WEBVTT - Leighton Smith Podcast #266 - November 20th 2024 - Dr Michael Johnston

0:00:09.133 --> 0:00:12.013
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from news Talks It be

0:00:12.413 --> 0:00:16.373
<v Speaker 1>follow this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.

0:00:16.733 --> 0:00:19.733
<v Speaker 2>It's time for all the attitude, all the opinion, all

0:00:19.773 --> 0:00:22.453
<v Speaker 2>the information, all the debates.

0:00:21.933 --> 0:00:27.533
<v Speaker 1>Off now the Layton Smith podcast powered by news Talks It.

0:00:27.613 --> 0:00:30.413
<v Speaker 3>Be Welcome to podcasts number two hundred and sixty six

0:00:30.533 --> 0:00:33.853
<v Speaker 3>for November twenty, twenty twenty four. Now I know I

0:00:33.893 --> 0:00:36.533
<v Speaker 3>spend a lot of time on matters relating to education.

0:00:37.053 --> 0:00:40.853
<v Speaker 3>It is because of the importance of schooling, and not

0:00:40.893 --> 0:00:44.853
<v Speaker 3>just schooling, but universities and other forms of education in

0:00:44.933 --> 0:00:48.533
<v Speaker 3>the interests of the individual and the country. It's much

0:00:48.573 --> 0:00:51.933
<v Speaker 3>the same story over most of the world, but especially

0:00:52.093 --> 0:00:56.773
<v Speaker 3>in Anglo speaking countries, the headwinds that have battered many

0:00:56.853 --> 0:00:59.813
<v Speaker 3>lives and destroyed reputations. By that, I means schools and

0:00:59.973 --> 0:01:04.453
<v Speaker 3>universities have been difficult to counter. The interview with doctor

0:01:04.453 --> 0:01:08.013
<v Speaker 3>Michael Johnson is I think quite revealing and should be

0:01:08.053 --> 0:01:10.733
<v Speaker 3>heard by a wide range of people. Please do not

0:01:10.893 --> 0:01:15.173
<v Speaker 3>hesitate to send it to anyone you think come is relevant.

0:01:15.773 --> 0:01:20.293
<v Speaker 3>And by that I mean parents, grandparents, teachers, kids, And

0:01:20.413 --> 0:01:23.173
<v Speaker 3>it was hearing the intent of Donald Trump to eliminate

0:01:23.213 --> 0:01:27.013
<v Speaker 3>the Department of Education in the United States that inspired

0:01:27.053 --> 0:01:30.413
<v Speaker 3>by contacting Michael to invite him on, and he was

0:01:30.453 --> 0:01:33.533
<v Speaker 3>only too happy to He has plenty to say. At

0:01:33.533 --> 0:01:36.773
<v Speaker 3>the back end of two double six, we make reference

0:01:36.853 --> 0:01:39.693
<v Speaker 3>to other matters that are of interest to most of you,

0:01:40.053 --> 0:01:42.893
<v Speaker 3>that are of interest to most of you, the WHO,

0:01:42.973 --> 0:01:48.213
<v Speaker 3>the World Health Organization, the trashing of Parliament being amongst them,

0:01:48.253 --> 0:01:54.333
<v Speaker 3>an artificial intelligence, and democracy also. But next Michael Johnson.

0:02:11.133 --> 0:02:14.133
<v Speaker 3>Education has been a battleground for as long as I

0:02:14.173 --> 0:02:18.333
<v Speaker 3>can remember, a war zone between specifically left and right,

0:02:18.573 --> 0:02:22.853
<v Speaker 3>socialism and freedom. Michael Johnson has had a lengthy career

0:02:22.853 --> 0:02:27.613
<v Speaker 3>in education at all levels. He was when I became

0:02:27.693 --> 0:02:31.813
<v Speaker 3>aware of him, he was at Victoria University. He is now.

0:02:32.413 --> 0:02:36.253
<v Speaker 3>He leads the education work at the New Zealand Initiative,

0:02:36.413 --> 0:02:39.053
<v Speaker 3>which is doing good things in spite of what you

0:02:39.173 --> 0:02:43.933
<v Speaker 3>might read about it occasionally in well in the commentary

0:02:43.933 --> 0:02:48.493
<v Speaker 3>from some of some of the media. Michael Johnson, we've

0:02:48.493 --> 0:02:50.293
<v Speaker 3>had you on the podcast before, of course, you know,

0:02:50.413 --> 0:02:56.693
<v Speaker 3>stranger to people on this particular platform, and I have

0:02:56.733 --> 0:02:57.773
<v Speaker 3>to say it's always good to.

0:02:57.693 --> 0:03:00.293
<v Speaker 2>Talk with you, and you it's great to be here.

0:03:00.933 --> 0:03:03.533
<v Speaker 3>Now, would you disagree with anything I've said so far

0:03:03.653 --> 0:03:05.293
<v Speaker 3>about education being a battleground.

0:03:05.533 --> 0:03:09.253
<v Speaker 4>I think it is a battleground. To describe it as

0:03:09.293 --> 0:03:12.853
<v Speaker 4>a battle between left and right to me kind of odd.

0:03:13.013 --> 0:03:16.253
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it non pluses me to an extent that

0:03:16.933 --> 0:03:20.093
<v Speaker 4>it is such a political battleground. And the reason I

0:03:20.133 --> 0:03:23.333
<v Speaker 4>say that is, actually we have quite a wealth of

0:03:23.373 --> 0:03:28.173
<v Speaker 4>evidence on what effective teaching looks like and how to

0:03:28.613 --> 0:03:32.213
<v Speaker 4>teach children to read, for example, and how to teach

0:03:32.253 --> 0:03:38.093
<v Speaker 4>them in general along the lines of understanding human information processing,

0:03:38.173 --> 0:03:41.573
<v Speaker 4>human memory, human attention, this kind of thing, and also

0:03:41.653 --> 0:03:45.013
<v Speaker 4>the necessity for children not to be stressed in order

0:03:45.053 --> 0:03:48.893
<v Speaker 4>to learn best. There's all kinds of things that we know,

0:03:49.693 --> 0:03:52.453
<v Speaker 4>and so why it needs to be a political battle

0:03:53.213 --> 0:03:57.413
<v Speaker 4>is a little strange. And certainly why there is a

0:03:57.493 --> 0:04:01.333
<v Speaker 4>conflict between left and right if indeed the distinction left

0:04:01.373 --> 0:04:05.253
<v Speaker 4>and right really makes sense in the modern political context.

0:04:05.773 --> 0:04:08.013
<v Speaker 4>So I think that's the only thing that I would

0:04:08.093 --> 0:04:11.293
<v Speaker 4>question about your introduction, is what we mean by left

0:04:11.333 --> 0:04:14.533
<v Speaker 4>and right and why things have turned out the way

0:04:14.573 --> 0:04:18.613
<v Speaker 4>they have. I guess part of it is patch protection

0:04:18.773 --> 0:04:22.293
<v Speaker 4>on the part of the unions. They tend to oppose

0:04:22.333 --> 0:04:26.973
<v Speaker 4>things like charter schools. They oppose things like structuring teachers

0:04:27.053 --> 0:04:31.013
<v Speaker 4>careers so that they get paids according to the quality

0:04:31.013 --> 0:04:33.613
<v Speaker 4>of their practice rather than how long that been teachers,

0:04:34.693 --> 0:04:37.453
<v Speaker 4>which is the current scenario. So there are certainly some

0:04:37.493 --> 0:04:43.253
<v Speaker 4>specific things that the unions influence labor governments over which

0:04:43.333 --> 0:04:49.893
<v Speaker 4>makes reform more difficult, But I think the fundamental ground

0:04:49.893 --> 0:04:53.373
<v Speaker 4>of the battle is deeper than that. Arguably it goes

0:04:53.413 --> 0:04:58.373
<v Speaker 4>back as far as philosophers like junjak Russo, who saw

0:04:58.533 --> 0:05:01.613
<v Speaker 4>children as coming into the world more or less perfectly formed,

0:05:01.813 --> 0:05:04.693
<v Speaker 4>and we messed them up when we've put them in

0:05:04.733 --> 0:05:11.693
<v Speaker 4>formal education systems versus I guess a more pragmatic view

0:05:11.773 --> 0:05:15.093
<v Speaker 4>of human beings, which is that there's there's a great

0:05:15.093 --> 0:05:19.453
<v Speaker 4>deal of knowledge and disciplinary ideas that have to be

0:05:21.053 --> 0:05:24.773
<v Speaker 4>inculcated in children and young people in order to make

0:05:24.813 --> 0:05:30.653
<v Speaker 4>them effective citizens. So there is that disagreement about learning itself.

0:05:31.973 --> 0:05:35.533
<v Speaker 4>But really pragmatically, I think that we actually have good

0:05:35.573 --> 0:05:39.933
<v Speaker 4>evidence on how education systems best function.

0:05:40.533 --> 0:05:44.253
<v Speaker 3>And okay, let me let me ask you. Let me

0:05:44.253 --> 0:05:46.573
<v Speaker 3>ask you a question. Would you would you feel more

0:05:46.573 --> 0:05:50.053
<v Speaker 3>comfortable with progressives versus conservatives?

0:05:50.573 --> 0:05:54.453
<v Speaker 4>Well, it depends what you mean in their educational context.

0:05:55.613 --> 0:05:58.413
<v Speaker 3>Levy. Let me let me take it a step further

0:05:58.493 --> 0:06:01.853
<v Speaker 3>than you say that we know the best way to

0:06:01.893 --> 0:06:02.453
<v Speaker 3>do things.

0:06:03.533 --> 0:06:06.733
<v Speaker 2>We have very good scientific, scientific evidence.

0:06:07.893 --> 0:06:13.333
<v Speaker 3>So so open classrooms. Where does that fall in that scenario.

0:06:14.253 --> 0:06:17.533
<v Speaker 4>Well, open classrooms have no evidence space for them at all,

0:06:17.613 --> 0:06:20.053
<v Speaker 4>and that turned out to be quite a catastrophe, and

0:06:20.453 --> 0:06:26.413
<v Speaker 4>many schools are now trying to reverse the situation building

0:06:26.453 --> 0:06:31.773
<v Speaker 4>walls to recreate cellular classrooms. Now, that whole thing was

0:06:31.813 --> 0:06:35.533
<v Speaker 4>bizarre because it entailed spending a huge amount of money

0:06:35.573 --> 0:06:38.853
<v Speaker 4>with no evidence space, against the will of many schools.

0:06:39.253 --> 0:06:44.693
<v Speaker 3>But doesn't that forward of the category of progressivism.

0:06:46.853 --> 0:06:47.853
<v Speaker 2>Arguably it does.

0:06:48.013 --> 0:06:51.053
<v Speaker 4>The rationale that was used by the ministry for forcing

0:06:51.093 --> 0:06:56.853
<v Speaker 4>schools to build these environments was a progressivist agenda. I

0:06:56.893 --> 0:07:00.733
<v Speaker 4>think that's true. It was about, you know, child centered,

0:07:00.813 --> 0:07:04.853
<v Speaker 4>child led education, and the idea that if we created

0:07:04.893 --> 0:07:09.533
<v Speaker 4>these big barns and allowed children to roam around in them,

0:07:09.613 --> 0:07:13.173
<v Speaker 4>that they would, you know, acquire the knowledge they need.

0:07:13.533 --> 0:07:15.893
<v Speaker 4>And that is a very Roussouian sort of argument.

0:07:16.093 --> 0:07:18.493
<v Speaker 3>That was going to be my next point. So let

0:07:18.613 --> 0:07:25.653
<v Speaker 3>me move on then to teaching literacy. Yes, well, teaching

0:07:25.733 --> 0:07:31.413
<v Speaker 3>teaching literacy the way that they adopted some time back, Yes,

0:07:31.493 --> 0:07:32.453
<v Speaker 3>in this country.

0:07:32.173 --> 0:07:36.013
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that's a very interesting story, and I wondered for

0:07:36.053 --> 0:07:39.813
<v Speaker 4>a long time what the basis of the so called

0:07:39.853 --> 0:07:43.373
<v Speaker 4>whole language approach was and where it went wrong. So

0:07:43.813 --> 0:07:46.733
<v Speaker 4>just for listeners to be clear that the whole language

0:07:46.773 --> 0:07:53.613
<v Speaker 4>method involves exposing children to books and enabling them or

0:07:53.693 --> 0:07:57.533
<v Speaker 4>encouraging them to use what they call multiple cues to

0:07:57.573 --> 0:08:00.093
<v Speaker 4>get the meaning of a word. So it might be,

0:08:00.533 --> 0:08:02.733
<v Speaker 4>you know, the shape of the word itself, it might

0:08:02.773 --> 0:08:04.973
<v Speaker 4>be some illustrations on the page, it might be the

0:08:04.973 --> 0:08:08.253
<v Speaker 4>context of the sentence. And the trouble with that is

0:08:08.413 --> 0:08:11.413
<v Speaker 4>that it disperses attension across all of these different cues

0:08:11.453 --> 0:08:14.173
<v Speaker 4>instead of focusing it on the one that gives them

0:08:14.453 --> 0:08:16.773
<v Speaker 4>the most information, which is the spelling of the word

0:08:17.013 --> 0:08:19.453
<v Speaker 4>and the correspondence between that spelling and the sound of

0:08:19.493 --> 0:08:24.733
<v Speaker 4>the word. And it also ignores the very great cognitive

0:08:24.813 --> 0:08:28.133
<v Speaker 4>load that is imposed when a child is first learning

0:08:28.173 --> 0:08:30.773
<v Speaker 4>to read. It is a very difficult task. And so

0:08:31.053 --> 0:08:35.053
<v Speaker 4>just focusing them on the most important information is what

0:08:35.133 --> 0:08:38.333
<v Speaker 4>builds fluency the quickest, and there's a huge amount of

0:08:38.493 --> 0:08:40.973
<v Speaker 4>evidence for that. But to turn to the question of

0:08:41.013 --> 0:08:44.853
<v Speaker 4>why the whole language method got going in the first place,

0:08:45.213 --> 0:08:48.653
<v Speaker 4>it comes back to a confusion about the difference between

0:08:49.413 --> 0:08:55.333
<v Speaker 4>oral language or spoken language, and literacy. So oral language

0:08:55.773 --> 0:09:00.773
<v Speaker 4>is a human universal. All cultures have oral language, and interestingly,

0:09:00.973 --> 0:09:04.373
<v Speaker 4>it seems to be a biological function in the sense that, well,

0:09:04.413 --> 0:09:07.773
<v Speaker 4>anybody who has brought up a child themselves or been

0:09:07.773 --> 0:09:11.813
<v Speaker 4>around very young children is amazed by the fact that

0:09:12.133 --> 0:09:16.493
<v Speaker 4>a child acquires language in their second and third years

0:09:16.493 --> 0:09:20.253
<v Speaker 4>of life at an incredible rate without anybody explicitly teaching

0:09:20.253 --> 0:09:23.293
<v Speaker 4>them anything. And so there seems to be some sort

0:09:23.333 --> 0:09:26.933
<v Speaker 4>of attemplate in the human brain that enables us to

0:09:26.973 --> 0:09:30.653
<v Speaker 4>acquire language in that way. But literacy is not like that.

0:09:31.173 --> 0:09:35.413
<v Speaker 4>Literacy is not a cultural universal. It's about three and

0:09:35.413 --> 0:09:38.733
<v Speaker 4>a half thousand years old at most, and until about

0:09:38.733 --> 0:09:42.453
<v Speaker 4>two hundred years ago, very few people were literate, and

0:09:42.933 --> 0:09:46.973
<v Speaker 4>so literacy is actually better described as a technology rather

0:09:46.973 --> 0:09:51.573
<v Speaker 4>than a biological function. And it's a big cognitive task

0:09:51.653 --> 0:09:55.533
<v Speaker 4>to read and write, and so we need to take

0:09:55.533 --> 0:09:59.493
<v Speaker 4>a structured, measured approach to how we teach it, and

0:09:59.533 --> 0:10:03.013
<v Speaker 4>we do have very good scientific evidence now on how

0:10:03.013 --> 0:10:06.413
<v Speaker 4>to do that, which is by focusing on the correspondence

0:10:06.413 --> 0:10:07.493
<v Speaker 4>between spelling and sound.

0:10:07.773 --> 0:10:10.133
<v Speaker 3>At first, well, let me go back to what I

0:10:10.173 --> 0:10:12.893
<v Speaker 3>was really going to start with, but as usual I didn't.

0:10:13.213 --> 0:10:17.453
<v Speaker 3>What is there about the New Zealand education system that's good.

0:10:18.853 --> 0:10:20.693
<v Speaker 2>Jee, That's a tough one.

0:10:21.293 --> 0:10:23.773
<v Speaker 4>At the moment, we've got quite the malaise in our

0:10:23.893 --> 0:10:29.813
<v Speaker 4>education system. Our teachers are not well trained by universities

0:10:30.333 --> 0:10:36.053
<v Speaker 4>and I liken it to some extent of committing untrained

0:10:36.053 --> 0:10:39.733
<v Speaker 4>soldiers to a war zone. And that sounds dramatic that

0:10:39.973 --> 0:10:42.413
<v Speaker 4>consider that we have something like a third of our

0:10:42.453 --> 0:10:46.053
<v Speaker 4>teachers dropping out of the profession within their first few

0:10:46.133 --> 0:10:50.573
<v Speaker 4>years of practice. And the roots of that is that

0:10:51.053 --> 0:10:57.133
<v Speaker 4>the university programs for training teachers don't focus on classroom

0:10:57.173 --> 0:11:01.573
<v Speaker 4>management nearly enough, and so our teachers start in the

0:11:01.573 --> 0:11:06.093
<v Speaker 4>classroom not knowing how to establish order in those classrooms. Well,

0:11:06.093 --> 0:11:10.173
<v Speaker 4>if you've got classrooms that are not well ordered, you've

0:11:10.173 --> 0:11:15.293
<v Speaker 4>got no chance of teaching effectively. So that's the very

0:11:15.293 --> 0:11:21.293
<v Speaker 4>foundations which are missing. Until now, we've had a curriculum

0:11:21.733 --> 0:11:24.853
<v Speaker 4>that is very loose and doesn't specify very much at

0:11:24.893 --> 0:11:27.173
<v Speaker 4>all in terms of what should be taught in our schools.

0:11:27.413 --> 0:11:32.653
<v Speaker 4>That's changing with Minister Stanford's reforms and as of next

0:11:32.733 --> 0:11:36.413
<v Speaker 4>year there will be new curricula for English and mathematics

0:11:37.893 --> 0:11:41.093
<v Speaker 4>in our primary schools. That will be followed by more

0:11:41.133 --> 0:11:44.853
<v Speaker 4>curriculum development over the next couple of years until we

0:11:45.013 --> 0:11:48.293
<v Speaker 4>do have a knowledge rich curriculum. So I would say

0:11:48.293 --> 0:11:51.693
<v Speaker 4>that's a good direction that we're going in to look

0:11:51.733 --> 0:11:56.093
<v Speaker 4>for something nice to say about our education system. But

0:11:56.213 --> 0:11:58.093
<v Speaker 4>you know, the other thing that we need to talk

0:11:58.093 --> 0:12:01.773
<v Speaker 4>about is how our schools are organized. At the moment,

0:12:02.653 --> 0:12:06.493
<v Speaker 4>they're all independent crown agencies and there isn't nearly enough

0:12:06.533 --> 0:12:12.653
<v Speaker 4>cooperation between schools, and that drives I would say, increasing

0:12:13.213 --> 0:12:18.093
<v Speaker 4>educational inequality over time. Because schools that are well provisioned

0:12:18.653 --> 0:12:23.173
<v Speaker 4>with I would say parental resources in communities where their

0:12:23.213 --> 0:12:26.773
<v Speaker 4>boards can bring on board lawyers and accountants and so on.

0:12:27.973 --> 0:12:31.373
<v Speaker 4>Those schools that buy and large well governed and functional

0:12:31.533 --> 0:12:35.013
<v Speaker 4>a lot better than schools that lack those resources. So

0:12:35.333 --> 0:12:37.853
<v Speaker 4>I think we need to find a way to bring

0:12:37.893 --> 0:12:44.293
<v Speaker 4>schools together into more functional communities of schools where those

0:12:44.373 --> 0:12:51.213
<v Speaker 4>who are operating in better off communities can really share

0:12:51.213 --> 0:12:53.413
<v Speaker 4>their resources a bit more with those who are not,

0:12:53.653 --> 0:12:58.333
<v Speaker 4>and try to really get to grips with educational inequality,

0:12:58.413 --> 0:13:02.813
<v Speaker 4>because not only do we have falling standards in things

0:13:02.893 --> 0:13:07.133
<v Speaker 4>like literacy and numeracy, and that's been well discussed in

0:13:07.173 --> 0:13:10.573
<v Speaker 4>the media. Also have some of the largest gaps in

0:13:10.613 --> 0:13:13.653
<v Speaker 4>the world between the young people who do the best

0:13:13.733 --> 0:13:16.213
<v Speaker 4>and those who are really being left behind, and that

0:13:16.613 --> 0:13:18.173
<v Speaker 4>gradient is socioeconomic.

0:13:18.733 --> 0:13:22.013
<v Speaker 3>Do you think there is a difference, a racial difference

0:13:22.093 --> 0:13:27.733
<v Speaker 3>in the ability to learn and succeed. No, it's a

0:13:27.773 --> 0:13:29.053
<v Speaker 3>trick It's not a trick question.

0:13:29.493 --> 0:13:29.613
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:13:29.733 --> 0:13:32.493
<v Speaker 4>I think there's no evidence for that at all. And

0:13:32.533 --> 0:13:37.053
<v Speaker 4>I think that our focus on ethnicity, on you know,

0:13:37.613 --> 0:13:41.533
<v Speaker 4>especially Mari kids not doing as well as non Mari

0:13:41.733 --> 0:13:45.373
<v Speaker 4>kids and specifica kids not doing as well as others,

0:13:46.013 --> 0:13:48.173
<v Speaker 4>is a misguided way to talk about it.

0:13:48.333 --> 0:13:49.773
<v Speaker 2>By and large.

0:13:50.493 --> 0:13:55.853
<v Speaker 4>Actually, the problem, as I said, is socioeconomic. If off

0:13:56.053 --> 0:14:00.973
<v Speaker 4>come from a well off family, regardless of the ethnicity

0:14:00.773 --> 0:14:04.933
<v Speaker 4>of your parents, they're going to have an educational background.

0:14:05.013 --> 0:14:09.053
<v Speaker 4>Very often that enables them to support your education. They're

0:14:09.173 --> 0:14:11.533
<v Speaker 4>likely to have well they by definition they have more

0:14:11.573 --> 0:14:18.013
<v Speaker 4>economic resources to if necessary, higher tutors and help in

0:14:18.053 --> 0:14:21.933
<v Speaker 4>other ways like that, you just have more economic and

0:14:21.973 --> 0:14:27.413
<v Speaker 4>cultural capital backing you. And when the education system itself

0:14:27.493 --> 0:14:31.413
<v Speaker 4>is not well structured, it means that those who are

0:14:31.453 --> 0:14:33.693
<v Speaker 4>not who don't have the benefit of those kinds of

0:14:33.773 --> 0:14:37.013
<v Speaker 4>resources get left more and more behind if the system

0:14:37.013 --> 0:14:40.973
<v Speaker 4>itself is not doing its job well enough. So no,

0:14:41.173 --> 0:14:43.373
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that there's any evidence for it being

0:14:43.373 --> 0:14:46.173
<v Speaker 4>a racial or ethnic issue at bottom.

0:14:47.613 --> 0:14:48.813
<v Speaker 2>The only cab out.

0:14:48.653 --> 0:14:50.293
<v Speaker 4>On that that I would add, and I don't think

0:14:50.293 --> 0:14:53.013
<v Speaker 4>this has got anything to do with race as such.

0:14:53.093 --> 0:14:56.093
<v Speaker 4>It has more to do with culture is that our

0:14:56.173 --> 0:15:00.453
<v Speaker 4>schools do need to meet children where they are. So

0:15:01.333 --> 0:15:05.413
<v Speaker 4>I'm all in favor of schools taking account of the

0:15:05.413 --> 0:15:09.053
<v Speaker 4>communities they serve and setting themselves up to serve those

0:15:09.053 --> 0:15:12.693
<v Speaker 4>communities well. And if it's a community that has lots

0:15:12.693 --> 0:15:17.133
<v Speaker 4>and lots of Mary kids, then representing Mary culture in

0:15:17.173 --> 0:15:19.413
<v Speaker 4>the school is a good idea because it makes it

0:15:19.453 --> 0:15:22.573
<v Speaker 4>a more welcoming place to them.

0:15:22.853 --> 0:15:26.773
<v Speaker 3>I'd query that, and I have for a while. Let

0:15:26.773 --> 0:15:29.733
<v Speaker 3>me go back though to the mid eighties, and I'm

0:15:29.733 --> 0:15:34.733
<v Speaker 3>not looking for any honors, but I was interviewing it.

0:15:34.973 --> 0:15:40.533
<v Speaker 3>I was interviewing a woman. She lived in Ponsonby, and

0:15:40.573 --> 0:15:45.613
<v Speaker 3>she was renowned for her work with kids and schooling,

0:15:47.053 --> 0:15:50.653
<v Speaker 3>and she didn't hold any positions. She was married, and

0:15:51.853 --> 0:15:55.013
<v Speaker 3>she was very concerned about the way that things were hitting.

0:15:56.253 --> 0:15:58.573
<v Speaker 3>And even though I can't remember her name. She was

0:15:58.573 --> 0:16:02.293
<v Speaker 3>one of the most impressive people I've I've met to

0:16:02.333 --> 0:16:04.613
<v Speaker 3>that point of my life. And I said to her,

0:16:05.133 --> 0:16:11.333
<v Speaker 3>I would like to anonymously establish a scholarship for a

0:16:11.373 --> 0:16:18.093
<v Speaker 3>married child. And she exploded, not angrily. She said, another

0:16:18.213 --> 0:16:23.373
<v Speaker 3>scholarship or something along those lines is something we don't need,

0:16:24.093 --> 0:16:28.173
<v Speaker 3>because that's not the problem. The problem was the background, etc.

0:16:28.813 --> 0:16:31.493
<v Speaker 3>But my comment to her had led into this was

0:16:31.533 --> 0:16:36.133
<v Speaker 3>that I don't believe that Mary or marry kids are

0:16:36.133 --> 0:16:38.773
<v Speaker 3>any less intelligent than any others. I think all races

0:16:38.973 --> 0:16:44.693
<v Speaker 3>are pretty much pretty much equal, even when it comes

0:16:44.733 --> 0:16:48.133
<v Speaker 3>to when it comes to such things. And realizing at

0:16:48.173 --> 0:16:51.493
<v Speaker 3>the same time that that I was stomping on Thomas Sole,

0:16:51.613 --> 0:16:54.373
<v Speaker 3>who has written a couple of very good books like

0:16:54.493 --> 0:16:59.533
<v Speaker 3>Race and Culture, and pointed out that there are differences

0:16:59.573 --> 0:17:06.653
<v Speaker 3>in the talents of various countries, like Italians who go

0:17:06.733 --> 0:17:11.133
<v Speaker 3>to South America and carry on with the specialty areas

0:17:11.173 --> 0:17:14.333
<v Speaker 3>that they're renowned in. It was just one that's one

0:17:14.373 --> 0:17:17.733
<v Speaker 3>that springs to mind. So they conquer that particular share

0:17:17.773 --> 0:17:20.573
<v Speaker 3>of the market and they do very and they do

0:17:20.773 --> 0:17:24.013
<v Speaker 3>very well, but it's not it's not or it wasn't

0:17:24.053 --> 0:17:28.093
<v Speaker 3>for me. An IQ thing. It was just the cultural background,

0:17:28.333 --> 0:17:28.733
<v Speaker 3>right or right?

0:17:28.773 --> 0:17:30.973
<v Speaker 4>I agree, I think I think different cultures do have

0:17:31.013 --> 0:17:37.973
<v Speaker 4>different orientations and things that they prepare young people for.

0:17:38.293 --> 0:17:42.293
<v Speaker 4>And just to complete what I'm saying here, While I

0:17:42.293 --> 0:17:46.333
<v Speaker 4>think it is entirely appropriate for schools to respond to

0:17:46.413 --> 0:17:51.493
<v Speaker 4>the children that they have and take into account their

0:17:51.493 --> 0:17:55.413
<v Speaker 4>cultural backgrounds, that doesn't mean that their mission, their ultimate mission,

0:17:55.493 --> 0:17:59.093
<v Speaker 4>is any different. Their ultimate mission is to teach the

0:17:59.213 --> 0:18:05.533
<v Speaker 4>universal disciplines or subjects derived from the universal disciplines, in

0:18:05.613 --> 0:18:08.733
<v Speaker 4>order to set children up well with powerful knowledge. And

0:18:08.773 --> 0:18:12.813
<v Speaker 4>by the universal disciplines, I mean things like mathematics, science,

0:18:13.333 --> 0:18:15.733
<v Speaker 4>exposing them to the great literature of the world from

0:18:15.773 --> 0:18:20.773
<v Speaker 4>all different cultures. These kinds of things are what builds

0:18:20.813 --> 0:18:24.853
<v Speaker 4>the platform for young people to have successful lives, and

0:18:24.893 --> 0:18:28.973
<v Speaker 4>so wherever they're coming from and whatever their backgrounds, that

0:18:29.053 --> 0:18:33.493
<v Speaker 4>should be the aim. Now, there are different challenges associated

0:18:33.613 --> 0:18:39.333
<v Speaker 4>with different children. You know, some children do come to

0:18:39.613 --> 0:18:42.853
<v Speaker 4>school with particular learning needs and difficulties, and we need

0:18:42.893 --> 0:18:43.733
<v Speaker 4>to address those.

0:18:44.253 --> 0:18:46.133
<v Speaker 2>The children don't have the same.

0:18:47.453 --> 0:18:51.413
<v Speaker 4>Cultural capital in their home background as others do, and

0:18:51.573 --> 0:18:54.653
<v Speaker 4>that presents a particular challenge. But all of these things

0:18:54.693 --> 0:18:56.853
<v Speaker 4>point in the same direction, which is that we need

0:18:56.893 --> 0:19:01.413
<v Speaker 4>to use the methods of teaching that science tells us

0:19:01.613 --> 0:19:04.573
<v Speaker 4>are the most effective, and that's the best way to

0:19:04.653 --> 0:19:08.813
<v Speaker 4>address these differences, and to have education in being an

0:19:08.813 --> 0:19:16.133
<v Speaker 4>equalizing force in our society rather than just reproducing the

0:19:16.173 --> 0:19:18.213
<v Speaker 4>conditions that people start in.

0:19:19.693 --> 0:19:22.253
<v Speaker 3>Let me approach that a different way, because I didn't

0:19:22.613 --> 0:19:26.893
<v Speaker 3>quite agree with something you said at the beginning. When

0:19:26.933 --> 0:19:31.013
<v Speaker 3>I came to this country decades ago, all the talk

0:19:31.213 --> 0:19:33.773
<v Speaker 3>was well not all the talk, but much of the

0:19:33.813 --> 0:19:36.893
<v Speaker 3>talk was with reard to marry and marry issues.

0:19:37.573 --> 0:19:37.853
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:19:38.493 --> 0:19:41.613
<v Speaker 3>In the time that I've been here forty years, it

0:19:41.613 --> 0:19:44.853
<v Speaker 3>hasn't changed. It hasn't gone away, it hasn't been resolved.

0:19:45.133 --> 0:19:47.973
<v Speaker 3>It's still the same mold, same mold as we witnessed

0:19:47.973 --> 0:19:52.493
<v Speaker 3>in Parliament to an aggressive extent just last week. Now,

0:19:52.493 --> 0:19:57.093
<v Speaker 3>if you're going to say that there are, if this

0:19:57.173 --> 0:20:00.413
<v Speaker 3>is a marry dominated school, then making it feel welcome

0:20:00.493 --> 0:20:04.893
<v Speaker 3>with culture, et cetera is appropriate. I can't disagree to

0:20:05.013 --> 0:20:09.653
<v Speaker 3>a limited extent, but I not in danger of and

0:20:09.693 --> 0:20:12.293
<v Speaker 3>are we not doing it locking them in to the

0:20:12.333 --> 0:20:17.053
<v Speaker 3>past and to culture and into a culture that well

0:20:17.573 --> 0:20:19.213
<v Speaker 3>prevents them from breaking free.

0:20:19.573 --> 0:20:21.933
<v Speaker 4>Well not if we follow what I just said, which

0:20:21.973 --> 0:20:27.373
<v Speaker 4>is that while that's the you can have that as

0:20:27.373 --> 0:20:31.013
<v Speaker 4>a way to make them feel welcome and also to reflect,

0:20:32.133 --> 0:20:36.293
<v Speaker 4>you know, what they're used to perhaps in their background.

0:20:36.333 --> 0:20:40.093
<v Speaker 4>And in fact, I would say that we have an

0:20:40.173 --> 0:20:47.493
<v Speaker 4>obligation to enable all people, regardless of their cultural background,

0:20:47.493 --> 0:20:50.493
<v Speaker 4>to see themselves in the school system, because we can't

0:20:50.573 --> 0:20:53.093
<v Speaker 4>shy away from the fact that school can be an

0:20:53.133 --> 0:20:58.813
<v Speaker 4>intimidating institution. So that's the entry point. What we're aiming

0:20:58.893 --> 0:21:02.213
<v Speaker 4>for is to have I mean, the ideal is that

0:21:02.333 --> 0:21:06.533
<v Speaker 4>all young people, regardless of their background, leave school well

0:21:06.693 --> 0:21:13.933
<v Speaker 4>educated in the objects derived from universal disciplines like science, mathematics, history, etc.

0:21:14.613 --> 0:21:19.533
<v Speaker 4>Because that is what gives them the knowledge and based

0:21:19.573 --> 0:21:24.213
<v Speaker 4>on that knowledge, the ability to think through ideas in

0:21:24.293 --> 0:21:29.013
<v Speaker 4>a really coherent, disciplined way, and that's what sets them

0:21:29.093 --> 0:21:34.453
<v Speaker 4>up for success in life. Now, in the senior years

0:21:34.493 --> 0:21:36.813
<v Speaker 4>of school, I think we do need to think harder

0:21:36.853 --> 0:21:41.133
<v Speaker 4>about the pathways that young people follow. Frankly, I think

0:21:41.133 --> 0:21:46.533
<v Speaker 4>we send far too many young people from university to university,

0:21:46.933 --> 0:21:50.613
<v Speaker 4>and we don't send nearly enough into apprenticeships and trades,

0:21:51.333 --> 0:21:56.213
<v Speaker 4>and that's because we have this misguided view that a

0:21:56.373 --> 0:22:02.053
<v Speaker 4>university education is somehow inherently superior to being an electrician

0:22:02.453 --> 0:22:07.173
<v Speaker 4>or a plumber or a trades person. So I think

0:22:07.213 --> 0:22:09.413
<v Speaker 4>that's a cultural issue we need to face up to

0:22:09.453 --> 0:22:11.693
<v Speaker 4>and do something about. And I have some ideas about

0:22:11.733 --> 0:22:17.973
<v Speaker 4>that too. But up until the senior secondary, all young

0:22:18.013 --> 0:22:21.213
<v Speaker 4>people should be taught to read and write and do

0:22:21.333 --> 0:22:25.773
<v Speaker 4>mathematics and learn about science and history and so on,

0:22:26.453 --> 0:22:29.693
<v Speaker 4>and that should be a universal offering.

0:22:30.933 --> 0:22:33.693
<v Speaker 3>So I've got I've got one more point to make.

0:22:34.453 --> 0:22:39.293
<v Speaker 3>If you follow in school the approach that you just nominated,

0:22:40.773 --> 0:22:44.973
<v Speaker 3>how does that then relate to the situation. The prime

0:22:45.053 --> 0:22:49.733
<v Speaker 3>example I'll utilize, and obviously so is the bonfight at

0:22:49.733 --> 0:22:53.053
<v Speaker 3>Auckland University a couple of years back, which still continues.

0:22:53.093 --> 0:22:57.933
<v Speaker 4>I gather you're talking about the listener letter business. Well, well,

0:22:57.973 --> 0:23:03.333
<v Speaker 4>I mean that was an appalling betrayal of the academics

0:23:03.533 --> 0:23:07.773
<v Speaker 4>who wrote that piece, none of them, of course, wire racists,

0:23:07.813 --> 0:23:12.333
<v Speaker 4>despite being accused of that by many, And they were

0:23:12.373 --> 0:23:15.333
<v Speaker 4>thrown under the bus by their own vice chancellor who

0:23:15.373 --> 0:23:19.813
<v Speaker 4>said that their letter had caused hurt, in dismay and

0:23:20.173 --> 0:23:23.013
<v Speaker 4>all of this. What they were pointing out, of course,

0:23:23.493 --> 0:23:27.413
<v Speaker 4>is simply that there are different knowledge systems in the world.

0:23:28.013 --> 0:23:34.533
<v Speaker 4>Science is a particular one with unique characteristics, and if

0:23:34.533 --> 0:23:36.613
<v Speaker 4>we're going to teach science, then it needs to be

0:23:36.773 --> 0:23:40.613
<v Speaker 4>taught in terms of what it is, rather than trying

0:23:40.653 --> 0:23:46.413
<v Speaker 4>to bring in knowledge systems like muttering amati that might

0:23:46.453 --> 0:23:48.813
<v Speaker 4>have their own contribution to make, but which are not

0:23:49.093 --> 0:23:53.973
<v Speaker 4>themselves science. So that was all they were saying in

0:23:54.013 --> 0:23:54.573
<v Speaker 4>this letter.

0:23:55.253 --> 0:23:56.893
<v Speaker 2>Now, if I'd been.

0:23:59.893 --> 0:24:02.493
<v Speaker 4>Wanting to say those things myself, I probably wouldn't have

0:24:02.493 --> 0:24:04.093
<v Speaker 4>tried to do it in a letter to the listener.

0:24:04.373 --> 0:24:08.253
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that that affords enough scope to do

0:24:08.493 --> 0:24:12.333
<v Speaker 4>issue justice, because you really need to explain what science

0:24:12.453 --> 0:24:16.333
<v Speaker 4>is because very few people people actually understand that it's

0:24:16.373 --> 0:24:19.653
<v Speaker 4>not just any old system of finding out about the

0:24:19.733 --> 0:24:25.133
<v Speaker 4>natural world. It's been refined over literally millennia. I mean,

0:24:25.133 --> 0:24:29.973
<v Speaker 4>we could go back to ancient philosophers like Aristotle to

0:24:30.013 --> 0:24:34.093
<v Speaker 4>start to see the first terms of scientific thinking back

0:24:34.093 --> 0:24:37.813
<v Speaker 4>in the ancient Greek world. But it developed over many,

0:24:37.893 --> 0:24:41.973
<v Speaker 4>many centuries. It brought in knowledge from the Middle East

0:24:42.093 --> 0:24:47.733
<v Speaker 4>and India and many different cultures, and it's really not

0:24:47.853 --> 0:24:53.973
<v Speaker 4>until the twentieth century that it really formed into what

0:24:54.133 --> 0:24:57.773
<v Speaker 4>it is now, which is the most powerful system we

0:24:57.893 --> 0:25:02.373
<v Speaker 4>know for testing theories about the world. And the reason

0:25:02.413 --> 0:25:07.853
<v Speaker 4>it's so powerful is because it has at its core

0:25:08.493 --> 0:25:11.413
<v Speaker 4>the idea that, first of all, there is an objective

0:25:11.533 --> 0:25:15.093
<v Speaker 4>reality the way things are, but we always will have

0:25:15.173 --> 0:25:18.453
<v Speaker 4>imperfect access to that, and so all we can do

0:25:18.573 --> 0:25:21.373
<v Speaker 4>is build theories and try to knock them down with evidence.

0:25:21.893 --> 0:25:25.133
<v Speaker 4>And it's the trying to knock them down part what

0:25:25.413 --> 0:25:31.653
<v Speaker 4>Carl Popper called falsification that makes a scientific theory scientific,

0:25:32.813 --> 0:25:36.973
<v Speaker 4>and that is a unique approach to the testing of

0:25:37.053 --> 0:25:41.853
<v Speaker 4>theories with evidence, and it's built the prosperity that we

0:25:42.013 --> 0:25:46.813
<v Speaker 4>have in the world now, has given us the technologies

0:25:46.933 --> 0:25:48.773
<v Speaker 4>we have. I think it's also got a lot to

0:25:48.773 --> 0:25:52.253
<v Speaker 4>do with democracy. I don't think it's any accident that

0:25:52.373 --> 0:25:57.093
<v Speaker 4>Carl Popper, the greatest philosopher of science in history, in

0:25:57.133 --> 0:26:01.373
<v Speaker 4>my opinion, was also a philosopher of democracy and open society,

0:26:02.133 --> 0:26:03.693
<v Speaker 4>because there's a lot in common.

0:26:04.693 --> 0:26:06.133
<v Speaker 2>And at the core.

0:26:06.093 --> 0:26:11.093
<v Speaker 4>It's the ability to discuss ideas, to argue about ideas

0:26:11.813 --> 0:26:15.973
<v Speaker 4>backed by evidence in a civil way without wanting to

0:26:16.053 --> 0:26:20.053
<v Speaker 4>kill your opponent and instead seeing a disagreement is a

0:26:20.133 --> 0:26:22.933
<v Speaker 4>chance to improve everybody's ideas just.

0:26:23.253 --> 0:26:28.173
<v Speaker 3>For the sake of everybody. When you say an open society,

0:26:28.253 --> 0:26:31.133
<v Speaker 3>and Papa believe in an open society. What sort of

0:26:31.173 --> 0:26:32.853
<v Speaker 3>open society? Can you give us a definition?

0:26:34.893 --> 0:26:39.653
<v Speaker 4>Well, open society would liberal democracies are open societies. That

0:26:40.253 --> 0:26:43.533
<v Speaker 4>is to say, we have a quality of political rights,

0:26:44.733 --> 0:26:49.773
<v Speaker 4>We have free speech, we have the idea of free elections,

0:26:49.813 --> 0:26:52.973
<v Speaker 4>which are a way of ensuring that everybody has a

0:26:53.053 --> 0:26:55.293
<v Speaker 4>say and who governs them. In other words, we have

0:26:55.373 --> 0:26:59.453
<v Speaker 4>government by consent and not just some feudal overlord telling

0:26:59.533 --> 0:27:05.413
<v Speaker 4>us what to do or some tyrant but ultimately it's

0:27:05.493 --> 0:27:10.573
<v Speaker 4>underpinned by a particular culture, and that culture is one

0:27:10.613 --> 0:27:14.413
<v Speaker 4>in which we're prepared to tolerate difference of opinion and

0:27:15.653 --> 0:27:20.333
<v Speaker 4>to use our free speech to resolve disputes. And so

0:27:20.653 --> 0:27:25.053
<v Speaker 4>you know, a democratic legal system is another pillar of

0:27:25.053 --> 0:27:30.093
<v Speaker 4>an open society, where disputes and criminal matters are resolved

0:27:30.973 --> 0:27:33.213
<v Speaker 4>on the basis of evidence in courts, and we have

0:27:33.293 --> 0:27:37.573
<v Speaker 4>things like juries and so on. That's an open society.

0:27:37.573 --> 0:27:41.293
<v Speaker 4>And it contrasts with tyrannical societies, with their feudal or

0:27:41.333 --> 0:27:45.973
<v Speaker 4>fascist or communist in other words, where all of those

0:27:46.413 --> 0:27:49.933
<v Speaker 4>what all of those have in common is authority figures

0:27:50.093 --> 0:27:53.253
<v Speaker 4>just telling people what to do by dictat and threatening

0:27:53.293 --> 0:27:55.373
<v Speaker 4>them with violence if they don't.

0:27:56.133 --> 0:28:00.773
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, there is a certain billionaire in the United States

0:28:01.653 --> 0:28:06.533
<v Speaker 3>who spends more than anybody else on election buying, So

0:28:06.613 --> 0:28:11.093
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking about George Soros. Spends megabucks and his intent

0:28:11.533 --> 0:28:16.053
<v Speaker 3>is to change America then anywhere else he can to

0:28:16.133 --> 0:28:19.333
<v Speaker 3>his so called open society, which.

0:28:19.133 --> 0:28:25.613
<v Speaker 4>Is interestingly he was a student associated, yeah with Karl

0:28:25.653 --> 0:28:27.693
<v Speaker 4>Popfer in the past. But I agree with you that

0:28:28.333 --> 0:28:33.493
<v Speaker 4>he's deviated from Popper's ideas fairly dramatically. But look, in

0:28:33.533 --> 0:28:37.733
<v Speaker 4>the end, open societies will always be threatened in various ways.

0:28:38.133 --> 0:28:41.493
<v Speaker 4>They're precarious things and we have to bear that in mind.

0:28:41.893 --> 0:28:44.933
<v Speaker 4>And I guess to bring the conversation back to education.

0:28:45.373 --> 0:28:49.013
<v Speaker 4>That is why I think we need young people to

0:28:49.173 --> 0:28:52.813
<v Speaker 4>be educated in the disciplines that give them the ability

0:28:52.853 --> 0:28:56.133
<v Speaker 4>to think critically. Now much is made of critical thinking

0:28:56.253 --> 0:28:59.813
<v Speaker 4>in our current curriculum, but what has missed is the

0:28:59.853 --> 0:29:04.653
<v Speaker 4>necessity for critical thinking to be built on a base

0:29:04.733 --> 0:29:09.853
<v Speaker 4>of knowledge. Without quite sophisticated knowledge, which critical thinking is

0:29:09.933 --> 0:29:13.733
<v Speaker 4>just not possible. And it's not just the knowledge of

0:29:13.773 --> 0:29:16.293
<v Speaker 4>the facts of the world or the facts are important.

0:29:17.333 --> 0:29:22.453
<v Speaker 4>In addition to factual knowledge, we need knowledge of systems

0:29:22.493 --> 0:29:26.093
<v Speaker 4>of thinking that enable us to get better representations of

0:29:27.733 --> 0:29:32.693
<v Speaker 4>truth over time. Whether it's in history or science or mathematics,

0:29:33.213 --> 0:29:37.733
<v Speaker 4>these are all disciplines that have methods for weighing evidence

0:29:38.173 --> 0:29:44.533
<v Speaker 4>and for resolving disagreements using that evidence. We never get

0:29:44.573 --> 0:29:47.733
<v Speaker 4>to a perfect understanding of how things are, which is

0:29:47.773 --> 0:29:51.293
<v Speaker 4>why it's always a work in progress. And it's that

0:29:51.533 --> 0:29:57.573
<v Speaker 4>endless contestability, which is the essence of the versal disciplines

0:29:58.013 --> 0:29:59.293
<v Speaker 4>as well as democracy.

0:30:00.373 --> 0:30:04.213
<v Speaker 3>Can I go back to the education and the schools

0:30:04.973 --> 0:30:11.773
<v Speaker 3>at least momentarily. Yes, mentioned that having the schools working

0:30:11.773 --> 0:30:17.493
<v Speaker 3>together in the same region is ideal. My thought is

0:30:18.053 --> 0:30:20.813
<v Speaker 3>usually and it is in this case. I mean, if

0:30:21.533 --> 0:30:24.453
<v Speaker 3>there is a local agreement because people like each other

0:30:24.453 --> 0:30:26.493
<v Speaker 3>and they get on well with the other principle or whatever,

0:30:26.573 --> 0:30:30.533
<v Speaker 3>they can help out sometimes that's fine. But isn't competition

0:30:30.733 --> 0:30:34.093
<v Speaker 3>even between schools worthy of pursuing.

0:30:35.613 --> 0:30:38.173
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it probably is, But I don't think that competition

0:30:38.533 --> 0:30:43.533
<v Speaker 4>and cooperation are mutually exclusive things. And I think we

0:30:43.573 --> 0:30:48.493
<v Speaker 4>do need a mechanism by which we can propagate good

0:30:48.573 --> 0:30:54.013
<v Speaker 4>practice across schools rather than simply having them all set

0:30:54.093 --> 0:30:59.493
<v Speaker 4>up in just pure competition with one another. Because a

0:30:59.573 --> 0:31:07.213
<v Speaker 4>pure competitive model is always going to leave schools in

0:31:07.373 --> 0:31:14.373
<v Speaker 4>less advantage communities not as well off. So I think

0:31:14.413 --> 0:31:17.493
<v Speaker 4>there is a place, So let's think of it like this.

0:31:18.293 --> 0:31:21.733
<v Speaker 4>I think that the education system schools need to be

0:31:21.773 --> 0:31:25.853
<v Speaker 4>accountable to the country for doing a good job, and

0:31:25.893 --> 0:31:28.813
<v Speaker 4>for that they need feedback. That means we need to

0:31:28.853 --> 0:31:32.733
<v Speaker 4>measure how they're doing and for that to be known,

0:31:33.533 --> 0:31:38.053
<v Speaker 4>and that in a sense becomes a mechanism of competition

0:31:38.133 --> 0:31:41.373
<v Speaker 4>because you get to see what is functioning better than

0:31:41.973 --> 0:31:47.893
<v Speaker 4>what else. But I don't think that having schools cooperate

0:31:48.533 --> 0:31:51.173
<v Speaker 4>is actually a barrier to doing that, and I think

0:31:51.173 --> 0:31:53.893
<v Speaker 4>we can set things up and I'm just thinking through

0:31:53.973 --> 0:31:56.693
<v Speaker 4>this now. I'm going to write a report about it

0:31:56.693 --> 0:31:59.453
<v Speaker 4>next year. So the ideas are not yet fully formed.

0:31:59.853 --> 0:32:03.213
<v Speaker 4>But we already have communities of schools. They're called kahuiaco,

0:32:03.813 --> 0:32:09.493
<v Speaker 4>but they're not very well structured or resourced. And I

0:32:09.533 --> 0:32:13.213
<v Speaker 4>think we have this strange situation where we have a

0:32:13.293 --> 0:32:18.133
<v Speaker 4>kind of megalithic ministry of education that just keeps growing

0:32:18.173 --> 0:32:21.533
<v Speaker 4>and growing over time. It's got thousands and thousands of

0:32:21.533 --> 0:32:25.373
<v Speaker 4>public servants working for it. It's also got regional offices,

0:32:25.453 --> 0:32:30.173
<v Speaker 4>so there's a massive bureaucracy and then we've got basically

0:32:30.213 --> 0:32:34.813
<v Speaker 4>nothing between that and individual schools. So what I'm thinking

0:32:34.853 --> 0:32:40.293
<v Speaker 4>of is a way of organizing our schools into groups,

0:32:40.973 --> 0:32:44.933
<v Speaker 4>and I would set them up such that the primary

0:32:44.933 --> 0:32:48.573
<v Speaker 4>schools and secondary schools that were working together tended to

0:32:48.613 --> 0:32:51.853
<v Speaker 4>have children who passed through the primary schools into the

0:32:51.893 --> 0:32:53.973
<v Speaker 4>secondary schools and the same group, so you have a

0:32:54.013 --> 0:32:57.933
<v Speaker 4>more connected up view of the children as they passed through,

0:32:59.213 --> 0:33:04.173
<v Speaker 4>to have a mix of socioeconomic circumstances within them, so

0:33:04.213 --> 0:33:10.853
<v Speaker 4>that the resources were able to be shared across different

0:33:10.933 --> 0:33:16.093
<v Speaker 4>kinds of communities. And critically, I think that these organizations

0:33:16.173 --> 0:33:20.693
<v Speaker 4>should be owned by the schools themselves and become the

0:33:20.813 --> 0:33:25.333
<v Speaker 4>units of accountability. So if you have to some extent

0:33:25.653 --> 0:33:30.493
<v Speaker 4>a competitive element that might take place within these communities.

0:33:30.653 --> 0:33:34.493
<v Speaker 4>But also you'd have the different communities across the country

0:33:35.693 --> 0:33:38.893
<v Speaker 4>and we could compare how well each we're doing.

0:33:39.293 --> 0:33:43.093
<v Speaker 3>You've you've just given me an idea. Yes, we've got

0:33:43.093 --> 0:33:46.093
<v Speaker 3>a shortage of math teachers. We do, We've got an

0:33:46.093 --> 0:33:51.253
<v Speaker 3>even bigger shortage of good math teachers. So what about

0:33:51.293 --> 0:33:55.053
<v Speaker 3>sharing math teachers. You've got a part of the idea.

0:33:55.213 --> 0:33:58.653
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk about what these communities might do. First,

0:33:58.693 --> 0:34:02.733
<v Speaker 3>and foremost, I think it is the sharing of good practice.

0:34:03.053 --> 0:34:05.733
<v Speaker 3>So you could have a situation where you know, it's

0:34:05.453 --> 0:34:08.733
<v Speaker 3>a really good maths teacher was the condo for a

0:34:08.773 --> 0:34:14.373
<v Speaker 3>couple of years to work for this community and to

0:34:14.493 --> 0:34:17.533
<v Speaker 3>lead professional development across a range of schools, and that

0:34:17.613 --> 0:34:21.493
<v Speaker 3>way you spread that good practice across schools instead of

0:34:21.533 --> 0:34:24.853
<v Speaker 3>having it all focused and where that teacher is working.

0:34:26.573 --> 0:34:29.213
<v Speaker 3>And for sure that school then loses that teacher for

0:34:29.253 --> 0:34:33.013
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years, but they're making a wider contribution

0:34:33.133 --> 0:34:35.493
<v Speaker 3>there was I was thinking, though, I was thinking more

0:34:35.533 --> 0:34:39.093
<v Speaker 3>of the same teacher teaching it. I mean, that's their

0:34:39.133 --> 0:34:45.493
<v Speaker 3>specialty maths at level three or whatever, and they've got

0:34:46.773 --> 0:34:50.573
<v Speaker 3>a couple of classes, classrooms, they're dealing with the school

0:34:50.573 --> 0:34:53.493
<v Speaker 3>that they're at, but they've got plenty of time up

0:34:53.493 --> 0:34:58.173
<v Speaker 3>there sleeve. I'm guessing. I'm guessing, why can't they work

0:34:58.213 --> 0:35:01.573
<v Speaker 3>out with another local school that this teacher is shared

0:35:01.613 --> 0:35:04.533
<v Speaker 3>between them and they do both schools at that level.

0:35:05.173 --> 0:35:08.573
<v Speaker 4>So that's certainly a possibility, especially for smaller school so

0:35:08.613 --> 0:35:11.653
<v Speaker 4>that they could share teachers like that. I mean, you

0:35:11.693 --> 0:35:16.253
<v Speaker 4>would find that a maths teacher at a large secondary

0:35:16.293 --> 0:35:19.173
<v Speaker 4>school would be working full time just at that secondary

0:35:19.213 --> 0:35:22.973
<v Speaker 4>school teaching maths, so they wouldn't have a lot of

0:35:23.013 --> 0:35:27.533
<v Speaker 4>spare time. But my point, my point is that why

0:35:28.813 --> 0:35:34.053
<v Speaker 4>just let them be an excellent teacher in isolation. Why

0:35:34.093 --> 0:35:37.933
<v Speaker 4>not enable them to share their expertise and bring other

0:35:38.013 --> 0:35:39.493
<v Speaker 4>teachers up.

0:35:40.813 --> 0:35:41.573
<v Speaker 2>In expertise.

0:35:42.373 --> 0:35:47.093
<v Speaker 4>So professional development is one thing that these centers could do.

0:35:47.373 --> 0:35:50.933
<v Speaker 4>Another would be teacher education. So instead of having teachers

0:35:50.973 --> 0:35:54.973
<v Speaker 4>trained at university, have them trained in the classroom, and.

0:35:57.013 --> 0:35:59.213
<v Speaker 2>Then you know, you have a community of.

0:35:59.173 --> 0:36:03.893
<v Speaker 4>Schools that has a critical mass that enables a really

0:36:03.933 --> 0:36:08.493
<v Speaker 4>strong teacher education program to be put in place. Is

0:36:08.493 --> 0:36:10.653
<v Speaker 4>going to have much more practical focus. There's going to

0:36:10.653 --> 0:36:14.413
<v Speaker 4>be more of an alignment between the kind of course

0:36:14.453 --> 0:36:18.573
<v Speaker 4>work element of the program and what teachers actually need

0:36:18.613 --> 0:36:22.933
<v Speaker 4>in the classrooms because schools are nothing if not pragmatic

0:36:22.973 --> 0:36:27.853
<v Speaker 4>and practical. They've got huge challenges and they know what

0:36:27.933 --> 0:36:33.573
<v Speaker 4>teachers need to learn better than universities do. So there

0:36:33.573 --> 0:36:37.733
<v Speaker 4>would still be a place, a strong place for teacher educators,

0:36:37.773 --> 0:36:41.733
<v Speaker 4>but let them be employed by the schools themselves. Let

0:36:41.773 --> 0:36:46.173
<v Speaker 4>the communities of schools have their own qualification. And look,

0:36:46.173 --> 0:36:48.733
<v Speaker 4>there's already a model for this taking place with the

0:36:48.773 --> 0:36:52.053
<v Speaker 4>community of schools in Auckland that has got a teacher

0:36:52.133 --> 0:36:56.253
<v Speaker 4>qualification that they run and they train teachers in schools,

0:36:56.253 --> 0:36:59.053
<v Speaker 4>and I think that this is the way ahead with

0:36:59.173 --> 0:37:04.253
<v Speaker 4>teacher education. So it'll take a while to ratchet up

0:37:04.253 --> 0:37:08.493
<v Speaker 4>something like that, but I think that the remodeling of

0:37:08.493 --> 0:37:11.613
<v Speaker 4>the education system along the lines that I'm talking about

0:37:11.893 --> 0:37:16.013
<v Speaker 4>would really help. Other things that these communities could do

0:37:16.173 --> 0:37:18.813
<v Speaker 4>is instead of you know, if you need an educational

0:37:18.853 --> 0:37:24.853
<v Speaker 4>psychologist to assess a child for dyslexia or ADHD or

0:37:24.853 --> 0:37:27.893
<v Speaker 4>whatever it is, you don't have to wait months for

0:37:27.933 --> 0:37:31.653
<v Speaker 4>the ministry to allocate one to you. Instead, you have

0:37:33.133 --> 0:37:37.373
<v Speaker 4>a cadre of specialists working for your community who circulate

0:37:37.413 --> 0:37:39.613
<v Speaker 4>around the schools and do the work that needs to

0:37:39.653 --> 0:37:42.093
<v Speaker 4>be done. And that's going to result in a more

0:37:42.133 --> 0:37:46.893
<v Speaker 4>efficient allocation of resources like that as well. So I

0:37:46.933 --> 0:37:50.973
<v Speaker 4>think these communities could take on a lot and that importantly,

0:37:51.013 --> 0:37:54.293
<v Speaker 4>they would also be the center of accountability. So at

0:37:54.293 --> 0:38:01.613
<v Speaker 4>the moment, we have almost no feedback from schools to parents,

0:38:01.733 --> 0:38:07.173
<v Speaker 4>to government, to the state, and that's because we just

0:38:07.213 --> 0:38:11.213
<v Speaker 4>don't collect enough data and report it. Schools run assessments,

0:38:11.253 --> 0:38:13.613
<v Speaker 4>but they keep those data to themselves.

0:38:14.253 --> 0:38:15.773
<v Speaker 2>And one of the reasons for that.

0:38:16.533 --> 0:38:18.733
<v Speaker 3>It should be public knowledge.

0:38:18.733 --> 0:38:22.093
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it should be public knowledge. Why is it not? Well?

0:38:22.453 --> 0:38:29.333
<v Speaker 4>Schools fear reporting data because they fear being exposed basically,

0:38:29.973 --> 0:38:35.413
<v Speaker 4>and that's an understandable fear. It's not acceptable situation. But

0:38:35.893 --> 0:38:39.053
<v Speaker 4>what's the way around it. If we made the community

0:38:39.093 --> 0:38:44.453
<v Speaker 4>itself the locus of accountability, then the schools that belong

0:38:44.533 --> 0:38:47.973
<v Speaker 4>to that community would collect data and report it to

0:38:48.093 --> 0:38:56.413
<v Speaker 4>their community and let me finish. Then the community itself

0:38:56.453 --> 0:38:59.053
<v Speaker 4>would aggregate that data and report it to the center,

0:38:59.453 --> 0:39:02.013
<v Speaker 4>and that would be It would be the community as

0:39:02.053 --> 0:39:04.613
<v Speaker 4>a whole held accountable for those data.

0:39:05.653 --> 0:39:07.933
<v Speaker 2>So then the schools.

0:39:07.493 --> 0:39:10.173
<v Speaker 4>Within that community would have a strong incentive to help

0:39:10.213 --> 0:39:13.853
<v Speaker 4>one another improve and no one school would have to

0:39:13.853 --> 0:39:17.253
<v Speaker 4>feel so exposed. And I think that might be a

0:39:17.293 --> 0:39:21.333
<v Speaker 4>way to solve our data problem. That idea does need

0:39:21.333 --> 0:39:24.653
<v Speaker 4>a bit more thinking through, in particular what to do

0:39:24.853 --> 0:39:28.053
<v Speaker 4>when you've got a whole community that isn't functioning well,

0:39:28.693 --> 0:39:31.453
<v Speaker 4>But I think it would take the heat off individual

0:39:31.493 --> 0:39:37.733
<v Speaker 4>schools as well as building an incentive structure for the

0:39:37.733 --> 0:39:41.093
<v Speaker 4>schools to help one another more for schools that we're

0:39:41.133 --> 0:39:43.973
<v Speaker 4>doing well, say in literacy, to be able to help

0:39:44.013 --> 0:39:46.533
<v Speaker 4>ones within their community that we're not doing so well

0:39:46.733 --> 0:39:49.213
<v Speaker 4>because they've got a collective interest in the data that

0:39:49.253 --> 0:39:50.813
<v Speaker 4>they're reporting to the center.

0:39:52.093 --> 0:39:55.533
<v Speaker 3>Of the well. The main reason that triggered this conversation

0:39:55.653 --> 0:39:59.293
<v Speaker 3>today is something that I picked up a few days

0:39:59.333 --> 0:40:05.493
<v Speaker 3>ago with regard to the American election. Let me quote you.

0:40:06.053 --> 0:40:09.333
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump's vision for education revolves around a single goal

0:40:09.573 --> 0:40:16.133
<v Speaker 3>to rid America's schools of perceived wokeness and left wing indoctrination.

0:40:17.493 --> 0:40:20.893
<v Speaker 3>You can tell already that the word perceived before those

0:40:20.973 --> 0:40:26.373
<v Speaker 3>two is hinting at the angle that the article has

0:40:26.453 --> 0:40:31.573
<v Speaker 3>taken from AP News. The president elect wants to forbid

0:40:31.573 --> 0:40:35.253
<v Speaker 3>the classroom lessons on gender identity and structural racism. He

0:40:35.293 --> 0:40:38.493
<v Speaker 3>wants to abolish diversity and inclusion officers. He wants to

0:40:38.533 --> 0:40:42.053
<v Speaker 3>keep transgender athletes out of girls' sports. Throughout his campaign,

0:40:42.093 --> 0:40:46.333
<v Speaker 3>the Republican depicted schools as a political battleground to be

0:40:46.453 --> 0:40:49.493
<v Speaker 3>won back from the left. Now that he's won the

0:40:49.533 --> 0:40:52.373
<v Speaker 3>White House, he plans to use federal money as leverage

0:40:52.453 --> 0:40:57.773
<v Speaker 3>to advance his vision of education across the country. Now,

0:40:58.053 --> 0:41:04.253
<v Speaker 3>in so doing, he's vowed to disengage the Department of Education.

0:41:06.133 --> 0:41:09.093
<v Speaker 3>And you talk about the thousands of people in the

0:41:09.773 --> 0:41:13.813
<v Speaker 3>department in this country. It made me wonder if there

0:41:13.893 --> 0:41:16.733
<v Speaker 3>was a similar approach that maybe we could look at.

0:41:17.653 --> 0:41:20.133
<v Speaker 3>But it's not. It's not easy because he's going to

0:41:20.133 --> 0:41:22.013
<v Speaker 3>send it back to the States. We've got the States

0:41:22.053 --> 0:41:23.173
<v Speaker 3>to send it back too.

0:41:23.373 --> 0:41:27.093
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So have we have a simpler system and easy

0:41:27.173 --> 0:41:31.413
<v Speaker 4>it's sort out because it's not so huge and doesn't

0:41:31.453 --> 0:41:35.693
<v Speaker 4>have the complication of states as America and Australia do.

0:41:36.493 --> 0:41:38.773
<v Speaker 2>So we do have it. So a couple of things

0:41:38.813 --> 0:41:39.213
<v Speaker 2>about that.

0:41:39.253 --> 0:41:41.773
<v Speaker 4>First of all, the kind of approach that I'm talking

0:41:41.773 --> 0:41:45.093
<v Speaker 4>about with establishing these communities of schools, they would need

0:41:45.133 --> 0:41:47.853
<v Speaker 4>resources that I would say, they would need physical premises.

0:41:48.773 --> 0:41:49.853
<v Speaker 2>Now, how do we fund that?

0:41:50.533 --> 0:41:53.893
<v Speaker 4>Well, we take a whole lot of functions off the Ministry,

0:41:54.133 --> 0:41:57.693
<v Speaker 4>basically turn it into a smallish policy shop in Wellington,

0:41:58.733 --> 0:42:01.733
<v Speaker 4>and instead of having all these regional offices, give the

0:42:01.773 --> 0:42:08.213
<v Speaker 4>resources to the to the schools themselves to use more locally.

0:42:09.173 --> 0:42:11.613
<v Speaker 4>I think that would be a more effective approach. So

0:42:11.973 --> 0:42:14.613
<v Speaker 4>that's the answer to that part of the question. I

0:42:14.653 --> 0:42:20.653
<v Speaker 4>would downsize the Ministry greatly and reallocate the resources to

0:42:20.733 --> 0:42:23.173
<v Speaker 4>the communities of schools for which they would have to

0:42:23.213 --> 0:42:26.133
<v Speaker 4>be accountable that's an important part of it, making sure

0:42:26.253 --> 0:42:29.173
<v Speaker 4>there is accountability for how those resources are used. And

0:42:29.253 --> 0:42:32.413
<v Speaker 4>at the moment, the ministry isn't really held to account

0:42:32.453 --> 0:42:38.093
<v Speaker 4>for presiding over twenty bus years of educational decline. So

0:42:38.373 --> 0:42:41.213
<v Speaker 4>I think it is time to try something different. To

0:42:41.293 --> 0:42:44.573
<v Speaker 4>turn to what Trump is saying about education. There's a

0:42:44.613 --> 0:42:48.053
<v Speaker 4>lot in that which I agree with. I think it

0:42:48.173 --> 0:42:52.173
<v Speaker 4>is true that education systems across the world have become

0:42:52.253 --> 0:42:58.053
<v Speaker 4>captured by certain ideological ideas, and that is not good

0:42:58.533 --> 0:43:02.093
<v Speaker 4>educational practice because, to use a bit of a cliche,

0:43:02.173 --> 0:43:04.333
<v Speaker 4>we need to teach children how to think and not

0:43:04.373 --> 0:43:10.733
<v Speaker 4>what to think. Having said that, lightly worried that Trump

0:43:11.613 --> 0:43:17.933
<v Speaker 4>might implement ideological ideas of his own, and so that

0:43:17.973 --> 0:43:21.733
<v Speaker 4>to me would be not fixing the problem, but just

0:43:21.853 --> 0:43:22.733
<v Speaker 4>changing the problem.

0:43:23.333 --> 0:43:25.053
<v Speaker 3>I don't have that for you.

0:43:26.693 --> 0:43:27.493
<v Speaker 2>I hope you're right.

0:43:28.093 --> 0:43:33.013
<v Speaker 4>I mean, so, if you take the question of gender

0:43:33.093 --> 0:43:37.093
<v Speaker 4>identity or whatever, I don't think there's any problem in

0:43:37.493 --> 0:43:41.493
<v Speaker 4>teaching about that. But all ideas need to be contestable.

0:43:42.413 --> 0:43:45.573
<v Speaker 4>So you put the idea on the table, is it

0:43:45.653 --> 0:43:51.253
<v Speaker 4>possible for a boy to become a girl? Well, let's

0:43:51.293 --> 0:43:53.973
<v Speaker 4>look at that from all different angles and bring the

0:43:53.973 --> 0:43:56.773
<v Speaker 4>evidence to bere what does biology have to say about that,

0:43:58.333 --> 0:44:00.933
<v Speaker 4>and what's the difference between sex and gender? And if

0:44:00.933 --> 0:44:03.693
<v Speaker 4>we could have open discussions about that in our classrooms

0:44:03.693 --> 0:44:09.013
<v Speaker 4>that were not dominated by ideologies, then we would be

0:44:09.133 --> 0:44:13.053
<v Speaker 4>using that issue as which is, you know, obviously of

0:44:13.093 --> 0:44:16.373
<v Speaker 4>contemporary social interest, because it's all over the place at

0:44:16.373 --> 0:44:19.293
<v Speaker 4>the moment. If we could have open discussions about it

0:44:19.333 --> 0:44:22.853
<v Speaker 4>in the light of evidence, then people would be taught

0:44:22.893 --> 0:44:26.733
<v Speaker 4>to draw their conclusions based on evidence instead of ideology.

0:44:27.613 --> 0:44:31.293
<v Speaker 3>What place does the World Health Organization have in the classroom?

0:44:34.533 --> 0:44:36.733
<v Speaker 2>Very little place as far as I can see. I

0:44:36.733 --> 0:44:37.733
<v Speaker 2>don't know why it would.

0:44:37.573 --> 0:44:41.053
<v Speaker 3>Have the place, well, because it chooses.

0:44:40.733 --> 0:44:44.013
<v Speaker 2>To Can you elaborate? I'm not quite sure what you mean.

0:44:44.173 --> 0:44:47.693
<v Speaker 3>I can. I could elaborate in great details, except we

0:44:47.773 --> 0:44:52.213
<v Speaker 3>don't have enough time even in this podcast, however. Hugh

0:44:52.293 --> 0:44:55.773
<v Speaker 3>McCarthy is a retired as a head teacher after twenty

0:44:55.813 --> 0:45:00.093
<v Speaker 3>three years in that role. He also lectured in postgraduate

0:45:00.173 --> 0:45:04.773
<v Speaker 3>leadership course at the University of Ulster. And there's more

0:45:04.813 --> 0:45:07.973
<v Speaker 3>detail about this about this guy who has written a

0:45:08.013 --> 0:45:12.213
<v Speaker 3>twelve page missive Look who's in the classroom? Look who

0:45:13.093 --> 0:45:18.533
<v Speaker 3>who is in the classroom? Right the process to legislate

0:45:18.533 --> 0:45:22.533
<v Speaker 3>the amended Form of Relationship and Sexuality Education RS into

0:45:22.613 --> 0:45:26.213
<v Speaker 3>the school curriculum has seen the divers the diversion of

0:45:26.333 --> 0:45:30.173
<v Speaker 3>much needed administrative and teaching time and resources away from

0:45:30.253 --> 0:45:34.653
<v Speaker 3>education fundamentals such as reading and numeracy, the standards of

0:45:34.733 --> 0:45:38.893
<v Speaker 3>both of which have fallen alarmingly. The decline in reading

0:45:38.893 --> 0:45:42.093
<v Speaker 3>and numeracy standards caused by the impact of COVID related

0:45:42.093 --> 0:45:45.373
<v Speaker 3>policies has seen the UK achieve its worst standards since

0:45:45.413 --> 0:45:49.133
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and six and the US the worst in

0:45:49.173 --> 0:45:51.253
<v Speaker 3>the history. Anyway, I won't go on, but.

0:45:53.053 --> 0:45:55.213
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I see what you're saying. Now.

0:45:55.493 --> 0:46:01.173
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, whether it's the WHO or other organizations in the background,

0:46:01.613 --> 0:46:05.013
<v Speaker 4>I think there are some influences in our classrooms on

0:46:05.213 --> 0:46:12.173
<v Speaker 4>things like the Healton Sexuality curriculum. There are definitely some

0:46:12.293 --> 0:46:15.893
<v Speaker 4>interests that have been influencing our schools.

0:46:16.053 --> 0:46:16.253
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:46:16.493 --> 0:46:20.093
<v Speaker 4>This is actually one other very good argument for a

0:46:20.173 --> 0:46:23.213
<v Speaker 4>much stronger curriculum than we've had, because if we have

0:46:23.253 --> 0:46:27.933
<v Speaker 4>a really strong and full curriculum, then that specifies what

0:46:28.053 --> 0:46:33.013
<v Speaker 4>teachers are obligated to teach, and they're not going to

0:46:33.053 --> 0:46:35.973
<v Speaker 4>have much time to do these other things.

0:46:37.493 --> 0:46:41.773
<v Speaker 3>Some of them, from my information, would do anything to

0:46:42.533 --> 0:46:47.453
<v Speaker 3>continue with it because there is a.

0:46:46.573 --> 0:46:47.093
<v Speaker 2>They might do.

0:46:47.173 --> 0:46:51.573
<v Speaker 4>But if they're held accountable for teaching a really robust

0:46:51.573 --> 0:46:57.853
<v Speaker 4>and knowledge rich curriculum, then if they choose to spend

0:46:57.933 --> 0:47:02.053
<v Speaker 4>time doing these other things, then they might fail to

0:47:02.053 --> 0:47:04.733
<v Speaker 4>deliver what's expected of them, and there needs to be

0:47:04.973 --> 0:47:06.573
<v Speaker 4>ultimately consequences for that.

0:47:08.533 --> 0:47:13.293
<v Speaker 3>Well, we certainly agree on that. You mentioned the word

0:47:13.493 --> 0:47:16.573
<v Speaker 3>bureaucracy before when you were talking about them at headquarters.

0:47:16.613 --> 0:47:19.173
<v Speaker 3>Basically i'd use the word autocracy.

0:47:20.133 --> 0:47:21.613
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, I mean it's interesting.

0:47:22.253 --> 0:47:25.813
<v Speaker 4>Our school system is actually incredibly devolved, and I think

0:47:25.853 --> 0:47:28.693
<v Speaker 4>that has become part of the problem that we just

0:47:28.773 --> 0:47:36.533
<v Speaker 4>have all it's highly fractured. Indeed, so in some sense

0:47:36.613 --> 0:47:41.773
<v Speaker 4>the Ministry doesn't do enough at all to preside over

0:47:42.333 --> 0:47:45.533
<v Speaker 4>the education system. Having said that, I wouldn't trust the

0:47:45.693 --> 0:47:48.573
<v Speaker 4>ministry to preside over it, and I think we need

0:47:48.813 --> 0:47:51.493
<v Speaker 4>a different way of structuring it, which is what I'm

0:47:51.533 --> 0:47:55.293
<v Speaker 4>thinking through now. And the ideas that I've laid out

0:47:55.653 --> 0:48:00.133
<v Speaker 4>today are actually the first public airing of them. I'm

0:48:00.173 --> 0:48:03.013
<v Speaker 4>not the only one have thought along these lines, of course,

0:48:04.613 --> 0:48:08.693
<v Speaker 4>but I do think we need to think very carefully

0:48:08.973 --> 0:48:13.533
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the ministry being an autocracy. Well, in

0:48:13.613 --> 0:48:16.893
<v Speaker 4>some ways it probably is, but I think in ways

0:48:16.933 --> 0:48:21.413
<v Speaker 4>that it needs to assert a bit more control. It's

0:48:21.413 --> 0:48:24.773
<v Speaker 4>actually left things way too up in the air for

0:48:24.813 --> 0:48:25.413
<v Speaker 4>a long time.

0:48:25.533 --> 0:48:28.173
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but the people are the people capable of doing that,

0:48:28.253 --> 0:48:30.013
<v Speaker 3>actually holding down positions.

0:48:30.973 --> 0:48:32.813
<v Speaker 4>There are some There are some really good people in

0:48:32.853 --> 0:48:37.013
<v Speaker 4>the ministry, for example, the crew that do the international

0:48:37.053 --> 0:48:40.973
<v Speaker 4>testing work. I think they're really good statisticians and they

0:48:41.013 --> 0:48:42.093
<v Speaker 4>provide good information.

0:48:42.493 --> 0:48:44.693
<v Speaker 2>There are pockets of good.

0:48:46.053 --> 0:48:48.493
<v Speaker 4>Work happening in the ministry, But as a whole, it's

0:48:48.533 --> 0:48:53.973
<v Speaker 4>a highly dysfunctional organization. It's it's faction written and it

0:48:54.053 --> 0:48:59.613
<v Speaker 4>is yeah, not using it as a resource as well.

0:48:59.653 --> 0:49:05.333
<v Speaker 3>Shall we say, look, we we must before we terminate,

0:49:05.373 --> 0:49:09.333
<v Speaker 3>we must touch on one other thing. And this could

0:49:09.333 --> 0:49:11.373
<v Speaker 3>take as well. You can have as long as you like.

0:49:12.133 --> 0:49:17.453
<v Speaker 3>But AI now before you go. AI is something that

0:49:17.813 --> 0:49:21.053
<v Speaker 3>I'm intrigued with, but not so much. In fact, i'd

0:49:21.573 --> 0:49:25.933
<v Speaker 3>put AI in a parallel position to what Bitcoin was

0:49:25.973 --> 0:49:29.133
<v Speaker 3>when we first started talking about it a few years ago,

0:49:29.373 --> 0:49:31.213
<v Speaker 3>and I put my neck on the line and said

0:49:31.693 --> 0:49:36.413
<v Speaker 3>it'll collapse, it'll never go anywhere. Was totally wrong. So

0:49:37.253 --> 0:49:41.293
<v Speaker 3>the question is is AI in a similar similar category?

0:49:41.773 --> 0:49:45.453
<v Speaker 3>Is it a danger as much as it could be

0:49:45.573 --> 0:49:49.613
<v Speaker 3>a positive. How do you I know how you see

0:49:49.613 --> 0:49:53.333
<v Speaker 3>it because I've read I've read your articles, but take

0:49:53.333 --> 0:49:54.693
<v Speaker 3>it from where you want.

0:49:55.493 --> 0:49:55.733
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:49:56.053 --> 0:49:59.973
<v Speaker 4>So the way I started my reporter on AI was

0:50:00.013 --> 0:50:03.373
<v Speaker 4>to think back to the nineteen seventies and eighties, when

0:50:03.413 --> 0:50:07.933
<v Speaker 4>handheld calculators were finding their way into the pockets of

0:50:08.413 --> 0:50:12.293
<v Speaker 4>young people, and the idea was that now maybe we

0:50:12.333 --> 0:50:15.053
<v Speaker 4>don't need to teach them arithmetic anymore because they've got

0:50:15.053 --> 0:50:18.693
<v Speaker 4>these calculators to do it for them. And of course

0:50:18.733 --> 0:50:20.893
<v Speaker 4>the flaw in that is if they don't learn to

0:50:20.933 --> 0:50:25.333
<v Speaker 4>do arithmetic to the point of what we call cognitive automaticity,

0:50:25.373 --> 0:50:27.653
<v Speaker 4>which is to say, you know, you know your times

0:50:27.693 --> 0:50:31.733
<v Speaker 4>table's cold, and you know how to add numbers together

0:50:32.573 --> 0:50:36.773
<v Speaker 4>using an algorithm pretty straightforwardly and without much effort, You're

0:50:36.813 --> 0:50:38.933
<v Speaker 4>just not going to have the cognitive resources to take

0:50:38.973 --> 0:50:43.453
<v Speaker 4>further steps in mathematics. So everything that arithmetic depends on,

0:50:43.533 --> 0:50:45.853
<v Speaker 4>which is just about all of the rest of mathematics,

0:50:46.253 --> 0:50:48.693
<v Speaker 4>you're never going to be able to learn with any fluency.

0:50:49.733 --> 0:50:55.733
<v Speaker 4>So fast forward to AI. The same kind of argument

0:50:55.773 --> 0:50:58.893
<v Speaker 4>applies to learning to write. If you have an AI

0:50:59.133 --> 0:51:03.453
<v Speaker 4>producing writing for you, and there are some people who

0:51:03.453 --> 0:51:07.213
<v Speaker 4>have commented on the potential for AI to obviate the

0:51:07.253 --> 0:51:09.893
<v Speaker 4>need for children to learn to write themselves. Because they

0:51:09.933 --> 0:51:14.413
<v Speaker 4>can get AI to compile the facts and write a

0:51:14.573 --> 0:51:19.813
<v Speaker 4>reasonably cogent, if not exactly inspired piece, then they can

0:51:19.813 --> 0:51:23.333
<v Speaker 4>spend their time thinking critically about what the AI has produced.

0:51:24.333 --> 0:51:27.253
<v Speaker 4>Trouble with that is that, first of all, as I

0:51:27.293 --> 0:51:30.133
<v Speaker 4>said before, to think critically, you need a lot of knowledge,

0:51:30.373 --> 0:51:35.493
<v Speaker 4>and so just outsourcing knowledge production to AI is not

0:51:35.533 --> 0:51:41.573
<v Speaker 4>going to teach you knowledge. And secondly, writing is itself

0:51:41.613 --> 0:51:44.573
<v Speaker 4>a tool of thinking. So when we write, if we're

0:51:44.653 --> 0:51:48.733
<v Speaker 4>writing fluently and well, we are able to compile our ideas,

0:51:48.813 --> 0:51:52.133
<v Speaker 4>rearrange our ideas. In other words, we can get out

0:51:52.213 --> 0:51:55.613
<v Speaker 4>of our heads onto the page, as it were, our thoughts,

0:51:56.053 --> 0:52:01.293
<v Speaker 4>and then that gives us the kind of headspace freed

0:52:01.373 --> 0:52:04.453
<v Speaker 4>up to be able to think through those ideas properly,

0:52:05.173 --> 0:52:08.213
<v Speaker 4>to self criticize our ideas, and to rearrange them to

0:52:08.413 --> 0:52:11.933
<v Speaker 4>improve our arguments. So writing is itself a really important

0:52:11.973 --> 0:52:17.293
<v Speaker 4>tool of thinking, and we mustn't allow AI to subvert

0:52:18.653 --> 0:52:22.053
<v Speaker 4>the necessity for young people to learn to write and

0:52:22.413 --> 0:52:26.573
<v Speaker 4>to think and to acquire knowledge of their own. I

0:52:26.573 --> 0:52:30.453
<v Speaker 4>think there are some opportunities that are offered by AI educationally,

0:52:30.533 --> 0:52:36.853
<v Speaker 4>but it's much more in the category of feedback to children.

0:52:36.933 --> 0:52:40.133
<v Speaker 4>So you can imagine young people perhaps producing a piece

0:52:40.173 --> 0:52:43.453
<v Speaker 4>of writing of their own and then feeding it to

0:52:43.533 --> 0:52:46.613
<v Speaker 4>the AI, which doesn't just sort of rewrite it for them,

0:52:46.613 --> 0:52:51.013
<v Speaker 4>but says there are some problems with the way you've

0:52:51.013 --> 0:52:55.213
<v Speaker 4>structured this sentence and that sentence, and maybe even have

0:52:55.333 --> 0:52:58.813
<v Speaker 4>you thought about this counter argument to this idea. So

0:52:58.853 --> 0:53:01.453
<v Speaker 4>in other words, it's it's acting more as a coach.

0:53:01.933 --> 0:53:05.813
<v Speaker 4>It should also always be under the supervision of a

0:53:06.533 --> 0:53:11.173
<v Speaker 4>skilled teacher. We shouldn't just let AI take over in

0:53:11.213 --> 0:53:11.853
<v Speaker 4>the classroom.

0:53:12.693 --> 0:53:15.653
<v Speaker 3>Is it being actively used the moment in the classroom.

0:53:15.733 --> 0:53:19.013
<v Speaker 4>I think it's starting to be yes, And I don't

0:53:19.053 --> 0:53:21.133
<v Speaker 4>have a good handle on how it's being used at

0:53:21.133 --> 0:53:24.973
<v Speaker 4>this stage. I suspect it's very ad hoc because there

0:53:25.013 --> 0:53:32.373
<v Speaker 4>hasn't been any sort of central effort to introduce it

0:53:31.613 --> 0:53:35.893
<v Speaker 4>in a way that has any principles behind it. I

0:53:35.933 --> 0:53:38.453
<v Speaker 4>think a lot of teachers will intuitively understand that it's

0:53:38.453 --> 0:53:43.413
<v Speaker 4>a bad idea to let AI do writing for young people,

0:53:43.453 --> 0:53:46.333
<v Speaker 4>but I wouldn't be surprised if there's some of that happening.

0:53:47.493 --> 0:53:49.733
<v Speaker 4>Is there, apart from anything else, that's quite hard to

0:53:49.773 --> 0:53:51.413
<v Speaker 4>control what young people do with it?

0:53:52.533 --> 0:53:56.453
<v Speaker 3>Well, we found that out yep. Is there any danger

0:53:56.453 --> 0:53:59.053
<v Speaker 3>that it could be captured and used illicitly?

0:53:59.653 --> 0:54:01.173
<v Speaker 2>Can you explain what you mean a bit more?

0:54:01.373 --> 0:54:04.653
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I don't know how it works. I

0:54:04.653 --> 0:54:07.373
<v Speaker 3>don't pretend to and at this point I don't really

0:54:07.413 --> 0:54:10.813
<v Speaker 3>have any great interest in the mechanics of it. But

0:54:12.093 --> 0:54:17.133
<v Speaker 3>as there is misinformation abroad in volumes, is there any

0:54:17.173 --> 0:54:25.853
<v Speaker 3>reason why AI can't be programmed to behave badly misleadingly misleader?

0:54:26.173 --> 0:54:28.533
<v Speaker 4>There is no reason at all that it can't be

0:54:29.053 --> 0:54:32.733
<v Speaker 4>programmed to do that, And I would say that there

0:54:32.773 --> 0:54:37.893
<v Speaker 4>are probably engines that are like that already. So you

0:54:37.933 --> 0:54:40.613
<v Speaker 4>do need to understand a little bit about how AI

0:54:40.813 --> 0:54:46.493
<v Speaker 4>works to understand this. Essentially, AI doesn't know anything at all.

0:54:47.133 --> 0:54:51.133
<v Speaker 4>AI artificial intelligence is actually a bit of a misnomer.

0:54:51.133 --> 0:54:55.093
<v Speaker 4>I would say it's not intelligent. What it is is

0:54:55.293 --> 0:55:02.093
<v Speaker 4>a huge network which is trained using vast amounts of text. Now,

0:55:02.253 --> 0:55:06.613
<v Speaker 4>the text that you train it on will determine the

0:55:06.693 --> 0:55:10.173
<v Speaker 4>kinds of responses it gives you. So you could train

0:55:10.253 --> 0:55:15.573
<v Speaker 4>it on a whole bunch of documents from a particular

0:55:15.613 --> 0:55:20.133
<v Speaker 4>ideological perspective, and if you did that, the responses that

0:55:20.333 --> 0:55:25.693
<v Speaker 4>produced would be from that ideological perspective. And I think

0:55:25.733 --> 0:55:28.933
<v Speaker 4>there is already an extent to which the AI engines

0:55:29.013 --> 0:55:33.013
<v Speaker 4>are trained in something of a biased way. There's a

0:55:33.053 --> 0:55:38.413
<v Speaker 4>research called David Risado from Dunedin who has done some

0:55:38.453 --> 0:55:44.173
<v Speaker 4>really great work showing how various AI engines are politically biased.

0:55:44.173 --> 0:55:48.413
<v Speaker 4>And he does that by giving them questions from things

0:55:48.453 --> 0:55:51.893
<v Speaker 4>like the Political Compass test and seeing where they pitch up.

0:55:52.453 --> 0:55:56.653
<v Speaker 4>And most of the AI engines have a fairly pronounced

0:55:56.733 --> 0:56:00.613
<v Speaker 4>left wing bias, and one might suspect that they've been trained.

0:56:00.293 --> 0:56:06.613
<v Speaker 5>To be like that. And well, exactly, yes, you have

0:56:06.813 --> 0:56:09.813
<v Speaker 5>very valid concern. Then well you've got to the core

0:56:09.893 --> 0:56:14.173
<v Speaker 5>of my question right perfectly. There is something else I

0:56:14.253 --> 0:56:16.413
<v Speaker 5>just want to raise with you. Welfare.

0:56:17.373 --> 0:56:21.013
<v Speaker 3>The welfare system is I think, not just partly but

0:56:21.453 --> 0:56:25.573
<v Speaker 3>hugely responsible for a lot that's wrong with this country.

0:56:26.213 --> 0:56:29.893
<v Speaker 3>Now I could go into explanation, but if you do

0:56:29.973 --> 0:56:33.453
<v Speaker 3>agree with what I've just said, what's your thought.

0:56:35.013 --> 0:56:37.533
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm not an economist and welfare isn't really my

0:56:37.653 --> 0:56:40.213
<v Speaker 4>area of central expertise, but what I would say is that,

0:56:42.093 --> 0:56:44.853
<v Speaker 4>and we're at ABTZ education is that we need these

0:56:44.893 --> 0:56:48.293
<v Speaker 4>systems to left people out of bad circumstances and not

0:56:48.413 --> 0:56:53.413
<v Speaker 4>keep them there. So a welfare system that promotes into

0:56:53.453 --> 0:56:59.013
<v Speaker 4>generation or dependence is not good. There are situations in

0:56:59.053 --> 0:57:02.733
<v Speaker 4>which people need welfare. We should always be looking to

0:57:04.493 --> 0:57:07.373
<v Speaker 4>improve their capabilities so that they don't have to stay

0:57:07.413 --> 0:57:10.533
<v Speaker 4>on welfare and stay dependent, because that's not a recipe

0:57:10.573 --> 0:57:13.973
<v Speaker 4>for a meaningful life. Education has a really important role

0:57:14.053 --> 0:57:17.653
<v Speaker 4>to play in that for families that perhaps have been

0:57:18.093 --> 0:57:21.333
<v Speaker 4>stuck in a welfare trap for more than one generation.

0:57:22.573 --> 0:57:26.013
<v Speaker 4>It's pretty bad when a child has never seen an

0:57:26.053 --> 0:57:30.453
<v Speaker 4>adult who has a full time job, for example, and

0:57:31.653 --> 0:57:33.013
<v Speaker 4>we need to find a way out of that.

0:57:33.653 --> 0:57:36.173
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you what triggered that you write something on

0:57:36.613 --> 0:57:40.973
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand needs a clearer pathway to apprenticeships. Yep, and

0:57:41.333 --> 0:57:46.173
<v Speaker 3>I read you the first paragraph. Every year in New Zealand,

0:57:46.173 --> 0:57:49.133
<v Speaker 3>around sixty two thousand young people leave school, just six

0:57:49.213 --> 0:57:53.053
<v Speaker 3>percent of them enter apprenticeship training. Nearly double that, eleven

0:57:53.093 --> 0:57:56.573
<v Speaker 3>percent neither gain employment nor enroll in post school education.

0:57:56.813 --> 0:58:00.253
<v Speaker 3>That comparison points to a serious waste of human potential.

0:58:01.253 --> 0:58:04.653
<v Speaker 3>In contrast, I agree with you entirely. In contrast, under

0:58:04.693 --> 0:58:08.253
<v Speaker 3>the German dual training system, fully half of school leaders

0:58:08.573 --> 0:58:11.733
<v Speaker 3>take up apprenticeships. Now, the reason it got my attention

0:58:12.493 --> 0:58:16.213
<v Speaker 3>was because a number of years ago I met two

0:58:16.973 --> 0:58:22.973
<v Speaker 3>young Germans who were visiting Australia. My father was married

0:58:23.013 --> 0:58:27.893
<v Speaker 3>to a German and one of them was related to it.

0:58:28.373 --> 0:58:32.413
<v Speaker 3>So I found out the bit of detail they were

0:58:32.453 --> 0:58:36.133
<v Speaker 3>on the doll and they were traveling the world and

0:58:36.173 --> 0:58:38.533
<v Speaker 3>if memory serves me correctly, they could do that for

0:58:38.573 --> 0:58:41.253
<v Speaker 3>two years without repercussion.

0:58:42.493 --> 0:58:45.253
<v Speaker 4>No, I mean, I'm not aware of that scheme, but

0:58:45.413 --> 0:58:47.053
<v Speaker 4>I do know that half of their school leaders do

0:58:47.213 --> 0:58:52.213
<v Speaker 4>go into apprenticeships, and there's a really well coordinated system

0:58:52.253 --> 0:58:57.373
<v Speaker 4>whereby they go through particular kinds of secondary schools, and

0:58:57.413 --> 0:59:00.573
<v Speaker 4>in fact they divide their kids at age ten into

0:59:00.613 --> 0:59:03.933
<v Speaker 4>different tracks, which I think is too young. But what

0:59:03.973 --> 0:59:07.013
<v Speaker 4>they do really well is when they leave school they

0:59:07.013 --> 0:59:10.333
<v Speaker 4>can be employed as an apprenticed by a company. They

0:59:10.333 --> 0:59:14.333
<v Speaker 4>don't have to pay for apprenticeship training because the companies

0:59:14.373 --> 0:59:19.573
<v Speaker 4>actually pulled the resources and fund a system whereby they're trained,

0:59:20.173 --> 0:59:24.013
<v Speaker 4>they work several days a week in the company, and

0:59:24.053 --> 0:59:27.013
<v Speaker 4>then they're studying with a tertiary provider.

0:59:27.053 --> 0:59:28.053
<v Speaker 2>The rest of the time.

0:59:27.853 --> 0:59:30.853
<v Speaker 4>To teach them the general skills of the trade that

0:59:30.893 --> 0:59:36.893
<v Speaker 4>they're preparing for, and when they qualify that they become

0:59:36.893 --> 0:59:41.613
<v Speaker 4>a master trades person, they can go on to be

0:59:41.653 --> 0:59:45.213
<v Speaker 4>a trainer themselves, which is a highly respected position in

0:59:45.493 --> 0:59:48.653
<v Speaker 4>German society. A lot of it comes back to culture.

0:59:48.933 --> 0:59:51.773
<v Speaker 4>The Germans have a very long standing respects for the trades.

0:59:52.293 --> 0:59:55.133
<v Speaker 4>In some sense, it goes back to the medieval guilds.

0:59:57.173 --> 1:00:00.413
<v Speaker 4>Be very difficult to reproduce their system in New Zealand,

1:00:00.413 --> 1:00:01.973
<v Speaker 4>but I think there are elements of it that we

1:00:02.013 --> 1:00:04.693
<v Speaker 4>could adopt. And really what I'm focusing on at the

1:00:04.733 --> 1:00:07.013
<v Speaker 4>moment is what we can do in the senior secondary

1:00:07.053 --> 1:00:11.013
<v Speaker 4>school to make the trades pathway much more visible and

1:00:11.093 --> 1:00:14.413
<v Speaker 4>much more accessible to young people so that we don't

1:00:14.533 --> 1:00:17.453
<v Speaker 4>end up with twice as many going on the doll

1:00:17.493 --> 1:00:21.093
<v Speaker 4>as we have leaving school and becoming apprentices If we

1:00:21.133 --> 1:00:24.373
<v Speaker 4>could even capture you know, that eleven percent and go

1:00:24.453 --> 1:00:28.253
<v Speaker 4>from six percent going into apprenticeships to something like fifteen percent,

1:00:28.333 --> 1:00:30.213
<v Speaker 4>that would be a really good start.

1:00:31.053 --> 1:00:34.693
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, and speaking of the word start, we might call

1:00:34.813 --> 1:00:40.453
<v Speaker 3>a finish no worries. So, Michael, it's great talking with

1:00:40.533 --> 1:00:42.213
<v Speaker 3>you and very productive.

1:00:42.253 --> 1:00:44.813
<v Speaker 2>I think it's very latent. Thanks have always a good

1:00:44.853 --> 1:00:45.973
<v Speaker 2>conversation with you.

1:00:46.093 --> 1:00:48.013
<v Speaker 3>Thanks kindly and we'll talk again.

1:00:48.333 --> 1:01:01.653
<v Speaker 2>Take care fine now, Layton Smith.

1:01:02.973 --> 1:01:07.373
<v Speaker 3>Leverix is an antihistamine made in Switzerland to the highest quality.

1:01:07.573 --> 1:01:11.453
<v Speaker 3>Leveris really use hay fever and skin allergies or itchy skin.

1:01:11.933 --> 1:01:16.253
<v Speaker 3>It's a dual action antihistamine and has a unique nasal

1:01:16.453 --> 1:01:21.093
<v Speaker 3>decongestent action. It's fast acting for fast relief and it

1:01:21.173 --> 1:01:24.253
<v Speaker 3>works in under an hour and lasts for over twenty

1:01:24.293 --> 1:01:28.093
<v Speaker 3>four hours. Leverrix is a tiny tablet that unblocks the nose,

1:01:28.413 --> 1:01:32.333
<v Speaker 3>deals with itchy eyes, and stops sneezing. Leverrix is an

1:01:32.333 --> 1:01:36.653
<v Speaker 3>antihistamine made in Switzerland to the highest quality. So next

1:01:36.733 --> 1:01:40.253
<v Speaker 3>time you're in need of an effective antihistamine, call into

1:01:40.293 --> 1:01:45.893
<v Speaker 3>the pharmacy and ask for Leverrix l v Rix Levrix

1:01:46.293 --> 1:01:49.053
<v Speaker 3>and always read the label. Take us directed and if

1:01:49.093 --> 1:02:05.933
<v Speaker 3>symptoms persist, see your health professional. Farmer Broker Auckland. Here

1:02:05.933 --> 1:02:08.653
<v Speaker 3>we are in two double six, that is Podcast two

1:02:08.693 --> 1:02:11.013
<v Speaker 3>double six with the mailroom and missus producer. How are

1:02:11.013 --> 1:02:12.533
<v Speaker 3>you feeling after your beach walk?

1:02:12.973 --> 1:02:14.933
<v Speaker 6>Lighton who couldn't feel fabulous?

1:02:14.933 --> 1:02:15.013
<v Speaker 2>On?

1:02:15.053 --> 1:02:17.333
<v Speaker 6>A day like this, life is good.

1:02:18.213 --> 1:02:20.253
<v Speaker 3>You realize that when people hear this it may be

1:02:20.373 --> 1:02:21.133
<v Speaker 3>bucketing down.

1:02:21.573 --> 1:02:24.013
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, but every day's fabulous, really, isn't it.

1:02:24.733 --> 1:02:25.533
<v Speaker 3>What if you're breathing?

1:02:26.533 --> 1:02:26.973
<v Speaker 6>We know that.

1:02:27.533 --> 1:02:30.613
<v Speaker 3>So for two double six, lead the way I shall start.

1:02:30.853 --> 1:02:34.573
<v Speaker 6>Lynn says. I am an ordinary New Zealander seventy seven

1:02:34.653 --> 1:02:37.933
<v Speaker 6>years of age. I find what happened last Thursday appalling,

1:02:38.093 --> 1:02:40.853
<v Speaker 6>of course, but I have seen a lot of political actions,

1:02:40.893 --> 1:02:44.053
<v Speaker 6>stunts and protests over my life. But this, this is

1:02:44.093 --> 1:02:47.493
<v Speaker 6>something sinister. This is not a protest. It is a

1:02:47.533 --> 1:02:51.573
<v Speaker 6>serious attempt to disable an elected government and dispense with

1:02:51.653 --> 1:02:55.493
<v Speaker 6>democracy and even the rule of law. They are blatantly

1:02:55.533 --> 1:02:58.013
<v Speaker 6>breaking the law and yet relying on the same law

1:02:58.053 --> 1:03:00.253
<v Speaker 6>to allow them to keep doing it. It is a

1:03:00.253 --> 1:03:03.133
<v Speaker 6>well established tactic of groups such as these to go

1:03:03.373 --> 1:03:07.013
<v Speaker 6>the government or establishment into taking the sort of action

1:03:07.093 --> 1:03:10.893
<v Speaker 6>that could allow them to I foul and act hurtful

1:03:11.013 --> 1:03:15.493
<v Speaker 6>and indignant. Also, schools and teachers are breaking their contracts

1:03:15.493 --> 1:03:18.773
<v Speaker 6>with the Ministry of Education. As public servants, they are

1:03:18.773 --> 1:03:22.333
<v Speaker 6>obliged to be seen as politically neutral. Yet twice last

1:03:22.373 --> 1:03:24.853
<v Speaker 6>week I saw the pupils and teachers of the two

1:03:24.893 --> 1:03:28.733
<v Speaker 6>local schools in my area marching around holding Mauri flags,

1:03:28.773 --> 1:03:32.453
<v Speaker 6>and teachers and pupils alike wearing red hats with white

1:03:32.533 --> 1:03:36.453
<v Speaker 6>feathers on them. So children as young as five are

1:03:36.493 --> 1:03:40.293
<v Speaker 6>indoctrinated into this. These children will no doubt be included

1:03:40.373 --> 1:03:45.253
<v Speaker 6>in the inflated figures reported by mainstream media. Equally upsetting,

1:03:45.333 --> 1:03:49.133
<v Speaker 6>says Lynn. Is Chris Luxen going to take any meaningful action?

1:03:49.453 --> 1:03:53.173
<v Speaker 6>I feel he should be supporting his coalition partner. I

1:03:53.253 --> 1:03:56.293
<v Speaker 6>know he has reiterated ad nauseum his feelings that he

1:03:56.333 --> 1:03:58.853
<v Speaker 6>doesn't like the bill, which I take to mean he's

1:03:58.893 --> 1:04:02.053
<v Speaker 6>wanting a quiet life. With all due respect, he should

1:04:02.093 --> 1:04:03.853
<v Speaker 6>be better than that, and I intend to make him

1:04:03.853 --> 1:04:06.493
<v Speaker 6>aware of my thoughts for all the good that that

1:04:06.573 --> 1:04:10.013
<v Speaker 6>will do. I will stop my rant later, as I

1:04:10.013 --> 1:04:12.173
<v Speaker 6>know abler pens than mine will be writing to you

1:04:12.213 --> 1:04:14.733
<v Speaker 6>on this subject, but I had to express my feelings

1:04:14.853 --> 1:04:18.613
<v Speaker 6>of fear about this. The Treaty Principle's bill is doing

1:04:18.653 --> 1:04:22.093
<v Speaker 6>no more than maintaining the principle of one man, one vote,

1:04:22.653 --> 1:04:25.693
<v Speaker 6>and lind says, I use man in the genetic sense,

1:04:25.933 --> 1:04:28.293
<v Speaker 6>as in mankind. Change it if you don't want to

1:04:28.373 --> 1:04:33.933
<v Speaker 6>risk cancelation. Another sinister aspect another sinister aspect of life

1:04:33.973 --> 1:04:36.693
<v Speaker 6>now and she says, thank you for your time. That's

1:04:36.693 --> 1:04:38.293
<v Speaker 6>from Lynn Linda.

1:04:38.373 --> 1:04:39.813
<v Speaker 3>At the end of the mail room, or before the

1:04:39.893 --> 1:04:41.773
<v Speaker 3>end of the mail room, I've got a comment to

1:04:41.893 --> 1:04:49.413
<v Speaker 3>make which I think you should hear from Chris. Thank

1:04:49.413 --> 1:04:53.413
<v Speaker 3>you for the US election debrief with Patrick Masham. Totally

1:04:53.453 --> 1:04:56.853
<v Speaker 3>worth the effort and the weight. I was one of

1:04:56.893 --> 1:04:59.813
<v Speaker 3>those people who called the election for Trump. During this election,

1:05:00.093 --> 1:05:03.453
<v Speaker 3>I was most interested in the way election processes were

1:05:03.533 --> 1:05:07.293
<v Speaker 3>handled post twenty twenty A note that quite a few

1:05:07.333 --> 1:05:12.533
<v Speaker 3>states in private entities instituted measures to counteract voter fraud

1:05:12.733 --> 1:05:16.173
<v Speaker 3>prior to the last week to well, he says, to

1:05:16.253 --> 1:05:20.293
<v Speaker 3>last week's elections. Honestly, on the day, my main interest

1:05:20.653 --> 1:05:23.693
<v Speaker 3>was how the timings and results from the seven swing

1:05:23.733 --> 1:05:27.693
<v Speaker 3>states were progressing, and I was not disappointed. However, in

1:05:27.733 --> 1:05:31.653
<v Speaker 3>the wake of Trump's win, the Republicans and supporters were

1:05:31.773 --> 1:05:35.733
<v Speaker 3>quick to credit success to their campaign activating voters to

1:05:35.813 --> 1:05:39.533
<v Speaker 3>the GOP cause. This may be true, but if we

1:05:39.613 --> 1:05:44.533
<v Speaker 3>put some context around the popular vote, things look slightly different,

1:05:45.093 --> 1:05:49.413
<v Speaker 3>although still great from a GOP perspective. In twenty sixteen,

1:05:49.453 --> 1:05:53.773
<v Speaker 3>Trump received sixty three million votes and Clinton sixty point

1:05:53.893 --> 1:05:58.533
<v Speaker 3>one million votes. In twenty twenty, Trump received seventy four

1:05:58.573 --> 1:06:02.533
<v Speaker 3>point two million votes and Biden eighty one point three

1:06:02.653 --> 1:06:07.333
<v Speaker 3>million votes. Really, in twenty twenty four, Trump has seventy

1:06:07.373 --> 1:06:09.933
<v Speaker 3>three point six million votes at the time I write

1:06:09.933 --> 1:06:13.933
<v Speaker 3>this email, while Harris has sixty nine point three. This

1:06:13.973 --> 1:06:18.933
<v Speaker 3>will increase slightly without thinking too deeply. In comparison to

1:06:18.973 --> 1:06:22.893
<v Speaker 3>the twenty twenty election, Harris has lost eleven million votes,

1:06:22.933 --> 1:06:27.093
<v Speaker 3>while Trump's vote count remained roughly the same. The red

1:06:27.133 --> 1:06:30.773
<v Speaker 3>wave looks in reality to be a receding blue tide.

1:06:31.133 --> 1:06:35.013
<v Speaker 3>Has something more sinisterive been exposed by this outgoing tide

1:06:35.173 --> 1:06:38.653
<v Speaker 3>of Democrat votes? I wonder, and then it break it's

1:06:38.693 --> 1:06:42.453
<v Speaker 3>without evidence. I wonder, without evidence, if we are seeing

1:06:42.573 --> 1:06:46.453
<v Speaker 3>a relatively clean twenty twenty four election where voter fraud

1:06:46.853 --> 1:06:51.973
<v Speaker 3>has been effectively stymied, and the twenty twenty overcount is

1:06:52.093 --> 1:06:56.133
<v Speaker 3>now obvious, or at least obvious enough to need openly

1:06:56.213 --> 1:07:01.573
<v Speaker 3>explaining both for and against arguments would be welcome. Please

1:07:01.653 --> 1:07:05.333
<v Speaker 3>keep up the great work, Chris. I sent that off

1:07:05.333 --> 1:07:09.053
<v Speaker 3>to to Patrick actually with a question. I don't think

1:07:09.093 --> 1:07:11.693
<v Speaker 3>I have a reply at this point, but I'll keep

1:07:11.693 --> 1:07:12.413
<v Speaker 3>you in touch if I do.

1:07:13.453 --> 1:07:16.813
<v Speaker 6>Latent John says, I've just this afternoon being speaking to

1:07:16.853 --> 1:07:21.133
<v Speaker 6>a retired and knighted justice. As you know, not all

1:07:21.173 --> 1:07:25.573
<v Speaker 6>retired judges get gonged. He must remain nameless, But he too,

1:07:25.693 --> 1:07:28.933
<v Speaker 6>is very concerned with this partnership concept and where it

1:07:29.013 --> 1:07:32.773
<v Speaker 6>might inevitably lead. A great majority of the electorate really

1:07:32.813 --> 1:07:36.693
<v Speaker 6>needs to wise up to the probable disastrous outcome. A

1:07:36.773 --> 1:07:39.853
<v Speaker 6>grab bag of kcs have come out and supported some

1:07:39.973 --> 1:07:42.853
<v Speaker 6>of this radicalism. They tend to be the newer bunch,

1:07:43.053 --> 1:07:47.813
<v Speaker 6>notable absences of endorsement from the older appointees. There are

1:07:47.933 --> 1:07:51.213
<v Speaker 6>arguably too many cass now the currency of the honor

1:07:51.253 --> 1:07:54.613
<v Speaker 6>has been devalued. When I started as a lawyer late

1:07:54.813 --> 1:07:57.693
<v Speaker 6>nineteen sixties, there were only a handful of QC's in

1:07:57.733 --> 1:08:00.973
<v Speaker 6>New Zealand. Now we're overrun with them. But I digress.

1:08:01.613 --> 1:08:04.773
<v Speaker 6>I fear we're hurtling down a slippery slope. Don't think

1:08:04.773 --> 1:08:08.813
<v Speaker 6>I'm overstating things, do you? If we have twofold systems,

1:08:08.813 --> 1:08:12.253
<v Speaker 6>how does anyone with very mixed genes determine where they stand?

1:08:12.733 --> 1:08:16.653
<v Speaker 6>Auckland's Asian population, for instance, becoming a high percentage of

1:08:16.693 --> 1:08:21.413
<v Speaker 6>the populace they and other more recent mixed heritage immigrants.

1:08:21.653 --> 1:08:26.173
<v Speaker 6>What for them? Seymour is courageous and absolutely correct. A

1:08:26.293 --> 1:08:29.653
<v Speaker 6>huge amount of discussion needed. Too many second rates in

1:08:29.693 --> 1:08:31.693
<v Speaker 6>the media who need to be given a wake.

1:08:31.533 --> 1:08:35.853
<v Speaker 3>Up proud that's from John John very well put and

1:08:35.933 --> 1:08:39.293
<v Speaker 3>I thank you late and missus producer. I hope you're well,

1:08:39.973 --> 1:08:41.173
<v Speaker 3>miss a producer. Are you well?

1:08:42.093 --> 1:08:44.413
<v Speaker 6>Very well? Thank you whoever's asking.

1:08:44.213 --> 1:08:47.853
<v Speaker 3>The I'm a clip on short and sharp email expressing

1:08:47.973 --> 1:08:51.573
<v Speaker 3>my and views of many others I speak to. The

1:08:51.613 --> 1:08:56.573
<v Speaker 3>Seymour bill is not contentious, Just what radical illogical MARII

1:08:56.693 --> 1:08:59.973
<v Speaker 3>don't want to hear the gravy train and misrepresentation of

1:09:00.013 --> 1:09:03.133
<v Speaker 3>the treaty written in English by colonials at the time

1:09:03.213 --> 1:09:07.893
<v Speaker 3>and translated by the same into Mari doesn't suit their agenda.

1:09:08.373 --> 1:09:11.733
<v Speaker 3>I would be so bold as to suggest most New

1:09:11.813 --> 1:09:15.213
<v Speaker 3>Zealanders are sick of their bleeding and devisive, hateful retrick.

1:09:15.893 --> 1:09:21.493
<v Speaker 3>They are an embarrassment to this nation. Yes they are.

1:09:23.293 --> 1:09:27.453
<v Speaker 6>Layton Mel says, love your podcasts, both yousus producer, Thank you, Mel.

1:09:27.573 --> 1:09:30.693
<v Speaker 6>It's all Layton, I'm telling you, it is all Laton.

1:09:31.653 --> 1:09:34.093
<v Speaker 6>My parents used to listen to you on talkback radio.

1:09:34.173 --> 1:09:36.013
<v Speaker 6>Years ago, and as a kid, I used to roll

1:09:36.053 --> 1:09:38.413
<v Speaker 6>my eyes and think how stupid and boring it was

1:09:38.493 --> 1:09:41.173
<v Speaker 6>to listen to talkback. I don't know how many times

1:09:41.213 --> 1:09:45.053
<v Speaker 6>I heard Layton said. Now I find myself listening to

1:09:45.093 --> 1:09:48.253
<v Speaker 6>talkback and podcasts all the time. I guess I grew

1:09:48.373 --> 1:09:51.333
<v Speaker 6>up anyway. Late in your podcast two five seven with

1:09:51.573 --> 1:09:54.613
<v Speaker 6>mister Paul Merrick mentioned a book that Amazon band and

1:09:54.853 --> 1:09:57.493
<v Speaker 6>is no longer available. He mentioned that he would send

1:09:57.533 --> 1:10:00.053
<v Speaker 6>you a PDF of the book, So I'm wondering if

1:10:00.093 --> 1:10:02.213
<v Speaker 6>I can have a copy of that pdf to read.

1:10:02.653 --> 1:10:06.733
<v Speaker 6>I'd also like any information on treating COVID short and long.

1:10:06.853 --> 1:10:10.293
<v Speaker 3>And that's from mel Well. I don't believe he has,

1:10:11.413 --> 1:10:15.333
<v Speaker 3>but I've got his contact, and there was another reason

1:10:15.413 --> 1:10:18.653
<v Speaker 3>why he may not have. But I'll see what I

1:10:18.693 --> 1:10:21.653
<v Speaker 3>can do. Let you know, that's two commitments I've made

1:10:21.653 --> 1:10:22.053
<v Speaker 3>so fast.

1:10:22.093 --> 1:10:24.253
<v Speaker 6>I was going to say, if you remember, you need

1:10:24.333 --> 1:10:27.053
<v Speaker 6>to write down, so you need to make the note.

1:10:27.333 --> 1:10:29.093
<v Speaker 6>Make the note.

1:10:29.453 --> 1:10:33.293
<v Speaker 3>I have been disturbed by the mainstream media outright attack

1:10:33.493 --> 1:10:37.893
<v Speaker 3>and blatant misinformation on RFK the last few days. This

1:10:38.053 --> 1:10:41.573
<v Speaker 3>article explains the media's complicit behavior and total lack of

1:10:41.573 --> 1:10:46.493
<v Speaker 3>balance reporting Kennedy is and has been for decades, calling

1:10:46.533 --> 1:10:51.173
<v Speaker 3>for transparent and actual studies of childhood vaccines in particular,

1:10:51.853 --> 1:10:55.253
<v Speaker 3>then a list of four points. Number one studies of

1:10:55.373 --> 1:11:00.653
<v Speaker 3>BAX versus unbacked kids. Second, the same stringent clinical trials

1:11:00.733 --> 1:11:05.813
<v Speaker 3>as applied to all pharmaceutceutical drugs to be applied to vaccines. Three,

1:11:06.093 --> 1:11:12.573
<v Speaker 3>the removal of legal indemnity for vaccines I reckon number four,

1:11:13.533 --> 1:11:17.693
<v Speaker 3>the studies of vaccines versus an actual placebo. Then, in

1:11:17.733 --> 1:11:23.373
<v Speaker 3>Brackett's the placebo used is either a neurotoxic EG aluminium

1:11:23.453 --> 1:11:27.573
<v Speaker 3>or another vaccine on the childhood immunization schedule. It would

1:11:27.573 --> 1:11:33.173
<v Speaker 3>appear these are reasonable requests that surely any parent considering

1:11:33.253 --> 1:11:38.733
<v Speaker 3>vaccinating their child would want. Instead, all they receive is

1:11:38.813 --> 1:11:43.053
<v Speaker 3>gaslighting behavior by their gp that all childhood vaccines are

1:11:43.053 --> 1:11:46.573
<v Speaker 3>safe and effective. The media asks no questions. Worse, they

1:11:46.573 --> 1:11:50.373
<v Speaker 3>attack anyone who raises concerns. Shame on them. No wonder

1:11:50.413 --> 1:11:53.933
<v Speaker 3>people are switching off from mainstream media. One can almost

1:11:53.973 --> 1:11:57.493
<v Speaker 3>smell the death throws of a desperate, captured, paid off

1:11:57.573 --> 1:12:02.453
<v Speaker 3>media cheers Caroline, Very aggressive, Caroline, But I know there

1:12:02.493 --> 1:12:03.933
<v Speaker 3>is much sort along those lines.

1:12:04.533 --> 1:12:06.853
<v Speaker 6>Layton Serlda says, just a quick note to say how

1:12:06.933 --> 1:12:11.613
<v Speaker 6>much you are appreciated. Full of stimulating interesting subject matter.

1:12:11.893 --> 1:12:14.453
<v Speaker 6>I especially liked your coverage of Trump as he cleaned

1:12:14.533 --> 1:12:16.293
<v Speaker 6>up in the election. And that's from Zelda.

1:12:16.533 --> 1:12:22.453
<v Speaker 3>Zelda well said all from Roger. Roger writes from Sydney.

1:12:22.773 --> 1:12:27.373
<v Speaker 3>Harker erupts in New Zealand Parliament over controversial bill. Good

1:12:27.413 --> 1:12:29.373
<v Speaker 3>to see that New Zealand is as batty as ever

1:12:31.693 --> 1:12:34.053
<v Speaker 3>and by the look of this, Roger is an accountant.

1:12:37.053 --> 1:12:40.933
<v Speaker 3>Just say, what do you think of this? Bearing in

1:12:41.013 --> 1:12:44.773
<v Speaker 3>mind the Waitaki Council has recently been found to be

1:12:45.133 --> 1:12:48.893
<v Speaker 3>overdosing the water supplies there, don't you think an assurance

1:12:48.893 --> 1:12:52.213
<v Speaker 3>from the Director General of Health would be appropriate? But

1:12:52.293 --> 1:12:55.973
<v Speaker 3>she won't front up. Surely as a public servant she should.

1:12:56.173 --> 1:13:00.013
<v Speaker 3>This is a highly toxic chemical and I am extremely

1:13:00.053 --> 1:13:04.053
<v Speaker 3>concerned that this is going unchecked as overdosing too especially

1:13:04.093 --> 1:13:08.013
<v Speaker 3>babies and young children is toxic. Can you please investigate this?

1:13:08.053 --> 1:13:11.133
<v Speaker 3>The US is going to ban this chemical in all

1:13:11.173 --> 1:13:15.373
<v Speaker 3>their drinking water on the twentieth of January twenty twenty five.

1:13:16.053 --> 1:13:19.293
<v Speaker 3>Israel banned in twenty fourteen, saying it was dangerous. The

1:13:19.333 --> 1:13:23.893
<v Speaker 3>warnings on fluoride toothpaste as they do not swallow. So

1:13:23.933 --> 1:13:27.333
<v Speaker 3>how does the Ministry of Health know everybody is getting

1:13:27.373 --> 1:13:31.213
<v Speaker 3>the right dosage? Unless they can prove this one hundred percent,

1:13:31.533 --> 1:13:35.133
<v Speaker 3>they should immediately stop. Strangely, I can't even get a

1:13:35.173 --> 1:13:39.653
<v Speaker 3>reply from either Shane Ready or Diana Safati on this.

1:13:40.453 --> 1:13:44.573
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps you can, Linda. What's going to take place in

1:13:44.613 --> 1:13:49.573
<v Speaker 3>the US I think is yet to be refined. But

1:13:49.693 --> 1:13:54.293
<v Speaker 3>if they followed this path, then isn't Australia going to

1:13:54.293 --> 1:13:59.773
<v Speaker 3>do something as well? I think? But I either way, anyway,

1:13:59.933 --> 1:14:02.173
<v Speaker 3>this needs to be looked at. My mind has been

1:14:02.253 --> 1:14:04.733
<v Speaker 3>cast back to a period of time when we had

1:14:05.693 --> 1:14:08.973
<v Speaker 3>the Prime Minister's scientific chief were laying on the law

1:14:09.533 --> 1:14:14.093
<v Speaker 3>that this wasn't going to change because it's perfectly safe.

1:14:14.253 --> 1:14:17.973
<v Speaker 3>I've pondered that ever since. To be honest, let me

1:14:18.013 --> 1:14:23.013
<v Speaker 3>finish with this. One English writer and defender of Western civilization,

1:14:23.093 --> 1:14:26.653
<v Speaker 3>Douglas Murray, has something to say that is very pertinent

1:14:26.733 --> 1:14:29.573
<v Speaker 3>to New Zealand and the situation we are in today.

1:14:30.293 --> 1:14:33.253
<v Speaker 3>He does not hold back. Mister Murray's words give rise

1:14:33.293 --> 1:14:35.813
<v Speaker 3>to the question why is there no one in New

1:14:35.933 --> 1:14:39.333
<v Speaker 3>Zealand defending our developed culture with the same kind of

1:14:39.493 --> 1:14:44.173
<v Speaker 3>zeal The narcissist mister Whititty exercises in his drive to

1:14:44.253 --> 1:14:48.893
<v Speaker 3>return us to pre European culture. In my humble opinion,

1:14:49.133 --> 1:14:53.293
<v Speaker 3>Seymour's Treaty Principles Bill is doing something quite minor compared

1:14:53.293 --> 1:14:57.333
<v Speaker 3>to what really should be done. For just a few examples,

1:14:57.613 --> 1:15:01.093
<v Speaker 3>the defunding of all government race based departments, the closure

1:15:01.173 --> 1:15:04.453
<v Speaker 3>of the Waitangi Tribunal, and the removal of taxation concessions

1:15:04.453 --> 1:15:08.733
<v Speaker 3>for all so called murray enterprises. Mister Whiteitty is welcome

1:15:08.773 --> 1:15:11.093
<v Speaker 3>to what he perceives as his own culture if he

1:15:11.173 --> 1:15:14.173
<v Speaker 3>wants it so badly, but he should not be robbing

1:15:14.213 --> 1:15:17.933
<v Speaker 3>every other New Zealander in pursuit of that objective. Neither

1:15:17.973 --> 1:15:20.973
<v Speaker 3>should he be making a mockery of our Parliament. There

1:15:21.013 --> 1:15:26.813
<v Speaker 3>should be far greater sanctions applied for his barbaric behavior

1:15:27.413 --> 1:15:30.053
<v Speaker 3>this week. Now, that brings us to the end of

1:15:30.093 --> 1:15:34.373
<v Speaker 3>the mail room. But I have reserved a commentary for

1:15:34.773 --> 1:15:39.133
<v Speaker 3>following up immediately, well very shortly, that I wanted to

1:15:39.453 --> 1:15:41.733
<v Speaker 3>spend a little time on, So I'm not including it

1:15:41.733 --> 1:15:43.693
<v Speaker 3>in the mailroom because missus producers got things to do,

1:15:44.853 --> 1:15:47.293
<v Speaker 3>no late, and I love being here, but you still

1:15:47.333 --> 1:15:49.693
<v Speaker 3>have things to do. I got a lot of driving

1:15:49.773 --> 1:15:53.773
<v Speaker 3>to do. Yes, I do so, thank you. We shall

1:15:53.813 --> 1:15:54.733
<v Speaker 3>see you next.

1:15:54.573 --> 1:15:57.053
<v Speaker 6>Week lovely, Thanks later and look forward to him.

1:16:11.133 --> 1:16:14.813
<v Speaker 3>Now here's the letter that I said i'd read after

1:16:14.893 --> 1:16:18.533
<v Speaker 3>the mail room, and I think you'll note for appropriate reasons.

1:16:18.733 --> 1:16:21.333
<v Speaker 3>But before I do, I just want to make reference

1:16:21.373 --> 1:16:25.373
<v Speaker 3>to Matt Walsh, who is well it's going to be

1:16:25.413 --> 1:16:28.653
<v Speaker 3>explained in a moment, but I've seen the video. I

1:16:28.693 --> 1:16:32.213
<v Speaker 3>saw it before the before the letter arrived, and I

1:16:32.253 --> 1:16:34.053
<v Speaker 3>was going to include it, and then I thought, well,

1:16:34.133 --> 1:16:39.093
<v Speaker 3>let's do both together. So here is the letter American

1:16:39.093 --> 1:16:42.853
<v Speaker 3>political commentator Matt Walsh dedicated nearly twenty two minutes of

1:16:42.893 --> 1:16:46.133
<v Speaker 3>his recent podcast to New Zealand. When the famous star

1:16:46.253 --> 1:16:49.813
<v Speaker 3>of What Is a Woman? And Am I Racist? Dedicates

1:16:49.933 --> 1:16:53.613
<v Speaker 3>nearly one third of his entire podcast to New Zealand politics,

1:16:54.173 --> 1:16:56.613
<v Speaker 3>you can be sure that New Zealand has either done

1:16:56.653 --> 1:17:01.333
<v Speaker 3>something extraordinarily good or in this case, catastrophically bad. In

1:17:01.413 --> 1:17:06.613
<v Speaker 3>his podcast, Matt Lambastard, the Teparti Mariri, the Marry Party

1:17:06.653 --> 1:17:11.173
<v Speaker 3>inmates who turned out Parliament into a political asylum. The

1:17:11.213 --> 1:17:15.053
<v Speaker 3>caption on his YouTube video says Parliament in New Zealand

1:17:15.253 --> 1:17:19.293
<v Speaker 3>descended into tribal stone age grunting on behalf of so

1:17:19.453 --> 1:17:22.973
<v Speaker 3>called indigenous rites. This is a preview of what our

1:17:23.013 --> 1:17:26.933
<v Speaker 3>country could look like if we keep apologizing for our history.

1:17:27.333 --> 1:17:31.693
<v Speaker 3>What a shameful indictment of the state of New Zealand politics. Furthermore,

1:17:32.293 --> 1:17:35.493
<v Speaker 3>local YouTuber Fonga Ray Tim never heard of him, but

1:17:36.093 --> 1:17:40.973
<v Speaker 3>now you have had a funnier caption saying New Zealand's

1:17:40.973 --> 1:17:45.413
<v Speaker 3>low IQ special needs primitive MPs perform a Marie Harker

1:17:45.493 --> 1:17:48.933
<v Speaker 3>war dance when they don't like the vote. Close quote

1:17:49.133 --> 1:17:53.013
<v Speaker 3>that young to Party Mary MP, who violently tore Act's

1:17:53.093 --> 1:17:57.293
<v Speaker 3>Treaty Principle's Bill in Parliament and started the Harker in

1:17:57.453 --> 1:18:02.253
<v Speaker 3>defiance of the Speaker should be fired, jailed and rehabilitated,

1:18:03.053 --> 1:18:07.733
<v Speaker 3>or maybe just jailed. She is categorically unfit to be

1:18:07.933 --> 1:18:13.813
<v Speaker 3>an Why the majority so silent on these parliament terrorists?

1:18:13.853 --> 1:18:17.253
<v Speaker 3>In the recent Free Speech Union agm held in Auckland,

1:18:17.653 --> 1:18:22.493
<v Speaker 3>Professor Nigel Bigar suggested that the problem lies with a

1:18:22.613 --> 1:18:26.813
<v Speaker 3>mild risk averse majority who often wants to keep out

1:18:26.853 --> 1:18:30.773
<v Speaker 3>of trouble. As a result, they inadvertently allowed the aggressive

1:18:30.853 --> 1:18:34.893
<v Speaker 3>noise of the minority to intimidate the majority. In this case,

1:18:35.133 --> 1:18:37.773
<v Speaker 3>says the author, I believe the majority of New Zealanders,

1:18:37.893 --> 1:18:42.773
<v Speaker 3>especially white New Zealanders, have been conditioned to self censor

1:18:43.493 --> 1:18:46.893
<v Speaker 3>on all matters pertaining to Mary, for fear of being

1:18:47.253 --> 1:18:52.773
<v Speaker 3>labeled racist by actual racists like Willie Jackson. Well, for once,

1:18:53.173 --> 1:18:55.653
<v Speaker 3>I hope whatever is happening in America will happen in

1:18:55.693 --> 1:19:00.133
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand, because we too need to fight, fight, fight.

1:19:02.213 --> 1:19:05.373
<v Speaker 3>It was slightly more aggressive than I read, and to

1:19:05.373 --> 1:19:09.653
<v Speaker 3>be honest, so I self sent a little bit now

1:19:09.693 --> 1:19:13.373
<v Speaker 3>to respond to Linn's letter and be put it this way.

1:19:13.973 --> 1:19:17.813
<v Speaker 3>The detritus there was witnessed in part of it last week.

1:19:18.213 --> 1:19:21.453
<v Speaker 3>It has a source. It goes back a long way.

1:19:22.373 --> 1:19:25.293
<v Speaker 3>It's the result of a great deal of cowardice, or

1:19:25.333 --> 1:19:28.653
<v Speaker 3>if you prefer, an unwillingness on the part of governments

1:19:29.413 --> 1:19:32.973
<v Speaker 3>on both sides of the aisle to take action, to

1:19:33.053 --> 1:19:36.893
<v Speaker 3>take firm action to resolve issues, and well as the

1:19:36.973 --> 1:19:40.573
<v Speaker 3>saying goes, kick the can down the road. It falls

1:19:40.573 --> 1:19:45.933
<v Speaker 3>into a similar category as printing dollars, printing money the

1:19:46.013 --> 1:19:52.013
<v Speaker 3>future generations paid for, and the most recent labor administration

1:19:52.413 --> 1:19:54.853
<v Speaker 3>has shown us how to do that big time and

1:19:54.973 --> 1:19:59.413
<v Speaker 3>screw the country now I've made reference. Oh Now, if

1:19:59.413 --> 1:20:03.893
<v Speaker 3>you want to get the Matt Welsh piece the video,

1:20:04.973 --> 1:20:08.293
<v Speaker 3>just do a search on Matt Walsh's en Z clip

1:20:08.613 --> 1:20:13.733
<v Speaker 3>Matt Walsh's end z clip and you will find it. Now.

1:20:14.493 --> 1:20:19.853
<v Speaker 3>I've made reference recently to Robert McCulloch from Auckland University,

1:20:20.173 --> 1:20:25.413
<v Speaker 3>professor of economics, and part of the reason was because

1:20:25.453 --> 1:20:28.133
<v Speaker 3>I discovered him and he was writing for his own

1:20:28.133 --> 1:20:33.053
<v Speaker 3>blog and I really liked what he said, except did

1:20:33.093 --> 1:20:35.973
<v Speaker 3>I say it again, it's got an overrider that he's

1:20:36.013 --> 1:20:39.173
<v Speaker 3>had to go with a couple of people who who

1:20:39.253 --> 1:20:45.613
<v Speaker 3>I'm familiar with, put me in a precarious position. However,

1:20:46.133 --> 1:20:49.733
<v Speaker 3>on the seventeenth of November he wrote the following, Now

1:20:49.773 --> 1:20:53.653
<v Speaker 3>we know how New Zealand's economy became broken. The Judiciary

1:20:53.813 --> 1:21:00.253
<v Speaker 3>wrote a communist style constitution without consultation, without people knowing.

1:21:01.493 --> 1:21:04.853
<v Speaker 3>The treaty debate is great. We've just found out, courtesy

1:21:04.853 --> 1:21:09.053
<v Speaker 3>about King's Councils, what has broken the economic of this nation.

1:21:09.933 --> 1:21:12.573
<v Speaker 3>It has only just been revealed, thanks to their letter

1:21:12.693 --> 1:21:16.813
<v Speaker 3>to the PM, that the Judiciary invented their own set

1:21:16.853 --> 1:21:20.413
<v Speaker 3>of treaty principles, the main one of interests to economists

1:21:20.453 --> 1:21:25.333
<v Speaker 3>being the requirement of equitable outcomes, which are our fully

1:21:25.333 --> 1:21:28.933
<v Speaker 3>part of our constitution, so much so that the councils

1:21:29.013 --> 1:21:34.253
<v Speaker 3>call them settled constitutional law, unable to be adjusted by Parliament,

1:21:34.573 --> 1:21:38.293
<v Speaker 3>let alone upstarts like Acts Seymour and the likes of

1:21:38.333 --> 1:21:41.573
<v Speaker 3>whom they swat by referring to as being part of

1:21:41.613 --> 1:21:44.933
<v Speaker 3>the government of the day. It's sort of a throwaway

1:21:45.013 --> 1:21:47.733
<v Speaker 3>and part of the government of the day. According to

1:21:47.853 --> 1:21:52.493
<v Speaker 3>the lawyers, we the little people, just vote for day

1:21:52.533 --> 1:21:58.573
<v Speaker 3>to day administrators, whereas the profound, unalterable constitutional principles governing

1:21:58.653 --> 1:22:02.533
<v Speaker 3>us in an enduring sense are written by people with

1:22:03.093 --> 1:22:07.413
<v Speaker 3>bigger minds, our judges. Most of us have heard about

1:22:07.413 --> 1:22:11.253
<v Speaker 3>the principles before, but until the treaty debate was opened recently,

1:22:11.973 --> 1:22:15.133
<v Speaker 3>we had no idea that they were so embedded into

1:22:15.133 --> 1:22:22.053
<v Speaker 3>our constitutional arrangements. Many countries have affirmative action programs. However,

1:22:22.333 --> 1:22:25.613
<v Speaker 3>I know of no country, he writes, no country that

1:22:25.733 --> 1:22:32.493
<v Speaker 3>has a constitutional requirement of outcomes not opportunities being equalized

1:22:32.533 --> 1:22:36.093
<v Speaker 3>amongst the citizenry, other than maybe a few commoner states

1:22:36.133 --> 1:22:40.413
<v Speaker 3>that failed and no longer exist. The reasons are obvious

1:22:40.573 --> 1:22:44.413
<v Speaker 3>to economists, but not to our judiciary. Now that's only

1:22:44.853 --> 1:22:48.813
<v Speaker 3>a little that's half of it. Maybe because he doesn't

1:22:48.813 --> 1:22:51.853
<v Speaker 3>write long pieces, which makes it much easier to punch

1:22:51.893 --> 1:22:55.973
<v Speaker 3>through more of them. I suggest you have a look

1:22:56.013 --> 1:22:59.173
<v Speaker 3>at it, and you want to know how to get it. McCulloch,

1:22:59.613 --> 1:23:06.093
<v Speaker 3>Robert McCulloch m a double CUBLC and you'll come across

1:23:06.133 --> 1:23:10.573
<v Speaker 3>his lot. It's worth it's worth keeping in touch with now.

1:23:10.613 --> 1:23:16.093
<v Speaker 3>Another thing I mentioned was AI and democracy because we

1:23:16.213 --> 1:23:18.293
<v Speaker 3>discussed AI at the end of the interview that we

1:23:18.413 --> 1:23:23.693
<v Speaker 3>had with Michael Johnson. And this is an alternative approach.

1:23:23.973 --> 1:23:29.413
<v Speaker 3>Shall we say how AI threatens democracy? The explosive rise

1:23:29.453 --> 1:23:34.533
<v Speaker 3>of generative AI is already transforming journalism, finance, and medicine,

1:23:34.733 --> 1:23:37.453
<v Speaker 3>but it could also have a disruptive influence on politics.

1:23:37.813 --> 1:23:41.733
<v Speaker 3>For example, asking a chatbot how to navigate a complicated

1:23:41.733 --> 1:23:45.853
<v Speaker 3>bureaucracy or to help draft a letter to an elected

1:23:45.893 --> 1:23:51.253
<v Speaker 3>official could bolster civic engagement. However, that same technology, with

1:23:51.373 --> 1:23:56.733
<v Speaker 3>its potential to produce disinformation and misinformation at scale, threatens

1:23:56.773 --> 1:24:02.413
<v Speaker 3>to interfere with democratic representation, undermine democratic accountability, and corrode

1:24:02.653 --> 1:24:05.693
<v Speaker 3>social and political trust. Like we need more of it.

1:24:06.173 --> 1:24:09.573
<v Speaker 3>This essay analyzes the scope of the threat in each

1:24:09.613 --> 1:24:14.293
<v Speaker 3>of these spheres, and discusses potential guardrails for these misuses,

1:24:14.573 --> 1:24:20.653
<v Speaker 3>including neural networks used to identify generated content, self regulation

1:24:20.933 --> 1:24:25.933
<v Speaker 3>by generative AI platforms, and greater digital literacy on the

1:24:25.973 --> 1:24:29.013
<v Speaker 3>part of the public and elites alike. Just a month

1:24:29.053 --> 1:24:34.853
<v Speaker 3>after its introduction, a chat GPT, the generative artificial intelligence

1:24:35.413 --> 1:24:39.973
<v Speaker 3>AI chat bon hit one hundred million monthly users, making

1:24:39.973 --> 1:24:43.613
<v Speaker 3>it the fastest growing application in history. For context, it

1:24:43.653 --> 1:24:47.653
<v Speaker 3>took the video streaming service Netflix, now a household name,

1:24:48.293 --> 1:24:51.613
<v Speaker 3>three and a half years to reach one million monthly users.

1:24:51.853 --> 1:24:56.893
<v Speaker 3>But unlike Netflix, the meteoric rise of chat GPT and

1:24:57.093 --> 1:25:01.493
<v Speaker 3>its potential for good or ill spark considerable debate. Would

1:25:01.493 --> 1:25:04.013
<v Speaker 3>students be able to use or other misuse the tool

1:25:04.053 --> 1:25:07.573
<v Speaker 3>for researching or writing? Would it put journalists and coders

1:25:07.653 --> 1:25:11.573
<v Speaker 3>out of business? What it's hijacked democracy? As one New

1:25:11.653 --> 1:25:15.093
<v Speaker 3>York Times up head put it by enabling mass phony

1:25:15.173 --> 1:25:23.213
<v Speaker 3>inputs to perhaps influence democratic representation. And most fundamentally or apocalyptically,

1:25:23.973 --> 1:25:29.333
<v Speaker 3>could advances in artificial intelligence actually pose an existential threat

1:25:29.373 --> 1:25:32.053
<v Speaker 3>to humanity? And these are things I had in mind

1:25:32.093 --> 1:25:37.533
<v Speaker 3>when I will raise it with Michael. If you want

1:25:37.533 --> 1:25:43.453
<v Speaker 3>to read the entire discussion. Search how AI Threatens Democracy?

1:25:43.693 --> 1:25:48.453
<v Speaker 3>Simple How AI Threatens Democracy got two authors. Sarah Krepps

1:25:48.653 --> 1:25:54.573
<v Speaker 3>is a professor in the Department of Government, adjunct Professor

1:25:54.613 --> 1:25:58.173
<v Speaker 3>of Law, and the director of the Tech Policy Institute

1:25:58.213 --> 1:26:04.253
<v Speaker 3>at Cornell University. Doug Kriner, the second author is the

1:26:04.253 --> 1:26:09.013
<v Speaker 3>Clinton Rossiter, Professor of American Institute in American Instituts in

1:26:09.053 --> 1:26:11.533
<v Speaker 3>the Department of Government at Cornell University. So the both

1:26:11.573 --> 1:26:15.773
<v Speaker 3>at Cornell. George Freeman dot his degree at Cornell. I'm

1:26:15.853 --> 1:26:19.253
<v Speaker 3>just throwing for interest. Take now, there is one other

1:26:19.493 --> 1:26:22.133
<v Speaker 3>thing that I want to mention. I raised the subject

1:26:22.133 --> 1:26:27.413
<v Speaker 3>of the who again with Michael, and there were parts

1:26:27.453 --> 1:26:30.373
<v Speaker 3>of it that I wanted to dive into, but I

1:26:30.493 --> 1:26:36.893
<v Speaker 3>left them out until now because they're sensitive to some people.

1:26:37.333 --> 1:26:40.253
<v Speaker 3>But after all, we're all adults and we can or

1:26:40.293 --> 1:26:43.933
<v Speaker 3>should be able to cope with such things. Look Who's

1:26:43.973 --> 1:26:48.013
<v Speaker 3>in the Classroom? Written by Hugh McCarthy. Now you'll find it,

1:26:48.133 --> 1:26:50.213
<v Speaker 3>I think I might have mentioned you'll find it on

1:26:50.293 --> 1:26:55.493
<v Speaker 3>Brownstone Institute. Here's Hugh McCarthy's a bio. He retired as

1:26:55.533 --> 1:26:58.173
<v Speaker 3>a head teacher after twenty three years in that role.

1:26:58.653 --> 1:27:01.653
<v Speaker 3>He also lectured in a postgraduate leadership course at the

1:27:01.693 --> 1:27:05.333
<v Speaker 3>University of Ulster. Hugh has served as a director of

1:27:05.533 --> 1:27:10.133
<v Speaker 3>two of Northern Ireland's major educational and currently serves as

1:27:10.173 --> 1:27:13.853
<v Speaker 3>a ministerial appointment on one. He has fifty years of

1:27:13.933 --> 1:27:17.573
<v Speaker 3>experience in education. He lives just outside Belfast, married to

1:27:17.613 --> 1:27:22.533
<v Speaker 3>Lorraine and made all this but nevertheless and has three sons.

1:27:22.933 --> 1:27:27.093
<v Speaker 3>Hugh holds a master's degree in distinction in education financial

1:27:27.173 --> 1:27:31.613
<v Speaker 3>management and an honors degree in chemistry at a BA

1:27:31.773 --> 1:27:36.493
<v Speaker 3>in public administration over educated if anything now in reference

1:27:36.573 --> 1:27:42.173
<v Speaker 3>to the WHO at its interference in education in the

1:27:42.213 --> 1:27:45.133
<v Speaker 3>next section zo page four. In the next section, the

1:27:45.173 --> 1:27:50.533
<v Speaker 3>who's approach to sexuality education is discussed. It is summed

1:27:50.613 --> 1:27:54.213
<v Speaker 3>up by the statement a child is understood to be

1:27:54.253 --> 1:27:57.053
<v Speaker 3>a sexual being from the beginning. The basis for this

1:27:57.173 --> 1:28:02.213
<v Speaker 3>is explained in the section entitled Psychosexual Development of Children

1:28:02.613 --> 1:28:08.333
<v Speaker 3>and argues the need for an early start to sexuality education. Psychologies,

1:28:08.733 --> 1:28:12.893
<v Speaker 3>especially developmental psychology, they claim, purports to show that children

1:28:12.933 --> 1:28:18.413
<v Speaker 3>are born as sexual beings, whatever that means. This approach

1:28:18.653 --> 1:28:22.733
<v Speaker 3>is then transferred into education school and the classroom via

1:28:22.773 --> 1:28:27.253
<v Speaker 3>the guidelines offered to teachers. Now where it gets sensitive,

1:28:27.413 --> 1:28:30.333
<v Speaker 3>but I'm going to include it because I think it's important.

1:28:30.493 --> 1:28:35.173
<v Speaker 3>The guidance given for ages six to nine recommends a

1:28:35.213 --> 1:28:40.053
<v Speaker 3>curriculum content which includes six to nine, remember sexual intercourse,

1:28:41.053 --> 1:28:46.173
<v Speaker 3>gender orientation and sexual behavior of young people, enjoyment and

1:28:46.213 --> 1:28:50.573
<v Speaker 3>pleasure when touching one's own body, masturbation, self stimulation, orgasm.

1:28:51.653 --> 1:28:55.773
<v Speaker 3>Then from nine to twelve, the curriculum content includes how

1:28:55.813 --> 1:29:00.173
<v Speaker 3>to enjoy sexuality in an appropriate way, first sexual experience

1:29:00.613 --> 1:29:04.173
<v Speaker 3>and then covers off the pleasure, masturbation and orgasm just

1:29:04.213 --> 1:29:09.093
<v Speaker 3>for good measure now. Whilst in the International TechEd Guidance,

1:29:09.133 --> 1:29:13.133
<v Speaker 3>the learning objective for five to eight year olds state

1:29:13.333 --> 1:29:17.373
<v Speaker 3>that learners will be able to identify the critical parts

1:29:17.453 --> 1:29:22.093
<v Speaker 3>of the internal and external genitals and describe their basic function,

1:29:23.093 --> 1:29:25.813
<v Speaker 3>and from night to twelve year old learners they'll be

1:29:25.893 --> 1:29:33.493
<v Speaker 3>able to describe what sexually explicit media, pornography and sexting are,

1:29:34.893 --> 1:29:39.653
<v Speaker 3>and male and female responses to sexual stimulation. Knowledge in

1:29:39.693 --> 1:29:43.693
<v Speaker 3>brackets explain that many boys and girls begin to masturbate

1:29:43.773 --> 1:29:47.613
<v Speaker 3>during puberty or sometimes earlier, comes under the heading of knowledge. Again,

1:29:47.973 --> 1:29:51.133
<v Speaker 3>the guidance also refers to teaching the material in an

1:29:51.213 --> 1:29:54.093
<v Speaker 3>interactive way. I am at a loss, he writes, to

1:29:54.173 --> 1:29:57.213
<v Speaker 3>know how this can be done without graphic images and

1:29:57.293 --> 1:30:02.453
<v Speaker 3>the lead discussion taking place. It clearly establishes a culture

1:30:02.813 --> 1:30:05.133
<v Speaker 3>and sets out a norm for what is acceptable to

1:30:05.213 --> 1:30:08.693
<v Speaker 3>teach young children, and the guidance goes further. It also

1:30:08.773 --> 1:30:14.373
<v Speaker 3>provides detailed guidance for the teaching of RSC. So what

1:30:14.493 --> 1:30:21.533
<v Speaker 3>is RSC RS is relationship and sexuality education. Now I

1:30:21.573 --> 1:30:26.093
<v Speaker 3>shall now just refer to his conclusion. Well, actually maybe

1:30:26.093 --> 1:30:29.013
<v Speaker 3>I won't because fairly long, but the beginning of it.

1:30:29.013 --> 1:30:31.453
<v Speaker 3>It is right that schools pass on broad moral and

1:30:31.493 --> 1:30:35.493
<v Speaker 3>spiritual values. These values will include respect, tolerance, and caring

1:30:35.533 --> 1:30:38.933
<v Speaker 3>for others. It seems to me, however, that the RSSE

1:30:39.293 --> 1:30:43.653
<v Speaker 3>issue appears to be the driving culture in some schools

1:30:43.933 --> 1:30:48.773
<v Speaker 3>to the marginalization of more vital components to the roles

1:30:48.813 --> 1:30:51.573
<v Speaker 3>of schools. Children are being forced to accept this culture

1:30:51.573 --> 1:30:54.733
<v Speaker 3>which surrounds the actions of the school. Much guidance from

1:30:54.813 --> 1:30:58.293
<v Speaker 3>the authority speaks of promoting the culture. This is far

1:30:58.373 --> 1:31:02.013
<v Speaker 3>removed from providing information. And there's quite a bit more.

1:31:03.053 --> 1:31:05.973
<v Speaker 3>This is the who now. By the way, if you think,

1:31:06.413 --> 1:31:11.733
<v Speaker 3>if you're thinking, doesn't happen here, you're deluding yourself sadly,

1:31:12.933 --> 1:31:16.173
<v Speaker 3>or maybe just not in a possession of information. I

1:31:16.253 --> 1:31:22.013
<v Speaker 3>dealt with this briefly, fairly recently with a high profile

1:31:22.093 --> 1:31:25.933
<v Speaker 3>school in this country, a high school, high profile school

1:31:27.293 --> 1:31:31.573
<v Speaker 3>of the private nature, when I had communication from parents

1:31:31.973 --> 1:31:34.853
<v Speaker 3>and they were disgusted and they were basically told to

1:31:34.893 --> 1:31:39.133
<v Speaker 3>bugger off. And on that unsavory note, I will say

1:31:39.613 --> 1:31:42.053
<v Speaker 3>if you would like to write to us latent at

1:31:42.053 --> 1:31:45.413
<v Speaker 3>newstalks ab dot co dot nzid or Carolyn news Talks

1:31:45.413 --> 1:31:48.893
<v Speaker 3>of dot co dot nz. We shall return in a

1:31:48.933 --> 1:31:52.253
<v Speaker 3>few days as always with podcast number two hundred and

1:31:52.893 --> 1:31:58.173
<v Speaker 3>sixty seven. Until then, thank you for listening and we'll

1:31:58.173 --> 1:31:58.653
<v Speaker 3>talk soon.

1:32:06.413 --> 1:32:09.453
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for more or from News Talk set B.

1:32:09.733 --> 1:32:12.973
<v Speaker 1>Listen live on air or online, and keep our shows

1:32:13.013 --> 1:32:16.333
<v Speaker 1>with you wherever you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio