WEBVTT - On The Front Foot: Episode 255

0:00:09.093 --> 0:00:11.973
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a podcast from News Talk sat B.

0:00:12.373 --> 0:00:15.173
<v Speaker 1>Follow this and our wide range of podcasts now on

0:00:15.333 --> 0:00:21.093
<v Speaker 1>iHeart Radio.

0:00:20.573 --> 0:00:21.733
<v Speaker 2>Y take another.

0:00:23.373 --> 0:00:25.213
<v Speaker 3>It's a trick, it is out.

0:00:25.533 --> 0:00:31.093
<v Speaker 2>The test is over. Con't smoke a beauty, It is

0:00:31.133 --> 0:00:34.293
<v Speaker 2>out and here you goes. This delivery has in un

0:00:34.573 --> 0:00:35.053
<v Speaker 2>used to go.

0:00:37.693 --> 0:00:41.093
<v Speaker 1>On the front foot with Brian Waddell and Jeremy Cody

0:00:41.413 --> 0:00:45.293
<v Speaker 1>powered by News Talk, said B at iHeart Radio.

0:00:47.453 --> 0:00:50.253
<v Speaker 2>Hello, We're on the front foot. Well, the New Zealand

0:00:50.333 --> 0:00:53.293
<v Speaker 2>cricket team, the black Caps probably weren't on the front foot.

0:00:53.573 --> 0:00:56.813
<v Speaker 2>A limp batting display against Banglavik settled the ode I

0:00:56.973 --> 0:01:00.493
<v Speaker 2>series in the heats of Cheta Graham used to be

0:01:00.573 --> 0:01:03.093
<v Speaker 2>known as Chittagong, which was a hell of a lot easy

0:01:03.133 --> 0:01:08.213
<v Speaker 2>to say. Was anything meaningful achieved from that one day series.

0:01:08.693 --> 0:01:12.053
<v Speaker 2>Heap and Boyle continue to impress in Sri Lanka with

0:01:12.133 --> 0:01:15.213
<v Speaker 2>the a's will any new faces make the fifteen man

0:01:15.253 --> 0:01:19.573
<v Speaker 2>squad for England and the leaky rumor SI says that

0:01:19.773 --> 0:01:24.133
<v Speaker 2>former paceballer Jeff Allett is likely to get the CEO's

0:01:24.253 --> 0:01:27.173
<v Speaker 2>job at New Zealand Cricket. If it's true, is it

0:01:27.213 --> 0:01:32.053
<v Speaker 2>a good option? I don't know. The interesting the names

0:01:32.173 --> 0:01:35.173
<v Speaker 2>I've heard, Peter Holland and Jeremy Coney will us again

0:01:35.253 --> 0:01:40.293
<v Speaker 2>on the front foot lead Jamon, Jeff Allett and Rayleian Castle.

0:01:40.333 --> 0:01:43.373
<v Speaker 2>Well now Rallian Castle's back with New Zealand Sports signed

0:01:43.453 --> 0:01:46.173
<v Speaker 2>or twenty twenty nine. Jerry, So, I guess it's between

0:01:46.253 --> 0:01:47.613
<v Speaker 2>Allott and Jamon.

0:01:48.253 --> 0:01:50.733
<v Speaker 4>I think Jamon's pulled out too, hasn't he wadds. I

0:01:50.773 --> 0:01:56.493
<v Speaker 4>thought I saw something somewhere to say that at least

0:01:56.493 --> 0:01:59.893
<v Speaker 4>they're both cricketers former cricketers.

0:01:59.893 --> 0:02:00.733
<v Speaker 3>That's a bonus.

0:02:00.933 --> 0:02:05.413
<v Speaker 4>I think you need to know the game intimately. And

0:02:06.853 --> 0:02:11.493
<v Speaker 4>I think also uh and the fans. I think you

0:02:11.613 --> 0:02:14.413
<v Speaker 4>need to to be That's one of the main roles,

0:02:14.453 --> 0:02:17.853
<v Speaker 4>isn't it. Most she'll know that so that they they've

0:02:17.893 --> 0:02:20.253
<v Speaker 4>got to be aware the board.

0:02:20.733 --> 0:02:23.573
<v Speaker 3>He spoke to me last night or when he.

0:02:23.573 --> 0:02:29.133
<v Speaker 4>Had just seen seeds at the favorite watering hole and it.

0:02:29.013 --> 0:02:31.293
<v Speaker 5>Was the Cambridge Terrorist Community Center.

0:02:31.453 --> 0:02:38.493
<v Speaker 4>Jerry, Yes, okay, yeah, and uh and and and you

0:02:39.133 --> 0:02:42.213
<v Speaker 4>really I think we we did mention at some point

0:02:42.773 --> 0:02:49.173
<v Speaker 4>about Allott and Jimon and also the role of New

0:02:49.253 --> 0:02:51.813
<v Speaker 4>Zealand cricket and the board.

0:02:52.413 --> 0:02:55.333
<v Speaker 5>And and and and part of this was was triggered

0:02:55.333 --> 0:02:58.653
<v Speaker 5>by some of the correspondents that Brian had has has

0:02:58.733 --> 0:03:04.333
<v Speaker 5>received from from listeners to to our to our meanderings

0:03:04.373 --> 0:03:07.013
<v Speaker 5>on on the on the wireless, so to speak. That

0:03:07.133 --> 0:03:10.013
<v Speaker 5>I and and and what got me is particularly with

0:03:10.053 --> 0:03:14.133
<v Speaker 5>our previous conversation that we'd had with respect to decisions

0:03:14.733 --> 0:03:19.173
<v Speaker 5>concerning the T twenty and it came to me thinking about, well, actually,

0:03:19.173 --> 0:03:22.733
<v Speaker 5>what do the board members owe duties do they owe

0:03:23.213 --> 0:03:27.333
<v Speaker 5>to the cricket community. And the cricket community is fans,

0:03:27.373 --> 0:03:31.893
<v Speaker 5>the people. It's not sectional interests such as players only.

0:03:32.333 --> 0:03:36.533
<v Speaker 5>It's the broader community, if you will. And I just

0:03:36.653 --> 0:03:42.013
<v Speaker 5>wonder whether, in fact, I would like for them to

0:03:42.253 --> 0:03:45.853
<v Speaker 5>explain to us how they believe that they are meeting

0:03:45.973 --> 0:03:50.253
<v Speaker 5>the obligations in terms of the duties they owe to

0:03:50.253 --> 0:03:53.493
<v Speaker 5>the community for the greater good of the sport here

0:03:53.973 --> 0:03:56.293
<v Speaker 5>and not just to line some pockets of some people,

0:03:56.693 --> 0:03:59.693
<v Speaker 5>which then brings you back squarely to the role of

0:03:59.733 --> 0:04:04.773
<v Speaker 5>the CEO in order to implement the requirements of the board.

0:04:05.253 --> 0:04:07.813
<v Speaker 5>And clearly there was a clash which caused the previous

0:04:07.893 --> 0:04:13.053
<v Speaker 5>CEO to leave. I think we still have and I

0:04:13.093 --> 0:04:16.893
<v Speaker 5>would posit the view that anyone who takes on that

0:04:17.013 --> 0:04:19.813
<v Speaker 5>role as a CEO is in for a very tough

0:04:20.093 --> 0:04:26.453
<v Speaker 5>and challenging year or two because cash is short. There

0:04:26.493 --> 0:04:28.773
<v Speaker 5>may be cash flying for the T twenty, but that's

0:04:28.773 --> 0:04:32.333
<v Speaker 5>not for the New Zealand Cricket necessarily, so the demands

0:04:32.333 --> 0:04:36.373
<v Speaker 5>will continue. So I wish that person well. And Jeff

0:04:36.693 --> 0:04:38.293
<v Speaker 5>seems to be a pretty sensible person.

0:04:38.933 --> 0:04:42.133
<v Speaker 2>Yeah indeed, and he was on the board for a

0:04:42.173 --> 0:04:45.293
<v Speaker 2>considerable period of time. I only concern, of course, is

0:04:45.333 --> 0:04:51.293
<v Speaker 2>that that board has become rather negative to some extent,

0:04:51.413 --> 0:04:57.493
<v Speaker 2>or has received negative press from many quarters. And their

0:04:57.533 --> 0:05:01.733
<v Speaker 2>ability to spend money and raise money is important, I suppose.

0:05:01.773 --> 0:05:05.013
<v Speaker 2>But their whole job is the administration of the game,

0:05:05.053 --> 0:05:08.613
<v Speaker 2>as you say, most not just T twenty competitions and

0:05:08.733 --> 0:05:12.773
<v Speaker 2>international players. It's the guy that plays down at Cornwall

0:05:12.853 --> 0:05:15.693
<v Speaker 2>Park or Nenville Park or Hagley Park and christ Church

0:05:16.133 --> 0:05:19.533
<v Speaker 2>or even in the outlying reaches of New Zealand. Their

0:05:19.573 --> 0:05:22.693
<v Speaker 2>responsibility is the administration of the game.

0:05:22.693 --> 0:05:29.173
<v Speaker 4>YEP, community cricket, and that's where the future players come from.

0:05:30.493 --> 0:05:34.853
<v Speaker 4>They have an obligation to try and arrange various things

0:05:35.053 --> 0:05:39.013
<v Speaker 4>so that anybody who wants to enjoy the game in

0:05:39.093 --> 0:05:42.813
<v Speaker 4>New Zealand has the opportunity to do so, and so

0:05:43.653 --> 0:05:46.693
<v Speaker 4>in an organized way. It's not playing on the beach necessarily,

0:05:47.213 --> 0:05:53.053
<v Speaker 4>but to have structured kind of competitions throughout a potential

0:05:53.133 --> 0:05:56.973
<v Speaker 4>players playing Korea. So that's that's their job, and to

0:05:57.053 --> 0:06:00.253
<v Speaker 4>keep people interested in the game generally and to be

0:06:00.293 --> 0:06:02.933
<v Speaker 4>able to put it in front of them. So I

0:06:03.013 --> 0:06:05.893
<v Speaker 4>don't I don't have any problem with what either of

0:06:05.893 --> 0:06:08.413
<v Speaker 4>you two are saying there about that.

0:06:08.093 --> 0:06:10.773
<v Speaker 3>There's a slight concern in the back of my mind.

0:06:10.893 --> 0:06:15.173
<v Speaker 4>Has Jeff All has ever been involved in some business

0:06:15.573 --> 0:06:19.693
<v Speaker 4>kind of operations with say, people like Fleming or you know,

0:06:19.933 --> 0:06:23.893
<v Speaker 4>people who have worked with India particularly. I'm just a

0:06:23.933 --> 0:06:28.533
<v Speaker 4>wee bit concerned that there might be an ongoing relationship

0:06:28.613 --> 0:06:32.173
<v Speaker 4>between those two when he's going to have to if

0:06:32.213 --> 0:06:36.053
<v Speaker 4>he's going to be the CEO, has to make decisions

0:06:36.213 --> 0:06:40.173
<v Speaker 4>outside of that and consider exactly what Moose has just

0:06:40.253 --> 0:06:43.733
<v Speaker 4>been talking about and still have a past and a

0:06:43.893 --> 0:06:46.973
<v Speaker 4>history with some of the players who are pushing that

0:06:47.093 --> 0:06:51.653
<v Speaker 4>particular option. That's my just a little question mark in

0:06:51.693 --> 0:06:53.853
<v Speaker 4>the back of my mind because I've heard those names

0:06:53.893 --> 0:06:56.013
<v Speaker 4>together a number of times.

0:06:56.133 --> 0:06:57.813
<v Speaker 3>In business terms.

0:06:58.253 --> 0:07:05.813
<v Speaker 5>I believe that that is correct theory and in the

0:07:06.053 --> 0:07:10.253
<v Speaker 5>in the off use and phrase conflict. I don't know

0:07:12.093 --> 0:07:15.173
<v Speaker 5>that that would require And this is not this is

0:07:15.213 --> 0:07:23.053
<v Speaker 5>not casting any dispersions about ours, but you'll have to

0:07:23.093 --> 0:07:26.813
<v Speaker 5>tread a very careful line in order to ensure that

0:07:28.133 --> 0:07:32.293
<v Speaker 5>previous relationships and and there's nothing against that either, of

0:07:32.333 --> 0:07:37.533
<v Speaker 5>course not but but or that person must be focused

0:07:37.533 --> 0:07:41.613
<v Speaker 5>about what it is that the obligations and the duty

0:07:41.733 --> 0:07:44.373
<v Speaker 5>day o to the cricket community in its broadest sense,

0:07:44.933 --> 0:07:49.813
<v Speaker 5>and not a select few, as it were, And that

0:07:49.853 --> 0:07:51.973
<v Speaker 5>will be tricky for for any person who tax on

0:07:52.013 --> 0:07:52.813
<v Speaker 5>that role, really.

0:07:52.733 --> 0:07:56.813
<v Speaker 2>Would We'll have to wait and see what the announcement

0:07:56.893 --> 0:07:59.133
<v Speaker 2>is in terms of at It's only a rumor, as

0:07:59.173 --> 0:08:02.533
<v Speaker 2>they say, but those rumors are fairly strong around the country.

0:08:03.173 --> 0:08:06.493
<v Speaker 2>So we'll wait and see what happens when an announcement

0:08:06.533 --> 0:08:11.613
<v Speaker 2>has made and what plans are put forward. I know

0:08:11.653 --> 0:08:13.613
<v Speaker 2>when the last Chief executive came in he had great

0:08:13.613 --> 0:08:16.613
<v Speaker 2>plans for test cricket, but we haven't seen them, so

0:08:17.293 --> 0:08:21.053
<v Speaker 2>we'll just have to wait and see. Talking about plans

0:08:21.093 --> 0:08:24.333
<v Speaker 2>for test cricket, we'll be talking about our squad to

0:08:24.373 --> 0:08:26.213
<v Speaker 2>go to England shortly. But I just want to reflect

0:08:26.253 --> 0:08:31.453
<v Speaker 2>on the trip to Bangladesh by the New Zealand side

0:08:31.493 --> 0:08:33.813
<v Speaker 2>black Caps. They were beaten. I've got to say I

0:08:33.893 --> 0:08:36.093
<v Speaker 2>tossed the toys again when they were three down chasing

0:08:36.093 --> 0:08:39.013
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and sixty five and decided sleep was better

0:08:39.053 --> 0:08:44.773
<v Speaker 2>than watching cricket. I missed Foxcroft hitting something like seven

0:08:44.893 --> 0:08:47.893
<v Speaker 2>six is and doing a number down the order, but

0:08:47.933 --> 0:08:51.133
<v Speaker 2>it came a little bit too late. I just I'm

0:08:51.173 --> 0:08:54.093
<v Speaker 2>still sort of wondering at the rationale of going to

0:08:54.573 --> 0:08:59.853
<v Speaker 2>forty two degrees and playing ODI cricket at this time

0:08:59.853 --> 0:09:03.493
<v Speaker 2>of the year. And to me, while any experience should

0:09:03.493 --> 0:09:06.853
<v Speaker 2>be a good experience, seems to me a pointless exercise.

0:09:07.173 --> 0:09:09.253
<v Speaker 2>And they've lost the series two one.

0:09:09.533 --> 0:09:12.733
<v Speaker 5>And lost I think is yes, I would say they

0:09:12.773 --> 0:09:15.933
<v Speaker 5>got soundly beaten in the last matches.

0:09:17.573 --> 0:09:19.573
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to be nice, yes.

0:09:19.533 --> 0:09:23.013
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yeh and yeah, and diplomatic, which is not something

0:09:23.053 --> 0:09:34.573
<v Speaker 5>I'd always.

0:09:30.333 --> 0:09:35.693
<v Speaker 2>Around the bush.

0:09:36.893 --> 0:09:41.013
<v Speaker 5>I can't help but think that the opportunities to provide

0:09:41.213 --> 0:09:45.213
<v Speaker 5>or give give opportunities to a broader number of players

0:09:45.253 --> 0:09:50.253
<v Speaker 5>like Fotscroft, like Clark's and a bass in those conditions,

0:09:50.293 --> 0:09:52.533
<v Speaker 5>because we have to face the fact that we're going

0:09:52.613 --> 0:09:54.733
<v Speaker 5>to play a lot of cricket in the subcontinent. If

0:09:54.733 --> 0:09:57.213
<v Speaker 5>we have to be relevant in any way, shape or form,

0:09:57.533 --> 0:10:01.173
<v Speaker 5>that's probably a reality of it. And so exposure to

0:10:01.213 --> 0:10:04.413
<v Speaker 5>these conditions against what I will say, it was a

0:10:04.413 --> 0:10:06.853
<v Speaker 5>pretty good sign. And can I just make it make

0:10:06.893 --> 0:10:10.853
<v Speaker 5>it another another comment. The quick bowling, I've got to say,

0:10:11.173 --> 0:10:15.453
<v Speaker 5>took me by surprise this and yeah, uinely, genuinely good bowlers,

0:10:15.453 --> 0:10:19.173
<v Speaker 5>and so I'm giving them, giving them a hat off

0:10:19.173 --> 0:10:21.893
<v Speaker 5>to them. I thought that the way they played, I

0:10:21.893 --> 0:10:24.333
<v Speaker 5>thought they played damn good cricket. Okay in their backyard,

0:10:24.893 --> 0:10:28.933
<v Speaker 5>but well well done, blanded dish we went. We weren't

0:10:28.933 --> 0:10:31.893
<v Speaker 5>close enough with the New Zealand a team so to speak.

0:10:32.453 --> 0:10:35.053
<v Speaker 2>That go right. I was bowling at one forty five,

0:10:35.413 --> 0:10:39.933
<v Speaker 2>concrestently by the old slower ball. But boy, he's tall

0:10:40.493 --> 0:10:43.773
<v Speaker 2>and he gets good bounce and generates pace. He's going

0:10:43.813 --> 0:10:44.933
<v Speaker 2>to be an interesting one to watch.

0:10:45.213 --> 0:10:47.533
<v Speaker 5>And that was in those conditions. I mean, get him

0:10:47.533 --> 0:10:49.853
<v Speaker 5>on something a little bit bouncy in green over over

0:10:49.893 --> 0:10:53.173
<v Speaker 5>this side, well that'll be that'll be interesting, wasn't it.

0:10:53.973 --> 0:10:57.293
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they've certainly found someone, haven't they. They they cleaned

0:10:57.333 --> 0:11:00.813
<v Speaker 4>up Pakistan just before they met the New Zealanders.

0:11:00.853 --> 0:11:01.413
<v Speaker 5>He is.

0:11:01.453 --> 0:11:04.093
<v Speaker 3>You're right, he's the sort of the key.

0:11:03.893 --> 0:11:08.693
<v Speaker 4>To it, claiming wickets one forty five to one fifty.

0:11:08.733 --> 0:11:13.413
<v Speaker 4>He was, wasn't he quite and quite consistently and also

0:11:13.653 --> 0:11:17.053
<v Speaker 4>pretty accurate. It wasn't as it was firing it down

0:11:17.173 --> 0:11:19.333
<v Speaker 4>leg side and then one outside that she could have

0:11:19.333 --> 0:11:22.053
<v Speaker 4>a crack out, you know, you know, over to third

0:11:22.133 --> 0:11:22.853
<v Speaker 4>man and so on.

0:11:22.933 --> 0:11:23.693
<v Speaker 3>Nothing like that.

0:11:24.893 --> 0:11:28.213
<v Speaker 4>He held his pace, He had a good wrist, you

0:11:28.253 --> 0:11:30.613
<v Speaker 4>know that he was flicking it down as well as

0:11:30.693 --> 0:11:34.493
<v Speaker 4>tall and lean as you say, wads I thought he was.

0:11:34.693 --> 0:11:37.933
<v Speaker 4>He was a really good look actually, and went well

0:11:38.013 --> 0:11:41.053
<v Speaker 4>with Shoreful, who was very tight at the other end.

0:11:41.093 --> 0:11:44.413
<v Speaker 4>The left armor, who we've seen before but is really

0:11:45.133 --> 0:11:47.933
<v Speaker 4>again tidied up and become much more consistent.

0:11:48.373 --> 0:11:50.013
<v Speaker 3>Mustafis was there last night.

0:11:50.013 --> 0:11:53.293
<v Speaker 4>Well we know he's got the variations, particularly at the

0:11:53.333 --> 0:11:57.413
<v Speaker 4>back end. He surprised Nichols, didn't he with a short

0:11:57.453 --> 0:12:01.093
<v Speaker 4>one last night and hurried him. I mean, the runs

0:12:01.133 --> 0:12:04.093
<v Speaker 4>were the problems for New Zealand, effectively.

0:12:03.453 --> 0:12:03.933
<v Speaker 3>Weren't there.

0:12:03.933 --> 0:12:07.013
<v Speaker 4>There was just no one getting collid runs at the

0:12:07.013 --> 0:12:07.853
<v Speaker 4>top of the order.

0:12:07.933 --> 0:12:10.213
<v Speaker 3>Young and Latham at.

0:12:10.053 --> 0:12:15.373
<v Speaker 4>Three and four Young thirty two nineteen Latham fourteen, fourteen

0:12:15.413 --> 0:12:18.893
<v Speaker 4>and five. You've got to have more from that, from

0:12:18.893 --> 0:12:21.773
<v Speaker 4>those two positions, and that put a great deal of

0:12:21.813 --> 0:12:25.053
<v Speaker 4>pressure on players like Kelly, who came out of it

0:12:25.093 --> 0:12:26.973
<v Speaker 4>again quite well, even though it was a strange and

0:12:26.973 --> 0:12:30.013
<v Speaker 4>odd dismissal last night, sort of lurching his way from

0:12:30.053 --> 0:12:33.813
<v Speaker 4>outside leg to off went outside of stump, hitting it

0:12:33.893 --> 0:12:35.293
<v Speaker 4>to sort of a straight cover.

0:12:35.973 --> 0:12:36.253
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:12:36.413 --> 0:12:39.573
<v Speaker 4>So I think we had a few little gains, though

0:12:39.733 --> 0:12:42.213
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it was totally wasted.

0:12:43.053 --> 0:12:44.293
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the heat got to.

0:12:44.293 --> 0:12:47.653
<v Speaker 4>Us, no doubt about that, especially when you field first there.

0:12:48.133 --> 0:12:52.573
<v Speaker 4>But I thought O'Rourke improved. He's a key man for us.

0:12:53.053 --> 0:12:57.693
<v Speaker 4>He got some competitive bowling in the legs, bowling around

0:12:57.733 --> 0:13:00.013
<v Speaker 4>the wicket a little bit more than he normally does.

0:13:00.053 --> 0:13:03.013
<v Speaker 4>He's learning to get off the wicket, which is not

0:13:03.133 --> 0:13:06.173
<v Speaker 4>his natural thing, because he wants to lean away, doesn't he,

0:13:06.213 --> 0:13:08.253
<v Speaker 4>which is leaning if you're round the wicket to all

0:13:08.493 --> 0:13:11.613
<v Speaker 4>the center of the pitch. I thought Smith made a

0:13:11.653 --> 0:13:13.973
<v Speaker 4>few little movements as well. He's starting to.

0:13:13.933 --> 0:13:14.653
<v Speaker 3>Swing the ball.

0:13:15.573 --> 0:13:18.373
<v Speaker 4>I thought that his couple of not outs were handy

0:13:18.453 --> 0:13:21.533
<v Speaker 4>lower down the order in the first two matches, and

0:13:21.573 --> 0:13:25.253
<v Speaker 4>he's getting wickets in the powerplay I thought Lenox continued

0:13:25.293 --> 0:13:28.573
<v Speaker 4>his improvement in the heat. I thought it was a

0:13:28.613 --> 0:13:31.493
<v Speaker 4>weird team that they selected last night. To be honest

0:13:31.533 --> 0:13:34.973
<v Speaker 4>with you, it didn't make sense when you got obviously

0:13:34.973 --> 0:13:38.493
<v Speaker 4>two opening bowlers, and that's Smith and O'Rourke. That lister,

0:13:38.653 --> 0:13:41.813
<v Speaker 4>who really is only a swing bowler, comes in straight

0:13:41.853 --> 0:13:45.813
<v Speaker 4>after that and the ball's not swinging, So what does

0:13:45.853 --> 0:13:48.933
<v Speaker 4>he do? For heaven's sake, that's his strength, that's how

0:13:48.933 --> 0:13:51.893
<v Speaker 4>he gets wickets. He was forced to bowl wide for

0:13:51.973 --> 0:13:55.573
<v Speaker 4>a start and then sort of across seam for the

0:13:55.613 --> 0:13:59.333
<v Speaker 4>rest of his overs, and that did show some limitations

0:13:59.373 --> 0:14:03.253
<v Speaker 4>that he had in that role. Then Muhammader Bass bowled

0:14:03.253 --> 0:14:06.773
<v Speaker 4>a few. He did okay. He was sort of gripping

0:14:06.813 --> 0:14:09.333
<v Speaker 4>the ball a little bit and bowling little left arm

0:14:09.373 --> 0:14:12.573
<v Speaker 4>off spinners coming back into the left handers. But he

0:14:12.653 --> 0:14:18.093
<v Speaker 4>wasn't threatening and so really they only had three bowlers O'Rourke,

0:14:18.333 --> 0:14:22.493
<v Speaker 4>Smith and Lennox. They tried a bit of Foxcroft, they

0:14:22.533 --> 0:14:24.653
<v Speaker 4>tried a bit of fox Trot, they tried a bit

0:14:24.693 --> 0:14:28.853
<v Speaker 4>of Clarkson, they tried a bit of a bass and listen.

0:14:28.973 --> 0:14:33.293
<v Speaker 4>So they didn't really have the bowlers to continue the

0:14:33.373 --> 0:14:37.053
<v Speaker 4>decent start. They had and so they you know, they

0:14:37.173 --> 0:14:40.333
<v Speaker 4>chased a big total and they seemed to all be

0:14:40.413 --> 0:14:44.813
<v Speaker 4>getting out to me to the horizontal batshots they did

0:14:44.853 --> 0:14:49.933
<v Speaker 4>in game two Bastard, Kelly did, Foxcroft did, and technical

0:14:50.053 --> 0:14:51.213
<v Speaker 4>not quite so important.

0:14:51.453 --> 0:14:54.013
<v Speaker 3>And in game three you know you had.

0:14:55.453 --> 0:15:00.613
<v Speaker 4>Nichols did, Latham did a sweepless time lower down horizontal

0:15:01.013 --> 0:15:05.533
<v Speaker 4>and are bastard as well. So that's that's been a

0:15:05.533 --> 0:15:08.973
<v Speaker 4>common thread for me about that part. Make you a lot,

0:15:09.213 --> 0:15:12.173
<v Speaker 4>But I think there were things there you maybe have

0:15:12.213 --> 0:15:16.453
<v Speaker 4>to look a little bit harder, but the runs clearly

0:15:16.493 --> 0:15:17.253
<v Speaker 4>with the difference.

0:15:18.293 --> 0:15:21.413
<v Speaker 5>But then picking up on that, from what I understand

0:15:21.533 --> 0:15:23.653
<v Speaker 5>is if the if the opposition's bowling is quite good,

0:15:23.653 --> 0:15:25.573
<v Speaker 5>then runs are quite often hard to come by. I

0:15:25.573 --> 0:15:28.573
<v Speaker 5>think that's how it works. So we have to pace,

0:15:28.773 --> 0:15:33.293
<v Speaker 5>you know, due respect to Bangladesh, but we were found

0:15:33.333 --> 0:15:36.733
<v Speaker 5>a little bit wanting. I think the one that the

0:15:36.773 --> 0:15:39.693
<v Speaker 5>one player that I'm disappointed about it, and I guess

0:15:39.693 --> 0:15:43.133
<v Speaker 5>he will be as well as is Will Young. He

0:15:43.373 --> 0:15:47.773
<v Speaker 5>was our best player arguably in that Test series against

0:15:47.773 --> 0:15:50.773
<v Speaker 5>India a little while back, and really since then it

0:15:50.853 --> 0:15:53.653
<v Speaker 5>hasn't hasn't come on, so to speak. And you touched

0:15:53.653 --> 0:15:56.653
<v Speaker 5>on a little bit earlier that his output wasn't great Jerry,

0:15:57.013 --> 0:16:00.533
<v Speaker 5>and I just I'm disappointed for New Zealand Cricket because

0:16:00.533 --> 0:16:04.053
<v Speaker 5>he looked so fantastic in that series, but we really

0:16:04.093 --> 0:16:07.173
<v Speaker 5>haven't seen too much of that sense, which is a

0:16:07.173 --> 0:16:10.493
<v Speaker 5>petty for us as as New Zealand Cricket followers. But

0:16:10.573 --> 0:16:14.213
<v Speaker 5>no doubt he's he's not that thrill either. But I

0:16:14.253 --> 0:16:16.813
<v Speaker 5>think by and large there were some pluses in there

0:16:17.213 --> 0:16:21.533
<v Speaker 5>to see Fox Foxcroft and Clarkson and a bass and

0:16:21.653 --> 0:16:26.133
<v Speaker 5>Nick Kelly and Smith Smith coming on. There was I

0:16:26.133 --> 0:16:30.173
<v Speaker 5>think better for having gone and and done it. And

0:16:30.253 --> 0:16:32.413
<v Speaker 5>okay they got beaten, but but you learn from it,

0:16:32.453 --> 0:16:34.133
<v Speaker 5>I think if you if you're good enough.

0:16:34.653 --> 0:16:37.573
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Indeed, interesting that you mentioned those names, and I

0:16:37.933 --> 0:16:43.693
<v Speaker 2>guess the one that is significant is young and will

0:16:43.733 --> 0:16:46.093
<v Speaker 2>he be part of the squad going to England?

0:16:46.093 --> 0:16:46.213
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:16:46.253 --> 0:16:48.213
<v Speaker 2>We asked last week for people to come forward with

0:16:48.733 --> 0:16:52.253
<v Speaker 2>their ideas of a squad of fifteen and I'll just

0:16:52.253 --> 0:16:55.573
<v Speaker 2>pick one out. A guy who thinks that Jeremy is

0:16:55.613 --> 0:17:02.173
<v Speaker 2>a very very good broadcaster and congratulates I'm getting into it.

0:17:02.333 --> 0:17:04.413
<v Speaker 3>To pick up the fact that I actually wrote that

0:17:04.493 --> 0:17:05.093
<v Speaker 3>once for him.

0:17:07.413 --> 0:17:10.213
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to say, Jerry's changed his name to

0:17:10.293 --> 0:17:13.933
<v Speaker 2>Paul and has said in a team, and he hasn't

0:17:13.933 --> 0:17:18.093
<v Speaker 2>picked a bad side. I think thirteen of them make

0:17:18.413 --> 0:17:21.853
<v Speaker 2>good sense to me, and I go quickly through it. Latham, Conway,

0:17:21.973 --> 0:17:30.013
<v Speaker 2>Ravendra Williamson, Mitchell Phillips, Blundell Smith, Henry Duffy, O'Rourke, Santna

0:17:30.173 --> 0:17:35.413
<v Speaker 2>and Jamison. And the last two Henry Nichols and Ajz

0:17:35.493 --> 0:17:40.013
<v Speaker 2>Patel now interesting calls. Paul says. Nichols domestic form edges

0:17:40.053 --> 0:17:44.973
<v Speaker 2>out will Young for him, and he likes Ajs. Pattell.

0:17:45.253 --> 0:17:47.013
<v Speaker 2>I mean I do too, but I just wonder whether,

0:17:47.613 --> 0:17:50.533
<v Speaker 2>on top of the spin talent you've got there, whether

0:17:50.613 --> 0:17:53.253
<v Speaker 2>a Jaz is going to be part of that squad

0:17:53.293 --> 0:17:56.453
<v Speaker 2>and you might need another seamer like Tickner or Sears

0:17:56.573 --> 0:17:59.733
<v Speaker 2>or or the like, or even Fuchs the all rounder.

0:18:00.053 --> 0:18:01.173
<v Speaker 2>How do you say that, Moose?

0:18:01.853 --> 0:18:03.933
<v Speaker 5>I mean I always lovel this as that, because there's

0:18:03.973 --> 0:18:07.133
<v Speaker 5>no right or wrong, and we will probably should be

0:18:07.173 --> 0:18:10.333
<v Speaker 5>the selectors, but no one's ever asters. More's the pity,

0:18:10.453 --> 0:18:15.973
<v Speaker 5>I think. But I I look at this and Young

0:18:16.093 --> 0:18:17.813
<v Speaker 5>I would like to see, but I don't think he

0:18:17.893 --> 0:18:21.533
<v Speaker 5>makes it. Patel, I think you're right because we've already

0:18:21.573 --> 0:18:24.413
<v Speaker 5>got satin in their bowling left left arm. The guy

0:18:24.453 --> 0:18:28.173
<v Speaker 5>that I would like to see because he gives quite

0:18:28.173 --> 0:18:33.573
<v Speaker 5>a lot is Michael Bracewell. Bats yeah, really good for you,

0:18:34.533 --> 0:18:40.173
<v Speaker 5>has leadership qualities which I think helps in all of this.

0:18:41.053 --> 0:18:44.493
<v Speaker 5>Devin Conway, I put a question mark around him. I'm

0:18:44.533 --> 0:18:49.013
<v Speaker 5>just not sure. I don't think he's sorted out that technique,

0:18:49.013 --> 0:18:51.053
<v Speaker 5>that rising one up on his on his on his

0:18:51.453 --> 0:18:55.533
<v Speaker 5>on his hip. And because the English, all things being equal,

0:18:55.613 --> 0:18:58.493
<v Speaker 5>will come with some pace archer and there, and they've

0:18:58.493 --> 0:19:02.813
<v Speaker 5>got a few others knocking around there, so they're going

0:19:02.853 --> 0:19:05.853
<v Speaker 5>to make it awkward for for Conway. And I'm from

0:19:05.893 --> 0:19:08.053
<v Speaker 5>that wonderful start. I think he's he's come off the

0:19:08.093 --> 0:19:11.533
<v Speaker 5>ball well and the other one, which I'm sorry to say,

0:19:12.293 --> 0:19:17.253
<v Speaker 5>being a Wellingtonian, I would probably go with Hey rather

0:19:17.293 --> 0:19:20.493
<v Speaker 5>than Blundle. He just seems to be offering more, particularly

0:19:20.533 --> 0:19:24.773
<v Speaker 5>with the bat and a certainly refine keeper. So this

0:19:24.853 --> 0:19:27.773
<v Speaker 5>is all, this is all good stuff, but I yeah,

0:19:27.813 --> 0:19:31.013
<v Speaker 5>I would. I got more questions than I have answers

0:19:31.053 --> 0:19:31.293
<v Speaker 5>to this.

0:19:32.853 --> 0:19:34.253
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Well.

0:19:34.453 --> 0:19:37.133
<v Speaker 4>I had a chat to Mose a couple of nights

0:19:37.133 --> 0:19:41.173
<v Speaker 4>ago and we had an interesting conversation, including some of

0:19:41.173 --> 0:19:42.413
<v Speaker 4>those he's just mentioned.

0:19:43.453 --> 0:19:46.013
<v Speaker 3>I've had a kind of a rethink.

0:19:47.493 --> 0:19:51.613
<v Speaker 4>I think, you know, this is not really a tour

0:19:52.773 --> 0:19:54.773
<v Speaker 4>in the sense of developing a player.

0:19:56.213 --> 0:19:59.173
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it is. It's a test tour, isn't it.

0:19:59.173 --> 0:20:03.653
<v Speaker 4>It's three games, three tests, or four you could count.

0:20:04.173 --> 0:20:07.133
<v Speaker 3>But let's just look at the England part particularly.

0:20:07.933 --> 0:20:10.493
<v Speaker 4>It's not, not, in my opinion, a series to blood

0:20:11.333 --> 0:20:15.293
<v Speaker 4>new players. Don't forget if we blood a player there,

0:20:15.413 --> 0:20:17.613
<v Speaker 4>they're the ones who are going to Big heading over

0:20:18.173 --> 0:20:22.533
<v Speaker 4>to face Cummins and Hazelwood and Stark and.

0:20:22.493 --> 0:20:25.133
<v Speaker 3>Bowland in a few months time.

0:20:26.293 --> 0:20:29.693
<v Speaker 4>Blooding players is quite a sort of a careful thing,

0:20:29.853 --> 0:20:33.213
<v Speaker 4>I think, and it has to be treated that way.

0:20:33.813 --> 0:20:36.013
<v Speaker 3>You generally want. They'd like to do it at.

0:20:35.853 --> 0:20:41.333
<v Speaker 4>Home, as he was, you know, at Wellington, that kind

0:20:41.373 --> 0:20:45.013
<v Speaker 4>of approach. But to go to Lord's and introduce a

0:20:45.053 --> 0:20:49.613
<v Speaker 4>new player is a question mark in my mind. Then

0:20:49.693 --> 0:20:54.653
<v Speaker 4>we get someone like say a Williamson, for example, who's

0:20:54.693 --> 0:20:58.493
<v Speaker 4>indicated he's available for this tour, and New Zealand do

0:20:58.653 --> 0:21:03.613
<v Speaker 4>need that solidity there. How long However, is Kine going

0:21:03.613 --> 0:21:07.013
<v Speaker 4>to keep playing. He's thirty six, he's got three kids,

0:21:07.333 --> 0:21:12.453
<v Speaker 4>He's pulled out a tween twenties, he's.

0:21:11.853 --> 0:21:12.933
<v Speaker 3>And not quite so.

0:21:14.573 --> 0:21:18.533
<v Speaker 4>You know seen around ODIs now he plays the odd tests,

0:21:18.573 --> 0:21:20.453
<v Speaker 4>doesn't he and the ones that he wants to play,

0:21:20.693 --> 0:21:24.573
<v Speaker 4>and he's certainly earned those that kind of position. But

0:21:24.733 --> 0:21:26.773
<v Speaker 4>how long is it going to be? Would you say

0:21:26.773 --> 0:21:28.213
<v Speaker 4>two years? Would be thirty eight?

0:21:28.973 --> 0:21:31.213
<v Speaker 2>I'd say the Australian series.

0:21:31.093 --> 0:21:34.373
<v Speaker 4>Has got to be some plan over the next year

0:21:34.493 --> 0:21:37.013
<v Speaker 4>or so for someone to go into three.

0:21:37.453 --> 0:21:40.773
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's Test matches against India here in New Zealand

0:21:40.773 --> 0:21:45.453
<v Speaker 2>before Australia, after the England series, then there's Australia, then

0:21:45.493 --> 0:21:48.093
<v Speaker 2>there's Sri Lanka coming here and then a Test series

0:21:48.093 --> 0:21:51.933
<v Speaker 2>in Pakistan, Who've got thirteen Test matches in the next

0:21:51.933 --> 0:21:54.613
<v Speaker 2>twelve months, which is quite a lot. And some of

0:21:54.653 --> 0:21:58.253
<v Speaker 2>those A players who would obviously come into contention, the

0:21:58.453 --> 0:22:02.773
<v Speaker 2>likes of Heafi Marriou and even Robinson now after his

0:22:02.853 --> 0:22:06.453
<v Speaker 2>batting in Sri Lanka, they may be further down the line.

0:22:06.493 --> 0:22:08.813
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not sure that you're right. I'm sure that

0:22:08.853 --> 0:22:12.333
<v Speaker 2>you're right in terms of England is not a place

0:22:12.373 --> 0:22:14.293
<v Speaker 2>to blood somebody and send them out to Lords on

0:22:14.333 --> 0:22:18.573
<v Speaker 2>their first Test match after a warm up game in Ireland.

0:22:18.773 --> 0:22:21.013
<v Speaker 3>I don't know most you and he comment about all

0:22:21.053 --> 0:22:21.373
<v Speaker 3>that much.

0:22:21.453 --> 0:22:23.693
<v Speaker 4>The other point I would make very quickly is we

0:22:23.773 --> 0:22:27.853
<v Speaker 4>know the method of our selectors, don't we Yes, they

0:22:27.973 --> 0:22:29.933
<v Speaker 4>tend to be conservative.

0:22:29.613 --> 0:22:32.613
<v Speaker 5>One of Onslow's finest, and and so what more can

0:22:32.653 --> 0:22:33.053
<v Speaker 5>I say?

0:22:33.893 --> 0:22:35.013
<v Speaker 2>Coney's not a selector.

0:22:36.413 --> 0:22:37.133
<v Speaker 5>I thought he was.

0:22:37.653 --> 0:22:40.333
<v Speaker 2>He was, he was on Slow's finest. May have the

0:22:40.373 --> 0:22:42.013
<v Speaker 2>Williamton Club champions Now.

0:22:42.613 --> 0:22:46.413
<v Speaker 5>Oh sorry, oh oh, I take that all back there.

0:22:47.213 --> 0:22:53.533
<v Speaker 2>Yes, goodness me, Jerry, I'm sorry. I'm sorry to let

0:22:53.573 --> 0:22:56.773
<v Speaker 2>that loosely on. I think that that's totally harsh and unfair.

0:22:58.893 --> 0:23:01.813
<v Speaker 3>Well I didn't hear it once, thank heavens.

0:23:02.013 --> 0:23:04.013
<v Speaker 2>Oh good we're.

0:23:03.893 --> 0:23:09.093
<v Speaker 5>Learning quickly on. I think Williamson that absolutely the right.

0:23:09.733 --> 0:23:13.973
<v Speaker 5>But when you're thirty six, you're coming, you're coming to

0:23:14.093 --> 0:23:17.053
<v Speaker 5>that phase where the reactions aren't quite what they were,

0:23:17.573 --> 0:23:20.533
<v Speaker 5>and when you're up against and in Australia where he

0:23:20.573 --> 0:23:23.253
<v Speaker 5>hasn't gone that well, that's going to be going to

0:23:23.293 --> 0:23:26.253
<v Speaker 5>be interesting. And I think the one that the place

0:23:26.253 --> 0:23:28.773
<v Speaker 5>where we do want to prove ourselves is surely Australia,

0:23:28.813 --> 0:23:30.853
<v Speaker 5>because I think we've we've we know we can play

0:23:30.893 --> 0:23:33.333
<v Speaker 5>in England and we can be competitive there, but Australia

0:23:33.373 --> 0:23:36.413
<v Speaker 5>is the one. But if you're thirty six thirty seven

0:23:37.413 --> 0:23:41.293
<v Speaker 5>in Australia, that's going to be tough, tough for Williamson,

0:23:41.333 --> 0:23:44.333
<v Speaker 5>but hey, we'll see. The one who I'd like to

0:23:44.373 --> 0:23:48.133
<v Speaker 5>see more out of is Revendra and the English certainly

0:23:48.173 --> 0:23:51.373
<v Speaker 5>worked them out last time they played here, short short

0:23:51.413 --> 0:23:54.773
<v Speaker 5>outside off and he kept following it. So he's he's

0:23:54.773 --> 0:23:57.173
<v Speaker 5>got a lot to prove. I mean, wonderful player that

0:23:57.253 --> 0:24:00.173
<v Speaker 5>he is and when he gets going. But yeah, there's

0:24:00.293 --> 0:24:03.133
<v Speaker 5>real talent that we do have, but it's harnessing it

0:24:03.493 --> 0:24:05.933
<v Speaker 5>and I frankly would like to see some of these

0:24:05.933 --> 0:24:09.493
<v Speaker 5>players come on. This Guyry he seems he seems to

0:24:09.533 --> 0:24:12.453
<v Speaker 5>be a fabulous prospect. I like to see Hay in

0:24:12.533 --> 0:24:14.933
<v Speaker 5>there in place of Blundell, who's just not given us,

0:24:14.933 --> 0:24:18.253
<v Speaker 5>giving us enough, sad to say, compared with a few

0:24:18.293 --> 0:24:18.773
<v Speaker 5>years ago.

0:24:20.093 --> 0:24:23.133
<v Speaker 2>But I might just point out that he was a

0:24:23.133 --> 0:24:26.333
<v Speaker 2>big scorer domestically for Wellington because it's all the cricket

0:24:26.333 --> 0:24:29.213
<v Speaker 2>that he's had over the season. So he did win

0:24:29.253 --> 0:24:37.093
<v Speaker 2>the Wellington Cricketer of the Year and performed all but yeah, yeah, but.

0:24:37.013 --> 0:24:39.213
<v Speaker 5>There was a lot of competition in the Wellington was there.

0:24:39.253 --> 0:24:40.693
<v Speaker 5>They didn't go that good this year.

0:24:42.453 --> 0:24:43.973
<v Speaker 2>I didn't. I didn't bring that up.

0:24:44.893 --> 0:24:45.533
<v Speaker 3>This is great.

0:24:45.533 --> 0:24:48.293
<v Speaker 4>There's trading of insults. I love hearing this.

0:24:48.213 --> 0:24:49.213
<v Speaker 5>That's excellent.

0:24:50.613 --> 0:24:51.413
<v Speaker 2>Carry on, Moose.

0:24:54.213 --> 0:24:57.453
<v Speaker 5>But I but I do. But I do think Blundell,

0:24:57.653 --> 0:24:59.653
<v Speaker 5>that player we had two or three years ago, is

0:24:59.693 --> 0:25:03.493
<v Speaker 5>not it doesn't seem to be there, but that they

0:25:03.533 --> 0:25:06.093
<v Speaker 5>will go with them. I'm pretty sure because that's that's

0:25:06.173 --> 0:25:10.493
<v Speaker 5>that has been their their remo, so to speak, and

0:25:10.493 --> 0:25:15.413
<v Speaker 5>and by a large, hey, it's been pretty successful. But

0:25:15.613 --> 0:25:18.653
<v Speaker 5>we we're going to be wanting a lot from Mitchell,

0:25:20.173 --> 0:25:23.173
<v Speaker 5>Ravendra and and and the likes up the top of

0:25:23.213 --> 0:25:26.453
<v Speaker 5>the order there. So Phillips, I just wonder about that

0:25:26.533 --> 0:25:31.013
<v Speaker 5>a bit seems to get included anyway. I'm able to

0:25:31.093 --> 0:25:34.093
<v Speaker 5>go with in Test cricket with a brace rather than Phillips.

0:25:34.253 --> 0:25:40.053
<v Speaker 5>That's me so I yeah, I wait with some interest,

0:25:40.653 --> 0:25:43.453
<v Speaker 5>Jerry will will you be over there around that time

0:25:43.493 --> 0:25:44.253
<v Speaker 5>when they're playing.

0:25:44.813 --> 0:25:49.533
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I'm over there, sort of opening my mouth again.

0:25:49.813 --> 0:25:53.893
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, but you guys easily avoid that by changing

0:25:53.933 --> 0:25:55.533
<v Speaker 4>the station and doing something better.

0:25:56.613 --> 0:25:57.293
<v Speaker 2>The best player.

0:26:00.453 --> 0:26:07.813
<v Speaker 4>Yea, they should play the third Test at Nnville. But look, guys,

0:26:07.893 --> 0:26:15.773
<v Speaker 4>I just have the feeling that the wave of England

0:26:15.973 --> 0:26:19.053
<v Speaker 4>enthusiasm that swept through the last time I was there

0:26:19.093 --> 0:26:22.733
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty two when New Zealand played England won

0:26:22.773 --> 0:26:26.973
<v Speaker 4>that series three nil and it felt unstoppable, you know.

0:26:27.173 --> 0:26:32.493
<v Speaker 4>And now I think supporters turned against them, and we

0:26:32.533 --> 0:26:37.093
<v Speaker 4>should be very wary of a wounded team. I think

0:26:37.173 --> 0:26:40.733
<v Speaker 4>they've been subjected to a wealth of dislike and criticism

0:26:40.733 --> 0:26:43.893
<v Speaker 4>from a lot of quarters, and they've been told that

0:26:43.933 --> 0:26:47.373
<v Speaker 4>they're too relaxed and they have no specialists, of they're

0:26:47.413 --> 0:26:50.613
<v Speaker 4>playing too much golf. There's incidents off the field as

0:26:50.653 --> 0:26:55.453
<v Speaker 4>poor preparation. So on ad nauseum they will be very

0:26:55.533 --> 0:26:58.813
<v Speaker 4>keen I think to close ranks and show what they

0:26:58.853 --> 0:27:04.813
<v Speaker 4>can do, whether that criticism is founded or otherwise, so

0:27:04.973 --> 0:27:08.213
<v Speaker 4>there will be changes in their side. You would expect

0:27:08.493 --> 0:27:11.693
<v Speaker 4>to show that they've been listening. I think an opener

0:27:11.773 --> 0:27:16.613
<v Speaker 4>is on the cards. I would guess, well, they've got

0:27:16.613 --> 0:27:19.893
<v Speaker 4>a keeper who doesn't keep for the county championship, but

0:27:19.933 --> 0:27:21.133
<v Speaker 4>he's getting lots of runs.

0:27:21.733 --> 0:27:25.293
<v Speaker 3>Will they pick a spinner in June? I'm not sure.

0:27:25.333 --> 0:27:28.653
<v Speaker 4>They'll probably play four seamers, I would have thought, and

0:27:28.733 --> 0:27:32.533
<v Speaker 4>it would be Stokes and Tongue and Archer as you mentioned,

0:27:32.533 --> 0:27:38.293
<v Speaker 4>Moose and either Pass or Atkinson, and they will be

0:27:38.333 --> 0:27:41.853
<v Speaker 4>the main bowlers. I would think with Stokes, as I say,

0:27:41.893 --> 0:27:45.413
<v Speaker 4>to back them up. New Zealand I think will go

0:27:45.493 --> 0:27:49.253
<v Speaker 4>with an eight to seven split eight batsmen, in other words,

0:27:49.253 --> 0:27:54.333
<v Speaker 4>seven bowlers, the batsmen being basically Lathan, Conway, Williams and

0:27:54.373 --> 0:27:57.373
<v Speaker 4>Revendra Mitchell, and some of them are a bit more

0:27:57.373 --> 0:27:59.813
<v Speaker 4>loose at the start, as you pointed out Moose Ravendra,

0:28:00.173 --> 0:28:06.413
<v Speaker 4>but he's so dangerous he's obviously there, Mitchell determined, Blundle Phillips.

0:28:06.773 --> 0:28:10.853
<v Speaker 4>Probably they will go with normally He's seven, isn't he?

0:28:11.613 --> 0:28:14.693
<v Speaker 4>And Blundle six and it's just a question of that

0:28:14.813 --> 0:28:19.413
<v Speaker 4>last position. But I would go with Young because I

0:28:19.493 --> 0:28:21.533
<v Speaker 4>think he's going to be the one to take over

0:28:21.693 --> 0:28:23.853
<v Speaker 4>at number three from Williamson.

0:28:24.893 --> 0:28:27.293
<v Speaker 3>And I think to put in a new.

0:28:27.253 --> 0:28:30.493
<v Speaker 4>Lad like a Hea for who's good Maria is showing

0:28:30.493 --> 0:28:32.533
<v Speaker 4>and our bas and the Robin. We've all talked about

0:28:32.573 --> 0:28:35.813
<v Speaker 4>those names. They're the ones that are emerging, the key ones.

0:28:36.293 --> 0:28:41.133
<v Speaker 4>But I'm not sure in this particular tour, in these circumstances,

0:28:41.573 --> 0:28:46.973
<v Speaker 4>that it's necessarily the best idea Bowlers. Henry Duffy Obviously,

0:28:47.173 --> 0:28:50.613
<v Speaker 4>Henry nips it both ways. Duffy swinging it away over

0:28:50.653 --> 0:28:54.173
<v Speaker 4>there with the Duke's ball will be handy. Oh Rourke returning,

0:28:54.813 --> 0:28:58.053
<v Speaker 4>do you pick a Sears with O Rourt when they

0:28:58.093 --> 0:28:59.013
<v Speaker 4>have both had just.

0:28:59.053 --> 0:29:02.693
<v Speaker 3>Injury and they are slightly slightly vulnerable?

0:29:03.133 --> 0:29:08.693
<v Speaker 4>Jamison the same, you know, so those are interesting. Is

0:29:08.773 --> 0:29:13.133
<v Speaker 4>Tichner a possibility certainly, folks, Not quite yet because I

0:29:13.133 --> 0:29:16.493
<v Speaker 4>don't think he has kind of shown he can.

0:29:16.373 --> 0:29:17.453
<v Speaker 3>Handle the workload.

0:29:18.173 --> 0:29:21.253
<v Speaker 4>He does swing it a different way, which I think

0:29:21.373 --> 0:29:24.773
<v Speaker 4>John Bracewell pointed out quite nicely in one of the

0:29:25.573 --> 0:29:29.053
<v Speaker 4>podcasts we had him onwards. And then you've got to choose,

0:29:29.053 --> 0:29:31.933
<v Speaker 4>as you guys were talking about, do you go Bracewell,

0:29:32.333 --> 0:29:35.773
<v Speaker 4>remembering that spinner's like any bowler is there to take

0:29:36.133 --> 0:29:39.653
<v Speaker 4>wickets and I think Bracewell is more than Phillip's. And

0:29:39.893 --> 0:29:43.093
<v Speaker 4>there's Patel or Santna And those are the questions we

0:29:43.613 --> 0:29:46.653
<v Speaker 4>are really the ones around the key parts, aren't they?

0:29:46.933 --> 0:29:50.213
<v Speaker 2>Okay, just one quick question before we have to move

0:29:50.253 --> 0:29:52.293
<v Speaker 2>on because we can look at the England part of

0:29:52.333 --> 0:29:55.373
<v Speaker 2>the tour next week. There's plenty of time to talk

0:29:55.373 --> 0:29:59.333
<v Speaker 2>about that. Fraser who has been a regular contributor to

0:29:59.453 --> 0:30:02.773
<v Speaker 2>our program, has put center forward as the captain rather

0:30:02.893 --> 0:30:03.853
<v Speaker 2>than Latham.

0:30:04.853 --> 0:30:10.133
<v Speaker 5>Any thoughts, I actually quite like that, I think, and

0:30:10.173 --> 0:30:12.533
<v Speaker 5>I may have said have been a much earlier podcast.

0:30:13.173 --> 0:30:15.893
<v Speaker 5>I thought Satler was sort of on his way out,

0:30:16.653 --> 0:30:22.173
<v Speaker 5>but his progression into being a quality equality bowler with

0:30:22.413 --> 0:30:25.893
<v Speaker 5>variations as opposed to just simply darts. But more to

0:30:25.973 --> 0:30:31.813
<v Speaker 5>the point, it's his leadership and captaincy, most notably in

0:30:31.813 --> 0:30:35.173
<v Speaker 5>the One Day Game, has been nothing but impressive. The

0:30:35.213 --> 0:30:38.133
<v Speaker 5>guy never gets ruffled. I mean, as I say, he's

0:30:38.133 --> 0:30:41.573
<v Speaker 5>so laid back, he's horizontal. But I rather like that,

0:30:42.253 --> 0:30:47.213
<v Speaker 5>and I would I would support that frankly though I

0:30:47.333 --> 0:30:50.173
<v Speaker 5>do it, but I would genuinely go that way. I

0:30:50.213 --> 0:30:53.053
<v Speaker 5>think he offers a lot. He really does, and he

0:30:53.093 --> 0:30:55.133
<v Speaker 5>deserves to be in sight, which is the other first

0:30:55.133 --> 0:30:55.773
<v Speaker 5>important thing.

0:30:56.013 --> 0:31:01.053
<v Speaker 4>Yep, I agree with what most says in terms of

0:31:01.093 --> 0:31:01.893
<v Speaker 4>his abilities.

0:31:01.893 --> 0:31:05.653
<v Speaker 3>He seems very relaxed, and that's a good thing to be.

0:31:06.333 --> 0:31:12.453
<v Speaker 4>He also seems well gemmed up with what possibilities there are.

0:31:13.013 --> 0:31:19.373
<v Speaker 4>A different man than Latham. Can he help Latham from

0:31:19.453 --> 0:31:24.613
<v Speaker 4>the position of being in the side, is my first thought.

0:31:25.493 --> 0:31:29.333
<v Speaker 4>Do they need to make a major change like that

0:31:30.053 --> 0:31:33.733
<v Speaker 4>when he can be a close Certainly.

0:31:34.733 --> 0:31:37.453
<v Speaker 3>He bats a bit that helps the New Zealand side.

0:31:37.453 --> 0:31:40.573
<v Speaker 4>He captains both the white ball games, which is he's

0:31:40.573 --> 0:31:44.453
<v Speaker 4>a little more unconventional I think, and comes up with

0:31:44.533 --> 0:31:49.493
<v Speaker 4>perhaps different solutions and Latham might and that might be

0:31:49.573 --> 0:31:54.973
<v Speaker 4>a nice combination. Whether that means that he overtakes Latham

0:31:55.893 --> 0:31:57.893
<v Speaker 4>and becomes the captain, I think they won't do that.

0:31:58.213 --> 0:32:01.213
<v Speaker 4>They won't do that, but it's not a bad sort

0:32:01.413 --> 0:32:03.613
<v Speaker 4>to have him, and I think he wouldn't generally be

0:32:03.693 --> 0:32:05.453
<v Speaker 4>in the in the picture, wouldn't he.

0:32:05.493 --> 0:32:12.213
<v Speaker 5>Guys absolutely agree. Yeah, As I said, I've become quite

0:32:12.213 --> 0:32:13.093
<v Speaker 5>afan oftner.

0:32:13.893 --> 0:32:18.693
<v Speaker 2>I think we all have, and I mean Latham hasn't

0:32:18.733 --> 0:32:21.413
<v Speaker 2>done too much wrong. We'd have to say and corrects.

0:32:21.413 --> 0:32:24.653
<v Speaker 2>Got Williamson in the side, Mitchell. If there is a

0:32:24.693 --> 0:32:28.813
<v Speaker 2>possibility that, say someone like Nichols or younger, they're both

0:32:28.853 --> 0:32:33.893
<v Speaker 2>experienced players and you see them supporting Latham currently on

0:32:33.933 --> 0:32:37.533
<v Speaker 2>this tour of Blangladesh, then there's plenty of leadership there.

0:32:37.853 --> 0:32:40.573
<v Speaker 2>That's the only question I would ask does he deserve

0:32:40.613 --> 0:32:42.773
<v Speaker 2>to go? But I agree with the points that you make.

0:32:42.853 --> 0:32:47.973
<v Speaker 2>Center has taken good control of the team and the

0:32:48.053 --> 0:32:49.093
<v Speaker 2>decision making.

0:32:50.213 --> 0:32:53.053
<v Speaker 5>I look very much. So I think it's it's it's

0:32:53.053 --> 0:32:55.693
<v Speaker 5>always a quality problem when you actually when you've got

0:32:56.093 --> 0:32:59.413
<v Speaker 5>other contenders, So so you take that and you just

0:32:59.453 --> 0:33:02.253
<v Speaker 5>hope that. And they seem to be a pretty pretty

0:33:02.253 --> 0:33:06.453
<v Speaker 5>good team. I'm not close to it, I was clearly,

0:33:06.973 --> 0:33:09.253
<v Speaker 5>but they don't seem to be into little ructions and

0:33:09.853 --> 0:33:12.053
<v Speaker 5>the like. They seem to get on with each other.

0:33:12.133 --> 0:33:16.133
<v Speaker 5>So it seems to be a pretty collaborative set up there.

0:33:16.173 --> 0:33:19.453
<v Speaker 5>And and you know, no one's no one's the sole

0:33:19.653 --> 0:33:23.173
<v Speaker 5>sole owner of the only good ideas. I think I

0:33:23.213 --> 0:33:25.533
<v Speaker 5>think they'll be uh, they'll work well together, and I

0:33:26.733 --> 0:33:29.853
<v Speaker 5>think SAT there will be will be fabous, which therefore

0:33:29.853 --> 0:33:32.373
<v Speaker 5>puts pressure on Agesptel getting in the site. And that's

0:33:32.373 --> 0:33:34.573
<v Speaker 5>why I would like to go towards Racewood.

0:33:35.773 --> 0:33:38.613
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's something that we can have a look at.

0:33:38.853 --> 0:33:40.413
<v Speaker 2>I don't know when the team is going to be named,

0:33:40.413 --> 0:33:43.493
<v Speaker 2>but we might also investigate a little bit about the

0:33:43.533 --> 0:33:47.493
<v Speaker 2>English opposition and what's going on in the United Kingdom

0:33:47.533 --> 0:33:52.293
<v Speaker 2>in terms of county competition and possible selections, the ructions

0:33:52.333 --> 0:33:54.973
<v Speaker 2>that they have had. Jerry will know a bit about

0:33:55.013 --> 0:33:59.613
<v Speaker 2>that from his experience of dealing with England and watching

0:34:00.253 --> 0:34:03.813
<v Speaker 2>English cricket, and we can perhaps get an English voice

0:34:03.813 --> 0:34:06.493
<v Speaker 2>in next week as well, just to put some ideas

0:34:06.493 --> 0:34:09.413
<v Speaker 2>forward because we're getting to that stage now where you know,

0:34:09.533 --> 0:34:15.053
<v Speaker 2>the Test match series is only about five weeks away,

0:34:15.493 --> 0:34:18.573
<v Speaker 2>the one on Ireland twenty seventh of May. They're starting that,

0:34:18.653 --> 0:34:22.133
<v Speaker 2>so that's five weeks away. Thanks your time, guys. Good

0:34:22.173 --> 0:34:25.533
<v Speaker 2>to talk to you. We've selected as I'm thank you

0:34:25.613 --> 0:34:28.653
<v Speaker 2>to all those people who sent them their teams. We

0:34:28.773 --> 0:34:30.453
<v Speaker 2>got pretty close to them. It will be interesting to

0:34:30.493 --> 0:34:37.853
<v Speaker 2>see now what the brains trusts produce in the end.

0:34:38.373 --> 0:34:39.173
<v Speaker 2>Nice to talk guys.

0:34:40.613 --> 0:34:44.453
<v Speaker 5>It's all right. I think it's very exciting that we've

0:34:44.453 --> 0:34:46.533
<v Speaker 5>got Test cricket of the sort coming up.

0:34:46.613 --> 0:34:49.013
<v Speaker 3>Oh wait, that's great.

0:34:49.573 --> 0:34:53.773
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, great, because it's a change too, hasn't it, fellas

0:34:53.813 --> 0:34:55.293
<v Speaker 4>we don't see much of it now.

0:34:55.733 --> 0:34:59.213
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that's good.

0:35:00.173 --> 0:35:06.613
<v Speaker 3>All right, There you go, summer.

0:35:08.453 --> 0:35:12.053
<v Speaker 5>Do do.

0:35:13.413 --> 0:35:16.053
<v Speaker 1>For more from News Talk st B. Listen live on

0:35:16.133 --> 0:35:19.093
<v Speaker 1>air or online, and keep our shows with you wherever

0:35:19.173 --> 0:35:21.733
<v Speaker 1>you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio.