speaker 4>planting chips and brains is already underway. Like what you're

0:27:25.573 --> 0:27:28.453
<v Speaker 4>saying is the argument, I think is that we if

0:27:28.453 --> 0:27:32.013
<v Speaker 4>we don't, if we don't have a line to hold,

0:27:32.253 --> 0:27:34.613
<v Speaker 4>then we are in danger of allowing things to just

0:27:34.653 --> 0:27:37.413
<v Speaker 4>sort of continue. And one could say, oh, well, this

0:27:37.493 --> 0:27:40.693
<v Speaker 4>is the old slippery slope argument. But I do think

0:27:40.733 --> 0:27:44.613
<v Speaker 4>you touch on something important. In contrast to like you've said,

0:27:44.813 --> 0:27:48.133
<v Speaker 4>with the artificial insemination issue and the discussions with the doctor,

0:27:48.573 --> 0:27:51.013
<v Speaker 4>I think for AI, we do need to be very

0:27:51.013 --> 0:27:54.813
<v Speaker 4>heavily in the debate as individuals, as groups of society.

0:27:55.453 --> 0:27:58.533
<v Speaker 4>I think the difference here goes back to one question

0:27:58.613 --> 0:28:00.853
<v Speaker 4>you asked earlier, laden, which is there is an exits

0:28:00.973 --> 0:28:03.653
<v Speaker 4>there is we talked about it. There's that percentage of

0:28:03.693 --> 0:28:07.453
<v Speaker 4>an as extential threat to humans. I think that this

0:28:07.533 --> 0:28:10.253
<v Speaker 4>is the one where we probably need to therefore obviously

0:28:10.293 --> 0:28:14.933
<v Speaker 4>be in the debate, because I think taking, say, a

0:28:14.973 --> 0:28:18.573
<v Speaker 4>position of let's just see where it goes, is not

0:28:18.613 --> 0:28:22.573
<v Speaker 4>a healthy one because of the nature of the of

0:28:22.653 --> 0:28:25.773
<v Speaker 4>the danger that could come from it. And I actually

0:28:25.853 --> 0:28:28.973
<v Speaker 4>think this is why we all need to be discussing

0:28:29.413 --> 0:28:32.373
<v Speaker 4>where AI sits in our lives, how much of it

0:28:32.413 --> 0:28:35.813
<v Speaker 4>we're prepared to accept, and where we should be accepting

0:28:36.413 --> 0:28:40.853
<v Speaker 4>its its inclusion and pushing very hard against its exclusion.

0:28:41.653 --> 0:28:44.093
<v Speaker 2>That's intriguing, and I'm pleased to hear you say it,

0:28:44.213 --> 0:28:47.053
<v Speaker 2>But I think of things that are out of our control,

0:28:48.333 --> 0:28:51.013
<v Speaker 2>as in some in some parts of the world, they

0:28:51.133 --> 0:28:57.773
<v Speaker 2>legitimize activities that I'm talking aboutically that are banned here

0:28:57.973 --> 0:29:01.133
<v Speaker 2>or that we don't accept. And once you're once you're

0:29:01.173 --> 0:29:04.213
<v Speaker 2>on the path of developing something and you've you've got

0:29:04.253 --> 0:29:08.093
<v Speaker 2>an open gate, then there will be minds somewhere who

0:29:08.133 --> 0:29:12.133
<v Speaker 2>will what to utilize it and develop it. And while

0:29:12.213 --> 0:29:16.853
<v Speaker 2>we might agree that we should be involved in it,

0:29:16.853 --> 0:29:18.333
<v Speaker 2>it may be taken away from us.

0:29:18.693 --> 0:29:22.053
<v Speaker 4>This is true, and this is where things like what

0:29:22.173 --> 0:29:25.613
<v Speaker 4>China is doing has some concern because I think it's

0:29:25.653 --> 0:29:27.893
<v Speaker 4>fair to say that China has a different perspective on

0:29:28.413 --> 0:29:30.933
<v Speaker 4>the approach to the way they're integrating and using AI.

0:29:31.653 --> 0:29:34.573
<v Speaker 4>They're obviously going to be pushing more of that into

0:29:34.613 --> 0:29:37.853
<v Speaker 4>their social credit system that they currently have where people

0:29:37.893 --> 0:29:42.733
<v Speaker 4>are tracked in kind of real time. China is basically

0:29:42.973 --> 0:29:46.413
<v Speaker 4>your point about they having a different view of the

0:29:46.453 --> 0:29:51.173
<v Speaker 4>way AI will be integrated into their social structures. The problem,

0:29:51.253 --> 0:29:54.573
<v Speaker 4>I think is that America's response right now is a

0:29:54.573 --> 0:29:56.733
<v Speaker 4>little like, we need to make sure we're ahead of

0:29:56.813 --> 0:30:00.333
<v Speaker 4>China in many ways, but we may the hope that

0:30:00.373 --> 0:30:04.573
<v Speaker 4>they continue, all all societies continue to push back against

0:30:04.813 --> 0:30:07.973
<v Speaker 4>what that particular approach is going to be for us.

0:30:08.413 --> 0:30:13.053
<v Speaker 4>You know, there have been arguments that we may go

0:30:13.093 --> 0:30:15.213
<v Speaker 4>down the track of trying and integrate it too quickly.

0:30:15.613 --> 0:30:18.293
<v Speaker 4>I personally have a problem, for instance, if we just

0:30:18.333 --> 0:30:20.613
<v Speaker 4>go back to a local matter in New Zealand, I

0:30:20.653 --> 0:30:22.933
<v Speaker 4>have a huge issue for me with the fact that

0:30:22.973 --> 0:30:29.973
<v Speaker 4>supermarkets are trailing facial AI facial recognition systems so that

0:30:30.213 --> 0:30:33.933
<v Speaker 4>you enter the supermarket and it sort of effectively tracks

0:30:33.973 --> 0:30:35.653
<v Speaker 4>you and knows who you are, and they're able to

0:30:35.733 --> 0:30:39.373
<v Speaker 4>deploy security guards to push people out because and then

0:30:39.413 --> 0:30:42.533
<v Speaker 4>we've had several incidences where it's been false positives. I mean,

0:30:42.573 --> 0:30:44.733
<v Speaker 4>this is the kind of yeah, this is the kind

0:30:44.733 --> 0:30:46.933
<v Speaker 4>of problem I think where we do need to be

0:30:47.053 --> 0:30:50.413
<v Speaker 4>very vocal and we need to be pushing back because

0:30:51.093 --> 0:30:54.133
<v Speaker 4>it's exciting technology, but it's not one we should be

0:30:54.253 --> 0:31:00.933
<v Speaker 4>just adopting without question because you can, because you can. So.

0:31:03.333 --> 0:31:07.253
<v Speaker 2>I refer to a lengthy piece that Frank Faraidi, the

0:31:07.253 --> 0:31:14.253
<v Speaker 2>philosopher wrote back in twenty one headed we need skepticism

0:31:14.293 --> 0:31:15.133
<v Speaker 2>now more than ever.

0:31:17.293 --> 0:31:21.653
<v Speaker 3>You agree, totally agree, Laton, and I think the real

0:31:21.693 --> 0:31:25.533
<v Speaker 3>issue that we just need to address, which you referred

0:31:25.533 --> 0:31:28.893
<v Speaker 3>to with politicians, as you know, how much can we trust?

0:31:29.533 --> 0:31:32.173
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you remember the nineteen sixty eight

0:31:32.813 --> 0:31:36.093
<v Speaker 3>classic sci fi movie which was two thousand and one

0:31:36.093 --> 0:31:40.293
<v Speaker 3>A Space Odyssey, which was actually an early example of AI,

0:31:40.533 --> 0:31:45.853
<v Speaker 3>where how the computer locked out the astronaut and said,

0:31:45.893 --> 0:31:49.213
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, I can't do that. I can't open the doors.

0:31:49.733 --> 0:31:52.813
<v Speaker 3>You know, The issue is what happens when AI goes

0:31:52.973 --> 0:31:56.933
<v Speaker 3>rogue or whether it gets so clever that in fact,

0:31:57.773 --> 0:32:00.733
<v Speaker 3>these sort of issues happen where we are starting to

0:32:00.773 --> 0:32:05.573
<v Speaker 3>be totally controlled by AI, and that's already happening. A

0:32:05.613 --> 0:32:10.173
<v Speaker 3>new wave of so called reasonings from companies like open

0:32:10.213 --> 0:32:15.253
<v Speaker 3>ai has started to produce incorrect information more often, and

0:32:15.293 --> 0:32:19.013
<v Speaker 3>the companies don't really know why, and they're politely calling

0:32:19.053 --> 0:32:25.733
<v Speaker 3>the sollucinations, but they don't actually know what why incorrect

0:32:25.773 --> 0:32:31.253
<v Speaker 3>information is coming through and it could have serious implications.

0:32:31.653 --> 0:32:34.773
<v Speaker 4>Well worse than that, actually, I mean, the reality is

0:32:34.813 --> 0:32:41.333
<v Speaker 4>that these these GPT chat style systems do show a

0:32:41.333 --> 0:32:44.333
<v Speaker 4>certain level of intelligence that it can be concerning. There's

0:32:44.373 --> 0:32:47.693
<v Speaker 4>a there's a whole process in AI development called red

0:32:48.093 --> 0:32:51.613
<v Speaker 4>red teaming, and the point of red teaming is to

0:32:52.693 --> 0:32:55.533
<v Speaker 4>take a model that's been freshly baked, let's say, and

0:32:55.773 --> 0:33:00.213
<v Speaker 4>check that it has adhered to certain safety requirements and

0:33:00.253 --> 0:33:02.493
<v Speaker 4>that it is not acting in a way that is

0:33:03.213 --> 0:33:07.453
<v Speaker 4>destructive or dangerous in some form. But recently, for instance, Anthropic,

0:33:07.493 --> 0:33:11.693
<v Speaker 4>which is one of these technology companies that's competitive open AI,

0:33:11.853 --> 0:33:15.773
<v Speaker 4>they create a whole bunch of AI models. They recently

0:33:15.933 --> 0:33:19.133
<v Speaker 4>were explaining how one of their latest systems they had

0:33:19.133 --> 0:33:21.933
<v Speaker 4>to do quite a bit of work with because it

0:33:22.253 --> 0:33:26.253
<v Speaker 4>was doing all sorts of things like trying to blackmail

0:33:26.733 --> 0:33:30.493
<v Speaker 4>the developers so that it would stay alive when they

0:33:30.493 --> 0:33:33.093
<v Speaker 4>were they indicated they might be changing it. It tried

0:33:33.133 --> 0:33:36.973
<v Speaker 4>to read their mail. It basically engaged in all of

0:33:37.013 --> 0:33:40.813
<v Speaker 4>this sort of nefarious activity to kind of keep itself alive.

0:33:41.413 --> 0:33:45.613
<v Speaker 4>This is the type of mechanistic stuff that is going on,

0:33:45.973 --> 0:33:50.493
<v Speaker 4>and we know we needed it careful about making sure

0:33:50.533 --> 0:33:53.253
<v Speaker 4>that this is always something we're looking at effectively, because

0:33:53.293 --> 0:33:56.573
<v Speaker 4>if that's this version of aill, what does it mean

0:33:56.613 --> 0:34:00.093
<v Speaker 4>as we continue to increase and develop the technologies exactly

0:34:00.813 --> 0:34:05.173
<v Speaker 4>justin how would that opus as their known, How would

0:34:05.213 --> 0:34:07.693
<v Speaker 4>it have arrived at that decision, How would it have

0:34:08.653 --> 0:34:12.333
<v Speaker 4>come across blackmail and utilize it or attempted to. This

0:34:12.413 --> 0:34:16.533
<v Speaker 4>is the part that is where we're not sure. Actually

0:34:17.853 --> 0:34:21.133
<v Speaker 4>one of the big admissions is that this is an

0:34:21.173 --> 0:34:27.573
<v Speaker 4>emission from the technologists, the people that develop AI, especially

0:34:27.613 --> 0:34:31.253
<v Speaker 4>these GPT chat systems, is they don't know what goes

0:34:31.253 --> 0:34:34.413
<v Speaker 4>on inside. It's a black box. And this is another

0:34:34.453 --> 0:34:37.653
<v Speaker 4>reason why it's fair to have concerns because it's a

0:34:37.653 --> 0:34:41.413
<v Speaker 4>bit like playing with the button of a nuclear switch

0:34:41.453 --> 0:34:44.013
<v Speaker 4>where you don't actually know it's connected to a nuclear bomb,

0:34:44.053 --> 0:34:46.253
<v Speaker 4>because we don't really know what's going on inside. So

0:34:46.493 --> 0:34:49.373
<v Speaker 4>to answer that point is simply to say they're not sure.

0:34:49.813 --> 0:34:52.293
<v Speaker 4>What it does seem to be showing is some sort

0:34:52.293 --> 0:34:57.933
<v Speaker 4>of rudimentary survival tactic where it's understanding that it's under threat,

0:34:58.493 --> 0:35:01.333
<v Speaker 4>and if it's under threat, it needs to take action.

0:35:01.573 --> 0:35:03.893
<v Speaker 4>And this is where that red teeming tries to shake

0:35:04.013 --> 0:35:07.693
<v Speaker 4>out the nefarious or darker elements of what it's trying

0:35:07.733 --> 0:35:11.933
<v Speaker 4>to do to protect itself, but also indicates that there

0:35:11.973 --> 0:35:15.733
<v Speaker 4>are aspects of this that cross into that question about

0:35:15.813 --> 0:35:18.253
<v Speaker 4>what does it mean for something like that to actually

0:35:18.253 --> 0:35:21.653
<v Speaker 4>be intelligent. There is this on going claim that none

0:35:21.693 --> 0:35:23.933
<v Speaker 4>of these systems yet are what you would call intelligence,

0:35:24.533 --> 0:35:26.853
<v Speaker 4>but one does have to ask, well, then why does

0:35:26.853 --> 0:35:29.333
<v Speaker 4>it know how to try and blackmail and protect itself?

0:35:30.213 --> 0:35:31.813
<v Speaker 2>If you let your mind run away with you. It's

0:35:31.813 --> 0:35:35.053
<v Speaker 2>actually frightening. I I want to quote you something. I

0:35:35.053 --> 0:35:39.853
<v Speaker 2>don't know whether you've come across Tyler Cohen. No neither

0:35:39.933 --> 0:35:43.053
<v Speaker 2>did I. This was published just a few days ago,

0:35:43.373 --> 0:35:45.253
<v Speaker 2>and this is how it begins. This is the most

0:35:45.333 --> 0:35:47.973
<v Speaker 2>important essay that we have run so far on the

0:35:48.053 --> 0:35:51.853
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence revolution. I'm excited for you to read it.

0:35:51.893 --> 0:35:55.333
<v Speaker 2>There's the author. Are we helping create the tools of

0:35:55.373 --> 0:35:56.733
<v Speaker 2>our own obsolescence?

0:35:57.453 --> 0:35:57.533
<v Speaker 4>Now?

0:35:57.573 --> 0:36:00.373
<v Speaker 2>If that sounds like a question only a depressive or

0:36:00.413 --> 0:36:03.293
<v Speaker 2>a stoner would ask, let us assure you we are neither.

0:36:03.453 --> 0:36:07.173
<v Speaker 2>We are early AI adopters. We stand at the threshold

0:36:07.333 --> 0:36:11.013
<v Speaker 2>of perhaps the most found identity crisis humanity is ever faced.

0:36:11.893 --> 0:36:16.413
<v Speaker 2>As AI systems increasingly match or exceed our cognitive abilities.

0:36:17.013 --> 0:36:21.333
<v Speaker 2>We're witnessing the twilight of human intellectual supremacy, a position

0:36:21.413 --> 0:36:26.453
<v Speaker 2>we've held unchallenged for our entire existence. This transformation won't

0:36:26.493 --> 0:36:30.733
<v Speaker 2>arrive in some distant future. It's unfolding now, reshaping not

0:36:30.813 --> 0:36:33.933
<v Speaker 2>just our economy but our very understanding of what it

0:36:34.013 --> 0:36:38.813
<v Speaker 2>means to be human beings. We are not doomers, quite

0:36:38.853 --> 0:36:42.333
<v Speaker 2>the opposite one of us. Tyler is a heavy user

0:36:42.373 --> 0:36:46.333
<v Speaker 2>of this technology and the other Abbotel is working at

0:36:46.853 --> 0:36:51.413
<v Speaker 2>Anthropic or Anthropic the company that makes Claude to usher

0:36:51.533 --> 0:36:54.533
<v Speaker 2>it into the world. Now, how does that affect you?

0:36:55.453 --> 0:36:58.093
<v Speaker 4>I mean the answer is that this is the part

0:36:58.133 --> 0:37:02.093
<v Speaker 4>we need to be vigilant. And I think that's what

0:37:02.253 --> 0:37:06.173
<v Speaker 4>these articles, these commentries from actually professionals that are already

0:37:06.173 --> 0:37:09.293
<v Speaker 4>doing stuff in the industry is we need to be vigilant.

0:37:09.293 --> 0:37:13.013
<v Speaker 4>And it's interesting that he has to predicate this by

0:37:13.053 --> 0:37:15.893
<v Speaker 4>saying we're not doomers, because it's very easy in this

0:37:15.973 --> 0:37:20.813
<v Speaker 4>current space to dismiss these concerns and almost be a

0:37:20.813 --> 0:37:23.893
<v Speaker 4>bit derogatory by going, oh, you're just a doomer because

0:37:24.053 --> 0:37:29.133
<v Speaker 4>of the techno enthusiasm over the technology. But the reality

0:37:29.213 --> 0:37:31.053
<v Speaker 4>is we do need to be vigilant, and these kind

0:37:31.053 --> 0:37:34.893
<v Speaker 4>of articles are ones where the issues brought up need

0:37:34.933 --> 0:37:38.973
<v Speaker 4>to be seriously considered. It is a category shift for us.

0:37:39.373 --> 0:37:43.213
<v Speaker 4>The thing I just mentioned about the opus tool knowing

0:37:43.213 --> 0:37:47.493
<v Speaker 4>how to kind of protect itself, the nature that red teaming,

0:37:47.893 --> 0:37:50.333
<v Speaker 4>then the whole idea that red teaming has to exist

0:37:50.573 --> 0:37:55.853
<v Speaker 4>because the technologies are not necessarily baked with human values

0:37:55.853 --> 0:37:58.773
<v Speaker 4>in them. These are all reasons for vigilance and that

0:37:58.853 --> 0:38:03.053
<v Speaker 4>we do need to not just be overwhelmed with the

0:38:03.093 --> 0:38:07.613
<v Speaker 4>techno enthusiasm. There needs to be some techno dystopia here.

0:38:07.653 --> 0:38:09.493
<v Speaker 4>We do need to go into this with an eyes

0:38:09.533 --> 0:38:12.653
<v Speaker 4>open of like asking hard questions.

0:38:13.813 --> 0:38:16.253
<v Speaker 2>Let's get down to symbol sorry, sorry night.

0:38:16.373 --> 0:38:16.973
<v Speaker 4>One of them.

0:38:17.053 --> 0:38:19.973
<v Speaker 3>One of the takeaways from the course that I did

0:38:20.013 --> 0:38:24.493
<v Speaker 3>which really shocked me was the fact that there is

0:38:24.573 --> 0:38:28.653
<v Speaker 3>so much talk with these experts about AI replacing the

0:38:28.733 --> 0:38:33.253
<v Speaker 3>human mind. And Google's leading AI scientists said just this

0:38:33.293 --> 0:38:37.213
<v Speaker 3>week he believes there is a fifty percent chance that

0:38:37.293 --> 0:38:42.053
<v Speaker 3>will be developed by twenty twenty eight. Now the experts

0:38:42.093 --> 0:38:45.293
<v Speaker 3>are talking about twenty twenty eight to twenty thirty, which

0:38:45.333 --> 0:38:49.333
<v Speaker 3>is only a few years away. Here's the worry about

0:38:49.413 --> 0:38:51.733
<v Speaker 3>Here's one of the worries about that whether AI can

0:38:51.853 --> 0:38:56.333
<v Speaker 3>outsmart humans or whether AI actually is developed to the

0:38:56.333 --> 0:39:01.213
<v Speaker 3>point whereas making decisions that humans should make. And you know,

0:39:01.293 --> 0:39:04.773
<v Speaker 3>my worry is that we all make decisions, sometimes good

0:39:04.813 --> 0:39:07.493
<v Speaker 3>or bad. We're humans. We don't always get it right.

0:39:07.813 --> 0:39:10.773
<v Speaker 3>But weally a company making a major decision in our

0:39:10.813 --> 0:39:14.573
<v Speaker 3>life with some sort of emotional response as to how

0:39:14.613 --> 0:39:18.813
<v Speaker 3>that's going to affect people around us. And that is

0:39:18.933 --> 0:39:24.333
<v Speaker 3>missing from something that's mechanical and is a technology tool

0:39:24.813 --> 0:39:27.573
<v Speaker 3>that a doesn't have the life experience that we have,

0:39:27.653 --> 0:39:31.293
<v Speaker 3>which we also draw on to make those decisions. But

0:39:31.413 --> 0:39:35.013
<v Speaker 3>it also doesn't have that emotional impact as to what

0:39:35.493 --> 0:39:36.333
<v Speaker 3>how that could act.

0:39:36.373 --> 0:39:37.533
<v Speaker 4>And you know that goes back.

0:39:37.373 --> 0:39:41.933
<v Speaker 3>To your comment about an AI tool saying kill yourself.

0:39:42.653 --> 0:39:46.013
<v Speaker 3>You know you wouldn't say that to someone. You would

0:39:46.213 --> 0:39:50.133
<v Speaker 3>discuss the depression or their problem and do it with

0:39:50.213 --> 0:39:54.693
<v Speaker 3>some empathy and try to work out a solution, whereas

0:39:55.253 --> 0:39:58.133
<v Speaker 3>the AI tool didn't do that. And you know, my

0:39:58.293 --> 0:40:03.013
<v Speaker 3>worry is that these experts are rushing to try to

0:40:03.133 --> 0:40:07.253
<v Speaker 3>match what they call the human mind. By twenty twenty eight.

0:40:08.453 --> 0:40:11.933
<v Speaker 2>How about the development of AI to the point where

0:40:12.453 --> 0:40:15.693
<v Speaker 2>the one off, as far as we know, go kill

0:40:15.693 --> 0:40:20.413
<v Speaker 2>yourself becomes rampant. Then you've got the normal spread of

0:40:20.693 --> 0:40:25.173
<v Speaker 2>influence that would hit some people more than others, some

0:40:25.333 --> 0:40:29.133
<v Speaker 2>groups more than other some ages, et cetera. Of just

0:40:29.173 --> 0:40:31.933
<v Speaker 2>adopting it and saying, well, you know, go kill yourself,

0:40:31.933 --> 0:40:34.813
<v Speaker 2>to you, to you what used to be your best matal,

0:40:37.213 --> 0:40:40.013
<v Speaker 2>It would influence and infect society.

0:40:41.613 --> 0:40:44.373
<v Speaker 3>Again, going back to that example I did of having

0:40:44.373 --> 0:40:48.253
<v Speaker 3>an AI companion. If you're lonely. Maybe you're getting on

0:40:48.293 --> 0:40:52.213
<v Speaker 3>in years, you look by yourself and you rely entirely

0:40:52.253 --> 0:40:56.133
<v Speaker 3>on this person that you've actually formed a sort of

0:40:56.213 --> 0:41:00.213
<v Speaker 3>emotional relationship with because you're able to talk to somebody

0:41:00.373 --> 0:41:04.133
<v Speaker 3>that you otherwise not having much social contact. Again, that's

0:41:04.173 --> 0:41:08.653
<v Speaker 3>the real danger that this person could well start to

0:41:08.693 --> 0:41:12.653
<v Speaker 3>influence important decisions in your life, which may not be

0:41:12.733 --> 0:41:13.253
<v Speaker 3>good ones.

0:41:14.973 --> 0:41:18.373
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the reality is we're on the cuspiple so

0:41:18.493 --> 0:41:23.253
<v Speaker 4>latent of some new devices. That recent announcement of Open

0:41:23.293 --> 0:41:28.773
<v Speaker 4>Ai buying Johnny ives Io company and because they're going

0:41:28.813 --> 0:41:34.373
<v Speaker 4>to start looking to release these AI devices of some form.

0:41:35.573 --> 0:41:39.533
<v Speaker 4>But I think what is clear about these devices is

0:41:39.573 --> 0:41:42.853
<v Speaker 4>they are going to be ambient AI, which means it

0:41:42.853 --> 0:41:45.693
<v Speaker 4>will be some type of device you are wearing. It'll

0:41:45.693 --> 0:41:50.733
<v Speaker 4>be wearable, and it is basically tracking you twenty four

0:41:50.773 --> 0:41:54.893
<v Speaker 4>to seven full time. It's kind of got a situational

0:41:54.893 --> 0:41:59.653
<v Speaker 4>awareness about your life. And also the impact of that

0:41:59.813 --> 0:42:03.093
<v Speaker 4>is that anyone else interacting with you clearly at that time.

0:42:03.533 --> 0:42:07.333
<v Speaker 4>So we're going down a path where AI is going

0:42:07.373 --> 0:42:12.173
<v Speaker 4>to suddenly be front and present in our lives for

0:42:12.653 --> 0:42:15.853
<v Speaker 4>people very quickly. Because I hate to say it, but

0:42:15.893 --> 0:42:20.453
<v Speaker 4>I suspect that these devices are going to be enthusiastically adopted,

0:42:21.893 --> 0:42:25.413
<v Speaker 4>maybe because people aren't asking questions enough, but also because

0:42:25.573 --> 0:42:29.493
<v Speaker 4>they do probably shortcut a lot of activity that would

0:42:29.493 --> 0:42:32.573
<v Speaker 4>normally take longer. But this goes to your point about

0:42:32.613 --> 0:42:36.293
<v Speaker 4>it being kind of exposed to it quite regularly and frequently,

0:42:36.373 --> 0:42:38.613
<v Speaker 4>but suddenly it will be a persistent thing in our

0:42:38.653 --> 0:42:40.333
<v Speaker 4>lives very well.

0:42:40.333 --> 0:42:45.773
<v Speaker 2>Said from the article from Spectator this current week, The

0:42:45.813 --> 0:42:49.093
<v Speaker 2>age of AI and nuclear energy is coming. The anti

0:42:49.213 --> 0:42:53.133
<v Speaker 2>nuclear conglomerates are promoting windmills and solar panels, which have

0:42:53.253 --> 0:42:56.853
<v Speaker 2>proven to be costly and inefficient. They're also promoted they've

0:42:56.893 --> 0:43:00.733
<v Speaker 2>also promoted green hydrogen, which has proven to be even

0:43:00.773 --> 0:43:05.893
<v Speaker 2>more costly and so inefficient that every project the Labor

0:43:05.933 --> 0:43:08.493
<v Speaker 2>Party has subsidized since coming to power in twenty two

0:43:08.493 --> 0:43:10.853
<v Speaker 2>has failed in close and there's a lesson in that,

0:43:10.933 --> 0:43:14.373
<v Speaker 2>I think anyway. Meanwhile, electricity prices are at their highest,

0:43:14.453 --> 0:43:18.053
<v Speaker 2>energy production is at its most inefficient, productivity levels are

0:43:18.053 --> 0:43:20.653
<v Speaker 2>at their lowest, supply chains are at their lowest, and

0:43:20.733 --> 0:43:23.853
<v Speaker 2>housing prices are at their highest, which also means rents

0:43:23.893 --> 0:43:27.813
<v Speaker 2>are at their highest levels ever in Australia's history. As

0:43:27.853 --> 0:43:32.213
<v Speaker 2>our food prices young people have every right to be concerned.

0:43:32.213 --> 0:43:35.173
<v Speaker 2>The major driver of economic growth, real wages, and overall

0:43:35.173 --> 0:43:39.493
<v Speaker 2>living standards is labour productivity, which is the barometer of

0:43:39.533 --> 0:43:44.373
<v Speaker 2>economic efficiency. The Australian Bureau of Stats recorded that from

0:43:44.453 --> 0:43:48.373
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen to twenty four labour productivity growth has reduced

0:43:49.093 --> 0:43:53.373
<v Speaker 2>from one point seven to zero point nine, and the

0:43:53.373 --> 0:43:57.133
<v Speaker 2>trend is continuing downward. This lowering of the standard of

0:43:57.173 --> 0:44:00.653
<v Speaker 2>living has coincided with the gradual increase in energy prices

0:44:00.653 --> 0:44:04.933
<v Speaker 2>such as electricity and petrol and petrol prices. This is

0:44:05.013 --> 0:44:09.493
<v Speaker 2>not a coincidence. Now, all that might seem alien to

0:44:09.533 --> 0:44:13.773
<v Speaker 2>what we're talking about, but there is a connection with

0:44:13.853 --> 0:44:20.333
<v Speaker 2>it with nuclear power, which the left is opposed to,

0:44:20.773 --> 0:44:23.853
<v Speaker 2>and the standard of living that people are going to

0:44:24.093 --> 0:44:29.533
<v Speaker 2>be sucked down to if they keep on this same path.

0:44:30.053 --> 0:44:33.013
<v Speaker 2>Is there an AI answer to this, Well.

0:44:32.893 --> 0:44:37.453
<v Speaker 3>I think. I think the elephant in the room remains

0:44:37.533 --> 0:44:40.893
<v Speaker 3>the fact that what is going to actually happen with

0:44:41.373 --> 0:44:49.693
<v Speaker 3>people's economic power if AI takes the jobs and artificial intelligence.

0:44:50.253 --> 0:44:56.133
<v Speaker 3>According to many reports, PwC, McKinsey, World Economic Forum are

0:44:56.133 --> 0:45:01.253
<v Speaker 3>all predicting that AI will fundamentally transform the global workface

0:45:01.493 --> 0:45:05.253
<v Speaker 3>by twenty fifty. Again, that's not very far, and the

0:45:05.413 --> 0:45:10.653
<v Speaker 3>estimation is that up to sixty of current jobs will

0:45:10.653 --> 0:45:16.093
<v Speaker 3>require significant adoption or adaptation because of AI. Now, the

0:45:16.173 --> 0:45:20.733
<v Speaker 3>issue is already routine and repetitive jobs that people do

0:45:21.173 --> 0:45:25.293
<v Speaker 3>are being replaced because corporations are seeing that they can

0:45:25.333 --> 0:45:29.133
<v Speaker 3>save money by getting people to do data entry and

0:45:29.173 --> 0:45:33.373
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of other routine, repetitive jobs. So what is

0:45:33.413 --> 0:45:35.773
<v Speaker 3>going to happen to these people? Laton? If you're going

0:45:35.813 --> 0:45:40.853
<v Speaker 3>to have large numbers of the population who are no

0:45:40.933 --> 0:45:43.173
<v Speaker 3>longer going to be able to have a job, but

0:45:43.293 --> 0:45:47.933
<v Speaker 3>also they won't necessarily have the skills to adapt to

0:45:48.053 --> 0:45:53.733
<v Speaker 3>another job because automation and AI tools will be doing

0:45:53.973 --> 0:45:57.053
<v Speaker 3>so much of the stuff that they're capable that they

0:45:57.133 --> 0:45:59.453
<v Speaker 3>might be capable of doing. What are they going to do?

0:45:59.493 --> 0:46:01.133
<v Speaker 3>Are they going to be sitting at home? Are we

0:46:01.213 --> 0:46:04.933
<v Speaker 3>going to have to increase benefits so that sixty percent

0:46:04.973 --> 0:46:08.173
<v Speaker 3>of the population end up with a government benefit? I mean,

0:46:08.453 --> 0:46:12.253
<v Speaker 3>has lawless economic implications?

0:46:12.733 --> 0:46:14.813
<v Speaker 2>Well that's what somebody was saying to me the other day.

0:46:15.493 --> 0:46:17.973
<v Speaker 2>What's going to happen to what's going to happen to

0:46:18.013 --> 0:46:22.293
<v Speaker 2>our jobs? And where can I go if I lose mind?

0:46:22.373 --> 0:46:27.293
<v Speaker 2>This individual because I'm not trained in anything else.

0:46:28.213 --> 0:46:31.093
<v Speaker 4>Look, I do think jobs are definitely going to change.

0:46:31.413 --> 0:46:35.933
<v Speaker 4>It's transformative. I think it's disingenuous not to be blunt

0:46:36.413 --> 0:46:40.813
<v Speaker 4>that we are going to see transformational or huge shifts

0:46:40.613 --> 0:46:43.293
<v Speaker 4>in what it means to be employed in certain sectors.

0:46:44.293 --> 0:46:46.413
<v Speaker 4>Part of what we do in that newsletter is explore

0:46:46.453 --> 0:46:48.093
<v Speaker 4>one of the things that we thought never would happen,

0:46:48.133 --> 0:46:50.333
<v Speaker 4>which is that AI actually is pretty good at doing

0:46:50.333 --> 0:46:54.053
<v Speaker 4>creative stuff. So we've got a whole concern around even

0:46:54.213 --> 0:46:58.293
<v Speaker 4>the creative industry stuff. But I also think that in

0:46:58.373 --> 0:47:02.293
<v Speaker 4>every great technological shift, there has been a discussion about

0:47:02.293 --> 0:47:04.853
<v Speaker 4>the loss of jobs, and we've lost them, we will

0:47:04.853 --> 0:47:08.773
<v Speaker 4>also get new jobs. And Look, I think that for

0:47:08.893 --> 0:47:13.293
<v Speaker 4>all the conversation around the negative concerns and the dangers

0:47:13.293 --> 0:47:15.013
<v Speaker 4>of AI, I think that there is a lot of

0:47:15.053 --> 0:47:20.093
<v Speaker 4>positive opportunities for us to create interactions that may well

0:47:20.133 --> 0:47:22.653
<v Speaker 4>solve problems. I mean, your part of your question was

0:47:22.693 --> 0:47:26.213
<v Speaker 4>what could AI do around all these crises? Look, AI

0:47:26.573 --> 0:47:29.173
<v Speaker 4>does bring the opportunity to be able to look at

0:47:29.773 --> 0:47:33.413
<v Speaker 4>information in ways that generally human beings can't and solve

0:47:33.493 --> 0:47:36.573
<v Speaker 4>problems in a way that we aren't able to. Some

0:47:36.613 --> 0:47:39.933
<v Speaker 4>of the exciting stuff, for instance that Google's done with

0:47:41.333 --> 0:47:43.653
<v Speaker 4>cancer research, as Nigel it picked up at the front

0:47:43.653 --> 0:47:47.773
<v Speaker 4>of this, and also even just understanding some of our

0:47:47.813 --> 0:47:51.933
<v Speaker 4>climate problems. All of this is capable, but in that

0:47:51.973 --> 0:47:53.893
<v Speaker 4>we are going to lose jobs. But I think new

0:47:53.973 --> 0:47:55.933
<v Speaker 4>jobs will come out of this. What those will look

0:47:56.093 --> 0:47:59.333
<v Speaker 4>like like in any transformational shift, we don't know. I

0:47:59.373 --> 0:48:03.973
<v Speaker 4>do think that. I was at a forum the other

0:48:04.053 --> 0:48:06.413
<v Speaker 4>day where I was asked to speak to high school

0:48:06.453 --> 0:48:09.693
<v Speaker 4>leaders about some of the stuff to do with AI

0:48:09.853 --> 0:48:12.773
<v Speaker 4>and the fact that it's becoming part of the territory

0:48:12.813 --> 0:48:14.773
<v Speaker 4>and what does it mean to look for a job,

0:48:14.853 --> 0:48:17.133
<v Speaker 4>And there was some concerns and I said the same thing.

0:48:17.173 --> 0:48:20.333
<v Speaker 4>I said, Look, jobs will change, but I think we'll

0:48:20.333 --> 0:48:22.253
<v Speaker 4>see new jobs. One of the things I did say

0:48:22.413 --> 0:48:24.453
<v Speaker 4>was that I think we do see a future where

0:48:25.013 --> 0:48:29.213
<v Speaker 4>I believe if we have a good pathway here, humans

0:48:29.253 --> 0:48:32.453
<v Speaker 4>and AI will work together. I think that we will

0:48:32.453 --> 0:48:35.813
<v Speaker 4>see sort of hybrid jobs where neither can do it individually,

0:48:35.853 --> 0:48:40.453
<v Speaker 4>but you're working together. There's a great anecdote in a

0:48:40.453 --> 0:48:46.893
<v Speaker 4>book called Range where Gary Kasparov, the X chess master,

0:48:47.013 --> 0:48:51.133
<v Speaker 4>when he lost to Big Blue and finally the machine

0:48:51.133 --> 0:48:54.013
<v Speaker 4>beat a chess Master. He didn't just go away. What

0:48:54.053 --> 0:48:56.333
<v Speaker 4>he did was he actually went off. He got really

0:48:56.373 --> 0:49:00.333
<v Speaker 4>into it, and he created this whole exploration with AI

0:49:00.413 --> 0:49:03.253
<v Speaker 4>and humans. And what they did was he actually came back.

0:49:03.253 --> 0:49:04.813
<v Speaker 4>And this is not that well known. He came back

0:49:04.813 --> 0:49:06.493
<v Speaker 4>and he took on Big Blue again, but he took

0:49:06.813 --> 0:49:10.373
<v Speaker 4>took on Big Blue with AI himself, and the two

0:49:10.373 --> 0:49:14.133
<v Speaker 4>of them together beat the machine every time. Human beings

0:49:14.173 --> 0:49:18.333
<v Speaker 4>working with AI together were unstoppable. And I think there's

0:49:18.373 --> 0:49:21.733
<v Speaker 4>an interesting thing in that about some of the buoyancy

0:49:21.973 --> 0:49:24.013
<v Speaker 4>or the positive nature of the way that AI and

0:49:24.093 --> 0:49:25.573
<v Speaker 4>humans might interact with each other.

0:49:26.293 --> 0:49:31.453
<v Speaker 2>There's a question that I haven't heard really asked, before

0:49:31.813 --> 0:49:36.453
<v Speaker 2>working together creates relationship, what sort of relationship would you

0:49:36.533 --> 0:49:40.813
<v Speaker 2>get back from an AI operative? So you work with

0:49:40.893 --> 0:49:43.853
<v Speaker 2>somebody and you become good mates, and you talk about

0:49:43.893 --> 0:49:45.253
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of things, and you might get down the

0:49:45.293 --> 0:49:47.693
<v Speaker 2>pub to get whatever. How would you get from any

0:49:47.733 --> 0:49:51.813
<v Speaker 2>sort of any sort of relationship on that basis from AI.

0:49:52.053 --> 0:49:55.093
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I understand what you're asking, and I don't think

0:49:55.133 --> 0:49:58.613
<v Speaker 4>we quite know there will be a relationship though. I

0:49:58.653 --> 0:50:00.853
<v Speaker 4>think that to do that there needs to be some

0:50:00.893 --> 0:50:06.773
<v Speaker 4>sort of interpersonal mechanism. To be fair, some people are

0:50:06.853 --> 0:50:10.133
<v Speaker 4>using these current AI bots in a very collaborative way.

0:50:10.213 --> 0:50:12.733
<v Speaker 4>They're actually engaging with it and talking to it as

0:50:12.853 --> 0:50:16.733
<v Speaker 4>if it is another partner in the room, and because

0:50:16.733 --> 0:50:20.053
<v Speaker 4>of the nature of how these chat GTPs can work,

0:50:20.653 --> 0:50:23.613
<v Speaker 4>they are engaging back in a way that seems fruitful.

0:50:23.973 --> 0:50:27.893
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like I use my open AI chat GTP

0:50:28.093 --> 0:50:32.053
<v Speaker 4>quite a lot like a collaborator. I'll have disagreements and

0:50:32.213 --> 0:50:35.693
<v Speaker 4>explore ideas with it. I'm very clear that it's a machine,

0:50:35.933 --> 0:50:39.293
<v Speaker 4>but it does have this thing where at times it

0:50:39.373 --> 0:50:42.413
<v Speaker 4>strikes me because it talks back to me like it's

0:50:42.893 --> 0:50:46.893
<v Speaker 4>a human being. It has responses that are very intrapersonal

0:50:46.933 --> 0:50:50.293
<v Speaker 4>at times, which I do take pause at at the

0:50:50.293 --> 0:50:53.653
<v Speaker 4>moment because it makes me think, Okay, this is a machine,

0:50:53.693 --> 0:50:57.333
<v Speaker 4>this is not another person. But I think interpersonal relationships

0:50:57.333 --> 0:51:02.013
<v Speaker 4>with machines are on the horizon as well. Whether that's

0:51:02.053 --> 0:51:04.093
<v Speaker 4>a good thing or a bad thing. I think we

0:51:04.453 --> 0:51:08.173
<v Speaker 4>aren't quite sure as a society yet, because I could

0:51:08.173 --> 0:51:08.893
<v Speaker 4>go either way.

0:51:10.253 --> 0:51:15.013
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know whether I'm interpreting you correctly, but

0:51:15.173 --> 0:51:18.613
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned earlier that we'd come back to something so

0:51:19.373 --> 0:51:21.413
<v Speaker 2>on the basis that I think you have touched on

0:51:21.453 --> 0:51:25.413
<v Speaker 2>it deep fake technology. There was a weekend story from

0:51:25.533 --> 0:51:30.733
<v Speaker 2>Australia from Sydney, I think in the Australian newspaper with

0:51:30.773 --> 0:51:35.173
<v Speaker 2>regard to the school kids around the age of twelve

0:51:35.453 --> 0:51:39.533
<v Speaker 2>using deep fake technology, which you might like to expand

0:51:39.573 --> 0:51:44.253
<v Speaker 2>on a little, but using it to show the girls

0:51:44.253 --> 0:51:48.093
<v Speaker 2>in the classes in all sorts of compromising positions, starting

0:51:48.133 --> 0:51:49.413
<v Speaker 2>with being totally naked.

0:51:49.653 --> 0:51:53.093
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. So this first thing deep fake technology, just for

0:51:53.133 --> 0:51:56.533
<v Speaker 4>the audience is on and the listeners, is basically the

0:51:56.573 --> 0:52:01.613
<v Speaker 4>capability of taking someone's likeness and being able to project

0:52:01.613 --> 0:52:05.453
<v Speaker 4>that likeness onto existing video or in the case of

0:52:05.493 --> 0:52:08.333
<v Speaker 4>what you're talking about and what's now the more sophistical,

0:52:08.333 --> 0:52:11.493
<v Speaker 4>de catered version of deep fake technology being able to

0:52:11.493 --> 0:52:17.693
<v Speaker 4>take a person's likeness and create completely generated new video

0:52:17.773 --> 0:52:23.733
<v Speaker 4>material that was never obviously created. So completely fake. And

0:52:23.853 --> 0:52:26.253
<v Speaker 4>the nature of this, yes, is that it is being

0:52:26.373 --> 0:52:32.133
<v Speaker 4>used to create pornographic experiences and also even potentially blackmailing

0:52:32.213 --> 0:52:35.053
<v Speaker 4>experiences because they are able to take in this case,

0:52:35.293 --> 0:52:39.373
<v Speaker 4>the girl's likeness or the girl's likenesses and they're able

0:52:39.413 --> 0:52:43.813
<v Speaker 4>to create put their face on basically pornographic material. And

0:52:43.853 --> 0:52:47.693
<v Speaker 4>this is why a lot of states in America especially

0:52:47.733 --> 0:52:52.653
<v Speaker 4>have started jumping on and creating deep fake laws. This

0:52:52.813 --> 0:52:54.813
<v Speaker 4>was to be fair, they started this when it was

0:52:54.853 --> 0:52:59.013
<v Speaker 4>still rudimentary. But we're going down a path now where

0:52:59.573 --> 0:53:04.453
<v Speaker 4>the latest launch of a generative video technology from a

0:53:04.573 --> 0:53:07.613
<v Speaker 4>Google called vo three, this is the third version of

0:53:07.653 --> 0:53:11.413
<v Speaker 4>it can now create video that's circulating as of this

0:53:11.453 --> 0:53:14.933
<v Speaker 4>week where it is almost impossible to tell that it

0:53:15.133 --> 0:53:19.613
<v Speaker 4>is not real. The video technology lets you put a

0:53:19.653 --> 0:53:23.253
<v Speaker 4>prompt in and it will generate the video. It generates

0:53:23.333 --> 0:53:27.173
<v Speaker 4>the dialogue, and it generates the sound effects to create

0:53:27.253 --> 0:53:30.893
<v Speaker 4>something that by all looks is effectively a real video

0:53:31.053 --> 0:53:33.293
<v Speaker 4>that's been created. Now you take that into deep fate

0:53:33.493 --> 0:53:36.573
<v Speaker 4>territory and we have a really concerning space.

0:53:37.453 --> 0:53:41.693
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, the other aspect of that is the is the

0:53:41.693 --> 0:53:47.933
<v Speaker 2>creation of AI robotic companions that are x rated. In

0:53:47.973 --> 0:53:52.813
<v Speaker 2>other words, they become they become sexual partners, and you

0:53:52.933 --> 0:53:55.173
<v Speaker 2>cannot help but have picked up over the years when

0:53:55.253 --> 0:53:58.413
<v Speaker 2>advances have been made in that particular area. But now

0:53:58.453 --> 0:54:00.813
<v Speaker 2>you throw AI in there and it's a whole new

0:54:00.853 --> 0:54:05.173
<v Speaker 2>different scenario, good, indifferent or bad.

0:54:05.613 --> 0:54:07.933
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think again it's a worry. As I indicated

0:54:08.053 --> 0:54:14.933
<v Speaker 3>with companions is that you know, it plays to people's

0:54:15.013 --> 0:54:20.173
<v Speaker 3>and securities, people's loneliness and so forth. I mean, I

0:54:20.213 --> 0:54:25.053
<v Speaker 3>think it's interesting technology. Porn has actually played a part

0:54:25.093 --> 0:54:29.173
<v Speaker 3>in just about every development of technology. In the early

0:54:29.253 --> 0:54:32.693
<v Speaker 3>days of the Internet, it was actually when it was

0:54:32.733 --> 0:54:34.413
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a Wild West show. It was the

0:54:34.413 --> 0:54:40.333
<v Speaker 3>availability of sexual material that helped actually fuel it. If

0:54:40.373 --> 0:54:43.693
<v Speaker 3>you remember the early days of VCRs, that was exactly

0:54:43.733 --> 0:54:49.013
<v Speaker 3>the same. So here we have a new technology where porn,

0:54:50.093 --> 0:54:54.453
<v Speaker 3>the peddlers of porn, if you like, latching onto it

0:54:54.573 --> 0:55:01.133
<v Speaker 3>and trying to make hay from it. This is as

0:55:01.213 --> 0:55:08.293
<v Speaker 3>I say, I think the question of companionship using AI

0:55:08.573 --> 0:55:12.053
<v Speaker 3>is going to be a really major issue because if

0:55:12.053 --> 0:55:17.413
<v Speaker 3>you're replacing human beings who can make sensible emotional decisions

0:55:18.613 --> 0:55:24.453
<v Speaker 3>with assistance in some ways, that maybe encouraging bad stuff

0:55:24.693 --> 0:55:30.013
<v Speaker 3>or in fact putting you in a space where which

0:55:30.053 --> 0:55:35.373
<v Speaker 3>is not good by encouraging you with thoughts and ideas

0:55:35.613 --> 0:55:39.573
<v Speaker 3>that aren't helpful that other humans would not suggest. You know,

0:55:39.653 --> 0:55:41.693
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a real worry. But again we

0:55:41.813 --> 0:55:44.093
<v Speaker 3>come back to the thing who's controlling this late and

0:55:44.173 --> 0:55:48.253
<v Speaker 3>I mean again, nobody is waking up to this. The

0:55:48.333 --> 0:55:52.013
<v Speaker 3>regulators aren't waking up to this. It feels as though

0:55:52.053 --> 0:55:55.653
<v Speaker 3>the technology companies are just going as fast as they

0:55:55.733 --> 0:56:00.413
<v Speaker 3>can to develop you know, human minds replacements. By twenty

0:56:00.453 --> 0:56:03.693
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight. No one is actually putting any brakes on this.

0:56:05.533 --> 0:56:08.293
<v Speaker 2>So who's running it, who's organizing it?

0:56:09.533 --> 0:56:11.853
<v Speaker 4>Well, well, the big tech companies.

0:56:11.933 --> 0:56:13.533
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's all about money, isn't it.

0:56:13.573 --> 0:56:16.373
<v Speaker 2>And again, as you say, but Nigel, is it is

0:56:16.373 --> 0:56:18.653
<v Speaker 2>it totally about money or is it is it about

0:56:18.733 --> 0:56:23.613
<v Speaker 2>I mean, take Bill Gates, Well, it's controls Bill exactly.

0:56:24.173 --> 0:56:27.373
<v Speaker 2>Bill Gates doesn't need any more money. He would be

0:56:27.453 --> 0:56:30.613
<v Speaker 2>though interested in as you as you just mentioned, in

0:56:30.653 --> 0:56:35.293
<v Speaker 2>control and one thing leads to another. The two go

0:56:35.653 --> 0:56:37.733
<v Speaker 2>very well hand in hand for a lot of people.

0:56:37.733 --> 0:56:44.373
<v Speaker 2>Look a look at George Sorris. So are you suggesting

0:56:44.493 --> 0:56:48.293
<v Speaker 2>then that they're the sort of people who are behind

0:56:48.373 --> 0:56:48.853
<v Speaker 2>pushing this.

0:56:50.413 --> 0:56:53.213
<v Speaker 3>Well, I you quoted in an article which see it

0:56:53.293 --> 0:56:56.733
<v Speaker 3>that whoever wins c AI race will control the world

0:56:56.933 --> 0:56:59.853
<v Speaker 3>or something along those lines. I mean that that is

0:56:59.893 --> 0:57:04.293
<v Speaker 3>what the kind of belief is. I mean, as justin mentioned,

0:57:05.333 --> 0:57:08.933
<v Speaker 3>there's a huge race going on between America and to

0:57:09.013 --> 0:57:11.733
<v Speaker 3>try and win. You know, they see it as who's

0:57:11.773 --> 0:57:14.573
<v Speaker 3>going to control Who's going to win this, but what

0:57:14.613 --> 0:57:16.813
<v Speaker 3>are we actually winning? What do we mean by winning?

0:57:17.293 --> 0:57:18.853
<v Speaker 3>You know, are we taking a step back and say,

0:57:18.893 --> 0:57:21.173
<v Speaker 3>what do we mean? Does that mean that we will

0:57:21.293 --> 0:57:25.293
<v Speaker 3>end up with these assistants that are being developed. The

0:57:25.373 --> 0:57:28.053
<v Speaker 3>person that Justin was talking about is the person who

0:57:28.493 --> 0:57:33.013
<v Speaker 3>the genius at Apple who created the iPhone and Apple Watch.

0:57:33.493 --> 0:57:36.453
<v Speaker 3>He is the one now developing a major AI assistant.

0:57:36.533 --> 0:57:40.453
<v Speaker 3>And his talk that in ten years time the iPhone

0:57:40.493 --> 0:57:43.093
<v Speaker 3>will be dead, that we'll all be carrying around some

0:57:43.213 --> 0:57:48.613
<v Speaker 3>sort of lapels something now whatever, something that will be

0:57:48.933 --> 0:57:51.933
<v Speaker 3>telling us what to do, and we're asking it questions

0:57:52.333 --> 0:57:53.653
<v Speaker 3>and it will be directing us.

0:57:54.533 --> 0:57:56.493
<v Speaker 4>You've talked about which.

0:57:56.493 --> 0:58:00.493
<v Speaker 3>Sounds crazy sci fi, but you've talked about the real

0:58:01.853 --> 0:58:07.573
<v Speaker 3>musk type enthusiasm for something that goes into our heads

0:58:08.773 --> 0:58:12.053
<v Speaker 3>and some sort of thing that controls us. So, I mean,

0:58:12.413 --> 0:58:16.853
<v Speaker 3>this is the science fiction era that we're actually moving

0:58:16.893 --> 0:58:21.373
<v Speaker 3>into reality now. And there are definitely forces out there

0:58:21.493 --> 0:58:24.853
<v Speaker 3>that are all about control, and they're quite right. Whoever

0:58:24.933 --> 0:58:28.093
<v Speaker 3>can get an AI assistant to tell you and me

0:58:28.333 --> 0:58:31.933
<v Speaker 3>and Justin and everyone listening what to do and how

0:58:31.973 --> 0:58:34.653
<v Speaker 3>to do it, and what to buy and where to

0:58:34.693 --> 0:58:39.133
<v Speaker 3>go and all the rest of it. Surely that's you know,

0:58:39.293 --> 0:58:42.013
<v Speaker 3>that's in a completely different world, I.

0:58:41.933 --> 0:58:43.853
<v Speaker 4>Mean later and there is a narrative out there which

0:58:43.893 --> 0:58:46.733
<v Speaker 4>I think is worth mentioning, and that is the idea

0:58:46.773 --> 0:58:50.853
<v Speaker 4>that there's a kind of developing AI cold war between

0:58:51.213 --> 0:58:54.733
<v Speaker 4>China and the US and this sort of who is

0:58:54.773 --> 0:58:56.973
<v Speaker 4>going to be the best to control it or even

0:58:57.653 --> 0:59:03.133
<v Speaker 4>as we touched earlier in this podcast, is whose vision

0:59:03.173 --> 0:59:05.133
<v Speaker 4>of the world is going to win out for AI?

0:59:05.613 --> 0:59:09.573
<v Speaker 4>And I think the forces which talking about here with

0:59:09.573 --> 0:59:12.253
<v Speaker 4>with what you're asking, what Nigel's mentioning, is that there

0:59:12.333 --> 0:59:14.333
<v Speaker 4>is if that is part of the narrative or the play,

0:59:15.053 --> 0:59:17.773
<v Speaker 4>and we know we've also talked about the s extential layer,

0:59:17.853 --> 0:59:21.813
<v Speaker 4>then then all these threats do push forward the idea

0:59:21.893 --> 0:59:24.013
<v Speaker 4>that it's kind of going to be keep it's going

0:59:24.093 --> 0:59:27.013
<v Speaker 4>to keep getting developed. But whose vision of what that

0:59:27.093 --> 0:59:28.973
<v Speaker 4>means is is not clear yet.

0:59:29.413 --> 0:59:31.773
<v Speaker 2>Does it come down to whoever drops the first bomb?

0:59:32.573 --> 0:59:34.813
<v Speaker 4>Well, it wouldn't be a bomb, though, I think that

0:59:36.093 --> 0:59:40.773
<v Speaker 4>it's more likely to be some sort of weaponized interaction

0:59:41.173 --> 0:59:44.573
<v Speaker 4>on an AI level. I mean, there's a lot of

0:59:44.613 --> 0:59:47.773
<v Speaker 4>talk about the idea of a third World war, but

0:59:47.893 --> 0:59:51.413
<v Speaker 4>I don't necessarily know who that we'll be seeing bombs

0:59:51.453 --> 0:59:54.333
<v Speaker 4>necessarily in that. That's why I think the AI cold

0:59:54.333 --> 0:59:57.373
<v Speaker 4>War is an interesting narrative because it's it's almost like

0:59:57.453 --> 1:00:01.333
<v Speaker 4>a different type of battle that isn't that isn't drawn

1:00:01.373 --> 1:00:04.133
<v Speaker 4>necessarily by clear geopolitical lines.

1:00:04.453 --> 1:00:06.093
<v Speaker 3>And is that a battle for your mind?

1:00:06.213 --> 1:00:06.533
<v Speaker 4>Layton?

1:00:07.373 --> 1:00:10.013
<v Speaker 2>There are two other areas that I've got tucked away

1:00:10.133 --> 1:00:14.733
<v Speaker 2>that I know I want to engage with. One is education.

1:00:15.813 --> 1:00:19.053
<v Speaker 2>Is AI a future class teacher?

1:00:20.013 --> 1:00:22.973
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I think so, being a lecturer. I think this

1:00:23.053 --> 1:00:26.613
<v Speaker 4>is something that is talked about currently at inside aut

1:00:26.893 --> 1:00:29.653
<v Speaker 4>and it's something all institutions but also down to the

1:00:29.733 --> 1:00:32.693
<v Speaker 4>high school and primary school levels about where AI fits

1:00:32.693 --> 1:00:37.493
<v Speaker 4>in this. The way I see it is, education is

1:00:37.533 --> 1:00:40.693
<v Speaker 4>also up for grabs, first of all in the whole

1:00:40.773 --> 1:00:44.413
<v Speaker 4>nature of what it means to have artificial intelligence working

1:00:44.453 --> 1:00:48.293
<v Speaker 4>in that space. I think teaching is going to change.

1:00:49.013 --> 1:00:51.533
<v Speaker 4>I think it will put pressures on all the layers

1:00:51.573 --> 1:00:56.093
<v Speaker 4>of education that we have. But I do think it

1:00:56.173 --> 1:00:59.253
<v Speaker 4>is going to be a hybrid situation. In fact, I

1:00:59.293 --> 1:01:02.413
<v Speaker 4>would almost say earlier when I talked about the future

1:01:02.413 --> 1:01:06.253
<v Speaker 4>of jobs kind of being hybrid jobs. I think education

1:01:06.493 --> 1:01:09.853
<v Speaker 4>is probably the first sector where we will see some

1:01:09.973 --> 1:01:13.613
<v Speaker 4>realization of this very quickly where you have a teacher

1:01:14.173 --> 1:01:18.573
<v Speaker 4>and you have an artificial intelligent machine or GPT or agent,

1:01:18.973 --> 1:01:23.253
<v Speaker 4>that is that they're working in concert to help educate.

1:01:25.973 --> 1:01:28.453
<v Speaker 2>So how long would you put on it before every

1:01:28.733 --> 1:01:31.373
<v Speaker 2>every kid is being influenced by an AI whatever.

1:01:32.013 --> 1:01:34.773
<v Speaker 4>Well, I would argue they're already being influenced actually because

1:01:35.213 --> 1:01:37.573
<v Speaker 4>one of the reasons the education sector has to get

1:01:37.573 --> 1:01:40.693
<v Speaker 4>on board in some form or maybe a better way

1:01:40.693 --> 1:01:42.853
<v Speaker 4>to describe this is they have to be there so

1:01:42.933 --> 1:01:47.093
<v Speaker 4>they can control some of the narrative is because kids

1:01:47.093 --> 1:01:50.013
<v Speaker 4>in high school and primary school are already engaging and

1:01:50.053 --> 1:01:56.613
<v Speaker 4>playing with these chatbots, and they already are effectively learning

1:01:56.733 --> 1:01:59.493
<v Speaker 4>faster about how they work and what they can get

1:01:59.493 --> 1:02:03.053
<v Speaker 4>out of them. They're necessarily even the educators that are

1:02:03.053 --> 1:02:07.613
<v Speaker 4>older generations, and so we're already they're already being influenced.

1:02:07.693 --> 1:02:10.373
<v Speaker 4>It's already had. We're just got to be part of

1:02:10.373 --> 1:02:10.973
<v Speaker 4>the narrative.

1:02:11.293 --> 1:02:12.373
<v Speaker 2>Is parenting over.

1:02:14.613 --> 1:02:17.893
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't believe so. I think that there's a

1:02:17.933 --> 1:02:23.613
<v Speaker 4>fundamental interaction in parenting that and my current belief AI

1:02:23.693 --> 1:02:25.853
<v Speaker 4>can't replace. I mean, this is a whole bunch of

1:02:25.933 --> 1:02:32.413
<v Speaker 4>factors like presence, daily interactions but it may be substituted

1:02:32.413 --> 1:02:34.973
<v Speaker 4>to some extent. That's again part of these concerns.

1:02:35.693 --> 1:02:39.533
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So the other area that we haven't touched on,

1:02:39.773 --> 1:02:42.533
<v Speaker 2>and I want to because this is important to I

1:02:42.573 --> 1:02:47.053
<v Speaker 2>think all of us, everybody. The use of AI in

1:02:47.133 --> 1:02:50.213
<v Speaker 2>journalism does that raise ethical questions?

1:02:50.933 --> 1:02:55.613
<v Speaker 3>It certainly does latent such as the potential for a

1:02:55.653 --> 1:02:59.493
<v Speaker 3>bias if you're using AI algorithms. And there's already been

1:03:00.053 --> 1:03:05.093
<v Speaker 3>a problem with some of the AI chetbots that actually produce.

1:03:06.973 --> 1:03:07.773
<v Speaker 4>A bias.

1:03:08.893 --> 1:03:11.293
<v Speaker 3>And we already have issues in the media that we

1:03:11.373 --> 1:03:16.733
<v Speaker 3>know of where many people are concerned about bias, not

1:03:16.853 --> 1:03:18.013
<v Speaker 3>in in the media.

1:03:17.733 --> 1:03:18.813
<v Speaker 4>But also in.

1:03:20.893 --> 1:03:25.333
<v Speaker 3>Some of the narratives that are being driven. There's also

1:03:25.573 --> 1:03:29.053
<v Speaker 3>a need for transparency in AI generated content. There are

1:03:29.093 --> 1:03:34.533
<v Speaker 3>already news sites that are being controlled by AI. AI

1:03:34.693 --> 1:03:35.653
<v Speaker 3>is deciding what.

1:03:35.653 --> 1:03:37.493
<v Speaker 4>Clickbait might be.

1:03:39.013 --> 1:03:40.733
<v Speaker 3>The best to push.

1:03:40.773 --> 1:03:42.413
<v Speaker 4>There are already stories.

1:03:42.973 --> 1:03:47.893
<v Speaker 3>We've had examples where strange stories have been appearing in

1:03:48.173 --> 1:03:57.213
<v Speaker 3>news sites and even in newspapers, where the AI has

1:03:57.293 --> 1:04:00.333
<v Speaker 3>produced stuff that is not accurate. I mean the problem.

1:04:01.293 --> 1:04:04.653
<v Speaker 3>The problem is that if you ask the chatbot something,

1:04:04.973 --> 1:04:08.053
<v Speaker 3>or you ask it to do something again, as I say,

1:04:08.213 --> 1:04:13.013
<v Speaker 3>it's making mistakes. It can make mistakes, and so if

1:04:13.053 --> 1:04:19.493
<v Speaker 3>you're handing over aspects of journalism as some newspeople, we

1:04:19.613 --> 1:04:22.853
<v Speaker 3>know the news media is under economic strain, so a

1:04:22.973 --> 1:04:28.533
<v Speaker 3>number of media places now are handing over some aspects.

1:04:29.093 --> 1:04:33.613
<v Speaker 3>For example, they're handing over news articles on very routing topics.

1:04:34.773 --> 1:04:37.653
<v Speaker 3>Media releases are already being processed on one of the

1:04:37.693 --> 1:04:40.293
<v Speaker 3>local news sites by AI.

1:04:40.733 --> 1:04:42.693
<v Speaker 4>Financial reports, sports.

1:04:42.253 --> 1:04:45.853
<v Speaker 3>Schools, weather updates, all that stuff are being asked to

1:04:45.933 --> 1:04:49.933
<v Speaker 3>AI to produce, and that way you don't need humans.

1:04:50.613 --> 1:04:55.093
<v Speaker 3>They're also analyzing very large data sets that could be

1:04:55.173 --> 1:04:59.053
<v Speaker 3>helpful because if you're investigating something, it can search for

1:04:59.093 --> 1:05:02.173
<v Speaker 3>stuff very quickly and come up with stuff, so it

1:05:02.253 --> 1:05:06.013
<v Speaker 3>can help that. The danger is two things. One is

1:05:06.413 --> 1:05:10.733
<v Speaker 3>the writing of news stuff are without journalists. And secondly,

1:05:11.333 --> 1:05:15.453
<v Speaker 3>delivering personalized content to readers based on their interests and

1:05:15.493 --> 1:05:16.293
<v Speaker 3>reading habits.

1:05:17.133 --> 1:05:19.613
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's something I just don't want to know about.

1:05:19.853 --> 1:05:24.813
<v Speaker 2>I resist having, and I've got enough already anyway, but

1:05:24.973 --> 1:05:29.093
<v Speaker 2>I resist having the sites that send me what they

1:05:29.173 --> 1:05:33.373
<v Speaker 2>think I'm interested in, and I won't sign up to them.

1:05:33.613 --> 1:05:36.413
<v Speaker 2>You know, every every newspaper's doing it now. I just

1:05:36.453 --> 1:05:40.813
<v Speaker 2>canceled my London Telegraph subscription. A because because it went

1:05:40.853 --> 1:05:44.213
<v Speaker 2>through the roof, and b because because there was sending

1:05:44.253 --> 1:05:46.413
<v Speaker 2>me stuff that I'm that I didn't care about. But

1:05:46.493 --> 1:05:49.053
<v Speaker 2>I want, I want access to it so that it's

1:05:49.053 --> 1:05:52.093
<v Speaker 2>my choice. I don't. I don't want them deciding what

1:05:52.173 --> 1:05:54.133
<v Speaker 2>they think I should see and read.

1:05:54.733 --> 1:05:57.253
<v Speaker 3>And I can't understand why this has been pushed so

1:05:57.373 --> 1:06:00.813
<v Speaker 3>heavily later because there is such an issue at the

1:06:00.853 --> 1:06:04.413
<v Speaker 3>moment with trust and media and it's been widely debated.

1:06:04.493 --> 1:06:07.493
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's being debated vigorously in America at the

1:06:07.493 --> 1:06:12.493
<v Speaker 3>moment because a CNN journalist that didn't cover the demise

1:06:12.653 --> 1:06:18.093
<v Speaker 3>of Biden is now making millions from a book which

1:06:18.453 --> 1:06:22.253
<v Speaker 3>suddenly has discovered that Biden had cognitive issues. I mean,

1:06:22.573 --> 1:06:25.693
<v Speaker 3>it's a major issue. If really one in three New

1:06:25.813 --> 1:06:30.133
<v Speaker 3>Zealanders trusts the media, then why are we now giving

1:06:30.173 --> 1:06:34.053
<v Speaker 3>it over to AI to write stories for us or,

1:06:34.173 --> 1:06:37.253
<v Speaker 3>as you say, decide what you want to read, which

1:06:37.293 --> 1:06:40.013
<v Speaker 3>means that you don't actually see stuff that may be

1:06:40.093 --> 1:06:43.133
<v Speaker 3>important to read. And that's the real worry with this.

1:06:43.533 --> 1:06:47.533
<v Speaker 3>If AI is deciding what the homepage of a news

1:06:47.613 --> 1:06:51.293
<v Speaker 3>site should be, are we actually getting stuff that we

1:06:51.453 --> 1:06:55.133
<v Speaker 3>need to actually see? And think about and cover issues

1:06:55.533 --> 1:06:57.013
<v Speaker 3>that we actually need to debate.

1:06:57.373 --> 1:06:58.853
<v Speaker 2>How are we going to be able to continue to

1:06:58.893 --> 1:07:05.053
<v Speaker 2>think of the future generations in the critical manner because

1:07:05.053 --> 1:07:07.173
<v Speaker 2>it's all being taken out of them, all being taken

1:07:07.173 --> 1:07:07.853
<v Speaker 2>out of their hands.

1:07:09.133 --> 1:07:11.933
<v Speaker 4>Well, this is it. And I actually think one issue

1:07:11.933 --> 1:07:16.733
<v Speaker 4>for me around the AI being incorporated into journalistic stuff

1:07:16.893 --> 1:07:20.133
<v Speaker 4>is that we've already seen, as I mentioned earlier, some

1:07:20.173 --> 1:07:24.333
<v Speaker 4>of the issues around algorithms having full control of content,

1:07:24.413 --> 1:07:26.693
<v Speaker 4>which is what goes on in social media spaces, and

1:07:26.733 --> 1:07:30.733
<v Speaker 4>the echo chamber problems and the nature of misinformation. I

1:07:30.893 --> 1:07:33.133
<v Speaker 4>just can't help but feel like there's a lesson or

1:07:33.173 --> 1:07:37.133
<v Speaker 4>we learned there. So handing over actual what you might

1:07:37.213 --> 1:07:43.253
<v Speaker 4>call legitimate news sources into this AI system is concerning

1:07:43.453 --> 1:07:45.733
<v Speaker 4>on even the nature of how you go back to

1:07:45.773 --> 1:07:49.133
<v Speaker 4>your point, it starts deciding what it thinks is everyone

1:07:49.213 --> 1:07:52.253
<v Speaker 4>needs to see. I mean, this goes back to something

1:07:52.293 --> 1:07:55.013
<v Speaker 4>I feel we need to be careful about, and it's

1:07:55.093 --> 1:07:59.013
<v Speaker 4>easy for that line to be unclear, which is that

1:07:59.293 --> 1:08:04.493
<v Speaker 4>human beings are still awesome at creation curation. I should say.

1:08:05.973 --> 1:08:10.173
<v Speaker 4>The clear thing that GPT intelligence chatbots can't do is

1:08:10.213 --> 1:08:13.693
<v Speaker 4>that they're always looking backwards they're not. They're not great

1:08:13.813 --> 1:08:16.853
<v Speaker 4>at well, they're not good at at the ability to

1:08:16.933 --> 1:08:18.693
<v Speaker 4>kind of look at something and know that this is

1:08:19.133 --> 1:08:21.693
<v Speaker 4>a way forward, or this is what we should be promoting.

1:08:22.493 --> 1:08:25.933
<v Speaker 4>That's the human curation process of anything. AI is making

1:08:26.173 --> 1:08:29.893
<v Speaker 4>that demarcation clearer every day that it's really rubbish at

1:08:29.893 --> 1:08:32.533
<v Speaker 4>this and that what we do need is to keep

1:08:32.573 --> 1:08:36.013
<v Speaker 4>that human being in the curation and the decision making processes,

1:08:36.333 --> 1:08:38.653
<v Speaker 4>and so when it comes to things like information sources,

1:08:38.693 --> 1:08:41.333
<v Speaker 4>this is a line I think we should be holding.

1:08:41.853 --> 1:08:46.173
<v Speaker 2>So the future of AI in everyday life, give me

1:08:46.253 --> 1:08:51.013
<v Speaker 2>your perspective as to where it might be. Well, you

1:08:51.453 --> 1:08:53.293
<v Speaker 2>picked the time period I want to. I don't want

1:08:53.293 --> 1:08:56.573
<v Speaker 2>to put it on you, but there it appears that

1:08:56.613 --> 1:09:00.213
<v Speaker 2>it's moving forward, if you like, at a greater greater rate,

1:09:00.373 --> 1:09:02.253
<v Speaker 2>greater speed than we anticipate it.

1:09:03.053 --> 1:09:05.173
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's just pick twenty thirty because it's a nice

1:09:05.613 --> 1:09:09.653
<v Speaker 4>five years from now. And I think by twenty thirty

1:09:11.293 --> 1:09:14.173
<v Speaker 4>a majority of us will have some type of persistent

1:09:14.533 --> 1:09:18.373
<v Speaker 4>wearable AI device on us, much like a smartphone. I

1:09:18.373 --> 1:09:24.373
<v Speaker 4>think AI will have integrated itself into all aspects of

1:09:24.373 --> 1:09:29.093
<v Speaker 4>our everyday lives in a kind of active and passive,

1:09:29.173 --> 1:09:32.813
<v Speaker 4>so they'll be passive what might call ambient AI, where

1:09:32.853 --> 1:09:34.813
<v Speaker 4>it's sort of happening in the background and just kind

1:09:34.853 --> 1:09:39.133
<v Speaker 4>of making things easy would be the positive look, but

1:09:39.213 --> 1:09:41.253
<v Speaker 4>also active. Going back to a lot of the part

1:09:41.293 --> 1:09:45.413
<v Speaker 4>of the conversation, I think people will have active intelligent

1:09:45.493 --> 1:09:48.853
<v Speaker 4>agents they have a communication with that they interact with

1:09:49.493 --> 1:09:52.453
<v Speaker 4>from a spectrum of how's your day going, or give

1:09:52.453 --> 1:09:56.853
<v Speaker 4>me the weather, through to full relationships. And I think

1:09:56.853 --> 1:09:58.973
<v Speaker 4>we're going to see I think in five years by

1:09:58.973 --> 1:10:02.733
<v Speaker 4>twenty thirty, none of us will quite recognize the world

1:10:02.933 --> 1:10:05.213
<v Speaker 4>as it is right now. I think it will be

1:10:05.293 --> 1:10:09.973
<v Speaker 4>dramatically shifted by having what you I might say, here's

1:10:09.973 --> 1:10:12.933
<v Speaker 4>a way to think about it. We haven't met aliens yet,

1:10:14.413 --> 1:10:17.013
<v Speaker 4>but I think in five years by twenty thirty, we'll

1:10:17.053 --> 1:10:20.533
<v Speaker 4>have aliens on Earth and they'll just be effectively intelligence.

1:10:20.893 --> 1:10:24.253
<v Speaker 4>Artificial intelligence will be kind of like imagine aliens turned

1:10:24.293 --> 1:10:26.573
<v Speaker 4>up and integrated our society. I think that's the kind

1:10:26.573 --> 1:10:28.933
<v Speaker 4>of future we're going to be seeing because it will

1:10:28.973 --> 1:10:31.573
<v Speaker 4>be that prolific and it'll be that transformational.

1:10:33.133 --> 1:10:37.773
<v Speaker 2>Nigel before, well, you want to have an input there,

1:10:38.293 --> 1:10:40.493
<v Speaker 2>because I've got a question off the back of that progestion.

1:10:41.853 --> 1:10:44.653
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, No, I absolutely agree with that, I think, and

1:10:44.693 --> 1:10:48.213
<v Speaker 3>that's why I'm urging that we really need I'm really

1:10:48.733 --> 1:10:51.733
<v Speaker 3>glad you're discussing it today Latin, because we need to

1:10:51.773 --> 1:10:56.133
<v Speaker 3>be having these discussions rather than just walk into it

1:10:56.333 --> 1:11:00.013
<v Speaker 3>without any discussion whatsoever. I mean, we've got a younger

1:11:00.053 --> 1:11:03.813
<v Speaker 3>generation now, We've got a generation or two that have

1:11:03.893 --> 1:11:06.533
<v Speaker 3>grown up with the Internet and don't remember the world

1:11:06.573 --> 1:11:09.693
<v Speaker 3>you and I remember where there's Now we've now got

1:11:09.693 --> 1:11:12.813
<v Speaker 3>a generation that just accepts that they go to chet

1:11:12.893 --> 1:11:16.413
<v Speaker 3>GPT to either do this school we say, or to

1:11:16.493 --> 1:11:20.773
<v Speaker 3>ask a question about life. And so we're heading down

1:11:20.813 --> 1:11:24.333
<v Speaker 3>that path. There is no stopping it. But should we

1:11:24.413 --> 1:11:28.253
<v Speaker 3>actually be pausing, as I keep saying, and asking questions

1:11:28.293 --> 1:11:32.933
<v Speaker 3>about whether we should you reframe some of what's going

1:11:32.973 --> 1:11:36.693
<v Speaker 3>on or or make sure that we don't head down

1:11:36.853 --> 1:11:39.973
<v Speaker 3>certain roads which which could be disastrous.

1:11:41.333 --> 1:11:44.613
<v Speaker 2>Well, justin you triggered something that I that I was

1:11:44.653 --> 1:11:46.893
<v Speaker 2>going to include, and then when you said it, I

1:11:46.933 --> 1:11:49.853
<v Speaker 2>thought I'd forgotten about it. So I'm glad you did.

1:11:49.933 --> 1:11:52.773
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, And that is you mentioned aliens. And the

1:11:52.853 --> 1:11:56.373
<v Speaker 2>question is is it possible now I've asked this question

1:11:56.773 --> 1:12:00.133
<v Speaker 2>in one way or another previously on the on My

1:12:00.253 --> 1:12:05.253
<v Speaker 2>podcast of people who are including a professor from Melbourne

1:12:05.493 --> 1:12:09.453
<v Speaker 2>Tech who co wrote a book in a twenty twenty

1:12:09.533 --> 1:12:11.693
<v Speaker 2>nineteen I think, and his answer was in the negative.

1:12:11.813 --> 1:12:16.653
<v Speaker 2>But is it possible that AI could be hijacked by

1:12:16.693 --> 1:12:20.013
<v Speaker 2>some alien force? And when I say sorry, when I

1:12:20.053 --> 1:12:22.933
<v Speaker 2>say alien, I mean you can. You can start local

1:12:22.973 --> 1:12:25.653
<v Speaker 2>if you want, go wherever you like. I don't mean

1:12:25.853 --> 1:12:29.013
<v Speaker 2>just from X from external.

1:12:29.933 --> 1:12:32.013
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think we could just say there's a spectrum

1:12:32.013 --> 1:12:35.453
<v Speaker 4>on that, and I think the answer for me is yes,

1:12:35.733 --> 1:12:38.333
<v Speaker 4>es es. Along that spectrum, the answer at one end

1:12:38.573 --> 1:12:42.613
<v Speaker 4>is that alien in the sense of a foreign agencies

1:12:42.693 --> 1:12:47.293
<v Speaker 4>or foreign forces, this will happen. AI is hackable. AI

1:12:47.413 --> 1:12:51.413
<v Speaker 4>will be hackable. And so, going back to our twenty

1:12:51.493 --> 1:12:57.013
<v Speaker 4>thirty future cast, we will definitely have situations where, unfortunately,

1:12:57.453 --> 1:13:00.893
<v Speaker 4>there will be incidences where AI have been forced to

1:13:00.893 --> 1:13:03.533
<v Speaker 4>do things or hacked in some way. And at the

1:13:03.573 --> 1:13:06.213
<v Speaker 4>other end of the spectrum, I'm the big believer there

1:13:06.213 --> 1:13:09.413
<v Speaker 4>are aliens out there. So if aliens do turn up, well,

1:13:09.653 --> 1:13:12.693
<v Speaker 4>the reality is yes, the answer is if they could

1:13:12.693 --> 1:13:15.373
<v Speaker 4>turn up halfway across the galaxy to us, they can

1:13:15.413 --> 1:13:16.493
<v Speaker 4>definitely hack our AI.

1:13:17.413 --> 1:13:21.013
<v Speaker 2>So you reckon that some of those more recent sightings

1:13:21.013 --> 1:13:23.573
<v Speaker 2>in America maybe for real.

1:13:25.973 --> 1:13:29.893
<v Speaker 4>Well I or yeah, I mean, I don't know. I'm

1:13:30.013 --> 1:13:32.533
<v Speaker 4>just a big believer that I don't There's a thing

1:13:32.573 --> 1:13:37.493
<v Speaker 4>called the fer Ferm a paradox, Ferm Fernie paradox, something

1:13:37.533 --> 1:13:41.613
<v Speaker 4>like that, and it basically says that from this this

1:13:41.693 --> 1:13:45.493
<v Speaker 4>thinker was basically saying, well, if we've got all this

1:13:45.893 --> 1:13:48.333
<v Speaker 4>galaxy out there, how can we haven't seen aliens? Because

1:13:48.333 --> 1:13:52.493
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't quite make sense. Look, I think in one

1:13:52.493 --> 1:13:55.333
<v Speaker 4>of the answers to that is court it's called the

1:13:55.533 --> 1:13:59.693
<v Speaker 4>zoo answer. I believe aliens are out there, and I

1:13:59.733 --> 1:14:01.893
<v Speaker 4>think that we're just being We've just been kept in

1:14:01.893 --> 1:14:05.453
<v Speaker 4>a zoo. They don't want us to know. So, yeah,

1:14:05.933 --> 1:14:07.253
<v Speaker 4>they're going to turn up at some point.

1:14:08.613 --> 1:14:10.813
<v Speaker 2>Interesting Nigel, Well.

1:14:10.613 --> 1:14:11.293
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure.

1:14:12.293 --> 1:14:16.973
<v Speaker 3>I've got a very open mind about it, but I

1:14:17.053 --> 1:14:22.213
<v Speaker 3>agree with you that definitely the danger is that the

1:14:22.333 --> 1:14:27.773
<v Speaker 3>systems will be hijacked by potentially what are called bad actors.

1:14:27.933 --> 1:14:33.173
<v Speaker 3>Whether they were already seeing the rapid advances of AI

1:14:33.333 --> 1:14:38.653
<v Speaker 3>being weaponized by cyber criminals, very highly sophisticated scams. You

1:14:38.773 --> 1:14:43.413
<v Speaker 3>mentioned the deep fake technology, but they are they certainly

1:14:44.613 --> 1:14:52.613
<v Speaker 3>with frightening accuracy, impersonating voices, they're creating fake speeches, They're

1:14:52.693 --> 1:14:56.293
<v Speaker 3>definitely falling people into handing over money as well from

1:14:56.333 --> 1:15:00.013
<v Speaker 3>their bank account. So we're really seeing very sophisticated scams

1:15:00.093 --> 1:15:03.893
<v Speaker 3>using AI. So if we're now talking about the huge

1:15:03.973 --> 1:15:08.253
<v Speaker 3>developments over the next five years, the potential for bad force,

1:15:08.653 --> 1:15:13.693
<v Speaker 3>whether they be political forces or whether they be criminals

1:15:13.813 --> 1:15:19.133
<v Speaker 3>or whoever they are, the potential is that the world

1:15:19.253 --> 1:15:21.053
<v Speaker 3>is going to change. And again, if we go back

1:15:21.053 --> 1:15:24.813
<v Speaker 3>to the early days of the Internet, Layton, I mean,

1:15:24.973 --> 1:15:31.013
<v Speaker 3>we never quite imagined that the early developments of Google

1:15:31.093 --> 1:15:34.973
<v Speaker 3>and Facebook would have such an enormous impact on everything

1:15:35.053 --> 1:15:42.733
<v Speaker 3>from misinformation to affecting young kids and so forth. So

1:15:42.773 --> 1:15:47.973
<v Speaker 3>that we are definitely heading to a place where whoever

1:15:48.093 --> 1:15:52.693
<v Speaker 3>can control what we end up using the AI.

1:15:54.533 --> 1:16:00.013
<v Speaker 4>It's got potential problems. I will just add Laton, don't

1:16:00.093 --> 1:16:04.973
<v Speaker 4>count us out. Independence date the movie they hacked the Aliens,

1:16:05.053 --> 1:16:08.093
<v Speaker 4>so don't count us out. We we might have.

1:16:08.733 --> 1:16:11.373
<v Speaker 2>No I don't want to count us out. All right, guys,

1:16:12.453 --> 1:16:13.693
<v Speaker 2>do a sales spitch for me.

1:16:15.293 --> 1:16:21.013
<v Speaker 4>On Creative mckinna's or yeah, well, creative mckinna's is just

1:16:21.173 --> 1:16:24.333
<v Speaker 4>our way of trying to keep the dialogue going. We

1:16:24.413 --> 1:16:27.493
<v Speaker 4>wanted to have a place where we could talk about

1:16:27.733 --> 1:16:35.093
<v Speaker 4>all the issues are unfiltered. Being honest, we are not sycophants,

1:16:35.373 --> 1:16:38.693
<v Speaker 4>nor are we doomers. We're all about exploring it in

1:16:38.733 --> 1:16:42.253
<v Speaker 4>a kind of quite journalistic way to actually ask the

1:16:42.333 --> 1:16:47.093
<v Speaker 4>hard questions and explore basically all these issues we've been

1:16:47.173 --> 1:16:52.013
<v Speaker 4>exploring with you, and importantly having that narrative and that

1:16:52.133 --> 1:16:54.893
<v Speaker 4>dialogue out there so that people can have a way

1:16:54.933 --> 1:16:58.933
<v Speaker 4>to understand these the different aspects because ais are very

1:16:58.973 --> 1:17:01.413
<v Speaker 4>broad field, and we want to have a way of

1:17:02.453 --> 1:17:04.893
<v Speaker 4>exploring that with people so that they can have a

1:17:04.973 --> 1:17:08.613
<v Speaker 4>sense of it and quite importantly they can go often

1:17:08.653 --> 1:17:09.773
<v Speaker 4>ask their own questions.

1:17:09.893 --> 1:17:11.293
<v Speaker 2>So how do you find it?

1:17:11.293 --> 1:17:15.773
<v Speaker 3>It's on substack. So substack is very popular at the

1:17:15.853 --> 1:17:19.053
<v Speaker 3>moment as a kind of a blog type site. If

1:17:19.093 --> 1:17:22.853
<v Speaker 3>you go to substack and search for either of our names,

1:17:23.613 --> 1:17:25.133
<v Speaker 3>then you'll definitely find it that way.

1:17:26.013 --> 1:17:30.893
<v Speaker 2>Justin Matthews and Nigel Horrocks. Of course, now I've got

1:17:30.893 --> 1:17:32.933
<v Speaker 2>to congratulate you both because this is the first time

1:17:33.013 --> 1:17:37.293
<v Speaker 2>that I've done in seven years, in two hundred and

1:17:37.333 --> 1:17:40.613
<v Speaker 2>eighty six podcasts, just being the tow eighty sixth. The

1:17:40.653 --> 1:17:44.733
<v Speaker 2>first time I've done a double header and it's gone

1:17:44.733 --> 1:17:45.973
<v Speaker 2>pretty damn well. I reckon.

1:17:46.173 --> 1:17:48.333
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you again for having us so lat and

1:17:48.373 --> 1:17:50.973
<v Speaker 3>thank you again for what you're doing as well as

1:17:51.013 --> 1:17:54.373
<v Speaker 3>getting all sorts of great information out there. You've got

1:17:54.373 --> 1:17:56.733
<v Speaker 3>a great podcast, so well done.

1:17:56.973 --> 1:17:59.373
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we appreciate it.

1:17:59.373 --> 1:18:02.733
<v Speaker 2>It's been a pleasure, Nigel. I could use a news

1:18:02.813 --> 1:18:09.453
<v Speaker 2>editor keep me on the straight and narrow. So I reckon,

1:18:09.973 --> 1:18:12.293
<v Speaker 2>I reckon six months more and we'll do another one.

1:18:12.533 --> 1:18:13.973
<v Speaker 3>That'd be great lake and we'll look forward.

1:18:14.053 --> 1:18:15.053
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that'd be fantastic.

1:18:15.893 --> 1:18:16.413
<v Speaker 2>We'll do it.

1:18:16.573 --> 1:18:17.373
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much.

1:18:17.693 --> 1:18:36.613
<v Speaker 2>Thank you both. Now, Missinus producer. Here we are in

1:18:36.613 --> 1:18:40.693
<v Speaker 2>the mail room for podcast number two hundred and eighty six.

1:18:42.533 --> 1:18:43.253
<v Speaker 4>How are you late?

1:18:43.933 --> 1:18:45.013
<v Speaker 2>I thought you'd never ask.

1:18:45.333 --> 1:18:46.693
<v Speaker 5>Do you think it might be a good idea to

1:18:46.773 --> 1:18:49.213
<v Speaker 5>have at least an hour of the day where you might,

1:18:49.453 --> 1:18:52.373
<v Speaker 5>you know, go for a walk on the beach or something. Literally,

1:18:52.413 --> 1:18:57.173
<v Speaker 5>you have been in this room the entire week. That's

1:18:57.213 --> 1:19:00.493
<v Speaker 5>a little slap down. We want we want work life

1:19:00.613 --> 1:19:01.253
<v Speaker 5>balance here.

1:19:01.453 --> 1:19:04.293
<v Speaker 2>I'm a prisoner and I don't know your own prison,

1:19:04.373 --> 1:19:07.813
<v Speaker 2>and I don't go walking in this weather. Now, what

1:19:07.973 --> 1:19:08.213
<v Speaker 2>you got.

1:19:08.493 --> 1:19:10.373
<v Speaker 5>He's going to carry on doing this till these ninety

1:19:10.453 --> 1:19:11.093
<v Speaker 5>nine folks.

1:19:11.173 --> 1:19:12.133
<v Speaker 4>Hope you're ready for it.

1:19:12.253 --> 1:19:14.213
<v Speaker 2>Don't think so late.

1:19:14.253 --> 1:19:18.573
<v Speaker 5>And Andrew says, firstly, congratulations on a fascinating podcast, bringing

1:19:18.573 --> 1:19:21.773
<v Speaker 5>in people and perspectives you would otherwise not get to hear.

1:19:22.573 --> 1:19:25.973
<v Speaker 5>I have listened to every podcast at least twice, and

1:19:26.093 --> 1:19:28.773
<v Speaker 5>some more than twice. I spend a lot of time

1:19:28.853 --> 1:19:32.573
<v Speaker 5>operating machinery, so get plenty of time to myself. The

1:19:32.613 --> 1:19:36.333
<v Speaker 5>podcast fulfills the need to stimulate my brain while I'm working.

1:19:36.893 --> 1:19:40.213
<v Speaker 5>I have particularly enjoyed Robert McCulloch, and the silencing of

1:19:40.333 --> 1:19:42.933
<v Speaker 5>him shows the corruption of New Zealand and how people

1:19:42.933 --> 1:19:46.213
<v Speaker 5>in positions of power are threatened by those who may

1:19:46.213 --> 1:19:49.613
<v Speaker 5>be considered smarter than they are. Instead of bringing them

1:19:49.653 --> 1:19:55.573
<v Speaker 5>on board and utilizing their experience, they are ostracized and excommunicated.

1:19:56.093 --> 1:19:58.133
<v Speaker 5>Going to show that the big end of town is

1:19:58.173 --> 1:20:02.733
<v Speaker 5>nothing more than an incestuous club. Please consider getting mister

1:20:02.813 --> 1:20:05.253
<v Speaker 5>McCulloch back on, although I don't blame him if he

1:20:05.333 --> 1:20:09.773
<v Speaker 5>is hesitant. And then Andrew says, so another podcast he's

1:20:09.773 --> 1:20:14.573
<v Speaker 5>listened to several times, the two John Olcock podcasts. John

1:20:14.693 --> 1:20:17.573
<v Speaker 5>mentioned the current money system had about eighteen months to

1:20:17.613 --> 1:20:19.733
<v Speaker 5>two years to run. From memory, we are now more

1:20:19.773 --> 1:20:23.413
<v Speaker 5>than twelve months on from this prediction. Would you please

1:20:23.533 --> 1:20:26.653
<v Speaker 5>consider getting John back to give his opinion on where

1:20:26.693 --> 1:20:29.573
<v Speaker 5>we are currently at. And then Andrew goes on to

1:20:29.613 --> 1:20:32.493
<v Speaker 5>say that he's a big fan of crypto and he's

1:20:32.613 --> 1:20:35.693
<v Speaker 5>having a look seeing how that's going. He says, love

1:20:35.733 --> 1:20:38.093
<v Speaker 5>the mailroom and the banter between the both of you.

1:20:38.173 --> 1:20:41.933
<v Speaker 5>Please continue with your interesting and informative interviews.

1:20:41.973 --> 1:20:45.573
<v Speaker 2>That's from Andrew Andrew, thank you the banter the best

1:20:45.573 --> 1:20:51.253
<v Speaker 2>part gets cleaned out now from who we got from John?

1:20:52.493 --> 1:20:55.733
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for the podcast with Jodie running from PSGR.

1:20:56.573 --> 1:20:59.973
<v Speaker 2>Jody covers the high level governance and process problems with

1:21:00.093 --> 1:21:03.133
<v Speaker 2>the bill, but there is also what it means at

1:21:03.173 --> 1:21:07.533
<v Speaker 2>a practical level for farmers, consumers and exports. The issue

1:21:07.813 --> 1:21:11.333
<v Speaker 2>is that the bill ends regulation and traceability of gene

1:21:11.413 --> 1:21:15.733
<v Speaker 2>editor GMOs, so there is no visibility in the food chain.

1:21:16.533 --> 1:21:20.253
<v Speaker 2>The social license for ge has been based on the

1:21:20.293 --> 1:21:23.933
<v Speaker 2>precautionary principle and the right to choose these are to

1:21:23.933 --> 1:21:26.293
<v Speaker 2>be taken away in the bill. I would welcome the

1:21:26.413 --> 1:21:29.053
<v Speaker 2>chance to discuss the issues with you on a podcast

1:21:29.333 --> 1:21:35.413
<v Speaker 2>says John consumer researcher and advocate spokesman ge Free, New Zealand.

1:21:35.773 --> 1:21:36.733
<v Speaker 2>John appreciate it.

1:21:37.013 --> 1:21:40.653
<v Speaker 5>Leyton Morris says, thank you for your excellent podcasts. I

1:21:40.733 --> 1:21:44.333
<v Speaker 5>have just listened to your interview with Dr Corey. Even

1:21:44.373 --> 1:21:47.653
<v Speaker 5>if the comments by doctor Corey cannot be fully verified,

1:21:47.853 --> 1:21:51.293
<v Speaker 5>his views and evidence, together with other medical practitioners that

1:21:51.373 --> 1:21:55.173
<v Speaker 5>can collaborate his research with supporting data, should be included

1:21:55.173 --> 1:21:58.573
<v Speaker 5>in the current review on COVID nineteen. Further than that,

1:21:58.733 --> 1:22:01.933
<v Speaker 5>the corruption by Big Farmer is incredible and for me

1:22:02.133 --> 1:22:06.853
<v Speaker 5>almost unbelievable, and should be widely disseminated through medical journals

1:22:06.973 --> 1:22:11.253
<v Speaker 5>and the media. Big Farmer and their Lackey's actions are

1:22:11.293 --> 1:22:15.613
<v Speaker 5>not just unethical but criminal. Unfortunately I cannot see them

1:22:15.653 --> 1:22:19.653
<v Speaker 5>being brought to justice. People like doctor Bloomfield and Jacinda

1:22:19.773 --> 1:22:22.973
<v Speaker 5>Ardurn should be required to respond to his assertions and

1:22:23.013 --> 1:22:26.813
<v Speaker 5>not simply respond that they were simply repeating what who

1:22:26.853 --> 1:22:30.613
<v Speaker 5>and medical experts were saying. Surely people in power, such

1:22:30.653 --> 1:22:33.493
<v Speaker 5>as heads of government, not just in New Zealand, owe

1:22:33.533 --> 1:22:36.693
<v Speaker 5>it to their public to provide alternative evidence of the

1:22:36.733 --> 1:22:41.333
<v Speaker 5>information being given as considered controversial. Honesty should be a

1:22:41.373 --> 1:22:45.773
<v Speaker 5>hallmark of public officials, doctors and scientists. But I'm cynical

1:22:45.893 --> 1:22:48.973
<v Speaker 5>enough to know that that will never happen. Hence people

1:22:49.053 --> 1:22:52.333
<v Speaker 5>like you Leyton are so important in the media. Keep

1:22:52.413 --> 1:22:56.013
<v Speaker 5>up the good work. That's from Morris, the very flattering Morris.

1:22:56.133 --> 1:22:59.933
<v Speaker 5>I try and not succumb to flattery. But you are

1:22:59.973 --> 1:23:04.853
<v Speaker 5>correct in what you say as regard the individuals who

1:23:05.733 --> 1:23:10.213
<v Speaker 5>contributed to the vice of what happened over that period.

1:23:10.533 --> 1:23:15.613
<v Speaker 5>I'm amazed, pleasantly so with the number of people who

1:23:16.173 --> 1:23:19.773
<v Speaker 5>communicate with me and who I talk with who say,

1:23:20.013 --> 1:23:23.453
<v Speaker 5>and you've heard some of them on interviews say that

1:23:23.613 --> 1:23:27.333
<v Speaker 5>these people should be charged, and plenty often go on

1:23:27.333 --> 1:23:30.453
<v Speaker 5>and saying they should be behind bars. My comment is it

1:23:30.613 --> 1:23:35.693
<v Speaker 5>will never happen. And somewhere buried in these emails there

1:23:35.773 --> 1:23:39.453
<v Speaker 5>is a very short one. I don't think I can

1:23:39.573 --> 1:23:44.413
<v Speaker 5>lay my hands on it straight away from Christine, thank

1:23:44.453 --> 1:23:46.733
<v Speaker 5>you for your great interviews today with Brian Leyland and

1:23:46.773 --> 1:23:51.893
<v Speaker 5>miss running. Informative but a bit depressing realizing my thoughts

1:23:51.973 --> 1:23:55.333
<v Speaker 5>are actually true. Read Donald Trump. Do you think that

1:23:55.453 --> 1:23:57.493
<v Speaker 5>due to the price of gold they might open up

1:23:57.493 --> 1:24:00.493
<v Speaker 5>Fort Knox and revalue the gold that's hopefully still there,

1:24:01.693 --> 1:24:06.333
<v Speaker 5>Hopefully it's currently only valued at forty two dollars an ounce,

1:24:06.373 --> 1:24:09.853
<v Speaker 5>I believe, and go back to the gold standard. It

1:24:09.933 --> 1:24:14.653
<v Speaker 5>were just about payoff America's debt, I imagine. Regards to you,

1:24:14.773 --> 1:24:18.773
<v Speaker 5>kind regards to you both, Chris. This question about whether

1:24:18.853 --> 1:24:20.813
<v Speaker 5>the gold is still or all the gold is still

1:24:20.813 --> 1:24:23.973
<v Speaker 5>in Fort Knox is rolling on and on. I thought

1:24:24.053 --> 1:24:26.533
<v Speaker 5>Trump was going down there to have a look at it,

1:24:26.973 --> 1:24:29.373
<v Speaker 5>but then there was something I read that says that

1:24:29.493 --> 1:24:32.693
<v Speaker 5>not even he has the right to go into it

1:24:33.053 --> 1:24:36.173
<v Speaker 5>if they don't want him to. I don't know the answer,

1:24:36.293 --> 1:24:39.733
<v Speaker 5>but I want to see the confrontation. Lady John says,

1:24:40.533 --> 1:24:43.973
<v Speaker 5>during the latest podcast two eight five and previously two

1:24:44.013 --> 1:24:48.973
<v Speaker 5>seven six, you've talked about our electricity supply and looming shortages.

1:24:49.373 --> 1:24:51.733
<v Speaker 5>No one is talking about the power required to run

1:24:51.733 --> 1:24:55.293
<v Speaker 5>the massive data centers that are being built in Hobsonville

1:24:55.333 --> 1:24:58.413
<v Speaker 5>and elsewhere. My guess is that we will all be

1:24:58.493 --> 1:25:01.613
<v Speaker 5>subsidizing them and our power bills will go up again.

1:25:02.413 --> 1:25:03.853
<v Speaker 4>How does this help New Zealand?

1:25:04.253 --> 1:25:06.573
<v Speaker 5>I hope you get the opportunity to ask this question

1:25:06.693 --> 1:25:10.053
<v Speaker 5>next time you have a guest to discussing electricity supply.

1:25:10.733 --> 1:25:11.013
<v Speaker 4>John.

1:25:11.293 --> 1:25:16.293
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, John, thank you for from Paul. This is

1:25:16.333 --> 1:25:19.093
<v Speaker 2>not the one that I just referred to, but it's

1:25:19.493 --> 1:25:22.933
<v Speaker 2>along the same lines. Thanks for another great thought provoking

1:25:22.973 --> 1:25:27.573
<v Speaker 2>a sobering show, particularly the insights delivered by Jay Brunning.

1:25:28.253 --> 1:25:31.453
<v Speaker 2>The actions of Judith and Jacinda before her had me

1:25:31.533 --> 1:25:35.653
<v Speaker 2>thinking of Thomas Soule's quote, It's hard to imagine a

1:25:35.693 --> 1:25:38.893
<v Speaker 2>more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than

1:25:38.933 --> 1:25:42.173
<v Speaker 2>by putting those decisions in the hands of people who

1:25:42.213 --> 1:25:45.893
<v Speaker 2>pay no price for being wrong. We are going to

1:25:46.253 --> 1:25:49.813
<v Speaker 2>miss Thomas Sole when he's gone, but I've got one

1:25:49.853 --> 1:25:53.693
<v Speaker 2>full shelf of books of his, so we'll never forget Lton.

1:25:53.773 --> 1:25:54.333
<v Speaker 4>Chris says.

1:25:54.413 --> 1:25:57.013
<v Speaker 5>I'm a long time listener and discovered your radio show

1:25:57.053 --> 1:26:00.853
<v Speaker 5>in twenty fourteen when I arrived in New Zealand. I

1:26:00.933 --> 1:26:03.653
<v Speaker 5>find your podcast is full of grown up discussions about

1:26:03.733 --> 1:26:08.653
<v Speaker 5>important topics, and always value your opinion and insight. I

1:26:08.773 --> 1:26:12.373
<v Speaker 5>always enjoy your mailroom segments, but sometimes wish a younger

1:26:12.413 --> 1:26:15.893
<v Speaker 5>contributor would write in. In an effort to take this

1:26:16.013 --> 1:26:19.173
<v Speaker 5>in hand, I have put together my middle aged musings

1:26:19.293 --> 1:26:22.213
<v Speaker 5>in a hope that you find them interesting. I've tried

1:26:22.253 --> 1:26:24.573
<v Speaker 5>to make it interesting and hang together, so I hope

1:26:24.573 --> 1:26:27.653
<v Speaker 5>it's not too tedious. In any case, it has helped

1:26:27.653 --> 1:26:30.573
<v Speaker 5>me put my middle aged musings into print, so at

1:26:30.613 --> 1:26:32.493
<v Speaker 5>least I can refer to it in the future and

1:26:32.533 --> 1:26:35.853
<v Speaker 5>tell my children I told you so. Best wishes, late

1:26:35.893 --> 1:26:39.213
<v Speaker 5>and you're an absolute legend. And he can't be that

1:26:39.333 --> 1:26:42.093
<v Speaker 5>old latent because he says a musing of a middle

1:26:42.093 --> 1:26:46.493
<v Speaker 5>aged millennial in his document, which I gather you've printed

1:26:46.493 --> 1:26:47.173
<v Speaker 5>out and read.

1:26:47.693 --> 1:26:50.813
<v Speaker 2>No, I haven't read it. Where would I get time

1:26:50.853 --> 1:26:54.573
<v Speaker 2>to read this? Oh, my goodness the moment. It's eight

1:26:54.613 --> 1:27:00.453
<v Speaker 2>pages six, it's not it's five three four five, it's

1:27:00.493 --> 1:27:04.173
<v Speaker 2>five pages, but very very small type. But let me

1:27:04.213 --> 1:27:06.573
<v Speaker 2>give you an idea, because I will read it. Musings

1:27:06.573 --> 1:27:11.253
<v Speaker 2>of a middle aged millennial is opening, then doctors and education,

1:27:11.973 --> 1:27:19.933
<v Speaker 2>followed by houses, followed by children, followed by pensions and investments,

1:27:20.253 --> 1:27:23.333
<v Speaker 2>and finally, which is probably the best one of all,

1:27:23.613 --> 1:27:28.693
<v Speaker 2>hope as an hope. So it will get consumed, believe me.

1:27:28.773 --> 1:27:30.733
<v Speaker 2>But I'm going to reprint it in a larger type.

1:27:30.813 --> 1:27:32.853
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for all that effort, Chris.

1:27:33.173 --> 1:27:41.013
<v Speaker 2>I reckon now from Ian great interview with Pierre highlights sadly,

1:27:41.333 --> 1:27:44.213
<v Speaker 2>how so many folks still have no idea what this

1:27:44.373 --> 1:27:48.453
<v Speaker 2>product can do for them if you aren't already. He

1:27:48.573 --> 1:27:51.253
<v Speaker 2>is a very good rundown on the latest attempt by

1:27:51.293 --> 1:27:56.053
<v Speaker 2>this hapless net party to get us corded into digital id.

1:27:56.973 --> 1:28:02.213
<v Speaker 2>Battle after battle after battle. It seems ian short and

1:28:02.333 --> 1:28:03.373
<v Speaker 2>sweet lad.

1:28:03.413 --> 1:28:06.413
<v Speaker 5>And I've just picked up Chris's page one, and I'll

1:28:06.453 --> 1:28:08.613
<v Speaker 5>just read you the first couple of paragraphs. It's really

1:28:08.653 --> 1:28:12.293
<v Speaker 5>cute usings of a middle aged millennial. Would you believe

1:28:12.413 --> 1:28:14.933
<v Speaker 5>that it's been eight years since the newspapers were telling

1:28:15.013 --> 1:28:18.173
<v Speaker 5>younger me millennials to cut back on the AVO toasts

1:28:18.173 --> 1:28:21.773
<v Speaker 5>and four dollar coffees. Since then, some of us older

1:28:21.813 --> 1:28:25.733
<v Speaker 5>millennials have reached our early forties. We've climbed the hill

1:28:25.733 --> 1:28:28.413
<v Speaker 5>of youth and reached the uplands of middle aged. And I,

1:28:28.533 --> 1:28:31.093
<v Speaker 5>for one, have taken a sharp intake of breath at

1:28:31.133 --> 1:28:34.413
<v Speaker 5>the view that surrounds us. Just as the excitement of

1:28:34.493 --> 1:28:38.173
<v Speaker 5>brunch is being replaced by the appeal of an afternoon snooze.

1:28:38.533 --> 1:28:39.533
<v Speaker 4>I'd like to take you.

1:28:39.533 --> 1:28:41.773
<v Speaker 5>Through some usings of a mind that's old enough now

1:28:41.813 --> 1:28:44.653
<v Speaker 5>to be part of the problem, with the experience to

1:28:44.693 --> 1:28:47.613
<v Speaker 5>look for solutions and with the energy to make them happen.

1:28:48.533 --> 1:28:51.453
<v Speaker 5>Just one more paragraph. Let's start by setting the mood.

1:28:51.533 --> 1:28:54.253
<v Speaker 5>This isn't going to be a ripping critique of how

1:28:54.253 --> 1:28:57.613
<v Speaker 5>the boom has left us with scraps or how unfair

1:28:57.653 --> 1:29:00.333
<v Speaker 5>it is to be a millennial. I've done most things right.

1:29:00.413 --> 1:29:03.853
<v Speaker 5>I'm married with teenage children, I'm self employed and earn

1:29:03.933 --> 1:29:06.773
<v Speaker 5>enough to own a home as a family. We've been

1:29:06.853 --> 1:29:10.773
<v Speaker 5>hard working and lucky, probably an equal measure. However, there

1:29:10.813 --> 1:29:14.253
<v Speaker 5>are certain choices where I have been a contrarian, where

1:29:14.253 --> 1:29:16.293
<v Speaker 5>I've missed the trip wire that caught out a lot

1:29:16.333 --> 1:29:19.333
<v Speaker 5>of my fellow millennials. On the other hand, there have

1:29:19.413 --> 1:29:22.613
<v Speaker 5>been missed opportunities where a home in Auckland and a

1:29:22.653 --> 1:29:26.693
<v Speaker 5>proper career might have eventuated. Middle age is the time

1:29:26.733 --> 1:29:29.053
<v Speaker 5>to take stock and point out where we might be

1:29:29.133 --> 1:29:33.093
<v Speaker 5>going wrong and what tactics have definitely paid off. So

1:29:33.853 --> 1:29:34.933
<v Speaker 5>he says, let's.

1:29:34.733 --> 1:29:38.213
<v Speaker 2>Begin, Well, let's begin. Let's begin with some facts. Though

1:29:39.093 --> 1:29:43.293
<v Speaker 2>you're not middle aged. Early forties, he said, early forties

1:29:43.333 --> 1:29:45.893
<v Speaker 2>has not middle aged anymore. It's been replaced by the

1:29:45.933 --> 1:29:50.813
<v Speaker 2>early sixties, and some people think even the seventies. So

1:29:50.933 --> 1:29:53.453
<v Speaker 2>you've still got a little way to go. But after

1:29:53.533 --> 1:29:58.293
<v Speaker 2>today's interview, well after the day this discussion on AI.

1:29:59.773 --> 1:30:01.813
<v Speaker 2>I wonder what effect that might have had on you

1:30:02.133 --> 1:30:06.253
<v Speaker 2>when you were listening to it as to where your

1:30:06.293 --> 1:30:10.333
<v Speaker 2>life's sat and what's coming at you. Whether I'm a

1:30:10.453 --> 1:30:15.653
<v Speaker 2>feared or really happy about something, I'm always interested in

1:30:15.813 --> 1:30:20.533
<v Speaker 2>the result, whatever it might be. So from David, this

1:30:20.693 --> 1:30:23.653
<v Speaker 2>is a report on the latest US saidate hearing into

1:30:23.653 --> 1:30:27.333
<v Speaker 2>COVID jabs. They say Big Farmer can't be sued in

1:30:27.373 --> 1:30:30.013
<v Speaker 2>the US, so what about in New Zealand? It is

1:30:30.173 --> 1:30:33.493
<v Speaker 2>really quite shocking that Pfizer was able to sell their

1:30:33.533 --> 1:30:38.933
<v Speaker 2>deadly concoction to the New Zealand government without any legal consequences. Similarly,

1:30:39.493 --> 1:30:42.453
<v Speaker 2>why haven't government and health officials in New Zealand faced

1:30:42.493 --> 1:30:45.493
<v Speaker 2>legal consequences for the atrocity they inflicted on the people

1:30:45.533 --> 1:30:47.853
<v Speaker 2>of New Zealand. This is not the letter either I

1:30:47.893 --> 1:30:51.613
<v Speaker 2>was referring to earlier. So there were three of them

1:30:51.653 --> 1:30:57.053
<v Speaker 2>if you include the one that I can't spot. Regards David. David,

1:30:57.653 --> 1:31:00.933
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of a lot of answers to the

1:31:01.053 --> 1:31:06.253
<v Speaker 2>questions that you ask, but it'll never happen. That's the point,

1:31:06.653 --> 1:31:08.293
<v Speaker 2>and the point is that we don't have the ball

1:31:08.453 --> 1:31:12.853
<v Speaker 2>in this country to do it. Nobody does be useless

1:31:13.213 --> 1:31:15.853
<v Speaker 2>in the greatest scheme of things. This is producer, Thank you.

1:31:16.093 --> 1:31:20.533
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, lighton. You'm done and dusted. I'm downe and dusted.

1:31:20.973 --> 1:31:22.253
<v Speaker 2>Shall we see you next week?

1:31:22.773 --> 1:31:24.493
<v Speaker 5>I think there's a very high probability.

1:31:25.173 --> 1:31:26.973
<v Speaker 2>The question is will there be next week?

1:31:44.293 --> 1:31:44.333
<v Speaker 4>No.

1:31:44.453 --> 1:31:46.773
<v Speaker 2>I was going to leave the podcast at the end

1:31:46.813 --> 1:31:49.533
<v Speaker 2>of the mail room for this week because we covered

1:31:49.573 --> 1:31:53.173
<v Speaker 2>an awful lot of ground. But something has caught my

1:31:53.213 --> 1:31:56.653
<v Speaker 2>attention that I thought might be of interest and useful

1:31:56.773 --> 1:31:59.973
<v Speaker 2>to wind it up with. Keep in mind this is

1:32:00.093 --> 1:32:06.093
<v Speaker 2>from an American author, an American source. AI is replacing

1:32:06.213 --> 1:32:10.853
<v Speaker 2>human workers. How companies using automation to cut jobs, so

1:32:10.933 --> 1:32:16.573
<v Speaker 2>a little information across nearly every industry. Artificial intelligence is

1:32:16.653 --> 1:32:20.813
<v Speaker 2>no longer just a tool. It's becoming the worker. From

1:32:20.933 --> 1:32:24.173
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street to Silicon Valley, major companies are laying off

1:32:24.253 --> 1:32:29.493
<v Speaker 2>employees and replacing them with AI systems that promise greater efficiency,

1:32:29.653 --> 1:32:34.893
<v Speaker 2>higher profits, and streamlined operations. But as corporate giants boast

1:32:34.933 --> 1:32:39.333
<v Speaker 2>about record breaking productivity, a growing number of employees are

1:32:39.453 --> 1:32:42.613
<v Speaker 2>waking up to a grim reality their jobs may be

1:32:42.773 --> 1:32:47.133
<v Speaker 2>next A World Economic Forum report published in early twenty

1:32:47.173 --> 1:32:50.933
<v Speaker 2>twenty five found that forty one percent of employers globally

1:32:51.373 --> 1:32:54.533
<v Speaker 2>planned to reduce their workforce by twenty thirty due to

1:32:54.693 --> 1:32:59.173
<v Speaker 2>AI automation. This is not some distant predictions already underway.

1:32:59.813 --> 1:33:03.133
<v Speaker 2>The kind of jobs being replaced. AI is hitting hardest

1:33:03.173 --> 1:33:08.853
<v Speaker 2>where jobs involve repetitive and routine tasks, both physical and cognitive.

1:33:09.373 --> 1:33:13.893
<v Speaker 2>According to the WEF's Future of Jobs Report, these roles

1:33:14.013 --> 1:33:20.053
<v Speaker 2>are seeing rapid decline postal service clerks, executive assistance, payroll

1:33:20.093 --> 1:33:25.213
<v Speaker 2>and benefits clerks, customer service agents, mid level software engineers,

1:33:25.733 --> 1:33:31.413
<v Speaker 2>human resources personnel would they be missed? And graphic designers.

1:33:32.613 --> 1:33:36.813
<v Speaker 2>Even in traditionally human centered roles, companies are finding ways

1:33:36.853 --> 1:33:42.853
<v Speaker 2>to use AI tools to automate communication, design and support. Microsoft,

1:33:42.973 --> 1:33:48.213
<v Speaker 2>IBM and others lead the AI layoff charge. Microsoft recently

1:33:48.253 --> 1:33:51.693
<v Speaker 2>announced it would lay off six thousand employees, around three

1:33:51.733 --> 1:33:55.013
<v Speaker 2>percent of its global workforce. The company said the layoffs

1:33:55.013 --> 1:33:59.453
<v Speaker 2>were part of an effort to boost efficiency and reduce bureaucracy.

1:34:00.333 --> 1:34:04.933
<v Speaker 2>At the same time, Microsoft is investing heavily in AI

1:34:05.053 --> 1:34:10.093
<v Speaker 2>and new technology platforms. IBM replaced hundreds of human resource

1:34:10.133 --> 1:34:14.813
<v Speaker 2>employees with its in house AI which is called ASKHR,

1:34:15.653 --> 1:34:19.093
<v Speaker 2>which now handles ninety four percent of routine HR tasks

1:34:19.373 --> 1:34:25.013
<v Speaker 2>like managing vacation requests and pay statements. CEO Arvand Krishna

1:34:25.373 --> 1:34:28.853
<v Speaker 2>said the layoffs made room for hiring more programmers and

1:34:28.933 --> 1:34:33.653
<v Speaker 2>critical thinking roles. Salesforce cut one thousand jobs earlier this

1:34:33.773 --> 1:34:38.213
<v Speaker 2>year to make way for its new AI product Agent Force.

1:34:39.053 --> 1:34:43.213
<v Speaker 2>CEO Mark Benioff emphasized that using AI is now a

1:34:43.253 --> 1:34:50.693
<v Speaker 2>fundamental expectation for all employees. CrowdStrike, a major cybersecurity firm,

1:34:51.133 --> 1:34:55.493
<v Speaker 2>laid off five hundred workers as it ramped up AI deployment.

1:34:56.093 --> 1:35:01.533
<v Speaker 2>CEO George Kertz called AI a force multiplier, explaining that

1:35:01.613 --> 1:35:04.973
<v Speaker 2>it allows the company to innovate faster, reduce hiring, and

1:35:05.053 --> 1:35:09.773
<v Speaker 2>improve customer outcomes. Even Wall Street and Safe, City Group

1:35:09.813 --> 1:35:12.893
<v Speaker 2>and JP Morgan are among banks projecting that AI could

1:35:12.973 --> 1:35:17.213
<v Speaker 2>lead to you ready two hundred thousand layoffs in the

1:35:17.253 --> 1:35:21.453
<v Speaker 2>next five years, particularly in middle office and operational roles.

1:35:21.813 --> 1:35:24.933
<v Speaker 2>The City Group noted that more than half of banking

1:35:25.053 --> 1:35:29.133
<v Speaker 2>jobs are highly susceptible to automation. Now what the numbers say?

1:35:29.493 --> 1:35:33.493
<v Speaker 2>Fifty four percent of tech hiring managers expect layoffs due

1:35:33.533 --> 1:35:37.093
<v Speaker 2>to AI within the next year. Forty five percent believe

1:35:37.173 --> 1:35:42.013
<v Speaker 2>employees in AI replaceable roles are most at risk. Seventy

1:35:42.173 --> 1:35:45.813
<v Speaker 2>seven percent of large companies plan to reskill employees to

1:35:45.893 --> 1:35:50.853
<v Speaker 2>work with AI. Sixty nine percent say AI will create

1:35:51.093 --> 1:35:56.213
<v Speaker 2>demand for entirely new roles. Thirty two percent of American

1:35:56.213 --> 1:36:00.973
<v Speaker 2>workers believe AI will reduce job opportunities, and only sixteen

1:36:01.013 --> 1:36:04.973
<v Speaker 2>percent say they currently use AI in their own work.

1:36:06.573 --> 1:36:10.933
<v Speaker 2>Can you bulletproof your career despite the job cuts? AI

1:36:11.293 --> 1:36:14.653
<v Speaker 2>is not just replacing people, it's also creating new opportunities.

1:36:14.973 --> 1:36:19.933
<v Speaker 2>But staying employed will require adaptability and new skills. So

1:36:20.093 --> 1:36:24.253
<v Speaker 2>here are ways to future proof your career. Firstly, learn

1:36:24.533 --> 1:36:31.853
<v Speaker 2>AI basics now. Free courses from Corsera, Navidia, and IBM

1:36:32.013 --> 1:36:34.893
<v Speaker 2>can teach you how AI works and how to use it.

1:36:35.333 --> 1:36:39.333
<v Speaker 2>Hiring managers now routinely ask how familiar are you with AI?

1:36:40.013 --> 1:36:42.893
<v Speaker 2>That makes me chuckle thinking back to at the end

1:36:42.893 --> 1:36:50.053
<v Speaker 2>of the discussion and talking about relationships with AI things,

1:36:51.413 --> 1:36:56.213
<v Speaker 2>how familiar are you with AI? It's got two meanings anyway.

1:36:56.573 --> 1:37:00.533
<v Speaker 2>Number two upskill in demand areas. According to surveys, the

1:37:00.533 --> 1:37:06.533
<v Speaker 2>most desirable skills include AI developments and cybersecurity, a data analysis,

1:37:06.573 --> 1:37:14.133
<v Speaker 2>strategic thinking at adaptibils, shift to human centered roles. Jobs

1:37:14.133 --> 1:37:19.133
<v Speaker 2>that involve critical thinking, creativity and direct human interaction are

1:37:19.293 --> 1:37:25.213
<v Speaker 2>harder to automate. These include leadership, product development, sales strategy,

1:37:25.533 --> 1:37:29.253
<v Speaker 2>and high level consulting. Going back to that first one

1:37:29.293 --> 1:37:32.853
<v Speaker 2>of critical thinking, you know, it's something that we've talked

1:37:32.893 --> 1:37:35.413
<v Speaker 2>a lot about on the podcasts, as though hasn't been

1:37:35.453 --> 1:37:40.373
<v Speaker 2>talked much about in other areas, including of course, education,

1:37:41.213 --> 1:37:44.013
<v Speaker 2>and it seems that critical thinking has been sort of

1:37:44.253 --> 1:37:48.653
<v Speaker 2>left on the byway by many folk. Now is the

1:37:48.693 --> 1:37:55.733
<v Speaker 2>time to resurrect a big time number. Four. Companies like

1:37:55.813 --> 1:37:59.253
<v Speaker 2>Shopify and Fiber have made it clear if you can't

1:37:59.293 --> 1:38:03.293
<v Speaker 2>prove you're doing something that AI can't. If you can't

1:38:03.333 --> 1:38:07.493
<v Speaker 2>prove you're doing something AI can't, you may not be

1:38:07.573 --> 1:38:11.533
<v Speaker 2>hired or retained. Lifelong learning is the new job security,

1:38:12.173 --> 1:38:16.693
<v Speaker 2>and five stay visible and valuable a warning for the future.

1:38:16.853 --> 1:38:21.213
<v Speaker 2>Many company leaders, like JP Morgan's Jamie Diamond and IBM's Krishna,

1:38:21.853 --> 1:38:26.893
<v Speaker 2>say that AI will augment rather than eliminate jobs, but

1:38:26.973 --> 1:38:30.653
<v Speaker 2>the early results suggest otherwise. At least for now, AI

1:38:30.773 --> 1:38:33.893
<v Speaker 2>is being used primarily to cut costs and raise profits,

1:38:34.333 --> 1:38:38.453
<v Speaker 2>not preserve jobs. For many workers, this feels less like

1:38:38.653 --> 1:38:42.133
<v Speaker 2>a tech revolution and more like a hostile takeover, as

1:38:42.213 --> 1:38:46.333
<v Speaker 2>the Pew Research Center found more than half of American

1:38:46.373 --> 1:38:50.293
<v Speaker 2>workers are worried about AI's long term impact. That fear

1:38:50.373 --> 1:38:54.693
<v Speaker 2>is not misplaced, but the outcome is not set in stone.

1:38:54.933 --> 1:38:58.173
<v Speaker 2>Those who adapt, learn and stay ahead of the curve

1:38:58.773 --> 1:39:02.333
<v Speaker 2>may not just survive the AI revolution, they might thrive

1:39:02.413 --> 1:39:06.813
<v Speaker 2>in it. For everyone else, the time to prepare is now.

1:39:07.213 --> 1:39:09.053
<v Speaker 2>And that, by the way, if if you want to

1:39:09.053 --> 1:39:13.173
<v Speaker 2>look for it, it's from finance and money. AI is

1:39:13.253 --> 1:39:17.573
<v Speaker 2>replacing human workers, and that's where we shall leave it now.

1:39:17.613 --> 1:39:20.213
<v Speaker 2>If you'd like to write to us Latent at newstalksv

1:39:20.333 --> 1:39:22.893
<v Speaker 2>dot co dot nz or Carolyn at news Talks dot

1:39:22.893 --> 1:39:27.933
<v Speaker 2>co dot nz, and we shall record your mail and

1:39:28.333 --> 1:39:30.893
<v Speaker 2>most likely utilize it. And the only thing left to

1:39:30.933 --> 1:39:34.933
<v Speaker 2>say is, as always, thank you so much for listening,

1:39:35.213 --> 1:39:36.613
<v Speaker 2>and we shall talk soon.

1:39:44.453 --> 1:39:48.413
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for more from News Talks b Listen live

1:39:48.573 --> 1:39:51.293
<v Speaker 1>on air or online, and keep our shows with you

1:39:51.373 --> 1:39:54.373
<v Speaker 1>wherever you go with our podcast on iHeartRadio.