WEBVTT - Ben Brinkerhoff: When to take a look at your KiwiSaver

0:00:05.761 --> 0:00:09.321
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Weekend Collective podcast from News Talk

0:00:09.401 --> 0:00:10.401
<v Speaker 1>sedb it.

0:00:11.441 --> 0:00:14.001
<v Speaker 2>But it don't too far because you know it don't

0:00:14.041 --> 0:00:19.241
<v Speaker 2>matter anyway, So money money won't get your no barget

0:00:19.441 --> 0:00:20.081
<v Speaker 2>too far.

0:00:34.721 --> 0:00:35.121
<v Speaker 3>To take.

0:00:35.241 --> 0:00:35.641
<v Speaker 4>What is.

0:00:38.161 --> 0:00:38.601
<v Speaker 5>This is on?

0:00:40.961 --> 0:00:43.761
<v Speaker 3>I started talking before I was really ready. There, Welcome

0:00:43.761 --> 0:00:45.641
<v Speaker 3>back to the Weekend Collective. This is smart Money. I'm

0:00:45.641 --> 0:00:48.601
<v Speaker 3>Tim Beverage. And if you've missed any of the previous hours,

0:00:48.601 --> 0:00:50.681
<v Speaker 3>we had Jude Walter in just now for the Health

0:00:50.761 --> 0:00:52.961
<v Speaker 3>Up talking about keeping your brain active and fit and

0:00:53.001 --> 0:00:57.281
<v Speaker 3>healthy and avoiding stress and just basically keeping your cognitive

0:00:57.281 --> 0:00:58.761
<v Speaker 3>health on top. So if you want to listen to

0:00:58.801 --> 0:01:02.321
<v Speaker 3>you that, go and check out the podcast. iHeartRadio, look

0:01:02.361 --> 0:01:06.121
<v Speaker 3>for the Weekend Collective and for politics, we had an

0:01:06.121 --> 0:01:09.401
<v Speaker 3>interview with well Shane Rettie was chatting about nitrous oxide

0:01:09.641 --> 0:01:11.241
<v Speaker 3>and how they're clamping down on it. Every time I

0:01:11.241 --> 0:01:13.641
<v Speaker 3>think not nutro soxide, I we think of Steve Martin

0:01:13.681 --> 0:01:15.921
<v Speaker 3>and as the dentist in the Little Shop of Horrors.

0:01:17.961 --> 0:01:21.561
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, the clamping down on nitrosoxide recreationally speaking. But

0:01:21.561 --> 0:01:23.161
<v Speaker 3>also we had a chat with Simon Carter as the

0:01:23.801 --> 0:01:29.281
<v Speaker 3>Poletry Undersecretary to the Ministry for rom Reform about basically

0:01:29.401 --> 0:01:31.041
<v Speaker 3>they're throwing it out and they're going to start again.

0:01:31.081 --> 0:01:34.601
<v Speaker 3>Well they have started, and yeah, rom Reform. If you

0:01:34.601 --> 0:01:37.841
<v Speaker 3>want to check that out, listen to our podcast. So

0:01:38.041 --> 0:01:41.561
<v Speaker 3>but right now it's time for smart money. And my

0:01:41.641 --> 0:01:45.001
<v Speaker 3>guest is he's head of advice at Concilium. You can

0:01:45.001 --> 0:01:48.561
<v Speaker 3>go and check out their their worker anytime Concilium dot

0:01:48.601 --> 0:01:51.801
<v Speaker 3>co dot nz or the Kiwi save a funders Kiwi

0:01:51.881 --> 0:01:54.601
<v Speaker 3>rap as in wrapping a present dot co dot nz.

0:01:54.841 --> 0:01:56.881
<v Speaker 3>And he is Ben Brinkerhoff.

0:01:56.921 --> 0:01:57.361
<v Speaker 5>Gid a Ben.

0:01:57.401 --> 0:01:58.601
<v Speaker 3>How are you going good?

0:01:58.641 --> 0:01:58.841
<v Speaker 6>Dan?

0:01:58.881 --> 0:02:00.761
<v Speaker 3>How are you not too bad? Nice to thank you

0:02:00.801 --> 0:02:01.801
<v Speaker 3>for coming into the studio.

0:02:01.841 --> 0:02:03.441
<v Speaker 6>Good to see you. It's good to be here.

0:02:03.521 --> 0:02:05.161
<v Speaker 5>What's been keeping you out of mischief.

0:02:05.561 --> 0:02:07.081
<v Speaker 3>And the money scene?

0:02:07.961 --> 0:02:09.881
<v Speaker 6>I mean, but it's a strange way to put a question.

0:02:10.241 --> 0:02:10.921
<v Speaker 6>It sort of is.

0:02:11.281 --> 0:02:12.961
<v Speaker 2>I think the best way to stay out of trouble

0:02:13.001 --> 0:02:17.001
<v Speaker 2>is to read the newspaper as little as possible, right, Yeah.

0:02:16.281 --> 0:02:18.281
<v Speaker 3>I might just get you to just pull your microphone

0:02:18.321 --> 0:02:20.081
<v Speaker 3>just a little closer there, So there we go, there

0:02:20.081 --> 0:02:22.161
<v Speaker 3>we go. We want to talk about key we saver

0:02:22.241 --> 0:02:25.441
<v Speaker 3>a bit because for many people when it comes to

0:02:25.481 --> 0:02:29.561
<v Speaker 3>the financial investment it's sort of a default thing where

0:02:29.561 --> 0:02:32.921
<v Speaker 3>people they're investing in all sorts of things without knowing

0:02:32.921 --> 0:02:37.081
<v Speaker 3>it and people, I mean, yeah, so if you've got look,

0:02:37.081 --> 0:02:39.041
<v Speaker 3>we're going to talk about key we saver from a

0:02:39.041 --> 0:02:41.561
<v Speaker 3>whole bunch of angles as to how often you should

0:02:41.601 --> 0:02:43.521
<v Speaker 3>monitor the performance of your key we save it you

0:02:43.561 --> 0:02:46.561
<v Speaker 3>just put it away and forget it does past performance?

0:02:46.601 --> 0:02:48.281
<v Speaker 3>For instance, you look at someone and go, man, they

0:02:48.281 --> 0:02:50.561
<v Speaker 3>have an amazing key we save a fund. Should I

0:02:50.561 --> 0:02:53.161
<v Speaker 3>stick my money with them? All those sorts of things

0:02:53.281 --> 0:02:57.161
<v Speaker 3>Key we saver it actually, ben how often do you

0:02:57.161 --> 0:03:00.121
<v Speaker 3>think people actually look at the performance of their key

0:03:00.121 --> 0:03:02.361
<v Speaker 3>we save or is it best? Is it best just

0:03:02.401 --> 0:03:03.841
<v Speaker 3>to sort of put it in the bottom drawer and

0:03:03.881 --> 0:03:06.041
<v Speaker 3>maybe look at it every so six months.

0:03:06.041 --> 0:03:09.201
<v Speaker 2>We'll side that. That's a question with a couple of layers.

0:03:09.201 --> 0:03:10.481
<v Speaker 2>But let me just peel back a couple.

0:03:10.921 --> 0:03:11.121
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:03:11.961 --> 0:03:16.281
<v Speaker 2>There's an awesome paper written in the past called myopic

0:03:16.361 --> 0:03:19.121
<v Speaker 2>lossid version, and my opic just means short.

0:03:19.521 --> 0:03:23.241
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to write that down myopic myopic that's short

0:03:23.481 --> 0:03:26.361
<v Speaker 3>loss a version, right, okay.

0:03:26.241 --> 0:03:31.881
<v Speaker 2>And the premise of this paper was that basically people's

0:03:32.241 --> 0:03:35.241
<v Speaker 2>point of view is very short sighted. That's what myopic

0:03:35.321 --> 0:03:38.201
<v Speaker 2>means is short sighted. And the more short sighted your

0:03:38.281 --> 0:03:40.881
<v Speaker 2>view of your performance is, the more likely you are

0:03:41.201 --> 0:03:44.401
<v Speaker 2>to make bad decisions. And so I wrote a paper

0:03:44.481 --> 0:03:47.201
<v Speaker 2>once called It's Okay to look Away, Yeah, and I

0:03:47.201 --> 0:03:53.681
<v Speaker 2>wrote it during the COVID time period, where was pretty challenging.

0:03:54.561 --> 0:03:58.041
<v Speaker 2>And the other waying premise was don't look at your

0:03:58.121 --> 0:04:01.641
<v Speaker 2>account balance. You want to set things up to be

0:04:01.721 --> 0:04:05.001
<v Speaker 2>done correctly. You should maybe review it once a year,

0:04:05.641 --> 0:04:07.561
<v Speaker 2>and I think you should view with an advisor and

0:04:07.601 --> 0:04:09.761
<v Speaker 2>determine if you're on track to achieve your goals or

0:04:09.761 --> 0:04:11.961
<v Speaker 2>if your goals have changed, if your strategy needs to change.

0:04:11.961 --> 0:04:15.561
<v Speaker 2>All that's good stuff, right, But looking at your key

0:04:15.681 --> 0:04:19.321
<v Speaker 2>saver balance regularly is more likely to lead you to

0:04:19.321 --> 0:04:20.041
<v Speaker 2>make a mistake.

0:04:20.281 --> 0:04:22.641
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's like it's like, if you're buying and selling

0:04:22.681 --> 0:04:24.521
<v Speaker 3>shares and it was your hobby to do your own

0:04:24.561 --> 0:04:27.801
<v Speaker 3>make your own choices, probably following them every day wouldn't

0:04:27.841 --> 0:04:30.761
<v Speaker 3>necessarily lead you to the right decisions. Of course, then again,

0:04:31.041 --> 0:04:33.401
<v Speaker 3>if they suddenly went up in value a lot, it

0:04:33.401 --> 0:04:35.161
<v Speaker 3>would have been useful to follow them. But that's not

0:04:35.201 --> 0:04:35.441
<v Speaker 3>the game.

0:04:35.481 --> 0:04:37.761
<v Speaker 2>Machan, the number one person that looks at car ads

0:04:38.921 --> 0:04:43.401
<v Speaker 2>car sellers, people that just bought a car or really, yeah,

0:04:43.881 --> 0:04:46.361
<v Speaker 2>so you just buy a car and you're looking at ads,

0:04:46.361 --> 0:04:47.921
<v Speaker 2>why just to make sure you've got a good deal.

0:04:48.561 --> 0:04:51.961
<v Speaker 2>I think when people make when they change their investments around,

0:04:52.001 --> 0:04:53.521
<v Speaker 2>they're going to look at them a lot, decide to

0:04:53.761 --> 0:04:55.641
<v Speaker 2>make a good choice and make a bad choice. I

0:04:55.681 --> 0:04:59.281
<v Speaker 2>think it leads to a lot of people being unsettled overall.

0:04:59.481 --> 0:05:01.441
<v Speaker 2>I don't think looking at your key saver balance that

0:05:01.601 --> 0:05:04.201
<v Speaker 2>often no idea.

0:05:03.801 --> 0:05:07.201
<v Speaker 3>Are there actually investments it does if you are taking

0:05:07.281 --> 0:05:09.321
<v Speaker 3>hands on approach, are there investments where it does pay

0:05:09.361 --> 0:05:12.641
<v Speaker 3>to keep a regular eye on them? Because of course,

0:05:12.681 --> 0:05:15.881
<v Speaker 3>key that's the thing with key we Saver people aren't

0:05:15.921 --> 0:05:18.281
<v Speaker 3>key we Saber managers because they're idiots. They are on

0:05:18.401 --> 0:05:21.441
<v Speaker 3>the job for you all the time. But whereas I guess,

0:05:21.441 --> 0:05:26.801
<v Speaker 3>if you are managing your own personal, individualized investments, then

0:05:27.001 --> 0:05:29.441
<v Speaker 3>obviously you're you're going to keep an eye on that.

0:05:29.521 --> 0:05:32.161
<v Speaker 3>For instance, if you're you're choosing your own stocks in

0:05:32.201 --> 0:05:35.361
<v Speaker 3>the share market, you've got ten companies that you've invested in,

0:05:35.561 --> 0:05:38.481
<v Speaker 3>you probably will monitor their performance more regularly. But that's

0:05:38.481 --> 0:05:39.841
<v Speaker 3>a completely different game, isn't It's a.

0:05:39.761 --> 0:05:43.321
<v Speaker 2>Completely different game. And by the way, don't don't don't

0:05:43.321 --> 0:05:45.961
<v Speaker 2>do that. Don't don't that you're Key we saver balance

0:05:46.001 --> 0:05:46.881
<v Speaker 2>on ten stocks.

0:05:47.081 --> 0:05:49.201
<v Speaker 3>I No, I wasn't saying that. I'm just talking about

0:05:49.321 --> 0:05:51.521
<v Speaker 3>different the reasons you might keep an eye on your

0:05:51.561 --> 0:05:52.281
<v Speaker 3>investor totally.

0:05:52.321 --> 0:05:53.881
<v Speaker 2>If you're in and yet and they're in that kind

0:05:53.881 --> 0:05:56.641
<v Speaker 2>of situation and you are basically the manager of your

0:05:56.681 --> 0:06:01.641
<v Speaker 2>own investments, yeah, then maybe maybe it makes sense, you know,

0:06:01.761 --> 0:06:06.001
<v Speaker 2>But I just suggest that that the key Saver is

0:06:06.001 --> 0:06:10.201
<v Speaker 2>one area where we're diversification and maybe taking a different approach.

0:06:10.281 --> 0:06:13.841
<v Speaker 3>Piece are You've raised a couple of things there which

0:06:13.881 --> 0:06:16.441
<v Speaker 3>I might I wouldn't mind digging into, because how many

0:06:16.481 --> 0:06:21.961
<v Speaker 3>people do you think actually have a goal with the

0:06:22.041 --> 0:06:23.921
<v Speaker 3>key we save it? And and the reason I asked

0:06:23.961 --> 0:06:28.561
<v Speaker 3>that is because we generally have If you are an employee,

0:06:29.001 --> 0:06:31.841
<v Speaker 3>your employer may put in I'm not sure what the

0:06:31.881 --> 0:06:33.881
<v Speaker 3>rules are because I'm self employed, which is, let's not

0:06:33.921 --> 0:06:37.241
<v Speaker 3>dig into that, but say three percent or something or

0:06:37.281 --> 0:06:39.841
<v Speaker 3>two or three percent. And I wonder if people just

0:06:39.881 --> 0:06:41.441
<v Speaker 3>sort of go, well, this is what Key we Saver

0:06:41.481 --> 0:06:43.961
<v Speaker 3>it does, and I've got this amount, but they don't

0:06:44.001 --> 0:06:46.081
<v Speaker 3>actually ever stop to think what the goal is. They

0:06:46.201 --> 0:06:48.081
<v Speaker 3>just know that there's money going in that.

0:06:48.281 --> 0:06:51.241
<v Speaker 2>Oh you've hit I don't know if you if you

0:06:51.601 --> 0:06:53.441
<v Speaker 2>thought about that too much ahead of time, but you've

0:06:53.481 --> 0:06:58.841
<v Speaker 2>actually completely hit on the issue is that with keysaver,

0:06:59.721 --> 0:07:01.601
<v Speaker 2>you want to have, you want to be intentional, what

0:07:01.721 --> 0:07:04.681
<v Speaker 2>do you actually want to achieve? And you think about

0:07:05.961 --> 0:07:08.561
<v Speaker 2>you don't have a huge number of choices to make

0:07:08.561 --> 0:07:12.081
<v Speaker 2>in kiv saver, but boy that it can be dramatic

0:07:12.561 --> 0:07:15.561
<v Speaker 2>the impact of the choices that you make over maybe

0:07:15.601 --> 0:07:18.241
<v Speaker 2>a twenty thirty, maybe a forty year time arise. And

0:07:18.241 --> 0:07:20.001
<v Speaker 2>if you start when you're twenty five, you cash out

0:07:20.001 --> 0:07:22.681
<v Speaker 2>when you're sixty five, that is a long time for

0:07:22.721 --> 0:07:28.681
<v Speaker 2>those choices to compound. And I'm American, right, so, for

0:07:28.681 --> 0:07:32.161
<v Speaker 2>for better or for worse, I tend to be overly

0:07:32.201 --> 0:07:34.801
<v Speaker 2>friendly with people. And I'm on I'm on the airplane

0:07:35.081 --> 0:07:37.001
<v Speaker 2>and I'm asking I ask people what they're doing in

0:07:37.041 --> 0:07:40.361
<v Speaker 2>their kiwisaver, and they are you California?

0:07:40.521 --> 0:07:42.641
<v Speaker 3>I am California because you can check out, but you

0:07:42.641 --> 0:07:43.641
<v Speaker 3>can never leave.

0:07:45.001 --> 0:07:46.201
<v Speaker 6>Exactly.

0:07:46.321 --> 0:07:48.361
<v Speaker 2>Let's not get into the deep spiritual sense.

0:07:48.401 --> 0:07:49.961
<v Speaker 5>That's on California.

0:07:50.041 --> 0:07:52.601
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, yeah, okay, anyway.

0:07:52.361 --> 0:07:57.121
<v Speaker 2>Carry on well, and you talk to people about kivsaver

0:07:57.241 --> 0:08:00.521
<v Speaker 2>and you say, well, based on what you want to

0:08:00.561 --> 0:08:04.561
<v Speaker 2>spend in your future, what amount of what you need

0:08:04.641 --> 0:08:07.041
<v Speaker 2>is ever we're going to cover? You know, is it

0:08:07.081 --> 0:08:08.721
<v Speaker 2>going to cover forty percent of what you need? Is

0:08:08.721 --> 0:08:10.481
<v Speaker 2>it going to cover sixty percent of what you need?

0:08:10.641 --> 0:08:12.841
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to cover everything that you need? And

0:08:13.481 --> 0:08:15.801
<v Speaker 2>what's your plan to fund the difference?

0:08:17.801 --> 0:08:20.561
<v Speaker 3>I reckon people find that, and I'm probably speaking personally

0:08:20.601 --> 0:08:23.321
<v Speaker 3>as well, there's a part of I think there's a

0:08:23.401 --> 0:08:25.521
<v Speaker 3>huge amount of I'm not sure if the word is

0:08:25.561 --> 0:08:31.161
<v Speaker 3>procrastination or avoidance, because people don't want to know what

0:08:31.201 --> 0:08:32.961
<v Speaker 3>that means when they set their goal this is what

0:08:33.001 --> 0:08:35.041
<v Speaker 3>I want, It's like, well, this is how far away

0:08:35.121 --> 0:08:37.521
<v Speaker 3>from that you are? How often do people avoid it

0:08:37.561 --> 0:08:41.961
<v Speaker 3>because they just you know, we're living in high we've

0:08:41.961 --> 0:08:44.841
<v Speaker 3>been living in under high inflation. The costs of buying

0:08:44.841 --> 0:08:47.321
<v Speaker 3>a house is people who are pessimistic about a bunch

0:08:47.321 --> 0:08:49.281
<v Speaker 3>of things. I reckon, a lot of people put that

0:08:49.281 --> 0:08:51.041
<v Speaker 3>stuff in the bottom drawn. That's why they just leave

0:08:51.081 --> 0:08:53.601
<v Speaker 3>it to the employer contribution and whatever they have to

0:08:53.601 --> 0:08:56.081
<v Speaker 3>stick in and go to sleep.

0:08:56.321 --> 0:08:57.841
<v Speaker 6>You know that's right, that's right.

0:08:58.161 --> 0:09:00.281
<v Speaker 2>Well, listen, you know, if you don't have a plan,

0:09:00.361 --> 0:09:02.961
<v Speaker 2>You'll get somewhere. It just may not be where you intended.

0:09:03.201 --> 0:09:06.761
<v Speaker 3>Right, So sounds like that, it sounds like a lyric

0:09:06.801 --> 0:09:08.241
<v Speaker 3>from that song again, But it's probably not.

0:09:08.601 --> 0:09:11.641
<v Speaker 2>As long as that's an acceptable outcome, that you you

0:09:11.761 --> 0:09:15.361
<v Speaker 2>end up where you ended up, and perhaps that's okay

0:09:15.401 --> 0:09:18.801
<v Speaker 2>because you wouldn't have known the difference. But when you

0:09:18.841 --> 0:09:20.961
<v Speaker 2>actually know where you want, or you have an idea

0:09:20.961 --> 0:09:23.641
<v Speaker 2>of what you want. I talk to some people sometimes

0:09:23.641 --> 0:09:27.481
<v Speaker 2>and they're just desperate because they think I'm not going

0:09:27.561 --> 0:09:30.521
<v Speaker 2>to be successful. I've I've waited too long. It's it's

0:09:30.561 --> 0:09:33.241
<v Speaker 2>it's passed me by. But but you can actually sit

0:09:33.281 --> 0:09:36.201
<v Speaker 2>down and still form a strategy and people can go

0:09:36.361 --> 0:09:38.881
<v Speaker 2>from maybe hopeless to go like, you know, this might

0:09:38.881 --> 0:09:39.681
<v Speaker 2>actually work out.

0:09:40.721 --> 0:09:42.721
<v Speaker 3>And I says something to be said for even if

0:09:42.841 --> 0:09:44.961
<v Speaker 3>you know maybe it's not the answer you want, the

0:09:45.081 --> 0:09:47.681
<v Speaker 3>fact of taking control of your finances, it's actually in

0:09:47.721 --> 0:09:50.401
<v Speaker 3>its own right, no matter how good or bad the

0:09:50.441 --> 0:09:53.121
<v Speaker 3>outcome is, there's something about it that is actually liberating

0:09:53.121 --> 0:09:56.001
<v Speaker 3>because you're finally in control and you know what you're

0:09:56.001 --> 0:09:57.121
<v Speaker 3>doing absolutely.

0:09:57.241 --> 0:09:59.601
<v Speaker 2>You feel you feel like, well, this is where I'm

0:09:59.601 --> 0:10:01.961
<v Speaker 2>at and I'm not in denial anymore, and I actually

0:10:01.961 --> 0:10:05.081
<v Speaker 2>have a strategy to make the best out of the

0:10:05.161 --> 0:10:06.281
<v Speaker 2>choices I have left.

0:10:07.321 --> 0:10:08.721
<v Speaker 3>We Actually, i'd like to hear from you on this.

0:10:08.961 --> 0:10:11.921
<v Speaker 3>I eight one hundred eighty t and eighty. Have you

0:10:12.001 --> 0:10:17.241
<v Speaker 3>stopped to think of a particular financial goal or do

0:10:17.361 --> 0:10:19.521
<v Speaker 3>you sort of just do different things, Like I'll stick

0:10:19.521 --> 0:10:21.281
<v Speaker 3>a bit of extra money into ki we sab because

0:10:21.321 --> 0:10:22.761
<v Speaker 3>I think I need to save some more, But you

0:10:22.801 --> 0:10:24.641
<v Speaker 3>have no idea what that's going to amount to in

0:10:24.681 --> 0:10:27.161
<v Speaker 3>the end. You just sort of think this is what

0:10:27.201 --> 0:10:29.881
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to do because I think I should. It's

0:10:29.921 --> 0:10:33.281
<v Speaker 3>but like people want to buy get into the residential

0:10:33.281 --> 0:10:36.201
<v Speaker 3>property market, they may not have the actual financial goal

0:10:36.241 --> 0:10:39.081
<v Speaker 3>in mind, but they'll go, well, apparently this is the

0:10:39.121 --> 0:10:41.201
<v Speaker 3>place to be. So I'm going to stick some money

0:10:41.241 --> 0:10:44.761
<v Speaker 3>in because I should. I'm actually quite curee I'll be

0:10:44.841 --> 0:10:46.441
<v Speaker 3>cursed to know how many people actually have a goal.

0:10:46.721 --> 0:10:49.561
<v Speaker 2>I ran the numbers recently, and well, if you took

0:10:49.601 --> 0:10:51.601
<v Speaker 2>like a thirty year old and I know that this

0:10:51.681 --> 0:10:54.121
<v Speaker 2>sounds like like a big salary, but I want to

0:10:54.161 --> 0:10:56.161
<v Speaker 2>think about it from the sink of a professional, because

0:10:56.161 --> 0:10:58.041
<v Speaker 2>that was the audience I was thinking about. A thirty

0:10:58.081 --> 0:10:59.761
<v Speaker 2>year old who was on one hundred thousand dollars a

0:10:59.841 --> 0:11:02.441
<v Speaker 2>year and just put in three percent. Poor, you're putting

0:11:02.521 --> 0:11:05.921
<v Speaker 2>three percent and you know, saved age sixty five. That

0:11:05.961 --> 0:11:08.241
<v Speaker 2>person ended up some way. If you look at the math,

0:11:08.321 --> 0:11:11.241
<v Speaker 2>like at three hundred ffty thousand dollars balance, but at that.

0:11:11.321 --> 0:11:13.281
<v Speaker 3>Same person's going to be bitter them that you just said,

0:11:13.321 --> 0:11:15.121
<v Speaker 3>Actually I thought that was going to be I was

0:11:15.161 --> 0:11:17.201
<v Speaker 3>surprised at what it was that much.

0:11:17.161 --> 0:11:19.681
<v Speaker 2>Three and fifty thousand dollars balance. It isn't as much

0:11:19.681 --> 0:11:21.841
<v Speaker 2>as it should be because you know that's that's three

0:11:21.881 --> 0:11:23.801
<v Speaker 2>and fifty thousand and thirty five years from now. What's

0:11:23.841 --> 0:11:26.441
<v Speaker 2>the purchasing power of that. It's not as great as

0:11:26.481 --> 0:11:28.921
<v Speaker 2>it sounds. It's maybe half of what it is now.

0:11:29.561 --> 0:11:34.361
<v Speaker 2>If that same person allocated into an aggressive portfolio and

0:11:35.081 --> 0:11:38.041
<v Speaker 2>put in six percent, they'd end up with three or

0:11:38.321 --> 0:11:42.561
<v Speaker 2>four times the balance. You know, that's that's a life

0:11:42.641 --> 0:11:46.441
<v Speaker 2>altering difference to end up with three hundred thousand, to

0:11:46.521 --> 0:11:50.401
<v Speaker 2>end up with one point two million, And those two

0:11:50.401 --> 0:11:53.681
<v Speaker 2>outcomes are both possible for the thirty year old who's

0:11:53.801 --> 0:11:57.401
<v Speaker 2>who's a high earner based on just increasing their personal

0:11:57.441 --> 0:12:02.201
<v Speaker 2>contributions and allocating more aggressively, course, more aggressively. You allocied,

0:12:02.201 --> 0:12:04.481
<v Speaker 2>there's gonna be ups and downs. We can talk about

0:12:04.481 --> 0:12:07.161
<v Speaker 2>that later if you well, I'd love to talk about that. Actually,

0:12:07.161 --> 0:12:09.161
<v Speaker 2>I would love to know what you wanted. Of course, Ben,

0:12:09.401 --> 0:12:11.881
<v Speaker 2>he's got a few clues about investing. In fact, the

0:12:11.921 --> 0:12:13.161
<v Speaker 2>last time I on the show, there are a couple

0:12:13.201 --> 0:12:15.361
<v Speaker 2>of things that you said that really did stick with me.

0:12:15.521 --> 0:12:16.961
<v Speaker 6>So you did well there.

0:12:16.961 --> 0:12:19.881
<v Speaker 3>But Brent Ben Brenkerhoff is my guest. He's head of

0:12:19.961 --> 0:12:23.441
<v Speaker 3>advice at Concilium. You can check out Concilium dot code

0:12:23.441 --> 0:12:25.761
<v Speaker 3>on ZID. They also have their own Keiwi Saber Fund,

0:12:25.761 --> 0:12:28.081
<v Speaker 3>which is key we rap as in wrapping a present

0:12:28.361 --> 0:12:31.241
<v Speaker 3>dot code dot nz. We'd like to take your calls

0:12:31.361 --> 0:12:34.041
<v Speaker 3>any questions you've got about Kiwi Saber and Ben and

0:12:34.081 --> 0:12:36.801
<v Speaker 3>I have lots to talk about. So we'll be back

0:12:36.801 --> 0:12:39.681
<v Speaker 3>in just a moment. It's so eighteen minutes past five

0:12:39.881 --> 0:12:40.361
<v Speaker 3>news talks.

0:12:40.361 --> 0:12:42.241
<v Speaker 6>He'd be and welcome back.

0:12:42.321 --> 0:12:45.521
<v Speaker 3>My guest is Ben Bronkohoff, head of advice at Concilium.

0:12:45.561 --> 0:12:49.001
<v Speaker 3>Actually I say Concilium, Ben, just quickly, what does Concilium do?

0:12:49.081 --> 0:12:49.641
<v Speaker 5>What's your bag?

0:12:49.681 --> 0:12:50.041
<v Speaker 6>Baby?

0:12:51.401 --> 0:12:55.241
<v Speaker 2>So Concilium's job is basically to help independent advisors stay independent.

0:12:55.761 --> 0:12:58.401
<v Speaker 2>So we provide a lot of the services, consulting, a

0:12:58.441 --> 0:13:03.721
<v Speaker 2>lot of the research and software required for an independent advisor,

0:13:03.841 --> 0:13:05.161
<v Speaker 2>not out to sell someone's stuff.

0:13:05.521 --> 0:13:06.561
<v Speaker 6>So excellent.

0:13:07.001 --> 0:13:08.961
<v Speaker 3>So, look, we've got a lot of questions about can

0:13:09.001 --> 0:13:11.441
<v Speaker 3>we say we went to the break just with the

0:13:11.521 --> 0:13:14.441
<v Speaker 3>questions around aggressive funds? And I mean there are generally

0:13:14.441 --> 0:13:16.441
<v Speaker 3>three types of fund are there is three or four?

0:13:16.841 --> 0:13:21.561
<v Speaker 3>There's conservative, balanced and aggressive and maybe there's somewhere but.

0:13:21.481 --> 0:13:24.281
<v Speaker 2>There's there's some nuancewers there ten but you you can

0:13:24.321 --> 0:13:25.361
<v Speaker 2>stick with those if you want.

0:13:25.561 --> 0:13:29.281
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So aggressive, you were talking about over a you know,

0:13:29.401 --> 0:13:31.401
<v Speaker 3>say a thirty year old decides they're going to stick

0:13:31.441 --> 0:13:34.601
<v Speaker 3>a certain percentagen and the difference between being in a

0:13:34.841 --> 0:13:37.361
<v Speaker 3>more conservative fund to aggressive and the potential money that

0:13:37.401 --> 0:13:40.121
<v Speaker 3>they could end up having. I guess the first question

0:13:40.601 --> 0:13:45.241
<v Speaker 3>would be over what time period? So aggressive? Obviously you

0:13:45.281 --> 0:13:47.361
<v Speaker 3>are more susceptible to the rises and the falls in

0:13:47.401 --> 0:13:51.001
<v Speaker 3>the market. So is there a time period where the

0:13:51.161 --> 0:13:54.721
<v Speaker 3>risks of being in an aggressive fund are at at

0:13:54.761 --> 0:13:56.681
<v Speaker 3>a point where you know what, you're okay, if you're

0:13:56.721 --> 0:13:59.321
<v Speaker 3>in this for ten years, don't worry, or five years

0:13:59.441 --> 0:14:03.081
<v Speaker 3>or what's the sort of minimum time to be in

0:14:03.121 --> 0:14:05.881
<v Speaker 3>an aggressive fund. Yeah, so not spific.

0:14:06.401 --> 0:14:08.841
<v Speaker 2>I think people that invest in keV saver mess this up,

0:14:08.841 --> 0:14:10.161
<v Speaker 2>and I'll tell you how they mess it up because

0:14:10.161 --> 0:14:12.961
<v Speaker 2>they think I'm going to reach sixty five and then oh,

0:14:13.001 --> 0:14:15.921
<v Speaker 2>I got ten years until sixty five. Therefore my time

0:14:15.961 --> 0:14:19.961
<v Speaker 2>arison is ten years. I'm fifty five. Well, no, when

0:14:20.001 --> 0:14:21.921
<v Speaker 2>do you want to spend the money? Your time horizon

0:14:22.001 --> 0:14:23.921
<v Speaker 2>is not based on when you reach the age of

0:14:24.721 --> 0:14:27.121
<v Speaker 2>the that you can pull the money out. Your time

0:14:27.161 --> 0:14:31.241
<v Speaker 2>horizon should be the time until you spend down the money,

0:14:31.641 --> 0:14:35.481
<v Speaker 2>and if you have fifteen years, then you can then aggressive.

0:14:35.521 --> 0:14:38.521
<v Speaker 2>An aggressive allocation is perfectly fine, but it's actually more

0:14:38.601 --> 0:14:41.641
<v Speaker 2>nuanced of that. And let me explain this. When you

0:14:41.721 --> 0:14:45.841
<v Speaker 2>are saving regularly right that means money's going in every

0:14:45.961 --> 0:14:49.241
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks right from your paycheck, then being in

0:14:49.281 --> 0:14:52.481
<v Speaker 2>an aggressive allocation makes a lot of sense typically because

0:14:52.521 --> 0:14:57.241
<v Speaker 2>if prices are down and you're a buyer, that's good. Yeah,

0:14:57.521 --> 0:14:59.921
<v Speaker 2>so I want you. I want to give everyone in

0:14:59.921 --> 0:15:01.841
<v Speaker 2>the mind if they're in KIV saver right now, they're

0:15:01.881 --> 0:15:03.401
<v Speaker 2>regularly contributing.

0:15:03.041 --> 0:15:03.761
<v Speaker 6>They're a buyer.

0:15:04.361 --> 0:15:06.921
<v Speaker 2>If there was a recession and prices went down, they're

0:15:06.921 --> 0:15:09.681
<v Speaker 2>not harmed because they're buying at low prices. Now who

0:15:09.721 --> 0:15:13.001
<v Speaker 2>are they buying from. They're buying from people that are selling. Yeah, well,

0:15:13.041 --> 0:15:15.361
<v Speaker 2>if if there's a recession of prices are down, you're

0:15:15.361 --> 0:15:18.921
<v Speaker 2>a seller, that's a lot more harmful. So when you're

0:15:19.041 --> 0:15:22.321
<v Speaker 2>become when you transition from becoming a buyer and you

0:15:22.361 --> 0:15:25.561
<v Speaker 2>become a seller, you want to have some securities in

0:15:25.601 --> 0:15:29.201
<v Speaker 2>your portfolio that you can sell that aren't very price sensitive,

0:15:29.441 --> 0:15:33.761
<v Speaker 2>cash term deposits, fixed interest, things like this, so that

0:15:33.881 --> 0:15:36.081
<v Speaker 2>when prices are down, you're not forced to sell at

0:15:36.121 --> 0:15:38.641
<v Speaker 2>low prices. But if you're buying them, you're buying every

0:15:38.641 --> 0:15:41.681
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks and prices are low because of recession,

0:15:41.721 --> 0:15:44.561
<v Speaker 2>the stock markets are down, and that doesn't harm you

0:15:44.641 --> 0:15:46.521
<v Speaker 2>very much because you're buying at low prices.

0:15:46.761 --> 0:15:50.601
<v Speaker 3>So what I'm hearing there is if I was what

0:15:50.721 --> 0:15:52.521
<v Speaker 3>even my fund is, Let's let's pretend I'm in a

0:15:52.561 --> 0:15:56.881
<v Speaker 3>conservative fund and we should aggressive, we should talk. I'm

0:15:56.881 --> 0:15:59.361
<v Speaker 3>not in a concert fund, don't worry. I'm in balance.

0:15:59.401 --> 0:16:01.361
<v Speaker 3>But I'm a bit passive on this because you know,

0:16:01.521 --> 0:16:03.601
<v Speaker 3>mortgages and all sorts of cost of expence. So I

0:16:03.641 --> 0:16:08.641
<v Speaker 3>haven't been a great contributor. I'm hearing that right now.

0:16:09.081 --> 0:16:13.241
<v Speaker 3>The GDP data and all that sort of data data

0:16:13.481 --> 0:16:17.401
<v Speaker 3>is we're not rocking and rolling as an economy at

0:16:17.401 --> 0:16:20.241
<v Speaker 3>the moment. So intuitally, what I just heard you say

0:16:20.321 --> 0:16:22.001
<v Speaker 3>is probably now is a good time to switch to

0:16:22.001 --> 0:16:25.961
<v Speaker 3>an aggressive fund. Yeah, I believe I've got enough time.

0:16:26.801 --> 0:16:27.801
<v Speaker 3>What is it fifteen years?

0:16:27.801 --> 0:16:28.121
<v Speaker 6>You say?

0:16:28.801 --> 0:16:31.201
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I kind of think about fifteen years if you're

0:16:31.201 --> 0:16:33.881
<v Speaker 2>an aggressive portfolio, that would be ninety percent or more

0:16:33.921 --> 0:16:36.841
<v Speaker 2>in shares as opposed to cash and bonds and things.

0:16:37.601 --> 0:16:40.841
<v Speaker 2>So if you have that kind of time horizon. Now,

0:16:40.921 --> 0:16:43.281
<v Speaker 2>I think the idea of when you should be in

0:16:43.321 --> 0:16:46.281
<v Speaker 2>and we should get out is really tricky because the

0:16:46.361 --> 0:16:49.961
<v Speaker 2>share market is a prediction. It's a prediction of future prices,

0:16:50.001 --> 0:16:52.321
<v Speaker 2>so it's really hard to know when to get in

0:16:52.521 --> 0:16:53.441
<v Speaker 2>and when to get out.

0:16:53.841 --> 0:16:56.681
<v Speaker 3>And you are reminding me of our earlier conversation as well,

0:16:56.721 --> 0:16:59.121
<v Speaker 3>because it was about people watching the shear market and

0:16:59.161 --> 0:17:00.761
<v Speaker 3>thinking when's a good time to buy, and you are like,

0:17:00.881 --> 0:17:02.601
<v Speaker 3>the market is always going to be ahead of you.

0:17:02.561 --> 0:17:04.321
<v Speaker 6>Buddy, That's exactly right.

0:17:04.401 --> 0:17:06.601
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think that that's a good idea, but

0:17:06.721 --> 0:17:09.201
<v Speaker 2>I do think that when people are regularly buying, they

0:17:09.281 --> 0:17:13.161
<v Speaker 2>they're partially insulated from the effects of down markets because

0:17:13.201 --> 0:17:16.361
<v Speaker 2>if the markets are down, then they can purchase at

0:17:16.401 --> 0:17:20.241
<v Speaker 2>low prices and that helps to blunt the effect of

0:17:20.281 --> 0:17:21.321
<v Speaker 2>those low prices.

0:17:21.561 --> 0:17:23.561
<v Speaker 3>But if you're constantly buying, you're also buying when the

0:17:23.601 --> 0:17:24.841
<v Speaker 3>market is inflated as well.

0:17:24.921 --> 0:17:27.081
<v Speaker 2>That's right, but no one cares. When the market's in flavor,

0:17:27.081 --> 0:17:28.761
<v Speaker 2>they're super happy because they look at their balance and

0:17:28.761 --> 0:17:31.561
<v Speaker 2>there they're an aggressive allocation and it's it's done really well,

0:17:31.841 --> 0:17:34.041
<v Speaker 2>So psychologically.

0:17:33.801 --> 0:17:35.401
<v Speaker 6>They are they're happy.

0:17:35.481 --> 0:17:35.721
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:17:36.161 --> 0:17:38.561
<v Speaker 2>The problem with us that with the idea of when

0:17:38.601 --> 0:17:42.201
<v Speaker 2>the market's high is the market, over any length of

0:17:42.241 --> 0:17:45.361
<v Speaker 2>time generally trends one direction, so it's always going to

0:17:45.401 --> 0:17:48.241
<v Speaker 2>go get higher. So the idea when it's high, if

0:17:48.281 --> 0:17:49.921
<v Speaker 2>it's at an all time high, does that mean it's

0:17:49.921 --> 0:17:51.681
<v Speaker 2>going to fall? No, that doesn't mean that at all.

0:17:51.681 --> 0:17:54.001
<v Speaker 2>It's very hard to know these things.

0:17:53.881 --> 0:17:55.401
<v Speaker 6>Because the issue that you've.

0:17:56.881 --> 0:18:00.841
<v Speaker 3>Maybe touched on is it's one thing to decide when

0:18:00.881 --> 0:18:02.681
<v Speaker 3>you're going to get into an aggressive fund. And I

0:18:02.681 --> 0:18:05.121
<v Speaker 3>guess the answer is as early as possible.

0:18:05.121 --> 0:18:05.761
<v Speaker 6>That's the answer.

0:18:05.841 --> 0:18:09.641
<v Speaker 3>Okay, as possible that that is the answer.

0:18:09.801 --> 0:18:11.881
<v Speaker 6>You know, but of course I listen.

0:18:11.961 --> 0:18:14.961
<v Speaker 2>This isn't advice and not if someone someone, if someone

0:18:15.041 --> 0:18:18.281
<v Speaker 2>is has a has a frame of mind that when

0:18:18.361 --> 0:18:21.801
<v Speaker 2>markets are volatile they really lose sleep and it's highly

0:18:21.881 --> 0:18:25.841
<v Speaker 2>uncomfortable for them, then they should understand that that they

0:18:25.841 --> 0:18:28.841
<v Speaker 2>can go more conservative to balance or a conservative but

0:18:28.961 --> 0:18:32.761
<v Speaker 2>the implication of is that they will likely, over a

0:18:32.801 --> 0:18:34.641
<v Speaker 2>long period of time end up with less money. So

0:18:34.681 --> 0:18:35.441
<v Speaker 2>here's the tension.

0:18:36.481 --> 0:18:37.161
<v Speaker 6>What is risk?

0:18:37.561 --> 0:18:42.601
<v Speaker 2>Is risk the fear or the risk of prices going

0:18:42.681 --> 0:18:44.921
<v Speaker 2>up and down a little bit or even a lot

0:18:44.961 --> 0:18:46.841
<v Speaker 2>over a short term time period. Or is risk that

0:18:46.921 --> 0:18:48.761
<v Speaker 2>I might not have as much money as I want

0:18:48.801 --> 0:18:49.681
<v Speaker 2>when I want to spend it.

0:18:50.361 --> 0:18:53.361
<v Speaker 3>You know that that is what is risk? Well, actually

0:18:53.801 --> 0:18:57.481
<v Speaker 3>that is also inadvertently. There's another question that comes out

0:18:57.521 --> 0:19:03.041
<v Speaker 3>of that is we all understand risk in our own

0:19:06.041 --> 0:19:10.081
<v Speaker 3>lay person sort of way, like I might hear aggressive

0:19:10.081 --> 0:19:13.161
<v Speaker 3>fund is more risky. But do I really have any

0:19:13.241 --> 0:19:17.041
<v Speaker 3>idea what the actual risk is and what that means

0:19:17.081 --> 0:19:20.241
<v Speaker 3>because we all just have our own subjective Because some

0:19:20.281 --> 0:19:21.921
<v Speaker 3>of us I've got I mean, I've got a maide

0:19:21.921 --> 0:19:24.881
<v Speaker 3>of mine who's I produce concerts from time to time,

0:19:24.921 --> 0:19:26.321
<v Speaker 3>and I consider that pretty risky?

0:19:26.841 --> 0:19:27.681
<v Speaker 5>What a mine?

0:19:27.721 --> 0:19:29.801
<v Speaker 3>Who does it all the time? And he will have

0:19:29.921 --> 0:19:32.121
<v Speaker 3>moments where he thinks, oh, that's not very risky. That

0:19:32.201 --> 0:19:36.441
<v Speaker 3>would terrify someone else. So his perception of risk is

0:19:36.481 --> 0:19:39.721
<v Speaker 3>completely different. So how can we, ever, as key we

0:19:39.761 --> 0:19:43.201
<v Speaker 3>savor investors, which most of it many of us are,

0:19:43.801 --> 0:19:46.401
<v Speaker 3>How can we really understand what the risk is because

0:19:47.241 --> 0:19:50.201
<v Speaker 3>it's almost Some people might think, okay, you've got conservative.

0:19:50.241 --> 0:19:53.041
<v Speaker 3>Let's just pretend there's three. We've got conservative, balanced and

0:19:53.121 --> 0:19:56.921
<v Speaker 3>aggressive and aggressive. His picture is more risky and some

0:19:56.961 --> 0:19:59.041
<v Speaker 3>people will see that as being that's a bit more risky,

0:19:59.081 --> 0:20:01.841
<v Speaker 3>but what the hell other people be thinking it's a

0:20:01.881 --> 0:20:02.681
<v Speaker 3>lot more risky.

0:20:02.921 --> 0:20:04.121
<v Speaker 6>There's no way.

0:20:04.201 --> 0:20:05.961
<v Speaker 3>So how do we under stand what risk is? And

0:20:06.121 --> 0:20:06.761
<v Speaker 3>can we Saiva?

0:20:06.881 --> 0:20:09.281
<v Speaker 2>Well, the number one thing I think you should do

0:20:09.361 --> 0:20:15.081
<v Speaker 2>is get an advisor, right because the ultimately what you're

0:20:15.121 --> 0:20:18.561
<v Speaker 2>trying to solve, the question you're trying to ask is

0:20:18.561 --> 0:20:20.961
<v Speaker 2>is the two types of risk I'm trying to trade

0:20:21.001 --> 0:20:23.761
<v Speaker 2>off is the risk of price movements to go up

0:20:23.801 --> 0:20:26.041
<v Speaker 2>and down, and that makes me uncomfortable when so when

0:20:26.081 --> 0:20:29.281
<v Speaker 2>markets go down, how much is my portfolio likely to

0:20:29.281 --> 0:20:29.561
<v Speaker 2>go down?

0:20:29.641 --> 0:20:30.441
<v Speaker 6>Or could it go down?

0:20:30.961 --> 0:20:33.321
<v Speaker 2>But the other risk that no one ever talks about,

0:20:33.401 --> 0:20:36.841
<v Speaker 2>or pays attention to, or knows intuitively, is what's the

0:20:37.001 --> 0:20:39.241
<v Speaker 2>risk that I won't be able to spend what I

0:20:39.281 --> 0:20:42.441
<v Speaker 2>want to spend when I want to spend it. And

0:20:42.521 --> 0:20:45.521
<v Speaker 2>what's the risk that's actually the more salient risk of

0:20:45.561 --> 0:20:48.201
<v Speaker 2>the two price movements? You know, does anyone care now

0:20:48.201 --> 0:20:50.761
<v Speaker 2>what price movements were ten or twenty years ago? Yet

0:20:50.761 --> 0:20:53.761
<v Speaker 2>your allocation to growth stocks ten or twenty years ago

0:20:53.801 --> 0:20:56.001
<v Speaker 2>would have a big impact on how much money you

0:20:56.081 --> 0:20:58.641
<v Speaker 2>have available today to spend if you want to start

0:20:58.681 --> 0:20:59.401
<v Speaker 2>spending today.

0:21:00.441 --> 0:21:02.481
<v Speaker 6>Okay, I will.

0:21:02.401 --> 0:21:04.401
<v Speaker 3>Drill into one more question. I'm dying to ask that

0:21:04.441 --> 0:21:06.121
<v Speaker 3>about that even the you've sort of probably answered a

0:21:06.201 --> 0:21:10.161
<v Speaker 3>question if you know how with statistics there's a bell curve. Yeah,

0:21:10.201 --> 0:21:14.681
<v Speaker 3>and at the fringes, you know, the majority of action

0:21:15.001 --> 0:21:17.401
<v Speaker 3>takes place in the middle, sort of thirty forty percent

0:21:17.481 --> 0:21:21.961
<v Speaker 3>or whatever. When it comes to key we savor portfolios

0:21:22.401 --> 0:21:24.681
<v Speaker 3>are any of the risks at the extreme of the

0:21:24.761 --> 0:21:29.121
<v Speaker 3>spectrum where they are either extremely conservative or extremely risky,

0:21:29.361 --> 0:21:32.161
<v Speaker 3>or are they all sort of more within a narrower band.

0:21:32.161 --> 0:21:36.801
<v Speaker 3>If you're talking about conservative, balanced growth, and aggressive.

0:21:36.681 --> 0:21:41.441
<v Speaker 2>You absolutely can take a kV server allocation that can

0:21:41.481 --> 0:21:44.161
<v Speaker 2>be at the ends of those those you can you

0:21:44.161 --> 0:21:47.441
<v Speaker 2>can be virtually all in cash or you can be

0:21:47.681 --> 0:21:50.121
<v Speaker 2>virtually all in just a few shares, depending on the

0:21:50.201 --> 0:21:53.001
<v Speaker 2>keV server that you're thinking about. So yeah, there's a

0:21:53.041 --> 0:21:56.561
<v Speaker 2>wide spectrum. But the question you should be asking yourself

0:21:56.641 --> 0:22:01.001
<v Speaker 2>is does the allocation I'm in is it likely to

0:22:01.081 --> 0:22:02.961
<v Speaker 2>achieve what I want?

0:22:03.121 --> 0:22:04.121
<v Speaker 3>And how do you know?

0:22:04.441 --> 0:22:04.721
<v Speaker 6>I think?

0:22:04.801 --> 0:22:07.081
<v Speaker 2>I think, I think for most people they need to

0:22:07.081 --> 0:22:09.161
<v Speaker 2>get advice. But if you don't want to get advice,

0:22:09.201 --> 0:22:11.881
<v Speaker 2>you certainly avail yourself with the tools on sordid dot

0:22:11.881 --> 0:22:15.121
<v Speaker 2>co dot nz and and take and take those sorts

0:22:15.161 --> 0:22:19.361
<v Speaker 2>of tools available to you. But like on our website

0:22:19.441 --> 0:22:21.601
<v Speaker 2>kivi RAP, we have a list of advisors you can

0:22:21.641 --> 0:22:24.681
<v Speaker 2>go to. All these people give advice on retirement portfolios

0:22:24.681 --> 0:22:26.721
<v Speaker 2>and it's good and those are the kind of people

0:22:26.761 --> 0:22:29.121
<v Speaker 2>you might How does figure out what you want? Most

0:22:29.121 --> 0:22:30.841
<v Speaker 2>people don't even know what they want, tim So it's

0:22:30.881 --> 0:22:34.201
<v Speaker 2>like the question is very difficult to answer. They say, well, well,

0:22:34.241 --> 0:22:36.961
<v Speaker 2>I have enough, Well I don't even know what I need.

0:22:37.161 --> 0:22:38.961
<v Speaker 2>I don't I mean, how do I how do I

0:22:39.001 --> 0:22:41.241
<v Speaker 2>even get to think about the question I I if

0:22:41.281 --> 0:22:43.401
<v Speaker 2>I have enough? Or mine I'm going to be funded

0:22:43.401 --> 0:22:46.881
<v Speaker 2>through Kiwisaver. There's so many questions you need to answer

0:22:46.961 --> 0:22:49.801
<v Speaker 2>even before that, questions relevant how does it go.

0:22:49.881 --> 0:22:52.081
<v Speaker 3>With Actually I've just gone on to your the Kiwi

0:22:52.201 --> 0:22:55.321
<v Speaker 3>rap site that you guys have for your kiwisaver, and

0:22:55.361 --> 0:22:58.841
<v Speaker 3>it says find an advisor And my head's spinning because

0:22:58.881 --> 0:23:01.801
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot on there. So you know, how do

0:23:01.841 --> 0:23:03.961
<v Speaker 3>you how do you make a choice there? And and

0:23:04.001 --> 0:23:06.321
<v Speaker 3>how does it work with the funcial advisor? Because I

0:23:06.401 --> 0:23:11.081
<v Speaker 3>have had people who are personal personal financial advisors who say,

0:23:11.161 --> 0:23:14.801
<v Speaker 3>to be honest, it's expensive sometimes if you want to

0:23:14.801 --> 0:23:18.001
<v Speaker 3>get personalized financial advice, how does it work?

0:23:18.801 --> 0:23:20.521
<v Speaker 6>Well, I have a lot to say about that.

0:23:21.881 --> 0:23:23.681
<v Speaker 3>Well that's good because we're here to talk.

0:23:23.721 --> 0:23:24.641
<v Speaker 6>So see.

0:23:25.521 --> 0:23:29.401
<v Speaker 2>You know, advice is not a commodity. It varies widely

0:23:29.441 --> 0:23:32.881
<v Speaker 2>in quality, and I understand how intimidating that is. You know,

0:23:33.201 --> 0:23:35.361
<v Speaker 2>so you you don't how do I know if I'm

0:23:35.361 --> 0:23:39.481
<v Speaker 2>getting really really good advice? And how do I know

0:23:39.481 --> 0:23:42.241
<v Speaker 2>if maybe I should switch an advisor. I think one

0:23:42.281 --> 0:23:43.881
<v Speaker 2>of the first things you want to think about in

0:23:43.961 --> 0:23:47.401
<v Speaker 2>terms of the quality advisor that you're with is whether

0:23:47.401 --> 0:23:50.161
<v Speaker 2>they're independent. And what I mean by that is, do

0:23:50.201 --> 0:23:53.761
<v Speaker 2>they have the ability to recommend to you whatever they

0:23:53.801 --> 0:23:57.361
<v Speaker 2>think is in your interests or are they essentially working

0:23:57.401 --> 0:24:00.841
<v Speaker 2>for a provider. They're working for a company that sells something,

0:24:00.881 --> 0:24:04.001
<v Speaker 2>and no matter what your problem is, the answer is

0:24:04.001 --> 0:24:08.001
<v Speaker 2>always going to be buy this thing. Most kiwis are

0:24:08.041 --> 0:24:11.441
<v Speaker 2>not with an advisor that has the freedom to give

0:24:11.481 --> 0:24:14.841
<v Speaker 2>them the best choice possible. Most kibis are with an

0:24:14.881 --> 0:24:18.441
<v Speaker 2>advisor that maybe working at a financial institution and they'll

0:24:18.441 --> 0:24:22.601
<v Speaker 2>sell you that institution's thing. So that is now, that's

0:24:22.641 --> 0:24:24.481
<v Speaker 2>not exclusive. There's some people that they are in that

0:24:24.561 --> 0:24:27.121
<v Speaker 2>space that do it really well. But that is one

0:24:27.161 --> 0:24:28.201
<v Speaker 2>thing to pay attention to.

0:24:29.361 --> 0:24:32.641
<v Speaker 3>H Okay, so how do you know that? Do you

0:24:32.681 --> 0:24:35.601
<v Speaker 3>just say, do you have the questions you should ask

0:24:35.601 --> 0:24:36.601
<v Speaker 3>a financial advisor?

0:24:36.801 --> 0:24:41.281
<v Speaker 2>So I was recently, I advisor send me, you know,

0:24:41.481 --> 0:24:43.721
<v Speaker 2>a blacked out version of someone's statement where all the

0:24:43.721 --> 0:24:46.001
<v Speaker 2>personal informations blacked out, but I can see what they're

0:24:46.001 --> 0:24:49.281
<v Speaker 2>invested in. This person has five million dollars invested, and

0:24:49.441 --> 0:24:52.881
<v Speaker 2>every single thing they're invested in began with three letters

0:24:53.401 --> 0:24:56.201
<v Speaker 2>because the three letters were the institution they were they

0:24:56.201 --> 0:25:00.001
<v Speaker 2>had been working with. Yeah, so basically that institution had

0:25:00.041 --> 0:25:02.921
<v Speaker 2>put them in their own solutions, their own products. If

0:25:02.961 --> 0:25:05.241
<v Speaker 2>you're in that size situation, I would just suggest you

0:25:05.561 --> 0:25:10.521
<v Speaker 2>that oftentimes there's better advice available to you. Here's the thing.

0:25:10.641 --> 0:25:14.801
<v Speaker 3>See, I'm instantly just thinking, okay, how and where do

0:25:14.841 --> 0:25:19.121
<v Speaker 3>I go? I mean, I would find that bewildering because yea,

0:25:19.961 --> 0:25:23.601
<v Speaker 3>ideally what we all want is some magic guru mentor

0:25:23.961 --> 0:25:25.681
<v Speaker 3>and I call them up and say, look, who's a

0:25:25.681 --> 0:25:29.001
<v Speaker 3>good financial advisor? When they say this person is great

0:25:29.041 --> 0:25:30.801
<v Speaker 3>because they're not tight and they give you their answer.

0:25:30.841 --> 0:25:33.521
<v Speaker 3>But you have to do It's not that straightforward. Not

0:25:33.561 --> 0:25:35.041
<v Speaker 3>many people have a financial risk.

0:25:35.001 --> 0:25:37.481
<v Speaker 2>Question you're asking is a great one. How do I

0:25:37.881 --> 0:25:41.681
<v Speaker 2>find an advisor? How do I find an advisor? And

0:25:41.801 --> 0:25:44.161
<v Speaker 2>you know what, there isn't a great answer to that situation.

0:25:44.281 --> 0:25:46.201
<v Speaker 2>I mean the best I can give you is look

0:25:46.201 --> 0:25:48.801
<v Speaker 2>at our website right there, because all those people are

0:25:48.841 --> 0:25:52.721
<v Speaker 2>great advisors, and so that is a great place to

0:25:52.801 --> 0:25:55.721
<v Speaker 2>choose from. And they do talk about what location that

0:25:55.761 --> 0:25:59.201
<v Speaker 2>they operate in, so you can always look at your

0:25:59.201 --> 0:26:00.361
<v Speaker 2>geography as a way.

0:26:00.561 --> 0:26:02.081
<v Speaker 3>Oh, in terms of people want to have face to

0:26:02.121 --> 0:26:07.001
<v Speaker 3>face sort of advice, absolutely, yeah, now' it's I'm gonna

0:26:07.001 --> 0:26:08.841
<v Speaker 3>have a look at people qirap dot, Curtin and Z

0:26:09.521 --> 0:26:12.361
<v Speaker 3>because anything where you start making some exploration on this

0:26:12.401 --> 0:26:14.801
<v Speaker 3>stuff is probably the step in the right direction. But

0:26:15.841 --> 0:26:18.201
<v Speaker 3>is it important the individuals who are within a company

0:26:18.201 --> 0:26:21.041
<v Speaker 3>as well? Because it's a bit like any organization. There'll

0:26:21.041 --> 0:26:23.081
<v Speaker 3>be people who are absolutely rocking and rolling at what

0:26:23.121 --> 0:26:25.481
<v Speaker 3>they do and the people who are maybe not so good.

0:26:25.801 --> 0:26:30.361
<v Speaker 3>So an organization, well, is it about particular individuals or

0:26:30.441 --> 0:26:32.201
<v Speaker 3>is it about the organization?

0:26:32.321 --> 0:26:35.121
<v Speaker 2>Let me give you some intuition on this. If you

0:26:35.441 --> 0:26:37.401
<v Speaker 2>go and you talk to an advisor and they spend

0:26:37.401 --> 0:26:39.561
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time telling you about how they're their

0:26:39.641 --> 0:26:42.641
<v Speaker 2>their investments that they use are amazing, and they spend

0:26:42.641 --> 0:26:44.361
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time convincing you that they know how

0:26:44.401 --> 0:26:47.321
<v Speaker 2>to pick the best investments, be very concerned because that

0:26:47.361 --> 0:26:49.601
<v Speaker 2>sounds like a sale. Be very concerned. If you talk

0:26:49.641 --> 0:26:51.721
<v Speaker 2>to an advisor and they spend a lot of time

0:26:51.801 --> 0:26:55.001
<v Speaker 2>trying to understand you, what what are your what are

0:26:55.041 --> 0:26:57.681
<v Speaker 2>your what are the things that that you're passionate? What

0:26:57.721 --> 0:26:59.921
<v Speaker 2>are the things that you love? How do you want

0:26:59.961 --> 0:27:02.401
<v Speaker 2>to spend your time? How do you want to allocate

0:27:02.441 --> 0:27:04.921
<v Speaker 2>your resources? Then they can help you devise a st

0:27:05.401 --> 0:27:09.921
<v Speaker 2>a financial strategy to achieve those things. So so just

0:27:09.921 --> 0:27:12.961
<v Speaker 2>pay attention to this one thing. How often does the

0:27:13.001 --> 0:27:16.241
<v Speaker 2>conversation go back to you and what you want and

0:27:16.281 --> 0:27:19.161
<v Speaker 2>what matters to you and the financial resources you have

0:27:19.281 --> 0:27:22.721
<v Speaker 2>to build that life. And how often instead does your

0:27:23.481 --> 0:27:27.001
<v Speaker 2>your advisor spend talking about how wonderful their investment solutions are.

0:27:27.601 --> 0:27:30.521
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a good sign if you're with a

0:27:30.521 --> 0:27:32.921
<v Speaker 2>good advisor. The advice should be focused on you and

0:27:32.961 --> 0:27:33.521
<v Speaker 2>your needs.

0:27:33.801 --> 0:27:36.561
<v Speaker 3>So if they're trying to sell you something first time,

0:27:36.761 --> 0:27:38.081
<v Speaker 3>first sign of trouble.

0:27:38.161 --> 0:27:39.801
<v Speaker 2>That is a that is a sign of that is

0:27:39.841 --> 0:27:40.761
<v Speaker 2>a sign of trouble.

0:27:40.841 --> 0:27:43.001
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, look, we're gonna be back in just a moment.

0:27:43.041 --> 0:27:44.841
<v Speaker 3>If you've got any questions for being Ben brink Off

0:27:44.841 --> 0:27:46.641
<v Speaker 3>ahead of advice, it's going to sell him some great

0:27:47.001 --> 0:27:50.601
<v Speaker 3>information and conversation. We're going to continue it in just

0:27:50.641 --> 0:27:54.681
<v Speaker 3>a moment. It is twenty three minutes to six news talks.

0:27:54.681 --> 0:27:58.561
<v Speaker 3>He'd be te.

0:27:59.481 --> 0:28:02.201
<v Speaker 2>What's see what's the same name?

0:28:02.361 --> 0:28:14.961
<v Speaker 4>And shine the pressure.

0:28:16.841 --> 0:28:20.681
<v Speaker 3>A billion there and there's the theme for the show

0:28:20.721 --> 0:28:22.481
<v Speaker 3>when I'm a billionaire. I'm not sure we're going to

0:28:22.481 --> 0:28:24.761
<v Speaker 3>return into billionaires. It's a lot of money. By the way,

0:28:24.761 --> 0:28:26.281
<v Speaker 3>when you think I'd like to be a billionaire. It's like,

0:28:26.321 --> 0:28:29.361
<v Speaker 3>would you really ten million be enough? How much money

0:28:29.401 --> 0:28:31.521
<v Speaker 3>would be enough that will save that for another show?

0:28:31.641 --> 0:28:34.121
<v Speaker 3>How much money would be enough for you time? Make

0:28:34.121 --> 0:28:36.001
<v Speaker 3>a note of that. I'm Tim Beverages, a smart money.

0:28:36.001 --> 0:28:38.561
<v Speaker 3>We've got Ben Brinkoff, head of advice at Concilium in

0:28:38.601 --> 0:28:40.961
<v Speaker 3>the in the studio with us. I've got a few

0:28:40.961 --> 0:28:41.481
<v Speaker 3>texts for you.

0:28:41.561 --> 0:28:41.761
<v Speaker 5>Ben.

0:28:43.041 --> 0:28:45.481
<v Speaker 3>It if I take out Key WE Saver in a

0:28:45.521 --> 0:28:49.441
<v Speaker 3>lump summit retirement, does it get taxed again? If it does,

0:28:49.481 --> 0:28:51.401
<v Speaker 3>at what rate? Would it be better to stop putting

0:28:51.441 --> 0:28:53.241
<v Speaker 3>in and put in savings account at some point to

0:28:53.241 --> 0:28:56.041
<v Speaker 3>get some interest instead of penalty of tax taken off again?

0:28:56.201 --> 0:28:58.481
<v Speaker 3>I think they mean does it keep getting taxed on

0:28:58.561 --> 0:29:00.441
<v Speaker 3>the interest or something? Once it's I don't know what.

0:29:00.761 --> 0:29:02.881
<v Speaker 2>When you're with draw key WE Serve, it's not taxed. No,

0:29:02.961 --> 0:29:04.161
<v Speaker 2>it's taxed on the way through.

0:29:04.441 --> 0:29:04.681
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:29:04.841 --> 0:29:07.841
<v Speaker 2>So whatever money you see in your kdcver account at

0:29:07.841 --> 0:29:10.001
<v Speaker 2>sixty five, if you pull that money out, there's no

0:29:10.121 --> 0:29:11.201
<v Speaker 2>tax do Yeah.

0:29:11.241 --> 0:29:13.801
<v Speaker 3>But if you invest it in a savings account, then

0:29:13.841 --> 0:29:15.481
<v Speaker 3>you will get taxed on the interest. Correct.

0:29:15.761 --> 0:29:17.641
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're gonna get You're gonna get taxed on the

0:29:17.681 --> 0:29:21.321
<v Speaker 2>interest in either account, so it's not that's not gonna.

0:29:21.361 --> 0:29:23.961
<v Speaker 3>Yeah effect, no lump sums to worry about the account.

0:29:23.961 --> 0:29:27.601
<v Speaker 3>And I think is the moral of the story with

0:29:27.721 --> 0:29:30.201
<v Speaker 3>the American Fed cutting the interest rate, I was on

0:29:30.321 --> 0:29:32.961
<v Speaker 3>the conservative and my keywi Saver, I'm now considering going

0:29:33.001 --> 0:29:35.321
<v Speaker 3>to balance rather because people will now be investing in

0:29:35.321 --> 0:29:38.921
<v Speaker 3>stocks rather than bonds. Is that a good idea from Sue?

0:29:39.081 --> 0:29:41.121
<v Speaker 3>I think the way Sues expressed itself is the way

0:29:41.121 --> 0:29:43.401
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people just think broadly. It's just like

0:29:43.721 --> 0:29:46.881
<v Speaker 3>I reckon, this is down seul shoven in here and

0:29:46.961 --> 0:29:50.281
<v Speaker 3>away we go. Not specific financial advice for you, Sue,

0:29:50.401 --> 0:29:52.001
<v Speaker 3>but Ben's comments.

0:29:52.681 --> 0:29:55.441
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Sue, So you know, when I think about a

0:29:55.481 --> 0:29:58.641
<v Speaker 2>situation like this, I don't make any changes at all

0:29:58.921 --> 0:30:01.001
<v Speaker 2>based on things like what the Fed does. And I'll

0:30:01.001 --> 0:30:04.081
<v Speaker 2>tell you why, what do I know about what the

0:30:04.121 --> 0:30:07.401
<v Speaker 2>Fed just did? Markets haven't already priced? Yeah, markets have

0:30:07.481 --> 0:30:10.641
<v Speaker 2>already priced set information in. In order to actually get

0:30:10.641 --> 0:30:12.681
<v Speaker 2>an advantage on the markets, you've got to know something

0:30:12.681 --> 0:30:14.881
<v Speaker 2>the market doesn't know. And what the market knows more

0:30:14.921 --> 0:30:18.201
<v Speaker 2>than anything is what the Fed does. They that is

0:30:18.281 --> 0:30:21.081
<v Speaker 2>that information is already in prices. So there's not an

0:30:21.121 --> 0:30:23.801
<v Speaker 2>advantage or disadvantage, but there is an advantage suit of this.

0:30:24.521 --> 0:30:27.161
<v Speaker 2>If you go to balance, you'll have more growth assets

0:30:27.161 --> 0:30:29.081
<v Speaker 2>in your portfolio. If you hold that for a long

0:30:29.161 --> 0:30:32.081
<v Speaker 2>enough time, that is very likely, although not guaranteed, to

0:30:32.161 --> 0:30:35.201
<v Speaker 2>leave you with more money at cash in hand in retirement.

0:30:35.801 --> 0:30:40.521
<v Speaker 2>That is something you can you can count on. But

0:30:41.081 --> 0:30:43.841
<v Speaker 2>trying to outwit the market in terms of what they've

0:30:43.841 --> 0:30:47.681
<v Speaker 2>done with interest rate movements is something that it's very hot.

0:30:47.761 --> 0:30:49.601
<v Speaker 2>You can't have an informational advantage there.

0:30:49.641 --> 0:30:53.001
<v Speaker 3>Did the markets know that the feed was going to

0:30:53.001 --> 0:30:55.481
<v Speaker 3>be dropped or was it by point fifty bases points

0:30:55.521 --> 0:30:57.041
<v Speaker 3>or whatever? Did they know that or not?

0:30:57.161 --> 0:31:00.481
<v Speaker 2>What the market will do is that people have differing opinions.

0:31:00.481 --> 0:31:06.001
<v Speaker 2>That's why there's a buyer and seller right.

0:31:04.881 --> 0:31:07.241
<v Speaker 3>So bleeding obviously, but it's good to remember.

0:31:07.641 --> 0:31:10.601
<v Speaker 2>So so what happened is it will it will factor

0:31:10.641 --> 0:31:12.921
<v Speaker 2>in a rate cut of some variety, and then when

0:31:12.921 --> 0:31:16.761
<v Speaker 2>the and when the news becomes certain, then they'll have

0:31:16.801 --> 0:31:20.281
<v Speaker 2>maybe a small correction right in that moment. But generally

0:31:20.321 --> 0:31:22.841
<v Speaker 2>people have already anticipated these things before they happen.

0:31:22.881 --> 0:31:25.161
<v Speaker 3>When those announcements are made, are they people sitting at

0:31:25.241 --> 0:31:26.801
<v Speaker 3>computers ready ahead a button.

0:31:28.121 --> 0:31:29.881
<v Speaker 2>Just like I mean, the fact that you say there's

0:31:29.881 --> 0:31:33.881
<v Speaker 2>a person hitting a button is like it's it's it's

0:31:34.041 --> 0:31:37.161
<v Speaker 2>it is an algorithm, my friend. Right, So for the

0:31:37.201 --> 0:31:40.401
<v Speaker 2>for the most part, people have already factored these things in.

0:31:40.521 --> 0:31:44.281
<v Speaker 2>It's already priced in. That's a very hard thing to understand,

0:31:44.281 --> 0:31:47.081
<v Speaker 2>and I understand, I get why that's not intuitive.

0:31:50.001 --> 0:31:52.281
<v Speaker 3>Actually it's funny. I think the moral of the story

0:31:52.321 --> 0:31:55.121
<v Speaker 3>that you comes from last time. It's a people are

0:31:55.961 --> 0:31:59.161
<v Speaker 3>and when we discussed about making your own investment choices,

0:31:59.841 --> 0:32:04.481
<v Speaker 3>and the point you made quite well it's stuck with

0:32:04.561 --> 0:32:09.961
<v Speaker 3>me was that unless you really, really really I fe

0:32:09.961 --> 0:32:14.001
<v Speaker 3>with stocks and you're passionate about a particular investments, then

0:32:14.241 --> 0:32:17.561
<v Speaker 3>you don't do your own investing because there's the market

0:32:17.641 --> 0:32:19.481
<v Speaker 3>is always going to be ahead of you, unless you

0:32:19.521 --> 0:32:21.401
<v Speaker 3>are just blind lucky like a lotto ticket.

0:32:21.441 --> 0:32:22.681
<v Speaker 6>I guess that's absolutely right.

0:32:23.201 --> 0:32:25.641
<v Speaker 2>So what am I? If I buy something, someone's got

0:32:25.681 --> 0:32:27.641
<v Speaker 2>to sell it. Why does that person want to sell it?

0:32:27.961 --> 0:32:28.161
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:32:28.281 --> 0:32:30.481
<v Speaker 2>What do I know that the seller doesn't know? What

0:32:30.561 --> 0:32:33.761
<v Speaker 2>we both don't know is the news happening in the future, right,

0:32:33.801 --> 0:32:35.561
<v Speaker 2>And the news will happen. It will be good or

0:32:35.561 --> 0:32:38.001
<v Speaker 2>it will be bad and one of us will end

0:32:38.041 --> 0:32:39.321
<v Speaker 2>up better off in the transaction.

0:32:39.481 --> 0:32:41.281
<v Speaker 6>But if either of us or both of us.

0:32:41.281 --> 0:32:44.801
<v Speaker 2>Knew that information, you know, we would factor that into

0:32:44.801 --> 0:32:47.841
<v Speaker 2>prices and it would already we wouldn't neither of us

0:32:47.881 --> 0:32:48.281
<v Speaker 2>would win.

0:32:48.481 --> 0:32:51.441
<v Speaker 3>It does always fascinate me when things are really in

0:32:51.481 --> 0:32:53.281
<v Speaker 3>a boom and people are thinking, well, I'm definitely going

0:32:53.321 --> 0:32:54.921
<v Speaker 3>to sell because it's not going to go any further.

0:32:54.961 --> 0:32:56.641
<v Speaker 3>But and the fact that there are still people to buy.

0:32:56.841 --> 0:33:00.601
<v Speaker 3>But that's the whole supply and demand and just that.

0:32:59.721 --> 0:33:01.961
<v Speaker 2>That's what makes the market such a beautiful thing, right,

0:33:02.121 --> 0:33:04.481
<v Speaker 2>is that it's that information needs to be processed so

0:33:04.481 --> 0:33:07.161
<v Speaker 2>that there's buyers and sellers, so that what you're left

0:33:07.201 --> 0:33:09.921
<v Speaker 2>with is the buyer takes risk the reward for that,

0:33:10.121 --> 0:33:13.321
<v Speaker 2>the seller takes cash and they're happy with that. And

0:33:13.321 --> 0:33:16.601
<v Speaker 2>depending on how much uncertainty there isn't a price as

0:33:17.001 --> 0:33:20.561
<v Speaker 2>how what someone buys when they buy, So the more uncertainty,

0:33:20.761 --> 0:33:23.481
<v Speaker 2>generally speaking, the more return you have to offer me

0:33:23.561 --> 0:33:24.121
<v Speaker 2>to take that on.

0:33:25.841 --> 0:33:28.881
<v Speaker 3>Now, another question that's come through and from a few texts,

0:33:29.001 --> 0:33:31.681
<v Speaker 3>is when is the time to take your money out

0:33:31.681 --> 0:33:33.841
<v Speaker 3>of an aggressive fund? So you've decided you've had the

0:33:33.841 --> 0:33:36.761
<v Speaker 3>window you've had fifteen years or twenty or thirty or whatever,

0:33:37.121 --> 0:33:40.001
<v Speaker 3>and you're getting maybe a few years from retirement. There's

0:33:40.001 --> 0:33:41.841
<v Speaker 3>a part of me that sort of thinks, well, look

0:33:42.161 --> 0:33:44.041
<v Speaker 3>if i've been it for fifteen years and when I

0:33:44.121 --> 0:33:45.401
<v Speaker 3>just hang on to it and take it when I

0:33:45.441 --> 0:33:48.961
<v Speaker 3>need it. And that's my layperson sort of thing. Although

0:33:50.081 --> 0:33:52.961
<v Speaker 3>the general conversation from most people is like, I'm going

0:33:53.041 --> 0:33:55.201
<v Speaker 3>to need my money soon when I need to shift

0:33:55.201 --> 0:33:57.761
<v Speaker 3>it to a conservative fund. So what window do you

0:33:57.801 --> 0:34:00.601
<v Speaker 3>think people should think about it?

0:34:00.601 --> 0:34:03.761
<v Speaker 2>It's a very individual question because it does depend on

0:34:03.801 --> 0:34:06.121
<v Speaker 2>when you want to spend how much you want to spend.

0:34:07.041 --> 0:34:09.721
<v Speaker 2>So again, these are things you sit down with someone

0:34:10.441 --> 0:34:12.481
<v Speaker 2>and you you work all that out and you figure

0:34:12.481 --> 0:34:15.361
<v Speaker 2>out what an allocation is appropriate. But when it's in

0:34:15.441 --> 0:34:18.001
<v Speaker 2>your mind that you could spend some of that money,

0:34:18.241 --> 0:34:20.521
<v Speaker 2>when you when there's when there's something on the horizon

0:34:20.521 --> 0:34:22.761
<v Speaker 2>you can think of, Okay, you know, I could see

0:34:22.761 --> 0:34:24.321
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to start to spend some of this money.

0:34:24.601 --> 0:34:27.441
<v Speaker 2>You know, maybe it's a couple of years out then

0:34:27.481 --> 0:34:30.041
<v Speaker 2>you should be thinking, maybe I want to start to

0:34:30.121 --> 0:34:34.441
<v Speaker 2>dial down the amount of shares I have so I

0:34:34.521 --> 0:34:37.281
<v Speaker 2>have some cash and bonds and something that's a little

0:34:37.281 --> 0:34:38.881
<v Speaker 2>bit more price stable so that when I want to

0:34:38.921 --> 0:34:43.561
<v Speaker 2>sell it's there to sell it. But that's very very general.

0:34:43.681 --> 0:34:45.921
<v Speaker 2>Generally you want to sit down and with an advisor

0:34:45.961 --> 0:34:48.761
<v Speaker 2>to determine is the amount I want to spend sustainable?

0:34:49.041 --> 0:34:52.041
<v Speaker 2>If so, is the allocation I have going to support it?

0:34:52.321 --> 0:34:54.121
<v Speaker 2>If not? What's the gap? And what do I need

0:34:54.161 --> 0:34:54.841
<v Speaker 2>to do about it?

0:34:55.441 --> 0:35:00.801
<v Speaker 3>Who decides when it comes to qcyber providers, Because you

0:35:00.801 --> 0:35:02.921
<v Speaker 3>were saying that there is the complete spectrum. You can

0:35:02.961 --> 0:35:05.601
<v Speaker 3>go incredibly conservative or you can go and credible aggressive.

0:35:05.641 --> 0:35:09.681
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely Who decides the language to describe their funds?

0:35:10.041 --> 0:35:12.721
<v Speaker 2>I know, right? Like it's it is so confusing. I

0:35:13.121 --> 0:35:15.961
<v Speaker 2>hate the word aggressive. You wants to be aggressive? Most

0:35:15.961 --> 0:35:19.721
<v Speaker 2>people think Americans are aggressive? Wow, you know, and and

0:35:19.801 --> 0:35:22.801
<v Speaker 2>they do so in a in a fairly derogatory way.

0:35:22.961 --> 0:35:26.761
<v Speaker 2>Right where the word growth that's or balanced. I want

0:35:26.761 --> 0:35:29.041
<v Speaker 2>to be balanced. I'm much more balanced, right.

0:35:28.881 --> 0:35:30.241
<v Speaker 3>Well balanced?

0:35:30.281 --> 0:35:31.361
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't sounds good.

0:35:31.441 --> 0:35:33.441
<v Speaker 3>That sounds a bout of a snooze though, does it?

0:35:33.481 --> 0:35:33.721
<v Speaker 5>Okay?

0:35:34.521 --> 0:35:36.841
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean it sounds it sounds like you're having

0:35:36.881 --> 0:35:37.561
<v Speaker 3>a bubb each white.

0:35:37.601 --> 0:35:39.441
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's a there's a study ones I love

0:35:39.481 --> 0:35:42.321
<v Speaker 2>academic studies, and they they gave they gave these two

0:35:42.401 --> 0:35:44.561
<v Speaker 2>different groups of people two different funds to choose from.

0:35:44.561 --> 0:35:46.241
<v Speaker 2>They said, you got to make a portfolio from these

0:35:46.241 --> 0:35:49.481
<v Speaker 2>two funds, right, and one of the in one case

0:35:49.561 --> 0:35:53.081
<v Speaker 2>the fund was fifty fifty percent shares fifty percent bonds

0:35:53.081 --> 0:35:55.321
<v Speaker 2>and the other and they had to balance that with

0:35:55.321 --> 0:35:57.121
<v Speaker 2>someone that was one hundred percent shares. Well, do what

0:35:57.161 --> 0:35:57.521
<v Speaker 2>they did.

0:35:57.801 --> 0:35:58.641
<v Speaker 6>They just kind of took.

0:35:58.521 --> 0:36:01.081
<v Speaker 2>Fifty percent of each and they got about seventy five

0:36:01.121 --> 0:36:04.561
<v Speaker 2>percent shares. The other group they gave two funds, one

0:36:04.601 --> 0:36:06.241
<v Speaker 2>was a hundred percent shares and what was one hundred

0:36:06.241 --> 0:36:09.201
<v Speaker 2>percent bonds, and that group kind of just took fifty

0:36:09.201 --> 0:36:11.081
<v Speaker 2>percent of each and end up with fifty percent shares.

0:36:11.641 --> 0:36:14.361
<v Speaker 2>So what happens is people people when they don't know,

0:36:14.641 --> 0:36:16.921
<v Speaker 2>they just kind of they kind of just take an

0:36:16.921 --> 0:36:17.561
<v Speaker 2>advert on the.

0:36:17.481 --> 0:36:20.001
<v Speaker 6>F So, but is that right for you?

0:36:20.081 --> 0:36:21.721
<v Speaker 2>I feel like people are just feel like.

0:36:22.481 --> 0:36:23.681
<v Speaker 6>Oh, that's the whole point.

0:36:23.921 --> 0:36:26.441
<v Speaker 3>That's why I'm saying, it's even people's understanding of risk,

0:36:26.801 --> 0:36:28.281
<v Speaker 3>mild risk or whatever.

0:36:28.321 --> 0:36:31.121
<v Speaker 2>And so what happens is they take these these surveys

0:36:31.201 --> 0:36:33.761
<v Speaker 2>of five or six questions and that it tells you oh,

0:36:33.801 --> 0:36:36.561
<v Speaker 2>you should you should be in eighty percent shares, You

0:36:36.601 --> 0:36:38.281
<v Speaker 2>should be in fifty percent shares, you should be in

0:36:38.321 --> 0:36:41.361
<v Speaker 2>thirty percent shares. Five or six questions? Right, No one

0:36:41.441 --> 0:36:44.161
<v Speaker 2>ever describes, Oh, by the way, in twenty years time,

0:36:44.281 --> 0:36:46.281
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna have one hundred thousand dollars less because of

0:36:46.321 --> 0:36:48.961
<v Speaker 2>that choice. Right, No one actually takes you through that logic.

0:36:49.241 --> 0:36:51.321
<v Speaker 3>No, Right, We're gonna take another break, can come back?

0:36:51.321 --> 0:36:53.521
<v Speaker 3>We got because time is flying. It's ten to six,

0:36:53.601 --> 0:37:03.601
<v Speaker 3>but this is news talks. He'd be back, soone center.

0:37:12.281 --> 0:37:13.641
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to the weekend collective.

0:37:13.681 --> 0:37:15.361
<v Speaker 3>Of course, if you do want to have a good retirement,

0:37:15.441 --> 0:37:18.921
<v Speaker 3>write a song like Hotel California. And it's probably a

0:37:18.961 --> 0:37:23.961
<v Speaker 3>license to print money, isn't it, Brand Brinkerhoff? So yeah,

0:37:23.961 --> 0:37:28.161
<v Speaker 3>look are they just we've got about I've got three

0:37:28.201 --> 0:37:32.281
<v Speaker 3>minutes left. But are there particular warning signs or signs

0:37:32.321 --> 0:37:35.201
<v Speaker 3>that people should look out for that it might be

0:37:35.281 --> 0:37:39.681
<v Speaker 3>time to change their advisor or their their plan.

0:37:40.401 --> 0:37:41.161
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there are.

0:37:42.041 --> 0:37:44.081
<v Speaker 2>If you don't know what you need to do to

0:37:44.161 --> 0:37:46.841
<v Speaker 2>have the retirement that you want, and if your advisor

0:37:46.881 --> 0:37:49.481
<v Speaker 2>has in contacted you in the last year, then change

0:37:50.081 --> 0:37:53.241
<v Speaker 2>very simple. Okay, if you know if good advice needs

0:37:53.241 --> 0:37:55.961
<v Speaker 2>to be updated with changes of your circumstances. What you

0:37:56.001 --> 0:37:58.961
<v Speaker 2>want and what your financial circumstances are, right, so you

0:37:59.001 --> 0:38:02.521
<v Speaker 2>need a plan, need a strategy, And if you don't

0:38:02.561 --> 0:38:04.801
<v Speaker 2>know what your strategy is, you don't know what the

0:38:05.081 --> 0:38:07.721
<v Speaker 2>app is between what you want and where you're cruising,

0:38:08.801 --> 0:38:10.321
<v Speaker 2>then that you need to make a change.

0:38:10.401 --> 0:38:13.121
<v Speaker 3>What about your key we saber fund? Are there signs

0:38:13.161 --> 0:38:15.921
<v Speaker 3>that you should reach?

0:38:16.601 --> 0:38:19.801
<v Speaker 2>So if you don't know why you're in the key

0:38:19.801 --> 0:38:23.761
<v Speaker 2>we severy you're in, then consider a change, or at

0:38:23.841 --> 0:38:27.521
<v Speaker 2>least people why am I in? What am I? I

0:38:27.561 --> 0:38:30.641
<v Speaker 2>guess I'm in at a fault or or I'm I

0:38:30.681 --> 0:38:32.241
<v Speaker 2>went down to the bank and they signed me up

0:38:32.281 --> 0:38:34.761
<v Speaker 2>with something I don't really know. Why consider a change?

0:38:34.841 --> 0:38:36.841
<v Speaker 2>You're not there on purpose, are they?

0:38:37.801 --> 0:38:40.721
<v Speaker 3>The sort of dot org dot nz website is one

0:38:40.761 --> 0:38:42.441
<v Speaker 3>that gets referred to frequently?

0:38:42.961 --> 0:38:44.161
<v Speaker 6>Does it?

0:38:44.201 --> 0:38:46.601
<v Speaker 3>Is there any sort of external website and maybe that's

0:38:46.641 --> 0:38:50.201
<v Speaker 3>the one that actually assesses the risk profiles sort of

0:38:50.201 --> 0:38:53.241
<v Speaker 3>from a third party point of view of different funds,

0:38:53.321 --> 0:38:57.681
<v Speaker 3>Like so because one one one funds aggressive fund maybe

0:38:57.761 --> 0:39:00.241
<v Speaker 3>completely different in terms of risk profile to another.

0:39:00.441 --> 0:39:03.201
<v Speaker 2>This is what we do. A Kiwi wrap is you

0:39:03.241 --> 0:39:05.521
<v Speaker 2>work with an advisor. In the advisor actually as five

0:39:05.601 --> 0:39:08.761
<v Speaker 2>hundred or more different options that they can use. So

0:39:09.041 --> 0:39:11.441
<v Speaker 2>so the advisor sits there and looks at everything that's

0:39:11.441 --> 0:39:14.041
<v Speaker 2>available to and then they determine what is the right

0:39:14.121 --> 0:39:16.121
<v Speaker 2>mix of those things for you. And I think that

0:39:16.121 --> 0:39:18.121
<v Speaker 2>that is because I think it is an overwhelming thing

0:39:18.161 --> 0:39:21.841
<v Speaker 2>and likely to be something that people avoid because they

0:39:21.841 --> 0:39:22.921
<v Speaker 2>feel uncomfortable with it.

0:39:23.561 --> 0:39:27.121
<v Speaker 3>Hey, believe it or not, that brings the art or

0:39:27.201 --> 0:39:29.961
<v Speaker 3>close that has flown by, hasn't it. Well, that's that's

0:39:29.961 --> 0:39:32.441
<v Speaker 3>why I love about radio and having a good conversation. Hey,

0:39:32.481 --> 0:39:34.841
<v Speaker 3>thanks so much for joining us, Ben. If people want

0:39:34.881 --> 0:39:38.161
<v Speaker 3>to check out you want to check out Ben's company,

0:39:38.201 --> 0:39:40.721
<v Speaker 3>here is what's what's your job description again?

0:39:40.761 --> 0:39:42.321
<v Speaker 5>Financial head of.

0:39:42.241 --> 0:39:43.241
<v Speaker 6>Advice at Concilium.

0:39:43.281 --> 0:39:46.521
<v Speaker 3>There we go. It's a Concilium dot co dot NZ.

0:39:46.721 --> 0:39:48.801
<v Speaker 3>That's c O N S I L I U E M.

0:39:48.841 --> 0:39:51.001
<v Speaker 3>If you're curious about those pages I've referred to in

0:39:51.041 --> 0:39:55.681
<v Speaker 3>our conversation, that's on the the key we sabor page.

0:39:55.681 --> 0:39:58.521
<v Speaker 3>It's kiwi rap as and w A R sorry w

0:39:58.841 --> 0:40:01.521
<v Speaker 3>R A P. And you can see the list of

0:40:01.561 --> 0:40:03.081
<v Speaker 3>the drop down list of advice and a whole lot

0:40:03.081 --> 0:40:05.361
<v Speaker 3>of an interesting information on there, which I couldn't begin

0:40:05.441 --> 0:40:07.961
<v Speaker 3>to describe any further given we've only got thirty seconds left,

0:40:08.041 --> 0:40:10.121
<v Speaker 3>so Ben, we'll catch you again. I hope we'll get

0:40:10.161 --> 0:40:12.241
<v Speaker 3>you on the show again soon. Yeah, a great thanks

0:40:12.241 --> 0:40:15.441
<v Speaker 3>to my producer, Tyra Roberts for her song choices. That's

0:40:15.441 --> 0:40:17.961
<v Speaker 3>a sort of that's a mixed thanks because some of

0:40:17.961 --> 0:40:20.081
<v Speaker 3>them are great and some of them just dreadful. But

0:40:20.121 --> 0:40:22.961
<v Speaker 3>you know, as long as someone's happy, we're all happy.

0:40:23.001 --> 0:40:25.041
<v Speaker 3>I'll look for to your company. I'm back filling in

0:40:25.041 --> 0:40:26.801
<v Speaker 3>for afternoons for the next couple of weeks as well,

0:40:27.161 --> 0:40:29.641
<v Speaker 3>So we'll catch you again, same time tomor not, same

0:40:29.641 --> 0:40:32.881
<v Speaker 3>time right tomorrow, twelve o'clock tomorrow, and of course every

0:40:32.921 --> 0:40:34.921
<v Speaker 3>weekend for the Weekend Collective at three o'clock. We'll catch

0:40:34.921 --> 0:40:36.041
<v Speaker 3>you again soon every great evening.

0:40:45.641 --> 0:40:48.441
<v Speaker 1>For more from the Weekend Collective, listen live to news

0:40:48.481 --> 0:40:51.561
<v Speaker 1>talks he'd be weekends from three pm, or follow the

0:40:51.601 --> 0:40:53.081
<v Speaker 1>podcast on iHeartRadio.