1 00:00:09,093 --> 00:00:12,853 Speaker 1: You're listening to a podcast from Newstalk Z'B. Follow this 2 00:00:13,053 --> 00:00:16,133 Speaker 1: and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio. 3 00:00:16,613 --> 00:00:18,613 Speaker 2: The government is rolling out a fifty dollars a week 4 00:00:18,653 --> 00:00:21,172 Speaker 2: in work tanks credit in two weeks time to help 5 00:00:21,173 --> 00:00:24,053 Speaker 2: people hardest hit by petrol price increases. Roughly one hundred 6 00:00:24,053 --> 00:00:26,653 Speaker 2: and forty three thousand families with children will get the boost, 7 00:00:26,973 --> 00:00:30,493 Speaker 2: costing an estimated three hundred and seventy three million dollars 8 00:00:30,813 --> 00:00:33,093 Speaker 2: if that lasts for the full year. So it will 9 00:00:33,093 --> 00:00:36,053 Speaker 2: continue for the year, or until the price of ninety 10 00:00:36,053 --> 00:00:38,453 Speaker 2: one drops below the three dollar a liter for four 11 00:00:38,493 --> 00:00:41,653 Speaker 2: weeks in a row. Gareth Kennon heads up the forecasting 12 00:00:41,693 --> 00:00:45,053 Speaker 2: team at Infometrics and joins us now Gareth, Good afternoon. 13 00:00:44,693 --> 00:00:45,853 Speaker 3: To you afternoon. 14 00:00:46,092 --> 00:00:48,412 Speaker 2: So on your view, is this a prudent intervention from 15 00:00:48,452 --> 00:00:49,373 Speaker 2: the government. 16 00:00:49,373 --> 00:00:51,493 Speaker 3: Yeah, pruden is probably the right word. I mean, it's 17 00:00:51,533 --> 00:00:53,892 Speaker 3: you know, you're talking one hundred and forty three thousand families. 18 00:00:54,173 --> 00:00:56,493 Speaker 3: You know, it's ten percent of the population probably who 19 00:00:56,493 --> 00:00:59,653 Speaker 3: are going to benefit or be touched by this policy 20 00:00:59,693 --> 00:01:02,212 Speaker 3: and extra payment going out. I mean, the government has 21 00:01:02,253 --> 00:01:04,773 Speaker 3: started from a position where you know, they did want 22 00:01:04,813 --> 00:01:06,573 Speaker 3: it to be targeted. They did want it to be 23 00:01:06,613 --> 00:01:08,893 Speaker 3: temporary entirely than those are the words have been given 24 00:01:09,253 --> 00:01:11,333 Speaker 3: also starting from a position of course where they had 25 00:01:11,533 --> 00:01:13,732 Speaker 3: ratings downgrade over the weekend, so they will have been 26 00:01:14,373 --> 00:01:16,292 Speaker 3: a conscious they don't want to go rushing out and 27 00:01:16,333 --> 00:01:18,973 Speaker 3: spending a lot more money. Given the attitude that the 28 00:01:19,013 --> 00:01:20,653 Speaker 3: ratings agencies are taking at the moment. 29 00:01:21,093 --> 00:01:23,773 Speaker 2: Getting a lot of techs over the last hour gareth 30 00:01:24,093 --> 00:01:26,693 Speaker 2: from people saying why couldn't they look at cutting the 31 00:01:26,773 --> 00:01:29,572 Speaker 2: fuel excise tax? So as Nicola willis correct that if 32 00:01:29,572 --> 00:01:32,012 Speaker 2: they did go the universal option and look at that 33 00:01:32,093 --> 00:01:35,733 Speaker 2: fuel tax on the government side, would that be inflationary. 34 00:01:35,453 --> 00:01:38,773 Speaker 3: Potentially inflationary in terms of, you know, enabling people to 35 00:01:38,813 --> 00:01:41,253 Speaker 3: get out and continue spending more at a time when 36 00:01:41,253 --> 00:01:44,013 Speaker 3: there are already obviously cost pressures coming through the system. 37 00:01:44,173 --> 00:01:47,053 Speaker 3: I think the biggest issue around the fuel excise duty though, 38 00:01:47,212 --> 00:01:50,813 Speaker 3: is that you are helping everyone out, and you know, 39 00:01:50,893 --> 00:01:53,013 Speaker 3: while everyone is feeling the pain at the moment, some 40 00:01:53,053 --> 00:01:54,493 Speaker 3: people are feeling it a hell of a lot more 41 00:01:54,493 --> 00:01:56,373 Speaker 3: than others, and so I think, you know, trying to 42 00:01:56,453 --> 00:01:59,293 Speaker 3: limit it to sort of lower and middle income people 43 00:01:59,733 --> 00:02:02,853 Speaker 3: is much more appropriate than putting forward a fuel exis 44 00:02:02,933 --> 00:02:05,453 Speaker 3: duty cut which we saw a few years ago. And 45 00:02:05,493 --> 00:02:08,333 Speaker 3: you know when Frankly, my household, my sort of income, 46 00:02:08,413 --> 00:02:10,693 Speaker 3: we don't need that assistance. Yes, we don't like paying 47 00:02:10,693 --> 00:02:12,373 Speaker 3: more fuel, but we can afford to do it. 48 00:02:13,053 --> 00:02:15,733 Speaker 2: Do you think the government could go a little bit 49 00:02:15,773 --> 00:02:18,653 Speaker 2: further than what they've done today, Gareth, if this situation 50 00:02:18,893 --> 00:02:22,293 Speaker 2: continues that there's some groups arguably who need it, like 51 00:02:22,413 --> 00:02:26,093 Speaker 2: rural communities with no public transport, industry that relies on 52 00:02:26,173 --> 00:02:28,333 Speaker 2: vehicle fleets and fuel of struggling at the moment. Could 53 00:02:28,373 --> 00:02:30,453 Speaker 2: that be a real potential that is eyed up in 54 00:02:30,493 --> 00:02:31,093 Speaker 2: the near future. 55 00:02:31,493 --> 00:02:34,093 Speaker 3: Yeah, I'd be reluctant to go down the industry route. 56 00:02:34,133 --> 00:02:37,653 Speaker 3: I mean, you know, businesses have an ability to potentially 57 00:02:37,693 --> 00:02:40,373 Speaker 3: pass on those higher costs if they need to in 58 00:02:40,413 --> 00:02:43,453 Speaker 3: some regards, and we have seen a little bit of 59 00:02:43,853 --> 00:02:48,093 Speaker 3: I guess almost industry wealthare corporate welfare policies over the 60 00:02:48,173 --> 00:02:51,093 Speaker 3: last twelve to twenty four months in some regards anyway, 61 00:02:51,133 --> 00:02:53,533 Speaker 3: So I don't think we necessarily need more of that. 62 00:02:53,573 --> 00:02:56,252 Speaker 3: The rural community question is an interesting one because you're right, 63 00:02:56,293 --> 00:02:58,933 Speaker 3: they don't have the public transporter access to that, but 64 00:02:58,972 --> 00:03:02,213 Speaker 3: it is also potentially one that's difficult to really target 65 00:03:02,693 --> 00:03:06,133 Speaker 3: particularly tightly. But yeah, look, let's be honest, the longer 66 00:03:06,173 --> 00:03:08,252 Speaker 3: this crisis drags on, the longer the war drag soon, 67 00:03:08,773 --> 00:03:10,373 Speaker 3: the more pressure that will be on the government to 68 00:03:10,493 --> 00:03:11,412 Speaker 3: potentially do more. 69 00:03:11,853 --> 00:03:14,133 Speaker 2: And tough timing for the government and Nichola willis. The 70 00:03:14,133 --> 00:03:17,053 Speaker 2: budget is two months away, Gareth, and has that ring 71 00:03:17,093 --> 00:03:18,813 Speaker 2: true that when she mentioned it's going to cost three 72 00:03:18,893 --> 00:03:21,133 Speaker 2: hundred and seventy three million dollars if that policy is 73 00:03:21,173 --> 00:03:24,252 Speaker 2: in place for a year, But that has already been 74 00:03:24,293 --> 00:03:27,573 Speaker 2: factored into the Treasury's fiscal forecast, which gives her that 75 00:03:27,613 --> 00:03:28,613 Speaker 2: regal room come maye. 76 00:03:28,653 --> 00:03:30,213 Speaker 3: Yeah, I was a little surprised when I read that. 77 00:03:30,252 --> 00:03:33,133 Speaker 3: I mean, the government does always have some operating allowance 78 00:03:33,173 --> 00:03:35,573 Speaker 3: in terms of its spending that it has in each 79 00:03:35,653 --> 00:03:37,973 Speaker 3: budget going forward. Usually by the time you're getting through 80 00:03:38,013 --> 00:03:40,813 Speaker 3: to March or rapful, most of that allowance has been 81 00:03:40,853 --> 00:03:43,613 Speaker 3: allocating in various places. So I'll be interested to see 82 00:03:43,613 --> 00:03:46,613 Speaker 3: how they sort of make those numbers work when the figures, 83 00:03:46,653 --> 00:03:48,093 Speaker 3: you know, the budget comes out in a couple of 84 00:03:48,133 --> 00:03:50,853 Speaker 3: months time. But I don't have to believe or out 85 00:03:50,853 --> 00:03:51,173 Speaker 3: a word. 86 00:03:51,333 --> 00:03:53,253 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's going to be very interesting when we see 87 00:03:53,293 --> 00:03:55,453 Speaker 2: that may budget. Gareth, thank you very much for your 88 00:03:55,453 --> 00:03:58,253 Speaker 2: time this afternoon, really appreciate it. We'll catch up again soon. 89 00:03:58,453 --> 00:03:59,013 Speaker 3: It's good to talk to. 90 00:03:59,293 --> 00:04:01,693 Speaker 2: That is Gareth Kennan. He is the head of the 91 00:04:01,733 --> 00:04:03,693 Speaker 2: forecasting team at Informetrics. 92 00:04:04,253 --> 00:04:06,893 Speaker 1: For more from news talks that'd be listen live on 93 00:04:06,973 --> 00:04:09,493 Speaker 1: air or online, and to keep our shows with you 94 00:04:09,573 --> 00:04:12,573 Speaker 1: wherever you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio.