WEBVTT - Investor guide to tariffs and the Aussie election

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.199
<v Speaker 1>Join over seven hundred and fifty thousand people using Chezy's

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to build long term wealth. Invest with no minimum across

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the US, Australian and New Zealand share markets. Download the

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>cheeseas app to get started.

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>But every company is, you know, going to survive and thrive.

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.319
<v Speaker 2>But shares in general are very likely in my opinion,

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 2>because history tells us to go much higher from here

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 2>over the long term, and that's the only timeframe that

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 2>people should be worried about. Half of my brain is like,

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm losing money. This sucks so much red. The other

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>part of my brain, and this is the important bit,

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 2>is the bit that says, but hang on, you knew

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 2>this was going to happen. You know what's happened before

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 2>you know it's going to happen again. Dollar cost averaging

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>for the winds. Buying shares on sales is what we

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>all think we want to do, except when they're on sale.

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>We pain.

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to shared Lunch, brought to you by Chas's. At Cheza's,

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 3>we're on a mission to create financial empowerment for everyone,

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 3>which is why we have these conversations. They're a big

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 3>part of being able to dig in to the different

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 3>topics that are affecting at vistas and to get experts

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 3>along to share their view on it. So I'm Sonya,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 3>the co founders and co CEOs at Chairs Ease, and

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 3>today we're joined by Chief Investing Officer at the Montley

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Full Scott Phillips. We're going to chat about all things

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 3>US tariffs and the upcoming election and how this is

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 3>impacting Australia.

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Before we get.

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 3>Started, I want to acknowledge the Getigul people of the

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 3>or nation, the traditional custodians of the land when we're

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 3>coming to you from today and pay respects to elders, past,

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 3>present and emerging.

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 5>Investing involves the risk you might lose the money you

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 5>start with. We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor.

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 5>We also recommend reading product disclosure documents before deciding to invest.

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Everything you're about to see and here is current at

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 5>the time of recording.

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Hi Scott, welcome to the show, Sonya, Thank you and

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 4>thank you for having me. Yeah, great to have you back.

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just going to jump straight into it is

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 3>now a good time to invest?

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely a great time to invest, but with a

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 2>massive asteriskmote. The asterisk is I have no idea what

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>happens next. So I maybe the market force twenty percent,

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe it rises twenty percent, maybe it goes nowhere for

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 2>a year. I have absolutely no idea. So how can

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 2>I say it's a great time to invest. That's a

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 2>really really simple one. Here's what history tells us, and

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 2>this is really important. The ASX, the US markets, developed

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 2>markets around the world have never yet failed to regain

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 2>then surpass a previous high. So here's the thing. If

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>that holds true, now it may not. I can't give

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 2>a promise or a guarantee. If it does hold true,

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 2>that means it upside from here to get back to

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 2>the last high and then more upside again. Shares, relatively

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 2>where they have been, are on special. So do I

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 2>know what's going to happen next? No? Do I know

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 2>which companies know. And by the way, when I say shares,

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 2>when you ask the question, shares, I'm talking about generically

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 2>generally across the market. Not every company will go up,

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 2>not every company is worth buying, not every company is

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 2>going to survive and thrive, But shares in general are

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 2>very likely in my opinion, because history tells us to

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 2>go much higher from here over the long term, and

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 2>that's the only timeframe that people should be worried about.

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned that you know things have been dropping over

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 3>the last week, while largely know one of the things

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 3>that's driving this is the tariffs that have been put

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 3>in place by the US. And so we're looking at

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 3>ten percent for Australia as a baseline. What impact are

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 3>these tariffs having on Australian companies.

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's work out what's going on. So the tariffs that

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 2>have been put in place. I'm going to be going

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 2>to be pretty honest here and I'm gonna be pretty upfront.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to ask your listeners to trust me on

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the process here. I don't have a political dog in

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>this fight. Democrat, Republican, liberal, labor, I don't care. What

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 2>I will say to you is economically, these tariffs are

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 2>a terrible idea and a terrible solution to a reasonable problem.

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 2>And just because if identified a problem correctly, which is hoy,

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 2>there's some problems with the US manufacturing, doesn't mean the answer,

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 2>any answer is always going to be necessarily correct. I'm

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 2>sorry for the hardcore Trump finds that fans out that

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 2>it's not true. Again, it's not a personal view it's

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 2>not even a political view, it's just an economic view.

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 2>So what's happening is Donald Trumps announced tariffs on much

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 2>of the rest of the world. And I'll get back

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 2>to Australia and New Zealand by extension a minute. But

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the impact of those tariffs are going to be almost

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 2>certainly higher prices for US consumers. Why because when we

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 2>say we're putting tariffs on Chinese products, we're not really

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>say we're paying putting traffs on tarifts on China. We're

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 2>saying American consumers or Donald Trump saying American consumer is

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 2>going to pay more for Chinese imports. Or by the way,

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 2>the newly competitive US made stuff that's more expensive than

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>it used to be but can now compete at those

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 2>higher prices. In other words, no matter which way you

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 2>cut the sausage, you're paying a higher price for those goods.

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 2>Higher prices mean inflation. Now, I don't have to explain

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 2>that we've been through five years of it over the

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>last half decade right around the world. High inflation is bad.

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 2>High inflation may also lead to and most economists, and frankly,

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 2>even the Atlanta branch of the US Federal Reserve are

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 2>expecting the US to enter a recession this year. If

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 2>the US enters a recession, the other world's largest economy

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 2>are the world's largest consumer economy by miles. If the

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:48.799
<v Speaker 2>US has a recession, it's going to put meaningful downward

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>pressure on economic growth right around the rest of the world,

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 2>including down here at the bottom end of the globe

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 2>in Australia, in New Zealand. So that's the setup. But

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 2>it's important set up because when you say, what's going

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 2>to happen to companies here in Australia, Yeah, there's three

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 2>ways to think about it. The first is that global story,

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the global recession risk. If the US demands less, Australian

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 2>companies may produce less. If Australian's companies produced less, their

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 2>profits are probably going to fall. Now that's a modest outcome.

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 2>It is a lot less. We may well see companies far,

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 2>we may well see job losses. And I'm an optimist

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 2>by the way, but I would also want to tell

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 2>it straight. So that is the possible outcome. That is

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the worst case scenario probably if this does get to

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 2>that intergre So that's the first order impact. The second

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 2>order impact is, of course the impact on Australian companies directly.

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 2>We know there's twenty five percent on Australian aluminium and steel.

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 2>There is ten percent now and everything else going to

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 2>the US. If you have a meaningful proportion of your

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 2>sales that go to the US, they are going to

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 2>be harder sales to make. Maybe you absorb the increase

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 2>and make lower margins. Maybe you pass on the increase

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 2>and have lower sales. There'll be a few companies that

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 2>can pass on the increase and still sell the same amount.

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 2>That's the best case scenario, but it's probably a small group.

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Because price elasticity matters. If you put prices up, people

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 2>buy less. So that's the second order for all those

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 2>businesses that are exporting to the US. And by the way,

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 2>those companies reliant on those other companies. If you're supplying

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 2>a company that's exporting to the US and they buy less,

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 2>are going to buy less from you, so that matters.

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Further impact really quickly is China. Australia is China's so

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>China's Astralia's largest trading partner by heaps. There are ongoing

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 2>tit for tat reciprocal tariffs of the bullies, Bass each

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 2>other over the head. Trump said overnight recently a couple

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 2>of days ago, they are going to maybe put fifty

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 2>percent tariffs on Chinese goods on top or they've already

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 2>announced why because China had the too ready to basically

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 2>bash back at the US putting tariffs on at the

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 2>first place. And this is the silliness of what's going on.

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>But if China's economy slows and Chinese steel production slows,

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 2>guess what that's going to hurt austrain and own or

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 2>exports meaningfully. That's not a big economic impact, by the way,

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>because iron or impact. It doesn't employ a whole lot

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 2>of people, but big impact for share prices for those

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 2>iron or exporters they own shares and four descu for

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 2>full disclosure, bad news for those miners, bad news for

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 2>government revenues, and for gross domestic economic output. So there's

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 2>three kind of concentric circles, if you like, of potential

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 2>outcomes from the tariff or when it comes to what's

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 2>going to hit us here at home, are there.

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 4>Any particular areas that benefit from the change?

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you stretch and you squint really significantly,

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 2>you might find an opportunity to find one or two.

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 2>What you might see happen is Australian companies find other

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 2>markets for their products. For example, we saw when China

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 2>put massive tariffs on Australian wine. Australia wine makers found

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 2>other markets. It wasn't easy and found some something didn't

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 2>find any at all, by the way, I was going

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 2>to a massive wine glut in Australia. So is there upside

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 2>from that? No, If you are in an ASX listed

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 2>company that happens to a business only in the US

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 2>and somehow it is able to make more money because

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 2>it could prices up because inputs are more expensive, maybe

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a little bit somewhere there in the nooks and crannies.

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a really really small sliver of potential upside. And frankly,

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 2>even then, those companies are more likely to be hit

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 2>by US economic pain more broadly rather than tariffs. Particularly,

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 2>that is, if inflation goes up, if economic growth falls,

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>if unemployment rises, those companies that are based there are

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 2>probably going to hurt. And by the way, that's why

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing US share markets fall. You kind of think

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 2>in the way that the simplistic version that Trump and

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 2>others like to present this tariffs go up, US business

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>gets better. US companies make a lot of money, US

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 2>people get employed. Therefore, it's all wine and roses. The

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 2>reality is the US market is absolutely tanked for a

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 2>couple of straight days late last week, earlier this week.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Why because those investor are worried about the profits of

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 2>those companies because of the economic harm that these tarifts

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 2>will do domestically. I'm looking long term, which, by the way,

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 2>is still why you go back to your first question.

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Why I'm still massively optimistic. So if I think five,

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 2>if I investment prises five years plus out it is

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 2>that's post Trump's term. So again, thinking about what's happening now,

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 2>this week, this month, that's scary. It hurts your portfolio falls,

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 2>It just sucks because no one likes the uncertainty. But

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 2>if I'm a long term investor, and I am, I'm

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 2>looking at five years and going ah, if companies are

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 2>bigger and better than five years than they are now,

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 2>despite what they go through in the meantime, they're worth buying.

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 2>And so that's the lens I really want to impress

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>on people. Think about what's happening in those number of

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 2>years out there. Don'try about just the short term stuff between.

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Now and then, we track and sentiment through the quarters,

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 3>and over the last quarter we've seen it move from

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 3>what was pretty balanced into cautious territory. What are you

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 3>noticing from Invista sentiment and long term planning?

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 5>Now?

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 2>When we went through COVID almost exactly five years ago.

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Weirdly enough, we've looked about the market fellow in Australia thirty

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 2>eight percent from top to bottom in a month and

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.599
<v Speaker 2>four days. Now, that felt scary as heck. Right, that's

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 2>just really really scary. And I don't blame people feeling

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 2>scared because what if COVID was bigger than ended up being.

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 2>What if the death toll was massively higher, and that

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 2>would be obviously far more tragic than the financial impacts.

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 2>What if the economy's ground or hopeful longer? What if?

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 2>What if I get all those concerns right? Except in

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 2>hindsight we know it was the fastest bear market in

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 2>history and then the fastest recovery in history. So when

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 2>you think about people cautious, yes, absolutely, I'm seeing exactly

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the same thing, mate, Just like I got to get

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 2>out of here. This is scary. One thing I want

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 2>to remind people is remember for every seller, for every

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 2>so called panic seller, there's a buyer. You can't sell

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 2>shares unless someone buys them from you. And so while

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 2>we say, oh, everyone's selling, well, it can't be because

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>everyone's also buying. There's always two sides to a trade.

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 2>So while we focus on the declines, and yes, there's

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 2>more panic in the sellers than there is excitement in

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 2>the buyers, otherwise the prices go back up. That's why

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 2>we get it with price falls, right, that the sellers

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>are keener than the buyers are. Everything finds its market,

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 2>finds its price, and someone ever a lot, millions and

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 2>minuses and millions of shares are changing hands, being bought

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 2>by people who are saying, hey, this is okay. So, yes,

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 2>there's cautiousness out there. There is fear out there is uncertainly.

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I get why people are worried about it. So I

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.839
<v Speaker 2>want to validate that because it's really really important, the

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 2>active investing through COVID. This is what I've told this

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 2>story before, son, you and I may have told anything

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 2>to you, guys, I hope I didn't. During COVID, there's

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 2>two sides of the investor's brain, right, there's a bit

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 2>that says, oh my god, what's happening out there? This

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 2>is ridiculous. And a policy perspective, I have very strong views,

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 2>as you've already heard, from an investment perspective, though, I've

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 2>got to have two parts of my brain. Half of

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 2>my brain is like, I'm losing money. This sucks so much,

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 2>red I'm down again. Maybe the market's right. What if

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 2>this is the time that it's different freaking out here?

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 2>What if it keeps falling? Maybe now is not the time.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I should wait till the coast is cleared. All

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 2>those fear emotions, all those uncertainty, all those worries they're

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be there. What if I'm investing too early?

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 2>What if I'm wasting money? All that things through my head.

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:18.599
<v Speaker 2>The other part of my brain, and this is the

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 2>important bit, is the bit that says, but hang on,

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 2>you knew this was going to happen. You know what's

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 2>happened before, you know what's going to happen again. Dollar

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 2>cost averaging for the wind. If you've got some money

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 2>to invest, if you can find great companies you think

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 2>they're going to better in five years time, then now

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 2>what that is a great thing to be able to do.

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Buying shares on sale is what we all think we

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 2>want to do, except when they're on sale, we panic.

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 2>And so two parts of your brain acknowledge the fear,

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 2>acknowledge the uncertain, acknowledge the concern, and then say, but

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm investing anyway, because I just have to confront it,

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 2>ignore it, do what if you need to do with

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 2>the fear, But invest anyway, because long term that's proven

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 2>over and over and over and over again to be

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 2>the right approach. Again, not in any company. Quality companies,

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 2>diversified companies, across currencies, across exchanges, across the industries, businesses

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 2>with good balance sheets, all the good things that we've

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 2>talked about before about good investing, keep doing that stuff.

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Don't buy indiscriminately, but keep buying anyway.

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 3>What are the key metrics that people should be keeping

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 3>an eye on to see how things are going?

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.839
<v Speaker 2>So I've got to say this is where there are

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 2>really easy bit wrong answers to that question.

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 2>And if you speak to short term trades, if you

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 2>speak to people who are going to try and sell

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 2>you a thing rather than hopefully educate you about an approach,

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 2>they'll give you lots of great metrics. I have exactly

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 2>zero metrics in the short term. Why because think about

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 2>think about think about every recession we've ever lived through,

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 2>and I've lived through a few. The market goes down,

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 2>share prices go down, say I always go down, profits

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 2>go down. If you're looking for the recovery to happen,

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>by the time of the recovery happens, that's too late.

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I've told the story before about some really really smart,

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 2>wealthy investors who sold everything at the beginning of COVID

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 2>and said, I'm not going to buy back in until

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the pandemic is over. Now, the pandemic took two years

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 2>to be over, and in fact got worse before it

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 2>got better. But as lockdowns happened, one tomy shrank. As

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 2>that happened, the stock market recovered. So if you're looking

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 2>out the rest of the world, this is way the

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 2>economy in the stock market up. The same thing. If

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 2>you're looking around the world, you're saying, well, tragically, deaths

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 2>have increased, illnesses have increased, hospitalizations have increased, lockdowns have happened.

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 2>People are barred from entering and leaving countries. Economic activity

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 2>has stalled. Governments are keeping US afloat with welfare money.

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 2>This feel it's getting worse, and yet the market recovered

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 2>and recovered and recovered up into the right. Not in

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 2>a straight line and not without doubts and concerns, but

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 2>it did. If you waited until a vaccine, you missed out.

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 2>If you waited until a pandemic was declared over, you

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 2>missed out even more. So I'm going to politely not

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 2>answer your question, because honestly, the only metrics you need

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 2>to be thinking about are I guess there are, but

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>they're not really metrics in terms of what data I'm

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 2>seeing happen. I'm trying to, as an investor, look forward

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 2>and say, in a pick a year in twenty thirty,

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to pick a business in twenty thirty. Are

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 2>they going to have more stores? Are they going to

0:13:58.080 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 2>sell to more people? Are they going to find new

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 2>ways to add categories? They're going to keep their costs

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 2>under control? Probably yes, And if that's the case, they're

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 2>going to be mostly more profitable in twenty thirty than

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 2>they were. I'll say last year. Let's not include this

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 2>year because what happened the last year. Yeah, probably they will. Okay, Well,

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.839
<v Speaker 2>if that's true, how much should I pay for that business?

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 2>And I can no matter what you've preached to evaluation

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 2>is you can pick a rough price or rough multiple

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 2>or rough whatever you want to base your evaluation one

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 2>to say worth buying or not buying now based on

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 2>where I think it'll be in twenty thirty. Let's say

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 2>think a year long recession that's says really bad year long,

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 2>and it goes from middle of twenty twenty five to

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 2>middle of twenty twenty six and sales four by fifty percent.

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Now is the company going to survive that? If it's

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 2>got a good enough balance sheet, Yes, it's got good

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 2>enough cash flows. Yes, okay, if I'm comfortable they will,

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 2>And you shouldn't assume, by the way, do do the

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 2>work for yourself. In the middle of twenty twenty six,

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 2>they come out of recession and sales suck and they're

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 2>losing money, but they start to improve over time, and

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 2>over that period of time from twenty to twenty seven,

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight, twenty nine, things get back to normal. And

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 2>again I look at it and go roight well by

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirty, even if they've gone through a recession, even

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 2>if sales and profits did get really ugly for a while,

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 2>but they survived and then come out the other d

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 2>I think going to be bigger and better. Okay, what's

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 2>a fair price to pay for those businesses now? So

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 2>don't wait? Is my opinion? My us for the metrics

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 2>to come through start by saying, what do I think

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 2>about the business? Do I like it has got a

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 2>good brand, has got a good future? Will it have

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 2>those in five years time? Yes? Okay, what's it worth

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 2>paying today to get that benefit of five years time?

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 2>That's the entire lens I use for my investing.

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Great. So alongside all of this, there's an election

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 3>coming up in Australia, so's what's again another moment of

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 3>uncertainty that does ripple through into the markets. What's been

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 3>most interesting to you so far and the lead out.

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Australia still has a very large budget deficit and it's

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 2>projected to get worse based on the most recent budget

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 2>handed down by the current incumbent government. And that's not

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 2>good for Australia. That's worse than the US by the way.

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 2>They've got massive foreign dead issues, massive government debt issues,

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 2>so fiscal kind of fiscal being tax and spend right,

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 2>the fancy where the economists use for government spending and taxation.

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 2>The tax and spend settings are misaligned, and how that

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 2>nets out does actually have an impact on the economy.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 2>We're supposed to run service in the good times definit

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 2>at the bad time is supposed to offset each other.

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 2>The taxes, spen serting is actually really matter for long

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 2>term prosperity. So I'm keeping an eye on how much

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 2>they're spending. Really honestly, what is interesting too is the

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 2>focus on the short term. So we've got one side,

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the incumbent government putting cost of living relief through extension

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 2>of energy subsidies. Electricity subsidies effectively a discount on your

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 2>energy bill. The oppositions promising a reduction of fuel excise

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 2>for six months twelve months. Sorry, these are really short

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 2>term solutions. So I got to say, from an economic perspective,

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 2>my view has always been that as an investor, I

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 2>care far more about the long term settings of the

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 2>country than about the short term opportunities or risks to

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 2>the individual businesses. Now I want to say risks, I

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 2>don't mean existential risks. If something's going to go broke,

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 2>I really care if it's like well, tax rates for

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 2>companies are slightly higher a lower, or tax rates to

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 2>individuals slightly hire a lower. But if I'm a long

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 2>term investor, what I care most about is my companies

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 2>had the opportunity to operate in a really really solid, healthy,

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 2>growing economy, and so I honestly want to look at

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 2>the election. I'm not looking at who's going to give

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 2>more money to this industry five bucks for that, ten

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 2>bucks for that. By the way, I'm not top that investor.

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 2>I do' a macro investor at all. But policy wise,

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 2>I would like to think the government that comes into

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 2>power post election is going to fix the budget bottom line.

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 2>They probably won't, but I'd like to think that, and

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 2>they're really genuinely thinking long term about setting the country

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 2>up for the best long term success so that we

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 2>can all thrive. And if we all do, companies have

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 2>well people to sell goods too, they have richer people

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 2>to sell goods to, and people on low incomes have

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 2>more money to spend on. I mean, it's a really

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 2>beautiful virtual circle if they get it right. The sugar

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 2>hit is exactly what it sounds like. It's good for

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 2>a little while and then goes away. So those are

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of things I've been kind of focusing on. There's

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 2>not a lot specifically for individual companies or industries. I'll

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 2>have to wait and see kind of what comes from that.

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 2>What is interesting at the moment is both sides have

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 2>been reasonably restrained in terms of new spending announcements. I

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 2>think because they realize where the budget is. But there

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 2>also a lot of cost of living pre sure as

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 2>they call it, and the Polley's a laser focus on

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 2>make us feel better about ourselves so we'll vote for them.

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, on there.

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 4>What do you think is top of mind for Australians

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 4>going in I'm not.

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Election aunt lost either, but it's been meaningfully different over

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 2>the past six months to the last two months. Even

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 2>the last month the government was on the nose, the

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 2>opposition was in the descendency. Government was getting tagged with

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 2>cost of living pressures. I have to say in the

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 2>last kind of couple of weeks, and again I make

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 2>no predictions, I no election analysts, but it's been what's

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 2>been really interesting is the government's clawed back some ground,

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 2>whether it's because the RBA started cutting rates, whether it's

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.719
<v Speaker 2>because we've got used to inflation, frankly, whether it's because

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the Trump stuff is so scary, we just want the

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 2>better the devil we know, I don't really know. And

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 2>again this could change between now and the election date.

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 2>But we've seen some meaningful swings back to the government

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 2>on a bit of a. It's gone from pure cost

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 2>of living to yes cost of living with a bit

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 2>of a. This feels a bit scary. Is it time

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>for a change? So if you asked people, I suspect

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 2>they would still say it's all about cost of living.

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 2>We know Australian real waves are actually really really poor.

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 2>They've they've fallen more than I think any other OECD country,

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 2>certainly much lower than the US, the UK and the

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 2>average for the OECD. I don't know the New Zealand

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 2>numbers that the moment I have to say, I should

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 2>know them, but I don't. So we've seen that kind

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 2>of happen, and the cost of living press are probably

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 2>worse in terms of real incomes, real being what you get.

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Les's the increase for inflation. If I pay rose a

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 2>five percent flashes up six I've gone back as by

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 2>one percent of my real wages fallen one percent. That's

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 2>what that term means I know, you know that sony

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 2>bitch just fear listeners of yours. So yeah, we've gone

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 2>backwards in real terms more than almost any other country.

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 2>And that was really I think playing in the opposition's

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 2>hands cost of living, fix it for me, make it better,

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 2>I have say. In the last couple of weeks we've

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 2>also seen Peter Dutton the Opposition Letter, reverse his view

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 2>on working from home, for example, and sucking public servants.

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 2>They are two things that ordinarily would have played really

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 2>strongly to a right wing conservative voter base rightly wrong.

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 2>I make no value judgment, just an observation they've reversed

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 2>course on those because they're losing votes on them. And

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder whether there's a bit more of a

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 2>band together in the circums sense we find ourselves is

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of tough economic and geopolitical circumstances, rather than the

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 2>divide on partying policy lines. Again, I don't mean the

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 2>lymp's being devisive, both groups just kind of you know,

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 2>the tribes reverting to their corners. It does feel like

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 2>there's more of a considered middle to be won by

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the major parties. And I suspect cost of living is

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 2>first and foremost, but also that idea of who is

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 2>best place to whether the storm that's coming from the US.

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 3>As a result, what can retail the visitors expect or

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, how do elections impact to the markets, So.

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 2>What markets tend to respond to. We've seen this in

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of weeks is markets respond to uncertainty,

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 2>but more importantly to the unexpected. And I guess what

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean by that is this horrible phrash. Cool things

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 2>are priced in. Well, if the market knows there's going

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 2>to be tax cuts in a month time, just pick

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 2>an example, the market will say, we think people spend

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 2>more money then, and so the taxcat gets priced in.

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 2>People foresee that increase, and the price goes up in anticipation.

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 2>So the things that we know are already priced in,

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 2>at least in theory. The tar that were surprise announcements

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 2>are why the market fell because we all kind of thought, well,

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump might do some cares. Maybe possibly, we'll see and

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 2>that's why we've seen it. At four. The election will

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 2>move markets only when either a party wins who is

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 2>expected to win, or a party unveils a policy or

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 2>set of policies the market's not expecting and so generally speaking,

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 2>we don't tend to see much movement in markets or

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 2>even individual industries most of the time if there is

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 2>either a change of government or a return of the

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 2>incumbent government because the things that differentiate those two parties.

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 2>There's also numbers from one of the big economists, Christ

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 2>original Shanelevel or can't remember who was, I think it

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 2>was Chris said ninety some of the ninety nine percent

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 2>of the spending of both parties exactly the same, ether

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 2>as they differ only a one percent of the government budget. Now,

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:43.959
<v Speaker 2>those differences a matter if you a company is going

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 2>to get some money or you know individual is going

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 2>to get a tax cut or something, so it matters.

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 2>But most of the spending is the same across the board.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 2>So unless you're in an industry specific or a company

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 2>that's going to benefit or be hurt by a policy

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 2>that's announced, and even then it's already probably priced in

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 2>unless the party is not expected to win and they

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 2>do so not much. The last thing I'll leave you with,

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Sony is in the US have worked done by Morgan

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 2>House or like a great writer and expotly full employee

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 2>for the record is basically the over the life of

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the US stock market nineteen hundred or so onwards, there's

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 2>been literally no significant difference between the party in power

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 2>and the average returns of the stock market during that

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 2>period in power. And so that's really important to think

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 2>of because we have plenty of if Trump's elected, he'll

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 2>do this. If doesn't selected, he'll do that. If Albo's liketed,

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 2>he'll do this. They'll do those things. But statistically, at

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 2>least the odds that the party in power make a

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 2>meaningful difference to the stock market subsequently, it's yeah, it's

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 2>lie ball. There is no meaningful difference. There's a lot

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 2>of people who have this view of if Party X wins,

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:43.959
<v Speaker 2>then the market marke will do well, so I'll buy,

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 2>or they're going to wreck the party. Why I was

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 2>going to wrect the economy, so I'll sell everything. It

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 2>just isn't the case very often, and so I really

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 2>would encourage people separate your politics and your your you're

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 2>investing anything else.

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 4>That we want to that we haven't covered about the

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 4>election or tariffs, really, I.

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 2>Think so a couple of things. The people who are

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 2>the supportive of Trump's tariffs say, well, other countries have

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 2>done on the country's done it before. You know, Yes,

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 2>they've always been around, and I guess I kind of

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 2>hap him back a little bit on what I said

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 2>about the tariffs. But if you kind of go back

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 2>and say, so what you know? And then what and

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 2>then what? The best way to inoculate yourself, by the way,

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 2>against the stuff is learn some history. And I don't

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 2>mean boring history. I've ever mean economic history. I just

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 2>mean history history. Things improve over time despite stuff. So

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 2>the Australians share market's gone up nine percent a year

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 2>on average, eight nine percent since about nineteen oh six.

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Credit Squiz put some numbers out. By the way, the

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 2>ASEX was the best performing stock market over that period

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 2>of time, which is pretty good, but only by a

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 2>hairsbreadth against the US now roughly nine percent a year.

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 2>They say six pp in a year, six point something

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>six point four. I think it was before inflation, so

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 2>you aduflation back, you're roughly nine, give or take. And

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 2>that happened despite all these things. Two World wars, the

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Korean War, the Vietnam War, two Iraq War was the

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 2>war in Afghanistan, the Great Depression, recessions before the Great Depressions,

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 2>right after the Great Depression before the Baby Boom, and

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 2>then for every seven or ten years after oil shocks

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 2>in the seventies, the GFC, the dot com crash, the

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 2>eighty seven stock market crash, stagflation in the early eighties.

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 2>If I feel like I'm giving a laundry list, I

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 2>haven't bet a live that long. But I've done the history.

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 2>My point is that over time things go on to

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 2>do better and big at Why because human ingenuity you

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 2>mentioned this before, Sonya. Unless we've hit peak ingenuity, unless

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 2>we've hit peak human development, human capacity, human potential. I

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 2>haven't even talked about AI. We won't. But man, I mean,

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 2>think about the opportunities that are coming for companies and

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 2>for people in a world where computer power is just

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 2>phenomenally large than it ever has been. If you're a

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 2>brave person to say, yeah, we hit peak capitalists, we

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 2>hit peak ingenuity, we hit peak development in twenty twenty four,

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be rubbish ever after. I mean, maybe it

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 2>will be, but jeers, there's a much chance of that

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 2>not really, So really, please please please look through the tariffs,

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 2>invest well, investing quality business. We talked about that, but

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 2>please do that. That's the point of the biggest takeaway

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 2>of the TARFFS. I hope so all the time we

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 2>spent on it is in hindsight they will think not

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 2>be as consequential to your wealth as you might think

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 2>fear looking forward because you can't see through them yet right,

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 2>so dot com crash, natact like eighty five percent. It

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 2>was an enormous wipeout right huge, and yet NAS it

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 2>went on a new Hives. The now the es people

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 2>in New Highs Yx went on New Hives. It wasn't

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the Bill and end all. Now don't I don't like them,

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't want them. I'm not saying we shouldn't have them.

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 2>If we didn't could avoid them, of course we shouldn't.

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 2>But if you can't avoid them, the nextperst thing is

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 2>to say they're here. What's the best way to make

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the best of them? And there's likely to invest anyway.

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 2>I think on the lecture, I've probably cover enough of that. Mate.

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:29.959
<v Speaker 2>The best thing, as I said, is to separate your

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 2>policy or your political brain from your investing brain. Don't

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 2>overthink it, don't extrapolate too much. I've seen plenty of

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 2>commentary on Twitter. Ah, this this, this party will kill

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 2>the economy, this party will kill it, and that, by

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the way, both say about each other, because that's just

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 2>what we do. It's not going to happen. Right. Are

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 2>some better or worse than the economy? Maybe? Probably? Do

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 2>we know that yet? I don't even know if we

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 2>know that yet. But you know, more more broadly, despite governments,

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 2>despite crashes, despite tariffs, despite all this stuff, human engineering

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 2>works right. Churchill said, democracy is the worst system except

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 2>for every other system that's been tried. My versionay, is

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 2>democratic capitalism right for all of its flaws, for all

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 2>of its problems, and I would fix them if I

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 2>had the choice. Maybe treasurer for six months is all

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 2>they'd need. But despite all those things, it still goes

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 2>on to create enormous wealth for people if you are

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 2>part of the system. Why, because it harnesses all that

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 2>human capacity and potential.

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 4>I think that people are really you know, the wealth

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 4>of experience.

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Now that we have been through a few of these things,

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we've caught up over the years about the

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 3>different periods of market volatility. So I mean, is there

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 3>anything you want to want to leave people with before

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 3>we wrap today?

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 2>The future is bright. The future is bright, and wins

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 2>for all the doom say. It's for all the doom

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and gloomers, for all the perma bears, for all the

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 2>people who are Oh it's raining, it's raining. The skies falling,

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Chicken little style, you know what. Bits of the sky

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 2>fall all the time, but the sky hasn't falling. The

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 2>future is bright. We will go on to bigger and

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 2>better and brighter things. You and I be talking in

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 2>five years time, Sonya and I we bet a reasonal

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 2>amount of money. The A six has hit another high,

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 2>probably another two or three on the way through. Maybe

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 2>it's even fallen out of ten percent on that journey

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 2>and come back up again. Vanguard have a great chart.

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I've banged on about it before. It's called their thirty

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 2>year Index chart. Ten thousand dollars invested in nineteen ninety

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 2>four was one hundred and thirty thousand dollars. Hypothetical amount

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 2>ten grand became one hundred and thirty thousand dollars. Despite

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 2>all these things I talked about, it happened over that

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 2>thirty year period, right, a thirty fold increase. It's about

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 2>the wars and the terrorisms and the recessions and the

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Covids and the all this stuff. Now, if you're added

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 2>money regularly, you're going to have even more than that.

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm not saying that'll be the next thirty years,

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 2>who knows. But also that average radar of that thirty

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 2>year period not dis similar to thirty years and the

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 2>thirties and thirty years before that. So the future is bright.

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Optimism wins. Look through the clouds and make sure you

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 2>can see the long term value being built by companies

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 2>and people right across the world and particularly on our

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 2>stock exchanges.

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 3>So one thing that did stand out from the data

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 3>was around optimism for Australians and a group that felt

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 3>least optimistic, we're younger Australians. Do you have anything to

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of share on that or what might be factoring

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 3>in the air.

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 2>I honestly, I started investing relatively early, but not as

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 2>early as I should have. And I hate you because

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 2>we have our own podcast. I regularly abuse and when

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 2>they very very good naturedly when they ride in because

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 2>they've got things. I want their time right. I want

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 2>to go back thirty years. I want to go and

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 2>invest more. I want to. I want to. I want

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 2>to set myself up even better because I know what

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 2>not because I know what the future did. Hat did bring,

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 2>but I know what the future can bring. If you're

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 2>a young person, I get By the way, why do

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 2>you feel Why do you feel bad? Housing is ridiculously expensive?

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 2>You've just seen the superannuation of fall. You haven't been

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 2>through these market cycles before, and you're like, oh my god,

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 2>this is investing. What are you people mad? Why would

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I do this thing right? Why would I feel good

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 2>about this? So I get that. I absolutely get it,

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 2>because you know, again, the one benefit of age other

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 2>than dodgy knees and less hair is is you kind

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 2>of have been there before and you see it saying

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 2>to happen. So yeah, I'm incredibly envious with young people

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 2>because they've got all the time in the world, whether

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 2>it's through superannuational, compulsory savings, whether I said, their ownly investing,

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 2>just the passing of time, right, I am. I am

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 2>so optimistic. I've got a twenty nine year old, an

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 2>eleven year old, twelve year old now, and I am

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 2>so jealous of their future because they have got an

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 2>amazing future ahead. And think about the technological changes. What's

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 2>going to happen in the world. Man, can you imagine it,

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 2>and yet they've got the time to actually enjoy that

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 2>and invest now. So what I want to say to

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 2>young people is retirement feels a very long time away.

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 2>That's why super is so great, because it makes you say,

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 2>when you're nineteen, you don't want to And I'm yet

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 2>to hear someone who's retired who hates superannuation. Please, people

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 2>working new, I want to have to put this money away.

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 2>If this is terrible, as horrible, I don't. I would

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 2>rather spend it. They get the hirement and go, oh man,

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I am so glad there's superannuation. So if you're a

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 2>young person listening, please say the course. Please believe that

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the future is bright. Please believe that we have a

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 2>system of democratic capitalism for all its failings, and we're

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 2>failing you on house prices right now, and change that

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 2>if I was in the Treasurer's chair for a while.

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 2>But investing will work for you. It will build wealth

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 2>over time. I can't give your carriage and allowed to

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 2>give you promises because otherwise the regulator will yell at me.

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Let me just say, in my very very very very

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 2>very strong opinion, the future is very bright. You have

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 2>so much time on your hands. The last message is

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>please keep contributing, whether it's adding to your own super

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 2>or tributing, investing in your own name through chases or otherwise.

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Please keep investing because the compound returns you get over time.

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 2>If you're listening to your twenty five now, you're probably

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna live to your ninety five. And no retirement's at

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the end. The retirement date is not the end of

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 2>your investing, right, it's about two thirds of the way

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 2>through your life. So you've got seventy five years to compound.

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 2>That is, do the mats on that, by the way,

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 2>it will blow your mind. And so yes, please be positive,

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Please be optimistic. I know it feels like it sucks.

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Take it for an old person. Things will get better.

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 2>They will deliver plenty of returns. Your compound returns will

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 2>be spectacular. Stay the course, keep investing. It'd be absolutely

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 2>worth it. Your retired self, well, thank you, and maybe

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 2>you might have been think of me when I'm long

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 2>dead and in the grove.

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 3>I love that, and it gives me a chance to

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 3>slip in my favorite or on buffet quote, which is

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 3>someone sitting in the shade because they've planted a tree

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 3>many years ago.

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 2>So I get a T shirt with that on it, Sonia,

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 2>I wear a T shirt with that quote. I love

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 2>that quote.

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>It's so good but just.

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Exactly what you're talking about, right, Like you don't know

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 3>it at the time, but you know over time it plays.

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Off plant the tree, baby, plant the thure, you know.

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 4>Thanks Scott, and thanks everyone for tuning in.

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 3>You can watch the episode on YouTube or listen in

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 3>on your favorite podcast at Leave us a message or

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 3>comment about what you'd like to hear in future episodes.