1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,640 Speaker 1: So at last rugby the rugby world has decided to 2 00:00:02,680 --> 00:00:04,640 Speaker 1: take the R three sixties seriously. Most of the world 3 00:00:04,720 --> 00:00:07,440 Speaker 1: rugby unions have signed this collective agreement that would see 4 00:00:07,440 --> 00:00:08,960 Speaker 1: them banning players who'd defect. 5 00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:09,120 Speaker 2: Now. 6 00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:12,160 Speaker 1: Oma Hasanain is the chief executive of the International Players 7 00:00:12,160 --> 00:00:15,360 Speaker 1: Association and with US, Argentina and Fiji are missing in 8 00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:17,239 Speaker 1: this combination. Is that a problem? 9 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:21,279 Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know of it is. I think I 10 00:00:21,320 --> 00:00:24,520 Speaker 2: think there's conversations being had amongst all the TI one nations. 11 00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:29,640 Speaker 2: Argentina and Fiji perhaps have their own reasons that perhaps 12 00:00:29,640 --> 00:00:33,080 Speaker 2: don't have the same level as depth, so they're not 13 00:00:33,120 --> 00:00:38,280 Speaker 2: committing to a statement that advises men's and women's players, 14 00:00:38,280 --> 00:00:42,400 Speaker 2: not that those participating would be ineligible for international selection. 15 00:00:42,479 --> 00:00:45,480 Speaker 2: It's hard to say, but certainly eight of the top 16 00:00:45,560 --> 00:00:47,760 Speaker 2: nations have come out and made that statement publicly. 17 00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:50,839 Speaker 1: This is just a preemptive move. Or have you heard 18 00:00:50,880 --> 00:00:53,720 Speaker 1: of enough players who might bail that you've started to worry? 19 00:00:55,000 --> 00:00:58,400 Speaker 2: Oh, look, we get anecdotal information coming through from different 20 00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:03,240 Speaker 2: different groups amongst our membership around the world. It's hard 21 00:01:03,240 --> 00:01:06,280 Speaker 2: to say, but look, I think the competition will likely 22 00:01:06,319 --> 00:01:09,400 Speaker 2: go ahead. I guess it's just depending on the quality 23 00:01:09,440 --> 00:01:12,959 Speaker 2: of players, and you know this position at the national 24 00:01:13,040 --> 00:01:16,000 Speaker 2: unions and our taking and how that might affect decisions 25 00:01:16,040 --> 00:01:16,840 Speaker 2: amongst players. 26 00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:19,920 Speaker 1: How legally does it work with players who get sabbaticals 27 00:01:19,920 --> 00:01:22,200 Speaker 1: currently to go to places like Japan then come back 28 00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:25,560 Speaker 1: and represent their country. How have you set that precedent? 29 00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:27,959 Speaker 1: But you can sit another president with this competition. 30 00:01:30,040 --> 00:01:34,800 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's an interesting one. Look, I think you know, 31 00:01:34,840 --> 00:01:39,360 Speaker 2: we work in the international space and generally managing international issues. 32 00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:42,080 Speaker 2: I suppose that what you described there is the space 33 00:01:42,400 --> 00:01:47,360 Speaker 2: of local countries, local national unions and in negotiation with 34 00:01:47,400 --> 00:01:51,880 Speaker 2: their players associations and whatnot. New Zealand the SAMs, you know, 35 00:01:52,080 --> 00:01:54,080 Speaker 2: might have a different policy to Australia, which might have 36 00:01:54,160 --> 00:01:56,160 Speaker 2: a different policy to South Africa as to how they 37 00:01:56,600 --> 00:01:58,000 Speaker 2: as to how they do that, and a lot of 38 00:01:58,040 --> 00:02:01,320 Speaker 2: that depends on the depth that they have of talent 39 00:02:01,400 --> 00:02:03,840 Speaker 2: to be able to keep super rugby teams going but 40 00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:07,280 Speaker 2: also keep the best players in the country available for 41 00:02:07,280 --> 00:02:09,000 Speaker 2: selection for the country. 42 00:02:09,120 --> 00:02:10,960 Speaker 1: The legals of that are interesting though, aren't they. If 43 00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:12,880 Speaker 1: I was a lawyer, I'd be wanting to explore that 44 00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:13,560 Speaker 1: in a court or two. 45 00:02:13,600 --> 00:02:17,280 Speaker 2: I reckon they are they are probably not best for 46 00:02:17,280 --> 00:02:19,080 Speaker 2: me to comment on that at the moment, but yeah, 47 00:02:19,680 --> 00:02:21,840 Speaker 2: I'd say that that's an interesting conversation. 48 00:02:21,960 --> 00:02:23,400 Speaker 1: Good on, You're nice to talk to. You appreciate it 49 00:02:23,480 --> 00:02:25,600 Speaker 1: very much. Oma Hasna, who's the cheap executive of the 50 00:02:25,600 --> 00:02:28,160 Speaker 1: International Players Association. He's in Australia this morning, so he's 51 00:02:28,240 --> 00:02:30,320 Speaker 1: up early for US at five point fifteen. So that 52 00:02:30,400 --> 00:02:32,560 Speaker 1: will be a Simon Watts Award for the WIG. 53 00:02:33,080 --> 00:02:35,959 Speaker 2: For more from the Mike Asking Breakfast, listen live to 54 00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:39,160 Speaker 2: news talks. It'd be from six am weekdays, or follow 55 00:02:39,200 --> 00:02:40,760 Speaker 2: the podcast on iHeartRadio.