1
00:00:00,920 --> 00:00:02,679
Speaker 1: Hello, do you reckon she's got a case?

2
00:00:04,480 --> 00:00:10,360
Speaker 2: Ah? Boy, wow, I do? I mean, it's the defense

3
00:00:10,760 --> 00:00:13,480
Speaker 2: by Netflix will be the truth that they told the truth,

4
00:00:14,440 --> 00:00:17,960
Speaker 2: and so we're going to have a real life drama

5
00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:20,480
Speaker 2: play out before our eyes if the case ever goes

6
00:00:20,520 --> 00:00:20,920
Speaker 2: to court.

7
00:00:21,320 --> 00:00:23,800
Speaker 1: But they have to prove that they told the truth, right,

8
00:00:23,840 --> 00:00:26,239
Speaker 1: And it seems to me that the allegation that is

9
00:00:26,800 --> 00:00:28,920
Speaker 1: the difficult one at the stage is that she was

10
00:00:28,960 --> 00:00:31,560
Speaker 1: a twice convicted stalker and that she'd been to jail,

11
00:00:31,600 --> 00:00:33,959
Speaker 1: and as far as we know, there's no evidence publicly

12
00:00:34,080 --> 00:00:34,559
Speaker 1: that that is.

13
00:00:34,520 --> 00:00:40,320
Speaker 2: True, right, correct, Although there is some evidence that she

14
00:00:40,600 --> 00:00:44,159
Speaker 2: had been that she did have some legal trouble before,

15
00:00:44,520 --> 00:00:47,320
Speaker 2: but what the extent of it was really hasn't been

16
00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:49,560
Speaker 2: really hasn't come to light thus far.

17
00:00:50,280 --> 00:00:53,800
Speaker 1: Do Netflix have a case that they did everything within

18
00:00:53,880 --> 00:00:56,560
Speaker 1: their power to keep her identity secret and it was

19
00:00:56,600 --> 00:00:59,160
Speaker 1: out of their control that the Internet managed to uncover her.

20
00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:03,560
Speaker 2: I don't think so. As you said, the Internet managed

21
00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:06,679
Speaker 2: to uncover her, and it did so quite quickly. So

22
00:01:06,840 --> 00:01:09,480
Speaker 2: any defense that they might try to use of well,

23
00:01:09,520 --> 00:01:13,760
Speaker 2: we hit her identity that you know, we hit that

24
00:01:13,840 --> 00:01:15,920
Speaker 2: as best as we could. We hit it to you know,

25
00:01:16,040 --> 00:01:19,400
Speaker 2: the legal professional standard I think will fall flat, because

26
00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:21,720
Speaker 2: you know, the proof is in the pudding. The Internet

27
00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:25,000
Speaker 2: basically docks her in no time flat.

28
00:01:25,720 --> 00:01:28,760
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean this is tricky then, isn't it. For

29
00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:32,120
Speaker 1: anybody who wants to make some sort of documentary or

30
00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:34,640
Speaker 1: some sort of TV series like this and keep somebody anonymous,

31
00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:36,600
Speaker 1: They're going to have to go to quite extreme links

32
00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:40,120
Speaker 1: to hide the identity in the future, aren't they correct.

33
00:01:40,160 --> 00:01:44,120
Speaker 2: I mean we're seeing the human intelligence come together in

34
00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:47,000
Speaker 2: the form of the Internet. I mean Twitter can be

35
00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:50,960
Speaker 2: a force for good, you know, if we just set

36
00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:54,000
Speaker 2: our minds to it. And I think this is an

37
00:01:54,120 --> 00:01:56,720
Speaker 2: example of the power of the Internet and the power

38
00:01:56,800 --> 00:02:01,360
Speaker 2: of our collective intelligence being focused on a single point,

39
00:02:01,440 --> 00:02:06,800
Speaker 2: a single fact. And yeah, it really is. This is

40
00:02:06,800 --> 00:02:09,560
Speaker 2: going to be an extraordinary trial, Like I said, when

41
00:02:09,560 --> 00:02:11,799
Speaker 2: it gets to trial, or if it gets to a courtroom.

42
00:02:12,080 --> 00:02:16,400
Speaker 1: Joseph fifty million bucks in a California court Is that plausible?

43
00:02:19,440 --> 00:02:24,880
Speaker 2: It very much is, Yes, very much so. If if

44
00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:28,760
Speaker 2: the plaintiff were to prevail, she can prove all the

45
00:02:28,800 --> 00:02:32,920
Speaker 2: elements of everything. In other words, if she manages to

46
00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:39,839
Speaker 2: prove that that or defeat netflame. Netflix's defense of that. Hey,

47
00:02:39,880 --> 00:02:43,800
Speaker 2: this is the truth. She will certainly be owe damages

48
00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:45,520
Speaker 2: and I don't think this be on the pale at

49
00:02:45,560 --> 00:02:47,080
Speaker 2: all of fifty million dollars.

50
00:02:48,120 --> 00:02:51,360
Speaker 1: For more from Hither duplessy Ellen Drive, listen live to

51
00:02:51,400 --> 00:02:54,440
Speaker 1: news talks it'd be from four pm weekdays, or follow

52
00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:56,200
Speaker 1: the podcast on iHeartRadio.