WEBVTT - Charlie Kirk shooting sparks warnings on online radicalisation risks

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Kyota.

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm Chelsea Daniels and This is the Front Page, a

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 2>daily podcast presented by The New Zealand Herald. The assassination

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 2>of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has shone a spotlight on

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 2>political violence in the US and around the world. The

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 2>thirty one year old was shot at a Utah University

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 2>last week in front of thousands of people. The alleged

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 2>killer is twenty two year old Tyler Robinson, who's set

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 2>to appear in court this week. While his motive remains unclear,

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 2>the killing has sparked conversations about the widening gap between

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 2>left and right politics. It's also highlighted the deep dark

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 2>depths of the Internet and how young people can be

0:00:54.920 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>radicalized online. Today on the Front Page, Massy University emeritus

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 2>professor and sociologist Paul Spoonley is with us to dissect

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 2>the inner workings of those who perpetrate political violence and

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 2>how we might be able to stop them. So, Paul,

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the race is on to try and figure out why

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 2>this shooter targeted Charlie Kirk. And there are a lot

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 2>of accusations being thrown around at the moment. At the

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, though, does it really matter what

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 2>side he was on, left or right, It's still political violence,

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:32.559
<v Speaker 2>isn't it.

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>It is political violence, and unfortunately, and particularly in the US,

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing more of it. And the difficulty, the difficulty

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>there and the difficulty here in New Zealand is that

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>when we get these local actors, these homegrown local actors,

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>very often they're invisible. They send out quite weak signals.

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think, Chelsea, we're naive. I think we're naive

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to think that this is something that happens in America,

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>not here. It has happened here, and it will happen here.

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>But we're also a naive in terms of what we

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>need to look for, because in the case of the

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirk killing, but also in the case of the

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>christ Church shooter, there were people around both of those

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>shooters who would have seen something but didn't possibly didn't

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>know what they were looking at. So I do think

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>we need to increase the awareness of families and peers

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and teachers in terms of what they might look for

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 1>as people get radicalized.

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 2>And in terms of that as well, I mean, I've

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 2>seen a lot of conversation around on the Internet and

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 2>kind of deciphering this language used I know that bullets

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 2>found after the shooting carried a range of messages and

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the Internet is kind of racing to decipher those, and

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 2>it looks like, you know, they're referencing video games, meme culture.

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.559
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it seems to me like a completely different language.

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 2>And that isn't foreign to these kind of people, right.

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not. And I mean I would go to

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the christ Church shooter and the advantage, if there are

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>any advantages there was that he published a manifesto, so he,

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>like the killer of Charlie Kirk, had insignia or memes

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>or sayings on the guns and the ammunition. In the

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>case of the christ Church shooter, he did have that

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>as well, but he also had a manifesto, so we

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>can get a sense of why what prompted him to

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>do what he did in christ Church in twenty nineteen.

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit more difficult with this one, particularly

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>as the shooter is not being cooperative and so we

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>now got to do a forensic check of what's happened online,

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>what we can get from that, and of course what

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the police and other are athorities are doing, which is

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>talking to family and friends.

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, regardless what these inscriptions actually mean it just

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 2>it points to a person who's like deeply entrenched in

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>those online forums and that online culture, and this is

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 2>where a lot of that radicalization happens nowadays.

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Hey, yes it does, and it's actually relatively recent Chelsea

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what we're seeing. Last year the Five

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Eyes of which New Zealand's part, produced a very interesting

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>report on young people in the five countries and radicalization.

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 1>And what we're seeing is that younger people, sometimes educated

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>so well educated, perhaps students who are doing well or

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>university students and you know that's the case with this shooter,

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>are attracted and then they go down these rabbit holes

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>into conspiratorial extreme views and ideologies. I have to say

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that the the bulk of people who express those extreme

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>views online do not necessarily act out those views. But

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>we still have that possibility and what we need to

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>understand and I don't think we do really as much

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>as we would like to. What's the process who's vulnerable

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in the first instance, but what's the process whereby people

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>get convinced that these extreme views are views that they

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>should hold, in which they demonize others. The difficulty at

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the moment is we're really paralyzed, and we've got declining trust.

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>We've got declining trust and politicians, unfortunately Chelsea, and the media,

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and so we tend to revert to these echo chambers

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in which we get affirmation of our own views. So

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>what starts that process? What leads you into that echo chamber?

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we know vulnerability, we know social isolation.

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>There are a number of cues that we need to

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.799
<v Speaker 1>be aware of, but we really do need to understand

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>more about it. And how do we intervene much earlier

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>in that process before they do get radicalized?

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 2>And generally we're talking about this kind of right wing conservatism,

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 2>it's disenfranchised young men as well. Nine times out of ten.

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 2>How do we get to that group and steer them

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 2>away from these kind of forums that make them feel

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 2>so included and so part of a pack, so to speak.

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I was at the University of California at

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Berkeley with an author called Ali Hodgchild, and what she

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>pointed to in the American context was the disaffection and

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the alienation of particularly white working class men, increasingly white

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>middle class men in terms of the recognition of diversity.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>So what we've got is an inversion. In the past,

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we would have probably said that particular groups, let's say

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Afro Americans, have been the victims of institutional racism, to

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>use a word. What we're now seeing is the flip

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of that, and that the victims in modern society are

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>very often white males who were being excluded from promotion,

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>from jobs. And so we're getting this combination of economic circumstances.

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And remember a lot of us began to emerge during

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the global financial crisis two and eight twenty twelve, and

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>then got accelerated during COVID, and so's there's certainly a constituency.

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, there is a constituency in New Zealand.

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>If you look at a group like right wing Resistance,

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>they tended to be young males and very much into

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the manisphere, so you know, a toxic masculinity, and a

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>number of them were a university student. So those old

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>ideas that somehow the people who are going to be

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>recruited were not educated, were not aware of the world

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>around them, is no longer true.

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 2>These interpretations of the messages as well as the shooters

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 2>online blueprint, it's hard to decipher what his political leaning is.

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 2>So you've got these very niche references to anti fascism,

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 2>but you've also got these references used by groups like

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 2>neo Nazi nick for Winters as followers who didn't actually

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 2>like Charlie Kirk. Does this show that the far right

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 2>isn't as black and white anymore?

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes. And indeed our own groups inside New Zealand, our

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>security and intelligence agencies, but also the Combined Threats Assessment Group,

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>which is the main government group that looks at the

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>threat landscape in New Zealand, have developed some new categories.

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>And it looks as though those new categories of people

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>who bring together various traditions both sort of less than right,

0:08:54.640 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>as you've pointed out, to provide new political view points,

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're still extreme. And for me, I think one

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I've focused on the extreme right,

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>but one of the things that strikes me is that

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the extreme left and the extreme right,

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>very often they look quite similar. They look the way

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in which they demonize particular people. They might demonize different people,

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>but the way in which they demonize people and the

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>way in which they justify are violence towards government. And

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>so what we've seen, and I think the US evidence

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>over the last two decades. They've got an excellent report

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>on what's contributed to tourist attacks and redcalization is that

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent have come from the extreme right. And yes,

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>white supremacists, so they would be classic sort of Nazi

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>fascist groups. But the other major category is anti government.

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>And so I think what we've seen as a new

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>set of as a new set of groups begin to emerge,

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly since COVID, in which attacking the government, attacking the

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>police sovereign citizens would be a case in point. And

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>so we had a we had an activist, Richard Silvill,

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>who was sentenced and earlier this year, and he was

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>sentenced because he shared objectionable material the christ Church stream

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of the shooting, but because he threatened to kill the

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister, just Sindra Adourn. And so I think we're

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>getting these diverse but mixed set of messages and positions

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that are beginning to emerge. It's much more complex than

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>when I first began to look at the extreme right

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>some decades ago.

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, because it's from my learnings online, it's

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 2>not really right versus left anymore. And even that kind

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 2>of spectrum, you can question whether that's a particularly good

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 2>way of describing these groups. I learned that there are

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 2>factions of the far right actually in conflict with each other,

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 2>so these people called gropers who think MAGA is actually liberal.

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 2>So knowing the kind of colorful array and all of

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the different gray bits in between will probably help us

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 2>moving forward, right.

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.479
<v Speaker 1>It will. It will, but we need to map that landscape.

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's changed and constantly changing. So I've talked about

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>its diversity, but we're also seeing new positions beginning to emerge,

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>which is what you've highlighted. And we do need good

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>evidence for this, And can I go to There's a

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>private group in New Zealand called Global Risk Consulting Group,

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and their latest assessment, which came out a while ago,

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>think says that there's a seventy percent chance that we

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>will see a terrorist act in the next five years

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in New Zealand. And I think we've got to take

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that seriously. So one of the things I would dearly

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>love us to do is to understand both the international

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>but also the domestic landscape here, because I do think

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>we face the possibility that because we don't understand all

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of these permutations, somebody's going to come out of somewhere

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't actually paid much attention to. And that was,

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 1>of course the Royal Commission's concern after the christ shooting,

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that we paid too much attention to Islamic terrorism and

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>not enough to write a white supremacy terrorism.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Jennie Vancier live from my office in the White House

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 3>complex and filling in for somebody who cannot be filled

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 3>in for. But I'm going to try to do my

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 3>best my dear friend, the great Charlie Kirk. The thing is,

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 3>every single person in this building we owe something to Charlie.

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 3>He was a joyful warrior for our country. He loved

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 3>America did voted himself tirelessly to making our country a

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 3>better place. He was a critical part of getting Donald

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Trump elected as president, getting me elected as vice president,

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 3>and so much of our success over the last seven

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 3>months is due to his efforts, his staffing, his support

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 3>in his friendship.

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it's quite interesting in the US if we

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 2>go back to the Charlie Kirk shooting. Donald Trump has

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 2>continued to accuse his political opponents of inciting violence and

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 2>placing blame on the left. He said, the problem is

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 2>on the left. It's not on the right. He then

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>blamed left wing radicals. Then we have JD. Vance signaling

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 2>a growing and powerful minority on the left as well,

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 2>and the very quick to point fingers. And I read

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 2>a comment from Seawan Westwood. He's the director of the

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Polarization Research Lab at Dartmouth College, and he said, in

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the aftermath of the assassination attempt against Donald Trump, say,

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 2>leaders on both side of the IOWA called the national

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 2>temperature issuing unified condemnation, and in the way of Kirk's murder,

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the opposite is happening. He said, We're witnessing the cynical

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 2>minting of a martyr and a call to fight instead.

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 2>How important is it that they're taking this route as

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 2>opposed to unifying and calling for condemnation of all political violence.

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think that's really disappointing. And so I

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.359
<v Speaker 1>think there are a number of public commentators and politicians

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in the United States that have asked, we're toning down

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>at the temperature around this, because if you look at

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the evidence of President Trump's own agencies, then the major

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>threat comes from the far right, not from the far left.

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So this attempt to recategorize where the threat is coming

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>from is actually not supported by the evidence. So the

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Department Justice has done some really good works around looking

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>at where terrorism is likely to come from. And if

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I can give an example, Timothy McVeigh was a sovereign

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>citizen and he was involved in the Oklahoma bombing. So

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>those major events of terrorism have involved the far right,

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and I just don't think it's helpful, I mean politically,

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>but also in terms of how you rebuild trust. You're

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>really effectively cementing in some of the divisions and some

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of the hostility and the polarization and the demonization of

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>particular groups. And of course we forget or have forgotten,

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's not mentioned now that a Democratic senator was

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>shot in their own home not so long ago. So

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>why the outrage now not the outrage?

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Then?

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems very one sided to me and very unfortunate,

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>because how do you rebuild when you dig these sort

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of trenches and conduct the sort of warfare.

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 2>How do we catch up to these kind of groups,

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 2>and how do we learn their language online? And how

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 2>can New Zealand make sure that nothing similar happens here?

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some excellent work being done internationally. So

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the International Strategic dialogue and one of the researchers might

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>have come Ifort has done some really good work in

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand. By the way, that research shows that New

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Zealand is accessing far right YouTube or Facebook, I'm not

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>sure which sites. Was double the rate of Australian, triple

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the rate of Canada. So why is that the case?

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think we need to access some of the

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>initiatives and the understanding that's available internationally. The EU has

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>done some really good work around what to do in

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of identifying the dynamics of a particular country and

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>internationally and then what we might do. By the way,

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>there are some initiatives in New Zealand which I think

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>we need to acknowledge. The New Zealand Security Intelligence Service

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>had produced a very good little Booklet's saying No the Signs.

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So there is something that is happening here. There are

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>some things that are happening here. But I would really

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>like us to pay more attention, fund more activity to

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we are on top of what's happening.

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And particularly I think we're going to struggle given the

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>volume of material that's appearing online and so our agencies,

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>our security and intelligence agencies are really swamped by this material.

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>The amount of material and then trying to identify where

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 1>the potential risks might be coming from just got to

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>be a much more community wide response. And I do

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:50.959
<v Speaker 1>think we need to talk about digital literacy and digital citizenship.

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>We've really got to understand what's happening, particularly to young

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>people but also others online at the moment and what

0:17:57.680 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the possibilities and the problems.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us, Paul.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Chelsea. Always a pleasure.

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 2>That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 2>can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 2>at enzidherld dot co dot nz. The Front Page is

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 2>produced by Jane Ye and Richard Martin, who is also

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 2>our editor. I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to The Front Page

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 2>on iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts, and tune

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 2>in tomorrow for another look behind the headlines.