1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:03,600 Speaker 1: Twenty away from six the huddle with New Zealand Southeby's 2 00:00:03,680 --> 00:00:06,080 Speaker 1: International Realty Find You're one of a kind. 3 00:00:06,440 --> 00:00:08,320 Speaker 2: Actually, I took the boy to the rugby game for 4 00:00:08,360 --> 00:00:10,760 Speaker 2: the first time last week. I'll tell you about that shortly. 5 00:00:10,960 --> 00:00:12,560 Speaker 2: With me on the huddle we have Stuart Nash and 6 00:00:12,600 --> 00:00:17,840 Speaker 2: Jack Tame Highlands. Okay, Nashi, we're obviously being softened up 7 00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:19,720 Speaker 2: for asset sales next term. Is it going to fly? 8 00:00:20,680 --> 00:00:23,840 Speaker 3: Sounds like it, doesn't it? And I'm completely gangsta itselves 9 00:00:23,840 --> 00:00:26,080 Speaker 3: to be honest, but I do agree with you vaned 10 00:00:26,200 --> 00:00:28,680 Speaker 3: MP up North. These guys have got to cut a profit, 11 00:00:28,800 --> 00:00:32,199 Speaker 3: but let's be clear, they can also experiment a little better. 12 00:00:32,200 --> 00:00:35,320 Speaker 3: I mean, if it's a state owned enterprise like land Corp, 13 00:00:35,840 --> 00:00:37,680 Speaker 3: it can be a little bit innovative and try things 14 00:00:37,680 --> 00:00:40,320 Speaker 3: that maybe a farmer who has to turn a profit 15 00:00:41,360 --> 00:00:43,360 Speaker 3: can't have word ago, so that let them be a 16 00:00:43,400 --> 00:00:46,600 Speaker 3: little bit innovative, but also let them why because you know, 17 00:00:46,640 --> 00:00:50,360 Speaker 3: we're built on the back of the of the agriculture 18 00:00:50,360 --> 00:00:53,120 Speaker 3: and horticulture sector that we are. Some of them, our 19 00:00:53,120 --> 00:00:55,320 Speaker 3: farmers are some of the most innovative in the world. 20 00:00:55,600 --> 00:00:58,320 Speaker 3: We do it incredibly well, but we need to keep innovating. 21 00:00:58,360 --> 00:01:00,480 Speaker 3: And if the state can't lead a lot of innovation, 22 00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:01,160 Speaker 3: than who does. 23 00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:03,560 Speaker 2: But Stu, you just told me our farmers are already 24 00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:06,160 Speaker 2: super innovative. So why does the state have to innovate 25 00:01:06,240 --> 00:01:08,120 Speaker 2: if the farmers are already doing it Like, if it's 26 00:01:08,160 --> 00:01:10,240 Speaker 2: going to if it's going to work, farmers will try 27 00:01:10,280 --> 00:01:12,320 Speaker 2: it out. You don't need states to try these crazy 28 00:01:12,360 --> 00:01:12,920 Speaker 2: ideas out. 29 00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:15,360 Speaker 3: Well. One of the reason a lot of them aren't crazy, 30 00:01:15,400 --> 00:01:17,600 Speaker 3: but some of them start out crazy and becomes hugely profitable. 31 00:01:17,640 --> 00:01:19,640 Speaker 3: And one of the reasons why some of our farmers 32 00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:22,520 Speaker 3: are the most profitable in the world is because the 33 00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:25,280 Speaker 3: research has been done by the state. I mean, there's 34 00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:28,759 Speaker 3: fantastic collaborations between the different universities and the CRIS and 35 00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:32,080 Speaker 3: the private sector to drive innovation in a way that 36 00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:34,000 Speaker 3: makes us hugely profitable. 37 00:01:34,800 --> 00:01:37,240 Speaker 2: Jack, everything that Stu just told me makes me want 38 00:01:37,240 --> 00:01:38,600 Speaker 2: to sell Land corpor What about you? 39 00:01:39,280 --> 00:01:43,760 Speaker 4: Well, I think it good point that the one of 40 00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:47,720 Speaker 4: the benefits of state owned enterprises is that they can 41 00:01:48,160 --> 00:01:50,720 Speaker 4: serve multiple purposes. Right now, we should all expect that 42 00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:53,040 Speaker 4: they are turning profits and turning good profits, that they're 43 00:01:53,040 --> 00:01:55,440 Speaker 4: turning profits that are comparable to the private sector. But 44 00:01:55,480 --> 00:01:57,920 Speaker 4: that being said, they are in a position whereby they 45 00:01:57,960 --> 00:02:01,440 Speaker 4: can serve multiple purposes. I mean, and I suggest TV 46 00:02:01,520 --> 00:02:05,600 Speaker 4: and D might arguably serve multiple purposes. For example, you like, 47 00:02:05,680 --> 00:02:09,720 Speaker 4: what are the multiple purposes well reflecting New Zealand stories 48 00:02:09,840 --> 00:02:13,360 Speaker 4: on television in a way that wouldn't necessarily otherwise be possible. 49 00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:15,120 Speaker 4: Now you can argue with whether or not there's a 50 00:02:15,120 --> 00:02:16,920 Speaker 4: worthwhile purpose, but we don't need to go down that 51 00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:19,679 Speaker 4: track now. But my point is that you know, to 52 00:02:20,320 --> 00:02:23,960 Speaker 4: Stuart's point, there are often multiple purposes for these state 53 00:02:24,040 --> 00:02:25,799 Speaker 4: on enterprises as to whether or not it will fly. 54 00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:29,720 Speaker 4: It's my it's my opinion that actually there might be 55 00:02:29,840 --> 00:02:32,880 Speaker 4: slightly more public appetite in this economic moment then there 56 00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:34,639 Speaker 4: has been in a long time. And just just think 57 00:02:34,639 --> 00:02:36,880 Speaker 4: about the way some of those public conversations have been 58 00:02:37,080 --> 00:02:40,160 Speaker 4: held around asset sales to things like airports, shares and 59 00:02:40,200 --> 00:02:42,400 Speaker 4: auckland and wellings. And I get it that shares sales 60 00:02:42,440 --> 00:02:46,680 Speaker 4: and those cities are different to selling off a majority 61 00:02:46,680 --> 00:02:48,760 Speaker 4: stake in a State on the enterprise. But I look 62 00:02:48,760 --> 00:02:51,040 Speaker 4: at the way that those conversations and debates have been 63 00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:54,480 Speaker 4: received and I can see something similar happening in the 64 00:02:54,520 --> 00:02:57,160 Speaker 4: next electoral term if this government's re elected. I think 65 00:02:57,160 --> 00:02:59,040 Speaker 4: if they spell it out and say, yep, we want 66 00:02:59,040 --> 00:03:00,480 Speaker 4: to have this debate, we want to walk off a 67 00:03:00,480 --> 00:03:02,480 Speaker 4: couple that actually a lot of voters will support that. 68 00:03:02,639 --> 00:03:04,679 Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree with you. Hey Stu, how do you 69 00:03:04,720 --> 00:03:06,839 Speaker 2: feel about having your photo taken when you go into 70 00:03:06,840 --> 00:03:09,480 Speaker 2: the supermarket so that they can keep the bad guys out? 71 00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:11,800 Speaker 3: I didn't have a problem with this, to be honest. 72 00:03:11,960 --> 00:03:16,040 Speaker 3: A retail crime in this country costs the industry about 73 00:03:16,120 --> 00:03:19,160 Speaker 3: two point nine billion dollars. Health and safety is huge. 74 00:03:19,200 --> 00:03:21,080 Speaker 3: I had to look at the stats on the trial 75 00:03:21,120 --> 00:03:24,120 Speaker 3: that is up north. If there was no match to 76 00:03:24,160 --> 00:03:28,000 Speaker 3: any bad person, the image was automatically and immediately deleted. 77 00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:29,919 Speaker 3: So you know, I don't have a problem with this. 78 00:03:30,440 --> 00:03:31,480 Speaker 2: No, I don't either, Jack You. 79 00:03:32,280 --> 00:03:34,760 Speaker 4: Yeah, from what I understand about the trial, I think 80 00:03:34,760 --> 00:03:37,040 Speaker 4: it sounds like they took a whole series of really 81 00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:40,960 Speaker 4: smart and reasonable steps around some of those privacy concerns. 82 00:03:41,160 --> 00:03:44,600 Speaker 4: I think like consent is a big part of it, right, Like, 83 00:03:45,040 --> 00:03:47,080 Speaker 4: if they were to roll this out nationwide, I think 84 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:50,120 Speaker 4: it would be really important that they informed potential customers 85 00:03:50,360 --> 00:03:52,840 Speaker 4: that this technology was being used and you know, I 86 00:03:52,840 --> 00:03:55,400 Speaker 4: think that's an important element. But personally, you know, do 87 00:03:55,440 --> 00:03:57,400 Speaker 4: I have any issue with my face being scanned to 88 00:03:57,400 --> 00:03:59,000 Speaker 4: make sure that I'm not a shop list or someone 89 00:03:59,000 --> 00:04:01,559 Speaker 4: who's been violent in there still on the past, No problem. 90 00:04:01,280 --> 00:04:03,560 Speaker 2: No, not at all. No, they should go for it, absolutely, 91 00:04:03,600 --> 00:04:05,600 Speaker 2: just unleash it. Guys, will take a break. Come back 92 00:04:05,640 --> 00:04:07,120 Speaker 2: shortly sixteen away from. 93 00:04:06,960 --> 00:04:13,480 Speaker 1: Six the Huddle with New Zealand Southeby's International Realty achieve 94 00:04:13,560 --> 00:04:15,960 Speaker 1: extraordinary results with unparallel reach. 95 00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:18,680 Speaker 2: Back of the Huddle, Jack Tame Stuart Nashjak, what did 96 00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:20,120 Speaker 2: you make of the conflicting polls. 97 00:04:21,400 --> 00:04:23,760 Speaker 4: I honest didn't read too much and I think general 98 00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:25,600 Speaker 4: trends kind of suggest that it's a bit of a 99 00:04:25,640 --> 00:04:27,880 Speaker 4: holding pattern at the moment. As far as his Zeeland, first, 100 00:04:27,880 --> 00:04:30,320 Speaker 4: I'd be very pleased with the state of affairs and 101 00:04:30,360 --> 00:04:32,120 Speaker 4: I think that's will be well on track to being 102 00:04:32,160 --> 00:04:35,320 Speaker 4: returned to the Parliament for the first time after having 103 00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:39,359 Speaker 4: been in a coalition. I mean, I'm still kind of 104 00:04:39,360 --> 00:04:41,520 Speaker 4: intrigued to see that the Greens are polling as well 105 00:04:41,560 --> 00:04:44,080 Speaker 4: as they are, right right, We've obviously had a kind 106 00:04:44,080 --> 00:04:47,400 Speaker 4: of horror eighteen months, but yeah, it feels like a 107 00:04:47,440 --> 00:04:49,000 Speaker 4: bit of a bit of a holding pattern. I think 108 00:04:49,040 --> 00:04:53,239 Speaker 4: increasingly though, we're going to see intensifyd questions about Labour's 109 00:04:53,240 --> 00:04:56,520 Speaker 4: past power and you know, the three party coalition with 110 00:04:56,640 --> 00:05:00,000 Speaker 4: Party Mardi, Greens and Labor, and more and more pressure 111 00:05:00,160 --> 00:05:02,799 Speaker 4: go on Labor to say what they will and won't 112 00:05:02,800 --> 00:05:05,039 Speaker 4: do if they do form some sort of you know, 113 00:05:05,080 --> 00:05:08,200 Speaker 4: some sort of Colorsian agreement or support agreement with the party. Marty, 114 00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:11,159 Speaker 4: I think, you know, it's pretty clear that that's only 115 00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:15,680 Speaker 4: the only real, realistic path to power, three party support 116 00:05:15,720 --> 00:05:18,520 Speaker 4: deal on the left. And yeah, I think the press 117 00:05:18,600 --> 00:05:18,840 Speaker 4: is on. 118 00:05:18,800 --> 00:05:21,560 Speaker 2: There, Stu, could you explain why the Greens keep on 119 00:05:21,680 --> 00:05:23,720 Speaker 2: polling as why as well as they do when they 120 00:05:23,720 --> 00:05:25,920 Speaker 2: have the weirdest collection of odd balls in there? 121 00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:30,080 Speaker 3: I have absolutely no idea. Not only odd balls, but 122 00:05:30,080 --> 00:05:33,680 Speaker 3: their policies are just out of this world. They're no 123 00:05:33,760 --> 00:05:35,880 Speaker 3: longer the Green Party. You know, Jeanette fitz Simon's and 124 00:05:35,920 --> 00:05:38,760 Speaker 3: by Donald were a couple of environmentals who believed that 125 00:05:38,800 --> 00:05:41,200 Speaker 3: they could make more of a difference by working within 126 00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:43,880 Speaker 3: the system than outside. And I would argue they did this. 127 00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:46,680 Speaker 3: This is a socially radical party. I've called them the 128 00:05:46,720 --> 00:05:48,919 Speaker 3: alliance and drag because that's what they sort of look like. 129 00:05:48,960 --> 00:05:51,400 Speaker 3: They're no longer an environmental party. They've got the brand, 130 00:05:51,960 --> 00:05:54,680 Speaker 3: but it astounds me. The other thing also is, you know, 131 00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:58,039 Speaker 3: David Seymour said that book van Velden might have saved 132 00:05:58,040 --> 00:06:02,560 Speaker 3: the budget with her pay equity policy. But but it's 133 00:06:02,560 --> 00:06:05,760 Speaker 3: tankers party. So we've got a Deputy Prime Minister Peacock 134 00:06:05,760 --> 00:06:07,280 Speaker 3: and the rounds. If he's the man in ninety four 135 00:06:07,279 --> 00:06:10,599 Speaker 3: percent of key, he's rather someone else. So but I 136 00:06:10,600 --> 00:06:12,200 Speaker 3: do agree with are you. 137 00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:14,320 Speaker 2: Doing in New Zealand first lines on our skin? 138 00:06:14,440 --> 00:06:14,760 Speaker 3: Isn't it? 139 00:06:15,440 --> 00:06:15,640 Speaker 4: Look? 140 00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:18,039 Speaker 3: Winston and Shane are really the only two that are 141 00:06:18,080 --> 00:06:19,719 Speaker 3: resonating in the part of the world that I live in. 142 00:06:20,120 --> 00:06:22,760 Speaker 3: But but you know, you're just. 143 00:06:23,120 --> 00:06:25,880 Speaker 2: You're you're out of out of control, out of. 144 00:06:25,800 --> 00:06:30,240 Speaker 3: Control do you live in you guys with an Auckland 145 00:06:30,240 --> 00:06:32,320 Speaker 3: and well, I live in the provinces, and you know 146 00:06:32,600 --> 00:06:38,200 Speaker 3: Labor isn't resonating. Chris simply doesn't. I've been very clear 147 00:06:38,240 --> 00:06:40,320 Speaker 3: on this. I do not know why Labor does not 148 00:06:40,480 --> 00:06:42,080 Speaker 3: rule out to party marrying. I don't know that. 149 00:06:42,160 --> 00:06:44,880 Speaker 2: I don't know either, don't. I don't think that's because 150 00:06:45,200 --> 00:06:48,880 Speaker 2: because Stuart. I reckon, I reckon, they haven't realized how 151 00:06:48,920 --> 00:06:52,039 Speaker 2: toxic the Mardi Party are because they're listening to Willy, 152 00:06:52,160 --> 00:06:53,320 Speaker 2: and Willy thinks it's fine. 153 00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:56,800 Speaker 3: Well, I think it is ellectual poison. 154 00:06:57,360 --> 00:07:02,320 Speaker 4: Yeah, here's my here's my random tape. I think one 155 00:07:02,360 --> 00:07:04,600 Speaker 4: of the big challenges for Labor is that they have 156 00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:07,320 Speaker 4: to convince people that they can have a coherent government 157 00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:10,119 Speaker 4: on the left. And I think obviously to Party Mahori 158 00:07:10,160 --> 00:07:12,480 Speaker 4: have gone down the protesting kind of thing and that's 159 00:07:12,520 --> 00:07:14,360 Speaker 4: working for them. They're doing really well in the polls 160 00:07:14,480 --> 00:07:16,360 Speaker 4: and they're connecting with the people they want to connect. 161 00:07:16,360 --> 00:07:19,120 Speaker 4: They will very very likely be returned to Parliament and 162 00:07:19,160 --> 00:07:22,760 Speaker 4: when at least one, if not all, of the Malordi seats. 163 00:07:22,840 --> 00:07:25,680 Speaker 4: But then you look at the Greens and you think, well, strategically, 164 00:07:25,760 --> 00:07:27,280 Speaker 4: is it a better idea for the Greens to try 165 00:07:27,320 --> 00:07:29,640 Speaker 4: and convince the voting public that they will be a 166 00:07:29,720 --> 00:07:32,640 Speaker 4: coherent coalition partner keep in mind, have never been in 167 00:07:32,760 --> 00:07:35,920 Speaker 4: cabinet before, or is it a better strategy for them 168 00:07:35,920 --> 00:07:38,080 Speaker 4: to also be like to Party Mahori and go down 169 00:07:38,120 --> 00:07:40,160 Speaker 4: the more protesting kind of route. And I think at 170 00:07:40,160 --> 00:07:42,160 Speaker 4: the moment they're going with the latter option, And I'm 171 00:07:42,160 --> 00:07:45,360 Speaker 4: not convinced that from a strategic perspective, if they're going 172 00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:47,760 Speaker 4: to convince middle New Zealand that the left can govern, 173 00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:49,440 Speaker 4: that that's actually the best approach. 174 00:07:49,600 --> 00:07:52,800 Speaker 2: No, I agree that you can switch strategies in different cycles, 175 00:07:52,880 --> 00:07:53,880 Speaker 2: different parts of the cycle. 176 00:07:54,000 --> 00:07:57,320 Speaker 3: Right. Look, the interesting thing about this is about sixty 177 00:07:57,360 --> 00:08:00,760 Speaker 3: five percent thirty five percent of mums are not voting 178 00:08:00,760 --> 00:08:03,760 Speaker 3: for the main parties, So you know, the National and 179 00:08:03,840 --> 00:08:06,360 Speaker 3: label ended up with you know, sixty sixty five cents 180 00:08:06,400 --> 00:08:07,840 Speaker 3: the vote, So that means there's a hell of a 181 00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:10,200 Speaker 3: lot of votes up for grabs. And what people will 182 00:08:10,200 --> 00:08:12,920 Speaker 3: look at is, okay, what and Jack's right, what does 183 00:08:12,920 --> 00:08:14,800 Speaker 3: a coalition look like? It's not necessarily what does the 184 00:08:14,840 --> 00:08:17,000 Speaker 3: label look like? What does national look like? Is what 185 00:08:17,080 --> 00:08:19,080 Speaker 3: does the labor the Greens to Party Marror look like? 186 00:08:19,400 --> 00:08:21,760 Speaker 3: Get rid of the Party Marray and then still, you know, 187 00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:23,800 Speaker 3: Hipkins must be tearing some of his hair out when 188 00:08:23,800 --> 00:08:26,760 Speaker 3: he hears some of the pronunciations of the Greens, because 189 00:08:26,760 --> 00:08:31,120 Speaker 3: even a lot of their stuff is nutty but possibly acceptable. 190 00:08:31,440 --> 00:08:34,240 Speaker 3: But to Party Marrow, like I said, electric poison, rule 191 00:08:34,320 --> 00:08:38,280 Speaker 3: them out now before it costs labor absolutely the election. 192 00:08:38,800 --> 00:08:41,840 Speaker 4: I do reckon it is possible, and I've got Nolan's 193 00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:43,720 Speaker 4: I take on this, but I do think it's possible 194 00:08:43,760 --> 00:08:45,880 Speaker 4: that to Party, Mardi and Labor would come to some 195 00:08:45,920 --> 00:08:49,640 Speaker 4: sort of agreement whereby the Party Mardi weren't in cabinets, 196 00:08:49,800 --> 00:08:53,040 Speaker 4: like it almost suits their MPs not to be part 197 00:08:53,080 --> 00:08:53,800 Speaker 4: of a cabinet. 198 00:08:53,520 --> 00:08:55,480 Speaker 3: And ninety pearts going confidence sort of thing. 199 00:08:55,559 --> 00:08:57,800 Speaker 4: Exactly if they gave us applying confidence deal and see, 200 00:08:57,840 --> 00:08:59,800 Speaker 4: give us a couple of policies, give us appling, We'll 201 00:08:59,800 --> 00:09:03,040 Speaker 4: give you Supart confidence and we will retain the capacity 202 00:09:03,080 --> 00:09:05,400 Speaker 4: to stand outside of government and hurl stones at you 203 00:09:05,720 --> 00:09:08,360 Speaker 4: for the next three years. That would probably suit both sides. 204 00:09:08,440 --> 00:09:09,360 Speaker 2: No, I agree with you. 205 00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:11,000 Speaker 3: Do you know either? What this does do is it 206 00:09:11,040 --> 00:09:13,160 Speaker 3: opens up the door for New Zealm. First, because you've 207 00:09:13,160 --> 00:09:17,280 Speaker 3: got Chris Luckton and serious Chris Lacson that Chris Lacson 208 00:09:17,360 --> 00:09:20,640 Speaker 3: is not resonating. Labor has become an urban liberal party 209 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:23,200 Speaker 3: the people that are won around the country talking sense. 210 00:09:23,240 --> 00:09:27,119 Speaker 3: And now you've got Winston Peters. Pieter's unshackled from the 211 00:09:27,160 --> 00:09:31,400 Speaker 3: responsibilities of There's. 212 00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:32,360 Speaker 4: Only one problem, Stuart. They need some new blood, someone 213 00:09:32,360 --> 00:09:33,839 Speaker 4: with experience. 214 00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:38,280 Speaker 2: Someone who Jack. I feel like some like a good 215 00:09:38,400 --> 00:09:40,360 Speaker 2: man who connects with the rural voter. 216 00:09:40,520 --> 00:09:41,120 Speaker 1: Do you know what I mean? 217 00:09:42,400 --> 00:09:44,200 Speaker 3: Yeah? Good idea? 218 00:09:44,360 --> 00:09:47,440 Speaker 2: Yeah okay, who could have been? Who could it be? 219 00:09:47,520 --> 00:09:50,959 Speaker 2: We'll split all those ideas. Thank you, guys, appreciated. It's 220 00:09:51,000 --> 00:09:53,079 Speaker 2: going to happen every time he's on a Stuart Nash 221 00:09:53,280 --> 00:09:55,880 Speaker 2: Jack tame Our huddles Away from six. 222 00:09:57,760 --> 00:10:00,960 Speaker 1: For more from Hither Duplessy Alan Drey. Listen live to 223 00:10:01,040 --> 00:10:04,079 Speaker 1: news Talks It'd be from four pm weekdays, or follow 224 00:10:04,120 --> 00:10:05,880 Speaker 1: the podcast on iHeartRadio