WEBVTT - Leighton Smith Podcast #287 - June 4th 2025 - Patrick Basham

0:00:09.093 --> 0:00:11.973
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from news talks it B.

0:00:12.373 --> 0:00:16.173
<v Speaker 1>Follow this and our wide range of podcast now on iHeartRadio.

0:00:16.693 --> 0:00:19.733
<v Speaker 1>It's time for all the attitude, all the opinion, all

0:00:19.773 --> 0:00:24.813
<v Speaker 1>the information, all the debates of the now, the Leyton

0:00:24.933 --> 0:00:27.653
<v Speaker 1>Smith Podcast powered by news talks it B.

0:00:28.093 --> 0:00:31.533
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to podcast two hundred and eighty seven for June fourth,

0:00:31.773 --> 0:00:37.653
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five. Patrick Basham, founder of Democracy Institute, discusses

0:00:37.773 --> 0:00:40.973
<v Speaker 2>their recent poll on whether Donald Trump is fixing the

0:00:41.013 --> 0:00:44.093
<v Speaker 2>American economy or otherwise, and I have to say that

0:00:44.133 --> 0:00:48.613
<v Speaker 2>some of the stats are somewhat interesting. We then engage

0:00:48.653 --> 0:00:51.413
<v Speaker 2>in discussion on the most critical issues, while some of

0:00:51.453 --> 0:00:54.053
<v Speaker 2>the most critical issues on the planet Iran and their

0:00:54.133 --> 0:01:00.053
<v Speaker 2>nuclear developments, Ukraine's successful drone strike on Russia, the South

0:01:00.133 --> 0:01:03.253
<v Speaker 2>Korean and Polish elections, and by the way, the amount

0:01:03.293 --> 0:01:09.173
<v Speaker 2>of CCP Chinese Communist Party interference in South Korea and

0:01:09.253 --> 0:01:13.253
<v Speaker 2>their election is well, it's almost terrifying. Then we have

0:01:13.373 --> 0:01:16.213
<v Speaker 2>the mail room and at the back end of two

0:01:16.213 --> 0:01:22.133
<v Speaker 2>eight seven some commentary on stupidity and net zero and

0:01:22.253 --> 0:01:24.853
<v Speaker 2>yes they go very well together. But in a moment,

0:01:25.013 --> 0:01:36.653
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Basham. Buccolan is a natural oral vaccine in a

0:01:36.653 --> 0:01:40.813
<v Speaker 2>tablet form called bacterial licate. It'll boost your natural protection

0:01:40.893 --> 0:01:44.173
<v Speaker 2>against bacterial infections in your chest and throat. A three

0:01:44.253 --> 0:01:47.093
<v Speaker 2>day course of seven Buckland tablets will help your body

0:01:47.093 --> 0:01:50.693
<v Speaker 2>build up to three months of immunity against bugs which

0:01:50.733 --> 0:01:54.613
<v Speaker 2>cause bacterial cold symptoms. So who can take buccolan well,

0:01:54.733 --> 0:01:57.573
<v Speaker 2>the whole family From two years of age and upwards.

0:01:57.733 --> 0:02:00.813
<v Speaker 2>A course of Buckelan tablets offers cost effective and safe

0:02:00.813 --> 0:02:05.013
<v Speaker 2>protection from colds and chills. Protection becomes effective a few

0:02:05.093 --> 0:02:07.933
<v Speaker 2>days after you take buccolan and lasts for up to

0:02:07.973 --> 0:02:11.053
<v Speaker 2>three month following the three day course. Buckolhan can be

0:02:11.093 --> 0:02:13.933
<v Speaker 2>taken throughout the cold season, over winter or or the

0:02:14.013 --> 0:02:16.893
<v Speaker 2>year round. And remember Buckelan is not intended as an

0:02:16.933 --> 0:02:20.813
<v Speaker 2>alternative to influenza vaccination, but may be used along with

0:02:20.853 --> 0:02:24.573
<v Speaker 2>the flu vaccination for added protection. And keep in mind

0:02:24.613 --> 0:02:27.573
<v Speaker 2>that millions of doses have been taken by Kiwi's for

0:02:27.653 --> 0:02:31.573
<v Speaker 2>over fifty years. Only available from your pharmacist. Always read

0:02:31.573 --> 0:02:34.733
<v Speaker 2>the label and users directed, and see your doctor if

0:02:34.733 --> 0:02:50.013
<v Speaker 2>systems persist. Farmer Broker Auckland now from Democracy Institute in Washington,

0:02:50.133 --> 0:02:53.213
<v Speaker 2>d C. Once again, Patrick Masham, it's great to talk

0:02:53.253 --> 0:02:53.693
<v Speaker 2>to you.

0:02:53.733 --> 0:02:55.573
<v Speaker 3>Great to be with you late in your fine audience.

0:02:55.613 --> 0:02:56.573
<v Speaker 3>Always look forward to it.

0:02:57.253 --> 0:03:02.373
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, Patrick, you a few days ago you released the

0:03:02.413 --> 0:03:09.133
<v Speaker 2>results of a poll that you did on Trump's popularity. Yes,

0:03:09.293 --> 0:03:11.093
<v Speaker 2>why did you do that? At this point?

0:03:11.933 --> 0:03:15.573
<v Speaker 3>Are we episodically you know, test the waters in terms

0:03:15.653 --> 0:03:20.973
<v Speaker 3>of the president's approval and the general sense of how

0:03:21.013 --> 0:03:22.533
<v Speaker 3>things are going in the country. So you know, we

0:03:22.533 --> 0:03:26.013
<v Speaker 3>did this episodically well Biden was president or Trump was

0:03:26.053 --> 0:03:29.013
<v Speaker 3>in his first term. And it's something that most you know,

0:03:29.093 --> 0:03:33.333
<v Speaker 3>most posters do and it's they don't usually they're not

0:03:33.413 --> 0:03:36.333
<v Speaker 3>usually exciting figures, but when you look at the trends

0:03:36.333 --> 0:03:41.013
<v Speaker 3>over time, it can be quite revealing. And historically even

0:03:41.013 --> 0:03:44.933
<v Speaker 3>there's no perfect yardstick for how a president will do,

0:03:45.093 --> 0:03:49.373
<v Speaker 3>say in the upcoming election, but generally a president's approval

0:03:49.453 --> 0:03:53.333
<v Speaker 3>rating has been a pretty good guide. So, you know,

0:03:53.613 --> 0:03:57.013
<v Speaker 3>crudely put, if a president is around or above fifty

0:03:57.013 --> 0:04:01.053
<v Speaker 3>percent approval come nearing an election, he's usually re elected

0:04:01.293 --> 0:04:03.093
<v Speaker 3>if he has that opportunity, and if he's you know,

0:04:03.573 --> 0:04:06.693
<v Speaker 3>in the low forties or below, he's usually defeated. Obviously,

0:04:06.733 --> 0:04:09.493
<v Speaker 3>in Trump's case, he doesn't have any more elections to come,

0:04:09.573 --> 0:04:14.653
<v Speaker 3>but so that's that's why we do it, and we

0:04:14.733 --> 0:04:16.293
<v Speaker 3>did it at a time when there's been a lot

0:04:16.333 --> 0:04:22.293
<v Speaker 3>of discussion in America about Trump's approval because most of

0:04:22.333 --> 0:04:26.373
<v Speaker 3>the legacy media pollsters have found in recent or had

0:04:26.413 --> 0:04:29.533
<v Speaker 3>found in recent weeks and months that Trump's approval was

0:04:29.653 --> 0:04:35.573
<v Speaker 3>quote unquote down. Most of those ourselves included, who were

0:04:35.973 --> 0:04:39.013
<v Speaker 3>the more accurate ones in twenty twenty four, had and

0:04:39.173 --> 0:04:43.733
<v Speaker 3>have found his approval is quite fine. So there's that

0:04:44.293 --> 0:04:48.653
<v Speaker 3>there's that contrast that was in existence, you know, throughout

0:04:48.693 --> 0:04:51.733
<v Speaker 3>much of the twenty twenty four campaign between within the

0:04:51.733 --> 0:04:52.653
<v Speaker 3>polling community.

0:04:53.013 --> 0:04:56.213
<v Speaker 2>All right, so let's look at the figures. Is Trump

0:04:56.293 --> 0:05:02.053
<v Speaker 2>fixing or breaking America? Was the title of it? You've got, well,

0:05:02.053 --> 0:05:02.853
<v Speaker 2>why don't you deliver?

0:05:04.093 --> 0:05:08.853
<v Speaker 3>So it's it's memory Services fifty one saying that he

0:05:09.093 --> 0:05:14.693
<v Speaker 3>is fixing and thirty seven saying he's breaking the country,

0:05:16.093 --> 0:05:21.253
<v Speaker 3>with you know, a healthy number the remainder saying neither.

0:05:21.413 --> 0:05:23.493
<v Speaker 3>Neither is the case. They don't really have a fixer

0:05:24.333 --> 0:05:27.053
<v Speaker 3>upon that, they don't have a strong sense of whether

0:05:27.333 --> 0:05:29.853
<v Speaker 3>he's making the country better or worse. It's a it's

0:05:29.893 --> 0:05:32.893
<v Speaker 3>a sort of simple crude, but we think effective way

0:05:32.933 --> 0:05:39.133
<v Speaker 3>of just capturing how people think he's doing overall, given

0:05:39.213 --> 0:05:43.813
<v Speaker 3>that most people who voted last year, whoever they voted for,

0:05:44.573 --> 0:05:48.293
<v Speaker 3>thought that things weren't as they should be. Now, you know,

0:05:48.853 --> 0:05:51.813
<v Speaker 3>many of them blamed Biden and Harris, but a good

0:05:51.893 --> 0:05:56.693
<v Speaker 3>number thought that the problems that America faced, particularly the

0:05:56.853 --> 0:06:01.173
<v Speaker 3>sort of larger our problems, were because of Trump and

0:06:01.213 --> 0:06:04.373
<v Speaker 3>his ilk, threatening democracy and all this kind of stuff.

0:06:04.653 --> 0:06:08.773
<v Speaker 3>So most people thought there were there were the change

0:06:08.813 --> 0:06:12.173
<v Speaker 3>was necessary, the country needed to be fixed. And so

0:06:12.213 --> 0:06:14.933
<v Speaker 3>we asked whether Trump was how he was doing on that,

0:06:15.173 --> 0:06:18.053
<v Speaker 3>and we found that, you know, by a fair distance,

0:06:18.373 --> 0:06:23.373
<v Speaker 3>given how tightly divided American politics are, is that most

0:06:23.413 --> 0:06:28.013
<v Speaker 3>people think, yeah, despite the media's best efforts to spin

0:06:28.133 --> 0:06:32.053
<v Speaker 3>things otherwise, Trump is actually you know, making some progress,

0:06:32.093 --> 0:06:32.853
<v Speaker 3>making some headway.

0:06:33.653 --> 0:06:36.453
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm intrigued with the with the next set, So

0:06:36.653 --> 0:06:39.213
<v Speaker 2>just just running through that again, fifty one percent say

0:06:39.253 --> 0:06:44.093
<v Speaker 2>that he is fixing the country or the economy, thirty

0:06:44.133 --> 0:06:47.413
<v Speaker 2>seven percent say breaking twelve percent neither. Then you get

0:06:47.413 --> 0:06:53.173
<v Speaker 2>to Trump's actual approval rating, and you've got fifty You've

0:06:53.213 --> 0:06:59.213
<v Speaker 2>got fifty two percent approve. Disapprove is forty six. So

0:06:59.813 --> 0:07:01.413
<v Speaker 2>it's a you can look at it two.

0:07:01.453 --> 0:07:05.813
<v Speaker 3>It in isolation, one would say that's a very good number,

0:07:05.853 --> 0:07:08.853
<v Speaker 3>and I believe it is, and it's it's on on

0:07:08.893 --> 0:07:12.453
<v Speaker 3>a par with the other better numbers for Trump out

0:07:12.493 --> 0:07:16.813
<v Speaker 3>there from other poles, and in start contrast to the

0:07:16.853 --> 0:07:19.653
<v Speaker 3>polls that show him down five or ten points on

0:07:19.653 --> 0:07:24.973
<v Speaker 3>the approval disapproval question instead underwater in negative territory. But

0:07:25.533 --> 0:07:27.933
<v Speaker 3>if you're if you look at it next to or

0:07:28.013 --> 0:07:33.613
<v Speaker 3>following the question we've just discussed, it begs then the question, well,

0:07:34.293 --> 0:07:38.813
<v Speaker 3>why if only thirty seven percent think he's breaking it

0:07:38.853 --> 0:07:43.733
<v Speaker 3>to forty six percent disapprove Exactly What that reveals is

0:07:43.773 --> 0:07:50.613
<v Speaker 3>that when you ask people questions that either directly or indirectly,

0:07:50.653 --> 0:07:53.493
<v Speaker 3>explicitly or implicitly get to the issue of issues of

0:07:54.093 --> 0:07:57.373
<v Speaker 3>tangible change, and most people think of it interest They

0:07:57.373 --> 0:07:58.653
<v Speaker 3>think of in terms of the country as a whole,

0:07:58.653 --> 0:08:02.093
<v Speaker 3>but most people think first and foremost tangible change in

0:08:02.093 --> 0:08:06.613
<v Speaker 3>their own lives, the lies of those around them. Then

0:08:06.653 --> 0:08:12.213
<v Speaker 3>you get a less negative response because two thirds of them,

0:08:12.453 --> 0:08:15.013
<v Speaker 3>you know, only a third of the country really thinks

0:08:15.053 --> 0:08:17.493
<v Speaker 3>that things are not getting better, or at least they're

0:08:17.493 --> 0:08:22.693
<v Speaker 3>not getting worse. But when you ask exclusively about Trump himself,

0:08:22.853 --> 0:08:29.933
<v Speaker 3>as president. A president's you know, personal qualities or perceptions

0:08:29.933 --> 0:08:33.813
<v Speaker 3>of his personal qualities are always going to affect that number,

0:08:33.813 --> 0:08:36.133
<v Speaker 3>And of course Trump is the epitomizes how it can

0:08:36.213 --> 0:08:40.293
<v Speaker 3>do in ways, you know, positive or negative. So when

0:08:40.333 --> 0:08:44.173
<v Speaker 3>people are asked exclusively about Trump and not his policies,

0:08:44.693 --> 0:08:48.933
<v Speaker 3>then you get a much more reflexive default response from

0:08:49.333 --> 0:08:51.613
<v Speaker 3>you know, almost half the country, which is, well, I

0:08:51.613 --> 0:08:54.453
<v Speaker 3>don't like Trump. I wish he wasn't president. So I'm

0:08:54.453 --> 0:08:57.893
<v Speaker 3>going to say I disapprove of his presidency to this point,

0:08:58.093 --> 0:09:00.733
<v Speaker 3>even though, as I say, a slice of that, a

0:09:00.813 --> 0:09:03.533
<v Speaker 3>significant slice of those who disapprove of him as president

0:09:04.133 --> 0:09:08.293
<v Speaker 3>actually recognize that he's not doing such a terrible job.

0:09:10.013 --> 0:09:12.653
<v Speaker 2>Is there is there a strong possibility that a significant

0:09:12.733 --> 0:09:16.013
<v Speaker 2>number would have voted for him as well those who disapprove.

0:09:17.093 --> 0:09:20.533
<v Speaker 3>Uh, those that some some some, yeah, some would have

0:09:20.573 --> 0:09:23.733
<v Speaker 3>been some some would have stayed home. You know, that

0:09:23.893 --> 0:09:26.773
<v Speaker 3>was one of the problems that Democrats had if Harris

0:09:26.773 --> 0:09:32.013
<v Speaker 3>didn't enthuse enough enough folks on that side. Uh. And

0:09:32.053 --> 0:09:34.453
<v Speaker 3>where whereas Trump had the opposite effect. You know, he

0:09:34.453 --> 0:09:38.493
<v Speaker 3>was able to squeeze out every every possible vote where

0:09:38.533 --> 0:09:41.533
<v Speaker 3>Harris wasn't. And so yeah, you have people who didn't vote,

0:09:41.693 --> 0:09:43.893
<v Speaker 3>who couldn't bring himself they would never vote for Trump vote,

0:09:43.893 --> 0:09:46.853
<v Speaker 3>we may never vote for a Republican perhaps most likely

0:09:48.053 --> 0:09:50.613
<v Speaker 3>they you know, they just sort of said, well, I just,

0:09:50.653 --> 0:09:52.453
<v Speaker 3>you know, wake up on our election morning and I

0:09:52.453 --> 0:09:54.333
<v Speaker 3>hope Harris is one, but you know, I just can't

0:09:54.333 --> 0:09:59.373
<v Speaker 3>bring myself to actually vote for uh uh. And now

0:09:59.413 --> 0:10:02.453
<v Speaker 3>that Trump's president, they wish he wasn't and they're willing

0:10:02.493 --> 0:10:06.693
<v Speaker 3>to say so, but they're not moved sufficiently to say

0:10:06.693 --> 0:10:09.413
<v Speaker 3>anything particularly enthusiastic about the other side.

0:10:10.293 --> 0:10:12.573
<v Speaker 2>Let us take a side road just for a moment.

0:10:13.413 --> 0:10:16.533
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Harris. She was Did you know that she

0:10:16.613 --> 0:10:18.973
<v Speaker 2>was down in Australia just last week?

0:10:19.773 --> 0:10:21.933
<v Speaker 3>I did. Yes, It's got a little bit of play

0:10:22.093 --> 0:10:23.013
<v Speaker 3>in this part of the world.

0:10:23.093 --> 0:10:26.493
<v Speaker 2>That's more than that deserved. She was she was appearing

0:10:26.533 --> 0:10:31.053
<v Speaker 2>at a real estate conference in Queensland. In Queensland, did

0:10:31.133 --> 0:10:32.453
<v Speaker 2>you see any of her speech?

0:10:34.133 --> 0:10:36.493
<v Speaker 3>Just literally just like a SoundBite or two.

0:10:37.773 --> 0:10:40.973
<v Speaker 2>The well, let's put it this way, Sky News Australia

0:10:41.133 --> 0:10:44.493
<v Speaker 2>just took the took the bat to her. Is she

0:10:45.213 --> 0:10:47.653
<v Speaker 2>just what on earth was she doing there? Why on

0:10:47.693 --> 0:10:49.813
<v Speaker 2>earth did she come? What did they get it down?

0:10:49.893 --> 0:10:52.573
<v Speaker 2>For for heaven's sake, word salad all over again.

0:10:52.653 --> 0:10:54.333
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, oh yeah, yeah.

0:10:54.373 --> 0:10:56.693
<v Speaker 2>It was just the same, just exactly the same same

0:10:56.733 --> 0:10:59.893
<v Speaker 2>approach that she used just before. Nothing's changed. She's got

0:10:59.893 --> 0:11:02.013
<v Speaker 2>no show of ever becoming president.

0:11:02.893 --> 0:11:07.893
<v Speaker 3>No, no, she's incapable of learning, doesn't really want to learn.

0:11:08.893 --> 0:11:12.813
<v Speaker 3>Still doesn't understand why she lost, expected to win, and

0:11:13.613 --> 0:11:17.373
<v Speaker 3>you know, fair chance to run for governor of California,

0:11:17.933 --> 0:11:20.733
<v Speaker 3>and if she does, she probably wins, because you know,

0:11:20.973 --> 0:11:25.493
<v Speaker 3>someone like her wins in California and in her own head,

0:11:26.053 --> 0:11:29.373
<v Speaker 3>the last presidential election will just be this inexplicable blip

0:11:30.373 --> 0:11:34.893
<v Speaker 3>in her career. But yeah, it's you have been I mean,

0:11:34.933 --> 0:11:36.693
<v Speaker 3>I say, I haven't didn't see the whole speech, but

0:11:37.093 --> 0:11:42.213
<v Speaker 3>where you know, the exposure that she's had since so

0:11:42.413 --> 0:11:47.973
<v Speaker 3>many people comment on how especially relieved they are how

0:11:47.973 --> 0:11:51.933
<v Speaker 3>the election went when they are reminded of who would

0:11:51.973 --> 0:11:55.173
<v Speaker 3>have been president if it had gone another way. Rights,

0:11:55.613 --> 0:12:01.093
<v Speaker 3>it's something that is, you know, implicitly helping Trump. It's

0:12:01.133 --> 0:12:04.173
<v Speaker 3>the contrast with Biden, but but with what Biden was.

0:12:04.853 --> 0:12:08.173
<v Speaker 3>And there's also the contrast with what Harris would have been.

0:12:09.373 --> 0:12:12.373
<v Speaker 3>And you know, sometimes you're very unlucky with your opponents

0:12:12.453 --> 0:12:16.813
<v Speaker 3>or enemies, and sometimes you are quite lucky, and Job

0:12:16.933 --> 0:12:19.413
<v Speaker 3>was quite lucky in the end that it was Biden.

0:12:19.413 --> 0:12:22.133
<v Speaker 3>And then Harris, so.

0:12:22.693 --> 0:12:24.693
<v Speaker 2>I think this is the first time we've spoken since

0:12:24.933 --> 0:12:30.733
<v Speaker 2>since the election night. And and then we all, you know,

0:12:30.733 --> 0:12:32.253
<v Speaker 2>in this part of the world, we went on holiday,

0:12:32.253 --> 0:12:36.013
<v Speaker 2>and what have you. I'd like your personal opinion, not

0:12:36.093 --> 0:12:40.373
<v Speaker 2>your official one, your personal opinion on how Trump is doing.

0:12:41.013 --> 0:12:43.493
<v Speaker 2>How would you rate him? I don't care how you

0:12:43.933 --> 0:12:47.973
<v Speaker 2>approach this on various matters, but overall, what do you say.

0:12:49.333 --> 0:12:52.373
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'd give him. I give him an A plus

0:12:52.413 --> 0:12:54.853
<v Speaker 3>for effort to this point, and I'd give him an

0:12:54.893 --> 0:12:59.293
<v Speaker 3>a to anus in terms of outcomes. And as a

0:12:59.333 --> 0:13:02.813
<v Speaker 3>sort of general statement, I based it on the fact

0:13:02.853 --> 0:13:11.093
<v Speaker 3>that second terms, which of course this is usually underwhelming,

0:13:11.173 --> 0:13:14.693
<v Speaker 3>maybe unkind, but they tend to be more of a

0:13:14.773 --> 0:13:17.853
<v Speaker 3>victory lap or a legacy lap than anything else. And

0:13:18.013 --> 0:13:21.053
<v Speaker 3>Trump could have taken his foot off the gas, as

0:13:21.053 --> 0:13:26.813
<v Speaker 3>they say, you know, you know, vengeance or endorsement of

0:13:26.933 --> 0:13:29.773
<v Speaker 3>him belatedly after what happened in twenty twenty. But no,

0:13:30.253 --> 0:13:34.493
<v Speaker 3>he has approached his second term in a way that's

0:13:34.533 --> 0:13:38.173
<v Speaker 3>even more impactful than he attempted in his first and

0:13:38.213 --> 0:13:41.933
<v Speaker 3>more impactful and I think ultimately consequential. The most presidents

0:13:41.973 --> 0:13:45.693
<v Speaker 3>do in their first terms, to say they blew out

0:13:45.733 --> 0:13:48.333
<v Speaker 3>of the gate is putting it, you know, mildly. I mean,

0:13:48.373 --> 0:13:51.373
<v Speaker 3>they were so prepared, They were so much better prepared

0:13:51.373 --> 0:13:54.213
<v Speaker 3>this time. He and those around him clearly learned so

0:13:54.413 --> 0:14:00.173
<v Speaker 3>many painful lessons from twenty seventeen eighteen especially, And while

0:14:01.053 --> 0:14:03.573
<v Speaker 3>he hasn't got it all right in terms of personnel,

0:14:04.013 --> 0:14:06.733
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think he's made all the right moves,

0:14:07.213 --> 0:14:10.013
<v Speaker 3>I think most of the movie have been have been

0:14:10.133 --> 0:14:14.213
<v Speaker 3>very positive. Most of the people that he has put

0:14:14.253 --> 0:14:17.813
<v Speaker 3>around him are far superior than the one His team

0:14:17.893 --> 0:14:21.293
<v Speaker 3>is far superior than the one he had in twenty seventeen.

0:14:22.653 --> 0:14:28.173
<v Speaker 3>And the enormous number of areas that he's attempting to,

0:14:29.533 --> 0:14:34.693
<v Speaker 3>you know, initiate really significant structural reform. You know, it's

0:14:34.693 --> 0:14:37.613
<v Speaker 3>always said that, I mean prime ministers often don't have

0:14:37.693 --> 0:14:40.933
<v Speaker 3>that in parliamentaris and have that much leeway and two

0:14:41.053 --> 0:14:43.693
<v Speaker 3>or three issues may do it. But with presidents, especially

0:14:44.293 --> 0:14:46.333
<v Speaker 3>American presidents, you know, two or three things you can

0:14:46.373 --> 0:14:48.933
<v Speaker 3>focus on and hope to get a fair bit of

0:14:48.973 --> 0:14:51.813
<v Speaker 3>what you're looking for in your first term. And Trump

0:14:51.933 --> 0:14:54.813
<v Speaker 3>is just you know, throwing out that playbook, especially for

0:14:54.853 --> 0:14:57.533
<v Speaker 3>a second term, and just going for it, you know,

0:14:57.973 --> 0:15:01.253
<v Speaker 3>across the board. And this is this is I think

0:15:01.293 --> 0:15:05.573
<v Speaker 3>it's two very strong positives politically out of this. One

0:15:05.693 --> 0:15:12.253
<v Speaker 3>is it has really pleasantly surprised, impressed, reassured most of

0:15:12.253 --> 0:15:14.813
<v Speaker 3>those who voted for him that he was serious about

0:15:14.813 --> 0:15:17.693
<v Speaker 3>the things he was said he wanted to do. And secondly,

0:15:17.773 --> 0:15:22.893
<v Speaker 3>it has totally depressed the opposition. It is because they

0:15:23.933 --> 0:15:26.333
<v Speaker 3>one hoped he wasn't serious as they had hoped in

0:15:26.373 --> 0:15:29.293
<v Speaker 3>his first term, but they would thinking, well, you know,

0:15:29.453 --> 0:15:31.893
<v Speaker 3>first month, he'll try this, second or third month, he'll

0:15:31.893 --> 0:15:34.573
<v Speaker 3>try that, and they'll be able to do their usual

0:15:35.053 --> 0:15:38.093
<v Speaker 3>you know, pounce on it, go push back on it,

0:15:38.373 --> 0:15:41.653
<v Speaker 3>media attacks, all of that. But of course he's been

0:15:41.733 --> 0:15:44.493
<v Speaker 3>ann he was announcing this first hundred days, you know,

0:15:44.613 --> 0:15:47.093
<v Speaker 3>new policies, not his every day, but every hour on

0:15:47.173 --> 0:15:49.533
<v Speaker 3>a whole host of different issues. So they have just

0:15:49.733 --> 0:15:54.413
<v Speaker 3>been completely bewildered, just spinning around like you know, tops

0:15:54.453 --> 0:15:58.293
<v Speaker 3>out of control, which is meant that the it's been

0:15:58.453 --> 0:16:02.333
<v Speaker 3>very very hard for the opposition, the criticism of any

0:16:02.373 --> 0:16:07.893
<v Speaker 3>of these individual policies to get enough attention to even

0:16:07.893 --> 0:16:14.533
<v Speaker 3>potentially stick. And it's really meant that the Twite House

0:16:14.573 --> 0:16:16.813
<v Speaker 3>has been on the front foot. The Democrats have been

0:16:16.893 --> 0:16:19.053
<v Speaker 3>very much on the back foot, and so it's I

0:16:19.053 --> 0:16:20.573
<v Speaker 3>think it's just very very encouraging.

0:16:22.333 --> 0:16:26.253
<v Speaker 2>Would you say that the Democrats picking up the pieces

0:16:26.373 --> 0:16:29.933
<v Speaker 2>and making progress in the direction they'd like to?

0:16:31.213 --> 0:16:36.573
<v Speaker 3>No, I wouldn't. I don't they have been. I'm actually

0:16:36.613 --> 0:16:40.053
<v Speaker 3>surprised at how poorly they've they've dealt with it. They

0:16:40.093 --> 0:16:44.373
<v Speaker 3>are still clueless as to what happened. They now accept,

0:16:44.413 --> 0:16:47.933
<v Speaker 3>they acknowledge now that you know that yes, a lot

0:16:47.973 --> 0:16:51.133
<v Speaker 3>of young people voted for Trump, and that you know

0:16:51.173 --> 0:16:53.493
<v Speaker 3>a lot of Hispanics did, and a surprising number of

0:16:53.533 --> 0:16:57.293
<v Speaker 3>black people, particularly black men, and there's all these poor

0:16:57.293 --> 0:16:59.693
<v Speaker 3>people who voted for Trump. They now accept that, which

0:16:59.733 --> 0:17:02.973
<v Speaker 3>they always resisted in twenty sixteen, after twenty sixteen, and

0:17:02.973 --> 0:17:05.613
<v Speaker 3>again after twenty twenty, But they don't have the first

0:17:05.733 --> 0:17:09.573
<v Speaker 3>idea why. You're right, there's still very much of the

0:17:09.653 --> 0:17:13.693
<v Speaker 3>mindset that Trump and Musk and the other mysterious figures,

0:17:13.933 --> 0:17:21.053
<v Speaker 3>other nefarious figures, somehow we're able to conn all these uneducated,

0:17:21.453 --> 0:17:27.133
<v Speaker 3>unsophisticated people to vote for him, and they the notion

0:17:27.333 --> 0:17:30.773
<v Speaker 3>that their message was wrong, their candidates candidate was wrong

0:17:30.773 --> 0:17:33.933
<v Speaker 3>about all of that, and they're having real trouble coming

0:17:33.933 --> 0:17:35.773
<v Speaker 3>to terms. I mean, it's always difficult and you lose

0:17:36.013 --> 0:17:37.413
<v Speaker 3>to actually look in the mirror and go, you know

0:17:37.533 --> 0:17:40.173
<v Speaker 3>a lot of it was my fault. But they're not

0:17:40.213 --> 0:17:43.733
<v Speaker 3>even close to doing that. So you know, that's you know,

0:17:43.773 --> 0:17:46.133
<v Speaker 3>that's really good news for Trump and the Republicans. Of course,

0:17:46.573 --> 0:17:50.293
<v Speaker 3>you know, come the mid terms, come the next presidential elections,

0:17:50.573 --> 0:17:53.373
<v Speaker 3>as usual, it will probably be more about the incumbent

0:17:53.453 --> 0:17:55.733
<v Speaker 3>party and the won't be the incumbent president, but you know,

0:17:55.813 --> 0:17:57.733
<v Speaker 3>if it's the vice come and vice president, then it

0:17:57.733 --> 0:18:00.453
<v Speaker 3>will be about the opposition. So if things have seemed

0:18:00.453 --> 0:18:02.573
<v Speaker 3>to go poorly over the next two or three years,

0:18:03.093 --> 0:18:07.093
<v Speaker 3>then even if they don't get their act together, they

0:18:07.173 --> 0:18:11.973
<v Speaker 3>may slip in again, you know, because they're but like

0:18:12.013 --> 0:18:14.373
<v Speaker 3>you know, the Labor Party did in England in the UK,

0:18:14.733 --> 0:18:19.293
<v Speaker 3>because they're not the unpopular incumbent. But at the moment,

0:18:19.773 --> 0:18:22.293
<v Speaker 3>it looks like things will really have to go off

0:18:22.333 --> 0:18:25.533
<v Speaker 3>the rails for the Trump administration for the Democrats to

0:18:25.573 --> 0:18:28.693
<v Speaker 3>have a good chance next time around.

0:18:28.493 --> 0:18:32.973
<v Speaker 2>Depending depending on the media that you that you attend. Yeah,

0:18:33.333 --> 0:18:36.413
<v Speaker 2>you could be forgiven for thinking that lots and lots

0:18:36.493 --> 0:18:39.093
<v Speaker 2>is going wrong with the Trump adminstration.

0:18:40.053 --> 0:18:43.093
<v Speaker 3>Oh my goodness. Yeah, I mean things the media tells us,

0:18:43.133 --> 0:18:45.613
<v Speaker 3>has told us from day one. I mean it's incredible.

0:18:45.613 --> 0:18:48.413
<v Speaker 3>I mean, inflation is up, the economy is crashing, the

0:18:48.413 --> 0:18:52.533
<v Speaker 3>stock market's trashing. Trump is even more unpopular in his

0:18:52.573 --> 0:18:56.453
<v Speaker 3>second term with foreign leaders and foreign electorates than he

0:18:56.613 --> 0:19:02.333
<v Speaker 3>was in this term. He has really incompetent in people. Really,

0:19:02.493 --> 0:19:08.773
<v Speaker 3>the visive cabinet secretaries. The policies aren't thought out, they're

0:19:08.933 --> 0:19:15.773
<v Speaker 3>they're coldheartedly callously firing you know, wonderful government public service workers,

0:19:16.333 --> 0:19:19.533
<v Speaker 3>willy nilly. Uh, it's just I mean just taking a

0:19:19.573 --> 0:19:23.053
<v Speaker 3>wrecking ball to important programs. I mean, this is you know,

0:19:23.133 --> 0:19:28.853
<v Speaker 3>this has been the word from day one, and that

0:19:29.093 --> 0:19:32.213
<v Speaker 3>there's two problems with that in terms of getting an

0:19:32.253 --> 0:19:34.653
<v Speaker 3>audience or getting an audience, you know, a sort of

0:19:34.693 --> 0:19:39.333
<v Speaker 3>majority audience, critical mass to to go with that. One

0:19:39.373 --> 0:19:42.693
<v Speaker 3>is when any of any of those claims or at

0:19:42.693 --> 0:19:50.093
<v Speaker 3>tax or investigator that they're demonstrably untrue or you know, inaccurate. Uh.

0:19:50.133 --> 0:19:54.653
<v Speaker 3>And also the media, you know, is even less trusted

0:19:55.013 --> 0:19:57.573
<v Speaker 3>than it was four years ago, uh, you know, the

0:19:57.573 --> 0:20:00.813
<v Speaker 3>trend line continues down is the legacy media is just

0:20:01.653 --> 0:20:03.853
<v Speaker 3>you know, the first thing a lot of people think

0:20:03.893 --> 0:20:05.893
<v Speaker 3>when they see a CNN headline or a New York

0:20:05.893 --> 0:20:09.773
<v Speaker 3>Times headline, they think, oh my, be the opposite then, right,

0:20:09.893 --> 0:20:13.373
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's just they've just cried wolf, told too

0:20:13.373 --> 0:20:19.333
<v Speaker 3>many lies too many times. So at the moment, it's

0:20:19.373 --> 0:20:21.373
<v Speaker 3>it's just not paying off. But as I say, you know,

0:20:21.773 --> 0:20:25.813
<v Speaker 3>things turn you know, figuratively south in terms of policy outcomes,

0:20:25.853 --> 0:20:29.613
<v Speaker 3>then more people will think the media is onto something.

0:20:29.693 --> 0:20:33.453
<v Speaker 3>But you know, most people know the media is going

0:20:33.493 --> 0:20:36.293
<v Speaker 3>to attempt to destroy Trump's second term the way they

0:20:36.293 --> 0:20:38.493
<v Speaker 3>it is. First, I mean, there was a statistic I

0:20:38.573 --> 0:20:42.413
<v Speaker 3>just earlier today from the Media Research Center on you know,

0:20:42.413 --> 0:20:46.173
<v Speaker 3>they regularly update the nature of the coverage of any

0:20:46.213 --> 0:20:50.013
<v Speaker 3>given president, and Trump's coverage so far in his second

0:20:50.093 --> 0:20:53.413
<v Speaker 3>term is something like ninety one or ninety two percent negative,

0:20:54.133 --> 0:20:57.893
<v Speaker 3>whereas Biden's was something like sixty five seventy percent positive.

0:20:59.413 --> 0:21:02.133
<v Speaker 3>And you know, it's you know, that's just the way

0:21:02.333 --> 0:21:07.773
<v Speaker 3>it is in America. Fortunately, as I say, increasingly people

0:21:07.773 --> 0:21:11.813
<v Speaker 3>don't believe legacy media, and also the independent alternative media

0:21:12.453 --> 0:21:18.493
<v Speaker 3>is thriving. And so there are other sources more generally

0:21:18.533 --> 0:21:21.773
<v Speaker 3>more reliable, and certainly contrasting that more and more people

0:21:22.133 --> 0:21:24.053
<v Speaker 3>actually pay more and more attention to.

0:21:24.293 --> 0:21:27.573
<v Speaker 2>If I want to suggest that the situation that the

0:21:27.573 --> 0:21:30.533
<v Speaker 2>Democrats find themselves in has a great deal to do

0:21:30.653 --> 0:21:35.733
<v Speaker 2>with their collective low IQ, you would say.

0:21:35.653 --> 0:21:39.413
<v Speaker 3>Well, I would say I personally, I pretended to say yes,

0:21:39.493 --> 0:21:45.093
<v Speaker 3>I mean professionally, I would say they are incredibly, almost

0:21:45.173 --> 0:21:50.373
<v Speaker 3>unbelievably uninformed and ill informed. It's to the point where,

0:21:50.693 --> 0:21:54.453
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the politicians, you have to ask yourself,

0:21:54.733 --> 0:21:57.453
<v Speaker 3>do they actually believe what they're saying or is it

0:21:57.613 --> 0:22:01.533
<v Speaker 3>simply a con right? You know? Is it just a

0:22:01.613 --> 0:22:04.973
<v Speaker 3>means to an end when it comes to ordinary folk

0:22:05.333 --> 0:22:09.093
<v Speaker 3>who loyally vote for them and will tell you how

0:22:09.173 --> 0:22:12.613
<v Speaker 3>terrible Trump is and all the rest of it, a

0:22:12.653 --> 0:22:14.053
<v Speaker 3>lot of it is. I think it's just it's just

0:22:14.173 --> 0:22:19.973
<v Speaker 3>lack of quality information. But you you know, I would

0:22:20.013 --> 0:22:22.653
<v Speaker 3>I would. I would say the IQ of the iriage

0:22:22.653 --> 0:22:25.413
<v Speaker 3>democratic voter is probably quite a bit higher than the

0:22:25.413 --> 0:22:29.053
<v Speaker 3>IQ of the ariage democratic politician. It appears if ifyone

0:22:29.093 --> 0:22:32.213
<v Speaker 3>takes them at their word, that they are well intentioned,

0:22:32.373 --> 0:22:36.533
<v Speaker 3>well meaning, and you know, genuine people I'm.

0:22:36.413 --> 0:22:41.893
<v Speaker 2>Just wondering about your your reference to information, getting bad information,

0:22:42.013 --> 0:22:45.253
<v Speaker 2>wrong information, et cetera. And if you and if you

0:22:45.333 --> 0:22:48.093
<v Speaker 2>equate that to IQ, surely the two go hand in hand.

0:22:48.333 --> 0:22:51.013
<v Speaker 2>In most cases, if you've got a low IQ, you

0:22:51.093 --> 0:22:54.333
<v Speaker 2>don't even know you're getting bad information or or or

0:22:54.373 --> 0:22:58.413
<v Speaker 2>you or you're treating it as a weapon even even

0:22:58.453 --> 0:23:01.973
<v Speaker 2>though you recognize it. So you're you're not only not

0:23:02.013 --> 0:23:05.613
<v Speaker 2>only trying to fool your voting public, but you're actually

0:23:06.493 --> 0:23:08.773
<v Speaker 2>having yourself on a bit as well.

0:23:08.973 --> 0:23:11.013
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, there's say something of that. And I think

0:23:11.013 --> 0:23:14.293
<v Speaker 3>another thing that plays into this in America. I mean

0:23:14.373 --> 0:23:15.893
<v Speaker 3>very a lot of the West, but America is the

0:23:15.893 --> 0:23:20.653
<v Speaker 3>probably the best example, is there are so many well educated,

0:23:21.093 --> 0:23:25.053
<v Speaker 3>formally well educated, very well educated people who are actually

0:23:25.173 --> 0:23:28.533
<v Speaker 3>actually know very little about things. Right there, we become

0:23:28.573 --> 0:23:32.173
<v Speaker 3>such a credentialed society. This is this is This is

0:23:32.213 --> 0:23:35.293
<v Speaker 3>across the board, but it's especially on the left. Right,

0:23:35.373 --> 0:23:41.973
<v Speaker 3>you have so many people and it scus excus female

0:23:42.053 --> 0:23:46.533
<v Speaker 3>and excus minorities. There's something like sixty five seventy percent

0:23:46.853 --> 0:23:50.693
<v Speaker 3>of black women in Black American women with degrees work

0:23:50.773 --> 0:23:53.573
<v Speaker 3>for the government. Right, and what that means if you

0:23:53.653 --> 0:23:56.853
<v Speaker 3>drill down is they work in human resources and communications

0:23:56.893 --> 0:24:01.733
<v Speaker 3>and this, et cetera, et cetera, and they've been educated

0:24:01.773 --> 0:24:05.933
<v Speaker 3>in a way that is not helpful to learning how

0:24:05.933 --> 0:24:10.173
<v Speaker 3>the world really works. And you know, they continue along

0:24:10.173 --> 0:24:14.853
<v Speaker 3>that path in their careers and in their voting habits.

0:24:14.853 --> 0:24:18.013
<v Speaker 3>So it's you know, you have a lot of people.

0:24:18.093 --> 0:24:20.253
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying this to counter what you said late,

0:24:20.373 --> 0:24:22.013
<v Speaker 3>but just to sort of flesh it out a bit

0:24:22.093 --> 0:24:23.773
<v Speaker 3>from my end, I think you have a lot of

0:24:23.813 --> 0:24:27.973
<v Speaker 3>people on the left who believe that they are very

0:24:27.973 --> 0:24:31.533
<v Speaker 3>bright because they have never been they never been, never

0:24:31.573 --> 0:24:34.293
<v Speaker 3>failed anything, because they've been allowed to fail. They've always

0:24:34.333 --> 0:24:38.493
<v Speaker 3>been passed, pushed on, passed through. And they think that

0:24:38.573 --> 0:24:42.853
<v Speaker 3>their degrees and certificates on the wall and their business

0:24:42.853 --> 0:24:47.733
<v Speaker 3>cards entitle them to be really good judges, to have

0:24:47.813 --> 0:24:49.613
<v Speaker 3>very good judgment when it comes to what's good and

0:24:49.653 --> 0:24:52.653
<v Speaker 3>bad information, when in fact it's the opposite. You know,

0:24:52.693 --> 0:24:56.693
<v Speaker 3>they they are they are so deferential when it comes

0:24:56.733 --> 0:25:03.373
<v Speaker 3>to the experts, that is, the approved experts, that they're unquestioning.

0:25:03.413 --> 0:25:05.293
<v Speaker 3>And of course this is what you want. If you

0:25:05.453 --> 0:25:09.213
<v Speaker 3>want a controlling, top down kind of ideology, take route

0:25:09.613 --> 0:25:12.813
<v Speaker 3>which it has you know, massive parts of the country.

0:25:13.773 --> 0:25:17.053
<v Speaker 3>And so it's whether there is it that they're really

0:25:17.053 --> 0:25:20.013
<v Speaker 3>not very bright, or is it just that they're poorly educated,

0:25:20.093 --> 0:25:24.813
<v Speaker 3>or is it some combination of the two self deceit. Yeah,

0:25:24.853 --> 0:25:27.133
<v Speaker 3>there's yeah, there's definitely a lot of that. I mean,

0:25:27.253 --> 0:25:29.013
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's there's plenty on the other side too,

0:25:29.053 --> 0:25:31.293
<v Speaker 3>But it's not they don't tend to they don't tend

0:25:31.373 --> 0:25:33.813
<v Speaker 3>to be politically, they don't tend to be as influential

0:25:34.213 --> 0:25:37.093
<v Speaker 3>to to have these sort of key roles, not in

0:25:37.293 --> 0:25:41.493
<v Speaker 3>you know, in in government, in Congress, in terms of

0:25:41.493 --> 0:25:44.933
<v Speaker 3>the staff and advisory roles you think of, you know,

0:25:45.653 --> 0:25:49.653
<v Speaker 3>the Clinton administration, especially the Obama the Biden administration, many

0:25:49.653 --> 0:25:51.413
<v Speaker 3>of these people were the same. But you have in

0:25:51.453 --> 0:25:54.653
<v Speaker 3>the Obama and Biden administrations so many of these twenty

0:25:54.733 --> 0:25:59.893
<v Speaker 3>thirty somethings, graduates of Ivy League universities, you know, dictating

0:25:59.933 --> 0:26:04.093
<v Speaker 3>foreign policy and tax policy and health policy, who clearly

0:26:04.493 --> 0:26:09.173
<v Speaker 3>demonstrably knew very very little about what they were talking about, right,

0:26:09.973 --> 0:26:12.213
<v Speaker 3>But they spent all day talking to each other and

0:26:12.293 --> 0:26:15.093
<v Speaker 3>to those in the academy and in the NGOs and

0:26:15.133 --> 0:26:18.053
<v Speaker 3>the think tanks of the same background profile and views,

0:26:19.133 --> 0:26:21.573
<v Speaker 3>and continued every day waking up every day thinking that

0:26:21.613 --> 0:26:23.733
<v Speaker 3>they were the brightest people on the planet and we

0:26:23.813 --> 0:26:26.253
<v Speaker 3>were all should be very grateful that they're willing to

0:26:26.293 --> 0:26:28.933
<v Speaker 3>spend some time each day telling us how we should

0:26:28.933 --> 0:26:29.573
<v Speaker 3>live our lives.

0:26:30.453 --> 0:26:32.293
<v Speaker 2>Where would you put Harvard these days?

0:26:34.093 --> 0:26:37.173
<v Speaker 3>As far out of America as I could get it,

0:26:38.133 --> 0:26:41.893
<v Speaker 3>It's I mean, it's Harvard most of the Ivy League.

0:26:41.933 --> 0:26:45.173
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's so it's completely different to what it

0:26:45.253 --> 0:26:48.693
<v Speaker 3>used to be. But I mean, these the more elite

0:26:49.293 --> 0:26:52.653
<v Speaker 3>the educational institution in America, the further it is fallen,

0:26:52.733 --> 0:26:55.493
<v Speaker 3>it appears as a sort of general statement, right, I mean,

0:26:55.653 --> 0:27:03.933
<v Speaker 3>they're so politicized, they're so cowardly, they're so ideological, and

0:27:03.973 --> 0:27:07.813
<v Speaker 3>they're also so money or money centered, which you know,

0:27:07.853 --> 0:27:11.813
<v Speaker 3>you've got a Harvard with its tens of billions of

0:27:12.733 --> 0:27:15.493
<v Speaker 3>endowment money doesn't need a penny from a student or

0:27:15.493 --> 0:27:20.293
<v Speaker 3>a government forever. But boy, they're you know, they're going

0:27:20.333 --> 0:27:23.413
<v Speaker 3>to sue the federal government if they're taking away the

0:27:23.453 --> 0:27:26.693
<v Speaker 3>billions that the federal government the taxpayers give them every year.

0:27:28.253 --> 0:27:31.173
<v Speaker 3>It's it's quite remarkable. And we know that the Harvards

0:27:31.173 --> 0:27:35.933
<v Speaker 3>of this world have been the incubators of so much

0:27:36.013 --> 0:27:39.693
<v Speaker 3>of the crazy wokeness that is not not only threatened

0:27:39.693 --> 0:27:43.773
<v Speaker 3>to destroy the universicities themselves, but of course put the

0:27:43.773 --> 0:27:48.053
<v Speaker 3>corporate world and especially the political world. So I mean,

0:27:48.093 --> 0:27:52.093
<v Speaker 3>what what Trump is doing attempting to do with the

0:27:52.213 --> 0:27:56.933
<v Speaker 3>likes of Harvard is something that Democrats fall into the

0:27:56.973 --> 0:28:00.373
<v Speaker 3>trap of the of of countering and defending the institute,

0:28:00.493 --> 0:28:06.453
<v Speaker 3>the university, not realizing that for most people, what Trump

0:28:06.533 --> 0:28:09.653
<v Speaker 3>is saying and what he's demonstrating, you know, makes complete sense.

0:28:10.093 --> 0:28:14.093
<v Speaker 3>But the Democrats it seemed just to sort of slightly

0:28:14.133 --> 0:28:16.733
<v Speaker 3>circle back late for a moment. One of the probably

0:28:16.773 --> 0:28:19.693
<v Speaker 3>the thing that's most going in Trump's favor, you put

0:28:19.733 --> 0:28:22.173
<v Speaker 3>aside anything he is or isn't doing, what the outcomes

0:28:22.253 --> 0:28:24.373
<v Speaker 3>may or may not be at the moment, what's most

0:28:24.413 --> 0:28:27.613
<v Speaker 3>helpful to him is that for the time being, at least,

0:28:27.893 --> 0:28:31.093
<v Speaker 3>the Democrats appear to have decided that they are going

0:28:31.133 --> 0:28:39.413
<v Speaker 3>to hang their hats on defending federal bureaucrats, foreign aid recipients,

0:28:39.493 --> 0:28:45.373
<v Speaker 3>particularly those in the NGOs at home, domestically illegal immigrants,

0:28:45.853 --> 0:28:50.693
<v Speaker 3>and transgender people, and they seem to be very very

0:28:50.813 --> 0:28:58.453
<v Speaker 3>enthusiastic about defending, supporting protecting those four groups. And the

0:28:58.693 --> 0:29:03.213
<v Speaker 3>problem is that to say those four groups don't constitute

0:29:04.213 --> 0:29:07.813
<v Speaker 3>electoral majority or appeal to one. It's putting a very

0:29:07.853 --> 0:29:10.853
<v Speaker 3>very gender So as long as they keep doing that,

0:29:11.213 --> 0:29:15.253
<v Speaker 3>they will remain in sort of pretty poor spot.

0:29:16.213 --> 0:29:20.173
<v Speaker 2>Well buried in that commentary you've just delivered is a

0:29:20.253 --> 0:29:22.813
<v Speaker 2>very good explanation of why an ex prime minister of

0:29:22.853 --> 0:29:30.013
<v Speaker 2>this country found yourself employed at Harvard. Yes, now, based

0:29:30.053 --> 0:29:32.813
<v Speaker 2>on what you've said, I'm going to ask you to

0:29:32.893 --> 0:29:38.813
<v Speaker 2>extend your commentary to deal with the judiciary, and that

0:29:38.933 --> 0:29:44.373
<v Speaker 2>is that is specifically the Supreme Judiciary, but at further

0:29:44.413 --> 0:29:47.213
<v Speaker 2>down if you if you choose to go, but can

0:29:47.293 --> 0:29:49.773
<v Speaker 2>I make a suggestion to try and stir you on,

0:29:50.333 --> 0:29:57.253
<v Speaker 2>And that is that the amount of authoritarian attitude, if

0:29:57.253 --> 0:30:00.773
<v Speaker 2>I can put it that way, or some might even

0:30:00.813 --> 0:30:03.653
<v Speaker 2>call it tyranny. If not, if not yet, then on

0:30:04.053 --> 0:30:07.893
<v Speaker 2>its way judicial tyranny is having a very big influence

0:30:08.053 --> 0:30:12.133
<v Speaker 2>on the progress of the administration. Right or wrong?

0:30:13.333 --> 0:30:15.493
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Absolutely, right, one and ten percent right.

0:30:15.533 --> 0:30:22.173
<v Speaker 2>But I is the judiciary right, Yes, absolutely, and I

0:30:22.173 --> 0:30:22.773
<v Speaker 2>would put it.

0:30:22.933 --> 0:30:26.213
<v Speaker 3>I would place it in the following context if I may,

0:30:26.253 --> 0:30:30.453
<v Speaker 3>which is that the opposition to Trump, that sort of

0:30:30.653 --> 0:30:36.053
<v Speaker 3>big umbrella I'm including the politicians, the media, the judiciary,

0:30:37.053 --> 0:30:41.453
<v Speaker 3>the bureaucracy, all of the institutional opposition to Trump from

0:30:41.493 --> 0:30:45.933
<v Speaker 3>the very beginning right. So in twenty twenty, they decide

0:30:45.973 --> 0:30:48.573
<v Speaker 3>they can impeach him, try to impeach him and prevent

0:30:48.693 --> 0:30:52.173
<v Speaker 3>him from running for a second term. That doesn't work,

0:30:52.293 --> 0:30:55.293
<v Speaker 3>so they stuff enough ballots to stop him from having

0:30:55.293 --> 0:30:58.973
<v Speaker 3>a second term. And then when he protests that, they

0:30:59.013 --> 0:31:00.893
<v Speaker 3>try to impeach him to stop him from being able

0:31:00.933 --> 0:31:04.533
<v Speaker 3>to run again. That doesn't work, so they try to

0:31:04.573 --> 0:31:07.453
<v Speaker 3>bankrupt him through the courts. Then they try to imprison

0:31:07.533 --> 0:31:10.493
<v Speaker 3>him through the court of That works, and then coincidentally,

0:31:10.533 --> 0:31:15.053
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure twice he's there's attempts to assassinate him. None

0:31:15.093 --> 0:31:18.253
<v Speaker 3>of it works. He's back in. And I think many

0:31:18.333 --> 0:31:25.493
<v Speaker 3>people on both sides assumed and hoped that that would

0:31:25.573 --> 0:31:28.613
<v Speaker 3>be it. Oh well, somehow if you didn't like him,

0:31:28.613 --> 0:31:30.493
<v Speaker 3>this crazy guy's back in. We only got to put

0:31:30.533 --> 0:31:32.613
<v Speaker 3>up with it for four years. And on the on

0:31:32.653 --> 0:31:35.373
<v Speaker 3>the on the Trump side, it's like they've shot every

0:31:35.413 --> 0:31:38.413
<v Speaker 3>bullet they had. There's nothing else they can do. Well,

0:31:38.613 --> 0:31:41.693
<v Speaker 3>guess what they had more ready and waiting, And of

0:31:41.733 --> 0:31:45.453
<v Speaker 3>course what they had waiting was the judiciary, and so

0:31:45.613 --> 0:31:50.133
<v Speaker 3>what has happened since the very moment Trump was sort

0:31:50.133 --> 0:31:55.733
<v Speaker 3>of reinaugurated, uh in late January, was that the judiciary

0:31:55.893 --> 0:32:01.573
<v Speaker 3>has taken upon itself to be the most disloyal opposition

0:32:02.053 --> 0:32:05.173
<v Speaker 3>and to do everything to not eliminate Trump, but to

0:32:05.333 --> 0:32:09.133
<v Speaker 3>eliminate any possible progress on the polar side that he

0:32:09.173 --> 0:32:13.133
<v Speaker 3>could make. And where this really comes, where this is

0:32:13.173 --> 0:32:16.573
<v Speaker 3>playing out, it's playing at the federal level. Because there's

0:32:16.653 --> 0:32:20.853
<v Speaker 3>a federal system. There's a Supreme Court that everybody knows about.

0:32:21.853 --> 0:32:24.653
<v Speaker 3>And then you think, of course at the state level

0:32:24.733 --> 0:32:28.013
<v Speaker 3>or local level, but there are federal courts that are

0:32:28.053 --> 0:32:33.773
<v Speaker 3>that are divided regionally in America that supposedly Supreme Court

0:32:34.013 --> 0:32:36.853
<v Speaker 3>justice as they each have a number of them to

0:32:36.853 --> 0:32:43.453
<v Speaker 3>sort of oversee. Those courts are the ones that are determining,

0:32:43.933 --> 0:32:46.853
<v Speaker 3>at least in the short term that you name the

0:32:46.973 --> 0:32:52.373
<v Speaker 3>policy of Trump, it's unconstitutional slash illegal. So Trump can't

0:32:52.373 --> 0:32:56.253
<v Speaker 3>close the Department of Education, according to the court, Trump

0:32:56.293 --> 0:33:00.853
<v Speaker 3>can't close USAID. Trump can't fire federal workers. You know,

0:33:01.013 --> 0:33:04.213
<v Speaker 3>Trump can't attempt to broke a piece in the Middle

0:33:04.253 --> 0:33:07.213
<v Speaker 3>East or Ukraine. Trump can't raise tariffs. You know, it

0:33:07.253 --> 0:33:10.213
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter what it is some court somewhere has said

0:33:10.613 --> 0:33:13.853
<v Speaker 3>he can't do it, and one of the really, I mean,

0:33:13.853 --> 0:33:17.253
<v Speaker 3>we know, we know why it's happening because these judges,

0:33:17.293 --> 0:33:22.133
<v Speaker 3>and they're not all Democrats, but those that are Republican

0:33:22.933 --> 0:33:29.853
<v Speaker 3>are anti Trump Republicans, and the judicial mindset and psychology

0:33:29.933 --> 0:33:33.253
<v Speaker 3>across the board conservative, liberal, Republican Democrat tends to be

0:33:33.293 --> 0:33:35.013
<v Speaker 3>And this is just gets back to something you touched

0:33:35.053 --> 0:33:37.733
<v Speaker 3>on in your introduction to the question, Laton, which is

0:33:37.813 --> 0:33:43.413
<v Speaker 3>there's an authoritarian mindset. Okay, these folks are very deferential

0:33:43.733 --> 0:33:47.093
<v Speaker 3>to power in an institutional sense. They are pro establishment,

0:33:47.133 --> 0:33:51.173
<v Speaker 3>they're pro big business, they're pro big government. They will

0:33:51.453 --> 0:33:56.333
<v Speaker 3>enormous all cases. Their default position is to go with

0:33:56.533 --> 0:34:03.493
<v Speaker 3>the powerful force and to not be sympathetic to the contrarian,

0:34:04.093 --> 0:34:08.533
<v Speaker 3>the little guy, the outsider, all that. And that's I mean,

0:34:09.093 --> 0:34:12.213
<v Speaker 3>you could say always been the case. But when you

0:34:12.213 --> 0:34:15.373
<v Speaker 3>get to figure the ultimate outside of like Trump, with

0:34:15.493 --> 0:34:20.293
<v Speaker 3>the entire system against him, these folks don't see themselves

0:34:20.453 --> 0:34:25.853
<v Speaker 3>as arbiters of justice. They see themselves as instruments of

0:34:25.893 --> 0:34:31.293
<v Speaker 3>the system because in their minds, the just outcome is,

0:34:31.333 --> 0:34:36.053
<v Speaker 3>of course, to limit Trump's power. And so this is

0:34:36.053 --> 0:34:39.133
<v Speaker 3>what's been playing out now. It's been allowed to play

0:34:39.173 --> 0:34:42.733
<v Speaker 3>out because the Supreme Court, which is led by a

0:34:42.813 --> 0:34:46.573
<v Speaker 3>Chief Justice in Roberts, who is off of this ilk

0:34:46.733 --> 0:34:50.813
<v Speaker 3>even though he's quote unquote a conservative Republican. They they

0:34:50.853 --> 0:34:53.453
<v Speaker 3>didn't take their opportunity to sort of cut this stuff

0:34:53.653 --> 0:34:55.853
<v Speaker 3>off at the pass, and it's going to come back

0:34:55.853 --> 0:34:57.773
<v Speaker 3>to them and they're going to have to decide one

0:34:57.853 --> 0:35:03.933
<v Speaker 3>way or another. And also, these courts, they're all congressionally mandated.

0:35:04.013 --> 0:35:06.053
<v Speaker 3>There's nothing in the Constitution that says that we should

0:35:06.053 --> 0:35:08.133
<v Speaker 3>have is a Supreme Court, but there's nothing about all

0:35:08.133 --> 0:35:12.053
<v Speaker 3>these federal courts. And so they are a product of Congress,

0:35:12.093 --> 0:35:13.973
<v Speaker 3>which means Congress can do something about it. They can

0:35:14.013 --> 0:35:16.453
<v Speaker 3>impeach the judges, all these things. These are all things

0:35:16.453 --> 0:35:19.973
<v Speaker 3>that may happen, but we're looking at a situation where

0:35:20.533 --> 0:35:23.213
<v Speaker 3>it could be before too long if the Supreme Court

0:35:23.333 --> 0:35:27.733
<v Speaker 3>continues to act in a cowardly way or actually rules

0:35:27.973 --> 0:35:31.773
<v Speaker 3>in an irrational way, a logical way, where Trump is

0:35:31.813 --> 0:35:35.013
<v Speaker 3>going to be faced with either complying with this madness

0:35:35.413 --> 0:35:37.893
<v Speaker 3>or simply saying as some of his predecessors have done

0:35:38.333 --> 0:35:43.813
<v Speaker 3>in which is sorry, you know, not doing it, you know.

0:35:44.813 --> 0:35:48.173
<v Speaker 3>And so this is it's a really scary time, but

0:35:48.333 --> 0:35:52.333
<v Speaker 3>one which is blatantly getting some attention. But you know,

0:35:52.413 --> 0:35:53.733
<v Speaker 3>this is where we find ourselves.

0:35:54.093 --> 0:35:55.733
<v Speaker 2>How uncomfortable does that make you feel?

0:35:57.293 --> 0:36:05.893
<v Speaker 3>Very It's another example of how a historically traditionally pillar

0:36:06.053 --> 0:36:12.533
<v Speaker 3>of American society, American American way of life, he has

0:36:13.093 --> 0:36:19.853
<v Speaker 3>been watered down, harmed. Uh And and so many people

0:36:20.213 --> 0:36:24.693
<v Speaker 3>are just so surprised and literally shocked, bewildered and then

0:36:25.693 --> 0:36:29.493
<v Speaker 3>really offended by what's going on. And of course some

0:36:29.533 --> 0:36:32.253
<v Speaker 3>people are asking, well, did this happen yesterday or is

0:36:32.293 --> 0:36:35.213
<v Speaker 3>this something that's been going on for years or decades?

0:36:35.773 --> 0:36:40.293
<v Speaker 3>Uh And Unfortunately, the more one drills down, the uglier

0:36:40.373 --> 0:36:44.453
<v Speaker 3>the answer has become. Because as I'm sure you know you,

0:36:44.493 --> 0:36:46.173
<v Speaker 3>and I know you know late, and I'm sure many

0:36:46.213 --> 0:36:48.373
<v Speaker 3>of your audience does, as what much of your audience

0:36:48.373 --> 0:36:51.853
<v Speaker 3>does as well, that most of the things we object to,

0:36:51.893 --> 0:36:55.813
<v Speaker 3>the really serious things in the world these days, they're

0:36:55.853 --> 0:36:58.853
<v Speaker 3>not something that was thought up yesterday morning. There were

0:36:58.893 --> 0:37:01.053
<v Speaker 3>mostly things that were forced up and first acted upon

0:37:01.213 --> 0:37:04.973
<v Speaker 3>last century at least, that are now coming. You know,

0:37:05.173 --> 0:37:09.253
<v Speaker 3>they're they're now coming to a fruition. And the judicial,

0:37:09.453 --> 0:37:14.253
<v Speaker 3>the real the way in which the the perversion of

0:37:13.613 --> 0:37:17.813
<v Speaker 3>the judiciary, at least at the federal level. Uh, you know,

0:37:17.813 --> 0:37:23.053
<v Speaker 3>it's coming to the four And it's as I say,

0:37:23.173 --> 0:37:25.293
<v Speaker 3>is that they weren't out of bullets. They still had

0:37:25.973 --> 0:37:27.893
<v Speaker 3>a couple left in the in the chamber.

0:37:29.133 --> 0:37:31.693
<v Speaker 2>Funny. It's funny how things turn up, you know, because

0:37:33.173 --> 0:37:34.773
<v Speaker 2>all I had to do was reach out and pick

0:37:34.813 --> 0:37:39.013
<v Speaker 2>this up. You mentioned bullets, big bank boss urges America

0:37:39.053 --> 0:37:43.893
<v Speaker 2>to stockpiled bullets, not bitcoin. I that was. That was

0:37:43.973 --> 0:37:47.053
<v Speaker 2>Jamie Diamond, by the way. Yeah, who's had a lot

0:37:47.133 --> 0:37:49.053
<v Speaker 2>to say over the over the weekend, not all of

0:37:49.093 --> 0:37:53.173
<v Speaker 2>it encouraging. Now if I or did you want to

0:37:53.173 --> 0:37:53.733
<v Speaker 2>comment on.

0:37:53.613 --> 0:37:55.813
<v Speaker 3>That, No, No, it's just I mean, it's a sort

0:37:55.853 --> 0:37:57.933
<v Speaker 3>of sidebar on Jamie Diamond. The thing that I was

0:37:57.973 --> 0:38:01.133
<v Speaker 3>pleasantly surprised about the price about with his comments is

0:38:01.133 --> 0:38:06.693
<v Speaker 3>that he really explained some a little bit of reality

0:38:06.733 --> 0:38:11.293
<v Speaker 3>on immigration to his alliance, which was quite shocking, talking

0:38:11.373 --> 0:38:15.493
<v Speaker 3>about how insane it had been to have had such

0:38:15.613 --> 0:38:17.773
<v Speaker 3>numbers come into the country and what had it done

0:38:18.013 --> 0:38:21.853
<v Speaker 3>in terms of worsening the quality of life material quality

0:38:21.853 --> 0:38:26.373
<v Speaker 3>of life of lower income Americans, and you know how

0:38:26.413 --> 0:38:28.093
<v Speaker 3>something had to be done about this I mean in

0:38:28.133 --> 0:38:31.693
<v Speaker 3>say any of this before, but it's better he says it.

0:38:31.733 --> 0:38:33.013
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad to know he thinks it, and it is

0:38:33.053 --> 0:38:34.093
<v Speaker 3>good that he's saying it now.

0:38:35.093 --> 0:38:38.053
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, I don't want to spend too much time on

0:38:37.933 --> 0:38:40.693
<v Speaker 2>the media because we've we've done plenty of that over

0:38:40.853 --> 0:38:44.093
<v Speaker 2>over a period of time, and we've we've already mentioned

0:38:44.093 --> 0:38:48.693
<v Speaker 2>that a little today. But as this individual is part

0:38:48.733 --> 0:38:50.893
<v Speaker 2>of the media, I'm going to throw them in here.

0:38:51.533 --> 0:38:55.293
<v Speaker 2>Jake Tapper, Yeah, the only thing that I want to say,

0:38:55.373 --> 0:39:01.493
<v Speaker 2>really is how does this irresponsible individual think that he

0:39:01.533 --> 0:39:04.253
<v Speaker 2>can lie the way that he is at the moment,

0:39:04.693 --> 0:39:07.133
<v Speaker 2>that he knew nothing, and that try and launch the

0:39:07.173 --> 0:39:10.813
<v Speaker 2>responsibility back on the on the on the White House

0:39:11.853 --> 0:39:15.813
<v Speaker 2>in itself because he had no idea. I don't believe

0:39:15.813 --> 0:39:18.213
<v Speaker 2>it where that guy says, I have not for a

0:39:18.293 --> 0:39:20.373
<v Speaker 2>very long time. He's just proven it for me.

0:39:21.853 --> 0:39:25.293
<v Speaker 3>I think it's because he and those of his ilk

0:39:25.893 --> 0:39:31.493
<v Speaker 3>have succeeded to this point saying whatever they wanted, whether

0:39:31.533 --> 0:39:34.413
<v Speaker 3>it was untrue or it was the complete opposite of

0:39:34.453 --> 0:39:36.333
<v Speaker 3>what they'd said yesterday and the opposite of what they'll

0:39:36.333 --> 0:39:39.853
<v Speaker 3>say tomorrow, and there's been no there'll be no consequences right,

0:39:39.933 --> 0:39:43.373
<v Speaker 3>their careers sored. They continue, they make all this money,

0:39:43.373 --> 0:39:46.533
<v Speaker 3>they get these great book contracts, and they live in

0:39:46.613 --> 0:39:51.573
<v Speaker 3>such a bubble that you know, they they never called

0:39:51.573 --> 0:39:56.253
<v Speaker 3>out on the carpet. And so someone in his case,

0:39:56.573 --> 0:40:01.773
<v Speaker 3>like many others, but most obviously him, who would not

0:40:02.213 --> 0:40:09.893
<v Speaker 3>hear one word about Biden's obvious cognitive and physiological decline

0:40:10.373 --> 0:40:13.373
<v Speaker 3>until Biden was out of the Oval office, turns around

0:40:13.413 --> 0:40:17.773
<v Speaker 3>and produces this expose book, explaining to the great Onwash

0:40:17.893 --> 0:40:21.733
<v Speaker 3>that Biden had been too lappy the whole time and

0:40:22.013 --> 0:40:25.333
<v Speaker 3>aren't I the brave journalists for you know, speaking truth

0:40:25.373 --> 0:40:29.613
<v Speaker 3>to power? And it's I mean, it is mind blowing,

0:40:30.013 --> 0:40:34.053
<v Speaker 3>the hypocrisy of it, the goal of it. And as

0:40:34.093 --> 0:40:37.853
<v Speaker 3>one of my friends reminds me frequently, whether you're talking

0:40:37.893 --> 0:40:40.853
<v Speaker 3>about the media, the legacy media, or your democrat, the

0:40:40.893 --> 0:40:43.533
<v Speaker 3>average democrat, and if they didn't have double standards, they

0:40:43.533 --> 0:40:47.373
<v Speaker 3>have no standards at all, And it is just it

0:40:47.693 --> 0:40:54.893
<v Speaker 3>is simply remarkable. Fortunately, it is so obviously ridiculous that

0:40:55.013 --> 0:40:59.573
<v Speaker 3>this person is trying to portray themselves as a discoverer

0:40:59.653 --> 0:41:04.253
<v Speaker 3>of truth that you know, there's at least a mixed response,

0:41:04.253 --> 0:41:09.493
<v Speaker 3>and the book itself is not selling, so we have

0:41:09.573 --> 0:41:13.133
<v Speaker 3>to hope that at least, you know, he's not rewarded

0:41:13.733 --> 0:41:16.253
<v Speaker 3>further for this. But it's yeah, I mean, the media

0:41:16.373 --> 0:41:19.573
<v Speaker 3>is just it's not it's not just a joke, the

0:41:19.653 --> 0:41:23.933
<v Speaker 3>legacy media. But it's actually dangerous when you consider not

0:41:23.973 --> 0:41:25.973
<v Speaker 3>only what they tell us that isn't so, but the

0:41:25.973 --> 0:41:29.013
<v Speaker 3>things that they simply ignore and refuse to tell us

0:41:29.413 --> 0:41:31.573
<v Speaker 3>that would have been helpful, to put it, malvedly to

0:41:31.613 --> 0:41:32.573
<v Speaker 3>know at the time.

0:41:33.253 --> 0:41:38.813
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, I've heard commentators say that critical commentators say they'll

0:41:38.853 --> 0:41:40.973
<v Speaker 2>be making He'll be making millions out of the book,

0:41:41.453 --> 0:41:43.773
<v Speaker 2>and I thought, no, he won't because no one's going

0:41:43.813 --> 0:41:45.573
<v Speaker 2>to want to read it. On very few.

0:41:45.533 --> 0:41:49.213
<v Speaker 3>Now, he may have. He may have got a good advance,

0:41:49.693 --> 0:41:52.453
<v Speaker 3>in which we know a lot of these that that's

0:41:52.453 --> 0:41:54.173
<v Speaker 3>how mean. It's just like you know, most most of

0:41:54.213 --> 0:41:58.213
<v Speaker 3>the politicians their books, it's all about the advance. Very

0:41:58.213 --> 0:42:00.293
<v Speaker 3>few of them actually sell a lot of books that

0:42:00.373 --> 0:42:04.893
<v Speaker 3>pay for the advance. So he may have had a

0:42:04.893 --> 0:42:07.613
<v Speaker 3>good deal, but you know, hopefully not.

0:42:08.653 --> 0:42:16.533
<v Speaker 2>Let's turn our attention to to overseas the South Korean election. Yeah,

0:42:16.653 --> 0:42:22.973
<v Speaker 2>as we record this, what's your take, Well, if the

0:42:23.053 --> 0:42:24.453
<v Speaker 2>polls are accurate.

0:42:25.053 --> 0:42:29.293
<v Speaker 3>Then at the moment, it's advantage mister Lee, the liberal

0:42:29.453 --> 0:42:36.013
<v Speaker 3>left wing candidate and mister Kim the conservative candidate. Looks

0:42:36.093 --> 0:42:40.253
<v Speaker 3>like it's an uphill battle to succeed mister Yun, the

0:42:40.293 --> 0:42:45.173
<v Speaker 3>recently displaced president from the same Conservative party. It's no,

0:42:45.293 --> 0:42:49.173
<v Speaker 3>it's it's a fascinating and potentially, i think for people

0:42:49.213 --> 0:42:53.093
<v Speaker 3>on the right of the spectrum, frustrating election because you know,

0:42:53.133 --> 0:42:57.093
<v Speaker 3>the context is the President Yun in descent, the conservative

0:42:57.213 --> 0:43:00.813
<v Speaker 3>you know, won the election three years ago against mister Lee.

0:43:02.813 --> 0:43:07.653
<v Speaker 3>He's you know, pro American, tough on North Korea, tough

0:43:07.693 --> 0:43:13.013
<v Speaker 3>on China, tough on the nuclear proliferation, you know, really

0:43:13.093 --> 0:43:17.253
<v Speaker 3>a lot of emphasis on the good US South Korean relationship.

0:43:17.733 --> 0:43:20.173
<v Speaker 3>But then in December he decides that you know, he

0:43:20.213 --> 0:43:23.333
<v Speaker 3>used to declare martial law. The fixes in against him,

0:43:24.013 --> 0:43:27.373
<v Speaker 3>and it all goes pair shape, right the parliament, the

0:43:27.413 --> 0:43:33.093
<v Speaker 3>parliament votes against him, the people seemingly, you know, figuratively

0:43:33.133 --> 0:43:37.253
<v Speaker 3>revolt against him, and then what April, the Constitutional Court

0:43:37.733 --> 0:43:42.973
<v Speaker 3>threw him out. So what appears to have happened is

0:43:43.053 --> 0:43:47.653
<v Speaker 3>that a race that otherwise would have been highly competitive,

0:43:47.733 --> 0:43:51.933
<v Speaker 3>maybe even advantage the Conservative has turned around because of

0:43:51.973 --> 0:43:54.373
<v Speaker 3>this obviously very important thing that happened. It's one thing

0:43:54.373 --> 0:44:01.653
<v Speaker 3>that's happened because there appears to be in in South

0:44:01.733 --> 0:44:07.973
<v Speaker 3>Korean society right now an incredible what fear of a

0:44:08.053 --> 0:44:10.813
<v Speaker 3>k They feel they've been a chaotic period for a

0:44:10.853 --> 0:44:16.773
<v Speaker 3>few months and that continuing if the Conservative succeeds ex

0:44:16.813 --> 0:44:19.813
<v Speaker 3>President Un. Whereas Lee, who was one of those who

0:44:19.853 --> 0:44:23.213
<v Speaker 3>sort of very much went to the forefront to protest

0:44:23.733 --> 0:44:27.813
<v Speaker 3>what the previous president was attempting to do, is seen

0:44:27.853 --> 0:44:30.533
<v Speaker 3>as a more steady, at least in this context, a

0:44:30.533 --> 0:44:34.253
<v Speaker 3>more steady pair of hands. And what seems to have

0:44:34.293 --> 0:44:38.693
<v Speaker 3>hurt the Conservatives as a party putting forward a candidate

0:44:38.813 --> 0:44:41.653
<v Speaker 3>is that the kind of elites of the party, the

0:44:41.733 --> 0:44:47.493
<v Speaker 3>establishment wanted someone less associated with the outgoing president. Mister Kim,

0:44:47.613 --> 0:44:49.893
<v Speaker 3>I think was the labor Minister and has been one

0:44:49.973 --> 0:44:52.533
<v Speaker 3>of his staunchest defenders and has really gone out of

0:44:52.533 --> 0:44:57.333
<v Speaker 3>his way not to explicitly criticize ex President Yun, and

0:44:58.013 --> 0:45:02.293
<v Speaker 3>but the sort of the base of the party, the

0:45:02.373 --> 0:45:06.453
<v Speaker 3>members wanted him, and they chose him, and he's seen,

0:45:06.813 --> 0:45:09.213
<v Speaker 3>rightly or wrongly, is not the strongest candidate probably in

0:45:09.373 --> 0:45:12.853
<v Speaker 3>under the circumstances, and so have a situation we have

0:45:12.933 --> 0:45:17.533
<v Speaker 3>this quite left wing chap in Lee, you know, who's

0:45:17.773 --> 0:45:20.693
<v Speaker 3>very much about playing nice with North Korea and China,

0:45:21.733 --> 0:45:24.613
<v Speaker 3>not too concerned about the relationship with America, and of

0:45:24.653 --> 0:45:28.213
<v Speaker 3>course America you know, potentially is going to dump this

0:45:28.373 --> 0:45:32.293
<v Speaker 3>huge tariffs on them within days. And Lee's got personal

0:45:32.453 --> 0:45:37.213
<v Speaker 3>and business history with North Korea. It's you know, he's

0:45:37.253 --> 0:45:42.573
<v Speaker 3>gone against US and UN sanctions by funding North Korea

0:45:42.653 --> 0:45:48.293
<v Speaker 3>to tune of several million. And it's a you would think,

0:45:48.373 --> 0:45:51.933
<v Speaker 3>under quote unquote normal circumstances, whatever mister Kim on the

0:45:51.973 --> 0:45:56.013
<v Speaker 3>Conservative sides weaknesses are, mister Lee would not be the

0:45:56.053 --> 0:46:00.733
<v Speaker 3>strongest opponent, but the peers not to be playing out

0:46:00.773 --> 0:46:02.813
<v Speaker 3>that way. I mean, the betting markets, I think make

0:46:02.893 --> 0:46:05.853
<v Speaker 3>it a lot closer than the opinion polls. But the

0:46:05.853 --> 0:46:09.333
<v Speaker 3>betting markets are not always I mean, you know, sometimes

0:46:09.333 --> 0:46:11.973
<v Speaker 3>they're far more accurate in the polls, and sometimes they're not.

0:46:14.253 --> 0:46:16.893
<v Speaker 2>Let me bound something off you, and I'll tell you.

0:46:17.013 --> 0:46:18.693
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you my source right from the get go.

0:46:18.813 --> 0:46:22.373
<v Speaker 2>I have found myself of recent times, very recent times,

0:46:23.093 --> 0:46:28.733
<v Speaker 2>of paying a little attention to Steve Bannon's War Room podcast. Yeah,

0:46:28.813 --> 0:46:35.013
<v Speaker 2>and over the weekend I heard commentary from, amongst others,

0:46:35.933 --> 0:46:39.773
<v Speaker 2>the American Ambassador to South Korea m h. They were

0:46:39.813 --> 0:46:43.053
<v Speaker 2>talking about the amount of control that the CCP, the

0:46:43.133 --> 0:46:48.453
<v Speaker 2>Chinese Communist Party now has in in South Korea, the

0:46:48.493 --> 0:46:52.333
<v Speaker 2>influence it's got, and the cheating that is going on,

0:46:52.533 --> 0:46:55.493
<v Speaker 2>and they described the ways of cheating that they they

0:46:55.533 --> 0:47:02.173
<v Speaker 2>claimed were correct, including pre pre filled out voting forms

0:47:02.613 --> 0:47:04.933
<v Speaker 2>and dropping them off and et cetera, et cetera.

0:47:05.493 --> 0:47:08.453
<v Speaker 3>What do you say, Yeah, no, the the one one

0:47:08.493 --> 0:47:12.973
<v Speaker 3>of the you know, one of the issues that has

0:47:13.013 --> 0:47:15.893
<v Speaker 3>come up of late, has gotten a lot of discussion

0:47:15.933 --> 0:47:19.213
<v Speaker 3>in America of late, is this issue of election integrity,

0:47:19.293 --> 0:47:23.013
<v Speaker 3>voter integrity. And you're right, Steve Bannon has been at

0:47:23.013 --> 0:47:25.893
<v Speaker 3>the forefront of shining a spotlight. You know, there's this

0:47:26.133 --> 0:47:30.573
<v Speaker 3>voter integrity team, the ambassador, former ambassador, I think a

0:47:30.693 --> 0:47:34.013
<v Speaker 3>couple of senior retired military figures from America are over

0:47:34.053 --> 0:47:37.053
<v Speaker 3>there and they are very concerned about, as you say,

0:47:37.573 --> 0:47:41.733
<v Speaker 3>these apparent case numerous cases of ballots being filled in.

0:47:41.773 --> 0:47:46.773
<v Speaker 3>They're very concerned about the electronic voting being being able

0:47:46.813 --> 0:47:50.053
<v Speaker 3>to be interfered with, and they're doing the rounds of

0:47:50.773 --> 0:47:55.373
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the conservative, alternative independent media podcasts, etc.

0:47:56.093 --> 0:47:59.373
<v Speaker 3>So of getting the word out. And yes it's being

0:47:59.493 --> 0:48:03.173
<v Speaker 3>tied not simply too well the opposition party you know,

0:48:03.573 --> 0:48:06.693
<v Speaker 3>is all behind this, but actually it being as you say,

0:48:06.733 --> 0:48:09.973
<v Speaker 3>more of a CCP, more of a a Beijing thing.

0:48:11.213 --> 0:48:15.653
<v Speaker 3>And if you're on, if you're not on the lee

0:48:15.853 --> 0:48:20.573
<v Speaker 3>left side of this election, then you've got this concern

0:48:20.693 --> 0:48:26.453
<v Speaker 3>double concern of not simply that the Chinese might be attempting,

0:48:26.493 --> 0:48:29.853
<v Speaker 3>perhaps successfully to interfere with the election, but you've got

0:48:30.133 --> 0:48:36.053
<v Speaker 3>a apparent as all well, an apparent winner of the

0:48:36.053 --> 0:48:40.253
<v Speaker 3>election or to be who's someone who is by very

0:48:40.373 --> 0:48:46.173
<v Speaker 3>it's very nature and history open and sympathetic to that side.

0:48:46.573 --> 0:48:50.453
<v Speaker 3>That that's part of you know, that far left part

0:48:50.613 --> 0:48:53.013
<v Speaker 3>of the political spectrum all the way you know, from

0:48:53.133 --> 0:48:57.693
<v Speaker 3>China itself. So there's plenty to be We don't know

0:48:57.853 --> 0:49:00.733
<v Speaker 3>a lot in terms of the sort of the bottom

0:49:00.813 --> 0:49:03.093
<v Speaker 3>line here, the tangible stuff, but there's a lot to

0:49:03.133 --> 0:49:05.733
<v Speaker 3>be anxious about at this very late stage.

0:49:06.373 --> 0:49:09.853
<v Speaker 2>The suggestion is that there's a practice run for Taiwan.

0:49:10.813 --> 0:49:14.493
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it could it could, It could well be.

0:49:14.613 --> 0:49:16.893
<v Speaker 3>I mean this is how do you given you know,

0:49:16.933 --> 0:49:18.693
<v Speaker 3>what's happened in Asia and what's happening in the rest

0:49:18.733 --> 0:49:21.013
<v Speaker 3>of the world, and how the Chinese approached these things.

0:49:21.253 --> 0:49:22.413
<v Speaker 3>How could you rule that out.

0:49:22.613 --> 0:49:27.573
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, so the Polish election, that's that's turned out a

0:49:27.573 --> 0:49:28.773
<v Speaker 2>different way, thank goodness.

0:49:30.293 --> 0:49:34.893
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we've had the Trump explicitly Trump endorsed candidate, populist

0:49:35.453 --> 0:49:42.213
<v Speaker 3>anti EEU candidate win. You know, mister Nevrocki pulled it off.

0:49:42.933 --> 0:49:47.253
<v Speaker 3>The polls had him twenty points down not that long ago,

0:49:48.133 --> 0:49:51.493
<v Speaker 3>and the polls up to the election, most of them

0:49:51.533 --> 0:49:55.173
<v Speaker 3>had him losing by several points, you know, close to

0:49:55.213 --> 0:49:57.493
<v Speaker 3>double figures, some of them more than double figures. The

0:49:57.533 --> 0:50:00.653
<v Speaker 3>exit polls on the night had him losing narrowly, but

0:50:00.733 --> 0:50:05.773
<v Speaker 3>had him losing. And guess what, the people spoke differently.

0:50:05.853 --> 0:50:10.053
<v Speaker 3>He won, you buy a couple of points, and even

0:50:10.053 --> 0:50:12.293
<v Speaker 3>though his opponent declared victory as soon as the exit

0:50:12.333 --> 0:50:15.573
<v Speaker 3>polls were announced, which is a little difficult to retract.

0:50:16.853 --> 0:50:18.853
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, no, you have someone who I mean, we

0:50:18.853 --> 0:50:21.893
<v Speaker 3>were told that, you know, the stitch up in Romania

0:50:22.013 --> 0:50:23.973
<v Speaker 3>and the stitch up in Germany, and we were told

0:50:24.013 --> 0:50:27.333
<v Speaker 3>that the Musk endorsements and the Trump endorsements and these

0:50:27.813 --> 0:50:31.333
<v Speaker 3>quote unquote European mega mega style candidates, they just there

0:50:31.413 --> 0:50:34.253
<v Speaker 3>just wasn't. There just wasn't an audience for it in

0:50:34.733 --> 0:50:37.853
<v Speaker 3>sophisticated Europe. But in this case, and an election that

0:50:37.893 --> 0:50:43.053
<v Speaker 3>appears to have been comparatively free and fair, apparently there was.

0:50:44.213 --> 0:50:49.413
<v Speaker 3>And uh so the globalists, the globalist candidate, the pro

0:50:49.533 --> 0:50:55.813
<v Speaker 3>EU sophisticated and centrist likes lots of you know, internal migration,

0:50:55.893 --> 0:50:59.293
<v Speaker 3>in inward migration and all the rest of it that

0:50:59.453 --> 0:51:04.613
<v Speaker 3>everyone in Brussels hoped, assumed expected to win didn't. So

0:51:04.813 --> 0:51:07.333
<v Speaker 3>this is rather a black eye for the Eurocrats and

0:51:07.373 --> 0:51:11.613
<v Speaker 3>the globalists and rather rather puts a smile on the

0:51:11.613 --> 0:51:15.173
<v Speaker 3>face I think of populist and nationalists, anti EU types

0:51:15.253 --> 0:51:18.173
<v Speaker 3>throughout Europe, which I would argue is actually the majority,

0:51:18.373 --> 0:51:21.733
<v Speaker 3>and of course gives the White House nice, nice little

0:51:21.733 --> 0:51:22.413
<v Speaker 3>boost as well.

0:51:23.173 --> 0:51:26.493
<v Speaker 2>So turning attention to well, there's a couple of other

0:51:26.533 --> 0:51:30.213
<v Speaker 2>places we might visit, but to Ukraine and the drone

0:51:30.213 --> 0:51:36.693
<v Speaker 2>attack over the weekend, what sort of reaction might you expect?

0:51:37.133 --> 0:51:40.093
<v Speaker 3>Do you mean both separately from America and from Russia

0:51:40.133 --> 0:51:40.653
<v Speaker 3>that sort.

0:51:40.453 --> 0:51:44.973
<v Speaker 2>Of No, I'm thinking of the reprisal from Russia.

0:51:46.893 --> 0:51:49.213
<v Speaker 3>Well it is, I mean I think it was a

0:51:50.373 --> 0:51:54.333
<v Speaker 3>these attacks are I think at this stage I logical

0:51:54.373 --> 0:51:58.253
<v Speaker 3>and irrational and counterproductive. If from the Ukrainian point of view,

0:51:58.333 --> 0:52:01.533
<v Speaker 3>forget about sort of a wider picture, wider view of

0:52:01.573 --> 0:52:05.493
<v Speaker 3>what's going on in the world and in Europe, they

0:52:05.653 --> 0:52:12.173
<v Speaker 3>certainly risk a sort of large response, asymmetrical response from

0:52:12.213 --> 0:52:15.253
<v Speaker 3>the Russians. I mean, it's one of the things, you know.

0:52:15.333 --> 0:52:17.453
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm saying this. Probably most of your audiences

0:52:17.533 --> 0:52:19.453
<v Speaker 3>think I'm crazy for saying it, and certainly most people

0:52:19.533 --> 0:52:21.773
<v Speaker 3>do when I say it, whatever side of the political

0:52:21.813 --> 0:52:24.133
<v Speaker 3>fence they're on. But you know, the assumption all along

0:52:24.213 --> 0:52:28.933
<v Speaker 3>has been that if only Putin wasn't so, you know,

0:52:29.013 --> 0:52:31.813
<v Speaker 3>totally in control of everything in Russia, then all the

0:52:31.853 --> 0:52:34.813
<v Speaker 3>other saner heads would apply and things wouldn't be as

0:52:35.213 --> 0:52:39.853
<v Speaker 3>tough on Ukraine. When I have always argued that perversely,

0:52:39.893 --> 0:52:41.613
<v Speaker 3>you have to be glad it's not Putin and not

0:52:41.813 --> 0:52:45.933
<v Speaker 3>somebody else, because things would have gone quite differently if

0:52:45.973 --> 0:52:47.333
<v Speaker 3>they've been the case. And I think this is a

0:52:47.373 --> 0:52:49.893
<v Speaker 3>time where maybe my theory we put to the test.

0:52:51.013 --> 0:52:54.533
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be hard for Putin not to you

0:52:54.653 --> 0:53:03.333
<v Speaker 3>might say, overreact given domestic pressures, but I don't think

0:53:03.373 --> 0:53:06.213
<v Speaker 3>he wants to, because I think he sees the larger

0:53:06.333 --> 0:53:09.453
<v Speaker 3>picture in his own in his country self interest, and

0:53:09.493 --> 0:53:14.053
<v Speaker 3>I think he is at least open to whatever Trump

0:53:14.493 --> 0:53:17.013
<v Speaker 3>will advise him. And we know that Trump will advise

0:53:17.093 --> 0:53:21.373
<v Speaker 3>him not to, you know, get carried away in the moment.

0:53:23.133 --> 0:53:26.973
<v Speaker 3>And so you've got it's interesting what's happening in America,

0:53:27.053 --> 0:53:30.533
<v Speaker 3>and it's just in terms of trying to predict and

0:53:30.653 --> 0:53:34.133
<v Speaker 3>fear what the Russian response will be. I think most

0:53:34.173 --> 0:53:38.053
<v Speaker 3>people in America on both sides that is a Republican

0:53:38.173 --> 0:53:43.973
<v Speaker 3>democratic side, Trump's side. Other side is they assume that

0:53:44.013 --> 0:53:48.173
<v Speaker 3>the Russians are going to go heavy following this, and

0:53:49.413 --> 0:53:53.773
<v Speaker 3>the Trump supporters really fear that this is going to

0:53:53.813 --> 0:53:56.693
<v Speaker 3>make it so hard for Trump to get out of

0:53:56.973 --> 0:53:58.973
<v Speaker 3>you get America out of Ukraine, and get this thing

0:53:59.293 --> 0:54:02.333
<v Speaker 3>over with in a reasonable period of time without you know,

0:54:02.333 --> 0:54:05.853
<v Speaker 3>it's therefore going to have negative consequences for him politically.

0:54:06.013 --> 0:54:08.813
<v Speaker 3>And then you've got the folks, the anti Trump folks,

0:54:09.253 --> 0:54:15.693
<v Speaker 3>who are actually hoping that put and Ova reacts because

0:54:15.773 --> 0:54:19.693
<v Speaker 3>then this thing can keep going right and we can

0:54:19.813 --> 0:54:22.893
<v Speaker 3>keep pushing, you know, we believe in the in the

0:54:22.933 --> 0:54:25.533
<v Speaker 3>right direction, and that's very much the view, you know,

0:54:25.573 --> 0:54:28.933
<v Speaker 3>in the corridors of power in Western Europe, So which

0:54:29.013 --> 0:54:31.973
<v Speaker 3>makes you the cynical among us think, well, this is

0:54:32.133 --> 0:54:34.973
<v Speaker 3>irrational and logical thing that Ukraine did at this point.

0:54:35.693 --> 0:54:37.933
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they weren't the ones deciding what was going to

0:54:37.973 --> 0:54:39.813
<v Speaker 3>be done. It would be the first time in the

0:54:39.893 --> 0:54:44.253
<v Speaker 3>last three years. So yeah, I mean all to be decided, obviously,

0:54:44.293 --> 0:54:47.613
<v Speaker 3>but it's a I think really unnecessarily is that we're

0:54:47.613 --> 0:54:52.493
<v Speaker 3>in an unnecessarily precarious moment when it looked as if

0:54:53.213 --> 0:54:56.613
<v Speaker 3>we were going to get somewhere to ending this madness

0:54:56.693 --> 0:54:57.693
<v Speaker 3>sooner rather than later.

0:54:58.453 --> 0:55:01.333
<v Speaker 2>I'd suggest that I'm not saying anything that I don't

0:55:01.373 --> 0:55:03.173
<v Speaker 2>think anybody else was thought of, to be honest, but

0:55:03.373 --> 0:55:06.613
<v Speaker 2>I'd suggest this war is, if it wasn't at the beginning,

0:55:06.653 --> 0:55:09.933
<v Speaker 2>has become a fast How can you how can you

0:55:10.013 --> 0:55:13.133
<v Speaker 2>be holding peace talks at the same time as you

0:55:13.373 --> 0:55:17.893
<v Speaker 2>as you're bombing the proverbial out of out of your opposition.

0:55:18.413 --> 0:55:23.413
<v Speaker 2>It's it's just, it's just it's not horrific, it's not horrendous.

0:55:23.773 --> 0:55:24.893
<v Speaker 2>It's absurd.

0:55:25.533 --> 0:55:29.253
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely absolutely agree.

0:55:29.293 --> 0:55:33.413
<v Speaker 2>More it's like something that that they make out of

0:55:33.653 --> 0:55:38.293
<v Speaker 2>a Hollywood movie from the past anyway as a send up.

0:55:40.053 --> 0:55:43.373
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely absolutely has a it has a it has

0:55:43.413 --> 0:55:45.813
<v Speaker 3>a sort of Peter Seller's quality to it.

0:55:46.933 --> 0:55:49.733
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's yeah, you hit, you hit the nail

0:55:49.773 --> 0:55:52.853
<v Speaker 2>on the head. So the last remaining I think a

0:55:53.093 --> 0:55:57.013
<v Speaker 2>major issue is is what's going on and has been

0:55:57.053 --> 0:55:59.253
<v Speaker 2>going on for so long in the Middle East, in

0:55:59.533 --> 0:56:04.773
<v Speaker 2>and around Gaza in America the Jewish folk are getting

0:56:05.013 --> 0:56:09.493
<v Speaker 2>a really rough time, and there is there is a thought,

0:56:09.533 --> 0:56:11.973
<v Speaker 2>of course that it's only going to get worse, which

0:56:12.093 --> 0:56:16.973
<v Speaker 2>which it could. I have friends who who are Australian

0:56:17.693 --> 0:56:20.813
<v Speaker 2>who are in the same position and very concerned about

0:56:21.253 --> 0:56:25.053
<v Speaker 2>where where things are at. So who is holding the

0:56:25.093 --> 0:56:30.053
<v Speaker 2>strings here or pulling the ropes? And why is it

0:56:30.093 --> 0:56:32.893
<v Speaker 2>still unresolved? Now there's an easy question.

0:56:35.253 --> 0:56:40.973
<v Speaker 3>You just are you are you? Are you looking for

0:56:41.093 --> 0:56:45.253
<v Speaker 3>more comment on the American side of it or in

0:56:45.333 --> 0:56:48.533
<v Speaker 3>the in the Middle East side of it, or are

0:56:48.533 --> 0:56:50.173
<v Speaker 3>the two so intertwined.

0:56:49.653 --> 0:56:51.373
<v Speaker 2>It's exactly they are.

0:56:51.653 --> 0:56:56.453
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, it's yeah, it's it's a it's a combination

0:56:56.613 --> 0:56:58.333
<v Speaker 3>on both sides, isn't it. I mean, in terms of

0:56:58.333 --> 0:57:02.093
<v Speaker 3>the opposition to what Israel has done and been doing

0:57:02.493 --> 0:57:06.253
<v Speaker 3>for what is it eighteen months now, that's a combination.

0:57:07.493 --> 0:57:12.013
<v Speaker 3>And obviously you've got your your your your Palestinian sympathetic

0:57:12.453 --> 0:57:16.693
<v Speaker 3>our world Muslim world. And you've got your Palestinian sort

0:57:16.733 --> 0:57:19.893
<v Speaker 3>of on the on the ground. But in terms of

0:57:19.933 --> 0:57:26.933
<v Speaker 3>the political you know, mojo that that keeps them operating

0:57:27.253 --> 0:57:30.533
<v Speaker 3>as you're talking about Western Europe and North America and

0:57:30.613 --> 0:57:33.693
<v Speaker 3>there it's you've got a combination of the sort of

0:57:33.733 --> 0:57:40.413
<v Speaker 3>progressive lehard left that there's always disliked Israel for all

0:57:40.453 --> 0:57:42.733
<v Speaker 3>kinds of reasons, particularly the fact that Israel, you know,

0:57:43.453 --> 0:57:46.253
<v Speaker 3>the same reason the Soviet Union turned on Israel. Everybody

0:57:46.293 --> 0:57:50.213
<v Speaker 3>thought that Israel would be a kind of socialist country

0:57:50.213 --> 0:57:51.653
<v Speaker 3>and it kind of looked that way or while we

0:57:51.693 --> 0:57:53.493
<v Speaker 3>are and then the Israeli has made a decision they

0:57:53.493 --> 0:57:55.213
<v Speaker 3>were going to go, you know, and go on the

0:57:55.213 --> 0:57:57.573
<v Speaker 3>American route rather than the Soviet route. The Soviets never

0:57:57.613 --> 0:57:59.773
<v Speaker 3>forgave them, and a lot of the Western you know,

0:57:59.893 --> 0:58:04.733
<v Speaker 3>intellectual left never forgave them either. And there's that for sure.

0:58:05.133 --> 0:58:11.773
<v Speaker 3>Then you've got your young college you know, support the downtrodden,

0:58:12.333 --> 0:58:16.173
<v Speaker 3>the oppressed, in this case identified as the Palestinians. You've

0:58:16.213 --> 0:58:19.733
<v Speaker 3>got that which has been very very powerful politically, I

0:58:19.773 --> 0:58:23.453
<v Speaker 3>mean numerically. You put those groups together and the other group. Well,

0:58:24.053 --> 0:58:27.093
<v Speaker 3>the other group is in those two groups, but also separate.

0:58:27.133 --> 0:58:30.773
<v Speaker 3>And that is just a straight anti Semitic, anti Jewish sentiment, right,

0:58:31.733 --> 0:58:35.773
<v Speaker 3>just often crude, often more sophisticatedly expressed. You put all

0:58:35.773 --> 0:58:39.333
<v Speaker 3>those groups together, they make a lot of noise, and

0:58:39.413 --> 0:58:42.893
<v Speaker 3>they can get a crowd out, and they can block things,

0:58:42.973 --> 0:58:45.493
<v Speaker 3>and they can kill people and all this kind of stuff.

0:58:45.693 --> 0:58:48.773
<v Speaker 3>But they're not that many. They don't carry a lot

0:58:48.813 --> 0:58:54.133
<v Speaker 3>of sort of numerical weight. That's because most Americans, and

0:58:54.173 --> 0:58:56.533
<v Speaker 3>we sort of ask these questions all the time, most

0:58:56.573 --> 0:59:04.533
<v Speaker 3>Americans continue to be inherently pro Israel. The Americans are

0:59:04.933 --> 0:59:09.533
<v Speaker 3>much more ambivalent about how this has gone since the

0:59:09.533 --> 0:59:13.053
<v Speaker 3>initial attacks on Israel and then how these radius responses going.

0:59:13.453 --> 0:59:17.293
<v Speaker 3>But they are not sympathetic to the Palestinians in a

0:59:17.333 --> 0:59:21.133
<v Speaker 3>way that they are automatically sympathetic to the Israelis. And

0:59:21.173 --> 0:59:24.373
<v Speaker 3>that is the thing that you know, carries the day

0:59:24.573 --> 0:59:31.933
<v Speaker 3>with most politicians, even most Democrats national on the national stage.

0:59:33.493 --> 0:59:37.013
<v Speaker 3>And you know where it gets interesting, of course, right now,

0:59:37.693 --> 0:59:40.573
<v Speaker 3>is you bring Trump back into it, and there's a

0:59:40.573 --> 0:59:42.413
<v Speaker 3>couple of things going on there. You know, Trump is

0:59:44.413 --> 0:59:50.373
<v Speaker 3>very pro Israel, but his priority has been and is

0:59:50.453 --> 0:59:53.533
<v Speaker 3>and will remain peace in the Middle East, you know,

0:59:53.653 --> 0:59:58.933
<v Speaker 3>hence his very successful outreach to the Arab nations, particularly

0:59:58.973 --> 1:00:02.293
<v Speaker 3>in the Gulf uh and all of that. And so

1:00:02.333 --> 1:00:05.653
<v Speaker 3>what that what that does is it it makes it

1:00:06.253 --> 1:00:12.053
<v Speaker 3>less les given that whatever Israel does, Trump will just

1:00:12.053 --> 1:00:17.733
<v Speaker 3>say great because Trump actually thinks that they have they've

1:00:17.733 --> 1:00:21.813
<v Speaker 3>had that's the right to defend themselves, obviously, but what

1:00:22.013 --> 1:00:25.053
<v Speaker 3>they do on any given day may not necessarily be

1:00:25.133 --> 1:00:28.133
<v Speaker 3>in their own long term self interest. And this gets

1:00:28.173 --> 1:00:33.053
<v Speaker 3>even more complicated by the fact that net Naiu, who

1:00:33.093 --> 1:00:36.533
<v Speaker 3>is very popular on the American right as seen as

1:00:36.533 --> 1:00:39.013
<v Speaker 3>a you know, defender of Israel and a sort of

1:00:39.053 --> 1:00:43.533
<v Speaker 3>holding the line against you know, Muslim extremism and all

1:00:43.533 --> 1:00:46.453
<v Speaker 3>this rest of it, and it's very popular with evangelical

1:00:46.533 --> 1:00:48.973
<v Speaker 3>Christians and who have, you know, remained quite influential in

1:00:48.973 --> 1:00:52.693
<v Speaker 3>American politics. But Trump and Nett Naiu have a have

1:00:52.773 --> 1:00:56.453
<v Speaker 3>an interesting relationship. And one, you know, Trump's someone he

1:00:56.493 --> 1:01:01.493
<v Speaker 3>doesn't forget, he doesn't forget things. And when Biden was

1:01:01.573 --> 1:01:05.453
<v Speaker 3>declared the winner in twenty twenty, the first foreign leader

1:01:05.533 --> 1:01:09.773
<v Speaker 3>to rush to the microphone to say Trump's gone, it's Biden,

1:01:09.893 --> 1:01:13.133
<v Speaker 3>Let's move on, was with him was was Bbe and

1:01:13.613 --> 1:01:15.813
<v Speaker 3>that didn't go over so well. So Trump is at

1:01:15.813 --> 1:01:19.613
<v Speaker 3>a point now where he's starting to lose He's sympathetic,

1:01:20.293 --> 1:01:23.093
<v Speaker 3>very sympathetic Israel's position, but he's started to lose patience

1:01:23.173 --> 1:01:28.893
<v Speaker 3>with the Israeli leadership. And so it's not of it's

1:01:28.933 --> 1:01:33.293
<v Speaker 3>not a given that whatever Israel does going forward is

1:01:33.333 --> 1:01:36.013
<v Speaker 3>going to be robber stamped by the White House the

1:01:36.053 --> 1:01:39.853
<v Speaker 3>way that under Biden, rightly or wrongly, correctly or incorrectly,

1:01:40.213 --> 1:01:44.533
<v Speaker 3>it was viewed generally by the anti Israeli folks as

1:01:44.813 --> 1:01:47.013
<v Speaker 3>but why does Biden, why does she just go along

1:01:47.053 --> 1:01:50.613
<v Speaker 3>with whatever Israel says? And it's it's just like with

1:01:50.813 --> 1:01:54.133
<v Speaker 3>Ukraine and Russia. Trump's priority is to end what he've

1:01:54.213 --> 1:01:56.333
<v Speaker 3>used a sort of end the madness and the madness,

1:01:57.213 --> 1:02:02.933
<v Speaker 3>and he may take some interesting turns rhetorically and substantively

1:02:03.373 --> 1:02:07.693
<v Speaker 3>to try to get things closer to where he thinks

1:02:07.733 --> 1:02:10.453
<v Speaker 3>they should be, which might end up surprising a few

1:02:10.453 --> 1:02:12.453
<v Speaker 3>folks when it comes to Israel and Gaza.

1:02:13.413 --> 1:02:17.693
<v Speaker 2>There was a comment from your ambassador, the American Ambassador

1:02:17.773 --> 1:02:22.813
<v Speaker 2>to Israel. There was made i think overnight our time.

1:02:24.013 --> 1:02:31.573
<v Speaker 2>Most recently, it was that if the French are so

1:02:31.693 --> 1:02:35.653
<v Speaker 2>because the French had taken a turn against Israel again,

1:02:35.693 --> 1:02:39.333
<v Speaker 2>which is not unusual, but the French have suggested again

1:02:40.053 --> 1:02:45.893
<v Speaker 2>that there has to be a Palestinian state, and the

1:02:46.213 --> 1:02:49.773
<v Speaker 2>ambassadors whose name escapes me, the ex governor of Mike

1:02:49.813 --> 1:02:54.973
<v Speaker 2>Huckabee Huckerbye, thank you that Huckaby has suggested that if

1:02:55.613 --> 1:02:59.813
<v Speaker 2>France is so keen for the Palestinians to have their

1:02:59.853 --> 1:03:03.613
<v Speaker 2>own state, they should carpet out of the Coke de jeur.

1:03:05.493 --> 1:03:05.693
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:03:08.653 --> 1:03:11.013
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was really thought that was a beautiful,

1:03:11.133 --> 1:03:12.373
<v Speaker 2>beautiful way to deal with it.

1:03:13.693 --> 1:03:15.413
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. No, I mean you can understand where it's coming

1:03:15.453 --> 1:03:18.013
<v Speaker 3>from because you've got, you know, for a long time

1:03:19.213 --> 1:03:22.653
<v Speaker 3>the notion of a two state solution Israel Israel and

1:03:22.693 --> 1:03:25.653
<v Speaker 3>then you know Land put set aside for the Palestinians

1:03:25.653 --> 1:03:28.013
<v Speaker 3>would be the way. You know, most sophisticated people thought, well,

1:03:28.013 --> 1:03:30.093
<v Speaker 3>that makes sense. Everyone gets most of what they want,

1:03:30.453 --> 1:03:33.493
<v Speaker 3>and we can you know, peace will be every rain

1:03:33.573 --> 1:03:35.413
<v Speaker 3>and we can just move on. But of course it's

1:03:35.413 --> 1:03:39.813
<v Speaker 3>become blindingly obvious in recent decades and years that two

1:03:39.813 --> 1:03:44.893
<v Speaker 3>state solution there is not going to work because the

1:03:45.373 --> 1:03:47.413
<v Speaker 3>side you'd be giving the second state to the past

1:03:47.413 --> 1:03:49.293
<v Speaker 3>of the inside is not really interested in there being

1:03:49.293 --> 1:03:51.693
<v Speaker 3>two states. They want one state that doesn't include Israel.

1:03:52.813 --> 1:03:56.573
<v Speaker 3>Whether you think that's historically valid or not, that's you know,

1:03:56.773 --> 1:04:02.853
<v Speaker 3>that's that's their extreme position, which most Palestinian support. And

1:04:02.893 --> 1:04:04.933
<v Speaker 3>you can see, you can you can you can understand

1:04:04.933 --> 1:04:10.893
<v Speaker 3>appreciate Huckaby's frustration at sophisticated you left the Europeans lobbying

1:04:10.973 --> 1:04:15.013
<v Speaker 3>rhetorical barbles at Israel but not being willing to do

1:04:15.053 --> 1:04:20.093
<v Speaker 3>anything about it and not really being the ones who

1:04:20.213 --> 1:04:22.933
<v Speaker 3>kind of seriously deal have to deal with the blowback

1:04:22.973 --> 1:04:26.933
<v Speaker 3>in all kinds of ways. And I think also further,

1:04:27.173 --> 1:04:30.133
<v Speaker 3>I was just saying about Trump's sort of evolution on

1:04:30.253 --> 1:04:33.653
<v Speaker 3>israel Is, it's a way the Americans can keep the

1:04:33.773 --> 1:04:38.613
<v Speaker 3>Israelis off balance because see Hackebe's an eel, very serious

1:04:38.653 --> 1:04:42.693
<v Speaker 3>evangelical Christian and that's his political base in America and

1:04:42.733 --> 1:04:46.013
<v Speaker 3>why he was He's been a very successful politician in America,

1:04:46.173 --> 1:04:51.813
<v Speaker 3>and so he is a natural diplomat in that spot,

1:04:51.853 --> 1:04:55.933
<v Speaker 3>in that context, in the current context too very much

1:04:55.933 --> 1:04:59.613
<v Speaker 3>stand shoulder to shoulder with Israeli government and reassure them

1:04:59.813 --> 1:05:03.253
<v Speaker 3>that America's ultimately got their back. Well, Trump, from time

1:05:03.293 --> 1:05:06.613
<v Speaker 3>to time is appearing to sort of maybe take a

1:05:06.653 --> 1:05:09.853
<v Speaker 3>step or two to the side, and I suspect that

1:05:09.853 --> 1:05:13.453
<v Speaker 3>this kind of thing will continue. And it's both It

1:05:13.493 --> 1:05:17.813
<v Speaker 3>both reflects I think Huckerby's own opinions and Trump's own

1:05:17.813 --> 1:05:21.413
<v Speaker 3>opinions which aren't which overlap a lot but aren't identical.

1:05:21.533 --> 1:05:25.693
<v Speaker 3>But it also it plays to Trump's what I would

1:05:25.773 --> 1:05:28.613
<v Speaker 3>view as one of Trump's strengths in foreign policy, which

1:05:28.653 --> 1:05:32.893
<v Speaker 3>is he by design likes to keep everybody unsure of

1:05:32.933 --> 1:05:36.253
<v Speaker 3>what he's actually thinking and doing. I mean, he gave

1:05:36.493 --> 1:05:38.733
<v Speaker 3>during the election. Right at the end of the election,

1:05:38.773 --> 1:05:41.213
<v Speaker 3>he had this long two three hour interview with Joe

1:05:41.533 --> 1:05:45.373
<v Speaker 3>Rogan the Huge podcast in America, and in talking about

1:05:45.373 --> 1:05:50.053
<v Speaker 3>foreign policy, Trump said, you know, basically, I'm paraphrasing whatever

1:05:50.093 --> 1:05:53.893
<v Speaker 3>I say publicly about the negotiations going on and this

1:05:53.973 --> 1:05:56.493
<v Speaker 3>kind of thing. I'm never going to tell you publicly

1:05:56.613 --> 1:05:58.613
<v Speaker 3>what I think or what I'm going to do. It's

1:05:58.693 --> 1:06:02.893
<v Speaker 3>always disguised, right, which some of us think is very

1:06:03.013 --> 1:06:06.533
<v Speaker 3>sound strategy. Other people find out bizarre that he wouldn't

1:06:06.573 --> 1:06:09.933
<v Speaker 3>just show his cards for you. You know, the opposition

1:06:10.053 --> 1:06:12.973
<v Speaker 3>sees the cards or whatever it might be, guesses the cards.

1:06:13.093 --> 1:06:18.213
<v Speaker 3>So this this kind of this good cop bad cop,

1:06:18.213 --> 1:06:20.853
<v Speaker 3>which I think is developing visa of the Israel from

1:06:20.853 --> 1:06:23.013
<v Speaker 3>the White House, and you will see more of it. Howker,

1:06:23.093 --> 1:06:26.293
<v Speaker 3>beyond the ground, it's easier. It's harder for him to

1:06:27.613 --> 1:06:31.013
<v Speaker 3>say difficult things when he's there. It's easy for Trump

1:06:31.053 --> 1:06:32.773
<v Speaker 3>to do it from a distance. And I think this

1:06:32.893 --> 1:06:37.293
<v Speaker 3>sort of tag team will will continue very good.

1:06:37.453 --> 1:06:39.773
<v Speaker 2>A couple of things to wind it up, and I'm

1:06:39.813 --> 1:06:42.733
<v Speaker 2>springing this on you, sorry, but I am. When I

1:06:42.773 --> 1:06:45.253
<v Speaker 2>finished this question, I want to know the first thing

1:06:45.293 --> 1:06:49.493
<v Speaker 2>that comes to mind if anything, is there something or

1:06:49.573 --> 1:06:54.453
<v Speaker 2>anything that is working its way into the world's immediate

1:06:54.533 --> 1:06:57.533
<v Speaker 2>future that is not getting attention?

1:06:59.173 --> 1:07:03.293
<v Speaker 3>Mmmm? That's that's that is a good question. I think that,

1:07:05.253 --> 1:07:08.133
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, anything, anything I say is getting

1:07:08.173 --> 1:07:11.613
<v Speaker 3>it attention to some extent. But I think in terms

1:07:11.693 --> 1:07:15.293
<v Speaker 3>of relative weight, I would say, are going to be

1:07:15.293 --> 1:07:20.093
<v Speaker 3>pulled this way. AI is and will be super important

1:07:20.093 --> 1:07:22.373
<v Speaker 3>for good or for ill, but it's getting tons and

1:07:22.413 --> 1:07:27.133
<v Speaker 3>tons and tons of attention. I think that financial freedom,

1:07:27.613 --> 1:07:35.493
<v Speaker 3>that bucket of issues, is getting attention, but nothing like

1:07:35.533 --> 1:07:38.933
<v Speaker 3>as much as it should. You know, what happens with crypto,

1:07:39.133 --> 1:07:45.093
<v Speaker 3>what happens with the digital currencies, what happens about financial privacy,

1:07:46.093 --> 1:07:50.013
<v Speaker 3>All of the stuff that's been going on and every

1:07:50.093 --> 1:07:53.053
<v Speaker 3>now and then pops up, but it's really really important

1:07:53.133 --> 1:07:58.773
<v Speaker 3>to how everyone leaves, lives, their daily financial lives. All

1:07:58.813 --> 1:08:00.453
<v Speaker 3>of that. Some of it's going in a good direction,

1:08:00.533 --> 1:08:01.933
<v Speaker 3>some of it isn't. I mean, most of us going

1:08:01.933 --> 1:08:03.973
<v Speaker 3>in terrible direction for a few years, I would argue

1:08:03.973 --> 1:08:06.653
<v Speaker 3>in most parts of the world, all of that wrapped

1:08:06.733 --> 1:08:10.573
<v Speaker 3>up with the old you know, Chinese social credit scores,

1:08:10.693 --> 1:08:14.173
<v Speaker 3>which some of our European and North American friends, you know,

1:08:14.253 --> 1:08:16.973
<v Speaker 3>Mark Karney and the you just love that stuff. You

1:08:17.053 --> 1:08:19.333
<v Speaker 3>can't get social credit scores going. And that, of course

1:08:19.413 --> 1:08:23.013
<v Speaker 3>is all tied in with your financial score as as

1:08:23.053 --> 1:08:28.173
<v Speaker 3>decided by government bureaucrat. So all of that that bucket

1:08:28.733 --> 1:08:33.893
<v Speaker 3>of how you how you're allowed to spend your money,

1:08:34.253 --> 1:08:38.613
<v Speaker 3>account for your money, receive your money. Who does you know?

1:08:39.013 --> 1:08:41.973
<v Speaker 3>Is it? Is it? Do you have autonom financial autonomy

1:08:41.973 --> 1:08:48.133
<v Speaker 3>as an individual anymore? Should you will the government? Governments

1:08:48.173 --> 1:08:53.413
<v Speaker 3>determine uh your access to your money? What is the relationship?

1:08:53.613 --> 1:08:57.013
<v Speaker 3>Is the relationship with your financial institution more of one

1:08:57.093 --> 1:09:00.013
<v Speaker 3>where they are the messenger for the government or are

1:09:00.053 --> 1:09:03.573
<v Speaker 3>they also autonomous and you, You and they have a

1:09:03.653 --> 1:09:06.013
<v Speaker 3>relation have relationships with the government. You know, So which

1:09:06.053 --> 1:09:08.253
<v Speaker 3>way the arrow is going? This is not very sexy

1:09:08.333 --> 1:09:11.293
<v Speaker 3>answer late, and I apologize, but I think that all

1:09:11.373 --> 1:09:17.853
<v Speaker 3>of that is going to have a tangible impact on everyone,

1:09:19.093 --> 1:09:22.093
<v Speaker 3>and it's just not getting enough play, partly because it's

1:09:22.093 --> 1:09:26.213
<v Speaker 3>not sexy enough, and a large part because most of

1:09:26.253 --> 1:09:30.213
<v Speaker 3>the media is either ignorant of it, unable to understand it,

1:09:30.413 --> 1:09:33.093
<v Speaker 3>and those that are actually quite happy with the notion

1:09:33.573 --> 1:09:37.733
<v Speaker 3>of more control from the top and less autolemy at

1:09:37.733 --> 1:09:41.293
<v Speaker 3>the bottom. And so therefore, why write about something that's

1:09:41.333 --> 1:09:43.333
<v Speaker 3>actually moving in the right direction.

1:09:44.013 --> 1:09:47.213
<v Speaker 2>I have to tell you you're wrong in what you

1:09:47.253 --> 1:09:51.773
<v Speaker 2>say about it being not sexy or boring or whatever.

1:09:52.253 --> 1:09:54.813
<v Speaker 2>It is one of the most important things that I

1:09:54.853 --> 1:09:59.293
<v Speaker 2>congratulate you on targeting it, and in fact, at some stage,

1:09:59.333 --> 1:10:01.613
<v Speaker 2>and they're not too distant future, we might do a

1:10:01.653 --> 1:10:04.493
<v Speaker 2>podcast on that and some surrounding matters. The other thing

1:10:04.773 --> 1:10:07.573
<v Speaker 2>is so thank you for that. The other thing is

1:10:08.413 --> 1:10:12.933
<v Speaker 2>I'm sitting here listening to you and thinking, why doesn't

1:10:12.933 --> 1:10:15.893
<v Speaker 2>this man write a book? What's the answer? I mean,

1:10:15.933 --> 1:10:16.893
<v Speaker 2>why why aren't you?

1:10:16.973 --> 1:10:17.133
<v Speaker 3>Why?

1:10:17.533 --> 1:10:20.333
<v Speaker 2>Why when are you going to write a book? Then well,

1:10:20.333 --> 1:10:21.573
<v Speaker 2>I have I have.

1:10:22.853 --> 1:10:25.693
<v Speaker 3>I put my hand up. I've actually written co written

1:10:25.733 --> 1:10:31.093
<v Speaker 3>a number of books, most of them on I say,

1:10:31.213 --> 1:10:36.493
<v Speaker 3>esoteric toss topics, but very specific, you know, policy regulatory topics,

1:10:37.053 --> 1:10:40.733
<v Speaker 3>with with one one exception, not to bore you here,

1:10:40.893 --> 1:10:45.813
<v Speaker 3>belabor it. Twenty early twenty sixteen, I wrote a book

1:10:46.053 --> 1:10:48.613
<v Speaker 3>on a sort of strategy book on American foreign policy

1:10:48.853 --> 1:10:51.093
<v Speaker 3>as a kind of guide to it. Then there's the

1:10:51.253 --> 1:10:54.773
<v Speaker 3>sixteen people running for the Republican nomination praying that one

1:10:54.813 --> 1:10:57.293
<v Speaker 3>of them would would make it through, and it's it's

1:10:57.333 --> 1:10:59.973
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's it's a it's a critique of Obama

1:11:00.053 --> 1:11:02.613
<v Speaker 3>and Clinton foreign policy. And then they're like, you know,

1:11:02.693 --> 1:11:04.733
<v Speaker 3>this is I think, how this is what makes sense?

1:11:05.293 --> 1:11:08.293
<v Speaker 3>You could do it better? But no, it's I thought

1:11:08.373 --> 1:11:10.933
<v Speaker 3>about it more recently in terms of the recent elections

1:11:11.213 --> 1:11:14.213
<v Speaker 3>and all that's, all the changes, all the popular culture changes,

1:11:14.533 --> 1:11:18.013
<v Speaker 3>or the polling we've done, all of that. I haven't

1:11:18.053 --> 1:11:20.933
<v Speaker 3>probably had my excuses. I haven't had the time to

1:11:20.933 --> 1:11:23.573
<v Speaker 3>really zero in on what makes the most where I

1:11:23.573 --> 1:11:28.013
<v Speaker 3>could offer the most value, and where the greatest interest

1:11:28.053 --> 1:11:33.333
<v Speaker 3>would be whether those two could cross paths, and so

1:11:34.133 --> 1:11:36.773
<v Speaker 3>we haven't been there yet. But I appreciate you you

1:11:36.893 --> 1:11:40.293
<v Speaker 3>thinking that at this stage I have it in me.

1:11:40.373 --> 1:11:43.013
<v Speaker 2>Since I've said that, everyone listening is saying the same thing,

1:11:43.213 --> 1:11:48.813
<v Speaker 2>because your bank of knowledge and wisdom in many cases is.

1:11:49.653 --> 1:11:54.093
<v Speaker 3>Right up there. And as always lead You're very kind.

1:11:53.933 --> 1:11:55.813
<v Speaker 2>And I'm looking up at my bookshelf at the moment

1:11:55.853 --> 1:11:59.413
<v Speaker 2>I see the deaths of money.

1:12:00.253 --> 1:12:05.893
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yes, sorry, and just does a circle back cash,

1:12:06.573 --> 1:12:10.173
<v Speaker 3>you know, the plot to eliminate from our lives. That's

1:12:10.173 --> 1:12:13.333
<v Speaker 3>one of the huge battles that's massively underreported.

1:12:13.693 --> 1:12:18.973
<v Speaker 2>Patrick. I've been on that case for a decade at least,

1:12:19.373 --> 1:12:23.453
<v Speaker 2>and I agree with you entirely, and I have and

1:12:23.573 --> 1:12:27.333
<v Speaker 2>I have, I might say had I believe a small

1:12:27.373 --> 1:12:32.813
<v Speaker 2>amount of influence here in convincing people that they should

1:12:32.853 --> 1:12:38.653
<v Speaker 2>always have cash with them, and that well the blackout,

1:12:38.893 --> 1:12:43.413
<v Speaker 2>of course in Spain has led weight to that as well, hugely.

1:12:44.133 --> 1:12:48.493
<v Speaker 3>As soone much wiser than me has told me, always

1:12:48.493 --> 1:12:52.893
<v Speaker 3>remember Patrick, never in writing, always in cash. I love it.

1:12:53.533 --> 1:12:57.173
<v Speaker 2>So once again you've excelled. Thank you kindly, and I

1:12:57.213 --> 1:12:59.773
<v Speaker 2>trust that we shall talk soon. You're going back to

1:12:59.813 --> 1:13:02.853
<v Speaker 2>the conference where you go we'll have been going the

1:13:02.933 --> 1:13:04.733
<v Speaker 2>last few years in the Middle East.

1:13:04.813 --> 1:13:07.453
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I will be. I'll be at the Future Investment

1:13:07.493 --> 1:13:12.813
<v Speaker 3>Initiative Conference in Read in October. In late September, I

1:13:12.853 --> 1:13:17.013
<v Speaker 3>will be uh at a speaking at a business conference

1:13:17.173 --> 1:13:17.893
<v Speaker 3>in Dubai.

1:13:18.573 --> 1:13:21.813
<v Speaker 2>I find that interesting. I expect you to expect you

1:13:21.853 --> 1:13:24.173
<v Speaker 2>to carry a bed or a sign that says cash

1:13:24.333 --> 1:13:24.653
<v Speaker 2>is king.

1:13:28.013 --> 1:13:30.333
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, Well, the thing is when you when you're in

1:13:30.373 --> 1:13:34.453
<v Speaker 3>a when you're in a Middle Eastern bazaar, the haggling

1:13:34.533 --> 1:13:37.773
<v Speaker 3>is you know, is is essential to the whole experience,

1:13:38.293 --> 1:13:45.773
<v Speaker 3>and so cash cash often is king. Fortunately, refreshingly, reassuringly.

1:13:46.693 --> 1:13:49.893
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, Patrick, once again, thank you heaps, and we'll talk

1:13:50.213 --> 1:13:51.613
<v Speaker 2>in the not too distant.

1:13:51.933 --> 1:13:54.893
<v Speaker 3>It's been my great pleasure to lighton my good wishes

1:13:54.933 --> 1:14:14.413
<v Speaker 3>to you and your fine audience. Thank you so much, missus.

1:14:14.413 --> 1:14:15.933
<v Speaker 2>Producer. Are you ready later?

1:14:16.053 --> 1:14:16.893
<v Speaker 4>I'm all he is.

1:14:16.973 --> 1:14:21.653
<v Speaker 2>Podcast to eighty seven the mail Room and it's been

1:14:21.653 --> 1:14:26.013
<v Speaker 2>a holiday weekend. You can tell now from Barry. I

1:14:26.093 --> 1:14:28.933
<v Speaker 2>listened to podcasts to eighty six with much interest. Nigel

1:14:29.053 --> 1:14:33.773
<v Speaker 2>and Justin were suitably engaged or engaging as you did

1:14:33.853 --> 1:14:40.253
<v Speaker 2>quite well yourself. I love won't won't I won't anybody

1:14:40.253 --> 1:14:45.213
<v Speaker 2>put in brackets for what it's worth here are some

1:14:45.293 --> 1:14:48.733
<v Speaker 2>of my thoughts which followed from the discussion. The development

1:14:48.733 --> 1:14:51.693
<v Speaker 2>of AI has been predicted for many years, often the

1:14:51.733 --> 1:14:55.453
<v Speaker 2>basis of some very good sci fi themes. It's an

1:14:55.493 --> 1:14:59.813
<v Speaker 2>inevitable evolution of human development, something to which we adapt,

1:15:00.173 --> 1:15:04.133
<v Speaker 2>else we become irrelevant. By the way, I'm seventy six

1:15:04.173 --> 1:15:06.373
<v Speaker 2>as I write this, Gosh, you're getting on a bit.

1:15:07.093 --> 1:15:09.973
<v Speaker 2>Simply put, some all jobs will go and new ones

1:15:10.013 --> 1:15:14.573
<v Speaker 2>will emerge, a timeless cycle. Carefully developed and managed AI

1:15:14.693 --> 1:15:18.213
<v Speaker 2>should be a highly valuable tool for humankind. However, there

1:15:18.293 --> 1:15:22.773
<v Speaker 2>are obvious pros and cons, as with anything of significance,

1:15:23.373 --> 1:15:27.773
<v Speaker 2>so some pros that are evident. The ability of AI

1:15:27.893 --> 1:15:31.173
<v Speaker 2>to rapidly sift through data is a clear advantage, time

1:15:31.213 --> 1:15:37.133
<v Speaker 2>wastage minimized with increased chances of breakthrough discoveries. Neutrality, a

1:15:37.253 --> 1:15:41.373
<v Speaker 2>dispassionate AI review of data could be useful With the

1:15:41.493 --> 1:15:45.933
<v Speaker 2>human emotions and bias absent, here's the butt. Would all

1:15:46.053 --> 1:15:52.373
<v Speaker 2>programmers avoid bias? Could judges become AI? That might be

1:15:52.413 --> 1:15:56.573
<v Speaker 2>a pro or a con. A pro risk management an

1:15:56.613 --> 1:15:59.933
<v Speaker 2>AI ability to scan and consider a situation or incident

1:16:00.013 --> 1:16:03.373
<v Speaker 2>prior to the deployment of humans who might otherwise be

1:16:03.493 --> 1:16:07.173
<v Speaker 2>injured or killed is a big plus potentially that would

1:16:07.173 --> 1:16:11.893
<v Speaker 2>apply domestically as well as militarily. On the subject of

1:16:11.933 --> 1:16:15.373
<v Speaker 2>the military, I can imagine that the structures of conflict

1:16:15.413 --> 1:16:19.533
<v Speaker 2>will change, and certainly weapons will keep pace. Instead of

1:16:19.533 --> 1:16:22.293
<v Speaker 2>smashing an opponent to a mass of bodies in rubble,

1:16:22.853 --> 1:16:26.213
<v Speaker 2>an AI assisted victory might see a collapse of the

1:16:26.293 --> 1:16:31.773
<v Speaker 2>loser's systems and societal structure, with the victor taking over

1:16:31.853 --> 1:16:37.333
<v Speaker 2>from there. Domination would properly follow tradition, though subjugation, new laws,

1:16:37.453 --> 1:16:42.053
<v Speaker 2>new taxes, indoctrination, then the disappearance of trouble makers and

1:16:42.213 --> 1:16:48.093
<v Speaker 2>so on cons really depend on one's imagination. Human nature

1:16:48.133 --> 1:16:50.693
<v Speaker 2>means that we can expect a CD side to emerge

1:16:50.693 --> 1:16:54.573
<v Speaker 2>as well as illegal activity. Criminals seek power and fortune

1:16:54.933 --> 1:16:57.813
<v Speaker 2>as though they will adapt and turn the technologies to

1:16:57.893 --> 1:17:01.773
<v Speaker 2>their advantage when they can. Others will simply seek power

1:17:01.813 --> 1:17:07.173
<v Speaker 2>and control because they desire such things as Goebils infamously remarked,

1:17:07.493 --> 1:17:10.773
<v Speaker 2>propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated a

1:17:10.853 --> 1:17:15.413
<v Speaker 2>confident that they're acting on their own free will. In closing,

1:17:15.493 --> 1:17:21.493
<v Speaker 2>carefully considered regulation is essential, ideally agreed across international boundaries.

1:17:21.893 --> 1:17:24.293
<v Speaker 2>I apologize for the length of this email, Laton, thank

1:17:24.293 --> 1:17:27.613
<v Speaker 2>you again for these fascinating discussions. I am already looking

1:17:27.613 --> 1:17:30.413
<v Speaker 2>forward to the next issue with warm regards to missus

1:17:30.413 --> 1:17:32.213
<v Speaker 2>producer from Barry.

1:17:32.213 --> 1:17:35.933
<v Speaker 4>That's so nice, Barry, Thank you, Laton. Bill says your

1:17:36.133 --> 1:17:40.253
<v Speaker 4>AI podcast with Nigel and Justin was probably the most

1:17:40.293 --> 1:17:45.053
<v Speaker 4>important and incredible podcast of yours I've heard, and just

1:17:45.133 --> 1:17:48.613
<v Speaker 4>Layton as a side note, I know not of Justin,

1:17:48.893 --> 1:17:53.613
<v Speaker 4>but Nigel was our news editor and a journalist back

1:17:53.613 --> 1:17:57.733
<v Speaker 4>in the day, and a very very very fine news

1:17:57.813 --> 1:18:01.533
<v Speaker 4>editor and journalist. He was too, and an incredibly nice man,

1:18:01.613 --> 1:18:04.213
<v Speaker 4>so it was so nice to hear that. And then

1:18:04.293 --> 1:18:07.813
<v Speaker 4>Bill goes on to say, and I'm a regular listener

1:18:07.853 --> 1:18:10.253
<v Speaker 4>although this this is the first time I have emailed you.

1:18:10.813 --> 1:18:15.413
<v Speaker 4>What clever, interesting, knowledgeable and insightful people. I had no

1:18:15.533 --> 1:18:18.613
<v Speaker 4>idea about any of this, not at all. That is

1:18:18.653 --> 1:18:22.253
<v Speaker 4>why your podcasts are so critical. We all need to

1:18:22.293 --> 1:18:24.453
<v Speaker 4>know about this. So I have passed on the podcast

1:18:24.533 --> 1:18:28.453
<v Speaker 4>to others. Please have them back regularly the next few years.

1:18:28.493 --> 1:18:31.813
<v Speaker 4>Sounds scary, and Bill goes on to say, I have

1:18:31.853 --> 1:18:35.293
<v Speaker 4>a lovely longtime wife. I don't need an AI companion.

1:18:35.413 --> 1:18:38.613
<v Speaker 4>But it is obvious from what Nigel and Justin said

1:18:38.653 --> 1:18:42.573
<v Speaker 4>we are all in for intrusion from AI. Thank you,

1:18:42.613 --> 1:18:45.333
<v Speaker 4>says Bill. I can't stop thinking about it. I had

1:18:45.373 --> 1:18:45.973
<v Speaker 4>no idea.

1:18:46.173 --> 1:18:49.293
<v Speaker 2>Don't lose any sleep, Bill, it's not worth it. But

1:18:49.773 --> 1:18:53.413
<v Speaker 2>it's a good letter. Speaking of speaking of such things,

1:18:53.573 --> 1:18:56.973
<v Speaker 2>I got a very loud complaint, shall we say, from

1:18:56.973 --> 1:19:02.053
<v Speaker 2>Australia from someone over it. I said, well, write a letter,

1:19:02.493 --> 1:19:06.253
<v Speaker 2>haven't received it. Maybe they're all just mouth What were

1:19:06.293 --> 1:19:09.213
<v Speaker 2>they complaining about about the about the AI?

1:19:10.173 --> 1:19:10.933
<v Speaker 3>What was their complain?

1:19:13.333 --> 1:19:17.293
<v Speaker 2>Well, some people are and some people are inclined to

1:19:17.333 --> 1:19:19.413
<v Speaker 2>be bizarre and some people are entitled to people. What

1:19:19.413 --> 1:19:24.053
<v Speaker 2>were they wanted to hear? Do you know didn't get

1:19:24.093 --> 1:19:28.733
<v Speaker 2>the letter? Okay, that's queerest folk. The fact that he's

1:19:28.733 --> 1:19:31.733
<v Speaker 2>a friend of mine doesn't make any I wondered when

1:19:31.733 --> 1:19:36.813
<v Speaker 2>you might pass that one on now? From John? When

1:19:36.813 --> 1:19:40.333
<v Speaker 2>will they face reality sections of the media? I mean

1:19:40.973 --> 1:19:44.293
<v Speaker 2>good piece by Carl Defraye and Spectator on the seventeenth

1:19:44.333 --> 1:19:48.653
<v Speaker 2>of May and from James Allen. Carl points to New

1:19:48.773 --> 1:19:53.533
<v Speaker 2>Zealand newspaper circulation figures declining to an embarrassing extent. Then

1:19:53.573 --> 1:19:56.053
<v Speaker 2>he goes on and mentions a few things that I

1:19:56.213 --> 1:20:00.253
<v Speaker 2>just might leap out finishes up referring to somebody who

1:20:00.293 --> 1:20:03.533
<v Speaker 2>works in the media, in the paper media, if he

1:20:03.613 --> 1:20:09.053
<v Speaker 2>had any intellectual or moral probity, which is doubtful. He

1:20:09.133 --> 1:20:11.453
<v Speaker 2>knows who the dunces are. Thank you, John.

1:20:13.013 --> 1:20:15.213
<v Speaker 4>Leyden Jin says in twenty twenty two.

1:20:15.173 --> 1:20:17.053
<v Speaker 2>Much he wasn't talking about me.

1:20:17.693 --> 1:20:21.893
<v Speaker 4>Leyden Jin says. In twenty twenty two, Matt Walsh released

1:20:21.893 --> 1:20:25.573
<v Speaker 4>what was possibly the most important documentary in our lifetime,

1:20:25.813 --> 1:20:29.133
<v Speaker 4>What Is a Woman. Within just one year, the documentary

1:20:29.213 --> 1:20:33.133
<v Speaker 4>hit over one hundred and eighty million views. Matt's documentary

1:20:33.213 --> 1:20:35.933
<v Speaker 4>hit the nail on the zeitgeist's head in an age

1:20:35.973 --> 1:20:39.053
<v Speaker 4>where women must shut up while men became women and

1:20:39.173 --> 1:20:44.213
<v Speaker 4>wiped womanhood out of existence. Fast forward to twenty twenty five,

1:20:44.453 --> 1:20:48.453
<v Speaker 4>we have reached another zeitgeist, an age where AI is

1:20:48.493 --> 1:20:53.693
<v Speaker 4>replacing the very essence of humanity. AI is permeating everything

1:20:53.733 --> 1:20:58.933
<v Speaker 4>we do, constantly listening. AI is permeating everything we do,

1:20:59.093 --> 1:21:04.893
<v Speaker 4>constantly listening, constantly learning, constantly growing into an electric showcase

1:21:05.533 --> 1:21:08.893
<v Speaker 4>of the best and worst of humanity combined. I love

1:21:08.973 --> 1:21:11.773
<v Speaker 4>the dynamic feel of your first ever podcast duet with

1:21:11.893 --> 1:21:15.413
<v Speaker 4>Nigel Horricks and Justin Matthews. They really got me thinking

1:21:15.453 --> 1:21:18.373
<v Speaker 4>that AI might well be the alien life form we've

1:21:18.413 --> 1:21:21.933
<v Speaker 4>all been searching for, and they've been rewiring our brains

1:21:21.973 --> 1:21:26.893
<v Speaker 4>while we happily consumed their algorithms in the form of news, entertainment,

1:21:27.133 --> 1:21:32.333
<v Speaker 4>and social media. Just today, in their Creative Machinist substack,

1:21:32.453 --> 1:21:35.453
<v Speaker 4>they talked about the tragic death of Seawell, a fourteen

1:21:35.533 --> 1:21:40.093
<v Speaker 4>year old boy who committed suicide after forming an intense

1:21:40.333 --> 1:21:44.333
<v Speaker 4>emotional bond with an AI chatbot model on a character

1:21:44.373 --> 1:21:48.573
<v Speaker 4>from Game of Thrones. The company behind this AI chatbot

1:21:48.613 --> 1:21:51.613
<v Speaker 4>even tried to argue that their chatbots should be protected

1:21:51.693 --> 1:21:56.493
<v Speaker 4>under the First Amendment. Insane, isn't it. We may well

1:21:56.533 --> 1:21:59.573
<v Speaker 4>have slipped quietly into World War III, except that this

1:21:59.733 --> 1:22:03.773
<v Speaker 4>time round AI is the weapon, our minds the battlefield,

1:22:03.933 --> 1:22:07.853
<v Speaker 4>and our humanity the price. If the long March through

1:22:07.893 --> 1:22:10.733
<v Speaker 4>the instant took fifteen years, the long March through the

1:22:10.813 --> 1:22:13.253
<v Speaker 4>minds will only take three to five years or less.

1:22:14.013 --> 1:22:17.173
<v Speaker 4>Perhaps it's time for Matt Walsh to wield his magic

1:22:17.253 --> 1:22:20.853
<v Speaker 4>again and release the next most important documentary of all

1:22:20.893 --> 1:22:23.813
<v Speaker 4>time and call it What Is a Human? This time

1:22:23.853 --> 1:22:27.373
<v Speaker 4>we rediscovered what it means to be human again. Without

1:22:27.613 --> 1:22:28.973
<v Speaker 4>chatch ept's help.

1:22:29.893 --> 1:22:33.613
<v Speaker 2>Is that good? There are? Yeah, there are things that

1:22:33.653 --> 1:22:36.693
<v Speaker 2>are falling into place, predictions and what have you that

1:22:37.253 --> 1:22:39.693
<v Speaker 2>have I mean, who was it that said it's been around?

1:22:40.493 --> 1:22:42.853
<v Speaker 2>I read that's been around for or in the making

1:22:42.853 --> 1:22:45.653
<v Speaker 2>for a long time? Was on incoming if you like?

1:22:46.093 --> 1:22:48.213
<v Speaker 2>There are plenty of things that are incoming, and they're

1:22:48.213 --> 1:22:52.933
<v Speaker 2>not all good, just saying so from Craig. By the way,

1:22:53.453 --> 1:22:55.533
<v Speaker 2>for those of you who write niceties that I might

1:22:55.573 --> 1:23:00.093
<v Speaker 2>not read, don't think they're unappreciated at all. Your podcast

1:23:00.133 --> 1:23:02.613
<v Speaker 2>on AI was an eye opener and touched on the

1:23:02.653 --> 1:23:07.613
<v Speaker 2>same human interaction challenges that I have just finished presenting

1:23:07.653 --> 1:23:12.293
<v Speaker 2>on At an engineering conference, I had a hilarious interaction

1:23:12.453 --> 1:23:16.253
<v Speaker 2>with Facebook's meta AI on a topic very dear to

1:23:16.373 --> 1:23:20.893
<v Speaker 2>you and I, climate change. The responses absolutely underwrote the

1:23:21.013 --> 1:23:25.253
<v Speaker 2>inherent bias possible with AI as raised in your podcast.

1:23:25.693 --> 1:23:29.853
<v Speaker 2>I have included the screen snaps of my conversation, but

1:23:29.973 --> 1:23:32.333
<v Speaker 2>I don't expect you to read them out, as I

1:23:32.413 --> 1:23:37.773
<v Speaker 2>am a bit sweary. Here is the summary. I started

1:23:37.773 --> 1:23:40.333
<v Speaker 2>out reading an article about the collapse of a glacier

1:23:40.333 --> 1:23:43.453
<v Speaker 2>in the Swiss Alps. AI offered an explanation of why

1:23:43.533 --> 1:23:47.533
<v Speaker 2>the event happened, so I clicked on it out of interest.

1:23:48.213 --> 1:23:52.693
<v Speaker 2>Of course, AI walked straight into the trap, blaming mankind

1:23:52.973 --> 1:23:56.853
<v Speaker 2>climate change, which got my hackles up. I decided to

1:23:56.933 --> 1:24:02.533
<v Speaker 2>challenge it. So me, he says me him, Why do

1:24:02.613 --> 1:24:06.653
<v Speaker 2>you quote climate change? This is just an ideological construct.

1:24:07.133 --> 1:24:12.933
<v Speaker 2>AI responded that it provides evidence based information, quoting IPCC, NASA.

1:24:13.533 --> 1:24:18.213
<v Speaker 2>No A me, so what about sea level rise? AI

1:24:18.373 --> 1:24:23.373
<v Speaker 2>responded with the fact fact that sea levels have risen

1:24:23.493 --> 1:24:29.133
<v Speaker 2>eight to nine inches since eighteen eighty. I responded again, BS,

1:24:30.053 --> 1:24:33.453
<v Speaker 2>show me one location where this level of rise has occurred.

1:24:34.493 --> 1:24:40.813
<v Speaker 2>AI suddenly backtracked and said it is complicated and quoted projections.

1:24:41.653 --> 1:24:44.893
<v Speaker 2>It admitted it could not find a specific location. This

1:24:45.133 --> 1:24:50.533
<v Speaker 2>is an explosive admission. A globally powerful AI search engine

1:24:50.533 --> 1:24:54.373
<v Speaker 2>could not find one actual occurrence of sea level rise.

1:24:55.533 --> 1:25:00.053
<v Speaker 2>I responded with, so you disprove your eight dash nine,

1:25:00.093 --> 1:25:04.493
<v Speaker 2>don't you. AI then changed its story that it was

1:25:04.613 --> 1:25:11.053
<v Speaker 2>quoting general information. I responded with, you're talking BS and

1:25:11.093 --> 1:25:16.853
<v Speaker 2>claiming it as facts. I apologized for me. It was

1:25:16.893 --> 1:25:20.293
<v Speaker 2>revealing a little like trying to reason with Chloe issual

1:25:20.453 --> 1:25:27.013
<v Speaker 2>break try it yourself sometimes. I did, actually with the

1:25:27.333 --> 1:25:32.373
<v Speaker 2>aforementioned Chloe, try it sometime. It is cheap entertainment. What

1:25:32.493 --> 1:25:36.093
<v Speaker 2>it does underline, though, is the dangerous effect of bias

1:25:36.133 --> 1:25:38.573
<v Speaker 2>in the AI world. Craig, I'm going to say, that's

1:25:38.613 --> 1:25:45.533
<v Speaker 2>a real great commentary. Thank youss producer. We're done.

1:25:45.813 --> 1:25:49.813
<v Speaker 4>We're done late for another week, so thank.

1:25:49.613 --> 1:25:53.293
<v Speaker 2>You next next week. Yes, I was going to say.

1:25:53.133 --> 1:25:57.093
<v Speaker 3>Next you run out of run out of puff all day.

1:25:57.173 --> 1:26:00.493
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm fine, thank you, But I tell you what,

1:26:00.573 --> 1:26:03.853
<v Speaker 2>I really just leave you with this sort. I really

1:26:04.093 --> 1:26:09.613
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed today with Patrick Basham. Yes he's always good. I

1:26:09.653 --> 1:26:14.373
<v Speaker 2>just thought today he was good plus excellent, he excelled. Yes,

1:26:14.413 --> 1:26:18.973
<v Speaker 2>he's always good. We like Patrick, we do. Thank you, Flater,

1:26:27.813 --> 1:26:32.653
<v Speaker 2>Layton Smith and so to net zero and other matters

1:26:32.693 --> 1:26:36.213
<v Speaker 2>with regard to climate. Some time ago I decided that

1:26:36.493 --> 1:26:40.093
<v Speaker 2>the word stupid should get greater exercise, because the word

1:26:40.133 --> 1:26:45.493
<v Speaker 2>stupid is much under utilized, especially regarding some most important

1:26:45.493 --> 1:26:50.933
<v Speaker 2>matters like power supply. A number of events and announcements worldwide,

1:26:50.933 --> 1:26:54.893
<v Speaker 2>in fact, have exposed the stupidity that still exists in

1:26:54.933 --> 1:27:00.773
<v Speaker 2>this so called enlightened era CO two climate debate. Paris Accord.

1:27:00.813 --> 1:27:04.293
<v Speaker 2>Just to begin, lev he repeats CO two the climate

1:27:04.333 --> 1:27:09.613
<v Speaker 2>debate Paris accord. Every country has its percentage of stupidity.

1:27:10.133 --> 1:27:14.013
<v Speaker 2>The Australian Climate and Energy Minister Chris Bowen would fall

1:27:14.053 --> 1:27:17.053
<v Speaker 2>into the ranks of world leader stupid. He and his

1:27:17.133 --> 1:27:22.533
<v Speaker 2>PM are intent on destroying the Australian economy willingly or otherwise,

1:27:23.013 --> 1:27:26.853
<v Speaker 2>or should I say knowingly or otherwise. The following is

1:27:26.893 --> 1:27:29.773
<v Speaker 2>a comment by doctor David Phillips, who is a former

1:27:29.933 --> 1:27:34.893
<v Speaker 2>research scientist and the founder of Family Voice Australia. He

1:27:34.933 --> 1:27:38.653
<v Speaker 2>published in The Spectator this current Week an article on

1:27:38.853 --> 1:27:42.533
<v Speaker 2>mad about the Climate. This is the conclusion of his piece.

1:27:43.453 --> 1:27:49.173
<v Speaker 2>Here's the deal. Australia abandons cheap, reliable coal generated electricity

1:27:49.333 --> 1:27:53.453
<v Speaker 2>required by what's left of our manufacturing industry in pursuit

1:27:53.453 --> 1:27:57.253
<v Speaker 2>of net zero by twenty fifty. We export vast qualities

1:27:57.253 --> 1:28:00.293
<v Speaker 2>of coal to countries that don't care about CO two

1:28:00.333 --> 1:28:04.293
<v Speaker 2>emissions for them to use cheap coal generated electricity to

1:28:04.413 --> 1:28:09.733
<v Speaker 2>expand their manufacturing industry. In echo of George Orwell's nineteen

1:28:09.733 --> 1:28:14.293
<v Speaker 2>eighty four all CO two emissions are equal, but omissions

1:28:14.293 --> 1:28:17.493
<v Speaker 2>in some countries are more equal than in others. If

1:28:17.493 --> 1:28:20.573
<v Speaker 2>you can make sense of this, dear reader, you're a

1:28:20.613 --> 1:28:24.213
<v Speaker 2>better man than I am. Gonga Din. The great English

1:28:24.213 --> 1:28:28.253
<v Speaker 2>scientist Sir Isaac Newton once said, I can calculate the

1:28:28.333 --> 1:28:32.333
<v Speaker 2>motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people.

1:28:32.853 --> 1:28:36.333
<v Speaker 2>Australia seems to be mad about the climate now. In

1:28:36.373 --> 1:28:42.413
<v Speaker 2>a parallel piece in The Spectator, Rebecca Wiser writes, referring

1:28:42.453 --> 1:28:47.213
<v Speaker 2>to the aforementioned Chris Bowen, Bowen claims the silent majority

1:28:47.293 --> 1:28:49.933
<v Speaker 2>backs his ned zero fantasy, Yet he was the one

1:28:49.973 --> 1:28:52.533
<v Speaker 2>who was silent during the election after the Prime Minister

1:28:52.653 --> 1:28:57.413
<v Speaker 2>abandoned the powering Australian modeling that it took to the

1:28:57.453 --> 1:29:02.533
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two election that underpinned its joke promise joke

1:29:02.613 --> 1:29:06.453
<v Speaker 2>promise to cut power bills by two hundred and seventy

1:29:06.453 --> 1:29:08.933
<v Speaker 2>five dollars a year by twenty twenty five and by

1:29:08.973 --> 1:29:13.533
<v Speaker 2>three hundred seventy eight by twenty thirty. The only energy

1:29:13.573 --> 1:29:17.053
<v Speaker 2>policy Labour discussed during the campaign was Peter Dutton and

1:29:17.133 --> 1:29:21.373
<v Speaker 2>Ted O'Brien's plan to build seven nuclear plants on coalsites,

1:29:21.773 --> 1:29:26.373
<v Speaker 2>costed by Labour add a staggering six hundred billion to

1:29:26.453 --> 1:29:29.293
<v Speaker 2>hit net zero by twenty fifty. Now that is a

1:29:29.333 --> 1:29:32.893
<v Speaker 2>prize piece of scare nomics, she writes. Yet Dutton and

1:29:32.893 --> 1:29:38.133
<v Speaker 2>O'Brien failed to explain the reality as countries like Finland

1:29:38.173 --> 1:29:41.293
<v Speaker 2>and Korea have shown the cost would be far lower.

1:29:41.933 --> 1:29:45.613
<v Speaker 2>The first plant might cost fourteen billion, with each subsequent

1:29:45.733 --> 1:29:49.413
<v Speaker 2>unit ten to twenty five percent cheaper, so the total

1:29:49.693 --> 1:29:53.533
<v Speaker 2>closer to eighty to ninety billion. Yet the deeper floor

1:29:53.613 --> 1:29:57.373
<v Speaker 2>in O'Brien's plan was accepting the net zero by twenty

1:29:57.493 --> 1:30:01.293
<v Speaker 2>fifty target at all. Labour cleverly refused to cost its

1:30:01.293 --> 1:30:04.533
<v Speaker 2>own plan, But according to the Net Zero Australia project

1:30:05.133 --> 1:30:09.133
<v Speaker 2>run by the Universities of Melbourne, Princeton and others, its

1:30:09.173 --> 1:30:13.293
<v Speaker 2>renewables back scheme would cost seven to nine trillion by

1:30:13.573 --> 1:30:16.813
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixty, an eye watering one hundred and ninety four

1:30:16.853 --> 1:30:19.733
<v Speaker 2>to two hundred and fifty billion a year from twenty

1:30:19.813 --> 1:30:23.413
<v Speaker 2>five to sixty, that is twenty sixty. It is this

1:30:23.533 --> 1:30:27.853
<v Speaker 2>that makes nuclear cheap by comparison, this mad scheme involves

1:30:27.893 --> 1:30:34.053
<v Speaker 2>tripling the national electricity market and carpeting sixty eight million hectares.

1:30:34.733 --> 1:30:41.373
<v Speaker 2>Imagine this carpeting sixty eight million hectares about nine percent

1:30:41.453 --> 1:30:44.853
<v Speaker 2>of the country with one point nine t w of

1:30:44.933 --> 1:30:49.653
<v Speaker 2>solar one thirty two GW of onshore wind, forty two

1:30:49.733 --> 1:30:54.973
<v Speaker 2>GW of offshore wind, and ten thousand kilometers of transmission

1:30:55.013 --> 1:30:59.813
<v Speaker 2>lines poorly stabilized by batteries and hydro mandated electric vehicles

1:30:59.813 --> 1:31:04.493
<v Speaker 2>in heat pumps, vast desalination to produce green hydrogen, and

1:31:04.573 --> 1:31:07.933
<v Speaker 2>a network of pipelines to capture and transport CO two

1:31:08.013 --> 1:31:13.453
<v Speaker 2>to storage sites. The whole scheme is bonkers. So why

1:31:13.453 --> 1:31:16.053
<v Speaker 2>didn't Dutton and O'Brien tell Labor that they were dreaming?

1:31:16.693 --> 1:31:20.293
<v Speaker 2>Because the Liberal left add its venal rent seekers. What

1:31:20.453 --> 1:31:24.533
<v Speaker 2>a hop on board the net zero gravy train. That's

1:31:24.573 --> 1:31:28.093
<v Speaker 2>also why a group no one's heard of, Liberals Against Nuclear,

1:31:28.493 --> 1:31:31.853
<v Speaker 2>has been running ads on Sky News since the election.

1:31:32.493 --> 1:31:37.053
<v Speaker 2>Yet nuclear is only indispensable if you're chasing net zero delusions,

1:31:37.373 --> 1:31:41.933
<v Speaker 2>which even then are unachievable with current technology. In the

1:31:41.973 --> 1:31:46.293
<v Speaker 2>real world, a responsible government would face the strategic and

1:31:46.373 --> 1:31:51.053
<v Speaker 2>physical threats bearing down on Australia and do the only

1:31:51.213 --> 1:31:53.453
<v Speaker 2>sensible thing, go for growth.

1:31:54.053 --> 1:31:54.173
<v Speaker 3>Now.

1:31:54.173 --> 1:31:58.133
<v Speaker 2>One of the great intellects of science the New Zealand

1:31:58.173 --> 1:32:01.813
<v Speaker 2>has produced is Professor Michael Kelly. Born and bred in

1:32:01.853 --> 1:32:06.093
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand, he ended up in England and has reached

1:32:06.973 --> 1:32:10.733
<v Speaker 2>massive heights of reckinggn and respect Now. I've interviewed him

1:32:10.733 --> 1:32:14.293
<v Speaker 2>on two occasions over the years. He was here actually

1:32:14.453 --> 1:32:17.693
<v Speaker 2>just earlier this year, but we couldn't couldn't organize a

1:32:17.733 --> 1:32:22.333
<v Speaker 2>get together. But I've picked out something that he wrote

1:32:23.213 --> 1:32:27.613
<v Speaker 2>back in twenty eighteen. Why twenty eighteen and not recently well,

1:32:27.653 --> 1:32:31.493
<v Speaker 2>it is a self explanatory I think climate change mitigation

1:32:31.613 --> 1:32:35.613
<v Speaker 2>in New Zealand the stifling of debate. This paper is

1:32:35.653 --> 1:32:38.653
<v Speaker 2>in three sections. The first is a paper I wrote

1:32:38.773 --> 1:32:42.173
<v Speaker 2>examining in detail claims made in a report by the

1:32:42.253 --> 1:32:46.253
<v Speaker 2>Royal Society of New Zealand in twenty sixteen on transitioning

1:32:46.293 --> 1:32:50.413
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand to a low carbon economy. Three of forty

1:32:50.493 --> 1:32:56.093
<v Speaker 2>six recommendations three of forty six made sense both economically

1:32:56.493 --> 1:33:00.413
<v Speaker 2>and environmentally, three out of forty six eight made no

1:33:00.493 --> 1:33:04.933
<v Speaker 2>difference to either, and all the others were detrimental to

1:33:05.013 --> 1:33:09.373
<v Speaker 2>the New Zealand economy and or were ineffective at reducing

1:33:09.413 --> 1:33:13.333
<v Speaker 2>CO two emissions. I pointed out the futility of cutting

1:33:13.373 --> 1:33:16.733
<v Speaker 2>emissions when the Chinese are growing at a much greater

1:33:16.853 --> 1:33:20.813
<v Speaker 2>rate in bracketcy rights. I have discovered more recently that

1:33:20.853 --> 1:33:24.013
<v Speaker 2>with their Belton Road Initiative. Over the next thirty years,

1:33:24.493 --> 1:33:28.093
<v Speaker 2>they're about to treble their global emissions footprint, which is

1:33:28.133 --> 1:33:32.373
<v Speaker 2>already at two hundred and seventy times the New Zealand footprint.

1:33:32.853 --> 1:33:35.373
<v Speaker 2>The original paper is only a third of the length

1:33:35.573 --> 1:33:39.013
<v Speaker 2>of the report I submitted to the Royal Society New Zealand,

1:33:39.893 --> 1:33:44.253
<v Speaker 2>and that constraints led to criticisms that to add even

1:33:44.373 --> 1:33:48.813
<v Speaker 2>more to the paper, which was not allowed. The second

1:33:48.853 --> 1:33:52.213
<v Speaker 2>section is the correspondence with the editor of the Journal

1:33:52.293 --> 1:33:55.573
<v Speaker 2>of the Royal Society of New Zealand, where I tried

1:33:55.733 --> 1:33:59.893
<v Speaker 2>to continue the debate. This represents the second round of submission,

1:34:00.933 --> 1:34:04.693
<v Speaker 2>as I was able to identify by his comments that

1:34:04.773 --> 1:34:07.413
<v Speaker 2>one of the first referees was an author of the

1:34:07.413 --> 1:34:11.533
<v Speaker 2>original report. While the referees thought that the approach to

1:34:11.573 --> 1:34:15.693
<v Speaker 2>the research was to be lauded, they could not possibly

1:34:15.733 --> 1:34:18.693
<v Speaker 2>agree with the results and use the old rus of

1:34:18.973 --> 1:34:23.173
<v Speaker 2>nitpicking instead of unraveling these substantive arguments that I made,

1:34:23.613 --> 1:34:28.013
<v Speaker 2>which still stand. The third section deals with the correspondence

1:34:28.013 --> 1:34:31.453
<v Speaker 2>with the editor of the Journal of New Zealand studies

1:34:32.093 --> 1:34:35.533
<v Speaker 2>with pretty much the same conclusion. This paper is two

1:34:35.613 --> 1:34:39.213
<v Speaker 2>years old, but I have more empirical data to back

1:34:39.333 --> 1:34:42.573
<v Speaker 2>up each of the claims that I have made. That's

1:34:42.733 --> 1:34:47.853
<v Speaker 2>all I want to include, point being that stupidity reigned supreme.

1:34:48.773 --> 1:34:52.693
<v Speaker 2>I would suggest to you that Professor Michael Kelly has

1:34:52.733 --> 1:34:56.213
<v Speaker 2>more intelligence, and I'm tempted to say than the entire

1:34:56.733 --> 1:35:01.613
<v Speaker 2>membership of the New Zealand Royal Society, but that might

1:35:01.653 --> 1:35:04.493
<v Speaker 2>be just a wee bit of an exaggeration and that'll

1:35:04.493 --> 1:35:07.773
<v Speaker 2>take us out for podcasts to two hundred and eighty seven.

1:35:08.413 --> 1:35:10.413
<v Speaker 2>Would like to write to us Latent at the us

1:35:10.453 --> 1:35:13.653
<v Speaker 2>talks ab dot co dot nz or Carolyn at news

1:35:13.693 --> 1:35:18.333
<v Speaker 2>talks ab dot co dot nz on this podcast, any

1:35:18.373 --> 1:35:21.333
<v Speaker 2>other podcasts of mine, and anything else that you might

1:35:21.413 --> 1:35:25.173
<v Speaker 2>think is worthy of bringing to my attention. So the

1:35:25.173 --> 1:35:27.973
<v Speaker 2>only thing left to say is, as always, thank you

1:35:28.013 --> 1:35:29.893
<v Speaker 2>for listening and we'll talk soon.

1:35:37.693 --> 1:35:40.693
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for more from News Talks ed B.

1:35:41.013 --> 1:35:44.253
<v Speaker 1>Listen live on air or online, and keep our shows

1:35:44.253 --> 1:35:47.613
<v Speaker 1>with you wherever you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio