WEBVTT - Weight loss drug boom—opportunities & risks

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>We'd like to interview you about how we can make

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Shared Lunch better. We've got a survey happening right now

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>and we'd love your feedback. It just takes a few minutes,

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:11.879
<v Speaker 1>and if you're a New Zealand resident, you can go

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>on the drawer to one of six fifty dollars Charisi's gifts.

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>The link is in our show notes right now.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Sura, and welcome to this episode of Shared Lunch, where

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 2>we lift the lid on the weight loss drug boom

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 2>in the US. It's been big business for pharmaceutical companies

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>for a while, but how do investors know if it's

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 2>a fad or weather this promise. I'm your host, Halen Madison,

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 2>and I'll be discussing this with doctor Deborah Lambe, global

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 2>Equities analyst at Milford Asset Management.

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Investing involves risk you might lose the money you start with.

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 3>We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor. We also

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 3>recommend reading product disclosure dot douments before deciding to invest.

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Everything you're about to see and hear is current at

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 3>the time of recording.

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Great to have you on the program. Dead after your

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 2>trip to America.

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was much warmer in the States. I actually

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 4>spend quite a significant portion of the time in Vegas,

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 4>so it was about thirty five degrees when I was there,

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 4>which was really nice. A bit of a shock to

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 4>come back to the cold, rainy Auckland, but hopefully it

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 4>doesn't last too long.

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Wind to hear now, deb let's start with what you

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 2>do at Milford and the reason for your trip to

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 2>the US, which I understand included seeing a number of

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 2>pharmaceutical companies.

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 4>So at Milford, I'm in the global equities team, which

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 4>means I'm not looking at companies in New Zealand or Australia. Rather,

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm focused on listed companies that are based in the US,

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 4>in Japan, and in Europe. And you mentioned my trip

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 4>to the US, so traveling and getting on the road

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 4>is an important part of what we do. And I've

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 4>just spent two weeks, a pretty well win couple of

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 4>weeks in the US. The first thing days I visited

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 4>seven cities and drunk much more coffee than is probably

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 4>healthy for me. And then the trauff itself comprise of

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 4>a few independent days where I've visited companies by myself

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 4>and then visiting two conferences, so one was a global

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 4>bio Farmer conference, and then one was a global healthcare

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 4>investing conference, and I guess you also asked why is

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 4>it important to do this? So when I go and

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 4>visit a company and talk to the management team, I'm

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 4>going to be testing the assumptions that I have about

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 4>the company. So is what we believe about that company correct,

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 4>looking for risks that we may not be aware of,

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 4>and then also thinking about how is the management team

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 4>thinking about opportunities and then also challenges that it's facing.

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 4>And it's not just about visiting companies that we already

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 4>invest in, but it's also about visiting companies or hearing

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 4>from companies that might be a new company to invest in.

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 4>So it's a great source of new ideas as well.

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Now it'd be good to actually put in context the

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 2>size of the pharmaceutical industry in the US. I mean,

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 2>the numbers are eye watering from Australia and New Zealand's perspective,

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 2>but also maybe the future and the potential that this

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 2>sector has.

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So the pharmaceutical industry itself in the US, pharmaceutical

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 4>industry itself is it's massive. So more than five hundred

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars per year as the size of the industry,

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 4>which that to kind of put that in context, that's

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 4>bigger than the GDP of countries like Austria and Norway,

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 4>and that's more than twice the GDP of US here

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 4>in New Zealand. And then if you think about, though,

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 4>of course, the US technology industry, that's a whopping one

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 4>point seven trillion, So it's smaller than that, but it

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 4>is for something that's essentially mostly selling small white pills,

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 4>it's pretty big numbers. And then you also asked about

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 4>I guess like future growth. So the pharmaceutical industry itself,

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 4>it's forecast to grow about five percent per ADDAM through

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 4>to twenty thirty and that's driven by a few factors,

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 4>but one that I would really call out is this

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 4>aging population and changing demographics that we have. And that's

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 4>not just in the US, but that's also here in

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 4>New Zealand. And so if you think about our population

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 4>of people over sixty, that's forecast to double by twenty fifty,

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 4>and then the number of people that are aged over

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 4>eighty that's actually going to triple by twenty fifty. So

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 4>that means a much greater proportion of people that need

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.359
<v Speaker 4>medicines for their chronic conditions and also to manage their

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 4>quality of life. I suppose two.

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 2>With medicines. One thing investors really need to think about too,

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 2>if they're looking at such sectors is that it takes

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>a while for a medicine to be developed and go

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 2>through all the tests and the regulation, et cetera.

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 4>That's exactly right, and that pharmaceutical industry itself, and for

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 4>me is an investor learning about it, it's quite a

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 4>kind of complicated industry and for companies itself, getting a

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 4>medicine on the market is both time rechieving and expensive.

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 4>So to have a medicine approved for use, it has

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 4>to go through phase one, Phase two, phase three clinical trials,

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 4>and then the approval proceeds, and that's very expensive, and

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 4>I think from memory it costs around two billion dollars

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 4>per drug that's approved on average. On average, it takes

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 4>about ten years. And then also if you look at

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 4>that whole process, a lot of companies fall out, a

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.119
<v Speaker 4>lot of companies, a lot of medicines fall out along

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 4>the way. So around only seven percent of molecules that

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 4>start at phase one make it all the way through

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 4>to phase three clinical trials, and then of course, once

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 4>you have that medicine approved, so the regulator gives it

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 4>a tick, it says that it's safe and effective in patients.

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:33.559
<v Speaker 4>Then what happens is is that it's given a period

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 4>of loss of exclusivity on the market. And what that

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 4>means is that copycats can't come in and copy the medicine.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 4>But that only has a finite life, and so after

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.799
<v Speaker 4>that's on average ten years, and so after ten years,

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 4>what happens is then other companies can copy that molecule

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 4>and produce what's called a generic medicine. So then at

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 4>that point in time, then what we see is the

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 4>price of the drug falls rapidly, so normally to the

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 4>tune of seventy percent in and revenue from that molecule

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 4>falls away. So that means that farmer companies here on

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 4>this kind of wheel of having to make new drugs

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 4>which then have a period of exclusivity and then that

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 4>revenue drops right away. So for drug companies to continue

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 4>to grow, they have to be continually innovating and have

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 4>medicines coming through that pipeline over time.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 2>Gosh, quite a juggle then actually jumping into weight loss drugs,

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean they have been talked about a lot. There's

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 2>a fair bit of hype. Why do you think it

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:31.799
<v Speaker 2>has sort of struck a cord?

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and this is this is a really interesting one.

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 4>And one of the companies that I actually visited on

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 4>the trip was Elight Lilly, which is one of the

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 4>leaders in the weight loss in the weight loss race,

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 4>and there's been heaps of focus on the weight loss

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 4>phenomenon recently, despite the fact that weight loss medicines have

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 4>actually been around for quite a long time, and so

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 4>they were initially developed for use in diabetes to help

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 4>people manage their weight and blood sugar levels. But what's

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 4>driven the excitement over the past kind of twelve months

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 4>is new research that has shown that these medicines provide

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 4>benefit not just in people who have diabetes, which is

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 4>around five percent of the population, but also in people

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 4>who are oh weight or obese, which means that the

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 4>pool of people that can use them jumps from that

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 4>five percent to thirty three percent of the population. And

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 4>then the other really important thing that's been shown in

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 4>these clinical studies is not only do these medicines provide

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 4>a benefit in terms of the weight loss, but also

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 4>they provide other health benefits. So if you take these

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 4>medicines for a period of time, it will reduce your

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 4>risk of heart attack, it will reduce your risk of stroke,

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 4>it will reduce the progression of your kidney disease, it

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 4>will reduce the pain if you have arthritis. So it's

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 4>the combination of now proving out that it's a much

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 4>broader pool of people that can benefit from them, and

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 4>then also that the benefit extends beyond that of weight

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 4>loss alone.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 2>What about, though, if you stop taking these strikes. I mean,

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 2>they've got all those other aspects and benefits by the

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 2>sounds of things, But do you have to stay on

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 2>them forever?

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, this is a really good question, and it's

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 4>actually something that invests a debating, But what the trials

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 4>show so far is that to your point, to keep

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 4>the weight loss off, you have to stay on these medicines.

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 4>And as soon as you stop taking the medicine, slowly

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 4>but surely, the weight comes back on. And so they're

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 4>self administered injections, and they essentially work by making you

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 4>feel full and suppressing your appetite. And so when you're

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 4>no longer taking them, that means that you basically you

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 4>don't feel for that fullness your appetite comes back and

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 4>then slowly but surely that weight will just come back on.

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 2>What about the side effects? So this seems to be

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 2>always side effects for drugs no matter what you take.

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's true. And so there is side

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 4>effects with these medicines, but so far the evidence is

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 4>that they're generally pretty well tolerated and the main side

0:08:55.800 --> 0:09:00.319
<v Speaker 4>effects are things like nausea, upset stomach and that kind

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 4>of thing. But there hasn't been anything so far that

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 4>would be a really risky side effect that people have

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 4>to be worried about.

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Given these new weight loss drugs, I mean, how much

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 2>weight can you actually lose on them? And also what

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 2>is the bar for obesity?

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 4>So currently all the research has been done on people

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 4>that have a b ANDI over twenty seven, so that's

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:27.439
<v Speaker 4>classified as overweight or obese, so they're not for you

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 4>some people who are a normal weight or a healthy

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 4>or a healthy weight range, which is be in eighteen

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 4>to twenty four. And then what we see is if

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 4>you take these medicines for a year, on average average

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 4>person will lose between fifteen to twenty percent of their

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 4>body weight. So if you take Novo Nordics ozempic you

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 4>lose on average fifteen percent and Eli Lilly's medicines interesting

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 4>are slightly more effective and you'll lose an average twenty

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 4>percent of your body weight. And what we're seeing is

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 4>that next generation versions of the drug that are currently

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 4>in earlier clinical trials, they're showing a similar safety profiles

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 4>but losing more like twenty five percent of your body weight.

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 2>So what about in this part of the world, can

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 2>you actually get hold of these medicines or is that

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 2>some way off?

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes that so so far, what we've seen is that

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 4>Novo Nordous medicine ozempic that has been approved for use

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 4>and both diabetes and obesity. But Eli Lindity's medicine so

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 4>far has just been approved for use in diabetes but

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 4>not yet obesity, so the company is going through that

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 4>approval process now. And then another thing that's important to

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 4>keep in mind is that even though they're approved for

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 4>use here and in Australia, they're not yet funded. So

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 4>in New Zealand it's not funded by FARMAC. So that

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 4>means that if you are prescribed that medicine, you are

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 4>paying out of pocket cost yourself to take that medicine

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 4>and those are expensive, so around one thousand dollars per

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 4>person per month just to take the medicine. And then

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 4>the other factor to layer on top of this as

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 4>well is that there's been massive global shortages of the medicine.

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 4>So in Australia been able to get their hands on

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of supply, but here in New Zealand

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 4>there's been very little, if not any, people able to

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 4>take it so far.

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 2>And what about the pricing. If the supply and demand,

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't it go up and you'd be paying more again?

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 4>And that's it's kind of interesting because in most markets

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 4>you would expect that really high demand with a constrained supply,

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 4>that you would see prices go up, especially in the

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 4>short term until more supply comes online. But in the

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 4>farmer market, when the drug is approved, prices are negotiated

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 4>at that point in time and so they're set and

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 4>then what you see is over time, generally the price

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 4>of medicines actually will come down a little bit over time.

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 4>So this means maybe while we're supply constrained in the

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 4>near term, that prices will be able to stay a

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 4>little bit higher, so there'll be less pricing pressure over time.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 4>But we still expect the overtime prices will come down.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Now, deb you're a medical doctor, you aren't practicing at

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 2>the moment. I think you've been out for about seven years.

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 2>But what do you think would you be prescribing these

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 2>medicines given what you know?

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so seven years it's time does really fly. But

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 4>I would say so based on what I know. Mine

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 4>understanding is there's a really good basic evidence to show

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 4>that these demonstrate good health benefits and people over a

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 4>sustained period of time when they take them, and also

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 4>also basically that the risks are pretty are pretty small.

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Side effect profile is good. So I am with the

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 4>caveat that I'm not currently practicing. I see Nobodyson why

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't prescribe these.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Now, let's look at some of the companies involved in

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 2>this weight loss drag race, if you like. There's some

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 2>some pretty big ones and some pretty big numbers. As

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 2>we've just discussed, it'd be quite good too to see

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 2>how their share prices have performed given this new theme,

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 2>if you like.

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 4>So, the two main the two main leaders in the

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 4>weight loss race are Eli Lilly, Who's the US company

0:12:57.840 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 4>that I visited while I was on my trip. And

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 4>then also there's a Danish company called Novo Nordisk, and

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 4>that is a Danish company. And so what we've seen

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 4>is that all of this information, all of this new

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 4>information has driven really strong share price performance over the

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 4>past year. So shares an Eli Lilliar up around ninety

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 4>two percent I think last time I checked, and then

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 4>shares a Novo Nordisk up around seventy percent. So it's

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 4>been pretty stellar performance. And it's also meant that these

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 4>companies they are now pretty big companies. And so to

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 4>put it into context, if you look at the size

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 4>of these two companies combined and then you compare it

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 4>to all one hundred and eighty one companies that we

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 4>have listed on our New Zealand Stock Exchange, these two

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 4>companies are worth more than thirteen times all of our

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 4>listed companies combined.

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 2>At the same time, the prices might be high, I'm

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 2>not sure whether you've looked at the price to earnings ratio,

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 2>which is obviously what investors use as a sometimes fairly

0:13:56.160 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 2>blunt instrument to understand whether you're getting valued that but

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 2>there's also they're also spending a fee bit of capex

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 2>or capital to actually bring these medicines to market, aren't they?

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 4>And so I guess on the pe ratios, if you

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 4>look at what Eli Lilly is trading on relative to

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 4>Novo Nordisk, relative to other farmer companies, these are on

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 4>eyewatering multiples. So they are pretty they look optically pretty expensive.

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 4>They do have a great growth opportunity ahead of them,

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 4>but to your point, they are also spending a lot

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 4>and the kind of manufacturing of these is very complicated

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 4>and I think combined, by twenty twenty eight, it's expected

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 4>that they will spend around fifty billion dollars on capex.

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 4>And so one of the debates that investors are kind

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 4>of thinking about is are the shares getting overvalued? Because

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 4>while the growth opportunity is very exciting, there's no I guess,

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 4>in my mind, there's no debating the opportunity. The key

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 4>debate is really the valuation and then how much of

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 4>that is reflected in the valuation of these shares.

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Now we've talked about valuation in terms of thinking about

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 2>investing in the sector, and there's probably a number of

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 2>other things that investors need to think about. There's the exclusivity,

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 2>that's the time it takes to actually get a medicine

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 2>to market. Are there other issues that have been brought

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>up with this new theme if you like.

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I think with these farmer companies specifically and

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 4>the weight loss opportunities specifically aside, putting valuation aside, the

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 4>key questions would be priced. So how long will the

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 4>price stay at one thousand dollars per person per month?

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 4>And what will the price be in twenty thirty and

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 4>then what will the price be when other competitors bring

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 4>their products to market because competition is on the horizon. Also,

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 4>another debate is will people want to say on these

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 4>medicines for life? Because as we know, you stop taking

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 4>the medicine, the weight comes back on. That's a massive

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 4>commitment for someone to be taking either an injection currently

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 4>every week for a month or an oral pill for life.

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 4>And the third is given the high price point of

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 4>the medicines currently, will governments and house systems want to

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 4>pay for them? Will be able to pay for them?

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Because if you think about it, if it's one in

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 4>three keywis a classified as overweight or obese so could

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 4>benefit from these medicines and effort costs currently one thousand

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 4>dollars per person per month and you sum that up,

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 4>that's a massive cost for our healthcare system. So the

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 4>price kind of it's like where does the price land

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 4>and then how does that impact the proportion of people

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 4>that are on the medicine are kind of key debates

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 4>that investors are focusing on.

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Another thing I think investors probably need to think about too,

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>is are they a one show pony. I mean, hopefully

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 2>a pharmaceutical company has got a few strings to its

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 2>bo For example, Eli Lilly, I think is also getting

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 2>an Alzheimer's drug towards market production, aren't they?

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Yes? Yes, And this is it's a key difference between

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 4>Novo Nordicic and Eli Lilly. Is Novo Nordicic is currently

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 4>it's basically solely focused on diabetes and weight loss medicines,

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 4>whereas Eli Lilly is a much more diversified company. So

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 4>not only does it have its weight loss medicine, it

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 4>has gone Alzheimer's medicine coming. It also has an oncology portfolio.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 4>So they are quite two different companies when you think

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 4>about what sits in them and then the Alzheimer's opportunity.

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 4>That's something that investors have been pre focused on for

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 4>a while now. There's currently two main companies, so Eli Lilly,

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 4>and there's also a US company called Biogen, which has

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 4>been kind of like vying to get in the Alzheimer's market.

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 4>And Biogen has had a few controversies along the way

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 4>with its Alzheimer's medicine. The first was approved back in

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty one, and this was controversial because it was

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 4>the first disease modifying Alzheimer's treatment, and so that means

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 4>that it works to reduce the progression of the actual disease.

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 4>But the approval was controversial because it just showed improvement

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 4>in the scans of brains of people with Alzheimer's, but

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 4>it didn't actually prove that it improved their symptoms. And

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 4>so there are a number of people that actually resigned

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 4>from the FDA, which is a regulary body on the

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 4>bottom of that. On the back of that, and then

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 4>they were also very criticized because of the high price

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 4>point that the medicines were priced at at that point

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 4>when they were approved, which I think from memory was

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 4>around fifty six thousand dollars per person per year, So

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 4>that's much higher price than the weight loss drugs, for example.

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 4>But then so Biogen they've got a new CEO's coming.

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 4>They've since had a subsequent version of the medicine that's

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 4>been approved that does show improvement in symptoms of people

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 4>with Alzheimer's disease. And then also what we've seen is

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 4>that they've cut the price dramatically. It's still expensive. I

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 4>think it's maybe twenty six thousand dollars per person per year,

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 4>which is a lot, but it's come down from that

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 4>fifty six thousand.

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating. I think Alzheimer's and the drugs and the race

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 2>is probably a whole episode in its south dev which

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I think we'll probably come back to just getting back

0:18:56.240 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 2>to manufacturing these pharmaceuticals. Has AI had much of a

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 2>place here in terms of speeding things.

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Up, So this AI kind of in farmer companies and

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 4>in drug discovery. It's been a topic that investors are

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 4>kind of increasingly focused on and increasingly excited about. And

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 4>one of the key kind of themes or takeaways I

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 4>would say that I really noticed when I was in

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.479
<v Speaker 4>the US is just how excited companies are about the

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 4>use of AI and drug discovery. Because we've already talked

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 4>about how time consuming and expensive it is to develop

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 4>new medicines. And what we've seen is that the developments

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 4>in AI mean that you can develop new molecules around

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 4>ten times as fast, or so, you can design new

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 4>molecules around ten times as fast, you can run simulations

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 4>on those molecules around a hundred times as fast. And

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 4>then there's this new concept, which I think is pretty interesting.

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 4>You've heard of the concept of a self driving car.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 4>There's this new concept of a self driving lab. And

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 4>so what this means is that you have AI and

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 4>then you robotics, and so you use AI and robotics

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 4>together and they drive the cycle of kind of prediction,

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 4>experimentation and analysis, which means that you can iteratively identify

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 4>new compounds which you then run experiments on, which then

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 4>mean that the whole process is much faster and then

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 4>importantly more cost effective for companies.

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Gosh, So do we have any idea how much that

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 2>would speed things up? We talked about ten years before

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 2>being the time that it can take, I think for exclusivity,

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 2>but I think you know, when you've got a medicine

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 2>in the wings that can take even longer, can't it?

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I think it's I think it's probably too

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 4>early yet. To put an actual number on how much

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 4>it could speed things up. But I think what we're

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 4>seeing is more and more companies are talking about it,

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 4>more and more companies are using it in their drug

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 4>discovery process. So I think over time we'll be able

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 4>to get a better sense of how much time it

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 4>actually is taking off the drug discovery process. But to

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 4>the extent that it means we can develop medicines that

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 4>are cheaper, I feel like that could only be a

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 4>good thing given the high costs of healthcare that we're

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 4>seeing around the world now.

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Just thinking about investors looking to invest in the sector,

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there are those direct stocks, they are probably

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 2>quite expensive at the moment for some people. But also

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 2>what about ETFs. I know on cheeseys, for instance, we've

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 2>got about five or at least there's more actually pharmaceutical

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 2>ETFs that people can look to. They are mainly in

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the US. But also I did see that there was

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 2>a couple of applications for more themed weight loss ETFs

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 2>by I think Amplify and round Tel investments were two,

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 2>though I don't think they've actually come to fruition yet.

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 4>So I guess when you're thinking about healthcare, health care

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 4>itself is super broad, and then within that there's all

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 4>different kinds of companies, so hospitals, medical device companies, companies

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 4>that sell chemicals that are used in farmer companies that

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 4>sell tools that are used in farmer So all of

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 4>that kind of sets in the broader healthcare space. And

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 4>I think if you're thinking about getting a broad kind

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 4>of eatif exposure, maybe one way to get a sense

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 4>of what could be better is looking back at what's

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.959
<v Speaker 4>happened over time. And if you look back over a

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 4>significant period of time, say twenty years, the s and

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 4>P five hundred index and the SMP Healthcare Index have

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 4>actually interestingly performed basically neck on neck, So they both

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 4>generated around a ten percent return per year over a

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty year time horizon. If you look at farmer itself,

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 4>that generated around half a percent lower return, so around

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 4>nine and a half percent over that twenty year period

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 4>of time. But if you had managed to pick farmer

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 4>winner Novo or farmer Winner Eli Lilly over that period

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 4>of time, you would have generated I think from memory

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 4>it's around a sixteen percent return per ANIM and then

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 4>a twenty five percent return per ANIM. Picking a winner

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 4>can be great, but then if you're looking at a

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 4>diversified exposure, as she would suggest that rather than looking

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 4>for a narrow farmer exposure, a broader healthcare exposure would

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 4>be better. And then I think especially worth keeping in

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 4>mind with a diversified eatia for Farmer, you're likely to

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 4>have a higher exposure to the largest companies and they

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 4>may have a higher proportion of medicines that are coming

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 4>up to that loss of exclusivity and revenue and revenue

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 4>dropping off. So that's a really important thing to keep

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 4>in mind with Farmer itself, is what is that loss

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 4>of exclusivity burden and how does that sit across the

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 4>companies that are in that etf.

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, we could talk for ages dead. There's so much

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 2>to unpack here, but look, thanks so much for your

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 2>insights today and coming in even though you have got

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 2>a cold.

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much for having me. It's been awesome to

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 4>be here.

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 2>And thanks to everyone for joining in. But before you go,

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 2>we'd be really keen if you could fill out our

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 2>audience survey, which you'll find in the show notes. Alne,

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you take few minutes and you'll be in the drawer

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 2>to win fifty dollars to invest, So stay warm and

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 2>stay safe, and we'll see you next time on shed lunch.