WEBVTT - Hamish Pepper: Don't act too quickly after OCR announcement

0:00:05.761 --> 0:00:09.641
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Weekend Collective podcast from News Talks EDB.

0:00:10.441 --> 0:00:15.201
<v Speaker 2>My body's talking about exponential growth and the star monkey

0:00:15.361 --> 0:00:20.121
<v Speaker 2>crashing and the portfolios. Well, ah, were sitting here with

0:00:20.361 --> 0:00:23.761
<v Speaker 2>this song rote love Chanez the.

0:00:23.761 --> 0:00:41.321
<v Speaker 3>World and mom and I love Cheese the world and.

0:00:36.881 --> 0:00:38.881
<v Speaker 4>And welcome back to the show. I have no idea

0:00:38.881 --> 0:00:41.161
<v Speaker 4>who this is singing about money and money and expenditure

0:00:41.161 --> 0:00:44.081
<v Speaker 4>and growth. Oh, it's sharing. Apparently there we go, and

0:00:44.161 --> 0:00:47.401
<v Speaker 4>we so there we go. Some some music to theme

0:00:47.481 --> 0:00:49.561
<v Speaker 4>for our next hour. This is a Weekend Collective and

0:00:49.601 --> 0:00:52.401
<v Speaker 4>now it's time for smart money and of course what

0:00:52.401 --> 0:00:55.721
<v Speaker 4>we're going to discuss this before introduce our guest is well,

0:00:55.801 --> 0:00:58.641
<v Speaker 4>the Reserve Bank cut the oc arbor another fifty basis

0:00:58.681 --> 0:01:02.521
<v Speaker 4>points and the week that's just gone, homeowners and buyers

0:01:03.281 --> 0:01:05.521
<v Speaker 4>like being eagerly watching for the announcement to a lot

0:01:05.561 --> 0:01:08.321
<v Speaker 4>of predictions. Most people actually guessed it was going to

0:01:08.361 --> 0:01:11.241
<v Speaker 4>be fifty points. I guess twenty five, just to be contrary,

0:01:11.281 --> 0:01:13.801
<v Speaker 4>because I thought that the inflationary pressures that were happening

0:01:13.841 --> 0:01:17.281
<v Speaker 4>as the result of the Trump presidency might actually temper predictions.

0:01:17.601 --> 0:01:21.121
<v Speaker 4>Although the Reserve Bank Governor Adrian Or has sort of

0:01:21.161 --> 0:01:24.921
<v Speaker 4>tried to quell expectations of any major cuts following this anyway,

0:01:24.961 --> 0:01:27.081
<v Speaker 4>So what's behind it? But we want your calls as

0:01:27.081 --> 0:01:28.641
<v Speaker 4>well on O E one hundred and eighty ten to eighty.

0:01:28.881 --> 0:01:30.561
<v Speaker 4>And the simple question is, when it comes to the

0:01:30.561 --> 0:01:34.081
<v Speaker 4>ocr what does it actually mean for you? Is it

0:01:34.161 --> 0:01:37.401
<v Speaker 4>something you've been waiting for? And if it does, if

0:01:37.441 --> 0:01:40.121
<v Speaker 4>it is significant, what action do you end up taking

0:01:40.161 --> 0:01:42.961
<v Speaker 4>on the back of that prediction, on that sorry, the

0:01:43.001 --> 0:01:46.281
<v Speaker 4>back of that cut in addition to that, do you

0:01:46.321 --> 0:01:49.841
<v Speaker 4>reckon that's it? Or do you actually think, well, I'm

0:01:49.841 --> 0:01:51.721
<v Speaker 4>asking for your predictions basically, do you think it'll go

0:01:51.801 --> 0:01:53.641
<v Speaker 4>much further? And I don't think it will go down

0:01:53.721 --> 0:01:56.561
<v Speaker 4>much further at all, because they'll probably be worried about

0:01:57.681 --> 0:02:00.641
<v Speaker 4>Actually I don't know. But that's the whole point of

0:02:00.681 --> 0:02:03.681
<v Speaker 4>this hour. We have a chat about the Reserve Bank

0:02:03.841 --> 0:02:06.841
<v Speaker 4>rate cut and implications for it. And joining me he

0:02:07.081 --> 0:02:12.041
<v Speaker 4>is director and fixed income and currency strategist at Harbor

0:02:12.041 --> 0:02:15.721
<v Speaker 4>Asset Management, is Hamish Pepper. Good afternoon, Hi, Tim, How

0:02:15.761 --> 0:02:19.641
<v Speaker 4>are you not too bad? That is quite now? Just

0:02:19.761 --> 0:02:23.201
<v Speaker 4>explain again because I know I've asked this before, because

0:02:23.241 --> 0:02:27.441
<v Speaker 4>you've got a lengthy business card discriver occupation director. That

0:02:27.601 --> 0:02:30.881
<v Speaker 4>means you're a director at Harbor Asset Management, fixed income

0:02:31.001 --> 0:02:32.441
<v Speaker 4>and currency strategist.

0:02:33.921 --> 0:02:37.681
<v Speaker 5>That's right. Yeah, yeah, our interest rates going up or down?

0:02:38.001 --> 0:02:40.961
<v Speaker 5>Is the currency going to strengthen all weekend? That's the

0:02:41.521 --> 0:02:42.481
<v Speaker 5>kind of stuff I'm into.

0:02:42.761 --> 0:02:46.201
<v Speaker 4>And did you bet correctly that fifty basis points cut

0:02:46.241 --> 0:02:48.601
<v Speaker 4>from the Reserve Bank was what was going to happen?

0:02:48.721 --> 0:02:50.881
<v Speaker 4>Or were you more conservative or optimistic?

0:02:51.721 --> 0:02:51.881
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:02:52.001 --> 0:02:55.761
<v Speaker 5>No, we were with the large group that thought fifty

0:02:55.801 --> 0:02:58.761
<v Speaker 5>basis points was the most likely thing. I mean, Adrian

0:02:59.081 --> 0:03:01.601
<v Speaker 5>did Adria and all this is the Reserve Bank of

0:03:01.601 --> 0:03:04.561
<v Speaker 5>New Zealand governor did an unusual thing in November when

0:03:04.601 --> 0:03:07.201
<v Speaker 5>we last heard from them prior to this meeting, and

0:03:07.241 --> 0:03:10.401
<v Speaker 5>said in the press conference, look, my base case is

0:03:10.441 --> 0:03:13.681
<v Speaker 5>another fifty in February. So unless there's anything, you know,

0:03:13.841 --> 0:03:16.401
<v Speaker 5>really meaningful, that's what we're doing. And so with that,

0:03:16.521 --> 0:03:20.241
<v Speaker 5>the market, as well as most economists just sort of

0:03:20.241 --> 0:03:21.161
<v Speaker 5>move to that view.

0:03:22.241 --> 0:03:25.801
<v Speaker 4>He actually had a comment didn't ever crack at the banks,

0:03:25.881 --> 0:03:28.121
<v Speaker 4>saying I expect you to this to be reflected. But

0:03:28.761 --> 0:03:30.881
<v Speaker 4>I wondered if that was a bit unreasonable given that

0:03:30.961 --> 0:03:34.041
<v Speaker 4>he had signaled the cut the banks had sort of

0:03:34.041 --> 0:03:36.841
<v Speaker 4>predicted the cut, and so some of them sort of

0:03:37.241 --> 0:03:39.601
<v Speaker 4>had based maybe some of their interest rates on this

0:03:40.121 --> 0:03:41.761
<v Speaker 4>anticipated announcement, wouldn't they.

0:03:42.441 --> 0:03:46.041
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's dead right. I think the market has for

0:03:46.601 --> 0:03:51.041
<v Speaker 5>some time now pretty well anticipated this, this easing cycle,

0:03:51.121 --> 0:03:54.801
<v Speaker 5>this succession of interest rate cuts, and of course that's

0:03:55.201 --> 0:04:00.201
<v Speaker 5>why perhaps you haven't seen mortgage rates move as frequently

0:04:00.321 --> 0:04:03.601
<v Speaker 5>lower or by as much, because of exactly your point

0:04:03.641 --> 0:04:07.921
<v Speaker 5>to the market had anticipated this a fair few months ago,

0:04:08.041 --> 0:04:10.201
<v Speaker 5>and that was when we really started to see, you know,

0:04:10.241 --> 0:04:14.081
<v Speaker 5>some of the larger reductions and mortgage rates was pre Christmas.

0:04:14.161 --> 0:04:16.721
<v Speaker 4>I actually noticed I bank with the A and Z.

0:04:17.361 --> 0:04:19.961
<v Speaker 4>But I noticed when I went to because you can

0:04:20.761 --> 0:04:22.561
<v Speaker 4>on interest stock cut at in Z has a summary

0:04:22.601 --> 0:04:25.241
<v Speaker 4>of all the different interest mortgage rates, and I did

0:04:25.361 --> 0:04:27.921
<v Speaker 4>notice the rate that stuck out to me was that

0:04:27.961 --> 0:04:29.961
<v Speaker 4>A and Z was offering four point nine to nine

0:04:29.961 --> 0:04:35.841
<v Speaker 4>percent for two years, which which does signal, doesn't it

0:04:35.881 --> 0:04:37.801
<v Speaker 4>that they think that there might be a little bit

0:04:37.841 --> 0:04:41.081
<v Speaker 4>more cutting going on and they've priced that into their

0:04:41.081 --> 0:04:42.961
<v Speaker 4>two year rate. What do you think?

0:04:43.921 --> 0:04:46.881
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think that's reflective also of what the sort

0:04:46.881 --> 0:04:50.441
<v Speaker 5>of financial markets have in terms of their anticipation, which

0:04:50.481 --> 0:04:54.281
<v Speaker 5>is roughly three more twenty five basis point rate cuts

0:04:54.361 --> 0:04:58.321
<v Speaker 5>this year, So I think I think then that two

0:04:58.401 --> 0:05:01.241
<v Speaker 5>year rate is broadly reflective of that.

0:05:01.881 --> 0:05:05.641
<v Speaker 4>Soy, did you say you're anticipating three twenty five point

0:05:05.681 --> 0:05:07.961
<v Speaker 4>cuts this year? Three more so point seventy five.

0:05:08.921 --> 0:05:11.681
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's that's the market. It's it's a touch less

0:05:11.721 --> 0:05:15.201
<v Speaker 5>than that. But you know, if we deal with round numbers,

0:05:15.041 --> 0:05:18.761
<v Speaker 5>that's that's what they're saying. They're pretty convinced about. And

0:05:18.801 --> 0:05:21.721
<v Speaker 5>again with the help of Adrian at this most recent

0:05:22.481 --> 0:05:26.281
<v Speaker 5>press conference, they're pretty pretty convinced about April and May,

0:05:26.601 --> 0:05:29.241
<v Speaker 5>so a twenty five at each of those and then

0:05:29.561 --> 0:05:33.561
<v Speaker 5>the third one probably in August, the muneted policy statement.

0:05:33.561 --> 0:05:36.961
<v Speaker 5>We get then, but then that is it in terms

0:05:37.001 --> 0:05:39.681
<v Speaker 5>of from the financial markets point of view, that that's

0:05:39.721 --> 0:05:42.441
<v Speaker 5>the end of the using cycle, which then means by

0:05:42.481 --> 0:05:45.241
<v Speaker 5>the time we get to that point, you know, that's

0:05:45.281 --> 0:05:48.281
<v Speaker 5>the bottom and interest rates when it comes to things

0:05:48.321 --> 0:05:50.761
<v Speaker 5>like turn deposits and mortgages.

0:05:50.801 --> 0:05:52.601
<v Speaker 4>I know we've talked about this, but I do want

0:05:52.601 --> 0:05:54.561
<v Speaker 4>to back the back the truck up a little bit

0:05:55.041 --> 0:05:59.441
<v Speaker 4>on what we expect. So you've talked about the markets

0:05:59.481 --> 0:06:02.761
<v Speaker 4>and the anticipations, but three more twenty five point cuts,

0:06:03.481 --> 0:06:05.521
<v Speaker 4>but it was only it was less than a year

0:06:05.561 --> 0:06:10.281
<v Speaker 4>ago that Adrian or also said that we're not they

0:06:10.281 --> 0:06:13.081
<v Speaker 4>weren't going to be cutting points until sometime this year,

0:06:13.241 --> 0:06:16.481
<v Speaker 4>and before then we what have we seen pruned off

0:06:16.521 --> 0:06:18.681
<v Speaker 4>since he spoke about it more than one and a

0:06:18.681 --> 0:06:23.121
<v Speaker 4>half percent or something, or.

0:06:21.441 --> 0:06:23.201
<v Speaker 5>In terms of the easing.

0:06:22.961 --> 0:06:25.481
<v Speaker 4>Cycle, he said, we're not going to be easing things

0:06:25.561 --> 0:06:27.161
<v Speaker 4>until next year, and then all of a sudden he

0:06:27.201 --> 0:06:28.201
<v Speaker 4>was cut, cut, cut.

0:06:28.121 --> 0:06:30.441
<v Speaker 5>And then we've had one hundred and seventy five basis points. Yeah,

0:06:31.001 --> 0:06:34.761
<v Speaker 5>seven five percentage points. Yeah, I mean, I think if

0:06:34.881 --> 0:06:37.921
<v Speaker 5>I mean probably you know, with the benefit of hindsight,

0:06:38.681 --> 0:06:42.721
<v Speaker 5>and you know there'll be differing views among the economist

0:06:42.761 --> 0:06:47.881
<v Speaker 5>community in the media. But that may monetary policy statement

0:06:47.881 --> 0:06:50.801
<v Speaker 5>in the middle of last year, where they were contemplating

0:06:51.681 --> 0:06:55.561
<v Speaker 5>perhaps the need to lift interest rates even higher, just

0:06:55.601 --> 0:06:58.161
<v Speaker 5>does now when we look back on it, look really

0:06:58.281 --> 0:07:01.161
<v Speaker 5>quite strange, because what we know now is that was

0:07:01.161 --> 0:07:04.121
<v Speaker 5>actually a point where the economy had taken a really

0:07:04.241 --> 0:07:08.321
<v Speaker 5>really sort of bad turn. We stepped into that quarter

0:07:08.401 --> 0:07:11.081
<v Speaker 5>Q two of last year, we dropped i think a

0:07:11.121 --> 0:07:14.161
<v Speaker 5>full percentage point in terms of output. Then we followed

0:07:14.161 --> 0:07:16.561
<v Speaker 5>that by another one, which was actually a little more

0:07:17.361 --> 0:07:21.081
<v Speaker 5>so that that middle part of last year was a real, real,

0:07:21.161 --> 0:07:24.961
<v Speaker 5>sort of hurtful moment for many businesses. And to think

0:07:25.001 --> 0:07:27.481
<v Speaker 5>that the Central Bank at that point was contemplating even

0:07:27.561 --> 0:07:31.641
<v Speaker 5>more restrictive interest rates, yeah, it looks it does look

0:07:31.681 --> 0:07:32.241
<v Speaker 5>strange now.

0:07:32.521 --> 0:07:35.761
<v Speaker 4>No, there was a reason to asking that was because

0:07:36.001 --> 0:07:39.121
<v Speaker 4>we have the point is a year ago, the predictions

0:07:39.121 --> 0:07:42.601
<v Speaker 4>were totally wrong, right, okay, And I think actually, to

0:07:42.641 --> 0:07:44.401
<v Speaker 4>be honest, a lot of people in the financial markets

0:07:44.401 --> 0:07:46.401
<v Speaker 4>were like, he's going to be cutting before the end.

0:07:46.481 --> 0:07:49.081
<v Speaker 4>They saw that he was probably wrong he was saying.

0:07:49.641 --> 0:07:51.921
<v Speaker 4>But the reason I asked that was because now people

0:07:51.921 --> 0:07:55.121
<v Speaker 4>will if we're talking about this general certainty that they're

0:07:55.161 --> 0:07:57.201
<v Speaker 4>going to be three more cuts of twenty five percent.

0:07:58.161 --> 0:08:01.361
<v Speaker 4>Obviously you're not giving financial advice, But the vibe I

0:08:01.441 --> 0:08:05.201
<v Speaker 4>get is these predictions are safer to rely on than

0:08:05.361 --> 0:08:06.801
<v Speaker 4>ones we might have seen a year ago.

0:08:07.841 --> 0:08:11.681
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I think what's going on is you probably

0:08:11.801 --> 0:08:16.281
<v Speaker 5>have a more normal set of circumstances for the Reserve

0:08:16.281 --> 0:08:18.761
<v Speaker 5>Bank of New Zealand to be dealing with, for forecasters

0:08:18.761 --> 0:08:20.281
<v Speaker 5>to be dealing with. And don't get me wrong, you

0:08:20.281 --> 0:08:22.441
<v Speaker 5>know there's still going to be eras and people are

0:08:22.441 --> 0:08:24.961
<v Speaker 5>still going to get it wrong, but the margin of

0:08:25.001 --> 0:08:28.481
<v Speaker 5>those errors when you're in a more normal environment. And

0:08:28.521 --> 0:08:29.921
<v Speaker 5>what I mean by that is, you know, we're not

0:08:29.961 --> 0:08:33.241
<v Speaker 5>dealing with a big COVID supply shock for example. No,

0:08:33.401 --> 0:08:35.721
<v Speaker 5>that's doing stuff the global supply chains. Right, this is

0:08:35.801 --> 0:08:38.481
<v Speaker 5>just really an economy here in New Zealand that is

0:08:38.521 --> 0:08:42.881
<v Speaker 5>now feeling the effects very much of those higher interest rates.

0:08:43.041 --> 0:08:45.801
<v Speaker 5>And it's then now a matter of okay, how quickly

0:08:45.961 --> 0:08:50.081
<v Speaker 5>can the Central Bank normalize those and perhaps maybe even

0:08:50.561 --> 0:08:53.881
<v Speaker 5>needs to put them at a level which is helpful,

0:08:53.961 --> 0:08:56.121
<v Speaker 5>you know, provides some stimulus to the economy. And I

0:08:56.161 --> 0:09:00.201
<v Speaker 5>think that's where the debate is. Are less about, you know,

0:09:00.441 --> 0:09:03.361
<v Speaker 5>the seventy five basis points, the three twenty five basis

0:09:03.361 --> 0:09:06.801
<v Speaker 5>point cuts, but perhaps more more about is that going

0:09:06.881 --> 0:09:09.601
<v Speaker 5>to be enough given? And there'll be many people listening

0:09:09.601 --> 0:09:12.881
<v Speaker 5>who will be saying wow, you know, like I know

0:09:13.041 --> 0:09:16.761
<v Speaker 5>people or I've experienced myself, you know, ongoing job losses

0:09:16.881 --> 0:09:20.441
<v Speaker 5>or business closures. So you know, it does beg that

0:09:20.521 --> 0:09:24.641
<v Speaker 5>question whether interest rates will get low enough to actually

0:09:24.681 --> 0:09:25.481
<v Speaker 5>provide that help.

0:09:26.081 --> 0:09:28.681
<v Speaker 4>Okay, just one other, because we've got a lot to

0:09:28.721 --> 0:09:33.641
<v Speaker 4>talk about on this What about for people who follow

0:09:34.001 --> 0:09:37.601
<v Speaker 4>international news and we have a we have a change

0:09:37.601 --> 0:09:41.441
<v Speaker 4>of government in the States obviously, and Trump Trump is unpredictable.

0:09:41.481 --> 0:09:43.561
<v Speaker 4>I don't think anyone who can argue with that. We've

0:09:43.601 --> 0:09:46.481
<v Speaker 4>got this uncertainty around what's going to happen with the

0:09:46.521 --> 0:09:50.441
<v Speaker 4>peace process in Ukraine. We've got Chinese frigates, you know,

0:09:50.721 --> 0:09:53.961
<v Speaker 4>behaving in this mischievous way off the coast of Australia.

0:09:54.241 --> 0:09:58.121
<v Speaker 4>How much. What are the sorts of things that would

0:09:58.161 --> 0:10:00.761
<v Speaker 4>throw a spanner in the works. Maybe the most obvious

0:10:00.801 --> 0:10:03.481
<v Speaker 4>thing is the question of tariffs and trade. When it

0:10:03.481 --> 0:10:06.121
<v Speaker 4>comes to interest rates here, cashwits.

0:10:07.121 --> 0:10:10.121
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean that's I think where while we might

0:10:10.241 --> 0:10:14.321
<v Speaker 5>characterize our situation here as being you know, more normal,

0:10:14.681 --> 0:10:17.481
<v Speaker 5>in one that we have perhaps more confidence in predicting,

0:10:17.601 --> 0:10:21.401
<v Speaker 5>we're dealing with this really uncertain global picture for all

0:10:21.401 --> 0:10:25.401
<v Speaker 5>those reasons you mentioned. If we think about just tariffs,

0:10:26.121 --> 0:10:30.041
<v Speaker 5>the main impact for US will be through the way

0:10:30.081 --> 0:10:34.081
<v Speaker 5>that could lower global growth, you know, lower the prospects

0:10:34.081 --> 0:10:38.721
<v Speaker 5>of our trading partners, particularly if it's something where you'll

0:10:38.721 --> 0:10:43.281
<v Speaker 5>see retaliation to the US tariff, so perhaps from China,

0:10:43.721 --> 0:10:47.081
<v Speaker 5>you know, from Europe. All that will do, from our

0:10:47.081 --> 0:10:50.441
<v Speaker 5>point of view, is lower that global growth picture and

0:10:50.681 --> 0:10:54.041
<v Speaker 5>make things a tougher environment for our exporters to go

0:10:54.121 --> 0:10:58.281
<v Speaker 5>and sell their products into. So I think that's the headline,

0:10:59.241 --> 0:11:04.121
<v Speaker 5>which is it's not a particularly positive development on that

0:11:04.201 --> 0:11:05.721
<v Speaker 5>front for US, but I guess.

0:11:05.761 --> 0:11:07.721
<v Speaker 4>But as a currency strategist, I can ask you this

0:11:07.761 --> 0:11:09.681
<v Speaker 4>as well, how does it? What are the events you

0:11:09.721 --> 0:11:13.041
<v Speaker 4>would be looking for when you as informing your view

0:11:13.081 --> 0:11:13.881
<v Speaker 4>on currencies.

0:11:15.201 --> 0:11:18.761
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think that one is one where so in

0:11:19.921 --> 0:11:24.281
<v Speaker 5>a more orderly version of events there which is where

0:11:25.241 --> 0:11:28.001
<v Speaker 5>we have largely this bang about the US wanting to

0:11:28.001 --> 0:11:31.161
<v Speaker 5>impose tariffs and maybe others less so, but that is

0:11:31.201 --> 0:11:36.081
<v Speaker 5>then introducing inflation into their economy and lowering their growth

0:11:36.481 --> 0:11:38.521
<v Speaker 5>because you know the cost of those imported goods is

0:11:38.561 --> 0:11:41.441
<v Speaker 5>going up. You know, that's something which you would say, well,

0:11:41.521 --> 0:11:45.361
<v Speaker 5>we're going to look better. You know, our economy is

0:11:45.361 --> 0:11:48.201
<v Speaker 5>going to look a bit better than one like the

0:11:48.321 --> 0:11:50.801
<v Speaker 5>US where they're doing that, and that would normally be

0:11:50.841 --> 0:11:53.161
<v Speaker 5>something I mean, you could say, well, our currency should

0:11:53.481 --> 0:11:56.081
<v Speaker 5>perhaps appreciate slightly even to the US dollar. Now there's

0:11:56.081 --> 0:11:59.081
<v Speaker 5>a butt coming. You're probably sensing that the butt is

0:11:59.241 --> 0:12:03.561
<v Speaker 5>if it develops into all our trade war, you know,

0:12:03.601 --> 0:12:06.561
<v Speaker 5>a global trade war that is not an environment that

0:12:06.601 --> 0:12:09.281
<v Speaker 5>our currency does well. Then you know, we we need

0:12:09.321 --> 0:12:12.161
<v Speaker 5>the world to be feeling good. We need global investors

0:12:12.201 --> 0:12:15.241
<v Speaker 5>to to feel good about funding us. You know, we

0:12:15.321 --> 0:12:17.321
<v Speaker 5>need the rest of the world's the world's money, and

0:12:17.961 --> 0:12:22.521
<v Speaker 5>if they start to feel uncertain, then that's usually an

0:12:22.601 --> 0:12:25.361
<v Speaker 5>environment we're the key we weaken. So that's that's the

0:12:25.441 --> 0:12:27.361
<v Speaker 5>kind of caveat to that.

0:12:27.881 --> 0:12:29.961
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I got one last question. Then we're going to

0:12:30.001 --> 0:12:31.721
<v Speaker 4>move on, and because we do have a lot to cover.

0:12:31.801 --> 0:12:35.201
<v Speaker 4>But when it comes to the cash rate, what is

0:12:35.241 --> 0:12:37.841
<v Speaker 4>the This is a really this will sound like a

0:12:37.881 --> 0:12:40.041
<v Speaker 4>sort of dumb over a simplified question, but I'm going

0:12:40.041 --> 0:12:42.881
<v Speaker 4>to do it anyway. What generally, so if the cash

0:12:42.961 --> 0:12:48.281
<v Speaker 4>rate now is three point seventy five, what sort of

0:12:49.121 --> 0:12:51.641
<v Speaker 4>what's the difference between a cash rate and what we

0:12:51.681 --> 0:12:54.241
<v Speaker 4>can expect the banks to be offering sort of between

0:12:54.281 --> 0:12:57.201
<v Speaker 4>six months and two or three years. What's their type

0:12:57.201 --> 0:12:59.721
<v Speaker 4>of how do they how many points do we usually

0:12:59.761 --> 0:13:02.841
<v Speaker 4>see as a markup? If I can put it crudely, Yeah,

0:13:02.881 --> 0:13:03.641
<v Speaker 4>it's a good question.

0:13:03.801 --> 0:13:07.281
<v Speaker 5>So what you would want is you say, you say

0:13:07.281 --> 0:13:10.201
<v Speaker 5>someone's thinking about a six month term deposit rate, you know,

0:13:10.241 --> 0:13:13.401
<v Speaker 5>what should I expect you know, that to be for

0:13:13.481 --> 0:13:16.761
<v Speaker 5>a given cash rate setting. The big thing is about,

0:13:17.001 --> 0:13:20.961
<v Speaker 5>obviously what we've just been saying, right, what is the

0:13:21.001 --> 0:13:24.761
<v Speaker 5>expectation for the cash rate moves over that period of time.

0:13:24.881 --> 0:13:27.681
<v Speaker 5>And so at the moment you've got this situation where

0:13:28.681 --> 0:13:32.681
<v Speaker 5>embedded in a six month rate is these three or

0:13:32.721 --> 0:13:36.041
<v Speaker 5>are these three twenty five basis point rate cuts? So

0:13:37.001 --> 0:13:40.881
<v Speaker 5>it's it's not an easy thing to sort of get

0:13:41.041 --> 0:13:43.241
<v Speaker 5>get a measure of. But you know, I think if

0:13:43.241 --> 0:13:47.361
<v Speaker 5>we're talking rough numbers, somewhere in the region of you know,

0:13:47.521 --> 0:13:52.281
<v Speaker 5>one hundred basis points or for deposits a percentage point

0:13:52.481 --> 0:13:55.121
<v Speaker 5>to Yeah, that's right to wear term deposit rates are.

0:13:55.281 --> 0:13:57.241
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's what about for mortgages?

0:13:58.441 --> 0:14:02.041
<v Speaker 5>Mortgages it's usually a bit more. Yeah, So you're kind

0:14:02.041 --> 0:14:05.241
<v Speaker 5>of with your reference to the four ninety nine. But

0:14:05.281 --> 0:14:08.401
<v Speaker 5>if I look at, say, like that's a two year

0:14:08.521 --> 0:14:10.521
<v Speaker 5>rate for an Z that the one that you mentioned,

0:14:10.561 --> 0:14:12.921
<v Speaker 5>and so if I look at where wholesale rates are

0:14:13.041 --> 0:14:16.961
<v Speaker 5>in the market right now, they're about three sixty. Yeah,

0:14:17.241 --> 0:14:19.081
<v Speaker 5>So you know, you call that one hundred and forty

0:14:19.121 --> 0:14:22.441
<v Speaker 5>basis points one point four percentage points above.

0:14:22.961 --> 0:14:26.041
<v Speaker 4>So if the cash rate with three percent, would would

0:14:26.041 --> 0:14:28.121
<v Speaker 4>people be expecting that they might be able to see

0:14:28.121 --> 0:14:30.441
<v Speaker 4>even better interest rates like four point twenty five four

0:14:30.441 --> 0:14:31.801
<v Speaker 4>point five percent sort of thing.

0:14:32.881 --> 0:14:39.561
<v Speaker 5>I think it depends. I think it depends on It's

0:14:39.641 --> 0:14:44.441
<v Speaker 5>that forward pricing, right, So the market I think has

0:14:45.121 --> 0:14:48.321
<v Speaker 5>got itself to a point of pricing the using cycle

0:14:48.401 --> 0:14:51.201
<v Speaker 5>well in terms of what the vindt is communicated, I

0:14:51.241 --> 0:14:54.361
<v Speaker 5>think you know, what we're seeing from the mortgage rates

0:14:54.401 --> 0:14:59.521
<v Speaker 5>side is broadly reflective of that. Where I think there

0:14:59.721 --> 0:15:02.801
<v Speaker 5>is more room and many many commentators have talked about

0:15:02.841 --> 0:15:06.521
<v Speaker 5>this is that term deposit rate have really lagged in

0:15:06.601 --> 0:15:10.161
<v Speaker 5>terms of the pace with which they've fallen through this

0:15:10.441 --> 0:15:11.441
<v Speaker 5>easing cycle FES.

0:15:11.721 --> 0:15:13.601
<v Speaker 4>So probably why Adrian told every went off.

0:15:14.721 --> 0:15:17.401
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean it's an interesting thing because you know,

0:15:18.361 --> 0:15:24.161
<v Speaker 5>this is banks actually being kind. This is this is

0:15:24.201 --> 0:15:28.801
<v Speaker 5>then giving you a return on your savings which is

0:15:29.001 --> 0:15:31.601
<v Speaker 5>slightly out of line with these other rates we've been

0:15:31.601 --> 0:15:34.481
<v Speaker 5>talking about in terms of wholesale rates and what mortgage

0:15:34.521 --> 0:15:37.161
<v Speaker 5>rates have done. So this I think more is banks

0:15:37.201 --> 0:15:40.561
<v Speaker 5>wanting to make sure they keep these deposits and keep

0:15:40.601 --> 0:15:43.361
<v Speaker 5>these depositors. You know, the people that sit behind them

0:15:44.001 --> 0:15:47.761
<v Speaker 5>because you know, that's a very very important source of

0:15:47.841 --> 0:15:49.201
<v Speaker 5>funding four banks.

0:15:50.161 --> 0:15:52.641
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I keep forgetting I for kept forgetting that. On

0:15:52.681 --> 0:15:55.041
<v Speaker 4>the other side of the scale, there are the savers

0:15:55.241 --> 0:15:58.681
<v Speaker 4>who who we all remember when interest rates were through

0:15:58.681 --> 0:16:00.641
<v Speaker 4>the floor, people were like, I'm not getting anything from

0:16:00.641 --> 0:16:02.881
<v Speaker 4>the money. Basically you're lucky for you get points seventy

0:16:02.921 --> 0:16:07.001
<v Speaker 4>five percent. So I forget that. There's that side of it,

0:16:07.081 --> 0:16:09.281
<v Speaker 4>isn't it. And so that's the banks encouraging them to

0:16:09.321 --> 0:16:10.281
<v Speaker 4>keep their money with them.

0:16:11.001 --> 0:16:14.521
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's right. And you know for those savers, you know,

0:16:14.561 --> 0:16:19.001
<v Speaker 5>they've just started to now experience sub five percent term

0:16:19.041 --> 0:16:22.921
<v Speaker 5>deposit rates. I think that's probably been the latest development

0:16:22.961 --> 0:16:27.081
<v Speaker 5>for them. And so I think with that, we for example,

0:16:27.161 --> 0:16:31.441
<v Speaker 5>are experiencing maybe a little bit more inquiry. You know, what,

0:16:31.721 --> 0:16:35.481
<v Speaker 5>what can you do in the case that you're not

0:16:35.521 --> 0:16:38.441
<v Speaker 5>happy with turn deposit rates? And which is what we

0:16:38.481 --> 0:16:42.161
<v Speaker 5>saw obviously in COVID. It was very fast that that

0:16:42.281 --> 0:16:46.961
<v Speaker 5>fall and those those deposit rates, and the real change

0:16:47.241 --> 0:16:50.921
<v Speaker 5>in kind of behavior from from savers was when they

0:16:50.921 --> 0:16:53.041
<v Speaker 5>went through one percent time. I don't know if you

0:16:53.081 --> 0:16:55.681
<v Speaker 5>remember that, but you know, six month term deposit rates

0:16:55.721 --> 0:16:58.281
<v Speaker 5>went through one percent and that was for so many people,

0:16:58.321 --> 0:17:00.241
<v Speaker 5>that was the final straw and they said, look, I've

0:17:00.241 --> 0:17:02.001
<v Speaker 5>just got to find something different.

0:17:01.681 --> 0:17:04.401
<v Speaker 4>Then get into the shares or something. Yeah, hey, well

0:17:04.641 --> 0:17:06.281
<v Speaker 4>just hold the Hamish will be back in this moment.

0:17:06.281 --> 0:17:09.201
<v Speaker 4>We're with Hamish pepperes as a director and fixed income

0:17:09.441 --> 0:17:13.001
<v Speaker 4>currency strategists at Harbor Asset Management, and we're going to

0:17:13.121 --> 0:17:16.001
<v Speaker 4>actually discuss what this means for whether, in fact, where

0:17:16.041 --> 0:17:19.081
<v Speaker 4>the money where the cash rate's gone, is that stimulatory

0:17:19.321 --> 0:17:21.041
<v Speaker 4>for the economy or do we need to cut further

0:17:21.081 --> 0:17:24.481
<v Speaker 4>before we really see something some significant difference there. And

0:17:24.561 --> 0:17:27.041
<v Speaker 4>if you've got any questions for Hamish, give us a call.

0:17:27.281 --> 0:17:29.521
<v Speaker 4>I wait, one hundred eighty ten to eighty. We'd love

0:17:29.561 --> 0:17:31.281
<v Speaker 4>to hear from you. We'll back in just a moment.

0:17:33.961 --> 0:17:38.201
<v Speaker 2>Not taking Marvel singing Sweeden Home Alabama.

0:17:38.841 --> 0:17:42.521
<v Speaker 4>Sum let's right back. We can collective this is smart money.

0:17:42.601 --> 0:17:45.241
<v Speaker 4>My guest is Hamish Pepper. He's fixed income and currency

0:17:45.281 --> 0:17:49.441
<v Speaker 4>strategists strategist at Harbor Asset Management. Just before we got

0:17:49.441 --> 0:17:53.361
<v Speaker 4>to our calls, Hamish, the question that the a lot

0:17:53.401 --> 0:17:56.161
<v Speaker 4>of people would consider is that cut in the ocr

0:17:57.121 --> 0:17:59.881
<v Speaker 4>is it something that is viewed as being of a

0:17:59.961 --> 0:18:02.681
<v Speaker 4>stimulation to the economy of we or is we not there?

0:18:04.281 --> 0:18:07.001
<v Speaker 5>No, we're not yet. So the way we talk about

0:18:07.001 --> 0:18:11.321
<v Speaker 5>it is that there's less sort of restriction being imposed

0:18:11.361 --> 0:18:16.041
<v Speaker 5>on the economy now, but there still is some. So

0:18:16.121 --> 0:18:18.841
<v Speaker 5>that that's part of the reason why the rbn DID

0:18:18.881 --> 0:18:22.521
<v Speaker 5>themselves are communicating in their forecast that they're going to

0:18:22.601 --> 0:18:25.401
<v Speaker 5>keep going, they're going to keep cutting down towards three

0:18:25.441 --> 0:18:26.681
<v Speaker 5>percent later this year.

0:18:26.921 --> 0:18:29.041
<v Speaker 4>So why is three percent seen as being if we

0:18:29.081 --> 0:18:31.241
<v Speaker 4>get there, which we're assuming we hopefully will by the

0:18:31.281 --> 0:18:33.201
<v Speaker 4>end of the year. Why is that scene as being

0:18:33.241 --> 0:18:36.841
<v Speaker 4>stimulatory as opposed to not at the moment?

0:18:37.481 --> 0:18:41.201
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's interesting, actually, in their view, it's not necessarily

0:18:41.721 --> 0:18:44.161
<v Speaker 5>a stimulatory once they get to three. There's a there's

0:18:44.161 --> 0:18:49.241
<v Speaker 5>a big range of what they call neutral, so a

0:18:49.361 --> 0:18:52.161
<v Speaker 5>neutral cash rate or a neutral interest rate. We're basically

0:18:52.161 --> 0:18:54.601
<v Speaker 5>the entrant rate is not doing anything. It's not adding

0:18:54.601 --> 0:18:57.161
<v Speaker 5>to activity, it's not detracting from it's not adding to inflation,

0:18:57.241 --> 0:18:59.401
<v Speaker 5>it's not detracting from it. And there's sort of this

0:18:59.801 --> 0:19:03.961
<v Speaker 5>you know, sort of magical, you know, happy place, but

0:19:04.241 --> 0:19:07.441
<v Speaker 5>really there's huge uncertainty around exactly where that is. And

0:19:07.481 --> 0:19:09.401
<v Speaker 5>so I think what they're doing is saying we're going

0:19:09.481 --> 0:19:13.761
<v Speaker 5>to step reasonably quickly towards that and look at what

0:19:13.801 --> 0:19:16.161
<v Speaker 5>the economy is doing, because that's one of the best

0:19:16.161 --> 0:19:20.041
<v Speaker 5>ways to know, you know, what your policy settings are

0:19:20.121 --> 0:19:24.321
<v Speaker 5>actually are doing. You know, are they you know, becoming

0:19:24.321 --> 0:19:27.561
<v Speaker 5>stimilitary And it might be the case that they get

0:19:27.561 --> 0:19:29.801
<v Speaker 5>to three and they start to see a real turnaround

0:19:30.521 --> 0:19:33.601
<v Speaker 5>an activity and there you know, it answers a question

0:19:33.681 --> 0:19:37.001
<v Speaker 5>for them, But it also could be that they need to.

0:19:36.921 --> 0:19:38.601
<v Speaker 4>Do more, Yeah, because I guess you know, they get

0:19:38.601 --> 0:19:40.481
<v Speaker 4>the number of what you can borrow and the cash rate,

0:19:40.521 --> 0:19:42.401
<v Speaker 4>and then you look at other factors that of course

0:19:42.441 --> 0:19:45.921
<v Speaker 4>set the stimulat trees, such as attracting overseas investment. And

0:19:45.961 --> 0:19:48.321
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's interesting the balance, isn't it as to

0:19:48.361 --> 0:19:50.241
<v Speaker 4>what the magic sort of the sweet spot is.

0:19:51.361 --> 0:19:53.801
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, totally. And I think the thing that's holding them back.

0:19:53.801 --> 0:19:56.841
<v Speaker 5>A question we often get and maybe there's some people

0:19:56.881 --> 0:19:58.881
<v Speaker 5>listening who have this this question in their head, is

0:19:59.401 --> 0:20:02.121
<v Speaker 5>if they know that three percent is where they're heading,

0:20:02.481 --> 0:20:06.001
<v Speaker 5>why not just get there today? You know? And Adrian

0:20:06.041 --> 0:20:08.201
<v Speaker 5>has been that kind of governor in the past to

0:20:08.841 --> 0:20:12.441
<v Speaker 5>you know, basically if his economics department or the Manata

0:20:12.481 --> 0:20:14.601
<v Speaker 5>Police committee are telling him something, then he'll just do it.

0:20:15.081 --> 0:20:19.961
<v Speaker 5>But the niggly bit is that inflation from the domestic standpoint,

0:20:20.121 --> 0:20:23.081
<v Speaker 5>you know, that sort of non tradeable stuff is still

0:20:23.121 --> 0:20:24.481
<v Speaker 5>a little high.

0:20:24.561 --> 0:20:26.801
<v Speaker 4>Is there anything in once but and twice shy because

0:20:26.801 --> 0:20:28.561
<v Speaker 4>he has been sort of a bit more gung home

0:20:28.601 --> 0:20:30.201
<v Speaker 4>with things and he kept it too high. And so

0:20:30.521 --> 0:20:32.961
<v Speaker 4>does do you think it's affected him? Just wanting to

0:20:32.961 --> 0:20:35.041
<v Speaker 4>be easy as she goes with you know, let's just

0:20:35.121 --> 0:20:36.761
<v Speaker 4>turn the turn the tiller slowly.

0:20:38.521 --> 0:20:41.801
<v Speaker 5>I mean it's possible. I mean, it is possible. I

0:20:41.841 --> 0:20:44.321
<v Speaker 5>think there's a committee which is.

0:20:44.441 --> 0:20:47.601
<v Speaker 4>Sounds like you think it's not really realistic though possible.

0:20:47.241 --> 0:20:51.161
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, I think it's more the committee speaking honestly.

0:20:51.281 --> 0:20:53.241
<v Speaker 5>I think you've got a range of voices there and

0:20:53.761 --> 0:20:57.041
<v Speaker 5>it's working well because it's highlighting, you know, the risks

0:20:57.041 --> 0:21:00.201
<v Speaker 5>that you run if you do just you know, cut

0:21:00.201 --> 0:21:03.521
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and fifty bass toward get to three percent.

0:21:03.601 --> 0:21:06.281
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, get a bit of emotionalist area and everyone suddenly

0:21:06.761 --> 0:21:09.121
<v Speaker 4>cashing into the getting into the property market or something

0:21:09.161 --> 0:21:10.801
<v Speaker 4>and pushing it, pushing it in the way we don't

0:21:10.801 --> 0:21:11.401
<v Speaker 4>want to see it going.

0:21:11.761 --> 0:21:13.121
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's a scenario exactly.

0:21:14.201 --> 0:21:15.001
<v Speaker 4>It's take some calls.

0:21:15.081 --> 0:21:18.681
<v Speaker 6>Shane, Hello, oh hi there, I just had a question

0:21:18.721 --> 0:21:21.161
<v Speaker 6>for Hamish, you know, to do with the investors. You know,

0:21:21.161 --> 0:21:24.641
<v Speaker 6>we talked about, you know, the interest rates for the investors,

0:21:24.881 --> 0:21:27.281
<v Speaker 6>for the savers you know, to benefit and it's important

0:21:27.321 --> 0:21:30.361
<v Speaker 6>for the banks to retain them. My question was more

0:21:30.361 --> 0:21:32.361
<v Speaker 6>to do with the banks boring from overseas.

0:21:32.521 --> 0:21:34.521
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I believe the New Zealand banks are in

0:21:34.601 --> 0:21:37.761
<v Speaker 7>pretty good good shape health wise and you know, for

0:21:37.881 --> 0:21:42.321
<v Speaker 7>profitability wise. So they must be getting some sort of

0:21:42.321 --> 0:21:44.401
<v Speaker 7>a discount because of the credit worthiness when they bought

0:21:44.401 --> 0:21:47.801
<v Speaker 7>from overseas, and so the cost of money or from

0:21:47.801 --> 0:21:50.881
<v Speaker 7>overseas would be cheaper. And would there be any truth

0:21:50.921 --> 0:21:51.121
<v Speaker 7>to that?

0:21:51.441 --> 0:21:53.081
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, thanks Shan.

0:21:53.201 --> 0:21:55.481
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, yeah, it's a good question. So it's

0:21:55.481 --> 0:22:01.801
<v Speaker 5>important to note broadly that while deposits usually from retail

0:22:01.841 --> 0:22:05.641
<v Speaker 5>and households, is the majority of the way that banks

0:22:05.641 --> 0:22:08.881
<v Speaker 5>fund themselves here in New Zealand, the residual which is

0:22:09.161 --> 0:22:13.561
<v Speaker 5>called it, roughly a third comes from wholesale markets. And yeah,

0:22:13.641 --> 0:22:16.121
<v Speaker 5>as you point out, those wholesale markets that banks can

0:22:16.161 --> 0:22:19.321
<v Speaker 5>access are here in New Zealand. And so you know,

0:22:19.361 --> 0:22:22.041
<v Speaker 5>the funds that we manage, the fixed income funds. We

0:22:22.121 --> 0:22:26.521
<v Speaker 5>will buy bank bonds that are issued here in this market,

0:22:27.081 --> 0:22:29.721
<v Speaker 5>but of course, yeah, they can issue overseas as well,

0:22:30.281 --> 0:22:35.001
<v Speaker 5>and they have good support from those overseas investors and

0:22:35.041 --> 0:22:38.921
<v Speaker 5>the likes of the US and in Europe, and that

0:22:39.161 --> 0:22:43.521
<v Speaker 5>is something that does keep their overall cost of funding

0:22:45.001 --> 0:22:49.961
<v Speaker 5>down because also, as the caller mentioned, our banks are

0:22:50.481 --> 0:22:54.561
<v Speaker 5>in really really good shape, well capitalized, and there's yeah,

0:22:54.721 --> 0:22:57.881
<v Speaker 5>the default risk is relatively low. So yeah, it's an

0:22:57.921 --> 0:23:02.761
<v Speaker 5>important mix, that mix of funding which then allows them

0:23:02.801 --> 0:23:06.401
<v Speaker 5>to yeah, obviously ex end loans to us here in

0:23:06.401 --> 0:23:06.921
<v Speaker 5>New Zealand.

0:23:08.721 --> 0:23:12.721
<v Speaker 4>I get this question a bit about does I must

0:23:12.921 --> 0:23:15.041
<v Speaker 4>just as a sort of non sequity question really, but

0:23:15.081 --> 0:23:18.761
<v Speaker 4>it's around currencies and uncertainty of cash rates and dollars

0:23:18.801 --> 0:23:22.161
<v Speaker 4>and all that sort of thing. How does the gold

0:23:22.281 --> 0:23:25.561
<v Speaker 4>Does gold reserves around the word world play any role

0:23:25.721 --> 0:23:28.961
<v Speaker 4>in currencies because the gold standard was abandoned decades ago,

0:23:29.121 --> 0:23:29.441
<v Speaker 4>wasn't it?

0:23:30.521 --> 0:23:35.921
<v Speaker 5>Yes? And I would say no is the short answer.

0:23:36.721 --> 0:23:41.881
<v Speaker 5>The interesting thing with gold more recently has been perhaps

0:23:41.921 --> 0:23:48.601
<v Speaker 5>a re emergence of concern about inflation, particularly in the US.

0:23:49.201 --> 0:23:53.081
<v Speaker 5>You've probably followed that that story, and maybe many people

0:23:53.081 --> 0:23:55.361
<v Speaker 5>listening have as well. That we were at a point

0:23:55.401 --> 0:23:58.841
<v Speaker 5>where we just felt that inflation was very much solved

0:23:59.041 --> 0:24:02.441
<v Speaker 5>in the US and that the US Federal Reserve would

0:24:02.481 --> 0:24:05.041
<v Speaker 5>be able to keep cutting similar to what we've done here,

0:24:05.321 --> 0:24:09.161
<v Speaker 5>but probably just prior to Christmas that all started to

0:24:10.201 --> 0:24:13.721
<v Speaker 5>look a little shaky at the inflation progress back towards

0:24:13.721 --> 0:24:16.361
<v Speaker 5>two percent, they had the same target as we do stalled,

0:24:17.161 --> 0:24:22.521
<v Speaker 5>and we had the Trump obviously the Trump presidency confirmed

0:24:22.521 --> 0:24:25.361
<v Speaker 5>with the election, and so there you saw some of

0:24:25.401 --> 0:24:27.961
<v Speaker 5>these alternative assets, I suppose you can think of them.

0:24:28.321 --> 0:24:32.321
<v Speaker 5>Bitcoin is another one where people were looking for things

0:24:32.361 --> 0:24:35.121
<v Speaker 5>that can store value. They don't give you an income,

0:24:35.441 --> 0:24:38.801
<v Speaker 5>but they can store value being being sought after. So

0:24:39.121 --> 0:24:44.081
<v Speaker 5>I think gold is more in that camp of an

0:24:44.121 --> 0:24:46.921
<v Speaker 5>alternative asset. It doesn't give me any income, but it

0:24:47.001 --> 0:24:50.921
<v Speaker 5>might give me the ability at times to protect my capital.

0:24:51.201 --> 0:24:53.361
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, Gold's not your bag, is it in

0:24:53.401 --> 0:24:55.761
<v Speaker 4>terms of tracking the value of that. But people often

0:24:56.001 --> 0:24:57.721
<v Speaker 4>go on about our gold's the best place to put

0:24:57.761 --> 0:25:01.841
<v Speaker 4>your money in things, And I think what I understand

0:25:01.881 --> 0:25:04.041
<v Speaker 4>is that actually it is one of the slowest growth

0:25:04.041 --> 0:25:06.281
<v Speaker 4>sort of assets. Long too, are you better to be

0:25:06.361 --> 0:25:09.201
<v Speaker 4>in the share market or have someone managing your money

0:25:09.241 --> 0:25:11.601
<v Speaker 4>and choosing the right funds rather than stick it in gold.

0:25:12.801 --> 0:25:16.681
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I find I find two things with gold difficult. One,

0:25:16.961 --> 0:25:21.881
<v Speaker 5>I don't have a good framework for thinking about how

0:25:21.921 --> 0:25:25.561
<v Speaker 5>to determine its price, so that that's a tough thing.

0:25:25.921 --> 0:25:27.841
<v Speaker 5>And part of that. The second thing is part of

0:25:27.881 --> 0:25:31.161
<v Speaker 5>it relates to that, the fact it doesn't provide an income.

0:25:31.601 --> 0:25:34.201
<v Speaker 5>You know, for most of the assets that we deal

0:25:34.241 --> 0:25:37.761
<v Speaker 5>with and think about, you've got an income stream that

0:25:37.841 --> 0:25:40.241
<v Speaker 5>you can think of when it comes to valuing the

0:25:40.281 --> 0:25:44.001
<v Speaker 5>ownership of the asset, and so gold gold doesn't have that.

0:25:44.161 --> 0:25:47.441
<v Speaker 5>So I often just put it in the too hard

0:25:47.481 --> 0:25:50.361
<v Speaker 5>basket in my head and am thankful that I'm not

0:25:50.441 --> 0:25:51.921
<v Speaker 5>a gold analyst.

0:25:52.321 --> 0:25:55.081
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Just on the inflation, where are we at with

0:25:55.121 --> 0:25:55.881
<v Speaker 4>inflation now?

0:25:56.801 --> 0:25:59.561
<v Speaker 5>Oh, we're all at a headline level. We're pretty much

0:25:59.641 --> 0:26:02.961
<v Speaker 5>at target. We're two point two percent in headline, which

0:26:03.001 --> 0:26:06.041
<v Speaker 5>of course is what the RBNZ target.

0:26:06.401 --> 0:26:07.841
<v Speaker 4>So what does that mean in headline?

0:26:09.041 --> 0:26:14.481
<v Speaker 5>Oh, headline is includes everything. And the reason I'm saying

0:26:14.561 --> 0:26:17.001
<v Speaker 5>that is just going back to that discussion we were

0:26:17.001 --> 0:26:22.361
<v Speaker 5>having a few moments ago that within this overall you know,

0:26:22.841 --> 0:26:26.921
<v Speaker 5>consumer price basket, the basket of goods that's supposed to

0:26:26.921 --> 0:26:30.201
<v Speaker 5>represent what everybody you know buys. Of course that's an

0:26:30.201 --> 0:26:33.201
<v Speaker 5>impossible thing to do. But if within that basket you've

0:26:33.241 --> 0:26:37.441
<v Speaker 5>got things that will be imported for which we've seen,

0:26:38.121 --> 0:26:41.481
<v Speaker 5>you know, actually outright deflation, the prices of those things

0:26:41.521 --> 0:26:44.961
<v Speaker 5>overall have been falling after that huge impact from COVID,

0:26:45.001 --> 0:26:46.081
<v Speaker 5>you know what, which.

0:26:45.801 --> 0:26:48.121
<v Speaker 4>Means that we must be domestically generating a bit I

0:26:48.161 --> 0:26:48.641
<v Speaker 4>guess are we?

0:26:49.081 --> 0:26:52.401
<v Speaker 5>Exactly four and a half percent on an annual basis

0:26:52.481 --> 0:26:56.441
<v Speaker 5>was the last reading for that domestically driven inflation. And

0:26:56.521 --> 0:26:59.441
<v Speaker 5>so while you bring all of that together and you

0:26:59.481 --> 0:27:01.321
<v Speaker 5>get two point two percent, which might as well be

0:27:01.481 --> 0:27:05.601
<v Speaker 5>you know, two, and therefore job done. The RBNZ look

0:27:05.641 --> 0:27:09.361
<v Speaker 5>a little deeper as they should and say, well, hold on,

0:27:09.401 --> 0:27:13.241
<v Speaker 5>the stuff that we can control and policy has an

0:27:13.241 --> 0:27:17.721
<v Speaker 5>influence on doesn't look to be quite back to where

0:27:17.761 --> 0:27:20.361
<v Speaker 5>we like it. And that's the reason why I think

0:27:20.361 --> 0:27:25.601
<v Speaker 5>the biggest reason why we are seeing this gradual approach

0:27:26.361 --> 0:27:30.641
<v Speaker 5>towards that neutral three percent level rather than anything quicker.

0:27:31.041 --> 0:27:32.601
<v Speaker 4>I've got one more question before we get the break

0:27:32.601 --> 0:27:35.601
<v Speaker 4>on that, would we always be aiming to get out domestically,

0:27:35.881 --> 0:27:39.001
<v Speaker 4>you know, the inflation that we've got control over the

0:27:39.041 --> 0:27:43.481
<v Speaker 4>domestically generated inflation, would that number or that goal always

0:27:43.561 --> 0:27:47.161
<v Speaker 4>be the same regardless of what inflation we're actually importing.

0:27:49.681 --> 0:27:53.281
<v Speaker 5>Really good question. Yeah, it's a really good question. I think.

0:27:54.081 --> 0:27:59.041
<v Speaker 5>I think instead of there being too much of a

0:27:59.121 --> 0:28:03.441
<v Speaker 5>focus on where that the tradeable inflation may or may

0:28:03.481 --> 0:28:05.601
<v Speaker 5>not be, I think because they know that that can

0:28:05.641 --> 0:28:07.481
<v Speaker 5>move quickly, right, you know, the exchange rate has a

0:28:07.521 --> 0:28:09.481
<v Speaker 5>huge influence on it, and the exchange rate can move

0:28:09.481 --> 0:28:11.721
<v Speaker 5>a lot, you know, in a day, a week, a month,

0:28:11.841 --> 0:28:15.401
<v Speaker 5>you know, So I think what the focus is naturally

0:28:15.401 --> 0:28:18.961
<v Speaker 5>going to be is more on the domestically driven inflation.

0:28:19.801 --> 0:28:22.441
<v Speaker 5>But the wrinkle there now which hasn't been there so

0:28:22.521 --> 0:28:25.441
<v Speaker 5>much in the past, is that within this part of

0:28:25.481 --> 0:28:28.241
<v Speaker 5>the basket you've got a whole bunch of stuff that

0:28:28.361 --> 0:28:32.241
<v Speaker 5>monetary policy and interest rates just can't have much impact on.

0:28:32.321 --> 0:28:34.281
<v Speaker 5>And that's the stuff we've talked about before. You know,

0:28:34.601 --> 0:28:39.681
<v Speaker 5>local authority rates, council rates, insurance for example, which are

0:28:39.721 --> 0:28:44.121
<v Speaker 5>quite big weights in the basket. But you know, moneture

0:28:44.161 --> 0:28:46.281
<v Speaker 5>policy at the moment is that that's not having an

0:28:46.281 --> 0:28:48.361
<v Speaker 5>impact on those Those are going up for these big

0:28:48.441 --> 0:28:51.961
<v Speaker 5>structural reasons, you know, global reinsurance costs as we have

0:28:52.001 --> 0:28:54.521
<v Speaker 5>all these natural disasters and so on, and then this

0:28:54.681 --> 0:28:58.841
<v Speaker 5>huge infrastructure need that counsels have which is forcing rates

0:28:58.921 --> 0:29:01.881
<v Speaker 5>up by you know, double digits each year. So that

0:29:01.881 --> 0:29:05.481
<v Speaker 5>that's an interesting, I think question going forward. Will the

0:29:05.601 --> 0:29:10.881
<v Speaker 5>RBNZ look through some of those things and be happy

0:29:10.881 --> 0:29:14.401
<v Speaker 5>to continue the using cycle knowing that they can't control

0:29:14.481 --> 0:29:17.601
<v Speaker 5>that stuff or not? You know's kind an ongoing.

0:29:17.321 --> 0:29:19.441
<v Speaker 4>Question, right Look, we're going to take a moment. We're

0:29:19.441 --> 0:29:22.161
<v Speaker 4>going to come back and see and explore what does

0:29:22.201 --> 0:29:25.241
<v Speaker 4>this actually mean for mortgage rates? And I guess on

0:29:25.281 --> 0:29:28.801
<v Speaker 4>everyone's mind if you're someone who's thinking about buying, you're

0:29:28.841 --> 0:29:31.001
<v Speaker 4>thinking about investing in the property market, what does that

0:29:31.041 --> 0:29:34.241
<v Speaker 4>actually mean for the property market? And with these falling

0:29:34.281 --> 0:29:36.241
<v Speaker 4>interest rates? Are we going to explore that a little

0:29:36.241 --> 0:29:38.081
<v Speaker 4>bit more with Hamish Pepper in just a moment. This

0:29:38.161 --> 0:29:40.001
<v Speaker 4>is smart Money. We'd love your cause you've got any

0:29:40.041 --> 0:29:43.081
<v Speaker 4>questions for Hamish, then jump on the blower eight hundred

0:29:43.201 --> 0:29:58.281
<v Speaker 4>eighty eighty. It's twenty one to six. Yes's welcome back

0:29:58.321 --> 0:30:00.401
<v Speaker 4>to smart Money on the Weekend Collective. My guest is

0:30:00.521 --> 0:30:03.161
<v Speaker 4>Hamish Pepper is a fixed income and currency strategist at

0:30:03.201 --> 0:30:05.561
<v Speaker 4>Harbor asset management. I finally meant to get that out

0:30:05.561 --> 0:30:08.201
<v Speaker 4>because the's quite a few syllables on that job description there.

0:30:08.201 --> 0:30:11.041
<v Speaker 4>But Hamish, I actually I did. I did make it.

0:30:11.521 --> 0:30:14.121
<v Speaker 4>Let's say I misspoke when I was talking about gold

0:30:14.201 --> 0:30:17.921
<v Speaker 4>not being that flash. I was comparing it to if

0:30:17.961 --> 0:30:22.321
<v Speaker 4>you just what had happened with us stop with the

0:30:22.321 --> 0:30:25.401
<v Speaker 4>stock market, basically, because of course, if you did buy

0:30:25.441 --> 0:30:27.161
<v Speaker 4>gold twenty years ago and sat on it, you'd still

0:30:27.201 --> 0:30:29.281
<v Speaker 4>be better than having it in the bank, isn't that right?

0:30:30.761 --> 0:30:33.121
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I mean, well, I suppose it depends exactly what

0:30:33.161 --> 0:30:36.081
<v Speaker 5>you were being paid by your bank to have your

0:30:36.081 --> 0:30:39.481
<v Speaker 5>money there. But you know that sounds about right.

0:30:39.881 --> 0:30:41.721
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, Now, I just got picked up on a

0:30:41.721 --> 0:30:44.521
<v Speaker 4>few texts as somebody saying it was too gold was

0:30:44.521 --> 0:30:46.281
<v Speaker 4>seven hundred and eighty and two thousand and six and

0:30:46.321 --> 0:30:48.401
<v Speaker 4>now it's twenty eight hundred, which is still not a

0:30:48.401 --> 0:30:51.001
<v Speaker 4>bad rate. I think that if you'd stuck your shares

0:30:51.041 --> 0:30:54.441
<v Speaker 4>and there, I think there was various funds that massively

0:30:54.481 --> 0:30:57.241
<v Speaker 4>outperformed that. Though haven't there been over the last decade

0:30:57.321 --> 0:30:57.481
<v Speaker 4>or so.

0:30:59.081 --> 0:31:01.001
<v Speaker 5>It's a good question. Yeah, I'm just pulling up the

0:31:01.041 --> 0:31:04.001
<v Speaker 5>chart in front of me now, yeah, so yeah, what

0:31:04.081 --> 0:31:07.401
<v Speaker 5>are we We Yeah, we're pretty much more than doubled

0:31:07.401 --> 0:31:12.041
<v Speaker 5>and in ten years. Yeah, let me get back to

0:31:12.041 --> 0:31:13.961
<v Speaker 5>your PEPs.

0:31:14.081 --> 0:31:17.561
<v Speaker 4>I can't remember. I just remembered in a conversation somebody saying, well, okay,

0:31:17.601 --> 0:31:19.681
<v Speaker 4>gold is all very well, but if you've stuck it

0:31:19.721 --> 0:31:22.241
<v Speaker 4>in this fund over the same period of time, you'd

0:31:22.281 --> 0:31:25.241
<v Speaker 4>be about you'd be two, two or three times better off.

0:31:25.241 --> 0:31:27.201
<v Speaker 4>I can't I think it was something like that. Anyway, Look,

0:31:27.321 --> 0:31:33.601
<v Speaker 4>let's take some calls. Jim, Hello, Hi there, hire you go.

0:31:36.001 --> 0:31:36.921
<v Speaker 8>Did you give my question?

0:31:37.321 --> 0:31:37.561
<v Speaker 7>No?

0:31:38.961 --> 0:31:41.761
<v Speaker 8>I said, what proportion of New Zealand banks is owned

0:31:41.801 --> 0:31:44.081
<v Speaker 8>by overseas interests?

0:31:44.321 --> 0:31:44.641
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:31:44.721 --> 0:31:51.481
<v Speaker 5>Okay, if you mean if you count Australia as being

0:31:51.481 --> 0:31:57.641
<v Speaker 5>an overseas interest, it would be indeed, most of them. Yeah,

0:31:58.121 --> 0:32:04.761
<v Speaker 5>that's the big four taken out as they're all Australian banks,

0:32:04.801 --> 0:32:10.641
<v Speaker 5>and then you're left with the likes of obviously Qui Bank, Cadani,

0:32:10.921 --> 0:32:11.721
<v Speaker 5>Savon's Bank.

0:32:12.281 --> 0:32:15.321
<v Speaker 4>Is that because you're concerned, Jim with the profits going overseas?

0:32:15.881 --> 0:32:17.681
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, And the second part of the question was what

0:32:17.721 --> 0:32:21.601
<v Speaker 8>portion of the profits goes overseas well?

0:32:22.161 --> 0:32:25.921
<v Speaker 5>Based on the ownership, it would be I would say,

0:32:25.921 --> 0:32:27.801
<v Speaker 5>without without knowing before, but I'd say it would be

0:32:27.801 --> 0:32:30.921
<v Speaker 5>the majority.

0:32:31.281 --> 0:32:34.361
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, there's something really wrong with their banking system, isn't there.

0:32:35.561 --> 0:32:38.321
<v Speaker 4>Well, I guess the problem is why we don't have

0:32:38.441 --> 0:32:43.521
<v Speaker 4>more New Zealand banks Hamish. I guess I don't know

0:32:43.921 --> 0:32:46.441
<v Speaker 4>that that's the thing. We've got plenty of competition, one

0:32:46.441 --> 0:32:49.401
<v Speaker 4>would argue, because we've got quite a few banks. It's

0:32:49.401 --> 0:32:51.401
<v Speaker 4>not like we've just got two. What do you what

0:32:51.401 --> 0:32:53.041
<v Speaker 4>do you? What's your response Hamus to that?

0:32:54.241 --> 0:32:57.841
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, I think this has been a kind

0:32:57.881 --> 0:33:00.441
<v Speaker 5>of feature of the discussion for some time now. I

0:33:00.441 --> 0:33:03.321
<v Speaker 5>think I think when Kiwibank came along, there were hopes

0:33:03.361 --> 0:33:08.481
<v Speaker 5>there that perhaps with more capital provided from the government,

0:33:08.601 --> 0:33:11.961
<v Speaker 5>that Kiwi Bank could be a real competitor to the

0:33:12.001 --> 0:33:17.601
<v Speaker 5>Aussie banks, and unfortunately that just hasn't quite played out.

0:33:17.921 --> 0:33:20.201
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, I mean, I think we're left probably with

0:33:20.241 --> 0:33:23.841
<v Speaker 5>a situation where, you know, the profits that are being

0:33:23.881 --> 0:33:29.121
<v Speaker 5>earned are commonly under scrutiny and for many, you know, commentators,

0:33:29.161 --> 0:33:30.961
<v Speaker 5>they feel that they are too high because of a

0:33:31.041 --> 0:33:35.841
<v Speaker 5>lack of competition. But from a system point of view,

0:33:36.441 --> 0:33:40.481
<v Speaker 5>the banking system here works very very well in terms

0:33:40.521 --> 0:33:45.201
<v Speaker 5>of the way it can provide lending to those that

0:33:45.281 --> 0:33:49.601
<v Speaker 5>needed and then obviously take deposits from those that have saving.

0:33:49.721 --> 0:33:55.441
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, I think, you know, we should be not

0:33:55.801 --> 0:33:57.721
<v Speaker 5>grateful is probably for the right word. But you know,

0:33:57.801 --> 0:34:00.761
<v Speaker 5>there are countries in the world where banking systems don't

0:34:00.801 --> 0:34:04.801
<v Speaker 5>operate so well, and for example, countries where you are

0:34:04.841 --> 0:34:08.641
<v Speaker 5>for to borrow in foreign currency, which is not something

0:34:08.681 --> 0:34:11.761
<v Speaker 5>that we have to consider. And so what that can

0:34:11.841 --> 0:34:15.201
<v Speaker 5>mean is that you can have, say, for example, a

0:34:15.281 --> 0:34:18.881
<v Speaker 5>mortgage which is denominated in a different currency, and therefore

0:34:19.521 --> 0:34:23.681
<v Speaker 5>if your currency weakends against that one, then all of

0:34:23.681 --> 0:34:27.161
<v Speaker 5>a sudden, your mortgage becomes a whole lot larger. And

0:34:27.241 --> 0:34:31.441
<v Speaker 5>so yeah, there, Yes, there are some perhaps issues in

0:34:31.521 --> 0:34:35.641
<v Speaker 5>terms of a lack of local ownership of banks here

0:34:35.641 --> 0:34:39.161
<v Speaker 5>in New Zealand, but there are some real benefits to

0:34:39.201 --> 0:34:41.681
<v Speaker 5>the current structure that we have, and that's it. That

0:34:41.801 --> 0:34:42.681
<v Speaker 5>is a really big one.

0:34:42.801 --> 0:34:45.161
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, that's probably something we can spend a

0:34:45.161 --> 0:34:47.361
<v Speaker 4>whole hour on just talking about the nature of ownership

0:34:47.401 --> 0:34:49.321
<v Speaker 4>of our banks. I did a quick Google set. You

0:34:49.361 --> 0:34:50.801
<v Speaker 4>can tell me how wrong I was on this. By

0:34:50.801 --> 0:34:53.921
<v Speaker 4>the way, Hamish that back in nineteen ninety the price

0:34:53.961 --> 0:34:56.721
<v Speaker 4>of God was four hundred bucks basically, and now it's

0:34:56.841 --> 0:34:59.761
<v Speaker 4>three thousand bucks, I think, whereas if you'd stuck your

0:34:59.801 --> 0:35:04.161
<v Speaker 4>money in the Dow Jones industrial average in nineteen ninety

0:35:04.761 --> 0:35:09.081
<v Speaker 4>to thousand, six hundred dollars turned into today around forty

0:35:09.121 --> 0:35:15.001
<v Speaker 4>three thousand. So that's that's you know, that's right.

0:35:15.921 --> 0:35:18.601
<v Speaker 5>A similar answer. Yeah, yeah, so you're almost something like

0:35:18.681 --> 0:35:22.081
<v Speaker 5>twenty times your money, yeah, in those global equities.

0:35:21.801 --> 0:35:25.201
<v Speaker 4>Or twenty times in money versus eight or nine times

0:35:25.241 --> 0:35:28.281
<v Speaker 4>in money. Yeah. Okay, good. I'm glad I wasn't completely

0:35:28.321 --> 0:35:30.961
<v Speaker 4>wrong on that, because I don't like saying things and

0:35:31.001 --> 0:35:32.761
<v Speaker 4>then people call him out and going, Tim, you don't

0:35:32.761 --> 0:35:36.081
<v Speaker 4>know what you're talking about, which possibly is true. But anyway,

0:35:36.361 --> 0:35:36.801
<v Speaker 4>I kind.

0:35:36.681 --> 0:35:38.081
<v Speaker 5>Of like that we did that all real time.

0:35:38.161 --> 0:35:41.081
<v Speaker 4>That was Oh yeah, look I've got the got the

0:35:41.201 --> 0:35:45.721
<v Speaker 4>old fact checking Google search. It serves me well in

0:35:45.721 --> 0:35:50.001
<v Speaker 4>the we small hours on talkback. Hey, look, we've sort

0:35:50.001 --> 0:35:51.521
<v Speaker 4>of don't have a lot of time to explore this.

0:35:51.561 --> 0:35:53.561
<v Speaker 4>In fact, I'll tell you what, We'll take a break

0:35:53.561 --> 0:35:55.001
<v Speaker 4>and we'll come back Hamish and we'll just have a

0:35:55.081 --> 0:35:59.161
<v Speaker 4>chat about you know, the impact on mortgage rates continuing

0:35:59.201 --> 0:36:00.961
<v Speaker 4>to fall and while we think is going to happen

0:36:01.001 --> 0:36:02.601
<v Speaker 4>to the housing market. So we'll talk about that in

0:36:02.641 --> 0:36:05.281
<v Speaker 4>just a moment with Hamish Pepper. He's a current see

0:36:05.281 --> 0:36:08.321
<v Speaker 4>and fixed income strategist at Harborrastic Management. This is news talk,

0:36:08.361 --> 0:36:23.121
<v Speaker 4>said b. It's just gone twelve minutes to say, let's

0:36:23.121 --> 0:36:25.161
<v Speaker 4>welcome back to the weekend collective. Smart man. And I

0:36:25.201 --> 0:36:27.441
<v Speaker 4>wonder how many people listening to that what that song

0:36:27.441 --> 0:36:29.801
<v Speaker 4>would realize. It's actually from an old musical called Fiddler

0:36:29.801 --> 0:36:31.521
<v Speaker 4>on the Roof, but it's been you put a funky

0:36:31.521 --> 0:36:34.321
<v Speaker 4>beat to it and the way you go anyway, Hamish

0:36:34.321 --> 0:36:38.441
<v Speaker 4>Pepper from Harbor Rasset Management. Actually, just because I'll just

0:36:38.521 --> 0:36:40.281
<v Speaker 4>get your quick reaction to this text and then we'll

0:36:40.281 --> 0:36:42.161
<v Speaker 4>see if we can squeeze something about the housing market.

0:36:42.841 --> 0:36:44.281
<v Speaker 4>It says high time. I get a bit tired of

0:36:44.321 --> 0:36:46.601
<v Speaker 4>the bleating about overseas ownership with the banks. We sold

0:36:46.601 --> 0:36:48.481
<v Speaker 4>them to the foreign banks. It's our own fault. People

0:36:48.561 --> 0:36:51.201
<v Speaker 4>chose not to invest themselves and just need to stop

0:36:51.281 --> 0:36:54.201
<v Speaker 4>going on about it. From Anthony, there is something about

0:36:54.241 --> 0:36:55.841
<v Speaker 4>that text that kind of appeals to me. You know,

0:36:55.881 --> 0:36:57.761
<v Speaker 4>we complain all the time, but what are we doing

0:36:57.761 --> 0:36:58.481
<v Speaker 4>about it? Nothing?

0:37:00.841 --> 0:37:04.321
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think there's probably a broader point that comes

0:37:04.321 --> 0:37:06.841
<v Speaker 5>out of that too. Where what we're dealing with here

0:37:06.881 --> 0:37:09.801
<v Speaker 5>in New Zealand is, you know, there's decades of obsession

0:37:09.881 --> 0:37:12.281
<v Speaker 5>with housing has been you know, the number one asset

0:37:13.041 --> 0:37:16.001
<v Speaker 5>you know, to invest in. Has meant that we've we've

0:37:16.041 --> 0:37:18.961
<v Speaker 5>got pretty shallow capital markets, you know, so our share

0:37:19.041 --> 0:37:22.441
<v Speaker 5>market and our bomb market's getting deeper, but generally that's

0:37:22.441 --> 0:37:27.001
<v Speaker 5>the price we've paid for that obsession has meant that, Yeah,

0:37:27.001 --> 0:37:29.041
<v Speaker 5>there's there's just not a lot of capital out there

0:37:29.081 --> 0:37:32.081
<v Speaker 5>for businesses to fund themselves with.

0:37:32.561 --> 0:37:34.441
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's touch quickly. I know we've left it quite

0:37:34.481 --> 0:37:37.481
<v Speaker 4>late our run on this one. But the housing market,

0:37:37.601 --> 0:37:42.401
<v Speaker 4>because look at that does feel it just intuitively that

0:37:42.921 --> 0:37:45.361
<v Speaker 4>you know, we're not going to see any sort of

0:37:45.521 --> 0:37:49.041
<v Speaker 4>rushing to sort of people buy multiple properties with these

0:37:49.161 --> 0:37:51.561
<v Speaker 4>these cuts, that we've got other issues at play when

0:37:51.561 --> 0:37:52.601
<v Speaker 4>it comes to the market, haven't we.

0:37:54.041 --> 0:38:00.161
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's been really interesting how perhaps disappointing the reaction

0:38:00.401 --> 0:38:04.121
<v Speaker 5>from the housing market has been to these cuts and

0:38:04.481 --> 0:38:09.121
<v Speaker 5>mortga trade. Not disappointing of course, if you're a new

0:38:09.161 --> 0:38:12.361
<v Speaker 5>home buyer thinking of getting into the market, you know,

0:38:12.401 --> 0:38:16.801
<v Speaker 5>this has been probably quite a pleasant surprise. It appears

0:38:16.921 --> 0:38:20.401
<v Speaker 5>what's going on is that this massive drop in our

0:38:20.441 --> 0:38:25.321
<v Speaker 5>population growth is generally it's been people leaving, which has

0:38:25.401 --> 0:38:30.401
<v Speaker 5>driven it more than the lower arrivals. But you know,

0:38:30.481 --> 0:38:34.161
<v Speaker 5>that's having quite a big impact on housing, and it

0:38:34.201 --> 0:38:36.961
<v Speaker 5>happens with quite a lag, so it will continue to

0:38:36.961 --> 0:38:39.801
<v Speaker 5>have that downward force on the property market. And of

0:38:39.801 --> 0:38:41.761
<v Speaker 5>course we mentioned earlier about the fact that we are

0:38:41.801 --> 0:38:45.401
<v Speaker 5>still seeing job losses in the economy and so unemployment

0:38:45.521 --> 0:38:47.801
<v Speaker 5>in the unemployment rate is something which matters a lot

0:38:48.361 --> 0:38:51.561
<v Speaker 5>for the housing market. So interest rates are fighting against

0:38:51.641 --> 0:38:55.881
<v Speaker 5>those downward forces and will probably continue to do so

0:38:56.001 --> 0:38:58.481
<v Speaker 5>for another couple of quarters at least.

0:38:59.041 --> 0:39:01.681
<v Speaker 4>And of course when people think them traits are getting

0:39:01.681 --> 0:39:03.201
<v Speaker 4>lower and they think, well good, there might be small

0:39:03.241 --> 0:39:05.001
<v Speaker 4>bars in the market. Then of course more people put

0:39:05.081 --> 0:39:07.041
<v Speaker 4>their properties on the market, I hoping it's going to move,

0:39:07.041 --> 0:39:10.561
<v Speaker 4>and then there's more supply. So the old kensy and

0:39:10.601 --> 0:39:13.281
<v Speaker 4>economics kicks in, doesn't it supplies matching the demand.

0:39:14.121 --> 0:39:17.081
<v Speaker 5>Well, and that's been the most interesting thing. We probably

0:39:17.121 --> 0:39:20.401
<v Speaker 5>all got, maybe initially a bit excited about what this

0:39:20.561 --> 0:39:23.321
<v Speaker 5>meant that sales were picking up, But then we started

0:39:23.321 --> 0:39:26.241
<v Speaker 5>to look at what the prices were for those sales,

0:39:26.361 --> 0:39:30.121
<v Speaker 5>and you know, they weren't particularly impressive. So this is

0:39:30.121 --> 0:39:33.441
<v Speaker 5>the housing market that feels quite static. It's got those

0:39:33.481 --> 0:39:37.441
<v Speaker 5>opposing forces and probably we'll feel that way for for

0:39:37.521 --> 0:39:38.761
<v Speaker 5>a little while while longer.

0:39:39.041 --> 0:39:42.521
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Hey, ho, much time, fliers, mate, We've got we've

0:39:42.521 --> 0:39:43.921
<v Speaker 4>got to wrap it up there, just quickly. We've got

0:39:43.961 --> 0:39:46.201
<v Speaker 4>about a minute to go. What's so, what's what are

0:39:46.201 --> 0:39:48.721
<v Speaker 4>you focusing on in your in your role at the moment.

0:39:48.721 --> 0:39:49.961
<v Speaker 4>What are the sort of things when you hit the

0:39:49.961 --> 0:39:52.161
<v Speaker 4>desk tomorrow, what are you going to be looking for

0:39:52.201 --> 0:39:54.241
<v Speaker 4>in terms of what's what's driving your week?

0:39:55.401 --> 0:39:57.641
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think number one is this US economy term.

0:39:57.681 --> 0:40:00.041
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we we touched on the Trump factor, but

0:40:00.081 --> 0:40:02.401
<v Speaker 5>there's also another bit going on there, which is it

0:40:02.601 --> 0:40:07.641
<v Speaker 5>finally might be slowing down to being this unbelievable sort

0:40:07.681 --> 0:40:11.401
<v Speaker 5>of exception. You know, this ongoing resilience that we're seeing

0:40:11.401 --> 0:40:13.361
<v Speaker 5>out of the US. It looks like maybe there's a

0:40:13.481 --> 0:40:17.041
<v Speaker 5>few cracks appearing, and that has huge implications for global markets.

0:40:17.041 --> 0:40:20.801
<v Speaker 5>We touched on equities, their share prices, but also for bombs.

0:40:20.881 --> 0:40:23.481
<v Speaker 5>You know, they've got a heap of room there for

0:40:23.601 --> 0:40:26.801
<v Speaker 5>interest rates to fall, and if that starts to be

0:40:26.841 --> 0:40:30.281
<v Speaker 5>something that markets anticipate, we will inherit some of that,

0:40:30.361 --> 0:40:33.241
<v Speaker 5>so there'll be number one job excellent tomorrow morning.

0:40:33.321 --> 0:40:35.361
<v Speaker 4>Good no rest for the wicked. Hey, great to have

0:40:35.401 --> 0:40:37.121
<v Speaker 4>you on the show, Homush really appreciate it. And if

0:40:37.121 --> 0:40:38.961
<v Speaker 4>people want to check out the work you guys do

0:40:39.201 --> 0:40:40.641
<v Speaker 4>harbor asset dot coutter at inn z.

0:40:40.841 --> 0:40:43.961
<v Speaker 5>Right, that's the one. Thanks very much, Tim.

0:40:43.721 --> 0:40:46.201
<v Speaker 4>Okay, and thanks for your company everyone. Thanks a great show.

0:40:46.241 --> 0:40:48.921
<v Speaker 4>Thanks my producer, Tyra Roberts. We'll look forward to your

0:40:48.921 --> 0:40:53.121
<v Speaker 4>company again, same time next weekend and Sunday It's six

0:40:53.401 --> 0:40:57.441
<v Speaker 4>is next to Following the News, It's three minutes to

0:40:57.521 --> 0:41:05.201
<v Speaker 4>Sex News Talk sed B.

0:41:07.801 --> 0:41:10.561
<v Speaker 1>For more from the weekend collective, listen live to News

0:41:10.601 --> 0:41:14.241
<v Speaker 1>Talk ZEDB weekends from three pm, or follow the podcast

0:41:14.321 --> 0:41:15.281
<v Speaker 1>on iHeartRadio