WEBVTT - Crypto, Trump & NZX: 2024 in review

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>How do you revitalize New Zealand capital markets? And you

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>go through some of the investment houses and they've been

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>putting out articles one way or another, sometimes disguise, but

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>asking those re same questions, how does New Zealand capital

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>markets actually get a shot.

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 2>In the arm given that you know, there's a fair

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 2>amount of New Zealand beef that goes into the US,

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and I'm pretty sure a fair amount of that probably

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 2>goes onto McDonald's Burger's. Given Trump's interest in the Golden Archers,

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe there's a trade opportunity for us.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>The cryptocurrencies now have an investment legitimacy which will not

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>be broken notwithstanding what happens, and it will speed up

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>moves by central banks and other mainstream financial service providers

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to get into the space somehow.

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Cura and welcome to Shed Lunch, brought to you by Cheesy's.

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 3>My name is Helen Madison, and today on the program

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 3>we'll be looking back at twenty twenty five, the good,

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 3>the bad and the ugly, but we'll also be looking

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 3>towards twenty twenty five and Watson's Store. I'll be joined

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 3>by Giles Beckford, the business editor at R and Z

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 3>and Informetrics chief economist Brad Olsen. But before we get started,

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 3>he's some important information.

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Investing involves the risk you might lose the money you

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 4>start with. We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor.

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 4>We also recommend reading product disclosure documents before deciding to invest.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Everything you're about to see and here is current at

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 4>the time of recording.

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for coming in, Giles and Brad, Welcome to the

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 3>studio and our last episode of shed launch for twenty

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty four. Let's start with January this year when the

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:49.559
<v Speaker 3>Security and Exchange Commission that's the US regulator, actually approved

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin exchange traded funds. That's a real difference for crypto

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 3>and probably legitimizes the fact that it could be an

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 3>asset class. Giles, how do you think the feed since then?

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, that was the good housekeeping seal of approval, wasn't it.

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>When the SEC comes out and says, yeah, you know

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going future, and everybody figured, let's not play around

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>with actually getting into the crypto. Let's get into the

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>crypto operators. Hence the ETFs that got set up and bang,

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that was just the touching the blue paper and away

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it went, and all we've seen since then is just

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a complete appreciation. Right, it's dominated by bitcoin. You have

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to say that there's much about the crypto scene which

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>is still dodgy. It is questionable. You just know that

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>there's so much dark stuff happening under the surface, and

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the amount of crypto that's been stolen so much for

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it being necessarily secure investment. But all that aside. Once

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>the bandwagon gets rolling, everybody keeps chasing the train, and

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>that's what's happening. And with the prospect now with the

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>new Trump administration saying you know, we're going to make

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>it easier, when you've got the likes of Musk being

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>able to hype it up in particular doge, how coincidental

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 1>is it that the new department he's going to run

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to take out the red tape and make government more

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>efficient and cheaper and easier as the acronym doge as well.

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, oh, it's a complete meme, right, I mean,

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.839
<v Speaker 1>and they're not going to have the US government sealed there.

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>What they're going to have, in fact, is probably the

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>portrait of being on Musk right behind every employee there.

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>But you have to say that cryptocurrencies now have an

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>investment legitimacy, which will not be broken notwithstanding what happens,

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and it will speed up moves by central banks and

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>other mainstream financial service providers to get into the space.

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Somehow, I think it's well though. I mean, yes, it

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 2>legitimized it a touch, but I think it also gave

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 2>it a crypto more generally, a bit of an easier

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 2>entry method, and rather than people having to figure out

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 2>how their own wallets and everything else worked, you know,

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 2>you didn't have to go through all the hoopla that

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 2>was sometimes either a bit dangerous, dodgy or otherwise, and

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 2>it actually just made it a little bit more convenient

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 2>through those ETFs and similar I mean, there's still, I think,

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 2>like you say, a lot of caution, a lot of

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 2>worry in some areas about it, and people are still

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 2>dropping new coins all the time. And there was another

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 2>popular one the other day, the hop tour Girl released

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 2>a coin that you know, shot up in price and

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 2>then immediately crashed ninety percent. So again, some people are

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 2>still putting some pretty serious money into things that they're

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 2>not fully or aren't fully regulated. But now there's a

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 2>little bit more of I guess some guardrails around it.

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 2>That provides a little bit more legitimate to So you're right.

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>It would be interesting to see actually how firm those guardrails

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>are because the US will set the standard for regulation

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.559
<v Speaker 1>and everyone else is going to take it around the world.

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Like about one of the bigger operators here in New Zealand,

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and we've spoken to them a few times recently. They

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I think are probably being extremely responsible by saying, look,

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>do your due diligence, right, but don't take this as

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>being the be all and end all of your investment future.

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>This firm whom I won't name, but they're saying, look,

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 1>regard crypto as say a five percent part of a

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>diversified portfolio, right, just be sensible. And I'm thinking these

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>are people who are actually going to earn money out

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of it, but they're taking a really responsible view, trying

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to advise people and keep the custom.

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Well that that's with everything though, right, I mean, the

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>risk conversation is always the biggest one. I still all

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 2>the time, all through this year, all through the last

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 2>couple have people coming up and there generally three questions

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 2>that people on the street want to know. You know,

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 2>what's the housing market going to do, What's my personal

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 2>interest rate that I should fix on for and what's

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 2>my investment strategy? And I always go back, well, what's

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 2>your tolerance? You know, if you're real happy to sort

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 2>of maybe put it all on on one thing and

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 2>it'll either blow up or blow down, as the case

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 2>might be, then then that's cool for you, if you're

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 2>willing to lose it all or gain it all. But

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of other people who aren't, it's then going, well,

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 2>how do I sort of match things through? So you're

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 2>totally right, that's a much more appropriate response and sort

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 2>of plow it all in on the one option and

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of hope that hope, like heck it works.

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Sticking with the US, guys, I'm just thinking Donald Trump,

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 3>president elect. Tariffs has been a big topic, and what

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 3>will happen to New Zealand In other countries, uncertainty seems

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 3>to be what we're going for in twenty twenty five, Brad,

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 3>What are you thinking given the US is our second

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 3>largest trading partner.

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, and that's only happened this year, right, the

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Chinese economy hasn't been going as well. We've now been

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 2>doing more with the US because their economy has been

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot stronger. That's great, But equally you're right that

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing more uncertain times, but perhaps we're seeing more

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 2>certain uncertainty. You know, it's going to be maybe not

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 2>as volatile, but there's just so many moving parts that

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 2>are sort of heading forward. So I think increasingly when

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 2>we're looking at the US markets and more generally the

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 2>US economy, I think we know that we're in for

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 2>quite a lot. You saw some of those early talks

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 2>this year by Trump saying, look, I might levy tariff's

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 2>on Mexico, Canada, and China. Now knew about China, we

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't necessarily know who was going to be first off

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the ranks for the other ones. But again, the reaction

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 2>that had one changed the currency around quite a bit

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 2>for New Zealand. But also some of our providers like

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 2>so Officier and Piker Will they've got manufacturing sites in

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Mexico that supply North America. So I think it also

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 2>highlighted to us again sort of the importance in the

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 2>financial system that the US occupies. We've known that for

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 2>a long time, but it's been a bit more latent

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 2>or background, and now all of a sudden it's back

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>to the forefront, because whatever happens there will have sort

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 2>of ripple effects and maybe bigger ripples than before through

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>to the rest of US.

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Trump's last administration it's slightly indicative of how

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>we might feel the whole thing about tariffs and the like.

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, the one thing that sort of directly affected us,

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and it was only small fry, was aluminium steel, which

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs cost us in the region of say six

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>million bucks I think over that period. But the bigger impact,

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact was the paralysis that attached and Trump brought

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to the World Trade Organization. Now we believe in the

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>World Trade Organization because it's the referee of the world

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>trading system. It's rules based, and little people like this,

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>when you haven't got financial clout right, you've got to

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>rely on the rules to help you. And the Trump

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>administration last time round, they basically froze the WTO into inactivity.

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:55.439
<v Speaker 1>They made it impotent as a trade referee, very simply

0:08:55.520 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>just because they refused to nominate people to be appellate

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>judges to work out the disputes between people who trying

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to work out. What's interesting for me is it sheds

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a light that there are a significant

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>number of small New Zealand tech companies who have domiciled

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>themselves essentially in the States, and that might be our

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>little secret back door, right that we've got Kiwi firms

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>doing business in the States who will actually be to

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>some extent insulated. Right, they actually might get the advantage

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of these sorts of things. But we'll wait and see

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>on that one. Trump. Look, there's more bluff and bluster

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>right than you would find Niagara Falls.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, you just don't know, and I think that's one

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>of the big challenges for everyone, not only in New

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Zealand but around the world. You're just not sure what

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 2>is ever going to necessarily come through. I mean, the

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 2>wider tone I think from this is that trade is

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 2>going to be more difficult, which is not great news

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 2>for New Zealand. Equally, I've been quite impressed that this year,

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, we have had a greater focus on trade deals.

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 2>We've got with the UAE, We've got trade deals with

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 2>the Golf Cooperation Council, we've got some with Costa ECRA

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 2>in Switzerland recently. So is still a lot of good

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 2>moves there. We've had in the last couple of years,

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 2>both the EU and the UK Free Trade Agreement, So

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 2>we've still got a lot of options out there, but

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that trading environment is more difficult. The challenge,

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 2>I think is that the US economy is still such

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 2>a hefty part of the global market that you know,

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 2>this year, for example, we saw that when our meat

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 2>wasn't going as well into China, we could pivot that

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 2>quite quickly a lot of it, not all of it,

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of it into the US because they've

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>got the lowest beef stocks and I think seventy years,

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 2>so you know, that's where we can send our meat. Now,

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 2>it does always come through. And you know, we've talked

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 2>about not only the tariffs but the possible exemptions that

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 2>maybe we need to try and focus on because Trump

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 2>won't be looking to target New Zealand, it'll just be

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 2>probably across the board thing. But given that, you know,

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>there's a fair amount of New Zealand beef that goes

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 2>into the US, and I'm pretty sure a fair amount

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 2>of that probably goes into McDonald's burgers. Given Trump's interest

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 2>in the Golden Archers, maybe maybe there's a trade opportunity

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 2>for US there, or you know, some sort of exemption.

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 2>But I mean just the consumption numbers that you're seeing

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 2>in the US. They are spending like no tomorrow. And

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 2>I must say, looking at the markets as well, there's

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 2>part of me that goes, we're too next. I mean

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 2>that just what's going on there.

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm keen to see what you think of that, Giles too,

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 3>because the tech stocks and video and the like, it's

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 3>been insane, but there seems to be no bottom.

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't know, let's be honest. You know, things

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>can run their course. We've been through these sorts of

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>cycles in the pastime thinking that I've been around so long, Right,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the Internet wasn't invented when they started journalism. Microsoft was

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>just a twinkle in Bill Gates's eye. But what then

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>turned out was that we are we very quickly had

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble bang right just on the turn

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>near the late nineties, right, we had the e commerce

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>like that. You know, everybody built so much promise into it,

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>right bang it fell away. But I think, you know,

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got to say that the tech stocks now they

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>have such clouts. You know, when the likes of Nnvidia

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is what one hundred times bigger than the New Zealand economy,

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's evaluation of it, so like that, you go, yeah,

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>they're probably here to stay. It's the games that the

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>investment funds want to play, I think, and where the

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>technology will take us where we see that you know,

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence will be the driver for two, three, four,

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>five years, right, the invidios of this world and all

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>the other chip makers and the associated tech companies must

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to thrive. The Magnificent seven. Who knows if there'll

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>actually be seven or seventeen or three allies all the

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>same companies and who will own them. I mean politics

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>comes in to play because there's a lot of Chinese

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>influence in that tech sector, like it or not, and

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>do the politics of a Trump administration wants to punish

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese, as we've just actually seen in the past

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>few days where there's a district court judgment in the

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>States right that TikTok's got TikTok's got to be divested.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And so from that point of view, you know, technologies

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>here of the state, there will all be companies and

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>money that drive that. We're going to see more boom,

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think. But I think we're just going to say

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>there will be busts somewhere as well.

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Well. It has been interesting. I saw a chart the

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>other day that because let's be clear, this is mostly

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 2>about the US markets. It's not that generally you know,

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 2>stocks and equities and that are just on a rocket

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 2>ship to the moon. It's the US. And I saw

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 2>something the other day I think that said that, you know,

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the US markets are you know, now so far away

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 2>relative to Europe. It's like the biggest the GAP's ever

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 2>been in terms of sort of you know, the positioning

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>on the US compared to Europe. And I mean that

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 2>does highlight that again, there's a lot of growth and fundamentals,

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of money going in there, there's a

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of consumer spending. But I go, the markets are

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 2>high when interest rates have been high. If interest rates

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 2>then come down normally that would stimulate a greater level

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 2>of investment in spending, which would then put the markets higher.

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 2>So if the markets are high when interest rates are high,

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and when they're low, then, like you say, I mean,

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 2>my question is when does it turn around? But I

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 2>mean the reality is you look at the sorts of

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 2>numbers that New Zealanders invest, we do put it into

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 2>the US as well. We're not alone in that fact.

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 2>So there seems to be correct me up from Wronghound,

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 2>but there seems to be sort of quite a focus

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>there on people wanting to look at it well.

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I find interesting though, is that you talk about how

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the US is just well ahead of the rest of

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the world. Is that also introduces distortion into capital allocation

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>around the world, And you've got to say, well, if

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the US is sucking it all up or is putting

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>most of its own resources into the sector, right, how's

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the rest.

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Of the world going with the rest of it?

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>That's right? Where's ourbit right?

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, that leads me to the fact that here in

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand we've had our highest trading days ever at

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Cheersey's a lot of that is US fueled because everybody

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 3>sees great returns, prospects, etc. They're not seeing the same

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 3>with our own market. Then dead X and Giles. You know,

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 3>there's been a few shockers and terms of earnings, there's

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 3>many companies I could talk about, Spark in New Zealand,

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 3>the Warehouse, the list goes on.

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's the incredible shrinking inz X, isn't it. You

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>contrast it with thirty forty years ago where it was

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>well driven, well supported. But the in X, you have

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to say, has just not being able to make any

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>headway in persuading local companies that the exchange is the

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>place for them. What is the ENDINEX for? Essentially, it's

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a way of raising money. Why do you invest in it? Well,

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>because you, as an investor have confidence in the way

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>companies are run. You would have to save that over

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the past two to three years in particular, and the

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>case for some companies for the past decade, they've been

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>less than competently run. Right, And I was channeling up

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the number of companies in this country that have not

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>been paying dividends for the past couple of years. There's

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>some really big ones, right, Sky City, Fletcher Building in

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand, some of the retail stocks, right, But they're

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>all saying we're saving our cash, well, saving the cash, well,

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>saving the cash actually to cover some rather big holes

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in their balance sheets because they made really bad decisions.

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's one of the features is that

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the level of corporate governance and commercial nous that's been

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>applied by some of our publicly listed companies has been

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>shown to be woefully inadequate. Leave aside the one off

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>effects of the pandemic because everybody got a kick in

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the backside and a kick in the balance sheet for that.

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Well and good, but you have to say that, you know,

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the level of shareholder return and the New Zealand market

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is essentially supported by investors who want dividends. That's what

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.959
<v Speaker 1>it's all about. It tells you everything that the NSINEX fifty,

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the benchmark index, includes dividends, right, a lot of other

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>places around the world it doesn't. And I think that

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people will have been woefully disappointed. And

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you can see why people don't have much enthusiasm for

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>actually getting in there. If there's going to be a

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>big IPO. Say, you know, let's just pretend bank k gosh,

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't they just the spectral vision on the horizon? Now

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that's going to save us? Or Kiwi Bank?

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Are they?

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>But the point being is that say Kibibank were to list,

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody would be in like the way that people were

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in for the gent tailors, right, Meridian, Mighty River Power.

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 3>We're talking twenty eight, aren't we, now, Child, Well, if

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 3>it happens.

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>At all, it may not happen in any of our

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>investing lifetimes.

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I've got a lot of time.

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, but I mean I think, you know, serious

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>questions come down to how do you revitalize New Zealand

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>capital markets? And you go through some of the investment

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>houses and they've been putting out articles one way or another,

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes disguise, been asking those very same questions, how does

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand capital markets actually get a shot on the arm,

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure that anybody's actually got a reasonable

0:18:58.640 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>answer about that.

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, the question I start to ask is, you know,

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 2>when does this come to a head, Because you've got

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 2>those the issues with just canvas, the fact that increasingly

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 2>seems to be a trend of businesses that are either

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 2>looking to only list on the Australian markets in Australian Exchange,

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 2>or they're actually going unlisted here in New Zealand because

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 2>they don't want all the big obligations and the costs.

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.360
<v Speaker 2>And so I think one of the reasons that you're

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 2>not seeing, for example, there as many young people. I

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.199
<v Speaker 2>know that there's an easy way to vote now and

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 2>I've done that myself with Macheesy's app, But I look

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 2>at that and I do find that a lot of

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 2>times people go, well, I've continued to get the same results,

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 2>and I feel like, you know, it's not like I

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 2>can put up a director or eything else. You know,

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I've sort of got to vote on the pictures that

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.479
<v Speaker 2>are made by those that sort of seem to have

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 2>more of the power. What's the point. I'm sort of

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 2>just voting for the same old, same old. So I

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 2>think there is a real lack of engagement and a

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 2>real level of disappointment amongst investors, but who are voting

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 2>with their wallets and going, well, stuff it, I'll find

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 2>something better, and they are.

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The one little candle of confidence, if I can

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>call it that, is that I like the more assertive

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and prominent attitude that the Shareholders Association has taken in

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the past few years, where they've been willing to stand

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>up whether it's big company or small company and saying

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>what you're proposing isn't good. It works against the interests

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>of small shareholders and us be honest, you know, the

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Shareholders Association looks after little folks, little folk like me

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>who've got their three hundred shares and you know ABC

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, and we we feel the person who's got

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>ten million shares right, well, we've done so why bothered?

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we've got some sort of return. But

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the Sharehold Association says no, you know, big company or

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>small companies say you've got a standard of care and

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the standard of duty and a fiscal, a fiduciary and

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>legal obligation to look after all shareholders, big or small. Right,

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>So I applaud the Shareholder Association. I actually I think

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that if there was an organization to belong to as

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>an investor, that would be one that you would look

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>at and say it's worth giving our support, because if

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody's going to be a voice against some of the

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>bigger powers, it'll be then.

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 2>There's been a bit more sort of talk as well,

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 2>I feel this year and last as well about sort

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 2>of putting your money where your mouth is, you know,

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.239
<v Speaker 2>making sure that for some of those people who are

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 2>on boards and even a management you know that they

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 2>need to have some skin in the game to recognize

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>why this loss of value and the lack of outcome

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 2>is actually important. And I mean you brought up keep Bank,

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 2>and I sort of feel like that's sort of similar there.

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 2>I find it pretty difficult to stomach the idea that

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 2>the government thinks that having a bank is so good,

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 2>but it's not good enough for them to bank with.

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Why on earth does a bank? Does a government own

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 2>a bank that they're not willing to do work with?

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of banks, and one of the things that did

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 3>happen in twenty twenty four is interest rates, which obviously

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 3>banks have a big part in play, thinking, Brad, we're

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 3>on the downward cycle, but it doesn't feel like it's

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 3>champagne time. It's caution still. What's your view on where

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 3>we're going to get to in twenty twenty five.

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I think the big thing with interest rates at the

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 2>moment is we're looking for where the new goldilocks owners,

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 2>where is the new normal, because it might not be

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 2>exactly where it was pre pandemic in twenty nineteen. And

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 2>I think the difference as well this time is we're

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 2>not trying to stimulate the economy. We're trying to take

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 2>our foot off the break and stop restraining it. If

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 2>you look at where the official cash rade is expected

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 2>to end out around that sort of three ish percent,

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 2>maybe three and a half percent, that's still quite a

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 2>bit above where it was in twenty nineteen. So I

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 2>think that that's the sort of the different tone it's

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 2>we're trying to unlock the economy, but we're not trying

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 2>to put any sort of boost or noss behind it.

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 2>We're just trying to get it back to a normal,

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 2>solid level of operation. So that will be different. I

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 2>think when we're looking at sort of the next year,

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 2>there's been a lot more front loading of those intrast

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 2>rate cuts by the Reserve Bank, and there seems to

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 2>be a bit more front loading that the retail banks

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 2>have done as well on mortgage rates and the likes

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 2>of savings rates and similar as well. So I do

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 2>wonder there will be further next year. There will be

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 2>more to come, but I think that we're possibly closer

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 2>to the bottom of interest rates than we might think.

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 2>It's just that it will take a while, I think,

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 2>for households to refix. So there's probably another six months

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 2>of quite challenging conditions until midyear when a lot more

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 2>people every fix that all of a sudden got a

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 2>bit more money that they're not spending on the mortgage,

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 2>they can spend that on other things. Business sales start

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 2>to perk up a bit. Businesses then need a bit

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 2>more resource, start to hire a bit more, and you

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 2>start to get again that more I guess it is

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 2>solid level of economic activity. It's it's not economic goal drums,

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 2>but it's not the rocket ship to the moon stuff either.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Interestingly, just before I came here this morning, one of

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>our leading clothing retailers just reported to the internet saying,

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>our sales are up ten percent for the first eighteen

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>weeks of our trading year, and go ten percent. That's great,

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And I said, but you should have seen what they

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>were like last year, so a ten percent rise isn't

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that great. But they made the comment that they found

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>their margins were actually stable in an environment where everybody

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>else would be doing deep discounting just to get goods

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 1>out the door, right, and to get cash into the tools,

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that whole turnover piece, right, just running fast to stay still.

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And from that point of view, you know, there's been

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a real pressure on margins. In the end, I think

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of firms were hanging on by their fingertips

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>through the pandemic. They were saved by wage subsidies and

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the other cheap finance schemes that came through from the government.

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And now that that TAP's been largely turned off, right,

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and people like Treasury and the banks are saying, well,

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>we lent you, you know, five hundred thousand dollars during the pandemic.

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Excuse us, can we have some of it back? Right

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in an environment where they're still paying high money for

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>their working cash when they're not making sales and wage

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>bills are Actually we should note there that their wage

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>costs have gone up quite considerably as well. So looking

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>at that throw it all together, Yeah, you can see

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>why more businesses are failing, and we.

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 3>Probably will have some more failures, you think, o.

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Bounty, I mean, you've got well, four hundred and thirty

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>six thousand people. I think by the last Centric report,

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we're in their debt areas, right, four hundred and thirty

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 1>six Now you say, you know, that's enormous. The number

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of liquidations of companies is double in the past year

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>or so, in particular construction, retails, a hospital.

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 2>It is interesting, though, because I feel like we're sort

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 2>of back into a almost an economic purgatory position where

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 2>you've got those business closures coming through. You've still got

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 2>some pretty tough operating conditions through in the economy. But

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 2>at the same time you are looking at the likes

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 2>of electronic card data are starting to pick up ever

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 2>so slightly. It's still down on a year ago, but

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 2>it's picking up slightly, and I think it highlights that

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 2>there's still that level of cause amongst consumers that when

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 2>we've looked at that, how that spending has sort of

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 2>changed consumable so you know, your supermarket spend your essentials

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 2>is pretty stable and solid. Your durables, your big items,

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 2>your electronics and couches, and that's still pretty lackluster.

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 3>One of the other features of twenty twenty four was

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 3>we had the introduction of climate reporting and that's four

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 3>entities I think that have got one billion in assets.

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 3>It feels quite mixed reaction. We've had what would you say, Giles.

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Well, we had two big reports out in the past

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. One was from the Financial Markets Authority,

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>who have got the oversight for the climate reporting entities.

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Those big firms that you were talking about. They said, well,

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm generally speaking, people have sular got to

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>grips were that, but there areas of need for improvement

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and we've got the view that some firms actually probably

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 1>still haven't quite got the grips of what they're supposed

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to say and what they're supposed to measure and how

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they're supposed to present the information. Some of them were

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>accentuating the positive, right and should we say, well the

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>dirty word, but exactly they were green washing. And then

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>there was a report by Forsyth Bar who looked at

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>those companies on the nz X who were putting out

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the ESG reporting and they do a carbon component as well,

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and they said the ones who have got to grips

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 1>with that are the gent tailors. And the reason why,

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, is because they've got some of the biggest

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>carbon emissions, so they actually they measure, they know the cost,

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they're moving to mitigate racings. They've got the whole renewable

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>energy side to their business as well. They're fine. Other

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>companies are trailing quite a way back. Everybody's making an effort.

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought the interesting comment that came out of the

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>FMA report was that cost of compliance, even for a

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>small firm, a smallish firm, you can be spending a

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>million dollars or more to actually do this report or

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to do these reports. It's required by law for those

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>entities of being who meet that criteria, but you know,

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's taking up a lot of time, there's a

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>whole industry now in ESG reporting. So all those firms

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that we're doing consultancy on smart tax avoidance sorry, tax

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>minimization schemes right are now doing reports on how to

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>do your ESG reporting. That's a new side of their business.

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 2>See. That's my worry as well, though, is that we're

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 2>effectively creating a whole another cottage industry. And in fact,

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 2>you get some of the businesses who, you know, I

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 2>don't know if it's been public or reporter, but a

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 2>few every now and then seem to suggest that actually,

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 2>thus spending more on compliance, that they've actually had to

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 2>strip out some of their budget for doing stuff on

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 2>the climate, for supporting you know, the adaptation and mitigation

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 2>to just fill out the forms and do some of

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 2>that reporting, and that seems a little bit over the top.

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 2>There has been I think some common sense changes that

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 2>have come through from the External Reporting Board and that

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 2>that have sort of pushed out the expectations of how

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 2>quickly a whole lot of the additional reporting has to

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 2>come through. And that's important, And my sort of worry is,

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 2>like I totally think we need to do this quite clearly.

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 2>It's important more importantly from a business point of view,

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 2>you're seeing a lot of our overseas operators, those who

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 2>are buying from New Zealand businesses saying I need you

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 2>to do this, otherwise I won't buy from you. So

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 2>like there's a business imperative there for it, but I

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 2>feel like there's got to be a slightly smart way

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 2>of going about it. Then making everyone do all of

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 2>this paperwork that might have some value but maybe isn't

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 2>all going as easily to plan, isn't quite as cheap

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 2>to produce, and more importantly diverts resources away. That there's

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 2>got to be a better middle ground there. It was

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 2>encouraging though at least what my sort of one positive

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 2>on that broader climate landscape was at least the emission's

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 2>trading scheme got a few credits sold this year because

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 2>market I mean, there was nothing before and it's i

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.719
<v Speaker 2>mean again still not working like it should be, but

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the fact that there was actually a few bit of

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 2>a look up.

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't, like buy some cute carbon credits. I've just

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>got a few times.

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 2>If I could buy some, I probably would. I mean,

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 2>one of the disappointing things this year as as an economist,

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're always looking at numbers. Was that actually

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 2>some of the transparency on the carbon markets was taken

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 2>away when Jarden's closed, the sort of public fronting on

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 2>carbon and price supporting. So, I mean, it's one of

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 2>those things. I feel like the government still got a

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of work to do there to make everyone actually

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 2>realize that you do need to do this stuff, rather

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 2>than at the moment it still seems like everyone's like, yeah, okay,

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 2>we get it, but you don't seem committed. So I

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know if I need to be committed well, which

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 2>is a bad place.

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Interestingly, of course, the government before it came into power

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was counting on a rather robust ets to be able

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to furnish some money for them, which actually hasn't emerged.

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 2>There's no money in the kiddy for that.

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, You hat another pressure on the scores.

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:03.959
<v Speaker 3>Now, guys, we've talked about a lot of things, and

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot of them are a little bit depressing. We

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 3>need to lift the tempos somewhat. What are you thinking

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty five, I'll start with you, Giles, is

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 3>going to be a positive for New Zealand.

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we're just actually going to be more cheerful.

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're no now, I mean, and that's.

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 2>That's where it starts. It's that positivity there.

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, a sunny disposition of disposition even if the weather

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play ball. But I think people you're feeling it already, right,

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>People talk positive, right. I mean the number of people

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I talk to now are actually saying it won't be thrive, right,

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but we've survived right well and good you're right.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Next year I think will be better quite simply because

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 2>people's mortgages are coming down like that. We've seen that effect.

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Monetary policy did very well to curb economic activity when

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 2>they were high. Now they're coming down. It will give

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 2>people a bit more money. So I think as we

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 2>go through next year it won't hit the first of January.

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Everything is all that quickly better. But that sort of

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 2>talk around you know, green shirts, and I've been talking

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 2>about it quite a lot. I feel like the sunflower

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 2>comes out a bit more around midyear, if you will,

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 2>because that's when the spending will come through. And again,

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you can't break the economy down this simply,

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 2>but sometimes you have to try. Once households are spending

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 2>a bit more, they will go and put that into

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 2>out into businesses, and similar to those businesses, once they

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 2>have a bit more activity, they've got some runs on

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the board, they need a few more people to work

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 2>through that. That then stimulates a bit more employment. The

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 2>unemployment rate drops a bit, more spending happen. So again

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 2>I think you're right, We're just onto a more solid

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 2>footing next year.

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of spending, then, Brad, what are you thinking for

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 3>spending for Christmas? What about gifting? How do you feel

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 3>about that?

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Personally? I really struggle with present shopping one. It's just

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 2>the crowd sort of you know. I struggle with those enough.

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 2>But as a good economist, the sort of lowest transaction

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 2>value is to give people cash. In fact, a bank

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 2>transfer would be better. Now some people say it's very unsentimental, Charles,

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you've got a view on how

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 2>you gift, but I'm a big fan of cash and money.

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 2>That's a much better option for me, very easy. Whoever

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gifting it to, they can choose whatever they want.

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>The best gift I think I can give actually is

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>my time. Right is to be actually with You can't

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>put a price on it other than to say right

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>when I have a family gathering, I come away uplifted, right,

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and I hope that you know, they gain a little

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>something from me. And so time is the most important thing.

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think Look, we speak about peace on earth,

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>good world war people right for Christmas, why don't we

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>do it for three hundred and sixty five days of

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the year. Actually, that's the key issue. I know it

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't generate a lot of money. I know Brad's economic

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 1>philip won't you know, necessarily get that boost, But so

0:33:55.400 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>be it right, if we're actually better mentally within our

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>own family structures, that actually, to me is the foundation

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of a good economy.

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's with many more things we could talk about. Guys,

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much for coming in today and being

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 3>with us for our last episode of the year, and

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 3>thanks listeners for joining us. You can watch Shared Lunch

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 3>on YouTube, or you can follow us on your favorite

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 3>podcast app. Leave us a rating and tell us what

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 3>you'd like to hear next. Merry Christmas and Martewar