WEBVTT - ASX: Insights, earnings & outlook

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to this episode of Shared Lunch. We

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>were going to focus on the Australian market off the

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>back of the recent earning season.

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 2>We're also going to chat about what to.

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Look for when investing in small to medium sized companies.

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Investing involves for risk you might lose the money you

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 3>start with. We recommend talking to a licensed financial advisor.

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 3>We also recommend reading product disclosure documents before deciding to invest.

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 3>Everything you're about to see and here is current at

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 3>the time of recording.

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>My name's Sonya Williams. I'm the co founder and co

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>CEO at Shears's and today I'm joined by the City

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>based Michelle Lopez, head of Australasian Equities and portfolio manager

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>at Pie Funds. Welcome, Michelle, Hi, Sonja. Before we get started,

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land,

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>water and sky on which we come to you from today,

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the Gettigill people of the Aura nation, and pay my

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>respects to their elders, past, present and emerging.

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>So thanks Heeps for joining us. Michelle.

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Before we get into it chatting all things a six,

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>can you tell us about you and what does a

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>day to day look like for you.

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 5>Sure.

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 4>Firstly, thanks very much for having me on your podcast, Sonya.

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm always really happy to share a bit about the

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 4>exciting world of investing and really what.

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 5>Moves and shakes it.

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 4>So, as you mentioned, I'm based here in Sydney, and

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 4>as the accent is probably given away, I am at

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 4>Aussie and by a way of background, I joined Pithon's

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 4>early last year in twenty twenty three as a portfolio

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 4>manager and as you mentioned, head of this Australation equity team,

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 4>and I brought with me probably twenty years of experience

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 4>investing inequities, most recently as the head of OSSI Equities

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 4>at a large global fund manager, where I trained very

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 4>much much on the job as a fundamental analyst and really.

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 5>Lucky to have learned.

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 4>From some incredibly well respected and successful portfolio managers and

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 4>fund managers in the region.

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Markets are volatile of nature, and especially of late we've

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>seen the A six has been down in the recent

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>days due to some concerns around the US growth. Did

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>this have any bearing to the end of the earning

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>season in Australia. Yes, so.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 5>August which we've just come out of.

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 4>You would think was a pretty you know, benign month

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 4>if you looked at the performance over the month, which

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:44.119
<v Speaker 4>was virtually flat, but it certainly had a lot of volatility.

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 4>And to your point, Sonya, the first week of August,

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, we had a five percent draw down which

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 4>was which is quite brutal, and then it just recovered

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 4>all of that as we sort of progressed through it.

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 5>To your point, yes, a.

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Big driver was started coming out of the US, but

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 4>as as you would.

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 5>Know, August is really all about earnings.

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.839
<v Speaker 4>For US and companies reporting, so we saw a lot

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 4>of big moves just on a stop by stock basis.

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 4>And again if I sort of think through and I

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 4>considered the earnings outcomes, again at a high level, it

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 4>looked like it was quite evenly matched between companies that

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 4>beat expectations and those that missed expectations. But again looking

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 4>underneath the surface, there was there was a lot of

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 4>callouts from the reporting season. The first, first and biggest

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 4>trend that we saw and this probably isn't going to

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 4>be a surprise for most was really around the cost

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 4>of living pressures and these remained persistent and widespread. So

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 4>there are a number of companies referring to changed consumer

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 4>behaviors in response to kind of household budget pressures.

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 5>And this was across the board, So this.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 4>Was retailers, it was supermarkets, which you think are quite defensive,

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 4>It was the utility players, it was travel. However, I

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 4>would actually say that the consumer has shown great resilience

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 4>if you think about sort of where we've come from

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 4>from an interest rate perspective and inflation being really high,

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 4>and in fact we're starting to see signs that the

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 4>trough in the consumer activity is could be behind us.

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 4>So that'd be the first one. The second one is margins.

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 4>So interesting that ebit DA, which is earnings before interest, tax,

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 4>depreciation and amaltization, which is quite a common terminology in

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 4>our market. The margins were revised lower for every single

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 4>sector throughout August, and you know, one of the key

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 4>drivers obviously inflation. But in our view again looking forward,

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 4>which is really important is we feel that the margins

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 4>should begin to recover from here. So we are seeing

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 4>cost stabilize and importantly we're seeing labor supply improving and

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 4>then maybe the final ones balance sheets.

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 5>So balance sheets are strong.

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 4>So the Australian corporates have remained lowly geared and they've

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 4>had shown actually very little appetite to lever up. As

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 4>you would know, we're probably at an inflection point from

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 4>a rates perspective in Australia. We're lagging probably New Zealand

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 4>in that sense, so there is an expectation that cuts

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 4>will come next you And again we'll say kind of

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 4>where the balance sheets go from there, but it's meant

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 4>that there's been.

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 5>A number of buybacks that companies have been able to do.

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 4>The other thing I'd probably highlight from reporting season is

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 4>more on the guidance and the outlook statements. And again

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 4>the one thing was where companies did provide guidance, they

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 4>were very it was very conservatively set as I mentioned

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 4>the living and interest rate on uncertainties, and that actually

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 4>meant that downgrades outpaced upgrades. If you look into the

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 4>next fiscal year so FY twenty five, and on average

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 4>forty six percent of the companies had earnings downgrades and

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 4>that sort of versus twenty percent that had upgrades. So

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 4>again there was a skew to having revisions revised downwards

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 4>earnings revised downwards.

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and when you say the downgrades and upgrades, do

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>you want to just explain that what you mean by that.

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, of course, So upgrades.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 4>It essentially means that the management provide guidance that is

0:06:55.640 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 4>ahead of where market expectations are. So in our world,

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 4>earnings really drives share prices, so having an understanding of

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 4>where earnings are going.

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 5>So an upgrade is now we think earnings are going.

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 4>To be higher next year than what we originally thought,

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 4>and downgrades is the inverse of that.

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 5>So we've had to revise earnings.

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Down in light of what management commentary has been.

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And so were there any surprises or anything that struck

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>struck you as surprising?

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 6>There's always surprises, So there's always surprises, and by surprises,

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 6>the direct correlation here is just share price moves.

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 4>So when we look at the beat versus miss ratio,

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 4>a couple of things to call out. So from a

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 4>sector perspective, we had healthcare the highest rates of beats,

0:07:56.320 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 4>and then we had energy and utilities as the highest

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 4>rate of misses. But to your question on surprises, you know,

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 4>when I look at share price reactions, and in fact

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 4>I pulled out I pulled out a report just just

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 4>before our meeting, and they actually gave some numbers around

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 4>this which I thought was quite interesting.

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 5>This is a JP Morgan report, but as you'd.

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Expect, so if it met expectations, share price was benign

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 4>and in line with market. If they beat consensus by

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 4>more than two percent, that those that bucket of companies

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 4>outperformed by three percent. So in a flat market, which

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 4>was what we had in August, they are up three

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 4>percent as a whole.

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 5>The interesting part is the missus.

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 4>So those companies that missed expectations by two percent or more,

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 4>that group actually fell by six percent.

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 5>And that's that skew to the downside.

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Is why you'll hear industry veterans saying all the time

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 4>arou our reporting season that the goal is really to

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:07.239
<v Speaker 4>avoid the blowups.

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 5>Because you can see that skew.

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 4>Companies that exceeded by two percent were up three those

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 4>that disappointed by two percent were down six.

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Are there any particular industries that you're keeping your eye

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on over the next six months.

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I suppose i'd call out.

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 4>I'd probably call out three again months is a very

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 4>very short time horizon for us. But let me just

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 4>call something out and then I'll cave.

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 5>It all of it. But the first one would probably.

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 4>Be infrastructure and construction so we've got a really solid pipeline.

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 4>It's actually one point seven trillion worth of work for

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 4>the next seven years, and importantly, this continues to be replenished,

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 4>so there's a real tailwind within that set. And then

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 4>if I can just narrow it in more construction. In particular,

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 4>there's two hundred and forty thousand new homes that are

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 4>required annually to achieve government supply targets. We're well below

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 4>that level from an approvals perspective, and this has been

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 4>a problem now for a couple of years, but it's

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 4>really coming to a head. We've got a chronic shortage

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 4>of in housing and we need to see this addressed.

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 4>So I think over the next six months that's one

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 4>that I've sort.

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 5>Of been looking I'll be looking at closely.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 4>The second one is probably those consumer exposed sectors.

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 5>So as I mentioned earlier, we are starting.

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 4>To see signs of a trough and consumer activity. We've

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 4>had retailers come up with trading updates throughout sort of

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 4>July and into August and showing an improvement, not a

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.119
<v Speaker 4>huge improvement, but at least it's positive.

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 5>So again, we've got tax cuts.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 4>That have started to filter through the economy, and we've

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 4>got interest rate cuts coming next year, so I think

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 4>that's going to be quite stimulatory for the consumer. And

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 4>then finally, just real estate, with interest rates now sort

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 4>of entering a new phase. I think that's going to

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 4>look interesting from a valuation perspective. But as I mentioned,

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 4>look that that's just kind of sectors, and importantly for US,

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 4>we're bottom up fundamental investors, and that means that we

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 4>approach investing at the company level rather than kind of

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 4>at a sector level.

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And are there any big milestones or announcements that you're

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>coming up that you think will impact the markets in

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>any way?

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Oh, there's always announcements. I mean, you just don't know

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 4>what you're going to wake up to and sort.

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 5>Of overnight moves.

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 4>But I mean, I suppose the very near term ones

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 4>that we're look looking for.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.599
<v Speaker 5>You know, macro data out of the US is always important.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 4>Payrolls which we've had just very recently, we're about to

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 4>enter or we're in the campaigning of the politic of

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 4>the US elections, that that could have quite an impact

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 4>on our market from a policy setting perspective.

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 5>The other big sort of announcements or I suppose.

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 4>External factors if you wanted to call it, that is

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 4>just commodity prices. Just to be aware that our market

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 4>is quite levered to commodity prices for better or worse.

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, they represent a large part of our exports.

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 4>So any data and announcements around China policy will have

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 4>will have an impact, will have an impact there as well.

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so that's a nice threat to follow there around like,

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the external factors that impact the

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 1>Australian market.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I suppose, like most countries, Australia is absolutely

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 4>intertwined with global markets, so we really can't say we

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 4>sort of stand alone. So there's always going to be

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 4>external factors. I mentioned commodities. That's a big one for

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 4>us if you think about and the reason for that

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 4>if you think about the top three contributors to trade,

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 4>So our biggest exports there Idal, CALL and LNG, so

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 4>again really important.

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.479
<v Speaker 5>Just the demand for those in particular.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 4>The other one I would probably call out, and this

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 4>is again not just for Australia, but you know, geopolitics

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 4>can can really impact sort of markets and then the

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 4>energy situation.

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 5>So I try to desensitize.

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Sort of big words and I don't think it's a crisis,

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 4>so we'll call it the energy transition. But again that's

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 4>that's what's proving out, is that it's slower and it's

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 4>harder than what maybe we had hoped for and what

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 4>government's policy had had sort of factored in.

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 5>And what we've also found out is it's most.

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Likely going to need gas, so we've had no hydrogen

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 4>as as an example of a renewable source that we

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 4>were trying to develop, capitals being.

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 5>Sort of pulled out actually one of the major.

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 4>Ones just because there the returns are not there, so

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 4>to stimulate that level. So that's a you know, the

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 4>energy transition is another one that's that's playing playing out

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 4>in our market.

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>So with the US election coming up, like how does

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that vector into how you know your investing decisions?

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Taking a step back, what do elections mean? It could

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 4>potentially make a change in And the difficult part at

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 4>this juncture is the Biden Harris administration haven't got firm

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 4>policies in place. I think the Trump jd Vance does

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 4>have all a bit more and it's the one thing

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 4>I would say is both parties are going to be

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 4>very stimulatory, and this is typically quite positive for equity

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 4>markets if I think about the risks either one way

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 4>or the other that we're considering, So renewables as a really.

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 5>Topical policy, the Inflation Reduction Act.

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 4>Which was introduced by Biden, that stimulated a lot of

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 4>investment into renewables, a lot of incentives into that.

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 5>Part of the market.

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 4>So a question mark around whether that remains under Trump.

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 4>I would say it's difficult to unwind something like that.

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 4>So although it's a risk, I would say it's a hugely.

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 5>Likely to happen.

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 4>But I think in totality we're not overly concerned one

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 4>way or the other what way it falls and lands.

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 4>We're positioned and we've positioned our portfolio such that there's

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 4>no great risk either way, and in fact we see

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 4>it as a positive, a stimulatory type of response from

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 4>both parties.

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Like now kind of honing in on one of the

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>funds that you offer, talking about, you know, managing the

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>risk or how you look at creating those things.

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 2>One of the interesting things.

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>About the PIG High Growth Fund is that you look

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of small to medium listed companies. What

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>do you define as small to medium, Like we've heard

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the big companies or the big industries, like, yeah,

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>how do you define that?

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Yes, So there's probably two ways to look at it. Firstly,

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 4>is just market cap, so the size of the business

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 4>itself and small we've just given our given our size

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 4>at the moment, we really do need to be mindful

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 4>of liquidity risk, so we kind of say from the

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 4>small end of two hundred million market cap all the

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 4>way up to say fifteen billion for a mid size business.

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 4>And you know, we deliberately try to keep our vestable

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 4>universe as broad as we can and as deep as possible.

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 4>We don't want to limit ourselves within that. So that's

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 4>the first kind of categorization. It's by market cap, it's

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 4>by size. The second way to look at it, which

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 4>is which is properly industry practice, is more is around

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 4>the indices that they're in. So we focus on the

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 4>small ordinaries for small caps, which is anything from if

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 4>I think about size of companies stopping UMBER one hundred

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 4>and one, so X one hundred all the way down

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 4>to the three hundred mark. And then for midcaps, we

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 4>look at everything outside of the X fifty, so the

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 4>top fifty names we tend to classify as large cap.

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Is the way that you consider those different to how

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you would consider some of the larger companies, like how

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you evaluate them.

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Good question.

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 5>I think.

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Look, the approach to investing and what we call our

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 4>guess our investment process is very consistent regardless of the

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 4>size of the company. So the characteristics that we're looking

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 4>for in the businesses, which again we could probably to

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:42.959
<v Speaker 4>a whole nother podcast on that because it's kind of

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 4>obviously live and breathe and love it, so but the

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 4>characteristics themselves and the kind of questions that we're trying

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 4>to solve for are consistent.

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 5>The one thing I would say, though, and the reason

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 5>why we have.

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 4>A preference for the smaller MidCap over the large cap,

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 4>is that potential for our performance is a lot greater

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 4>within the smaller MidCap space.

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 5>And there's a number of reasons for that.

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 4>The first ones that they're much there's much less research

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 4>available on them, and that allows for some more mispricing opportunities,

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 4>and it's also a much less efficient part of the market.

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 4>So again that potential for our performance is there. The

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 4>other thing I'd say around small caps is that the

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 4>growth is typically stronger. So when you think about the

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 4>companies that they're typically younger companies, they're at an earlier

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 4>stage of development, so that growth trajectory is stronger. And

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 4>then the final piece which has probably missed a little bits,

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, merger and acquisition or i PO so initial

0:19:56.000 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 4>public offerings. Within our markets, they've been a constant tailwind

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 4>for smaller mid caps, and in fact, ninety five percent

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 4>of merger and acquisition targets in terms of the number

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 4>of deals have been in companies that have got a

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 4>market cap of less than US fifty bill and the

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 4>average premium that they get when they're bid for is

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 4>you know, thirty to forty percent, and that's created a

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.719
<v Speaker 4>really strong tailwind within that part of the market. So

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 4>that's the differences i'd call out between sort of the

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 4>large versus smaller mid But what we're looking for in

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 4>a company would be consistently applied in the.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 5>Large type as well.

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Some would say that the A six provides more retail

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>or better retail opportunities than the insidets currently. What do

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you think about this or what do you think the

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>main points of difference are.

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it just comes back to the depth

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 4>of opportunities. Really, there's just much more or many more

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:03.719
<v Speaker 4>stocks in Australia. There's a greater diversity of companies and

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 4>industries available for us to invest in. You know, New

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 4>Zealand traditionally has been quite a high yield market, dominated

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 4>by infrastructure and property names, and whilst there's actually a

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 4>very strong concentration in the Australian large cap part of

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 4>the market. So if you think banks, you know, the

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 4>big miners, a couple of supermarkets. If you strip that out,

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 4>and again maybe one of the reasons we tend to

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 4>focus on smaller MidCap it offers a real diversity of

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 4>businesses and in fact there's some real global leaders amongst

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 4>that pack as well. So I suppose if I had

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 4>to just really zoom out, it would be that that

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 4>there's just more stocks, greater depth of opportunities. Having said that, though,

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 4>I think for the first time, well the first time

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 4>since I joined PI eighteen months ago, we're seriously looking

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 4>at some New Zealand investments. You know that there are

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 4>companies over there with very solid fundamentals, and importantly, share

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 4>prices at the moment are probably factoring in continued kind

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 4>of challenges and derma and gloom that the NZ market

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 4>has really muddled through and.

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 5>That presents some really good buying opportunities.

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Right, So we're absolutely not dismissing New Zealand, and I

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 4>think probably this is the time to start really kicking

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 4>the tires.

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 2>What kind of opportunities do you see?

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 4>There's a two that we're sort of really down. We're

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 4>doing quite detailed work on. One of them is actually

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 4>in the logistics company. And again, what we like about

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 4>this investment opportunity in particular is, yes, there's a large

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 4>proportion of their earnings tied and pinned to the New

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 4>Zealand economy, which we think is at an inflection point.

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 4>But they've also so that's the near term sort of

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 4>thesis and earnings driver. But then they've all I got

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 4>optionality and upside through a US through the US side

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 4>of the business. So again that's that's one. The other

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 4>one is more in the property side of things. So

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 4>again with interest rates being quite high in Zealand up

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 4>until recently, and also you know, the valuation of a

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 4>lot of these property companies have come down in a

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 4>training you know, at book value or well below book value,

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 4>and this particular company has got a really strong pipeline

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 4>of development sort of in the age care space. So

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 4>again that's just a couple of examples that we're looking

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 4>at that the valuation we think underpins quite a bit of.

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 5>Upside from here.

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, one company, if it springs to mind, that you

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 1>wish you invested in ten years ago, and why you

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>know what, this.

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 4>One's easy for me because I also wish I invested

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 4>in a PA. You know what for me, it's Promedicuse

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Promedicus is. It's a healthcare IT company specializing in.

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 5>Radiology imaging software. And I have been I have been a.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 4>Shareholder from a professional capacity, and it's in the funds today.

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 5>But the stock was a dollar ten years ago.

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 4>I think it was a dollar. I'll have to check that.

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it was a dollar close to a dollar.

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 4>It's one hundred and fifty today, so you know, but

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 4>that that type of return, I'm not sure there are many,

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 4>if any other companies. And importantly, this was not just

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 4>a one hit wonder. It wasn't just that they I

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 4>don't know, hit drill results in a gold mine and

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 4>character this has been a really consistent compounder. And you know,

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 4>it's a super high quality business. It's like and sorry

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 4>by high quality the revenues are recurring, so it's it's

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, locked in revenues five percent locked in through

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 4>very long term contracts.

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 5>The profit margins are industry leading.

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 4>They've got a globally leading product, their customers and their

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 4>clients are top deer academic universities in the US, so

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 4>you know, think Mayo, you know, and importantly, a really

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 4>solid earnings trajectory. Even as we stand here today, they've

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 4>got a very clear pathway to be generating thirty percent

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 4>per annum for the next three probably ten years. And

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 4>the reason is their penetration is still very low. They're

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 4>you know, seven percent penetrated. And they've got new adjacencies

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 4>so I mentioned radiology, they're getting into cardiology, they're you know,

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 4>just being accredited the highest level of security for the

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 4>US Department of Defense.

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 5>So there's all these other growth avenues. So yeah, I

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 5>still am an investor, and I still think that there's.

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 4>A really long trajectory of growth. But I don't think

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 4>we're going to get the fifteen thousand percent return. I

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 4>think it was for a dollar to a dollar fifty

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:12.239
<v Speaker 4>for the next ten years. But I think we can

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 4>get a really solid consistent return still yeah.

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And do you think, like the power of hindsight,

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think there would have been signs signs ten

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago that would have would have like what would

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>have been the signs ten years ago that it was

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>getting to end up on that path? Yeah.

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean I probably started investing in this company six

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 4>years ago, seven six or seven years ago, I would say, yeah,

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 4>I just I think this is a really good example

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 4>of a company that when you see these really solid

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 4>fundamentals and you can see a global market and they're

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 4>winning off the major incumbent companies like Phillips and Semens,

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 4>it's it's clearly gaining traction and you've got to listen

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 4>and the repeatability of it. So if they're able to

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 4>do that consistently for three four years, you know, I

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 4>think sometimes valuation is evaluation has been the real blocking

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 4>reason people haven't been invested in it. But I think

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 4>you need to approach a company like this from a

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 4>different lens, from a valuation perspective. Yeah.

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, thanks thanks for joining us, Michelle and sharing your

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 2>insights with us.

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 5>No, it's been pleasure, been absolute pleasure. So thanks for having.

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Me awesome and thanks everyone for tuning in. You can

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Watch this Shared Lunch episode on YouTube, or follow the

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast on your favorite podcast app. Leave us a rating

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:46.959
<v Speaker 1>and a comment about what you'd like to hear about next.

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Thanks everyone, and goodbye.