WEBVTT - Stadium wars set to continue - but which venue is really the best for Auckland?

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Gilda.

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 2>daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald. The so

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 2>called stadium wars in Auckland have been raging quietly.

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Behind the scenes for several years now.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 2>But last week the battle popped up in the public

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 2>once again, with Auckland Council voting to throw at support

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 2>behind a plan to upgrade Eden Park over the proposed

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>new stadium on the city's waterfront. Eden Park may have

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 2>won on the day, but questions remain over how the

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 2>upgrades will be funded, while the government still needs to

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>weigh in on which project to support ends at. Herald

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 2>sports writer Michael Burgess has been following these discussions for

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 2>over a decade and joins us today on the Front

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Page to dig into what this latest.

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Vote means in the long term.

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 2>So, Michael, what did Auckland Council vote on last week

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 2>with regards to the stadiums.

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, they were sort of a sort of a halfway

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 3>house really. They decided to partly endorse Eden Park's proposal,

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 3>So it's not the full endorsement. They're not saying hey,

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 3>you can go ahead and do everything you want. They're

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 3>saying that, look, we think you might be the best option,

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 3>and we're going to endorse heart one, but there's no

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 3>money for it. So it's a bit like, you know,

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 3>you're having this great plan to turn your villa into

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 3>all these apartments and the developer saying, look, we'll let

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 3>you do the garage. That's sort of about it at

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 3>the moment. So it was a funny, really funny situation, Chelsea,

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 3>because it feels like they still haven't completely made their

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 3>mind up. But I guess you can interpret it in

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 3>the first instance as a slight vote of confidence in

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>eden Park's proposal, but it's still contingent on so many things,

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 3>especially the fact that there's no money for it, so

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 3>they still need money from somewhere, and of course now

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 3>they're talking about money from the.

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Government, right, So they vote really doesn't do much beyond

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 2>I guess signaling to the government which one they should back.

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, that's right. And the thing is the

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 3>government's also tried to stay out of this as well.

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 3>The government has sort of said, well, wait a minute,

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 3>this is an Auckland thing, this is a council thing.

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 3>We may get involved with some legislation with some fast

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 3>tracking we might help in the future, but Auckland, this

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 3>is really this is your baby. So that's what is

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 3>kind of confusing about all this. It feels to me

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 3>like Auckland Council are still not completely sure. You know,

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 3>they're not completely sure about Eden Park if it is

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 3>actually completely viable. They're not sure about Key Park. So

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 3>I do wonder if it might have been smarter to say, hey,

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 3>we still need a bit more time. But I also

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 3>understand that people are perhaps tired of hearing that the

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 3>council needs more time and the council wanted to be

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 3>seed to be making a definitive decision.

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 4>Are we not actually selling ourselves short by not asking,

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 4>not taking the time to allow a business case to

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 4>be looked at by both parties as leaders.

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 3>When it's taken approach based on evidence, based on rational planning,

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 3>it should actually be kind of as boring as we

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 3>can make it out to be, rather than fiery speeches

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 3>about this and that.

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 4>In my view, in some ways, I'm wondering, what is

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 4>that decision today and what outcome does it achieve.

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 3>I certainly cannot, for the life of me, understand what

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 3>it is we're doing here.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Nothing is absolutely deadly dead as a result of this.

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 4>But I think that we're injecting a bit of oxygen

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 4>into one of them.

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 5>This is kind of like the firmer.

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 4>Of a couple of evils, and I'm quite comfortable with it.

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So neither plan is necessarily alive or dead. So that's

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit of an odd vote, don't you.

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 5>Think it is a bit odd?

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 3>I think Wayne Brown summed it up when he said that,

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, we've injected a bit of oxygen into Eden Park.

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 3>So he's saying that, you know, we're keeping them alive

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 3>and they're a good chance. But it's not the end

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 3>of the road for Key Park. The interesting thing was

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 3>the council and their report came in and said, look,

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 3>we like a lot of things that Key Park could

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.919
<v Speaker 3>do in terms of the regeneration of the downtown, the

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 3>economic benefits. We think it's technically feasible, it's environmentally feasible.

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 3>But they just don't. The council has doubts if Key

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Park can deliver. In other words, can they raise all

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 3>the money they say they're going to raise from the precinct.

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 3>Can they raise all the money from their apartments the

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 3>hotels to pay for the Steatum. That's the main council doubt,

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 3>and that's fair enough. But the thing that's confusing is

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 3>they haven't had the same microscope on eden Park in

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 3>terms of where's eden Park's money coming from. Because the

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 3>whole point of this process Chelsea back in September twenty

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty three when it started. I mean, this goes back

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 3>to twenty twelve, but we won't go into that. Back

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 3>in September twenty twenty three, the council's whole point of

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 3>this was that the stadiums had to come up with

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 3>proposals that didn't need public money, neither government nor council,

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 3>ratepayers nor taxpayers. And Eden Park still hasn't passed that bar.

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, they still need this one hundred and ten

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 3>million for the first phase of their proposal and who

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 3>knows how many more hundreds of millions for the other

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 3>phases because they haven't proven that there's any private investment.

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 3>So that's where when you talk about doubt over both,

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that's where the doubt, the major doubts still

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>lose over eden Park.

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 2>So if we had to declare a winner here, I

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 2>guess it'd have to be Eden Park, wouldn't it.

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>What exactly are they proposing?

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, so, yeah, they've stepped back.

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Their initial Eden Park two point zero was a big

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 3>bells and whistles new roof, new stands. They scaled that

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 3>back a bit over more than a year ago to

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 3>call it at Epark two point one, which reduced the

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 3>cost a little bit and was a bit more about

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 3>upgrades rather than new stands. What they're doing now, which

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 3>is quite smart in a way, is they're trying to

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 3>make it more palatable. So they're saying, hey, we're going

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 3>to do this in three stages. The first stage is

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 3>a little upgrade of the North stand which brings fans

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 3>closer for rugby matches but also allows them to have

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 3>an oval for cricket matches. And then they've got two

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 3>more phases, which they're being a bit not completely clear

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 3>about the costs. They're still talking about a roof, which

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 3>they're saying will cost around three hundred million or that.

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Most people have doubts about that figure because a roof

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 3>over Eden Park with its four existing grand stands is

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 3>a major project, so let's see where that cost goes.

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 3>But I think their strategy is really let's get Phase

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 3>one done, approved and funded, and then by that stage

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 3>it's pretty hard to go back, isn't it. You know,

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 3>once you've started on this student, it's hard to go

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 3>back and say, now, actually we do want to pursue

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 3>another option on the water frontal downtown. So it's quite

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 3>a clever strategy for Meadom Park. Whether it's the best

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 3>strategy for Auckland as a whole, that's probably a bigger question.

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 6>With improvements to the East and West stands and a

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 6>new pedestrian butch bringing traveling fans right to our doorstep,

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.679
<v Speaker 6>a new north stand transforms the park into the ultimate

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 6>theater and a retractable roof.

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 5>She turns that theater into.

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 7>A fortress, a fortress with the ingrandest of entries for

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 7>the grandest of occasions, and the flexibility to host every event.

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 2>It kind of feels like Eden Park has just got

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 2>their Pinterest board open to the public, because we all

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 2>go shopping on Pinterest, don't we for ideas for our

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>houses when we don't have any money?

0:07:57.720 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of the thing here?

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 2>They're like, look, this is all what what we want

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 2>to do, but actually we don't have the money for it.

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But here's what we want to do. Let's get excited

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>about it anyway.

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a good point. They're sort of trying to

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 3>get the public excited. And you know, as always with

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the stadium things, Chelsea, the plans and the pictures look great,

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 3>but I think you know, as a rate payer, as

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 3>a taxpayer, all of us, we've all poured tens of

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 3>millions as rate payers and hundreds of millions as taxpayers

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 3>into Eden Park, and that's where you would start to question,

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 3>why why is everyone still pouring money into it and

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 3>park when it's a private stadium owned by a private trust,

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 3>with no money that comes back to the council or

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 3>to any of us. So that's sort of the overriding question,

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 3>and that's why the council insisted that no public money

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 3>should or very little public money should go into any

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 3>of these proposals, because there's a view that, hey, the

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 3>city doesn't have any money at the moment and that's

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 3>not likely to change in the future. But yeah, Eden

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 3>Park is certainly trying to drum up interest, support and excitement.

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 3>As you say. The other big advantage Reading Park, of course,

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 3>is they're already there. You know, it's a stadium that's there,

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 3>it's a safe bet. It's got the history, it's got

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 3>all the wonderful memories of all the sports events and

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 3>entertainment that's been on that ground over the years, and

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 3>that of course is a key thing in their favor.

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 2>So currently you get rugby, cricket, football and occasionally league

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 2>at Eden Park. Would any other sports be able to

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 2>go there under this proposal, Well.

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Not really no, I think they're the core ones that wouldn't.

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 3>There's no proposal, for example, to build an athletics track

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 3>or something which you know could bring in some other options.

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 3>I think the fact they're still trying to keep cricket

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 3>is interesting because that does bring pros and cons. It

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 3>certainly isn't great for the rugby and the codes that

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 3>need a rectangular field, which is what a lot of

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 3>sports people are sort of interested in. I think the

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 3>other question around this, though, Chelsea, is the fact that

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 3>the major teams in all Cland don't play at Eden Park,

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 3>and they don't particularly want to play at Eden Park.

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 3>I know the Warriors for a fact, they're not interested

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 3>in playing at eden Park. They've been word by eden

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 3>Park for years, but they don't want to leave Mount Smart.

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 3>They've said they won't leave Mount Smart unless there is

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 3>a downtown option. That's what they said years ago. Hawk

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 3>and the FC, the new football team that everyone's talking

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 3>about and they're going so well, they weren't interested in

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 3>eden Park. They opted for Mount Smart. They felt eden

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Park was too big for them, and even the Blues

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 3>who have been there a long time. The last negotiations

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 3>with eden Park went on for quite some time before

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 3>they agreed to a two year deal. Wasn't like hey,

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 3>like I said, for ten years? So that to me

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 3>is another question. If you've got these sporting codes that

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 3>feel that eden Park doesn't particularly suit them, then how

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 3>viable is eden Park as a main stadium for sport?

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>And what about concerts?

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, would Taylor Swift to be able to bring

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 2>her next tour to eden Park if this proposal is

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 2>done by the time the next Era's tour comes around.

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's the other big question, isn't it, Because that's

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 3>obviously me. Park has pivoted towards concerts. They've been very successful,

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 3>They've hosted a lot of concerts and of course they've

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 3>got the resource consent now to do a lot more

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 3>than in the past. The Taylor Swift film is an

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 3>interesting one. I know Nick Sorton have brought that up

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 3>quite a bit during her tour to Australia and said, hey, look,

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 3>she could have been here. The experts I've talked to

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 3>said there was no chance of her coming here because

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 3>this wasn't really on her schedule and she already couldn't

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 3>fit in more concerts in Australia. So could we host

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 3>more concerts because of this proposal, I don't think so.

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 3>It's not particularly at the moment going to increase the

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 3>capacity or the attraction of Eden Park to potential touring acts.

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 3>The other tricky thing with eden Park I think is

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 3>that the new christ Jutch Stadium will also change the

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 3>equation a bit because the fact that's new, it's quite

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 3>a bit easier to stage concerts there. In terms of

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 3>the setting up, Eden Park is not a particularly easy

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 3>place to set up. They can't work overnight because of

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the residents. It takes quite a few days to pack

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 3>in and pack out, and they've got to put the

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 3>stage on the field on the grass, which which is

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 3>also another tricky scenario without going to too many details.

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Whereas for example, Melt Smart they've got the big slab

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 3>of concrete at one end that the stage goes on,

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 3>so they don't need to protect the grass.

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 5>It's a lot less work.

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 3>So Eden Park has stage concerts and they will continue

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 3>to and it'll be an attraction. But it's also not

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 3>completely straightforward. And to answer your first question at the moment,

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it is. This new proposal will open

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 3>the door for a million more concerts.

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>So the loser here sounds like Tetuanga or the brand

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 2>new Auckland Waterfront Stadium water the backers they're proposing.

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>And why did it lose out on the day?

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 5>Good question.

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean that's right, it's not I don't I

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 3>think it's the end of the road for them.

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 5>You know, they're still alive.

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 3>It could still happen, but this is definitely a setback,

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.119
<v Speaker 3>a pretty major setback.

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 5>They were, of course proposing.

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 3>This massive precinct in the I think it's about fifteen

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 3>hectacres from memory in the vicinity of Spark Arena on

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 3>this old brownfield land madely. They talked about two or

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 3>three thousand apartments. They talked about commercial buildings, three or

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 3>four hotels, including an all black hotel, and a new stadium.

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 3>I guess their issues have been twofold. Number one is

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 3>convincing Council they can raise the money. They're saying they've

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 3>got a lot of private investment, and certainly the documents

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 3>that were presented the Council have shown they've got a

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of prime investment coming in from overseas. Because people

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 3>think this precinct could make money. Stadiums don't make money.

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 3>The precincts do, and that's the whole point of it.

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 5>Council.

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Theoy aren't completely convinced, as we were talking about earlier.

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 3>They think that Key Park is being a bit optimistic

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 3>in terms of how much money that can make from,

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 3>for example, apartments, which would then pay for the stadium.

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 3>The second point is there are some complexities with the

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Key Part plan because the stadium will have to be

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 3>built in an area where there's an existing rollery line.

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 3>It is tricky with what they have to do given

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the roway liners there, and the stadium has to go

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 3>beside it and in parts has to go on top

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 3>of it.

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 5>Not easy.

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 3>The backers say that's not insurmountable and that has been

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 3>done in other stadiums around the world, so they're quite

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 3>relaxed about it. But obviously councils saw that as another obstacle.

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 3>But I guess to go back to what we talked

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 3>about at the start. The confusing thing about this is

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 3>that key part did take a lot of other boxes.

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Council omitted that, and it also an option that would

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 3>regenerate downtown and also bring in massive economic benefits. So

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of surprising to see that council has seemingly

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 3>turned their back on that when the other option doesn't

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 3>have the money behind it either.

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 5>It would have.

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe been pragmatic to say, look, let's give them both

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 3>six more months to prove their business case. But it

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 3>and turn out that way.

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 8>Big deck Bill who came over here and has got

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 8>the football franchise, he is saying he wants to build

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 8>like a twenty thousand seat waterfront stadium and maybe around

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 8>the Tank Army area.

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the Tank Farmers.

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Is that where the council just vetos Russell Kurtz building

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 3>a temporary stand.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 8>Yes, yeah, because the soil had a petrol of it.

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 5>I could just see. This is so classic New Zealand.

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 8>Someone's coming from outside New Zealand with a bunch of

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 8>money and an idea to make our country better.

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Oh, hang on, hang on, hang on here, and we

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 5>can't do.

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>That sporting loyalties assigned.

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Michael, do you have a preference of which one you'd

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 2>like to see build?

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's a good question.

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think for me, it's not actually about

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 3>the stadium, you know, it's about what is best for

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 3>the city, and it's about what unlocking the potential of

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 3>the city without going into too many cliches, and I

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 3>think about.

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 5>What the city might need in fifty year, year or

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 5>one hundred years.

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 3>I know as Kiwi's Chelsea were not very good at

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 3>doing that. The Australians are much better at thinking long term,

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 3>as you see.

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 5>With their planning.

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 3>But I just my big thing is what could unlock

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 3>the potential of the city, And it seems to me

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 3>it's pretty obvious that downtown, the city center is slowly dying.

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's really hard to get people in there,

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 3>really hard to drag people into Queen Street, onto the waterfront.

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 3>It's not a place that seems to attract people to go.

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Businesses are struggling. So I guess the appeal of Key

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Park for me was that it's a vehicle. Having that

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 3>precint in the stadium there drags people into the city.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 3>You imagine having an all Blacks game, they're having a

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 3>concert downtown, Having a big Warriors game on a Sunday

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 3>afternoon suddenly got thousands of people in the city spending

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 3>their money. They're going to all the bars after the concert,

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 3>after the game, and that's something that could actually change

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 3>the face of Auckland. So that was what excited me

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 3>about Key parkile was possible. Whereas Eden Park, we've seen

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 3>that it's got limitations for the sporting codes, it's got

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 3>limitations in terms of where it is, and it's certainly

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 3>got limitations in terms of the facts that it hasn't

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 3>been able to pay for itself. So if you put

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 3>those two things beside each other, then you know, it

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 3>seems pretty compelling to me that Key Park would have

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 3>been quite an exciting option for Auckland as a city

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 3>in terms of providing an economic boost for a long,

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 3>long term.

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, it sounds like the conversation certainly isn't over and

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 2>it's not dead in the water yet.

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 5>Hey no, I don't think so.

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the conversation is definitely over, and I

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 3>think there's still be a few more twists and turns.

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 3>As I said, Charles, have been covering this stadium debate

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 3>since twenty twelve, and sometimes I think that actually nothing

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 3>has really changed because we're still asking the same questions

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 3>that we were back in twenty twelve. I think the

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 3>great thing about this process that it has put the

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 3>microscope on what we want, what's possible. It's put the

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 3>microscope on Eden Park, the microscope on the other proposals, which.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Has actually been a good thing to do.

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 3>So there has been some positive stuff to come out

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 3>of this proposal, and I think the next step, as

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 3>you say, will be fascinating in terms of, hey, what

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 3>is the next chapter, what.

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 5>Are we going to do?

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 2>That's it for this episode of The Front Page. You

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 2>can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 2>at enzed Herald dot co dot enz. The Front Page

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 2>is produced by Ethan Seals. Dan Goodwin is the sound engineer.

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to The Front Page on iHeartRadio

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 2>or wherever you get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 2>for another look behind the headlines.