WEBVTT - Leighton Smith Podcast #256 - September 18th 2024 - Michael Rectenwald

0:00:09.133 --> 0:00:11.973
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from news talks it B.

0:00:12.413 --> 0:00:16.373
<v Speaker 1>Follow this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.

0:00:16.773 --> 0:00:19.773
<v Speaker 1>It's time for all the attitude, all the opinion, all

0:00:19.813 --> 0:00:24.893
<v Speaker 1>the information, all the debates of us now the Leighton

0:00:25.013 --> 0:00:27.693
<v Speaker 1>Smith Podcast powered by news talks it B.

0:00:28.013 --> 0:00:31.773
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Podcast two hundred and fifty six for September eighteen,

0:00:31.853 --> 0:00:35.773
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four. Now, for long time attendees of this podcast,

0:00:35.813 --> 0:00:39.213
<v Speaker 2>the name Michael Recton World will be familiar. For those

0:00:39.213 --> 0:00:43.173
<v Speaker 2>who are not so informed, you'll find his background most interesting.

0:00:43.693 --> 0:00:47.013
<v Speaker 2>From two thousand and eight to twenty nineteen, he was

0:00:47.053 --> 0:00:50.213
<v Speaker 2>professor of Liberal Studies at New York University, and he

0:00:50.373 --> 0:00:54.213
<v Speaker 2>was a convicted Marxist communist. Then he saw the light

0:00:54.813 --> 0:00:59.293
<v Speaker 2>and transitd to libertarianism. Now that was the end of

0:00:59.333 --> 0:01:03.093
<v Speaker 2>his position at New York University. He was relieved of

0:01:03.213 --> 0:01:06.653
<v Speaker 2>his post. He guested first on podcast one oh one

0:01:06.773 --> 0:01:09.653
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty one, and that was in March twenty

0:01:09.693 --> 0:01:12.693
<v Speaker 2>twenty one, and again for podcast one seventy three in

0:01:12.773 --> 0:01:17.413
<v Speaker 2>September of twenty two. Kamala Harris, Democrat contender for the

0:01:17.493 --> 0:01:21.693
<v Speaker 2>US presidency, has been acclaimed the most left wing Socialist

0:01:21.733 --> 0:01:25.013
<v Speaker 2>member of the Senate as vice President. She is frequently

0:01:25.053 --> 0:01:28.573
<v Speaker 2>tagged a Marxist. So what is she? That's a bone

0:01:28.613 --> 0:01:34.013
<v Speaker 2>of contention rife among commentators of all political persuasions, Marxist

0:01:34.533 --> 0:01:38.213
<v Speaker 2>or empty head, And that's a polite call. Who better

0:01:38.253 --> 0:01:41.773
<v Speaker 2>to seek advice from than a past Marxist commonist professor

0:01:42.013 --> 0:01:47.013
<v Speaker 2>Michael Rechtenwald. But first, once again on the podcast morning,

0:01:47.053 --> 0:01:50.413
<v Speaker 2>I find that there is so much of interest that

0:01:50.493 --> 0:01:53.453
<v Speaker 2>I simply can't cover it all, in fact, nowhere near it.

0:01:53.733 --> 0:01:56.693
<v Speaker 2>But this is a common complaint on my part, I know,

0:01:57.173 --> 0:02:00.773
<v Speaker 2>but it's true. There is so much. So I thought, well,

0:02:00.813 --> 0:02:03.413
<v Speaker 2>actually I had a couple of ideas this morning that

0:02:03.413 --> 0:02:05.733
<v Speaker 2>I'll share with you a little later, either in this

0:02:05.773 --> 0:02:10.733
<v Speaker 2>podcast or next week. But there was something that caught

0:02:10.773 --> 0:02:13.693
<v Speaker 2>my eye a couple of days ago, and it came

0:02:13.773 --> 0:02:17.973
<v Speaker 2>from one of our more recent guests, Robert McCulloch from

0:02:18.013 --> 0:02:21.813
<v Speaker 2>Auckland University, who was in podcast number two hundred and

0:02:21.933 --> 0:02:25.853
<v Speaker 2>fifty one. And I'm going to quote you. This is

0:02:25.853 --> 0:02:27.613
<v Speaker 2>not very long, but I'm going to quote it because

0:02:28.173 --> 0:02:31.413
<v Speaker 2>there is I disagree with him on this particular point,

0:02:31.773 --> 0:02:35.573
<v Speaker 2>and I'll explain why shortly. Headed has This is from

0:02:35.613 --> 0:02:39.573
<v Speaker 2>his blog site down to earth dot Kiwi. Down to

0:02:39.613 --> 0:02:43.773
<v Speaker 2>earth dot Kiwi has former pm Adern become New Zealand's

0:02:43.813 --> 0:02:49.013
<v Speaker 2>single biggest individual emitter of greenhouse gases, and it reads

0:02:49.493 --> 0:02:52.253
<v Speaker 2>it's impossible to keep up with the former pm Adern's

0:02:52.293 --> 0:02:56.413
<v Speaker 2>emissions of greenhouse gazes. Where she has traveled on carbon

0:02:56.573 --> 0:03:00.733
<v Speaker 2>dumping into the atmosphere long haul flights this past year,

0:03:00.973 --> 0:03:03.853
<v Speaker 2>to name a few. In November of twenty twenty three,

0:03:04.013 --> 0:03:07.293
<v Speaker 2>she flew to Singapore to walk the Green Carpet and

0:03:07.373 --> 0:03:11.653
<v Speaker 2>to give earthshot as including in the category of clean air.

0:03:12.333 --> 0:03:15.533
<v Speaker 2>How ironic when you get homesick? How about around the

0:03:15.573 --> 0:03:18.533
<v Speaker 2>world flight back to good old New Zealand to marry

0:03:18.533 --> 0:03:22.253
<v Speaker 2>on location at a Vignard Yes, in January of twenty four,

0:03:22.733 --> 0:03:25.893
<v Speaker 2>it was long haul to do the wedding in the

0:03:25.933 --> 0:03:29.853
<v Speaker 2>Hawk's Bay. Then in March of twenty four she burnt

0:03:29.853 --> 0:03:33.733
<v Speaker 2>those air miles to Italy to inaugurate the academic year

0:03:33.813 --> 0:03:37.613
<v Speaker 2>at the University of Bologna. Oh, and don't forget the

0:03:37.653 --> 0:03:40.613
<v Speaker 2>carbon dumping flight up to Chicago in August of twenty

0:03:40.613 --> 0:03:45.493
<v Speaker 2>four to visit the Democratic Party Convention for a yarn

0:03:45.853 --> 0:03:48.053
<v Speaker 2>And why go to well I didn't see anything on

0:03:48.093 --> 0:03:51.293
<v Speaker 2>her performance in there, did you? But you could say

0:03:51.453 --> 0:03:56.733
<v Speaker 2>that Carmela is benefiting from her from Durn's experience. Sounds

0:03:56.773 --> 0:04:00.013
<v Speaker 2>like it than me. And why go to Italy once

0:04:00.173 --> 0:04:02.253
<v Speaker 2>in a year when you can go there twice on

0:04:02.293 --> 0:04:05.733
<v Speaker 2>a long haul jet to accept another award. This past week,

0:04:05.893 --> 0:04:08.693
<v Speaker 2>she flew to Venice to whoop it up at an

0:04:08.693 --> 0:04:13.133
<v Speaker 2>event coinciding with the Venice Film Festival. She preached there

0:04:13.773 --> 0:04:18.333
<v Speaker 2>that we must demand from our leaders empathy and kindness.

0:04:19.373 --> 0:04:22.293
<v Speaker 2>Competence would be a nice one to add, though always

0:04:22.293 --> 0:04:25.333
<v Speaker 2>seems to be missing off her list. I don't think

0:04:25.373 --> 0:04:28.653
<v Speaker 2>she could spell it anyhow. That's just a few flights

0:04:28.693 --> 0:04:31.093
<v Speaker 2>that we know about. We've got no problem with their

0:04:31.133 --> 0:04:36.253
<v Speaker 2>travel on this blog, provided carbon emissions are priced, though

0:04:36.293 --> 0:04:38.773
<v Speaker 2>we note the US does not have an emissions trading

0:04:38.813 --> 0:04:42.853
<v Speaker 2>scheme like New Zealand. Maybe that's a reason Adern is

0:04:42.893 --> 0:04:47.373
<v Speaker 2>basing herself outside this country, since she would probably single

0:04:47.413 --> 0:04:52.973
<v Speaker 2>handedly blow our reduction targets. Now, that's a critical column

0:04:53.053 --> 0:04:56.093
<v Speaker 2>of the ex Prime Minister of New Zealand, and I

0:04:56.213 --> 0:04:59.173
<v Speaker 2>choose to disagree with it on I think a very

0:04:59.213 --> 0:05:03.253
<v Speaker 2>sound basis. Ex Prime Minister at Dern no longer believes

0:05:03.293 --> 0:05:07.013
<v Speaker 2>obviously in man made global warming or man made climate change,

0:05:07.333 --> 0:05:11.293
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise she would not do what she did and fire

0:05:11.333 --> 0:05:14.013
<v Speaker 2>all those miles. Am I correct, Well, I have to

0:05:14.053 --> 0:05:19.053
<v Speaker 2>be Is she really so hypocritical that she'd tell you

0:05:19.173 --> 0:05:21.653
<v Speaker 2>can't do things, but she'd happily go and do it herself.

0:05:21.893 --> 0:05:26.973
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying or suggesting at least it's worth consideration that

0:05:26.973 --> 0:05:29.853
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister should be congratulated on waking up to

0:05:29.893 --> 0:05:33.293
<v Speaker 2>the con that she was part of mind you, but

0:05:33.413 --> 0:05:35.973
<v Speaker 2>waking up to the con that we have all suffered

0:05:35.973 --> 0:05:38.813
<v Speaker 2>from and finally realizing the best way to do it

0:05:38.853 --> 0:05:42.213
<v Speaker 2>is not to verbalize it, but to just act accordingly.

0:05:43.253 --> 0:05:46.213
<v Speaker 2>And I think that we should follow her lead. Robert McCulloch,

0:05:46.293 --> 0:06:04.973
<v Speaker 2>I'll see you at the airport. Michael Recton wat it's

0:06:05.013 --> 0:06:07.453
<v Speaker 2>great to have you back on the podcast and I

0:06:07.493 --> 0:06:08.533
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it very much much.

0:06:08.573 --> 0:06:11.453
<v Speaker 3>Thank you thanks for having me, and it's great to

0:06:11.493 --> 0:06:11.853
<v Speaker 3>be here.

0:06:11.933 --> 0:06:16.373
<v Speaker 2>I was triggered to make contact with you because you

0:06:16.973 --> 0:06:20.053
<v Speaker 2>were a Marxist for much of your life, if not

0:06:20.293 --> 0:06:23.933
<v Speaker 2>most of it, and it was only in relatively recent

0:06:23.973 --> 0:06:28.213
<v Speaker 2>times that you actually woke up and what you'renar are

0:06:28.213 --> 0:06:32.373
<v Speaker 2>a libertarian basically, and even a conservative libertarian maybe like

0:06:32.653 --> 0:06:36.493
<v Speaker 2>my claim. But you have the experience more than anybody

0:06:36.533 --> 0:06:40.533
<v Speaker 2>I've known or have spoken with on Marxism and what

0:06:40.653 --> 0:06:43.413
<v Speaker 2>is a Marxist and who was a Marxist, etc. So

0:06:43.853 --> 0:06:47.733
<v Speaker 2>they say frequently you can read it in headlines all

0:06:47.773 --> 0:06:52.533
<v Speaker 2>over in articles that Kamala Harris is a Marxist. And

0:06:52.693 --> 0:06:55.653
<v Speaker 2>after all, her father was a Marxist professor, So why

0:06:55.733 --> 0:06:58.773
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't she be or couldn't she be with your experience,

0:06:59.173 --> 0:07:00.573
<v Speaker 2>would you call her a Marxist?

0:07:00.893 --> 0:07:04.293
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's a great question. I would say that Kamala

0:07:04.333 --> 0:07:09.973
<v Speaker 3>Harris is at least an unconscious Marxist, perhaps a conscious Marxist,

0:07:09.973 --> 0:07:13.213
<v Speaker 3>but I know that she's at least an unconscious Marxist

0:07:14.053 --> 0:07:19.133
<v Speaker 3>who has absorbed probably through her family, her father. But

0:07:19.413 --> 0:07:24.533
<v Speaker 3>you know, through the political zeitgeist itself the premises of

0:07:24.613 --> 0:07:30.093
<v Speaker 3>Marxist thought, and that is this idea that there is

0:07:30.253 --> 0:07:34.613
<v Speaker 3>this exploited class and that's the majority, and they are

0:07:34.893 --> 0:07:38.213
<v Speaker 3>stolen from at work at the point of production, and

0:07:38.293 --> 0:07:42.773
<v Speaker 3>therefore they need redistribution. There needs to be redistribution, and

0:07:42.813 --> 0:07:45.653
<v Speaker 3>that has to be conducted by the state, and that's

0:07:45.693 --> 0:07:48.933
<v Speaker 3>the state's role. And that's really where she comes down.

0:07:49.693 --> 0:07:53.773
<v Speaker 3>And you know, it's a zero sum thinking. It assumes

0:07:53.813 --> 0:07:58.053
<v Speaker 3>that anybody getting wealthy comes at the expense of somebody else,

0:07:58.573 --> 0:08:02.773
<v Speaker 3>which is just fallacious. It's completely economic dribble. You know,

0:08:02.853 --> 0:08:07.573
<v Speaker 3>her father was a Marxist economist, which is a contradiction

0:08:07.693 --> 0:08:12.253
<v Speaker 3>in terms Marxism is not economics at all. It is

0:08:12.333 --> 0:08:17.933
<v Speaker 3>completely you know, it's it's really metaphysical rambling and it

0:08:17.973 --> 0:08:20.693
<v Speaker 3>has no real economic basis to it.

0:08:20.933 --> 0:08:25.773
<v Speaker 2>What a new opinion qualifies somebody as a Marxist, Well, if.

0:08:25.253 --> 0:08:27.693
<v Speaker 3>They were a conscious Marxist, they have to believe a

0:08:27.733 --> 0:08:31.053
<v Speaker 3>couple of things. First of all, the history of all

0:08:31.573 --> 0:08:34.853
<v Speaker 3>of all, you know, hitherto human relations is the history

0:08:34.893 --> 0:08:39.853
<v Speaker 3>of class struggle, and that struggle is particularly undertaken in

0:08:39.973 --> 0:08:43.893
<v Speaker 3>the current era in terms of the proletariat and the

0:08:43.893 --> 0:08:48.093
<v Speaker 3>capitalist class. And the capitalist class, according to this theory,

0:08:48.413 --> 0:08:52.373
<v Speaker 3>exploits the worker every single minute of the day, and

0:08:52.853 --> 0:08:57.533
<v Speaker 3>they steal from them. It's a conspiracy theory. They steal

0:08:57.613 --> 0:09:01.533
<v Speaker 3>from the worker all all day long. They exploit them.

0:09:01.573 --> 0:09:07.493
<v Speaker 3>They siphon surplus value out of the labor process and

0:09:07.653 --> 0:09:12.493
<v Speaker 3>retain exploited wealth, and it builds up over time and

0:09:12.613 --> 0:09:16.013
<v Speaker 3>this creates a kind of impossible barrier for the worker,

0:09:17.013 --> 0:09:21.533
<v Speaker 3>and the only resort is to conduct a revolution, a

0:09:21.613 --> 0:09:27.653
<v Speaker 3>class revolution. And it all comes down to their belief

0:09:27.773 --> 0:09:30.653
<v Speaker 3>and the labor theory of value, which I once believed in,

0:09:31.613 --> 0:09:34.573
<v Speaker 3>which is the idea that labor is the source of

0:09:34.613 --> 0:09:40.933
<v Speaker 3>all value and that therefore, in order for the capitalist

0:09:41.013 --> 0:09:46.173
<v Speaker 3>to get any value extraction, he must exploit the worker

0:09:47.173 --> 0:09:50.613
<v Speaker 3>on a regular day to day, minute by minute basis,

0:09:50.693 --> 0:09:54.853
<v Speaker 3>paying them a fraction of what they really produce. Of course,

0:09:54.933 --> 0:09:58.053
<v Speaker 3>this is all complete nonsense because there's so many factors

0:09:58.093 --> 0:10:02.013
<v Speaker 3>that go into production, and the labor theory of value,

0:10:02.133 --> 0:10:05.253
<v Speaker 3>once you knock that out, which is completely fallacious, that's

0:10:05.293 --> 0:10:09.013
<v Speaker 3>not where value comes from. Value comes from the subjective

0:10:09.093 --> 0:10:13.493
<v Speaker 3>wants of consumers, of people that buy products. That's where

0:10:13.573 --> 0:10:17.213
<v Speaker 3>value comes from. It is not based on labor time.

0:10:17.773 --> 0:10:19.373
<v Speaker 3>If that were the case, I could go out and

0:10:19.413 --> 0:10:22.053
<v Speaker 3>dig a hole for sixteen hours and expect to be

0:10:22.133 --> 0:10:25.733
<v Speaker 3>paid at some rate, you know, the hole that was

0:10:25.813 --> 0:10:28.013
<v Speaker 3>useless to anybody, and then filled it back up and

0:10:28.133 --> 0:10:31.293
<v Speaker 3>expect to get paid for both processes. It's absurd.

0:10:32.133 --> 0:10:34.173
<v Speaker 2>Did you have got to the Soviet Union?

0:10:34.853 --> 0:10:37.893
<v Speaker 3>No? I did not, had I gone to this. Had

0:10:37.973 --> 0:10:41.373
<v Speaker 3>I gone, I might have, you know, during the Soviet period,

0:10:41.453 --> 0:10:46.053
<v Speaker 3>I might have seen things differently. But to the Marxists,

0:10:46.333 --> 0:10:52.493
<v Speaker 3>they obscure what happens is in the Marxist milieuse. What

0:10:52.533 --> 0:11:00.253
<v Speaker 3>they do is obscure history and obscure the actual existing socialism,

0:11:00.413 --> 0:11:04.093
<v Speaker 3>actually existing socialism as the dissidents came to refer to it.

0:11:04.893 --> 0:11:08.093
<v Speaker 3>They obscure this from view and keep you focused on

0:11:08.133 --> 0:11:13.053
<v Speaker 3>the theory and the ideas and how theoretically wonderful be

0:11:14.093 --> 0:11:17.693
<v Speaker 3>and how just it is, you know. And having come

0:11:17.853 --> 0:11:22.333
<v Speaker 3>full circle into becoming a libertarian, a free market, a

0:11:22.373 --> 0:11:25.893
<v Speaker 3>believer in the free market and freedom, I now see

0:11:25.973 --> 0:11:29.933
<v Speaker 3>that this is anything but the reverse. This is actually

0:11:30.413 --> 0:11:34.133
<v Speaker 3>the reverse or the inverse of the truth that, in fact,

0:11:34.173 --> 0:11:37.613
<v Speaker 3>there's no freedom under Marxism because the first thing you

0:11:37.613 --> 0:11:41.133
<v Speaker 3>surrender is yourself. You are now property of the state.

0:11:42.053 --> 0:11:45.173
<v Speaker 3>And when you have no possession of yourself, that's the

0:11:45.213 --> 0:11:51.213
<v Speaker 3>first principle of libertarianism, as self ownership. Once that is surrendered,

0:11:51.253 --> 0:11:54.533
<v Speaker 3>you're a slave, and so there's no freedom. And of course,

0:11:54.573 --> 0:11:58.653
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the goolog system, there was forced labor, unpaid,

0:11:58.693 --> 0:12:01.973
<v Speaker 3>there was slavery, literal slavery in the Soviet Union.

0:12:02.453 --> 0:12:04.693
<v Speaker 2>If Kavala was on the Marxist story, you weren't going

0:12:04.733 --> 0:12:07.973
<v Speaker 2>to refer to her as as any kind of Marxist.

0:12:08.853 --> 0:12:11.333
<v Speaker 2>What label would you put on her? I've got one

0:12:11.333 --> 0:12:11.773
<v Speaker 2>in mind.

0:12:12.173 --> 0:12:15.733
<v Speaker 3>Well, she is at least an unconscious Marxist, but I

0:12:15.733 --> 0:12:20.413
<v Speaker 3>would say, in keeping with the Marxist idea, she's also

0:12:21.213 --> 0:12:24.613
<v Speaker 3>a globalist and an internationalist, because one of the main

0:12:24.733 --> 0:12:28.573
<v Speaker 3>things about Marxism is it had to be the socialist

0:12:28.653 --> 0:12:33.933
<v Speaker 3>or communist system has to be international and likewise, her policies,

0:12:33.933 --> 0:12:38.053
<v Speaker 3>for example, on immigration, where she wants unfettered immigration and

0:12:38.173 --> 0:12:43.213
<v Speaker 3>also total social welfare inclusive of healthcare benefits for anybody

0:12:43.253 --> 0:12:46.053
<v Speaker 3>that's in this country, anybody, no matter how they got

0:12:46.093 --> 0:12:49.773
<v Speaker 3>here or how long they've been here. She wants to

0:12:49.813 --> 0:12:55.853
<v Speaker 3>give them free healthcare. This is internationalist, globalist, and it's

0:12:55.933 --> 0:13:00.173
<v Speaker 3>Marxists all at the same time, and those all fall together.

0:13:00.213 --> 0:13:01.373
<v Speaker 3>But what was your term?

0:13:01.693 --> 0:13:02.293
<v Speaker 2>Progressive?

0:13:03.573 --> 0:13:07.333
<v Speaker 3>A progressive? Well, yeah, she's a progressive with a with

0:13:07.413 --> 0:13:10.173
<v Speaker 3>a foot with a foot on the gas pedal. It's

0:13:10.173 --> 0:13:14.893
<v Speaker 3>a highly accelerated progressivism. Okay, yeah, I mean she really

0:13:14.933 --> 0:13:20.973
<v Speaker 3>wants to create equity as they call it, as quickly

0:13:21.013 --> 0:13:25.773
<v Speaker 3>as possible, and that means redistribution. And she sees she's

0:13:25.973 --> 0:13:29.293
<v Speaker 3>running on this campaign now to help the middle class,

0:13:29.333 --> 0:13:33.893
<v Speaker 3>which is really quite ironic because if anything, her policies

0:13:33.933 --> 0:13:40.173
<v Speaker 3>will utterly dissolve the middle class into a stagnant lower

0:13:40.213 --> 0:13:43.573
<v Speaker 3>class pool that can never get out of it. I mean,

0:13:43.653 --> 0:13:45.213
<v Speaker 3>that's really what it will come down to.

0:13:46.373 --> 0:13:48.853
<v Speaker 2>Well, we had a Prime minister recently who claimed she

0:13:48.933 --> 0:13:52.573
<v Speaker 2>was a progressive. That's why I that's why I chose

0:13:52.613 --> 0:13:58.973
<v Speaker 2>that term. And you know about whom I speak. She

0:13:59.053 --> 0:14:02.813
<v Speaker 2>gets one mentioned in a list of similar types in

0:14:02.853 --> 0:14:05.253
<v Speaker 2>your book, The Great Reset and the Struggle for Liberty,

0:14:05.733 --> 0:14:09.733
<v Speaker 2>which was released last year. And I could only say

0:14:09.933 --> 0:14:13.973
<v Speaker 2>that most people, most people in this country don't realize

0:14:14.013 --> 0:14:17.933
<v Speaker 2>how close to disaster we really came. Albeit that it

0:14:17.973 --> 0:14:20.453
<v Speaker 2>was bad enough, but it could have been that it

0:14:20.453 --> 0:14:23.373
<v Speaker 2>could have been a whole lot worse. Speaking of which,

0:14:24.253 --> 0:14:29.133
<v Speaker 2>and let me divert just momentarily, the World Economic Forum,

0:14:29.253 --> 0:14:33.933
<v Speaker 2>the WEF, which had had to do with just into

0:14:33.973 --> 0:14:37.933
<v Speaker 2>redurance training. Are they still as active? Are they still

0:14:37.933 --> 0:14:40.213
<v Speaker 2>as progressive as they were? And I used progressive in

0:14:40.253 --> 0:14:41.453
<v Speaker 2>its in its proper sense.

0:14:43.493 --> 0:14:47.173
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean the World Economics Forum, their main project

0:14:47.293 --> 0:14:52.133
<v Speaker 3>really well, there's kind of multi pronged, but that's only

0:14:52.173 --> 0:14:54.933
<v Speaker 3>because the main project that they support, which is Agenda

0:14:55.013 --> 0:14:59.493
<v Speaker 3>twenty thirty. UN's Agenda twenty thirty is a multi pronged

0:14:59.693 --> 0:15:06.013
<v Speaker 3>program and that their world, the World Economics form Great Reset,

0:15:06.733 --> 0:15:10.013
<v Speaker 3>not a conspiracy, but in a bi open plan is

0:15:10.053 --> 0:15:16.293
<v Speaker 3>about accelerating the arrival of the accomplishment of Agenda twenty thirty.

0:15:16.853 --> 0:15:19.493
<v Speaker 3>That's really what it is in a nutshell. So to

0:15:19.613 --> 0:15:22.653
<v Speaker 3>understand the Great Reset, all you have to do is

0:15:22.693 --> 0:15:26.293
<v Speaker 3>study Agenda twenty thirty. I mean not only but because

0:15:26.613 --> 0:15:29.053
<v Speaker 3>I did that in I think one or two chapters.

0:15:29.093 --> 0:15:31.653
<v Speaker 3>But there's a lot more to it because the UN

0:15:31.693 --> 0:15:34.813
<v Speaker 3>has a deep history as well. But Agenda twenty thirty

0:15:34.893 --> 0:15:36.933
<v Speaker 3>is what they want to bring about, and that is

0:15:37.573 --> 0:15:42.733
<v Speaker 3>a globalist plan to institute well to have the various

0:15:42.813 --> 0:15:47.573
<v Speaker 3>nation states and local and regional governments adopt. These are

0:15:47.653 --> 0:15:51.773
<v Speaker 3>the agenda items, and all of the agenda items refer

0:15:51.893 --> 0:15:57.173
<v Speaker 3>to things like redistribution of wealth, control over waterways, control

0:15:57.173 --> 0:16:03.453
<v Speaker 3>over land, control over individuals. These are the technologies, the

0:16:03.653 --> 0:16:09.013
<v Speaker 3>digital identity, and the whole slew of other means of

0:16:09.053 --> 0:16:15.253
<v Speaker 3>incorporating the subject, including in CBDCs. But the Bank of

0:16:15.293 --> 0:16:21.853
<v Speaker 3>International Settlements has said many times that the CBDC depends

0:16:21.893 --> 0:16:26.213
<v Speaker 3>on a digital identity, and that is exactly what they

0:16:26.253 --> 0:16:30.213
<v Speaker 3>look for. They want to have every single subject under

0:16:30.213 --> 0:16:36.813
<v Speaker 3>the UN's auspices as a digitally identified subject whom they

0:16:36.893 --> 0:16:44.693
<v Speaker 3>know virtually everything vital about, inclusive of their finances, but furthermore,

0:16:45.613 --> 0:16:52.333
<v Speaker 3>their political proclivities, their consumption and you name it. Basically

0:16:52.613 --> 0:16:56.133
<v Speaker 3>everything that you do would be part of a database

0:16:56.173 --> 0:16:59.053
<v Speaker 3>called which is the digital identity. It's not a mere

0:16:59.133 --> 0:17:04.133
<v Speaker 3>means of identification. It's a database attached to every single person,

0:17:04.573 --> 0:17:10.173
<v Speaker 3>replete with biometric surveillance data, so that they know exactly

0:17:10.213 --> 0:17:13.173
<v Speaker 3>who you are and what you do and they can

0:17:13.293 --> 0:17:15.613
<v Speaker 3>verify it through biometric data.

0:17:17.053 --> 0:17:20.013
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're in that position. New Zealand's Reserve Bank is

0:17:20.053 --> 0:17:25.333
<v Speaker 2>working toward a rather rapidly. I fear to order a CBDC.

0:17:25.813 --> 0:17:29.253
<v Speaker 2>There are lots of people, plenty of people at this

0:17:29.373 --> 0:17:31.813
<v Speaker 2>point of time who say, well, this would be a

0:17:33.013 --> 0:17:39.813
<v Speaker 2>great way of handling the financial system, who don't see

0:17:39.413 --> 0:17:45.933
<v Speaker 2>anything wrong with it. So what do you say when

0:17:45.973 --> 0:17:47.333
<v Speaker 2>somebody challenges you on that.

0:17:48.933 --> 0:17:52.453
<v Speaker 3>Well, I just point to the documents and what they

0:17:52.613 --> 0:17:57.813
<v Speaker 3>actually say straight up. The Bank of International Settlements kind

0:17:57.813 --> 0:18:02.173
<v Speaker 3>of the Central Bank Clearinghouse, if you will, says directly

0:18:02.293 --> 0:18:07.333
<v Speaker 3>that there's no there is no anonymity with anything using

0:18:07.333 --> 0:18:14.373
<v Speaker 3>a CBDC, So every purchase becomes completely transparent to the

0:18:14.413 --> 0:18:19.333
<v Speaker 3>central banks, and perhaps to all the central banks simultaneously

0:18:20.413 --> 0:18:24.533
<v Speaker 3>if they share data. So this data is now completely

0:18:24.613 --> 0:18:28.373
<v Speaker 3>transparent to them. That means every purchase you make is

0:18:28.493 --> 0:18:32.213
<v Speaker 3>known by the central bank. And since you know, in

0:18:32.253 --> 0:18:34.453
<v Speaker 3>the case of the United States, it's the Federal Reserve.

0:18:34.493 --> 0:18:38.813
<v Speaker 3>Of course, they're a private cartel. Nevertheless, they are also

0:18:39.053 --> 0:18:44.653
<v Speaker 3>strangely and ambiguously an agency of the federal government. So likewise,

0:18:44.693 --> 0:18:49.693
<v Speaker 3>the federal government effectively knows everything you buy, all the

0:18:49.733 --> 0:18:52.653
<v Speaker 3>money you have, et cetera, et cetera. And also they

0:18:52.733 --> 0:18:59.093
<v Speaker 3>can exact real time taxation on all income immediately. They

0:18:59.093 --> 0:19:03.733
<v Speaker 3>could even impose negative interest rates on balances that were

0:19:04.293 --> 0:19:07.293
<v Speaker 3>not spent at the proper rate. There's all kinds of

0:19:07.333 --> 0:19:10.853
<v Speaker 3>things they can do. They can forbid particular types of

0:19:10.893 --> 0:19:15.253
<v Speaker 3>transactions or perhaps give quotas on particular types of transactions.

0:19:15.813 --> 0:19:20.133
<v Speaker 3>Say you've had your full complement of meat this month,

0:19:20.653 --> 0:19:24.413
<v Speaker 3>you cannot buy any more meat, you know, so they

0:19:24.453 --> 0:19:27.893
<v Speaker 3>do that here with food stamps, you know, which is

0:19:27.933 --> 0:19:30.973
<v Speaker 3>now all electronic in the United States. They could do

0:19:31.013 --> 0:19:34.293
<v Speaker 3>this easily with the CBDC. Everybody will be on food stamps,

0:19:34.733 --> 0:19:38.693
<v Speaker 3>and everybody's spending will be capped at certain points on

0:19:38.773 --> 0:19:42.733
<v Speaker 3>different items, including gasoline, because they certainly want to phase

0:19:42.773 --> 0:19:47.173
<v Speaker 3>out the gasoline automobile and replace it, God knows why

0:19:47.253 --> 0:19:51.893
<v Speaker 3>with the electron electric automobile, even though that is environmentally

0:19:51.933 --> 0:19:58.533
<v Speaker 3>more damaging, damaging than the gas powered automobile, and it

0:19:58.653 --> 0:20:03.373
<v Speaker 3>uses gas, it uses fossil fuels in order to charge it.

0:20:03.373 --> 0:20:05.693
<v Speaker 3>It's absurd. I mean, the whole thing is absurd. I mean,

0:20:05.933 --> 0:20:09.053
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how this charade has and pulled over

0:20:09.133 --> 0:20:11.453
<v Speaker 3>the eyes of so many people for so long, but

0:20:12.133 --> 0:20:14.453
<v Speaker 3>it has well.

0:20:14.493 --> 0:20:18.493
<v Speaker 2>I would suggest that, like so many other metas, the

0:20:18.573 --> 0:20:20.173
<v Speaker 2>media has a great deal to do with it.

0:20:21.573 --> 0:20:25.973
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's unbelievable. They represent things without getting giving any

0:20:26.133 --> 0:20:33.173
<v Speaker 3>kinds of context or information or really they managed to

0:20:33.293 --> 0:20:37.813
<v Speaker 3>pull kind of like a complete reversal of the truth

0:20:38.573 --> 0:20:42.413
<v Speaker 3>when they represent different things like this, like the like

0:20:42.453 --> 0:20:48.053
<v Speaker 3>the electric vehicle it has you know, there's no savings

0:20:48.093 --> 0:20:51.253
<v Speaker 3>and fossil fuels on that basis. I don't believe at all.

0:20:52.093 --> 0:20:54.813
<v Speaker 3>And in fact, it's in the United States. Much of

0:20:54.853 --> 0:20:58.413
<v Speaker 3>it is driven by coal technology because that's where the

0:20:58.453 --> 0:21:01.173
<v Speaker 3>power plants are. That's what the power plants are using,

0:21:01.253 --> 0:21:05.813
<v Speaker 3>is largely coal, and likewise it's just as polluting, if

0:21:05.853 --> 0:21:10.093
<v Speaker 3>not more than the gas power engine. So it's ridiculous

0:21:10.613 --> 0:21:12.733
<v Speaker 3>And how they get away with this is just like

0:21:12.813 --> 0:21:14.893
<v Speaker 3>you said, the media is very much of a shroud

0:21:15.013 --> 0:21:19.773
<v Speaker 3>over reality. It serves as a kind of obscuration of

0:21:20.293 --> 0:21:24.973
<v Speaker 3>facts and instead gives you this packaged view that's completely wrong,

0:21:25.893 --> 0:21:29.373
<v Speaker 3>and that's very frustrating for those who are somewhat awake

0:21:29.813 --> 0:21:31.133
<v Speaker 3>and aware of what's happening.

0:21:32.373 --> 0:21:34.773
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you must be a conspiracy theorist.

0:21:35.973 --> 0:21:39.213
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, I make no apologies for that. In fact, in

0:21:39.253 --> 0:21:41.533
<v Speaker 3>my books A Great Reset and the Struggle for Liberty,

0:21:41.573 --> 0:21:45.933
<v Speaker 3>I have a whole chapter on the epistemological status of

0:21:46.213 --> 0:21:50.893
<v Speaker 3>conspiracy theory per se. And there's absolutely no there's no

0:21:51.053 --> 0:21:55.133
<v Speaker 3>justification for dismissing any theory because it's a conspiracy theory

0:21:55.413 --> 0:21:59.333
<v Speaker 3>on that basis, there's no justification at all. Because there

0:21:59.373 --> 0:22:03.293
<v Speaker 3>are conspiracies and there are hidden agendas. This is a fact,

0:22:03.453 --> 0:22:05.813
<v Speaker 3>and they're not so hidden all the time, and most

0:22:05.813 --> 0:22:07.853
<v Speaker 3>of the time you just have to look under the

0:22:07.893 --> 0:22:10.213
<v Speaker 3>hood and you'll find what's going on.

0:22:10.373 --> 0:22:14.333
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, that's part five of the book on page

0:22:14.333 --> 0:22:17.413
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and thirty one. I'm just letting you know.

0:22:17.453 --> 0:22:23.573
<v Speaker 2>I've got a copy then the and it's full of

0:22:23.853 --> 0:22:29.373
<v Speaker 2>very interesting and intriguing information, I might add, So we

0:22:29.453 --> 0:22:35.253
<v Speaker 2>have diverted just slightly. Let me retarget Kamala Harris at

0:22:35.253 --> 0:22:38.333
<v Speaker 2>this point. What chance would you say that she has

0:22:38.333 --> 0:22:39.213
<v Speaker 2>of pulling this off?

0:22:41.493 --> 0:22:46.333
<v Speaker 3>Oh, unfortunately, it's very close to fifty fifty fifty one percent.

0:22:46.413 --> 0:22:48.573
<v Speaker 3>I mean, she has a very good chance of pulling

0:22:48.573 --> 0:22:52.413
<v Speaker 3>this off. It's alarming beyond words, but I think she

0:22:52.493 --> 0:22:53.573
<v Speaker 3>has a very good chance.

0:22:54.213 --> 0:22:58.253
<v Speaker 2>So on that basis, assuming that that is the result,

0:22:58.813 --> 0:23:02.453
<v Speaker 2>what would a Kamala administration look like? Do you think?

0:23:03.893 --> 0:23:07.613
<v Speaker 3>I think it'll be a sequel of the Biden and

0:23:07.733 --> 0:23:11.133
<v Speaker 3>Obama administration, So I think you'd see a lot of

0:23:11.173 --> 0:23:16.133
<v Speaker 3>recycling of the same people in the upper echelons in

0:23:16.213 --> 0:23:22.973
<v Speaker 3>the directorships and heads of all the agencies would pretty

0:23:23.013 --> 0:23:26.373
<v Speaker 3>much be the same, with some reshuffling I think to

0:23:26.413 --> 0:23:28.533
<v Speaker 3>make it look different. But it's going to be the

0:23:28.573 --> 0:23:32.373
<v Speaker 3>same cast of characters running the show, and they have

0:23:32.453 --> 0:23:36.373
<v Speaker 3>the same foreign policy and the same domestic policy. I

0:23:36.373 --> 0:23:40.893
<v Speaker 3>think you're going to see a sequel, but with acceleration.

0:23:41.733 --> 0:23:46.453
<v Speaker 3>I think Kamala Harris is what is known in Marxist

0:23:46.453 --> 0:23:49.973
<v Speaker 3>circles as an accelerationist. She wants to bring about these

0:23:50.013 --> 0:23:54.333
<v Speaker 3>things quickly, even if it means driving chaos on the way,

0:23:54.373 --> 0:23:57.293
<v Speaker 3>because there are those who say that you basically have

0:23:57.413 --> 0:24:00.613
<v Speaker 3>to make things really bad in order to get the

0:24:00.693 --> 0:24:02.733
<v Speaker 3>kind of change you want. And I think that's the

0:24:02.813 --> 0:24:06.893
<v Speaker 3>kind of the kind of pretext to her political philosophy.

0:24:07.453 --> 0:24:12.373
<v Speaker 3>If it makes things really bad quickly, then we're getting

0:24:12.413 --> 0:24:13.333
<v Speaker 3>closer to the goal.

0:24:13.893 --> 0:24:17.253
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that America as we have known it

0:24:17.293 --> 0:24:21.573
<v Speaker 2>would and could survive one or two terms of Kamala

0:24:21.653 --> 0:24:23.093
<v Speaker 2>Harris administration?

0:24:24.693 --> 0:24:28.773
<v Speaker 3>Wow? Well, I think it would leave at best a

0:24:28.893 --> 0:24:36.173
<v Speaker 3>remnant of political dissidents and communities that are now being formed,

0:24:36.333 --> 0:24:41.133
<v Speaker 3>parallel communities that are being formed on the basis of

0:24:41.173 --> 0:24:45.213
<v Speaker 3>what you and I value, which is freedom, free markets.

0:24:46.293 --> 0:24:52.333
<v Speaker 3>But these are parallel communities that would survive somehow, like

0:24:52.493 --> 0:24:55.493
<v Speaker 3>for example, the Amish in the United States, no matter

0:24:55.533 --> 0:24:58.853
<v Speaker 3>what happens to the political establishment here or the whole

0:24:58.893 --> 0:25:02.973
<v Speaker 3>economic system for the most part these people would survive.

0:25:03.533 --> 0:25:08.293
<v Speaker 3>This is the kind of parallel economic and social bodies

0:25:08.493 --> 0:25:12.053
<v Speaker 3>that I think are forming in advance of all of this.

0:25:12.293 --> 0:25:16.173
<v Speaker 3>And they would survive. But how long it's hard to say.

0:25:16.413 --> 0:25:19.413
<v Speaker 3>And how many of them there would be, and how

0:25:19.413 --> 0:25:22.893
<v Speaker 3>many people they would have contain, very very hard to say.

0:25:23.493 --> 0:25:27.493
<v Speaker 3>But the overall economic order of the United States could

0:25:27.573 --> 0:25:32.973
<v Speaker 3>be plunged into a kind of post USSR disaster or

0:25:33.253 --> 0:25:37.573
<v Speaker 3>you know, the kind of economics that the USSR had

0:25:37.733 --> 0:25:41.493
<v Speaker 3>prior to their collapse, their total collapse. It would be

0:25:41.693 --> 0:25:44.253
<v Speaker 3>hard to take down the United States. You know, you

0:25:44.293 --> 0:25:48.213
<v Speaker 3>look around, you go to New York, you fly over

0:25:48.253 --> 0:25:52.573
<v Speaker 3>these cities, you see the vastness of this landscape and

0:25:52.733 --> 0:25:56.213
<v Speaker 3>the incredible resources that have been built up here. It

0:25:56.293 --> 0:25:58.533
<v Speaker 3>takes a lot to tear it down. It takes a

0:25:58.693 --> 0:26:03.773
<v Speaker 3>lot concerted effort, but it would be it would be hobbled,

0:26:04.133 --> 0:26:08.813
<v Speaker 3>severely hobbled at best after four years, and after eight years,

0:26:09.053 --> 0:26:10.053
<v Speaker 3>it'll be on its knees.

0:26:10.973 --> 0:26:12.533
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to use the word challenge. We're I'm

0:26:12.533 --> 0:26:14.573
<v Speaker 2>going to challenge you just slightly on some of that

0:26:16.733 --> 0:26:20.413
<v Speaker 2>we've we've just we just discussed the CBDCs and the

0:26:20.453 --> 0:26:24.733
<v Speaker 2>control that they would give the administration whatever form the

0:26:24.773 --> 0:26:28.973
<v Speaker 2>administration was in. So on that basis and the fact

0:26:29.053 --> 0:26:31.853
<v Speaker 2>that the Amish I mean to armies land by the way,

0:26:32.133 --> 0:26:35.773
<v Speaker 2>and I was, I was, I couldn't believe. I was fascinated.

0:26:36.173 --> 0:26:39.053
<v Speaker 2>But the armies have survived because they had the freedom

0:26:39.093 --> 0:26:42.733
<v Speaker 2>to do what they wanted to do. When you when

0:26:42.733 --> 0:26:45.053
<v Speaker 2>you don't have that freedom, when that's taken away from you,

0:26:46.213 --> 0:26:52.013
<v Speaker 2>and let's say it it revolves around the administration of finance,

0:26:53.013 --> 0:26:56.533
<v Speaker 2>then the things aren't going to be so easy.

0:26:57.013 --> 0:27:01.413
<v Speaker 3>No, yeah, I think it would be very difficult. And

0:27:01.453 --> 0:27:06.773
<v Speaker 3>the incursions of the overarching economic order into those places

0:27:06.853 --> 0:27:10.773
<v Speaker 3>would be very hard to resist, and also the states

0:27:10.853 --> 0:27:14.333
<v Speaker 3>impositions on them would be very difficult. I mean, we

0:27:14.493 --> 0:27:18.413
<v Speaker 3>just saw that recently with a Mennonite here in Pennsylvania

0:27:18.493 --> 0:27:21.693
<v Speaker 3>where I live. A Mennonite who just wants to farm

0:27:21.773 --> 0:27:25.613
<v Speaker 3>and sell his products, milk and things like this, and

0:27:25.653 --> 0:27:31.013
<v Speaker 3>they raided his establishment, took all the products, levied an

0:27:31.213 --> 0:27:33.693
<v Speaker 3>enormous sign against him. I think it was five hundred

0:27:33.733 --> 0:27:37.973
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars, utterly destroying his business. So yes, as long

0:27:38.013 --> 0:27:40.613
<v Speaker 3>as those people can do that, as long as the

0:27:41.013 --> 0:27:45.613
<v Speaker 3>FDA here, the Federal and Drug Administration, Food and Drug Administration,

0:27:45.733 --> 0:27:47.933
<v Speaker 3>as long as they can get to you. In fact,

0:27:48.133 --> 0:27:51.573
<v Speaker 3>you could be destroyed even trying to keep yourself alive

0:27:51.653 --> 0:27:55.573
<v Speaker 3>with food. But we would say that, and I'm going

0:27:55.613 --> 0:27:58.893
<v Speaker 3>to be slightly provocative here, as these smaller communities would

0:27:58.893 --> 0:28:02.373
<v Speaker 3>have to be like the Amish, only armed frankly for

0:28:02.453 --> 0:28:04.533
<v Speaker 3>self protection, not for aggression.

0:28:05.333 --> 0:28:10.613
<v Speaker 2>Of course, that's why the to bear arms exists. Essentially

0:28:11.453 --> 0:28:14.973
<v Speaker 2>the state system. Of course, I have this throned me

0:28:15.173 --> 0:28:17.493
<v Speaker 2>from time to time by a couple of people, in

0:28:17.533 --> 0:28:21.733
<v Speaker 2>particular that Washington doesn't have that much power and the

0:28:21.773 --> 0:28:26.173
<v Speaker 2>states can undermine it. What chance, in your opinion, with

0:28:26.373 --> 0:28:31.653
<v Speaker 2>Texas and Florida and Tennessee, for instance, what chance would

0:28:31.653 --> 0:28:31.973
<v Speaker 2>they have?

0:28:34.133 --> 0:28:37.733
<v Speaker 3>Well, it would come down to standoffs, and I think

0:28:38.893 --> 0:28:43.453
<v Speaker 3>they're going to be. There will be attempts to make

0:28:43.493 --> 0:28:47.933
<v Speaker 3>the states more autonomous, and you could see possible if

0:28:47.973 --> 0:28:53.773
<v Speaker 3>things get bad enough, secession, attempts at a secession and

0:28:54.133 --> 0:29:00.373
<v Speaker 3>to insulate themselves from the overreach, the overreach and penetration

0:29:00.573 --> 0:29:04.293
<v Speaker 3>of the federal hegemon that's running the show. And I

0:29:04.293 --> 0:29:07.093
<v Speaker 3>think you're going to have to also have people in

0:29:07.173 --> 0:29:11.733
<v Speaker 3>those states that are liberty minded, so they're not only

0:29:11.813 --> 0:29:17.133
<v Speaker 3>working on people through direct force and coersion, but also propaganda,

0:29:17.813 --> 0:29:21.733
<v Speaker 3>so that it's hard to even find leaders who understand

0:29:21.773 --> 0:29:25.053
<v Speaker 3>what we're trying to save in the first place. And

0:29:25.053 --> 0:29:30.653
<v Speaker 3>they're penetrating local governments too, using Agenda twenty thirty, rules

0:29:30.653 --> 0:29:35.813
<v Speaker 3>and issues and so forth to create sort of fifteen

0:29:35.853 --> 0:29:39.453
<v Speaker 3>minute type cities and all this nonsense. This stuff has

0:29:39.533 --> 0:29:44.053
<v Speaker 3>penetrated local townships, and I know for a fact because

0:29:44.333 --> 0:29:49.413
<v Speaker 3>I witnessed it in Colorado where these the administrators there,

0:29:49.253 --> 0:29:55.213
<v Speaker 3>the local government was doing all these globalist things. So

0:29:55.373 --> 0:30:01.573
<v Speaker 3>it requires an educated and resilient, recalcitrant remnant running the

0:30:01.613 --> 0:30:05.613
<v Speaker 3>show in those various local places and resisting the federal

0:30:06.453 --> 0:30:10.413
<v Speaker 3>incursions as much as possible. It's a very difficult proposition.

0:30:11.133 --> 0:30:14.693
<v Speaker 3>In the United States, there's an organization. I'm bragging about

0:30:14.693 --> 0:30:16.853
<v Speaker 3>it here because I'm involved with. It's called the Mesis

0:30:16.893 --> 0:30:20.493
<v Speaker 3>Caucus of the Libertarian Party, and that is the plan

0:30:21.213 --> 0:30:23.773
<v Speaker 3>of the Mesas Caucus now has been adopted by the

0:30:23.813 --> 0:30:29.973
<v Speaker 3>Libertarian Party. It's called Project Decentralized Revolution. It's really only

0:30:30.013 --> 0:30:34.813
<v Speaker 3>a revolution back to the kind of anti federalist, anti

0:30:34.933 --> 0:30:39.813
<v Speaker 3>centralized government that the founders actually envisioned in the first place,

0:30:40.573 --> 0:30:43.733
<v Speaker 3>and that the states would be autonomous except in matters

0:30:44.293 --> 0:30:51.413
<v Speaker 3>relating to constitutional provisions that the federal government had authority over.

0:30:51.813 --> 0:30:55.253
<v Speaker 3>In other words, only those things the federal government explicitly

0:30:55.333 --> 0:30:59.933
<v Speaker 3>has authority over can be imposed on the states. Everything

0:30:59.933 --> 0:31:03.933
<v Speaker 3>else can be nullified. It's difficult, but it can be done,

0:31:03.933 --> 0:31:06.973
<v Speaker 3>and there are cases of nullification happening all over the place.

0:31:08.853 --> 0:31:12.093
<v Speaker 3>And you know, one of the other movements that's really

0:31:12.133 --> 0:31:14.813
<v Speaker 3>along these lines is called the Defend the Guard movement

0:31:14.813 --> 0:31:18.933
<v Speaker 3>in the United States. It's a movement to preclude the

0:31:19.213 --> 0:31:25.213
<v Speaker 3>use of national guards state national guardsmen in undeclared wars

0:31:25.253 --> 0:31:29.573
<v Speaker 3>across the globe. This is another way of the states

0:31:30.533 --> 0:31:36.413
<v Speaker 3>asserting their own autonomy and it's not allowed to you know.

0:31:37.453 --> 0:31:40.893
<v Speaker 3>You know, technically the United States cannot fight fight wars

0:31:40.933 --> 0:31:44.253
<v Speaker 3>without a declaration from Congress, but it's been going on

0:31:44.453 --> 0:31:49.933
<v Speaker 3>without without really any hesitation otherwise. But at least they

0:31:50.013 --> 0:31:54.173
<v Speaker 3>could reserve their own National Guard and keep them at

0:31:54.213 --> 0:31:57.893
<v Speaker 3>bay and keep them from participating. So things like this,

0:31:58.373 --> 0:32:01.933
<v Speaker 3>Defend the Guard, decentralized revolution, all of these things can

0:32:02.053 --> 0:32:06.733
<v Speaker 3>be done, and they're already underway in some places. But

0:32:06.853 --> 0:32:09.973
<v Speaker 3>it's very difficult. It's not going to be easy. Nobody

0:32:10.053 --> 0:32:14.493
<v Speaker 3>said that this remnant will struggle against this kind of

0:32:14.653 --> 0:32:16.653
<v Speaker 3>detlitarianism that we're up against.

0:32:16.853 --> 0:32:20.133
<v Speaker 2>Right. This is a side by question, but it's related

0:32:20.733 --> 0:32:24.013
<v Speaker 2>from this far away. I've watched the story of the

0:32:24.053 --> 0:32:28.773
<v Speaker 2>Southern border unfold and if you go back, if you

0:32:28.813 --> 0:32:31.973
<v Speaker 2>go back four or five years, where it was already

0:32:32.013 --> 0:32:36.533
<v Speaker 2>a problem. Now it's more than a problem, but it

0:32:37.573 --> 0:32:41.333
<v Speaker 2>was a state of well, chaos wouldn't be the wrong word,

0:32:42.453 --> 0:32:49.253
<v Speaker 2>and the Southern border gradually, actually in a rush, became

0:32:49.493 --> 0:32:53.853
<v Speaker 2>no Southern border. And what number do you do you

0:32:54.053 --> 0:32:56.493
<v Speaker 2>use when you talk about the number of illegal immigrants

0:32:56.493 --> 0:32:58.693
<v Speaker 2>who have come across that border in the last few years.

0:33:00.253 --> 0:33:05.773
<v Speaker 3>I would say it's upwards of fifteen million, roughly upwards

0:33:05.773 --> 0:33:10.133
<v Speaker 3>of fifteen million, because the reports are somewhere around ten

0:33:10.213 --> 0:33:13.973
<v Speaker 3>or eleven, and I would say they're missing some people,

0:33:14.053 --> 0:33:18.173
<v Speaker 3>of course, so I think it's upwards of fifteen million,

0:33:19.133 --> 0:33:20.373
<v Speaker 3>and that's a lot of people.

0:33:21.653 --> 0:33:26.773
<v Speaker 2>Well, you had the Texas governor take a stand on this,

0:33:27.053 --> 0:33:32.133
<v Speaker 2>and the fence off some areas of the along the river,

0:33:32.573 --> 0:33:33.773
<v Speaker 2>the name of which escapes me.

0:33:35.453 --> 0:33:37.413
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember the name either right now.

0:33:37.613 --> 0:33:42.333
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, anyway, they tried doing that, and then the White

0:33:42.373 --> 0:33:45.973
<v Speaker 2>House sent down who was it that they sent which

0:33:46.053 --> 0:33:49.333
<v Speaker 2>particular grouping of military did they send down to ord

0:33:49.733 --> 0:33:51.453
<v Speaker 2>to try to put us up to it? And I'm

0:33:51.453 --> 0:33:53.653
<v Speaker 2>not sure. I'm not sure how it ended.

0:33:55.253 --> 0:33:57.253
<v Speaker 3>You know, that's a good question. That's a story that

0:33:57.373 --> 0:34:02.693
<v Speaker 3>sort of disappeared, yep, and it needs to be examined.

0:34:03.013 --> 0:34:07.173
<v Speaker 3>But I think the standoff was using or an attempt

0:34:07.213 --> 0:34:09.533
<v Speaker 3>to use, the National Guard. But the National Guard are

0:34:09.573 --> 0:34:12.533
<v Speaker 3>state based, so I don't think they were able to

0:34:12.573 --> 0:34:19.333
<v Speaker 3>actually use any militia against this, against the fencing that

0:34:19.413 --> 0:34:23.693
<v Speaker 3>took place, and you're right, the body of water escapes me.

0:34:24.333 --> 0:34:28.933
<v Speaker 3>But they erected barbois fences and so forth to keep

0:34:29.493 --> 0:34:35.973
<v Speaker 3>people from crossing into Texas, and that's perfectly legitimate in

0:34:36.013 --> 0:34:40.773
<v Speaker 3>my mind. I think immigration should be handled at the

0:34:40.813 --> 0:34:44.213
<v Speaker 3>local level as much as possible. But the main thing

0:34:44.293 --> 0:34:46.973
<v Speaker 3>that's really going on here with this immigration is the

0:34:47.013 --> 0:34:51.253
<v Speaker 3>incentivizing of it to the tune of billions tens of

0:34:51.413 --> 0:34:56.333
<v Speaker 3>billions of dollars. The federal government is not directly funding it.

0:34:56.453 --> 0:34:59.013
<v Speaker 3>What they're doing is a little ledger domain in which

0:34:59.053 --> 0:35:03.533
<v Speaker 3>they use a middlemen, the NGOs, and they're handing out

0:35:03.573 --> 0:35:07.133
<v Speaker 3>tens of billions of dollars to these charities so called

0:35:07.133 --> 0:35:12.293
<v Speaker 3>these philanthropy and letting them distribute the money. And this

0:35:12.493 --> 0:35:17.533
<v Speaker 3>is in the form of everything from debit cards to transportation,

0:35:17.773 --> 0:35:22.653
<v Speaker 3>to housing, to healthcare to everything. This is being accommodated

0:35:22.693 --> 0:35:27.093
<v Speaker 3>through these NGOs largely. And then the States then in

0:35:27.213 --> 0:35:30.133
<v Speaker 3>the when this when the immigrants arrived, then they grant

0:35:30.173 --> 0:35:34.413
<v Speaker 3>them housing and hotels and housing and who knows where

0:35:34.453 --> 0:35:39.013
<v Speaker 3>else apartment buildings. In the case of Aurora, Hi, Aurora, Ohio,

0:35:39.213 --> 0:35:44.333
<v Speaker 3>they actually took over at an apartment complex. Is driving

0:35:44.373 --> 0:35:48.973
<v Speaker 3>people out of their plate homes and just basically a

0:35:49.093 --> 0:35:52.453
<v Speaker 3>violent takeover of property. This is where we're at.

0:35:52.573 --> 0:35:57.053
<v Speaker 2>Well, we've seen that. I don't know about local television,

0:35:57.053 --> 0:36:00.053
<v Speaker 2>but it's been it's been seen on the cable from

0:36:00.053 --> 0:36:02.933
<v Speaker 2>the States down here. I've seen it on more than

0:36:02.933 --> 0:36:07.453
<v Speaker 2>one occasion, and it's just just plain ugly.

0:36:07.973 --> 0:36:12.773
<v Speaker 3>It's I'm believable, it's very ugly. It's just utter theft

0:36:13.573 --> 0:36:19.733
<v Speaker 3>of property and complete occupation of people's residences that they're

0:36:19.733 --> 0:36:24.293
<v Speaker 3>literally throwing people out of their homes and taking their property,

0:36:24.653 --> 0:36:27.453
<v Speaker 3>throwing it in the trash with if they don't want

0:36:27.453 --> 0:36:33.813
<v Speaker 3>it and occupying their property with the complete apparent okay

0:36:34.413 --> 0:36:37.173
<v Speaker 3>of the local authorities. They are doing nothing about it.

0:36:37.933 --> 0:36:40.253
<v Speaker 3>They aren't doing anything to stop it, and they're not

0:36:40.333 --> 0:36:43.813
<v Speaker 3>doing anything to reverse it when it happens. So in

0:36:43.853 --> 0:36:46.253
<v Speaker 3>this case, what we're looking at, if Trump got in,

0:36:46.573 --> 0:36:53.133
<v Speaker 3>hopefully he would have these places completely retaken. They have

0:36:53.173 --> 0:36:56.093
<v Speaker 3>to have a counter insurgence to get these properties back,

0:36:57.053 --> 0:37:00.413
<v Speaker 3>and that would be probably one of the first orders

0:37:00.413 --> 0:37:04.493
<v Speaker 3>of business, I think, because if you're going to go after, oh,

0:37:04.613 --> 0:37:06.973
<v Speaker 3>the illegals and deport them, I would think you might

0:37:07.013 --> 0:37:10.133
<v Speaker 3>want to get the ones first who have actually taken

0:37:10.173 --> 0:37:14.813
<v Speaker 3>over other people's homes. It's unbelievable, is can you believe

0:37:14.813 --> 0:37:15.733
<v Speaker 3>we're even saying this.

0:37:16.493 --> 0:37:20.453
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's not forget that. It didn't start in Ohio. Really,

0:37:21.093 --> 0:37:23.853
<v Speaker 2>it started up in New York as far as I'm aware.

0:37:23.933 --> 0:37:27.413
<v Speaker 2>Where you may have seen the woman on television who

0:37:27.453 --> 0:37:31.133
<v Speaker 2>had been away, away somewhere, came back. The house had

0:37:31.133 --> 0:37:34.493
<v Speaker 2>been occupied, and she called the police, and the police

0:37:34.573 --> 0:37:35.253
<v Speaker 2>arrested her.

0:37:36.613 --> 0:37:40.173
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the owner squatter's rights. Yes, based on squatters rights.

0:37:40.173 --> 0:37:43.373
<v Speaker 3>Once you get ahold of a property, that's it. In

0:37:43.453 --> 0:37:47.773
<v Speaker 3>New York, you are out it's unbelievable. So there's no

0:37:47.973 --> 0:37:52.133
<v Speaker 3>sense of property rights. In many places now property rights

0:37:52.173 --> 0:37:57.453
<v Speaker 3>are being completely abrogated. There is no sense that property

0:37:57.613 --> 0:38:00.413
<v Speaker 3>is real and that people have a right to it.

0:38:00.653 --> 0:38:04.053
<v Speaker 3>This has been one of the main reasons, I think

0:38:04.173 --> 0:38:07.853
<v Speaker 3>for the whole Wok ideology, is to make people believe

0:38:07.893 --> 0:38:09.973
<v Speaker 3>that they don't have any right to what they have,

0:38:10.773 --> 0:38:13.373
<v Speaker 3>that in fact they should feel guilty and should abdicate

0:38:13.453 --> 0:38:17.133
<v Speaker 3>it or or otherwise have been divested from it by

0:38:17.173 --> 0:38:21.373
<v Speaker 3>the authorities. That that's it's just it's unbelievable.

0:38:21.493 --> 0:38:23.493
<v Speaker 2>And you've got to wonder if the world's gone insane.

0:38:24.093 --> 0:38:27.333
<v Speaker 2>The substackt that you write for under the name if

0:38:27.533 --> 0:38:31.373
<v Speaker 2>my memory serves me correctly of and don't tell me

0:38:32.333 --> 0:38:38.453
<v Speaker 2>m recton wald great at substack dot com that's correct,

0:38:39.013 --> 0:38:43.453
<v Speaker 2>contains a large number of your offerings over the last

0:38:43.773 --> 0:38:47.133
<v Speaker 2>over the last couple of years, and it's it's an

0:38:47.253 --> 0:38:52.533
<v Speaker 2>extremely profitable place to spend a bit of time, in fact,

0:38:52.733 --> 0:38:55.253
<v Speaker 2>more than a bit of time, because it's very educational.

0:38:56.253 --> 0:39:00.733
<v Speaker 2>I just wonder every everybody these days and their uncle

0:39:01.733 --> 0:39:06.053
<v Speaker 2>is writing substact stuff. I'm watching the increase of it

0:39:06.173 --> 0:39:10.493
<v Speaker 2>just in our country, and it's turning out some extremely

0:39:10.573 --> 0:39:15.573
<v Speaker 2>good commentary, such stuff that the mainstream media simply wouldn't

0:39:15.773 --> 0:39:20.893
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't consider. And I suppose it's probably a long stretch

0:39:20.973 --> 0:39:24.253
<v Speaker 2>to refer to it as a contemporary version of those

0:39:24.293 --> 0:39:27.253
<v Speaker 2>pamphlets that were written back in the seventeen hundreds. I

0:39:27.253 --> 0:39:32.773
<v Speaker 2>think in your country. But is that a good ground, Well,

0:39:32.853 --> 0:39:36.093
<v Speaker 2>let's stay with you and yours. I would imagine you

0:39:36.133 --> 0:39:39.213
<v Speaker 2>have good readership, but there are so many now that

0:39:39.253 --> 0:39:42.773
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to know exactly where to spend your time.

0:39:43.253 --> 0:39:45.613
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's very difficult to tell. I have a good

0:39:45.933 --> 0:39:51.813
<v Speaker 3>subscriber base. I think it's upwards of twenty five subscribers.

0:39:52.533 --> 0:39:59.053
<v Speaker 3>And I was very hesitant to move my work off

0:39:59.093 --> 0:40:02.533
<v Speaker 3>of my own website, Michael rectinwall dot com and to

0:40:02.573 --> 0:40:07.693
<v Speaker 3>put it first on substack. But I reach a much

0:40:07.813 --> 0:40:11.693
<v Speaker 3>broader eye audience this way. It's incredible how it just

0:40:11.853 --> 0:40:17.173
<v Speaker 3>traffics people between these various substack sites. And likewise, I've

0:40:17.293 --> 0:40:21.373
<v Speaker 3>gained tremendous reach over this, and so I don't regret it.

0:40:21.453 --> 0:40:25.053
<v Speaker 3>I do try to keep my other page up to date,

0:40:25.173 --> 0:40:28.253
<v Speaker 3>but I let the substack lead the way now, and

0:40:28.333 --> 0:40:31.013
<v Speaker 3>it's just very it's very good. It's a good way

0:40:31.053 --> 0:40:34.333
<v Speaker 3>of reaching a lot of people. You might call it

0:40:34.373 --> 0:40:38.053
<v Speaker 3>like a kind of pamphleteering, as in, you know in

0:40:38.133 --> 0:40:42.413
<v Speaker 3>England during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, you know when

0:40:42.413 --> 0:40:47.853
<v Speaker 3>you had Addison and Steel and others writing for the

0:40:47.933 --> 0:40:51.053
<v Speaker 3>public in these kind of public squares. It's the new

0:40:51.093 --> 0:40:54.813
<v Speaker 3>public square for a long form, at least more than

0:40:54.853 --> 0:40:57.893
<v Speaker 3>a tweet long content.

0:40:58.013 --> 0:41:01.973
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've got to refer to something as something else.

0:41:03.453 --> 0:41:06.813
<v Speaker 2>The university prefaces have started the petition for academics already

0:41:06.853 --> 0:41:11.493
<v Speaker 2>behind Donald Trump in the twenty twenty four presidential election.

0:41:11.573 --> 0:41:15.733
<v Speaker 2>The petition's statement, a project of Professor Daniel Klein of

0:41:15.853 --> 0:41:20.013
<v Speaker 2>George Mason University and Daniel Mahoney or that should be

0:41:20.053 --> 0:41:25.813
<v Speaker 2>many probably, professor emeritus of Political Science at Assumption University,

0:41:25.973 --> 0:41:30.613
<v Speaker 2>encourages scholars to support the Republican candidate. The article goes

0:41:30.653 --> 0:41:34.493
<v Speaker 2>on with more detailed but this is how it finishes. However,

0:41:34.653 --> 0:41:38.453
<v Speaker 2>he said, a Kamala Harris administration would be catastrophic. While

0:41:38.453 --> 0:41:41.333
<v Speaker 2>President Trump can be thought of as a bad landlord,

0:41:41.693 --> 0:41:44.333
<v Speaker 2>the Harris administration is a further step on the road

0:41:44.373 --> 0:41:49.853
<v Speaker 2>to serfdom, a step toward totalitarianism. Censorship suppression law fare

0:41:50.293 --> 0:41:54.333
<v Speaker 2>and attacks on the affluent middle class. The Democrats are

0:41:54.413 --> 0:41:58.933
<v Speaker 2>a passionate, indoctrinated mob that cares little for freedom. Now,

0:41:59.813 --> 0:42:03.653
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people, if they were reading that, i'd suggest,

0:42:03.693 --> 0:42:08.053
<v Speaker 2>would think, oh, what an exaggeration. It's nowhere near anything

0:42:08.373 --> 0:42:10.333
<v Speaker 2>as bad as that. Your response.

0:42:11.693 --> 0:42:16.493
<v Speaker 3>I've been saying we were headed towards totalitarianism for approximately

0:42:17.373 --> 0:42:21.453
<v Speaker 3>nine years now, and I think it's great that some

0:42:21.493 --> 0:42:24.293
<v Speaker 3>people are catching up, and and it's amazing that you're

0:42:24.333 --> 0:42:29.973
<v Speaker 3>seeing a profess certain segments of the Professoriat actually finally

0:42:30.013 --> 0:42:33.413
<v Speaker 3>catching up to this. And yeah, I think he's correct.

0:42:33.573 --> 0:42:36.853
<v Speaker 3>You know, you're going to see with with Harris, you

0:42:36.893 --> 0:42:42.173
<v Speaker 3>would see a totalitarian regime, you know, in in if

0:42:42.213 --> 0:42:45.573
<v Speaker 3>not in full force, in in accelerated motion. And so

0:42:46.253 --> 0:42:48.613
<v Speaker 3>I think that is a very good development, and I

0:42:48.653 --> 0:42:52.013
<v Speaker 3>hope more more academics. But I think that many of

0:42:52.053 --> 0:42:58.653
<v Speaker 3>them will be cold and quailed, afraid to join because

0:42:58.693 --> 0:43:00.733
<v Speaker 3>it could mean the end of their careers as they do.

0:43:01.413 --> 0:43:02.333
<v Speaker 3>That's how bad it is.

0:43:03.133 --> 0:43:05.413
<v Speaker 2>Well, we know that because you fell into that either

0:43:05.413 --> 0:43:09.453
<v Speaker 2>that very category, but you had you had survived. But

0:43:11.333 --> 0:43:13.733
<v Speaker 2>I'm guessing you'd say that it might be harder to

0:43:13.773 --> 0:43:17.653
<v Speaker 2>survive now. Because the market that you've you've helped create

0:43:19.493 --> 0:43:21.973
<v Speaker 2>is probably busy enough.

0:43:22.813 --> 0:43:26.373
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's not easy. As I had a virtual sinecure

0:43:26.493 --> 0:43:29.373
<v Speaker 3>as a university professor. I mean I did teach. I

0:43:29.493 --> 0:43:32.333
<v Speaker 3>taught two days a week if that was a full

0:43:32.373 --> 0:43:36.693
<v Speaker 3>time job, nine months a year, and I gave it

0:43:36.813 --> 0:43:42.253
<v Speaker 3>up because of my greater value, which is truth. And

0:43:42.293 --> 0:43:44.653
<v Speaker 3>that's why I went into academy in the first place.

0:43:44.733 --> 0:43:50.733
<v Speaker 3>So I wasn't going to sacrifice the truth for a sinecure.

0:43:50.813 --> 0:43:53.613
<v Speaker 3>It's just a drive. That would be a sniveling and

0:43:53.813 --> 0:43:56.933
<v Speaker 3>very obsequist thing to do, and I couldn't do it.

0:43:57.613 --> 0:44:00.973
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think the ruling class see is democracy?

0:44:01.413 --> 0:44:04.053
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's interesting because I've been writing about this question

0:44:04.133 --> 0:44:08.293
<v Speaker 3>of our democracy as they call it here. The Democrat

0:44:08.693 --> 0:44:13.293
<v Speaker 3>particularly use this phrase, and it's anything but democracy. What

0:44:13.333 --> 0:44:17.613
<v Speaker 3>they mean by our democracy is something like our rule,

0:44:18.693 --> 0:44:22.173
<v Speaker 3>a rule by our party or our uniparty, whatever you

0:44:22.213 --> 0:44:25.693
<v Speaker 3>want to call it, and anything else is a threat

0:44:25.733 --> 0:44:30.573
<v Speaker 3>to democracy. So what they mean by democracy is kind

0:44:30.613 --> 0:44:34.373
<v Speaker 3>of like ruled by the administrative state with our puppets

0:44:35.613 --> 0:44:42.173
<v Speaker 3>in place, carrying out the deep state or administrative states deciderata,

0:44:42.733 --> 0:44:48.813
<v Speaker 3>and anything else is a threat or anti democratic or

0:44:48.893 --> 0:44:52.973
<v Speaker 3>fascist or nazi or whatever else they want to call it.

0:44:53.173 --> 0:44:57.333
<v Speaker 3>And it's just such an irony because they're anything but democratic.

0:44:57.853 --> 0:45:02.733
<v Speaker 3>It's in fact the opposite of democratic. It's dictatorial. It's

0:45:02.733 --> 0:45:08.973
<v Speaker 3>a dictatorship by a particular elite of subversive elites, and

0:45:09.533 --> 0:45:13.653
<v Speaker 3>that's who's running the show. And they consider any threat

0:45:13.893 --> 0:45:20.093
<v Speaker 3>to their single, solitary control of power to be anti democratic.

0:45:20.133 --> 0:45:23.493
<v Speaker 3>That's what they call it. So they hate democracy because

0:45:23.973 --> 0:45:27.013
<v Speaker 3>look at the people that would vote, and they want

0:45:27.053 --> 0:45:31.733
<v Speaker 3>to discount these people. They want to discount the fact

0:45:31.813 --> 0:45:34.693
<v Speaker 3>that you have at least half the country. I think

0:45:34.733 --> 0:45:38.333
<v Speaker 3>it's more who favors Donald Trump here in the United

0:45:38.333 --> 0:45:42.613
<v Speaker 3>States as opposed to the regime puppet that they want

0:45:42.613 --> 0:45:48.893
<v Speaker 3>to prop up instead, and that's called anti democratic. So

0:45:49.413 --> 0:45:51.453
<v Speaker 3>that's the people they want to shut out. They don't

0:45:51.493 --> 0:45:55.173
<v Speaker 3>want them having a voice, they don't want them casting about,

0:45:55.533 --> 0:45:57.453
<v Speaker 3>or if they do, they want to make sure they

0:45:57.493 --> 0:46:02.613
<v Speaker 3>get enough additional ballots from god knows where, including immigrants,

0:46:02.733 --> 0:46:07.973
<v Speaker 3>I believe, another chicanery. Really, they want to make sure

0:46:08.053 --> 0:46:11.173
<v Speaker 3>that they get they keep power, and they're willing to

0:46:11.213 --> 0:46:14.293
<v Speaker 3>subvert democracy in the name of our democracy.

0:46:14.693 --> 0:46:17.293
<v Speaker 2>Such an irony well, I've heard if I've heard it once,

0:46:17.333 --> 0:46:22.173
<v Speaker 2>I've heard it a million times that the Democrats will

0:46:22.173 --> 0:46:26.973
<v Speaker 2>stop at nothing to retain power and win this election.

0:46:27.533 --> 0:46:31.173
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's absolutely correct. I think they'll stop it nothing.

0:46:31.973 --> 0:46:35.293
<v Speaker 3>And I wouldn't even put it past them to precipitate

0:46:36.053 --> 0:46:41.093
<v Speaker 3>a world war with Russia in advance of this, because

0:46:41.973 --> 0:46:45.893
<v Speaker 3>then they'll be talking about the peaceful transfer of power

0:46:45.973 --> 0:46:48.173
<v Speaker 3>and how we have to keep it in certain hands

0:46:48.213 --> 0:46:52.933
<v Speaker 3>and we can't let Trump, who's a conciliator and a

0:46:52.973 --> 0:46:55.853
<v Speaker 3>putent poppet, we can't let him in power because he'll

0:46:56.853 --> 0:47:00.813
<v Speaker 3>he'll put us at existential risk. But likewise we must

0:47:00.813 --> 0:47:03.213
<v Speaker 3>continue and we may have to suspend the election. I

0:47:03.213 --> 0:47:05.293
<v Speaker 3>would not put that pass them, even.

0:47:05.293 --> 0:47:09.173
<v Speaker 2>It has crossed my mind, speaking of which I haven't

0:47:09.213 --> 0:47:11.933
<v Speaker 2>mentioned this on a podcast yet, but I'm going to

0:47:13.053 --> 0:47:15.613
<v Speaker 2>not that. Not that we've had many podcasts since that,

0:47:15.973 --> 0:47:20.333
<v Speaker 2>since that debate, but I said to my wife during

0:47:20.373 --> 0:47:23.813
<v Speaker 2>that debate, which wasn't a debate at the face, but

0:47:24.093 --> 0:47:29.013
<v Speaker 2>I said to her, she's had preconditioning with the questions,

0:47:29.693 --> 0:47:33.733
<v Speaker 2>and my wife said, no, no, no, they wouldn't dare

0:47:33.813 --> 0:47:38.693
<v Speaker 2>do that. She was look, she was responding, so immediately

0:47:39.173 --> 0:47:43.493
<v Speaker 2>so consistently with ret with what could only be described

0:47:43.493 --> 0:47:47.893
<v Speaker 2>as ready comments for every question. There was no hesitation.

0:47:49.013 --> 0:47:51.253
<v Speaker 2>It's just banged straight into it. Whether it was right

0:47:51.333 --> 0:47:53.453
<v Speaker 2>or wrong, or indifferent or whatever it was. It was

0:47:53.853 --> 0:47:57.213
<v Speaker 2>straight into it like she'd had like she'd had the

0:47:57.293 --> 0:47:59.653
<v Speaker 2>questions fed to her and been and been suare we say,

0:47:59.733 --> 0:48:04.773
<v Speaker 2>coached in them. And for anybody who who might struggle

0:48:04.773 --> 0:48:06.573
<v Speaker 2>to believe that, you've only got to look at the

0:48:06.733 --> 0:48:11.813
<v Speaker 2>the the interview that she did in Pennsylvania two days

0:48:11.893 --> 0:48:15.253
<v Speaker 2>later where she was asked where she was asked questions

0:48:15.253 --> 0:48:18.693
<v Speaker 2>by a lift leaning interviewer and she went back to

0:48:18.693 --> 0:48:21.853
<v Speaker 2>words Sellatville. Yeah, she gave disaster schounces.

0:48:22.333 --> 0:48:27.173
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think you know she I was almost shocked

0:48:27.213 --> 0:48:31.893
<v Speaker 3>at her cogency during this so called debate. But you know,

0:48:31.973 --> 0:48:37.573
<v Speaker 3>there is a whistleblower now that alleges that she was

0:48:37.653 --> 0:48:42.533
<v Speaker 3>given This is from an ABC whistleblower, that she was

0:48:42.733 --> 0:48:46.813
<v Speaker 3>given the questions, or at least given the parameters of

0:48:46.893 --> 0:48:52.693
<v Speaker 3>the questions where she was able to delimit the possible questions.

0:48:53.133 --> 0:48:57.653
<v Speaker 3>I think everything she said was utterly memorized. That was

0:48:57.693 --> 0:49:00.453
<v Speaker 3>a pretty impressive feat. I've done a lot of public

0:49:00.493 --> 0:49:03.453
<v Speaker 3>speaking and it's very difficult to memorize that much material.

0:49:03.493 --> 0:49:06.973
<v Speaker 3>But I believe it was memorized, and I think it

0:49:07.053 --> 0:49:10.213
<v Speaker 3>was ready made, ready to spit out at on queue,

0:49:10.613 --> 0:49:13.053
<v Speaker 3>and that's exactly what happened. I do believe she was

0:49:13.093 --> 0:49:17.693
<v Speaker 3>given some sort of information, if not the direct questions,

0:49:17.733 --> 0:49:22.213
<v Speaker 3>then the topics, and just had a ready answer for

0:49:22.333 --> 0:49:24.213
<v Speaker 3>every topic and subtopic.

0:49:25.373 --> 0:49:31.293
<v Speaker 2>I was aware of that whistleblower yesterday, and I decided

0:49:31.293 --> 0:49:36.653
<v Speaker 2>that I wouldn't raise it because I really need more

0:49:37.533 --> 0:49:39.173
<v Speaker 2>This is what I was thinking. I really, I really

0:49:39.173 --> 0:49:42.813
<v Speaker 2>need more confirmation of it than is currently available. I

0:49:42.853 --> 0:49:45.053
<v Speaker 2>saw that, I looked at I did a bit of research,

0:49:45.093 --> 0:49:49.013
<v Speaker 2>and I saw that there were sort of hints in

0:49:49.053 --> 0:49:54.813
<v Speaker 2>that direction from from elsewhere prior to that announcement yesterday.

0:49:55.253 --> 0:49:57.453
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons that I decided to hold was

0:49:57.613 --> 0:50:01.413
<v Speaker 2>who was the guy who who worked for Trump who

0:50:02.013 --> 0:50:05.653
<v Speaker 2>announced on X that there would be in the next

0:50:06.053 --> 0:50:09.213
<v Speaker 2>couple of days, within a very short space of time,

0:50:10.133 --> 0:50:11.493
<v Speaker 2>that this would be revealed.

0:50:12.173 --> 0:50:17.773
<v Speaker 3>That could have been Steven Smith. Perhaps it wasn't him.

0:50:19.853 --> 0:50:23.013
<v Speaker 3>I don't have that information at the top of my tongue.

0:50:23.573 --> 0:50:25.493
<v Speaker 2>My tongue here it was somebody who'd been a bit

0:50:25.533 --> 0:50:29.893
<v Speaker 2>controversial in the past. That's that's why I held back.

0:50:31.533 --> 0:50:34.653
<v Speaker 2>But if that's true, you won't see it in the

0:50:34.653 --> 0:50:35.653
<v Speaker 2>New York Times.

0:50:36.573 --> 0:50:39.813
<v Speaker 3>I don't know even if it's true. You know, that's

0:50:39.853 --> 0:50:44.693
<v Speaker 3>just it. I mean, they're curating reality. Google New York Times,

0:50:44.773 --> 0:50:48.853
<v Speaker 3>the whole media plex that you know, they're curating information

0:50:49.053 --> 0:50:53.853
<v Speaker 3>to such an extent that they're effectively curating reality. And

0:50:53.933 --> 0:50:56.373
<v Speaker 3>it's very difficult to put pierce through it. And no

0:50:56.453 --> 0:51:00.013
<v Speaker 3>matter what evidence you provide, they just say, oh, that's

0:51:00.053 --> 0:51:02.733
<v Speaker 3>been debunked, and that's it for It's that's the end

0:51:02.733 --> 0:51:06.173
<v Speaker 3>of it. It's supposed to be a conversation stopper. My

0:51:06.293 --> 0:51:09.053
<v Speaker 3>assistant would know all this. This is Lori Price. She

0:51:09.053 --> 0:51:13.813
<v Speaker 3>she works in compiling news and keeping track of everything,

0:51:13.933 --> 0:51:17.093
<v Speaker 3>and she would she wouldn't know. But I don't have

0:51:17.173 --> 0:51:18.293
<v Speaker 3>that on a tip of my tongue.

0:51:18.893 --> 0:51:20.733
<v Speaker 2>This is a good spot, though, to raise something with

0:51:20.813 --> 0:51:25.093
<v Speaker 2>you that I've been intrigued with. You actually ran for

0:51:25.173 --> 0:51:29.213
<v Speaker 2>the presidency for the Libertarian Party. Correct?

0:51:29.493 --> 0:51:32.893
<v Speaker 3>I did? Yes, I did. I ran as a presidential

0:51:32.933 --> 0:51:34.573
<v Speaker 3>candidate and the Libertian Party.

0:51:34.773 --> 0:51:39.893
<v Speaker 2>If you were an official candidate, but you must have

0:51:40.093 --> 0:51:43.893
<v Speaker 2>known that you had no show of winning even if

0:51:43.893 --> 0:51:46.333
<v Speaker 2>you became the candidate, but you didn't, you got you

0:51:46.453 --> 0:51:48.853
<v Speaker 2>got defeated. But there's a story behind this. I know that,

0:51:49.013 --> 0:51:50.853
<v Speaker 2>So why don't you just drop it on us?

0:51:51.853 --> 0:51:58.173
<v Speaker 3>Sure? Okay? So I was the lead candidate for the

0:51:58.213 --> 0:52:04.893
<v Speaker 3>whole campaign, and then during the nomination process there were

0:52:04.933 --> 0:52:08.213
<v Speaker 3>they do what they call round voting, and therefore you

0:52:08.493 --> 0:52:10.973
<v Speaker 3>have to get fifty percent of the vote to win,

0:52:11.813 --> 0:52:14.853
<v Speaker 3>and so they eliminate people based on various you know

0:52:14.973 --> 0:52:18.093
<v Speaker 3>you got under this? Not sure? You know? They eliminate

0:52:18.173 --> 0:52:22.253
<v Speaker 3>the bottom first of all, the bottom candidate, and then

0:52:22.293 --> 0:52:24.853
<v Speaker 3>anybody that fails to get X amount. I forget the

0:52:24.893 --> 0:52:29.173
<v Speaker 3>exact criteria. Anyway, I won the first five rounds of voting,

0:52:30.733 --> 0:52:33.613
<v Speaker 3>and I was very close to breaking through to fifty percent.

0:52:34.293 --> 0:52:38.013
<v Speaker 3>And then there was a candidate that got eliminated in

0:52:38.173 --> 0:52:42.173
<v Speaker 3>the fourth round. I'm sorry in the fifth round. And

0:52:42.773 --> 0:52:47.173
<v Speaker 3>he had promised to if he was knocked out, although

0:52:47.213 --> 0:52:49.853
<v Speaker 3>he was stingy to admit it could happen, if he

0:52:49.933 --> 0:52:53.373
<v Speaker 3>was knocked out, he would definitely support me. He promised

0:52:53.373 --> 0:52:56.893
<v Speaker 3>this three times, no less and one time no less

0:52:56.933 --> 0:53:00.573
<v Speaker 3>than three seconds before he went up to announce that

0:53:00.693 --> 0:53:03.653
<v Speaker 3>he was throwing his support to the other candidate. He

0:53:03.693 --> 0:53:06.493
<v Speaker 3>even said it to my face three seconds before he

0:53:06.533 --> 0:53:09.533
<v Speaker 3>made his announcement. I said, you're not going to endorse

0:53:09.973 --> 0:53:12.333
<v Speaker 3>Chase Oliver, now, are you? And he said, oh no,

0:53:13.133 --> 0:53:16.813
<v Speaker 3>and then stepped up to the microphone and did just

0:53:16.893 --> 0:53:24.453
<v Speaker 3>that and became his vice presidential running mate. So then

0:53:24.613 --> 0:53:30.213
<v Speaker 3>I lost. And then Chase Oliver couldn't win even in

0:53:30.253 --> 0:53:32.973
<v Speaker 3>the next round because he didn't get fifty percent, so

0:53:33.013 --> 0:53:35.653
<v Speaker 3>he had to run against nobody, and they call it noda,

0:53:36.253 --> 0:53:39.973
<v Speaker 3>none of the above, and he barely won against nobody,

0:53:40.013 --> 0:53:43.573
<v Speaker 3>but he did. And that's what happened and what we

0:53:43.653 --> 0:53:46.413
<v Speaker 3>got in place of me, which is you were correct.

0:53:46.493 --> 0:53:53.093
<v Speaker 3>I'm a conservative culturally conservative libertarian, yes, and this guy

0:53:53.333 --> 0:53:57.533
<v Speaker 3>is actually for transing children and other things, you know.

0:53:57.613 --> 0:54:01.293
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not bitter about this because, frankly, I would

0:54:01.293 --> 0:54:04.093
<v Speaker 3>have been in a precarious position now had I won

0:54:04.133 --> 0:54:08.173
<v Speaker 3>the nomination of having to deal with the fact that

0:54:08.213 --> 0:54:11.813
<v Speaker 3>you have a presidential candidate who's been they've attempted to

0:54:11.853 --> 0:54:18.573
<v Speaker 3>assassinate twice or somebody has attempted, and who could can't

0:54:18.613 --> 0:54:21.933
<v Speaker 3>afford to lose any votes in the swing states. So

0:54:22.173 --> 0:54:24.413
<v Speaker 3>I would have had the position I would have been

0:54:24.453 --> 0:54:28.493
<v Speaker 3>in the very uncomfortable position of having either to take

0:54:28.573 --> 0:54:33.013
<v Speaker 3>votes and maybe deprived of Trump of the election, or

0:54:33.053 --> 0:54:37.533
<v Speaker 3>throw my support to Trump in those in those states,

0:54:37.573 --> 0:54:44.773
<v Speaker 3>I would have gotten tremendous criticism and you know, vehemence

0:54:44.933 --> 0:54:49.573
<v Speaker 3>either way, in one case from the libertarian people, the

0:54:49.573 --> 0:54:52.053
<v Speaker 3>Libertarian Party people, and in the other case from the

0:54:52.053 --> 0:54:56.773
<v Speaker 3>Trump people. Naturally, of course, I'm voting for Trump, and

0:54:57.693 --> 0:55:00.173
<v Speaker 3>I'll make no mistake about that. I'm voting for Trump,

0:55:00.293 --> 0:55:02.893
<v Speaker 3>and I might even have voted for him against myself

0:55:03.733 --> 0:55:11.293
<v Speaker 3>because I am in the swing state Pennsylvania. Well, the.

0:55:14.613 --> 0:55:18.213
<v Speaker 2>If you'd won, what what would that have meant to

0:55:18.253 --> 0:55:18.653
<v Speaker 2>your life?

0:55:20.373 --> 0:55:21.933
<v Speaker 3>It would have meant a lot of travel, a lot

0:55:21.973 --> 0:55:24.333
<v Speaker 3>more travel. I'd already done a whole year of travel

0:55:24.613 --> 0:55:30.973
<v Speaker 3>doing this, traveling to all the states, doing all the conventions, participating.

0:55:30.973 --> 0:55:35.773
<v Speaker 3>We had twenty five thirty debates. I mean, it's nothing

0:55:35.853 --> 0:55:38.893
<v Speaker 3>like the Republican or Democratic primary, so you know, there's

0:55:38.973 --> 0:55:42.573
<v Speaker 3>twenty five or thirty debates. I would have continued to

0:55:42.693 --> 0:55:44.693
<v Speaker 3>do that. I would have got a lot of press attention,

0:55:44.893 --> 0:55:47.973
<v Speaker 3>probably a lot of negative attention, because what I was

0:55:48.013 --> 0:55:51.613
<v Speaker 3>saying was get rid of the administrative state altogether. Get

0:55:51.733 --> 0:55:57.573
<v Speaker 3>rid of the regulatory agencies, get rid of the intelligence agencies.

0:55:58.413 --> 0:56:02.173
<v Speaker 3>Start gutting the federal government because we can't. We cannot

0:56:02.213 --> 0:56:05.733
<v Speaker 3>survive under it. It is crushing us, and it is

0:56:05.813 --> 0:56:09.413
<v Speaker 3>crushing the economy, and it's a it's crushed people's lives.

0:56:09.933 --> 0:56:12.773
<v Speaker 3>They're not working for us, They're working on their own behalf.

0:56:13.453 --> 0:56:18.133
<v Speaker 3>They don't care about the general welfare. They're you know,

0:56:18.253 --> 0:56:21.133
<v Speaker 3>everybody is self interested, So why do you give certain

0:56:21.133 --> 0:56:25.653
<v Speaker 3>people monopoly over power? You know, since everybody is self interested.

0:56:25.773 --> 0:56:28.253
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's quite frankly between you and me and

0:56:28.333 --> 0:56:32.173
<v Speaker 3>your listeners. I was running as an anarcho capitalist, that is,

0:56:33.053 --> 0:56:36.373
<v Speaker 3>free market, no state at all, and I thought that,

0:56:36.493 --> 0:56:38.213
<v Speaker 3>you know, I was going to argue that the federal

0:56:38.253 --> 0:56:41.613
<v Speaker 3>government should be dissolved. What do we needed for? And

0:56:42.693 --> 0:56:44.893
<v Speaker 3>you know, that would have been interesting, not to say

0:56:44.933 --> 0:56:47.853
<v Speaker 3>the least, it would have been perhaps the most radical

0:56:48.453 --> 0:56:51.053
<v Speaker 3>presidential candidate in history.

0:56:51.413 --> 0:56:55.693
<v Speaker 2>Well, that would have been a fascinating thing to watch. Yeah,

0:56:55.853 --> 0:57:00.693
<v Speaker 2>I purposely lift out until the until the end, any

0:57:00.773 --> 0:57:05.773
<v Speaker 2>any discussion of Trump and what's been going on that

0:57:05.813 --> 0:57:10.653
<v Speaker 2>attempted assassination of the over the last weekend. Only a

0:57:10.653 --> 0:57:14.533
<v Speaker 2>couple of days ago, now has shocked a lot of people,

0:57:14.933 --> 0:57:19.533
<v Speaker 2>or is it now something that has been what's the word,

0:57:19.613 --> 0:57:24.653
<v Speaker 2>I want softened? People have been softened by the first experience,

0:57:24.733 --> 0:57:28.893
<v Speaker 2>now the second experience, So there's a third attempt, people

0:57:29.093 --> 0:57:30.013
<v Speaker 2>might start yawning.

0:57:31.853 --> 0:57:35.173
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's ridiculous. I mean, we've had assassination attempts, two

0:57:35.293 --> 0:57:42.453
<v Speaker 3>assassination attempts on a presidential candidate, and the establishment media

0:57:42.613 --> 0:57:49.093
<v Speaker 3>couldn't be less interested, really and dismissive and putting scare

0:57:49.173 --> 0:57:53.533
<v Speaker 3>quotes on assassination attempt in every case they can, and

0:57:53.733 --> 0:57:59.213
<v Speaker 3>blaming Trump for his rhetoric, effectively what they call blaming

0:57:59.253 --> 0:58:03.893
<v Speaker 3>the victim. You know, NBC News has Lester Holt said,

0:58:04.773 --> 0:58:08.413
<v Speaker 3>you know this, this assassination attempt is really coming on

0:58:08.493 --> 0:58:12.853
<v Speaker 3>the heels of violent and incendiary rhetoric coming out of

0:58:12.853 --> 0:58:16.933
<v Speaker 3>the Trump campaign. They blamed Trump for people shooting at

0:58:16.973 --> 0:58:19.253
<v Speaker 3>him or attempting to shoot at him, or wanting to

0:58:19.293 --> 0:58:23.613
<v Speaker 3>shoot at him. It's unbelievable. So I can't be I'm

0:58:23.693 --> 0:58:27.773
<v Speaker 3>just amazed at how people have been habituated to this

0:58:28.733 --> 0:58:33.533
<v Speaker 3>and can particularly just forget about it, you know, weeks

0:58:33.653 --> 0:58:38.653
<v Speaker 3>or days after when we're having political violence here in

0:58:38.693 --> 0:58:42.373
<v Speaker 3>the United States, not on an unprecedented scale. After all,

0:58:42.173 --> 0:58:46.213
<v Speaker 3>we did witness the assassination of JFK and of course

0:58:46.333 --> 0:58:50.693
<v Speaker 3>Robert Kennedy and also Martin Luther King. It's not alien

0:58:50.733 --> 0:58:53.813
<v Speaker 3>to us. But here we have it right now, and

0:58:53.853 --> 0:58:57.173
<v Speaker 3>it's the same person every time. And if this were

0:58:57.253 --> 0:58:59.093
<v Speaker 3>the other if the shoe were on the other foot,

0:58:59.173 --> 0:59:02.493
<v Speaker 3>you would believe there would be endless commentary on news,

0:59:03.253 --> 0:59:08.293
<v Speaker 3>endless op eds in the papers to crying political violence,

0:59:08.333 --> 0:59:11.933
<v Speaker 3>and also to crying Trump's role in it. They would

0:59:11.933 --> 0:59:14.013
<v Speaker 3>have blamed them. They're blaming him in either case they

0:59:14.013 --> 0:59:16.213
<v Speaker 3>shoot at them and they blame them, or if they

0:59:16.293 --> 0:59:18.973
<v Speaker 3>shoot at somebody else, they would certainly blame them. So

0:59:19.093 --> 0:59:24.373
<v Speaker 3>it's just unbelievable. We're living in a similacrum, if you will,

0:59:24.493 --> 0:59:31.013
<v Speaker 3>a media similacrum in which they completely curtail and inquiry

0:59:31.133 --> 0:59:36.653
<v Speaker 3>and shut off thinking and curate reality. It's a stunning

0:59:36.693 --> 0:59:38.333
<v Speaker 3>it's a stunning development. It is.

0:59:39.253 --> 0:59:41.373
<v Speaker 2>So I think my last question is going to be this,

0:59:42.213 --> 0:59:45.253
<v Speaker 2>If the worst happened between now and the election and

0:59:45.293 --> 0:59:49.373
<v Speaker 2>Trump was moving, what do you think the reaction from

0:59:49.373 --> 0:59:51.453
<v Speaker 2>the population would be.

0:59:52.213 --> 0:59:56.493
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a real good one. There'll be there would

0:59:56.573 --> 1:00:00.893
<v Speaker 3>be a lot of talk, at least talk of an uprising.

1:00:01.053 --> 1:00:04.093
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure that the uprising would ever materialize, but

1:00:04.173 --> 1:00:07.413
<v Speaker 3>there would be an enormous amount of rhetoric in that direction.

1:00:08.493 --> 1:00:11.733
<v Speaker 3>I could see X, for example, the former Twitter blowing

1:00:11.813 --> 1:00:19.733
<v Speaker 3>up with threat you know, with plans and rhetoric and demonstrations.

1:00:19.733 --> 1:00:23.453
<v Speaker 3>I think there would definitely be demonstrations, big ones. You know,

1:00:23.493 --> 1:00:26.093
<v Speaker 3>it wouldn't really be civil war because it would be

1:00:26.133 --> 1:00:31.373
<v Speaker 3>the establishment versus this people, right, So interestingly, you know,

1:00:31.413 --> 1:00:35.653
<v Speaker 3>they talk about predictive programming. There was there is a

1:00:35.733 --> 1:00:40.133
<v Speaker 3>movie called Civil War and in which it's really the

1:00:40.213 --> 1:00:44.893
<v Speaker 3>state against this dissidant community or these dissident people politically.

1:00:46.293 --> 1:00:51.173
<v Speaker 3>So I mean that's that's either predictive programming or habituation

1:00:51.413 --> 1:00:54.653
<v Speaker 3>to the possibility of what might happen. I don't know

1:00:54.693 --> 1:00:59.573
<v Speaker 3>that the United States would see a mass armed uprising.

1:00:59.653 --> 1:01:04.213
<v Speaker 3>I doubt it because people are still too comfortable, They

1:01:04.253 --> 1:01:07.013
<v Speaker 3>still have things to protect, they still have things to lose.

1:01:07.613 --> 1:01:09.973
<v Speaker 2>I think that is a brilliant way to put it.

1:01:10.853 --> 1:01:14.133
<v Speaker 2>I might borrow it if you don't mind, not at all.

1:01:14.293 --> 1:01:19.333
<v Speaker 2>I want to conclude though, with just saying that your

1:01:19.893 --> 1:01:24.253
<v Speaker 2>your substack site m recton World r C. T. E.

1:01:24.373 --> 1:01:30.773
<v Speaker 2>N w Ald Mrectonworld dot substack dot com is worthy

1:01:30.973 --> 1:01:36.213
<v Speaker 2>of attacking. So if you go to that site, make

1:01:36.253 --> 1:01:39.613
<v Speaker 2>sure you read the Grand Refusal by Michael. The Grand

1:01:39.653 --> 1:01:42.733
<v Speaker 2>Refusal Agenda twenty thirty and the Great Reset Plan to

1:01:42.733 --> 1:01:46.173
<v Speaker 2>bring it about is a multi tentacled, many headed hydra

1:01:46.573 --> 1:01:50.613
<v Speaker 2>of mythical proportions. It's a very good piece and it

1:01:50.653 --> 1:01:53.813
<v Speaker 2>contains something that stood out to me immediately, the nine

1:01:53.853 --> 1:01:55.973
<v Speaker 2>point plan for stopping the Great Reset.

1:01:57.973 --> 1:02:03.533
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's kind of like a companion to the idea

1:02:03.613 --> 1:02:07.173
<v Speaker 3>of a kind of decentralized revolution. But it doesn't mean

1:02:07.773 --> 1:02:11.493
<v Speaker 3>you have to move necessarily. You have to create local networks,

1:02:11.493 --> 1:02:15.813
<v Speaker 3>but also networks of like minded people who exchange goods,

1:02:16.253 --> 1:02:20.933
<v Speaker 3>who use their own currency if necessary, and you know,

1:02:21.013 --> 1:02:24.093
<v Speaker 3>they agree upon the currency, whether it's bitcoin, gold leafs,

1:02:24.173 --> 1:02:27.613
<v Speaker 3>what have you. I'm not going to adjudicate that, but yeah,

1:02:27.653 --> 1:02:32.933
<v Speaker 3>that plan is effectively a plan for resistance, and it's

1:02:32.973 --> 1:02:36.653
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily like an overthrow because it's just it's just

1:02:36.733 --> 1:02:39.573
<v Speaker 3>as many people that get involved in it, that's who

1:02:39.613 --> 1:02:43.333
<v Speaker 3>it will serve. It won't necessarily serve everybody, because not

1:02:43.413 --> 1:02:46.293
<v Speaker 3>everybody's going to get involved in it, but for those

1:02:46.333 --> 1:02:52.293
<v Speaker 3>who want to elude this totalitarian, centralized system, that's what

1:02:52.333 --> 1:02:52.933
<v Speaker 3>the plan's for.

1:02:53.333 --> 1:02:56.253
<v Speaker 2>Very good. I just I've done to something else that

1:02:56.293 --> 1:03:00.893
<v Speaker 2>I meant to include, so I will quickly The Expect

1:03:00.933 --> 1:03:06.733
<v Speaker 2>Money Summit, yes, coming up on October seven through eleven.

1:03:08.373 --> 1:03:10.373
<v Speaker 2>I thought when I when I first read about it,

1:03:10.413 --> 1:03:15.213
<v Speaker 2>I thought that would be worth attending. The list of

1:03:15.253 --> 1:03:20.093
<v Speaker 2>guests is great, but more importantly, it is all being

1:03:20.133 --> 1:03:24.533
<v Speaker 2>done online. And am I correct in saying that it's free.

1:03:25.133 --> 1:03:28.773
<v Speaker 3>It's free online except for us a few special programs,

1:03:29.133 --> 1:03:34.173
<v Speaker 3>of which yours truly is one, and I am speaking there,

1:03:34.253 --> 1:03:38.813
<v Speaker 3>but to see my talk you have to pay. But

1:03:39.013 --> 1:03:41.533
<v Speaker 3>most of the talks are free, and largely the thing

1:03:41.653 --> 1:03:45.933
<v Speaker 3>is free, with a few exceptions of some events. But yes,

1:03:46.053 --> 1:03:52.693
<v Speaker 3>it's all online. It's Expat Money Summit, Expat Money one word,

1:03:52.973 --> 1:03:57.093
<v Speaker 3>summit another one word. It's altogether dot com And that's

1:03:57.613 --> 1:04:02.093
<v Speaker 3>an amazing event. And I am friends with the guy

1:04:02.173 --> 1:04:06.413
<v Speaker 3>that runs it, and they have very good ideas for

1:04:06.533 --> 1:04:10.253
<v Speaker 3>protecting your wealth and perhaps your life if it comes

1:04:10.293 --> 1:04:12.693
<v Speaker 3>down to that. So that's how That's how I'll leave

1:04:12.733 --> 1:04:13.133
<v Speaker 3>it there.

1:04:13.293 --> 1:04:15.853
<v Speaker 2>So it says to reserve your complimentary ticket head to

1:04:15.893 --> 1:04:18.493
<v Speaker 2>expect money summit. Do you do you need to register?

1:04:18.573 --> 1:04:21.133
<v Speaker 3>Maybe? Yes, you will have to register, and if you

1:04:21.213 --> 1:04:23.973
<v Speaker 3>register under my link you'll have to pay, but you

1:04:24.053 --> 1:04:27.733
<v Speaker 3>can find the free links on their site from there.

1:04:27.813 --> 1:04:31.373
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, I shall be in attendance. Michael.

1:04:31.453 --> 1:04:32.173
<v Speaker 3>It's wonderful.

1:04:32.213 --> 1:04:34.733
<v Speaker 2>It's been great. I thank you for your time. You've

1:04:34.773 --> 1:04:39.213
<v Speaker 2>donated quite a bit of it, and canoni in by

1:04:39.253 --> 1:04:42.453
<v Speaker 2>saying I look forward to the next one.

1:04:42.853 --> 1:04:45.013
<v Speaker 3>So do I. And it's great talking to you. I

1:04:45.053 --> 1:04:48.613
<v Speaker 3>always it's always a pleasure, and I appreciate your giving

1:04:48.653 --> 1:04:52.453
<v Speaker 3>me a forum to the events, but to also get

1:04:52.493 --> 1:04:55.573
<v Speaker 3>across the ideas that I think are vital for us.

1:04:55.693 --> 1:05:15.853
<v Speaker 2>Terrific. Thanks Michael, thank you. There are essential fat nutrients

1:05:15.893 --> 1:05:18.133
<v Speaker 2>that we need in our diets as the body cart

1:05:18.133 --> 1:05:22.173
<v Speaker 2>manufacture them. These are omega three and Omega six fatty acids.

1:05:22.493 --> 1:05:26.093
<v Speaker 2>Equisine is a combination of fish oil and virgin evening

1:05:26.133 --> 1:05:29.893
<v Speaker 2>primrose oil, a formula that provides an excellent source of

1:05:29.933 --> 1:05:33.173
<v Speaker 2>Omega three and Omega six fatty acids in their naturally

1:05:33.213 --> 1:05:37.413
<v Speaker 2>existing ratios. The omega six from evening primrose oil assists

1:05:37.533 --> 1:05:40.853
<v Speaker 2>the Omega three fish oil to be more effective. Equisine

1:05:40.893 --> 1:05:43.813
<v Speaker 2>is a high quality fish oil supplement enriched with evening

1:05:43.813 --> 1:05:48.373
<v Speaker 2>primrose oil that works synergistically for comprehensive health support. Source

1:05:48.453 --> 1:05:52.813
<v Speaker 2>from the deep sea sardines, Anchovisa Magrol provide essential Amiga

1:05:52.853 --> 1:05:56.693
<v Speaker 2>three fatty acids in their purest form without any internal

1:05:56.773 --> 1:06:00.013
<v Speaker 2>organs or toxins. Every batch is tested for its purity

1:06:00.053 --> 1:06:03.413
<v Speaker 2>before it's allowed to be sold. Equisine supports cells to

1:06:03.413 --> 1:06:07.213
<v Speaker 2>be flexible, so important to support healthy blood flow and

1:06:07.333 --> 1:06:12.253
<v Speaker 2>overall cardiovascular health. Equisine can support mood, balance and mental

1:06:12.293 --> 1:06:15.533
<v Speaker 2>clarity and focus in children, all the way to supporting

1:06:15.533 --> 1:06:19.133
<v Speaker 2>stiff joints, mental focus, brain health and healthy eyes as

1:06:19.173 --> 1:06:22.013
<v Speaker 2>we get older. Equason is a premium, high grade fish

1:06:22.173 --> 1:06:25.533
<v Speaker 2>and evening primrose oil to be taken in addition to

1:06:25.613 --> 1:06:29.053
<v Speaker 2>a healthy diet and is only available from pharmacies and

1:06:29.133 --> 1:06:32.693
<v Speaker 2>health stores. Always read the label and users directed and

1:06:32.773 --> 1:06:37.213
<v Speaker 2>if symptoms persist, seeing your healthcare professional. Farmer Broker Auckland

1:06:38.053 --> 1:06:42.173
<v Speaker 2>Layton Smith. This is producer. Welcome to the mail room

1:06:42.213 --> 1:06:44.453
<v Speaker 2>for podcasts two hundred and fifty.

1:06:44.133 --> 1:06:47.013
<v Speaker 4>Six high lighton how are you doing?

1:06:47.653 --> 1:06:50.533
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing just fine? Thank you good, better than expected.

1:06:50.733 --> 1:06:53.413
<v Speaker 2>I could even say, oh dear, So let me begin

1:06:53.573 --> 1:06:58.173
<v Speaker 2>if I may from Eva Layton. Just finished listening to

1:06:58.213 --> 1:07:02.133
<v Speaker 2>your podcast with Nicholas a'roni, and as always, it was

1:07:02.173 --> 1:07:05.733
<v Speaker 2>incredibly engaging. Didn't ease my concern that we seem to

1:07:05.773 --> 1:07:10.853
<v Speaker 2>be loosening laws while multaneously moving away from religious values

1:07:10.853 --> 1:07:14.733
<v Speaker 2>and nurturing care for children. We're raising the next generation

1:07:14.853 --> 1:07:18.293
<v Speaker 2>in daycares and behind screens, with parents so consumed by

1:07:18.333 --> 1:07:23.693
<v Speaker 2>modern life that they aren't instilling strong character, as Nicholas discussed,

1:07:24.493 --> 1:07:28.733
<v Speaker 2>a worrying combination at the end, from either look I would,

1:07:29.093 --> 1:07:30.933
<v Speaker 2>this is what I say, this is how I look

1:07:30.973 --> 1:07:34.133
<v Speaker 2>at it sometimes anyway, Yeah, there's a lot of kids

1:07:34.173 --> 1:07:37.453
<v Speaker 2>who aren't being raised well at all. There are, on

1:07:37.493 --> 1:07:41.413
<v Speaker 2>the other hand, there are, on the other hand, kids

1:07:41.413 --> 1:07:44.413
<v Speaker 2>that are being raised in households where they are brought

1:07:44.493 --> 1:07:48.533
<v Speaker 2>up magnificently, with both parents working, holding down jobs and

1:07:49.213 --> 1:07:50.493
<v Speaker 2>just doing what they need to do.

1:07:51.933 --> 1:07:55.293
<v Speaker 4>Laydon Scott says, it's been some years since I have

1:07:55.333 --> 1:07:58.133
<v Speaker 4>written to you, laden your podcasts have been as staple

1:07:58.173 --> 1:08:00.253
<v Speaker 4>for me since your days on news Talks. It'd be

1:08:00.453 --> 1:08:04.293
<v Speaker 4>ended your interview with Robert McCulloch was the catalyst for

1:08:04.373 --> 1:08:07.973
<v Speaker 4>me hitting the keyboard. Roberts suggested that the cream of

1:08:07.973 --> 1:08:11.453
<v Speaker 4>our young talent was heading overseas at ever younger ages,

1:08:11.933 --> 1:08:15.813
<v Speaker 4>and you seemed unconvinced by this. I immediately recalled the

1:08:15.853 --> 1:08:18.973
<v Speaker 4>name Jamie Beaton, and I'm sure that this demographic was

1:08:19.013 --> 1:08:22.893
<v Speaker 4>the target market for his company, Crimson Consulting, though I

1:08:22.893 --> 1:08:26.093
<v Speaker 4>haven't heard much about them in recent times. And then

1:08:26.213 --> 1:08:28.893
<v Speaker 4>Scott goes on to say, my own experience with our

1:08:28.973 --> 1:08:31.693
<v Speaker 4>thirty three year old son, however, couldn't be more of

1:08:31.733 --> 1:08:36.093
<v Speaker 4>a contradiction to Roberts theory. A fairly bright individual, but

1:08:36.213 --> 1:08:40.093
<v Speaker 4>not exceptional. He graduated Auckland University with a b coom

1:08:40.293 --> 1:08:45.653
<v Speaker 4>did his professional papers to attain his ca qualification recognized

1:08:46.013 --> 1:08:50.733
<v Speaker 4>more widely, then set about developing a specialization field, which

1:08:50.853 --> 1:08:56.533
<v Speaker 4>was financial analytics within accountancy, to make himself more employable.

1:08:57.013 --> 1:08:59.893
<v Speaker 4>He has no desire to leave New Zealand, even though

1:08:59.933 --> 1:09:03.253
<v Speaker 4>his parents at one point delicately suggested that they might

1:09:03.333 --> 1:09:07.493
<v Speaker 4>head to Queensland and would he follow. He seems unconvinced

1:09:07.533 --> 1:09:10.013
<v Speaker 4>that the grass is new, necessarily green or elsewhere, and

1:09:10.053 --> 1:09:13.493
<v Speaker 4>although he has a large friend base overseas, is resolute

1:09:13.493 --> 1:09:17.813
<v Speaker 4>that he will remain here in the medium term. Lucky you, Scott,

1:09:18.293 --> 1:09:21.653
<v Speaker 4>rest of us have got children disappearing. And then Scott

1:09:21.693 --> 1:09:23.693
<v Speaker 4>goes on to say, I think he also has a

1:09:23.733 --> 1:09:27.213
<v Speaker 4>perception that the job market is perhaps easier here, as

1:09:27.253 --> 1:09:29.853
<v Speaker 4>with the exodus from New Zealand. There are fewer people

1:09:29.973 --> 1:09:34.253
<v Speaker 4>vying for the positions he wants. His corporate progression has

1:09:34.293 --> 1:09:37.493
<v Speaker 4>been steady, and the companies he has found himself working

1:09:37.533 --> 1:09:41.613
<v Speaker 4>for are usually domiciled off shore. Anyway, renumeration is on

1:09:41.653 --> 1:09:43.853
<v Speaker 4>a par with what he would be making in Australia.

1:09:44.213 --> 1:09:46.693
<v Speaker 4>He may be lucky in this regard, or his field

1:09:46.813 --> 1:09:50.173
<v Speaker 4>might just be an outlier, but that negates that reason

1:09:50.253 --> 1:09:53.293
<v Speaker 4>for leaving New Zealand. And then Scott goes on to

1:09:53.373 --> 1:09:55.973
<v Speaker 4>talk to you about a trip that he and his

1:09:56.133 --> 1:10:00.293
<v Speaker 4>son did in the States, and I'm sure you've read

1:10:00.293 --> 1:10:02.573
<v Speaker 4>that late. Then he goes on to say, I express

1:10:02.653 --> 1:10:05.493
<v Speaker 4>the same sentiment as many in hoping that you keep

1:10:05.573 --> 1:10:08.813
<v Speaker 4>up with the podcasts for some time. Yet the broad

1:10:08.893 --> 1:10:11.813
<v Speaker 4>array of subjects keeps me looking up for the next one,

1:10:11.933 --> 1:10:13.813
<v Speaker 4>although you will no doubt be a where by this

1:10:13.933 --> 1:10:17.413
<v Speaker 4>letter that I am currently running one month behind. That's

1:10:17.413 --> 1:10:18.653
<v Speaker 4>from Scott Scott.

1:10:19.373 --> 1:10:22.413
<v Speaker 2>Now, thank you for that. Yes, I did read the

1:10:22.853 --> 1:10:25.373
<v Speaker 2>trip story and I don't disagree with you. They need

1:10:25.493 --> 1:10:27.453
<v Speaker 2>just make a reference to one thing. He says here

1:10:28.293 --> 1:10:33.413
<v Speaker 2>talks about him and he and his son san Antonio, Houston, Dallas.

1:10:33.973 --> 1:10:38.173
<v Speaker 2>They were unsurprising Austin had a bit going on, and

1:10:38.293 --> 1:10:41.693
<v Speaker 2>my boys just just come back from being in Austin

1:10:42.053 --> 1:10:46.253
<v Speaker 2>and raving about it. And san Antonio was quite pretty

1:10:46.293 --> 1:10:49.733
<v Speaker 2>culminating in lunch alongside the Mid Canal, the Mid City

1:10:49.733 --> 1:10:52.653
<v Speaker 2>Canal at one of the vast array of eteries have

1:10:52.773 --> 1:10:55.653
<v Speaker 2>eaten me. One of those vast array of eateries. Wouldn't

1:10:55.693 --> 1:10:58.493
<v Speaker 2>be a coincidence if it was the same one. Then

1:10:58.493 --> 1:11:00.613
<v Speaker 2>you get to New Orleans for a few days, and

1:11:00.653 --> 1:11:03.973
<v Speaker 2>I'm envious with an overnight stop in a one horse

1:11:04.013 --> 1:11:07.773
<v Speaker 2>town on the way wandered. Bourbon Street and the French Quarter, etc.

1:11:08.453 --> 1:11:11.973
<v Speaker 2>All had a foreboding air of commercialism about it, as

1:11:12.013 --> 1:11:16.573
<v Speaker 2>every last vestige of originality seemed to be squeezed out.

1:11:16.893 --> 1:11:20.573
<v Speaker 2>I have advised a couple of people recently on New

1:11:20.653 --> 1:11:26.013
<v Speaker 2>Orleans and Bourbon Street is a place to be clear of,

1:11:26.093 --> 1:11:30.453
<v Speaker 2>I think come nighttime. So it seems I haven't been there.

1:11:30.493 --> 1:11:33.013
<v Speaker 2>We haven't been there since twenty thirteen. Ton's it's eleven

1:11:33.093 --> 1:11:38.173
<v Speaker 2>years so it's a long long time, and my claim

1:11:38.293 --> 1:11:41.173
<v Speaker 2>to have gone there for thirteen or fourteen I can't

1:11:41.213 --> 1:11:44.413
<v Speaker 2>remember now different trips is starting to wear a bit thin.

1:11:45.093 --> 1:11:49.053
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's time to update now From Joe, I have

1:11:49.093 --> 1:11:53.493
<v Speaker 2>an interest in megalithic structures at ancient civilizations around the world,

1:11:53.773 --> 1:11:58.413
<v Speaker 2>i e. Stonehenge, pyramids, et cetera. Researching this has led

1:11:58.453 --> 1:12:01.453
<v Speaker 2>me to look at our own country and I'm astonished

1:12:01.493 --> 1:12:03.773
<v Speaker 2>at what I found. Some examples of this would be Low.

1:12:04.053 --> 1:12:09.453
<v Speaker 2>He goes through a number of different places like Silverdale, Bombay, Boulders,

1:12:09.893 --> 1:12:14.533
<v Speaker 2>chin Hill, part of the above Isthmus alignments, places I've

1:12:14.533 --> 1:12:17.853
<v Speaker 2>never heard of even little and know where they are.

1:12:18.053 --> 1:12:22.853
<v Speaker 2>There's quite a few of them, involving megalithic structures, carvings,

1:12:23.733 --> 1:12:27.053
<v Speaker 2>and a few other things. It appears that over the years,

1:12:27.333 --> 1:12:30.933
<v Speaker 2>acknowledgment of these structures and people has been suppressed and

1:12:31.013 --> 1:12:34.093
<v Speaker 2>kept from the New Zealand public. In some cases, a

1:12:34.173 --> 1:12:38.573
<v Speaker 2>seventy five year embargo has been put in place. Other cases,

1:12:40.213 --> 1:12:45.733
<v Speaker 2>caves and skeletons remains have been destroyed. Geologists and archaeologists

1:12:45.773 --> 1:12:48.293
<v Speaker 2>around the world are finding more and more evidence of

1:12:48.333 --> 1:12:52.373
<v Speaker 2>ancient civilizations due to satellite imaging and they're now finding

1:12:52.413 --> 1:12:55.853
<v Speaker 2>pyramids around the globe in places never before known. The

1:12:55.933 --> 1:13:01.213
<v Speaker 2>belief is that these may be all interlinked in some way. However,

1:13:01.293 --> 1:13:04.573
<v Speaker 2>due to New Zealand's shutting this down, they are unable

1:13:04.613 --> 1:13:07.453
<v Speaker 2>to study this part of the world where other countries

1:13:07.493 --> 1:13:12.213
<v Speaker 2>embrace it. New Zealand suppresses Marie legend, even speak of

1:13:12.333 --> 1:13:15.533
<v Speaker 2>feskinned people with red hair being here when they arrived.

1:13:15.933 --> 1:13:18.493
<v Speaker 2>They also know of the structures around the country. It's

1:13:18.533 --> 1:13:20.653
<v Speaker 2>also believed that a lot of married items were in

1:13:20.693 --> 1:13:24.693
<v Speaker 2>fact copied from these pre Marie people. My question is

1:13:25.493 --> 1:13:28.493
<v Speaker 2>why and what can be done to bring this incredible

1:13:28.533 --> 1:13:30.973
<v Speaker 2>story in history back to the public of New Zealand.

1:13:31.493 --> 1:13:34.333
<v Speaker 2>Has the government tried to keep this from the New

1:13:34.373 --> 1:13:37.413
<v Speaker 2>Zealand public and rewrite history. I can see a great

1:13:37.453 --> 1:13:40.893
<v Speaker 2>opportunity here for New Zealand. Imagine the extra tourist dollars

1:13:41.173 --> 1:13:46.493
<v Speaker 2>that could come into the country. Any assistance would be appreciated. Well,

1:13:46.533 --> 1:13:49.773
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what I can do to assist, but

1:13:50.333 --> 1:13:53.413
<v Speaker 2>there's all sorts of restrictions that have been placed on

1:13:53.933 --> 1:13:58.853
<v Speaker 2>various parts of this country, some inspired by local Marie,

1:13:58.973 --> 1:14:03.213
<v Speaker 2>others not. I don't know that what's there is going

1:14:03.293 --> 1:14:07.213
<v Speaker 2>to albeit true, is going to be much of an

1:14:07.213 --> 1:14:10.573
<v Speaker 2>attraction to the the vast majority of people who come here.

1:14:10.893 --> 1:14:12.013
<v Speaker 2>But then I might be wrong.

1:14:13.173 --> 1:14:16.573
<v Speaker 4>Lady Taran says, I've been listening to you on and

1:14:16.613 --> 1:14:21.373
<v Speaker 4>off for almost thirty years in Brackets. I'm only forty three.

1:14:21.853 --> 1:14:23.973
<v Speaker 4>My dad was always tuned to you on the radio,

1:14:24.013 --> 1:14:26.413
<v Speaker 4>and I vividly remember listening to you as we painted

1:14:26.413 --> 1:14:29.533
<v Speaker 4>our family beach house one summer in my early teens.

1:14:30.373 --> 1:14:33.373
<v Speaker 4>Another excellent episode again this week, but I think it's

1:14:33.373 --> 1:14:36.133
<v Speaker 4>time to get Jeffrey Tucker back on. We haven't heard

1:14:36.133 --> 1:14:39.053
<v Speaker 4>from him since episode one three eight that was in

1:14:39.173 --> 1:14:42.973
<v Speaker 4>November twenty one, and Taran goes on to say, here

1:14:43.053 --> 1:14:46.093
<v Speaker 4>is a tweet of his from four days ago. You

1:14:46.133 --> 1:14:49.413
<v Speaker 4>could have an entire interview with him just discussing this.

1:14:49.733 --> 1:14:54.253
<v Speaker 4>So this apparently is Jeffrey Tucker's tweet. No event has

1:14:54.373 --> 1:14:57.253
<v Speaker 4>traumatized me so much as watching nearly the whole of

1:14:57.293 --> 1:15:02.813
<v Speaker 4>the professional media and academic class be entirely fine with

1:15:02.933 --> 1:15:08.693
<v Speaker 4>the sudden imposition of totalitarian controls on association, movement, and speech,

1:15:09.053 --> 1:15:12.813
<v Speaker 4>provided they could luxuriate at home believing there to be

1:15:12.853 --> 1:15:16.733
<v Speaker 4>a killer virus and hang out on video chats as

1:15:16.733 --> 1:15:21.053
<v Speaker 4>the workers and peasants kept society running and delivered groceries

1:15:21.053 --> 1:15:24.173
<v Speaker 4>to their front doors. That same group was thrilled to

1:15:24.213 --> 1:15:28.133
<v Speaker 4>receive trillions in payments for having done this. Again, nearly

1:15:28.173 --> 1:15:30.693
<v Speaker 4>the whole of the top third of society was just

1:15:30.813 --> 1:15:34.213
<v Speaker 4>fine with this and certainly raised no objection. Many within

1:15:34.253 --> 1:15:38.773
<v Speaker 4>this group manufactured excuses for their deeply disgusting disdain for others.

1:15:39.173 --> 1:15:41.973
<v Speaker 4>I doubt I can never recover the respect I once

1:15:42.013 --> 1:15:46.893
<v Speaker 4>had for the wealthy, the educated, the credentialed, and the successful.

1:15:47.213 --> 1:15:50.573
<v Speaker 4>In the COVID period, they deployed their privileges as a

1:15:50.613 --> 1:15:55.013
<v Speaker 4>weapon against modern ideals and against all the people they

1:15:55.213 --> 1:16:00.053
<v Speaker 4>secretly regarded as they lessers. This really happened, and it

1:16:00.173 --> 1:16:04.373
<v Speaker 4>revealed everything. In the end, they were rewarded for their

1:16:04.373 --> 1:16:09.253
<v Speaker 4>disgraceful attitudes and behaviors. This reality, again, more than anything

1:16:09.293 --> 1:16:13.493
<v Speaker 4>I've ever personally witnessed, has shaped my views on nearly

1:16:13.653 --> 1:16:18.333
<v Speaker 4>everything and fundamentally disrupted much of what I once believed.

1:16:18.973 --> 1:16:22.933
<v Speaker 4>So that's Taran, You're writer. Later on delivering the quote from.

1:16:22.773 --> 1:16:28.173
<v Speaker 2>Rom Jeffy Tucker, taren, I did Jeffrey Tucker twice, and

1:16:28.533 --> 1:16:32.293
<v Speaker 2>the last time when he was launching the Brownstone Institute,

1:16:32.293 --> 1:16:35.453
<v Speaker 2>although nobody knew knew about it at the time of

1:16:35.453 --> 1:16:39.133
<v Speaker 2>that second interview. I knew something was going on because

1:16:40.373 --> 1:16:43.053
<v Speaker 2>I had the second interview arranged for I believe from

1:16:43.053 --> 1:16:47.013
<v Speaker 2>memory it was a Sunday night, and with fifteen minutes

1:16:47.053 --> 1:16:50.413
<v Speaker 2>fifteen minutes before we were due to record, he communicated

1:16:50.453 --> 1:16:52.773
<v Speaker 2>and said, could we postpone it to Monday night? And

1:16:52.853 --> 1:16:56.933
<v Speaker 2>I found out why. One of the major sponsors of

1:16:57.813 --> 1:17:02.733
<v Speaker 2>Brownstone Institute was coming for dinner and Jeffrey was cooking

1:17:02.773 --> 1:17:04.973
<v Speaker 2>for him. And so I've sort of left him alone

1:17:04.973 --> 1:17:08.853
<v Speaker 2>because he's had his hands full so much. I don't

1:17:08.893 --> 1:17:13.813
<v Speaker 2>know whether he does some, you know, interviews on podcasts anymore.

1:17:13.973 --> 1:17:16.533
<v Speaker 2>He writes a column for The Epic Times a couple

1:17:16.533 --> 1:17:20.013
<v Speaker 2>of times a week. I think he writes for Brownstone

1:17:20.013 --> 1:17:24.333
<v Speaker 2>Institute frequently, as he would probably be aware. I just

1:17:24.413 --> 1:17:28.573
<v Speaker 2>reckon he's got his handsful, but I think he's one

1:17:28.613 --> 1:17:31.853
<v Speaker 2>of the greatest. With that in mind, thank you for

1:17:31.853 --> 1:17:37.173
<v Speaker 2>another great podcast, writes Cam this alliance, missus producer. With

1:17:37.413 --> 1:17:42.613
<v Speaker 2>what you just read in a way intelligent and influential people.

1:17:43.533 --> 1:17:47.493
<v Speaker 2>He's referring to another great podcast. You see intelligent and

1:17:47.493 --> 1:17:52.293
<v Speaker 2>influential people. A couple would be better easy. Jordan Peterson,

1:17:52.373 --> 1:17:57.293
<v Speaker 2>Douglas Murray, Elon Musk not so easy. Let me tell

1:17:57.373 --> 1:18:01.693
<v Speaker 2>you I have considered. Look, people want me to ask

1:18:01.773 --> 1:18:07.013
<v Speaker 2>me to do things, and I give it consideration. I

1:18:07.133 --> 1:18:10.893
<v Speaker 2>set this up to do one on one long form

1:18:10.933 --> 1:18:17.013
<v Speaker 2>interviews and discover things, particularly people, and I'm enjoying it. Still.

1:18:18.133 --> 1:18:22.493
<v Speaker 2>Can you imagine trying to line Jordan Peterson, ed Elon Musk,

1:18:22.653 --> 1:18:25.813
<v Speaker 2>or even Douglas Murray, because he's difficult enough aligning two

1:18:25.813 --> 1:18:29.013
<v Speaker 2>of them up at any one time from different parts

1:18:29.053 --> 1:18:32.293
<v Speaker 2>of the world. That doesn't work for me. But I

1:18:32.293 --> 1:18:34.653
<v Speaker 2>appreciate your comments. Thank you, Layton.

1:18:34.733 --> 1:18:38.733
<v Speaker 4>Paul says, through the talkback show and now the podcast,

1:18:38.813 --> 1:18:42.253
<v Speaker 4>your broadcasting style has shaped how I interact with the

1:18:42.373 --> 1:18:46.173
<v Speaker 4>vast ocean of information now available regarding world affairs.

1:18:46.333 --> 1:18:47.533
<v Speaker 2>A bit worrying it is.

1:18:48.213 --> 1:18:51.533
<v Speaker 4>The list of go to sources you've pointed out is extensive.

1:18:52.213 --> 1:18:55.413
<v Speaker 4>Two of the very best are George Friedman and Jeffrey Tucker.

1:18:55.893 --> 1:18:58.893
<v Speaker 4>My respect for George Friedman is immense. Now the gem

1:18:58.973 --> 1:19:02.493
<v Speaker 4>of Jeffrey Tucker has provided another source of reading material

1:19:02.853 --> 1:19:06.613
<v Speaker 4>that breeds understanding. I believe that a podcast with these

1:19:06.653 --> 1:19:08.893
<v Speaker 4>two great thinkers would be spect tula.

1:19:09.413 --> 1:19:10.533
<v Speaker 2>What's this an assault?

1:19:11.853 --> 1:19:16.893
<v Speaker 4>Everybody's a producer this week? But thank you though, I

1:19:16.893 --> 1:19:20.293
<v Speaker 4>have endeavored to attach a copy of Jeffrey's latest piece

1:19:20.373 --> 1:19:25.573
<v Speaker 4>on the Brownstones website titled What Broke Libertarianism? It is

1:19:25.613 --> 1:19:28.653
<v Speaker 4>a twenty seven minute read but well worthy effort, and

1:19:29.693 --> 1:19:32.413
<v Speaker 4>Paul has sent you the brownstone dot org.

1:19:33.213 --> 1:19:41.093
<v Speaker 2>Link he has. Okay, thank you. Mark has written answer

1:19:41.173 --> 1:19:45.373
<v Speaker 2>to is Trump the closest thing America has had to Hitler?

1:19:45.533 --> 1:19:49.533
<v Speaker 2>By John Smith Laton. Do you really believe that Trump

1:19:49.613 --> 1:19:52.613
<v Speaker 2>is fit to be president when all the people who

1:19:52.653 --> 1:19:58.053
<v Speaker 2>worked with him so strongly disagree? Signed Mark. So, Mike,

1:19:58.093 --> 1:19:59.933
<v Speaker 2>I tell you what I'm going to do. I'm going

1:19:59.973 --> 1:20:03.333
<v Speaker 2>to in the next segment, which will be an additional one,

1:20:03.413 --> 1:20:05.933
<v Speaker 2>and just for you at anybody else who wants to listen,

1:20:06.253 --> 1:20:09.173
<v Speaker 2>but especially for you, I'll cover a couple of points

1:20:09.213 --> 1:20:12.653
<v Speaker 2>that will take a few minutes, and just see if

1:20:12.693 --> 1:20:16.453
<v Speaker 2>that makes any difference, missus producer. That means you can go.

1:20:16.773 --> 1:20:17.053
<v Speaker 5>Thanks.

1:20:17.573 --> 1:20:18.853
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to hold you up because you're a

1:20:18.893 --> 1:20:21.693
<v Speaker 2>very busy woman. So thank you. We shall see you

1:20:22.293 --> 1:20:24.413
<v Speaker 2>see you next week. I was going to say, for dinner.

1:20:24.253 --> 1:20:36.973
<v Speaker 5>See you next week.

1:20:38.133 --> 1:20:40.773
<v Speaker 2>Now to Mark's comments, let me make a couple of points.

1:20:41.533 --> 1:20:45.573
<v Speaker 2>The term all the people who worked with him being

1:20:45.613 --> 1:20:49.733
<v Speaker 2>Trump is of course not true, and by any stretch

1:20:49.733 --> 1:20:52.373
<v Speaker 2>of the imagination, it's not true. There are plenty who

1:20:52.533 --> 1:20:55.133
<v Speaker 2>don't want him in the Oval offers because they know

1:20:55.253 --> 1:20:58.253
<v Speaker 2>that he is likely and for that you can read,

1:20:58.373 --> 1:21:02.493
<v Speaker 2>probably will release details of events that they once kept secret.

1:21:03.133 --> 1:21:06.613
<v Speaker 2>Think of JFK's assassination, just for starters, and then think

1:21:06.653 --> 1:21:09.653
<v Speaker 2>of the deep state the administrative date. There are lots

1:21:09.693 --> 1:21:13.413
<v Speaker 2>and lots of secrets and plenty of corruption in Washington,

1:21:14.213 --> 1:21:17.133
<v Speaker 2>and there are plenty of people who want to keep

1:21:17.173 --> 1:21:21.693
<v Speaker 2>it under wraps. Secondly, the lessons learned in the first

1:21:21.693 --> 1:21:27.333
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration would facilitate greater achievement in the second is

1:21:27.373 --> 1:21:30.813
<v Speaker 2>a simple way to put it. Then there's something else

1:21:31.853 --> 1:21:39.373
<v Speaker 2>that eventuated very recently. Ben Carson, doctor Ben Carson, neurosurgeon, retired,

1:21:39.373 --> 1:21:44.373
<v Speaker 2>of course, a man who entered politics and what was

1:21:44.413 --> 1:21:47.493
<v Speaker 2>He was Secretary of Housing at Urban Development in the

1:21:47.533 --> 1:21:51.413
<v Speaker 2>first Trump administration. I had quite a bit to do

1:21:51.533 --> 1:21:53.973
<v Speaker 2>with Carson on the two visits that he made to

1:21:54.013 --> 1:21:57.413
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand back in the mid teens. He is a

1:21:57.453 --> 1:22:03.253
<v Speaker 2>deeply religious man. He is a very honest man, and

1:22:03.293 --> 1:22:05.493
<v Speaker 2>he has the very best intentions for his country and

1:22:05.533 --> 1:22:08.013
<v Speaker 2>the people in it. He interviewed in the studio with

1:22:08.053 --> 1:22:11.533
<v Speaker 2>me on two occasions, and we did an interview on

1:22:11.733 --> 1:22:14.733
<v Speaker 2>stage before a large crowd, which actually was a lot

1:22:14.773 --> 1:22:17.733
<v Speaker 2>of fun. So why do I bring him up. The

1:22:17.773 --> 1:22:21.973
<v Speaker 2>answer is because there was an announcement made at the

1:22:22.053 --> 1:22:27.973
<v Speaker 2>Republican Convention and Donald Trump made the following comment. Kamala

1:22:28.013 --> 1:22:30.773
<v Speaker 2>Harris and the radical Left have waged war in America's

1:22:30.773 --> 1:22:33.493
<v Speaker 2>faith community since the day they took office. His election

1:22:33.573 --> 1:22:38.453
<v Speaker 2>of Governor Tim Walls as her vice president nominee solidifies

1:22:38.573 --> 1:22:42.093
<v Speaker 2>their commitment to intensifying those efforts. Ben Carson is a

1:22:42.133 --> 1:22:44.893
<v Speaker 2>man of unwavering faith, the perfect person to work with

1:22:45.053 --> 1:22:47.933
<v Speaker 2>leaders of the faith community on behalf of the campaign

1:22:48.453 --> 1:22:51.653
<v Speaker 2>to promote the protection of religious freedom and prosperity in

1:22:51.693 --> 1:22:56.253
<v Speaker 2>our country. That's part of it. In his acceptance of

1:22:56.293 --> 1:23:01.493
<v Speaker 2>this role, Ben Carson, amongst other comments, said, I'm honored

1:23:01.533 --> 1:23:04.493
<v Speaker 2>to serve as his national Faith Chairman and will work

1:23:04.533 --> 1:23:07.453
<v Speaker 2>diligently with the faith community to get him elected. There's

1:23:07.493 --> 1:23:11.173
<v Speaker 2>only one candidate in this race that has defended religious

1:23:11.413 --> 1:23:14.973
<v Speaker 2>liberty and supported Americans of faith. And that man is

1:23:15.013 --> 1:23:18.253
<v Speaker 2>Donald J. Trump. So being a man of character, of

1:23:18.373 --> 1:23:20.773
<v Speaker 2>having character, I have a great deal of faith in

1:23:21.253 --> 1:23:24.853
<v Speaker 2>Ben Carter's opinion. Now I got to drag this out

1:23:24.893 --> 1:23:27.013
<v Speaker 2>a little longer because I want to quote you an

1:23:27.053 --> 1:23:33.293
<v Speaker 2>article written by Elise Stephanick. Elise Staphanick represents New York's

1:23:33.293 --> 1:23:37.253
<v Speaker 2>twenty first congressional district chair, is the House Republican Conference

1:23:37.333 --> 1:23:41.133
<v Speaker 2>Chair and the chair of Women for Trump. But this

1:23:41.213 --> 1:23:45.093
<v Speaker 2>is don't worry about that. Just listen to the detail.

1:23:45.453 --> 1:23:50.253
<v Speaker 2>Numbers don't lie. Women thrived under Trump, suffered under Harris.

1:23:51.293 --> 1:23:55.173
<v Speaker 2>Of the countless lies about Karmala Harris perpetuated by Democrats

1:23:55.173 --> 1:23:58.693
<v Speaker 2>and their loyal stenographers in the mainstream media, one of

1:23:58.773 --> 1:24:03.453
<v Speaker 2>the most egregious is that Karmala Harris's presidency will deliver

1:24:03.693 --> 1:24:08.933
<v Speaker 2>historic economic opportunity for working women. Unfortunately, for the desperate

1:24:09.053 --> 1:24:14.533
<v Speaker 2>Democrats attempting to erase publicly available data, numbers tell the

1:24:14.773 --> 1:24:19.533
<v Speaker 2>exact opposite story. Carmala Harris and Joe Biden saddled women

1:24:19.613 --> 1:24:23.613
<v Speaker 2>with the largest pay cut, inflation crisis, tax hike, and

1:24:23.773 --> 1:24:28.893
<v Speaker 2>economic crash so far this century. Whereas President Trump delivered

1:24:28.893 --> 1:24:32.453
<v Speaker 2>the greatest economic boost for American women of any modern

1:24:32.533 --> 1:24:37.253
<v Speaker 2>day president. The median income for women increased every year

1:24:37.373 --> 1:24:40.293
<v Speaker 2>during the Trump administration, reaching the highest on record in

1:24:40.333 --> 1:24:45.013
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty. Real average weekly earnings increased eight point two

1:24:45.093 --> 1:24:49.093
<v Speaker 2>percent under Trump, yet decreased three point nine percent under

1:24:49.133 --> 1:24:53.973
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden and Carmla Harris. The unemployment rate for women overall,

1:24:54.373 --> 1:24:57.893
<v Speaker 2>and for Black women in particular, reached a record low

1:24:58.133 --> 1:25:02.493
<v Speaker 2>during President Trump's term. In twenty nineteen, the workforce participation

1:25:02.613 --> 1:25:07.373
<v Speaker 2>gap between men and women shrank to the narrowest in history,

1:25:08.533 --> 1:25:11.173
<v Speaker 2>and Trump's economy made history with the most women in

1:25:11.213 --> 1:25:16.093
<v Speaker 2>the workforce ever. This was not by accident. Understanding that

1:25:16.213 --> 1:25:20.053
<v Speaker 2>working women are also balancing families, President Trump delivered a

1:25:20.093 --> 1:25:24.813
<v Speaker 2>pro family economic agenda that included doubling the child tax

1:25:24.893 --> 1:25:28.253
<v Speaker 2>credit from one thousand to two thousand per child and

1:25:28.533 --> 1:25:33.973
<v Speaker 2>expanding eligibility. Nearly forty million families received an average benefit

1:25:34.013 --> 1:25:38.293
<v Speaker 2>of twenty two hundred under his leadership, totaling credits of

1:25:38.333 --> 1:25:42.653
<v Speaker 2>approximately eighty eight billion dollars. He then created the first

1:25:42.733 --> 1:25:46.533
<v Speaker 2>ever paid family leave tax credit for employees earning seventy

1:25:46.533 --> 1:25:50.173
<v Speaker 2>two thousand or less and signed into law twelve weeks

1:25:50.213 --> 1:25:53.933
<v Speaker 2>of paid parental leave for federal workers. He also signed

1:25:53.973 --> 1:25:58.213
<v Speaker 2>the largest ever increase in Childcare and Development Block grants,

1:25:59.013 --> 1:26:03.653
<v Speaker 2>expanding access to quality, affordable childcare and more than eight

1:26:03.773 --> 1:26:08.333
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand low income families. President Trump signed into law

1:26:08.533 --> 1:26:12.093
<v Speaker 2>a provision that enabled new parents to withdraw up to

1:26:12.133 --> 1:26:15.773
<v Speaker 2>five thousand dollars from their retirement accounts without penalty when

1:26:15.773 --> 1:26:20.373
<v Speaker 2>they gave birth to or adopted a child. The oft

1:26:20.453 --> 1:26:23.493
<v Speaker 2>to ask question about balancing work and family life is

1:26:23.773 --> 1:26:27.333
<v Speaker 2>can women have it all? Under President Trump's leadership? The

1:26:27.373 --> 1:26:30.653
<v Speaker 2>answer was a resounding yes. Under Joe Biden and Carmala

1:26:30.693 --> 1:26:35.693
<v Speaker 2>Harris not so much. Biden and Harris's failed economic policies

1:26:36.093 --> 1:26:40.213
<v Speaker 2>hurt every American, but hit women hardest of all. Women

1:26:40.253 --> 1:26:44.133
<v Speaker 2>are bearing the brunt of Harris's tie breaking vote for

1:26:44.213 --> 1:26:50.173
<v Speaker 2>Biden's comically named Inflation Reduction Act, which turbocharged inflation with

1:26:50.253 --> 1:26:54.573
<v Speaker 2>a glut of ridiculous climate spending. Women are working longer

1:26:54.613 --> 1:26:58.213
<v Speaker 2>hours and delaying retirement as a result. Talk to any

1:26:58.253 --> 1:27:00.893
<v Speaker 2>woman in America and there is no question that inflation

1:27:01.013 --> 1:27:04.413
<v Speaker 2>is a woman's issue. Since Carmala Harris was sworn in

1:27:04.613 --> 1:27:09.253
<v Speaker 2>as Vice President, prices have risen by ninetyzero point four percent,

1:27:09.773 --> 1:27:12.853
<v Speaker 2>making it increasingly difficult for women to provide for their families.

1:27:13.293 --> 1:27:17.293
<v Speaker 2>Women are the majority of grocery shoppers and grocery bills

1:27:17.293 --> 1:27:20.653
<v Speaker 2>of skyrocket at forcing many Americans to cut back on essentials.

1:27:21.253 --> 1:27:23.293
<v Speaker 2>A single mother of two and Nevada had to sell

1:27:23.333 --> 1:27:26.333
<v Speaker 2>a car to afford groceries. Under Biden, a mother of

1:27:26.413 --> 1:27:30.733
<v Speaker 2>two in Michigan had to think about putting gasoline prices

1:27:31.053 --> 1:27:35.333
<v Speaker 2>before buying my kid's clothes because of the Kamala Harris

1:27:35.333 --> 1:27:40.573
<v Speaker 2>tie breaking vote for Biden's radical green energy agenda, Families

1:27:40.613 --> 1:27:43.373
<v Speaker 2>now need an extra twelve thousand, five hundred and ninety

1:27:43.373 --> 1:27:47.133
<v Speaker 2>dollars annually just to maintain the same standard of living

1:27:47.413 --> 1:27:50.773
<v Speaker 2>that they enjoyed three years ago, according to Congress's Joint

1:27:50.773 --> 1:27:55.133
<v Speaker 2>Economic Committee, and sixty seven percent of parents say inflation

1:27:55.293 --> 1:27:58.253
<v Speaker 2>has impacted their ability to pay for their children's education,

1:27:59.533 --> 1:28:04.173
<v Speaker 2>school supplies, and extra curricular activities this past school year.

1:28:04.933 --> 1:28:07.573
<v Speaker 2>The cost of childcare has increased thirty two percent for

1:28:07.613 --> 1:28:11.213
<v Speaker 2>the average family since twenty nineteen, and nearly two thirds

1:28:11.253 --> 1:28:14.333
<v Speaker 2>are spending twenty percent or more of their annual income

1:28:14.373 --> 1:28:18.013
<v Speaker 2>on childcare. The average price for a pack of disposable

1:28:18.053 --> 1:28:22.093
<v Speaker 2>diapers has increased thirty two percent since twenty nineteen, and

1:28:22.173 --> 1:28:25.693
<v Speaker 2>forty seven percent of families reports struggling to afford them.

1:28:26.253 --> 1:28:30.493
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty two, Joe Biden and Carmala Harris's incompetence

1:28:30.533 --> 1:28:34.653
<v Speaker 2>created a baby formula shortage, causing the price to soar

1:28:34.733 --> 1:28:38.253
<v Speaker 2>to an all time high. Some forty four million people

1:28:38.293 --> 1:28:41.973
<v Speaker 2>were living in food insecure households in twenty two, a

1:28:42.013 --> 1:28:45.213
<v Speaker 2>thirty one percent annual increase and the largest one year

1:28:45.333 --> 1:28:49.533
<v Speaker 2>increase since two thousand eight. Women, she concludes, make up

1:28:49.573 --> 1:28:52.613
<v Speaker 2>the majority of voters in America, so it's no wonder

1:28:52.653 --> 1:28:56.213
<v Speaker 2>the Harris propaganda machine is in overdrive, attempting to gaslight

1:28:56.253 --> 1:29:00.093
<v Speaker 2>them into thinking they've never had it better. But as

1:29:00.213 --> 1:29:04.693
<v Speaker 2>much as Democrats may lie numbers, never do they show

1:29:04.773 --> 1:29:07.973
<v Speaker 2>that President Trump not only cares deeply about women and

1:29:08.093 --> 1:29:11.653
<v Speaker 2>all Americans, but also knows what it takes to stimulate

1:29:11.693 --> 1:29:16.853
<v Speaker 2>the economy to create historic opportunities on our behalf. Carmala

1:29:16.933 --> 1:29:21.893
<v Speaker 2>Harris meanwhile, sees women as a convenient voting block to pander,

1:29:21.933 --> 1:29:27.413
<v Speaker 2>to deceive, and then abandon in favor of an economic poisonous,

1:29:27.853 --> 1:29:33.333
<v Speaker 2>radically liberal agenda. To my fellow women voters. Don't be fooled.

1:29:34.533 --> 1:29:34.653
<v Speaker 3>Now.

1:29:34.653 --> 1:29:36.973
<v Speaker 2>I know that she's the chair for Women for Trump

1:29:37.293 --> 1:29:42.853
<v Speaker 2>and holds a position in Congress, but the political aspect

1:29:42.893 --> 1:29:46.933
<v Speaker 2>of that aside, and it's obvious these statistics are real.

1:29:48.293 --> 1:29:52.173
<v Speaker 2>And as she says at the top, statistics don't lie,

1:29:52.333 --> 1:29:54.973
<v Speaker 2>and I won't lie to you either. That takes us

1:29:55.013 --> 1:29:59.213
<v Speaker 2>out for podcast number two hundred and fifty six. Now,

1:29:59.373 --> 1:30:01.613
<v Speaker 2>if you'd like to comment on any of the above,

1:30:02.013 --> 1:30:06.013
<v Speaker 2>go for it. Latent at newstalksb dot co dot NZ

1:30:06.453 --> 1:30:09.613
<v Speaker 2>Well Carolyn at NEWSTALKSB dot com co dot m Z

1:30:09.773 --> 1:30:12.173
<v Speaker 2>love getting your mail. There's been some very good stuff lately.

1:30:12.493 --> 1:30:15.613
<v Speaker 2>See if you can match it for better. We shall

1:30:15.733 --> 1:30:18.733
<v Speaker 2>return shortly. So there is only one thing to say,

1:30:19.373 --> 1:30:22.453
<v Speaker 2>thank you again for listening, and we shall talk soon.

1:30:30.253 --> 1:30:33.853
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for more from us Talk zed B. Listen

1:30:33.973 --> 1:30:36.933
<v Speaker 1>live on air or online, and keep our shows with

1:30:37.053 --> 1:30:40.213
<v Speaker 1>you wherever you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio