1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,360 Speaker 1: Now here's a voice I've been looking forward to hearing again. 2 00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:03,440 Speaker 1: Ron Little, how are you? 3 00:00:04,519 --> 00:00:07,200 Speaker 2: I'm very well. Happy new year mate, and to you too. 4 00:00:07,400 --> 00:00:10,200 Speaker 1: Just let me I've got a series of holiday questions 5 00:00:10,680 --> 00:00:14,000 Speaker 1: that involves your country, that that I've been reading about. 6 00:00:14,000 --> 00:00:19,200 Speaker 1: But the wind Rossendell Jinrick as a how we wind? 7 00:00:19,239 --> 00:00:21,759 Speaker 1: Does it stop in our reform the real deal? 8 00:00:24,640 --> 00:00:27,040 Speaker 2: I don't think it does stop, or at least it 9 00:00:27,040 --> 00:00:30,480 Speaker 2: doesn't stop until reform shows signs of sagging, and they 10 00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:32,920 Speaker 2: are sagging a little in the poll set down from 11 00:00:32,960 --> 00:00:36,959 Speaker 2: thirty to twenty seven. But Rossendell is quite a capture. 12 00:00:37,840 --> 00:00:41,159 Speaker 2: He is not the same profile as Robert Jenrick, but 13 00:00:41,280 --> 00:00:45,559 Speaker 2: he is a sitting MP who represents Rodford, so it's 14 00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:51,560 Speaker 2: absolutely prime territory East end of London for a reform seat, 15 00:00:51,960 --> 00:00:55,480 Speaker 2: and he probably saw which way the wind was blowing. 16 00:00:55,680 --> 00:01:00,760 Speaker 2: But he's always been on that populist reform side of 17 00:01:00,800 --> 00:01:04,680 Speaker 2: the Conservative Party, so it's not a huge surprise. There 18 00:01:04,720 --> 00:01:09,360 Speaker 2: is some resistance, probably not to Rossendell, but probably to 19 00:01:09,440 --> 00:01:13,559 Speaker 2: Robert Jenrick and certainly to the rather oily Nadeem Zahawi 20 00:01:15,760 --> 00:01:20,480 Speaker 2: from Reform members. About twenty percent of them say look, 21 00:01:20,680 --> 00:01:23,080 Speaker 2: just stop all this. We've had enough tourris coming in. 22 00:01:23,360 --> 00:01:25,720 Speaker 2: This isn't going to be the Tory party mark too. 23 00:01:26,200 --> 00:01:30,440 Speaker 2: And you know, okay, generic's a big name, but Nadeem Zahawi, 24 00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:34,399 Speaker 2: who was in trouble for his financial dealings, you know, 25 00:01:34,440 --> 00:01:36,759 Speaker 2: we don't want any of that. That's the stuff we're 26 00:01:36,800 --> 00:01:37,559 Speaker 2: rebelling against. 27 00:01:37,840 --> 00:01:41,840 Speaker 1: So would that lead to no coalition arrangement deal whatever 28 00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:43,600 Speaker 1: between them and the Tories come election time. 29 00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:47,480 Speaker 2: Some people are saying that, but I don't think so. 30 00:01:47,560 --> 00:01:50,680 Speaker 2: I think that pragmatics will come into play in three 31 00:01:50,760 --> 00:01:52,800 Speaker 2: years time, which is a long way away of course, 32 00:01:53,640 --> 00:01:56,680 Speaker 2: and if it looks as if the Toys and Reform 33 00:01:56,800 --> 00:02:00,080 Speaker 2: can do some sort of casual deal in order to 34 00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:04,280 Speaker 2: ensure the maximum success on both sides, then they will 35 00:02:04,320 --> 00:02:06,320 Speaker 2: do it. And I don't think there's much doubt about that, 36 00:02:06,400 --> 00:02:08,600 Speaker 2: no matter what Kenny Baydeno might say. Now. 37 00:02:08,880 --> 00:02:12,160 Speaker 1: Other bits of holiday reading Government to water down business right, 38 00:02:12,280 --> 00:02:16,600 Speaker 1: rise for pubs, government polls, Hill's law amendment after becklash, 39 00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:19,760 Speaker 1: Government drops plans for mandatory digital ID to work in 40 00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:23,240 Speaker 1: the UK, headlined Starmer's thirteenth U turn. Does he have 41 00:02:23,280 --> 00:02:24,200 Speaker 1: a clue what he's doing? 42 00:02:25,280 --> 00:02:28,280 Speaker 2: No, not the remotest clue certainly not on domestic policy, 43 00:02:29,040 --> 00:02:31,840 Speaker 2: no idea whatsoever. There have been new turns after U turns, 44 00:02:31,840 --> 00:02:35,400 Speaker 2: after U turns, and also failures to implement laws which 45 00:02:35,639 --> 00:02:38,200 Speaker 2: are causing them problems all over the place, such as, 46 00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:43,760 Speaker 2: for example, the Supreme Court in April last year made 47 00:02:43,800 --> 00:02:47,679 Speaker 2: it absolutely clear that will it came to public spaces, 48 00:02:47,680 --> 00:02:50,760 Speaker 2: somebody's sex meant their sex, you know, none of his 49 00:02:50,919 --> 00:02:54,320 Speaker 2: gender nonsense. And the government still hasn't got to groups 50 00:02:54,360 --> 00:03:01,519 Speaker 2: without another tribunelw was ruled against the trends activist argument 51 00:03:01,639 --> 00:03:05,079 Speaker 2: on Friday, and yet the government is terrified of its 52 00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:07,680 Speaker 2: own left wing backbenchers who will object to all of this. 53 00:03:08,240 --> 00:03:11,320 Speaker 2: So there have been new turns and new turns. We 54 00:03:11,440 --> 00:03:14,240 Speaker 2: haven't yet seen a proper U turn on the pubs, 55 00:03:14,280 --> 00:03:17,720 Speaker 2: by the way, and that's it's a frightening one. You know, 56 00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:21,600 Speaker 2: pubs are already under the cosh, the smoking ban, hurd pubs, 57 00:03:22,520 --> 00:03:26,280 Speaker 2: COVID herd pubs, and the fact that you know, the 58 00:03:26,360 --> 00:03:30,359 Speaker 2: growth in no no alcoholic beers and so on has 59 00:03:30,440 --> 00:03:33,320 Speaker 2: really hurt the pubs as well. This this, this is 60 00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:34,480 Speaker 2: the final death nail. 61 00:03:34,560 --> 00:03:37,800 Speaker 1: I think it's interesting. Yet another headline I was reading 62 00:03:37,800 --> 00:03:41,000 Speaker 1: about the question was why does labor not like pubs? 63 00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:43,000 Speaker 1: And I thought that's a good question to ask, because 64 00:03:43,040 --> 00:03:45,360 Speaker 1: you know, working class all that stuff. What what is this? 65 00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:48,760 Speaker 2: It doesn't like the working class mine, It's never liked 66 00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:53,480 Speaker 2: the clubs, bang the working class. It despises what they like. 67 00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:59,360 Speaker 2: It despises their food, their culture, their their behavior. It 68 00:03:59,520 --> 00:04:02,000 Speaker 2: has no time for the whatsoever. It's now a party 69 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:04,240 Speaker 2: of the public sector middle class. 70 00:04:04,480 --> 00:04:06,920 Speaker 1: So what happens over the next three years given, I mean, 71 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:08,840 Speaker 1: this is just my reading over the summer period, for 72 00:04:08,880 --> 00:04:13,480 Speaker 1: goodness sake, three years of this continues. Presumably starma doesn't 73 00:04:13,560 --> 00:04:15,880 Speaker 1: last the distance, or somebody wakes up and goes, we're 74 00:04:15,880 --> 00:04:18,039 Speaker 1: going for a loss at the election. How does it 75 00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:18,919 Speaker 1: all unfold? 76 00:04:20,480 --> 00:04:23,160 Speaker 2: Well, the sensible way to say it unfolds at the 77 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:27,359 Speaker 2: moment is to say that reform becomes the government. But 78 00:04:28,600 --> 00:04:31,039 Speaker 2: there are things which Starmer has up his sleeves. The 79 00:04:31,080 --> 00:04:34,680 Speaker 2: economy is picking up a little bit, wages are picking 80 00:04:34,760 --> 00:04:38,159 Speaker 2: up a little bit. And what was meant to be 81 00:04:38,320 --> 00:04:45,160 Speaker 2: his kind of his execution moment, which was the May elections, 82 00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:49,159 Speaker 2: have been circumvented a little bit because he's managed to 83 00:04:49,200 --> 00:04:52,599 Speaker 2: persuade twenty five percent of local councils not to have 84 00:04:52,680 --> 00:04:56,200 Speaker 2: elections at all. So they banned local elections because they're 85 00:04:56,240 --> 00:05:00,960 Speaker 2: rearranging local government. It's shocking, It's genuine shocking, you know. 86 00:05:02,640 --> 00:05:07,720 Speaker 2: So that the trouble he will have got from having 87 00:05:07,760 --> 00:05:10,839 Speaker 2: lost hundreds and hundreds of seats isn't going to happen, 88 00:05:10,960 --> 00:05:14,040 Speaker 2: almost certainly because there are enough seats up for grabs now. 89 00:05:15,360 --> 00:05:20,359 Speaker 2: So I think he may well persist, well, persist, Sorry, 90 00:05:20,360 --> 00:05:20,600 Speaker 2: go on? 91 00:05:20,839 --> 00:05:23,239 Speaker 1: Does he have as I hid in wonder? I've written 92 00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:26,120 Speaker 1: one story this morning on c CNBC. They refer to 93 00:05:26,160 --> 00:05:28,560 Speaker 1: his magic, and he was going to roll out his 94 00:05:28,760 --> 00:05:33,040 Speaker 1: magic to quill Trump visa v. Greenland. Does he have 95 00:05:33,120 --> 00:05:33,760 Speaker 1: such magic? 96 00:05:36,080 --> 00:05:39,279 Speaker 2: No, he is the least magical person what the world 97 00:05:39,279 --> 00:05:44,560 Speaker 2: has ever seen. I think is probably the answer to that. However, however, 98 00:05:44,920 --> 00:05:47,520 Speaker 2: he has played a carry as up set you many 99 00:05:47,520 --> 00:05:51,440 Speaker 2: times before. He's played a Cannie line when dealing with Trump. 100 00:05:53,120 --> 00:05:56,599 Speaker 2: It may be two canny this time. You know that 101 00:05:56,640 --> 00:05:58,800 Speaker 2: the Europeans sent a whole bunch of people to a 102 00:05:58,960 --> 00:06:02,720 Speaker 2: whole bunch of service to the Antarctic, to the Arctic, 103 00:06:02,839 --> 00:06:09,000 Speaker 2: rather to Greenland to patrol and stay there as a 104 00:06:09,080 --> 00:06:13,400 Speaker 2: kind of presence and we've set one person, and in 105 00:06:13,440 --> 00:06:17,040 Speaker 2: his response to Trump's latest demands on Greenland, he has 106 00:06:17,080 --> 00:06:20,840 Speaker 2: been by far, by far the most equivocal of all 107 00:06:20,880 --> 00:06:24,359 Speaker 2: the European leaders. Now he's obviously anxious not to ruin 108 00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:28,400 Speaker 2: a relationship with the USA, but if we get cropped 109 00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:31,279 Speaker 2: by ten percent tariffs, which is what Trump is threatening, 110 00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:34,440 Speaker 2: that won't do it any good at all. Given that Trump, 111 00:06:35,320 --> 00:06:37,279 Speaker 2: it looks to me at the moment, I don't know 112 00:06:37,320 --> 00:06:38,960 Speaker 2: what you think, Mike, but it looks to me as 113 00:06:38,960 --> 00:06:41,760 Speaker 2: if NATO is dead in the water with all this 114 00:06:41,920 --> 00:06:42,280 Speaker 2: going on. 115 00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:44,760 Speaker 1: Well, I was going to ask for a prediction NATO, 116 00:06:44,839 --> 00:06:47,400 Speaker 1: so you say, did in the water? How does Greenland 117 00:06:47,400 --> 00:06:50,000 Speaker 1: get resolved? Is it an increased NATO presence? Is an 118 00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:52,680 Speaker 1: increased American prison? Do they sell it to America? What 119 00:06:52,720 --> 00:06:54,080 Speaker 1: do you reckon happens? 120 00:06:54,560 --> 00:06:56,520 Speaker 2: I don't think they sell it to America. I just 121 00:06:56,520 --> 00:07:01,080 Speaker 2: don't think that's going to happen. I still don't think 122 00:07:01,600 --> 00:07:05,080 Speaker 2: that Trump will send troops or try to take her. 123 00:07:05,480 --> 00:07:08,920 Speaker 2: So I think it remains as a sort of grouchy 124 00:07:09,040 --> 00:07:14,400 Speaker 2: impass with Denmark still in control of Greenland and NATO 125 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:20,440 Speaker 2: basically aside from America supporting that rule. Of Greenland because 126 00:07:20,480 --> 00:07:25,800 Speaker 2: of course it is their country. And and you know, 127 00:07:26,520 --> 00:07:29,320 Speaker 2: don't forget there's only there's only two and a half 128 00:07:29,400 --> 00:07:33,360 Speaker 2: to three years left of Trump, and Greenland's lasted with 129 00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:34,800 Speaker 2: Denmark a lot longer than that. 130 00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:36,800 Speaker 1: Very good point. Always good to heavy on the program. 131 00:07:36,800 --> 00:07:39,600 Speaker 1: Welcome back to the Rod Little Back on Thursday morning. 132 00:07:40,080 --> 00:07:42,960 Speaker 1: For more from the Mic Asking Breakfast, listen live to 133 00:07:43,080 --> 00:07:46,160 Speaker 1: news talks it'd be from six am weekdays, or follow 134 00:07:46,200 --> 00:07:47,760 Speaker 1: the podcast on iHeartRadio.