1 00:00:09,093 --> 00:00:11,972 Speaker 1: You're listening to a podcast from News Talk zed B. 2 00:00:12,373 --> 00:00:16,332 Speaker 1: Follow this and our Wide Ranger podcasts now on iHeartRadio. 3 00:00:16,573 --> 00:00:18,692 Speaker 2: Let's talk about greenwashing. This on the back of an 4 00:00:18,692 --> 00:00:22,332 Speaker 2: Australian court has ordered glad owner Clorox to pay eight 5 00:00:22,372 --> 00:00:26,453 Speaker 2: point twenty five million dollars for fossil more misleading representations 6 00:00:26,453 --> 00:00:29,812 Speaker 2: about bags partly made or of recycled ocean plastic. The 7 00:00:29,853 --> 00:00:33,133 Speaker 2: offending garbage bags were partly made of Indonesian plastic source 8 00:00:33,173 --> 00:00:36,492 Speaker 2: from communities that were miles away from any shoreline. To 9 00:00:36,533 --> 00:00:39,293 Speaker 2: chat about this more, we're joined by Rebecca Styles, Consumer 10 00:00:39,573 --> 00:00:42,772 Speaker 2: NZ Investigative team leader Rebecca Good. 11 00:00:42,853 --> 00:00:51,333 Speaker 3: Afternoon him any relation to Harry Styles? I wish, I wish, Hey, 12 00:00:52,013 --> 00:00:55,173 Speaker 3: Rebecca Styles. What is green washing? 13 00:00:56,453 --> 00:00:59,613 Speaker 4: So? Basically, greenwashing is a misleading claim under the Fair 14 00:00:59,693 --> 00:01:03,093 Speaker 4: Trading Act. So, in particularly for greenwashing, it's a pright 15 00:01:03,213 --> 00:01:06,133 Speaker 4: that makes itself appear better for the environment than other 16 00:01:06,173 --> 00:01:07,973 Speaker 4: similar products on the shelves. 17 00:01:08,453 --> 00:01:11,333 Speaker 3: What are the punishments of a company is caught green washing? 18 00:01:12,613 --> 00:01:15,413 Speaker 4: Well, for New Zealand's penalties are actually quite light in 19 00:01:15,453 --> 00:01:18,932 Speaker 4: comparison to the big pine that Floric Scott so under 20 00:01:18,932 --> 00:01:23,013 Speaker 4: the Fair Trading Act, it's six hundred thousand dollars fine, 21 00:01:23,212 --> 00:01:25,933 Speaker 4: So that is quite light for it, especially for these 22 00:01:25,973 --> 00:01:28,933 Speaker 4: big multinational companies, And it's not much of a deterrent 23 00:01:29,053 --> 00:01:33,932 Speaker 4: to stop greenwashing. So we would just support a regulator 24 00:01:34,013 --> 00:01:36,653 Speaker 4: upping those fines, and upping the fines mean that it's 25 00:01:36,893 --> 00:01:38,812 Speaker 4: more roof while for their time and energy to actually 26 00:01:38,853 --> 00:01:42,853 Speaker 4: take these prosecutions so that it becomes a bigger deterrent 27 00:01:42,973 --> 00:01:44,452 Speaker 4: for these companies. 28 00:01:44,652 --> 00:01:47,053 Speaker 3: And is it prevalent in New Zealand? Are you seeing 29 00:01:47,093 --> 00:01:51,213 Speaker 3: more of it? Is it something that's that's growing as 30 00:01:51,213 --> 00:01:51,693 Speaker 3: a problem. 31 00:01:53,333 --> 00:01:55,173 Speaker 4: In some way, it feels a bit insidious because I 32 00:01:55,173 --> 00:01:58,413 Speaker 4: think any walk along the supermarket aisles you will come 33 00:01:58,453 --> 00:02:03,013 Speaker 4: across sort of meaningless terms things like green and natural 34 00:02:03,053 --> 00:02:07,733 Speaker 4: and environmentally friendly, eco, sustainable, There's all sort of these 35 00:02:07,813 --> 00:02:10,692 Speaker 4: environmental buzzwords but are sort of not backed up or 36 00:02:10,773 --> 00:02:15,733 Speaker 4: seem pretty meaningless on some products. So it is around, 37 00:02:15,893 --> 00:02:17,853 Speaker 4: but it feels like it's so much of it around 38 00:02:17,933 --> 00:02:20,452 Speaker 4: at the moment that it's almost, you know, I can't 39 00:02:20,453 --> 00:02:21,933 Speaker 4: be the fast for the trees type of thing. 40 00:02:22,573 --> 00:02:25,773 Speaker 3: Is there a version of green washing that isn't exactly illegal, 41 00:02:25,853 --> 00:02:28,692 Speaker 3: but it's still gross in a way, like safe for example, 42 00:02:28,693 --> 00:02:31,773 Speaker 3: you're on an airline and they're celebrating their greenness by 43 00:02:31,813 --> 00:02:35,933 Speaker 3: serving your food with bamboo knives and forks while you're 44 00:02:35,933 --> 00:02:39,933 Speaker 3: blasting aviation fuel on around the world flight? Is that 45 00:02:40,013 --> 00:02:43,293 Speaker 3: so they're not It's like almost like a green distraction. 46 00:02:43,532 --> 00:02:46,093 Speaker 3: It's like, look at the way we're doing this over here, 47 00:02:46,173 --> 00:02:49,252 Speaker 3: and don't look at what we're doing over there very much. 48 00:02:49,252 --> 00:02:51,453 Speaker 4: It feels very much like window dressing, doesn't it. Yeah, 49 00:02:51,493 --> 00:02:53,053 Speaker 4: And I think Uno a few years ago I wrote 50 00:02:53,053 --> 00:02:55,613 Speaker 4: about Any Zealand for their plant based cups, and that's 51 00:02:55,613 --> 00:02:58,813 Speaker 4: not much good yet when you're burning all that yet, 52 00:03:00,213 --> 00:03:02,173 Speaker 4: really it's a bit of a toe congestion. So it's 53 00:03:02,252 --> 00:03:04,532 Speaker 4: very much tinkering out the edges, but not tackling the 54 00:03:04,613 --> 00:03:07,213 Speaker 4: huge problem of what's being put in fiel thing. Yeah. 55 00:03:07,252 --> 00:03:09,373 Speaker 2: Has it got to the point where bee where companies 56 00:03:09,653 --> 00:03:14,093 Speaker 2: they you know, the trust on from consumers to believe 57 00:03:14,773 --> 00:03:18,453 Speaker 2: that these companies are doing environmental good for the planet 58 00:03:18,532 --> 00:03:21,213 Speaker 2: or whatever they might be doing. But that trust is 59 00:03:21,293 --> 00:03:24,133 Speaker 2: just completely lost now and most consumers will look at 60 00:03:24,133 --> 00:03:26,572 Speaker 2: this stuff and say, I think that's probably nonsense because 61 00:03:26,573 --> 00:03:28,053 Speaker 2: I've seen so many examples of that. 62 00:03:29,173 --> 00:03:31,293 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, you should be able to trust what's 63 00:03:31,333 --> 00:03:33,292 Speaker 4: on the label. You know, you expect a bit of 64 00:03:33,293 --> 00:03:36,093 Speaker 4: puffery with marketing and stuff, but essentially the essence of 65 00:03:36,133 --> 00:03:38,493 Speaker 4: what's said on products should be true and you should 66 00:03:38,533 --> 00:03:41,853 Speaker 4: be able to rely on it. And there has been 67 00:03:41,973 --> 00:03:44,373 Speaker 4: calls overseas for these green claims that a should be 68 00:03:44,453 --> 00:03:47,213 Speaker 4: checked before they go on to market so that consumers 69 00:03:47,213 --> 00:03:50,973 Speaker 4: can be very assured. Because it's also a competitive advantage. 70 00:03:50,973 --> 00:03:54,213 Speaker 4: If you're essentially misleading customers and you know, earning more 71 00:03:54,253 --> 00:03:56,053 Speaker 4: money on the back of that misleading claim. You know, 72 00:03:56,053 --> 00:03:59,133 Speaker 4: it's an anti competitive behavior, so it's good for other 73 00:03:59,173 --> 00:04:00,893 Speaker 4: businesses and for consumers. 74 00:04:01,893 --> 00:04:04,373 Speaker 3: Is because sometimes it seems to me that a company 75 00:04:04,413 --> 00:04:06,533 Speaker 3: shouldn't be allowed to continue. I'm not going to name 76 00:04:06,573 --> 00:04:08,213 Speaker 3: the name of it, doesn't cause get it wrong, but 77 00:04:08,333 --> 00:04:10,973 Speaker 3: it was a while back, and this isn't quite green washing. 78 00:04:11,013 --> 00:04:14,173 Speaker 3: I guess it's sort of a moral form of washing. 79 00:04:14,253 --> 00:04:18,333 Speaker 3: But you know, a free range selling eggs and saying 80 00:04:18,373 --> 00:04:20,133 Speaker 3: that they're free range and selling a whole lot of 81 00:04:20,133 --> 00:04:22,333 Speaker 3: eggs as free range, people are paying more for them, 82 00:04:22,453 --> 00:04:25,213 Speaker 3: and then there's an investigation and you find out though 83 00:04:25,213 --> 00:04:28,333 Speaker 3: it were never free range. Doesn't that feel like that 84 00:04:28,373 --> 00:04:32,493 Speaker 3: should be a company ending situation because you've lied to people, 85 00:04:32,533 --> 00:04:34,773 Speaker 3: People have paid money. It's come out of the consumers, 86 00:04:35,853 --> 00:04:37,893 Speaker 3: you know, pocket they thought they were buying free range 87 00:04:37,893 --> 00:04:40,533 Speaker 3: eggs because they care about that, they haven't. It seems 88 00:04:40,573 --> 00:04:43,253 Speaker 3: odd when you see a company continuing on they've paid 89 00:04:43,253 --> 00:04:47,453 Speaker 3: a fine, but you see what I'm saying. 90 00:04:47,933 --> 00:04:51,133 Speaker 4: Yeah, a similarly erodes trust, and I certainly would as 91 00:04:51,173 --> 00:04:55,813 Speaker 4: a customer, would steer clear of that particular brand. But yeah, 92 00:04:56,053 --> 00:04:58,933 Speaker 4: the marketplace is such a you know, the ethical concerns, 93 00:04:59,013 --> 00:05:02,813 Speaker 4: what ingredients come from, the fly chain. The marketplace is 94 00:05:02,853 --> 00:05:05,133 Speaker 4: just so complex for consumers at the moment, and we 95 00:05:05,253 --> 00:05:07,933 Speaker 4: just don't have the time to stand in the aisle 96 00:05:08,013 --> 00:05:10,013 Speaker 4: for our have to unpack all of these claims. So 97 00:05:10,053 --> 00:05:12,213 Speaker 4: it just makes it so much more important. You know, 98 00:05:12,293 --> 00:05:14,452 Speaker 4: if things were checked before they went to the market, 99 00:05:14,453 --> 00:05:16,293 Speaker 4: it would make life a lot easier for everyone. I 100 00:05:16,333 --> 00:05:17,293 Speaker 4: think what. 101 00:05:17,253 --> 00:05:20,573 Speaker 2: Would be a fair punishment for those companies found greenwashing 102 00:05:20,653 --> 00:05:24,613 Speaker 2: and making up you know, effectively they are lies. What 103 00:05:24,733 --> 00:05:27,013 Speaker 2: would be an appropriate punishment in New Zealand? I mean, 104 00:05:27,053 --> 00:05:28,533 Speaker 2: could it get to the point where you take that 105 00:05:28,653 --> 00:05:31,453 Speaker 2: product supermarkets are forced to take that product off the 106 00:05:31,493 --> 00:05:36,053 Speaker 2: shelves for a week, Maybe a. 107 00:05:36,093 --> 00:05:38,413 Speaker 4: Fine in proportion to the profit the company has made 108 00:05:38,533 --> 00:05:40,853 Speaker 4: or for that product, and those claims would be a 109 00:05:40,853 --> 00:05:43,533 Speaker 4: good idea. Certainly, at the moment the six hundred thousand 110 00:05:43,573 --> 00:05:46,653 Speaker 4: dollars is not working, so we would definitely support a 111 00:05:46,733 --> 00:05:49,293 Speaker 4: review of the penalties of the Bear Trading Act going 112 00:05:49,333 --> 00:05:52,453 Speaker 4: up quite substantially to act as a deterrant. And I 113 00:05:52,453 --> 00:05:57,533 Speaker 4: think this raising the penalty would be a good encouragement 114 00:05:57,573 --> 00:05:59,973 Speaker 4: to businesses to look at how they're labeling their products 115 00:05:59,973 --> 00:06:01,533 Speaker 4: and whether they're being miss learning or not. 116 00:06:02,293 --> 00:06:04,693 Speaker 2: Rebecca has been great to chat with you. Thank you 117 00:06:04,893 --> 00:06:09,253 Speaker 2: very much for your time. My pleasure that is Rebecca Styles. 118 00:06:09,253 --> 00:06:13,253 Speaker 2: She is Consumer insid investigative team leader for more. 119 00:06:13,093 --> 00:06:16,493 Speaker 1: From News Talk set B. Listen live on air or online, 120 00:06:16,533 --> 00:06:18,933 Speaker 1: and keep our shows with you wherever you go with 121 00:06:19,013 --> 00:06:20,973 Speaker 1: our podcasts on iHeartRadio.